<PAGE>
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002
Commission File Number: 0-24071
Sovran Acquisition Limited Partnership
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware |
16-1481551 |
6467 Main Street |
(Registrant's telephone number including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of Securities |
Exchanges on which Registered |
Securities registered pursuant to section 12(g) of the Act:
Units of Limited Partnership Interest
(Title of Class)
- 1 -
<PAGE>
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes [ X ] No [ ]
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [ X ]
As of March 14, 2003, 13,436,617 Units of Limited Partnership Interest were outstanding.
Exhibit Index is on Pages 68-70
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the Proxy Statement for Annual Meeting of Shareholders of the Company to be held on May 15, 2003 (Part III).
- 2 -
<PAGE>
Part I
ITEM 1. |
BUSINESS |
General
Sovran Acquisition Limited Partnership (the "Operating Partnership") is the entity through which Sovran Self Storage, Inc. (the "Company"), a self-administered and self-managed real estate investment trust ("REIT"), conducts substantially all of the Company's business and owns substantially all of the Company's assets. The Operating Partnership is one of the largest owners and operators of self-storage properties in the Eastern United States and Texas. In 1995, the Company was formed under Maryland law and the Operating Partnership was organized as a Delaware limited partnership to continue and to expand the self-storage operations of the Company's privately owned predecessor organizations. The term "Company" as used herein means Sovran Self Storage, Inc. and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis (including the Operating Partnership) or, where the context so requires, Sovran Self Storage, Inc. only. The term "Operating Partnership" as used herein means Sovran Acquisition Limited Partnership.
At December 31, 2002, the Company is a 95.90% economic owner of the Operating Partnership and controls it through Sovran Holdings, Inc. ("Holdings"), a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company incorporated in Delaware and the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership. This structure is commonly referred to as an umbrella partnership REIT or "UPREIT." The Board of Directors of Holdings, the members of which are the same as the members of the Board of Directors of the Company, manages the affairs of the Operating Partnership by directing the affairs of Holdings. The Company's limited partner and indirect general partner interests in the Operating Partnership entitle it to share in cash distributions from, and in the profits and losses of, the Operating Partnership in proportion to its ownership interest therein and entitle the Company to vote on all matters requiring a vote of the limited partners.
The other limited partners of the Operating Partnership are persons who contributed their direct or indirect interests in certain self-storage properties to the Operating Partnership. The Operating Partnership is obligated to redeem each unit of limited partnership ("Unit") at the request of the holder thereof for cash equal to the fair market value of a share of the Company's common stock, par value $.01 per share ("Common Shares"), at the time of such redemption, provided that the Company at its option may elect to acquire any such Unit presented for redemption for one Common Share or cash. With each such redemption or acquisition by the Company, the Company's percentage ownership interest in the Operating Partnership will increase. In addition, whenever the Company issues Common Shares, the Company is obligated to contribute any net proceeds therefrom to the Operating Partnership and the Operating Partnership is obligated to issue an equiva lent number of Units to the Company.
The Operating Partnership may issue additional Units to acquire additional self-storage properties in transactions that in certain circumstances defer some or all of the sellers' tax consequences. The Operating Partnership believes that many potential sellers of self-storage properties have a low tax basis in their properties
- 3 -
<PAGE>
and would be more willing to sell the properties in transactions that defer Federal income taxes. Offering Units instead of cash for properties may provide potential sellers partial Federal income tax deferral.
At March 15, 2003, the Operating Partnership owned and/or managed 264 Properties consisting of approximately 15.3 million net rentable square feet, situated in 21 states. Eleven of the Properties are managed under an agreement with an unconsolidated joint venture that is 45% owned by the Operating Partnership. As of December 31, 2002, the Properties have a weighted average occupancy of 84% and a weighted average annual rent per occupied square foot of $8.61. The Operating Partnership is the 5th largest operator of self-storage properties in the United States based on facilities owned and/or managed.
The Operating Partnership seeks to increase cash flow and enhance unitholder value through aggressive management of the Properties and selective acquisitions of new self-storage properties. Aggressive property management entails increasing rents, increasing occupancy levels, strictly controlling costs, maximizing collections, strategically expanding and improving the Properties and, should economic conditions warrant, developing new properties. The Operating Partnership believes that there continues to be significant opportunities for growth through acquisitions, and constantly seeks to acquire self-storage properties that are susceptible to realization of increased economies of scale and enhanced performance through application of the Operating Partnership's management expertise.
The Operating Partnership's principal executive offices are located at 6467 Main Street, Buffalo, New York 14221, and its telephone number is (716) 633-1850.
Industry Overview
The Operating Partnership believes that self-storage facilities offer inexpensive storage space to residential and commercial users. In addition to fully enclosed and secure storage space, some operators, including the Operating Partnership, also offer outside storage for automobiles, recreational vehicles and boats. The storage sites are usually fenced and well lighted with gates that are either manually operated or automated. All facilities have a full-time manager/leasing agent. Customers have access to their storage area during business hours and in certain circumstances are provided with 24-hour access. Individual storage units are secured by the customer's lock, which may be purchased from the Operating Partnership, and the customer has control of access to the unit.
The Operating Partnership believes that the self-storage industry is characterized by a trend toward consolidation and a relatively slow growth in supply. The rate of demand growth, while still positive, slowed in 2002, primarily as a result of slower overall economic conditions. This, combined with rate reductions and discounts offered by much of the competition, has resulted in minimal revenue growth. Spring and summer of 2002 showed negligible improvement in revenue compared to the same periods at the same stores in 2001, while the fourth quarter showed a 3% increase.
- 4 -
<PAGE>
The Operating Partnership has made a significant investment in technology in the past year, primarily in its call center. This investment has enabled the Operating Partnership to centralize its sales and marketing efforts and to spot leasing trends and opportunities in a more efficient and responsive manner. The Operating Partnership expects to gain market share and improve the yield realized on its rental spaces as a result of this call center management system.
According to published data, of the approximately 35,000 facilities in the United States, less than 13% are managed by the ten largest operators. The remainder of the industry is characterized by numerous small, local operators. The shortage of skilled operators, the scarcity of equity capital available to small operators for acquisitions and expansions and the potential for savings through economies of scale are factors that are leading to a consolidation in the industry. The Operating Partnership believes that, as a result of this trend, significant growth opportunities exist for operators with proven management systems and sufficient capital resources.
Property Management
The Operating Partnership believes that it has developed substantial expertise in managing self-storage facilities. Key elements of the Operating Partnership's management system include the following:
- |
Recruiting, training and retaining capable, aggressive on-site property managers; |
- |
Motivating property managers by providing incentive-based compensation; |
- |
Developing and maintaining an integrated marketing plan for each Property; and |
- |
Performing regular preventative maintenance to avoid significant repair obligations. |
Property managers attend a thorough orientation program and undergo continuous training that emphasizes closing techniques, identification of selected marketing opportunities, networking with possible referral sources, and familiarization with the Operating Partnership's customized management information system. In addition to frequent contact with Regional Team Leaders and other Operating Partnership personnel, property managers receive periodic newsletters regarding a variety of operational issues, and from time to time attend "roundtable" seminars with other property managers.
The Operating Partnership annually develops a written marketing plan for each of its Properties that is highly dependent upon local conditions. The focus of each marketing plan is, in part, determined by occupancy rates. If all storage units of the same size at a Property are at or near 90% occupancy, then the plan will generally include increases in rental rates. If a Property has excess capacity, then the marketing plan will target selected markets such as local military bases, colleges, apartment and condominium complexes, industrial parks, medical centers, retail shopping malls and office suites. The Operating Partnership primarily uses telephone directories to advertise its services, including a map and, when possible, listing Properties in the same
- 5 -
<PAGE>
marketplace in a single advertisement. The Operating Partnership also conducts quarterly surveys of its competitors' practices, which include "shopping" competing facilities.
The Operating Partnership's customized computer system performs billing, collections and reservation functions for each Property, and also tracks information used in developing marketing plans based on occupancy levels, and tenant demographics and histories. The system generates daily, weekly and monthly financial reports for each Property that are transmitted to the Operating Partnership's principal office each night. The system also requires a property manager to input a descriptive explanation for all debit and credit transactions, paid-to-date changes, and all other discretionary activities, which allows the accounting staff at the Operating Partnership's principal office to promptly review all such transactions. Late charges are automatically imposed. More sensitive activities, such as rental rate changes and unit size or number changes, are completed only by Regional Team Leaders. The Operating Partnership's customized management infor mation system permits it to add new facilities to its portfolio with minimal additional overhead expense.
Marketing Initiatives
Responding to the increased customer demand for services, the Operating Partnership has initiated several programs expected to increase occupancy and profitability. These programs include:
- |
A Customer Care Center (call center) that services new and existing customers' inquiries and facilitate the capture of sales leads that were previously lost; |
- |
Internet marketing, providing information about all of the Operating Partnership's stores via numerous portals and e-mail; |
- |
Dri-guard, providing humidity-controlled spaces. Through an exclusive agreement, the Operating Partnership became the first self-storage operator to utilize this humidity protection technology. These environmental control systems are a premium storage feature intended to protect metal, electronics, furniture, fabrics and paper from moisture; |
- |
Uncle Bob's Trucks, which provide customers with convenient, affordable access to vehicles to help move their goods, while serving as moving billboards to help advertise our storage facilities; and |
- |
Flex-a-Space, an innovative construction design that allows the Operating Partnership to easily reconfigure walls by using a track and roller mechanism, enabling customized storage space to fit the individual needs of the customer. |
Environmental and Other Regulations
The Operating Partnership is subject to federal, state, and local environmental regulations that apply generally to the ownership of real property and the operation of self-storage facilities. The Operating Partnership has not received notice from any governmental authority or private party of any material environmental noncompliance, claim, or liability in connection with any of the Properties, and is not aware of
- 6 -
<PAGE>
any environmental condition with respect to any of the Properties that could have a material adverse effect on the Operating Partnership's financial condition or results of operations.
The Properties are also generally subject to the same types of local regulations governing other real property, including zoning ordinances. The Operating Partnership believes that the Properties are in substantial compliance with all such regulations.
Insurance
Each of the Properties is covered by fire, property insurance, including comprehensive liability, all-risk property insurance policies, which are provided by reputable companies and on commercially reasonable terms. In addition, the Operating Partnership maintains a policy insuring against environmental liabilities resulting from tenant storage on terms customary for the industry, and title insurance insuring fee title to the Operating Partnership owned Properties in an aggregate amount believed to be adequate.
Competition
The primary factors upon which competition in the self-storage industry is based are location, rental rates, suitability of the property's design to prospective tenants' needs, and the manner in which the property is operated and marketed. The Operating Partnership believes it competes successfully on these bases. The extent of competition depends in significant part on local market conditions. The Operating Partnership seeks to locate its facilities so as not to cause its Properties to compete with one another for customers, but the number of self-storage facilities in a particular area could have a material adverse effect on the performance of any of the Properties.
Several of the Operating Partnership's competitors, including Public Storage Management, Inc., Shurgard Incorporated, U-Haul International, and Storage USA, Inc., are larger and have substantially greater financial resources than the Operating Partnership. These larger operators may, among other possible advantages, be capable of greater leverage and the payment of higher prices for acquisitions.
Investment Policy
While the Operating Partnership emphasizes equity real estate investments, it may, in its discretion, invest in mortgage and other real estate interests related to self-storage properties in a manner consistent with the Company's qualification as a REIT. The Operating Partnership may also retain a purchase money mortgage for a portion of the sale price in connection with the disposition of Properties from time to time. Should investment opportunities become available, the Operating Partnership may look to acquire self-storage properties via a joint-venture partnership or similar entity. The Operating Partnership may or may not have a significant investment in such a venture, but would use such an opportunity to expand its portfolio of branded and managed properties.
- 7 -
<PAGE>
Subject to the percentage of ownership limitations and gross income tests necessary for the Company's REIT qualification, the Operating Partnership also may invest in securities of entities engaged in real estate activities or securities of other issuers, including for the purpose of exercising control over such entities.
Disposition Policy
Management periodically reviews the assets comprising the Operating Partnership's portfolio. Any disposition decision will be based on a variety of factors, including, but not limited to, the (i) potential to continue to increase cash flow and value, (ii) sale price, (iii) strategic fit with the rest of the Company's portfolio, (iv) potential for, or existence of, environmental or regulatory issues, (v) alternative uses of capital, and (vi) maintaining of the Company's qualification as a REIT.
As part of an asset management program, the Operating Partnership has begun to "spin-off" non-core, slow-growth properties, into joint ventures. In cases where the Operating Partnership has a less than 50% ownership interest in a joint venture, the Properties of that joint venture are removed from the Operating Partnership's balance sheet and an investment in the joint venture is recorded. The Operating Partnership records only its percentage share of the operating results of unconsolidated joint ventures. These ventures may allow the Operating Partnership to i) increase incremental revenues through management fees, ii) provide strong returns on its equity in the joint venture, and iii) increase liquidity to allow redeployment of equity to repay debt, acquire stock, or buy higher growth properties. In 2000, the Operating Partnership sold seven facilities for approximately $20 million to an unconsolidated joint venture in which the Operating P artnership retained a 45% interest. In cases where the Operating Partnership is deemed to have greater than a 50% ownership interest, the joint venture is consolidated with the Operating Partnership's financial statements and a minority interest is recorded on the balance sheet and statement of operations for the portion of the joint venture not owned by the Operating Partnership.
Borrowing Policy
The Board of Directors of the Company currently limits the amount of debt that may be incurred by the Company to less than 50% of the sum of market value of the issued and outstanding Common and Preferred Stock plus the Company's debt (Market Capitalization). The Company, however, may from time to time re-evaluate and modify its borrowing policy in light of then current economic conditions, relative costs of debt and equity capital, market values of properties, growth and acquisition opportunities and other factors.
In February 2002, the consolidated joint venture (Locke Sovran II, LLC) entered into a mortgage note of $48 million. The note is secured by the 27 properties owned by the joint venture with a cost of $79 million. The 10-year note bears interest at 7.19%. The Operating Partnership also repaid a $30 million 1 year term note that matured in 2002.
- 8 -
<PAGE>
To the extent that the Operating Partnership desires to obtain additional capital to pay distributions, to provide working capital, to pay existing indebtedness or to finance acquisitions, expansions or development of new properties, the Operating Partnership may utilize floating or fixed rate debt financing, retention of cash flow (subject to satisfying the Company's distribution requirements under the REIT rules) or a combination of these methods. Additional debt financing may also be obtained through mortgages on its Properties, which may be recourse, non-recourse, or cross-collateralized and may contain cross-default provisions. The Operating Partnership has not established any limit on the number or amount of mortgages that may be placed on any single Property or on its portfolio as a whole. For additional information regarding borrowings, see Item 7. "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operati ons - Liquidity and Capital Resources" and Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements filed herewith.
Employees
The Operating Partnership currently employs a total of 727 employees, including 264 Property Managers, 16 Regional Team Leaders, and 355 assistant managers and part-time employees. At the Operating Partnership's headquarters, in addition to its three executive officers, the Operating Partnership employs 89 people engaged in various support activities, such as accounting, customer care, and management information systems. None of the Operating Partnership's employees is covered by a collective bargaining agreement. The Operating Partnership considers its employee relations to be excellent.
Available Information
The Operating Partnership files with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission quarterly and annual reports on Forms 10-Q and 10-K, respectively, current reports on Form 8-K, and proxy statements pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, in addition to other information as required. The public may read and copy any materials that the Operating Partnership files with the SEC at the SEC's Public Reference Room at 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549. The public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1 (800) SEC-0330. The Operating Partnership files this information with the SEC electronically, and the SEC maintains an Internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC at http://www.sec.gov. The Operating Partnership also maintains a web site at http://www.sovr anss.com.
Item 2. |
Properties |
At December 31, 2002, the Operating Partnership owned and/or managed a total of 264 Properties situated in twenty-one states in the Eastern and Midwestern United States, Arizona and Texas. Eleven of the Properties are managed under an agreement with an unconsolidated joint venture that is 45% owned by the Operating Partnership.
The Operating Partnership's self-storage facilities offer inexpensive, easily accessible, enclosed storage space to residential and commercial users on a month-to-month basis. Most of
- 9 -
<PAGE>
the Operating Partnership's Properties are fenced with computerized gates and are well lighted. All but thirty-five of the Properties are single-story, thereby providing customers with the convenience of direct vehicle access to their storage units. All Properties have a Property Manager on-site during business hours. Customers have access to their storage areas during business hours, and some commercial customers are provided 24-hour access. Individual storage units are secured by a lock furnished by the customer to provide the customer with control of access to the unit.
All but a few of the Properties conduct business under the user-friendly trade name "Uncle Bob's Self-Storage" and the remainder are operated under various names acquired with the Properties. The Operating Partnership intends to convert all of the Properties to the "Uncle Bob's" trade name.
- 10 -
<PAGE>
The table below provides certain information regarding the Properties included in the Operating Partnership's consolidated financial statements:
|
|
|
Uncle |
State |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Alabama |
83% |
||||||||||||||||
Birmingham I |
1990 |
36,775 |
Y |
2.7 |
288 |
9 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry/Steel Roof |
||||||||
Birmingham II |
1990 |
52,225 |
Y |
4.7 |
391 |
8 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry/Steel Roof |
||||||||
Montgomery I |
1982 |
74,004 |
Y |
5.0 |
613 |
16 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry/Steel Roof |
||||||||
Birmingham III |
1970 |
72,290 |
Y |
4.3 |
402 |
6 |
1 |
N |
Masonry/Steel Roof |
||||||||
Montgomery II |
1984 |
42,146 |
Y |
2.7 |
294 |
10 |
1 |
N |
Masonry/Steel Roof |
||||||||
Montgomery III |
1988 |
41,610 |
Y |
2.4 |
380 |
9 |
1 |
Y |
Steel Bldg./Steel Roof |
||||||||
Birmingham-Walt |
1984 |
64,580 |
Y |
3.3 |
293 |
6 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Metal Roof |
||||||||
Birmingham-Bessemer |
1998 |
44,070 |
Y |
|
5.6 |
345 |
8 |
1 |
N |
Metal Wall/Metal Roof |
|||||||
Arizona |
80% |
||||||||||||||||
Gilbert-Elliot Rd. |
1995 |
66,855 |
Y |
3.3 |
680 |
8 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Metal Roof |
||||||||
Glendale-59th Ave. |
1997 |
67,126 |
Y |
4.6 |
633 |
7 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Metal Roof |
||||||||
Mesa-Baseline |
1986 |
39,100 |
Y |
1.8 |
390 |
11 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Metal Roof |
||||||||
Mesa-E. Broadway |
1986 |
38,825 |
Y |
1.8 |
369 |
5 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Metal Roof |
||||||||
Mesa-W. Broadway |
1976 |
36,625 |
Y |
1.9 |
385 |
5 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Metal Roof |
||||||||
Mesa-Greenfield |
1986 |
48,359 |
Y |
2.1 |
431 |
8 |
1 |
N |
Masonry Wall/Metal Roof |
||||||||
Phoenix-Camelback |
1984 |
43,605 |
Y |
2.0 |
532 |
7 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Metal Roof |
||||||||
Phoenix-Bell |
1984 |
96,580 |
Y |
4.6 |
917 |
7 |
1 |
Y |
Metal Wall/Metal Roof |
||||||||
Phoenix-35th Ave. |
1996 |
70,985 |
Y |
4.3 |
695 |
8 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Metal Roof |
||||||||
Connecticut |
78% |
||||||||||||||||
New Haven |
1985 |
47,680 |
Y |
3.9 |
392 |
5 |
1 |
N |
Masonry Wall/Steel Roof |
||||||||
Hartford-Metro I |
1988 |
56,570 |
Y |
10.0 |
354 |
10 |
1 |
N |
Steel Bldg./Steel Roof |
||||||||
Hartford-Metro II |
1992 |
39,190 |
Y |
6.0 |
323 |
7 |
1 |
N |
Steel Bldg./Steel Roof |
||||||||
- 11 - |
|||||||||||||||||
<PAGE> |
|||||||||||||||||
Florida |
86% |
||||||||||||||||
Lakeland 1 |
1985 |
47,955 |
Y |
3.5 |
434 |
11 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Steel Roof |
||||||||
Tallahassee I |
1973 |
143,405 |
Y |
18.7 |
677 |
21 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Tar & Gravel Roof |
||||||||
Tallahassee II |
1975 |
51,380 |
Y |
4.0 |
273 |
7 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Tar & Gravel Roof |
||||||||
Port St. Lucie |
1985 |
55,742 |
Y |
4.0 |
535 |
12 |
1 |
N |
Steel Bldg./Steel Roof |
||||||||
Deltona |
1984 |
63,602 |
Y |
5.0 |
449 |
5 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Shingle Roof |
||||||||
Jacksonville I |
1985 |
39,912 |
Y |
2.7 |
290 |
14 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Tar & Gravel Roof |
||||||||
Orlando I |
1988 |
50,520 |
Y |
|
2.8 |
593 |
3 |
2 |
Y |
Steel Bldg./Steel Roof |
|||||||
Ft. Lauderdale |
1985 |
101,235 |
Y |
7.6 |
638 |
7 |
1 |
Y |
Steel Bldg./Steel Roof |
||||||||
West Palm 1 |
1985 |
51,585 |
Y |
3.2 |
404 |
6 |
1 |
N |
Steel Bldg./Steel Roof |
||||||||
Melbourne I |
1986 |
83,578 |
Y |
8.3 |
745 |
11 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Shingled Roof |
||||||||
Pensacola I |
1983 |
119,030 |
Y |
7.5 |
862 |
13 |
1 |
Y |
Steel Bldg./Steel Roof |
||||||||
Pensacola II |
1986 |
58,204 |
Y |
3.4 |
505 |
9 |
1 |
Y |
Steel Bldg./Steel Roof |
||||||||
Melbourne II |
1986 |
56,031 |
Y |
3.4 |
610 |
11 |
1 |
N |
Steel Bldg./Steel Roof |
||||||||
Jacksonville II |
1987 |
53,855 |
Y |
4.4 |
471 |
11 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry/Steel Roof |
||||||||
Pensacola III |
1986 |
84,490 |
Y |
6.1 |
602 |
12 |
1 |
N |
Steel Bldg./Steel Roof |
||||||||
Pensacola IV |
1990 |
38,850 |
Y |
2.7 |
274 |
9 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry/Steel Roof |
||||||||
Pensacola V |
1990 |
39,125 |
Y |
2.6 |
317 |
4 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry/Steel Roof |
||||||||
Tampa I |
1989 |
62,857 |
Y |
3.3 |
865 |
6 |
1 |
N |
Masonry/Steel Roof |
||||||||
Tampa II |
1985 |
60,672 |
Y |
2.9 |
675 |
10 |
1 |
N |
Masonry/Steel Roof |
||||||||
Tampa III |
1988 |
48,400 |
Y |
2.2 |
636 |
14 |
1 |
N |
Masonry/Steel Roof |
||||||||
Orlando II |
1986 |
134,869 |
Y |
8.5 |
1,319 |
20 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Steel Roof |
||||||||
Ft. Myers I |
1988 |
27,704 |
Y |
1.1 |
259 |
6 |
2 |
Y |
Steel Bldg./Steel Roof |
||||||||
Ft. Myers II |
1991/94 |
23,053 |
Y |
1.9 |
299 |
2 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry/Steel Roof |
||||||||
Tampa IV |
1985 |
57,915 |
Y |
4.0 |
524 |
10 |
1 |
N |
Masonry/Steel Roof |
||||||||
West Palm II |
1986 |
30,937 |
Y |
2.3 |
364 |
9 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry/Steel Roof |
||||||||
Ft. Myers III |
1986 |
36,052 |
Y |
2.4 |
257 |
9 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry/Steel Roof |
||||||||
Lakeland II |
1988 |
59,990 |
Y |
4.0 |
580 |
9 |
1 |
N |
Masonry Wall/Steel Roof |
||||||||
Ft. Myers IV |
1987 |
59,560 |
Y |
4.5 |
262 |
4 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry/Steel Roof |
||||||||
Jacksonville III |
1987 |
102,430 |
Y |
5.9 |
739 |
13 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Shingle Roof |
||||||||
- 12 - |
|||||||||||||||||
<PAGE> |
|||||||||||||||||
Jacksonville IV |
1985 |
38,205 |
Y |
2.7 |
352 |
7 |
1 |
Y |
Steel Bldg./Steel Roof |
||||||||
Jacksonville V |
1987/92 |
53,975 |
Y |
2.9 |
493 |
13 |
2 |
Y |
Steel Bldg./Masonry Wall/Steel Roof |
||||||||
Orlando III |
1975 |
52,388 |
Y |
3.2 |
496 |
8 |
2 |
N |
Masonry Wall/Steel Roof |
||||||||
Orlando IV-W 25th St. |
1984 |
38,374 |
Y |
2.8 |
347 |
6 |
1 |
Y |
Steel Bldg/Steel Roof |
||||||||
Delray I-Mini |
1969 |
49,529 |
Y |
3.5 |
437 |
3 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Concrete Roof |
||||||||
Delray II-Safeway |
1980 |
69,760 |
Y |
4.3 |
705 |
17 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Concrete Roof |
||||||||
Tampa-E. Hillborough |
1985 |
84,220 |
Y |
5.3 |
691 |
16 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Metal Roof |
||||||||
Ft. Myers-Mall |
1991/94 |
20,881 |
Y |
1.3 |
230 |
4 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry/Steel Roof |
||||||||
Indian Harbor-Beach |
1985 |
66,208 |
Y |
4.0 |
713 |
15 |
1 |
N |
Masonry Wall/Metal Roof |
||||||||
Hollywood-Sheridan |
1988 |
130,663 |
Y |
7.0 |
1,172 |
21 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Concrete Roof |
||||||||
Pompano Beach-Atlantic |
1985 |
77,062 |
Y |
4.0 |
923 |
17 |
1 |
N |
Masonry Wall/Concrete Roof |
||||||||
Pompano Beach-Sample |
1988 |
64,167 |
Y |
|
3.6 |
798 |
14 |
1 |
N |
Masonry Wall/Metal Roof |
|||||||
Boca Raton-18th St. |
1991 |
87,782 |
Y |
6.2 |
990 |
8 |
1 |
N |
Masonry Wall/Metal Roof |
||||||||
Vero Beach |
1997 |
34,450 |
Y |
1.9 |
321 |
2 |
1 |
N |
Masonry Wall/Metal Roof |
||||||||
Hollywood-N. 21st |
1987 |
58,977 |
Y |
3.1 |
710 |
11 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Metal Roof |
||||||||
Cocoa |
1982 |
75,205 |
Y |
2.5 |
688 |
12 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Metal Roof |
||||||||
Plantation |
1982 |
42,311 |
Y |
2.9 |
503 |
4 |
1&2 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Metal Roof |
||||||||
Georgia |
85% |
||||||||||||||||
Savannah |
1981 |
72,580 |
Y |
5.4 |
600 |
11 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Steel Roof |
||||||||
Atlanta-Metro I |
1988 |
69,860 |
Y |
3.9 |
536 |
5 |
1 |
Y |
Steel Bldg./Steel Roof |
||||||||
Atlanta-Metro II |
1988 |
45,300 |
Y |
3.9 |
373 |
6 |
1 |
Y |
Steel Bldg./Steel Roof |
||||||||
Atlanta-Metro III |
1988 |
56,945 |
Y |
5.3 |
408 |
9 |
1 |
Y |
Steel Bldg./Steel Roof |
||||||||
Atlanta-Metro IV |
1989 |
42,220 |
Y |
3.5 |
308 |
7 |
1 |
Y |
Steel Bldg./Steel Roof |
||||||||
Atlanta-Metro V |
1988 |
44,195 |
Y |
4.2 |
284 |
3 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Tar & Gravel Roof |
||||||||
Atlanta-Metro VI |
1986 |
50,775 |
Y |
3.6 |
443 |
7 |
1 |
Y |
Steel Bldg./Steel Roof |
||||||||
Atlanta-Metro VII |
1981 |
38,870 |
Y |
2.5 |
326 |
9 |
2 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Tar & Gravel Roof |
||||||||
Atlanta-Metro VIII |
1975 |
46,914 |
Y |
3.3 |
432 |
6 |
2 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Tar & Gravel Roof |
||||||||
Augusta I |
1988 |
52,000 |
Y |
4.0 |
398 |
13 |
1 |
Y |
Steel Bldg./Steel Roof |
||||||||
Macon I |
1989 |
40,850 |
Y |
3.2 |
347 |
14 |
1 |
Y |
Steel Bldg./Steel Roof |
||||||||
Augusta II |
1987 |
46,325 |
Y |
3.5 |
361 |
4 |
1 |
N |
Masonry Wall/Steel Roof |
||||||||
Atlanta-Metro IX |
1988 |
56,106 |
Y |
4.6 |
409 |
6 |
1 |
Y |
Steel Bldg./Steel Roof |
||||||||
- 13 - |
|||||||||||||||||
<PAGE> |
|||||||||||||||||
Atlanta-Metro X |
1988 |
48,635 |
Y |
6.8 |
445 |
9 |
1 |
N |
Steel Bldg./Steel Roof |
||||||||
Macon II |
1989/94 |
67,550 |
Y |
14.0 |
570 |
11 |
1 |
Y |
Steel Bldg./Steel Roof |
||||||||
Savannah II |
1988 |
49,365 |
Y |
2.6 |
458 |
8 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Steel Roof |
||||||||
Atlanta-Alpharetta |
1994 |
81,040 |
Y |
5.8 |
560 |
8 |
1&2 |
Y |
Steel Bldg./Steel Roof |
||||||||
Atlanta-Marietta-Roswell |
1996 |
60,375 |
Y |
6.0 |
448 |
8 |
1&2 |
Y |
Steel Bldg./Steel Roof |
||||||||
Atlanta-Doraville |
1995 |
68,415 |
Y |
4.9 |
621 |
8 |
1&2 |
Y |
Steel & Masonry Bldg./Steel Roof |
||||||||
Ft. Oglethorpe |
1989 |
45,100 |
Y |
3.3 |
443 |
6 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Metal Roof |
||||||||
Kingsland |
1989 |
66,829 |
Y |
4.1 |
562 |
12 |
1 |
N |
Masonry Wall/Metal Roof |
||||||||
Louisiana |
83% |
||||||||||||||||
Baton Rouge-Airline |
1982 |
71,720 |
Y |
2.5 |
433 |
12 |
1 |
N |
Masonry Wall/Metal Roof |
||||||||
Baton Rouge-Airline 2 |
1985 |
44,895 |
Y |
2.8 |
437 |
9 |
1 |
N |
Masonry Wall/Steel Roof |
||||||||
Lafayette-Pinhook 1 |
1980 |
56,625 |
Y |
3.2 |
487 |
7 |
1 |
N |
Masonry Wall/Metal Roof |
||||||||
Lafayette-Pinhook 2 |
1992/94 |
47,025 |
Y |
2.4 |
432 |
2 |
1 |
Y |
Metal Wall/Metal Roof |
||||||||
Lafayette-Ambassador |
1975 |
33,860 |
Y |
2.0 |
417 |
3 |
1 |
N |
Masonry Wall/Shingle Roof |
||||||||
Lafayette-Evangeline |
1977 |
34,630 |
Y |
3.1 |
347 |
3 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Metal Roof |
||||||||
Lafayette-Guilbeau |
1994 |
63,685 |
Y |
3.4 |
598 |
1 |
1 |
N |
Metal Wall/Metal Roof |
||||||||
Maine |
88% |
||||||||||||||||
Westbrook |
1988 |
45,940 |
Y |
5.9 |
475 |
7 |
1 |
Y |
Metal Wall/Metal Roof |
||||||||
Saco |
1988 |
53,750 |
Y |
4.2 |
416 |
12 |
1 |
N |
Masonry Wall/Metal Roof |
||||||||
Maryland |
90% |
||||||||||||||||
Salisbury |
1979 |
33,585 |
Y |
3.0 |
416 |
10 |
1 |
N |
Masonry Wall/Tar & Gravel Roof |
||||||||
Baltimore I-Frederick |
1984 |
21,233 |
Y |
1.9 |
347 |
2 |
3 |
N |
Masonry Wall/Shingled Roof |
||||||||
Baltimore II-Gaithersburg |
1988 |
60,645 |
Y |
2.2 |
535 |
2 |
4 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Tar & Gravel Roof |
||||||||
Baltimore III-Landover |
1990 |
51,357 |
Y |
3.1 |
666 |
8 |
1 |
Y |
Steel Bldg./Steel Roof |
||||||||
Massachusetts |
81% |
||||||||||||||||
New Bedford |
1982 |
42,338 |
Y |
3.4 |
376 |
7 |
1 |
N |
Steel Bldg./Steel Roof |
||||||||
Springfield |
1986 |
53,614 |
Y |
4.7 |
403 |
5 |
1 |
N |
Masonry Wall/Shingle Roof |
||||||||
Salem |
1979 |
53,445 |
Y |
2.0 |
500 |
2 |
2 |
Y |
Steel Wall/Metal Roof |
||||||||
Boston-Metro I |
1980 |
37,805 |
Y |
2.0 |
405 |
3 |
2 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Tar & Gravel Roof |
||||||||
Boston-Metro II |
1986 |
38,710 |
Y |
3.6 |
456 |
8 |
2 |
N |
Masonry Wall/Tar & Gravel Roof |
||||||||
- 14 - |
|||||||||||||||||
<PAGE> |
|||||||||||||||||
N. Andover |
1989 |
44,585 |
Y |
3.0 |
534 |
1 |
3 |
N |
Masonry & Metal Wall/Metal Roof |
||||||||
Dracut |
1986 |
45,926 |
Y |
5.0 |
403 |
11 |
1 |
N |
Masonry Wall/Metal Roof |
||||||||
Methuen |
1984 |
50,640 |
Y |
3.4 |
383 |
6 |
1 |
N |
Masonry Wall/Metal Roof |
||||||||
Plymouth |
1996 |
92,063 |
N |
7.7 |
750 |
14 |
1 |
N |
Metal Wall/Metal Roof |
||||||||
Sandwich |
1984 |
48,000 |
N |
4.9 |
362 |
8 |
1 |
N |
Metal Wall/Metal Roof |
||||||||
Michigan |
77% |
||||||||||||||||
Grand Rapids II |
1983 |
43,500 |
Y |
8.0 |
388 |
6 |
1 |
N |
Masonry & Steel Walls |
||||||||
Holland |
1978 |
53,100 |
Y |
13.6 |
434 |
18 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Steel Roof |
||||||||
Holland-Paw Paw |
1978 |
58,680 |
Y |
5.3 |
364 |
8 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Steel Roof |
||||||||
Waterford-Highland |
1978 |
136,611 |
Y |
16.6 |
1,664 |
16 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Metal Roof |
||||||||
Mississippi |
90% |
||||||||||||||||
Jackson I |
1990 |
42,100 |
Y |
2.0 |
351 |
6 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry/Steel Roof |
||||||||
Jackson II |
1990 |
38,761 |
Y |
2.1 |
306 |
9 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry/Steel Roof |
||||||||
Jackson III-155 |
1995 |
61,848 |
Y |
1.3 |
420 |
2 |
1 |
N |
Metal Wall/Metal Roof |
||||||||
Jackson-N. West |
1984 |
57,557 |
Y |
5.2 |
480 |
13 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Metal Roof |
||||||||
New Hampshire |
87% |
||||||||||||||||
Salem-Policy |
1980 |
62,025 |
Y |
8.7 |
545 |
9 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Metal Roof |
||||||||
New York |
84% |
||||||||||||||||
Middletown |
1988 |
33,865 |
Y |
2.8 |
337 |
4 |
1 |
N |
Steel Bldg./Steel Roof |
||||||||
Buffalo I |
1981 |
75,970 |
Y |
5.1 |
524 |
10 |
1 |
Y |
Steel Bldg./Steel Roof |
||||||||
Rochester I |
1981 |
41,834 |
Y |
2.9 |
406 |
5 |
1 |
Y |
Steel Bldg./Steel Roof |
||||||||
Rochester II |
1980 |
29,510 |
Y |
3.5 |
242 |
9 |
1 |
N |
Masonry Wall/Shingle Roof |
||||||||
Buffalo II |
1984 |
54,165 |
Y |
6.2 |
417 |
12 |
1 |
Y |
Steel Bldg./Steel Roof |
||||||||
Syracuse 1 |
1987 |
77,385 |
Y |
7.5 |
666 |
16 |
1 |
N |
Steel Bldg./Steel Roof |
||||||||
Syracuse II |
1983 |
67,824 |
Y |
3.6 |
544 |
10 |
1 |
Y |
Steel Bldg./Shingled Roof |
||||||||
Rochester III |
1990 |
66,784 |
Y |
2.7 |
495 |
1 |
1 |
N |
Masonry Wall/Shingle Roof |
||||||||
Harriman |
1989/95 |
74,340 |
Y |
6.1 |
638 |
10 |
1 |
Y |
Metal Wall/Metal Roof |
||||||||
Monroe |
1998 |
36,240 |
Y |
13.3 |
318 |
4 |
1 |
N |
Metal Wall/Metal Roof |
||||||||
Syracuse |
1987 |
35,090 |
Y |
2.2 |
289 |
12 |
1 |
N |
Metal Wall/Metal Roof |
||||||||
The Hamptons |
1989/95 |
64,885 |
N |
3.2 |
775 |
5 |
2 |
N |
Metal Wall/Metal Roof |
||||||||
- 15 - |
|||||||||||||||||
<PAGE> |
|||||||||||||||||
The Hamptons |
1998 |
32,970 |
N |
1.1 |
311 |
1 |
4 |
N |
Metal Wall/Metal Roof |
||||||||
The Hamptons |
1997 |
35,210 |
N |
1.9 |
428 |
2 |
2 |
N |
Metal Wall/Metal Roof |
||||||||
The Hamptons |
1994/98 |
65,000 |
N |
3.7 |
720 |
4 |
2 |
N |
Metal Wall/Metal Roof |
||||||||
North Carolina |
74% |
||||||||||||||||
Charlotte |
1986 |
37,815 |
Y |
2.9 |
333 |
6 |
1 |
Y |
Steel Bldg./Steel Roof |
||||||||
Fayetteville |
1980 |
87,294 |
Y |
6.2 |
908 |
12 |
1 |
Y |
Steel Bldg./Steel Roof |
||||||||
Greensboro |
1986 |
45,180 |
Y |
3.4 |
404 |
5 |
1 |
Y |
Steel Bldg./Mas. Wall/Steel Roof |
||||||||
Raleigh I |
1985 |
58,410 |
Y |
5.0 |
540 |
8 |
2 |
Y |
Steel Bldg./Steel Roof |
||||||||
Raleigh II |
1985 |
33,125 |
Y |
2.5 |
318 |
8 |
1 |
Y |
Steel Bldg./Steel Roof |
||||||||
Charlotte II |
1995 |
48,971 |
Y |
5.6 |
402 |
7 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Steel Roof |
||||||||
Charlotte III |
1995 |
30,920 |
Y |
2.9 |
319 |
6 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Steel Roof |
||||||||
Greensboro-Hilltop |
1995 |
32,153 |
Y |
1.0 |
295 |
7 |
1 |
N |
Metal Wall/Metal Roof |
||||||||
Greensboro-StageCoach |
1997 |
35,825 |
Y |
2.5 |
232 |
2 |
1 |
N |
Metal Wall/Metal Roof |
||||||||
Greensboro-High Point |
1993 |
57,717 |
Y |
2.5 |
494 |
9 |
1 |
N |
Steel Wall/Metal Roof |
||||||||
Durham-Hillborough |
1988/91 |
67,981 |
Y |
5.0 |
600 |
5 |
1 |
Y |
Metal Wall/Metal Roof |
||||||||
Durham-Cornwallis |
1990/96 |
78,645 |
Y |
4.7 |
662 |
9 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Metal Roof |
||||||||
Jacksonville-Center |
1995 |
51,100 |
Y |
5.0 |
396 |
11 |
1 |
Y |
Metal Wall/Metal Roof |
||||||||
Jacksonville-Gum Branch |
1989 |
62,916 |
Y |
5.0 |
477 |
14 |
1 |
Y |
Metal Wall/Metal Roof |
||||||||
Jacksonville-N. Marine |
1985 |
47,810 |
Y |
8.4 |
392 |
6 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Shingle Roof |
||||||||
Ohio |
88% |
||||||||||||||||
Youngstown |
1980 |
54,830 |
Y |
5.8 |
362 |
5 |
1 |
Y |
Steel Bldg./Steel Roof |
||||||||
Cleveland-Metro I |
1980 |
49,200 |
Y |
6.4 |
358 |
9 |
1 |
N |
Steel Bldg./Steel Roof |
||||||||
Cleveland-Metro II |
1987 |
60,500 |
Y |
4.8 |
440 |
4 |
1 |
Y |
Steel Bldg./Steel Roof |
||||||||
Youngstown |
1988 |
55,900 |
Y |
3.9 |
499 |
7 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Steel Roof |
||||||||
Akron |
1990 |
38,320 |
Y |
3.4 |
296 |
12 |
1 |
N |
Masonry Wall/Steel Roof |
||||||||
Cleveland III |
1986 |
68,175 |
Y |
3.4 |
586 |
12 |
1 |
N |
Masonry Wall/Steel Roof |
||||||||
Cleveland IV |
1978 |
65,000 |
Y |
3.5 |
561 |
5 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Steel Roof |
||||||||
Cleveland V |
1979 |
74,882 |
Y |
3.1 |
637 |
9 |
1&2 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Steel Roof |
||||||||
Cleveland VI |
1979 |
47,170 |
Y |
2.6 |
377 |
8 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Steel Roof |
||||||||
Cleveland VII |
1977 |
70,270 |
Y |
4.3 |
595 |
13 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Steel Roof |
||||||||
Cleveland VIII |
1970 |
47,725 |
Y |
5.7 |
452 |
6 |
1 |
N |
Masonry Wall/Steel Roof |
||||||||
- 16 - |
|||||||||||||||||
<PAGE> |
|||||||||||||||||
Cleveland IX |
1982 |
54,910 |
Y |
4.4 |
298 |
5 |
1 |
N |
Masonry Wall/Steel Roof |
||||||||
Cleveland 10-Avon |
1989 |
46,942 |
Y |
5.8 |
371 |
6 |
1 |
N |
Metal Wall/Metal Roof |
||||||||
Warren-Elm |
1986 |
60,200 |
Y |
7.3 |
483 |
8 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Metal Roof |
||||||||
Warren-Youngstown |
1986 |
58,987 |
Y |
5.0 |
525 |
11 |
1 |
N |
Masonry Wall/Metal Roof |
||||||||
Batavia |
1988 |
61,818 |
Y |
5.5 |
547 |
9 |
1 |
N |
Metal Wall/Steel Roof |
||||||||
Pennsylvania |
92% |
||||||||||||||||
Allentown |
1983 |
40,800 |
Y |
6.3 |
341 |
7 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Shingle Roof |
||||||||
Sharon |
1975 |
38,270 |
Y |
3.0 |
304 |
5 |
1 |
Y |
Steel Bldg./Steel Roof |
||||||||
Harrisburg I |
1983 |
49,120 |
Y |
4.1 |
444 |
9 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Steel Roof |
||||||||
Harrisburg II |
1985 |
59,450 |
Y |
9.2 |
292 |
10 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Steel Roof |
||||||||
Pittsburgh |
1990 |
57,365 |
Y |
3.4 |
504 |
6 |
1 |
Y |
Steel Bldg./Steel Roof |
||||||||
Pittsburgh II |
1983 |
102,780 |
Y |
4.8 |
743 |
4 |
2 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Shingled Roof |
||||||||
Harrisburg-Peiffers |
1984 |
63,740 |
Y |
4.1 |
604 |
9 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Metal Roof |
||||||||
Rhode Island |
87% |
||||||||||||||||
East Greenwich |
1984 |
45,620 |
Y |
2.9 |
412 |
9 |
1 |
Y |
Metal Wall/Metal Roof |
||||||||
Frenchtown |
1988 |
24,860 |
Y |
2.0 |
238 |
4 |
1 |
N |
Metal Wall/Metal Roof |
||||||||
W. Warwick |
1986/94 |
52,426 |
Y |
2.3 |
485 |
4 |
1 |
N |
Metal Wall/Steel Roof |
||||||||
Providence |
1984 |
38,610 |
Y |
3.7 |
386 |
7 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Tar & Gravel Roof |
||||||||
South Carolina |
82% |
||||||||||||||||
Charleston I |
1985 |
49,654 |
Y |
3.3 |
396 |
11 |
1 |
Y |
Steel Bldg./Mas. Wall/Steel Roof |
||||||||
Columbia I |
1985 |
47,710 |
Y |
3.3 |
390 |
7 |
1 |
Y |
Steel Bldg./Steel Roof |
||||||||
Columbia II |
1987 |
58,690 |
Y |
6.0 |
447 |
8 |
1 |
N |
Steel Bldg./Steel Roof |
||||||||
Columbia III |
1989 |
41,190 |
Y |
3.5 |
330 |
5 |
2 |
Y |
Steel Bldg./Steel Roof |
||||||||
Columbia IV |
1986 |
57,450 |
Y |
5.6 |
444 |
7 |
1 |
Y |
Steel Bldg./Steel Roof |
||||||||
Spartanburg |
1989 |
40,450 |
Y |
3.6 |
341 |
6 |
1 |
Y |
Steel Bldg./Steel Roof |
||||||||
Charlestown II |
1985 |
40,318 |
Y |
2.2 |
330 |
10 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Steel Roof |
||||||||
Columbia |
1985 |
73,490 |
Y |
5.0 |
775 |
17 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Steel Roof |
||||||||
Myrtle Beach |
1984 |
61,350 |
Y |
4.8 |
584 |
12 |
1 |
N |
Masonry Wall/Steel Roof |
||||||||
Tennessee |
82% |
||||||||||||||||
Chattanooga-Lee Hwy |
1987 |
37,877 |
Y |
3.3 |
391 |
6 |
1 |
N |
Masonry Wall/Metal Roof |
||||||||
- 17 - |
|||||||||||||||||
<PAGE> |
|||||||||||||||||
Chattanooga-Hwy 58 |
1985 |
35,460 |
Y |
2.4 |
295 |
4 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Metal Roof |
||||||||
Hendersonville |
1986/97 |
93,955 |
Y |
5.7 |
651 |
16 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Metal Roof |
||||||||
Texas |
83% |
||||||||||||||||
Arlington I |
1987 |
45,815 |
Y |
2.3 |
382 |
7 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Steel Roof |
||||||||
Arlington II |
1986 |
67,220 |
Y |
3.8 |
280 |
11 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Steel Roof |
||||||||
Ft. Worth |
1986 |
40,850 |
Y |
2.4 |
333 |
3 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Asphalt Roof |
||||||||
San Antonio I |
1986 |
49,675 |
Y |
3.9 |
484 |
12 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Steel Roof |
||||||||
San Antonio II |
1986 |
39,870 |
Y |
1.9 |
283 |
7 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Steel Roof |
||||||||
San Antonio III |
1981 |
48,782 |
Y |
2.6 |
485 |
5 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Steel Roof |
||||||||
Universal |
1985 |
35,160 |
Y |
2.4 |
376 |
8 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Steel Roof |
||||||||
San Antonio IV |
1995 |
54,620 |
Y |
5.4 |
528 |
11 |
1 |
Y |
Steel Bldg./Steel Roof |
||||||||
Houston-Eastex |
1993/95 |
83,900 |
Y |
6.4 |
663 |
5 |
1 |
Y |
Metal Wall/Steel Roof |
||||||||
Houston-Nederland |
1995 |
61,911 |
Y |
6.3 |
531 |
1 |
1 |
Y |
Metal Wall/Steel Roof |
||||||||
Houston-College |
1995 |
35,650 |
Y |
1.8 |
316 |
1 |
1 |
Y |
Metal Wall/Steel Roof |
||||||||
Dallas-Skillman |
1975 |
121,026 |
Y |
5.9 |
1,080 |
8 |
1&2 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Steel Roof |
||||||||
Dallas-Centennial |
1977 |
102,989 |
Y |
6.7 |
992 |
8 |
1&2 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Steel Roof |
||||||||
Dallas-Samuell |
1975 |
79,046 |
Y |
3.8 |
784 |
6 |
1&2 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Steel Roof |
||||||||
Dallas-Hargrove |
1975 |
71,934 |
Y |
3.1 |
734 |
5 |
1&2 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Steel Roof |
||||||||
Houston-Antoine |
1984 |
75,720 |
Y |
4.1 |
657 |
9 |
1 |
Y |
Metal Wall/Metal Roof |
||||||||
Katy |
1994 |
43,995 |
Y |
8.6 |
437 |
10 |
1 |
Y |
Metal Wall/Metal Roof |
||||||||
Humble |
1986 |
63,669 |
Y |
2.3 |
586 |
6 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Metal Roof |
||||||||
Houston-Old Katy |
1996 |
52,860 |
Y |
3.0 |
490 |
19 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Shingle Roof |
||||||||
Webster-Hwy 3 |
1997 |
55,350 |
Y |
3.3 |
536 |
6 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Metal Roof |
||||||||
Carrollton |
1997 |
51,740 |
Y |
3.2 |
497 |
5 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Metal Roof |
||||||||
San Marcos |
1994 |
61,690 |
Y |
5.0 |
432 |
18 |
1 |
N |
Metal Wall/Metal Roof |
||||||||
Austin-McNeil |
1994 |
72,485 |
Y |
7.0 |
548 |
19 |
1 |
Y |
Metal Wall/Metal Roof |
||||||||
Austin-FM |
1996 |
59,910 |
Y |
4.9 |
388 |
9 |
1 |
Y |
Metal Wall/Metal Roof |
||||||||
Euless |
1996 |
93,480 |
Y |
7.5 |
517 |
9 |
1 |
Y |
Metal Wall/Metal Roof |
||||||||
N. Richland Hills |
1996 |
76,535 |
Y |
7.4 |
554 |
11 |
1 |
Y |
Metal Wall/Metal Roof |
||||||||
Katy-Franz |
1993 |
67,145 |
Y |
7.2 |
530 |
10 |
1 |
Y |
Metal Wall/Metal Roof |
||||||||
Cedar Hill |
1985 |
52,735 |
Y |
3.0 |
410 |
16 |
1 |
Y |
Metal Wall/Metal Roof |
||||||||
- 18 - |
|||||||||||||||||
<PAGE> |
|||||||||||||||||
Seabrook |
1996 |
61,245 |
Y |
4.3 |
539 |
5 |
1 |
Y |
Metal Wall/Metal Roof |
||||||||
Houston-Westward |
1996 |
125,854 |
Y |
6.1 |
1,161 |
11 |
1&2 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Tar-Gravel Roof |
||||||||
Houston-Boone |
1996 |
45,435 |
Y |
2.3 |
441 |
4 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Metal Roof |
||||||||
Houston-Cook |
1996 |
60,455 |
Y |
3.0 |
490 |
7 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Metal Roof |
||||||||
Houston-Harwin |
1996 |
77,454 |
Y |
2.8 |
652 |
3 |
1&2 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Tar-Gravel Roof |
||||||||
Houston-Hempstead |
1996 |
99,231 |
Y |
3.5 |
902 |
10 |
1&2 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Metal Roof |
||||||||
Houston-Kuykendahl |
1996 |
102,600 |
Y |
4.8 |
789 |
12 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Metal Roof |
||||||||
Houston-Hwy 249 |
1996 |
54,516 |
Y |
2.9 |
536 |
4 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Metal Roof |
||||||||
Mesquite-Hwy 80 |
1996 |
63,590 |
Y |
6.1 |
643 |
6 |
1&2 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Tar-Gravel Roof |
||||||||
Mesquite-Franklin |
1996 |
83,705 |
Y |
3.2 |
753 |
13 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Metal Roof |
||||||||
Dallas-Plantation |
1996 |
61,865 |
Y |
2.4 |
507 |
10 |
1&2 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Metal Roof |
||||||||
San Antonio-Hunt |
1996 |
63,695 |
Y |
4.1 |
580 |
15 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Metal Roof |
||||||||
Humble |
1996 |
116,120 |
Y |
5.9 |
805 |
4 |
1 |
N |
Metal Wall/Metal Roof |
||||||||
Pasadena |
1996 |
55,675 |
N |
3.2 |
503 |
1 |
1 |
N |
Metal & MasonryWall/Metal Roof |
||||||||
League City |
1996 |
72,520 |
Y |
4.4 |
573 |
6 |
1&2 |
N |
Metal & MasonryWall/Metal Roof |
||||||||
Montgomery |
1996 |
44,400 |
Y |
2.5 |
391 |
1 |
1 |
N |
Metal Wall/Metal Roof |
||||||||
Texas City |
1996 |
55,700 |
Y |
3.4 |
466 |
3 |
1 |
N |
Metal & Masonry Wall/Metal Roof |
||||||||
Houston-Hwy 6 |
1996 |
47,475 |
Y |
2.6 |
432 |
1 |
1 |
N |
Metal Wall/Metal Roof |
||||||||
Lumberton |
1996 |
45,290 |
Y |
4.1 |
391 |
5 |
1 |
N |
Metal Wall/Metal Roof |
||||||||
Virginia |
85% |
||||||||||||||||
Newport News I |
1988 |
58,305 |
Y |
3.2 |
476 |
7 |
1 |
Y |
Steel Bldg./Steel Roof |
||||||||
Alexandria |
1984 |
76,470 |
Y |
3.2 |
1,144 |
4 |
2 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Tar & Gravel Roof |
||||||||
Norfolk I |
1984 |
50,430 |
Y |
2.7 |
379 |
7 |
1 |
Y |
Steel Bldg./Steel Roof |
||||||||
Norfolk II |
1989 |
45,275 |
Y |
2.1 |
351 |
4 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Steel Roof |
||||||||
Richmond |
1987 |
51,985 |
Y |
2.7 |
525 |
5 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Steel Roof |
||||||||
Newport News II |
1988/93 |
63,625 |
Y |
4.7 |
413 |
8 |
1 |
Y |
Steel Bldg./Steel Roof |
||||||||
Lynchburg-Lakeside |
1982 |
47,628 |
Y |
5.3 |
433 |
10 |
1 |
N |
Masonry Wall/Steel Roof |
||||||||
Lynchburg-Timberlake |
1985 |
43,830 |
Y |
2.3 |
353 |
4 |
1 |
N |
Masonry Wall/Steel Roof |
||||||||
Lynchburg-Amherst |
1987 |
23,618 |
Y |
1.5 |
208 |
3 |
1 |
N |
Masonry Wall/Metal Roof |
||||||||
Christiansburg |
1985/90 |
37,438 |
Y |
3.2 |
344 |
6 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Metal Roof |
||||||||
Chesapeake |
1988/95 |
43,075 |
Y |
12.0 |
390 |
7 |
1 |
Y |
Metal Wall/Steel Roof |
||||||||
- 19 - |
|||||||||||||||||
<PAGE> |
|||||||||||||||||
Danville |
1988 |
49,792 |
Y |
3.2 |
408 |
8 |
1 |
N |
Steel Wall/Metal Roof |
||||||||
Chesapeake-Military |
1996 |
58,505 |
Y |
3.0 |
526 |
3 |
1 |
N |
Masonry Wall/Metal Roof |
||||||||
Chesapeake-Volvo |
1995 |
63,250 |
Y |
4.0 |
533 |
4 |
1 |
N |
Masonry Wall/Metal Roof |
||||||||
Virginia Beach-Shell |
1991 |
52,626 |
Y |
2.5 |
553 |
5 |
1 |
N |
Masonry Wall/Metal Roof |
||||||||
Virginia Beach-Central |
1993/95 |
96,031 |
Y |
5.0 |
881 |
6 |
1 |
N |
Masonry Wall/Metal Roof |
||||||||
Norfolk-Naval Base |
1975 |
126,918 |
Y |
5.2 |
1,250 |
11 |
1 |
N |
Masonry Wall/Metal Roof |
||||||||
Lynchburg-Timberlake |
1990/96 |
50,145 |
Y |
5.2 |
473 |
7 |
1 |
N |
Masonry Wall/Metal Roof |
Total for all Properties 14,630,733 84% 1,078 127,419 2,023
- 20 -
<PAGE>
Item 3. |
Legal Proceedings |
In the normal course of business, the Operating Partnership is subject to various claims and litigation. While the outcome of any litigation is inherently unpredictable, the Operating Partnership does not believe that any of these matters will have a material adverse impact on the financial condition, results of operations or cash flows of the Operating Partnership.
Item 4. |
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders |
No matters were submitted during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year covered by this report to a vote of security holders, through the solicitation of proxies or otherwise.
Part II
Item 5. |
Market for Registrant's Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters |
There is no established public trading market for Units. As of March 14, 2003, there were 12 holders of record of Units.
The following table sets forth the quarterly distributions per Unit paid by the Operating Partnership to holders of its Units with respect to each such period.
History of Distributions Declared on Units
1st Quarter, 2001 |
$0.580 per unit |
2nd Quarter, 2001 |
$0.580 per unit |
3rd Quarter, 2001 |
$0.590 per unit |
4th Quarter, 2001 |
$0.590 per unit |
1st Quarter, 2002 |
$0.590 per unit |
2nd Quarter, 2002 |
$0.590 per unit |
3rd Quarter, 2002 |
$0.600 per unit |
4th Quarter, 2002 |
$0.600 per unit |
The partnership agreement of the Operating Partnership (the "Partnership Agreement") provides that the Operating Partnership will distribute all available cash (as defined in the Partnership Agreement) on at least a quarterly basis, in amounts determined by the general partner in its sole discretion, to the partners in accordance with their respective percentage interest in the Operating Partnership. Distributions are declared at the discretion of the Board of Directors of Holdings, the general partner of the Operating Partnership and a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, and will depend on actual funds from operations of the Operating Partnership, its financial condition, capital requirements, the annual distribution requirements under the REIT provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and such other factors as the Board of Directors may deem relevant. The Board of Directors of Holdings may modify the Operating Partnersh ip's distribution policy from time to time, subject to the terms of the Partnership Agreement.
- 21 -
<PAGE>
The Operating Partnership's line of credit contains customary representations, covenants and events of default, including covenants which restrict the ability of the Operating Partnership to make distributions in excess of stated amounts. In general, during any four consecutive fiscal quarters the Operating Partnership may only distribute up to 105% of the Operating Partnership's funds from operations (as defined in the related agreement). The line of credit contains exceptions to these limitations to allow the Operating Partnership to make any distributions necessary to allow the Company to maintain its status as a REIT. The Operating Partnership does not anticipate that this provision will adversely affect the ability of the Operating Partnership to make distributions, as currently anticipated.
- 22 -
<PAGE>
Item 6. |
Selected Financial Data |
At or For Year Ended December 31, |
|||||
(dollars in thousands, |
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Data |
|||||
Operating revenues |
$ 102,141 |
$ 91,012 |
$ 90,152 |
$ 84,078 |
$ 69,173 |
Net income |
27,481 |
25,721 |
27,519 |
27,347 |
24,798 |
Net income per common unit - basic |
1.67 |
1.75 |
1.90 |
1.97 |
1.91 |
Net income per common unit - diluted |
1.65 |
1.74 |
1.90 |
1.97 |
1.91 |
Distributions declared per common unit |
2.38 |
2.34 |
2.30 |
2.26 |
2.20 |
Balance Sheet Data Investment in storage facilities at cost |
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
652,337 |
567,838 |
547,139 |
529,719 |
490,124 |
Total debt |
252,452 |
241,190 |
231,223 |
203,253 |
190,059 |
Total liabilities |
278,755 |
255,999 |
246,309 |
218,281 |
203,439 |
Limited partners' capital interest at redemption vale |
|
|
|
|
|
Partners' capital |
341,315 |
274,170 |
283,876 |
295,550 |
265,002 |
Other Data |
|||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
$ 45,610 |
$ 40,922 |
$ 39,428 |
$ 41,001 |
$ 35,151 |
Net cash used in investing activities |
(99,244) |
(17,751) |
(25,274) |
(51,335) |
(154,367) |
Net cash provided by (used in) |
|
|
|
|
|
Funds from operations available to common unitholders (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) The Operating Partnership believes that Funds from Operations ("FFO") provides relevant and meaningful information about its operating performance that is necessary, along with net earnings and cash flows, for an understanding of its operating results. Funds from operations is defined by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts, Inc. ("NAREIT") as net income computed in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP"), excluding gains or losses on sales of properties, plus depreciation and amortization and after adjustments to record unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures on the same basis. We believe that to further understand our performance, FFO should be compared with our reported net income and cash flows in accordance with GAAP, as presented in our consolidated financial statements.
Our computation of FFO may not be comparable to FFO reported by other REITs or real estate companies that do not define the term in accordance with the current NAREIT definition or that interpret the current NAREIT definition differently. FFO does not represent cash generated from operating activities determined in accordance with GAAP, and should not be considered as an alternative to net income (determined in accordance with GAAP) as an indication of our performance, as an alternative to net cash flows from operating activities (determined in accordance with GAAP) as a measure of our liquidity, or as an indicator of our ability to make cash distributions. See the reconciliation of net income to FFO in Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and results of Operations.
- 23 -
<PAGE>
Item 7. |
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
The following discussion and analysis of the consolidated financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto included elsewhere in this report.
When used in this discussion and elsewhere in this document, the words "intends," "believes," "expects", "anticipates," and similar expressions are intended to identify "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of that term in Section 27A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1933 and in Section 21F of Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of the Operating Partnership to be materially different from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such factors include, but are not limited to, the effect of competition from new self-storage facilities, which would cause rents and occupancy rates to decline; the Operating Partnership's ability to evaluate, finance and integrate acquired businesses into the Operating Partnership's existing business and operations; the Operating Partnership's ability to form joint ventures and sell existing properties to those joint ventures and others; the Operating Partnership's ability to effectively compete in the industry in which it does business; the Operating Partnership's existing indebtedness may mature in an unfavorable credit environment, preventing refinancing or forcing refinancing of the indebtedness on terms that are not as favorable as the existing terms; interest rates may fluctuate, impacting costs associated with the Operating Partnership's outstanding floating rate debt; the Operating Partnership's ability to successfully implement its truck leasing program and Dri-Guard product roll-out; the Operating Partnership's reliance on its call center; the Operating Partnership's cash flow may be insufficient to meet required payments of principal and interest; and tax law changes which may change the taxability of future income.
Significant Accounting Policies and Estimates
The Operating Partnership's discussion and analysis of its financial condition and results of operations are based upon the Operating Partnership's consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires the Operating Partnership to make estimates and judgments that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and the accompanying notes. On an on-going basis, the Operating Partnership evaluates its estimates and judgments, including those related to carrying values of storage facilities, bad debts, and contingencies and litigation. The Operating Partnership bases its estimates on experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities tha t are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
The Operating Partnership believes its judgment regarding the impairment of the carrying value of its storage facilities is a significant accounting policy. The Operating Partnership's policy is to assess any impairment of value whenever events or circumstances indicate that the
- 24 -
<PAGE>
carrying value of the storage facility may not be recoverable. Such events or circumstances would include negative operating cash flow or significant declining revenue per storage facility. Impairment is evaluated based upon comparing the sum of the expected undiscounted future cash flows to the carrying value of the storage facility, on a property by property basis. If the sum of the undiscounted cash flow is less than the carrying amount, an impairment loss is recognized for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the fair value of the asset. If cash flow projections are inaccurate and in the future it is determined that storage facility carrying values are not recoverable, impairment charges may be required at that time and could materially affect the Operating Partnership's operating results and financial position. At December 31, 2002 and 2001, no assets had been determined to be impaired under this policy and, accordingly, this policy had no impact on the Operating Partnership's fi nancial position or results of operations.
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2002 COMPARED TO
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2001
The Operating Partnership recorded rental revenues of $100.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2002, an increase of $10.9 million or 12.2% when compared to 2001 rental revenues of $89.1 million. Of this increase, $1.2 million resulted from a 1.3% increase in revenues at the 222 core properties considered in same store sales. The remaining $9.7 million increase in rental revenues resulted from the acquisition of 23 stores during 2002 and from having the 2001 acquisitions included for a full year of operations. Other income increased $0.2 million due to increased insurance sales and the additional revenue generated by truck rentals.
Property operating and real estate tax expense increased $5.1 million or 17.7% in 2002 compared to 2001. Of this, $3.5 million was incurred by the facilities acquired in 2002 and from having the 2001 acquisitions included for a full year of operations. The remaining $1.6 million increase was due to increased insurance, personnel, truck expense, and property taxes at the 222 core properties considered same stores.
General and administrative expenses increased $0.6 million or 7.0%. The increase includes additional costs of approximately $2.3 million, which primarily resulted from increased cost in the Operating Partnership's call center and the increased costs associated with operating the properties acquired in 2002. The 2001 general and administrative expenses included a $1.7 million expense in connection with the lawsuit settlement - see Note 15 of the financial statements. There was no such charge in 2002.
Depreciation and amortization expense increased to $17.4 million from $15.0 million, primarily as a result of additional depreciation taken on real estate assets acquired in 2002 and a full year of depreciation on 2001 acquisitions.
Income from operations increased from $39.5 million in 2001 to $42.6 million in 2002 as a result of the aforementioned items.
- 25 -
<PAGE>
Interest expense increased from $13.9 million to $14.7 million as a result of higher rates associated with the mortgage debt incurred on the consolidated joint venture properties and the effect of interest rate swap agreements entered into during 2001.
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2001 COMPARED TO
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000
The Operating Partnership recorded rental revenues of $89.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2001, an increase of $0.9 million or 1% when compared to 2000 rental revenues of $88.2 million. Of this, $3.3 million resulted from a 4% increase in revenues at the 217 core properties considered in same store sales. $0.5 million resulted from the acquisition of eight stores during 2001 and from having the 2000 acquisitions included for a full year of operations. These increases were offset by a $2.9 million decrease from the sale of seven stores to a joint venture in 2000.
Property operating and real estate tax expense increased $1.5 million or 5% in 2001 compared to 2000. Of this increase, $1.4 million resulted from increased expenses at the 217 core properties considered as same stores. $0.7 million was incurred by the facilities acquired in 2001 and from having the 2000 acquisitions included for a full year of operations. These increases were offset by a reduction of $0.6 million from the sale of seven stores to a joint venture in 2000.
General and administrative expenses increased $2.2 million or 38.7% in 2001 compared to 2000. The increase was primarily a result of a $1.7 million expense in connection with a lawsuit settlement - see Note 15 of the financial statements.
Depreciation and amortization expense increased to $15.0 million from $14.3 million, primarily as a result of the additional depreciation taken on the real estate assets acquired in 2001 and a full year of depreciation on 2000 acquisitions.
Income from operations decreased 8.3% from $43.0 million in 2000 to $39.5 million in 2001 as a result of the aforementioned items.
In 2001, interest expense decreased to $13.9 million from $17.5 million as a result of significant decreases in interest rates.
The Operating Partnership recorded a $0.1 million loss in 2001 from its ownership interest in two real estate joint ventures.
RECONCILIATION OF NET INCOME TO FUNDS FROM OPERATIONS
For Year Ended December 31, |
|||||
(dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
$ 27,481 |
$ 25,721 |
$ 27,519 |
$ 27,347 |
$ 24,798 |
Minority interest in income |
810 |
85 |
- |
- |
- |
- 26 - |
|||||
<PAGE> |
|||||
Depreciation of real estate and |
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale of real estate |
- |
- |
(2,161) |
(652) |
- |
Share of office building joint venture |
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization from |
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock dividends |
(4,863) |
(2,955) |
(2,955) |
(1,239) |
- |
Funds from operations allocable to |
|
|
|
|
|
Funds from operations available to |
|
|
|
|
|
The Operating Partnership believes that Funds from Operations ("FFO") provides relevant and meaningful information about its operating performance that is necessary, along with net earnings and cash flows, for an understanding of its operating results. Funds from operations is defined by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts, Inc. ("NAREIT") as net income computed in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP"), excluding gains or losses on sales of properties, plus depreciation and amortization and after adjustments to record unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures on the same basis. We believe that to further understand our performance, FFO should be compared with our reported net income and cash flows in accordance with GAAP, as presented in our consolidated financial statements.
Our computation of FFO may not be comparable to FFO reported by other REITs or real estate companies that do not define the term in accordance with the current NAREIT definition or that interpret the current NAREIT definition differently. FFO does not represent cash generated from operating activities determined in accordance with GAAP, and should not be considered as an alternative to net income (determined in accordance with GAAP) as an indication of our performance, as an alternative to net cash flows from operating activities (determined in accordance with GAAP) as a measure of our liquidity, or as an indicator of our ability to make cash distributions.
CAPITAL RESOURCES, UNSECURED LINE OF CREDIT AND TERM NOTE
The Operating Partnership's unsecured credit facility provides availability up to $150 million, of which $128 million was drawn on December 31, 2002. The facility matures in November 2003 and bears interest at LIBOR plus 1.375%.
In addition to the credit facility, the Operating Partnership has a $75 million unsecured term note bearing interest at LIBOR plus 1.75%. The $75 million note has a maturity date of November 2003, but can be extended through November 2005 at the Operating Partnership's option.
The credit facility and term notes currently have investment grade ratings from Standard and Poor's (BBB-), Moody's (Baa3), and Fitch (BBB-).
- 27 -
<PAGE>
In February 2002, the consolidated joint venture (Locke Sovran II, LLC) entered into a mortgage note of $48 million. The note is secured by the 27 properties owned by the joint venture with a cost of $79 million. The 10-year note bears interest at 7.19%.
Principal maturities of the mortgage for the next five years are as follows: 2003, $0.7 million; 2004, $0.7 million; 2005, $0.8 million; 2006, $0.9 million; and 2007, $0.9 million.
During 2002, the Operating Partnership entered into lease agreements, qualifying as capital leases, for trucks to be used at its storage facilities. Principal maturities for capital lease obligations are as follows: 2003, $0.5 million; 2004, $0.5 million; 2005, $0.6 million; and 2006, $0.3 million.
In July 1999, the Company issued 1,200,000 shares of 9.85% Series B Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock. The Series B Preferred Stock is currently rated by Standard and Poor's (BB+), Moody's (Ba2) and Fitch (BB+).
On July 3, 2002, the Company entered into an agreement providing for the issuance of 2,800,000 shares of 8.375% Series C Convertible Cumulative Preferred Stock and warrants to purchase 379,166 shares of common stock at $32.60 per share in a privately negotiated transaction. The Company immediately issued 1,600,000 shares of the Series C Preferred and issued the remaining 1,200,000 shares on November 27, 2002. The offering price was $25.00 per share and the net proceeds of $67.9 million were used to reduce indebtedness that was incurred in the June acquisition of seven self-storage properties and to repay a portion of the line of credit.
In 2002, the Company acquired 186,617 shares of its common stock via the Share Repurchase Program authorized by the Board of Directors. Through December 31, 2002, the Company has reacquired 1,026,070 shares pursuant to this program. From time to time, subject to market price and certain loan covenants, the Company expects to continue reacquiring shares.
The Operating Partnership believes that its internally generated cash flows and borrowing capacity under the credit facility will be sufficient to fund ongoing operations, capital improvements, dividends, and share repurchases for the year 2003. The Operating Partnership expects to replace its maturing unsecured credit facility with a new unsecured credit facility and medium to long-term unsecured term notes. Future growth is expected to be funded through issuance of secured or unsecured term notes, issuance of common or preferred stock, sale of Properties, private placement solicitation of joint venture equity and other sources of capital.
The Operating Partnership's outstanding unsecured debt as of December 31, 2002, assuming available extensions, matures as follows: 2003, $128 million; and 2005, $75 million.
ACQUISITION OF PROPERTIES
During 2002, the Operating Partnership and the consolidated joint venture used borrowings pursuant to the line of credit and a mortgage to acquire 23 Properties in Texas and New York
- 28 -
<PAGE>
comprising 1.5 million square feet from unaffiliated storage operators. In 2001, three facilities totaling 200,000 square feet were acquired. At December 31, 2002, the Operating Partnership owned and/or operated 264 self-storage facilities in 21 states. Of these facilities, 11 are managed by the Operating Partnership for Locke Sovran I, LLC, an unconsolidated joint venture.
FUTURE ACQUISITION AND DEVELOPMENT PLANS
The Operating Partnership's external growth strategy is to increase the number of facilities it owns by acquiring suitable facilities in markets in which it already has operations, or to expand in new markets by acquiring several facilities at once in those new markets.
At December 31, 2002, the Operating Partnership had no contracts to acquire additional properties.
The Operating Partnership also intends to expand and enhance certain of its existing facilities by building additional storage buildings on presently vacant land and by installing climate control and enhanced security systems at selected sites.
DISPOSITION OF PROPERTIES
During 2001, the Operating Partnership sold eight Properties for approximately $24.5 million to Locke Sovran II, LLC. Because Locke Sovran II, LLC is a consolidated joint venture, no gain was recognized on the sale.
In 2000, the Operating Partnership sold seven Properties for approximately $20 million, recognizing a gain of $2.1 million. The gain recognized represents the proportion of the total gain not related to the Operating Partnership's ongoing ownership interest. The Properties were sold to an unconsolidated joint venture in which the Operating Partnership retained a 45% interest and whose properties the Operating Partnership will manage for an ongoing fee. The Operating Partnership invested $5 million of the proceeds to fund its 45% interest in the venture and received a short-term promissory note of approximately $15 million. The note was repaid in 2001 and the Operating Partnership used the proceeds to pay down its outstanding line of credit, freeing up working capital for acquisitions and expansions done in 2001.
The Operating Partnership may seek to sell additional Properties to similar joint venture programs or third parties in 2003.
INVESTMENT IN JOINT VENTURES
Investment in joint ventures includes an ownership interest in Locke Sovran I, LLC, which operates 11 self storage facilities throughout the United States, and an ownership interest in Iskalo Office Holdings, LLC, which owns the building that houses the Operating Partnership's headquarters and other tenants.
In December 2000, the Operating Partnership contributed seven self-storage properties to Locke Sovran I, LLC with a fair market value of $19.8 million, in exchange for a $15 million one
- 29 -
<PAGE>
year note receivable bearing interest at LIBOR plus 1.75% that was repaid in 2001, and a 45% interest in Locke Sovran I, LLC. For the year ended December 31, 2002, the Operating Partnership's share of Locke Sovran I, LLC's loss was $12,500, which is recorded as equity in losses of joint ventures on the consolidated statements of income.
The Operating Partnership also has a 49% ownership interest in Iskalo Office Holdings, LLC at December 31, 2002. The majority of the $1.6 million investment relates to interest bearing loans made by the Operating Partnership to the joint venture. For the year ended December 31, 2002, the Operating Partnership's share of Iskalo Office Holdings, LLC's loss was $42,000. The Operating Partnership paid rent to Iskalo Office Holdings, LLC of $225,000 in 2002 and 2001.
A summary of the unconsolidated joint ventures' financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2002 is as follows:
(dollars in thousands) |
Locke Sovran I, |
Iskalo Office |
Balance Sheet Data: |
||
Investment in storage facilities, net |
$ 40,099 |
$ - |
Investment in office building |
- |
6,903 |
Other assets |
1,952 |
471 |
Total Assets |
$ 42,051 |
$ 7,374 |
Due to the Operating Partnership |
$ 2,023 |
$ 1,574 |
Demand note payable |
- |
900 |
Mortgage payable |
30,269 |
5,800 |
Other liabilities |
706 |
137 |
Total Liabilities |
32,998 |
8,411 |
Unaffiliated partners' equity (deficiency) |
4,913 |
(529) |
Company equity (deficiency) |
4,140 |
(508 ) |
Total Liabilities and Partners' Equity (Deficiency) |
$ 42,051 |
$ 7,374 |
|
||
Total revenues |
$ 5,807 |
$ 815 |
Total expenses |
5,835 |
901 |
Net loss |
$ (28) |
$ (86) |
The Operating Partnership does not guarantee the debt of Locke Sovran I, LLC; it does guarantee the $900,000 demand note payable of Iskalo Office Holdings, LLC.
DISTRIBUTION REQUIREMENTS OF THE COMPANY AND IMPACT ON THE OPERATING PARTNERSHIP
As a REIT, the Company is not required to pay federal income tax on income that it distributes to its shareholders, provided that the amount distributed is equal to at least 90% of its taxable income. These distributions must be made in the year to which they relate, or in the
- 30 -
<PAGE>
following year if declared before the Company files its federal income tax return, and if it is paid before the first regular dividend of the following year. The first distribution of 2003 may be applied toward the Company's 2002 distribution requirement. The Company's source of funds for such distributions is solely and directly from the Operating Partnership.
As a REIT, the Company must derive at least 95% of its total gross income from income related to real property, interest and dividends. In 2002, the Company's percentage of revenue from such sources exceeded 97%, thereby passing the 95% test, and no special measures are expected to be required to enable the Company to maintain its REIT designation.
INTEREST RATE RISK
At December 31, 2002, the Operating Partnership has three outstanding interest rate swap agreements. The first, entered into in March 2001, effectively fixes the LIBOR base rate at 5.36% through November 2005 on $50 million notional amount. The second, entered in September 2001, effectively fixes the LIBOR base rate at 4.485% through October 2006 on another $50 million notional amount. The third, also entered in September 2001, effectively fixes the LIBOR base rate at 4.805% through September 2008 on $30 million notional amount. The Operating Partnership has an unsecured credit facility in place through November 2003 enabling the Operating Partnership to borrow funds at rates of LIBOR plus 1.375% and 1.75%. Accordingly, as a result of the above described interest rate swap agreements, the Operating Partnership has fixed its interest rate through November 2003 on $50 million at 6.735%, on another $50 million at 5.86%, and on $30 million at 6.555%. Upon renewal or replacement of the credit facility, the Operating Partnership's total interest may change dependent on the terms it negotiates with its lenders; however, the LIBOR base rates have been contractually fixed on $130 million of the Operating Partnership's debt through the interest rate swap termination dates.
Because all but $130 million of the Operating Partnership's outstanding unsecured debt of $203 million is on a floating rate basis, changes in short term interest rates could have a significant impact on the Operating Partnership's earnings and funds from operations. Should the Operating Partnership enter into further rate swap agreements, earnings could be negatively affected, as short-term rates are presently significantly below the five and seven year cost of funds.
Based upon the Operating Partnership's indebtedness at December 31, 2002, and taking the interest rate swap agreements into account, a 1% increase in interest rates would result in an increase to interest expense of approximately $0.7 million.
INFLATION
The Operating Partnership does not believe that inflation has had or will have a direct effect on its operations. Substantially all of the leases at the facilities allow for monthly rent increases, which provide the Operating Partnership with the opportunity to achieve increases in rental income as each lease matures.
- 31 -
<PAGE>
SEASONALITY
The Operating Partnership's revenues typically have been higher in the third and fourth quarters, primarily because the Operating Partnership increases its rental rates on most of its storage units at the beginning of May and because self-storage facilities tend to experience greater occupancy during the late spring, summer and early fall months due to the greater incidence of residential moves during these periods. However, the Operating Partnership believes that its tenant mix, diverse geographic locations, rental structure and expense structure provide adequate protection against undue fluctuations in cash flows and net revenues during off-peak seasons. Thus, the Operating Partnership does not expect seasonality to affect materially distributions to unitholders.
Recent Accounting Pronouncement
In August 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144, "Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets" (SFAS 144). SFAS 144 supersedes SFAS No. 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed of," but retains its fundamental provisions for recognition and measurement of the impairment of long-lived assets to be held and used and those to be disposed of by sale. SFAS 144 also extends the reporting of a discontinued operation to a component of an entity. The Operating Partnership adopted this standard in 2002. The adoption of this standard had no material effect on the Operating Partnership's results of operations and financial condition in 2002.
UNITHOLDER INFORMATION
CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS
6467 Main Street
Buffalo, New York 14221
716-633-1850
SOVRAN'S WEBSITE
http://www.sovranss.com
FORM 10-K REPORT
A copy of the Operating Partnership's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002, filed with the Securities Exchange Commission, will be furnished to unitholders without charge upon written request. Please contact Christine M. Aguglia, 716-633-1850
INVESTOR RELATIONS
For more information or to receive Sovran's quarterly reports, please contact Diane M. Piegza, 716-633-1850
- 32 -
<PAGE>
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
Ernst & Young LLP
1400 Key Tower
Buffalo, New York 14202
Item 7A. |
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk |
The information required is incorporated by reference to the information appearing under the caption "Interest Rate Risk" in Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" above.
Item 8. |
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data |
SOVRAN ACQUISITION LIMITED PARTNERSHIP CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
December 31, |
||
(dollars in thousands, except unit data) |
2002 |
2001 |
Assets |
||
Investment in storage facilities: |
||
Land |
$ 132,853 |
$ 117,069 |
Building and equipment |
577,988 |
494,220 |
710,841 |
611,289 |
|
Less: accumulated depreciation |
(75,344) |
(59,091) |
Investment in storage facilities, net |
635,497 |
552,198 |
Cash and cash equivalents |
2,063 |
1,883 |
Accounts receivable |
1,785 |
1,064 |
Receivable from related parties |
98 |
122 |
Receivable from joint ventures |
2,023 |
679 |
Investment in joint ventures |
3,386 |
3,659 |
Prepaid expenses |
2,719 |
2,505 |
Fair value of interest rate swap agreements |
- |
373 |
Other assets |
4,766 |
5,355 |
Total Assets |
$ 652,337 |
$ 567,838 |
Liabilities |
||
Line of credit |
$128,000 |
$134,000 |
Term note |
75,000 |
105,000 |
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
4,691 |
3,969 |
Deferred revenue |
3,468 |
3,157 |
Fair value of interest rate swap agreements |
10,020 |
- |
Accrued distributions |
8,124 |
7,683 |
Capital lease obligations |
1,933 |
- |
Mortgage payable |
47,519 |
2,190 |
Total Liabilities |
278,755 |
255,999 |
Minority interest - consolidated joint venture |
16,531 |
17,085 |
|
|
|
- 33 - |
||
<PAGE> |
||
Partners' Capital |
||
General partner (219,567 units outstanding |
|
|
Limited partner (12,764,772 and |
|
|
Preferred partners (1,200,000 Series B |
|
|
Preferred partners (2,800,000 Series C |
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
(10,020) |
373 |
Total Partners' Capital |
341,315 |
274,170 |
Total Liabilities and Partners' Capital |
$652,337 |
$567,838 |
See notes to financial statements. |
- 34
<PAGE>
SOVRAN ACQUISITION LIMITED PARTNERSHIP CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Year Ended December 31, |
|||
(dollars in thousands, except per unit data) |
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
Revenues |
|||
Rental income |
$ 99,987 |
$ 89,116 |
$ 88,208 |
Other operating income |
2,154 |
1,896 |
1,944 |
Total operating revenues |
102,141 |
91,012 |
90,152 |
Expenses |
|||
Property operations and maintenance |
24,284 |
20,517 |
19,329 |
Real estate taxes |
9,265 |
7,981 |
7,718 |
General and administrative |
8,586 |
8,026 |
5,786 |
Depreciation and amortization |
17,392 |
15,035 |
14,273 |
Total operating expenses |
59,527 |
51,559 |
47,106 |
Income from operations |
42,614 |
39,453 |
43,046 |
Other income (expenses) |
|||
Interest expense |
(14,664) |
(13,940) |
(17,708) |
Interest income |
356 |
395 |
197 |
Minority interest - consolidated joint venture |
(810) |
(75) |
- |
Equity in losses of joint ventures |
(15) |
(102) |
(177) |
Income before gain on sale of real estate |
27,481 |
25,731 |
25,358 |
Gain on sale of real estate |
- |
- |
2,161 |
Net Income |
27,481 |
25,731 |
27,519 |
Preferred unit distributions |
(5,093) |
(2,955) |
(2,955) |
Net income available to common unitholders |
$ 22,388 |
$ 22,776 |
$ 24,564 |
Per Common Unit: |
|||
Earnings per common unit - basic |
$ 1.67 |
$ 1.78 |
$ 1.90 |
Earnings per common unit - diluted |
$ 1.65 |
$ 1.74 |
$ 1.90 |
Distributions declared per common unit |
$ 2.38 |
$ 2.34 |
$ 2.30 |
See notes to financial statements.
- 35-
<PAGE>
Sovran Acquisition Limited Partnership
Statements of Partners' Capital
|
Sovran |
Sovran Self |
|
|
Accumulated |
Total |
|
Balance January 1, 2000 |
$ 5,283 |
$ 260,267 |
$ 30,000 |
$ - |
$ - |
$ 295,550 |
$ 15,888 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earned portion of restricted stock |
- |
137 |
- |
- |
- |
137 |
- |
Purchase of treasury shares |
- |
(7,784) |
- |
- |
- |
(7,784) |
- |
Deferred compensation |
- |
50 |
- |
- |
- |
50 |
- |
Net income |
469 |
25,238 |
- |
- |
- |
25,707 |
1,812 |
Distributions |
(559) |
(30,073) |
- |
- |
- |
(30,632) |
(1,962) |
Adjustment to reflect limited partners' |
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
Balance December 31, 2000 |
5,171 |
248,705 |
30,000 |
- |
- |
283,876 |
16,954 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redemption of Partnership Units |
- |
1,868 |
- |
- |
- |
1,868 |
(5,646) |
Exercise of stock options |
- |
1,096 |
- |
- |
- |
1,096 |
- |
Earned portion of restricted stock |
- |
424 |
- |
- |
- |
424 |
- |
Purchase of treasury shares |
- |
(1,809) |
- |
- |
- |
(1,809) |
- |
Deferred compensation |
- |
69 |
- |
- |
- |
69 |
- |
Net income |
429 |
23,760 |
- |
- |
- |
24,189 |
1,532 |
Increase in fair value of derivatives |
- |
- |
- |
- |
373 |
373 |
- |
Total comprehensive income |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
24,562 |
1,532 |
Distributions |
(560) |
(31,093) |
- |
- |
- |
(31,653) |
(1,728) |
Adjustment to reflect limited partners' |
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
- 36- |
|||||||
<PAGE> |
|||||||
Balance December 31, 2001 |
$ 4,873 |
$ 238,924 |
$ 30,000 |
$- |
$ 373 |
$ 274,170 |
$ 20,584 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redemption of Partnership Units |
- |
(150) |
- |
- |
- |
(150) |
(3,163) |
Issuance of 8.375% Series C Units |
- |
(2,124) |
- |
70,000 |
- |
67,876 |
- |
Exercise of stock options |
- |
5,648 |
- |
- |
- |
5,648 |
- |
Earned portion of restricted stock |
- |
430 |
- |
- |
- |
430 |
- |
Purchase of treasury shares |
- |
(5,188) |
- |
- |
- |
(5,188) |
- |
Deferred compensation |
- |
89 |
- |
- |
- |
89 |
- |
Net income |
433 |
25,868 |
- |
- |
- |
26,301 |
1,180 |
Decrease in fair value of derivatives |
- |
- |
- |
- |
(10,393) |
(10,393) |
- |
Total comprehensive income |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
15,908 |
1,180 |
Distributions |
(603) |
(34,847) |
- |
- |
- |
(35,450) |
(1,329) |
Adjustment to reflect limited partners' |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance December 31, 2002 |
$ 4,729 |
$ 246,606 |
$ 30,000 |
$ 70,000 |
$ (10,020) |
$ 341,315 |
$ 15,736 |
See notes to financial statements.
- 37 -
<PAGE>
SOVRAN ACQUISITION LIMITED PARTNERSHIP CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Year Ended December 31, |
|||
(dollars in thousands) |
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
Operating Activities |
|||
Net income |
$ 27,481 |
$ 25,721 |
$ 27,519 |
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash |
|||
Write-off of deferred financing costs |
- |
- |
211 |
Depreciation and amortization |
17,392 |
15,035 |
14,273 |
Gain on sale of real estate |
- |
- |
(2,161) |
Equity in losses of joint ventures |
15 |
102 |
177 |
Minority interest |
810 |
85 |
- |
Restricted stock earned |
430 |
424 |
137 |
Changes in assets and liabilities: |
|||
Accounts receivable |
(587) |
91 |
20 |
Fees receivable from joint ventures |
- |
711 |
(711) |
Prepaid expenses |
13 |
(472) |
(70) |
Accounts payable and other liabilities |
220 |
(626) |
203 |
Deferred revenue |
(164) |
(149) |
(170) |
Net cash provided by operating activities |
45,610 |
40,922 |
39,428 |
Investing Activities |
|||
Additions to storage facilities |
(97,150) |
(31,483) |
(23,390) |
(Advances) reimbursement of advances to joint |
|
|
|
Receipts from (advances to) related parties |
24 |
1,885 |
(1,370) |
Other assets |
- |
(2,807) |
- |
Net cash used in investing activities |
(99,244) |
(17,751) |
(25,274) |
Financing Activities |
|||
Net proceeds from sale of partnership units |
22,034 |
6,374 |
2,064 |
Net proceeds from sale of preferred units and |
|
|
|
(Paydown of) proceeds from line of credit |
(6,000) |
10,000 |
1,000 |
(Paydown of) proceeds from term note |
(30,000) |
- |
30,000 |
Proceeds from mortgage financing |
48,000 |
- |
- |
Financing costs |
(460) |
(398) |
(3,388) |
Distributions paid |
(37,646) |
(33,065) |
(32,627) |
Distributions from unconsolidated joint venture |
1,032 |
- |
- |
Purchase of treasury stock |
(5,188) |
(1,809) |
(7,784) |
Redemption of operating partnership units |
(3,163) |
(3,778) |
- |
Mortgage principal payments |
(2,671) |
(33) |
(3,030) |
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
53,814 |
(22,709) |
(13,765) |
- 38 - |
|||
<PAGE> |
|||
Net increase in cash |
180 |
462 |
389 |
Cash at beginning of period |
1,883 |
1,421 |
1,032 |
Cash at end of period |
$ 2,063 |
$ 1,883 |
$ 1,421 |
Year Ended December 31, |
||||||
(dollars in thousands) |
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
|||
Supplemental cash flow information |
||||||
Cash paid for interest |
$ 14,465 |
$ 14,416 |
$ 16,948 |
|||
Capital lease obligations incurred |
2,183 |
- |
- |
|||
Storage facilities acquired through issuance of |
|
|
|
|||
Note receivable from sale of storage facilities to |
|
|
|
|||
Investment in joint venture received as part of sale |
|
|
|
|||
Storage facilities acquired through assumption |
|
|
|
|||
Fair value of net liabilities assumed on the acquisition |
|
|
|
Distributions declared but unpaid at December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000 were $8,124, $7,683, and $7,472, respectively.
See notes to financial statements.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Sovran Acquisition Limited Partnership - December 31, 2002
1. ORGANIZATION
Sovran Acquisition Limited Partnership (the "Operating Partnership") is the entity through which Sovran Self Storage, Inc. (the "Company"), a self-administered and self-managed real estate investment trust ("REIT"), conducts substantially all of its business and owns substantially all of its assets. In 1995, the Company was formed under Maryland law and the Operating Partnership was organized as a Delaware limited partnership to continue and to expand the self-storage operations of the Company's privately owned predecessor organizations. On June 26, 1995, the Company commenced operations, through the Operating Partnership, effective with the completion of its initial public offering of 5,890,000 shares. At December 31, 2002, the Operating Partnership owned and/or managed 264 self-storage properties under the "Uncle Bob's Self Storage"® trade name in 21 states.
- 39 -
<PAGE>
As of December 31, 2002, the Company was a 95.90% economic owner of the Operating Partnership and controls it through Sovran Holdings, Inc. ("Holdings"), a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company incorporated in Delaware and the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership (this structure is commonly referred to as an umbrella partnership REIT or "UPREIT"). The board of directors of Holdings, the members of which are also members of the Board of Directors of the Company, manages the affairs of the Operating Partnership by directing the affairs of Holdings. The Company's limited partner and indirect general partner interests in the Operating Partnership entitle it to share in cash distributions from, and in the profits and losses of, the Operating Partnership in proportion to its ownership interest therein and entitle the Company to vote on all matters requiring a vote of the limited partners.
The other limited partners of the Operating Partnership are persons who contributed their direct or indirect interests in certain self-storage properties to the Operating Partnership. The Operating Partnership is obligated to redeem each unit of limited partnership ("Unit") at the request of the holder thereof for cash equal to the fair market value of a share of the Company's common stock ("Common Shares") at the time of such redemption, provided that the Company at its option may elect to acquire any Unit presented for redemption for one Common Share or cash. The Company presently anticipates that it will elect to issue Common Shares to acquire Units presented for redemption, rather than paying cash. With each such redemption the Company's percentage ownership interest in the Operating Partnership will increase. In addition, whenever the Company issues Common Shares, the Company is obligated to contribute any net proceeds therefrom to the Operati ng Partnership and the Operating Partnership is obligated to issue an equivalent number of Units to the Company. Such limited partners' redemption rights are reflected in "limited partners' capital interest" in the accompanying balance sheets at the cash redemption amount at the balance sheet date. Capital activity with regard to such limited partners' redemption rights is reflected in the accompanying statements of partners' capital.
2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis of Presentation: The consolidated financial statements of the Operating Partnership include the accounts of the Operating Partnership and Locke Sovran II, LLC, which is a majority controlled joint venture. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated. Investments in joint ventures which are not majority owned are reported using the equity method.
Cash and Cash Equivalents: The Operating Partnership considers all highly liquid debt instruments purchased with maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents.
Revenue and Expense Recognition: Rental income is recorded when earned. Rental income received prior to the start of the rental period is included in deferred revenue. Advertising costs are expensed as incurred and for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001, and 2000 were $0.6 million, $0.4 million, and $1.4 million, respectively.
Other Income: Consists primarily of sales of storage-related merchandise (locks and packing supplies), management fees, and commissions from truck rentals.
- 40 -
<PAGE>
Investment in Storage Facilities: Storage facilities are recorded at cost. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over estimated useful lives of forty years for buildings and improvements, and five to twenty years for furniture, fixtures and equipment. Expenditures for significant renovations or improvements that extend the useful life of assets are capitalized. Repair and maintenance costs are expensed as incurred.
Whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the basis of the Operating Partnership's property may not be recoverable, the Operating Partnership's policy is to assess any impairment of value. Impairment is evaluated based upon comparing the sum of the expected undiscounted future cash flows to the carrying value of the property, on a property by property basis. If the sum of the undiscounted cash flow is less than the carrying amount, an impairment loss is recognized for the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset. At December 31, 2002 and 2001, no assets had been determined to be impaired under this policy and, accordingly, this policy had no impact on the Operating Partnership's financial position or results of operations.
Other Assets: Included in other assets are intangible assets of $2.0 million and a note receivable of $2.8 million. The intangible assets at December 31, 2002, consist primarily of loan acquisition costs of approximately $4.0 million, net of accumulated amortization of approximately $2.0 million. Loan acquisition costs are amortized over the terms of the related debt. Amortization expense was $1.0 million, $1.1 million and $0.9 million for the periods ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively. The note receivable of $2.8 million represents a note from certain investors of Locke Sovran II, LLC. The note bears interest at LIBOR plus 2.4% and matures upon the dissolution of Locke Sovran II, LLC.
Stock-Based Compensation: In accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 123 "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation," the Operating Partnership has elected to continue applying the provisions of Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25 (APB 25) and related interpretations in accounting for its stock-based compensation plans. Accordingly, the Operating Partnership does not recognize compensation expense for stock options when the stock option price at the grant date is equal to or greater than the fair market value of the stock at that date. The following illustrates the pro forma effect on net income and earnings per unit if the Operating Partnership had applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123 (in thousands, except for earnings per unit information):
Pro Forma |
|||
(dollars in thousands, except per share data) |
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
Net income available to common unitholders |
|
|
|
Deduct: Total stock-based employee compensation |
|
|
|
Pro forma net income available to common |
|
|
|
Earnings per common unit |
|||
Basic - as reported |
$ 1.67 |
$ 1.75 |
$ 1.90 |
- 41 - |
|||
<PAGE> |
|||
Basic - pro forma |
$ 1.66 |
$ 1.74 |
$ 1.89 |
Diluted - as reported |
$ 1.65 |
$ 1.74 |
$ 1.90 |
Diluted - pro forma |
$ 1.64 |
$ 1.72 |
$ 1.89 |
Pro forma information regarding net income and earnings per unit is required by SFAS No. 123, and has been determined as if the Operating Partnership had accounted for its stock options under the fair value method of SFAS No. 123. The fair value for the stock options was estimated at the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions: risk-free interest rate of 4.0% for 2002, 5.0% for 2001, and 6.5% for 2000; dividend yield of 8.0% for 2002, 10.7% for 2001, and 11% for 2000; volatility factor of the expected market price of the Company's common stock of .21 for 2002, and .23 for 2001 and .21 for 2000. The average fair value of options granted was $1.98 in 2002, $.93 in 2001, and $.90 in 2000.
Minority Interest: The minority interest reflects the joint venture partner's interest in Locke Sovran II, LLC. Amounts allocated to the joint venture partners are reflected as an expense in the income statement and increase the minority interest in the balance sheet. Distributions to these partners reduce this balance.
Income Taxes: No provision has been made for income taxes in the accompanying financial statements since the Operating Partnership qualifies as a partnership for federal and state income tax purposes and its partners are required to include their respective shares of profits and losses in their income tax returns.
Comprehensive Income: Comprehensive income consists of net income and the change in value of derivatives used for hedging purposes and is reported in the consolidated statements of partners' capital. Comprehensive income was $15.9 million and $24.6 million and $25.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001, and 2000, respectively.
Derivative Financial Instruments: On January 1, 2001, the Operating Partnership adopted SFAS No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities," as amended, which requires companies to carry all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value. The Operating Partnership determines the fair value of derivatives by reference to quoted market prices. The accounting for changes in the fair value of a derivative instrument depends on whether it has been designated and qualifies as part of a hedging relationship and, if so, the reason for holding it. The Operating Partnership's use of derivative instruments is limited to cash flow hedges, as defined in SFAS No. 133, of certain interest rate risks.
Recent Accounting Pronouncement: In August 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets which supersedes SFAS No. 121 Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed of. Although retaining many of the provisions of SFAS No. 121, SFAS No. 144 establishes a uniform accounting model for long-lived assets to be disposed of. SFAS 144 also extends the reporting of a discontinued operation to a component of an entity. The Operating
- 42 -
<PAGE>
Partnership's adoption of this statement in the first quarter of 2002 did not have an impact on the Operating Partnership's financial results.
In April 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 145, "Rescission of FASB Statement No. 4, 44, and 64, Amendment of FASB Statement No. 13, and Technical Corrections." SFAS No. 145 updates, clarifies and simplifies existing accounting pronouncements. It rescinds SFAS No. 4, which required all gains and losses from extinguishment of debt to be aggregated and, if material, classified as an extraordinary item. The Operating Partnership adopted this standard in 2002 resulting in reclassification of its 2000 loss on extinguishment of debt of $211,000 from an extraordinary item to interest expense.
In June 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 146, Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities, which requires the recognition of expense when the liability is incurred and not as a result of an entity's commitment to an exit plan. The statement is effective for exit or disposal activities initiated after December 31, 2002. The adoption of SFAS No. 146 in the first quarter of 2003 is not expected to have a significant impact on the Operating Partnership's financial results.
In December 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation - Transition and Disclosure, an amendment of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation. SFAS No. 148, which is effective for years ending after December 15, 2002, provides alternative methods for a voluntary change to the fair value based method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation and requires prominent disclosure about the method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation and the effect of the method used on reported results. The Operating Partnership's adoption of SFAS No. 148 in 2002 enhanced stock-based employee compensation disclosures and had no effect on the method of accounting followed by the Operating Partnership, as the Operating Partnership continues to apply the provisions of APB 25.
Reclassification: Certain amounts from the 2001 and 2000 financial statements have been reclassified to conform with the current year presentation.
Use of Estimates: The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
3. EARNINGS PER UNIT
The Operating Partnership reports earnings per unit data in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 128, "Earnings Per Share." In computing earnings per unit, the Operating Partnership excludes preferred unit distributions from net income to arrive at net income available to common unitholders. The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per common unit.
- 43 -
<PAGE>
|
Year Ended |
Year Ended |
Year Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for diluted earnings per unit - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Potential common units from the Series C Convertible Cumulative Preferred Stock and related warrants, see Note 12, were excluded from the 2002 diluted earnings per unit calculation because their inclusion would have had an antidilutive effect on earnings per unit.
4. INVESTMENT IN STORAGE FACILITIES
The following summarizes activity in storage facilities during the years ended December 31, 2002 and December 31, 2001.
(Dollars in thousands) |
2002 |
2001 |
Cost: |
||
Beginning balance |
$611,289 |
$562,721 |
Property acquisitions |
81,819 |
30,269 |
Improvements and equipment additions |
17,934 |
18,527 |
Dispositions |
(201) |
(228) |
|
|
|
|
||
Beginning balance |
$ 59,091 |
$ 45,253 |
Additions during the year |
16,344 |
13,918 |
Dispositions |
(91) |
(80) |
- 44 - |
||
<PAGE> |
||
|
|
|
5. UNSECURED LINE OF CREDIT AND TERM NOTE
The Operating Partnership has a $150 million revolving line of credit due November 2003 at LIBOR plus 1.375% and a $75 million term loan due November 2003 (extendable, at the Operating Partnership's option, to November 2005) at LIBOR plus 1.75%. The weighted average interest rate at December 31, 2002 on the Operating Partnership's credit facility before the effect of interest rate swaps was approximately 3.0% (3.5% at December 31, 2001). At December 31, 2002, there was $22 million available on the line of credit.
The net carrying amount of the Operating Partnership's debt instruments approximates fair value.
6. MORTGAGE PAYABLE AND CAPITAL LEASE OBLIGATIONS
In February 2002, the consolidated joint venture (Locke Sovran II, LLC) entered into a mortgage note of $48 million. The note is secured by the 27 properties owned by the joint venture with a cost of $79 million. The 10-year mortgage bears interest at the fixed rate of 7.19%. The outstanding balance on the mortgage is $47.5 million at December 31, 2002. Principal maturities of the mortgage for the next five years are as follows: 2003, $0.7 million; 2004, $0.7 million; 2005, $0.8 million; 2006, $0.9 million; and 2007, $0.9 million.
During 2002, the Operating Partnership entered into lease agreements, qualifying as capital leases, for trucks to be used at its storage facilities. The outstanding balance on these capital lease obligations is $1.9 million at December 31, 2002. Principal maturities for capital lease obligations are as follows: 2003, $0.5 million; 2004, $0.5 million; 2005, $0.6 million; and 2006, $0.3 million.
The Operating Partnership has a $150 million revolving line of credit due November 2003 at LIBOR plus 1.375%, a $75 million term loan due November 2003 (extendable, at the Operating Partnership's option to November 2005) at LIBOR plus 1.75%, and a $30 million term loan due November 2002 at LIBOR plus 1.375%. The weighted average interest rate at December 31, 2001 on the Operating Partnership's credit facility before the effect of interest rate swaps was approximately 3.5% (8.2% at December 31, 2000). At December 31, 2001, there was $16 million available on the line of credit.
The Operating Partnership recorded an extraordinary loss on the extinguishment of debt of $211,000 in 2000, representing the unamortized financing costs of credit facilities that were refinanced during 2000.
The net carrying amount of the Operating Partnership's debt instruments approximates fair value.
- 45 -
<PAGE>
7. DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
Interest rate swaps are used to adjust the proportion of total debt that is subject to variable and fixed interest rates. The interest rate swaps require the Operating Partnership to pay an amount equal to a specific fixed rate of interest times a notional principal amount and to receive in return an amount equal to a variable rate of interest times the same notional amount. The notional amounts are not changed. No other cash payments are made unless the contract is terminated prior to its maturity, in which case the contract would likely be settled for an amount equal to its net present value. The Operating Partnership enters interest rate swaps with a number of major financial institutions to minimize counterparty credit risk.
The interest rate swaps qualify and are designated as hedges of the amount of future cash flows related to interest payments on variable rate debt. Therefore, the interest rate swaps are recorded in the consolidated balance sheet at fair value and the related gains or losses are deferred in partners' capital as Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income ("AOCI"). These deferred gains and losses are amortized into interest expense during the period or periods in which the related interest payments affect earnings. However, to the extent that the interest rate swaps are not perfectly effective in offsetting the change in value of the interest payments being hedged, the ineffective portion of these contracts is recognized in earnings immediately. Ineffectiveness was immaterial in 2002 and 2001.
The Operating Partnership has entered into three interest rate swap agreements, one in March 2001 for $50 million and two in September 2001 for $50 million and $30 million, to effectively convert a total of $130 million of variable-rate debt to fixed-rate debt. One of the $50 million interest rate swap agreements matures in November 2005, the other matures in October 2006, and the $30 million swap agreement matures in September 2008.
The 2001 interest rate swap agreements are the only derivative instruments, as defined by SFAS No. 133, held by the Operating Partnership; as such, there was no impact upon adoption of SFAS No. 133 at January 1, 2001. During 2002 and 2001, the net reclassification from AOCI to interest expense was $4.0 million and $1.1 million, respectively, based on payments made under the swap agreements. Based on current interest rates, the Operating Partnership estimates that payments under the interest rate swaps will be approximately $4.5 million in 2003. Payments made under the interest rate swap agreements will be reclassified to interest expense as settlements occur. The fair value of the swap agreements at December 31, 2002 was a $10 million liability.
8. STOCK OPTIONS
The Company established the 1995 Award and Option Plan (the "Plan") for the purpose of attracting and retaining the Company's executive officers and other key employees. 1,500,000 shares were authorized for issuance under the Plan. The options vest ratably over four and five years, and must be exercised within ten years from the date of grant. The exercise price for qualified incentive stock options must be at least equal to the fair market value at the date of grant. As of December 31, 2002, options for 647,275 shares were outstanding under the Plan and 383,360 shares of common stock were available for future issuance.
- 46 -
<PAGE>
The Company also established the 1995 Outside Directors' Stock Option Plan (the Non-employee Plan) for the purpose of attracting and retaining the services of experienced and knowledgeable outside directors. The Non-employee Plan provides for the annual granting of options to purchase 3,000 shares of common stock to each eligible director. Such options vest over a one-year period for initial awards and immediately upon subsequent grants. The total shares reserved under the Non-employee Plan is 100,000. The exercise price for options granted under the Non-employee Plan is equal to fair market value at date of grant. As of December 31, 2002, options for 87,500 shares were outstanding under the Non-employee Plan.
The Company has also issued 132,340 shares of restricted stock to employees which vest over four and five year periods. The fair market value of the restricted stock on the date of grant ranged from $20.38 to $31.65. The Company charges unearned restricted stock, a component of partners' capital, for the market value of shares as they are issued. The unearned portion is then amortized and charged to expense over the vesting period.
A summary of the Company's stock option activity and related information for the years ended December 31 follows:
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
||||
|
Weighted |
|
Weighted |
|
Weighted |
|
|
||||||
Outstanding at beginning of year: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
80,000 |
30.92 |
329,500 |
21.71 |
212,000 |
19.19 |
Exercised |
(247,775) |
22.80 |
(52,500) |
20.77 |
- |
- |
Forfeited |
- |
- |
(13,500) |
20.75 |
(6,000) |
19.06 |
|
||||||
Outstanding at end of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Exercisable at end of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise prices for options outstanding as of December 31, 2002 ranged from $19.07 to $31.68. The weighted average remaining contractual life of those options is 6.57 years. As disclosed further in Note 12, warrants to purchase 379,166 common shares of the Company at a price of $32.60 per share are outstanding at December 31, 2002.
- 47 -
<PAGE>
9. RETIREMENT PLAN
Employees of the Company qualifying under certain age and service requirements are eligible to be a participant in a 401(k) Plan, which became effective September 1, 1997. The Company contributes to the Plan at the rate of 50% of the first 4% of gross wages that the employee contributes. Total expense to the Company was approximately $92,000, $63,000, and $60,000 for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively.
10. SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS PLAN
In November 1996, the Company adopted a Shareholder Rights Plan and declared a dividend distribution of one Right for each outstanding share of common stock. Under certain conditions, each Right may be exercised to purchase one one-thousandth of a share of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock at a purchase price of $75, subject to adjustment. The Rights will be exercisable only if a person or group has acquired 10% or more of the outstanding shares of common stock, or following the commencement of a tender or exchange offer for 10% or more of such outstanding shares of the Company's common stock. If a person or group acquires more than 10% of the then outstanding shares of the Company's common stock, each Right will entitle its holder to receive, upon exercise, common stock having a value equal to two times the exercise price of the Right. In addition, if the Company is acquired in a merger or other business combination transaction , each Right will entitle its holder to purchase that number of the acquiring Company's common shares having a market value of twice the Right's exercise price. The Company will be entitled to redeem the Rights at $.01 per Right at any time prior to the earlier of the expiration of the Rights in November 2006 or the time that a person has acquired a 10% position. The Rights do not have voting or dividend rights, and until they become exercisable, have no dilutive effect on the Company's earnings.
11. INVESTMENT IN JOINT VENTURES
Investment in joint ventures includes an ownership interest in Locke Sovran I, LLC, which operates 11 self-storage facilities throughout the United States, and an ownership interest in Iskalo Office Holdings, LLC, which owns the building that houses the Operating Partnership's headquarters and other tenants.
In December 2000, the Operating Partnership contributed seven self-storage properties to Locke Sovran I, LLC with a fair market value of $19.8 million, in exchange for a $15 million 1 year note receivable bearing interest at LIBOR plus 1.75% that was repaid in 2001, and a 45% interest in Locke Sovran I, LLC. This transaction resulted in a gain on the disposal of the properties of approximately $4.3 million; $1.9 million of this gain was deferred as a result of the Operating Partnership's continuing ownership interest in Locke Sovran I, LLC, as such the initial investment, including cash funding, was recorded at $3.1 million. The deferred gain is being amortized over the life of the properties, consistent with the depreciation expense recorded by Locke Sovran I, LLC. For the year ended December 31, 2002, the Operating Partnership's share of Locke Sovran I, LLC's loss was $12,500 and the amortization of the deferred gain was
- 48 -
<PAGE>
$40,000, both of which are recorded as equity in losses of joint ventures on the consolidated statements of income.
The Operating Partnership also has a 49% ownership interest in Iskalo Office Holdings, LLC at December 31, 2002. The majority of the $1.6 million investment relates to interest bearing loans made by the Operating Partnership to the joint venture. For the year ended December 31, 2002, the Operating Partnership's share of Iskalo Office Holdings, LLC's loss was $42,000. The Operating Partnership paid rent to Iskalo Office Holdings, LLC of $255,000 in 2002 and 2001.
A summary of the unconsolidated joint ventures' financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2002 is as follows:
(dollars in thousands) |
Locke Sovran I, |
Iskalo Office |
Balance Sheet Data: |
||
Investment in storage facilities, net |
$40,099 |
$ - |
Investment in office building |
- |
6,903 |
Other assets |
1,952 |
471 |
Total Assets |
$ 42,051 |
$ 7,374 |
Due to the Operating Partnership |
$ 2,023 |
$ 1,574 |
Demand note payable |
- |
900 |
Mortgage payable |
30,269 |
5,800 |
Other liabilities |
706 |
137 |
Total Liabilities |
32,998 |
8,411 |
Unaffiliated partners' equity (deficiency) |
4,913 |
(529) |
Company equity (deficiency) |
4,140 |
(508 ) |
Total Liabilities and Partners' Equity (Deficiency) |
$ 42,051 |
$ 7,374 |
Income Statement Data: |
||
Total revenues |
$ 5,807 |
$ 815 |
Total expenses |
5,835 |
901 |
Net loss |
$ (28) |
$ (86) |
The Operating Partnership does not guarantee the debt of Locke Sovran I, LLC; it does guarantee the $900,000 demand note payable of Iskalo Office Holdings, LLC.
12. PREFERRED STOCK
Series A
The Company has authorized 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, of which 250,000 shares have been designated as Series A Junior Participating Cumulative Preferred Stock with a $.01 par value. Upon issuance pursuant to the Shareholder Rights Plan (see note 10), the Series A Junior Preferred Stock will have certain voting, dividend and liquidation preferences over common stock, as described in the Form 8-K filed December 3, 1996.
- 49 -
<PAGE>
Series B
On July 30, 1999, the Company issued 1,200,000 shares of 9.85% Series B Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock. The offering price was $25 per share resulting in net proceeds of $28.6 million after expenses. The Series B Preferred Stock is not redeemable until on or after July 30, 2004, at which time the Company may redeem the shares at $25.00 per share ($30,000,000 aggregate), plus any accrued and unpaid dividends. The shares may be redeemed only with the proceeds of certain sales of equity securities. Dividends on the Series B Preferred Stock are cumulative from the date of original issue and are payable quarterly in arrears on the last day of each March, June, September, and December at a rate of $2.4625 per annum per share.
Holders of the Series B Preferred Stock generally have no voting rights. However, if the Company does not pay dividends on the Series B shares for six or more quarterly periods (whether or not consecutive), the holders of the shares, voting as a class with the holders of any other class or series of stock with similar voting rights, will be entitled to vote for the election of two additional directors to serve on the Board of Directors until all Series B dividends that are accrued are paid.
Series C
On July 3, 2002, the Company entered into an agreement providing for the issuance of 2,800,000 shares of 8.375% Series C Convertible Cumulative Preferred Stock ("Series C Preferred") in a privately negotiated transaction. The Company immediately issued 1,600,000 shares of the Series C Preferred and issued the remaining 1,200,000 shares on November 27, 2002. The offering price was $25.00 per share resulting in net proceeds for the Series C Preferred and related common stock warrants of $67.9 million.
The Series C Preferred has a fixed annual dividend rate equal to the greater of 8.375% or the actual dividend paid on the number of the Company's common shares into which the Series C Preferred is convertible. The Series C Preferred is convertible at a ratio of .76687 common shares for each Series C Preferred share and can be redeemed at the Company's option on or after November 30, 2007 at $25.00 per share ($70,000,000 aggregate) plus accrued and unpaid dividends. Dividends on the Series C Preferred are cumulative from the date of original issue and are payable quarterly in arrears on the last day of each March, June, September, and December at a rate of $2.09375 per annum per share.
Holders of the Series C Preferred generally have no voting rights. However, if the Company does not pay dividends on the Series C Preferred shares for six or more quarterly periods (whether or not consecutive), the holders of the shares, voting as a class with the holders of any other class or series of stock with similar voting rights, will be entitled to vote for the election of two additional directors to serve on the Board of Directors until the Series C Preferred dividends are paid.
In addition, the Company issued warrants to the Series C Preferred investors to purchase 379,166 common shares of the Company at a price of $32.60 per share that expire November 30, 2007. Using the Black-Scholes method, the warrants had a fair value at the issue date of $1.97 per common share covered by the warrants. Also, an entity related to one of the investors received a placement certificate that entitles it to receive cash from the Company in the amount
- 50 -
<PAGE>
of 650,000 multiplied by the excess of the fair market value of the Company's common stock over $32.60 on the date the certificate is exercised. This arrangement expires on November 30, 2007. Based upon the Company's common stock price at December 31, 2002, no amount is currently payable under this arrangement.
The Company recorded a deemed dividend of $0.2 million in 2002 in connection with the issuance of the Series C Preferred. The deemed dividend represents the calculated value of the beneficial conversion feature that existed on July 3, 2002, the date of issuance of the Series C Preferred. The beneficial conversion feature is calculated as the excess of, on the date of issuance of the Series C Preferred, the fair value of the common stock into which the Series C Preferred is convertible, over the issuance amount allocated to the Series C Preferred.
The Series B and C Preferred Stock are recorded as Preferred Partners' Units in the Operating Partnership's balance sheet
13. SUPPLEMENTARY QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED)
The following is a summary of quarterly results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001 (dollars in thousands, except per unit data).
2002 Quarter Ended |
||||
March 31 |
June 30 |
Sept. 30 |
Dec. 31 |
|
Operating revenue |
$ 24,167 |
$ 25,177 |
$ 26,249 |
$ 26,548 |
Net Income |
$ 6,411 |
$ 6,956 |
$ 7,117 |
$ 6,997 |
Net income available to common |
|
|
|
|
Net Income Per Common Unit |
||||
Basic |
$ 0.43 |
$ 0.47 |
$ 0.39 |
$ 0.38 |
Diluted |
$ 0.43 |
$ 0.47 |
$ 0.39 |
$ 0.37 |
- 51 -
<PAGE>
2001 Quarter Ended |
||||
March 31 |
June 30 |
Sept. 30 |
Dec. 31 |
|
Operating revenue |
$ 22,125 |
$ 22,675 |
$ 23,435 |
$ 22,826 |
Net Income |
$ 5,722 |
$ 6,854 |
$ 7,738 |
$ 5,407 |
Net income available to common |
|
|
|
|
Net Income Per Common Unit |
||||
Basic |
$ 0.39 |
$ 0.47 |
$ 0.54 |
$ 0.35 |
Diluted |
$ 0.39 |
$ 0.47 |
$ 0.53 |
$ 0.35 |
Quarterly operating revenue amounts disclosed above differ from previously reported amounts due to a reclassification of interest income from operating revenue. The Operating Partnership's net income in the fourth quarter of 2001 was impacted by a $1.7 million expense in connection with a lawsuit settlement described in Note 15.
14. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
The Operating Partnership's current practice is to conduct environmental investigations in connection with property acquisitions. At this time, the Operating Partnership is not aware of any environmental contamination of any of its facilities that individually or in the aggregate would be material to the Operating Partnership's overall business, financial condition, or results of operations.
15. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
A former business associate (the "Plaintiff") of certain officers and directors of the Company, including Robert J. Attea, Kenneth F. Myszka, David L. Rogers and Charles E. Lannon (the "Founding Shareholders"), commenced a lawsuit against the Company on June 13, 1995 in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio. The Plaintiff subsequently amended the complaint in the lawsuit alleging breach of fiduciary duty, breach of contract, breach of general partnership/joint venture arrangement, breach of duty of good faith, fraud and deceit, and other causes of action including declaratory judgment as to the Plaintiff's continuing interest in the Company. The Plaintiff sought money damages in excess of $15 million, as well as punitive damages and declaratory and injunctive relief (including the imposition of a constructive trust on assets of the Company in which the Plaintiff claimed to have a continuing interest) an d an accounting. The amended complaint also added the Founding Shareholders as additional defendants. In April 2000, following trial, the jury rendered a verdict adverse to the Company with respect to the Plaintiff's claims for breach of contract and breach of general partnership/joint venture arrangement and found total compensatory damages in the amount of $6,462,068. The Company filed a post-trial motion for judgment as a matter of law and a motion for a new trial. Although the motion for judgment as a matter of law was denied, the motion for a new trial was granted and a new trial was scheduled. Prior to the commencement of the new trial, the parties agreed to settle the lawsuit and the Company paid
- 52 -
<PAGE>
$2,359,174 to the Plaintiff in settlement of all claims. In addition, legal fees and related expenses totaling $1,686,000 were paid by the Company in connection with the lawsuit, and $781,000 was paid in connection with its own counterclaim against the Plaintiff. Pursuant to their agreement with the Company to pay certain costs and losses arising from the lawsuit, the Founding Shareholders made payment to the Company in April 2001 of $1,785,000 and in November 2001 by the redemption of 46,528 shares of the Company's common stock owned by them having a market value of approximately $1,360,000. The cost to the Operating Partnership, after indemnification by the Founding Shareholders, was $1.7 million.
- 53 -
<PAGE>
Report of Independent Auditors
The Board of Directors and Partners
Sovran Acquisition Limited Partnership
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Sovran Acquisition Limited Partnership as of December 31, 2002 and 2001 and the related consolidated statements of operations, partners' capital and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2002. Our audit also included the financial statement schedule listed in the index at Item 15(a). These financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of the management of Sovran Acquisition Limited Partnership. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedule based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Sovran Acquisition Limited Partnership as of December 31, 2002 and 2001, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2002, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Also in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.
Ernst & Young LLP
Buffalo, New York
January 28, 2003
- 54 -
<PAGE>
Item 9. |
Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure |
None.
Part III
Item 10. |
Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant |
Through Holdings, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company and the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership, the Company controls the Operating Partnership. The Board of Directors of Holdings, the members of which are the same as the members of the Board of Directors of the Company, manages the affairs of the Operating Partnership by directing the affairs of the general partner of the Operating Partnership. The Operating Partnership has no directors, or executive officers. Consequently, this information incorporated by reference reflects information with respect to the directors and executive officers of the Company and Holdings.
The information required is incorporated by reference to "Election of Directors", including "Executive Officers of the Company" and "Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance" in the Company's Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of the Company to be held on May 15, 2003.
Item 11. |
Executive Compensation |
Through Holdings, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company and the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership, the Company controls the Operating Partnership. The Board of Directors of Holdings, the members of which are the same as the members of the Board of Directors of the Company, manages the affairs of the Operating Partnership by directing the affairs of the general partner of the Operating Partnership. The Directors and Officers of Holdings receive their compensation from the Company and are not separately compensated by Holdings. Consequently, the information incorporated by reference reflects compensation paid to the Directors and executive officers of the Company.
The information required is incorporated by reference to "Executive Compensation" and "Compensation of Directors" in the Company's Proxy Statement for Annual Meeting of Shareholders of the Company to be held on May 15, 2003.
Item 12. |
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management |
The Operating Partnership has no directors or officers. No director or officer of the Company or Holdings beneficially owns any Units.
At December 31, 2002, the Company beneficially owns 12,984,339 Units which constitute 95.90% of all outstanding Units. No other person holds more than a 5% beneficial ownership in the Operating Partnership.
- 55 -
<PAGE>
The information required herein for the Company is incorporated by reference to "Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management" in the Proxy Statement for Annual Meeting of Shareholders of the Company to be held on May 15, 2003.
RECENT SALES OF UNREGISTERED SECURITIES
During 2002, the Operating Partnership issued Units in private placements in reliance on the exemption from registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, in the amounts and for the consideration set forth below:
- |
On January 24, 2002, in connection with the Sovran Self Storage, Inc. Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan, the Company transferred $793,244 to the Operating Partnership in exchange for 26,822 Units. |
|
- |
On January 28, 2002, in connection with the Sovran Self Storage, Inc. 1995 Award and Option Plan, the Operating Partnership issued 30,000 Units to the Company. |
|
- |
On February 14, 2002, the Operating Partnership redeemed 52,969 Units from a partner. |
|
- |
On February 21, 2002, the Operating Partnership redeemed 43,895 Units from a partner. |
|
- |
On February 22, 2002, in connection with the Sovran Self Storage, Inc. Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan, the Company transferred $755,248 to the Operating Partnership in exchange for 24,707 Units. |
|
- |
On February 28, 2002, in connection with the Sovran Self Storage, Inc. 1995 Award and Option Plan, the Operating Partnership issued 41,875 Units to the Company. |
|
- |
On March 22, 2002, in connection with the Sovran Self Storage, Inc. Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan, the Company transferred $665,704 to the Operating Partnership in exchange for 22,388 Units. |
|
- |
On March 28, 2002, in connection with the Sovran Self Storage, Inc. 1995 Award and Option Plan, the Operating Partnership issued 4,000 Units to the Company. |
|
- |
On April 22, 2002, in connection with the Sovran Self Storage, Inc. Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan, the Company transferred $1,385,301 to the Operating Partnership in exchange for 45,224 Units. |
|
- 56 - |
||
<PAGE> |
||
- |
On April 29, 2002, in connection with the Sovran Self Storage, Inc. 1995 Award and Option Plan, the Operating Partnership issued 2,500 Units to the Company. |
|
- |
On May 22, 2002, in connection with the Sovran Self Storage, Inc. Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan, the Company transferred $891,538 to the Operating Partnership in exchange for 29,574 Units. |
|
- |
On May 31, 2002, in connection with the Sovran Self Storage, Inc. 1995 Award and Option Plan, the Operating Partnership issued 66,750 Units to the Company. |
|
- |
On June 24, 2002, in connection with the Sovran Self Storage, Inc. Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan, the Company transferred $3,150,110 to the Operating Partnership in exchange for 101,483 Units. |
|
- |
On June 28, 2002, in connection with the Sovran Self Storage, Inc. 1995 Award and Option Plan, the Operating Partnership issued 94,650 Units to the Company. |
|
- |
On July 1, 2002, the Operating Partnership redeemed 6,775 Units from a partner. |
|
- |
On July 2, 2002, in connection with the Sovran Self Storage, Inc. 1995 Award and Option Plan, the Operating Partnership issued 8,000 Units to the Company. |
|
- |
On July 22, 2002, in connection with the Sovran Self Storage, Inc. Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan, the Company transferred $1,804,450 to the Operating Partnership in exchange for 96,754 Units. |
|
- |
On August 5, 2002, in connection with the Company's incentive compensation plan, the Operating Partnership issued 18,500 Units to the Company. |
|
- |
On August 22, 2002, in connection with the Sovran Self Storage, Inc. Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan, the Company transferred $2,197,152 to the Operating Partnership in exchange for 72,613 Units. |
|
- |
On September 23, 2002, in connection with the Sovran Self Storage, Inc. Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan, the Company transferred $980,067 to the Operating Partnership in exchange for 32,806 Units. |
|
- |
On October 22, 2002, in connection with the Sovran Self Storage, Inc. Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan, the Company transferred $1,867,420 to the Operating Partnership in exchange for 67,650 Units. |
|
- 57 - |
||
<PAGE> |
||
- |
On November 22, 2002, in connection with the Sovran Self Storage, Inc. Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan, the Company transferred $393,238 to the Operating Partnership in exchange for 14,222 Units. |
|
- |
On December 23, 2002, in connection with the Sovran Self Storage, Inc. Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan, the Company transferred $416,568 to the Operating Partnership in exchange for 15,477 Units. |
|
- |
On December 30, 2002, the Operating Partnership redeemed 2,310 Units from a partner. |
|
Item 13. |
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions |
The information required herein is incorporated by reference to "Certain Transactions" in the Company's Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on May 15, 2003.
Item 14. |
Controls and Procedures |
The chief executive officer and the chief financial officer of the general partner of the Operating Partnership have evaluated the Operating Partnership's disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2002. Based on that evaluation, these officers have concluded that the Operating Partnership's disclosure controls and procedures are effective for the purpose of ensuring that material information required to be in this annual report is made known to them by others on a timely basis. There have not been changes in the Operating Partnership's internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect these controls subsequent to the date of this evaluation.
Part IV
Item 15. |
Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, and Reports on Form 8-K |
(a) |
Documents filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K: |
1. |
The following consolidated financial statements of Sovran Acquisition Limited Partnership are included in Item 8. |
|
(i) |
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2002 and 2001. |
|
(ii) |
Consolidated Statements of Operations for Years Ended December 31, 2002, 2001, and 2000. |
|
(iii) |
Consolidated Statements of Partners' Capital for Years Ended December 31, 2002, 2001, and 2000. |
|
(iv) |
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for Years Ended December 31, 2002, 2001, and 2000. |
|
(v) |
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. |
|
- 58 - |
||
<PAGE> |
||
2. |
The following financial statement Schedule as of the period ended December 31, 2002 is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. |
All other Consolidated financial schedules are omitted because they are inapplicable, not required, or the information is included elsewhere in the consolidated financial statements or the notes thereto.
3. |
(a) Exhibits - See the Exhibit Index beginning on page 69 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. |
|
(b) |
Reports on Form 8-K. |
- 59 -
<PAGE>
Sovran Acquisition Limited Partnership
Schedule III
Combined Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation
(in thousands)
December 31, 2002
|
|
Cost |
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
Building, |
Building, |
|
Building, |
|
|
|
Boston-Metro I |
MA |
$ 363 |
$ 1,679 |
$ 303 |
$ 363 |
$ 1,982 |
$ 2,345 |
$ 365 |
6/26/95 |
|
Boston-Metro II |
MA |
680 |
1,616 |
208 |
680 |
1,824 |
2,504 |
338 |
6/26/95 |
|
E. Providence |
RI |
345 |
1,268 |
186 |
345 |
1,454 |
1,799 |
278 |
6/26/95 |
|
Charleston I |
SC |
416 |
1,516 |
237 |
416 |
1,753 |
2,169 |
361 |
6/26/95 |
|
Lakeland I |
FL |
397 |
1,424 |
176 |
397 |
1,600 |
1,997 |
314 |
6/26/95 |
|
Charlotte |
NC |
308 |
1,102 |
329 |
308 |
1,431 |
1,739 |
243 |
6/26/95 |
|
Tallahassee I |
FL |
770 |
2,734 |
1,444 |
770 |
4,178 |
4,948 |
681 |
6/26/95 |
|
Youngstown |
OH |
239 |
1,110 |
288 |
239 |
1,398 |
1,637 |
299 |
6/26/95 |
|
Cleveland-Metro I |
OH |
179 |
836 |
399 |
179 |
1,235 |
1,414 |
220 |
6/26/95 |
|
Cleveland-Metro II |
OH |
701 |
1,659 |
384 |
701 |
2,043 |
2,744 |
377 |
6/26/95 |
|
Tallahassee II |
FL |
205 |
734 |
583 |
205 |
1,317 |
1,522 |
203 |
6/26/95 |
|
Pt. St. Lucie |
FL |
395 |
1,501 |
259 |
395 |
1,760 |
2,155 |
374 |
6/26/95 |
|
Deltona |
FL |
483 |
1,752 |
364 |
483 |
2,116 |
2,599 |
402 |
6/26/95 |
|
Middletown |
NY |
224 |
808 |
703 |
224 |
1,511 |
1,735 |
256 |
6/26/95 |
|
Buffalo I |
NY |
423 |
1,531 |
1,104 |
498 |
2,560 |
3,058 |
466 |
6/26/95 |
|
Rochester I |
NY |
395 |
1,404 |
164 |
395 |
1,568 |
1,963 |
291 |
6/26/95 |
|
Salisbury |
MD |
164 |
760 |
238 |
164 |
998 |
1,162 |
180 |
6/26/95 |
|
New Bedford |
MA |
367 |
1,325 |
292 |
367 |
1,617 |
1,984 |
338 |
6/26/95 |
|
Fayetteville |
NC |
853 |
3,057 |
246 |
853 |
3,303 |
4,156 |
618 |
6/26/95 |
|
Allentown |
PA |
199 |
921 |
855 |
204 |
1,771 |
1,975 |
268 |
6/26/95 |
|
Jacksonville I |
FL |
152 |
728 |
240 |
152 |
968 |
1,120 |
222 |
6/26/95 |
|
Columbia I |
SC |
268 |
1,248 |
223 |
268 |
1,471 |
1,739 |
293 |
6/26/95 |
|
Rochester II |
NY |
230 |
847 |
237 |
235 |
1,079 |
1,314 |
202 |
6/26/95 |
|
Savannah I |
GA |
463 |
1,684 |
1,287 |
463 |
2,971 |
3,434 |
436 |
6/26/95 |
|
Greensboro |
NC |
444 |
1,613 |
363 |
444 |
1,976 |
2,420 |
383 |
6/26/95 |
|
Raleigh I |
NC |
649 |
2,329 |
345 |
649 |
2,674 |
3,323 |
510 |
6/26/95 |
|
- 60 - |
||||||||||
<PAGE> |
||||||||||
New Haven |
CT |
387 |
1,402 |
367 |
387 |
1,769 |
2,156 |
314 |
6/26/95 |
|
Atlanta-Metro I |
GA |
844 |
2,021 |
346 |
844 |
2,367 |
3,211 |
447 |
6/26/95 |
|
Atlanta-Metro II |
GA |
302 |
1,103 |
169 |
303 |
1,271 |
1,574 |
282 |
6/26/95 |
|
Buffalo II |
NY |
315 |
745 |
541 |
315 |
1,286 |
1,601 |
197 |
6/26/95 |
|
Raleigh II |
NC |
321 |
1,150 |
254 |
321 |
1,404 |
1,725 |
278 |
6/26/95 |
|
Columbia II |
SC |
361 |
1,331 |
187 |
375 |
1,504 |
1,879 |
320 |
6/26/95 |
|
Columbia III |
SC |
189 |
719 |
224 |
189 |
943 |
1,132 |
210 |
6/26/95 |
|
Columbia IV |
SC |
488 |
1,188 |
226 |
488 |
1,414 |
1,902 |
309 |
6/26/95 |
|
Atlanta-Metro III |
GA |
430 |
1,579 |
196 |
430 |
1,775 |
2,205 |
383 |
6/26/95 |
|
Orlando I |
FL |
513 |
1,930 |
273 |
513 |
2,203 |
2,716 |
448 |
6/26/95 |
|
Spartanburg |
SC |
331 |
1,209 |
152 |
331 |
1,361 |
1,692 |
284 |
6/26/95 |
|
Sharon |
PA |
194 |
912 |
247 |
194 |
1,159 |
1,353 |
231 |
6/26/95 |
|
Ft. Lauderdale |
FL |
1,503 |
3,619 |
336 |
1,503 |
3,955 |
5,458 |
778 |
6/26/95 |
|
West Palm I |
FL |
398 |
1,035 |
138 |
398 |
1,173 |
1,571 |
260 |
6/26/95 |
|
Atlanta-Metro IV |
GA |
423 |
1,015 |
235 |
425 |
1,248 |
1,673 |
256 |
6/26/95 |
|
Atlanta-Metro V |
GA |
483 |
1,166 |
172 |
483 |
1,338 |
1,821 |
276 |
6/26/95 |
|
Atlanta-Metro VI |
GA |
308 |
1,116 |
323 |
308 |
1,439 |
1,747 |
316 |
6/26/95 |
|
Atlanta-Metro VII |
GA |
170 |
786 |
248 |
175 |
1,029 |
1,204 |
221 |
6/26/95 |
|
Atlanta-Metro VIII |
GA |
413 |
999 |
429 |
413 |
1,428 |
1,841 |
303 |
6/26/95 |
|
Baltimore I |
MD |
154 |
555 |
209 |
154 |
764 |
918 |
153 |
6/26/95 |
|
Baltimore II |
MD |
479 |
1,742 |
579 |
479 |
2,321 |
2,800 |
412 |
6/26/95 |
|
Augusta I |
GA |
357 |
1,296 |
351 |
357 |
1,647 |
2,004 |
290 |
6/26/95 |
|
Macon I |
GA |
231 |
1,081 |
195 |
231 |
1,276 |
1,507 |
251 |
6/26/95 |
|
Melbourne I |
FL |
883 |
2,104 |
1,346 |
883 |
3,450 |
4,333 |
573 |
6/26/95 |
|
Newport News |
VA |
316 |
1,471 |
527 |
316 |
1,998 |
2,314 |
383 |
6/26/95 |
|
Pensacola I |
FL |
632 |
2,962 |
732 |
651 |
3,675 |
4,326 |
704 |
6/26/95 |
|
Augusta II |
GA |
315 |
1,139 |
392 |
315 |
1,531 |
1,846 |
279 |
6/26/95 |
|
Hartford-Metro I |
CT |
715 |
1,695 |
412 |
715 |
2,107 |
2,822 |
375 |
6/26/95 |
|
Atlanta-Metro IX |
GA |
304 |
1,118 |
456 |
304 |
1,574 |
1,878 |
294 |
6/26/95 |
|
Alexandria |
VA |
1,375 |
3,220 |
583 |
1,375 |
3,803 |
5,178 |
694 |
6/26/95 |
|
Pensacola II |
FL |
244 |
901 |
230 |
244 |
1,131 |
1,375 |
273 |
6/26/95 |
|
Melbourne II |
FL |
834 |
2,066 |
156 |
834 |
2,222 |
3,056 |
510 |
6/26/95 |
|
Hartford-Metro II |
CT |
234 |
861 |
179 |
239 |
1,035 |
1,274 |
198 |
6/26/95 |
|
Atlanta-Metro X |
GA |
256 |
1,244 |
190 |
256 |
1,434 |
1,690 |
303 |
6/26/95 |
|
Norfolk I |
VA |
313 |
1,462 |
538 |
313 |
2,000 |
2,313 |
347 |
6/26/95 |
|
Norfolk II |
VA |
278 |
1,004 |
207 |
278 |
1,211 |
1,489 |
277 |
6/26/95 |
|
Birmingham I |
AL |
307 |
1,415 |
260 |
307 |
1,675 |
1,982 |
316 |
6/26/95 |
|
Birmingham II |
AL |
730 |
1,725 |
366 |
730 |
2,091 |
2,821 |
394 |
6/26/95 |
|
Montgomery I |
AL |
863 |
2,041 |
327 |
863 |
2,368 |
3,231 |
448 |
6/26/95 |
|
Jacksonville II |
FL |
326 |
1,515 |
283 |
326 |
1,798 |
2,124 |
334 |
6/26/95 |
|
Pensacola II |
FL |
369 |
1,358 |
956 |
369 |
2,314 |
2,683 |
392 |
6/26/95 |
|
Pensacola IV |
FL |
244 |
1,128 |
135 |
244 |
1,263 |
1,507 |
285 |
6/26/95 |
|
- 61 - |
||||||||||
<PAGE> |
||||||||||
Pensacola V |
FL |
226 |
1,046 |
437 |
226 |
1,483 |
1,709 |
300 |
6/26/95 |
|
Tampa I |
FL |
1,088 |
2,597 |
627 |
1,088 |
3,224 |
4,312 |
613 |
6/26/95 |
|
Tampa II |
FL |
526 |
1,958 |
320 |
526 |
2,278 |
2,804 |
512 |
6/26/95 |
|
Tampa III |
FL |
672 |
2,439 |
314 |
672 |
2,753 |
3,425 |
557 |
6/26/95 |
|
Jackson I |
MS |
343 |
1,580 |
189 |
343 |
1,769 |
2,112 |
375 |
6/26/95 |
|
Jackson II |
MS |
209 |
964 |
398 |
209 |
1,362 |
1,571 |
281 |
6/26/95 |
|
Richmond |
VA |
443 |
1,602 |
513 |
443 |
2,115 |
2,558 |
399 |
8/25/95 |
|
Orlando II |
FL |
1,161 |
2,755 |
667 |
1,162 |
3,421 |
4,583 |
622 |
9/29/95 |
|
Birmingham III |
AL |
424 |
1,506 |
429 |
424 |
1,935 |
2,359 |
426 |
1/16/96 |
|
Macon II |
GA |
431 |
1,567 |
499 |
431 |
2,066 |
2,497 |
331 |
12/1/95 |
|
Harrisburg I |
PA |
360 |
1,641 |
311 |
360 |
1,952 |
2,312 |
376 |
12/29/95 |
|
Harrisburg II |
PA |
(1) |
627 |
2,224 |
541 |
648 |
2,744 |
3,392 |
474 |
12/29/95 |
Syracuse I |
NY |
470 |
1,712 |
567 |
472 |
2,277 |
2,749 |
347 |
12/27/95 |
|
Ft. Myers |
FL |
205 |
912 |
137 |
205 |
1,049 |
1,254 |
263 |
12/28/95 |
|
Ft. Myers II |
FL |
412 |
1,703 |
303 |
413 |
2,005 |
2,418 |
488 |
12/28/95 |
|
Newport News II |
VA |
442 |
1,592 |
126 |
442 |
1,718 |
2,160 |
311 |
1/5/96 |
|
Montgomery II |
AL |
353 |
1,299 |
192 |
353 |
1,491 |
1,844 |
285 |
1/23/96 |
|
Charlestown II |
SC |
237 |
858 |
322 |
232 |
1,185 |
1,417 |
210 |
3/1/96 |
|
Tampa IV |
FL |
766 |
1,800 |
485 |
766 |
2,285 |
3,051 |
347 |
3/28/96 |
|
Arlington I |
TX |
442 |
1,767 |
202 |
442 |
1,969 |
2,411 |
328 |
3/29/96 |
|
Arlington II |
TX |
408 |
1,662 |
357 |
408 |
2,019 |
2,427 |
406 |
3/29/96 |
|
Ft. Worth |
TX |
328 |
1,324 |
131 |
328 |
1,455 |
1,783 |
251 |
3/29/96 |
|
San Antonio I |
TX |
436 |
1,759 |
394 |
436 |
2,153 |
2,589 |
390 |
3/29/96 |
|
San Antonio II |
TX |
289 |
1,161 |
330 |
289 |
1,491 |
1,780 |
277 |
3/29/96 |
|
Syracuse II |
NY |
481 |
1,559 |
1,099 |
671 |
2,468 |
3,139 |
340 |
6/5/96 |
|
Montgomery III |
AL |
279 |
1,014 |
181 |
279 |
1,195 |
1,474 |
238 |
5/21/96 |
|
West Palm II |
FL |
345 |
1,262 |
141 |
345 |
1,403 |
1,748 |
249 |
5/29/96 |
|
Ft. Myers III |
FL |
229 |
884 |
91 |
229 |
975 |
1,204 |
178 |
5/29/96 |
|
Pittsburgh |
PA |
545 |
1,940 |
193 |
545 |
2,133 |
2,678 |
351 |
6/19/96 |
|
Lakeland II |
FL |
359 |
1,287 |
854 |
359 |
2,141 |
2,500 |
314 |
6/26/96 |
|
Springfield |
MA |
251 |
917 |
1,211 |
297 |
2,082 |
2,379 |
295 |
6/28/96 |
|
Ft. Myers IV |
FL |
344 |
1,254 |
189 |
344 |
1,443 |
1,787 |
246 |
6/28/96 |
|
Baltimore III |
MD |
777 |
2,770 |
110 |
777 |
2,880 |
3,657 |
472 |
7/26/96 |
|
Jacksonville III |
FL |
568 |
2,028 |
687 |
568 |
2,715 |
3,283 |
422 |
8/23/96 |
|
Jacksonville IV |
FL |
436 |
1,635 |
386 |
436 |
2,021 |
2,457 |
354 |
8/26/96 |
|
Pittsburgh II |
PA |
627 |
2,257 |
731 |
631 |
2,984 |
3,615 |
490 |
8/28/96 |
|
Jacksonville V |
FL |
535 |
2,033 |
161 |
538 |
2,191 |
2,729 |
416 |
8/30/96 |
|
Charlotte II |
NC |
487 |
1,754 |
92 |
487 |
1,846 |
2,333 |
295 |
9/16/96 |
|
Charlotte III |
NC |
315 |
1,131 |
228 |
315 |
1,359 |
1,674 |
205 |
9/16/96 |
|
Orlando III |
FL |
314 |
1,113 |
495 |
314 |
1,608 |
1,922 |
246 |
10/30/96 |
|
Rochester III |
NY |
704 |
2,496 |
221 |
707 |
2,714 |
3,421 |
397 |
12/20/96 |
|
Youngstown II |
OH |
600 |
2,142 |
152 |
600 |
2,294 |
2,894 |
345 |
1/10/97 |
|
- 62 - |
||||||||||
<PAGE> |
||||||||||
Akron |
OH |
413 |
1,478 |
116 |
413 |
1,594 |
2,007 |
237 |
1/10/97 |
|
Cleveland III |
OH |
751 |
2,676 |
504 |
751 |
3,180 |
3,931 |
471 |
1/10/97 |
|
Cleveland IV |
OH |
725 |
2,586 |
782 |
725 |
3,368 |
4,093 |
493 |
1/10/97 |
|
Cleveland V |
OH |
(1) |
637 |
2,918 |
660 |
641 |
3,574 |
4,215 |
557 |
1/10/97 |
Cleveland VI |
OH |
495 |
1,781 |
385 |
495 |
2,166 |
2,661 |
332 |
1/10/97 |
|
Cleveland VII |
OH |
761 |
2,714 |
541 |
761 |
3,255 |
4,016 |
527 |
1/10/97 |
|
Cleveland VIII |
OH |
418 |
1,921 |
689 |
418 |
2,610 |
3,028 |
427 |
1/10/97 |
|
Cleveland IX |
OH |
606 |
2,164 |
246 |
606 |
2,410 |
3,016 |
368 |
1/10/97 |
|
Grand Rapids II |
MI |
219 |
790 |
607 |
219 |
1,397 |
1,616 |
208 |
1/17/97 |
|
Holland |
MI |
451 |
1,830 |
938 |
451 |
2,768 |
3,219 |
449 |
1/17/97 |
|
San Antonio III |
TX |
(1) |
474 |
1,686 |
149 |
474 |
1,835 |
2,309 |
275 |
1/30/97 |
Universal |
TX |
346 |
1,236 |
134 |
346 |
1,370 |
1,716 |
207 |
1/30/97 |
|
San Antonio IV |
TX |
432 |
1,560 |
881 |
432 |
2,441 |
2,873 |
297 |
1/30/97 |
|
Houston-Eastex |
TX |
634 |
2,565 |
833 |
634 |
3,398 |
4,032 |
407 |
3/26/97 |
|
Houston-Nederland |
TX |
566 |
2,279 |
150 |
566 |
2,429 |
2,995 |
351 |
3/26/97 |
|
Houston-College |
TX |
293 |
1,357 |
185 |
293 |
1,542 |
1,835 |
225 |
3/26/97 |
|
Lynchburg-Lakeside |
VA |
335 |
1,342 |
409 |
335 |
1,751 |
2,086 |
273 |
3/31/97 |
|
Lynchburg-Timberlake |
VA |
328 |
1,315 |
570 |
328 |
1,885 |
2,213 |
279 |
3/31/97 |
|
Lynchburg-Amherst |
VA |
155 |
710 |
181 |
152 |
894 |
1,046 |
159 |
3/31/97 |
|
Christiansburg |
VA |
245 |
1,120 |
135 |
245 |
1,255 |
1,500 |
183 |
3/31/97 |
|
Chesapeake |
VA |
260 |
1,043 |
449 |
260 |
1,492 |
1,752 |
188 |
3/31/97 |
|
Danville |
VA |
326 |
1,488 |
42 |
326 |
1,530 |
1,856 |
223 |
3/31/97 |
|
Orlando-W 25th St. |
FL |
289 |
1,160 |
316 |
290 |
1,475 |
1,765 |
199 |
3/31/97 |
|
Delray I-Mini |
FL |
491 |
1,756 |
494 |
491 |
2,250 |
2,741 |
333 |
4/11/97 |
|
Savannah II |
GA |
296 |
1,196 |
133 |
296 |
1,329 |
1,625 |
203 |
5/8/97 |
|
Delray II-Safeway |
FL |
921 |
3,282 |
287 |
921 |
3,569 |
4,490 |
505 |
5/21/97 |
|
Cleveland X-Avon |
OH |
301 |
1,214 |
234 |
304 |
1,445 |
1,749 |
213 |
6/4/97 |
|
Dallas-Skillman |
TX |
960 |
3,847 |
823 |
960 |
4,670 |
5,630 |
748 |
6/30/97 |
|
Dallas-Centennial |
TX |
965 |
3,864 |
894 |
943 |
4,780 |
5,723 |
730 |
6/30/97 |
|
Dallas-Samuell |
TX |
(1) |
570 |
2,285 |
416 |
570 |
2,701 |
3,271 |
447 |
6/30/97 |
Dallas-Hargrove |
TX |
370 |
1,486 |
260 |
370 |
1,746 |
2,116 |
337 |
6/30/97 |
|
Houston-Antione |
TX |
515 |
2,074 |
295 |
515 |
2,369 |
2,884 |
399 |
6/30/97 |
|
Atlanta-Alpharetta |
GA |
1,033 |
3,753 |
158 |
1,033 |
3,911 |
4,944 |
613 |
7/24/97 |
|
Atlanta-Marietta |
GA |
(1) |
769 |
2,788 |
79 |
771 |
2,865 |
3,636 |
408 |
7/24/97 |
Atlanta-Doraville |
GA |
735 |
3,429 |
85 |
735 |
3,514 |
4,249 |
496 |
8/21/97 |
|
Greensboro-Hilltop |
NC |
268 |
1,097 |
138 |
268 |
1,235 |
1,503 |
172 |
9/25/97 |
|
GreensboroStgCch |
NC |
89 |
376 |
921 |
89 |
1,297 |
1,386 |
115 |
9/25/97 |
|
Baton Rouge-Airline |
LA |
(1) |
396 |
1,831 |
271 |
396 |
2,102 |
2,498 |
308 |
10/9/97 |
Baton Rouge-Airline2 |
LA |
282 |
1,303 |
125 |
282 |
1,428 |
1,710 |
232 |
11/21/97 |
|
Harrisburg-Peiffers |
PA |
635 |
2,550 |
114 |
637 |
2,662 |
3,299 |
343 |
12/3/97 |
|
Chesapeake-Military |
VA |
542 |
2,210 |
155 |
542 |
2,365 |
2,907 |
306 |
2/5/98 |
|
Chesapeake-Volvo |
VA |
620 |
2,532 |
554 |
620 |
3,086 |
3,706 |
354 |
2/5/98 |
|
- 63 - |
||||||||||
<PAGE> |
||||||||||
Virginia Beach Shell |
VA |
540 |
2,211 |
131 |
540 |
2,342 |
2,882 |
307 |
2/5/98 |
|
Virginia Beach Central |
VA |
864 |
3,994 |
487 |
864 |
4,481 |
5,345 |
553 |
2/5/98 |
|
Norfolk-Naval Base |
VA |
1,243 |
5,019 |
203 |
1,243 |
5,222 |
6,465 |
654 |
2/5/98 |
|
Tampa-E. Hillsborough |
FL |
709 |
3,235 |
582 |
709 |
3,817 |
4,526 |
580 |
2/4/98 |
|
Harriman |
NY |
843 |
3,394 |
238 |
843 |
3,632 |
4,475 |
451 |
2/4/98 |
|
Greenboro-High Point |
NC |
397 |
1,834 |
345 |
397 |
2,179 |
2,576 |
271 |
2/10/98 |
|
Lynchburg-Timberlake |
VA |
488 |
1,746 |
256 |
488 |
2,002 |
2,490 |
235 |
2/18/98 |
|
Salem |
MA |
733 |
2,941 |
607 |
733 |
3,548 |
4,281 |
437 |
3/3/98 |
|
Chattanooga-Lee Hwy. |
TN |
384 |
1,371 |
219 |
384 |
1,590 |
1,974 |
234 |
3/27/98 |
|
Chattanooga-Hwy. 58 |
TN |
296 |
1,198 |
514 |
296 |
1,712 |
2,008 |
193 |
3/27/98 |
|
Ft. Oglethorpe |
GA |
349 |
1,250 |
154 |
349 |
1,404 |
1,753 |
172 |
3/27/98 |
|
Birmingham-Walt |
AL |
544 |
1,942 |
420 |
544 |
2,362 |
2,906 |
356 |
3/27/98 |
|
East Greenwich |
RI |
702 |
2,821 |
495 |
702 |
3,316 |
4,018 |
369 |
3/26/98 |
|
Durham-Hillborough |
NC |
775 |
3,103 |
423 |
775 |
3,526 |
4,301 |
408 |
4/9/98 |
|
Durham-Cornwallis |
NC |
940 |
3,763 |
339 |
940 |
4,102 |
5,042 |
476 |
4/9/98 |
|
Hendersonville |
TN |
1,050 |
4,203 |
167 |
1,050 |
4,370 |
5,420 |
514 |
4/9/98 |
|
Salem-Policy |
NH |
742 |
2,977 |
58 |
742 |
3,035 |
3,777 |
360 |
4/7/98 |
|
Warrem-Elm |
OH |
(1) |
522 |
1,864 |
142 |
522 |
2,006 |
2,528 |
269 |
4/22/98 |
Warren-Youngstown |
OH |
512 |
1,829 |
105 |
512 |
1,934 |
2,446 |
223 |
4/22/98 |
|
Waterford-Highland |
MI |
1,487 |
5,306 |
586 |
1,487 |
5,892 |
7,379 |
685 |
4/28/98 |
|
Indian Harbor |
FL |
662 |
2,654 |
177 |
662 |
2,831 |
3,493 |
334 |
6/2/98 |
|
Jackson 3 - I55 |
MS |
744 |
3,021 |
56 |
744 |
3,077 |
3,821 |
378 |
5/13/98 |
|
Katy-N. Fry |
TX |
419 |
1,524 |
60 |
419 |
1,584 |
2,003 |
194 |
5/20/98 |
|
Hollywood-Sheridan |
FL |
1,208 |
4,854 |
150 |
1,208 |
5,004 |
6,212 |
589 |
7/1/98 |
|
Pompano Beach - Atlantic |
FL |
944 |
3,803 |
158 |
944 |
3,961 |
4,905 |
462 |
7/1/98 |
|
Pompano Beach - Sample |
FL |
903 |
3,643 |
290 |
903 |
3,933 |
4,836 |
450 |
7/1/98 |
|
Boca Raton-18th St. |
FL |
1,503 |
6,059 |
434 |
1,503 |
6,493 |
7,996 |
735 |
7/1/98 |
|
Vero Beach |
FL |
489 |
1,813 |
38 |
489 |
1,851 |
2,340 |
237 |
6/12/98 |
|
Humble |
TX |
447 |
1,790 |
516 |
447 |
2,306 |
2,753 |
243 |
6/16/98 |
|
Houston-Old Katy |
TX |
(1) |
659 |
2,680 |
46 |
659 |
2,726 |
3,385 |
314 |
6/19/98 |
Webster |
TX |
635 |
2,302 |
35 |
635 |
2,337 |
2,972 |
278 |
6/19/98 |
|
Carrollton |
TX |
548 |
1,988 |
44 |
548 |
2,032 |
2,580 |
245 |
6/19/98 |
|
Hollywood-N. 21st. |
FL |
840 |
3,373 |
218 |
840 |
3,591 |
4,431 |
408 |
8/3/98 |
|
San Marcos |
TX |
324 |
1,493 |
302 |
324 |
1,795 |
2,119 |
201 |
6/30/98 |
|
Austin-McNeil |
TX |
492 |
1,995 |
115 |
510 |
2,092 |
2,602 |
247 |
6/30/98 |
|
Austin-FM |
TX |
484 |
1,951 |
105 |
481 |
2,059 |
2,540 |
244 |
6/30/98 |
|
Jacksonville-Center |
NC |
327 |
1,329 |
61 |
327 |
1,390 |
1,717 |
162 |
8/6/98 |
|
Jacksonville-Gum Branch |
NC |
508 |
1,815 |
153 |
508 |
1,968 |
2,476 |
224 |
8/17/98 |
|
Jacksonville-N. Marine |
NC |
216 |
782 |
314 |
216 |
1,096 |
1,312 |
160 |
9/24/98 |
|
Euless |
TX |
550 |
1,998 |
109 |
550 |
2,107 |
2,657 |
233 |
9/29/98 |
|
N. Richland Hills |
TX |
670 |
2,407 |
33 |
670 |
2,440 |
3,110 |
268 |
10/9/98 |
|
Batavia |
OH |
390 |
1,570 |
136 |
390 |
1,706 |
2,096 |
194 |
11/19/98 |
|
- 64 - |
||||||||||
<PAGE> |
||||||||||
Jackson-N. West |
MS |
460 |
1,642 |
306 |
460 |
1,948 |
2,408 |
283 |
12/1/98 |
|
Katy-Franz |
TX |
507 |
2,058 |
78 |
507 |
2,136 |
2,643 |
224 |
12/15/98 |
|
W. Warwick |
RI |
447 |
1,776 |
639 |
447 |
2,415 |
2,862 |
217 |
2/2/99 |
|
Lafayette-Pinhook 1 |
LA |
556 |
1,951 |
736 |
556 |
2,687 |
3,243 |
346 |
2/17/99 |
|
Lafayette-Pinhook 2 |
LA |
708 |
2,860 |
129 |
708 |
2,989 |
3,697 |
299 |
2/17/99 |
|
Lafayette-Ambassador |
LA |
314 |
1,095 |
440 |
314 |
1,535 |
1,849 |
219 |
2/17/99 |
|
Lafayette-Evangeline |
LA |
188 |
652 |
564 |
188 |
1,216 |
1,404 |
166 |
2/17/99 |
|
Lafayette-Guilbeau |
LA |
963 |
3,896 |
106 |
963 |
4,002 |
4,965 |
399 |
2/17/99 |
|
Gilbert-Elliott Rd. |
AZ |
651 |
2,600 |
601 |
772 |
3,080 |
3,852 |
258 |
5/18/99 |
|
Glendale-59th Ave. |
AZ |
565 |
2,596 |
114 |
565 |
2,710 |
3,275 |
253 |
5/18/99 |
|
Mesa-Baseline |
AZ |
330 |
1,309 |
79 |
330 |
1,388 |
1,718 |
131 |
5/18/99 |
|
Mesa-E. Broadway |
AZ |
339 |
1,346 |
117 |
339 |
1,463 |
1,802 |
136 |
5/18/99 |
|
Mesa-W. Broadway |
AZ |
291 |
1,026 |
106 |
291 |
1,132 |
1,423 |
107 |
5/18/99 |
|
Mesa-Greenfield |
AZ |
354 |
1,405 |
103 |
354 |
1,508 |
1,862 |
140 |
5/18/99 |
|
Phoenix-Camelback |
AZ |
453 |
1,610 |
140 |
453 |
1,750 |
2,203 |
163 |
5/18/99 |
|
Phoenix-Bell |
AZ |
872 |
3,476 |
262 |
872 |
3,738 |
4,610 |
385 |
5/18/99 |
|
Phoenix-35th Ave. |
AZ |
849 |
3,401 |
163 |
849 |
3,564 |
4,413 |
326 |
5/21/99 |
|
Westbrook |
ME |
410 |
1,626 |
315 |
410 |
1,941 |
2,351 |
172 |
8/2/99 |
|
Cocoa |
FL |
667 |
2,373 |
433 |
667 |
2,806 |
3,473 |
245 |
9/29/99 |
|
Cedar Hill |
TX |
335 |
1,521 |
123 |
335 |
1,644 |
1,979 |
148 |
11/9/99 |
|
Monroe |
NY |
276 |
1,312 |
31 |
276 |
1,343 |
1,619 |
105 |
2/2/00 |
|
N. Andover |
MA |
633 |
2,573 |
72 |
633 |
2,645 |
3,278 |
195 |
2/15/00 |
|
Seabrook |
TX |
633 |
2,617 |
82 |
633 |
2,699 |
3,332 |
206 |
3/1/00 |
|
Plantation |
FL |
384 |
1,422 |
78 |
384 |
1,500 |
1,884 |
108 |
5/2/00 |
|
Birmingham-Bessemer |
AL |
254 |
1,059 |
74 |
254 |
1,133 |
1,387 |
65 |
11/15/00 |
|
Dracut |
MA |
(1) |
1,035 |
3,737 |
25 |
1,035 |
3,762 |
4,797 |
105 |
12/1/01 |
Methuen |
MA |
(1) |
1,024 |
3,649 |
38 |
1,024 |
3,687 |
4,711 |
101 |
12/1/01 |
Columbia |
SC |
(1) |
883 |
3,139 |
99 |
883 |
3,238 |
4,121 |
91 |
12/1/01 |
Myrtle Beach |
SC |
(1) |
552 |
1,970 |
126 |
552 |
2,096 |
2,648 |
59 |
12/1/01 |
Kingsland |
GA |
(1) |
470 |
1,902 |
335 |
470 |
2,237 |
2,707 |
64 |
12/1/01 |
Saco |
ME |
(1) |
534 |
1,914 |
13 |
534 |
1,927 |
2,461 |
54 |
12/3/01 |
Plymouth |
MA |
1,004 |
4,584 |
39 |
1,004 |
4,623 |
5,627 |
117 |
12/19/01 |
|
Sandwich |
MA |
(1) |
670 |
3,060 |
66 |
670 |
3,126 |
3,796 |
80 |
12/19/01 |
Syracuse |
NY |
(1) |
294 |
1,203 |
166 |
294 |
1,369 |
1,663 |
32 |
2/5/02 |
Houston-Westward |
TX |
(1) |
853 |
3,434 |
227 |
855 |
3,659 |
4,514 |
82 |
2/13/02 |
Houston-Boone |
TX |
(1) |
250 |
1,020 |
22 |
251 |
1,041 |
1,292 |
26 |
2/13/02 |
Houston-Cook |
TX |
(1) |
285 |
1,160 |
41 |
286 |
1,200 |
1,486 |
30 |
2/13/02 |
Houston-Harwin |
TX |
(1) |
449 |
1,816 |
32 |
451 |
1,846 |
2,297 |
44 |
2/13/02 |
Houston-Hempstead |
TX |
(1) |
545 |
2,200 |
38 |
546 |
2,237 |
2,783 |
53 |
2/13/02 |
Houston-Kuykendahl |
TX |
(1) |
517 |
2,090 |
35 |
519 |
2,123 |
2,642 |
51 |
2/13/02 |
Houston-Hwy 249 |
TX |
(1) |
299 |
1,216 |
233 |
301 |
1,447 |
1,748 |
31 |
2/13/02 |
Mesquite-Hwy 80 |
TX |
(1) |
463 |
1,873 |
22 |
465 |
1,893 |
2,358 |
45 |
2/13/02 |
- 65 - |
||||||||||
<PAGE> |
||||||||||
Mesquite-Franklin |
TX |
(1) |
734 |
2,956 |
36 |
736 |
2,990 |
3,726 |
70 |
2/13/02 |
Dallas-Plantation |
TX |
(1) |
394 |
1,595 |
41 |
395 |
1,635 |
2,030 |
40 |
2/13/02 |
San Antonio-Hunt |
TX |
(1) |
381 |
1,545 |
32 |
383 |
1,575 |
1,958 |
38 |
2/13/02 |
Humble-5250 FM |
TX |
919 |
3,696 |
8 |
919 |
3,704 |
4,623 |
47 |
6/19/02 |
|
Pasadena |
TX |
612 |
2,468 |
9 |
612 |
2,477 |
3,089 |
32 |
6/19/02 |
|
League City |
TX |
689 |
3,159 |
3 |
689 |
3,162 |
3,851 |
40 |
6/19/02 |
|
Montgomery |
TX |
817 |
3,286 |
14 |
817 |
3,300 |
4,117 |
42 |
6/19/02 |
|
Texas City |
TX |
817 |
3,286 |
10 |
817 |
3,296 |
4,113 |
42 |
6/19/02 |
|
Houston-Hwy 6 |
TX |
407 |
1,650 |
10 |
407 |
1,660 |
2,067 |
21 |
6/19/02 |
|
Lumberton |
TX |
817 |
3,287 |
38 |
817 |
3,325 |
4,142 |
42 |
6/19/02 |
|
The Hamptons |
NY |
2,207 |
8,866 |
1 |
2,207 |
8,867 |
11,074 |
0 |
12/16/02 |
|
The Hamptons |
NY |
1,131 |
4,564 |
1 |
1,131 |
4,565 |
5,696 |
0 |
12/16/02 |
|
The Hamptons |
NY |
635 |
2,918 |
1 |
635 |
2,919 |
3,554 |
0 |
12/16/02 |
|
The Hamptons |
NY |
1,251 |
5,744 |
3 |
1,252 |
5,746 |
6,998 |
0 |
12/16/02 |
|
Corporate Office |
NY |
0 |
68 |
4,459 |
0 |
4,527 |
4,527 |
887 |
1/1/95 |
|
$132,314 |
$497,912 |
$ 80,615 |
$132,853 |
$577,988 |
$710,841 |
$ 75,344 |
(1) These properties are encumbered through one mortgage loan with an outstanding balance of $47.5 million at December 31, 2002.
- 66 -
<PAGE>
December 31, 2002 |
December 31, 2001 |
December 31, 2000 |
||||
Cost: |
||||||
Balance at beginning of period |
$ 611,289 |
$562,721 |
$ 556,473 |
|||
Additions during period: |
|
|
|
|||
99,753 |
48,796 |
23,467 |
||||
Deductions during period: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at close of period |
$710,841 |
$611,289 |
$562,721 |
|||
Accumulated Depreciation: |
||||||
Balance at beginning of period |
$ 59,091 |
$ 45,253 |
$ 33,453 |
|||
Additions during period: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deductions during period: |
||||||
Accumulated depreciation of real |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at close of period |
$ 75,344 |
$59,091 |
$ 45,253 |
- 67 -
<PAGE>
Exhibits
Exhibit Index
Exhibit No. |
Description |
3.1 |
Agreement of Limited Partnership of the Operating Partnership, as amended. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the General Form for Registration of Securities of the Operating Partnership on Form 10.) |
3.2* |
Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Company |
3.3** |
By-laws of the Company |
3.4 |
Articles Supplementary to the Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Company classifying and designating the Company's Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company's Form 8A filed December 3, 1996) |
3.5 |
Articles Supplementary to the Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Company classifying and designating the 9.85% Series B Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.6 to the Company's Form 8-A filed July 29, 1999) |
3.6** |
Articles Supplementary to the Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Company classifying and designating the 8.375% Series C Convertible Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock |
10.1 |
Revolving Credit and Term Loan Agreement among the Company, the Operating Partnership, Fleet National Bank and other lenders named therein. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000.) |
10.2* |
Form of Non-competition Agreement between the Company and Charles E. Lannon |
10.3* |
Form of Non-competition Agreement between the Company and Robert J. Attea |
10.4* |
Form of Non-competition Agreement between the Company and Kenneth F. Myszka |
10.5* |
Form of Non-competition Agreement between the Company and David L. Rogers |
10.6 |
Sovran Self Storage, Inc. 1995 Award and Option Plan, as Amended (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001.) |
- 68 - |
|
<PAGE> |
|
10.7 |
Sovran Self Storage, Inc. 1995 Outside Directors' Option Plan, as Amended (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001.) |
10.8* |
Sovran Self Storage Incentive Compensation Plan for Executive Officer |
10.9* |
Restricted Stock Agreement between the Company and David L. Rogers |
10.10* |
Form of Supplemental Representations, Warranties and Indemnification Agreement among the Company and Robert J. Attea, Charles E. Lannon, Kenneth F. Myszka and David L. Rogers |
10.11* |
Form of Pledge Agreement among the Company and Robert J. Attea, Charles E. Lannon, Kenneth F. Myszka and David L. Rogers |
10.12* |
Form of Indemnification Agreement between the Company and certain Officers and Directors of the Company |
10.13* |
Form of Subscription Agreement (including Registration Rights Statement) among the Company and subscribers for 422,171 Common Shares |
10.14* |
Form of Registration Rights and Lock-Up Agreement among the Company and Robert J. Attea, Charles E. Lannon, Kenneth F. Myszka and David L. Rogers |
10.15* |
Form of Facilities Services Agreement between the Company and Williamsville Properties, Inc. |
10.16 |
Sovran Self Storage, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors (Incorporated by reference to Appendix A to the Company's Proxy Statement for the 1999 Annual Meeting of Shareholders) |
10.17 |
First Amendment to Revolving Credit and Term Loan Agreement among the Company, the Operating Partnership, Fleet National Bank and other lenders named therein. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to the Company's Annual Report on From 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001.) |
10.18** |
Securities Purchase Agreement among Registrant, Sovran Acquisition Limited Partnership, The Prudential Insurance Company of America, Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association of America and other institutional investors |
10.19** |
Amendments to Agreement of Limited Partnership of Sovran Acquisition Limited Partnership |
10.20** |
Registration Rights Agreement |
- 69 - |
|
<PAGE> |
|
10.21 |
Promissory Note between Locke Sovran II, LLC and PNC Bank, National Association. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002.) |
12.1 |
Statement Re: Computation of Earnings to Fixed Charges |
23 |
Consent of Independent Auditors |
_________________
* Incorporated by reference to the exhibits as filed with the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-11 (File No. 33-91422) filed June 19, 1995.
* * Incorporated by reference to the exhibits as filed in the Company's current report on Form 8-K, filed July 12, 2002.
- 70 -
<PAGE>
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Sovran Holdings Inc., as general partner of registrant, certifies that it has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
SOVRAN ACQUISITION LIMITED PARTNERSHIP |
||
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of Sovran Holdings Inc., as general partner of registrant, and in the capacities and on the dates indicated. |
|||
Signature |
Title |
Date |
|
|
Chairman of the Board of Directors, Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
/s/ Kenneth F. Myszka |
President, Chief Operating |
|
|
/s/ David L. Rogers |
Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
|
|
/s/ Michael A. Elia |
|
|
|
/s/ Anthony P. Gammie |
|
|
|
/s/ Charles E. Lannon |
|
|
- 71 -
<PAGE>
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14 OR 15D-14 OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, Robert J. Attea, certify that:
1. |
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Sovran Acquisition LP; |
|
2. |
Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report; |
|
3. |
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report; |
|
4. |
The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have: |
|
a) |
designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared; |
|
b) |
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and |
|
c) |
presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date; |
|
5. |
The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): |
|
a) |
all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and |
|
b) |
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and |
|
6. |
The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this annual report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses. |
Date: March 27, 2003
/ S / Robert J. Attea |
- 72 -
<PAGE>
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14 OR 15D-14 OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, David L. Rogers, certify that:
1. |
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Sovran Acquisition LP; |
|
2. |
Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report; |
|
3. |
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report; |
|
4. |
The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have: |
|
a) |
designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared; |
|
b) |
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and |
|
c) |
presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date; |
|
5. |
The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): |
|
a) |
all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and |
|
b) |
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and |
|
6. |
The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this annual report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses. |
Date: March 27, 2003
/ S / David L. Rogers |
- 73 -
<PAGE>
Sovran Acquisition Limited Partnership
Exhibit (12.1) Statement |
Re: Computation of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividends |
Amounts in thousands
Year ended December 31, |
|||||
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
1999 |
1998 |
|
Earnings: |
|||||
Net income available to common unitholders |
$22,388 |
$22,776 |
$24,564 |
$26,108 |
$24,798 |
Fixed charges |
20,805 |
17,955 |
21,279 |
15,944 |
9,925 |
Earnings (1) |
43,193 |
40,731 |
45,843 |
42,052 |
34,723 |
Fixed charges: |
|||||
Interest expense |
14,664 |
13,940 |
17,497 |
13,927 |
9,601 |
Preferred stock dividends |
5,093 |
2,955 |
2,955 |
1,239 |
- |
Amortization of financing fees |
1,048 |
1,060 |
827 |
778 |
324 |
Fixed charges (2) |
$20,805 |
$17,955 |
$21,279 |
$15,944 |
$ 9,925 |
Ratio of earnings to combined fixed charges and preferred stock dividends |
|
|
|
|
|
- 74 -
<PAGE>
Exhibit 23
Consent of Independent Auditors
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-3, No. 333-51169) of Sovran Self Storage, Inc. and Sovran Acquisition Limited Partnership and in the related Prospectus of our report dated January 28, 2003, with respect to the financial statements and schedule of Sovran Acquisition Limited Partnership included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2002.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP |
Buffalo, New York
March 27, 2003
- 75 -
<PAGE>
Exhibit 99.1
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
In connection with the Annual Report of Sovran Acquisition LP (the "Operating Partnership") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), each of the undersigned does hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
1) |
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
2) |
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Operating Partnership. |
Dated: March 27, 2003
/ S / Robert J. Attea
|
- 76 -