Back to GetFilings.com

FORM 10-Q

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549


[ X ]  QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2004


Commission file number: 0-024071

SOVRAN ACQUISITION LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

6467 Main Street
Buffalo, NY 14221
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)

(716) 633-1850
(Registrant's telephone number including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X No ____

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes X No ____

- 1 -

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

The accompanying unaudited financial statements of Sovran Acquisition Limited Partnership (the "Operating Partnership") have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the three-month period ended March 31, 2004 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ended December 31, 2004.

Reclassifications: Certain amounts from the 2003 financial statements have been reclassified to conform with the current period presentation relating to the discontinued operations (see Note 5).

Sovran Acquisition Limited Partnership (the "Operating Partnership") is the entity through which Sovran Self Storage, Inc. (the "Company"), a self-administered and self-managed real estate investment trust ("REIT"), conducts substantially all of its business and owns substantially all of its assets. In 1995, the Company was formed under Maryland law and the Operating Partnership was organized as a Delaware limited partnership to continue and to expand the self-storage operations of the Company's privately owned predecessor organizations. On June 26, 1995, the Company commenced operations, through the Operating Partnership, effective with the completion of its initial public offering of 5,890,000 shares. At March 31, 2004, the Operating Partnership owned and/or managed 264 self-storage properties under the "Uncle Bob's Self Storage" Registered trade name in 21 states.

As of March 31, 2004, the Company was a 96.59% economic owner of the Operating Partnership and controls it through Sovran Holdings, Inc. ("Holdings"), a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company incorporated in Delaware and the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership (this structure is commonly referred to as an umbrella partnership REIT or "UPREIT"). The board of directors of Holdings, the members of which are also members of the Board of Directors of the Company, manages the affairs of the Operating Partnership by directing the affairs of Holdings. The Company's limited partner and indirect general partner interests in the Operating Partnership entitle it to share in cash distributions from, and in the profits and losses of, the Operating Partnership in proportion to its ownership interest therein and entitle the Company to vote on all matters requiring a vote of the limited partners.

- 5 -

The other limited partners of the Operating Partnership are persons who contributed their direct or indirect interests in certain self-storage properties to the Operating Partnership. The Operating Partnership is obligated to redeem each unit of limited partnership ("Unit") at the request of the holder thereof for cash equal to the fair market value of a share of the Company's common stock ("Common Shares") at the time of such redemption, provided that the Company at its option may elect to acquire any Unit presented for redemption for one Common Share or cash. The Company presently anticipates that it will elect to issue Common Shares to acquire Units presented for redemption, rather than paying cash. With each such redemption the Company's percentage ownership interest in the Operating Partnership will increase. In addition, whenever the Company issues Common Shares, the Company is obligated to contribute any net proceeds therefrom to the Operating Partnership and the Operating Partnership is obligated to issue an equivalent number of Units to the Company. Such limited partners' redemption rights are reflected in "limited partners' capital interest" in the accompanying balance sheets at the cash redemption amount at the balance sheet date. Capital activity with regard to such limited partners' redemption rights is reflected in the accompanying statements of partners' capital.

In accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 123 "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation," the Operating Partnership has elected to continue applying the provisions of Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25 and related interpretations in accounting for its stock-based compensation plans. Accordingly, the Operating Partnership does not recognize compensation expense for stock options when the stock option price at the grant date is equal to or greater than the fair market value of the stock on that date. The following illustrates the pro forma effect on net income and earnings per unit if the Operating Partnership had applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123 (in thousands, except for earnings per unit information):

- 6 -

<PAGE>

The following summarizes activity in storage facilities during the nine-month period ended March 31, 2004. This summary excludes the effect of storage facilities presented as discontinued operations (see Note 5).

In March 2004, the Operating Partnership acquired one storage facility for $13.7 million. Substantially all of the purchase price of this facility was allocated to land and building and the operating results of the acquired facility have been included in the Operating Partnership's operations since the acquisition date.

SFAS No.144 "Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets" addresses accounting for discontinued operations. The Statement requires the segregation of all disposed components of an entity with operations that (i) can be distinguished from the rest of the entity and (ii) will be eliminated from the ongoing operations of the entity in a disposal transaction.

Based on the criteria of SFAS No. 144, four properties that have been sold by the Operating Partnership require presentation as discontinued operations as of March 31, 2004. The amounts in the 2003 financial statements related to the operations and the net assets of these properties, have been reclassified and are presented as discontinued operations and net assets from discontinued operations, respectively.

During the three months ended March 31, 2004, the Operating Partnership sold three non-strategic storage facilities located in Pennsylvania and Ohio for net cash proceeds of $6.1 million resulting in a gain of $1.6 million. In April 2004, the Operating Partnership sold one facility in Tennessee for $3.8 million, resulting in a loss of $1.0 million. The $1.0 million loss has been

- 7 -

<PAGE>

recorded as a write-down to fair value during the three months ended March 31, 2004, and the property is recorded at March 31, 2004 at its fair value as net assets of discontinued operations. The operations of these four facilities,the gain on sale of the three facilities sold in the period ended March 31, 2004, and the write-down to fair value of the facility sold in April 2004 are reported as discontinued operations. The following is a summary of the amounts reported as discontinued operations:

The Operating Partnership has a $75 million (expandable to $100 million) revolving line of credit maturing September 2006 bearing interest at a variable rate equal to LIBOR plus 1.375%, a $100 million term note maturing September 2008 bearing interest at a variable rate equal to LIBOR plus 1.50%, a $80 million term note maturing September 2013 bearing interest at a fixed rate of 6.26%, and a $20 million term note maturing September 2013 bearing interest at a variable rate equal to LIBOR plus 1.50%. The weighted average interest rate at March 31, 2004 on the Operating Partnership's line of credit before the effect of interest rate swaps was approximately 2.5%. At March 31, 2004, there was $65 million available on the revolving line of credit excluding the amount available on the expansion feature.

The Operating Partnership has entered into three interest rate swap agreements, one in March 2001 for $50 million and two in September 2001 for $50 million and $30 million, to effectively convert a total of $130 million of variable-rate debt to fixed-rate debt. One of the $50 million interest rate swap agreements matures in November 2005, the other matures in October 2006, and the $30 million swap agreement matures in September 2008.

Based on current interest rates, the Operating Partnership estimates that payments under the interest rate swaps will be approximately $4.8 million in 2004. Payments made under the interest rate swap agreements will be reclassified to interest expense as settlements occur. The fair value of the swap agreements including accrued interest was a liability of $8.8 million at March 31, 2004.

The net carrying amount of the Operating Partnership's debt instruments approximates fair value.

- 8 -

<PAGE>

In February 2002, the consolidated joint venture (Locke Sovran II, LLC) entered into a mortgage note of $48 million. The note is secured by the 27 properties owned by the joint venture with a cost of $79 million. The 10-year note bears interest at 7.19%.

The Operating Partnership's current practice is to conduct environmental investigations in connection with property acquisitions. At this time, the Operating Partnership is not aware of any environmental contamination of any of its facilities that individually or in the aggregate would be material to the Operating Partnership's overall business, financial condition, or results of operations.

Total comprehensive income consisting of net income and the change in the fair value of interest rate swap agreements was $6.9 million and $6.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

Investment in joint ventures includes an ownership interest in Locke Sovran I, LLC, which operates 11 self storage facilities throughout the United States, and an ownership interest in Iskalo Office Holdings, LLC, which owns the building that houses the Operating Partnership's headquarters and other tenants.

In December 2000, the Operating Partnership contributed seven self-storage properties to Locke Sovran I, LLC with a fair market value of $19.8 million, in exchange for a $15 million one year note receivable bearing interest at LIBOR plus 1.75% that was repaid in 2001, and a 45% interest in Locke Sovran I, LLC.

The Operating Partnership also has a 49% ownership interest in Iskalo Office Holdings, LLC at March 31, 2004. The majority of the $1.0 million investment relates to interest bearing loans made by the Operating Partnership to the joint venture less the Operating Partnership's share of losses to date.

A summary of the unconsolidated joint ventures' operating statements as for the three-months ended March 31, 2004 is as follows:

- 9 -

<PAGE>

The Operating Partnership does not guarantee the debt of Locke Sovran I, LLC or Iskalo Office Holdings, LLC.

The Operating Partnership reports earnings per unit in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 128, "Earnings Per Share." In computing earnings per unit, the Operating Partnership deducts preferred stock distributions from net income to arrive at net income available to common unitholders. The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per common unit:

Potential common shares from the Series C Convertible Preferred Stock were excluded from the diluted earnings per share calculation because their inclusion would have had an antidilutive effect on earnings per share.

- 10 -

<PAGE>

The following discussion and analysis of the consolidated financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto included elsewhere in this report.

When used in this discussion and elsewhere in this document, the words "intends," "believes," "expects," "anticipates," and similar expressions are intended to identify "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of that term in Section 27A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1933 and in Section 21F of the Securities Act of 1934. Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of the Operating Partnership to be materially different from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such factors include, but are not limited to, the effect of competition from new self-storage facilities, which would cause rents and occupancy rates to decline; the Operating Partnership's ability to evaluate, finance and integrate acquired businesses into the Operating Partnership's existing business and operations; the Operating Partnership's ability to form joint ventures and sell existing pro perties to those joint ventures and others; the Operating Partnership's ability to effectively compete in the industry in which it does business; the Operating Partnership's existing indebtedness may mature in an unfavorable credit environment, preventing refinancing or forcing refinancing of the indebtedness on terms that are not as favorable as the existing terms; interest rates may fluctuate, impacting costs associated with the Operating Partnership's outstanding floating rate debt; the Operating Partnership's ability to successfully extend its truck leasing program and Dri-Guard product roll-out; the Operating Partnership's reliance on its call center; the Operating Partnership's cash flow may be insufficient to meet required payments of principal and interest; and tax law changes that may change the taxability of future income.

FOR THE PERIOD JANUARY 1, 2004 THROUGH MARCH 31, 2004, COMPARED TO THE PERIOD JANUARY 1, 2003 THROUGH MARCH 31, 2003

We recorded rental revenues of $27.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2004, an increase of $1.7 million or 6.5% when compared to rental revenues of $26.1 million during the same period in 2003. Of this increase, $1.2 million resulted from a 4.9% increase in rental revenues at the 245 core properties considered in same store sales (those properties included in the consolidated results of operations since January 1, 2003). The increase in same store rental revenues was achieved primarily through rate increases on select units and an increase in occupancy. The remaining $0.5 million increase in rental revenues resulted from the acquisition of one store in March 2004 and from having the 2003 acquisitions included for the entire period of operations in 2004. Other income increased $0.2 million due to the additional revenue generated by truck rentals and increased insurance sales.

- 11 -

<PAGE>

Property operating and real estate tax expense increased $0.8 million or 9.0% in the first three months of 2004 compared to the same period in 2003. Of this $0.1 million was incurred by the facilities acquired in 2004 and from having the 2003 acquisitions included for a full period of operations in 2004. The remaining $0.7 million increase was due to increased personnel, truck expense, utilities, insurance and increased property taxes in 2004 at the 245 core properties considered same stores.

General and administrative expenses increased $0.2 million or 6.6% from the first three months of 2003 to the same period in 2004. The increase primarily resulted from increased cost in our call center and the increased costs associated with operating the properties acquired in 2004 and 2003.

Depreciation and amortization expense increased to $4.7 million in the first three months of 2004 from $4.6 million in the same period in 2003, primarily as a result of additional depreciation taken on real estate assets acquired in 2004 and a full period of depreciation on 2003 acquisitions.

Income from operations increased from $10.4 million in the first three months of 2003 to $11.2 million for the same period in 2004 as a result of the aforementioned items.

Interest expense increased from $3.6 million in the first three months of 2003 to $4.1 million for the same period in 2004 as a result of higher interest rates associated with the fixed rate debt entered into in September 2003.

As described in Note 5 to the financial statements, during the quarter ended March 2004 we sold three non-strategic storage facilities for $6.1 million. The historical operations of the facilities sold, the related gain on sale, and the historical operations and the write-down to fair value of the one facility sold in April 2004 are included as discontinued operations.

We believe that Funds from Operations ("FFO") provides relevant and meaningful information about our operating performance that is necessary, along with net earnings and cash flows, for an understanding of our operating results.  Funds from operations is defined by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts, Inc. ("NAREIT") as net income computed in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP"), excluding gains or losses on sales of properties, plus depreciation and amortization and after adjustments to record unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures on the same basis.  We believe that to further understand our performance, FFO should be considered along with our reported net income and cash flows in accordance with GAAP, as presented in our consolidated financial statements.

Our computation of FFO may not be comparable to FFO reported by other REITs or real estate companies that do not define the term in accordance with the current NAREIT definition or that interpret the current NAREIT definition differently. FFO does not represent cash generated from

- 12 -

<PAGE>

operating activities determined in accordance with GAAP, and should not be considered as an alternative to net income (determined in accordance with GAAP) as an indication of our performance, as an alternative to net cash flows from operating activities (determined in accordance with GAAP) as a measure of our liquidity, or as an indicator of our ability to make cash distributions. The following table sets forth the calculation of FFO:

Our ability to retain cash flow is limited because the Company operates as a REIT. In order for the Company to maintain its REIT status, a substantial portion of our operating cash flow must be used to pay distributions to our unitholders. We believe that our internally generated net cash provided by operating activities and our revolving line of credit will continue to be sufficient to fund ongoing operations, capital improvements, distributions and debt service requirements through September 2006, at which time our revolving line of credit matures.

Cash flows from operating activities were $11.3 million and $11.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The increase is primarily attributable to increased net income from continuing operations.

On September 4, 2003, we entered into agreements relating to new unsecured credit arrangements, and received funds under those arrangements. Our new unsecured line of credit provides availability up to $75 million (expandable to $100 million), of which $10 million was drawn as of March 31, 2004. The revolving line of credit facility matures in September 2006

- 13 -

<PAGE>

and bears interest at a variable rate equal to LIBOR plus 1.375%. We also entered into a $100 million term note through September 2008 at a variable rate equal to LIBOR plus 1.50%.

In addition to the line of credit and term note mentioned above, in 2003 we also issued a $80 million unsecured term note bearing interest at a fixed rate of 6.26% and a $20 million unsecured term note bearing interest at a variable rate equal to LIBOR plus 1.50%. The term notes mature September 2013.

The line of credit facility and term notes currently have investment grade ratings from Standard and Poor's (BBB-), Moody's (Baa3), and Fitch (BBB-).

In February 2002, the consolidated joint venture (Locke Sovran II, LLC) entered into a mortgage note of $48 million. The note is secured by the 27 properties owned by the joint venture with a cost of $79 million. The 10-year note bears interest at a fixed rate of 7.19%.

In July 1999, the Company issued 1,200,000 shares of 9.85% Series B Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock. The Series B Preferred Stock is currently rated by Standard and Poor's (BB+), Moody's (Ba2) and Fitch (BB+). The Company has the ability to retire its Series B Preferred Stock issue at any time after July 31, 2004. Should market conditions be favorable, and if by so doing the Company's capital position would be enhanced, it may redeem this issue at a total cost of $30 million. If the Company elects to redeem this stock, the Company would use the proceeds from its Dividend Reinvestment and Direct Stock Purchase Plan to fund the redemption. In accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force ("EITF") Topic D-42, "The Effect on the Calculation of Earnings per Share for the Redemption or Induced Conversion of Preferred Stock", we would expect to record a reduction of approximately $1.4 million from net income to arrive at net income available to common unitholders relating to the difference between the Series B Preferred Stock carrying value and the expected redemption amount should the issue be redeemed.

On July 3, 2002, the Company entered into an agreement providing for the issuance of 2,800,000 shares of 8.375% Series C Convertible Cumulative Preferred Stock and warrants to purchase 379,166 shares of common stock at $32.60 per share in a privately negotiated transaction. The Company immediately issued 1,600,000 shares of the Series C Preferred and issued the remaining 1,200,000 shares on November 27, 2002. The offering price was $25.00 per share and the net proceeds of $67.9 million were used to reduce indebtedness that was incurred in the June 2002 acquisition of seven self-storage properties and to repay a portion of the line of credit.

During the three months ended March 31, 2004, we issued 503,000 shares through our Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan and Stock Option Plan resulting in net proceeds of $16.6 million.

- 14 -

<PAGE>

From the inception of our Share Repurchase Program through March 31, 2004, the Company has reacquired a total of 1,171,886 shares of common stock pursuant to this program. No shares of common stock were repurchased by the Company under the Share Repurchase Program during the quarter ended March 31, 2004. From time to time, subject to market price and certain loan covenants, the Company may reacquire additional shares.

Future acquisitions, share repurchases and repayment of the credit line are expected to be funded with the revolving line of credit, issuance of secured or unsecured term notes, issuance of common or preferred stock, sale of properties, private placement solicitation of joint venture equity and other sources of capital.

During the three months ended March 31, 2004, we used operating cash flows and proceeds from the sale of storage facilities to acquire one Property in Connecticut comprising 113,000 square feet from an unaffiliated storage operator for $13.7 million.

During the three months ended March 31, 2004, we sold three storage facilities to unaffiliated parties for $6.1 million. In April 2004, we sold our facility in Nashville, Tennessee to an independent operator for approximately $3.8 million. The operations of these four facilities, the gain on sale of the three facilities sold in the period ended March 31, 2004, and the write-down to fair value of the facility sold in April 2004 are reported as discontinued operations on the financial statements. We may seek to sell additional non-strategic properties to third parties in 2004.

As a REIT, the Company is not required to pay federal income tax on income that it distributes to its shareholders, provided that the amount distributed is equal to at least 90% of its taxable income. These distributions must be made in the year to which they relate, or in the following year if declared before the Company files its federal income tax return, and if it is paid before the first regular dividend of the following year. The first distribution of 2004 may be applied toward the Company's 2003 distribution requirement. The Company's source of funds for such distributions is solely and directly from the Operating Partnership.

As a REIT, the Company must derive at least 95% of its total gross income from income related to real property, interest and dividends. In the first quarter of 2004, the Company's percentage of revenue from such sources exceeded 97%, thereby passing the 95% test, and no special measures are expected to be required to enable the Company to maintain its REIT designation.

- 15 -

<PAGE>

At March 31, 2004, we have three outstanding interest rate swap agreements. The first, entered into in March 2001, effectively fixes the LIBOR base rate at 5.36% through November 2005 on $50 million notional amount. The second, entered in September 2001, effectively fixes the LIBOR base rate at 4.485% through October 2006 on another $50 million notional amount. The third, also entered in September 2001, effectively fixes the LIBOR base rate at 4.805% through September 2008 on $30 million notional amount. We have an unsecured credit facility in place through September 2006 enabling us to borrow funds at rates of LIBOR plus 1.375%, an unsecured term note at rates of LIBOR plus 1.5% through September 2008, and an unsecured term note at rates of LIBOR plus 1.5% through September 2013. As a result of the above described interest rate swap agreements, we have fixed our interest rate through November 2005 on $9 million at 6.735%, and $41 million at 6.86%, through October 2006 on $50 million at 5.985%, and t hrough September 2008 on $30 million at 6.305%. Upon renewal or replacement of the credit facility, our total interest may change dependent on the terms we negotiate with the lenders; however, the LIBOR base rates have been contractually fixed on $130 million of our debt through the interest rate swap termination dates.

Through November 2005, all of our $210 million of unsecured debt is on a fixed rate basis after taking into account the interest rate swaps noted above. Based on our outstanding debt of $210 million at March 31, 2004, a 1% increase in interest rates would have no effect on our interest expense.

We do not believe that inflation has had or will have a direct effect on our operations. Substantially all of the leases at the facilities are on a month-to-month basis which provides us with the opportunity to increase rental rates as each lease matures.

Our revenues typically have been higher in the third and fourth quarters of a fiscal year, primarily because we increase rental rates on most of our storage units at the beginning of May and because self-storage facilities tend to experience greater occupancy during the late spring, summer and early fall months due to the greater incidence of residential moves during these periods. However, we believe that our tenant mix, diverse geographic locations, rental structure and expense structure provide adequate protection against undue fluctuations in cash flows and net revenues during off-peak seasons. Thus, we do not expect seasonality to affect materially distributions to shareholders.

- 16 -

<PAGE>

In January 2003, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 46 ("FIN 46"), "Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, an interpretation of ARB 51." The primary objectives of this interpretation are to provide guidance on the identification of entities for which control is achieved through means other than through voting rights ("variable interest entities") and how to determine when and which business enterprise (the "primary beneficiary") should consolidate the variable interest entity. This new model for consolidation applies to an entity in which either (i) the equity investors (if any) do not have a controlling financial interest, or (ii) the equity investment at risk is insufficient to finance that entity's activities without receiving additional subordinated financial support from other parties. In addition, FIN 46 requires that the primary beneficiary, as well as all other enterprises with a significant variable interest in a variable interest entity, make additional disclosures. Certain disclosure requirements of FIN 46 were effective for financial statements issued after January 31, 2003. In December 2003, the FASB issued FIN No. 46 (revised December 2003), "Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities" ("FIN 46-R") to address certain FIN 46 implementation issues. There was no impact to the Operating Partnership of adopting FIN 46-R.

The information required is incorporated by reference to the information appearing under the caption "Interest Rate Risk" in "Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" above.

The Operating Partnership's chief executive officer and chief financial officer have evaluated the Operating Partnership's disclosure controls and procedures as of March 31, 2004. Based on that evaluation, these officers have concluded that the Operating Partnership's disclosure controls and procedures are effective for the purpose of ensuring that material information required to be in this annual report is made known to them by others on a timely basis. There have not been changes in the Operating Partnership's internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect these controls subsequent to the date of this evaluation.

No disclosure required.

No disclosure required.

- 17 -

No disclosure required.

No disclosure required.

No disclosure required.

- 18 -

<PAGE>

None

- 19 -

<PAGE>

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

- 20 -

<PAGE>

- 21 -

<PAGE>

<PAGE>

               Each of the undersigned of Sovran Acquisition Limited Partnership (the "Operating Partnership") does hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

Dated:          May 10, 2004