SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Form 10-Q
þ
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR
15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2003 | ||
or | ||
o
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR
15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
For the transition period from to |
Commission file number 1-8972
IndyMac Bancorp, Inc.
Delaware
|
95-3983415 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
155 North Lake Avenue, Pasadena, California (Address of principal executive offices) |
91101-7211 (Zip Code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code:
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the exchange act). Yes þ No o
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
Common stock outstanding as of October 24, 2003, 55,610,448 shares
FORM 10-Q QUARTERLY REPORT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page | ||||||
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION | ||||||
Forward-looking Statements | 2 | |||||
Item 2.
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations | 2 | ||||
Highlights for the Quarter | 2 | |||||
Overall Results | 3 | |||||
Our Business | 4 | |||||
Mortgage Banking Activities | 14 | |||||
Loan Production | 14 | |||||
Mortgage Production by Division and Channel | 15 | |||||
Loan Sales | 19 | |||||
Investing Activities | 23 | |||||
Investment Portfolio Group | 25 | |||||
Construction Lending | 33 | |||||
HELOC Portfolio | 35 | |||||
Net Interest Income | 36 | |||||
Overall Interest Rate Risk Management | 39 | |||||
Credit Risk and Reserves | 40 | |||||
General | 40 | |||||
Secondary Market Reserves | 43 | |||||
Operating Expenses | 44 | |||||
Dividend Policy | 45 | |||||
Future Outlook | 45 | |||||
Liquidity and Capital Resources | 45 | |||||
Overview | 45 | |||||
Principal Sources of Cash | 46 | |||||
Principal Uses of Cash | 48 | |||||
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss | 48 | |||||
Regulatory Capital Requirements | 49 | |||||
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements | 50 | |||||
Contractual Obligations | 50 | |||||
Key Operating Risks | 50 | |||||
Interest Rate Risk | 50 | |||||
Valuation Risk | 51 | |||||
Credit Risk | 51 | |||||
Liquidity Risk/Access to Capital Markets | 51 | |||||
Government Regulation and Monetary Policy | 52 | |||||
Competition | 52 | |||||
Other Risks | 52 | |||||
Critical Accounting Policies | 53 | |||||
Item 3.
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk | 53 | ||||
Item 1.
|
Financial Statements (Unaudited) | |||||
Consolidated Balance Sheets | 54 | |||||
Consolidated Statements of Earnings | 56 | |||||
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders Equity and Comprehensive Income | 57 | |||||
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows | 58 | |||||
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements | 59 | |||||
Item 4.
|
Controls and Procedures | 62 | ||||
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION | ||||||
Item 6.
|
Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K | 63 |
1
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Form 10-Q contains statements that may be deemed to be forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Forward-looking statements include statements regarding our projected financial condition and results of operations, plans, objectives, future performance and business. Forward-looking statements typically include the words anticipate, believe, estimate, expect, project, plan, forecast, intend and other similar expressions. These statements reflect our current views with respect to future events and financial performance. They are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause future results to differ materially from historical results or from the results anticipated. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of their dates or as of the date hereof if no other date is identified. We undertake no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. For further information on our key operating risks, refer to Key Operating Risks at page 50 and IndyMacs annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002.
References to IndyMac Bancorp or the Parent Company refer to the parent company alone while references to IndyMac, the Company, or we refer to IndyMac Bancorp, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries. References to IndyMac Bank or the Bank refer to our subsidiary IndyMac Bank, F.S.B. and its consolidated subsidiaries. The following discussion addresses the Companys financial condition and results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2003.
Highlights for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2003 were as follows:
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | June 30, | September 30, | September 30, | ||||||||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2003 | 2003 | 2002 | ||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions, except per share data) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Income Statement
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income after provision for loan
losses
|
$ | 76 | $ | 48 | $ | 61 | $ | 197 | $ | 143 | ||||||||||||
Gain on sale of loans
|
121 | 77 | 102 | 307 | 226 | |||||||||||||||||
Other income
|
2 | 26 | 11 | 26 | 62 | |||||||||||||||||
Net revenues
|
200 | 151 | 173 | 530 | 431 | |||||||||||||||||
Operating expenses
|
117 | 89 | 105 | 318 | 249 | |||||||||||||||||
Net earnings
|
$ | 50 | $ | 37 | $ | 41 | $ | 128 | $ | 108 | ||||||||||||
Per Share Data
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Basic earnings per share
|
$ | 0.90 | $ | 0.65 | $ | 0.75 | $ | 2.33 | $ | 1.83 | ||||||||||||
Diluted earnings per share
|
0.87 | 0.64 | 0.73 | 2.26 | 1.78 | |||||||||||||||||
Dividends paid per share
|
0.15 | 0.00 | 0.10 | 0.35 | 0.00 | |||||||||||||||||
Book value per share at end of quarter
|
17.27 | 14.97 | 16.48 | 17.27 | 14.97 | |||||||||||||||||
Closing price per share
|
$ | 23.17 | $ | 19.27 | $ | 25.42 | $ | 23.17 | $ | 19.27 | ||||||||||||
Average common shares (in thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Basic
|
55,255 | 56,879 | 55,015 | 55,034 | 59,040 | |||||||||||||||||
Diluted
|
56,991 | 58,375 | 56,711 | 56,561 | 60,727 | |||||||||||||||||
Performance Ratios
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Return on average equity (annualized)
|
20.32 | % | 17.24 | % | 18.34 | % | 18.70 | % | 16.62 | % | ||||||||||||
Return on average assets (annualized)
|
1.63 | % | 1.82 | % | 1.52 | % | 1.55 | % | 1.90 | % | ||||||||||||
Dividend payout ratio(1)
|
17.24 | % | 0.00 | % | 13.70 | % | 15.49 | % | 0.00 | % | ||||||||||||
Net interest income to pretax income
|
100.36 | % | 81.92 | % | 98.74 | % | 100.68 | % | 84.79 | % | ||||||||||||
Average cost of funds
|
2.61 | % | 4.09 | % | 2.94 | % | 2.90 | % | 4.38 | % | ||||||||||||
Net interest margin
|
2.97 | % | 2.71 | % | 2.73 | % | 2.84 | % | 2.98 | % | ||||||||||||
Efficiency ratio(2)
|
57 | % | 58 | % | 58 | % | 58 | % | 57 | % |
2
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | June 30, | September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2003 | 2003 | 2002 | |||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions, except per share data) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Performance Ratios, Continued
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Capital to net revenue ratio(3)
|
1.18 | % | 1.40 | % | 1.25 | % | 1.26 | % | 1.47 | % | |||||||||||
Capital adjusted efficiency ratio(4)
|
67 | % | 81 | % | 73 | % | 73 | % | 84 | % | |||||||||||
Operating expenses to loan production
|
1.35 | % | 1.68 | % | 1.28 | % | 1.35 | % | 1.74 | % | |||||||||||
Balance Sheet and Asset Quality
Ratios
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Debt to equity ratio(5)
|
11.6:1 | 8.4:1 | 10.7:1 | 11.6:1 | 8.4:1 | ||||||||||||||||
Core capital ratio(6)
|
7.92 | % | 10.15 | % | 8.53 | % | 7.92 | % | 10.15 | % | |||||||||||
Risk-based capital ratio(6)
|
13.58 | % | 16.85 | % | 14.46 | % | 13.58 | % | 16.85 | % | |||||||||||
Non-performing assets to total assets
|
0.81 | % | 1.31 | % | 0.88 | % | 0.81 | % | 1.31 | % | |||||||||||
Allowance for loan losses to total loans held for
investment
|
0.92 | % | 1.82 | % | 1.09 | % | 0.92 | % | 1.82 | % | |||||||||||
Allowance for loan losses and other reserves to
non-performing loans
|
94 | % | 82 | % | 97 | % | 94 | % | 82 | % | |||||||||||
Allowance for loan losses to annualized net
charge-offs
|
349 | % | 271 | % | 176 | % | 272 | % | 283 | % | |||||||||||
Provision for loan losses to net charge-offs
|
164.9 | % | 54.4 | % | 97.1 | % | 111.9 | % | 73.2 | % | |||||||||||
Provision to net charge-offs (core loan
portfolio)(7)
|
263.0 | % | 56.4 | % | 119.7 | % | 150.6 | % | 110.3 | % | |||||||||||
Other Selected Items
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Loans serviced(8)
|
$ | 35,029 | $ | 27,191 | $ | 32,974 | $ | 35,029 | $ | 27,191 | |||||||||||
Loan production(9)
|
8,681 | 5,312 | 8,193 | 23,459 | 14,304 | ||||||||||||||||
Pipeline of mortgage loans in process
|
4,688 | 5,011 | 6,929 | 4,688 | 5,011 | ||||||||||||||||
Loans sold
|
$ | 6,675 | $ | 4,474 | $ | 6,336 | $ | 18,535 | $ | 12,447 |
(1) | Dividends declared per common share as a percentage of diluted earnings per share. |
(2) | Defined as operating expenses divided by net interest income and other income. |
(3) | Average equity divided by net interest income and other income. |
(4) | Efficiency ratio multiplied by the capital to net revenue ratio. |
(5) | Debt includes deposits. |
(6) | IndyMac Bank, F.S.B. (excludes unencumbered cash at the Parent Company available for investment in IndyMac Bank). Risk based capital ratio is based on the regulatory standard risk weighting. With IndyMacs additional subprime risk weightings, the ratios are 12.49%, 15.80% and 13.22% for the three months ended September 30, 2003, September 30, 2002 and June 30, 2003, respectively. |
(7) | Excludes provisions and charge-offs of discontinued product lines. |
(8) | Represents entire servicing portfolio including IndyMac owned loans and loans subserviced for others on an interim basis. |
(9) | Includes newly originated commitments on construction loans. |
OVERALL RESULTS
Record revenues, earnings and earnings per share as a result of continued strong mortgage loan production, characterized IndyMacs overall results for the quarter ended September 30, 2003. Mortgage loan production of $8.5 billion during the third quarter of 2003 was 64% higher than the third quarter of 2002 and the margin on loans sold improved by nine basis points. In addition, the Company deployed capital to increase average earning assets by 49%. Offsetting the strong mortgage production revenues, were lower servicing-related revenues as prepayments industry-wide continued at historically high levels. In addition, losses on the servicing-related hedge instruments were partially offset by the increases in the value of servicing-related assets.
3
Comparing third quarter 2003 to third quarter 2002, net revenues increased 32% and operating expenses increased 31%, resulting in net earnings of $49.7 million, up 35% over the prior year.
OUR BUSINESS
IndyMac is structured to achieve synergies among its operations and to enhance customer service. Operating through its three main segments, IndyMac Mortgage Bank, IndyMac Consumer Bank and the Investment Portfolio Group, the common denominator of the Companys business is providing consumers with single-family residential mortgages through relationships with each segments core customers via the channels in which each operates. IndyMac Mortgage Bank is focused on providing consumers with mortgage products through relationships with the Companys business customers mortgage brokers, mortgage bankers, community financial institutions, real estate professionals and homebuilders. IndyMac Consumer Bank provides the platform for the mortgage and deposit services that IndyMac offers directly to consumers. The Investment Portfolio Group serves as the main link to customers whose mortgages we service. Through its investments in single-family residential (SFR) mortgages, mortgage-backed securities and mortgage servicing rights (MSRs), the Investment Portfolio Group generates core spread and fee income and provides critical support to IndyMacs mortgage lending operations.
While our segments are structured to achieve synergies with our varying customer base and marketing strategies, our operating activities primarily consist of two broad categories: mortgage banking activities and investing activities. Both of these activities are performed to varying degrees by each of our main segments as shown in the tables that follow. Mortgage banking activities are characterized by high asset turnover (the production and sale of mortgage loans) and efficient utilization of capital but can be cyclical in nature depending on interest rates. Revenues generated by mortgage banking activities include gain on sale of mortgage loans, fee income and net spread (interest) income during the period loans are held pending sale. Investing activities tend to provide a source of revenues which is generally counter-cyclical to mortgage banking revenues, comprised primarily of net interest income and servicing fees. IndyMac is strategically focused on increasing the relative size of its portfolios of mortgage loans and HELOC loans held for investment and mortgage servicing to achieve greater balance between its mortgage banking activities and its core investing activities. We believe that our investing activities will increasingly act to stabilize IndyMacs core income. In addition to its revenue contribution, the Investment Portfolio Group performs the mortgage servicing function, which includes payment processing, customer service, default management and reporting to investors in our securitizations. The mortgage servicing function creates added opportunities to retain customers when the interest rate environment makes it attractive for them to refinance, and cross-market customers with other Company products. Default management, which includes the processes of collections, foreclosures, bankruptcies, claims, and foreclosed assets management, enables IndyMac to proactively manage credit risk for the Company and its investors in its securities.
The following tables summarize the Companys financial results for the three months ended September 30, 2003, illustrating the revenues earned in its mortgage banking activities and investing activities by each of its divisions. The profitability of each operating segment is measured on a fully-leveraged basis after allocating capital based on regulatory capital rules. The Company uses a fund transfer pricing (FTP) system to allocate net interest income to the operating segments. Each operating segment is allocated funding with maturities and interest rates matched with the expected lives, repricing frequencies and financing liquidities of the segments assets. The Retail Bank division within the Consumer Banking Group receives a funding credit for deposits using a similar methodology. The difference between these allocations and the Companys actual net interest income and capital levels resulting from centralized management of funding costs is reported in the Treasury unit. Corporate overhead costs related to managing the Company as a whole are not allocated to the operating segments.
4
The following table summarizes the segment financial highlights for the three months ended September 30, 2003:
Mortgage | Consumer | Investment | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||
Bank | Bank | Portfolio | Other | Company | ||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating Results
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage Banking Activities
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income
|
$ | 33,268 | $ | 6,683 | $ | 8,903 | $ | | $ | 48,854 | ||||||||||||||
Gain on sale of loans
|
96,238 | 33,509 | 16,293 | (24,542 | ) | 121,498 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other income
|
11,467 | 6,498 | | 44 | 18,009 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net revenues
|
140,973 | 46,690 | 25,196 | (24,498 | ) | 188,361 | ||||||||||||||||||
Operating expenses
|
42,700 | 19,213 | 408 | | 62,321 | |||||||||||||||||||
Pretax income
|
98,273 | 27,477 | 24,788 | (24,498 | ) | 126,040 | ||||||||||||||||||
Investing Activities
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income
|
16,926 | 3,644 | 19,142 | 1,107 | 40,819 | |||||||||||||||||||
Provision for loan losses
|
(712 | ) | (1,921 | ) | (3,564 | ) | (3 | ) | (6,200 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Service fee income
|
| | (13,971 | ) | 2,858 | (11,113 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Loss on sale of securities
|
| | (10,870 | ) | 2,223 | (8,647 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Other income
|
1,359 | 615 | 1,028 | 5 | 3,007 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net revenues
|
17,573 | 2,338 | (8,235 | ) | 6,190 | 17,866 | ||||||||||||||||||
Operating expenses
|
9,433 | 1,393 | 10,796 | 21,622 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Pretax income
|
8,140 | 945 | (19,031 | ) | 6,190 | (3,756 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Financing and Other Activities
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income
|
| 3,987 | | (11,207 | ) | (7,220 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Other income
|
| 538 | | 101 | 639 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net revenues
|
| 4,525 | | (11,106 | ) | (6,581 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Operating expenses
|
| 5,405 | | 28,142 | 33,547 | |||||||||||||||||||
Pretax income
|
| (880 | ) | (39,248 | ) | (40,128 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Total pretax income
|
106,413 | 27,542 | 5,757 | (57,556 | ) | 82,156 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net income
|
$ | 64,380 | $ | 16,663 | $ | 3,483 | $ | (34,822 | ) | $ | 49,704 | |||||||||||||
Ratios
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Percentage of assets
|
36.59 | % | 10.22 | % | 49.01 | % | 4.18 | % | 100 | % | ||||||||||||||
Percentage of total revenue
|
79.41 | % | 26.82 | % | 8.50 | % | (14.73 | )% | 100 | % | ||||||||||||||
Percentage of pretax income
|
129.53 | % | 33.52 | % | 7.01 | % | (70.06 | )% | 100 | % | ||||||||||||||
Balance Sheet Data
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average interest-earning assets
|
$ | 4,322,736 | $ | 1,174,783 | $ | 5,237,312 | $ | 284,369 | $ | 11,019,200 | ||||||||||||||
Average total assets
|
$ | 4,436,153 | $ | 1,239,312 | $ | 5,942,191 | $ | 507,338 | $ | 12,124,994 | ||||||||||||||
Allocated capital
|
$ | 283,076 | $ | 91,069 | $ | 360,719 | $ | 235,506 | $ | 970,370 | ||||||||||||||
Capital allocated to mortgage banking activities
|
$ | 154,803 | $ | 37,789 | $ | 35,588 | $ | | $ | 228,180 | ||||||||||||||
Capital allocated to investing activities
|
$ | 128,273 | $ | 51,970 | $ | 325,131 | $ | | $ | 505,374 | ||||||||||||||
Capital allocated to corporate & excess
|
$ | | $ | 1,310 | $ | | $ | 235,506 | $ | 236,816 | ||||||||||||||
Allocated capital/total average assets
|
6.38 | % | 7.35 | % | 6.07 | % | 46.42 | % | 8.00 | % | ||||||||||||||
Loans Produced
|
$ | 6,329,084 | $ | 1,940,863 | $ | 410,828 | $ | | $ | 8,680,775 | ||||||||||||||
Purchase mortgages
|
43 | % | 7 | % | | N/A | 36 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Cash out refinance mortgages
|
34 | % | 41 | % | | N/A | 35 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Rate and term refinance mortgages
|
23 | % | 52 | % | | N/A | 29 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Performance Ratios
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Return on equity (ROE)
|
90 | % | 73 | % | 4 | % | N/A | 20 | % | |||||||||||||||
ROE mortgage banking activities
|
152 | % | 175 | % | 167 | % | N/A | 133 | % | |||||||||||||||
ROE investing activities
|
15 | % | 4 | % | (14 | )% | N/A | (2 | )% | |||||||||||||||
ROE corporate
|
| (161 | )% | | N/A | (41 | )% | |||||||||||||||||
Return on assets (ROA)
|
5.76 | % | 5.33 | % | 0.23 | % | N/A | 1.63 | % | |||||||||||||||
Net interest margin
|
4.61 | % | 4.83 | % | 2.12 | % | N/A | 2.97 | % | |||||||||||||||
Efficiency ratio
|
33 | % | 47 | % | 55 | % | N/A | 57 | % | |||||||||||||||
Capital adjusted efficiency ratio
|
15 | % | 19 | % | 240 | % | N/A | 67 | % | |||||||||||||||
Average FTE
|
1,875 | 897 | 433 | 521 | 3,726 |
5
The following table provides additional detail on the segment results for IndyMac Mortgage Bank for the three months ended September 30, 2003:
Relationship Businesses | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
IndyMac Mortgage Bank | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
B2B | B2R | HCL | HBD | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating Results
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage Banking Activities
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income
|
$ | 27,369 | $ | 1,132 | $ | 4,014 | $ | 753 | $ | 33,268 | ||||||||||||||
Gain on sale of loans
|
84,724 | 4,548 | 4,916 | 2,050 | 96,238 | |||||||||||||||||||
Other income
|
8,943 | 807 | 1,522 | 195 | 11,467 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net revenues
|
121,036 | 6,487 | 10,452 | 2,998 | 140,973 | |||||||||||||||||||
Operating expenses
|
35,950 | 4,146 | 912 | 1,692 | 42,700 | |||||||||||||||||||
Pretax income
|
85,086 | 2,341 | 9,540 | 1,306 | 98,273 | |||||||||||||||||||
Investing Activities
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income
|
| | 9,739 | 7,187 | 16,926 | |||||||||||||||||||
Provision for loan losses
|
| | (400 | ) | (312 | ) | (712 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Service fee income
|
| | | | | |||||||||||||||||||
Loss on sale of securities
|
| | | | | |||||||||||||||||||
Other income
|
| | 1,159 | 200 | 1,359 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net revenues
|
| | 10,498 | 7,075 | 17,573 | |||||||||||||||||||
Operating expenses
|
| | 7,714 | 1,719 | 9,433 | |||||||||||||||||||
Pretax income
|
| | 2,784 | 5,356 | 8,140 | |||||||||||||||||||
Financing and Other Activities
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income
|
| | | | | |||||||||||||||||||
Other income
|
| | | | | |||||||||||||||||||
Net revenues
|
| | | | | |||||||||||||||||||
Operating expenses
|
| | | | | |||||||||||||||||||
Pretax income
|
| | | | | |||||||||||||||||||
Total pretax income
|
85,086 | 2,341 | 12,324 | 6,662 | 106,413 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net income
|
$ | 51,477 | $ | 1,416 | $ | 7,456 | $ | 4,031 | $ | 64,380 | ||||||||||||||
Ratios
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Percentage of assets
|
19.27 | % | 1.00 | % | 10.78 | % | 5.54 | % | 36.59 | % | ||||||||||||||
Percentage of total revenue
|
60.63 | % | 3.25 | % | 10.49 | % | 5.05 | % | 79.41 | % | ||||||||||||||
Percentage of pretax income
|
103.57 | % | 2.85 | % | 15.00 | % | 8.11 | % | 129.53 | % | ||||||||||||||
Balance Sheet Data
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average interest-earning assets
|
$ | 2,237,128 | $ | 115,726 | $ | 1,303,881 | $ | 666,001 | $ | 4,322,736 | ||||||||||||||
Average total assets
|
$ | 2,336,410 | $ | 121,129 | $ | 1,307,059 | $ | 671,555 | $ | 4,436,153 | ||||||||||||||
Allocated capital
|
$ | 139,112 | $ | 6,714 | $ | 70,858 | $ | 66,392 | $ | 283,076 | ||||||||||||||
Capital allocated to mortgage banking activities
|
$ | 139,112 | $ | 6,714 | $ | 4,744 | $ | 4,233 | $ | 154,803 | ||||||||||||||
Capital allocated to investing activities
|
$ | | $ | | $ | 66,114 | $ | 62,159 | $ | 128,273 | ||||||||||||||
Capital allocated to corporate & excess
|
$ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | ||||||||||||||
Allocated capital/total average assets
|
5.95 | % | 5.54 | % | 5.42 | % | 9.89 | % | 6.38 | % | ||||||||||||||
Loans Produced
|
$ | 4,891,082 | $ | 302,654 | $ | 821,238 | $ | 314,110 | $ | 6,329,084 | ||||||||||||||
Purchase mortgages
|
33 | % | 29 | % | 98 | % | 74 | % | 43 | % | ||||||||||||||
Cash out refinance mortgages
|
41 | % | 34 | % | 0 | % | 14 | % | 34 | % | ||||||||||||||
Rate and term refinance mortgages
|
26 | % | 37 | % | 2 | % | 12 | % | 23 | % | ||||||||||||||
Performance Ratios
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Return on equity (ROE)
|
147 | % | 84 | % | 42 | % | 24 | % | 90 | % | ||||||||||||||
ROE mortgage banking activities
|
147 | % | 84 | % | 483 | % | 74 | % | 152 | % | ||||||||||||||
ROE investing activities
|
| | 10 | % | 21 | % | 15 | % | ||||||||||||||||
ROE corporate
|
| | | | | |||||||||||||||||||
Return on assets (ROA)
|
8.74 | % | 4.64 | % | 2.26 | % | 2.38 | % | 5.76 | % | ||||||||||||||
Net interest margin
|
4.85 | % | 3.88 | % | 4.18 | % | 4.73 | % | 4.61 | % | ||||||||||||||
Efficiency ratio
|
30 | % | 64 | % | 40 | % | 33 | % | 33 | % | ||||||||||||||
Capital adjusted efficiency ratio
|
9 | % | 17 | % | 34 | % | 52 | % | 15 | % | ||||||||||||||
Average FTE
|
1,355 | 171 | 228 | 121 | 1,875 |
IndyMac Mortgage Bank Divisions | ||
B2B
|
Business-to-Business division, whose major lending channels are mortgage brokers and bankers | |
B2R
|
Business-to-Realtor division, whose lending customers are realtors | |
HCL
|
Home Construction Lending division, whose primary customers are individuals who are in the process of building their own homes and mortgage brokers | |
HBD
|
Homebuilder division, whose customers are mainly subdivision developers |
6
The following table provides additional details on the segment results for IndyMac Consumer Bank for the three months ended September 30, 2003:
Consumer Direct Businesses IndyMac Consumer Bank | ||||||||||||||||||||
Retail | ||||||||||||||||||||
B2C | HELOC | Bank | Total | |||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Operating Results
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage Banking Activities
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income
|
$ | 6,109 | $ | | $ | 574 | $ | 6,683 | ||||||||||||
Gain on sale of loans
|
31,151 | | 2,358 | 33,509 | ||||||||||||||||
Other income
|
6,219 | | 279 | 6,498 | ||||||||||||||||
Net revenues
|
43,479 | | 3,211 | 46,690 | ||||||||||||||||
Operating expenses
|
17,809 | | 1,404 | 19,213 | ||||||||||||||||
Pretax income
|
25,670 | | 1,807 | 27,477 | ||||||||||||||||
Investing Activities
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income
|
| 3,644 | | 3,644 | ||||||||||||||||
Provision for loan losses
|
| (1,921 | ) | | (1,921 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Service fee income
|
| | | | ||||||||||||||||
Loss on sale of securities
|
| | | | ||||||||||||||||
Other income
|
| 615 | | 615 | ||||||||||||||||
Net revenues
|
| 2,338 | | 2,338 | ||||||||||||||||
Operating expenses
|
| 1,393 | | 1,393 | ||||||||||||||||
Pretax income
|
| 945 | | 945 | ||||||||||||||||
Financing and Other Activities
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income
|
| | 3,987 | 3,987 | ||||||||||||||||
Other income
|
| | 538 | 538 | ||||||||||||||||
Net revenues
|
| | 4,525 | 4,525 | ||||||||||||||||
Operating expenses
|
| | 5,405 | 5,405 | ||||||||||||||||
Pretax income
|
| | (880 | ) | (880 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Total pretax income
|
25,670 | 945 | 927 | 27,542 | ||||||||||||||||
Net income
|
$ | 15,530 | $ | 572 | $ | 561 | $ | 16,663 | ||||||||||||
Ratios
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Percentage of assets
|
5.03 | % | 4.46 | % | 0.73 | % | 10.22 | % | ||||||||||||
Percentage of total revenue
|
21.78 | % | 1.17 | % | 3.87 | % | 26.82 | % | ||||||||||||
Percentage of pretax income
|
31.25 | % | 1.15 | % | 1.13 | % | 33.52 | % | ||||||||||||
Balance Sheet Data
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Average interest-earning assets
|
$ | 579,195 | $ | 532,186 | $ | 63,402 | $ | 1,174,783 | ||||||||||||
Average total assets
|
$ | 609,372 | $ | 541,349 | $ | 88,591 | $ | 1,239,312 | ||||||||||||
Allocated capital
|
$ | 34,462 | $ | 51,970 | $ | 4,637 | $ | 91,069 | ||||||||||||
Capital allocated to mortgage banking activities
|
$ | 34,462 | $ | | $ | 3,327 | $ | 37,789 | ||||||||||||
Capital allocated to investing activities
|
$ | | $ | 51,970 | $ | | $ | 51,970 | ||||||||||||
Capital allocated to corporate & excess
|
$ | | $ | | $ | 1,310 | $ | 1,310 | ||||||||||||
Allocated capital/total average assets
|
5.66 | % | 9.60 | % | 5.23 | % | 7.35 | % | ||||||||||||
Loans Produced(1)
|
$ | 1,533,119 | $ | 263,802 | $ | 143,942 | $ | 1,940,863 | ||||||||||||
Purchase mortgages
|
5 | % | N/A | 23 | % | 7 | % | |||||||||||||
Cash out refinance mortgages
|
43 | % | N/A | 27 | % | 41 | % | |||||||||||||
Rate and term refinance mortgages
|
52 | % | N/A | 50 | % | 52 | % | |||||||||||||
Performance Ratios
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Return on equity (ROE)
|
179 | % | 4 | % | 48 | % | 73 | % | ||||||||||||
ROE mortgage banking activities
|
179 | % | | 130 | % | 175 | % | |||||||||||||
ROE investing activities
|
| 4 | % | | 4 | % | ||||||||||||||
ROE corporate
|
| | (161 | )% | (161 | )% | ||||||||||||||
Return on assets (ROA)
|
10.11 | % | 0.42 | % | N/A | 5.33 | % | |||||||||||||
Net interest margin
|
4.18 | % | 2.72 | % | N/A | 4.83 | % | |||||||||||||
Efficiency ratio
|
41 | % | 33 | % | 88 | % | 47 | % | ||||||||||||
Capital adjusted efficiency ratio
|
8 | % | 100 | % | 13 | % | 19 | % | ||||||||||||
Average FTE
|
650 | 12 | 235 | 897 |
IndyMac Consumer Bank Divisions | ||
B2C
|
Business-to-Consumer division, offers direct lending to consumers | |
HELOC
|
Home Equity Line of Credit division, provides home equity lines of credit and seconds to consumers | |
Retail Bank
|
Retail Bank division, offers direct lending and deposit products to our depositors through our retail branch network |
(1) | All HELOC products produced by the business units during the third quarter of 2003 were consolidated into the HELOC division for segment reporting. |
7
The following table provides additional details on the segment results for the Investment Portfolio Group for the three months ended September 30, 2003:
Investment Portfolio Group | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Servicing- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Related | Whole | Discontinued | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Assets(1) | Loans(2) | MBS(3) | Products(4) | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating Results
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage Banking Activities
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income
|
$ | 8,903 | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 8,903 | ||||||||||||||
Gain on sale of loans
|
16,293 | | | | 16,293 | |||||||||||||||||||
Other income
|
| | | | | |||||||||||||||||||
Net revenues
|
25,196 | | | | 25,196 | |||||||||||||||||||
Operating expenses
|
408 | | | | 408 | |||||||||||||||||||
Pretax income
|
24,788 | | | | 24,788 | |||||||||||||||||||
Investing Activities
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income
|
11,104 | 5,535 | 1,158 | 1,345 | 19,142 | |||||||||||||||||||
Provision for loan losses
|
| (1,464 | ) | | (2,100 | ) | (3,564 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Service fee income
|
(13,971 | ) | | | | (13,971 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Loss on sale of securities
|
(10,870 | ) | | | | (10,870 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Other income
|
539 | 489 | | | 1,028 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net revenues
|
(13,198 | ) | 4,560 | 1,158 | (755 | ) | (8,235 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Operating expenses
|
9,253 | 605 | 126 | 812 | 10,796 | |||||||||||||||||||
Pretax income
|
(22,451 | ) | 3,955 | 1,032 | (1,567 | ) | (19,031 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Financing and Other Activities
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income
|
| | | | | |||||||||||||||||||
Other income
|
| | | | | |||||||||||||||||||
Net revenues
|
| | | | | |||||||||||||||||||
Operating expenses
|
| | | | | |||||||||||||||||||
Pretax income
|
| | | | | |||||||||||||||||||
Total pretax income
|
2,337 | 3,955 | 1,032 | (1,567 | ) | 5,757 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net income
|
$ | 1,414 | $ | 2,393 | $ | 624 | $ | (948 | ) | $ | 3,483 | |||||||||||||
Ratios
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Percentage of assets
|
15.41 | % | 22.87 | % | 10.13 | % | 0.60 | % | 49.01 | % | ||||||||||||||
Percentage of total revenue
|
6.01 | % | 2.28 | % | 0.58 | % | (0.38 | )% | 8.50 | % | ||||||||||||||
Percentage of pretax income
|
2.84 | % | 4.81 | % | 1.26 | % | (1.91 | )% | 7.01 | % | ||||||||||||||
Balance Sheet Data
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average interest-earning assets
|
$ | 1,275,519 | $ | 2,774,522 | $ | 1,106,943 | $ | 80,328 | $ | 5,237,312 | ||||||||||||||
Average total assets
|
$ | 1,868,091 | $ | 2,773,516 | $ | 1,228,041 | $ | 72,543 | $ | 5,942,191 | ||||||||||||||
Allocated capital
|
$ | 196,584 | $ | 120,265 | $ | 36,841 | $ | 7,029 | $ | 360,719 | ||||||||||||||
Capital allocated to mortgage banking activities
|
$ | 35,588 | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 35,588 | ||||||||||||||
Capital allocated to investing activities
|
$ | 160,996 | $ | 120,265 | $ | 36,841 | $ | 7,029 | $ | 325,131 | ||||||||||||||
Allocated capital/total average assets
|
10.52 | % | 4.34 | % | 3.00 | % | 9.69 | % | 6.07 | % | ||||||||||||||
Loans Produced
|
$ | 410,828 | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 410,828 | ||||||||||||||
Performance Ratios
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Return on equity (ROE)
|
3 | % | 8 | % | 7 | % | (54 | )% | 4 | % | ||||||||||||||
ROE-mortgage banking activities
|
167 | % | N/A | N/A | N/A | 167 | % | |||||||||||||||||
ROE-investing activities
|
(33 | )% | 8 | % | 7 | % | (54 | )% | (14 | )% | ||||||||||||||
Return on assets (ROA)
|
0.30 | % | 0.34 | % | 0.20 | % | (5.18 | )% | 0.23 | % | ||||||||||||||
Net interest margin
|
6.22 | % | 0.79 | % | 0.42 | % | 6.64 | % | 2.12 | % | ||||||||||||||
Efficiency ratio
|
81 | % | 10 | % | 11 | % | 60 | % | 55 | % | ||||||||||||||
Capital adjusted efficiency ratio
|
330 | % | 50 | % | 87 | % | 79 | % | 240 | % | ||||||||||||||
Average FTE
|
387 | 6 | 6 | 33 | 433 |
(1) | Mortgage servicing-related assets include the following: (i) MSRs, interest-only strips and residual securities, (ii) securities held as hedges of such assets, including principal-only securities and U.S. treasury bonds, (iii) loans acquired through clean-up calls or through the Investment Portfolio Groups other customer retention programs, and (iv) non-investment grade securities. |
(2) | Assets include all single-family residential loans held for investment other than discontinued products. |
(3) | Assets include AAA-rated agency and private label MBS portfolio and other investment grade bonds. |
(4) | Discontinued products are home improvement and manufactured housing loans. |
8
The following table provides additional details on the segment results for all others for the three months ended September 30, 2003:
Treasury | Corporate | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Group(1) | Subtotal | Overhead | Eliminations | Company | ||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating Results
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage Banking Activities
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income
|
$ | | $ | 48,854 | $ | | $ | | $ | 48,854 | ||||||||||||||
Gain on sale of loans
|
| 146,040 | | (24,542 | ) | 121,498 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other income
|
| 17,965 | | 44 | 18,009 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net revenues
|
| 212,859 | | (24,498 | ) | 188,361 | ||||||||||||||||||
Operating expenses
|
| 62,321 | | | 62,321 | |||||||||||||||||||
Pretax income
|
| 150,538 | | (24,498 | ) | 126,040 | ||||||||||||||||||
Investing Activities
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income
|
| 39,712 | | 1,107 | 40,819 | |||||||||||||||||||
Provision for loan losses
|
| (6,197 | ) | | (3 | ) | (6,200 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Service fee income
|
| (13,971 | ) | | 2,858 | (11,113 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Loss on sale of securities
|
| (10,870 | ) | | 2,223 | (8,647 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Other income
|
| 3,002 | 5 | | 3,007 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net revenues
|
| 11,676 | 5 | 6,185 | 17,866 | |||||||||||||||||||
Operating expenses
|
| 21,622 | | | 21,622 | |||||||||||||||||||
Pretax income
|
| (9,946 | ) | 5 | 6,185 | (3,756 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Financing and Other Activities
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income
|
(11,064 | ) | (7,077 | ) | (143 | ) | | (7,220 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Other income
|
98 | 636 | | 3 | 639 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net revenues
|
(10,966 | ) | (6,441 | ) | (143 | ) | 3 | (6,581 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Operating expenses
|
782 | 6,187 | 27,360 | | 33,547 | |||||||||||||||||||
Pretax income
|
(11,748 | ) | (12,628 | ) | (27,503 | ) | 3 | (40,128 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Total pretax income
|
(11,748 | ) | 127,964 | (27,498 | ) | (18,310 | ) | 82,156 | ||||||||||||||||
Net income
|
$ | (7,108 | ) | $ | 77,418 | $ | (16,636 | ) | $ | (11,078 | ) | $ | 49,704 | |||||||||||
Ratios
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Percentage of assets
|
3.06 | % | 98.88 | % | 1.12 | % | 0.00 | % | 100 | % | ||||||||||||||
Percentage of total revenue
|
(5.49 | )% | 109.24 | % | (0.07 | )% | (9.17 | )% | 100 | % | ||||||||||||||
Percentage of pretax income
|
(14.30 | )% | 155.76 | % | (33.47 | )% | (22.29 | )% | 100 | % | ||||||||||||||
Balance Sheet Data
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average interest-earning assets
|
$ | 250,083 | $ | 10,984,914 | $ | 34,286 | $ | | $ | 11,019,200 | ||||||||||||||
Average total assets
|
$ | 371,528 | $ | 11,989,184 | $ | 135,810 | $ | | $ | 12,124,994 | ||||||||||||||
Allocated capital
|
$ | 18,606 | $ | 753,470 | $ | 216,900 | $ | | $ | 970,370 | ||||||||||||||
Capital allocated to mortgage banking
|
$ | | $ | 228,180 | $ | | $ | | $ | 228,180 | ||||||||||||||
Capital allocated to investing activities
|
$ | | $ | 505,374 | $ | | $ | | $ | 505,374 | ||||||||||||||
Capital allocated to corporate & excess
|
$ | 18,606 | $ | 19,916 | $ | 216,900 | $ | | $ | 236,816 | ||||||||||||||
Allocated capital/total average assets
|
5.01 | % | 6.28 | % | 159.71 | % | | 8.00 | % | |||||||||||||||
Loans Produced
|
$ | | $ | 8,680,775 | $ | | $ | | $ | 8,680,775 | ||||||||||||||
Purchase mortgages
|
N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 36 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
Cash out refinance mortgages
|
N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 35 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
Rate and term refinance mortgages
|
N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 29 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
Performance Ratios
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Return on equity (ROE)
|
N/A | 41 | % | N/A | N/A | 20 | % | |||||||||||||||||
ROE mortgage banking
|
N/A | 158 | % | N/A | N/A | 133 | % | |||||||||||||||||
ROE investing activities
|
N/A | (5 | )% | N/A | N/A | (2 | )% | |||||||||||||||||
ROE corporate
|
N/A | (152 | )% | N/A | N/A | (41 | )% | |||||||||||||||||
Return on assets (ROA)
|
N/A | 2.56 | % | N/A | N/A | 1.63 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Net interest margin
|
N/A | 2.94 | % | N/A | N/A | 2.97 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Efficiency ratio
|
N/A | 40 | % | N/A | N/A | 57 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Capital adjusted efficiency ratio
|
N/A | 34 | % | N/A | N/A | 67 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Average FTE
|
23 | 3,228 | 498 | N/A | 3,726 |
(1) | During the three months ended September 30, 2003, the Treasury Group reported net interest expense of $11 million. This loss includes interest expenses related to the trust preferred securities issued by the Company in November 2001 and July 2003, the vast majority of which is not allocated to the business units. The Treasury Group also credits the Retail Bank and Investment Portfolio Group amounts in addition to their normal FTP credit to reward their raising of core deposits. Additionally, the net expense in Treasury reflects fixed rate liabilities assumed in prior years with maturities longer than the related assets and the subsequent decline in net interest income as interest rates fell. |
9
The following table compares the quarterly detail segment results of operations by period:
Relationship Businesses | ||||||||||||||||||||
IndyMac Mortgage Bank | ||||||||||||||||||||
B2B | B2R | HCL | HBD | Total | ||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage Banking Activities
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Q3 03 Pretax income
|
$ | 85,086 | $ | 2,341 | $ | 9,540 | $ | 1,306 | $ | 98,273 | ||||||||||
Q2 03 Pretax income
|
60,634 | 1,074 | 7,994 | 1,254 | 70,956 | |||||||||||||||
Annualized Variance Percent
|
161 | % | 472 | % | 77 | % | 17 | % | 154 | % | ||||||||||
Q3 02 Pretax income
|
52,413 | 305 | 10,307 | (579 | ) | 62,446 | ||||||||||||||
Variance Percent
|
62 | % | 668 | % | (7 | )% | NM | 57 | % | |||||||||||
Investing Activities
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Q3 03 Pretax income
|
| | 2,784 | 5,356 | 8,140 | |||||||||||||||
Q2 03 Pretax income
|
| | 3,690 | 6,270 | 9,960 | |||||||||||||||
Annualized Variance Percent
|
NM | NM | (98 | )% | (58 | )% | (73 | )% | ||||||||||||
Q3 02 Pretax income
|
| | 3,771 | 6,096 | 9,867 | |||||||||||||||
Variance Percent
|
NM | NM | (26 | )% | (12 | )% | (18 | )% | ||||||||||||
Financing and Other Activities
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Q3 03 Pretax income
|
| | | | | |||||||||||||||
Q2 03 Pretax income
|
| | | | | |||||||||||||||
Q3 02 Pretax income
|
| | | | | |||||||||||||||
Net Income
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Q3 03 Net Income
|
51,477 | 1,416 | 7,456 | 4,031 | 64,380 | |||||||||||||||
Q2 03 Net Income
|
36,684 | 650 | 7,069 | 4,552 | 48,955 | |||||||||||||||
Annualized Variance Percent
|
161 | % | 471 | % | 22 | % | (46 | )% | 126 | % | ||||||||||
Q3 02 Net Income
|
31,709 | 184 | 8,516 | 3,338 | 43,747 | |||||||||||||||
Variance Percent
|
62 | % | 670 | % | (12 | )% | 21 | % | 47 | % | ||||||||||
Performance Ratios
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Q3 03
|
||||||||||||||||||||
ROE
|
147 | % | 84 | % | 42 | % | 24 | % | 90 | % | ||||||||||
ROA
|
8.74 | % | 4.64 | % | 2.26 | % | 2.38 | % | 5.76 | % | ||||||||||
NIM
|
4.85 | % | 3.88 | % | 4.18 | % | 4.73 | % | 4.61 | % | ||||||||||
Efficiency ratio
|
30 | % | 64 | % | 40 | % | 33 | % | 33 | % | ||||||||||
Capital adjusted efficiency ratio
|
9 | % | 17 | % | 34 | % | 52 | % | 15 | % | ||||||||||
Average FTE
|
1,355 | 171 | 228 | 121 | 1,875 | |||||||||||||||
Q2 03
|
||||||||||||||||||||
ROE
|
106 | % | 45 | % | 45 | % | 26 | % | 71 | % | ||||||||||
ROA
|
6.55 | % | 2.59 | % | 2.47 | % | 2.73 | % | 4.71 | % | ||||||||||
NIM
|
4.50 | % | 4.04 | % | 4.26 | % | 4.91 | % | 4.49 | % | ||||||||||
Efficiency ratio
|
34 | % | 79 | % | 37 | % | 21 | % | 36 | % | ||||||||||
Capital adjusted efficiency ratio
|
13 | % | 22 | % | 30 | % | 37 | % | 19 | % | ||||||||||
Average FTE
|
1,231 | 158 | 204 | 101 | 1,694 | |||||||||||||||
Q3 02
|
||||||||||||||||||||
ROE
|
146 | % | 23 | % | 67 | % | 16 | % | 78 | % | ||||||||||
ROA
|
8.19 | % | 1.31 | % | 3.54 | % | 1.82 | % | 5.30 | % | ||||||||||
NIM
|
4.55 | % | 4.06 | % | 4.15 | % | 5.01 | % | 4.53 | % | ||||||||||
Efficiency ratio
|
32 | % | 90 | % | 30 | % | 45 | % | 35 | % | ||||||||||
Capital adjusted efficiency ratio
|
9 | % | 24 | % | 20 | % | 93 | % | 18 | % | ||||||||||
Average FTE
|
1,010 | 93 | 170 | 134 | 1,407 |
The Mortgage Bank segments net income, from both mortgage banking and investing activities, grew by an annualized rate of 126% since second quarter 2003. This increase was primarily related to the higher volume of loans sold and the resulting gains recognized. The gain on sale of loan margin increased from 1.61% in the second quarter 2003 to 1.82% in the third quarter 2003. Compared with third quarter 2002, the Mortgage Bank segments net income grew 47% year over year, primarily due to 49% increase in production volume from prior year.
10
The following table compares the quarterly detail segment results of operations by period, continued:
Consumer Direct Businesses | ||||||||||||||||
IndyMac Consumer Bank | ||||||||||||||||
B2C | HELOC | Retail Bank | Total | |||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Mortgage Banking Activities
|
||||||||||||||||
Q3 03 Pretax income
|
$ | 25,670 | $ | | $ | 1,807 | $ | 27,477 | ||||||||
Q2 03 Pretax income
|
22,789 | | 1,363 | 24,152 | ||||||||||||
Annualized Variance Percent
|
51 | % | NM | 130 | % | 55 | % | |||||||||
Q3 02 Pretax income
|
11,863 | | 406 | 12,269 | ||||||||||||
Variance Percent
|
116 | % | NM | 345 | % | 124 | % | |||||||||
Investing Activities
|
||||||||||||||||
Q3 03 Pretax income
|
| 945 | | 945 | ||||||||||||
Q2 03 Pretax income
|
| 1,313 | | 1,313 | ||||||||||||
Annualized Variance Percent
|
NM | (112 | )% | NM | (112 | )% | ||||||||||
Q3 02 Pretax income
|
| 1,156 | | 1,156 | ||||||||||||
Variance Percent
|
NM | (18 | )% | NM | (18 | )% | ||||||||||
Financing and Other Activities
|
||||||||||||||||
Q3 03 Pretax income
|
| | (880 | ) | (880 | ) | ||||||||||
Q2 03 Pretax income
|
| | (2,404 | ) | (2,404 | ) | ||||||||||
Q3 02 Pretax income
|
| | (2,216 | ) | (2,216 | ) | ||||||||||
Net Income
|
||||||||||||||||
Q3 03 Net Income
|
15,530 | 572 | 561 | 16,663 | ||||||||||||
Q2 03 Net Income
|
13,787 | 794 | (630 | ) | 13,951 | |||||||||||
Annualized Variance Percent
|
51 | % | (112 | )% | NM | 78 | % | |||||||||
Q3 02 Net Income
|
7,177 | 700 | (1,094 | ) | 6,783 | |||||||||||
Variance Percent
|
116 | % | (18 | )% | NM | 146 | % | |||||||||
Performance Ratios
|
||||||||||||||||
Q3 03
|
||||||||||||||||
ROE
|
179 | % | 4 | % | 48 | % | 73 | % | ||||||||
ROA
|
10.11 | % | 0.42 | % | | 5.33 | % | |||||||||
NIM
|
4.18 | % | 2.72 | % | | 4.83 | % | |||||||||
Efficiency ratio
|
41 | % | 33 | % | 88 | % | 47 | % | ||||||||
Capital adjusted efficiency ratio
|
8 | % | 100 | % | 13 | % | 19 | % | ||||||||
Average FTE
|
650 | 12 | 235 | 897 | ||||||||||||
Q2 03
|
||||||||||||||||
ROE
|
163 | % | 7 | % | NM | 66 | % | |||||||||
ROA
|
9.42 | % | 0.72 | % | NM | 5.06 | % | |||||||||
NIM
|
4.17 | % | 2.89 | % | NM | 4.45 | % | |||||||||
Efficiency ratio
|
43 | % | 24 | % | NM | 50 | % | |||||||||
Capital adjusted efficiency ratio
|
9 | % | 72 | % | NM | 22 | % | |||||||||
Average FTE
|
622 | 11 | 219 | 852 | ||||||||||||
Q3 02
|
||||||||||||||||
ROE
|
135 | % | 13 | % | NM | 55 | % | |||||||||
ROA
|
7.59 | % | 1.35 | % | NM | 4.31 | % | |||||||||
NIM
|
4.06 | % | 3.48 | % | NM | 5.59 | % | |||||||||
Efficiency ratio
|
56 | % | 35 | % | NM | 65 | % | |||||||||
Capital adjusted efficiency ratio
|
11 | % | 101 | % | NM | 24 | % | |||||||||
Average FTE
|
421 | 7 | 183 | 611 |
The Consumer Bank segments net income was up $2.7 million compared with the second quarter of 2003 and was up $9.9 million versus last years third quarter. These increases were largely due to the higher levels of mortgages produced and sold. The Consumer Banks loan production increased at an annualized rate of 21% over the second quarter of this year, and grew 87% compared to the prior year.
11
The following table compares the quarterly detail segment results of operations by period, continued:
Investment Portfolio Group | ||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage | ||||||||||||||||||||
Servicing- | ||||||||||||||||||||
Related | Whole | Discontinued | ||||||||||||||||||
Assets | Loans | MBS | Products | Total | ||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage Banking Activities
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Q3 03 Pretax income
|
$ | 24,788 | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 24,788 | ||||||||||
Q2 03 Pretax income
|
15,901 | 2,732 | | | 18,633 | |||||||||||||||
Annualized Variance Percent
|
224 | % | NM | NM | NM | 132 | % | |||||||||||||
Q3 02 Pretax income
|
| 12,670 | | | 12,670 | |||||||||||||||
Variance Percent
|
100 | % | (100 | )% | NM | NM | 96 | % | ||||||||||||
Investing Activities
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Q3 03 Pretax income
|
(22,451 | ) | 3,955 | 1,032 | (1,567 | ) | (19,031 | ) | ||||||||||||
Q2 03 Pretax income
|
(13,596 | ) | 3,313 | (1,427 | ) | (1,210 | ) | (12,920 | ) | |||||||||||
Annualized Variance Percent
|
261 | % | 78 | % | 689 | % | 118 | % | (189 | )% | ||||||||||
Q3 02 Pretax income
|
8,634 | 3,570 | 1,580 | (145 | ) | 13,639 | ||||||||||||||
Variance Percent
|
(360 | )% | 11 | % | (35 | )% | NM | (240 | )% | |||||||||||
Financing and Other Activities
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Q3 03 Pretax income
|
| | | | | |||||||||||||||
Q2 03 Pretax income
|
| | | | | |||||||||||||||
Q3 02 Pretax income
|
| | | | | |||||||||||||||
Net Income
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Q3 03 Net Income
|
1,414 | 2,393 | 624 | (948 | ) | 3,483 | ||||||||||||||
Q2 03 Net Income
|
1,395 | 3,657 | (863 | ) | (733 | ) | 3,456 | |||||||||||||
Annualized Variance Percent
|
5 | % | (138 | )% | 689 | % | 117 | % | 3 | % | ||||||||||
Q3 02 Net Income
|
5,224 | 9,825 | 956 | (88 | ) | 15,917 | ||||||||||||||
Variance Percent
|
(73 | )% | (76 | )% | (35 | )% | 977 | % | (78 | )% | ||||||||||
Performance Ratios
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Q3 03
|
||||||||||||||||||||
ROE
|
3 | % | 8 | % | 7 | % | (54 | )% | 4 | % | ||||||||||
ROA
|
0.30 | % | 0.34 | % | 0.20 | % | (5.18 | )% | 0.23 | % | ||||||||||
NIM
|
6.22 | % | 0.79 | % | 0.42 | % | 6.64 | % | 2.12 | % | ||||||||||
Efficiency ratio
|
81 | % | 10 | % | 11 | % | 60 | % | 55 | % | ||||||||||
Capital adjusted efficiency ratio
|
330 | % | 50 | % | 87 | % | 79 | % | 240 | % | ||||||||||
Average FTE
|
387 | 6 | 6 | 33 | 433 | |||||||||||||||
Q2 03
|
||||||||||||||||||||
ROE
|
3 | % | 13 | % | (9 | )% | (38 | )% | 4 | % | ||||||||||
ROA
|
0.45 | % | 0.57 | % | (0.27 | )% | (3.72 | )% | 0.27 | % | ||||||||||
NIM
|
7.40 | % | 1.04 | % | (1.01 | )% | 7.05 | % | 1.65 | % | ||||||||||
Efficiency ratio
|
80 | % | 7 | % | (15 | )% | 55 | % | 50 | % | ||||||||||
Capital adjusted efficiency ratio
|
343 | % | 21 | % | 121 | % | 69 | % | 212 | % | ||||||||||
Average FTE
|
382 | 8 | 6 | 34 | 430 | |||||||||||||||
Q3 02
|
||||||||||||||||||||
ROE
|
14 | % | 48 | % | 12 | % | (3 | )% | 23 | % | ||||||||||
ROA
|
1.77 | % | 2.93 | % | 0.27 | % | (0.28 | )% | 1.57 | % | ||||||||||
NIM
|
4.48 | % | 1.69 | % | 0.51 | % | 4.73 | % | 1.95 | % | ||||||||||
Efficiency ratio
|
45 | % | 2 | % | 7 | % | 36 | % | 22 | % | ||||||||||
Capital adjusted efficiency ratio
|
109 | % | 3 | % | 35 | % | 53 | % | 40 | % | ||||||||||
Average FTE
|
370 | 8 | 6 | 41 | 425 |
The Investment Portfolio Group segments net income in the third quarter of 2003 declined slightly in comparison to the second quarter of 2003 and declined $12.4 million in comparison to the third quarter of 2002. These decreases are primarily the result of reduction in earnings related to the segments investment in mortgage servicing and related assets and spread compression in its whole loan and MBS portfolios. Interest rates at 45-year lows have resulted in significant mortgage refinancing causing the underlying mortgages to prepay quickly, which created accelerated amortization and impairment of the servicing-related assets. Partially offsetting the decline in servicing fee income were gains on the sale of mortgage loans obtained through the exercise of the Companys right as the master servicer on mortgage-backed securities to call loans at par when the balance of the pool of loans sold falls below 10% of the original pool balance and other loan sale activities. These called loans have higher coupons than prevailing market rates and the Company is then able to resell these loans at gains. This right to call the loans serves as a partial hedge on the servicing investments in this period of intense prepayment activity. In addition, gains generated through customer retention programs implemented in the third quarter 2003, also mitigated the negative impact of rapid prepayments. Investment portfolio retention gains do not include portfolio refinancing volume generated through the B2C channel.
12
The following table compares the quarterly detail segment results of operations by period, continued:
Treasury | Corporate | Total | ||||||||||||||||||
Group | Subtotal | Overhead | Eliminations | Company | ||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage Banking Activities
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Q3 03 Pretax income
|
$ | | $ | 150,538 | $ | | $ | (24,498 | ) | $ | 126,040 | |||||||||
Q2 03 Pretax income
|
| 113,741 | | (9,796 | ) | 103,945 | ||||||||||||||
Annualized Variance Percent
|
NM | 129 | % | NM | 600 | % | 85 | % | ||||||||||||
Q3 02 Pretax income
|
| 87,385 | (106 | ) | (19,406 | ) | 67,873 | |||||||||||||
Variance Percent
|
NM | 72 | % | NM | 26 | % | 86 | % | ||||||||||||
Investing Activities
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Q3 03 Pretax income
|
| (9,946 | ) | 5 | 6,185 | (3,756 | ) | |||||||||||||
Q2 03 Pretax income
|
| (1,647 | ) | 105 | 2,696 | 1,154 | ||||||||||||||
Annualized Variance Percent
|
NM | (2,016 | )% | (381 | )% | 518 | % | (1,702 | )% | |||||||||||
Q3 02 Pretax income
|
| 24,662 | 5 | 4,907 | 29,574 | |||||||||||||||
Variance Percent
|
NM | (140 | )% | | 26 | % | (113 | )% | ||||||||||||
Financing and Other Activities
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Q3 03 Pretax income
|
(11,748 | ) | (12,628 | ) | (27,503 | ) | 3 | (40,128 | ) | |||||||||||
Q2 03 Pretax income
|
(10,308 | ) | (12,712 | ) | (24,017 | ) | 8 | (36,721 | ) | |||||||||||
Q3 02 Pretax income
|
(13,990 | ) | (16,206 | ) | (19,747 | ) | | (35,953 | ) | |||||||||||
Net Income
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Q3 03 Net Income
|
(7,108 | ) | 77,418 | (16,636 | ) | (11,078 | ) | 49,704 | ||||||||||||
Q2 03 Net Income
|
(6,236 | ) | 60,126 | (14,467 | ) | (4,290 | ) | 41,369 | ||||||||||||
Annualized Variance Percent
|
(56 | )% | 115 | % | 60 | % | 633 | % | 81 | % | ||||||||||
Q3 02 Net Income
|
(8,464 | ) | 57,983 | (12,008 | ) | (8,771 | ) | 37,204 | ||||||||||||
Variance Percent
|
(16 | )% | 34 | % | 39 | % | 26 | % | 34 | % | ||||||||||
Performance Ratios
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Q3 03
|
||||||||||||||||||||
ROE
|
| 41 | % | | | 20 | % | |||||||||||||
ROA
|
| 2.56 | % | | | 1.63 | % | |||||||||||||
NIM
|
| 2.94 | % | | | 2.97 | % | |||||||||||||
Efficiency ratio
|
| 40 | % | | | 57 | % | |||||||||||||
Capital adjusted efficiency ratio
|
| 34 | % | | | 67 | % | |||||||||||||
Average FTE
|
23 | 3,228 | 498 | | 3,726 | |||||||||||||||
Q2 03
|
||||||||||||||||||||
ROE
|
| 33 | % | | | 18 | % | |||||||||||||
ROA
|
| 2.24 | % | | | 1.52 | % | |||||||||||||
NIM
|
| 2.67 | % | | | 2.73 | % | |||||||||||||
Efficiency ratio
|
| 43 | % | | | 58 | % | |||||||||||||
Capital adjusted efficiency ratio
|
| 42 | % | | | 73 | % | |||||||||||||
Average FTE
|
23 | 2,999 | 506 | | 3,505 | |||||||||||||||
Q3 02
|
||||||||||||||||||||
ROE
|
| 41 | % | | | 17 | % | |||||||||||||
ROA
|
| 2.86 | % | | | 1.82 | % | |||||||||||||
NIM
|
| 2.62 | % | | | 2.71 | % | |||||||||||||
Efficiency ratio
|
| 41 | % | | | 58 | % | |||||||||||||
Capital adjusted efficiency ratio
|
| 34 | % | | | 81 | % | |||||||||||||
Average FTE
|
28 | 2,471 | 456 | | 2,927 |
13
MORTGAGE BANKING ACTIVITIES
Loan Production
During the three months ended September 30, 2003, the Company produced $8.7 billion of loans, which was a 63% increase over the $5.3 billion of loans produced during the three months ended September 30, 2002, and a 6% increase over the $8.2 billion of loans produced during the second quarter of 2003. The strong production volume reflects the continued unprecedented levels of production in the mortgage industry, continued penetration of the purchase market, growth in our products that are less interest rate sensitive, and the success of our Investment Portfolios customer retention program.
Total production by loan type was as follows:
Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | Variance | June 30, | Variance | ||||||||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | Percent | 2003 | Percent | ||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Volume by product
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Prime(1)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Agency conforming
|
$ | 1,503 | $ | 935 | 61 | % | $ | 1,471 | 2 | % | ||||||||||||
Alt-A
|
4,505 | 2,417 | 86 | % | 4,081 | 10 | % | |||||||||||||||
Jumbo
|
1,154 | 948 | 22 | % | 1,192 | (3 | )% | |||||||||||||||
Subprime(1)
|
520 | 380 | 37 | % | 465 | 12 | % | |||||||||||||||
Home equity line of credit(2)
|
264 | 119 | 122 | % | 229 | 15 | % | |||||||||||||||
Consumer construction(2)
|
586 | 409 | 43 | % | 518 | 13 | % | |||||||||||||||
Subtotal mortgage production
|
8,532 | 5,208 | 64 | % | 7,956 | 7 | % | |||||||||||||||
Subdivision construction commitments
|
149 | 104 | 43 | % | 237 | (37 | )% | |||||||||||||||
Total production volume
|
$ | 8,681 | $ | 5,312 | 63 | % | $ | 8,193 | 6 | % | ||||||||||||
Mortgage Web-based
production
|
$ | 5,983 | $ | 3,918 | 53 | % | $ | 5,994 | 0 | % | ||||||||||||
Mortgage pipeline at period end(3)
|
$ | 4,688 | $ | 5,011 | (6 | )% | $ | 6,929 | (32 | )% |
(1) | Fundings. |
(2) | New commitments. |
(3) | Includes rate lock commitments for loans in process plus loans that have been submitted for processing, but not yet rate locked. |
In addition to the record production volume, the mix of our pipeline has shifted favorably to even stronger penetration of the purchase market. The following table details the mix of our pipeline between purchase, cash out refinance, and rate/term refinance transactions at September 30, 2003, September 30, 2002 and June 30, 2003:
As of | ||||||||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | Variance | June 30, | Variance | ||||||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | Percent | 2003 | Percent | ||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Purchase transactions
|
$ | 1,839 | $ | 1,067 | 72 | % | $ | 1,714 | 7 | % | ||||||||||
Cash-out refinance transactions
|
1,698 | 1,857 | (9 | )% | 2,560 | (34 | )% | |||||||||||||
Rate/term refinance transactions
|
1,151 | 2,087 | (45 | )% | 2,655 | (57 | )% | |||||||||||||
Mortgage pipeline at period end
|
$ | 4,688 | $ | 5,011 | (6 | )% | $ | 6,929 | (32 | )% | ||||||||||
14
While our total pipeline declined 32% from the second quarter, this compares favorably to the Mortgage Bankers Association of Americas reported decline of 57% in its Mortgage Application Index. In addition, the mix of our pipeline has shifted favorably from refinance mortgages to purchase mortgages. Comparing to the June 30, 2003 level, purchase mortgages now represent 39% of the total pipeline compared with 21% a year ago.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2003, the Company produced $23.5 billion of loans, which was a 64% increase over the $14.3 billion of loans produced during the nine months ended September 30, 2002. Total production by loan type was as follows:
Nine Months Ended | ||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | Variance | ||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | Percent | ||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | ||||||||||||||
Volume by product
|
||||||||||||||
Prime(1)
|
||||||||||||||
Agency conforming
|
$ | 4,395 | $ | 2,751 | 60 | % | ||||||||
Alt-A
|
11,603 | 5,597 | 107 | % | ||||||||||
Jumbo
|
3,359 | 2,980 | 13 | % | ||||||||||
Subprime(1)
|
1,369 | 1,106 | 24 | % | ||||||||||
Home equity line of credit(2)
|
673 | 258 | 161 | % | ||||||||||
Consumer construction(2)
|
1,544 | 1,175 | 31 | % | ||||||||||
Subtotal mortgage production
|
22,943 | 13,867 | 65 | % | ||||||||||
Subdivision construction commitments
|
516 | 437 | 18 | % | ||||||||||
Total production volume
|
$ | 23,459 | $ | 14,304 | 64 | % | ||||||||
Mortgage Web-based
production
|
$ | 16,897 | $ | 10,301 | 64 | % | ||||||||
Mortgage pipeline at period end(3)
|
$ | 4,688 | $ | 5,011 | (6 | )% |
(1) | Fundings. |
(2) | New commitments. |
(3) | Includes rate lock commitments for loans in process plus loans that have been submitted for processing, but not yet rate locked. |
IndyMac generates its mortgage production through multiple channels on a nationwide basis with a concentration in those regions of the country in which we have regional offices or in which there are higher home prices, including California, Florida, New Jersey and New York. Our highest concentration of mortgage loans relates to properties in California. Mortgages secured by California properties accounted for 50% of the mortgage loans produced in the three months ended September 30, 2003 based on dollar value, and 41% based on number of loans.
IndyMac Mortgage Bank produces mortgages through its Business-to-Business (B2B), Business-to-Realtor (B2R), Consumer Construction (Home Construction Lending or HCL) and Homebuilder (HBD) divisions. IndyMac Consumer Bank produces mortgages through its Business-to-Consumer (B2C), HELOC and Retail Bank divisions.
15
The following table shows production and key performance indicators of the various relationship businesses of IndyMac Mortgage Bank during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2003.
Relationship Businesses | ||||||||||||||||||||||
IndyMac Mortgage Bank | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended September 30, 2003 | B2B | B2R | HCL | HBD | Total | |||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Volume by Channel and Customer
Source
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage brokers
|
$ | 2,976 | $ | | $ | 420 | $ | | $ | 3,396 | ||||||||||||
Mortgage bankers
|
1,283 | | 233 | | 1,516 | |||||||||||||||||
Conduit
|
625 | | | | 625 | |||||||||||||||||
Realtors
|
| 311 | | | 311 | |||||||||||||||||
Builder/ Builder affiliates
|
| | 21 | 168 | 189 | |||||||||||||||||
Financial institutions
|
108 | | | | 108 | |||||||||||||||||
Consumer direct marketing
|
| | 147 | | 147 | |||||||||||||||||
Subtotal mortgage production
|
4,992 | $ | 311 | 821 | 168 | 6,292 | ||||||||||||||||
Builder and subdivision construction commitments
|
| | | 149 | 149 | |||||||||||||||||
Total relationship businesses production volume
|
$ | 4,992 | $ | 311 | $ | 821 | $ | 317 | $ | 6,441 | ||||||||||||
Percentage of total production
|
57 | % | 4 | % | 9 | % | 4 | % | 74 | % | ||||||||||||
Percentage change relative to:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
3rd quarter 2002
|
44 | % | 125 | % | 36 | % | 144 | % | 49 | % | ||||||||||||
2nd quarter 2003
|
(2 | )% | 11 | % | 10 | % | (11 | )% | 0 | % | ||||||||||||
Composition of mortgage production:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Purchase transactions
|
33 | % | 29 | % | 100 | % | 73 | % | 41 | % | ||||||||||||
Cash-out refinance transactions
|
42 | % | 35 | % | 0 | % | 14 | % | 36 | % | ||||||||||||
Rate/term refinance transactions
|
25 | % | 36 | % | 0 | % | 13 | % | 23 | % | ||||||||||||
Key Performance Indicators for the Three
Months Ended September 30, 2003
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Active Customers:(1)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Average monthly active customers
|
2,244 | 280 | 311 | 30 | 2,865 | |||||||||||||||||
Active customers during the quarter
|
3,540 | 557 | 732 | 45 | 4,874 | |||||||||||||||||
Net new customers during the quarter(2)
|
658 | 347 | N/A | 15 | 1,020 | |||||||||||||||||
Sales and marketing personnel
|
360 | 78 | 84 | 30 | 552 | |||||||||||||||||
Cost per funded mortgage loan (bps)
|
69 | 154 | 80 | 115 | N/A | |||||||||||||||||
Percentage Change for the Three Months
Ended
September 30, 2003 vs. September 30, 2002 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Active Customers:(1)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Average monthly active customers
|
13 | % | 100 | % | 27 | % | 275 | % | 21 | % | ||||||||||||
Active customers during the quarter
|
13 | % | 85 | % | 30 | % | 125 | % | 22 | % | ||||||||||||
Sales and marketing personnel
|
55 | % | 129 | % | 58 | % | 58 | % | 44 | % | ||||||||||||
Cost per funded mortgage loan (bps)
|
17 | % | (11 | )% | 16 | % | (47 | )% | N/A |
16
Relationship Businesses | ||||||||||||||||||||||
IndyMac Mortgage Bank | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2003 | B2B | B2R | HCL | HBD | Total | |||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Volume by Channel and Customer
Source
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage brokers
|
$ | 8,471 | $ | | $ | 1,116 | $ | | $ | 9,587 | ||||||||||||
Mortgage bankers
|
3,799 | | 694 | | 4,493 | |||||||||||||||||
Conduit
|
1,461 | | | | 1,461 | |||||||||||||||||
Realtors
|
| 836 | | | 836 | |||||||||||||||||
Builder/ Builder affiliates
|
| | 54 | 381 | 435 | |||||||||||||||||
Financial institutions
|
336 | | | | 336 | |||||||||||||||||
Consumer direct marketing
|
| | 385 | | 385 | |||||||||||||||||
Subtotal mortgage production
|
14,067 | $ | 836 | 2,249 | 381 | 17,533 | ||||||||||||||||
Builder and subdivision construction commitments
|
| | | 516 | 516 | |||||||||||||||||
Total relationship businesses production volume
|
$ | 14,067 | $ | 836 | $ | 2,249 | $ | 897 | $ | 18,049 | ||||||||||||
Percentage of total production
|
59 | % | 4 | % | 10 | % | 4 | % | 77 | % | ||||||||||||
Percentage change relative to:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Nine months ended September 30, 2002
|
47 | % | 159 | % | 27 | % | 86 | % | 49 | % | ||||||||||||
Composition of mortgage production:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Purchase transactions
|
29 | % | 29 | % | 99 | % | 73 | % | 36 | % | ||||||||||||
Cash-out refinance transactions
|
45 | % | 35 | % | 0 | % | 14 | % | 40 | % | ||||||||||||
Rate/term refinance transactions
|
26 | % | 36 | % | 1 | % | 13 | % | 24 | % | ||||||||||||
Key Performance Indicators for the Nine Months
Ended September 30, 2003
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Active Customers:(1)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Average monthly active customers
|
2,149 | 251 | 256 | 28 | 2,684 | |||||||||||||||||
Active customers during the nine months
|
4,920 | 938 | 1,360 | 79 | 7,297 | |||||||||||||||||
Net new customers during the nine months(2)
|
1,645 | 202 | N/A | 30 | 1,877 | |||||||||||||||||
Cost per funded mortgage loan (bps)
|
68 | 173 | 75 | 107 | N/A | |||||||||||||||||
Percentage Change for the Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2003 vs. September 30, 2002
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Active Customers:(1)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Average monthly active customers
|
23 | % | 106 | % | 24 | % | 117 | % | 28 | % | ||||||||||||
Active customers during the nine months
|
27 | % | 76 | % | 30 | % | 31 | % | 32 | % | ||||||||||||
Cost per funded mortgage loan (bps)
|
(1 | )% | (17 | )% | 7 | % | (40 | )% | N/A |
(1) | Active customers are defined as customers who funded at least one loan during the period. The HCL division utilizes the B2B marketing relationships with mortgage brokers and mortgage bankers to produce consumer construction loans. As a result, there is some overlap of the two active customer statistics and new customers. The sales and marketing personnel under the HCL division are primarily focused on marketing the consumer construction product directly to consumers. |
(2) | Net new customers are the number of new customers signed up during the period less those terminated. |
IndyMac Mortgage Banks production increase of 49% from the three months ended September 30, 2002 to the three months ended September 30, 2003 was driven by 44% growth in the core B2B channel and bolstered by even faster growth in our newer channels including B2R and HBD partially offset by the slower
17
HCL continues to take advantage of the strong purchase market as new home construction starts and permits remained at second quarter record levels. New commitment origination volumes grew 10% over the quarter representing approximately 5% of the estimated $40 billion custom residential construction market. Our continued growth in originations is due to increases in active customers by 20% and marketing leads. Leveraging upon the mortgage banks regional operations strategy, new commitment volumes are aligned with strong housing growth regions as follows: Atlanta Operations Southeast & Mid Atlantic; Dallas Midwest & Intermountain; Pasadena Southwest & West coast. Overall, HCL enters the fourth quarter as the second largest custom residential lender in the nation and the largest in California.
The following tables show production and other key performance indicators of the various consumer direct businesses of IndyMac Consumer Bank during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2003. In addition, our Investment Portfolio Group initiated a new customer retention program in connection with its servicing portfolio during the third quarter 2003, as disclosed below.
Consumer Direct Businesses | ||||||||||||||||||||||
IndyMac Consumer Bank | Investment | |||||||||||||||||||||
Portfolio | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended September 30, 2003 | B2C | HELOC | Retail Bank | Total | Group | |||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Volume by Channel and Source(1)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Web-based production:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Direct at www.indymacmortgage.com
|
$ | 316 | $ | | $ | | $ | 316 | $ | | ||||||||||||
Indirect Web-based leads
|
187 | | | 187 | | |||||||||||||||||
Cross-marketing and portfolio refinancing
|
918 | | 76 | 994 | 411 | |||||||||||||||||
Direct telemarketing and affinity relationships
|
201 | 55 | | 256 | | |||||||||||||||||
Retail banking branches
|
| | 76 | 76 | | |||||||||||||||||
Total consumer direct production volume
|
$ | 1,622 | $ | 55 | $ | 152 | $ | 1,829 | $ | 411 | ||||||||||||
Percentage of total production
|
18 | % | 1 | % | 2 | % | 21 | % | 5 | % | ||||||||||||
Percentage change relative to:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
3rd quarter 2002
|
73 | % | N/A | 294 | % | 87 | % | N/A | ||||||||||||||
2nd quarter 2003
|
3 | % | 20 | % | 27 | % | 5 | % | N/A | |||||||||||||
Composition of mortgage production:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Purchase transactions
|
5 | % | N/A | 23 | % | 7 | % | 0 | % | |||||||||||||
Cash-out refinance transactions
|
45 | % | N/A | 30 | % | 44 | % | 0 | % | |||||||||||||
Rate/term refinance transactions
|
50 | % | N/A | 47 | % | 49 | % | 100 | % | |||||||||||||
Key Drivers of Growth and Profitability for
the Three Months Ended September 30, 2003
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Marketing costs (in thousands)
|
$ | 3,889 | N/A | $ | 3 | $ | 3,892 | N/A | ||||||||||||||
Marketing cost per funded loan (dollars)
|
$ | 435 | N/A | $ | 4 | $ | 439 | N/A | ||||||||||||||
Cost per funded mortgage loan (bps)
|
149 | N/A | 118 | N/A | N/A |
18
Consumer Direct Businesses | ||||||||||||||||||||||
IndyMac Consumer Bank | Investment | |||||||||||||||||||||
Portfolio | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2003 | B2C | HELOC | Retail Bank | Total | Group | |||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Volume by Channel and Source(1)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Web-based production:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Direct at www.indymacmortgage.com
|
$ | 975 | $ | | $ | | $ | 975 | $ | | ||||||||||||
Indirect Web-based leads
|
437 | | | 437 | | |||||||||||||||||
Cross-marketing and portfolio refinancing
|
2,475 | | 200 | 2,675 | 411 | |||||||||||||||||
Direct telemarketing and affinity relationships
|
621 | 142 | | 763 | | |||||||||||||||||
Retail banking branches
|
| | 149 | 149 | | |||||||||||||||||
Total consumer direct production volume
|
$ | 4,508 | $ | 142 | $ | 349 | $ | 4,999 | $ | 411 | ||||||||||||
Percentage of total production
|
19 | % | 1 | % | 1 | % | 21 | % | 2 | % | ||||||||||||
Percentage change relative to:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Nine months ended September 30, 2002.
|
117 | % | N/A | 289 | % | 130 | % | N/A | ||||||||||||||
Composition of mortgage production:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Purchase transactions
|
5 | % | N/A | 20 | % | 6 | % | N/A | ||||||||||||||
Cash-out refinance transactions
|
43 | % | N/A | 32 | % | 42 | % | 0 | % | |||||||||||||
Rate/term refinance transactions
|
52 | % | N/A | 48 | % | 52 | % | 100 | % | |||||||||||||
Key Drivers of Growth and Profitability for
the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2003
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Marketing costs (in thousands)
|
$ | 10,159 | N/A | $ | 66 | $ | 10,225 | N/A | ||||||||||||||
Marketing cost per funded loan (dollars)
|
$ | 420 | N/A | $ | 38 | $ | 458 | N/A | ||||||||||||||
Cost per funded mortgage loan (bps)
|
146 | N/A | 116 | N/A | N/A |
(1) | HELOC amounts represent the loans produced only by the HELOC division. HELOC loans produced by other business divisions totaled $209 million and $531 million during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2003, respectively. HELOC loans produced by business divisions other than the HELOC division are included in the production volume of the respective originating business division. |
B2Cs production volume grew 73% for the three months ended September 30, 2003 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2002. The B2C division is currently our most established consumer-direct business, generating 18% of the total consumer-direct business in the third quarter 2003. This business is expected to be more cyclical as a result of changes in interest rates. The HELOC division was established during 2002 to facilitate targeted marketing of our HELOC product directly to consumers in addition to the production of HELOCs within our other production channels. Through a streamlined application process and competitive pricing, this division provides homeowners the ability to easily access the excess equity in their homes for a variety of uses. Currently, we hold the HELOCs generated by the HELOC division for investment, as these HELOCs are prime rate based, and typically have high FICO scores and low combined loan-to-value ratios. The HELOC product also tends to be somewhat counter-cyclical to the mortgage industry. As interest rates rise, consumers who want to access the equity in their home are more inclined to utilize a HELOC product rather than a cash-out refinance of their existing low-rate mortgage loan. As a result, we expect the HELOC divisions production to increase now that the mortgage refinancing boom has abated.
Loan Sales
The Company sold $6.7 billion and $4.5 billion of loans during the three months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively, and $18.5 billion and $12.4 billion for the nine months then ended. The Companys gain on sale of loans increased 57% in the third quarter of 2003 to $121.5 million, from
19
The Company hedges the interest rate risk inherent in its pipeline of mortgage loans held for sale to protect its margin on sale of loans. Hedging practices can vary significantly from company to company ranging across a broad spectrum. At one extreme, a mortgage banker may choose to not hedge its pipeline at all. Mortgage bankers who choose to not hedge their pipeline will typically report higher earnings and profit margins in a falling interest rate environment, and lower earnings and profit margins in a rising interest rate environment. This will be the most profitable strategy over an indefinite period of time as more production is done in the declining rate environment, assuming the rates rise as often as they fall. However, this strategy results in highly volatile earnings and could result in losses for an extended period of time potentially risking the depletion of capital reserves. Conversely at the other extreme, a mortgage banker can choose to hedge 100% of its pipeline with option-based instruments to closely offset the free option enjoyed by the mortgage loan applicant to not close on his or her loan (i.e. fallout). This hedging strategy will generally produce stable and consistent results, but profitability is significantly reduced as the cost of the options can be prohibitive.
Generally, prudent mortgage bankers will choose a strategy that falls along the spectrum of the above extremes. IndyMac tends to utilize instruments such as forward sale agreements whose change in value as interest rates change is expected to offset the change in value of its underlying mortgage pipeline based on expected closing ratios. Utilizing this strategy we focus on trying to maintain stable profit margins with an emphasis on forecasting expected fallout to more precisely estimate our required hedge coverage ratio and minimize hedge costs. By closely monitoring key factors such as product type, business units, progress or status of transactions, as well as changes in market interest rates since we committed a rate to the borrower (rate lock commitments), the Company seeks to quantify the optional component of each rate lock, and in turn, the aggregate rate lock pipeline. By accurately evaluating these factors, the Company has been able to minimize the purchase of options and also stabilize gain on sale margins over different rate environments. Companies with lower coverage ratios may tend to follow the market increasing their hedge costs and reducing their profit margins as interest rates rise. In comparing financial results, investors should be aware of the varying results that can be achieved under different hedge strategies.
The table below illustrates the impact of the Companys pipeline hedging activities.
Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | June 30, | ||||||||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | % Change | 2003 | % Change | ||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Gross gain on mortgage loan sales
|
$ | 40 | $ | 155 | (74 | )% | $ | 163 | (75 | )% | ||||||||||
Gross margin before hedging
|
0.60 | % | 3.48 | % | (83 | )% | 2.57 | % | (77 | )% | ||||||||||
Hedging gains (losses)
|
$ | 81 | $ | (78 | ) | 204 | % | $ | (61 | ) | 233% | |||||||||
Net gains on sale
|
$ | 121 | $ | 77 | 57 | % | $ | 102 | 19% | |||||||||||
Net margin after hedging
|
1.82 | % | 1.73 | % | 5 | % | 1.61 | % | 13% |
Nine Months Ended | ||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | % Change | ||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | ||||||||||||
Gross gain on mortgage loan sales
|
$ | 322 | $ | 379 | (15 | )% | ||||||
Gross margin before hedging
|
1.74 | % | 3.05 | % | (43 | )% | ||||||
Hedging (losses)
|
$ | (14 | ) | $ | (153 | ) | 91 | % | ||||
Net gains on sale
|
$ | 307 | $ | 226 | 36 | % | ||||||
Net margin after hedging
|
1.66 | % | 1.82 | % | (9 | )% |
20
Included in the pipeline are rate lock commitments in addition to mortgage loans held for sale. Rate lock commitments on mortgage loans that are intended to be sold are considered to be derivatives pursuant to SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, (SFAS 133) and, therefore, are recorded at fair value. The Company hedges the risk of changes in fair value of rate lock commitments by selling forward contracts on securities of Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac as the Company deems appropriate to prudently manage this risk. These forward contracts are also accounted for as derivatives and recorded at fair value.
In measuring the fair value of rate lock commitments, the proceeds expected upon eventual loan sale are used. This value excludes the value of the MSRs inherent in the loan except for certain high quality, liquid, conventional mortgages where whole loan sale prices including servicing rights are readily available. These values are calculated using the same methodologies that are used in our loan sales, adjusted using an anticipated fallout factor for rate lock commitments that will likely not be funded. This method of calculating the value of the derivative has the effect of recognizing a portion of the gain from mortgage loans before the loans are funded. It is important to note that the time from rate lock commitment to loan sale is generally less than 90 days; therefore, any change to current practice would have only a short-term impact on revenues and net income. As of September 30, 2003, the fair value of the rate lock commitments, net of related hedges, was $11.3 million.
The following table presents the gain on sale margins by product type for the quarters ended September 30 and June 30, 2003:
Three Months Ended | Three Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||
September 30, 2003 | June 30, 2003 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Gain on Sale Margins | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
by Product Type | Amount Sold | Gain on Sale | Margin | Amount Sold | Gain on Sale | Margin | ||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Agency conforming
|
$ | 1,864 | $ | 22.8 | 1.22 | % | $ | 1,589 | $ | 18.4 | 1.16 | % | ||||||||||||
Alt-A and Jumbo
|
4,155 | 79.2 | 1.90 | % | 4,326 | 69.9 | 1.62 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Subprime
|
444 | 12.5 | 2.81 | % | 264 | 6.6 | 2.50 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Loans acquired through clean-up calls
|
212 | 7.0 | 3.30 | % | 157 | 7.2 | 4.59 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total gain on sale of loans
|
$ | 6,675 | $ | 121.5 | 1.82 | % | $ | 6,336 | $ | 102.1 | 1.61 | % | ||||||||||||
21
In addition to the gain on sale, IndyMac earns spread and fee income on its mortgage loans held for sale. It is important to look at the entire mortgage banking revenue stream in evaluating performance as these components may vary in differing interest rate environments and sale strategies. The following table depicts the total revenue margin on mortgage loans sold, which is calculated by dividing the sum of gain on sale of loans, net interest income (refer to Note 4: Segment Reporting in the accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements for further information on our method of allocating interest expense to the operating segments), and fee income by the amount of loans sold:
Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
September 30, | % of loans | September 30, | % of loans | June 30, | % of loans | |||||||||||||||||||
2003 | sold | 2002 | sold | 2003 | sold | |||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gain on sale of loans
|
$ | 121,498 | 1.82 | % | $ | 77,279 | 1.73 | % | $ | 102,146 | 1.61 | % | ||||||||||||
Net interest income
|
48,854 | 0.73 | % | 23,498 | 0.52 | % | 39,467 | 0.63 | % | |||||||||||||||
Fee income
|
18,009 | 0.27 | % | 12,130 | 0.27 | % | 18,011 | 0.28 | % | |||||||||||||||
Total mortgage banking revenue
|
$ | 188,361 | 2.82 | % | $ | 112,907 | 2.52 | % | $ | 159,624 | 2.52 | % | ||||||||||||
Loans sold
|
$ | 6,674,915 | $ | 4,473,620 | $ | 6,335,907 | ||||||||||||||||||
Nine Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||
September 30, | % of loans | September 30, | % of loans | |||||||||||||
2003 | sold | 2002 | sold | |||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Gain on sale of loans
|
$ | 307,427 | 1.66 | % | $ | 226,025 | 1.82 | % | ||||||||
Net interest income
|
120,065 | 0.65 | % | 68,192 | 0.55 | % | ||||||||||
Fee income
|
50,811 | 0.27 | % | 31,574 | 0.25 | % | ||||||||||
Total mortgage banking revenue
|
$ | 478,303 | 2.58 | % | $ | 325,791 | 2.62 | % | ||||||||
Loans sold
|
$ | 18,534,523 | $ | 12,447,009 | ||||||||||||
The following table shows the various channels through which loans were distributed:
Three Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
September 30, | Distribution | September 30, | Distribution | June 30, | Distribution | ||||||||||||||||||||
2003 | Percentages | 2002 | Percentages | 2003 | Percentages | ||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sales to the GSEs(1)
|
$ | 4,170 | 53 | % | $ | 1,885 | 39 | % | $ | 3,459 | 48 | % | |||||||||||||
Private-label securitizations
|
1,672 | 21 | % | 1,947 | 41 | % | 1,617 | 23 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Whole loan sales
|
833 | 11 | % | 642 | 13 | % | 1,260 | 18 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Subtotal sales
|
6,675 | 85 | % | 4,474 | 93 | % | 6,336 | 89 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Investment portfolio acquisitions(2)
|
1,223 | 15 | % | 315 | 7 | % | 798 | 11 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total loan distribution
|
$ | 7,898 | 100 | % | $ | 4,789 | 100 | % | $ | 7,134 | 100 | % | |||||||||||||
22
Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||
September 30, | Distribution | September 30, | Distribution | ||||||||||||||
2003 | Percentages | 2002 | Percentages | ||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | |||||||||||||||||
Sales to the GSEs(1)
|
$ | 11,093 | 53 | % | $ | 6,535 | 48 | % | |||||||||
Private-label securitizations
|
4,760 | 22 | % | 4,766 | 35 | % | |||||||||||
Whole loan sales
|
2,682 | 13 | % | 1,146 | 8 | % | |||||||||||
Subtotal sales
|
18,535 | 88 | % | 12,447 | 91 | % | |||||||||||
Investment portfolio acquisitions(2)
|
2,423 | 12 | % | 1,148 | 9 | % | |||||||||||
Total loan distribution
|
$ | 20,958 | 100 | % | $ | 13,595 | 100 | % | |||||||||
(1) | Government-sponsored enterprises. |
(2) | Loan production that IndyMac elected to retain in its investment portfolio. |
In conjunction with the sale of mortgage loans in private-label securitizations and government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs) transactions, the Company generally retains certain assets. The primary assets retained include MSRs and, to a lesser degree, AAA-rated securities and agency interest-only strips, non-investment grade securities and residual securities. The allocated cost of the retained assets at the time of sale is recorded as an asset with an offsetting increase to the gain on sale of loans (or a reduction in the cost basis of the loans sold). The calculation of the $121.5 million in gain on sale of loans earned during the three months ended September 30, 2003 included the retention of $121.2 million of servicing-related assets. Cash flow collected during the three months ended September 30, 2003 from assets previously retained amounted to $52.4 million. More information on the valuation assumptions related to IndyMacs retained assets can be found on page 29.
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
IndyMacs Investment Portfolio Group complements the Companys mortgage banking activities and serves to diversify the Companys revenue stream through its investments in single-family residential mortgage loans, mortgage-backed securities and servicing-related assets.
The Investment Portfolio Groups investment in prime SFR loans, mortgage-backed securities and mortgage loan servicing related assets also helps to provide a source of income to counterbalance the cyclical nature of mortgage production. Should loan production decline due to factors such as increasing interest rates, the value and fee income of the Investment Portfolio Groups MSRs generally rises, as there is less incentive for borrowers to refinance at a higher interest rate. Similarly, when loan production increases, the value of the MSRs generally decreases. We believe this serves to stabilize the Companys revenue stream through increased interest and servicing fee income when production slows.
In addition to the Investment Portfolio Groups investments, certain investing activities also take place in IndyMac Mortgage Bank and IndyMac Consumer Bank. These activities include the investment in construction loans and HELOCs by these business units.
23
The following table shows average annualized net returns for all of our investing activities, which is calculated by dividing the sum of net interest income after allocated interest expense (see Note 4: Segment Reporting in the accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements for further information on our method of allocating interest expense to the operating segments) and provision for loan losses, service fee income and related net gains or losses by the average balance of investment assets. Service fee income includes gross service fee income, amortization of MSRs, valuation adjustments and net hedging gains and losses. Gross service fee income includes reinvestment income, prepayment and late fee income net of compensating interest paid to borrowers and investors in addition to the contractual servicing fees.
Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | June 30, | ||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2003 | ||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||
Net interest income after provision for loan
losses
|
$ | 34,619 | $ | 33,888 | $ | 28,237 | ||||||
Service fee (loss) income
|
(11,113 | ) | 3,593 | (1,401 | ) | |||||||
(Loss) gain on mortgage-backed securities, net
|
(8,647 | ) | 7,674 | (9,258 | ) | |||||||
Other income
|
3,007 | 1,915 | 2,761 | |||||||||
Average balance of interest-earning assets and
MSRs
|
$ | 7,200,472 | $ | 5,307,286 | $ | 6,443,855 | ||||||
Investing activities return before
operating expenses on interest-earning assets and MSRs
(annualized)
|
0.98 | % | 3.52 | % | 1.27 | % | ||||||
Nine Months Ended | ||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||
2003 | 2002 | |||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||
Net interest income after provision for loan
losses
|
$ | 94,820 | $ | 108,064 | ||||
Service fee income
|
(10,130 | ) | 17,820 | |||||
(Loss) gain on mortgage-backed securities, net
|
(24,816 | ) | 3,387 | |||||
Other income
|
8,262 | 8,004 | ||||||
Average balance of interest-earning assets and
MSRs
|
$ | 6,618,571 | $ | 5,055,692 | ||||
Investing activities return before
operating expenses on interest-earning assets and MSRs
(annualized)
|
1.38 | % | 3.63 | % | ||||
The decrease in return primarily results from the impact of higher prepayment rates on MSRs and mortgage-backed securities in this low interest rate environment.
24
Investment Portfolio Group
The following table sets forth the composition of the Investment Portfolio Groups assets as of September 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002, respectively:
September 30, | December 31, | ||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | ||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||
SFR mortgage loans held for
investment
|
$ | 3,406,052 | $ | 2,096,517 | |||||||
SFR mortgage loans held for sale
|
756,375 | | |||||||||
Mortgage-backed, U.S. Treasury securities and
notes:
|
|||||||||||
Trading securities:
|
|||||||||||
AAA-rated securities and agency interest-only
strips
|
155,258 | 187,060 | |||||||||
AAA-rated principal-only securities
|
5,647 | 79,554 | |||||||||
U.S. Treasury securities
|
| 282,219 | |||||||||
AAA-rated non-agency securities
|
| 101,185 | |||||||||
AAA-rated agency securities
|
| 25,055 | |||||||||
Other investment grade securities
|
8,851 | 9,114 | |||||||||
Other non-investment grade securities
|
1,752 | 2,956 | |||||||||
Residual securities
|
54,743 | 78,740 | |||||||||
Subtotal trading securities
|
226,251 | 765,883 | |||||||||
Available for sale securities:
|
|||||||||||
AAA-rated non-agency securities
|
1,306,531 | 1,406,321 | |||||||||
AAA-rated agency securities
|
33,762 | 123,269 | |||||||||
AAA-rated agency notes
|
146,631 | | |||||||||
Other investment grade securities
|
23,551 | 39,258 | |||||||||
Other non-investment grade securities
|
6,805 | 4,362 | |||||||||
Subtotal available for sale securities
|
1,517,280 | 1,573,210 | |||||||||
Total mortgage-backed securities and agency notes
|
1,743,531 | 2,339,093 | |||||||||
Mortgage servicing rights
|
406,917 | 300,539 | |||||||||
Total
|
$ | 6,312,875 | $ | 4,736,149 | |||||||
Percentage of securities portfolio rated
investment grade
|
96 | % | 96 | % | |||||||
Percentage of securities portfolio rated AAA
|
95 | % | 94 | % |
AAA-rated securities and agency interest-only strips and residual securities and securities used to hedge these assets, are classified as trading securities. Changes in the fair value of these securities are recorded in earnings. All other mortgage-backed securities are classified as available for sale, and changes in fair value of these assets are recorded in equity.
SFR Mortgage Loans Held for Investment
The Companys portfolio of mortgage loans held for investment is comprised primarily of SFR mortgage loans, with a concentration in adjustable-rate loans to mitigate interest rate risk. The Company is focused on increasing its portfolio of mortgage loans held for investment to achieve better balance in its investing activities relative to its mortgage banking activities, which tends to be more cyclical. During the third quarter of 2003, the Company added $1.2 billion of mortgage loans in accordance with this strategy. The following
25
September 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2003 | 2002 | |||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||
SFR mortgage loans held for investment
|
$ | 3,406,052 | $ | 2,096,517 | ||||
Average loan size
|
291 | 227 | ||||||
Non-performing loans as a percentage of SFR loans
|
0.54 | % | 1.20 | % | ||||
Estimated average life in years(1)
|
4.01 | 3.36 | ||||||
Estimated average duration in years(2)
|
1.62 | 1.39 | ||||||
Yield
|
4.31 | % | 5.69 | % | ||||
Fixed-rate mortgages
|
20 | % | 23 | % | ||||
Adjustable-rate mortgages
|
29 | % | 28 | % | ||||
Hybrid adjustable-rate mortgages
|
51 | % | 49 | % |
Additional Information as of September 30, 2003 | ||||||||||
Average FICO score(3)
|
710 | |||||||||
Average loan to value ratio
|
72 | % | ||||||||
Geographic distribution:
|
||||||||||
Southern California
|
30 | % | ||||||||
Northern California
|
15 | % | ||||||||
Michigan
|
8 | % | ||||||||
New York
|
5 | % | ||||||||
Florida
|
3 | % | ||||||||
Georgia
|
3 | % | ||||||||
Colorado
|
2 | % | ||||||||
New Jersey
|
2 | % | ||||||||
Washington
|
2 | % | ||||||||
Other (each individually less than 2%)
|
30 | % | ||||||||
Total
|
100 | % | ||||||||
(1) | Represents the estimated length of time, on average, the SFR loan portfolio will remain outstanding based on the Banks estimates for prepayments. |
(2) | Average duration measures the expected variability of the value of a financial instrument in response to changes in interest rates. |
(3) | FICO scores reflect a credit scoring system developed by Fair Isaacs and Co. and are generally used by lenders to evaluate a borrowers credit history. FICO scores of 700 or higher are generally considered in the mortgage industry to be very high quality borrowers with low risk of default, but in general, the secondary market will consider FICO scores of 620 or higher to be prime. |
SFR Mortgage Loans Held for Sale
Loans held for sale in the Investment Portfolio Group are substantially comprised of SFR mortgage loans acquired through exercising our right to call selected transactions as Master Servicer and loans generated through portfolio retention programs. The Company maintains the right to call selected deals when the outstanding loan balances in the securitization trust decline to a specified level, typically 10% of the original collateral balance. During the quarter ended September 30, 2003, we sold approximately $212 million of loans, a significant portion of which was acquired through clean-up call exercises, for a pretax gain of $7.0 million. Additionally, we have recognized a pretax gain of $9.3 million related to the loans acquired through our
26
Mortgage-backed Securities and U.S. Treasury Securities
The Companys portfolio of mortgage-backed securities and U.S. Treasury securities totaled $1.6 billion and $2.3 billion at September 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002, respectively. These securities are recorded at fair value. The Company invests in high quality mortgage-backed securities to provide net interest income. The extreme prepayment environment has negatively impacted interest spreads on these securities for most of 2003; however spreads began to recover in the third quarter. At September 30, 2003, 95% of the portfolio was rated AAA with an expected weighted average life of 4.1 years. U.S. Treasury securities in the trading portfolio are purchased to hedge the interest rate risk associated with servicing-related assets, among other types of investments. AAA rated principal-only securities are retained from securities purchased in the secondary market to hedge MSR related assets. The Company periodically trades its hedging instruments to rebalance its portfolio into instruments we believe will most effectively hedge the underlying asset, after considering changing market conditions.
The fair value of other investment grade and non-investment grade securities by credit rating as of September 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002 follows:
September 30, | December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Current | Discount | ||||||||||||||||||||
Face | To Face | Amortized | Fair | ||||||||||||||||||
Value | Value | Cost | Value | Fair Value | |||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Investment grade mortgage-backed
securities:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
AAA
|
$ | 8,020 | $ | 75 | $ | 8,095 | $ | 8,119 | $ | | |||||||||||
AA
|
| | | | 22,133 | ||||||||||||||||
A
|
| | | | 2,445 | ||||||||||||||||
BBB+
|
2,247 | (176 | ) | 2,071 | 2,175 | | |||||||||||||||
BBB
|
19,372 | (1,299 | ) | 18,073 | 18,457 | 18,450 | |||||||||||||||
BBB-
|
4,000 | (349 | ) | 3,651 | 3,651 | 5,344 | |||||||||||||||
Total other investment grade mortgage-backed
securities
|
$ | 33,639 | $ | (1,749 | ) | $ | 31,890 | $ | 32,402 | $ | 48,372 | ||||||||||
Non-investment grade mortgage-backed
securities:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
BB
|
$ | 4,683 | $ | (801 | ) | $ | 3,882 | $ | 4,010 | $ | 3,661 | ||||||||||
B
|
841 | (556 | ) | 285 | 336 | 351 | |||||||||||||||
CCC
|
5,435 | (4,422 | ) | 1,013 | 1,146 | 2,955 | |||||||||||||||
C
|
7,043 | (5,202 | ) | 1,841 | 1,919 | | |||||||||||||||
D
|
3,397 | (2,610 | ) | 787 | 810 | | |||||||||||||||
NR
|
840 | (555 | ) | 285 | 336 | 351 | |||||||||||||||
Total other non-investment grade mortgage-backed
securities
|
$ | 22,239 | $ | (14,146 | ) | $ | 8,093 | $ | 8,557 | $ | 7,318 | ||||||||||
27
At September 30, 2003, of the total other investment grade and non-investment grade mortgage-backed securities, $23.5 million was collateralized by prime loans, $15.7 million by subprime loans and $1.8 million by manufactured housing loans.
Mortgage Servicing and Mortgage Servicing Rights
In addition to its own loans, IndyMac serviced $30.6 billion of mortgage loans owned by others at September 30, 2003 with a weighted average coupon of 6.67%. In comparison, IndyMac serviced $28.4 billion of mortgage loans at December 31, 2002. The table below shows the activity in the servicing portfolio during the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2003:
Three Months | Nine Months | |||||||
Ended | Ended | |||||||
September 30, 2003 | September 30, 2003 | |||||||
Servicing Portfolio | ||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | ||||||||
Unpaid principal balance at beginning of period
|
$ | 29,858 | $ | 28,376 | ||||
Additions
|
5,951 | 16,606 | ||||||
Clean-up calls exercised
|
(392 | ) | (1,324 | ) | ||||
Loan payments and prepayments
|
(4,780 | ) | (13,021 | ) | ||||
Unpaid principal balance at September 30,
2003
|
$ | 30,637 | $ | 30,637 | ||||
The capitalized value of MSRs totaled $406.9 million as of September 30, 2003 and $300.5 million as of December 31, 2002, reflecting an increase of $106.4 million. The table below shows the activity in MSRs:
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | June 30, | September 30, | September 30, | ||||||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2003 | 2003 | 2002 | ||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at beginning of period
|
$ | 335,727 | $ | 316,779 | $ | 343,544 | $ | 300,539 | $ | 321,316 | ||||||||||
Additions
|
98,928 | 53,100 | 73,732 | 240,402 | 178,241 | |||||||||||||||
Transfers to agency interest-only strips
|
(29,499 | ) | | (17,812 | ) | (47,311 | ) | (66,288 | ) | |||||||||||
Clean-up calls exercised
|
(2,546 | ) | | (1,481 | ) | (6,502 | ) | | ||||||||||||
Scheduled amortization
|
(22,559 | ) | (15,657 | ) | (21,832 | ) | (65,541 | ) | (51,468 | ) | ||||||||||
Valuation/impairment
|
26,866 | (76,181 | ) | (40,424 | ) | (14,670 | ) | (103,760 | ) | |||||||||||
Balance at end of period
|
$ | 406,917 | $ | 278,041 | $ | 335,727 | $ | 406,917 | $ | 278,041 | ||||||||||
Each quarter, we evaluate the MSRs for impairment in accordance with SFAS No. 140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities. We first stratify our MSRs based on predominant risk characteristics, underlying loan type, interest rate type, and interest rate band. Then, for each stratum, we determine the fair value of MSRs using our valuation models, which are periodically validated by third party opinions of value. If the carrying value exceeds the fair value by individual stratum, a valuation allowance is recorded as a charge to service fee income in current earnings. However, if such impairment is determined to be other-than-temporary and the recoverability of the value is remote, we recognize a direct write-down. Unlike a valuation allowance, a direct write-down permanently reduces the carrying value of the MSR asset and the related valuation allowance, precluding subsequent reversals. As of September 30, 2003, the valuation allowance on MSRs totaled $75.5 million.
As of October 1, 2003, we made certain changes to our MSR stratification to better reflect the predominant risk characteristics of the portfolio as a result of the change in the portfolio during the historic refinance boom. We will evaluate the MSRs for impairment based on this new stratification prospectively. There was no earning impact at the date of restratification.
28
AAA-Rated Securities and Agency Interest-Only Strips and Residuals
We evaluate the carrying value of our AAA-rated securities and agency interest-only strips and residual securities by discounting estimated net future cash flows. For these securities, estimated net future cash flows are primarily based on assumptions related to prepayment speeds, in addition to expected credit loss assumptions on the residual and non-investment grade securities.
A summary of the activity in the AAA-rated securities and agency interest-only strips and residual securities portfolios for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002 and for the three months ended June 30, 2003, follows:
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | June 30, | September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2003 | 2003 | 2002 | |||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||||
AAA-rated securities and agency interest-only
strips:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Beginning balance
|
$ | 135,264 | $ | 232,154 | $ | 156,212 | $ | 187,060 | $ | 211,104 | |||||||||||
Retained investments from securitizations
|
11,065 | 16,424 | 12,017 | 36,498 | 18,516 | ||||||||||||||||
Transfers from MSRs
|
29,499 | | 17,812 | 47,311 | 66,288 | ||||||||||||||||
Clean-up calls exercised
|
(7,272 | ) | | (7,077 | ) | (26,397 | ) | | |||||||||||||
Cash received, net of accretion
|
(12,496 | ) | (15,767 | ) | (13,629 | ) | (40,196 | ) | (37,119 | ) | |||||||||||
Valuation losses before hedges
|
(802 | ) | (43,287 | ) | (30,071 | ) | (49,018 | ) | (69,265 | ) | |||||||||||
Ending balance
|
$ | 155,258 | $ | 189,524 | $ | 135,264 | $ | 155,258 | $ | 189,524 | |||||||||||
Residual securities:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Beginning balance
|
$ | 66,031 | $ | 67,992 | $ | 77,998 | $ | 78,740 | $ | 43,123 | |||||||||||
Retained investments from securitizations
|
3,935 | 37,501 | 112 | 18,673 | 69,054 | ||||||||||||||||
Sales
|
| | | (10,525 | ) | | |||||||||||||||
Cash received, net of accretion
|
(8,185 | ) | (7,729 | ) | (6,189 | ) | (21,239 | ) | (16,159 | ) | |||||||||||
Valuation losses before hedges
|
(7,038 | ) | (3,531 | ) | (5,890 | ) | (10,906 | ) | (1,785 | ) | |||||||||||
Ending balance
|
$ | 54,743 | $ | 94,233 | $ | 66,031 | $ | 54,743 | $ | 94,233 | |||||||||||
Valuation of Servicing-Related Assets
AAA-rated securities and agency interest-only strips and residual securities are recorded at fair market value. MSRs are subject to lower of cost or market limitations. We determine the fair value of MSRs using our valuation models, which are periodically validated by third party opinions of value. Relevant information and assumptions used to value the Companys servicing related assets at September 30, 2003, June 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002 are shown below:
Actual | Valuation Assumptions | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross Wtd. | Servicing | 3-Month | Weighted | Lifetime | 3-Month | Remaining | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Book | Collateral | Average | Fee/Interest | Prepayment | Average | Prepayment | Prepayment | Discount | Cumulative | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value | Balance | Coupon | Strip | Speeds | Multiple | Speeds(1) | Speeds(1) | Yield | Loss Rate(2) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
September 30, 2003
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AAA-rated securities and agency interest-only
strips
|
$ | 155,258 | $ | 15,442,718 | 7.01 | % | 0.39 | % | 45.6 | % | 2.58 | 19.6 | % | 39.1 | % | 9.2 | % | N/A | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Prime residual securities
|
$ | 22,778 | $ | 2,932,148 | 7.14 | % | 0.85 | % | 69.9 | % | 0.91 | 26.1 | % | 40.8 | % | 15.3 | % | 0.6 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Subprime residual securities
|
31,965 | $ | 1,477,988 | 8.76 | % | 4.25 | % | 42.6 | % | 0.51 | 33.5 | % | 28.9 | % | 23.6 | % | 2.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total noninvestment grade residual securities
|
$ | 54,743 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MSRs(3)(4)
|
$ | 406,917 | $ | 30,636,605 | 6.67 | % | 0.32 | % | 50.5 | % | 4.15 | 19.6 | % | 38.4 | % | 10.1 | % | N/A | ||||||||||||||||||||||
29
Actual | Valuation Assumptions | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross Wtd. | Servicing | 3-Month | Weighted | Lifetime | 3-Month | Remaining | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Book | Collateral | Average | Fee/Interest | Prepayment | Average | Prepayment | Prepayment | Discount | Cumulative | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value | Balance | Coupon | Strip | Speeds | Multiple | Speeds(1) | Speeds(1) | Yield | Loss Rate(2) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, 2003
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AAA-rated securities and agency interest-only
strips
|
$ | 135,264 | $ | 14,684,652 | 7.30 | % | 0.44 | % | 42.5 | % | 2.09 | 24.5 | % | 51.3 | % | 7.6 | % | N/A | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Prime residual securities
|
$ | 32,211 | $ | 3,422,320 | 7.22 | % | 1.24 | % | 55.3 | % | 0.76 | 24.8 | % | 53.9 | % | 15.2 | % | 0.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Subprime residual securities
|
33,820 | $ | 1,430,135 | 9.24 | % | 4.20 | % | 37.9 | % | 0.56 | 33.2 | % | 34.4 | % | 22.7 | % | 2.5 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Total non-investment grade residual securities
|
$ | 66,031 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MSRs(3)
|
$ | 335,727 | $ | 29,858,219 | 6.97 | % | 0.33 | % | 46.6 | % | 3.41 | 25.6 | % | 48.6 | % | 9.1 | % | N/A | |||||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2002
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AAA-rated securities and agency interest-only
strips
|
$ | 187,060 | $ | 14,214,229 | 7.77 | % | 0.53 | % | 38.5 | % | 2.48 | 23.6 | % | 39.7 | % | 8.7 | % | N/A | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Prime residual securities
|
$ | 33,400 | $ | 2,968,794 | 7.51 | % | 1.44 | % | 35.5 | % | 0.78 | 18.9 | % | 40.3 | % | 15.2 | % | 0.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Subprime residual securities
|
45,340 | $ | 1,968,041 | 9.54 | % | 4.21 | % | 30.3 | % | 0.55 | 32.1 | % | 35.0 | % | 27.1 | % | 2.8 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Total non-investment grade residual securities
|
$ | 78,740 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MSRs
|
$ | 300,539 | $ | 28,375,897 | 7.56 | % | 0.33 | % | 40.7 | % | 3.21 | 22.0 | % | 36.3 | % | 9.5 | % | N/A | |||||||||||||||||||||||
(1) | Assumed prepayment speeds are higher in the short term and lower in the long term based on the market forward curve for interest rates rising over the life of the asset. |
(2) | As a percentage of the original pool balance, the actual cumulative loss rate to date totaled 0.04% and 1.27% for prime and subprime residuals, respectively, at September 30, 2003. |
(3) | At September 30, 2003, the capitalized servicing asset includes servicing of $30.6 billion of loans serviced by us. In addition to the primary servicing of $30.6 billion in loans, we also service $5.2 billion of IndyMac-owned loans and loans subserviced for others on an interim basis for a total primary servicing portfolio of $35.2 billion. |
The lifetime prepayment speeds represent the annual constant prepayment rate (CPR) we estimate for the remaining life of the collateral supporting the asset. For MSRs and AAA-rated securities and agency interest-only strips, we project prepayment rates using four-factor prepayment models which incorporate relative weighted average note rate, seasoning, seasonality and burn-out of the pool of loans relative to expectations of future rates implied by the market forward LIBOR/swap curve.
The weighted average multiple for MSRs, AAA-rated securities and agency interest-only strips and residual securities represents the book value divided by the product of collateral balance and servicing fee/interest strip. While the weighted average life of such assets is a function of the undiscounted cash flows, the multiple is a function of the discounted cash flows. With regard to AAA-rated securities and agency interest-only strips, the marketplace frequently uses calculated multiples to assess the overall impact valuation assumptions have on value. Collateral type, coupon, loan age and the size of the interest strip must be considered when comparing these multiples. The mix of collateral types supporting servicing-related assets is primarily non-conforming/ conventional, which may make comparisons of the Companys MSR multiples misleading relative to peer multiples whose product mix is different.
Lifetime prepayment assumptions for AAA-rated securities and agency interest-only strips and MSRs decreased at September 30, 2003 compared to June 30, 2003, while the lifetime prepayment assumption for prime and subprime residuals increased slightly. The increase in prepayment assumption for prime and subprime residuals was the result of higher actual prepayment speeds compared to June 30, 2003. The lifetime prepayment speeds for AAA-rated securities and agency interest-only strips and MSRs are expected to be lower as the interest rates rise. Discount yields increased at September 30, 2003 as compared to June 30, 2003 also reflecting the rise in interest rates and increase in expected lives.
Hedging Interest Rate Risk on Servicing-Related Assets
With respect to the investment in servicing-related assets (AAA-rated securities and agency interest-only strips, non-investment grade residual securities and MSRs), the Company is exposed to interest rate risk as a
30
The objective of our hedging strategy is to mitigate the impact of changes in interest rates on the net economic value of the balance sheet and quarterly earnings, not to speculate on interest rates. As such, we manage the comprehensive interest rate risk of our servicing-related assets using financial instruments and our portfolio retention efforts. Historically, we have hedged servicing-related assets using a mix of securities on balance sheet, such as AAA-rated principal-only securities, buying and/or selling mortgage-backed or U.S. Treasury securities, as well as derivatives such as futures, floors, swaps, or options. Recently, clean-up call revenues and retention programs have also been added to our overall hedging program. As there are no hedge instruments that would be perfectly correlated with these hedged assets, we use a mix of the above instruments designed to correlate well with the hedged assets.
During 2003, interest rates remained extremely volatile, reaching historic lows in mid June and abruptly reversing during the third quarter. During the first half of 2003, valuation losses of $93.6 million were offset by hedging gains and net interest on hedging instruments totaling $74.6 million. During the third quarter of 2003, valuation gains recorded as a result of decelerated prepayments on the servicing-related assets totaled $19.0 million. In addition to these gains, $3.1 million of net interest income was earned on the hedging instruments. These gains were offset by $43.5 million of losses on financial instruments utilized to hedge the interest rate risk on the servicing-related assets.
As shown in the segment disclosures on page 12, the overall returns for the servicing-related assets were essentially flat, as clean-up call gains and portfolio retention efforts offset net hedging losses.
31
The following breaks out the components of service fee income and the gain on mortgage-backed securities, net.
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | June 30, | September 30, | September 30, | ||||||||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2003 | 2003 | 2002 | ||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Service fee income:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross service fee income
|
$ | 28,007 | $ | 21,181 | $ | 25,510 | $ | 77,574 | $ | 73,168 | ||||||||||||
Amortization
|
(22,559 | ) | (15,657 | ) | (21,832 | ) | (65,541 | ) | (51,469 | ) | ||||||||||||
Service fee income net of amortization
|
5,448 | 5,524 | 3,678 | 12,033 | 21,699 | |||||||||||||||||
Valuation adjustments on MSRs
|
26,866 | (76,181 | ) | (40,424 | ) | (14,670 | ) | (103,760 | ) | |||||||||||||
Hedges (losses) gains
|
(43,427 | ) | 74,250 | 35,345 | (7,493 | ) | 99,880 | |||||||||||||||
Total service fee (expense) income
|
$ | (11,113 | ) | $ | 3,593 | $ | (1,401 | ) | $ | (10,130 | ) | $ | 17,819 | |||||||||
Net (loss) gain on securities:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Realized gain on available-for-sale securities
|
$ | | $ | | $ | 2,022 | $ | 2,022 | $ | 7,478 | ||||||||||||
Impairment on available-for-sale securities
|
(745 | ) | | (808 | ) | (2,135 | ) | (2,431 | ) | |||||||||||||
Unrealized loss on AAA-rated securities and
agency interest only strips and residual securities
|
(7,840 | ) | (43,287 | ) | (35,962 | ) | (59,924 | ) | (69,265 | ) | ||||||||||||
Transfer of residual securities to trading
classification
|
| 5,492 | | | 5,492 | |||||||||||||||||
Transfer of instruments used to hedge AAA IOs and
residual securities to trading
|
| 1,127 | | | 1,127 | |||||||||||||||||
Net (loss) gain on securities and other
instruments used to hedge AAA-rated securities and agency
interest-only strips and residual securities
|
(62 | ) | 44,342 | 25,490 | 35,221 | 60,986 | ||||||||||||||||
Total (loss) gain on mortgage-backed
securities, net
|
$ | (8,647 | ) | $ | 7,674 | $ | (9,258 | ) | $ | (24,816 | ) | $ | 3,387 | |||||||||
32
Construction Lending
IndyMac provides construction financing for individual consumers who are in the process of building their own home (consumer construction) and for residential subdivision developers (builder construction). With respect to consumer construction, the primary product is a construction-to-permanent residential mortgage loan. This product provides financing for the 9-12 month term of construction and automatically converts to a permanent mortgage loan at the end of construction. As a result, this product represents a hybrid activity between our portfolio lending activities and mortgage banking activities. The Company earns net interest income during the construction phase. When the loan converts to permanent status the loan is transferred into the Companys pipeline of mortgage loans held for sale. These loans are typically fixed-rate loans. Consumer construction loan origination grew 10% over the second quarter 2003, consistent with seasonal increases in single-family residence construction, and 36% over the same quarter of 2002. Increases in both origination channels (B2B and B2C) were driven by growth in active customers and marketing leads. The cost of funding an HCL construction loan increased 7% from the same quarter of 2002. Consumer construction loans outstanding at September 30, 2003 were $1,094 million, up 25.0% compared to the amount at December 31, 2002.
With respect to builder construction loans, our activities have been increasingly focused on those homebuilders that provide our mortgage loans to their customers when they sell the completed residence. New production is limited to nine states for new commitments (California, Illinois, Nevada, Utah, Arizona, Colorado, Washington, Oregon and Florida). Builder construction loans are typically based on prime rates. Builder loans outstanding, including construction and land and other mortgage loans, declined $65.2 million or 10.8% as compared to December 31, 2002. Commitments related to these outstanding loans declined $106.8 million or 9.7% over the same period. This decline is the result of loan payoffs exceeding new production and is expected to continue through the fourth quarter 2003. A substantial portion of our builder construction loans carries the guarantee of the builder.
33
The following tables present further information on our construction loan portfolios.
As of | ||||||||||||||||
September 30, 2003 | December 31, 2002 | |||||||||||||||
Consumer | Builder | Consumer | Builder | |||||||||||||
Construction | Construction | Construction | Construction | |||||||||||||
Loans | Loans | Loans | Loans | |||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Construction loans
|
$ | 1,093,918 | $ | 446,413 | $ | 875,335 | $ | 482,408 | ||||||||
Land and other mortgage loans
|
$ | 182,002 | $ | 93,875 | $ | 81,885 | $ | 123,066 | ||||||||
Outstanding commitments
|
$ | 2,079,394 | $ | 997,323 | $ | 1,531,011 | $ | 1,104,160 | ||||||||
Average construction loan commitment
|
$ | 378 | $ | 2,415 | $ | 415 | $ | 1,982 | ||||||||
Non-performing loans
|
0.70 | % | 2.20 | % | 1.08 | % | 2.92 | % | ||||||||
Yield
|
6.20 | % | 6.47 | % | 7.13 | % | 7.06 | % | ||||||||
Fixed-rate loans
|
94 | % | 0 | % | 94 | % | 1 | % | ||||||||
Adjustable-rate loans
|
0 | % | 98 | % | 0 | % | 96 | % | ||||||||
Hybrid adjustable-rate loans
|
6 | % | 2 | % | 6 | % | 3 | % |
Additional Information as of September 30, 2003
Consumer | Builder | ||||||||||
Construction | Construction | ||||||||||
Loans | Loans | ||||||||||
Average loan to value ratio(1)
|
74 | % | 71 | % | |||||||
Average FICO score(2)
|
707 | N/A | |||||||||
Geographic distribution(3)
|
|||||||||||
Southern California
|
31 | % | Southern California | 41 | % | ||||||
Northern California
|
20 | % | Northern California | 28 | % | ||||||
New York
|
6 | % | Illinois | 15 | % | ||||||
Hawaii
|
4 | % | Colorado | 3 | % | ||||||
Florida
|
3 | % | Texas | 2 | % | ||||||
Colorado
|
3 | % | Nevada | 2 | % | ||||||
New Jersey
|
3 | % | |||||||||
Nevada
|
3 | % | |||||||||
Washington
|
2 | % | |||||||||
Connecticut
|
2 | % | |||||||||
Other (each individually< 2%)
|
23 | % | Other (each individually< 2%) | 9 | % | ||||||
Total Consumer Construction
|
100 | % | Total Builder Construction | 100 | % | ||||||
(1) | The average loan to value ratio is based on the estimated appraised value of the completed project compared to the commitment amount at September 30, 2003. |
(2) | FICO scores are not calculated for corporate entities and, therefore, are not applicable to the builder construction portfolio. |
(3) | Geographic distribution is based on outstanding balances. Some projects are continuing to be built out in states in which we no longer solicit new loans. |
For information related to the Companys balance of non-performing assets and related credit reserves, see discussion in Credit Risk and Reserves at page 40.
34
HELOC Portfolio
The following table presents information on our HELOCs as of September 30, 2003, June 30, 2003, and December 31, 2002. All HELOC loans are adjustable rate loans and indexed to the prime rate.
September 30, | June 30, | December 31, | ||||||||||
2003 | 2003 | 2002 | ||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||
Outstanding book value
|
$ | 587,364 | $ | 485,471 | $ | 312,881 | ||||||
Outstanding commitments(1)
|
$ | 999,701 | $ | 763,504 | $ | 459,537 | ||||||
Average spread over prime
|
1.94 | % | 1.97 | % | 1.78 | % | ||||||
Average FICO score
|
712 | 712 | 711 | |||||||||
Average CLTV ratio(2)
|
77 | % | 77 | % | 78 | % |
Additional Information as of September 30, 2003
Total | Average Loan | 30+ Days | |||||||||||||||||||
Outstanding | Commitment | Average Spread | Average | Delinquency | |||||||||||||||||
CLTV | Book Value | Balance | Over Prime | FICO | Percentage | ||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||||
>= 96% &< = 100%
|
$ | 15,553 | $ | 47 | 4.39 | % | 723 | 0.55 | % | ||||||||||||
>= 91% &< = 95%
|
83,673 | 52 | 3.51 | % | 715 | 0.59 | % | ||||||||||||||
>= 81% &< = 90%
|
233,597 | 51 | 2.31 | % | 695 | 0.59 | % | ||||||||||||||
>= 71% &< = 80%
|
139,562 | 81 | 1.00 | % | 716 | 0.76 | % | ||||||||||||||
70%
|
114,979 | 87 | 0.88 | % | 728 | 0.42 | % | ||||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 587,364 | |||||||||||||||||||
(1) | On funded loans. |
(2) | The CLTV combines the loan to value on both the first mortgage loan and the HELOC. |
35
NET INTEREST INCOME
The following table sets forth information regarding our consolidated average balance sheets (Mortgage Bank, Investment Portfolio and Consumer Bank are combined), along with the total dollar amounts of interest income and interest expense and the weighted average interest rates for the periods presented. Average balances are calculated on a daily basis. Non-performing loans are included in the average balances for the periods presented. The allowance for loan losses is excluded from the average loan balances.
Three Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
September 30, 2003 | September 30, 2002 | June 30, 2003 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average | Yield | Average | Yield | Average | Yield | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance | Interest | Rate | Balance | Interest | Rate | Balance | Interest | Rate | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Securities
|
$ | 1,665,884 | $ | 20,436 | 4.87 | % | $ | 2,004,520 | $ | 29,246 | 5.79 | % | $ | 1,553,656 | $ | 16,111 | 4.16 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
Loans held for sale
|
4,043,670 | 61,934 | 6.08 | % | 2,425,306 | 40,395 | 6.61 | % | 3,467,140 | 52,460 | 6.07 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage loans held for investment
|
3,473,840 | 37,767 | 4.31 | % | 1,521,289 | 23,318 | 6.08 | % | 3,173,541 | 37,201 | 4.70 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Builder construction and income property
|
549,544 | 8,977 | 6.48 | % | 522,539 | 10,110 | 7.68 | % | 570,944 | 9,768 | 6.86 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consumer construction
|
1,009,016 | 15,592 | 6.13 | % | 760,955 | 13,568 | 7.07 | % | 899,204 | 14,639 | 6.53 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment in Federal Home Loan Bank stock and
other
|
277,246 | 2,633 | 3.77 | % | 142,763 | 1,537 | 4.27 | % | 244,552 | 2,298 | 3.77 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total interest-earning assets
|
11,019,200 | 147,339 | 5.30 | % | 7,377,372 | 118,174 | 6.36 | % | 9,909,037 | 132,477 | 5.36 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other
|
1,105,794 | 715,530 | 972,687 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total assets
|
$ | 12,124,994 | $ | 8,092,902 | $ | 10,881,724 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing deposits
|
$ | 3,336,257 | 22,261 | 2.65 | % | $ | 2,476,147 | 23,989 | 3.84 | % | $ | 2,996,427 | 21,950 | 2.94 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank
|
4,094,698 | 28,959 | 2.81 | % | 2,068,865 | 26,635 | 5.11 | % | 3,588,032 | 28,308 | 3.16 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other borrowings
|
2,434,027 | 13,666 | 2.23 | % | 2,032,547 | 17,175 | 3.35 | % | 2,276,959 | 14,704 | 2.59 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total interest-bearing liabilities
|
9,864,982 | 64,886 | 2.61 | % | 6,577,559 | 67,799 | 4.09 | % | 8,861,418 | 64,962 | 2.94 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other
|
1,289,642 | 659,115 | 1,115,755 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities
|
11,154,624 | 7,236,674 | 9,977,173 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shareholders equity
|
970,370 | 856,228 | 904,551 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
$ | 12,124,994 | $ | 8,092,902 | $ | 10,881,724 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income
|
$ | 82,453 | $ | 50,375 | $ | 67,515 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest spread
|
2.70 | % | 2.27 | % | 2.42 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest margin
|
2.97 | % | 2.71 | % | 2.73 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
36
Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
September 30, 2003 | September 30, 2002 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average | Yield | Average | Yield | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance | Interest | Rate | Balance | Interest | Rate | ||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Securities
|
$ | 1,713,395 | $ | 57,508 | 4.49 | % | $ | 1,727,136 | $ | 86,061 | 6.66 | % | |||||||||||||
Loans held for sale
|
3,459,452 | 159,595 | 6.17 | % | 2,043,010 | 105,511 | 6.90 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Mortgage loans held for investment
|
3,135,760 | 110,931 | 4.73 | % | 1,688,024 | 85,012 | 6.73 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Builder construction and income property
|
563,791 | 28,465 | 6.75 | % | 555,700 | 32,434 | 7.80 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Consumer construction
|
915,998 | 44,627 | 6.51 | % | 733,493 | 41,494 | 7.56 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Investment in Federal Home Loan Bank stock and
other
|
234,355 | 6,886 | 3.93 | % | 140,248 | 4,904 | 4.68 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Total interest-earning assets
|
10,022,751 | 408,012 | 5.44 | % | 6,887,611 | 355,416 | 6.90 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Other
|
991,042 | 695,588 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Total assets
|
$ | 11,013,793 | $ | 7,583,199 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing deposits
|
$ | 3,023,169 | 65,899 | 2.91 | % | $ | 2,697,174 | 82,125 | 4.07 | % | |||||||||||||||
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank
|
3,463,913 | 82,825 | 3.20 | % | 1,982,686 | 76,028 | 5.13 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Other borrowings
|
2,507,798 | 46,296 | 2.47 | % | 1,484,197 | 43,931 | 3.96 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Total interest-bearing liabilities
|
8,994,880 | 195,020 | 2.90 | % | 6,164,057 | 202,084 | 4.38 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Other
|
1,103,865 | 551,814 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities
|
10,098,745 | 6,715,871 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Shareholders equity
|
915,048 | 867,328 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
$ | 11,013,793 | $ | 7,583,199 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income
|
$ | 212,992 | $ | 153,332 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest spread
|
2.54 | % | 2.52 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest margin
|
2.84 | % | 2.98 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
The net interest margin during the third quarter of 2003 has widened from that of the second quarter 2003 and third quarter 2002. During the third quarter, the yield on interest earning assets continued to decline due to high prepayment speeds. However, the effect of that was partially offset by higher yielding clean-up call loans we have acquired. In addition, the rapid amortization of higher premium bonds which negatively impacted yields in the second quarter 2003 has substantially abated. Similarly, cost of funds has further decreased on deposits and borrowings. The decrease in borrowing rates is largely result of the repricing of higher interest rate CDs to lower rates and a shift to shorter-term borrowings.
37
The dollar amounts of interest income and interest expense fluctuate depending upon changes in the average balances and interest rates of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. The following table details changes attributable to: (1) changes in volume (changes in average outstanding balances multiplied by the prior periods rate); (2) changes in the rate (changes in the average interest rate multiplied by the prior periods volume); and (3) changes in rate/volume (mix) (changes in rates times the changes in volume).
Three Months Ended September 30, 2003 vs. 2002 | |||||||||||||||||
Increase/(Decrease) Due to | |||||||||||||||||
Volume | Rate | Mix | Total Change | ||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||
Interest income:
|
|||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities
|
$ | (4,941 | ) | $ | (4,655 | ) | $ | 786 | $ | (8,810 | ) | ||||||
Loans held for sale
|
26,956 | (3,249 | ) | (2,168 | ) | 21,539 | |||||||||||
Mortgage loans held for investment
|
29,929 | (6,779 | ) | (8,701 | ) | 14,449 | |||||||||||
Builder construction and income property
|
522 | (1,574 | ) | (81 | ) | (1,133 | ) | ||||||||||
Consumer construction
|
4,423 | (1,809 | ) | (590 | ) | 2,024 | |||||||||||
Investment in Federal Home Loan Bank stock and
other
|
1,447 | (181 | ) | (170 | ) | 1,096 | |||||||||||
Total interest income
|
58,336 | (18,247 | ) | (10,924 | ) | 29,165 | |||||||||||
Interest expense:
|
|||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing deposits
|
8,333 | (7,467 | ) | (2,594 | ) | (1,728 | ) | ||||||||||
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank
|
26,079 | (12,002 | ) | (11,753 | ) | 2,324 | |||||||||||
Other borrowings
|
3,394 | (5,764 | ) | (1,139 | ) | (3,509 | ) | ||||||||||
Total interest expense
|
37,806 | (25,233 | ) | (15,486 | ) | (2,913 | ) | ||||||||||
Net interest income
|
$ | 20,530 | $ | 6,986 | $ | 4,562 | $ | 32,078 | |||||||||
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2003 vs. 2002 | |||||||||||||||||
Increase/(Decrease) Due to | |||||||||||||||||
Volume | Rate | Mix | Total Change | ||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||
Interest income:
|
|||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities
|
$ | (685 | ) | $ | (28,091 | ) | $ | 223 | $ | (28,553 | ) | ||||||
Loans held for sale
|
73,152 | (11,261 | ) | (7,807 | ) | 54,084 | |||||||||||
Mortgage loans held for investment
|
72,911 | (25,297 | ) | (21,695 | ) | 25,919 | |||||||||||
Builder construction and income property
|
472 | (4,377 | ) | (64 | ) | (3,969 | ) | ||||||||||
Consumer construction
|
10,324 | (5,758 | ) | (1,433 | ) | 3,133 | |||||||||||
Investment in Federal Home Loan Bank stock and
other
|
3,291 | (783 | ) | (525 | ) | 1,983 | |||||||||||
Total interest income
|
159,465 | (75,567 | ) | (31,301 | ) | 52,597 | |||||||||||
Interest expense:
|
|||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing deposits
|
9,926 | (23,332 | ) | (2,820 | ) | (16,226 | ) | ||||||||||
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank
|
56,799 | (28,620 | ) | (21,382 | ) | 6,797 | |||||||||||
Other borrowings
|
30,298 | (16,532 | ) | (11,401 | ) | 2,365 | |||||||||||
Total interest expense
|
97,023 | (68,484 | ) | (35,603 | ) | (7,064 | ) | ||||||||||
Net interest income
|
$ | 62,442 | $ | (7,083 | ) | $ | 4,302 | $ | 59,661 | ||||||||
38
OVERALL INTEREST RATE RISK MANAGEMENT
In addition to our hedging activities to mitigate the interest rate risk in our pipeline of mortgage loans held for sale and our investment in servicing-related assets, we perform extensive overall interest rate risk analyses. The primary measurement tool used to evaluate interest rate risk over the comprehensive balance sheet is a net portfolio value (NPV) analysis that simulates the effects changes in interest rates have on the fair value of shareholders equity.
The following table sets forth the NPV and change in NPV of the Bank that we estimate might result from a 100 basis point change in interest rates as of September 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002. IndyMacs NPV model has been built to focus on the Bank alone as the $118.5 million of assets at the Parent Company have relatively little interest rate risk exposure.
September 30, 2003 | December 31, 2002 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effect of Change in | Effect of Change in | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest Rates | Interest Rates | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Decrease | Increase | Decrease | Increase | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair Value | 100 bps | 100 bps | Fair Value | 100 bps | 100 bps | ||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$ | 294,621 | $ | 294,621 | $ | 294,621 | $ | 196,589 | $ | 196,589 | $ | 196,589 | |||||||||||||
Trading securities
|
208,541 | 162,944 | 225,923 | 728,602 | 729,055 | 727,761 | |||||||||||||||||||
Available for sale securities
|
1,515,220 | 1,565,383 | 1,471,031 | 1,563,648 | 1,572,911 | 1,542,879 | |||||||||||||||||||
Loans held for sale
|
2,990,657 | 3,055,545 | 2,901,394 | 2,249,088 | 2,313,001 | 2,170,046 | |||||||||||||||||||
Loans held for investment
|
5,765,989 | 5,817,311 | 5,698,743 | 3,883,039 | 3,913,596 | 3,844,944 | |||||||||||||||||||
MSRs
|
406,917 | 282,948 | 492,942 | 300,539 | 226,834 | 365,046 | |||||||||||||||||||
Other assets
|
684,294 | 696,371 | 672,194 | 465,046 | 473,382 | 459,294 | |||||||||||||||||||
Derivatives
|
149,443 | 208,072 | 170,047 | 72,445 | 67,868 | 104,189 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total assets
|
$ | 12,015,682 | $ | 12,083,195 | $ | 11,926,895 | $ | 9,458,996 | $ | 9,493,236 | $ | 9,410,748 | |||||||||||||
Deposits
|
$ | 4,154,416 | $ | 4,186,643 | $ | 4,123,579 | $ | 3,177,911 | $ | 3,217,410 | $ | 3,139,628 | |||||||||||||
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank
|
4,083,857 | 4,112,223 | 4,055,934 | 2,786,237 | 2,820,402 | 2,753,314 | |||||||||||||||||||
Other borrowings
|
2,417,601 | 2,419,335 | 2,415,588 | 2,493,168 | 2,495,465 | 2,490,801 | |||||||||||||||||||
Other liabilities
|
175,599 | 175,691 | 175,463 | 140,853 | 140,897 | 140,741 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities
|
10,831,473 | 10,893,892 | 10,770,564 | 8,598,169 | 8,674,174 | 8,524,484 | |||||||||||||||||||
Shareholders equity (NPV)
|
$ | 1,184,209 | $ | 1,189,303 | $ | 1,156,331 | $ | 860,827 | $ | 819,062 | $ | 886,264 | |||||||||||||
% Change from base case
|
.43 | % | (2.35 | )% | (4.85 | )% | 2.95 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Retained earnings of $134.9 million contributed significantly to the $323.4 million increase in the Banks NPV during the nine months ended September 30, 2003. This increase also reflects deployment of excess capital primarily through additions to the SFR mortgage HFI portfolio. Additionally, the NPV has improved as the Banks funding mix has become better matched to the related assets through the maturity and subsequent repricing of fixed rate FHLB advances and certificates of deposit in addition to the use of liability hedging strategies. A deposit mix more heavily weighted towards lower cost transaction accounts has also added to the NPV. It should be noted that this analysis does not reflect changes in volumes and profits from our mortgage banking operations that would be expected to result from the interest rate environment.
The assumptions inherent in our interest rate models include expected valuation changes in an instantaneous and parallel interest rate shock and assumptions as to the degree of correlation between our hedge positions and the hedged assets and liabilities. These assumptions may not accurately predict factors such as the spread-widening or spread-tightening risk among the changes in rates on Treasury, LIBOR/swap curve and mortgages. In addition, the sensitivity analysis described in the prior paragraph is limited by the fact that it is performed at a particular point in time and does not incorporate other factors that would impact our financial performance in these scenarios. These factors include, but are not limited to expected increases in
39
The Companys Board of Directors level and management level ALCOs monitor our hedging activities to determine whether the value of our hedge positions, their correlation to the balance sheet item being hedged, and the amounts being hedged, continue to provide adequate protection against interest rate risk. While there can be no assurances that our interest rate management strategies will be effective, we believe we have adequate internal controls to monitor and manage our interest rate risk within reasonable levels.
CREDIT RISK AND RESERVES
The following table summarizes the Companys allowance for loan losses/ credit discounts and non-performing assets as of September 30, 2003.
Allowance | QTD Net | YTD Net | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
for Loan | Total Reserves | Charge | Charge | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Losses/Credit | as a Percentage | Non-Performing | Offs/Net | Offs/Net | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Type of Loan | Book Value | Discounts | of Book Value | Assets | REO (Gains) | REO (Gains) | ||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Held for investment portfolio
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
SFR mortgage loans and HELOCs
|
$ | 3,917,411 | $ | 18,808 | 0.48 | % | $ | 11,112 | $ | 1,014 | $ | 2,870 | ||||||||||||||
Land and other mortgage
|
99,921 | 3,178 | 3.18 | % | 103 | | | |||||||||||||||||||
Builder construction and income property
|
512,152 | 12,587 | 2.46 | % | 11,884 | 100 | 3,166 | |||||||||||||||||||
Consumer construction
|
1,093,918 | 10,313 | 0.94 | % | 8,555 | 446 | 1,017 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total core held for investment loans
|
5,623,402 | 44,886 | 0.80 | % | 31,654 | 1,560 | 7,053 | |||||||||||||||||||
Discontinued product lines(1)
|
76,005 | 7,595 | 9.99 | % | 7,209 | 2,201 | 7,427 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total held for investment portfolio
|
5,699,407 | 52,481 | 0.92 | % | 38,863 | 3,761 | 14,480 | |||||||||||||||||||
Held for sale portfolio
|
3,111,909 | 13,353 | 0.43 | % | 31,414 | | | |||||||||||||||||||
Total loans
|
$ | 8,811,316 | $ | 65,834 | 0.75 | % | 70,277 | $ | 3,761 | $ | 14,480 | |||||||||||||||
Foreclosed assets
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Core portfolios | 26,120 | $ | (101 | ) | $ | (1,326 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Discontinued product lines | 1,556 | 206 | 69 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Total foreclosed assets | 27,676 | $ | 105 | $ | (1,257 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total non-performing assets | $ | 97,953 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total non-performing assets as a percentage of total assets | 0.81 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
(1) | Discontinued product lines include manufactured home loans, home improvement loans and warehouse lines of credit. |
40
The following tables provide additional comparative data on non-performing assets relative to the allowance for loan losses.
September 30, | September 30, | December 31, | |||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2002 | |||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||||||
Loans held for investment
|
|||||||||||||||
Portfolio loans
|
|||||||||||||||
SFR mortgage loans
|
$ | 11,112 | $ | 16,028 | $ | 15,097 | |||||||||
Land and other mortgage loans
|
103 | 14,526 | 8,376 | ||||||||||||
Builder construction
|
11,884 | 12,997 | 9,275 | ||||||||||||
Consumer construction
|
8,555 | 10,075 | 10,257 | ||||||||||||
Total portfolio non-performing loans
|
31,654 | 53,626 | 43,005 | ||||||||||||
Discontinued product lines
|
7,209 | 12,415 | 10,005 | ||||||||||||
Total non-performing loans held for investment
|
38,863 | 66,041 | 53,010 | ||||||||||||
Non-performing loans held for sale
|
31,414 | 10,670 | 10,626 | ||||||||||||
Total non-performing loans
|
70,277 | 76,711 | 63,636 | ||||||||||||
Foreclosed assets
|
27,676 | 26,818 | 36,526 | ||||||||||||
Total non-performing assets
|
$ | 97,953 | $ | 103,529 | $ | 100,162 | |||||||||
Total non-performing assets to total assets
|
0.81 | % | 1.31 | % | 1.05 | % | |||||||||
Allowance for loan losses to non-performing loans
held for investment
|
135 | % | 82 | % | 96 | % | |||||||||
The following shows the activity in the allowance for loan losses during the indicated periods:
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2003 | 2002 | |||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||
Core portfolio loans
|
||||||||||||||||||
Balance, beginning of period
|
$ | 42,346 | $ | 43,256 | $ | 41,314 | $ | 41,771 | ||||||||||
Provision for loan losses
|
4,100 | 1,251 | 10,625 | 5,554 | ||||||||||||||
Charge-offs net of recoveries
|
||||||||||||||||||
SFR mortgage loans
|
(1,014 | ) | (2,173 | ) | (2,870 | ) | (3,916 | ) | ||||||||||
Builder construction
|
(446 | ) | | (1,017 | ) | (1,019 | ) | |||||||||||
Consumer construction
|
(100 | ) | (46 | ) | (3,166 | ) | (102 | ) | ||||||||||
Charge-offs net of recoveries
|
(1,560 | ) | (2,219 | ) | (7,053 | ) | (5,037 | ) | ||||||||||
Balance, end of period
|
44,886 | 42,288 | 44,886 | 42,288 | ||||||||||||||
Discontinued product lines
|
||||||||||||||||||
Balance, beginning of period
|
7,696 | 12,880 | 9,447 | 15,929 | ||||||||||||||
Provision for loan losses
|
2,100 | 1,449 | 5,575 | 4,900 | ||||||||||||||
Charge-offs net of recoveries
|
(2,201 | ) | (2,746 | ) | (7,427 | ) | (9,246 | ) | ||||||||||
Balance, end of period
|
7,595 | 11,583 | 7,595 | 11,583 | ||||||||||||||
Total allowance for loan losses
|
$ | 52,481 | $ | 53,871 | $ | 52,481 | $ | 53,871 | ||||||||||
41
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2003 | 2002 | |||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Net charge-offs to average loans
|
0.05 | % | 0.13 | % | 0.24 | % | 0.39 | % | ||||||||
Core portfolio loans only:
|
||||||||||||||||
Net charge-offs to average loans
|
0.02 | % | 0.06 | % | 0.12 | % | 0.14 | % |
Total credit-related reserves, including the allowance for loan losses and the lower of cost or market valuations, amounted to $65.8 million at September 30, 2003, compared to $57.7 million at December 31, 2002. The allowance for loan losses of $52.5 million for loans held for investment at September 30, 2003 represented 0.92% of total loans held for investment. This compares to an allowance for loan losses of $50.7 million, or 1.28% of total loans held for investment, at December 31, 2002.
The ratio of non-performing assets to total assets improved to 0.81% at September 30, 2003 from 1.05% at December 31, 2002. Total non-performing assets decreased by $2.2 million, from $100.2 million at December 31, 2002 to $98.0 million at September 30, 2003. The decrease is largely due to the decrease of $8.9 million in foreclosed assets as a result of liquidations. However, offsetting the decrease in foreclosed assets, our non-performing loans increased $6.6 million compared to December 31, 2002. The increase in our non-performing loans was due to $20.8 million increase in loans held for sale portfolio, while the non-performing loans held for investment portfolio decreased $14.1 million. The decrease in non-performing loans held for investment can be attributable to overall improved credit quality and strong asset management. The increase in non-performing loans held for sale is a result of the loans acquired through clean-up calls exercised during the third quarter 2003. The clean up call non-performing loans amounted to $14.4 million at September 30, 2003, which accounted for 46% of the total non-performing loans held for sale.
As master servicer for our various securitizations, we retain the right to call the securities when the outstanding loan balance in the securitization trust declines to a specified level, typically 10%, of the original balance. When the fair value of performing loans remaining within a securitization exceeds the expected losses on nonperforming loans and the cost of exercise, we will typically exercise our option to call. We called a total of $372.6 million loans during the third quarter of 2003. A portion of the loans we acquired pursuant to clean-up calls were delinquent or non-performing. At September 30, 2003, non-performing assets acquired through clean-up calls amounted to $17.7 million, of which $14.4 million is non-performing loans included in loans held for sale. We anticipate that approximately $500 million in loans will be eligible for clean-up calls during the fourth quarter of 2003. Therefore, it is possible that the absolute levels of non-performing loans held by us may increase temporarily between the time of the call exercise and the disposition of these loans.
With respect to the portfolio of loans held for investment in IndyMacs core businesses, the allowance for loan losses at September 30, 2003 was $52.5 million or 0.92% of loan balance, compared to 1.48% of total loan balance at September 30, 2002. The overall asset quality improved due to decreases in non-performing loans held for investment and disposition of foreclosed assets. Non-performing loans decreased by $27.2 million from $66.0 million at September 30, 2002 to $38.9 million at September 30, 2003. The non-performing loan amount at September 30, 2003 included one large matured construction loan in the amount of $9.2 million. Between the collateral and the guaranty, we expect to collect the full amount of this loan.
With respect to IndyMacs non-core liquidating portfolios, consisting primarily of manufactured housing and home improvement loans, net charge-offs totaled $2.2 million during the third quarter of 2003, down from the $2.7 million of charge-offs on these portfolios during the third quarter of 2002. After provision for loan losses of $2.1 million, the allowance for loan losses was $7.6 million, or 10% of the remaining principal balance of such liquidating portfolios, compared to the 11.2% reserve coverage at September 30, 2002.
Our determination of the level of the allowance for loan losses and, correspondingly, the provision for loan losses, is based on managements judgments and assumptions regarding various matters, including general economic conditions, loan portfolio composition, delinquency trends and prior loan loss experience. In assessing the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses, management reviews the performance in the portfolios
42
While we consider the allowance for loan losses to be adequate based on information currently available, future adjustments to the allowance may be necessary due to changes in economic conditions, delinquency levels, foreclosure rates, or loss rates. The level of our allowance for loan losses is also subject to review by our federal regulator, the Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS). Our regulator may require that our allowance for loan losses be increased based on their evaluation of the information available to it at the time of its examination of the Bank.
With respect to mortgage loans held for sale, IndyMac does not provide an allowance for loan losses, pursuant to the applicable accounting rules. Instead, a component for credit risk related to loans held for sale is embedded in the lower of cost or market valuation for these loans. The lower of cost or market on loans held for sale totaled $13.4 million at September 30, 2003. The increase in non-performing loans held for sale was largely due to the delinquent loans acquired as part of the clean-up calls exercised by the Company during the third quarter 2003. Therefore, the increase in non-performing loans is not related to our core lending portfolios and is expected to be temporary until the disposition of these loans.
SECONDARY MARKET RESERVES
We do not sell loans with recourse in our loan sale activities. However, we can be required to repurchase loans from investors when our loan sales contain individual loans that are not in conformity with the representations and warranties we make at the time of sale. We have made significant investments in our pre-production and post-production quality control processes to identify potential systemic issues that could cause repurchases. We believe that these efforts have improved our production quality; however, increases in default rates due to an economic slowdown could cause the overall rate of repurchases to remain constant or even increase. Since inception in 1993, the Company has repurchased only a very small amount of loans from its securitization trusts. The increase in repurchase activity in recent years has been primarily a function of IndyMacs diversification of its loan sale channels to whole loan and GSE sales. While sales through these channels generate enhanced cash flows, they tend to have a greater level of representation and warranty risk. The following table shows the amount of loans we have repurchased from each distribution channel, since the Company began active lending operations in January 1993.
Amount | Percentage | |||||||||||||
Repurchased | Total Sold | Repurchased | ||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | ||||||||||||||
Loans sold:
|
||||||||||||||
GSEs and whole loans
|
$ | 81.6 | $ | 50,287 | 0.16 | % | ||||||||
Securitization trusts
|
7.7 | 43,094 | 0.02 | % | ||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 89.3 | $ | 93,381 | 0.10 | % | ||||||||
43
The Company maintains secondary market reserves for losses that arise in connection with loans that we are required to repurchase from whole loan sales or securitization transactions. These reserves, which totaled $36 million at September 30, 2003, have two general components: reserves for repurchases arising from representation and warranty claims, and reserves for disputes with investors and vendors with respect to contractual obligations pertaining to mortgage operations. The table below shows the activity in the reserves during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2003.
Three | Nine | |||||||
Months | Months | |||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||
Balance, beginning of period
|
$ | 30,100 | $ | 37,636 | ||||
Additions/provisions
|
12,202 | 24,013 | ||||||
Claims reimbursement and estimated discounts on
loans held for sale/charge-offs
|
(6,302 | ) | (25,649 | ) | ||||
Balance, September 30, 2003.
|
$ | 36,000 | $ | 36,000 | ||||
Reserve levels are a function of expected losses based on actual pending claims and repurchase requests, historical experience, loan volume and loan sales distribution channels and the assessment of probable vendor or investor claims. While the ultimate amount of repurchases and claims is uncertain, management believes that the reserves are adequate. We will continue to evaluate the adequacy of our reserves and may continue to allocate a portion of its gain on sale proceeds to these reserves going forward. The entire balances of our secondary market reserves are included on the consolidated balance sheets as a component of other liabilities.
OPERATING EXPENSES
A summary of operating expenses follows:
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | June 30, | September 30, | September 30, | ||||||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2003 | 2003 | 2002 | ||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Salaries and related
|
$ | 63,100 | $ | 51,963 | $ | 57,030 | $ | 173,225 | $ | 148,686 | ||||||||||
Premises and equipment
|
9,591 | 8,137 | 8,138 | 26,035 | 22,731 | |||||||||||||||
Loan purchase costs
|
8,176 | 6,063 | 7,810 | 23,044 | 16,294 | |||||||||||||||
Professional services
|
5,581 | 6,402 | 5,086 | 15,277 | 16,213 | |||||||||||||||
Data processing
|
11,430 | 5,554 | 8,131 | 26,325 | 14,919 | |||||||||||||||
Office
|
6,296 | 4,845 | 5,860 | 17,416 | 13,026 | |||||||||||||||
Advertising and promotion
|
6,705 | 3,839 | 6,580 | 19,349 | 9,220 | |||||||||||||||
Operations and sale of foreclosed assets
|
1,506 | (812 | ) | 794 | 3,256 | 164 | ||||||||||||||
Other
|
4,897 | 3,004 | 5,329 | 13,772 | 7,998 | |||||||||||||||
$ | 117,282 | $ | 88,995 | $ | 104,758 | $ | 317,699 | $ | 249,251 | |||||||||||
General and administrative expenses, including salaries, increased during the three months ended September 30, 2003 to $117.3 million, compared to $89.0 million during the same period in 2002, primarily in salaries and related expenses. The increase of $11.1 million in salaries and related expenses over prior year third quarter is attributable to increases in commission and bonus expenses as our production volume and net earnings have increased significantly. During the third quarter 2003, the Company has continued to open new locations and build infrastructure to support its projected continued growth in its operations. Therefore, premises and equipment costs, data processing expenses, and advertising fees have increased by approximately $1.5 million, $5.9 million, and $2.9 million, respectively, over the same quarter of 2002. Lastly, due to reduced gain on sale of foreclosed assets, the net expense on operations of foreclosed assets increased by $2.3 million, as compared to three months ended September 30, 2002.
44
Total general and administrative expenses increased by $68.4 million from $249.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 to $317.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2003. The increase was again largely driven by the increases in salaries and infrastructure related expenses as a result of our significantly increased mortgage loan productions and operational expansions.
Despite the increase in operation expenses, our efficiency ratio has improved from 58% for the quarter ended September 30, 2002 to 57% of current year third quarter.
DIVIDEND POLICY
Based on IndyMacs strong operating performance and strong financial position, including earnings, capital and liquidity and its commitment to shareholder value, IndyMacs Board of Directors declared a cash dividend of $0.20 per share, up 33%, from $0.15 per share in the previous quarter and double the dividend rate paid in the first two quarters this year. The cash dividend is payable December 18, 2003 to shareholders of record on November 13, 2003.
FUTURE OUTLOOK
On average, U.S. mortgage debt outstanding has grown approximately 7% to 8% per year over the last 2 decades and is projected, based on economic demographics, to continue this level of approximate growth. At this rate, mortgage debt outstanding roughly doubles every decade. We believe, based on our confidence in our employees, hybrid thrift/ mortgage banking business model, capital strength and ability to gain market share, that we are positioned to grow earnings per share at a compounded growth rate of approximately 15% over the long run, or approximately double the rate of the industry. In fact IndyMacs historical track record has exceeded this target over the last decade with compounded annual growth of 28% under its current management team. During this period, IndyMac experienced eight years where earnings per share grew at 20% or more each year with one year of negative growth due to extraordinary global market factors in 1998 and one year where earnings per share grew 11%, below this targeted growth level.
With that said, the past three years have been extraordinary years for the mortgage industry. Industry mortgage production has achieved historic highs as a result of historically low interest rates, which led to record refinancing of mortgages. The industry is in the midst of a major transition from these historic highs back to more normalized levels and the Mortgage Bankers Association of America in its Mortgage Finance Forecast is projecting that industry production will decline 52% next year. Given the significant industry transition, IndyMac expects that its earnings per share next year will lag its long-term growth rate and may even decline slightly as we make this transition.
In the midst of this significant industry transition, forecasting is difficult. While there are many scenarios that could occur, we currently reasonably forecast that 2004 earnings per share will range from $2.90 to $3.25. Following this transition period for our industry which will be largely completed by the end of next year, we would expect to continue to grow at our targeted 15% or better annual rate.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
OVERVIEW
At September 30, 2003, we had operating liquidity of $942.5 million, which is represented by unpledged liquid assets on hand plus amounts that may be immediately raised through the pledging of other available assets as collateral pursuant to committed financing facilities. We currently believe that our liquidity level is in excess of that necessary to satisfy our operating requirements and meet our obligations and commitments in a timely and cost effective manner.
45
PRINCIPAL SOURCES OF CASH
Our principal financing needs are to fund acquisitions of mortgage loans and our investment in mortgage loans, mortgage-backed securities and MSRs. Our primary sources of funds used to meet these financing needs are loan sales and securitizations, deposits, advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank, other borrowings and retained earnings. The sources used vary depending on such factors as rates paid, maturities and the impact on our capital.
Loan Sales and Securitizations
Our business model relies heavily upon selling the majority of our mortgage loans shortly after acquisition. The proceeds of these sales are a critical component of the liquidity necessary for our ongoing operations. During the three months ended September 30, 2003, we sold our loans through three channels: (1) GSEs; (2) private label securitizations; and (3) whole loan sales. If any of our sales channels were disrupted, our liquidity could be negatively impacted. Disruptions in our whole loan sales and mortgage securitization transactions can occur as a result of the performance of our existing securitizations, as well as economic events or other factors beyond our control.
Deposits/ Retail Bank
We solicit deposits from the general public and institutions by offering a variety of accounts and rates through our network of 10 branches in Southern California, telebanking, and internet channels. Through our web site at www.indymacbank.com, consumers can access their accounts 24-hours a day, seven days a week. Online banking allows customers to access their accounts, view balances, transfer funds between accounts, view transactions, download account information and pay their bills conveniently from any computer terminal.
Our deposit products include regular savings accounts, demand deposit accounts, money market accounts, certificates of deposit and individual retirement accounts.
The following table sets forth the balance of deposits, by deposit category, as of the following period ends:
September 30, 2003 | September 30, 2002 | December 31, 2002 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
% of | % of | % of | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | Total | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Amount | Deposits | Amount | Deposits | Amount | Deposits | ||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Noninterest-bearing checking
|
$ | 42,897 | 1 | % | $ | 31,562 | 1 | % | $ | 38,430 | 1 | % | |||||||||||||
Interest-bearing checking
|
37,649 | 1 | % | 37,460 | 1 | % | 37,867 | 1 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Savings
|
1,440,208 | 35 | % | 541,270 | 19 | % | 635,608 | 21 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Custodial accounts
|
683,400 | 16 | % | 385,702 | 14 | % | 497,462 | 16 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total core deposits
|
2,204,154 | 53 | % | 995,994 | 35 | % | 1,209,367 | 39 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Certificates of deposit
|
1,942,180 | 47 | % | 1,859,340 | 65 | % | 1,931,135 | 61 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total deposits
|
$ | 4,146,334 | 100 | % | $ | 2,855,334 | 100 | % | $ | 3,140,502 | 100 | % | |||||||||||||
The increase in our savings deposits from $541.3 million to $1,440 million is mainly due to the introduction of the top tier money market products since October of last year. As the equity market remains volatile, liquid saving accounts have been an attractive investment alternative.
46
The following table sets forth the balance of deposits, by deposit channel, as of the following period ends:
September 30, 2003 | September 30, 2002 | December 31, 2002 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
% of | % of | % of | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | Total | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Amount | Deposits | Amount | Deposits | Amount | Deposits | ||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Branch
|
$ | 1,667,092 | 40 | % | $ | 1,241,619 | 43 | % | $ | 1,297,668 | 41 | % | |||||||||||||
Telebanking
|
569,034 | 14 | % | 502,218 | 18 | % | 489,977 | 16 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Internet
|
487,396 | 12 | % | 301,929 | 11 | % | 338,830 | 11 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Money desk
|
739,412 | 18 | % | 423,866 | 15 | % | 516,565 | 16 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Custodial
|
683,400 | 16 | % | 385,702 | 13 | % | 497,462 | 16 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total deposits
|
$ | 4,146,334 | 100 | % | $ | 2,855,334 | 100 | % | $ | 3,140,502 | 100 | % | |||||||||||||
Included in deposits at September 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002 were non-interest bearing custodial accounts, primarily related to our GSE servicing portfolio, totaling $683.4 million and $497.5 million, respectively.
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank
The Federal Home Loan Bank system functions as a borrowing source for regulated financial depositories and similar institutions that are engaged in residential housing finance. As a member of the FHLB of San Francisco, we are required to own capital stock of the FHLB and are authorized to apply for advances from the FHLB, on a secured basis, in amounts determined by reference to available collateral. SFR mortgage loans, agency and AAA-rated mortgage-backed securities are the principal collateral that may be used to secure these borrowings, although certain other types of loans and other assets may also be accepted pursuant to FHLB policies and statutory requirements. Currently, the Bank is approved for collateralized advances of up to $4.8 billion, of which $4.1 billion were outstanding at September 30, 2003. The FHLB offers several credit programs, each with its own fixed or floating interest rate, and a range of maturities.
Trust Preferred Securities and Warrants
On November 14, 2001, we completed an offering of Warrants and Income Redeemable Equity Securities to investors. Gross proceeds of the transaction were $175 million. The securities were offered as units consisting of a trust preferred security, issued by a trust formed by us, and a warrant to purchase IndyMac Bancorps common stock. The proceeds from the offering are intended to be used in ongoing operations and fund future growth and/or repurchases of IndyMac Bancorp stock under its share repurchase program. In July 2003, we issued an additional $30 million of 6.05% trust preferred securities, the proceeds of which will also be used in operations. These securities did not contain any warrants on IndyMac Bancorp common stock.
Upon the adoption of FASB Interpretation No. 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, an Interpretation of Accounting Research Bulletin (ARB) No. 51, on July 1, 2003, the trusts have been deconsolidated from the financial statements of the company. Trust preferred debentures, representing the liabilities due from IndyMac Bancorp to IndyMac Capital Trusts, amounted to $153.2 million and $117.1 million at September 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002, respectively. The increase in balance is primarily due to the issuance of $30 million trust preferred in July 2003. These debentures are included in Other Borrowings on the consolidated balance sheets.
Other Borrowings, excluding Trust Preferred
Other borrowings, excluding trust preferred, consist of loans and securities sold under committed financing facilities and uncommitted agreements to repurchase. Total other borrowings decreased to $2,417.6 million at September 30, 2003, from $2,491.7 million at December 31, 2002. The decrease of
47
At September 30, 2003, we had $2.9 billion in committed financing facilities, of which $1.4 billion was utilized and $636.4 million was available to use, based on eligible collateral. Decisions by our lenders and investors to make additional funds available to us in the future will depend upon a number of factors. These include our compliance with the terms of existing credit arrangements, our financial performance, eligible collateral, changes in our credit rating, industry and market trends in our various businesses, the general availability and interest rates applicable to financing and investments, the lenders and/or investors own resources and policies concerning loans and investments and the relative attractiveness of alternative investment or lending opportunities.
PRINCIPAL USES OF CASH
In addition to the financing sources discussed above, cash uses are funded by net cash flows from operations, sales of mortgage-backed securities and principal and interest payments on loans and securities.
As a financial institution, the lending and borrowing functions are integral parts of our business. When evaluating our sources and uses of cash, we consider cash used to grow our investments, and the borrowings used to finance those investments, separately from the Companys operating cash flows. Our most significant use of cash is for the acquisition of mortgage loans and securities. In accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (US GAAP), purchases of loans held for sale and trading securities, net of sales of such loans and securities, are required to be included in our consolidated statements of cash flows (see page 58) as a component of net cash used in operating activities, whereas the borrowings used to fund a substantial portion of such loan and securities purchases are required to be recorded in our cash flow statements as a component of net cash provided by financing activities. The amounts of net purchases of loans held for sale and trading securities included as components of net cash (used in)/provided by operating activities totaled $(137.2) million during the nine months ended September 30, 2003 and $197.6 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2002. Excluding the purchase and sale activities for loans held for sale and trading securities, the net cash (used in)/provided by the Companys operating activities totaled $(34.0) million and $67.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively. During the third quarter 2003, the Company started to purchase swaptions, and more caps and floors to hedge certain liabilities and servicing-related assets. The net (increase)/decrease in premiums paid for these derivative instruments totaled $(118.4) million and $0.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively. The net cash provided by the Companys operating activities before the activities for trading securities, loans held for sale and purchase of derivative instruments amounted to $84.4 million and $67.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively.
ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
Accumulated other comprehensive loss was ($27.4) million at September 30, 2003, compared to ($17.7) million at December 31, 2002. This change was a result of: (1) the decline in fair value of certain interest rate swaps and swaptions designated as cash flow hedges of floating rate borrowings and does not include related increases in the fair value of loans held for investment that are funded by borrowings that are hedged by these interest rate swaps and (2) the decline in the value of securities classified as available for sale. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss is not a component of the determination of regulatory capital.
48
REGULATORY CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS
The Bank is subject to regulatory capital regulations administered by the federal banking agencies. In addition, as a condition to its approval of our acquisition of SGV Bancorp, Inc. in July 2000, the OTS required that the Bank hold Tier 1 (core) capital of at least 8% of adjusted assets for three years following the consummation of the transaction and maintain a total risk-based capital position of at least 10% of risk-weighted assets. This particular condition expired on July 1, 2003 and the Bank has committed to the OTS to maintain total risk-based capital and Tier 1 risk-based capital (core capital minus the deduction for low-level recourse and residual interests) equal to at least 10% and 6%, respectively, of risk-weighted assets. As of September 30, 2003, the Bank met all of the requirements of a well-capitalized institution under the general regulatory capital regulations.
During 2001, the OTS issued guidance for subprime lending programs, which requires a lender to quantify the additional risks in its subprime lending activities and determine the appropriate amounts of allowances for loan losses and capital it needs to offset those risks. The OTS guidance suggests that subprime portfolios be supported by capital equal to one and one-half to three times greater than what is appropriate for similar prime assets. The OTS has accepted the Banks approach to conform to this guidance, which is based on the secondary market and rating agency securitization models. We segment the subprime loans into categories based on quantifiable, increasing risk levels. Category I includes all subprime loans with 1.0% to 1.5% estimated lifetime loss; Category II includes all subprime loans with 1.5% to 2.0% estimated lifetime loss; and Category III includes all subprime loans with greater than 2.0% estimated lifetime loss. These categories are risk-weighted for capital purposes at 150%, 200% and 300% of the standard risk weighting for the asset type, respectively. We report our subprime loan calculation in an addendum to the Thrift Financial Report that we file with the OTS. The levels and balances within each level were as follows at September 30, 2003:
09/30/03 | Multiple of Standard | Risk-Based | |||||||||||
Balance | Risk Weighting | Capital % | |||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||||
Category I
|
$ | 428,537 | 1.5 | 10 | % | ||||||||
Category II
|
91,219 | 2.0 | 12 | % | |||||||||
Category III
|
231,161 | 3.0 | 22 | % | |||||||||
Total subprime
|
$ | 750,917 | 15 | % | |||||||||
As of September 30, 2003, $469.7 million or 62.6% of our subprime loans are held for sale as calculated for regulatory reporting purposes.
The following table presents the Banks actual and required capital ratios and the minimum required capital ratios to be categorized as well-capitalized at September 30, 2003. Because not all institutions have uniformly implemented the new subprime guidance, it is possible that IndyMacs risk-based capital ratios will not be comparable to other institutions. The impact of the additional risk weighting criteria had the effect of reducing IndyMacs risk-based capital by 109 basis points as noted in the table below.
As Reported | Adjusted for | ||||||||||||
Pre-Subprime | Additional Subprime | Well-Capitalized | |||||||||||
Risk-Weighting | Risk-Weighting | Minimum | |||||||||||
Capital Ratios:
|
|||||||||||||
Tangible
|
7.92 | % | 7.92 | % | 2.00 | % | |||||||
Tier 1 core
|
7.92 | % | 7.92 | % | 5.00 | % | |||||||
Tier 1 risk-based
|
12.94 | % | 11.90 | % | 6.00 | % | |||||||
Total risk-based
|
13.58 | % | 12.49 | % | 10.00 | % |
The ratios above do not include $69.6 million of unencumbered cash at IndyMac Bancorp that is available for contribution to the Banks regulatory capital. Including the excess capital held by the Bank and such cash, we had $260 million of total excess capital at September 30, 2003.
49
We believe that, under current regulations, the Bank will continue to meet its well-capitalized minimum capital requirements in the foreseeable future. The Banks regulatory capital compliance could be impacted, however, by a number of factors, such as changes to applicable regulations, adverse action by our regulators, changes in the Banks mix of assets, interest rate fluctuations or significant changes in the economy in areas where the Bank has most of its loans. Any of these factors could cause our actual future results to vary from anticipated future results and consequently could have an adverse impact on the ability of the Bank to meet its future minimum capital requirements.
OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
We are party to various transactions that have an off-balance sheet component. In connection with loan sales that are securitization transactions, there are $11.3 billion in loans owned by off-balance sheet trusts as of September 30, 2003. The trusts have issued bonds secured by these loans. We have no obligation to provide funding support to either the third party investors or the off-balance sheet trusts. The third party investors or the trusts generally have no recourse to our assets or us and have no ability to require us to repurchase their securities other than for non-credit-related recourse that can arise under standard representations and warranties.
We often retain certain interests, which may include subordinated classes of securities, MSRs, AAA-rated securities and agency interest-only strips and residual securities in the securitization trust. The performance of the loans in the trusts will impact our ability to realize the current estimated fair value of these assets that are included on our balance sheet.
As of September 30, 2003, we have utilized various hedging instruments, including futures, floors, swaps, and options, to reduce our interest-rate exposure on retained servicing assets. The hedging instruments carried a fair value of $122 million at September 30, 2003.
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS
The following table summarizes our material contractual obligations as of September 30, 2003. The debt includes advances from Federal Home Loan Bank, other borrowings, including trust preferred debentures.
Payment Due | |||||||||||||||||
October 1, 2003 | January 1, 2004 | January 1, 2007 | |||||||||||||||
through | through | through | After | ||||||||||||||
December 31, 2003 | December 31, 2006 | December 31, 2009 | December 31, 2009 | ||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||
Debt
|
$ | 4,631,274 | $ | 1,244,979 | $ | 526,000 | $ | 228,374 | |||||||||
Operating Leases
|
3,967 | 43,723 | 24,808 | 19,299 | |||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 4,635,241 | $ | 1,288,702 | $ | 550,808 | $ | 247,673 | |||||||||
KEY OPERATING RISKS
Like all businesses, we assume a certain amount of risk in order to earn returns on our capital. The following is a summary discussion of key operating risks. For further information on these and other key operating risks, refer to IndyMacs annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002.
INTEREST RATE RISK
Due to the characteristics of our financial assets and liabilities and the nature of our business activities, our financial position and results of operations may be materially affected by changes in interest rates in various ways. While we have devised and implemented a comprehensive asset/liability management strategy that seeks, on an economic and an accounting basis, to mitigate significant fluctuations in our financial position and results of operations likely to be caused by market interest rate changes, there can be no assurance that this strategy (including assumptions concerning the correlation thought to exist among different types of instruments) or its implementation will be successful in any particular interest rate environment.
50
VALUATION RISK
In connection with the loan sale process, we retain certain assets for which the market is limited and illiquid. As a result, valuations are derived using complex modeling and significant assumptions and judgments, in the absence of third party market quotations or sale information to value such assets. The assets include AAA-rated securities and agency interest-only strips, MSRs, non-investment grade securities and residuals. In addition, from time to time, we may acquire these types of securities from third party issuers. These assets represented 5% of total assets and 65% of total equity at September 30, 2003. The fair value of these assets could vary significantly as market conditions change.
CREDIT RISK
A significant portion of our Investment Portfolio consists of prime residential SFR loans held for investment, and non-investment grade securities and residuals collateralized by mortgage loans. We also provide construction lending to consumers and developers to build residential properties. The credit risk profile on consumer loans is very similar to that of our permanent mortgage loans, while builder construction loans tend to have a higher credit risk profile than permanent mortgage loans. While the majority of our loans are to prime quality borrowers and secured by residential property, there is no guarantee that, in the event of borrower default, we will be able to recoup the full principal amount and interest due on a loan. We have adopted underwriting and loan quality monitoring systems, procedures and credit policies, including the establishment and review of the allowance for loan losses, that management believes are prudent and appropriate to minimize this risk by tracking loan performance, assessing the likelihood of nonperformance and diversifying our loan portfolio. Such policies and procedures, however, may not prevent unexpected losses that could adversely affect our results. In addition, while we have discontinued our home improvement and manufactured housing lending programs, we continue to liquidate portfolios of these loans, which have greater credit risk than that of our core mortgage loan portfolios. At September 30, 2003, the book value of these non-core portfolios was $68.4 million, net of reserves.
We also sell loans to GSEs, to outside investors, and to securitization trusts. In these instances, we are subject to repurchase risk in the event of breaches of representations or warranties we make in connection with the loan sales. While we have established what we believe to be adequate secondary marketing reserves, there can be no guarantee that the amount reserved is sufficient to cover all potential losses resulting from such repurchases.
LIQUIDITY RISK/ ACCESS TO CAPITAL MARKETS
We finance a substantial portion of our assets through consumer deposits insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) and through borrowings from the FHLB. We also obtain financing from investment and commercial banks. There is no guarantee that these sources of funds will continue to be available to us, or that our borrowings can be refinanced upon maturity, although we are not aware of any trends, events or uncertainties that we believe are reasonably likely to cause a decrease in our liquidity from these sources.
We utilize three sales channels to sell loans to the secondary market: whole loan sales, sales to the GSEs, and private-label securitizations. A disruption in the securitization market could adversely impact our ability to fund mortgage loans and our gains on sale, leading to a corresponding decrease in revenue and earnings. Likewise, a deterioration in the performance of our private-label securities could adversely impact the availability and pricing of future transactions.
51
GOVERNMENT REGULATION AND MONETARY POLICY
The banking industry in general is extensively regulated at the federal and state levels. Insured depository institutions and their holding companies are subject to comprehensive regulation, supervision, and examination by financial regulatory authorities covering all aspects of their organization, management and operations. The OTS and the FDIC are the primary federal regulatory agencies for us and our affiliated entities. In addition to their regulatory powers, these two agencies also have significant enforcement authority that they can use to address unsafe and unsound banking practices, violations of laws, and capital and operational deficiencies. Accordingly, the actions of those governmental authorities responsible for regulatory, fiscal and monetary affairs can have a significant impact on the activities of financial services firms such as ours. Our operations are also subject to regulation at the state level, including a variety of consumer protection provisions. Banking institutions are further affected by the various monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which can influence financial regulatory actions.
COMPETITION
We face significant competition in acquiring and selling loans. In our mortgage banking operations, we compete with other mortgage bankers, GSEs, established third party lending programs, investment banking firms, banks, savings and loan associations, and other lenders and entities purchasing mortgage assets. With regard to mortgage-backed securities issued through our mortgage banking operations, we face competition from other investment opportunities available to prospective investors. We estimate our market share of the U.S. mortgage market to be less than 1%. A number of our competitors have significantly larger market share and financial resources. While we believe our small market share creates opportunities for growth, there is no assurance that we can effectively compete with these entities in the future.
The GSEs have made and we believe will continue to make significant technological and economic advances to broaden their customer bases. When the GSEs contract or expand, there are both positive and negative impacts on our mortgage banking lending operations. As GSEs expand, additional liquidity is brought to the market, and loan products can be resold more quickly. Conversely, expanding GSEs increase competition for loans, which may reduce profit margins on loan sales. We seek to address these competitive pressures by making a strong effort to maximize our use of technology, by diversifying into other residential mortgage products that are less affected by GSEs, and by operating in a more cost-effective manner than our competitors. There can be no assurance that these efforts will be successful.
The primary competition for our Mortgage Banking Group comes from banks and other financial institutions and mortgage companies. We seek to compete with financial institutions and mortgage companies through an emphasis on quality of service, diversified products and maximum use of technology.
OTHER RISKS
We are subject to various other risks, including changes in the demand for mortgage loans, which historically tends to decrease as interest rates increase. Also, a majority of our loan acquisitions are geographically concentrated in certain states, including California, New York, Florida and New Jersey. Any adverse economic conditions in these markets could cause the number of loans acquired to decrease and delinquencies to increase, causing a corresponding decline in revenues. Lastly, there are no guarantees as to our degree of success in managing loan portfolio concentrations, anticipating and taking advantage of technological advances, or executing upon our growth plans for our mortgage banking operations.
52
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Various elements of our accounting policies, by their nature, are inherently subject to estimation techniques, valuation assumptions and other subjective assessments. In particular, we have identified five policies, that, due to the judgments, estimates and assumptions inherent in those policies are critical to an understanding of our financial statements. These policies relate to: (1) the valuation of AAA-rated securities and agency interest-only strips; (2) the valuation of MSRs; (3) the valuation of non-investment grade securities and residuals; (4) the methodology for determining our allowance for loan losses; and (5) the valuation of our secondary market reserves. Management discusses these critical accounting policies and related judgments with IndyMacs audit committee and external auditors on a quarterly basis. We believe that the judgments, estimates and assumptions used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements are appropriate given the factual circumstances at the time. However, given the sensitivity of our consolidated financial statements to these critical accounting policies, the use of other judgments, estimates and assumptions could result in material differences in our results of operations or financial condition. For further information on the Companys critical accounting policies, refer to IndyMacs annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002.
ITEM 3. | QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK |
See Overall Interest Rate Risk Management above for quantitative and qualitative disclosure about market risk on page 39.
53
ITEM 1. | FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
INDYMAC BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
September 30, | December 31, | |||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | |||||||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||
ASSETS | ||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$ | 294,880 | $ | 196,720 | ||||||||
Securities classified as trading
($81.0 million and $472.0 million pledged as
collateral for repurchase agreements at September 30, 2003
and December 31, 2002, respectively)
|
226,251 | 765,883 | ||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities and agency notes
available for sale, amortized cost of $1.5 billion and
$1.6 billion at September 30, 2003 and December 31,
2002, respectively ($1.5 billion and $974.2 million
pledged as collateral for borrowings at September 30, 2003
and December 31, 2002, respectively)
|
1,517,280 | 1,573,210 | ||||||||||
Loans receivable:
|
||||||||||||
Loans held for sale
|
||||||||||||
Prime
|
2,671,883 | 1,939,780 | ||||||||||
Subprime
|
250,717 | 213,405 | ||||||||||
Consumer lot loans
|
175,956 | 74,498 | ||||||||||
Total loans held for sale
|
3,098,556 | 2,227,683 | ||||||||||
Loans held for investment
|
||||||||||||
SFR mortgage
|
3,406,052 | 2,096,517 | ||||||||||
Land and other mortgage
|
99,921 | 130,454 | ||||||||||
Builder construction
|
466,413 | 482,408 | ||||||||||
Consumer construction
|
1,093,918 | 875,335 | ||||||||||
Income property
|
45,739 | 64,053 | ||||||||||
HELOC
|
587,364 | 312,881 | ||||||||||
Allowance for loan losses
|
(52,481 | ) | (50,761 | ) | ||||||||
Total loans held for investment
|
5,646,926 | 3,910,887 | ||||||||||
Total loans receivable ($1.7 billion pledged
as collateral for repurchase agreements at September 30,
2003 and December 31, 2002)
|
8,745,482 | 6,138,570 | ||||||||||
Mortgage servicing rights
|
406,917 | 300,539 | ||||||||||
Investment in Federal Home Loan Bank stock, at
cost
|
267,196 | 155,443 | ||||||||||
Interest receivable
|
45,047 | 47,089 | ||||||||||
Goodwill and other intangible assets
|
33,894 | 34,549 | ||||||||||
Foreclosed assets
|
27,676 | 36,526 | ||||||||||
Other assets
|
502,844 | 325,925 | ||||||||||
Total assets
|
$ | 12,067,467 | $ | 9,574,454 | ||||||||
54
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (Continued)
September 30, | December 31, | |||||||||
2003 | 2002 | |||||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY | ||||||||||
Deposits
|
$ | 4,146,334 | $ | 3,140,502 | ||||||
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank
|
4,059,899 | 2,721,783 | ||||||||
Other borrowings
|
2,570,728 | 2,608,534 | ||||||||
Other liabilities
|
330,946 | 253,670 | ||||||||
Total liabilities
|
11,107,907 | 8,724,489 | ||||||||
Shareholders Equity
|
||||||||||
Preferred stock authorized,
10,000,000 shares of $0.01 par value; none issued
|
| | ||||||||
Common stock authorized, 200,000,000
shares of $0.01 par value; issued 84,715,708 shares (55,561,512
outstanding) at September 30, 2003 and issued 83,959,547
shares (54,829,486 outstanding) at December 31, 2002
|
847 | 840 | ||||||||
Additional paid-in-capital
|
1,018,953 | 1,007,936 | ||||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
(27,352 | ) | (17,747 | ) | ||||||
Retained earnings
|
486,349 | 377,707 | ||||||||
Treasury stock, 29,154,196 shares and 29,130,061
shares at September 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002,
respectively
|
(519,237 | ) | (518,771 | ) | ||||||
Total shareholders equity
|
959,560 | 849,965 | ||||||||
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
$ | 12,067,467 | $ | 9,574,454 | ||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
55
INDYMAC BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
For the Three Months | For the Nine Months | |||||||||||||||||
Ended September 30, | Ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2003 | 2002 | |||||||||||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data) | ||||||||||||||||||
Interest income
|
||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed and other securities
|
$ | 20,437 | $ | 29,246 | $ | 57,508 | $ | 86,061 | ||||||||||
Loans held for sale
|
||||||||||||||||||
Prime
|
52,571 | 32,660 | 133,340 | 92,089 | ||||||||||||||
Subprime
|
6,784 | 4,327 | 20,170 | 10,014 | ||||||||||||||
HELOC
|
| 3,004 | | 3,004 | ||||||||||||||
Consumer lot loans
|
2,578 | 404 | 6,085 | 404 | ||||||||||||||
Total loans held for sale
|
61,933 | 40,395 | 159,595 | 105,511 | ||||||||||||||
Loans held for investment
|
||||||||||||||||||
SFR mortgage
|
30,140 | 20,272 | 90,113 | 66,289 | ||||||||||||||
Land and other mortgage
|
1,793 | 3,046 | 5,886 | 15,599 | ||||||||||||||
Builder construction
|
8,191 | 8,743 | 25,474 | 28,474 | ||||||||||||||
Consumer construction
|
15,591 | 13,568 | 44,627 | 41,494 | ||||||||||||||
Income property
|
787 | 1,367 | 2,991 | 3,960 | ||||||||||||||
HELOC
|
5,834 | | 14,931 | 3,124 | ||||||||||||||
Total loans held for investment
|
62,336 | 46,996 | 184,022 | 158,940 | ||||||||||||||
Other
|
2,633 | 1,537 | 6,887 | 4,904 | ||||||||||||||
Total interest income
|
147,339 | 118,174 | 408,012 | 355,416 | ||||||||||||||
Interest expense
|
||||||||||||||||||
Deposits
|
22,261 | 23,989 | 65,899 | 82,125 | ||||||||||||||
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank
|
28,959 | 26,635 | 82,824 | 76,028 | ||||||||||||||
Other borrowings
|
13,666 | 17,175 | 46,297 | 43,931 | ||||||||||||||
Total interest expense
|
64,886 | 67,799 | 195,020 | 202,084 | ||||||||||||||
Net interest income
|
82,453 | 50,375 | 212,992 | 153,332 | ||||||||||||||
Provision for loan losses
|
6,200 | 2,700 | 16,200 | 10,454 | ||||||||||||||
Net interest income after provision for loan
losses
|
76,253 | 47,675 | 196,792 | 142,878 | ||||||||||||||
Other income
|
||||||||||||||||||
Gain on sale of loans
|
121,498 | 77,279 | 307,428 | 226,025 | ||||||||||||||
Service fee (loss) income
|
(11,113 | ) | 3,593 | (10,130 | ) | 17,820 | ||||||||||||
(Loss)gain on mortgage-backed securities, net
|
(8,647 | ) | 7,674 | (24,816 | ) | 3,387 | ||||||||||||
Fee and other income
|
21,655 | 14,531 | 60,634 | 40,820 | ||||||||||||||
Total other income
|
123,393 | 103,077 | 333,116 | 288,052 | ||||||||||||||
Net revenues
|
199,646 | 150,752 | 529,908 | 430,930 | ||||||||||||||
Other expense
|
||||||||||||||||||
Operating expenses
|
117,282 | 88,995 | 317,699 | 249,251 | ||||||||||||||
Amortization of other intangible assets
|
208 | 263 | 655 | 842 | ||||||||||||||
Total other expense
|
117,490 | 89,258 | 318,354 | 250,093 | ||||||||||||||
Earnings before provision for income taxes
|
82,156 | 61,494 | 211,554 | 180,837 | ||||||||||||||
Provision for income taxes
|
32,452 | 24,290 | 83,564 | 73,040 | ||||||||||||||
Net earnings
|
$ | 49,704 | $ | 37,204 | $ | 127,990 | $ | 107,797 | ||||||||||
Earnings per share
|
||||||||||||||||||
Basic
|
$ | 0.90 | $ | 0.65 | $ | 2.33 | $ | 1.83 | ||||||||||
Diluted
|
$ | 0.87 | $ | 0.64 | $ | 2.26 | $ | 1.78 | ||||||||||
Weighted average shares outstanding
|
||||||||||||||||||
Basic
|
55,255 | 56,879 | 55,034 | 59,040 | ||||||||||||||
Diluted
|
56,991 | 58,375 | 56,561 | 60,727 | ||||||||||||||
Dividends paid per share
|
$ | 0.15 | | $ | 0.35 | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
56
INDYMAC BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Accumulated | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Additional | Comprehensive | Total | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Common | Paid-In- | Income | Retained | Comprehensive | Treasury | Shareholders | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Outstanding | Stock | Capital | (Loss) | Earnings | Income | Stock | Equity | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2001
|
60,366,266 | $ | 833 | $ | 996,649 | $ | 570 | $ | 234,314 | $ | | $ | (387,228 | ) | $ | 845,138 | ||||||||||||||||
Common stock options exercised
|
583,669 | 6 | 9,397 | | | | | 9,403 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net directors and officers notes
(receivables)
|
| | (379 | ) | | | | | (379 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Deferred compensation, restricted stock
|
21,356 | | 1,227 | | | | | 1,227 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net loss on mortgage securities available for sale
|
| | | 1,456 | | 1,456 | | 1,456 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net unrealized loss on derivatives used in cash
flow hedges
|
| | | (16,205 | ) | | (16,205 | ) | | (16,205 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Dividend reinvestment plan
|
1,341 | | 33 | | | | | 33 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Purchases of common stock
|
(5,013,163 | ) | | | | | | (110,669 | ) | (110,669 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net earnings
|
| | | | 107,797 | 107,797 | | 107,797 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income
|
| | | | | $ | 93,048 | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at September 30, 2002
|
55,959,469 | $ | 839 | $ | 1,006,927 | $ | (14,179 | ) | $ | 342,111 | $ | (497,897 | ) | $ | 837,801 | |||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2002
|
54,829,486 | $ | 840 | $ | 1,007,936 | $ | (17,747 | ) | $ | 377,707 | $ | | $ | (518,771 | ) | $ | 849,965 | |||||||||||||||
Common stock options exercised
|
552,148 | 7 | 9,159 | | | | | 9,166 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net directors and officers notes
payments
|
| | 196 | | | | | 196 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deferred compensation, restricted stock
|
204,013 | | 1,662 | | | | | 1,662 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net loss on mortgage securities available for sale
|
| | | (3,468 | ) | | (3,468 | ) | | (3,468 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net unrealized loss on derivatives used in cash
flow hedges
|
| | | (6,137 | ) | | (6,137 | ) | | (6,137 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Purchases of common stock
|
(24,135 | ) | | | | | | (466 | ) | (466 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Cash dividends
|
| | | | (19,348 | ) | | | (19,348 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net earnings
|
| | | | 127,990 | 127,990 | | 127,990 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income
|
| | | | | $ | 118,385 | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at September 30, 2003
|
55,561,512 | $ | 847 | $ | 1,018,953 | $ | (27,352 | ) | $ | 486,349 | $ | (519,237 | ) | $ | 959,560 | |||||||||||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
57
For the Nine Months | |||||||||||
Ended September 30, | |||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | ||||||||||
(Unaudited) | |||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||
Cash flows from operating
activities:
|
|||||||||||
Net earnings
|
$ | 127,990 | $ | 107,797 | |||||||
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash
(used in) provided by operating activities:
|
|||||||||||
Total amortization and depreciation
|
145,836 | 98,728 | |||||||||
Provision for valuation adjustment of mortgage
servicing rights
|
14,670 | 103,760 | |||||||||
Gain on sale of loans
|
(307,428 | ) | (226,025 | ) | |||||||
Loss (gain) on mortgage-backed securities, net
|
24,816 | (3,387 | ) | ||||||||
Provision for loan losses
|
16,200 | 10,454 | |||||||||
Net decrease (increase) in mortgage servicing
rights
|
3,772 | (885 | ) | ||||||||
Net decrease (increase) in other assets and
liabilities
|
58,535 | (23,473 | ) | ||||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities before
activity for trading securities, held for sale loans and
purchase of derivative instruments
|
84,391 | 66,969 | |||||||||
Net sales (purchases) of trading securities
|
589,876 | (280,535 | ) | ||||||||
Net (purchases) sales of and payments from
loans held for sale
|
(727,073 | ) | 478,140 | ||||||||
Net (increase) decrease on premiums paid for
derivative instruments
|
(118,407 | ) | 563 | ||||||||
Net cash (used in) provided by operating
activities
|
(171,213 | ) | 265,137 | ||||||||
Cash flows from investing
activities:
|
|||||||||||
Net purchases of and payments from loans held for
investment
|
(1,925,254 | ) | (172,055 | ) | |||||||
Net sales (purchases) of and payments from
mortgage-backed securities available for sale
|
46,145 | (294,302 | ) | ||||||||
Net increase in investment in Federal Home Loan
Bank stock, at cost
|
(111,753 | ) | (8,861 | ) | |||||||
Net purchases of property, plant and equipment
|
(28,236 | ) | (33,099 | ) | |||||||
Net cash used in investing activities
|
(2,019,098 | ) | (508,317 | ) | |||||||
Cash flows from financing
activities:
|
|||||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in deposits
|
1,005,832 | (383,536 | ) | ||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in advances from Federal
Home Loan Bank
|
1,337,914 | (49,799 | ) | ||||||||
Net (decrease) increase in other borrowings
|
(74,373 | ) | 788,313 | ||||||||
Net proceeds from issuance of trust preferred
debentures
|
29,550 | | |||||||||
Net payments from stock options and notes
receivable
|
9,362 | 10,284 | |||||||||
Cash dividends paid
|
(19,348 | ) | | ||||||||
Purchases of common stock
|
(466 | ) | (110,669 | ) | |||||||
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
2,288,471 | 254,593 | |||||||||
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
98,160 | 11,413 | |||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
196,720 | 153,295 | |||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$ | 294,880 | $ | 164,708 | |||||||
Supplemental cash flow information:
|
|||||||||||
Cash paid for interest
|
$ | 193,569 | $ | 195,412 | |||||||
Cash paid for income taxes
|
$ | 35,875 | $ | 25,341 | |||||||
Supplemental disclosure of noncash investing
and financing activities
|
|||||||||||
Net transfer of loans held for sale to
(from) loans held for investment
|
$ | 1,786,048 | $ | (176,261 | ) | ||||||
Net transfer of mortgage-backed securities
available for sale to trading
|
$ | | $ | 215,050 | |||||||
Net transfer of mortgage-servicing rights to
trading securities
|
$ | 47,311 | $ | 66,288 | |||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
58
INDYMAC BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Note 1 Basis of Presentation
IndyMac Bancorp, Inc. is a savings and loan holding company. References to IndyMac Bancorp refer to the parent company alone while references to IndyMac or we refer to IndyMac Bancorp and its consolidated subsidiaries. Our primary business is single family residential mortgage lending, using a hybrid thrift business model including portfolio lending and thrift financing. We offer a wide array of home mortgage products using a technology-based approach, leveraged across multiple products, channels and customers.
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of IndyMac Bancorp and its subsidiaries, including IndyMac Bank®, F.S.B. (IndyMac Bank). All significant intercompany balances and transactions with IndyMacs consolidated subsidiaries have been eliminated in consolidation. The consolidated financial statements of IndyMac are prepared in conformity with US GAAP. The foregoing financial statements are unaudited; however, in the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments necessary for a fair statement of the results for the interim periods have been included. Operating results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2003 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2003. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in IndyMacs annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002.
Note 2 Newly Adopted or Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In January 2003, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, and Interpretation of Accounting Research Bulletin (ARB) No. 51, (the Interpretation). The Interpretation introduces a new consolidation model the variable interests model which determines control (and consolidation) based on potential variability in gains or losses of the entity being evaluated for consolidation. The party with the majority of the variability in gains or losses of the variable interest entity (VIE) is required to consolidate the VIE. However, qualifying special-purpose entities defined under SFAS No. 140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities, are not required to be consolidated in the financial statements of a transferor. We adopted the Interpretation on July 1, 2003 and deconsolidated the capital trusts formed in connection with the issuance of trust preferred securities, which had very minimal effect on the consolidated financial statements. We also are not aware of any other relationships or transactions that we have entered impacted by FIN No. 46. Lastly, the FIN No. 46 provisions are subject to further deliberation by the FASB, and accordingly, there could be further changes to our accounting for the capital trusts formed for the issuance of trust preferred securities.
The FASB issued SFAS No. 149, Amendment of Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (SFAS No. 149) on April 30, 2003. SFAS No. 149 does not amend the definition of a derivative. The provisions of SFAS No. 149 merely represent the codification of previous Derivatives Implementation Group decisions, which are already effective and being applied. SFAS No. 149 is effective for contracts entered into or modified after June 30, 2003, and hedging relationships designated after June 30, 2003. The adoption of SFAS No. 149 did not have a material impact on the financial condition or the operating results of the Company.
On May 15, 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 150, Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of Both Liabilities and Equity (SFAS No. 150). SFAS No. 150 requires liability accounting for certain freestanding financial instruments that are either indexed to, or potentially settled in shares of the issuer. SFAS No. 150 does not apply to obligations incurred pursuant to stock compensation arrangements accounted for under APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees. SFAS No. 150 is effective for all financial instruments created or modified after May 31, 2003, and otherwise effective for the Company on July 1, 2003. Application of SFAS No. 150 to instruments that exist on the date
59
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
of adoption should be reported through a cumulative effect of a change in an accounting principle. The adoption of SFAS No. 150 did not have any impact on the financial condition or the operating results of the Company.
Note 3 Securities
The following table details our securities classified as trading and mortgage-backed and other securities available for sale as of September 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002, respectively.
September 30, | December 31, | |||||||||
2003 | 2002 | |||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||
Securities classified as trading:
|
||||||||||
AAA-rated securities and agency interest-only
strips
|
$ | 155,258 | $ | 187,060 | ||||||
AAA-rated principal-only securities
|
5,647 | 79,554 | ||||||||
U.S. Treasury securities
|
| 282,219 | ||||||||
AAA-rated non-agency securities
|
| 101,185 | ||||||||
AAA-rated agency securities
|
| 25,055 | ||||||||
Other investment grade securities
|
8,851 | 9,114 | ||||||||
Other non-investment grade securities
|
1,752 | 2,956 | ||||||||
Residual securities
|
54,743 | 78,740 | ||||||||
Total
|
$ | 226,251 | $ | 765,883 | ||||||
Mortgage-backed securities and agency notes
available for sale:
|
||||||||||
AAA-rated non-agency securities
|
$ | 1,306,531 | $ | 1,406,321 | ||||||
AAA-rated agency securities
|
33,762 | 123,269 | ||||||||
AAA-rated agency notes
|
146,631 | | ||||||||
Other investment grade securities
|
23,551 | 39,258 | ||||||||
Other non-investment grade securities
|
6,805 | 4,362 | ||||||||
Total
|
$ | 1,517,280 | $ | 1,573,210 | ||||||
Note 4 Segment Reporting
IndyMac operates through its three main segments: IndyMac Mortgage Bank, IndyMac Consumer Bank and the Investment Portfolio Group. IndyMac Mortgage Bank is centered on providing consumers with mortgage products through relationships with the Companys business customers mortgage brokers, mortgage bankers, financial institutions, real estate professionals and homebuilders. IndyMac Consumer Bank provides the platform for the mortgage and deposit services that IndyMac offers directly to consumers. Loans produced by IndyMac Mortgage Bank and IndyMac Consumer Bank are then securitized through the issuance of mortgage-backed securities, sold to government-sponsored enterprises, resold in bulk whole loan sales to investors, or transferred to and retained by our Investment Portfolio Group. The Investment Portfolio Group serves as the main link to customers whose mortgages we service. Through its investments in single-family residential mortgages, mortgage-backed securities and mortgage servicing rights, it serves a critical support function for IndyMacs mortgage lending operations.
Prior to 2003, we managed our business through only two operating segments: Mortgage Banking and Investment Portfolio. Previously, our consumer mortgage loan production business units were included with
60
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Mortgage Banking, and our consumer banking operations were included as overhead to the Company, or Other. Segment information for 2002, including a change in the allocation method of interest expense to the operating segments, has been adjusted to conform to the current method of segment disclosure.
The profitability of each operating segment is measured on a fully-leveraged basis after allocating capital based on regulatory capital rules. The Company uses a match-funded transfer pricing system to allocate net interest income to the operating segments. Each operating segment is allocated funding with maturities and interest rates matched with the expected lives, repricing frequencies and financing liquidities of the segments assets. Deposits receive a funding credit using a similar methodology. The difference between these allocations and the Companys actual net interest income and capital levels resulting from centralized management of funding costs is reported in Other. Also included in Other are unallocated corporate costs such as corporate salaries and related expenses, excess capital, and non-recurring corporate items.
Segment information for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002 was as follows:
IndyMac | IndyMac | Investment | |||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage | Consumer | Portfolio | |||||||||||||||||||
Bank | Bank | Group | Other | Consolidated | |||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Three months ended September 30, 2003
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income(expense)
|
$ | 50,194 | $ | 14,314 | $ | 28,045 | $ | (10,100 | ) | $ | 82,453 | ||||||||||
Net revenues (loss)
|
158,546 | 53,553 | 16,961 | (29,414 | ) | 199,646 | |||||||||||||||
Net earnings (loss)
|
64,380 | 16,663 | 3,483 | (34,822 | ) | 49,704 | |||||||||||||||
Assets as of September 30, 2003
|
$ | 3,651,439 | $ | 1,119,854 | $ | 6,661,224 | $ | 634,950 | $ | 12,067,467 | |||||||||||
Three months ended September 30, 2002
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income (expense)
|
$ | 36,421 | $ | 8,066 | $ | 17,053 | $ | (11,165 | ) | $ | 50,375 | ||||||||||
Net revenues (loss)
|
110,037 | 32,607 | 34,662 | (26,554 | ) | 150,752 | |||||||||||||||
Net earnings (loss)
|
43,747 | 6,783 | 15,917 | (29,243 | ) | 37,204 | |||||||||||||||
Assets as of September 30, 2002
|
$ | 2,812,371 | $ | 551,890 | $ | 4,230,532 | $ | 298,179 | $ | 7,892,972 |
IndyMac | IndyMac | Investment | |||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage | Consumer | Portfolio | |||||||||||||||||||
Bank | Bank | Group | Other | Consolidated | |||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Nine months ended September 30, 2003
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income (expense)
|
$ | 139,245 | $ | 36,216 | $ | 65,884 | $ | (28,353 | ) | $ | 212,992 | ||||||||||
Net revenues (loss)
|
400,998 | 138,544 | 53,620 | (63,254 | ) | 529,908 | |||||||||||||||
Net earnings (loss)
|
158,866 | 40,457 | 13,377 | (84,710 | ) | 127,990 | |||||||||||||||
Assets as of September 30, 2003
|
$ | 3,651,439 | $ | 1,119,854 | $ | 6,661,224 | $ | 634,950 | $ | 12,067,467 | |||||||||||
Nine months ended September 30, 2002
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income (expense)
|
$ | 116,066 | $ | 24,136 | $ | 54,616 | $ | (41,486 | ) | $ | 153,332 | ||||||||||
Net revenues (loss)
|
326,952 | 83,697 | 81,983 | (61,702 | ) | 430,930 | |||||||||||||||
Net earnings (loss)
|
129,093 | 17,605 | 33,466 | (72,367 | ) | 107,797 | |||||||||||||||
Assets as of September 30, 2002
|
$ | 2,812,371 | $ | 551,890 | $ | 4,230,532 | $ | 298,179 | $ | 7,892,972 |
Note 5 Stock-Based Compensation
We have two stock incentive plans, the 2002 Incentive Plan and the 2000 Stock Incentive Plan (collectively, the Plans), which provide for the granting of non-qualified stock options, incentive stock options, restricted stock awards, performance stock awards, stock bonuses and other awards to our employees
61
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(including officers and directors). Awards are granted at the average market price of our stock on the grant date, vest over varying periods generally beginning at least one year from the date of grant, and expire ten years from the date of grant.
As permitted by SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation (SFAS No. 123), we continue to measure and recognize compensation expense using the intrinsic value method specified in Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees (APB No. 25). As required under the provisions of SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation Transition and Disclosure, the following table discloses the pro forma net income and pro forma basic and diluted earnings per share had the fair value method been applied to all stock awards for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002:
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2003 | 2002 | |||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands, | ||||||||||||||||||
except per share data) | ||||||||||||||||||
Net Earnings
|
||||||||||||||||||
As reported
|
$ | 49,704 | $ | 37,204 | $ | 127,990 | $ | 107,797 | ||||||||||
Stock-based compensation expense
|
(4,257 | ) | (5,398 | ) | (12,546 | ) | (14,550 | ) | ||||||||||
Tax effect
|
1,682 | 2,132 | 4,956 | 5,747 | ||||||||||||||
Pro forma
|
$ | 47,129 | $ | 33,938 | $ | 120,400 | $ | 98,994 | ||||||||||
Basic Earnings Per Share
|
||||||||||||||||||
As reported
|
$ | 0.90 | $ | 0.65 | $ | 2.33 | $ | 1.83 | ||||||||||
Pro forma
|
$ | 0.85 | $ | 0.60 | $ | 2.19 | $ | 1.68 | ||||||||||
Diluted Earnings Per Share
|
||||||||||||||||||
As reported
|
$ | 0.87 | $ | 0.64 | $ | 2.26 | $ | 1.78 | ||||||||||
Pro forma
|
$ | 0.83 | $ | 0.58 | $ | 2.13 | $ | 1.63 |
In addition, during the three months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002, we recognized compensation expense of $612 thousand ($370 thousand, net of taxes) and $370 thousand ($224 thousand, net of taxes), respectively, related to restricted stock awards. These expenses were included in net earnings as reported.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
As of September 30, 2003, an evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of the Companys management, including the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO), of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures. Based on that evaluation, the Companys management, including the CEO and CFO, concluded that the Companys disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of September 30, 2003. There have been no significant changes in the Companys internal control over financial reporting or in other factors that could significantly affect internal control over financial reporting subsequent to September 30, 2003.
62
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
(a) Exhibits
10.1
|
Employment Agreement dated September 29, 2003 between IndyMac Bank and Ashwin Adarkar. | |
10.2
|
Employment Agreement dated September 15, 2003 between IndyMac Bank and Sherry Dupont. | |
10.3
|
Employment Agreement dated July 1, 2001 between IndyMac Bank and Charles Holroyd. | |
10.4
|
Employment Agreement dated July 31, 2003 between IndyMac Bank and Thomas H. Potts. | |
10.5
|
Employment Agreement dated July 31, 2003 between IndyMac Bank and Charles Allen Williams. | |
10.6
|
IndyMac Bank Deferred Compensation Plan, as amended. | |
31.1
|
Chief Executive Officers Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
31.2
|
Chief Financial Officers Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
32.1
|
Chief Executive Officers Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
32.2
|
Chief Financial Officers Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
(b) Reports on Form 8-K
The Company furnished a report on Form 8-K on September 9, 2003, which included:
Item 9.
|
Regulation FD Disclosure regarding presentation material for the Roth Capital Partners Conference in New York, September 9, 2003. |
63
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Pasadena, State of California, on October 31, 2003.
INDYMAC BANCORP, INC. |
By: | /s/ MICHAEL W. PERRY |
|
|
Michael W. Perry | |
Chairman of the Board of Directors | |
and Chief Executive Officer |
By: | /s/ SCOTT KEYS |
|
|
Scott Keys | |
Executive Vice President | |
and Chief Financial Officer |
64