Back to GetFilings.com



UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

[X] Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For The Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2004

or

[  ] Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Commission file #0-18431

Inland Land Appreciation Fund, L.P.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware

36-3544798

(State of organization)

(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)

   

2901 Butterfield Road, Oak Brook, Illinois

60523

(Address of principal executive office)

(Zip Code)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code: 630-218-8000

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class:

Name of each exchange on which registered:

None

None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

LIMITED PARTNERSHIP UNITS

(Title of class)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X No ___

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.[X]

State the aggregate market value of the voting stock held by nonaffiliates of the registrant. Not applicable.

Indicate by a checkmark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Securities Exchange Act

Rule 12b-2)    __ Yes     X  No


- -1-


 

INLAND LAND APPRECIATION FUND, L.P.

(a limited partnership)

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

Part I

Page

     

Item 1.

Business

3

     

Item 2.

Properties

4

     

Item 3.

Legal Proceedings

6

     

Item 4.

Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

6

     
 

Part II

 
     

Item 5.

Market for Partnership's Limited Partnership Units and Related Security Holder Matters

7

     

Item 6.

Selected Financial Data

8

     

Item 7.

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

9

     

Item 7(a)

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

15

     

Item 8.

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

16

     

Item 9.

Changes in and Disagreements with Independent Auditors on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

36

     

Item 9(a).

Controls and Procedures

36

     
 

Part III

 
     

Item 10.

Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant

37

     

Item 11.

Executive Compensation

40

     

Item 12.

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management

42

     

Item 13.

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

42

     

Item 14.

Principal Accountant Fees and Services

42

     
 

Part IV

 
     

Item 15.

Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, and Reports on Form 8-K

43

     

SIGNATURES

44


- -2-


PART I

Item 1. Business


Inland Land Appreciation Fund, L.P. was formed in October 1987 to invest in undeveloped land on an all-cash basis and realize appreciation of such land upon resale. On October 12, 1988, we commenced an offering of 10,000 (subject to an increase to 30,000) limited partnership units or units at $1,000 per unit, pursuant to a Registration Statement on Form S-11 under the Securities Act of 1933. The offering terminated on October 6, 1989, after we sold 30,000 units, at $1,000 per unit, resulting in gross offering proceeds of $30,000,000, which does not include proceeds from our general partner or our initial limited partner. All of the holders of our units were admitted to our partnership. Inland Real Estate Investment Corporation is our general partner. We used $25,187,069 of gross offering proceeds to purchase on an all-cash basis twenty-five parcels of undeveloped land and an option to purchase undeveloped land. Our limited partners share in their portion of benefits of ownership of our real property inves tments according to the number of units held. As of December 31, 2004, we have repurchased a total of 407.75 Units for $359,484 from various limited partners through the unit repurchase program. Under this program limited partners could under certain circumstances have their units repurchased for an amount equal to their original capital as reduced by distributions from net sale proceeds.


We purchased on an all-cash basis, twenty-five parcels of undeveloped land and are engaged in the rezoning and resale of the parcels. All of the investments were made in the Chicago metropolitan area. The anticipated holding period of the land was approximately two to seven years from the completion of the land portfolio acquisitions. As a result of the lengthy rezoning and entitlement processes and the no growth mentality of the municipalities where the land is located, our holding period has exceeded our original estimates. As of December 31, 2004, we have had multiple sales transactions, through which we have disposed of approximately 1,891 acres of the approximately 3,102 acres originally owned. We continue to market the remaining acres for sale.


We are engaged in the business of real estate investment which management considers being a single operating segment. A presentation of information about operating segments would not be material to an understanding of our business taken as a whole.


We plan to continue to enhance the value of our remaining land through pre-development activities such as rezoning, annexation and land planning. We have already been successful in, or are in the process of, pre-development activity on several of our land investments. Parcels 4, 6 and 7 have completed two phases of improvements for an industrial park and sites are being marketed and sold. We have also begun planning and zoning on the residential portion of these parcels. Zoning and land planning discussions have begun on Parcels 14, 17, 18, 19 and 22.


On February 20, 2004, we sold approximately 224 acres of Parcel 20 for $12,500,000. On March 10, 2004, we sold approximately 90 acres of Parcel 12 for $3,500,000. In March 2004, we paid distributions totaling $10,000,000, which includes $7,864,450 paid to the limited partners and $2,135,550 paid to the general partner. We received sales proceeds of $850,000 from the sale of lots of Parcel 4, 6 and 7. In December 2004, we paid an additional distribution of $3,100,000 to the limited partners and $499,480 to the general partner. In addition to these sales which occurred in 2004, we anticipate additional sales of Parcels 4, 6 and 7 during 2005. Proceeds from the 2004 sales were used to repay the note payable to our general partner. Undistributed net sales proceeds will be used to cover our operations, including property upgrades. We will evaluate our cash needs throughout the year to determine future distributions.


We had no employees during 2004.


Our general partner and its affiliates provide services to us. Our general partner and its affiliates are reimbursed for salaries and expenses of employees of the general partner and its affiliates relating to the administration of the partnership. An affiliate of the general partner performs marketing and advertising services for us and is reimbursed for direct costs. An affiliate of the general partner performs property upgrades, rezoning, annexation and other activities to prepare our parcels for sale and is reimbursed for salaries and direct costs.


- -3-


Access to Our Information

We electronically file our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and all amendments to those reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The public may read and copy any of the reports that are filed with the SEC at the SEC's Public Reference Room at 450 Fifth Street, NW, Washington, DC 20549. The public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at (800)-SEC-0330. The SEC maintains an Internet site at www.sec.gov that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding issuers that file electronically.


We make available, free of charge through our general partner's website, and by responding to requests addressed to our director of investor relations, the annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and all amendments to those reports. These reports are available as soon as reasonably practical after such material is electronically filed or furnished to the SEC. Our general partner's website address is www.inland-investments.com. The information contained on this website, or other websites linked to our website, is not part of this document.


Limited Partners
wishing to communicate with our general partner can do so by writing to the attention of the general partner care of our partnership at 2901 Butterfield Road, Oak Brook, IL 60523.


Item 2. Properties


We acquired fee ownership of the following real property investments:

 

Gross Acres

Remaining

Purchase/Sales

Parcel & Location

Purchased/Sold

Acres

Date

Parcel 1, Kendall County, Illinois

84.7360     

-    

01/19/89

(3.5200     

 

sold 12/24/96)

(.3520     

 

sold 11/25/97)

(80.8640     

 

sold 12/29/97)

       

Parcel 2, McHenry County, Illinois

223.4121     

-    

01/19/89

(183.3759     

 

sold 12/27/90)

 

(40.0362     

 

sold 05/11/00)

       

Parcel 3, Kendall County, Illinois

20.0000     

-    

02/09/89

(20.0000     

 

sold 05/08/90)

       

Parcel 4, Kendall County, Illinois

69.2760     

4.7900

04/18/89

 

(.4860     

 

sold 02/28/91)

 

(27.5750     

 

sold 08/25/95)

 

(4.4000     

 

sold various 2001)

 

(2.1417     

 

sold various 2002)

 

(23.1033     

 

sold various 2003)

 

(6.7800     

 

sold various 2004)

       

Parcel 5, Kendall County, Illinois

372.2230     

-    

05/03/89

(Option     

 

sold 04/06/90)

 

(372.2230     

 

sold 06/20/03)

As part of the purchase agreement for parcel 5, we were required to buy an option to purchase an additional 243 acres immediately to the west of this parcel. The 1990 sale transaction relates to the sale of this option.

-4-


 

Gross Acres

Remaining

Purchase/Sales

Parcel & Location

Purchased/Sold

Acres

Date

       

Parcel 6, Kendall County, Illinois

78.3900     

74.4400

06/21/89

 

(3.9500     

 

sold 11/01/00)

       

Parcel 7, Kendall County, Illinois

77.0490     

77.0490

06/21/89

       

Parcel 8, Kendall County, Illinois

5.0000     

-    

06/21/89

(5.0000     

 

sold 10/06/89)

       

Parcel 9, McHenry County, Illinois

51.0300     

51.0300

08/07/89

       

Parcel 10, McHenry County, Illinois

123.9400     

-    

08/07/89

(123.9400     

 

sold 12/06/89)

       

Parcel 11, McHenry County, Illinois

30.5920     

30.5920

08/07/89

       

Parcel 12, Kendall County, Illinois

90.2710     

-    

10/31/89

(.7090     

 

sold 04/26/91)

 

(89.5620     

 

sold 03/10/04)

       

Parcel 13, McHenry County, Illinois

92.7800     

-    

11/07/89

(2.0810     

 

sold 09/18/97)

 

(90.6990     

 

sold 02/15/01)

       

Parcel 14, McHenry County, Illinois

76.2020     

76.2020

11/07/89

       

Parcel 15, Lake County, Illinois

84.5564     

-    

01/03/90

(10.5300     

 

sold various 1996)

(5.4680     

 

sold various 1997)

(68.5584     

 

sold various 1998)

       

Parcel 16, Kane/Kendall Counties,

72.4187     

-    

01/29/90

  Illinois

(30.9000     

 

sold 07/10/98)

(10.3910     

 

sold 12/15/99)

 

(3.1000     

 

sold 12/12/00)

 

(28.0277     

 

sold 05/19/03)

       

Parcel 17, McHenry County, Illinois

99.9240     

72.4140

01/29/90

(27.5100     

 

sold 01/29/99)

       

Parcel 18, McHenry County, Illinois

71.4870     

69.9670

01/29/90

(1.0000     

 

sold various 1990)

(.5200     

 

sold 03/11/93)

       

Parcel 19, McHenry County, Illinois

63.6915     

63.6915

02/23/90

       

Parcel 20, Kane County, Illinois

224.1480     

-    

02/28/90

(.2790     

 

sold 10/17/91)

 

(223.8690     

 

sold 02/20/04)

-5-


 

Gross Acres

Remaining

Purchase/Sales

Parcel & Location

Purchased/Sold

Acres

Date

       

Parcel 21, Kendall County, Illinois

172.4950     

-    

03/08/90

(172.4950     

 

sold various 1998)

       

Parcel 22, McHenry County, Illinois

254.5250     

254.5250

04/11/90

       

Parcel 23, Kendall County, Illinois

140.0210     

-    

05/08/90

(4.4100     

 

sold various 1993)

(35.8800     

 

sold various 1994)

(3.4400     

 

sold various 1995)

(96.2910     

 

sold 08/26/99)

       

Parcel 24, Kendall County, Illinois

298.4830     

211.5770

05/23/90

(12.4570     

 

sold 05/25/90)

(4.6290     

 

sold 04/01/96)

 

(69.82     

 

sold 11/26/02)

       

Parcel 25, Kane County, Illinois

225.0000     

225.0000

06/01/90


Our general partner anticipates that the land we acquired will produce sufficient income to pay property taxes, insurance and other miscellaneous expenses. Income will be derived through leases to farmers or from other activities compatible with undeveloped land. Although the general partner believes that leasing our land will generate sufficient revenues to pay these expenses, there can be no assurance that this will in fact occur. Our general partner has agreed to make a supplemental capital contribution to us if and to the extent that real estate taxes and insurance payable with respect to our land during a given year exceed the revenue earned by us from leasing our land during such year. Any supplemental capital contribution will be repaid only after limited partners have received, over the life of our partnership, a return of their original capital plus the 15% cumulative return. A majority of the parcels purchased by us consist of land which generates revenue from farming or other l easing activities. It is not expected that we will generate cash distributions to limited partners from farm leases or other leasing activities. Through December 31, 2004, our land has generated sufficient revenues from leasing to cover real estate taxes and insurance expense.



Item 3. Legal Proceedings


We are not subject to any material pending legal proceedings.



Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders


Consistent with our partnership agreement, there were no matters submitted to a vote of our security holders during 2004.



- -6-


PART II



Item 5. Market for Our Limited Partnership Units and Related Security Holder Matters


As of March 7, 2005, there were 2,998 holders of our units. There is no public market for units nor is it anticipated that any public market for units will develop.


For the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, we paid the following distributions:

       

Distributions to:

 

2004

2003

       

General partners

$

2,635,030

1,265,299

Limited partners

 

10,964,450

7,100,133

       

Total

$

13,599,480

8,365,432
















- -7-


Item 6. Selected Financial Data

INLAND LAND APPRECIATION FUND, L.P.
(a limited partnership)

For the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003, 2002, 2001 and 2000

(not covered by the Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm)

   

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

             

Total assets

$

15,372,720

21,527,191 

27,611,879 

26,413,426

25,475,076

             

Total income

$

17,079,723

13,116,054 

1,916,049 

1,289,468

1,383,351

             

Net income

$

10,150,323

6,436,652 

314,651 

652,753

845,328

             

Net income (loss) allocated to the one general partner unit

$

2,632,985

1,265,292 

(8,513)

2,807

3,335

             

Net income allocated per limited partnership unit

$

254.02

174.75 

10.92 

21.96

28.45

             

Distributions per limited partnership unit from sales

$

370.51

239.93 

51.76 

-   

50.68

             

Weighted average limited partnership units

 

29,593

29,593 

29,593 

29,593

29,596

The above selected financial data should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and related notes appearing elsewhere in this annual report.


The net income per unit and distributions per unit data is based upon the weighted average number of units outstanding.


All distributions from sales represent a return of original capital until such time as the limited partners have received distributions totaling their original capital. As of March 2004, the limited partners had received distributions in excess of their original capital.










- -8-


Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations


Certain statements in this "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and elsewhere in this annual report on Form 10-K constitute "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Federal Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause our actual results, performance, or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance, or achievements expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. These factors include, among other things, the ability to obtain annexation and zoning approvals required to develop our properties; the approval of local governing bodies to develop our properties; successful lobbying of local "no growth" or limited development homeowner groups; adverse changes in real estate, financing and general economic or local conditions; eminent domain proceedings; changes in the environmental condition s or changes in the environmental positions of governmental bodies; and potential conflicts of interest between us and our affiliates, including our general partner.


Critical Accounting Policies


On December 12, 2001, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued Financial Reporting Release or FRR No. 60 "Cautionary Advice Regarding Disclosure About Critical Accounting Policies." A critical accounting policy is one that would materially affect our operations or financial condition, and requires management to make estimates or judgements in certain circumstances. We believe that our most critical accounting policies relate to how we value our investment properties and mortgage loans receivable and revenue recognition. These judgements often result from the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain. The purpose of the FRR is to provide investors with an understanding of how management forms these policies. Critical accounting policies discussed in this section are not to be confused with accounting principles and methods disclosed in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America or GAAP. GAAP requires information in financial statements about accounting principles, methods used and disclosures pertaining to significant estimates. The following disclosure discusses judgements known to management pertaining to trends, events or uncertainties known which were taken into consideration upon the application of those policies and the likelihood that materially different amounts would be reported upon taking into consideration different conditions and assumptions.


Valuation of Investment Properties - On a quarterly basis, in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144, we conduct an impairment analysis to ensure that the carrying value of each property does not exceed its estimated fair value. If this were to occur, we would be required to record an impairment loss equal to the excess of carrying value over fair value.


In determining the value of an investment property and whether the property is impaired, management considers several factors such as projected capital expenditures and sales prices. The aforementioned factors are considered by management in determining the value of any particular property. The value of any particular property is sensitive to the actual results of any of these uncertain factors, either individually or taken as a whole. Should the actual results differ from management's judgement, the valuation could be negatively or positively affected.


The valuation and possible subsequent impairment of investment properties is a significant estimate that can and does change based on management's continuous process of analyzing each property. For the year ended December 31, 2004, we had recorded no such impairment.


Cost Allocation - We use the area method of cost allocation, which approximates the relative sales method of cost allocation, whereby a per acre price is used as the standard allocation method for land purchases and sales. The total cost of the parcel is divided by the total number of acres to arrive at a per acre price.


Valuation of Mortgage Loans Receivable - On a quarterly basis, we conduct an analysis to ensure that the carrying value of each mortgage loan receivable is recoverable from the borrower. If we determine that all or a portion of the receivable is not collectible, we would be required to record an allowance for doubtful accounts equal to the amount estimated to be uncollectible.

-9-


In determining the value of mortgage loans receivable, management considers projected sales proceeds available and expenses related to the property associated with the mortgage. Should the actual results differ from management's judgement, the valuation could be negatively or positively affected.


The valuation and possible subsequent allowance for doubtful accounts is a significant estimate that can and does change based on management's continuous process of analyzing each mortgage loan receivable. As of December 31, 2004, the partnership has evaluated the mortgage loans receivables and written off $867,832 of previously reserved mortgage loans receivable. In addition, the partnership has recorded and allowance for doubtful accounts of $1,233,175 on the remaining mortgage loan receivable.


Revenue Recognition - We recognize income from the sale of land parcels in accordance with Statement of Financial Standards No. 66, "Accounting for Sales of Real Estate".


Liquidity and Capital Resources


On October 12, 1988, we commenced an offering of 10,000 (subject to increase to 30,000) limited partnership units or units pursuant to a Registration Statement on Form S-11 under the Securities Act of 1933. On October 6, 1989, the offering terminated after we had sold 30,000 units to the public at $1,000 per unit resulting in $30,000,000 in gross offering proceeds, which does not include proceeds from the initial limited partner and the general partner. All of the holders of our units were admitted to our partnership. Our limited partners share in their portion of benefits of ownership of our real property investments according to the number of units held.


We used $25,187,069 of gross offering proceeds to purchase on an all-cash basis twenty-five parcels of undeveloped land and an option to purchase undeveloped land. These investments include the payment of the purchase price, acquisition fees and acquisition costs of such properties. Fourteen of the parcels were purchased during 1989 and eleven during 1990. As of December 31, 2004, we have had multiple sales transactions, through which we have disposed of approximately 1,891 acres of the approximately 3,102 acres originally owned. As of December 31, 2004, cumulative distributions to the limited partners have totaled $33,169,906 (which exceeds the original capital) and $4,054,072 to the general partner. Through December 31, 2004, we have used $18,002,009 of working capital for rezoning and other activities. Such amounts have been capitalized and are included in investments in land.


Our capital needs and resources will vary depending upon a number of factors, including the extent to which we conduct rezoning and other activities relating to utility access, the installation of roads, subdivision and/or annexation of land to a municipality, changes in real estate taxes affecting our land, and the amount of revenue received from leasing. As of December 31, 2004, we own, in whole or in part, twelve of our twenty-five original parcels, the majority of which are leased to local farmers and are generating sufficient cash flow from farm leases to cover property taxes and insurance.


At December 31, 2004, we had cash and cash equivalents of approximately $602,000, which is available to be used for our costs and liabilities, cash distributions to partners and other activities with respect to some or all of our land parcels.


On February 20, 2004, we sold approximately 224 acres of Parcel 20 for $12,500,000. On March 10, 2004, we sold approximately 90 acres of Parcel 12 for $3,500,000. On March 24, 2004, we paid distributions totaling $10,000,000, which includes $7,864,450 paid to the limited partners and $2,135,550 paid to the general partner. We received sales proceeds of $850,000 from the sale of lots of Parcel 4,6 and 7. In December 2004, we paid an additional distribution of $3,100,000 to the limited partners and $499,480 to the general partner. In addition to these sales which occurred in 2004, we anticipate additional sales of Parcels 4, 6 and 7 during 2005. Proceeds from the 2004 sales were used to repay the note payable to our general partner. Undistributed net sales proceeds will be used to cover our operations, including property upgrades. We will evaluate our cash needs throughout the year to determine future distributions. We continue to market our remaining acres for sale.

-10-


We plan to enhance the value of our land through pre-development activities such as rezoning, annexation and land planning. We have already been successful in, or are in the process of, pre-development activity on several of our land investments. Parcels 4, 6 and 7 have completed two phases of improvements for an industrial park and sites are being marketed. We have also begun planning and zoning on the residential portion of these parcels. Zoning and land planning discussions have begun on Parcels 14, 17, 18, 19 and 22.



Transactions with Related Parties


Our general partner and its affiliates are entitled to reimbursement for salaries and expenses of employees of the general partner and its affiliates relating to our administration. Such costs of $48,039, $55,631 and $62,640 are included in professional services to affiliates and general and administrative expenses to affiliates for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively, of which $5,422 and $5,672 was unpaid as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively.


An affiliate of our general partner performed marketing and advertising services for us and was reimbursed for direct costs. Such costs of $19,280, $16,120, and $16,346 have been incurred and are included in marketing expenses to affiliates for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003, and 2002, respectively, all of which was paid as of December 31, 2004 and 2003.


An affiliate of the general partner performed property upgrades, rezoning, annexation and other activities to prepare our parcels for sale and was reimbursed for salaries and direct costs. For the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, we incurred $98,576 and $144,857, respectively, of such costs. The affiliate did not recognize a profit on any project. Such costs are included in investments in land, of which $16,016 and $30,187 was unpaid as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively.


On December 31, 1998, we obtained a loan from the general partner in the amount of $2,493,750 solely collateralized by Parcel 5. During 2002, the general partner advanced an additional $12,234. The note accrued interest at prime plus .5% and had a maturity date which was extended to December 29, 2003. For the year ended December 31, 2003, interest of $63,822 was capitalized. During 2003, all principal and interest on this loan was repaid.


On December 6, 2000, we obtained a loan from the general partner in the amount of $1,500,000 collateralized by Parcels 17, 18 and 22. During 2002, the general partner advanced an additional $15,000. The note accrued interest at prime plus .5% and had a maturity date of November 30, 2004. For the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, interest of $49,046 and $80,642, respectively, was capitalized, of which $0 and $229,921 was unpaid as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. During 2004, all principal and accrued interest on this loan was repaid.


On May 9, 2002, the general partner advanced us a loan in the amount of $200,000. The note accrued interest at 5.25%. This advance was repaid in full on September 17, 2002. For the year ended December 31, 2002, interest of $3,797 was capitalized, all of which was paid as of December 31, 2002.


On September 17, 2002, we obtained a loan from the general partner in the amount of $1,600,000, collateralized by Parcels 4, 6 and 7. The note accrued interest at a rate of prime plus .5% and had a maturity date of September 17, 2005. For the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, interest of $22,609 and $65,546 was capitalized, of which $0 and $85,611 was unpaid as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. During 2004, all principal and accrued interest on this loan was repaid.


- -11-


Results of Operations


As of December 31, 2004, we owned twelve parcels of land consisting of approximately 1,211 acres. Of the 1,211 acres owned, approximately 965 acres are tillable, leased to local farmers and generate sufficient cash flow to cover property taxes, insurance and other miscellaneous expenses. Rental income was $166,438, $225,179, and $274,768 for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003, and 2002, respectively. The decrease in rental income is due to the decrease in tillable acres as a result of the sale of land.


Sales of investments in land and improvements of $16,847,378 and cost of land sold of $6,492,519 for the year ended December 31, 2004 are a result of the sale of additional lots of Parcel 4 and the sale of the balance of Parcels 12 and 20. Sales of investments in land and improvements of $12,827,798 and cost of land sold of $4,289,425 for the year ended December 31, 2003 are a result of the sale of approximately 23 acres of Parcel 4, the sale of approximately 372 acres of Parcel 5 and the sale of approximately 28 acres of Parcel 16. The increase in sales activity for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003 is the result of favorable zoning as well as a change in our marketing approach to target homebuilders, industrial users and land developers. Sales of investments in land and improvements of $1,609,108 and cost of land sold of $450,778 for the year ended December 31, 2002 are a result of the sale of two lots of Parcel 4 and the sale of approximately 70 acres of Parcel 24.


Interest income was $58,782, $53,772, and $6,827 for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003, and 2002, respectively. Interest income is primarily a result of cash available to invest on a short term basis during the year as a result of sales proceeds received and interest earned on our mortgage loans receivable. During 2002, we recorded an allowance for doubtful accounts relating to the interest on our mortgage loans receivable and stopped the accrual of interest income on the mortgage loans receivable relating to Parcels 1, 15, 21 and 23.


Professional services to affiliates were $27,543, $31,832 and $37,398 for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Professional services to affiliates decreased for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003 compared to the year ended December 31, 2002, due to a decrease in legal services. This decrease was partially offset by an increase in fees for accounting services as a result of increased sales activity and regulatory requirements.


Professional services to non-affiliates were $55,829, $39,588 and $33,258 for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Professional services to non-affiliates increased for the year ended December 31, 2004 compared to the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, due to an increase in fees for accounting services.


General and administrative expenses to non-affiliates were $33,559, $17,704 and $21,894 for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. The increase in general and administrative expenses in 2004 is due to the amortization of loan fees as a result of payoff of the note payable.


Tax expenses were $139,258, $8,201 and $5,970 for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. The increase in tax expenses in 2004 is due to state taxes paid and accrued as a result of the land sales.


Marketing expenses to non-affiliates were $54,982, $83,826 and $125,569 for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. The increase in 2002 was due to increased marketing and advertising through radio and local cable television ads. In 2003 and continuing into 2004, we changed our marketing approach to target homebuilders, industrial users and land developers through direct mailings, newspaper and trade publication advertising and an enhanced website.


Land operating expenses to non-affiliates were $65,826, $72,980 and $106,588 for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. These costs primarily include real estate tax expense, ground maintenance and insurance expense on the parcels we own and have decreased due to the sale of acres.



- -12-


We determined that the maximum value of Parcels 1, 15, 21 and 23 could be realized if the parcels were developed and sold as individual lots. However, if we had followed that plan, there is a possibility that it could have increased income taxes. Therefore, we sold the parcels to a third party developer whereby 100% of the sales price was represented by notes receivable from the buyer. These transactions were deemed installment sales. After the sale, the developer, through limited liability companies or LLCs, secured third party financing to cover the deferred down payment owed to us as well as provide proceeds to begin the development of the project. These sales were structured so that the deferred down payment received was sufficient to provide a distribution to our limited partners that equated to the invested capital allocated to the parcel (parcel capital) plus approximately a 6% return per annum on the parcel capital through the date of the distribution.


The velocity of the developer's individual lot sales was slower than originally projected and consequently, the developer's carrying costs were higher. The developer obtained a loan from an affiliate of our general partner. These funds were used for operating costs and to continue the development of the projects. As a result of the slower lot sales, the net sale proceeds available to us are lower than anticipated. As of December 31, 2002, we had recorded an allowance for doubtful accounts of $767,248 relating to a portion of the accrued interest receivable on mortgage loans resulting from the sale of these parcels. In early August 2003, we reviewed recent forecasts on these parcels, and determined that the collectibility of these receivables was doubtful. As a result, we elected to reserve an additional $2,302,787 of principal and accrued interest relating to the mortgages receivable in 2003. The deferred gain of $242,368 relating to the mortgage loans receivable was also reserved and recorded against bad d ebt expense as of December 31, 2003. We continued to monitor these transactions throughout 2004 and, based on our review of the developments' financial situation during the fourth quarter of 2004, we do not anticipate receiving any additional proceeds on Parcels 15, 21 and 23. As of December 31, 2004, the Partnership has written off the mortgage loans receivable and related accrued interest receivable and deferred gain relating to Parcels 15, 21 and 23. As of December 31, 2004, the mortgage loan receivable relating to Parcel 1 has been fully reserved, however based on our review of the developments' financial situation relating to this Parcel and potential sales of the commercial pieces of this Parcel , we have not written off this receivable at this time.


Our general partner guaranteed the third party development loans owed by these limited liability companies. In reviewing the developments' financial situation, our general partner determined that it would be in its best interest to have an affiliate acquire the interests in the LLCs. The general partner and its affiliates concluded that they could better control the continuing costs to complete these developments and would therefore have the best opportunity to limit their exposure under the guarantee agreements and possibly recover a portion of the amount owed to us. An affiliate of our general partner contributed approximately $1,900,000 to acquire the interests in these LLCs. Our general partner contributed approximately $2,400,000 to pay off the debt under its guarantee of the LLC loans. The affiliate of the general partner will complete the development and sale of these projects. Based on our review of the developments' financial situation during the fourth quarter of 2004, we do not anticipate receiving any additional proceeds and therefore have written off these receivables in 2004. Our limited partners received distributions that equated to the parcel capital plus approximately a 6% return per annum on the parcel capital through the date of the distribution.



Our Partnership Agreement


Our partnership agreement defines the allocation of profits and losses, and available cash. If and to the extent that real estate taxes and insurance payable with respect to our land during a given year exceed our revenues, our general partner will make a supplemental capital contribution of such amount to us to ensure that we have sufficient funds to make such payments.



- -13-


Profits and losses from operations (other than capital transactions) will be allocated 99% to the limited partners and 1% to the general partner. The net gain from a sale of our properties is first allocated among the partners in proportion to the negative balances, if any, in their respective capital accounts. Thereafter, except as provided below, net gain is allocated to the general partner in an amount equal to the proceeds distributed to the general partner from such sale and the balance of any net gain is allocated to the limited partners. If the amount of net gain realized from a sale is less than the amount of cash distributed to the general partner from such sale, we will allocate income or gain to the general partner in an amount equal to the excess of the cash distributed to the general partner with respect to such sale as quickly as permitted by law. Any net loss from a sale will be allocated to the limited partners.


Distributions of net sale proceeds will be allocated between the general partner and the limited partners based upon both an aggregate overall return to the limited partners and a separate return with respect to each parcel of land purchased by us.


As a general rule, net sale proceeds will be distributed 90% to the limited partners and 10% to the general partner until the limited partners have received from net sale proceeds (i) a return of their original capital plus (ii) a noncompounded cumulative preferred return of 15% of their invested capital. However, with respect to each parcel of land, the general partner's 10% share will be subordinated until the limited partners receive a return of the original capital attributed to such parcel or parcel capital, plus a 6% per annum noncompounded cumulative preferred return thereon.


After the amounts described in items (i) and (ii) above and any previously subordinated distributions to the general partner have been paid, and the amount of any supplemental capital contributions have been repaid to the general partner, subsequent distributions shall be paid 75% to the limited partners and 25% to the general partner without considering parcel capital. If, after all net sale proceeds have been distributed, the general partner has received more than 25% of all net sale proceeds (exclusive of distributions made to the limited partners to return their original capital), the general partner shall contribute to the partnership for distribution to the limited partners an amount equal to such excess.


Any distributions from net sale proceeds at a time when invested capital is greater than zero shall be deemed applied first as a reduction of such invested capital before application to payment of any deficiency in the 15% cumulative preferred return.



Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements, Contractual Obligations, Liabilities and Contracts and Commitments


None








- -14-


Selected Quarterly Financial Data (unaudited)


The following represents the results of operations for each quarter during the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002.

   

12/31/04

09/30/04

06/30/04

03/31/04

Total income

$

58,690 

296,805

669,857

16,054,371

Net income (loss)

 

(2,404)

88,104

296,436

9,768,187

Net income (loss) allocated to the limited   partners

 

(501,860)

88,255

297,584

7,633,359

Net income (loss) per limited partnership unit,   basic and diluted

 

(16.96)

2.98

10.06

257.94

           
   

12/31/03

09/30/03

06/30/03

03/31/03

Total income

$

281,354 

557,672 

12,211,269 

65,759 

Net income (loss)

 

72,255 

99,950 

6,302,802 

(38,355)

Net income (loss) allocated to the limited   partners

 

(1,192,882)

97,583 

6,304,630 

(37,971)

Net income (loss) per limited partnership unit,   basic and diluted

 

(40.31)

3.30 

213.04

(1.28)

   

12/31/02

09/30/02

06/30/02

03/31/02

Total income

$

1,511,105 

81,077 

184,342 

139,525 

Net income (loss)

 

1,072,216 

(199,617)

70,147 

(628,095)

Net income (loss) allocated to the limited   partners

 

1,072,238 

(197,544)

69,972 

(621,502)

Net income (loss) per limited partnership unit,   basic and diluted

 

36.23 

(6.68)

2.36 

(21.00)

Inflation


Inflation in future periods may cause capital appreciation of our investments in land. Rental income levels (from leases to new tenants or renewals of existing tenants) will rise and fall in accordance with normal agricultural market conditions and may or may not be affected by inflation. To date, our operations have not been significantly affected by inflation.



Item 7(a). Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk


Not Applicable.




- -15-


Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data


INLAND LAND APPRECIATION FUND, L.P.
(a limited partnership)

Index

 

Page

   

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

17

   

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

18

   

Financial Statements:

 
   

  Balance Sheets, December 31, 2004 and 2003

19

   

  Statements of Operations, for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002

21

   

  Statements of Partners' Capital, for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002

22

   

  Statements of Cash Flows, for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002

23

   

  Notes to Financial Statements

25



Schedules not filed:


All schedules have been omitted as the required information is inapplicable or the information is presented in the financial statements or related notes.








- -16-


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm



To the Partners of
Inland Land Appreciation Fund, L.P.


We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Inland Land Appreciation Fund, L.P. (a limited partnership) ("the Partnership") as of December 31, 2004, and the related statements of operations, partners' capital, and cash flows for the year then ended. The financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.


We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Partnership is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Partnership's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial stat ement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.


In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Inland Land Appreciation Fund, L.P. at December 31, 2004, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.



Grant Thornton LLP

Chicago, Illinois
January 29, 2005








- -17-








REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



To the Partners of
Inland Land Appreciation Fund, L.P.


We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Inland Land Appreciation Fund, L.P. (a limited partnership) ("the Partnership") as of December 31, 2003, and the related statements of operations, partners' capital, and cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2003. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.


We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Partnership's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.


In our opinion, such financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Inland Land Appreciation Fund, L.P. as of December 31, 2003, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2003, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.



Deloitte & Touche LLP



March 26, 2004
Chicago, Illinois








- -18-


INLAND LAND APPRECIATION FUND, L.P.
(a limited partnership)

Balance Sheets

December 31, 2004 and 2003


Assets

 

   

2004

2003

Current assets:

     

  Cash and cash equivalents (Note 1)

$

601,956

965,756

  Accounts and accrued interest receivable (net of allowance for doubtful     accounts of $423,794 and $969,028 at December 31, 2004 and 2003,     respectively) (Note 6)

 

1,401

392

  Mortgage loans receivable (net of allowance for doubtful accounts of     $1,233,175 and $2,101,007 at December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively)     (Note 6)

 

-    

-    

  Other current assets

 

19,410

6,816

       

Total current assets

 

622,767

972,964

       

Other assets

 

5,729

16,840

Deferred loan fees (net of accumulated amortization of $77,507 and $57,399
  at December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively)

 

-    

20,108

Investments in land and improvements, at cost (including acquisition fees paid   to Affiliates of $495,417 and $704,853 at December 31, 2004 and 2003,   respectively) (Notes 3 and 4)

 

14,744,224

20,517,279

       

Total assets

$

15,372,720

21,527,191

       
















See accompanying notes to financial statements.

-19-


 

INLAND LAND APPRECIATION FUND, L.P.
(a limited partnership)

Balance Sheets
(continued)

December 31, 2004 and 2003

Liabilities and Partners' Capital

 

   

2004

2003

       

Current liabilities:

     

  Accounts payable

$

87,486 

3,455 

  Accrued real estate taxes

 

43,458 

55,718 

  Due to Affiliates (Notes 3 and 7)

 

21,438 

351,391 

  Current portion of notes payable to Affiliate (Note 7)

 

-    

1,515,000 

  Unearned income

 

28,830 

19,280 

       

Total current liabilities

 

181,212 

1,944,844 

       

Notes payable to Affiliate, less current portion (Note 7)

 

     -     

941,682 

       

Total liabilities

 

181,212 

2,886,526 

       

Partners' capital:

     

  General Partner:

     

    Capital contribution

 

500 

500 

    Cumulative net income

 

4,068,447 

1,435,462 

    Cumulative cash distributions

 

(4,054,072)

(1,419,042)

       

 

14,875 

16,920 

  Limited Partners:

     

    Units of $1,000. Authorized 30,001 Units, 29,593 outstanding at       December 31, 2004 and 2003, (net of offering costs of $3,768,113, of       which $1,069,764 was paid to Affiliates)

 

25,873,403 

25,873,403 

    Cumulative net income

 

22,473,136 

14,955,798 

    Cumulative cash distributions

 

(33,169,906)

(22,205,456)

       

 

15,176,633 

18,623,745 

       

Total Partners' capital

 

15,191,508 

18,640,665 

       

Total liabilities and Partners' capital

$

15,372,720 

21,527,191 

       





See accompanying notes to financial statements.

-20-


 

INLAND LAND APPRECIATION FUND, L.P.
(a limited partnership)

Statements of Operations

For the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002

 

   

2004

2003

2002

         

Income:

       

  Sale of investments in land and improvements (Note 4)

$

16,847,378 

12,827,798 

1,609,108 

  Recognition of deferred gain on sale of investments in     land and improvements (Note 6)

 

-     

-     

7,590 

  Rental income (Note 5)

 

166,438 

225,179 

274,768 

  Interest income

 

58,782 

53,772 

6,827 

  Other income

 

7,125 

9,305 

17,756 

         
   

17,079,723 

13,116,054 

1,916,049 

         

Expenses:

       

  Cost of land sold

 

6,492,519 

4,289,425 

450,778 

  Professional services to Affiliates

 

27,543 

31,832 

37,398 

  Professional services to non-affiliates

 

55,829 

39,588 

33,258 

  General and administrative expenses to Affiliates

 

20,496 

23,799 

24,742 

  General and administrative expenses to non-affiliates

 

33,559 

17,704 

21,894 

Tax expense

 

139,258 

8,201

5,970

  Marketing expenses to Affiliates

 

19,280 

16,120 

16,346 

  Marketing expenses to non-affiliates

 

54,982 

83,826 

125,569 

  Land operating expenses to non-affiliates

 

65,826 

72,980 

106,588 

  Amortization of deferred loan fees

 

20,108 

35,508 

11,607 

  Bad debt expense

 

     -     

2,060,419 

767,248 

         
   

6,929,400 

6,679,402 

1,601,398 

         

Net income

$

10,150,323

6,436,652 

314,651 

         

Net income (loss) allocated to (Note 2):

       

  General Partner

$

2,632,985 

1,265,292 

(8,513)

  Limited Partners

 

7,517,338 

5,171,360 

323,164 

         

Net income

$

10,150,323 

6,436,652 

314,651

         

Net income (loss) allocated to the one General Partner   Unit

$

2,632,985 

1,265,292

(8,513)

         

Net income per Unit allocated to Limited Partners per   weighted average Limited Partnership Units (29,593   for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and   2002)

$

254.02 

174.75 

10.92

         

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

-21-


INLAND LAND APPRECIATION FUND, L.P.
(a limited partnership)

Statements of Partners' Capital

For the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002

 

   

General

Limited

 
   

Partner

Partners

Total

         

Balance at January 1, 2002

$

25,440 

21,761,054 

21,786,494 

         

Net income (loss) (Note 2)

 

(8,513)

323,164 

314,651 

Distributions to Partners ($51.76 per weighted average   Limited Partnership Units of 29,593) (Note 2)

 

     -     

(1,531,700)

(1,531,700)

         

Balance at December 31, 2002

 

16,927 

20,552,518 

20,569,445 

         

Net income (Note 2)

 

1,265,292 

5,171,360 

6,436,652 

Distributions to Partners ($239.93 per weighted average   Limited Partnership Units of 29,593) (Note 2)

 

(1,265,299)

(7,100,133)

(8,365,432)

         

Balance at December 31, 2003

 

16,920 

18,623,745 

18,640,665 

         

Net income (Note 2)

 

2,632,985 

7,517,338 

10,150,323 

Distributions to Partners ($370.51 per weighted average Limited Partnership Units of 29,593) (Note 2)

 

(2,635,030)

(10,964,450)

(13,599,480)

         

Balance at December 31, 2004

$

14,875 

15,176,633 

15,191,508 



















See accompanying notes to financial statements.

-22-


 

INLAND LAND APPRECIATION FUND, L.P.
(a limited partnership)

Statements of Cash Flows

For the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002

   

2004

2003

2002

         

Cash flows from operating activities:

       

  Net income

$

10,150,323 

6,436,652 

314,651 

  Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided     by (used in) operating activities:

       

    Gain on sale of investments in land and improvements

 

(10,354,859)

(8,538,373)

(1,158,330)

    Recognition of deferred gain on sale of investments in       land and improvements

 

-     

-     

(7,590)

    Bad debt expense

 

-     

2,060,419 

767,248 

    Amortization of deferred loan fees

 

20,108 

35,508 

11,607 

    Changes in assets and liabilities:

       

      Accounts and accrued interest receivable

 

(1,009)

-     

(392)

      Other assets

 

(1,483)

(6,816)

5,172 

      Accounts payable

 

84,031 

(68,030)

60,450 

      Accrued real estate taxes

 

(12,260)

(27,248)

36,063 

      Due to Affiliates

 

(329,953)

(3,960)

299,345 

      Unearned income

 

9,550 

(650,000)

400,000 

         

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities

 

(435,552)

(761,848)

728,224 

         

Cash flows from investing activities:

       

  Principal payments collected on mortgage loans receivable

 

-     

-     

335,349 

  Additions to investments in land and improvements

 

(719,464)

(921,343)

(1,558,631)

  Proceeds from disposition of investments in land and     improvements

 

16,847,378 

12,827,798 

1,609,108 

         

Net cash flow provided by investing activities

 

16,127,914 

11,906,455 

385,826 

         

Cash flows from financing activities:

       

  Net proceeds from notes payable to Affiliate

 

-     

-     

1,627,234 

  Loan fees

 

-     

-     

(47,507)

  Principal payments on notes payable to Affiliates

 

(2,456,682)

(3,164,302)

-     

  Cash distributions

 

(13,599,480)

(8,365,432)

(1,531,700)

         

Net cash flow provided by (used in) financing activities

 

(16,056,162)

(11,529,734)

48,027 

         





See accompanying notes to financial statements.

-23-


 

INLAND LAND APPRECIATION FUND, L.P.
(a limited partnership)

Statements of Cash Flows
(continued)

For the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002

   

2004

2003

2002

         

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

$

(363,800)

(385,127)

1,162,077

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year

 

965,756 

1,350,883 

188,806

         

Cash and cash equivalents at end of year

$

601,956 

965,756 

1,350,883

         

Cash paid for interest

$

387,189

232,681 

3,797



Supplemental schedule of non-cash investing and financing activities:

   

2004

2003

2002

         

Reduction in investments in land and improvements

$

6,492,519

4,289,425 

450,778

Gain on sale of investments in land and improvements

 

10,354,859

8,538,373 

1,158,330

Proceeds from disposition of investments in land and   improvements

$

16,847,378

12,827,798 

1,609,108

         




















See accompanying notes to financial statements.

-24-


 

INLAND LAND APPRECIATION FUND, L.P.
(a limited partnership)

Notes to Financial Statements


For the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002

(1) Organization and Basis of Accounting


The Registrant, Inland Land Appreciation Fund, L.P. (the "Partnership"), was formed in October 1987, pursuant to the Delaware Revised Uniform Limited Partnership Act, to invest in undeveloped land on an all-cash basis and realize appreciation of such land upon resale. On October 12, 1988, the Partnership commenced an Offering of 10,000 (subject to increase to 30,000) Limited Partnership Units ("Units") pursuant to a Registration Statement on Form S-11 under the Securities Act of 1933. Inland Real Estate Investment Corporation is the General Partner. The Offering terminated on October 6, 1989, with total sales of 30,000 Units, at $1,000 per Unit, not including the General Partner or the Initial Limited Partner. All of the holders of these Units were admitted to this Partnership. The Limited Partners of the Partnership share in their portion of benefits of ownership of the Partnership's real property investments according to the number of Units held. As of December 31, 2004, the Partnership has repurchased a t otal of 407.75 Units for $359,484 from various Limited Partners through the Unit Repurchase Program. Under this program Limited Partners may under certain circumstances have their Units repurchased for an amount equal to their Invested Capital.


The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("GAAP") requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Certain reclassifications were made to the 2002 and 2003 financial statements to conform with the 2004 presentation.


Offering costs have been offset against the Limited Partners' capital accounts.


The Partnership considers all highly liquid investments purchased with a maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents which are carried at cost, which approximates market.


The Partnership recognizes income from the sale of land parcels in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 66, "Accounting for Sales of Real Estate".


Except as described in footnote (b) to Note 4 of these notes, the Partnership uses the area method of allocation, which approximates the relative sales method of allocation, whereby a per acre price is used as the standard allocation method for land purchases and sales. The total cost of the parcel is divided by the total number of acres to arrive at a per acre price.





- -25-


 

INLAND LAND APPRECIATION FUND, L.P.
(a limited partnership)

Notes to Financial Statements
(continued)

In August 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued SFAS No. 144, "Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets", ("SFAS No. 144"). SFAS 144 addresses accounting and reporting for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets. This statement supersedes SFAS No. 121. The Partnership adopted the provisions of this statement beginning January 1, 2002. SFAS No. 144 established new rules for the recognition, measurement and reporting of long-lived assets which are impaired and either held for sale or in use by the Partnership. The adoption of this statement did not have a material impact on the financial position or results of operations of the Partnership.


On January 1, 2003, the Partnership adopted FASB Interpretation No. 45 ("FIN 45") "Guarantor's Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness to Others, an interpretation of FASB Statements No. 5, 57 and 107 and a rescission of FASB Interpretation No. 34". FIN 45 elaborates on the disclosures to be made by a guarantor in its interim and annual financial statements about its obligations under guarantees issued. FIN 45 also clarifies that a guarantor is required to recognize, at inception of a guarantee, a liability for the fair value of the obligation undertaken. The adoption of FIN 45 did not have a material effect on the Partnership's financial statements.


In January 2003, FASB issued Interpretation No. 46 ("FIN 46") "Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities and Interpretation of Accounting Research Bulletin (ARB) No. 51", which was revised in December 2003. The primary objectives of FIN No. 46 are to provide guidance on the identification of entities for which control is achieved through means other than through voting rights (Variable Interest Entities) and how to determine when and which business enterprise should consolidate the Variable Interest Entity (the Primary Beneficiary). The effective date for the Partnership was March 31, 2004. FIN 46, as revised, did not have a material impact on the Partnership's financial condition and results of operations.


In May 2003, the FASB issued Statement No. 150 ("SFAS 150") "Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity". This statement establishes standards for classifying and measuring certain financial instruments as liabilities that embody obligations of the issuer and have characteristics of both liabilities and equity. SFAS No. 150 is effective for all financial instruments created or modified after May 31, 2003, and otherwise is effective at the beginning of the first interim period beginning after June 15, 2003. The provisions of SFAS No. 150 did not have an impact on the Partnership's financial condition and results of operations.


A presentation of information about operating segments as required in SFAS No. 131, "Disclosures About Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information" would not be material to an understanding of the Partnership's business taken as a whole as the Partnership is engaged in the business of real estate investment which management considers to be a single operating segment.







- -26-


INLAND LAND APPRECIATION FUND, L.P.
(a limited partnership)

Notes to Financial Statements
(continued)

Effective January 1, 2001, the Partnership adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities", as amended by SFAS Nos. 137, 138 and 149. This statement standardizes the accounting for derivative instruments by requiring that an entity recognize those items as assets or liabilities in the statement of financial position and measure them at fair value. It also provides for matching the timing of gain or loss recognition on the hedging instrument with the recognition of (a) the changes in fair value of the hedged asset or liability attributable to the hedged risk or (b) the earnings effect of the hedged forecasted transaction. The net impact of the adoption of SFAS No. 133 has no effect on the Partnership's financial statements.


The Partnership is required to pay a withholding tax to the Internal Revenue Service with respect to a Partner's allocable share of the Partnership's taxable net income, if the Partner is a foreign person. The Partnership will first pay the withholding tax from the distributions to any foreign partner, and to the extent that the tax exceeds the amount of distributions withheld, or if there have been no distributions to withhold, the excess will be accounted for as a distribution to the foreign partner. Withholding tax payments are made every April, June, September and December.


No provision for Federal income taxes has been made as the liability for such taxes is that of the Partners rather than the Partnership.


The Partnership's records are maintained on the accrual basis of accounting in accordance GAAP. The Federal income tax return has been prepared from such records after making appropriate adjustments, if any, to reflect the Partnership's accounts as adjusted for Federal income tax reporting purposes. Such adjustments are not recorded in the records of the Partnership. The net effect of these items is summarized as follows:

2004

2003

     

Tax

 

Tax

   

GAAP

Basis

GAAP

Basis

   

Basis

(unaudited)

Basis

(unaudited)

           

Total assets

$

15,372,720

19,129,018

21,527,191

25,295,875

           

Partners' capital:

         

  General Partner

 

14,875

(4,829)

16,920

(2,784)

  Limited Partners

 

15,176,633

18,920,773

18,623,745

22,411,563

           

Net income (loss) allocated:

         

  General Partner

 

2,632,985

2,632,983

1,265,292

1,241,853

  Limited Partners

 

7,517,338

6,112,380

5,171,360

5,194,798

           

Net income per Limited Partnership Unit

 

254.02

206.55

174.75

175.54

The net income per Unit is based upon the weighted average number of Units of 29,593 during 2004 and 2003.





- -27-


INLAND LAND APPRECIATION FUND, L.P.
(a limited partnership)

Notes to Financial Statements
(continued)

(2) Partnership Agreement


The Partnership Agreement defines the allocation of profits and losses, and available cash. If and to the extent that real estate taxes and insurance payable with respect to the Partnership's land during a given year exceed revenues of the Partnership, the General Partner will make a Supplemental Capital Contribution of such amount to the Partnership to ensure that it has sufficient funds to make such payments.


Profits and losses from operations (other than capital transactions) will be allocated 99% to the Limited Partners and 1% to the General Partner. The net gain from a sale of Partnership properties is first allocated among the Partners in proportion to the negative balances, if any, in their respective capital accounts. Thereafter, except as provided below, net gain is allocated to the General Partner in an amount equal to the proceeds distributed to the General Partner from such sale and the balance of any net gain is allocated to the Limited Partners. If the amount of net gain realized from a sale is less than the amount of cash distributed to the General Partner from such sale, the Partnership will allocate income or gain to the General Partner in an amount equal to the excess of the cash distributed to the General Partner with respect to such sale as quickly as permitted by law. Any net loss from a sale will be allocated to the Limited Partners.


Distributions of Net Sale Proceeds will be allocated between the General Partner and the Limited Partners based upon both an aggregate overall return to the Limited Partners and a separate return with respect to each parcel of land purchased by the Partnership.


As a general rule, Net Sale Proceeds will be distributed 90% to the Limited Partners and 10% to the General Partner until the Limited Partners have received from Net Sale Proceeds (i) a return of their Original Capital plus (ii) a noncompounded Cumulative Preferred Return of 15% of their Invested Capital. However, with respect to each parcel of land, the General Partner's 10% share will be subordinated until the Limited Partners receive a return of the Original Capital attributed to such parcel ("Parcel Capital") plus a 6% per annum noncompounded Cumulative Preferred Return thereon.


After the amounts described in items (i) and (ii) above and any previously subordinated distributions to the General Partner have been paid, and the amount of any Supplemental Capital Contributions have been repaid to the General Partner, subsequent distributions shall be paid 75% to the Limited Partners and 25% to the General Partner without considering Parcel Capital. If, after all Net Sale Proceeds have been distributed, the General Partner has received more than 25% of all Net Sale Proceeds (exclusive of distributions made to the Limited Partners to return their Original Capital), the General Partner shall contribute to the Partnership for distribution to the Limited Partners an amount equal to such excess.


Any distributions from Net Sale Proceeds at a time when Invested Capital is greater than zero shall be deemed applied first as a reduction of such Invested Capital before application to payment of any deficiency in the 15% Cumulative Preferred Return.






- -28-


INLAND LAND APPRECIATION FUND, L.P.
(a limited partnership)

Notes to Financial Statements
(continued)

(3) Transactions with Affiliates


The General Partner and its Affiliates are entitled to reimbursement for salaries and expenses of employees of the General Partner and its Affiliates relating to the administration of the Partnership. Such costs are included in professional services and general and administrative expenses to Affiliates, of which $5,422 and $5,672 were unpaid as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively.


An Affiliate of the General Partner performed marketing and advertising services for the Partnership and was reimbursed (as set forth under terms of the Partnership Agreement) for direct costs. Such costs of $19,280, $16,120 and $16,346 have been incurred and are included in marketing expenses to Affiliates for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively, all of which was paid as of December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002.


An Affiliate of the General Partner performed property upgrades, rezoning, annexation and other activities to prepare the Partnership's land investments for sale and was reimbursed (as set forth under terms of the Partnership Agreement) for salaries and direct costs. For the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, the Partnership incurred $98,576 and $144,857, respectively, of such costs. The Affiliate did not recognize a profit on any project. Such costs are included in investments in land and improvements, of which $16,016 and $30,187 were unpaid as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively.











- -29-


INLAND LAND APPRECIATION FUND, L.P.
(a limited partnership)

Notes to Financial Statements
(continued)

(4) Investments in Land and Improvements

         

Initial Costs

       
 

Illinois

Gross Acres Purchased

Purchase/Sales

 

Original

Acquisition

Total

Costs Capitalized Subsequent to

Costs of Property

Total Remaining Costs of Parcels at

Current Year Gain on Sale

Parcel

County

(Sold)

Date

 

Costs

Costs

Costs

Acquisition

Sold

12/31/04

Recognized

                       

1

Kendall

84.7360

01/19/89

$

423,680

61,625

485,305

5,462,589

5,947,894

-     

-     

(3.5200)

12/24/96

               

(.3520)

11/25/97

               

(80.8640)

12/29/97

               
                       

2

McHenry

223.4121

01/19/89

 

650,000

95,014

745,014

26,816

771,830

-     

-     

(183.3759)

12/27/90

               
   

(40.0362)

05/11/00

               
                       

3

Kendall

20.0000

02/09/89

 

189,000

13,305

202,305

-    

202,305

-     

-     

(20.0000)

05/08/90

               
                       

4

Kendall

69.2760

04/18/89

 

508,196

38,126

546,322

1,164,784

1,361,115

349,991

414,460

(.4860)

02/28/91

               

(27.5750)

08/25/95

               
   

(4.4000)

Var 2001

               
   

(2.1470)

Var 2002

               
   

(23.1033)

Var 2003

               
   

(6.7800)

Var 2004

               
                       

5

Kendall (a)

372.2230

05/03/89

 

2,532,227

135,943

2,668,170

456,398

3,124,568

-     

-     

 

(Option)

04/06/90

               
   

(372.2230)

06/20/03

               
                       

6

Kendall (b)

78.3900

06/21/89

 

416,783

31,691

448,474

1,304,987

43,735

1,709,726

-     

   

(3.9500)

11/01/00

               

                     

7

Kendall (b)

77.0490

06/21/89

 

84,754

8,163

92,917

1,265,851

-     

1,358,768

-     

                     

8

Kendall (b)

5.0000

06/21/89

 

60,000

5,113

65,113

-     

65,113

-     

-     

 

(5.0000)

10/06/89

               
                       

-30-


INLAND LAND APPRECIATION FUND, L.P.
(a limited partnership)

Notes to Financial Statements
(continued)

(4) Investments in Land and Improvements (continued)

Initial Costs

 

Illinois

Gross Acres Purchased

Purchase/Sales

 

Original

Acquisition

Total

Costs Capitalized Subsequent to

Costs of Property

Total Remaining Costs of Parcels at

Current Year Gain on Sale

Parcel

County

(Sold)

Date

 

Costs

Costs

Costs

Acquisition

Sold

12/31/04

Recognized

                       

9

McHenry (b)

51.0300

08/07/89

$

586,845

22,482

609,327

46,263

-     

655,590

-     

10

McHenry (b)

123.9400

08/07/89

 

91,939

7,224

99,163

600

99,763

-     

-     

 

(123.9400)

12/06/89

               
                       
                       

11

McHenry (b)

30.5920

08/07/89

 

321,216

22,641

343,857

51,529

-     

395,386

-     

                     

12

Kendall

90.2710

10/31/89

 

907,389

41,908

949,297

246,964

1,196,261

-     

2,332,495 

(.7090)

04/26/91

               
   

(89.562)

03/10/04

               
                       

13

McHenry

92.7800

11/07/89

 

251,306

19,188

270,494

18,745

289,239

-     

-     

(2.0810)

09/18/97

               
   

(90.6990)

02/15/01

               
                       

14

McHenry

76.2020

11/07/89

419,111

23,402

442,513

142,826

-     

585,339

-     

                       

15

Lake

84.5564

01/03/90

1,056,955

85,283

1,142,238

1,661,344

2,803,582

-     

-     

(10.5300)

Var 1996

               

(5.4680)

Var 1997

               

(68.5584)

Var 1998

               
                       

16

Kane/

72.4187

01/29/90

1,273,537

55,333

1,328,870

706,718

2,035,588

-     

-     

Kendall

(30.9000)

07/10/98

               

(10.3910)

12/15/99

               
   

(3.1000)

12/12/00

               
   

(28.0277)

05/19/03

               
                       

17

McHenry

99.9240

01/29/90

739,635

61,038

800,673

933,614

320,961

1,413,326

-     

(27.5100)

01/29/99

               

-31-


INLAND LAND APPRECIATION FUND, L.P.
(a limited partnership)

Notes to Financial Statements
(continued)

(4) Investments in Land and Improvements (continued)

         

Initial Costs

       
 

Illinois

Gross Acres Purchased

Purchase/Sales

 

Original

Acquisition

Total

Costs Capitalized Subsequent to

Costs of Property

Total Remaining Costs of Parcels at

Current Year Gain on Sale

Parcel

County

(Sold)

Date

 

Costs

Costs

Costs

Acquisition

Sold

12/31/04

Recognized

18

McHenry

71.4870

01/29/90

$

496,116

26,259

522,375

211,074

11,109

722,340

-     

(1.0000)

Var 1990

               

(.5200)

03/11/93

               
                       

19

McHenry

63.6915

02/23/90

490,158

29,158

519,316

133,126

-     

652,442

-     

                       

20

Kane

224.1480

02/28/90

2,749,800

183,092

2,932,892

1,938,930

4,871,822

-     

7,607,904 

(.2790)

10/17/91

               
   

(223.869)

02/20/04

               
                       

21

Kendall

172.4950

03/08/90

 

1,327,459

75,822

1,403,281

954,415

2,357,696

-     

-     

(172.4950)

Var 1998

               
                       

22

McHenry

254.5250

04/11/90

2,608,881

136,559

2,745,440

251,203

-     

2,996,643

-     

                       

23

Kendall

140.0210

05/08/90

 

1,480,000

116,240

1,596,240

909,395

2,505,635

-     

-     

(4.4100)

Var 1993

               

(35.8800)

Var 1994

               

(3.4400)

Var 1995

               

(96.2910)

08/26/99

               
                       

24

Kendall

298.4830

05/23/90

1,359,774

98,921

1,458,695

71,858

436,638

1,093,915

-     

(12.4570)

05/25/90

               

(4.6290)

04/01/96

               
   

(69.82)

11/26/02

               
                       

25

Kane

225.0000

06/01/90

2,600,000

168,778

2,768,778

41,980

-     

2,810,758

-     

                       

Totals

 

$

23,624,761

1,562,308

25,187,069

18,002,009

28,444,854

14,744,224

10,354,859 

                       




- -32-


 

INLAND LAND APPRECIATION FUND, L.P.
(a limited partnership)

Notes to Financial Statements
(continued)

(4) Investments in Land and Improvements (continued)

  1. Included in the purchase agreement of Parcel 5 was a condition that required the Partnership to buy an option to purchase an additional 243 acres immediately to the west of this parcel. The 1990 sale transaction relates to the sale of this option.
  2. The Partnership purchased from two third parties, two sets of three contiguous parcels of land (Parcels 6, 7 and 8; and Parcels 9, 10 and 11). The General Partner believes that the total value of this land will be maximized if it is treated and marketed to buyers as six separate parcels and closed the transactions as six separate purchases to facilitate this. Parcels 6, 7 and 8 will be treated as one parcel and Parcels 9, 10 and 11 will be treated as one parcel for purposes of computing Parcel Capital (as defined) and distributions to the Partners.
  3. Reconciliation of investments in land and improvements owned:
  4.    

    2004

    2003

           

    Balance at January 1,

    $

    20,517,279 

    23,885,361 

    Additions during year

     

    719,464 

    921,343 

    Sales during year

     

    (6,492,519)

    (4,289,425)

           

    Balance at December 31,

    $

    14,744,224 

    20,517,279 

  5. The aggregate cost of investments in land and improvements owned at December 31, 2004 for Federal income tax purposes was approximately $14,910,000 (unaudited).

(5) Rental Income


The Partnership has determined that all leases relating to the farm parcels are operating leases. Accordingly, rental income is reported when earned.


As of December 31, 2004, the Partnership had farm leases of generally one year in duration, for approximately 965 acres of the approximately 1,211 acres owned.










- -33-


INLAND LAND APPRECIATION FUND, L.P.
(a limited partnership)

Notes to Financial Statements
(continued)

(6) Mortgage Loans Receivable


Mortgage loans receivable are the result of sales of Parcels, in whole or in part. The Partnership has recorded a deferred gain on these sales. The deferred gain will be recognized over the life of the related mortgage loan receivable as principal payments are received. As of December 31, 2004, the mortgage loans receivable and the related deferred gain are fully reserved.

       

Principal Balance

Principal Balance

Accrued Interest Receivable

Deferred Gain

Parcel

Maturity

Interest Rate

 

12/31/04

12/31/03

12/31/04

12/31/04

               

1

03/01/04

9.00%

$

1,233,175

 1,233,175

423,794

60,752

               

15

12/31/03

9.00%

 

-    

144,557

-    

-    

               

21

03/31/05

9.00%

 

-    

656,050

-    

-    

               

23

08/26/03

9.00%

 

       -     

67,225

       -     

       -     

               
     

$

1,233,175

 2,101,007

423,794

60,752

               

Less Allowance for doubtful accounts

 

1,233,175

2,101,007

423,794

60,752

               
     

$

       -     

       -     

       -     

       -     

The General Partner determined that the maximum value of Parcels 1, 15, 21 and 23 could be realized if the parcels were developed and sold as individual lots. However, if we had followed that plan, there is a possibility that it could have increased income taxes. Therefore, the Partnership sold the parcels to a third party developer whereby a 100% of the sales price was represented by notes receivable from the buyer. These transactions were deemed installment sales. After the sale, the developer, through limited liability companies ("LLCs"), secured third party financing to cover the deferred down payment owed to the Partnership as well as provide proceeds to begin the development of the project. These sales were structured so that the down payment received at the time of the sale was sufficient to provide a distribution to the Limited Partners that equated to the parcel capital allocated to the parcel plus approximately a 6% return per ann um on the parcel capital through the date of the distribution.









- -34-


INLAND LAND APPRECIATION FUND, L.P.
(a limited partnership)

Notes to Financial Statements
(continued)

The velocity of the developer's individual lot sales was slower than originally projected and consequently, the developer's carrying costs were higher. The developer obtained a loan from an affiliate of the General Partner. These funds were used for operating costs and to continue the development of the projects. As a result of the slower lot sales, the net sale proceeds available to the Partnership were lower than anticipated. As of December 31, 2002, the Partnership recorded an allowance for doubtful accounts of $767,248 relating to a portion of the accrued interest receivable on mortgage loans resulting from the sale of these parcels. In early August 2003, we reviewed recent forecasts on these parcels, and determined that the collectibility of these receivables was doubtful. As a result, management elected to reserve an additional $2,302,787 of principal and accrued interest relating to the mortgages receivable in 2003. The deferred gain of $242,368 relating to the mortgage loans receivable was also re served and recorded against bad debt expense as of December 31, 2003. The General Partner continued to monitor these transactions throughout 2004 and, based on its review of the developments' financial situation during the fourth quarter of 2004, it does not anticipate receiving any additional proceeds on Parcels 15, 21 and 23. As of December 31, 2004, the Partnership has written off the mortgage loans receivable and related accrued interest receivable and deferred gain relating to Parcels 15, 21 and 23. As of December 31, 2004, the mortgage loan receivable relating to Parcel 1 has been fully reserved, however based on review of the developments' financial situation relating to this Parcel and potential sales of the commercial pieces of this Parcel , we have not written off this receivable at this time.


The General Partner guaranteed the third party development loans owed by these LLCs. In reviewing the developments' financial situation, the General Partner determined that it would be in its best interest to have an affiliate acquire the interests in the LLCs. The General Partner and its affiliates concluded that they could better control the continuing costs to complete these developments and would therefore have the best opportunity to limit their exposure under the guarantee agreements and possibly recover a portion of the amount owed to the Partnership. An affiliate of the General Partner contributed approximately $1,900,000 to acquire the interests in the LLCs. The General Partner contributed approximately $2,400,000 to pay off the debt under its guarantee of the LLC loans. The affiliate of the General Partner will complete the development and the sale of these projects.


(7) Notes Payable to Affiliate


On December 31, 1998, the Partnership obtained a loan from the General Partner in the amount of $2,493,750 solely collateralized by Parcel 5. During 2002, the General Partner advanced an additional $12,234. The note accrued interest at prime plus .5% and had a maturity date which was extended to December 29, 2003. For the year ended December 31, 2003, interest of $63,822 was capitalized. During 2003, all principal and interest on this loan was repaid.


On December 6, 2000, the Partnership obtained a loan from the General Partner in the amount of $1,500,000 collateralized by Parcels 17, 18 and 22. During 2002, the General Partner advanced an additional $15,000. The note accrued interest at prime plus .5% and had a maturity date of November 30, 2004. For the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, interest of $49,046 and $80,642, respectively, was capitalized, of which $0 and $229,921 was unpaid as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. During 2004, all principal and accrued interest on this loan was repaid.


On September 17, 2002, the Partnership obtained a loan from the General Partner in the amount of $1,600,000, collateralized by Parcels 4, 6 and 7. The note accrued interest at a rate of prime plus .5% and had a maturity date of September 17, 2005. For the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, interest of $22,609 and $65,546 was capitalized, of which $0 and $85,611 was unpaid as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. During 2004, all principal and accrued interest on this loan was repaid.

-35-


 

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Independent Auditors on Accounting and Financial Disclosure


On January 27, 2005, our audit committee engaged Grant Thornton LLP ("Grant Thornton") to serve as our independent registered public accounting firm effective immediately. In addition, on January 27, 2005, our audit committee accepted notice from Deloitte & Touche LLP ("Deloitte"), its current independent registered public accounting firm, indicating that, effective immediately, Deloitte will resign as our independent registered public accounting firm.


The reports of Deloitte on our financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2002 and December 31, 2003 did not contain an adverse opinion, disclaimer of opinion or explanatory paragraphs and were not qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principle.


In connection with Deloitte's audits of our two most recent fiscal years ended December 31, 2002 and 2003, there were no disagreements with Deloitte on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedures, which disagreements, if not resolved to the satisfaction of Deloitte, would have caused it to make reference to the subject matter of the disagreements in connection with its reports on the financial statements for such periods. During the our two most recent fiscal years, there were no reportable events as defined in Item 304(a)(1)(iv) of Regulation S-K.


We provided Deloitte a copy of the Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") and requested Deloitte to furnish us with a letter addressed to the SEC stating whether Deloitte agreed with the above statements made by us and, if not, stating the respects in which it does not agree. We filed Deloitte's response with the SEC on Form 8-K.


We did not consult Grant Thornton regarding (i) either the application of accounting principles to a specific completed or contemplated transaction or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on our financial statements; as such, no written or oral advice was provided, and none was an important factor considered by us in reaching a decision as to the accounting, auditing or financial reporting issues; or (ii) any matter that was a subject of a disagreement or reportable event with Deloitte (as there were none).



Item 9(a). Controls and Procedures


The general partner conducted, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by the Annual Report. Based upon that evaluation, the principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, our disclosure controls and procedures are effective in timely alerting them to material information that is required to be disclosed in the periodic reports that we must file with the Securities and Exchange Commission.


There were no significant changes in our internal controls over financial reporting during the fourth quarter of 2004 that have materially effected or are reasonably likely to materially affect our internal control over financial reporting.


Item 9 (b). Other Information


Not applicable




- -36-


PART III

Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant


Our general partner, Inland Real Estate Investment Corporation (IREIC), was organized in 1984 for the purpose of acting as general partner of limited partnerships formed to acquire, own and operate real properties. Our general partner is a wholly owned subsidiary of The Inland Group, Inc. The general partner has responsibility for all aspects of our operations.


During 2004, the board of directors of our general partner formalized the audit committee. The Audit Committee is not independent from our general partner and consists of Catherine L. Lynch, committee chair and financial expert, Brenda G. Gujral, Roberta S. Matlin and Gary Pechter. The audit committee is responsible for engaging our independent registered public accounting firm, reviewing the plans and results of the audit engagement with our independent registered public accounting firm and consulting with the independent registered public accounting firm regarding the adequacy of our internal accounting controls.


During 2004, our general partner adopted a Code of Ethics that applies to all of its employees.


Officers and Directors


The officers, directors, and key employees of IREIC and its affiliates that are likely to provide services to us are as follows. Ages are listed as of January 1, 2005.

 

Functional Title

   

Daniel L. Goodwin

Director

Robert H. Baum

Director, General Counsel of IREIC

Robert D. Parks

Chairman

Brenda G. Gujral

Director, President and principal executive officer of the Partnership

Catherine L. Lynch

Treasurer

Roberta S. Matlin

Director, Senior Vice President-Investments

Guadalupe Griffin

Vice President-Asset Management

Kelly Tucek

Vice President-Partnership Accounting and principal financial officer of the Partnership

Gary E. Pechter

Senior Vice President, The Inland Group, General Counsel of the Partnership





- -37-


DANIEL L. GOODWIN (age 61) has been with Inland since 1968 and is a founding and controlling stockholder of, and the chairman of the board and chief executive officer of, The Inland Group. Mr. Goodwin also serves as a director or officer of entities wholly owned or controlled by The Inland Group. In addition, Mr. Goodwin is the chairman of the board of Inland Real Estate Corporation, chairman of the board and chief executive officer of Inland Mortgage Investment Corporation and chairman of the board and chief executive officer of Inland Bancorp Holding Company, a bank holding company. Mr. Goodwin also serves on the management committee of Inland Real Estate Corporation.


Mr. Goodwin is a member of the National Association of Realtors, the Illinois Association of Realtors and the Northern Illinois Commercial Association of Realtors. He is also the author of a nationally recognized real estate reference book for the management of residential properties. Mr. Goodwin serves on the Board of the Illinois State Affordable Housing Trust Fund. He has served as an advisor for the Office of Housing Coordination Services of the State of Illinois, and as a member of the Seniors Housing Committee of the National Multi-Housing Council. He has served as Chairman of the DuPage County Affordable Housing Task Force and presently serves as chairman of New Directions Affordable Housing Corporation.


Mr. Goodwin obtained his bachelor's and master's degrees from Illinois State Universities. Following graduation, he taught for five years in the Chicago public schools system. More recently, Mr. Goodwin has served as a member of the board of governors of Illinois State Colleges and Universities. He is vice chairman of the board of trustees of Benedictine University, vice chairman of the board of trustees of Springfield College and chairman of the board of Northeastern Illinois University.



ROBERT H. BAUM (age 61) has been with Inland since 1968 and is one of the founding stockholders. Mr. Baum is vice chairman and executive vice president and general counsel of The Inland Group. In his capacity as general counsel, Mr. Baum is responsible for the supervision of the legal activities of The Inland Group and its affiliates. This responsibility includes the supervision of The Inland Law Department and serving as liaison with outside counsel. Mr. Baum has served as a member of the North American Securities Administrators Association Real Estate Advisory Committee and as a member of the Securities Advisory Committee to the Secretary of State of Illinois. He is a member of the American Corporation Counsel Association and has also been a guest lecturer for the Illinois State Bar Association. Mr. Baum has been admitted to practice before the Supreme Court of the United States, as well as the bars of several federal courts of appeals and federal district courts and the State of Illinois. He is also a licensed real estate broker. He has served as a director of American National Bank of DuPage and currently serves as a director of Inland Bancorp Holding Company and of Westbank. Mr. Baum also is a member of the Governing Council of Wellness House, a charitable organization that exists to improve the quality of life for people whose lives have been affected by cancer and its treatment by providing psychosocial and educational support for cancer patients, their families and friends.


ROBERT D. PARKS (age 61) has been with Inland since 1968 and is one of the founding stockholders. He also is chairman of Inland Real Estate Investment Corporation, director of Inland Securities Corporation and a director of Inland Investment Advisors, Inc. Mr. Parks is president, chief executive officer, and a director of Inland Real Estate Corporation and serves on its management committee. He is also chairman, chief executive officer and director of Inland Retail Real Estate Trust, Inc. and is chairman, chief executive officer and director of Inland Western Retail Real Estate Trust, Inc. He is chairman, chief executive officer and affiliated director of Inland American Real Estate Trust, Inc. Mr. Parks is responsible for the ongoing administration of existing investment programs, corporate budgeting and administration for Inland Real Estate Investment Corporation. He oversees and coordinates the marketing of all investments and investor relations.


Prior to joining Inland, Mr. Parks was a school teacher in Chicago's public schools. He received his B.A. Degree from Northeastern Illinois University and his M.A. Degree from the University of Chicago. He is a registered Direct Participation Program Limited Principal with the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. He is also a member of the Real Estate Investment Association, the Financial Planning Association, the Foundation for Financial Planning, as well as a member of the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts.

-38-


BRENDA G. GUJRAL (age 62) is president, chief operating officer and a director of Inland Real Estate Investment Corporation (IREIC). She is also president, chief operating officer and a director of Inland Securities Corporation (ISC), a member firm of the National Association of Securities Dealers (NASD). Mrs. Gujral is also a director of Inland Investment Advisors, Inc., an investment advisor. She is also an affiliated director of Inland Western Retail Real Estate Trust, Inc., chairman of the board of Inland Real Estate Exchange Corporation and affiliated director of Inland American Retail Real Estate Trust, Inc.


Mrs. Gujral has overall responsibility for the operations of IREIC, including the distribution of checks to over 70,000 investors, review of periodic communications to those investors, the filing of quarterly and annual reports for Inland's publicly registered investment programs with the Securities and Exchange Commission, compliance with other SEC and NASD securities regulations both for IREIC and ISC, review of asset management activities, and marketing and communications with the independent broker/dealer firms selling Inland's current and prior programs. Mrs. Gujral works with internal and outside legal counsel in structuring and registering the prospectuses for IREIC's investment programs and in connection with the preparation of its offering documents and registering the related securities with the Securities and Exchange Commission and state securities commissions.


Mrs. Gujral has been with the Inland organization for over 20 years, becoming an officer in 1982. Prior to joining Inland, she worked for the Land Use Planning Commission establishing an office in Portland, Oregon, to implement land use legislation for that state.


She is a graduate of California State University. She holds Series 7, 22, 39 and 63 licenses from the NASD. Mrs. Gujral is a member of the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (NAREIT), the Financial Planning Association (FPA), the Foundation for Financial Planning (FFP) and the National Association for Female Executives.



CATHERINE L. LYNCH (age 46) joined Inland in 1989 and is the treasurer of Inland Real Estate Investment Corporation. Ms. Lynch is responsible for managing the corporate accounting department. Prior to joining Inland, Ms. Lynch worked in the field of public accounting for KPMG LLP since 1980. She received her B.S. Degree in Accounting from Illinois State University. Ms. Lynch is a Certified Public Accountant and a member of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and the Illinois CPA Society. She is registered with the National Association of Securities Dealers as a Financial Operations Principal.



ROBERTA S. MATLIN (age 60) joined Inland Real Estate Investment Corporation (IREIC) in 1984 as director of investor administration and currently serves as senior vice president of IREIC, directing the day-to-day internal operations. Ms. Matlin is a director of IREIC and president of Inland Investment Advisors, Inc., and Intervest Southern Real Estate Corporation, and a director and vice president of Inland Securities Corporation. She is the president of Inland American Advisory Services, Inc. Since 2003, she has been vice president of administration of Inland Western Retail Real Estate Trust, Inc., and since 2004, vice president of administration of Inland American Real Estate Trust, Inc. She was vice president of administration of Inland Real Corporation from 1995 until 2000 and of Inland Retail Real Estate Trust, Inc from 1998 until 2004. From June 2001 until April 2004, she was a trustee and executive vice president of Inland Mutual Fund Trust. Prior to joining Inland, she worked for the Chicago Re gion of the Social Security Administration of the Untied States Department of Health and Human Services. Ms. Matlin is a graduate of the University of Illinois. She holds Series 7, 22, 24, 39, 63 and 65 licenses from the National Association of Securities Dealers.


- -39-


GUADALUPE GRIFFIN (age 40) joined Inland in 1994. Ms. Griffin serves as vice president of Inland Real Estate Investment Corporation and assistant vice president of Inland Midwest Investment Corporation. Ms. Griffin is responsible for the asset management and day-to-day operations of the public and private partnerships which include the development of operating and disposition strategies for the partnerships and investor communications. Prior to joining Inland, Ms. Griffin was employed by the University of Illinois at Chicago Center for Urban Educational Research and Development as Assistant to the Director of the Nation of Tomorrow Program; a privately funded multi-million dollar program, which provided educational and empowerment services to youths and their families in four inner-city schools. Ms. Griffin holds an Illinois Real Estate Sales License.


KELLY TUCEK (age 42) joined Inland in 1989 and is a vice president of Inland Real Estate Investment Corporation and since 2004, treasurer of Inland American Real Estate Trust, Inc. As of August 1996, Ms. Tucek is responsible for the investment accounting department which includes all public partnership accounting functions along with quarterly and annual SEC filings. Prior to joining Inland, Ms. Tucek was on the audit staff of Coopers and Lybrand since 1984. She received her B.A. Degree in Accounting and Computer Science from North Central College.


GARY E. PECHTER (age 53) joined Inland in 1985 and is a Senior Vice President and Senior Counsel of The Inland Real Estate Group, Inc., and a member of the Audit Committee for all public partnerships sponsored by IREIC. In his capacity as their counsel, Mr. Pechter has been admitted to practice law in the State of Illinois and the federal district court. He is also a licensed real estate broker. Mr. Pechter received his undergraduate degree from the University of Illinois and his law degree from John Marshall Law School.


Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires directors, executive officers and beneficial owners of more than ten percent of our partnership units to file initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership with the Securities and Exchange Commission and to provide us with copies of such reports. Based solely on a review of the copies provided to us and written representations from such reporting persons, we believe that all applicable Section 16(a) filing requirements have been met for such reporting persons.



Item 11. Executive Compensation


Our general partner is entitled to receive a share of cash distributions of net sales proceeds based upon both an aggregate overall return to the limited partners and a separate return with respect to each parcel of land purchased by us.


Our partnership agreement defines the allocation of profits and losses, and available cash. If and to the extent that real estate taxes and insurance payable with respect to our land during a given year exceed our revenues, our general partner will make a supplemental capital contribution of such amount to us to ensure that we have sufficient funds to make such payments.





- -40-


 

Profits and losses from operations (other than capital transactions) will be allocated 99% to the limited partners and 1% to the general partner. The net gain from a sale of our properties is first allocated among the partners in proportion to the negative balances, if any, in their respective capital accounts. Thereafter, except as provided below, net gain is allocated to the general partner in an amount equal to the proceeds distributed to the general partner from such sale and the balance of any net gain is allocated to the limited partners. If the amount of net gain realized from a sale is less than the amount of cash distributed to the general partner from such sale, we will allocate income or gain to the general partner in an amount equal to the excess of the cash distributed to the general partner with respect to such sale as quickly as permitted by law. Any net loss from a sale will be allocated to the limited partners.


Distributions of net sale proceeds will be allocated between the general partner and the limited partners based upon both an aggregate overall return to the limited partners and a separate return with respect to each parcel of land purchased by us.


As a general rule, net sale proceeds will be distributed 90% to the limited partners and 10% to the general partner until the limited partners have received from net sale proceeds (i) a return of their original capital plus (ii) a noncompounded cumulative preferred return of 15% of their invested capital. However, with respect to each parcel of land, the general partner's 10% share will be subordinated until the limited partners receive a return of the original capital attributed to such parcel or parcel capital, plus a 6% per annum noncompounded cumulative preferred return thereon.


After the amounts described in items (i) and (ii) above and any previously subordinated distributions to the general partner have been paid, and the amount of any supplemental capital contributions have been repaid to the general partner, subsequent distributions shall be paid 75% to the limited partners and 25% to the general partner without considering parcel capital. If, after all net sale proceeds have been distributed, the general partner has received more than 25% of all net sale proceeds (exclusive of distributions made to the limited partners to return their original capital), the general partner shall contribute to the partnership for distribution to the limited partners an amount equal to such excess.


Any distributions from net sale proceeds at a time when invested capital is greater than zero shall be deemed applied first as a reduction of such invested capital before application to payment of any deficiency in the 15% cumulative preferred return.


We are permitted to engage in various transactions involving affiliates of our general partner, as described below.


Our general partner was entitled to receive an asset management fee equal to one-quarter of 1% of our original cost of undeveloped land annually, limited to a cumulative total over the life of our partnership of 2% of the land's original cost to us. As of June 30, 1998, we had met this limit and no additional asset management fees have been paid.


Our general partner and its affiliates may be reimbursed for their expenses or out-of-pocket costs relating to our administration. For the year ended December 31, 2004, such costs included in general and administrative services to affiliates and professional services to affiliates were $48,039, of which $5,422 was unpaid as of December 31, 2004.


An affiliate of the general partner performed marketing and advertising services for us and was reimbursed for direct costs. For the year ended December 31, 2004, we incurred $19,280 of such costs, all of which was paid as of December 31, 2004.


An affiliate of the general partner performed property upgrades, rezoning, annexation and other activities to prepare our land investments for sale and was reimbursed for salaries and direct costs. For the year ended December 31, 2004, we incurred $98,576 of such costs, of which $16,016 was unpaid, and included in the investments in land and improvements. As of December 31, 2004, all notes payable to an affiliate had been repaid. For the year ended December 31, 2004, interest of $71,655 was capitalized and included in investments in land and improvements.

-41-


Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management

  1. No person or group is known by us to own beneficially more than 5% of the outstanding units of our partnership
  2. The officers and directors of our general partner own as a group the following units of our partnership:
  3.  

    Amount and Nature

     
     

    of Beneficial

    Percent

    Title of Class

    Ownership

    of Class

         

    Limited partnership units

    298 Units directly

    1%

         

    No officer or director of our general partner possesses a right to acquire beneficial ownership of units of our partnership.

    All of the outstanding shares of our general partner are owned by an affiliate or its officers and directors as set forth above in Item 10.

  4. There exists no arrangement, known to us, the operation of which may at a subsequent date result in a change in our control.

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions


There were no significant transactions or business relationships with the general partner, affiliates or their management other than those described in Items 10 and 11 above. Reference is made to Note 3 of the Notes to Financial Statements (Item 8 of this Annual Report) for information regarding related party transactions.



Item 14:  Principal Accountant Fees and Services


Fees. Aggregate fees paid for professional services rendered by our independent registered public accounting firm were as follows:

   

Years ended December 31,

   

2004

2003

       

Audit fees for professional services rendered for the audit of our annual financial statements and quarterly reviews of our financial statements.

$

35,900

31,800

Tax fees for professional services rendered for tax return preparation and review of our K-1s.

 

15,190

5,400

       

Total fees

$

51,090

37,200



On January 27, 2005, our audit committee approved Grant Thornton LLP to serve as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ended December 31, 2004.


- -42-


PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, and Reports on Form 8-K

  1. The financial statements listed in the index at page 16 of this annual report are filed as part of this annual report.
  2. Exhibits. The following exhibits are incorporated herein by reference:
  3. 3  Restated Certificate of Limited Partnership and amended and restated Agreement of Limited Partnership, included as Exhibits A and B of the Prospectus dated October 12, 1988 as supplemented, are incorporated herein by reference thereto.

    4  Form of Certificate of Ownership representing interests in the registrant filed as Exhibits 4(a) and 4(b) to Registration Statement on Form S-11, File No. 33-18607, is incorporated herein by reference thereto.

       

    31.1

    Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification by principal executive officer

       

    31.2

    Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification by principal financial officer

       

    32.1

    Section 1350 Certification by principal executive officer

       

    32.2

    Section 1350 Certification by principal financial officer

       
  4. Financial Statement Schedules.

All schedules have been omitted as the required information is inapplicable or the information is presented in the financial statements or related notes.

(d) Reports on Form 8-K.

None.



No annual report or proxy material for the year 2004 has been sent to our limited partners. An annual report will be sent to the limited partners subsequent to this filing and we will furnish copies of such report to the Commission when it is sent to the limited partners.






- -43-


SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

INLAND LAND APPRECIATION FUND, L.P.

Inland Real Estate Investment Corporation

General Partner

   

/s/

Brenda G. Gujral

   

By:

Brenda G. Gujral

President and Director

Date:

March 23, 2005

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated:

By:

Inland Real Estate Investment Corporation

General Partner

   

/s/

Brenda G. Gujral

   

By:

Brenda G. Gujral

President and Director

Date:

March 23, 2005

   

/s/

Guadalupe Griffin

   

By:

Guadalupe Griffin

Vice President

Date:

March 23, 2005

   

/s/

Kelly Tucek

   

By:

Kelly Tucek

Vice President

Date:

March 23, 2005

   

/s/

Robert D. Parks

   

By:

Robert D. Parks

Chairman

Date:

March 23, 2005

   

/s/

Daniel L. Goodwin

   

By:

Daniel L. Goodwin

Director

Date:

March 23, 2005

   

-44-