<Page>
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003
Commission File Number: 0-24071
Sovran Acquisition Limited Partnership
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware |
16-1481551 |
6467 Main Street |
(Registrant's telephone number including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of Securities |
Exchanges on which Registered |
Securities registered pursuant to section 12(g) of the Act:
Units of Limited Partnership Interest
(Title of Class)
-1-
<Page>
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes [ X ] No [ ]
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [ X ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes X No ____
As of March 1, 2004, 15,218,309 Units of Limited Partnership Interest were outstanding.
Exhibit Index is on Pages 70-72
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the Proxy Statement for Annual Meeting of Shareholders of the Company to be held on May 13, 2004 (Part III).
-2-
<Page>
Part I
When used in this discussion and elsewhere in this document, the words "intends," "believes," "expects," "anticipates," and similar expressions are intended to identify "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of that term in Section 27A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1933 and in Section 21F of the Securities Act of 1934. Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of the Operating Partnership to be materially different from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such factors include, but are not limited to, the effect of competition from new self-storage facilities, which would cause rents and occupancy rates to decline; the Operating Partnership's ability to evaluate, finance and integrate acquired businesses into the Operating Partnership's existing business and operations; the Opera ting Partnership's ability to form joint ventures and sell existing properties to those joint ventures and others; the Operating Partnership's ability to effectively compete in the industry in which it does business; the Operating Partnership's existing indebtedness may mature in an unfavorable credit environment, preventing refinancing or forcing refinancing of the indebtedness on terms that are not as favorable as the existing terms; interest rates may fluctuate, impacting costs associated with the Operating Partnership's outstanding floating rate debt; the Operating Partnership's ability to successfully extend its truck leasing program and Dri-Guard product roll-out; the Operating Partnership's reliance on its call center; the Operating Partnership's cash flow may be insufficient to meet required payments of principal and interest; and tax law changes that may change the taxability of future income.
ITEM 1. |
BUSINESS |
General
Sovran Acquisition Limited Partnership (the "Operating Partnership") is the entity through which Sovran Self Storage, Inc. (the "Company"), a self-administered and self-managed real estate investment trust ("REIT"), conducts substantially all of the Company's business and owns substantially all of the Company's assets. The Operating Partnership is one of the largest owners and operators of self-storage properties in the Eastern United States and Texas. In 1995, the Company was formed under Maryland law and the Operating Partnership was organized as a Delaware limited partnership to continue and to expand the self-storage operations of the Company's privately owned predecessor organizations. The term "Company" as used herein means Sovran Self Storage, Inc. and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis (including the Operating Partnership) or, where the context so requires, Sovran Self Storage, Inc. only. The term "Operating Partnership" as used herein means Sovran Acquisition Limited Partnership.
At December 31, 2003, the Company is a 96.35% economic owner of the Operating Partnership and controls it through Sovran Holdings, Inc. ("Holdings"), a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company incorporated in Delaware and the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership. This structure is commonly referred to as an umbrella partnership REIT or "UPREIT." The Board of Directors of Holdings, the members of which are the same as the members of the Board of Directors of the Company, manages the affairs of the Operating Partnership by directing the affairs of Holdings. The Company's limited partner and indirect
-3-
<Page>
general partner interests in the Operating Partnership entitle it to share in cash distributions from, and in the profits and losses of, the Operating Partnership in proportion to its ownership interest therein and entitle the Company to vote on all matters requiring a vote of the limited partners.
The Operating Partnership's other limited partners are persons who contributed their direct or indirect interests in certain self-storage properties to the Operating Partnership. The Operating Partnership is obligated to redeem each unit of limited partnership ("Unit") at the request of the holder thereof for cash equal to the fair market value of a share of the Company's common stock, par value $.01 per share ("Common Shares"), at the time of such redemption, provided that the Company at its option may elect to acquire any such Unit presented for redemption for one Common Share or cash. With each such redemption or acquisition by the Company, the Company's percentage ownership interest in the Operating Partnership will increase. In addition, whenever the Company issues Common Shares, the Company is obligated to contribute any net proceeds therefrom to the Operating Partnership and the Operating Partnership is obligated to issue an equivalent number of Units to the Company.
The Operating Partnership may issue additional Units to acquire additional self-storage properties in transactions that in certain circumstances defer some or all of the sellers' tax consequences. The Operating Partnership believes that many potential sellers of self-storage properties have a low tax basis in their properties and would be more willing to sell the properties in transactions that defer Federal income taxes. Offering Units instead of cash for properties may provide potential sellers partial Federal income tax deferral.
At March 1, 2004, the Operating Partnership owned and/or managed 265 Properties consisting of approximately 15.5 million net rentable square feet, situated in 21 states. Eleven of the Properties are managed under an agreement with an unconsolidated joint venture that is 45% owned by the Operating Partnership. The Operating Partnership is the 5th largest operator of self-storage properties in the United States based on facilities owned and/or managed. The Properties conduct business under the user-friendly trade name "Uncle Bob's Self-Storage."
The Operating Partnership seeks to enhance shareholder value through internal growth and acquisition of additional storage properties. Internal growth is achieved through aggressive property management: increasing rents, increasing occupancy levels, controlling costs, maximizing collections and strategically expanding and improving the Properties. Should economic conditions warrant, the Operating Partnership may develop new properties. The Operating Partnership believes that there continues to be opportunities for growth through acquisitions, and constantly seeks to acquire self-storage properties that are susceptible to realization of increased economies of scale and enhanced performance through application of its expertise.
The Operating Partnership's principal executive offices are located at 6467 Main Street, Buffalo, New York 14221, our telephone number is (716) 633-1850 and the Operating Partnership's web site is www.sovranss.com.
-4-
<Page>
Industry Overview
We believe that self-storage facilities offer inexpensive storage space to residential and commercial users. In addition to fully enclosed and secure storage space, many facilities also offer outside storage for automobiles, recreational vehicles and boats. Better facilities are usually fenced and well lighted with gates that are either manually operated or automated and have a full-time manager/leasing agent. Customers have access to their storage area during business hours and in certain circumstances are provided with 24-hour access. Individual storage units are secured by the customer's lock, and the customer has sole control of access to the unit.
According to published data, of the approximately 37,000 facilities in the United States, less than 13% are managed by the ten largest operators. The remainder of the industry is characterized by numerous small, local operators. The shortage of skilled operators, the scarcity of equity capital available to small operators for acquisitions and expansions, and the potential for savings through economies of scale are factors that are leading to a consolidation in the industry. We believe that, as a result of this trend, significant growth opportunities exist for operators with proven management systems and sufficient capital resources.
Property Management
We believe that we have developed substantial expertise in managing self-storage facilities. Key elements of our management system include the following:
Personnel:
Property managers attend a thorough orientation program and undergo continuous training that emphasizes closing techniques, identification of selected marketing opportunities, networking with possible referral sources, and familiarization with our customized management information system. In addition to frequent contact with Regional Team Leaders and other Company personnel, property managers receive periodic newsletters regarding a variety of operational issues, and from time to time attend "roundtable" seminars with other property managers.
Marketing and Sales:
Responding to the increased customer demand for services, we have initiated several programs expected to increase occupancy and profitability. These programs include:
- |
A Customer Care Center (call center) that services new and existing customers' inquiries and facilitates the capture of sales leads that were previously lost; |
- |
Internet marketing, providing information about all of our stores via numerous portals and e-mail; |
- |
Dri-guard, providing humidity-controlled spaces. We became the first self-storage operator to utilize this humidity protection technology. These environmental control systems are a premium storage feature intended to protect metal, electronics, furniture, fabrics and paper from moisture; |
-5-
<Page>
- |
Uncle Bob's Trucks, provide customers with convenient, affordable access to vehicles to help move their goods, while serving as moving billboards to help advertise our storage facilities; and |
- |
Flex-a-Space, an innovative construction design that allows us to easily reconfigure walls by using a track and roller mechanism, enabling customized storage space to fit the individual needs of the customer. |
Ancillary Income:
Our stores are essentially retail operations and we have in excess of 100,000 customers. As a convenience to those customers, we sell items, such as locks, boxes, tarps, etc. to make their storage experience easier. We also offer renters insurance through a third party carrier, on which we earn a commission. Income from truck rentals, billboards and cell towers is also earned by us.
Information Systems:
Our customized computer system performs billing, collections and reservation functions for each Property, and also tracks information used in developing marketing plans based on occupancy levels, and tenant demographics and histories. The system generates daily, weekly and monthly financial reports for each Property that are transmitted to our principal office each night. The system also requires a property manager to input a descriptive explanation for all debit and credit transactions, paid-to-date changes, and all other discretionary activities, which allows the accounting staff at our principal office to promptly review all such transactions. Late charges are automatically imposed. More sensitive activities, such as rental rate changes and unit size or number changes, are completed only by Regional Team Leaders. Our customized management information system permits us to add new facilities to our portfolio with minimal additional over head expense.
Property maintenance:
All of our properties are subject to regular and routine maintenance procedures, designed to maintain the structure and appearance of our buildings and grounds. A staff headquartered in our principal office is responsible for the upkeep of the properties, and all maintenance service is contracted through local providers, such as lawn service, snowplowing, pest control, gate maintenance, HVAC repairs, paving, painting, roofing, etc. A codified set of specifications has been designed and is applied to all work performed on our Uncle Bob's stores. As with many other aspects of our Company, our size has allowed us to enjoy relatively low maintenance costs because we have the benefit of economies of scale in purchasing, travel and overhead absorption.
Environmental and Other Regulations
We are subject to federal, state, and local environmental regulations that apply generally to the ownership of real property and the operation of self-storage facilities. We have not received notice from any governmental authority or private party of any material environmental noncompliance, claim, or liability in connection with any of the Properties, and are not aware of any environmental condition with respect to any of the Properties that could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.
-6-
<Page>
The Properties are also generally subject to the same types of local regulations governing other real property, including zoning ordinances. We believe that the Properties are in substantial compliance with all such regulations.
Insurance
Each of the Properties is covered by fire, property insurance, including comprehensive liability, and all-risk property insurance policies, which are provided by reputable companies and on commercially reasonable terms. In addition, we maintain a policy insuring against environmental liabilities resulting from tenant storage on terms customary for the industry, and title insurance insuring free title to the Company-owned Properties in an aggregate amount believed to be adequate.
Income Taxes
The Operating Partnership does not pay federal income taxes because we qualify as a partnership for federal and state income tax purposes and our partners are required to include their respective shares of profits and losses in their income tax returns.
Competition
The primary factors upon which competition in the self-storage industry is based are location, rental rates, suitability of the property's design to prospective customers' needs, and the manner in which the property is operated and marketed. We believe we compete successfully on these bases. The extent of competition depends in significant part on local market conditions. We seek to locate facilities so as not to cause our Properties to compete with one another for customers, but the number of self-storage facilities in a particular area could have a material adverse effect on the performance of any of the Properties.
Several of our competitors, including Public Storage Management, Inc., Shurgard Incorporated, U-Haul International, and Storage USA, Inc., are larger and have substantially greater financial resources than we do. These larger operators may, among other possible advantages, be capable of greater leverage and the payment of higher prices for acquisitions.
Investment Policy
While we emphasize equity real estate investments, we may, at our discretion, invest in mortgage and other real estate interests related to self-storage properties in a manner consistent with the Company's qualification as a REIT. We may also retain a purchase money mortgage for a portion of the sale price in connection with the disposition of Properties from time to time. Should investment opportunities become available, we may look to acquire self-storage properties via a joint-venture partnership or similar entity. We may or may not have a significant investment in such a venture, but would use such an opportunity to expand our portfolio of branded and managed properties.
-7-
<Page>
Subject to the percentage of ownership limitations and gross income tests necessary for the Company's REIT qualification, we also may invest in securities of entities engaged in real estate activities or securities of other issuers, including for the purpose of exercising control over such entities.
Disposition Policy
We periodically review the assets comprising our portfolio. Any disposition decision will be based on a variety of factors, including, but not limited to, the (i) potential to continue to increase cash flow and value, (ii) sale price, (iii) strategic fit with the rest of our portfolio, (iv) potential for, or existence of, environmental or regulatory issues, (v) alternative uses of capital, and (vi) the Company maintaining qualification as a REIT.
As part of an asset management program, we have begun to "spin-off" non-core, slow-growth properties, into joint ventures. In cases where we have a less than 50% controlling interest in a joint venture, the Properties of that joint venture are removed from our balance sheet and an investment in the joint venture is recorded. We record only our percentage share of the operating results of unconsolidated joint ventures. These ventures may allow us to (i) increase incremental revenues through management fees, (ii) provide strong returns on our equity in the joint venture, and (iii) increase liquidity to allow redeployment of equity to repay debt, acquire stock, or buy higher growth properties. In 2000, we sold seven facilities for approximately $20 million to an unconsolidated joint venture in which we retained a 45% interest. All eleven properties in the unconsolidated joint venture are managed by us under an agreement. In cases where we are deemed to have a greater than 50% controlling interest, the joint venture is consolidated with our financial statements and a minority interest is recorded on the balance sheet and statement of operations for the portion of the joint venture not owned by us. On February 20, 2004, we sold our facility in Allentown, PA to an independent operator.
Distribution Policy
We intend to pay regular quarterly distributions to our unitholders. However, future distributions by us will be at the discretion of the Board of Directors and will depend on the actual cash available for distribution, our financial condition and capital requirements, the Company's annual distribution requirements under the REIT provisions of the Code and such other factors as the Board of Directors deems relevant. In order to maintain its qualification as a REIT, the Company must make annual distributions to shareholders of at least 90% of its REIT taxable income (which does not include capital gains). Under certain circumstances, the Company may be required to make distributions in excess of cash available for distribution in order to meet this requirement.
Borrowing Policy
Our Board of Directors currently limit the amount of debt that may be incurred by us to less than 50% of the sum of market value of the issued and outstanding Common and Preferred Stock plus the Company's debt (Market Capitalization). We, however, may from time to time re-evaluate and modify our borrowing policy in light of then current economic conditions, relative
-8-
<Page>
costs of debt and equity capital, market values of properties, growth and acquisition opportunities and other factors.
On September 4, 2003, we entered into agreements relating to new unsecured credit arrangements, and received funds under those arrangements. The new agreements provide for a $75 million (expandable to $100 million) revolving line of credit maturing September 2006 bearing interest at a variable rate equal to LIBOR plus 1.375%, a $100 million term note maturing September 2008 bearing interest at a variable rate equal to LIBOR plus 1.50%, a $80 million term note maturing September 2013 bearing interest at a fixed rate of 6.26% and a $20 million term note maturing September 2013 bearing interest at a variable rate equal to LIBOR plus 1.5%.
To the extent that we desire to obtain additional capital to pay distributions, to provide working capital, to pay existing indebtedness or to finance acquisitions, expansions or development of new properties, we may utilize amounts available under the revolving line of credit, preferred stock offerings, floating or fixed rate debt financing, retention of cash flow (subject to satisfying the Company's distribution requirements under the REIT rules) or a combination of these methods. Additional debt financing may also be obtained through mortgages on our Properties, which may be recourse, non-recourse, or cross-collateralized and may contain cross-default provisions. We have not established any limit on the number or amount of mortgages that may be placed on any single Property or on our portfolio as a whole. For additional information regarding borrowings, see Item 7, "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Result s of Operations - Liquidity and Capital Resources" and Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements filed herewith.
Employees
We currently employ a total of 824 employees, including 265 Property Managers, 17 Regional Team Leaders, and 449 assistant managers and part-time employees. At our headquarters, in addition to the 3 executive officers, we employ 90 people engaged in various support activities, including accounting, customer care, and management information systems. None of our employees are covered by a collective bargaining agreement. We consider our employee relations to be excellent.
Available Information
The Company files with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission quarterly and annual reports on Forms 10-Q and 10-K, respectively, current reports on Form 8-K, and proxy statements pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, in addition to other information as required. The public may read and copy any materials that we file with the SEC at the SEC's Public Reference Room at 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549. The public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1 (800) SEC-0330. We file this information with the SEC electronically, and the SEC maintains an Internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC at http://www.sec.gov. In addition, our code of ethics is available free of charge at our website http://www.sovranss.com.
-9-
<Page>
Item 2. |
Properties |
At December 31, 2003, we owned and/or managed a total of 266 Properties situated in twenty-one states in the Eastern and Midwestern United States, Arizona and Texas. Eleven of the Properties are managed under an agreement with an unconsolidated joint venture that is 45% owned by us.
Our self-storage facilities offer inexpensive, easily accessible, enclosed storage space to residential and commercial users on a month-to-month basis. Most of our Properties are fenced with computerized gates and are well lighted. All but thirty-six of the Properties are single-story, thereby providing customers with the convenience of direct vehicle access to their storage units. All Properties have a Property Manager on-site during business hours. Customers have access to their storage areas during business hours, and some commercial customers are provided 24-hour access. Individual storage units are secured by a lock furnished by the customer to provide the customer with control of access to the unit.
At March 1, 2004, all but two of the Properties conduct business under the user-friendly trade name "Uncle Bob's Self-Storage" and we intend to convert those to the "Uncle Bob's" name on or before September 1, 2004.
-10-
<Page>
The table below provides certain information regarding the Properties included in the Operating Partnership's consolidated financial statements:
|
|
|
Uncle |
State |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alabama |
90% |
|||||||||
Birmingham I |
1990 |
36,775 |
Y |
2.7 |
288 |
9 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry/Steel Roof |
|
Birmingham II |
1990 |
52,135 |
Y |
4.7 |
388 |
8 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry/Steel Roof |
|
Montgomery I |
1982 |
74,119 |
Y |
5.0 |
614 |
16 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry/Steel Roof |
|
Birmingham III |
1970 |
72,290 |
Y |
4.3 |
402 |
6 |
1 |
N |
Masonry/Steel Roof |
|
Montgomery II |
1984 |
42,166 |
Y |
2.7 |
294 |
10 |
1 |
N |
Masonry/Steel Roof |
|
Montgomery III |
1988 |
41,610 |
Y |
2.4 |
381 |
9 |
1 |
Y |
Steel Bldg./Steel Roof |
|
Birmingham-Walt |
1984 |
64,580 |
Y |
3.3 |
293 |
6 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Metal Roof |
|
Birmingham-Bessemer |
1998 |
44,070 |
Y |
|
5.6 |
345 |
8 |
1 |
N |
Metal Wall/Metal Roof |
Arizona |
79% |
|||||||||
Gilbert-Elliot Rd. |
1995 |
66,845 |
Y |
3.3 |
679 |
9 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Metal Roof |
|
Glendale-59th Ave. |
1997 |
67,076 |
Y |
4.6 |
632 |
7 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Metal Roof |
|
Mesa-Baseline |
1986 |
39,100 |
Y |
1.8 |
388 |
11 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Metal Roof |
|
Mesa-E. Broadway |
1986 |
38,825 |
Y |
1.8 |
368 |
5 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Metal Roof |
|
Mesa-W. Broadway |
1976 |
36,655 |
Y |
1.9 |
369 |
5 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Metal Roof |
|
Mesa-Greenfield |
1986 |
48,343 |
Y |
2.1 |
407 |
8 |
1 |
N |
Masonry Wall/Metal Roof |
|
Phoenix-Camelback |
1984 |
43,355 |
Y |
2.0 |
526 |
7 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Metal Roof |
|
Phoenix-Bell |
1984 |
96,630 |
Y |
4.6 |
915 |
7 |
1 |
Y |
Metal Wall/Metal Roof |
|
Phoenix-35th Ave. |
1996 |
70,050 |
Y |
4.3 |
659 |
8 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Metal Roof |
|
Connecticut |
73% |
|||||||||
New Haven |
1985 |
47,680 |
Y |
3.9 |
392 |
5 |
1 |
N |
Masonry Wall/Steel Roof |
|
Hartford-Metro I |
1988 |
56,570 |
Y |
10.0 |
354 |
10 |
1 |
N |
Steel Bldg./Steel Roof |
|
Hartford-Metro II |
1992 |
39,190 |
Y |
6.0 |
323 |
7 |
1 |
N |
Steel Bldg./Steel Roof |
|
Florida |
91% |
|||||||||
Lakeland 1 |
1985 |
47,985 |
Y |
3.5 |
434 |
11 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Steel Roof |
|
Tallahassee I |
1973 |
139,880 |
Y |
18.7 |
710 |
21 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Tar & Gravel Roof |
|
Tallahassee II |
1975 |
51,270 |
Y |
4.0 |
274 |
7 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Tar & Gravel Roof |
|
Port St. Lucie |
1985 |
55,842 |
Y |
4.0 |
531 |
12 |
1 |
N |
Steel Bldg./Steel Roof |
|
Deltona |
1984 |
63,602 |
Y |
5.0 |
449 |
5 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Shingle Roof |
-11-
<Page>
Jacksonville I |
1985 |
40,032 |
Y |
2.7 |
294 |
14 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Tar & Gravel Roof |
|
Orlando I |
1988 |
50,520 |
Y |
|
2.8 |
591 |
3 |
2 |
Y |
Steel Bldg./Steel Roof |
Ft. Lauderdale |
1985 |
101,085 |
Y |
7.6 |
638 |
7 |
1 |
Y |
Steel Bldg./Steel Roof |
|
West Palm 1 |
1985 |
45,569 |
Y |
3.2 |
406 |
6 |
1 |
N |
Steel Bldg./Steel Roof |
|
Melbourne I |
1986 |
83,539 |
Y |
8.3 |
746 |
11 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Shingled Roof |
|
Pensacola I |
1983 |
119,405 |
Y |
7.5 |
855 |
13 |
1 |
Y |
Steel Bldg./Steel Roof |
|
Pensacola II |
1986 |
58,204 |
Y |
3.4 |
505 |
9 |
1 |
Y |
Steel Bldg./Steel Roof |
|
Melbourne II |
1986 |
56,031 |
Y |
3.4 |
610 |
11 |
1 |
N |
Steel Bldg./Steel Roof |
|
Jacksonville II |
1987 |
53,855 |
Y |
4.4 |
471 |
11 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry/Steel Roof |
|
Pensacola III |
1986 |
84,380 |
Y |
6.1 |
600 |
14 |
1 |
N |
Steel Bldg./Steel Roof |
|
Pensacola IV |
1990 |
38,850 |
Y |
2.7 |
275 |
9 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry/Steel Roof |
|
Pensacola V |
1990 |
39,125 |
Y |
2.6 |
318 |
4 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry/Steel Roof |
|
Tampa I |
1989 |
65,425 |
Y |
3.3 |
863 |
6 |
1 |
N |
Masonry/Steel Roof |
|
Tampa II |
1985 |
60,470 |
Y |
2.9 |
665 |
10 |
1 |
N |
Masonry/Steel Roof |
|
Tampa III |
1988 |
50,251 |
Y |
2.2 |
635 |
14 |
1 |
N |
Masonry/Steel Roof |
|
Orlando II |
1986 |
133,935 |
Y |
8.5 |
1,309 |
20 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Steel Roof |
|
Ft. Myers I |
1988 |
27,724 |
Y |
1.1 |
253 |
6 |
2 |
Y |
Steel Bldg./Steel Roof |
|
Ft. Myers II |
1991/94 |
23,043 |
Y |
1.9 |
299 |
2 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry/Steel Roof |
|
Tampa IV |
1985 |
58,215 |
Y |
4.0 |
525 |
10 |
1 |
N |
Masonry/Steel Roof |
|
West Palm II |
1986 |
30,937 |
Y |
2.3 |
363 |
9 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry/Steel Roof |
|
Ft. Myers III |
1986 |
36,052 |
Y |
2.4 |
257 |
9 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry/Steel Roof |
|
Lakeland II |
1988 |
59,950 |
Y |
4.0 |
581 |
9 |
1 |
N |
Masonry Wall/Steel Roof |
|
Ft. Myers IV |
1987 |
59,624 |
Y |
4.5 |
262 |
4 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry/Steel Roof |
|
Jacksonville III |
1987 |
102,430 |
Y |
5.9 |
734 |
13 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Shingle Roof |
|
Jacksonville IV |
1985 |
38,205 |
Y |
2.7 |
349 |
7 |
1 |
Y |
Steel Bldg./Steel Roof |
|
Jacksonville V |
1987/92 |
54,037 |
Y |
2.9 |
501 |
13 |
2 |
Y |
Steel Bldg./Masonry Wall/Steel Roof |
|
Orlando III |
1975 |
54,388 |
Y |
3.2 |
503 |
8 |
2 |
N |
Masonry Wall/Steel Roof |
|
Orlando IV-W 25th St. |
1984 |
38,354 |
Y |
2.8 |
326 |
6 |
1 |
Y |
Steel Bldg/Steel Roof |
|
Delray I-Mini |
1969 |
49,549 |
Y |
3.5 |
441 |
3 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Concrete Roof |
|
Delray II-Safeway |
1980 |
69,760 |
Y |
4.3 |
696 |
17 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Concrete Roof |
|
Tampa-E. Hillborough |
1985 |
84,470 |
Y |
5.3 |
687 |
16 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Metal Roof |
|
Ft. Myers-Mall |
1991/94 |
22,211 |
Y |
1.3 |
223 |
4 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry/Steel Roof |
|
Indian Harbor-Beach |
1985 |
66,211 |
Y |
4.0 |
716 |
15 |
1 |
N |
Masonry Wall/Metal Roof |
|
Hollywood-Sheridan |
1988 |
130,733 |
Y |
7.0 |
1,172 |
21 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Concrete Roof |
|
Pompano Beach-Atlantic |
1985 |
75,222 |
Y |
4.0 |
925 |
17 |
1 |
N |
Masonry Wall/Concrete Roof |
|
Pompano Beach-Sample |
1988 |
64,117 |
Y |
|
3.6 |
793 |
14 |
1 |
N |
Masonry Wall/Metal Roof |
-12-
<Page>
Boca Raton-18th St. |
1991 |
87,782 |
Y |
6.2 |
990 |
8 |
1 |
N |
Masonry Wall/Metal Roof |
|
Vero Beach |
1997 |
34,450 |
Y |
1.9 |
321 |
2 |
1 |
N |
Masonry Wall/Metal Roof |
|
Hollywood-N. 21st |
1987 |
58,881 |
Y |
3.1 |
711 |
11 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Metal Roof |
|
Cocoa |
1982 |
75,115 |
Y |
2.5 |
689 |
12 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Metal Roof |
|
Plantation |
1982 |
42,171 |
Y |
2.9 |
503 |
4 |
1&2 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Metal Roof |
|
Georgia |
85% |
|||||||||
Savannah |
1981 |
73,480 |
Y |
5.4 |
606 |
11 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Steel Roof |
|
Atlanta-Metro I |
1988 |
69,890 |
Y |
3.9 |
537 |
5 |
1 |
Y |
Steel Bldg./Steel Roof |
|
Atlanta-Metro II |
1988 |
45,300 |
Y |
3.9 |
371 |
6 |
1 |
Y |
Steel Bldg./Steel Roof |
|
Atlanta-Metro III |
1988 |
57,035 |
Y |
5.3 |
410 |
9 |
1 |
Y |
Steel Bldg./Steel Roof |
|
Atlanta-Metro IV |
1989 |
42,220 |
Y |
3.5 |
307 |
7 |
1 |
Y |
Steel Bldg./Steel Roof |
|
Atlanta-Metro V |
1988 |
44,165 |
Y |
4.2 |
283 |
3 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Tar & Gravel Roof |
|
Atlanta-Metro VI |
1986 |
50,775 |
Y |
3.6 |
444 |
7 |
1 |
Y |
Steel Bldg./Steel Roof |
|
Atlanta-Metro VII |
1981 |
38,900 |
Y |
2.5 |
327 |
9 |
2 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Tar & Gravel Roof |
|
Atlanta-Metro VIII |
1975 |
46,914 |
Y |
3.3 |
432 |
6 |
2 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Tar & Gravel Roof |
|
Augusta I |
1988 |
52,000 |
Y |
4.0 |
398 |
13 |
1 |
Y |
Steel Bldg./Steel Roof |
|
Macon I |
1989 |
41,030 |
Y |
3.2 |
353 |
14 |
1 |
Y |
Steel Bldg./Steel Roof |
|
Augusta II |
1987 |
46,325 |
Y |
3.5 |
361 |
4 |
1 |
N |
Masonry Wall/Steel Roof |
|
Atlanta-Metro IX |
1988 |
56,196 |
Y |
4.6 |
411 |
6 |
1 |
Y |
Steel Bldg./Steel Roof |
|
Atlanta-Metro X |
1988 |
46,815 |
Y |
6.8 |
376 |
9 |
1 |
N |
Steel Bldg./Steel Roof |
|
Macon II |
1989/94 |
67,670 |
Y |
14.0 |
574 |
12 |
1 |
Y |
Steel Bldg./Steel Roof |
|
Savannah II |
1988 |
49,365 |
Y |
2.6 |
456 |
8 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Steel Roof |
|
Atlanta-Alpharetta |
1994 |
80,790 |
Y |
5.8 |
559 |
8 |
1&2 |
Y |
Steel Bldg./Steel Roof |
|
Atlanta-Marietta-Roswell |
1996 |
59,475 |
Y |
6.0 |
447 |
8 |
1&2 |
Y |
Steel Bldg./Steel Roof |
|
Atlanta-Doraville |
1995 |
68,820 |
Y |
4.9 |
638 |
8 |
1&2 |
Y |
Steel & Masonry Bldg./Steel Roof |
|
Ft. Oglethorpe |
1989 |
45,642 |
Y |
3.3 |
453 |
6 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Metal Roof |
|
Kingsland |
1989 |
66,885 |
Y |
4.1 |
547 |
12 |
1 |
N |
Masonry Wall/Metal Roof |
|
Louisiana |
84% |
|||||||||
Baton Rouge-Airline |
1982 |
71,720 |
Y |
2.5 |
432 |
12 |
1 |
N |
Masonry Wall/Metal Roof |
|
Baton Rouge-Airline 2 |
1985 |
44,895 |
Y |
2.8 |
437 |
9 |
1 |
N |
Masonry Wall/Steel Roof |
|
Lafayette-Pinhook 1 |
1980 |
56,625 |
Y |
3.2 |
485 |
7 |
1 |
N |
Masonry Wall/Metal Roof |
|
Lafayette-Pinhook 2 |
1992/94 |
47,025 |
Y |
2.4 |
432 |
2 |
1 |
Y |
Metal Wall/Metal Roof |
|
Lafayette-Ambassador |
1975 |
33,835 |
Y |
2.0 |
413 |
3 |
1 |
N |
Masonry Wall/Shingle Roof |
|
Lafayette-Evangeline |
1977 |
34,630 |
Y |
3.1 |
346 |
3 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Metal Roof |
|
Lafayette-Guilbeau |
1994 |
63,685 |
Y |
3.4 |
593 |
1 |
1 |
N |
Metal Wall/Metal Roof |
-13-
<Page>
Maine |
92% |
|||||||||
Westbrook |
1988 |
45,820 |
Y |
5.9 |
471 |
7 |
1 |
Y |
Metal Wall/Metal Roof |
|
Saco |
1988 |
53,750 |
Y |
4.2 |
416 |
12 |
1 |
N |
Masonry Wall/Metal Roof |
|
Maryland |
90% |
|||||||||
Salisbury |
1979 |
33,585 |
Y |
3.0 |
416 |
10 |
1 |
N |
Masonry Wall/Tar & Gravel Roof |
|
Baltimore I-Frederick |
1984 |
21,233 |
Y |
1.9 |
341 |
2 |
3 |
N |
Masonry Wall/Shingled Roof |
|
Baltimore II-Gaithersburg |
1988 |
60,595 |
Y |
2.2 |
534 |
2 |
4 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Tar & Gravel Roof |
|
Baltimore III-Landover |
1990 |
51,226 |
Y |
3.1 |
666 |
8 |
1 |
Y |
Steel Bldg./Steel Roof |
|
Massachusetts |
82% |
|||||||||
New Bedford |
1982 |
42,308 |
Y |
3.4 |
375 |
7 |
1 |
N |
Steel Bldg./Steel Roof |
|
Springfield |
1986 |
53,614 |
Y |
4.7 |
399 |
10 |
1&2 |
N |
Masonry Wall/Shingle Roof |
|
Salem |
1979 |
53,325 |
Y |
2.0 |
496 |
2 |
2 |
Y |
Steel Wall/Metal Roof |
|
Boston-Metro I |
1980 |
37,815 |
Y |
2.0 |
403 |
3 |
2 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Tar & Gravel Roof |
|
Boston-Metro II |
1986 |
38,575 |
Y |
3.6 |
452 |
8 |
2 |
N |
Masonry Wall/Tar & Gravel Roof |
|
N. Andover |
1989 |
44,555 |
Y |
3.0 |
533 |
1 |
3 |
N |
Masonry & Metal Wall/Metal Roof |
|
Dracut |
1986 |
45,926 |
Y |
5.0 |
403 |
11 |
1 |
N |
Masonry Wall/Metal Roof |
|
Methuen |
1984 |
50,400 |
Y |
3.4 |
383 |
6 |
1 |
N |
Masonry Wall/Metal Roof |
|
Plymouth |
1996 |
92,127 |
Y |
7.7 |
753 |
14 |
1 |
N |
Metal Wall/Metal Roof |
|
Sandwich |
1984 |
47,970 |
Y |
4.9 |
361 |
8 |
1 |
N |
Metal Wall/Metal Roof |
|
Michigan |
78% |
|||||||||
Grand Rapids II |
1983 |
43,500 |
Y |
8.0 |
387 |
6 |
1 |
N |
Masonry & Steel Walls |
|
Holland |
1978 |
58,735 |
Y |
13.6 |
429 |
18 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Steel Roof |
|
Holland-Paw Paw |
1978 |
53,610 |
Y |
5.3 |
369 |
9 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Steel Roof |
|
Waterford-Highland |
1978 |
136,316 |
Y |
16.6 |
1,648 |
16 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Metal Roof |
|
Mississippi |
92% |
|||||||||
Jackson I |
1990 |
42,100 |
Y |
2.0 |
351 |
6 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry/Steel Roof |
|
Jackson II |
1990 |
38,761 |
Y |
2.1 |
306 |
9 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry/Steel Roof |
|
Jackson III-155 |
1995 |
61,948 |
Y |
1.3 |
420 |
2 |
1 |
N |
Metal Wall/Metal Roof |
|
Jackson-N. West |
1984 |
57,497 |
Y |
5.2 |
477 |
13 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Metal Roof |
|
New Hampshire |
87% |
|||||||||
Salem-Policy |
1980 |
62,955 |
Y |
8.7 |
547 |
9 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Metal Roof |
|
New York |
84% |
|||||||||
Middletown |
1988 |
33,865 |
Y |
2.8 |
337 |
4 |
1 |
N |
Steel Bldg./Steel Roof |
|
Buffalo I |
1981 |
83,865 |
Y |
5.1 |
600 |
10 |
1 |
Y |
Steel Bldg./Steel Roof |
|
Rochester I |
1981 |
41,834 |
Y |
2.9 |
406 |
5 |
1 |
Y |
Steel Bldg./Steel Roof |
|
Rochester II |
1980 |
29,510 |
Y |
3.5 |
242 |
9 |
1 |
N |
Masonry Wall/Shingle Roof |
-14-
<Page>
Buffalo II |
1984 |
62,025 |
Y |
6.2 |
495 |
12 |
1 |
Y |
Steel Bldg./Steel Roof |
|
Syracuse 1 |
1987 |
77,715 |
Y |
7.5 |
677 |
17 |
1 |
N |
Steel Bldg./Steel Roof |
|
Syracuse II |
1983 |
78,279 |
Y |
3.6 |
632 |
10 |
1 |
Y |
Steel Bldg./Shingled Roof |
|
Rochester III |
1990 |
66,639 |
Y |
2.7 |
493 |
1 |
1 |
N |
Masonry Wall/Shingle Roof |
|
Harriman |
1989/95 |
74,340 |
Y |
6.1 |
638 |
10 |
1 |
Y |
Metal Wall/Metal Roof |
|
Monroe |
1998 |
36,240 |
Y |
13.3 |
312 |
4 |
1 |
N |
Metal Wall/Metal Roof |
|
Syracuse |
1987 |
35,060 |
Y |
2.2 |
287 |
12 |
1 |
N |
Metal Wall/Metal Roof |
|
The Hamptons |
1989/95 |
64,885 |
Y |
3.2 |
775 |
5 |
2 |
N |
Metal Wall/Metal Roof |
|
The Hamptons |
1998 |
33,150 |
Y |
1.1 |
317 |
1 |
2 |
N |
Metal Wall/Metal Roof |
|
The Hamptons |
1997 |
35,210 |
Y |
1.9 |
429 |
2 |
2 |
N |
Metal Wall/Metal Roof |
|
The Hamptons |
1994/98 |
64,900 |
Y |
3.7 |
718 |
4 |
2 |
N |
Metal Wall/Metal Roof |
|
North Carolina |
80% |
|||||||||
Charlotte |
1986 |
37,815 |
Y |
2.9 |
332 |
6 |
1 |
Y |
Steel Bldg./Steel Roof |
|
Fayetteville |
1980 |
84,228 |
Y |
6.2 |
859 |
12 |
1 |
Y |
Steel Bldg./Steel Roof |
|
Greensboro |
1986 |
45,180 |
Y |
3.4 |
404 |
5 |
1 |
Y |
Steel Bldg./Mas. Wall/Steel Roof |
|
Raleigh I |
1985 |
58,410 |
Y |
5.0 |
540 |
8 |
2 |
Y |
Steel Bldg./Steel Roof |
|
Raleigh II |
1985 |
33,125 |
Y |
2.5 |
318 |
8 |
1 |
Y |
Steel Bldg./Steel Roof |
|
Charlotte II |
1995 |
49,006 |
Y |
5.6 |
400 |
7 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Steel Roof |
|
Charlotte III |
1995 |
30,920 |
Y |
2.9 |
314 |
6 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Steel Roof |
|
Greensboro-Hilltop |
1995 |
32,153 |
Y |
1.0 |
292 |
7 |
1 |
N |
Metal Wall/Metal Roof |
|
Greensboro-StageCoach |
1997 |
36,125 |
Y |
2.5 |
233 |
3 |
1 |
N |
Metal Wall/Metal Roof |
|
Greensboro-High Point |
1993 |
57,567 |
Y |
2.5 |
492 |
9 |
1 |
N |
Steel Wall/Metal Roof |
|
Durham-Hillborough |
1988/91 |
68,031 |
Y |
5.0 |
600 |
5 |
1 |
Y |
Metal Wall/Metal Roof |
|
Durham-Cornwallis |
1990/96 |
78,645 |
Y |
4.7 |
662 |
9 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Metal Roof |
|
Jacksonville-Center |
1995 |
52,000 |
Y |
5.0 |
396 |
11 |
1 |
Y |
Metal Wall/Metal Roof |
|
Jacksonville-Gum Branch |
1989 |
62,900 |
Y |
5.0 |
475 |
14 |
1 |
Y |
Metal Wall/Metal Roof |
|
Jacksonville-N. Marine |
1985 |
47,810 |
Y |
8.4 |
379 |
6 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Shingle Roof |
|
Ohio |
89% |
|||||||||
Youngstown |
1980 |
54,830 |
Y |
5.8 |
357 |
5 |
1 |
Y |
Steel Bldg./Steel Roof |
|
Cleveland-Metro I |
1980 |
49,200 |
Y |
6.4 |
358 |
9 |
1 |
N |
Steel Bldg./Steel Roof |
|
Cleveland-Metro II |
1987 |
65,900 |
Y |
4.8 |
489 |
4 |
1 |
Y |
Steel Bldg./Steel Roof |
|
Youngstown |
1988 |
55,750 |
Y |
3.9 |
495 |
7 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Steel Roof |
|
Akron |
1990 |
38,320 |
Y |
3.4 |
296 |
12 |
1 |
N |
Masonry Wall/Steel Roof |
|
Cleveland III |
1986 |
68,535 |
Y |
3.4 |
586 |
12 |
1 |
N |
Masonry Wall/Steel Roof |
|
Cleveland IV |
1978 |
72,750 |
Y |
3.5 |
643 |
5 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Steel Roof |
|
Cleveland V |
1979 |
75,212 |
Y |
3.1 |
638 |
9 |
1&2 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Steel Roof |
-15-
<Page>
Cleveland VI |
1979 |
47,221 |
Y |
2.6 |
379 |
8 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Steel Roof |
|
Cleveland VII |
1977 |
70,170 |
Y |
4.3 |
591 |
13 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Steel Roof |
|
Cleveland VIII |
1970 |
47,605 |
Y |
5.7 |
438 |
6 |
1 |
N |
Masonry Wall/Steel Roof |
|
Cleveland IX |
1982 |
54,880 |
Y |
4.4 |
297 |
5 |
1 |
N |
Masonry Wall/Steel Roof |
|
Cleveland 10-Avon |
1989 |
46,898 |
Y |
5.8 |
374 |
6 |
1 |
N |
Metal Wall/Metal Roof |
|
Warren-Elm |
1986 |
60,200 |
Y |
7.3 |
477 |
8 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Metal Roof |
|
Warren-Youngstown |
1986 |
58,987 |
Y |
5.0 |
521 |
11 |
1 |
N |
Masonry Wall/Metal Roof |
|
Batavia |
1988 |
61,818 |
Y |
5.5 |
547 |
9 |
1 |
N |
Metal Wall/Steel Roof |
|
Pennsylvania |
94% |
|||||||||
Allentown |
1983 |
40,800 |
Y |
6.3 |
341 |
7 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Shingle Roof |
|
Sharon |
1975 |
37,940 |
Y |
3.0 |
294 |
5 |
1 |
Y |
Steel Bldg./Steel Roof |
|
Harrisburg I |
1983 |
49,120 |
Y |
4.1 |
444 |
9 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Steel Roof |
|
Harrisburg II |
1985 |
59,365 |
Y |
9.2 |
292 |
10 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Steel Roof |
|
Pittsburgh |
1990 |
57,365 |
Y |
3.4 |
504 |
6 |
1 |
Y |
Steel Bldg./Steel Roof |
|
Pittsburgh II |
1983 |
102,330 |
Y |
4.8 |
746 |
4 |
2 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Shingled Roof |
|
Harrisburg-Peiffers |
1984 |
63,740 |
Y |
4.1 |
604 |
9 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Metal Roof |
|
Rhode Island |
89% |
|||||||||
East Greenwich |
1984 |
45,600 |
Y |
2.9 |
411 |
9 |
1 |
Y |
Metal Wall/Metal Roof |
|
Frenchtown |
1988 |
31,310 |
Y |
2.0 |
309 |
4 |
1 |
N |
Metal Wall/Metal Roof |
|
W. Warwick |
1986/94 |
52,376 |
Y |
2.3 |
484 |
4 |
1 |
N |
Metal Wall/Steel Roof |
|
Providence |
1984 |
38,550 |
Y |
3.7 |
386 |
7 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Tar & Gravel Roof |
|
South Carolina |
82% |
|||||||||
Charleston I |
1985 |
49,654 |
Y |
3.3 |
397 |
11 |
1 |
Y |
Steel Bldg./Mas. Wall/Steel Roof |
|
Columbia I |
1985 |
47,800 |
Y |
3.3 |
393 |
7 |
1 |
Y |
Steel Bldg./Steel Roof |
|
Columbia II |
1987 |
58,480 |
Y |
6.0 |
444 |
8 |
1 |
N |
Steel Bldg./Steel Roof |
|
Columbia III |
1989 |
41,390 |
Y |
3.5 |
329 |
5 |
2 |
Y |
Steel Bldg./Steel Roof |
|
Columbia IV |
1986 |
57,360 |
Y |
5.6 |
441 |
7 |
1 |
Y |
Steel Bldg./Steel Roof |
|
Spartanburg |
1989 |
40,450 |
Y |
3.6 |
341 |
6 |
1 |
Y |
Steel Bldg./Steel Roof |
|
Charlestown II |
1985 |
40,318 |
Y |
2.2 |
331 |
10 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Steel Roof |
|
Columbia |
1985 |
73,550 |
Y |
5.0 |
777 |
17 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Steel Roof |
|
Myrtle Beach |
1984 |
62,087 |
Y |
4.8 |
588 |
12 |
1 |
N |
Masonry Wall/Steel Roof |
|
Tennessee |
78% |
|||||||||
Chattanooga-Lee Hwy |
1987 |
37,937 |
Y |
3.3 |
393 |
6 |
1 |
N |
Masonry Wall/Metal Roof |
|
Chattanooga-Hwy 58 |
1985 |
35,460 |
Y |
2.4 |
295 |
4 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Metal Roof |
|
Hendersonville |
1986/97 |
93,955 |
Y |
5.7 |
651 |
16 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Metal Roof |
-16-
<Page>
Texas |
78% |
|||||||||
Arlington I |
1987 |
45,815 |
Y |
2.3 |
382 |
7 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Steel Roof |
|
Arlington II |
1986 |
67,220 |
Y |
3.8 |
280 |
11 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Steel Roof |
|
Ft. Worth |
1986 |
40,850 |
Y |
2.4 |
333 |
3 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Asphalt Roof |
|
San Antonio I |
1986 |
48,200 |
Y |
3.9 |
414 |
12 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Steel Roof |
|
San Antonio II |
1986 |
39,870 |
Y |
1.9 |
283 |
7 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Steel Roof |
|
San Antonio III |
1981 |
48,782 |
Y |
2.6 |
469 |
5 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Steel Roof |
|
Universal |
1985 |
35,160 |
Y |
2.4 |
375 |
8 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Steel Roof |
|
San Antonio IV |
1995 |
62,870 |
Y |
5.4 |
592 |
11 |
1 |
Y |
Steel Bldg./Steel Roof |
|
Houston-Eastex |
1993/95 |
83,650 |
Y |
6.4 |
660 |
6 |
1 |
Y |
Metal Wall/Steel Roof |
|
Houston-Nederland |
1995 |
61,731 |
Y |
6.3 |
531 |
1 |
1 |
Y |
Metal Wall/Steel Roof |
|
Houston-College |
1995 |
35,650 |
Y |
1.8 |
316 |
1 |
1 |
Y |
Metal Wall/Steel Roof |
|
Dallas-Skillman |
1975 |
121,026 |
Y |
5.9 |
1,080 |
8 |
1&2 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Steel Roof |
|
Dallas-Centennial |
1977 |
102,637 |
Y |
6.7 |
994 |
8 |
1&2 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Steel Roof |
|
Dallas-Samuell |
1975 |
79,046 |
Y |
3.8 |
784 |
6 |
1&2 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Steel Roof |
|
Dallas-Hargrove |
1975 |
71,879 |
Y |
3.1 |
734 |
5 |
1&2 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Steel Roof |
|
Houston-Antoine |
1984 |
76,620 |
Y |
4.1 |
657 |
9 |
1 |
Y |
Metal Wall/Metal Roof |
|
Katy |
1994 |
43,995 |
Y |
8.6 |
437 |
10 |
1 |
Y |
Metal Wall/Metal Roof |
|
Humble |
1986 |
63,599 |
Y |
2.3 |
583 |
6 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Metal Roof |
|
Houston-Old Katy |
1996 |
52,860 |
Y |
3.0 |
490 |
19 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Shingle Roof |
|
Webster-Hwy 3 |
1997 |
55,350 |
Y |
3.3 |
536 |
6 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Metal Roof |
|
Carrollton |
1997 |
51,315 |
Y |
3.2 |
490 |
5 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Metal Roof |
|
San Marcos |
1994 |
61,590 |
Y |
5.0 |
428 |
18 |
1 |
N |
Metal Wall/Metal Roof |
|
Austin-McNeil |
1994 |
73,115 |
Y |
7.0 |
561 |
19 |
1 |
Y |
Metal Wall/Metal Roof |
|
Austin-FM |
1996 |
59,910 |
Y |
4.9 |
388 |
9 |
1 |
Y |
Metal Wall/Metal Roof |
|
Euless |
1996 |
93,480 |
Y |
7.5 |
517 |
9 |
1 |
Y |
Metal Wall/Metal Roof |
|
N. Richland Hills |
1996 |
86,890 |
Y |
7.4 |
613 |
11 |
1 |
Y |
Metal Wall/Metal Roof |
|
Katy-Franz |
1993 |
67,235 |
Y |
7.2 |
531 |
10 |
1 |
Y |
Metal Wall/Metal Roof |
|
Cedar Hill |
1985 |
52,735 |
Y |
3.0 |
410 |
16 |
1 |
Y |
Metal Wall/Metal Roof |
|
Seabrook |
1996 |
61,225 |
Y |
4.3 |
511 |
5 |
1 |
Y |
Metal Wall/Metal Roof |
|
Houston-Westward |
1996 |
125,844 |
Y |
6.1 |
1,160 |
11 |
1&2 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Tar-Gravel Roof |
|
Houston-Boone |
1996 |
45,460 |
Y |
2.3 |
430 |
4 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Metal Roof |
|
Houston-Cook |
1996 |
60,455 |
Y |
3.0 |
490 |
7 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Metal Roof |
|
Houston-Harwin |
1996 |
77,454 |
Y |
2.8 |
650 |
3 |
1&2 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Tar-Gravel Roof |
|
Houston-Hempstead |
1996 |
99,153 |
Y |
3.5 |
888 |
10 |
1&2 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Metal Roof |
|
Houston-Kuykendahl |
1996 |
102,550 |
Y |
4.8 |
789 |
12 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Metal Roof |
-17-
<Page>
Houston-Hwy 249 |
1996 |
54,996 |
Y |
2.9 |
537 |
4 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Metal Roof |
|
Mesquite-Hwy 80 |
1996 |
63,440 |
Y |
6.1 |
640 |
6 |
1&2 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Tar-Gravel Roof |
|
Mesquite-Franklin |
1996 |
83,705 |
Y |
3.2 |
753 |
13 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Metal Roof |
|
Dallas-Plantation |
1996 |
61,865 |
Y |
2.4 |
507 |
10 |
1&2 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Metal Roof |
|
San Antonio-Hunt |
1996 |
63,645 |
Y |
4.1 |
579 |
15 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Metal Roof |
|
Humble |
1996 |
115,595 |
Y |
5.9 |
802 |
4 |
1 |
N |
Metal Wall/Metal Roof |
|
Pasadena |
1996 |
55,360 |
Y |
3.2 |
500 |
1 |
1 |
N |
Metal & MasonryWall/Metal Roof |
|
League City |
1996 |
72,070 |
Y |
4.4 |
552 |
6 |
1&2 |
N |
Metal & MasonryWall/Metal Roof |
|
Montgomery |
1996 |
44,400 |
Y |
2.5 |
391 |
1 |
1 |
N |
Metal Wall/Metal Roof |
|
Texas City |
1996 |
55,700 |
Y |
3.4 |
466 |
3 |
1 |
N |
Metal & Masonry Wall/Metal Roof |
|
Houston-Hwy 6 |
1996 |
47,475 |
Y |
2.6 |
432 |
1 |
1 |
N |
Metal Wall/Metal Roof |
|
Lumberton |
1996 |
45,040 |
Y |
4.1 |
386 |
5 |
1 |
N |
Metal Wall/Metal Roof |
|
Dallas-Duncanville |
1995/99 |
81,735 |
N |
5.0 |
635 |
16 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Metal Roof |
|
Dallas-Harry Hines |
1998/01 |
66,363 |
N |
2.5 |
480 |
1 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Metal Roof |
|
Virginia |
87% |
|||||||||
Newport News I |
1988 |
58,305 |
Y |
3.2 |
476 |
7 |
1 |
Y |
Steel Bldg./Steel Roof |
|
Alexandria |
1984 |
76,240 |
Y |
3.2 |
1,142 |
4 |
2 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Tar & Gravel Roof |
|
Norfolk I |
1984 |
50,430 |
Y |
2.7 |
379 |
7 |
1 |
Y |
Steel Bldg./Steel Roof |
|
Norfolk II |
1989 |
45,275 |
Y |
2.1 |
351 |
4 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Steel Roof |
|
Richmond |
1987 |
51,615 |
Y |
2.7 |
523 |
5 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Steel Roof |
|
Newport News II |
1988/93 |
63,535 |
Y |
4.7 |
412 |
8 |
1 |
Y |
Steel Bldg./Steel Roof |
|
Lynchburg-Lakeside |
1982 |
58,278 |
Y |
5.3 |
533 |
10 |
1 |
N |
Masonry Wall/Steel Roof |
|
Lynchburg-Timberlake |
1985 |
43,830 |
Y |
2.3 |
353 |
4 |
1 |
N |
Masonry Wall/Steel Roof |
|
Lynchburg-Amherst |
1987 |
23,618 |
Y |
1.5 |
208 |
3 |
1 |
N |
Masonry Wall/Metal Roof |
|
Christiansburg |
1985/90 |
37,468 |
Y |
3.2 |
345 |
6 |
1 |
Y |
Masonry Wall/Metal Roof |
|
Chesapeake |
1988/95 |
43,225 |
Y |
12.0 |
395 |
8 |
1 |
Y |
Metal Wall/Steel Roof |
|
Danville |
1988 |
49,792 |
Y |
3.2 |
408 |
8 |
1 |
N |
Steel Wall/Metal Roof |
|
Chesapeake-Military |
1996 |
58,505 |
Y |
3.0 |
526 |
3 |
1 |
N |
Masonry Wall/Metal Roof |
|
Chesapeake-Volvo |
1995 |
73,975 |
Y |
4.0 |
630 |
4 |
1 |
N |
Masonry Wall/Metal Roof |
|
Virginia Beach-Shell |
1991 |
52,626 |
Y |
2.5 |
553 |
5 |
1 |
N |
Masonry Wall/Metal Roof |
|
Virginia Beach-Central |
1993/95 |
96,031 |
Y |
5.0 |
881 |
6 |
1 |
N |
Masonry Wall/Metal Roof |
|
Norfolk-Naval Base |
1975 |
126,358 |
Y |
5.2 |
1,244 |
11 |
1 |
N |
Masonry Wall/Metal Roof |
|
Lynchburg-Timberlake |
1990/96 |
50,165 |
Y |
5.2 |
472 |
7 |
1 |
N |
Masonry Wall/Metal Roof |
Total for all Properties 14,853,829 85% 1,085 128,792 2,054
-18-
<Page>
Item 3. |
Legal Proceedings |
In the normal course of business, the Company is subject to various claims and litigation. While the outcome of any litigation is inherently unpredictable, the Company does not believe that any of these matters will have a material adverse impact on the financial condition, results of operations or cash flows of the Company.
Item 4. |
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders |
No matters were submitted during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year covered by this report to a vote of security holders, through the solicitation of proxies or otherwise.
Part II
Item 5. |
Market for Registrant's Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters |
There is no established public trading market for Units. As of March 1, 2004, there were 12 holders of record of Units.
The following table sets forth the quarterly distributions per Unit paid by the Operating Partnership to holders of its Units with respect to each such period.
History of Distributions Declared on Units
1st Quarter, 2002 |
$0.5900 per unit |
2nd Quarter, 2002 |
$0.5900 per unit |
3rd Quarter, 2002 |
$0.6000 per unit |
4th Quarter, 2002 |
$0.6000 per unit |
1st Quarter, 2003 |
$0.6000 per unit |
2nd Quarter, 2003 |
$0.6000 per unit |
3rd Quarter, 2003 |
$0.6025 per unit |
4th Quarter, 2003 |
$0.6025 per unit |
The partnership agreement of the Operating Partnership (the "Partnership Agreement") provides that the Operating Partnership will distribute all available cash (as defined in the Partnership Agreement) on at least a quarterly basis, in amounts determined by the general partner in its sole discretion, to the partners in accordance with their respective percentage interest in the Operating Partnership. Distributions are declared at the discretion of the Board of Directors of Holdings, the general partner of the Operating Partnership and a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, and will depend on actual funds from operations of the Operating Partnership, its financial condition, capital requirements, the annual distribution requirements
-19-
<Page>
under the REIT provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and such other factors as the Board of Directors may deem relevant. The Board of Directors of Holdings may modify the Operating Partnership's distribution policy from time to time, subject to the terms of the Partnership Agreement.
The Operating Partnership's line of credit contains customary representations, covenants and events of default, including covenants which restrict the ability of the Operating Partnership to make distributions in excess of stated amounts. In general, during any four consecutive fiscal quarters the Operating Partnership may only distribute up to 105% of the Operating Partnership's funds from operations (as defined in the related agreement). The line of credit contains exceptions to these limitations to allow the Operating Partnership to make any distributions necessary to allow the Company to maintain its status as a REIT. The Operating Partnership does not anticipate that this provision will adversely affect the ability of the Operating Partnership to make distributions, as currently anticipated.
Item 6. |
Selected Financial Data |
At or For Year Ended December 31, |
|||||
(dollars in thousands, |
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Data |
|||||
Operating revenues |
$ 113,161 |
$ 102,141 |
$ 91,012 |
$ 90,152 |
$ 84,078 |
Net income |
29,599 |
27,481 |
25,731 |
27,519 |
27,347 |
Net income per common unit - basic |
1.49 |
1.67 |
1.75 |
1.90 |
1.97 |
Net income per common unit - diluted |
1.48 |
1.65 |
1.74 |
1.90 |
1.97 |
Distributions declared per common unit |
2.41 |
2.38 |
2.34 |
2.30 |
2.26 |
Balance Sheet Data Investment in storage facilities at cost |
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
683,457 |
652,337 |
567,838 |
547,139 |
529,719 |
Total debt |
255,819 |
252,452 |
241,190 |
231,223 |
203,253 |
Total liabilities |
285,876 |
278,755 |
255,999 |
246,309 |
218,281 |
Limited partners' capital interest at redemption value |
|
|
|
|
|
Partners' capital |
361,779 |
341,315 |
274,170 |
283,876 |
295,550 |
Other Data |
|||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
$ 52,073 |
$ 45,610 |
$ 40,922 |
$ 39,428 |
$ 41,001 |
Net cash used in investing activities |
(31,271) |
(99,244) |
(17,751) |
(25,274) |
(51,335) |
Net cash (used in)provided by |
|
|
|
|
|
Funds from operations available to common unitholders (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) We believe that Funds from Operations ("FFO") provides relevant and meaningful information about our operating performance that is necessary, along with net earnings and cash
-20-
<Page>
flows, for an understanding of our operating results. Funds from operations is defined by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts, Inc. ("NAREIT") as net income computed in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP"), excluding gains or losses on sales of properties, plus depreciation and amortization and after adjustments to record unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures on the same basis. We believe that to further understand our performance, FFO should be considered along with our reported net income and cash flows in accordance with GAAP, as presented in our consolidated financial statements.
Our computation of FFO may not be comparable to FFO reported by other REITs or real estate companies that do not define the term in accordance with the current NAREIT definition or that interpret the current NAREIT definition differently. FFO does not represent cash generated from operating activities determined in accordance with GAAP, and should not be considered as an alternative to net income (determined in accordance with GAAP) as an indication of our performance, as an alternative to net cash flows from operating activities (determined in accordance with GAAP) as a measure of our liquidity, or as an indicator of our ability to make cash distributions. See the reconciliation of net income to FFO in Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
Item 7. |
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
The following discussion and analysis of the consolidated financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto included elsewhere in this report.
When used in this discussion and elsewhere in this document, the words "intends," "believes," "expects," "anticipates," and similar expressions are intended to identify "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of that term in Section 27A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1933 and in Section 21F of the Securities Act of 1934. Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of the Operating Partnership to be materially different from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such factors include, but are not limited to, the effect of competition from new self-storage facilities, which would cause rents and occupancy rates to decline; the Operating Partnership's ability to evaluate, finance and integrate acquired businesses into the Operating Partnership's existing business and operations; the Oper ating Partnership's ability to form joint ventures and sell existing properties to those joint ventures and others; the Operating Partnership's ability to effectively compete in the industry in which it does business; the Operating Partnership's existing indebtedness may mature in an unfavorable credit environment, preventing refinancing or forcing refinancing of the indebtedness on terms that are not as favorable as the existing terms; interest rates may fluctuate, impacting costs associated with the Operating Partnership's outstanding floating rate debt; the Operating Partnership's ability to successfully extend its truck leasing program and Dri-Guard product roll-out; the Operating Partnership's reliance on its call center; the Operating
-21-
<Page>
Partnership's cash flow may be insufficient to meet required payments of principal and interest; and tax law changes that may change the taxability of future income.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the amounts reported in our financial statements and the accompanying notes. On an on-going basis, we evaluate our estimates and judgments, including those related to carrying values of storage facilities, bad debts, and contingencies and litigation. We base these estimates on experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumpti ons or conditions.
Carrying value of storage facilities: We believe our judgment regarding the impairment of the carrying value of our storage facilities is a critical accounting policy. Our policy is to assess any impairment of value whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying value of our storage facility may not be recoverable. Such events or circumstances would include negative operating cash flow or significant declining revenue per storage facility. Impairment is evaluated based upon comparing the sum of the expected undiscounted future cash flows to the carrying value of the storage facility, on a property by property basis. If the sum of the undiscounted cash flow is less than the carrying amount, an impairment loss is recognized for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the fair value of the asset. If cash flow projections are inaccurate and in the future it is determined that storage facility carrying values are not recover able, impairment charges may be required at that time and could materially affect our operating results and financial position. At December 31, 2003 and 2002, no assets had been determined to be impaired under this policy, and, accordingly, this policy had no impact on our financial position or results of operations.
Estimated useful lives of long-lived assets: We believe that the estimated lives used for our depreciable, long-lived assets is a critical accounting policy. Changes in estimated useful lives of these assets could have a material adverse impact on our financial condition or results of operations.
Qualification as a REIT: The Company operates, and intends to continue to operate, as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the Code), but no assurance can be given that it will at all times so qualify. To the extent that the Company continues to qualify as a REIT, it will not be taxed, with certain limited exceptions, on the taxable income that is distributed to its shareholders. If the Company fails to qualify as a REIT, any requirement to pay federal income taxes could have a material adverse impact on our financial conditions and results of operations.
-22-
<Page>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2003 COMPARED TO
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2002
We recorded rental revenues of $110.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2003, an increase of $10.2 million or 10.2% when compared to 2002 rental revenues of $100.0 million. Of this increase, $4.8 million resulted from a 5% increase in rental revenues at the 230 core properties considered in same store sales (those properties included in the consolidated results of operations since January 1, 2002). The increase in same store rental revenues was achieved primarily through rate increases on select units, and improved responsiveness to customer demand created by our centralized call center and the availability of rental trucks at 158 of our stores. Occupancy levels grew slightly, and while the extensive discounting and promotional advertising seen in 2002 diminished, the storage industry as a whole was affected by a sluggish economy and a steady increase in supply of new storage units. The remaining $5.4 million increase in rental revenues resulted from the acquisition of two stores during 2003 and from having the 2002 acquisitions included for a full year of operations. Other income increased $0.8 million due to increased insurance sales and the additional revenue generated by truck rentals.
Property operating and real estate tax expense increased $5.6 million or 16.7% in 2003 compared to 2002. Of this, $1.7 million was incurred by the facilities acquired in 2003 and from having the 2002 acquisitions included for a full year of operations. The remaining $3.9 million increase was due to increased insurance, personnel, truck expense, maintenance, and increased property taxes at the 230 core properties considered same stores. While the trend of the past three years has been one of increasing operating costs, we expect this to subside in 2004 and 2005, as many of the new initiatives (increased store hours, truck availability and enhanced security and communication technologies) are now in place and related costs should not increase significantly. Nonetheless, the expenses related to operating a self-storage facility have increased substantially since 2001, and while current operating margins are expected to be sustaine d, it is not likely that much improvement will be seen in the coming years as a result of cost reductions.
General and administrative expenses increased $1.0 million or 12.0%. The increase primarily resulted from increased cost in our call center, new training center, and the increased costs associated with operating the properties acquired in 2003 and 2002.
Depreciation and amortization expense increased to $19.0 million from $17.4 million, primarily as a result of additional depreciation taken on real estate assets acquired in 2003 and a full year of depreciation on 2002 acquisitions.
Income from operations increased from $42.6 million in 2002 to $45.4 million in 2003 as a result of the aforementioned items.
Interest expense increased from $14.7 million to $15.1 million as a result of higher interest rates associated with the fixed rate debt entered into in September 2003.
-23-
<Page>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2002 COMPARED TO
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2001
Rental revenues were $100.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2002, an increase of $10.9 million or 12.2% when compared to 2001 rental revenues of $89.1 million. Of this increase, $1.2 million resulted from a 1.3% increase in revenues at the 222 core properties considered in same store sales. The remaining $9.7 million increase in rental revenues resulted from the acquisition of 23 stores during 2002 and from having the 2001 acquisitions included for a full year of operations. Other income increased $0.2 million due to increased insurance sales and the additional revenue generated by truck rentals.
Property operating and real estate tax expense increased $5.1 million or 17.7% in 2002 compared to 2001. Of this, $3.5 million was incurred by the facilities acquired in 2002 and from having the 2001 acquisitions included for a full year of operations. The remaining $1.6 million increase was due to increased insurance, personnel, truck expense, and increased property taxes at the 222 core properties considered same stores.
General and administrative expenses increased $0.6 million or 7.0%. The increase includes additional costs of approximately $2.3 million, which primarily resulted from increased cost in our call center and the increased costs associated with operating the properties acquired in 2002. The 2001 general and administrative expenses included a $1.7 million expense in connection with the lawsuit settlement - see Note 15 of the financial statements. There was no such charge in 2002.
Depreciation and amortization expense increased to $17.4 million from $15.0 million, primarily as a result of additional depreciation taken on real estate assets acquired in 2002 and a full year of depreciation on 2001 acquisitions.
Income from operations increased from $39.5 million in 2001 to $42.6 million in 2002 as a result of the aforementioned items.
Interest expense increased from $13.9 million to $14.7 million as a result of higher rates associated with the mortgage debt incurred on the consolidated joint venture properties and the effect of interest rate swap agreements entered into during 2001.
RECONCILIATION OF NET INCOME TO FUNDS FROM OPERATIONS
For Year Ended December 31, |
|||||
(dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
$ 29,599 |
$ 27,481 |
$ 25,721 |
$ 27,519 |
$ 27,347 |
Minority interest in income |
614 |
810 |
85 |
- |
- |
-24-
<Page>
Depreciation of real estate and |
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale of real estate |
- |
- |
- |
(2,161) |
(652) |
Depreciation and amortization from |
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock dividends |
713 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Preferred stock dividends |
(8,818) |
(4,863) |
(2,955) |
(2,955) |
(1,239) |
Funds from operations allocable to |
|
|
|
|
|
Funds from operations available to |
|
|
|
|
|
We believe that Funds from Operations ("FFO") provides relevant and meaningful information about our operating performance that is necessary, along with net earnings and cash flows, for an understanding of our operating results. Funds from operations is defined by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts, Inc. ("NAREIT") as net income computed in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP"), excluding gains or losses on sales of properties, plus depreciation and amortization and after adjustments to record unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures on the same basis. We believe that to further understand our performance, FFO should be considered along with our reported net income and cash flows in accordance with GAAP, as presented in our consolidated financial statements.
Our computation of FFO may not be comparable to FFO reported by other REITs or real estate companies that do not define the term in accordance with the current NAREIT definition or that interpret the current NAREIT definition differently. FFO does not represent cash generated from operating activities determined in accordance with GAAP, and should not be considered as an alternative to net income (determined in accordance with GAAP) as an indication of our performance, as an alternative to net cash flows from operating activities (determined in accordance with GAAP) as a measure of our liquidity, or as an indicator of our ability to make cash distributions.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Our ability to retain cash flow is limited because the Company operates as a REIT. In order for the Company to maintain its REIT status, a substantial portion of our operating cash flow must be used to pay distributions to our unitholders. We believe that our internally generated net cash provided by operating activities will continue to be sufficient to fund ongoing operations, capital improvements, distributions and debt service requirements through September 2006, at which time our revolving line of credit matures.
Cash flows from operating activities were $52.1 million, $45.6 million and $40.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002, and 2001, respectively. The increase for each year is primarily attributable to increased net income and increased non-cash charges for depreciation and amortization.
-25-
<Page>
On September 4, 2003, we entered into agreements relating to new unsecured credit arrangements, and received funds under those arrangements. Our new unsecured line of credit provides availability up to $75 million (expandable to $100 million), of which $9 million was drawn on December 31, 2003. The revolving line of credit facility matures in September 2006 and bears interest at a variable rate equal to LIBOR plus 1.375%. We also entered into a $100 million term note through September 2008 at a variable rate equal to LIBOR plus 1.50%.
In addition to the line of credit and term note mentioned above, we also issued a $80 million unsecured term note bearing interest at a fixed rate of 6.26% and a $20 million unsecured term note bearing interest at a variable rate equal to LIBOR plus 1.50%. The term notes mature September 2013.
The line of credit facility and term notes currently have investment grade ratings from Standard and Poor's (BBB-), Moody's (Baa3), and Fitch (BBB-).
In February 2002, the consolidated joint venture (Locke Sovran II, LLC) entered into a mortgage note of $48 million. The note is secured by the 27 properties owned by the joint venture with a cost of $79 million. The 10-year note bears interest at a fixed rate of 7.19%.
Principal maturities of the mortgage for the next five years are as follows: 2004, $0.7 million; 2005, $0.8 million; 2006, $0.9 million; 2007, $0.9 million; and 2008, $1.0 million.
In July 1999, the Company issued 1,200,000 shares of 9.85% Series B Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock. The Series B Preferred Stock is currently rated by Standard and Poor's (BB+), Moody's (Ba2) and Fitch (BB+). The Company has the ability to retire its Series B Preferred Stock issue at any time after July 31, 2004. Should market conditions be favorable, and if by so doing our capital position would be enhanced, it is expected that this issue would be redeemed at a total cost of $30 million. If the Company elects to redeem this stock, the Company would use the proceeds from its Dividend Reinvestment and Direct Stock Purchase Plan to fund the redemption. In accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force ("EITF") Topic D-42, "The Effect on the Calculation of Earnings per Share for the Redemption or Induced Conversion of Preferred Stock", we would expect to record a reduction of approximately $1.4 million from net inco me to arrive at net income available to common unitholders relating to the difference between the Series B Preferred Stock carrying value and the expected redemption amount should the issue be redeemed.
On July 3, 2002, the Company entered into an agreement providing for the issuance of 2,800,000 shares of 8.375% Series C Convertible Cumulative Preferred Stock and warrants to purchase 379,166 shares of common stock at $32.60 per share in a privately negotiated transaction. We immediately issued 1,600,000 shares of the Series C Preferred and issued the remaining 1,200,000 shares on November 27, 2002. The offering price was $25.00 per share and the net proceeds of $67.9 million were used to reduce indebtedness that was incurred in the June 2002 acquisition of seven self-storage properties and to repay a portion of the line of credit.
-26-
<Page>
From January 1, 2003 through December 31, 2003, the Company acquired 145,816 shares of its common stock via the Share Repurchase Program authorized by the Board of Directors. From the inception of the Share Repurchase Program through December 31, 2003, the Company has reacquired a total of 1,171,886 shares pursuant to this program. From time to time, subject to market price and certain loan covenants, we may reacquire additional shares.
During 2003, the Company issued approximately 1,421,000 shares via our Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan and Employee Stock Option Plan. We realized $42 million from the sale of such shares. We expect to issue shares when our share price and capital needs warrant such issuance.
Future acquisitions, share repurchases and repayment of the credit line are expected to be funded with the revolving line of credit, issuance of secured or unsecured term notes, issuance of common or preferred stock, sale of properties, private placement solicitation of joint venture equity and other sources of capital.
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS
The following table summarizes our future contractual obligations:
Payments due by period |
|||||
Contractual obligations |
Total |
2004 |
2005-2006 |
2007-2008 |
2009 and |
Line of credit |
$ 9.0 million |
- |
$9.0 million |
- |
- |
Term notes |
$200.0 million |
- |
- |
$100.0 million |
$100.0 million |
Building lease |
$ 2.8 million |
$0.4 million |
$0.8 million |
$ 0.8 million |
$ 0.8 million |
Total |
$211.8 million |
$0.4 million |
$9.8 million |
$100.8 million |
$100.8 million |
The above amounts for the line of credit and term notes exclude interest.
ACQUISITION OF PROPERTIES
During 2003, we used operating cash flow and borrowings pursuant to the line of credit to acquire two Properties in Texas comprising 148,098 square feet from unaffiliated storage operators. In 2002, we along with the consolidated joint venture used borrowings pursuant to the line of credit and a mortgage to acquire 23 Properties comprising 1.5 million square feet. At December 31, 2003, we owned and/or operated 266 self-storage facilities in 21 states. Of these facilities, 11 are managed by us for Locke Sovran I, LLC, an unconsolidated joint venture.
-27-
<Page>
FUTURE ACQUISITION AND DEVELOPMENT PLANS
Our external growth strategy is to increase the number of facilities we own by acquiring suitable facilities in markets in which we already have operations, or to expand in new markets by acquiring several facilities at once in those new markets.
At December 31, 2003, we had no contracts to acquire additional properties.
We also intend to expand and enhance certain of our existing facilities by building additional storage buildings on presently vacant land and by installing climate control and enhanced security systems at selected sites.
DISPOSITION OF PROPERTIES
During 2001, we sold eight Properties for approximately $24.5 million to Locke Sovran II, LLC. Because Locke Sovran II, LLC is a consolidated joint venture, no gain was recognized on the sale.
In 2000, we sold seven Properties for approximately $20 million, recognizing a gain of $2.1 million. The gain recognized represents the proportion of the total gain not related to our ongoing ownership interest. The Properties were sold to an unconsolidated joint venture in which we retained a 45% interest and whose properties we manage for an ongoing fee. We invested $5 million of the proceeds to fund our 45% interest in the venture and received a short-term promissory note of approximately $15 million. The note was repaid in 2001 and we used the proceeds to pay down our outstanding line of credit, freeing up working capital for acquisitions and expansions done in 2001.
We may seek to sell additional Properties to similar joint venture programs or third parties in 2004. On February 20, 2004, we sold our facility in Allentown, PA to an independent operator resulting in a gain of approximately $0.9 million and, at March 1, 2004, have negotiated agreements to sell two of our properties in Ohio to another independent operator.
INVESTMENT IN JOINT VENTURES
Investment in joint ventures includes an ownership interest in Locke Sovran I, LLC, which operates 11 self storage facilities throughout the United States, and an ownership interest in Iskalo Office Holdings, LLC, which owns the building that houses our headquarters and other tenants.
In December 2000, we contributed seven self-storage properties to Locke Sovran I, LLC with a fair market value of $19.8 million, in exchange for a $15 million one year note receivable bearing interest at LIBOR plus 1.75% that was repaid in 2001, and a 45% interest in Locke
-28-
<Page>
Sovran I, LLC. For the year ended December 31, 2003, our share of Locke Sovran I, LLC's income was $86,000, which is recorded as equity in income of joint ventures on the consolidated statements of income. We manage the storage facilities for Locke Sovran I, LLC and received fees of $311,000, $290,000, and $413,000, for the years ended 2003, 2002, and 2001, respectively.
We also have a 49% ownership interest in Iskalo Office Holdings, LLC at December 31, 2003. The majority of the $1.0 million investment relates to interest bearing loans made by us to the joint venture. For the year ended December 31, 2003, our share of Iskalo Office Holdings, LLC's income was $59,000. We paid rent to Iskalo Office Holdings, LLC of $393,000 in 2003 and $225,000 in 2002 and 2001. Also, during 2003 we purchased a tract of land from Iskalo Office Holdings, LLC for $1.2 million.
A summary of the unconsolidated joint ventures' financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2003 is as follows:
(dollars in thousands) |
Locke Sovran I, |
Iskalo Office |
Balance Sheet Data: |
||
Investment in storage facilities, net |
$ 39,333 |
$ - |
Investment in office building |
- |
6,051 |
Other assets |
1,691 |
392 |
Total Assets |
$ 41,024 |
$ 6,443 |
|
|
|
Mortgage payable |
30,018 |
5,800 |
Other liabilities |
692 |
90 |
Total Liabilities |
32,843 |
7,308 |
|
|
|
Company equity (deficiency) |
3,736 |
(407) |
Total Liabilities and Partners' Equity (Deficiency) |
$ 41,024 |
$ 6,443 |
|
||
Total revenues |
$ 6,224 |
$ 994 |
Total expenses |
6,032 |
873 |
Net income |
$ 192 |
$ 121 |
We do not expect to have material future cash outlays relating to these joint ventures and we do not guarantee the debt of Locke Sovran I, LLC or Iskalo Office Holdings, LLC.
-29-
<Page>
DISTRIBUTION REQUIREMENTS OF THE COMPANY AND
IMPACT ON THE OPERATING PARTNERSHIP
As a REIT, the Company is not required to pay federal income tax on income that it distributes to its shareholders, provided that the amount distributed is equal to at least 90% of its taxable income. These distributions must be made in the year to which they relate, or in the following year if declared before the Company files its federal income tax return, and if it is paid before the first regular dividend of the following year. The first distribution of 2004 may be applied toward the Company's 2003 distribution requirement. The Company's source of funds for such distributions is solely and directly from the Operating Partnership.
As a REIT, the Company must derive at least 95% of its total gross income from income related to real property, interest and dividends. In 2003, the Company's percentage of revenue from such sources exceeded 97%, thereby passing the 95% test, and no special measures are expected to be required to enable the Company to maintain its REIT designation.
INTEREST RATE RISK
At December 31, 2003, we have three outstanding interest rate swap agreements. The first, entered into in March 2001, effectively fixes the LIBOR base rate at 5.36% through November 2005 on $50 million notional amount. The second, entered in September 2001, effectively fixes the LIBOR base rate at 4.485% through October 2006 on another $50 million notional amount. The third, also entered in September 2001, effectively fixes the LIBOR base rate at 4.805% through September 2008 on $30 million notional amount. We have an unsecured credit facility in place through September 2006 enabling us to borrow funds at rates of LIBOR plus 1.375%, an unsecured term note at rates of LIBOR plus 1.5% through September 2008, and an unsecured term note at rates of LIBOR plus 1.5% through September 2013. As a result of the above described interest rate swap agreements, we have fixed our interest rate through November 2005 on $9 million at 6.735%, and $41 mi llion at 6.86%, through October 2006 on $50 million at 5.985%, and through September 2008 on $29 million at 6.305%. Upon renewal or replacement of the credit facility, our total interest may change dependent on the terms we negotiate with the lenders; however, the LIBOR base rates have been contractually fixed on $129 million of our debt through the interest rate swap termination dates.
Through November 2005, all of our $209 million of unsecured debt is on a fixed rate basis after taking into account the interest rate swaps noted above. Based on our outstanding debt of $209 million at December 31, 2003, a 1% increase in interest rates would have no effect on our interest expense.
-30-
<Page>
INFLATION
We do not believe that inflation has had or will have a direct effect on our operations. Substantially all of the leases at the facilities are on a month-to-month basis which provides us with the opportunity to increase rental rates as each lease matures.
SEASONALITY
Our revenues typically have been higher in the third and fourth quarters, primarily because we increase rental rates on most of our storage units at the beginning of May and because self-storage facilities tend to experience greater occupancy during the late spring, summer and early fall months due to the greater incidence of residential moves during these periods. However, we believe that our tenant mix, diverse geographic locations, rental structure and expense structure provide adequate protection against undue fluctuations in cash flows and net revenues during off-peak seasons. Thus, we do not expect seasonality to affect materially distributions to shareholders.
RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENT
In January 2003, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 46 ("FIN 46"), "Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, an interpretation of ARB 51." The primary objectives of this interpretation are to provide guidance on the identification of entities for which control is achieved through means other than through voting rights ("variable interest entities") and how to determine when and which business enterprise (the "primary beneficiary") should consolidate the variable interest entity. This new model for consolidation applies to an entity in which either (i) the equity investors (if any) do not have a controlling financial interest; or (ii) the equity investment at risk is insufficient to finance that entity's activities without receiving additional subordinated financial support from other parties. In addition, FIN 46 requires that the primary beneficiary, as well as all other enterprises with a significant variable interest in a variable interest entity, make additional disclosures. Certain d isclosure requirements of FIN 46 were effective for financial statements issued after January 31, 2003.
In December 2003, the FASB issued FIN No. 46 (revised December 2003), "Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities" ("FIN 46-R") to address certain FIN 46 implementation issues. We are currently evaluating the impact of adopting FIN 46-R applicable to Non-Special Purpose Entities created prior to February 1, 2003, but do not expect a material impact to our financial position, results of operations, and cash flows.
Effective June 2003, we adopted FASB Statement No. 150, "Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of Both Liabilities and Equity" (Statement No. 150). Statement No. 150 establishes standards for how an issuer classifies and measures certain financial instruments with characteristics of both liabilities and equity. It requires that an issuer
-31-
<Page>
classify a financial instrument within its scope as a liability. Many of these instruments were previously classified as equity. Statement No. 150 is effective for financial instruments entered into or modified after May 31, 2003, and otherwise is effective at the beginning of the first interim period beginning after June 15, 2003. In October 2003, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) SFAS 150-3, "Effective Date for Mandatorily Redeemable Financial Instruments of Certain Nonpublic Entities and Certain Mandatorily Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests under SFAS 150", which defers certain provisions of Statement No. 150 as they apply to mandatorily redeemable noncontrolling interests. The deferral is expected to remain in effect while those issues are addressed in either Phase II of the FASB's Liabilities and Equity project or Phase II of the Business Combination project. Adoption of Statement No. 150 did not have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.
UNITHOLDER INFORMATION
CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS
6467 Main Street
Buffalo, New York 14221
716-633-1850
SOVRAN'S WEBSITE
http://www.sovranss.com
FORM 10-K REPORT
A copy of the Operating Partnership's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003, filed with the Securities Exchange Commission, will be furnished to unitholders without charge upon written request. Please contact Christine M. Aguglia, 716-633-1850
INVESTOR RELATIONS
For more information or to receive Sovran's quarterly reports, please contact Diane M. Piegza, 716-633-1850
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
Ernst & Young LLP
1400 Key Tower
Buffalo, New York 14202
-32-
<Page>
Item 7A. |
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk |
The information required is incorporated by reference to the information appearing under the caption "Interest Rate Risk" in Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" above.
-33-
<Page>
Item 8. |
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data |
SOVRAN ACQUISITION LIMITED PARTNERSHIP CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
December 31, |
||
(dollars in thousands, except unit data) |
2003 |
2002 |
Assets |
||
Investment in storage facilities: |
||
Land |
$ 136,424 |
$ 132,853 |
Building and equipment |
603,412 |
577,988 |
739,836 |
710,841 |
|
Less: accumulated depreciation |
(92,498) |
(75,344) |
Investment in storage facilities, net |
647,338 |
635,497 |
Cash and cash equivalents |
20,101 |
2,063 |
Accounts receivable |
1,641 |
1,785 |
Receivable from related parties |
95 |
98 |
Receivable from joint ventures |
2,133 |
2,023 |
Investment in joint ventures |
2,926 |
3,386 |
Prepaid expenses |
3,144 |
2,719 |
Other assets |
6,079 |
4,766 |
Total Assets |
$ 683,457 |
$ 652,337 |
Liabilities |
||
Line of credit |
$9,000 |
$128,000 |
Term notes |
200,000 |
75,000 |
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
9,806 |
4,455 |
Deferred revenue |
3,498 |
3,468 |
Fair value of interest rate swap agreements |
7,835 |
10,256 |
Accrued distributions |
8,918 |
8,124 |
Capital lease obligations |
- |
1,933 |
Mortgage payable |
46,819 |
47,519 |
Total Liabilities |
285,876 |
278,755 |
Minority interest - consolidated joint venture |
15,713 |
16,531 |
|
|
|
Partners' Capital |
||
General partner (219,567 units outstanding |
|
|
Limited partner (14,040,296 and |
|
|
Preferred partners (1,200,000 Series B |
|
|
Preferred partners (2,800,000 Series C |
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
(7,580) |
(10,020) |
Total Partners' Capital |
361,779 |
341,315 |
Total Liabilities and Partners' Capital |
$683,457 |
$652,337 |
See notes to financial statements. |
-34-
<Page>
SOVRAN ACQUISITION LIMITED PARTNERSHIP CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Year Ended December 31, |
|||
(dollars in thousands, except per unit data) |
2003 |
2002 |
2001 |
Revenues |
|||
Rental income |
$ 110,223 |
$ 99,987 |
$ 89,116 |
Other operating income |
2,938 |
2,154 |
1,896 |
Total operating revenues |
113,161 |
102,141 |
91,012 |
Expenses |
|||
Property operations and maintenance |
29,021 |
24,284 |
20,517 |
Real estate taxes |
10,118 |
9,265 |
7,981 |
General and administrative |
9,616 |
8,586 |
8,026 |
Depreciation and amortization |
18,980 |
17,392 |
15,035 |
Total operating expenses |
67,735 |
59,527 |
51,559 |
Income from operations |
45,426 |
42,614 |
39,453 |
Other income (expenses) |
|||
Interest expense |
(15,102) |
(14,664) |
(13,940) |
Interest income |
416 |
356 |
395 |
Write-off of unamortized financing fees |
(713) |
- |
- |
Minority interest - consolidated joint venture |
(614) |
(810) |
(75) |
Equity in income (losses) of joint ventures |
186 |
(15) |
(102) |
Net Income |
29,599 |
27,481 |
25,731 |
Preferred unit distributions |
(8,818) |
(5,093) |
(2,955) |
Net income available to common unitholders |
$ 20,781 |
$ 22,388 |
$ 22,776 |
Per Common Unit: |
|||
Earnings per common unit - basic |
$ 1.49 |
$ 1.67 |
$ 1.75 |
Earnings per common unit - diluted |
$ 1.48 |
$ 1.65 |
$ 1.74 |
Distributions declared per common unit |
$ 2.41 |
$ 2.38 |
$ 2.34 |
See notes to financial statements.
-35-
<Page>
Sovran Acquisition Limited Partnership
Statements of Partners' Capital
|
Sovran |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance January 1, 2001 |
5,171 |
248,705 |
30,000 |
- |
- |
283,876 |
16,954 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redemption of Partnership Units |
- |
1,868 |
- |
- |
- |
1,868 |
(5,646) |
Exercise of stock options |
- |
1,096 |
- |
- |
- |
1,096 |
- |
Earned portion of restricted stock |
- |
424 |
- |
- |
- |
424 |
- |
Purchase of treasury shares |
- |
(1,809) |
- |
- |
- |
(1,809) |
- |
Deferred compensation |
- |
69 |
- |
- |
- |
69 |
- |
Net income |
429 |
23,760 |
- |
- |
- |
24,189 |
1,532 |
Increase in fair value of derivatives |
- |
- |
- |
- |
373 |
373 |
- |
Total comprehensive income |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
24,562 |
1,532 |
Distributions |
(560) |
(31,093) |
- |
- |
- |
(31,653) |
(1,728) |
Adjustment to reflect limited partners' |
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
Balance December 31, 2001 |
$ 4,873 |
$ 238,924 |
$ 30,000 |
$- |
$ 373 |
$ 274,170 |
$ 20,584 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redemption of Partnership Units |
- |
(150) |
- |
- |
- |
(150) |
(3,163) |
Issuance of 8.375% Series C Units |
- |
(2,124) |
- |
70,000 |
- |
67,876 |
- |
Exercise of stock options |
- |
5,648 |
- |
- |
- |
5,648 |
- |
Earned portion of restricted stock |
- |
430 |
- |
- |
- |
430 |
- |
Purchase of treasury shares |
- |
(5,188) |
- |
- |
- |
(5,188) |
- |
-36-
<Page>
Deferred compensation |
- |
89 |
- |
- |
- |
89 |
- |
Net income |
433 |
25,868 |
- |
- |
- |
26,301 |
1,180 |
Decrease in fair value of derivatives |
- |
- |
- |
- |
(10,393) |
(10,393) |
- |
Total comprehensive income |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
15,908 |
1,180 |
Distributions |
(603) |
(34,847) |
- |
- |
- |
(35,450) |
(1,329) |
Adjustment to reflect limited partners' |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance December 31, 2002 |
$ 4,729 |
$ 246,606 |
$ 30,000 |
$ 70,000 |
$ (10,020) |
$ 341,315 |
$ 15,736 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redemption of Partnership Units |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
(462) |
Exercise of stock options |
- |
7,729 |
- |
- |
- |
7,729 |
- |
Earned portion of restricted stock |
- |
412 |
- |
- |
- |
412 |
- |
Purchase of treasury shares |
- |
(3,950) |
- |
- |
- |
(3,950) |
- |
Deferred compensation |
- |
96 |
- |
- |
- |
96 |
- |
Series C placement certificate value |
- |
(2,958) |
- |
- |
- |
(2,958) |
- |
Net income |
449 |
27,974 |
- |
- |
- |
28,423 |
1,176 |
Decrease in fair value of derivatives |
- |
- |
- |
- |
2,440 |
2,440 |
- |
Total comprehensive income |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
30,863 |
1,176 |
Distributions |
(668) |
(40,700) |
- |
- |
- |
(41,368) |
(1,320) |
Adjustment to reflect limited partners' |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance December 31, 2003 |
$ 4,436 |
$ 264,923 |
$ 30,000 |
$ 70,000 |
$ (7,580) |
$ 361,779 |
$ 20,089 |
See notes to financial statements.
-37-
<Page>
SOVRAN ACQUISITION LIMITED PARTNERSHIP CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Year Ended December 31, |
|||
(dollars in thousands) |
2003 |
2002 |
2001 |
Operating Activities |
|||
Net income |
$ 29,599 |
$ 27,481 |
$ 25,731 |
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash |
|||
Write-off of deferred financing costs |
713 |
- |
- |
Depreciation and amortization |
18,980 |
17,392 |
15,035 |
Equity in losses of joint ventures |
(186) |
15 |
102 |
Minority interest |
614 |
810 |
75 |
Restricted stock earned |
411 |
430 |
424 |
Changes in assets and liabilities: |
|||
Accounts receivable |
144 |
(587) |
91 |
Fees receivable from joint ventures |
- |
- |
711 |
Prepaid expenses |
(420) |
13 |
(472) |
Accounts payable and other liabilities |
2,310 |
220 |
(626) |
Deferred revenue |
(92) |
(164) |
(149) |
Net cash provided by operating activities |
52,073 |
45,610 |
40,922 |
Investing Activities |
|||
Acquisition of storage facilities |
(8,187) |
(79,216) |
(12,956) |
Improvements and equipment additions |
(22,977) |
(17,934) |
(18,527) |
(Advances) reimbursement of advances to joint |
|
|
|
Receipts from (advances to) related parties |
3 |
24 |
1,885 |
Other assets |
- |
- |
(2,807) |
Net cash used in investing activities |
(31,271) |
(99,244) |
(17,751) |
Financing Activities |
|||
Net proceeds from sale of partnership units |
42,425 |
22,034 |
6,374 |
Net proceeds from sale of preferred units and |
|
|
|
Proceeds from line of credit |
9,000 |
- |
10,000 |
Paydown of line of credit |
(128,000) |
(6,000) |
- |
Proceeds from term notes |
200,000 |
- |
- |
Paydown of term notes |
(75,000) |
(30,000) |
- |
Proceeds from mortgage financing |
- |
48,000 |
- |
Financing costs |
(2,927) |
(460) |
(398) |
Distributions paid |
(43,320) |
(37,646) |
(33,065) |
-38-
<Page>
Distributions from unconsolidated joint venture |
646 |
1,032 |
- |
Purchase of treasury stock |
(3,950) |
(5,188) |
(1,809) |
Redemption of operating partnership units |
(462) |
(3,163) |
(3,778) |
Mortgage principal payments |
(1,176) |
(2,671) |
(33) |
|
|||
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities |
(2,764) |
53,814 |
(22,709) |
Net increase in cash |
18,038 |
180 |
462 |
Cash at beginning of period |
2,063 |
1,883 |
1,421 |
Cash at end of period |
$ 20,101 |
$ 2,063 |
$ 1,883 |
Year Ended December 31, |
||||||
(dollars in thousands) |
2003 |
2002 |
2001 |
|||
Supplemental cash flow information |
||||||
Cash paid for interest |
$ 13,344 |
$ 14,465 |
$ 14,416 |
|||
Capital lease obligations incurred |
1,529 |
2,183 |
- |
|||
Capital lease obligations discharged |
(2,986) |
- |
- |
|||
Storage facilities acquired through issuance of |
|
|
|
|||
Fair value of net liabilities assumed on the acquisition |
|
|
|
Distributions declared but unpaid at December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 were $8,918, $8,124, and $7,683, respectively.
See notes to financial statements.
-39-
<Page>
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Sovran Acquisition Limited Partnership - December 31, 2003
1. ORGANIZATION
Sovran Acquisition Limited Partnership (the "Operating Partnership") is the entity through which Sovran Self Storage, Inc. (the "Company"), a self-administered and self-managed real estate investment trust ("REIT"), conducts substantially all of its business and owns substantially all of its assets. On June 26, 1995, the Company commenced operations, through the Operating Partnership, effective with the completion of its initial public offering of 5,890,000 shares. At December 31, 2003, the Operating Partnership owned and/or managed 266 self-storage properties under the "Uncle Bob's Self Storage" registered trade name in 21 states.
As of December 31, 2003, the Company was a 96.35% economic owner of the Operating Partnership and controls it through Sovran Holdings, Inc. ("Holdings"), a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company incorporated in Delaware and the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership (this structure is commonly referred to as an umbrella partnership REIT or "UPREIT"). The board of directors of Holdings, the members of which are also members of the Board of Directors of the Company, manages the affairs of the Operating Partnership by directing the affairs of Holdings. The Company's limited partner and indirect general partner interests in the Operating Partnership entitle it to share in cash distributions from, and in the profits and losses of, the Operating Partnership in proportion to its ownership interest therein and entitle the Company to vote on all matters requiring a vote of the limited partners.
The other limited partners of the Operating Partnership are persons who contributed their direct or indirect interests in certain self-storage properties to the Operating Partnership. The Operating Partnership is obligated to redeem each unit of limited partnership ("Unit") at the request of the holder thereof for cash equal to the fair market value of a share of the Company's common stock ("Common Shares") at the time of such redemption, provided that the Company at its option may elect to acquire any Unit presented for redemption for one Common Share or cash. The Company presently anticipates that it will elect to issue Common Shares to acquire Units presented for redemption, rather than paying cash. With each such redemption the Company's percentage ownership interest in the Operating Partnership will increase. In addition, whenever the Company issues Common Shares, the Company is obligated to contribute any net proceeds therefrom to the Operati ng Partnership and the Operating Partnership is obligated to issue an equivalent number of Units to the Company. Such limited partners' redemption rights are reflected in "limited partners' capital interest" in the accompanying balance sheets at the cash redemption amount at the balance sheet date. Capital activity with regard to such limited partners' redemption rights is reflected in the accompanying statements of partners' capital.
-40-
<Page>
2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis of Presentation: The consolidated financial statements of the Operating Partnership include the accounts of the Operating Partnership and Locke Sovran II, LLC, which is a majority controlled joint venture. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated. Investments in joint ventures which are not majority owned are reported using the equity method.
Cash and Cash Equivalents: The Company considers all highly liquid debt instruments purchased with maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents.
Revenue and Expense Recognition: Rental income is recorded when earned. Rental income received prior to the start of the rental period is included in deferred revenue. Advertising costs are expensed as incurred and for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002, and 2001 were $0.6 million, $0.6 million, and $0.4 million, respectively.
Other Income: Consists primarily of sales of storage-related merchandise (locks and packing supplies), management fees, insurance commissions, and truck rentals.
Investment in Storage Facilities: Storage facilities are recorded at cost. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over estimated useful lives of forty years for buildings and improvements, and five to twenty years for furniture, fixtures and equipment. Expenditures for significant renovations or improvements that extend the useful life of assets are capitalized. Repair and maintenance costs are expensed as incurred.
Whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the basis of the Company's property may not be recoverable, the Company's policy is to assess any impairment of value. Impairment is evaluated based upon comparing the sum of the expected undiscounted future cash flows to the carrying value of the property, on a property by property basis. If the sum of the undiscounted cash flow is less than the carrying amount, an impairment loss is recognized for the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset. At December 31, 2003 and 2002, no assets had been determined to be impaired under this policy and, accordingly, this policy had no impact on the Company's financial position or results of operations.
Other Assets: Included in other assets are intangible assets of $3.3 million and a note receivable of $2.8 million. The intangible assets at December 31, 2003, consist primarily of loan acquisition costs of approximately $3.6 million, net of accumulated amortization of approximately $0.3 million. Loan acquisition costs are amortized over the terms of the related debt. Amortization expense was $0.9 million, $1.0 million and $1.1 million for the periods ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. The note receivable of $2.8 million represents a note from certain investors of Locke Sovran II, LLC. The note bears interest at LIBOR plus 2.4% and matures upon the dissolution of Locke Sovran II, LLC.
-41-
<Page>
Stock-Based Compensation: In accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 123 "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation," the Operating Partnership has elected to continue applying the provisions of Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25 (APB 25) and related interpretations in accounting for its stock-based compensation plans. Accordingly, the Operating Partnership does not recognize compensation expense for stock options when the stock option price at the grant date is equal to or greater than the fair market value of the stock at that date. The following illustrates the pro forma effect on net income and earnings per unit if the Operating Partnership had applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123 (in thousands, except for earnings per unit information):
Pro Forma |
|||
(dollars in thousands, except per share data) |
2003 |
2002 |
2001 |
Net income available to common unitholders |
|
|
|
Deduct: Total stock-based employee compensation |
|
|
|
Pro forma net income available to common |
|
|
|
Earnings per common unit |
|||
Basic - as reported |
$ 1.49 |
$ 1.67 |
$ 1.75 |
Basic - pro forma |
$ 1.48 |
$ 1.66 |
$ 1.74 |
Diluted - as reported |
$ 1.48 |
$ 1.65 |
$ 1.74 |
Diluted - pro forma |
$ 1.47 |
$ 1.64 |
$ 1.72 |
Pro forma information regarding net income and earnings per unit is required by SFAS No. 123, and has been determined as if the Operating Partnership had accounted for its stock options under the fair value method of SFAS No. 123. The fair value for the stock options was estimated at the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions: risk-free interest rate of 3.5% for 2003, 4.0% for 2002, and 5.0% for 2001; dividend yield of 7.0% for 2003, 8.0% for 2002, and 10.7% for 2001; volatility factor of the expected market price of the Company's common stock of .19 for 2003, and .21 for 2002 and .23 for 2001. The average fair value of options granted was $2.21 in 2003, $1.98 in 2002, and $.93 in 2001.
The Black-Scholes options valuation model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of traded options which have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. In addition, option valuation models require the input of highly subjective assumptions including the expected stock price volatility. Because the Operating Partnership's employee stock options have characteristics significantly different from those of traded options, and because changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate, in management's
-42-
<Page>
opinion, the existing models do not necessarily provide a reliable single measure of the fair value of its employee stock options. For purposes of pro forma disclosures, the estimated fair value of the options is amortized to expense over the options' vesting period.
Minority Interest: The minority interest reflects the joint venture partner's interest in Locke Sovran II, LLC. Amounts allocated to the joint venture partners are reflected as an expense in the income statement and increase the minority interest in the balance sheet. Distributions to these partners reduce this balance.
Income Taxes: No provision has been made for income taxes in the accompanying financial statements since the Operating Partnership qualifies as a partnership for federal and state income tax purposes and its partners are required to include their respective shares of profits and losses in their income tax returns.
Comprehensive Income: Comprehensive income consists of net income and the change in value of derivatives used for hedging purposes and is reported in the consolidated statements of partners' capital. Comprehensive income was $30.9 million and $15.9 million and $24.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002, and 2001, respectively.
Derivative Financial Instruments: On January 1, 2001, the Operating Partnership adopted SFAS No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities," as amended, which requires companies to carry all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value. The Operating Partnership determines the fair value of derivatives by reference to quoted market prices. The accounting for changes in the fair value of a derivative instrument depends on whether it has been designated and qualifies as part of a hedging relationship and, if so, the reason for holding it. The Operating Partnership's use of derivative instruments is limited to cash flow hedges, as defined in SFAS No. 133, of certain interest rate risks.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements: In January 2003, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 46 ("FIN 46"), "Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, an interpretation of ARB 51." The primary objectives of this interpretation are to provide guidance on the identification of entities for which control is achieved through means other than through voting rights ("variable interest entities") and how to determine when and which business enterprise (the "primary beneficiary") should consolidate the variable interest entity. This new model for consolidation applies to an entity in which either (i) the equity investors (if any) do not have a controlling financial interest; or (ii) the equity investment at risk is insufficient to finance that entity's activities without receiving additional subordinated financial support from other parties. In addition, FIN 46 requires that the primary beneficiary, as well as all other enterprises wit h a significant variable interest in a variable interest entity, make additional disclosures. Certain disclosure requirements of FIN 46 were effective for financial statements issued after January 31, 2003. In December 2003, the FASB issued FIN No. 46 (revised December 2003), "Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities" ("FIN 46-R") to address certain FIN 46
-43-
<Page>
implementation issues. The Operating Partnership is currently evaluating the impact of adopting FIN 46-R applicable to Non-Special Purpose Entities created prior to February 1, 2003 but does not expect a material impact.
Effective June 2003, the Operating Partnership adopted FASB Statement No. 150, "Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of Both Liabilities and Equity" (Statement No. 150). Statement No. 150 establishes standards for how an issuer classifies and measures certain financial instruments with characteristics of both liabilities and equity. It requires that an issuer classify a financial instrument within its scope as a liability. Many of these instruments were previously classified as equity. Statement No. 150 is effective for financial instruments entered into or modified after May 31, 2003, and otherwise is effective at the beginning of the first interim period beginning after June 15, 2003. In October 2003, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) SFAS 150-3, "Effective Date for Mandatorily Redeemable Financial Instruments of Certain Nonpublic Entities and Certain Mandatorily Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests under SFAS 150", which defers certain provisions of Statement No. 150 as they apply to mandatorily redeemable noncontrolling interests. The deferral is expected to remain in effect while those issues are addressed in either Phase II of the FASB's Liabilities and Equity project or Phase II of the Business Combination project. Adoption of Statement No. 150 did not have a material effect on the Operating Partnership's consolidated financial statements.
Use of Estimates: The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
3. EARNINGS PER UNIT
The Operating Partnership reports earnings per unit data in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 128, "Earnings Per Share." In computing earnings per unit, the Operating Partnership excludes preferred unit distributions from net income to arrive at net income available to common unitholders. The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per common unit.
|
Year Ended |
Year Ended |
Year Ended |
|
|
|
|
-44-
<Page>
Denominator |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for diluted earnings per unit - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Potential common units from the Series C Convertible Cumulative Preferred Stock, see Note 12, were excluded from the 2003 and 2002 diluted earnings per unit calculation because their inclusion would have had an antidilutive effect on earnings per unit.
4. INVESTMENT IN STORAGE FACILITIES
The following summarizes activity in storage facilities during the years ended December 31, 2003 and December 31, 2002.
(Dollars in thousands) |
2003 |
2002 |
Cost: |
||
Beginning balance |
$710,841 |
$611,289 |
Acquisition of storage facilities |
11,007 |
81,819 |
Improvements and equipment additions |
21,812 |
17,934 |
Dispositions |
(3,824) |
(201) |
|
|
|
|
||
Beginning balance |
$ 75,344 |
$ 59,091 |
Additions during the year |
18,079 |
16,344 |
Dispositions |
(925) |
(91) |
Ending balance |
$ 92,498 |
$ 75,344 |
During 2003 the Operating Partnership acquired two storage facilities, one in August for $5.2 million and one in October for $4.6 million. Substantially all of the purchase price of these two facilities was allocated to land and building and the operating results of the acquired
-45-
<Page>
facilities have been included in the Operating Partnership's operations since the respective acquisition dates.
5. UNSECURED LINE OF CREDIT AND TERM NOTE
The Operating Partnership had a $150 million revolving line of credit at LIBOR plus 1.375% and a $75 million term loan due November 2003 at LIBOR plus 1.75%. The facility was scheduled to mature November 2003; the facility was paid off in 2003 with the proceeds of the new debt agreements described below.
On September 4, 2003, the Operating Partnership entered into agreements relating to new unsecured credit arrangements, and received funds under those arrangements. The new agreements provide for a $75 million (expandable to $100 million) revolving line of credit maturing September 2006 bearing interest at a variable rate equal to LIBOR plus 1.375%, a $100 million term note maturing September 2008 bearing interest at a variable rate equal to LIBOR plus 1.50%, a $80 million term note maturing September 2013 bearing interest at a fixed rate of 6.26% and a $20 million term note maturing September 2013 bearing interest at a variable rate equal to LIBOR plus 1.5%. The weighted average interest rate at December 31, 2003 on the Operating Partnership's line of credit before the effect of interest rate swaps was approximately 2.5% (3.0% at December 31, 2002). At December 31, 2003, there was $66 million available on the revolving line of credit excl uding the amount available on the expansion feature.
The Operating Partnership recorded an expense of $713,000 during 2003, representing the unamortized financing costs relating to the credit facilities that were replaced by the new credit arrangements.
The net carrying amount of the Operating Partnership's debt instruments approximates fair value.
6. MORTGAGE PAYABLE AND CAPITAL LEASE OBLIGATIONS
In February 2002, the consolidated joint venture (Locke Sovran II, LLC) entered into a mortgage note of $48 million. The note is secured by the 27 properties owned by the joint venture with a cost of $79 million. The 10-year mortgage bears interest at the fixed rate of 7.19%. The outstanding balance on the mortgage is $46.8 million at December 31, 2003. Principal maturities of the mortgage for the next five years are as follows: 2004, $0.7 million; 2005, $0.8 million; 2006, $0.9 million; 2007, $0.9 million; and 2008, $1.0 million.
During 2002, the Operating Partnership entered into lease agreements, qualifying as capital leases, for trucks to be used at its storage facilities. On December 31, 2003, the Operating Partnership purchased the entity from which it was leasing the trucks. The purchase price of $3.3 million was allocated to the cost of the trucks. This purchase resulted in the discharge of the capital lease obligations.
-46-
<Page>
7. DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
Interest rate swaps are used to adjust the proportion of total debt that is subject to variable and fixed interest rates. The interest rate swaps require the Operating Partnership to pay an amount equal to a specific fixed rate of interest times a notional principal amount and to receive in return an amount equal to a variable rate of interest times the same notional amount. The notional amounts are not exchanged. No other cash payments are made unless the contract is terminated prior to its maturity, in which case the contract would likely be settled for an amount equal to its fair value. The Operating Partnership enters interest rate swaps with a number of major financial institutions to minimize counterparty credit risk.
The interest rate swaps qualify and are designated as hedges of the amount of future cash flows related to interest payments on variable rate debt. Therefore, the interest rate swaps are recorded in the consolidated balance sheet at fair value and the related gains or losses are deferred in shareholders' equity as Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income ("AOCI"). These deferred gains and losses are amortized into interest expense during the period or periods in which the related interest payments affect earnings. However, to the extent that the interest rate swaps are not perfectly effective in offsetting the change in value of the interest payments being hedged, the ineffective portion of these contracts is recognized in earnings immediately. Ineffectiveness was immaterial in 2003 and 2002.
The Operating Partnership has entered into three interest rate swap agreements, one in March 2001 for $50 million and two in September 2001 for $50 million and $30 million, to effectively convert a total of $130 million of variable-rate debt to fixed-rate debt. One of the $50 million interest rate swap agreements matures in November 2005, the other matures in October 2006, and the $30 million swap agreement matures in September 2008.
The 2001 interest rate swap agreements are the only derivative instruments, as defined by SFAS No. 133, held by the Operating Partnership; as such, there was no impact upon adoption of SFAS No. 133 at January 1, 2001. During 2003, 2002, and 2001, the net reclassification from AOCI to interest expense was $4.8 million, $4.0 million and $1.1 million, respectively, based on payments made under the swap agreements. Based on current interest rates, the Operating Partnership estimates that payments under the interest rate swaps will be approximately $4.8 million in 2004. Payments made under the interest rate swap agreements will be reclassified to interest expense as settlements occur. The fair value of the swap agreements including accrued interest was a liability of $7.8 million and $10.3 million at December 31, 2003, and 2002 respectively.
8. STOCK OPTIONS
The Company established the 1995 Award and Option Plan (the "Plan") for the purpose of attracting and retaining the Company's executive officers and other key employees. 1,500,000 shares were authorized for issuance under the Plan. The options vest ratably over four and five
-47-
<Page>
years, and must be exercised within ten years from the date of grant. The exercise price for qualified incentive stock options must be at least equal to the fair market value at the date of grant. As of December 31, 2003, options for 368,165 shares were outstanding under the Plan and options for 365,360 shares of common stock were available for future issuance.
The Company also established the 1995 Outside Directors' Stock Option Plan (the Non-employee Plan) for the purpose of attracting and retaining the services of experienced and knowledgeable outside directors. The Non-employee Plan provides for the annual granting of options to purchase 3,500 shares of common stock to each eligible director. Such options vest over a one-year period for initial awards and immediately upon subsequent grants. The total shares reserved under the Non-employee Plan is 150,000. The exercise price for options granted under the Non-employee Plan is equal to fair market value at date of grant. As of December 31, 2003, options for 75,500 shares were outstanding under the Non-employee Plan and options for 48,500 shares of common stock were available for future issuance.
The Company has also issued 132,340 shares of restricted stock to employees which vest over four to nine year periods. The fair market value of the restricted stock on the date of grant ranged from $20.38 to $31.65. The Company charges unearned restricted stock, a component of shareholders' equity, for the market value of shares as they are issued. The unearned portion is then amortized and charged to expense over the vesting period.
A summary of the Company's stock option activity and related information for the years ended December 31 follows:
2003 |
2002 |
2001 |
||||
|
||||||
|
Weighted |
|
Weighted |
|
Weighted |
|
|
||||||
Outstanding at beginning of year: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
32,000 |
30.42 |
80,000 |
30.92 |
329,500 |
21.71 |
Exercised |
(323,110) |
23.92 |
(247,775) |
22.80 |
(52,500) |
20.77 |
Forfeited |
- |
- |
- |
- |
(13,500) |
20.75 |
|
-48-
<Page>
Outstanding at end of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Exercisable at end of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
________________________________________________________________________________ |
At December 31, 2003, there were 245,500 options outstanding at exercise prices ranging from $19.07 to $24.99 and 198,165 options outstanding at exercise prices ranging from $25.00 to $33.40. The weighted average remaining contractual life of those options is 6.67 years. As disclosed further in Note 12, warrants to purchase 379,166 common shares of the Company at a price of $32.60 per share are outstanding at December 31, 2003.
9. RETIREMENT PLAN
Employees of the Operating Partnership qualifying under certain age and service requirements are eligible to be a participant in a 401(k) Plan. The Operating Partnership contributes to the Plan at the rate of 50% of the first 4% of gross wages that the employee contributes. Total expense to the Operating Partnership was approximately $119,000, $92,000, and $63,000 for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively.
10. SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS PLAN
In November 1996, the Company adopted a Shareholder Rights Plan and declared a dividend distribution of one Right for each outstanding share of common stock. Under certain conditions, each Right may be exercised to purchase one one-thousandth of a share of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock at a purchase price of $75, subject to adjustment. The Rights will be exercisable only if a person or group has acquired 10% or more of the outstanding shares of common stock, or following the commencement of a tender or exchange offer for 10% or more of such outstanding shares of the Company's common stock. If a person or group acquires more than 10% of the then outstanding shares of the Company's common stock, each Right will entitle its holder to receive, upon exercise, common stock having a value equal to two times the exercise price of the Right. In addition, if the Company is acquired in a merger or other business combination transacti on, each Right will entitle its holder to purchase that number of the acquiring Company's common shares having a market value of twice the Right's exercise price. The Company will be entitled to redeem the Rights at $.01 per Right at any time prior to the earlier of the expiration of the Rights in November 2006 or the time that a person has acquired a 10% position. The Rights do not have voting or dividend rights, and until they become exercisable, have no dilutive effect on the Company's earnings.
-49-
<Page>
11. INVESTMENT IN JOINT VENTURES
Investment in joint ventures includes an ownership interest in Locke Sovran I, LLC, which operates 11 self-storage facilities throughout the United States, and an ownership interest in Iskalo Office Holdings, LLC, which owns the building that houses the Operating Partnership's headquarters and other tenants.
In December 2000, the Operating Partnership contributed seven self-storage properties to Locke Sovran I, LLC with a fair market value of $19.8 million, in exchange for a $15 million 1 year note receivable bearing interest at LIBOR plus 1.75% that was repaid in 2001, and a 45% interest in Locke Sovran I, LLC. This transaction resulted in a gain on the disposal of the properties of approximately $4.3 million; $1.9 million of this gain was deferred as a result of the Operating Partnership's continuing ownership interest in Locke Sovran I, LLC, as such the initial investment, including cash funding, was recorded at $3.1 million. The deferred gain is being amortized over the life of the properties, consistent with the depreciation expense recorded by Locke Sovran I, LLC. For the year ended December 31, 2003, the Operating Partnership's share of Locke Sovran I, LLC's income was $86,000 and the amortization of the deferred gain was $40,000, bot h of which are recorded as equity in income of joint ventures on the consolidated statements of income. The Operating Partnership manages the storage facilities for Locke Sovran I, LLC and received fees of $311,000, $290,000, and $413,000, for the years ended 2003, 2002, and 2001, respectively.
The Operating Partnership also has a 49% ownership interest in Iskalo Office Holdings, LLC at December 31, 2003. The $1.0 million investment relates to interest bearing loans made by the Operating Partnership to the joint venture less the Operating Partnership's share of losses incurred to date. For the year ended December 31, 2003, the Operating Partnership's share of Iskalo Office Holdings, LLC's income was $59,000. The Operating Partnership paid rent to Iskalo Office Holdings, LLC of $393,000 in 2003 and $255,000 in 2002 and 2001. Also, during 2003 the Operating Partnership purchased a tract of land from Iskalo Office Holdings, LLC for $1.2 million.
A summary of the unconsolidated joint ventures' financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2003 is as follows:
(dollars in thousands) |
Locke Sovran I, |
Iskalo Office |
Balance Sheet Data: |
||
Investment in storage facilities, net |
$ 39,333 |
$ - |
Investment in office building |
- |
6,051 |
Other assets |
1,691 |
392 |
Total Assets |
$ 41,024 |
$ 6,443 |
|
|
|
-50-
<Page>
Mortgage payable |
30,018 |
5,800 |
Other liabilities |
692 |
90 |
Total Liabilities |
32,843 |
7,308 |
|
|
|
Operating Partnership equity (deficiency) |
3,736 |
(407) |
Total Liabilities and Partners' Equity (Deficiency) |
$ 41,024 |
$ 6,443 |
|
||
Total revenues |
$ 6,224 |
$ 994 |
Total expenses |
6,032 |
873 |
Net income |
$ 192 |
$ 121 |
The Operating Partnership does not guarantee the debt of Locke Sovran I, LLC or Iskalo Office Holdings, LLC.
12. PREFERRED STOCK
Series A
The Company has authorized 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, of which 250,000 shares have been designated as Series A Junior Participating Cumulative Preferred Stock with a $.01 par value. Upon issuance pursuant to the Shareholder Rights Plan (see note 10), the Series A Junior Preferred Stock will have certain voting, dividend and liquidation preferences over common stock, as described in the Form 8-K filed December 3, 1996.
Series B
On July 30, 1999, the Company issued 1,200,000 shares of 9.85% Series B Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock. The offering price was $25 per share resulting in net proceeds of $28.6 million after expenses. The Series B Preferred Stock is not redeemable until on or after July 30, 2004, at which time the Company may redeem the shares at $25.00 per share ($30,000,000 aggregate), plus any accrued and unpaid dividends. The shares may be redeemed only with the proceeds of certain sales of equity securities. Dividends on the Series B Preferred Stock are cumulative from the date of original issue and are payable quarterly in arrears on the last day of each March, June, September, and December at a rate of $2.4625 per annum per share.
Holders of the Series B Preferred Stock generally have no voting rights. However, if the Company does not pay dividends on the Series B shares for six or more quarterly periods (whether or not consecutive), the holders of the shares, voting as a class with the holders of any other class or series of stock with similar voting rights, will be entitled to vote for the election of two additional directors to serve on the Board of Directors until all Series B dividends that have accrued are paid.
-51-
<Page>
Series C
On July 3, 2002, the Company entered into an agreement providing for the issuance of 2,800,000 shares of 8.375% Series C Convertible Cumulative Preferred Stock ("Series C Preferred") in a privately negotiated transaction. The Company immediately issued 1,600,000 shares of the Series C Preferred and issued the remaining 1,200,000 shares on November 27, 2002. The offering price was $25.00 per share resulting in net proceeds for the Series C Preferred and related common stock warrants of $67.9 million after expenses.
The Series C Preferred has a fixed annual dividend rate equal to the greater of 8.375% or the actual dividend paid on the number of the Company's common shares into which the Series C Preferred is convertible. The Series C Preferred is convertible at a ratio of .76687 common shares for each Series C Preferred share and can be redeemed at the Company's option on or after November 30, 2007 at $25.00 per share ($70,000,000 aggregate) plus accrued and unpaid dividends. Dividends on the Series C Preferred are cumulative from the date of original issue and are payable quarterly in arrears on the last day of each March, June, September, and December at a rate of $2.09375 per annum per share.
Holders of the Series C Preferred generally have no voting rights. However, if the Company does not pay dividends on the Series C Preferred shares for six or more quarterly periods (whether or not consecutive), the holders of the shares, voting as a class with the holders of any other class or series of stock with similar voting rights, will be entitled to vote for the election of two additional directors to serve on the Board of Directors until the Series C Preferred dividends are paid.
In addition, the Company issued warrants to the Series C Preferred investors to purchase 379,166 common shares of the Company at a price of $32.60 per share that expire November 30, 2007. Using the Black-Scholes method, the warrants had a fair value at the issue date of $1.97 per common share covered by the warrants. Also, an entity related to one of the investors received a placement certificate that entitles it to receive cash from the Company in the amount of 650,000 multiplied by the excess of the fair market value of the Company's common stock over $32.60 on the date the certificate is exercised. This arrangement expires on November 30, 2007. Based upon the Company's common stock price at December 31, 2003, the Company has recorded a $3.0 million liability relating to the placement certificate arrangement.
The Company recorded a deemed dividend of $0.2 million in 2002 in connection with the issuance of the Series C Preferred. The deemed dividend represents the calculated value of the beneficial conversion feature that existed on July 3, 2002, the date of issuance of the Series C Preferred. The beneficial conversion feature is calculated as the excess of, on the date of issuance of the Series C Preferred, the fair value of the common stock into which the Series C Preferred is convertible, over the issuance amount allocated to the Series C Preferred.
The Series B and C Preferred Stock are recorded as Preferred Partners' Units in the Operating Partnership's balance sheet
-52-
<Page>
13. SUPPLEMENTARY QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED)
The following is a summary of quarterly results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002 (dollars in thousands, except per unit data).
2003 Quarter Ended |
||||
March 31 |
June 30 |
Sept. 30 |
Dec. 31 |
|
Operating revenue |
$ 27,055 |
$ 27,921 |
$ 29,190 |
$ 28,995 |
Net Income |
$ 6,971 |
$ 7,883 |
$ 7,299 |
$ 7,446 |
Net income available to common |
|
|
|
|
Net Income Per Common Unit |
||||
Basic |
$ 0.35 |
$ 0.42 |
$ 0.36 |
$ 0.36 |
Diluted |
$ 0.35 |
$ 0.41 |
$ 0.36 |
$ 0.36 |
2002 Quarter Ended |
||||
March 31 |
June 30 |
Sept. 30 |
Dec. 31 |
|
Operating revenue |
$ 24,167 |
$ 25,177 |
$ 26,249 |
$ 26,548 |
Net Income |
$ 6,411 |
$ 6,956 |
$ 7,117 |
$ 6,997 |
Net income available to common |
|
|
|
|
Net Income Per Common Unit |
||||
Basic |
$ 0.43 |
$ 0.47 |
$ 0.39 |
$ 0.38 |
Diluted |
$ 0.43 |
$ 0.47 |
$ 0.39 |
$ 0.37 |
14. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
The Operating Partnership's current practice is to conduct environmental investigations in connection with property acquisitions. At this time, the Operating Partnership is not aware of any environmental contamination of any of its facilities that individually or in the aggregate would be material to the Operating Partnership's overall business, financial condition, or results of operations.
15. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
A former business associate (the "Plaintiff") of certain officers and directors of the Company, including Robert J. Attea, Kenneth F. Myszka, David L. Rogers and Charles E. Lannon (the "Founding Shareholders"), commenced a lawsuit against the Company on June 13, 1995 in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio. The Plaintiff subsequently amended the complaint in the lawsuit alleging breach of fiduciary duty, breach of contract, breach of general partnership/joint venture arrangement, breach of duty of good faith, fraud and deceit, and other causes of action including declaratory judgment as to the Plaintiff's
- 53 -
<Page>
continuing interest in the Company. The parties agreed to settle the lawsuit and the Company paid $2,359,174 to the Plaintiff in settlement of all claims. In addition, legal fees and related expenses totaling $1,686,000 were paid by the Company in connection with the lawsuit, and $781,000 was paid in connection with its own counterclaim against the Plaintiff. Pursuant to their agreement with the Company to pay certain costs and losses arising from the lawsuit, the Founding Shareholders made payment to the Company in April 2001 of $1,785,000 and in November 2001 by the redemption of 46,528 shares of the Company's common stock owned by them having a market value of approximately $1,360,000. The cost to the Operating Partnership, after indemnification by the Founding Shareholders, was $1.7 million.
-54-
<Page>
Report of Independent Auditors
The Board of Directors and Partners
Sovran Acquisition Limited Partnership
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Sovran Acquisition Limited Partnership as of December 31, 2003 and 2002 and the related consolidated statements of operations, partners' capital and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2003. Our audit also included the financial statement schedule listed in the index at Item 15(a). These financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of the management of Sovran Acquisition Limited Partnership. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedule based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Sovran Acquisition Limited Partnership as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2003, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Also in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.
Ernst & Young LLP
Buffalo, New York
January 28, 2004
-55-
<Page>
Item 9. |
Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure |
None.
Item 9a. |
Controls and Procedures |
The Operating Partnership's chief executive officer and chief financial officer have evaluated the Operating Partnership's disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2003. Based on that evaluation, these officers have concluded that the Operating Partnership's disclosure controls and procedures are effective for the purpose of ensuring that material information required to be in this annual report is made known to them by others on a timely basis. There have not been changes in the Operating Partnership's internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect these controls subsequent to the date of this evaluation.
Part III
Item 10. |
Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant |
Through Holdings, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company and the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership, the Company controls the Operating Partnership. The Board of Directors of Holdings, the members of which are the same as the members of the Board of Directors of the Company, manages the affairs of the Operating Partnership by directing the affairs of the general partner of the Operating Partnership. The Operating Partnership has no directors, or executive officers. Consequently, this information incorporated by reference reflects information with respect to the directors and executive officers of the Company and Holdings.
The information contained in the Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of the Company to be held on May 13, 2004, with respect to directors, executive officers, audit committee, and audit committee financial experts of the Company and Section 16(a) beneficial ownership reporting compliance, is incorporated herein by reference in response to this item.
The Operating Partnership has adopted a code of ethics that applies to all of its directors, officers, and employees. The Operating Partnership has made the Code of Ethics available on its website at http://www.sovranss.com.
Item 11. |
Executive Compensation |
Through Holdings, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company and the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership, the Company controls the Operating Partnership. The Board of Directors of Holdings, the members of which are the same as the members of the Board of Directors of the Company, manages the affairs of the Operating Partnership by directing the
-56-
<Page>
affairs of the general partner of the Operating Partnership. The Directors and Officers of Holdings receive their compensation from the Company and are not separately compensated by Holdings. Consequently, the information incorporated by reference reflects compensation paid to the Directors and executive officers of the Company.
The information required is incorporated by reference to "Executive Compensation" and "Compensation of Directors" in the Company's Proxy Statement for Annual Meeting of Shareholders of the Company to be held on May 13, 2004.
Item 12. |
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management |
The Operating Partnership has no directors or officers. No director or officer of the Company or Holdings beneficially owns any Units.
At December 31, 2003, the Company beneficially owns 14,259,863 Units which constitute 96.35% of all outstanding Units. No other person holds more than a 5% beneficial ownership in the Operating Partnership.
The information required herein for the Company is incorporated by reference to "Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management" in the Proxy Statement for Annual Meeting of Shareholders of the Company to be held on May 13, 2004.
RECENT SALES OF UNREGISTERED SECURITIES
During 2003, the Operating Partnership issued Units in private placements in reliance on the exemption from registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, in the amounts and for the consideration set forth below:
- |
On January 22, 2003, in connection with the Sovran Self Storage, Inc. Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan, the Company transferred $1,575,804 to the Operating Partnership in exchange for 58,848 Units. |
- |
On January 31, 2003, the Operating Partnership redeemed 63,390 Units from a partner. |
- |
On February 24, 2003, in connection with the Sovran Self Storage, Inc. Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan, the Company transferred $528,483 to the Operating Partnership in exchange for 20,663 Units. |
- |
On February 27, 2003, the Operating Partnership redeemed 26,572 Units from a partner. |
-57-
<Page>
- |
On February 28, 2003, in connection with the Sovran Self Storage, Inc. 1995 Award and Option Plan, the Operating Partnership issued 11,000 Units to the Company. |
- |
On March 20, 2003, the Operating Partnership redeemed 55,854 Units from a partner. |
- |
On March 24, 2003, in connection with the Sovran Self Storage, Inc. Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan, the Company transferred $549,974 to the Operating Partnership in exchange for 20,522 Units. |
- |
On March 31, 2003, in connection with the Sovran Self Storage, Inc. 1995 Award and Option Plan, the Operating Partnership issued 6,000 Units to the Company. |
- |
On April 17, 2003, in connection with the Sovran Self Storage, Inc. 1995 Award and Option Plan, the Operating Partnership issued 1,500 Units to the Company. |
- |
On April 23, 2003, in connection with the Sovran Self Storage, Inc. Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan, the Company transferred $1,255,960 to the Operating Partnership in exchange for 44,875 Units. |
- |
On May 22, 2003, in connection with the Sovran Self Storage, Inc. Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan, the Company transferred $723,988 to the Operating Partnership in exchange for 24,490 Units. |
- |
On May 30, 2003, in connection with the Sovran Self Storage, Inc. 1995 Award and Option Plan, the Operating Partnership issued 105,625 Units to the Company. |
- |
On June 23, 2003, in connection with the Sovran Self Storage, Inc. Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan, the Company transferred $1,944,753 to the Operating Partnership in exchange for 64,576 Units. |
- |
On June 30, 2003, in connection with the Sovran Self Storage, Inc. 1995 Award and Option Plan, the Operating Partnership issued 24,350 Units to the Company. |
- |
On July 22, 2003, the Operating Partnership redeemed 10,000 Units from a partner. |
-58-
<Page>
- |
On July 23, 2003, in connection with the Sovran Self Storage, Inc. Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan, the Company transferred $4,362,134 to the Operating Partnership in exchange for 141,025 Units. |
- |
On July 30, 2003, in connection with the Sovran Self Storage, Inc. 1995 Award and Option Plan, the Operating Partnership issued 29,050 Units to the Company. |
- |
On August 20, 2003, in connection with the Sovran Self Storage, Inc. 1995 Award and Option Plan, the Operating Partnership issued 2,000 Units to the Company. |
- |
On August 22, 2003, in connection with the Sovran Self Storage, Inc. Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan, the Company transferred $3,563,215 to the Operating Partnership in exchange for 116,904 Units. |
- |
On September 22, 2003, in connection with the Sovran Self Storage, Inc. Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan, the Company transferred $4,528,352 to the Operating Partnership in exchange for 144,872 Units. |
- |
On September 30, 2003, in connection with the Sovran Self Storage, Inc. 1995 Award and Option Plan, the Operating Partnership issued 11,950 Units to the Company. |
- |
On October 22, 2003, in connection with the Sovran Self Storage, Inc. Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan, the Company transferred $5,407,426 to the Operating Partnership in exchange for 165,006 Units. |
- |
On October 31, 2003, in connection with the Sovran Self Storage, Inc. 1995 Award and Option Plan, the Operating Partnership issued 7,500 Units to the Company. |
- |
On November 22, 2003, in connection with the Sovran Self Storage, Inc. Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan, the Company transferred $4,795,515 to the Operating Partnership in exchange for 141,591 Units. |
- |
On November 28, 2003, in connection with the Sovran Self Storage, Inc. 1995 Award and Option Plan, the Operating Partnership issued 92,000 Units to the Company. |
- |
On December 18, 2003, the Operating Partnership redeemed 4,120 Units from a partner. |
-59-
<Page>
- |
On December 23, 2003, in connection with the Sovran Self Storage, Inc. Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan, the Company transferred $5,399,975 to the Operating Partnership in exchange for 154,853 Units. |
|
- |
On December 23, 2003, in connection with the Sovran Self Storage, Inc. 1995 Award and Option Plan, the Operating Partnership issued 32,140 Units to the Company. |
|
Item 13. |
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions |
The information required herein is incorporated by reference to "Certain Transactions" in the Company's Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on May 13, 2004.
Item 14. |
Principal Accountant Fees and Services |
The information required herein is incorporated by reference to "Appointment of Independent Accountants" in the Company's Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on May 13, 2004.
Part IV
Item 15. |
Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, and Reports on Form 8-K |
(a) |
Documents filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K: |
1. |
The following consolidated financial statements of Sovran Acquisition Limited Partnership are included in Item 8. |
|
(i) |
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2003 and 2002. |
|
(ii) |
Consolidated Statements of Operations for Years Ended December 31, 2003, 2002, and 2001. |
|
(iii) |
Consolidated Statements of Partners' Capital for Years Ended December 31, 2003, 2002, and 2001. |
|
(iv) |
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for Years Ended December 31, 2003, 2002, and 2001. |
|
(v) |
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. |
|
-60-
<Page>
2. |
The following financial statement Schedule as of the period ended December 31, 2003 is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. |
All other Consolidated financial schedules are omitted because they are inapplicable, not required, or the information is included elsewhere in the consolidated financial statements or the notes thereto.
3. |
(a) Exhibits - See the Exhibit Index beginning on page 66 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. |
|
(b) |
Reports on Form 8-K. |
-61-
<Page>
Sovran Self Storage, Inc.
Schedule III
Combined Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation
(in thousands)
December 31, 2003
|
|
Cost |
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
Building, |
Building, |
|
Building, |
|
|
|
Boston-Metro I |
MA |
$ 363 |
$ 1,679 |
$ 329 |
$ 363 |
$ 2,008 |
$ 2,371 |
$ 420 |
6/26/95 |
|
Boston-Metro II |
MA |
680 |
1,616 |
223 |
680 |
1,839 |
2,519 |
389 |
6/26/95 |
|
E. Providence |
RI |
345 |
1,268 |
216 |
344 |
1,485 |
1,829 |
322 |
6/26/95 |
|
Charleston I |
SC |
416 |
1,516 |
294 |
416 |
1,810 |
2,226 |
416 |
6/26/95 |
|
Lakeland I |
FL |
397 |
1,424 |
193 |
397 |
1,617 |
2,014 |
363 |
6/26/95 |
|
Charlotte |
NC |
308 |
1,102 |
424 |
308 |
1,526 |
1,834 |
292 |
6/26/95 |
|
Tallahassee I |
FL |
770 |
2,734 |
1,693 |
770 |
4,427 |
5,197 |
814 |
6/26/95 |
|
Youngstown |
OH |
239 |
1,110 |
301 |
239 |
1,411 |
1,650 |
342 |
6/26/95 |
|
Cleveland-Metro I |
OH |
179 |
836 |
409 |
179 |
1,245 |
1,424 |
260 |
6/26/95 |
|
Cleveland-Metro II |
OH |
701 |
1,659 |
530 |
701 |
2,189 |
2,890 |
436 |
6/26/95 |
|
Tallahassee II |
FL |
204 |
734 |
689 |
204 |
1,423 |
1,627 |
244 |
6/26/95 |
|
Pt. St. Lucie |
FL |
395 |
1,501 |
305 |
395 |
1,806 |
2,201 |
428 |
6/26/95 |
|
Deltona |
FL |
483 |
1,752 |
445 |
483 |
2,197 |
2,680 |
465 |
6/26/95 |
|
Middletown |
NY |
224 |
808 |
707 |
224 |
1,515 |
1,739 |
309 |
6/26/95 |
|
Buffalo I |
NY |
423 |
1,531 |
1,443 |
497 |
2,900 |
3,397 |
561 |
6/26/95 |
|
Rochester I |
NY |
395 |
1,404 |
193 |
395 |
1,597 |
1,992 |
340 |
6/26/95 |
|
Salisbury |
MD |
164 |
760 |
243 |
164 |
1,003 |
1,167 |
209 |
6/26/95 |
|
New Bedford |
MA |
367 |
1,325 |
321 |
367 |
1,646 |
2,013 |
398 |
6/26/95 |
|
Fayetteville |
NC |
853 |
3,057 |
370 |
853 |
3,427 |
4,280 |
711 |
6/26/95 |
|
Allentown |
PA |
199 |
921 |
868 |
203 |
1,785 |
1,988 |
317 |
6/26/95 |
|
Jacksonville I |
FL |
152 |
728 |
267 |
152 |
995 |
1,147 |
254 |
6/26/95 |
|
Columbia I |
SC |
268 |
1,248 |
232 |
268 |
1,480 |
1,748 |
349 |
6/26/95 |
|
Rochester II |
NY |
230 |
847 |
238 |
234 |
1,081 |
1,315 |
234 |
6/26/95 |
|
Savannah I |
GA |
463 |
1,684 |
1,330 |
463 |
3,014 |
3,477 |
534 |
6/26/95 |
|
Greensboro |
NC |
444 |
1,613 |
381 |
444 |
1,994 |
2,438 |
453 |
6/26/95 |
-62-
<Page>
Raleigh I |
NC |
649 |
2,329 |
391 |
649 |
2,720 |
3,369 |
598 |
6/26/95 |
|
New Haven |
CT |
387 |
1,402 |
433 |
387 |
1,835 |
2,222 |
363 |
6/26/95 |
|
Atlanta-Metro I |
GA |
844 |
2,021 |
356 |
844 |
2,377 |
3,221 |
513 |
6/26/95 |
|
Atlanta-Metro II |
GA |
302 |
1,103 |
175 |
303 |
1,277 |
1,580 |
322 |
6/26/95 |
|
Buffalo II |
NY |
315 |
745 |
793 |
315 |
1,538 |
1,853 |
238 |
6/26/95 |
|
Raleigh II |
NC |
321 |
1,150 |
277 |
321 |
1,427 |
1,748 |
320 |
6/26/95 |
|
Columbia II |
SC |
361 |
1,331 |
309 |
374 |
1,627 |
2,001 |
372 |
6/26/95 |
|
Columbia III |
SC |
189 |
719 |
319 |
189 |
1,038 |
1,227 |
249 |
6/26/95 |
|
Columbia IV |
SC |
488 |
1,188 |
314 |
488 |
1,502 |
1,990 |
357 |
6/26/95 |
|
Atlanta-Metro III |
GA |
430 |
1,579 |
199 |
430 |
1,778 |
2,208 |
439 |
6/26/95 |
|
Orlando I |
FL |
513 |
1,930 |
283 |
513 |
2,213 |
2,726 |
517 |
6/26/95 |
|
Spartanburg |
SC |
331 |
1,209 |
153 |
331 |
1,362 |
1,693 |
333 |
6/26/95 |
|
Sharon |
PA |
194 |
912 |
255 |
194 |
1,167 |
1,361 |
264 |
6/26/95 |
|
Ft. Lauderdale |
FL |
1,503 |
3,619 |
426 |
1,503 |
4,045 |
5,548 |
893 |
6/26/95 |
|
West Palm I |
FL |
398 |
1,035 |
161 |
398 |
1,196 |
1,594 |
300 |
6/26/95 |
|
Atlanta-Metro IV |
GA |
423 |
1,015 |
251 |
424 |
1,265 |
1,689 |
297 |
6/26/95 |
|
Atlanta-Metro V |
GA |
483 |
1,166 |
194 |
483 |
1,360 |
1,843 |
321 |
6/26/95 |
|
Atlanta-Metro VI |
GA |
308 |
1,116 |
335 |
308 |
1,451 |
1,759 |
367 |
6/26/95 |
|
Atlanta-Metro VII |
GA |
170 |
786 |
285 |
174 |
1,067 |
1,241 |
259 |
6/26/95 |
|
Atlanta-Metro VIII |
GA |
413 |
999 |
433 |
413 |
1,432 |
1,845 |
354 |
6/26/95 |
|
Baltimore I |
MD |
154 |
555 |
239 |
155 |
793 |
948 |
180 |
6/26/95 |
|
Baltimore II |
MD |
479 |
1,742 |
801 |
479 |
2,543 |
3,022 |
478 |
6/26/95 |
|
Augusta I |
GA |
357 |
1,296 |
409 |
357 |
1,705 |
2,062 |
349 |
6/26/95 |
|
Macon I |
GA |
231 |
1,081 |
229 |
231 |
1,310 |
1,541 |
292 |
6/26/95 |
|
Melbourne I |
FL |
883 |
2,104 |
1,369 |
883 |
3,473 |
4,356 |
666 |
6/26/95 |
|
Newport News |
VA |
316 |
1,471 |
544 |
316 |
2,015 |
2,331 |
450 |
6/26/95 |
|
Pensacola I |
FL |
632 |
2,962 |
758 |
651 |
3,701 |
4,352 |
824 |
6/26/95 |
|
Augusta II |
GA |
315 |
1,139 |
411 |
315 |
1,550 |
1,865 |
326 |
6/26/95 |
|
Hartford-Metro I |
CT |
715 |
1,695 |
418 |
715 |
2,113 |
2,828 |
434 |
6/26/95 |
|
Atlanta-Metro IX |
GA |
304 |
1,118 |
519 |
304 |
1,637 |
1,941 |
341 |
6/26/95 |
|
Alexandria |
VA |
1,375 |
3,220 |
794 |
1,376 |
4,013 |
5,389 |
816 |
6/26/95 |
|
Pensacola II |
FL |
244 |
901 |
232 |
244 |
1,133 |
1,377 |
310 |
6/26/95 |
|
Melbourne II |
FL |
834 |
2,066 |
177 |
835 |
2,242 |
3,077 |
579 |
6/26/95 |
|
Hartford-Metro II |
CT |
234 |
861 |
1,044 |
612 |
1,527 |
2,139 |
246 |
6/26/95 |
|
Atlanta-Metro X |
GA |
256 |
1,244 |
250 |
256 |
1,494 |
1,750 |
349 |
6/26/95 |
|
Norfolk I |
VA |
313 |
1,462 |
551 |
313 |
2,013 |
2,326 |
411 |
6/26/95 |
|
Norfolk II |
VA |
278 |
1,004 |
221 |
278 |
1,225 |
1,503 |
315 |
6/26/95 |
|
Birmingham I |
AL |
307 |
1,415 |
324 |
307 |
1,739 |
2,046 |
374 |
6/26/95 |
|
Birmingham II |
AL |
730 |
1,725 |
392 |
730 |
2,117 |
2,847 |
465 |
6/26/95 |
|
Montgomery I |
AL |
863 |
2,041 |
421 |
863 |
2,462 |
3,325 |
525 |
6/26/95 |
|
Jacksonville II |
FL |
326 |
1,515 |
286 |
326 |
1,801 |
2,127 |
386 |
6/26/95 |
-63-
<Page>
Pensacola II |
FL |
369 |
1,358 |
1,056 |
369 |
2,414 |
2,783 |
460 |
6/26/95 |
|
Pensacola IV |
FL |
244 |
1,128 |
143 |
244 |
1,271 |
1,515 |
320 |
6/26/95 |
|
Pensacola V |
FL |
226 |
1,046 |
452 |
226 |
1,498 |
1,724 |
341 |
6/26/95 |
|
Tampa I |
FL |
1,088 |
2,597 |
670 |
1,088 |
3,267 |
4,355 |
712 |
6/26/95 |
|
Tampa II |
FL |
526 |
1,958 |
542 |
526 |
2,500 |
3,026 |
582 |
6/26/95 |
|
Tampa III |
FL |
672 |
2,439 |
428 |
672 |
2,867 |
3,539 |
636 |
6/26/95 |
|
Jackson I |
MS |
343 |
1,580 |
192 |
343 |
1,772 |
2,115 |
425 |
6/26/95 |
|
Jackson II |
MS |
209 |
964 |
402 |
209 |
1,366 |
1,575 |
337 |
6/26/95 |
|
Richmond |
VA |
443 |
1,602 |
537 |
443 |
2,139 |
2,582 |
460 |
8/25/95 |
|
Orlando II |
FL |
1,161 |
2,755 |
699 |
1,162 |
3,453 |
4,615 |
717 |
9/29/95 |
|
Birmingham III |
AL |
424 |
1,506 |
497 |
424 |
2,003 |
2,427 |
511 |
1/16/96 |
|
Macon II |
GA |
431 |
1,567 |
521 |
431 |
2,088 |
2,519 |
395 |
12/1/95 |
|
Harrisburg I |
PA |
360 |
1,641 |
352 |
360 |
1,993 |
2,353 |
435 |
12/29/95 |
|
Harrisburg II |
PA |
(1) |
627 |
2,224 |
553 |
648 |
2,756 |
3,404 |
548 |
12/29/95 |
Syracuse I |
NY |
470 |
1,712 |
925 |
472 |
2,635 |
3,107 |
413 |
12/27/95 |
|
Ft. Myers |
FL |
205 |
912 |
148 |
206 |
1,059 |
1,265 |
303 |
12/28/95 |
|
Ft. Myers II |
FL |
412 |
1,703 |
319 |
413 |
2,021 |
2,434 |
557 |
12/28/95 |
|
Newport News II |
VA |
442 |
1,592 |
129 |
442 |
1,721 |
2,163 |
361 |
1/5/96 |
|
Montgomery II |
AL |
353 |
1,299 |
213 |
353 |
1,512 |
1,865 |
337 |
1/23/96 |
|
Charlestown II |
SC |
237 |
858 |
356 |
232 |
1,219 |
1,451 |
256 |
3/1/96 |
|
Tampa IV |
FL |
766 |
1,800 |
528 |
766 |
2,328 |
3,094 |
409 |
3/28/96 |
|
Arlington I |
TX |
442 |
1,767 |
234 |
442 |
2,001 |
2,443 |
385 |
3/29/96 |
|
Arlington II |
TX |
408 |
1,662 |
384 |
408 |
2,046 |
2,454 |
464 |
3/29/96 |
|
Ft. Worth |
TX |
328 |
1,324 |
171 |
328 |
1,495 |
1,823 |
296 |
3/29/96 |
|
San Antonio I |
TX |
436 |
1,759 |
840 |
436 |
2,599 |
3,035 |
465 |
3/29/96 |
|
San Antonio II |
TX |
289 |
1,161 |
333 |
289 |
1,494 |
1,783 |
331 |
3/29/96 |
|
Syracuse II |
NY |
481 |
1,559 |
1,557 |
671 |
2,926 |
3,597 |
417 |
6/5/96 |
|
Montgomery III |
AL |
279 |
1,014 |
350 |
433 |
1,210 |
1,643 |
283 |
5/21/96 |
|
West Palm II |
FL |
345 |
1,262 |
178 |
345 |
1,440 |
1,785 |
291 |
5/29/96 |
|
Ft. Myers III |
FL |
229 |
884 |
265 |
229 |
1,149 |
1,378 |
211 |
5/29/96 |
|
Pittsburgh |
PA |
545 |
1,940 |
200 |
545 |
2,140 |
2,685 |
412 |
6/19/96 |
|
Lakeland II |
FL |
359 |
1,287 |
929 |
359 |
2,216 |
2,575 |
382 |
6/26/96 |
|
Springfield |
MA |
251 |
917 |
1,387 |
297 |
2,258 |
2,555 |
364 |
6/28/96 |
|
Ft. Myers IV |
FL |
344 |
1,254 |
220 |
344 |
1,474 |
1,818 |
289 |
6/28/96 |
|
Baltimore III |
MD |
777 |
2,770 |
134 |
777 |
2,904 |
3,681 |
550 |
7/26/96 |
|
Jacksonville III |
FL |
568 |
2,028 |
722 |
568 |
2,750 |
3,318 |
499 |
8/23/96 |
|
Jacksonville IV |
FL |
436 |
1,635 |
397 |
436 |
2,032 |
2,468 |
416 |
8/26/96 |
|
Pittsburgh II |
PA |
627 |
2,257 |
748 |
631 |
3,001 |
3,632 |
588 |
8/28/96 |
|
Jacksonville V |
FL |
535 |
2,033 |
184 |
538 |
2,214 |
2,752 |
485 |
8/30/96 |
|
Charlotte II |
NC |
487 |
1,754 |
92 |
487 |
1,846 |
2,333 |
345 |
9/16/96 |
|
Charlotte III |
NC |
315 |
1,131 |
239 |
315 |
1,370 |
1,685 |
243 |
9/16/96 |
-64-
<Page>
Orlando III |
FL |
314 |
1,113 |
566 |
314 |
1,679 |
1,993 |
297 |
10/30/96 |
|
Rochester III |
NY |
704 |
2,496 |
476 |
707 |
2,969 |
3,676 |
473 |
12/20/96 |
|
Youngstown II |
OH |
600 |
2,142 |
175 |
600 |
2,317 |
2,917 |
407 |
1/10/97 |
|
Akron |
OH |
413 |
1,478 |
130 |
413 |
1,608 |
2,021 |
280 |
1/10/97 |
|
Cleveland III |
OH |
751 |
2,676 |
548 |
751 |
3,224 |
3,975 |
560 |
1/10/97 |
|
Cleveland IV |
OH |
725 |
2,586 |
829 |
725 |
3,415 |
4,140 |
585 |
1/10/97 |
|
Cleveland V |
OH |
(1) |
637 |
2,918 |
710 |
641 |
3,624 |
4,265 |
684 |
1/10/97 |
Cleveland VI |
OH |
495 |
1,781 |
401 |
495 |
2,182 |
2,677 |
392 |
1/10/97 |
|
Cleveland VII |
OH |
761 |
2,714 |
590 |
761 |
3,304 |
4,065 |
617 |
1/10/97 |
|
Cleveland VIII |
OH |
418 |
1,921 |
985 |
418 |
2,906 |
3,324 |
512 |
1/10/97 |
|
Cleveland IX |
OH |
606 |
2,164 |
271 |
606 |
2,435 |
3,041 |
439 |
1/10/97 |
|
Grand Rapids II |
MI |
219 |
790 |
633 |
219 |
1,423 |
1,642 |
251 |
1/17/97 |
|
Holland |
MI |
451 |
1,830 |
1,027 |
451 |
2,857 |
3,308 |
545 |
1/17/97 |
|
San Antonio III |
TX |
(1) |
474 |
1,686 |
161 |
474 |
1,847 |
2,321 |
322 |
1/30/97 |
Universal |
TX |
346 |
1,236 |
140 |
346 |
1,376 |
1,722 |
247 |
1/30/97 |
|
San Antonio IV |
TX |
432 |
1,560 |
1,391 |
432 |
2,951 |
3,383 |
375 |
1/30/97 |
|
Houston-Eastex |
TX |
634 |
2,565 |
890 |
634 |
3,455 |
4,089 |
501 |
3/26/97 |
|
Houston-Nederland |
TX |
566 |
2,279 |
155 |
566 |
2,434 |
3,000 |
414 |
3/26/97 |
|
Houston-College |
TX |
293 |
1,357 |
195 |
293 |
1,552 |
1,845 |
268 |
3/26/97 |
|
Lynchburg-Lakeside |
VA |
335 |
1,342 |
819 |
335 |
2,161 |
2,496 |
330 |
3/31/97 |
|
Lynchburg-Timberlake |
VA |
328 |
1,315 |
572 |
328 |
1,887 |
2,215 |
333 |
3/31/97 |
|
Lynchburg-Amherst |
VA |
155 |
710 |
206 |
152 |
919 |
1,071 |
186 |
3/31/97 |
|
Christiansburg |
VA |
245 |
1,120 |
142 |
245 |
1,262 |
1,507 |
218 |
3/31/97 |
|
Chesapeake |
VA |
260 |
1,043 |
474 |
260 |
1,517 |
1,777 |
230 |
3/31/97 |
|
Danville |
VA |
326 |
1,488 |
47 |
326 |
1,535 |
1,861 |
263 |
3/31/97 |
|
Orlando-W 25th St. |
FL |
289 |
1,160 |
322 |
290 |
1,481 |
1,771 |
240 |
3/31/97 |
|
Delray I-Mini |
FL |
491 |
1,756 |
510 |
491 |
2,266 |
2,757 |
405 |
4/11/97 |
|
Savannah II |
GA |
296 |
1,196 |
135 |
296 |
1,331 |
1,627 |
241 |
5/8/97 |
|
Delray II-Safeway |
FL |
921 |
3,282 |
313 |
921 |
3,595 |
4,516 |
612 |
5/21/97 |
|
Cleveland X-Avon |
OH |
301 |
1,214 |
869 |
304 |
2,080 |
2,384 |
267 |
6/4/97 |
|
Dallas-Skillman |
TX |
960 |
3,847 |
891 |
960 |
4,738 |
5,698 |
872 |
6/30/97 |
|
Dallas-Centennial |
TX |
965 |
3,864 |
940 |
943 |
4,826 |
5,769 |
856 |
6/30/97 |
|
Dallas-Samuell |
TX |
(1) |
570 |
2,285 |
431 |
570 |
2,716 |
3,286 |
524 |
6/30/97 |
Dallas-Hargrove |
TX |
370 |
1,486 |
294 |
370 |
1,780 |
2,150 |
388 |
6/30/97 |
|
Houston-Antione |
TX |
515 |
2,074 |
316 |
515 |
2,390 |
2,905 |
465 |
6/30/97 |
|
Atlanta-Alpharetta |
GA |
1,033 |
3,753 |
291 |
1,033 |
4,044 |
5,077 |
728 |
7/24/97 |
|
Atlanta-Marietta |
GA |
(1) |
769 |
2,788 |
87 |
771 |
2,873 |
3,644 |
490 |
7/24/97 |
Atlanta-Doraville |
GA |
735 |
3,429 |
131 |
735 |
3,560 |
4,295 |
591 |
8/21/97 |
|
Greensboro-Hilltop |
NC |
268 |
1,097 |
144 |
268 |
1,241 |
1,509 |
207 |
9/25/97 |
|
GreensboroStgCch |
NC |
89 |
376 |
930 |
89 |
1,306 |
1,395 |
154 |
9/25/97 |
|
Baton Rouge-Airline |
LA |
(1) |
396 |
1,831 |
290 |
396 |
2,121 |
2,517 |
365 |
10/9/97 |
-65-
<Page>
Baton Rouge-Airline2 |
LA |
282 |
1,303 |
131 |
282 |
1,434 |
1,716 |
271 |
11/21/97 |
|
Harrisburg-Peiffers |
PA |
635 |
2,550 |
122 |
637 |
2,670 |
3,307 |
413 |
12/3/97 |
|
Chesapeake-Military |
VA |
542 |
2,210 |
160 |
542 |
2,370 |
2,912 |
376 |
2/5/98 |
|
Chesapeake-Volvo |
VA |
620 |
2,532 |
755 |
620 |
3,287 |
3,907 |
446 |
2/5/98 |
|
Virginia Beach Shell |
VA |
540 |
2,211 |
136 |
540 |
2,347 |
2,887 |
375 |
2/5/98 |
|
Virginia Beach Central |
VA |
864 |
3,994 |
512 |
864 |
4,506 |
5,370 |
679 |
2/5/98 |
|
Norfolk-Naval Base |
VA |
1,243 |
5,019 |
555 |
1,243 |
5,574 |
6,817 |
808 |
2/5/98 |
|
Tampa-E. Hillsborough |
FL |
709 |
3,235 |
589 |
709 |
3,824 |
4,533 |
686 |
2/4/98 |
|
Harriman |
NY |
843 |
3,394 |
263 |
843 |
3,657 |
4,500 |
560 |
2/4/98 |
|
Greenboro-High Point |
NC |
397 |
1,834 |
355 |
397 |
2,189 |
2,586 |
332 |
2/10/98 |
|
Lynchburg-Timberlake |
VA |
488 |
1,746 |
275 |
488 |
2,021 |
2,509 |
289 |
2/18/98 |
|
Salem |
MA |
733 |
2,941 |
628 |
733 |
3,569 |
4,302 |
544 |
3/3/98 |
|
Chattanooga-Lee Hwy. |
TN |
384 |
1,371 |
241 |
384 |
1,612 |
1,996 |
290 |
3/27/98 |
|
Chattanooga-Hwy. 58 |
TN |
296 |
1,198 |
557 |
296 |
1,755 |
2,051 |
242 |
3/27/98 |
|
Ft. Oglethorpe |
GA |
349 |
1,250 |
267 |
349 |
1,517 |
1,866 |
215 |
3/27/98 |
|
Birmingham-Walt |
AL |
544 |
1,942 |
563 |
544 |
2,505 |
3,049 |
445 |
3/27/98 |
|
East Greenwich |
RI |
702 |
2,821 |
609 |
702 |
3,430 |
4,132 |
464 |
3/26/98 |
|
Durham-Hillborough |
NC |
775 |
3,103 |
466 |
775 |
3,569 |
4,344 |
502 |
4/9/98 |
|
Durham-Cornwallis |
NC |
940 |
3,763 |
390 |
940 |
4,153 |
5,093 |
585 |
4/9/98 |
|
Hendersonville |
TN |
1,050 |
4,203 |
168 |
1,050 |
4,371 |
5,421 |
626 |
4/9/98 |
|
Salem-Policy |
NH |
742 |
2,977 |
75 |
742 |
3,052 |
3,794 |
440 |
4/7/98 |
|
Warren-Elm |
OH |
(1) |
522 |
1,864 |
174 |
532 |
2,028 |
2,560 |
324 |
4/22/98 |
Warren-Youngstown |
OH |
512 |
1,829 |
124 |
512 |
1,953 |
2,465 |
275 |
4/22/98 |
|
Waterford-Highland |
MI |
1,487 |
5,306 |
588 |
1,487 |
5,894 |
7,381 |
857 |
4/28/98 |
|
Indian Harbor |
FL |
662 |
2,654 |
199 |
662 |
2,853 |
3,515 |
412 |
6/2/98 |
|
Jackson 3 - I55 |
MS |
744 |
3,021 |
59 |
744 |
3,080 |
3,824 |
460 |
5/13/98 |
|
Katy-N. Fry |
TX |
419 |
1,524 |
509 |
419 |
2,033 |
2,452 |
241 |
5/20/98 |
|
Hollywood-Sheridan |
FL |
1,208 |
4,854 |
171 |
1,208 |
5,025 |
6,233 |
730 |
7/1/98 |
|
Pompano Beach - Atlantic |
FL |
944 |
3,803 |
200 |
944 |
4,003 |
4,947 |
577 |
7/1/98 |
|
Pompano Beach - Sample |
FL |
903 |
3,643 |
296 |
903 |
3,939 |
4,842 |
559 |
7/1/98 |
|
Boca Raton-18th St. |
FL |
1,503 |
6,059 |
461 |
1,503 |
6,520 |
8,023 |
917 |
7/1/98 |
|
Vero Beach |
FL |
489 |
1,813 |
40 |
489 |
1,853 |
2,342 |
290 |
6/12/98 |
|
Humble |
TX |
447 |
1,790 |
545 |
447 |
2,335 |
2,782 |
313 |
6/16/98 |
|
Houston-Old Katy |
TX |
(1) |
659 |
2,680 |
59 |
659 |
2,739 |
3,398 |
380 |
6/19/98 |
Webster |
TX |
635 |
2,302 |
55 |
635 |
2,357 |
2,992 |
341 |
6/19/98 |
|
Carrollton |
TX |
548 |
1,988 |
246 |
548 |
2,234 |
2,782 |
305 |
6/19/98 |
|
Hollywood-N. 21st. |
FL |
840 |
3,373 |
218 |
840 |
3,591 |
4,431 |
514 |
8/3/98 |
|
San Marcos |
TX |
324 |
1,493 |
307 |
324 |
1,800 |
2,124 |
259 |
6/30/98 |
|
Austin-McNeil |
TX |
492 |
1,995 |
189 |
510 |
2,166 |
2,676 |
313 |
6/30/98 |
|
Austin-FM |
TX |
484 |
1,951 |
146 |
481 |
2,100 |
2,581 |
305 |
6/30/98 |
|
Jacksonville-Center |
NC |
327 |
1,329 |
63 |
327 |
1,392 |
1,719 |
202 |
8/6/98 |
-66-
<Page>
Jacksonville-Gum Branch |
NC |
508 |
1,815 |
169 |
508 |
1,984 |
2,492 |
280 |
8/17/98 |
|
Jacksonville-N. Marine |
NC |
216 |
782 |
342 |
216 |
1,124 |
1,340 |
205 |
9/24/98 |
|
Euless |
TX |
550 |
1,998 |
119 |
550 |
2,117 |
2,667 |
291 |
9/29/98 |
|
N. Richland Hills |
TX |
670 |
2,407 |
779 |
670 |
3,186 |
3,856 |
343 |
10/9/98 |
|
Batavia |
OH |
390 |
1,570 |
152 |
390 |
1,722 |
2,112 |
251 |
11/19/98 |
|
Jackson-N. West |
MS |
460 |
1,642 |
310 |
460 |
1,952 |
2,412 |
361 |
12/1/98 |
|
Katy-Franz |
TX |
507 |
2,058 |
88 |
507 |
2,146 |
2,653 |
282 |
12/15/98 |
|
W. Warwick |
RI |
447 |
1,776 |
644 |
447 |
2,420 |
2,867 |
282 |
2/2/99 |
|
Lafayette-Pinhook 1 |
LA |
556 |
1,951 |
750 |
556 |
2,701 |
3,257 |
451 |
2/17/99 |
|
Lafayette-Pinhook 2 |
LA |
708 |
2,860 |
139 |
708 |
2,999 |
3,707 |
380 |
2/17/99 |
|
Lafayette-Ambassador |
LA |
314 |
1,095 |
455 |
314 |
1,550 |
1,864 |
287 |
2/17/99 |
|
Lafayette-Evangeline |
LA |
188 |
652 |
615 |
188 |
1,267 |
1,455 |
225 |
2/17/99 |
|
Lafayette-Guilbeau |
LA |
963 |
3,896 |
108 |
963 |
4,004 |
4,967 |
505 |
2/17/99 |
|
Gilbert-Elliott Rd. |
AZ |
651 |
2,600 |
603 |
772 |
3,082 |
3,854 |
338 |
5/18/99 |
|
Glendale-59th Ave. |
AZ |
565 |
2,596 |
122 |
565 |
2,718 |
3,283 |
326 |
5/18/99 |
|
Mesa-Baseline |
AZ |
330 |
1,309 |
81 |
330 |
1,390 |
1,720 |
169 |
5/18/99 |
|
Mesa-E. Broadway |
AZ |
339 |
1,346 |
128 |
339 |
1,474 |
1,813 |
177 |
5/18/99 |
|
Mesa-W. Broadway |
AZ |
291 |
1,026 |
152 |
291 |
1,178 |
1,469 |
141 |
5/18/99 |
|
Mesa-Greenfield |
AZ |
354 |
1,405 |
114 |
354 |
1,519 |
1,873 |
181 |
5/18/99 |
|
Phoenix-Camelback |
AZ |
453 |
1,610 |
160 |
453 |
1,770 |
2,223 |
212 |
5/18/99 |
|
Phoenix-Bell |
AZ |
872 |
3,476 |
274 |
872 |
3,750 |
4,622 |
499 |
5/18/99 |
|
Phoenix-35th Ave. |
AZ |
849 |
3,401 |
351 |
849 |
3,752 |
4,601 |
422 |
5/21/99 |
|
Westbrook |
ME |
410 |
1,626 |
345 |
410 |
1,971 |
2,381 |
225 |
8/2/99 |
|
Cocoa |
FL |
667 |
2,373 |
496 |
667 |
2,869 |
3,536 |
328 |
9/29/99 |
|
Cedar Hill |
TX |
335 |
1,521 |
186 |
335 |
1,707 |
2,042 |
206 |
11/9/99 |
|
Monroe |
NY |
276 |
1,312 |
40 |
276 |
1,352 |
1,628 |
142 |
2/2/00 |
|
N. Andover |
MA |
633 |
2,573 |
93 |
633 |
2,666 |
3,299 |
265 |
2/15/00 |
|
Seabrook |
TX |
633 |
2,617 |
88 |
633 |
2,705 |
3,338 |
281 |
3/1/00 |
|
Plantation |
FL |
384 |
1,422 |
90 |
384 |
1,512 |
1,896 |
158 |
5/2/00 |
|
Birmingham-Bessemer |
AL |
254 |
1,059 |
75 |
254 |
1,134 |
1,388 |
97 |
11/15/00 |
|
Dracut |
MA |
(1) |
1,035 |
3,737 |
102 |
1,035 |
3,839 |
4,874 |
206 |
12/1/01 |
Methuen |
MA |
(1) |
1,024 |
3,649 |
67 |
1,024 |
3,716 |
4,740 |
197 |
12/1/01 |
Columbia |
SC |
(1) |
883 |
3,139 |
104 |
883 |
3,243 |
4,126 |
182 |
12/1/01 |
Myrtle Beach |
SC |
(1) |
552 |
1,970 |
205 |
552 |
2,175 |
2,727 |
126 |
12/1/01 |
Kingsland |
GA |
(1) |
470 |
1,902 |
400 |
470 |
2,302 |
2,772 |
135 |
12/1/01 |
Saco |
ME |
(1) |
534 |
1,914 |
60 |
534 |
1,974 |
2,508 |
105 |
12/3/01 |
Plymouth |
MA |
1,004 |
4,584 |
131 |
1,004 |
4,715 |
5,719 |
235 |
12/19/01 |
|
Sandwich |
MA |
(1) |
670 |
3,060 |
135 |
670 |
3,195 |
3,865 |
165 |
12/19/01 |
Syracuse |
NY |
(1) |
294 |
1,203 |
173 |
294 |
1,376 |
1,670 |
78 |
2/5/02 |
Houston-Westward |
TX |
(1) |
853 |
3,434 |
337 |
855 |
3,769 |
4,624 |
180 |
2/13/02 |
Houston-Boone |
TX |
(1) |
250 |
1,020 |
36 |
252 |
1,054 |
1,306 |
54 |
2/13/02 |
-67-
<Page>
Houston-Cook |
TX |
(1) |
285 |
1,160 |
48 |
287 |
1,206 |
1,493 |
63 |
2/13/02 |
Houston-Harwin |
TX |
(1) |
449 |
1,816 |
50 |
451 |
1,864 |
2,315 |
93 |
2/13/02 |
Houston-Hempstead |
TX |
(1) |
545 |
2,200 |
102 |
546 |
2,301 |
2,847 |
113 |
2/13/02 |
Houston-Kuykendahl |
TX |
(1) |
517 |
2,090 |
369 |
519 |
2,457 |
2,976 |
122 |
2/13/02 |
Houston-Hwy 249 |
TX |
(1) |
299 |
1,216 |
236 |
301 |
1,450 |
1,751 |
70 |
2/13/02 |
Mesquite-Hwy 80 |
TX |
(1) |
463 |
1,873 |
103 |
465 |
1,974 |
2,439 |
97 |
2/13/02 |
Mesquite-Franklin |
TX |
(1) |
734 |
2,956 |
56 |
736 |
3,010 |
3,746 |
148 |
2/13/02 |
Dallas-Plantation |
TX |
(1) |
394 |
1,595 |
48 |
395 |
1,642 |
2,037 |
84 |
2/13/02 |
San Antonio-Hunt |
TX |
(1) |
381 |
1,545 |
41 |
383 |
1,584 |
1,967 |
81 |
2/13/02 |
Humble-5250 FM |
TX |
919 |
3,696 |
222 |
919 |
3,918 |
4,837 |
147 |
6/19/02 |
|
Pasadena |
TX |
612 |
2,468 |
23 |
612 |
2,491 |
3,103 |
96 |
6/19/02 |
|
League City |
TX |
689 |
3,159 |
27 |
689 |
3,186 |
3,875 |
122 |
6/19/02 |
|
Montgomery |
TX |
817 |
3,286 |
19 |
817 |
3,305 |
4,122 |
127 |
6/19/02 |
|
Texas City |
TX |
817 |
3,286 |
45 |
817 |
3,331 |
4,148 |
127 |
6/19/02 |
|
Houston-Hwy 6 |
TX |
407 |
1,650 |
76 |
407 |
1,726 |
2,133 |
65 |
6/19/02 |
|
Lumberton |
TX |
817 |
3,287 |
75 |
817 |
3,362 |
4,179 |
128 |
6/19/02 |
|
The Hamptons |
NY |
2,207 |
8,866 |
197 |
2,207 |
9,063 |
11,270 |
225 |
12/16/02 |
|
The Hamptons |
NY |
1,131 |
4,564 |
303 |
1,131 |
4,867 |
5,998 |
119 |
12/16/02 |
|
The Hamptons |
NY |
635 |
2,918 |
132 |
635 |
3,050 |
3,685 |
76 |
12/16/02 |
|
The Hamptons |
NY |
1,251 |
5,744 |
199 |
1,252 |
5,942 |
7,194 |
148 |
12/16/02 |
|
Dallas |
TX |
1,039 |
4,201 |
8 |
1,039 |
4,209 |
5,248 |
36 |
8/26/03 |
|
Dallas |
TX |
827 |
3,776 |
5 |
827 |
3,781 |
4,608 |
24 |
10/1/03 |
|
Corporate Office |
NY |
0 |
68 |
7,072 |
1,170 |
5,970 |
7,140 |
1,035 |
1/1/95 |
|
$134,179 |
$505,889 |
$ 99,768 |
$136,424 |
$603,412 |
$739,836 |
$ 92,498 |
(1) These properties are encumbered through one mortgage loan with an outstanding balance of $46.8 million at December 31, 2003.
-68-
<Page>
December 31, 2003 |
December 31, 2002 |
December 31, 2001 |
||||
Cost: |
||||||
Balance at beginning of period |
$ 710,841 |
$ 611,289 |
$ 562,721 |
|||
Additions during period: |
|
|
|
|||
32,819 |
99,753 |
48,796 |
||||
Deductions during period: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at close of period |
$739,836 |
$710,841 |
$611,289 |
|||
Accumulated Depreciation: |
||||||
Balance at beginning of period |
$ 75,344 |
$ 59,091 |
$ 45,253 |
|||
Additions during period: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deductions during period: |
||||||
Accumulated depreciation of real |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at close of period |
$ 92,498 |
$ 75,344 |
$ 59,091 |
-69-
<Page>
Exhibit No. |
Description |
3.1 |
Agreement of Limited Partnership of the Operating Partnership, as amended. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the General Form for Registration of Securities of the Operating Partnership on Form 10.) |
3.2* |
Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Company |
3.3** |
By-laws of the Company |
3.4 |
Articles Supplementary to the Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Company classifying and designating the Company's Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company's Form 8A filed December 3, 1996) |
3.5 |
Articles Supplementary to the Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Company classifying and designating the 9.85% Series B Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.6 to the Company's Form 8-A filed July 29, 1999) |
3.6** |
Articles Supplementary to the Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Company classifying and designating the 8.375% Series C Convertible Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock |
10.2* |
Form of Non-competition Agreement between the Company and Charles E. Lannon |
10.3* |
Form of Non-competition Agreement between the Company and Robert J. Attea |
10.4* |
Form of Non-competition Agreement between the Company and Kenneth F. Myszka |
10.5* |
Form of Non-competition Agreement between the Company and David L. Rogers |
10.6 |
Sovran Self Storage, Inc. 1995 Award and Option Plan, as Amended (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001.) |
-70-
<Page>
10.7 |
Sovran Self Storage, Inc. 1995 Outside Directors' Option Plan, as Amended (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001.) |
10.8* |
Sovran Self Storage Incentive Compensation Plan for Executive Officer |
10.9* |
Restricted Stock Agreement between the Company and David L. Rogers |
10.10* |
Form of Supplemental Representations, Warranties and Indemnification Agreement among the Company and Robert J. Attea, Charles E. Lannon, Kenneth F. Myszka and David L. Rogers |
10.11* |
Form of Pledge Agreement among the Company and Robert J. Attea, Charles E. Lannon, Kenneth F. Myszka and David L. Rogers |
10.12* |
Form of Indemnification Agreement between the Company and certain Officers and Directors of the Company |
10.13* |
Form of Subscription Agreement (including Registration Rights Statement) among the Company and subscribers for 422,171 Common Shares |
10.14* |
Form of Registration Rights and Lock-Up Agreement among the Company and Robert J. Attea, Charles E. Lannon, Kenneth F. Myszka and David L. Rogers |
10.15* |
Form of Facilities Services Agreement between the Company and Williamsville Properties, Inc. |
10.16 |
Sovran Self Storage, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors (Incorporated by reference to Appendix A to the Company's Proxy Statement for the 1999 Annual Meeting of Shareholders) |
10.17 |
First Amendment to Revolving Credit and Term Loan Agreement among the Company, the Operating Partnership, Fleet National Bank and other lenders named therein. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to the Company's Annual Report on From 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001.) |
10.18** |
Securities Purchase Agreement among Registrant, Sovran Acquisition Limited Partnership, The Prudential Insurance Company of America, Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association of America and other institutional investors |
-71-
<Page>
10.19** |
Amendments to Agreement of Limited Partnership of Sovran Acquisition Limited Partnership |
10.20** |
Registration Rights Agreement |
10.21 |
Promissory Note between Locke Sovran II, LLC and PNC Bank, National Association. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002.) |
10.23 |
Amended and Restated Revolving Credit and Term Loan Agreement among Registrant, the Partnership, Fleet National Bank and other lenders named therein. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.23 to the Company's Annual Report on From 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003.) |
10.24 |
Note Purchase Agreement among Registrant, the Partnership and the purchaser named therein. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.24 to the Company's Annual Report on From 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003.) |
12.1 |
Statement Re: Computation of Earnings to Fixed Charges |
23 |
Consent of Independent Auditors |
31.1 |
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act, as amended |
31.2 |
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act, as amended |
32 |
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
_________________
* Incorporated by reference to the exhibits as filed with the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-11 (File No. 33-91422) filed June 19, 1995.
* * Incorporated by reference to the exhibits as filed in the Company's current report on Form 8-K, filed July 12, 2002.
-72-
<Page>
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Sovran Holdings Inc., as general partner of registrant, certifies that it has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
SOVRAN ACQUISITION LIMITED PARTNERSHIP |
||
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of Sovran Holdings Inc., as general partner of registrant, and in the capacities and on the dates indicated. |
|||
Signature |
Title |
Date |
|
|
Chairman of the Board of Directors, Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
/s/ Kenneth F. Myszka |
President, Chief Operating |
|
|
/s/ David L. Rogers |
Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
|
|
/s/ Michael A. Elia |
|
|
|
/s/ Anthony P. Gammie |
|
|
|
/s/ Charles E. Lannon |
|
|
-73-
<Page>
Sovran Acquisition Limited Partnership
Exhibit (12.1) Statement |
Re: Computation of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividends |
Amounts in thousands
Year ended December 31, |
|||||
2003 |
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
1999 |
|
Earnings: |
|||||
Net income available to common unitholders |
$20,781 |
$22,388 |
$22,776 |
$24,564 |
$26,108 |
Fixed charges |
25,534 |
20,805 |
17,955 |
21,279 |
15,944 |
Earnings (1) |
46,315 |
43,193 |
40,731 |
45,843 |
42,052 |
Fixed charges: |
|||||
Interest expense |
15,102 |
14,664 |
13,940 |
17,497 |
13,927 |
Preferred stock dividends |
8,818 |
5,093 |
2,955 |
2,955 |
1,239 |
Amortization of financing fees |
1,614 |
1,048 |
1,060 |
827 |
778 |
Fixed charges (2) |
$25,534 |
$20,805 |
$17,955 |
$21,279 |
$15,944 |
Ratio of earnings to combined fixed charges and preferred stock dividends |
|
|
|
|
|
-74-
<Page>
Exhibit 23
Consent of Independent Auditors
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-3, No. 333-51169) of Sovran Self Storage, Inc. and Sovran Acquisition Limited Partnership and in the related Prospectus of our report dated January 28, 2004, with respect to the financial statements and schedule of Sovran Acquisition Limited Partnership included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2003.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP |
Buffalo, New York
March 11, 2004
-75-
<Page>
Exhibit 31.1
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act, as amended
I, Robert J. Attea, certify that:
1. |
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Sovran Acquisition LP; |
|
2. |
Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report; |
|
3. |
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report; |
|
4. |
The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have: |
|
a) |
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared; |
|
b) |
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and |
|
c) |
disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to materially affect the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and |
|
5. |
The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): |
|
a) |
all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and |
|
b) |
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over financial reporting. |
Date: March 12, 2004
/ S / Robert J. Attea Robert J. Attea Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Sovran Holdings, Inc., the Sole General Partner of the Operating Partnership |
-76-
<Page>
Exhibit 31.2
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act, as amended
I, David L. Rogers, certify that:
1. |
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Sovran Acquisition LP; |
|
2. |
Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report; |
|
3. |
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report; |
|
4. |
The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have: |
|
a) |
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared; |
|
b) |
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and |
|
c) |
disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to materially affect the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and |
|
5. |
The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): |
|
a) |
all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and |
|
b) |
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over financial reporting. |
Date: March 12, 2004
/ S / David L. Rogers David L. Rogers Secretary, Chief Financial Officer of Sovran Holdings, Inc., the Sole General Partner of the Operating Partnership |
-77-
<Page>
Exhibit 32
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Each of the undersigned of Sovran Acquisition LP (the "Operating Partnership") does hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:
1) |
The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Operating Partnership for the annual period ended December 31, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and |
2) |
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Operating Partnership. |
Dated: March 12, 2004
/ S / Robert J. Attea |
|
|
-78-