<page>

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004
Commission File Number: 0-24071

          Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section  13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes  [  X  ]     No  [   ]

          Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S--K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [X]

          Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b--2 of the exchange Act). Yes  [  X  ]     No  [   ]

          As of March 1, 2005, 16,555,390 Units of Limited Partnership Interest were outstanding.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of the Proxy Statement for Annual Meeting of Shareholders of the Company to be held on May 18, 2005 (Part III).

Exhibit Index is on Pages 50-52

1

<page>

          When used in this discussion and elsewhere in this document, the words "intends," "believes," "expects," "anticipates," and similar expressions are intended to identify "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of that term in Section 27A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1933 and in Section 21F of the Securities Act of 1934. Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of the Operating Partnership to be materially different from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such factors include, but are not limited to, the effect of competition from new self-storage facilities, which would cause rents and occupancy rates to decline; the Operating Partnership's ability to evaluate, finance and integrate acquired businesses into the Operating Partnership's existing business and operations; the Operating Partnership's ability to effectively compete in the industry in which it does business; the Operating Partnership's existing indebtedness may mature in an unfavorable credit environment, preventing refinancing or forcing refinancing of the indebtedness on terms that are not as favorable as the existing terms; interest rates may fluctuate, impacting costs associated with the Operating Partnership's outstanding floating rate debt; the Operating Partnership's ability to successfully extend its truck move-in program for new customers and Dri-guard product roll-out; the Operating Partnership's reliance on its call center; the Operating Partnership's cash flow may be insufficient to meet required payments of principal, interest and dividends; and tax law changes that may change the taxability of future income.

          Sovran Acquisition Limited Partnership (the "Operating Partnership") is the entity through which Sovran Self Storage, Inc. (the "Company"), a self-administered and self-managed real estate investment trust ("REIT"), conducts substantially all of the Company's business and owns substantially all of the Company's assets. The Operating Partnership is the fifth largest operator of self-storage properties in the United States. In 1995, the Company was formed under Maryland law and the Operating Partnership was organized as a Delaware limited partnership to continue and to expand the self-storage operations of the Company's privately owned predecessor organizations. The term "Company" as used herein means Sovran Self Storage, Inc. and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis (including the Operating Partnership) or, where the context so requires, Sovran Self Storage, Inc. only. The term "Operating Partnership" as used herein means S ovran Acquisition Limited Partnership.

          At December 31, 2004, the Company is a 97.0% economic owner of the Operating Partnership and controls it through Sovran Holdings, Inc. ("Holdings"), a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company incorporated in Delaware and the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership. This structure is commonly referred to as an umbrella partnership REIT or "UPREIT." The Board of Directors of Holdings, the members of which are the same as the members of the Board of Directors of the Company, manages the affairs of the Operating Partnership by directing the affairs of Holdings. The Company's limited partner and indirect general partner interests in the Operating Partnership entitle it to share in cash distributions from, and in the profits and losses of, the Operating Partnership in proportion to its ownership interest therein and entitle the Company to vote on all matters requiring a vote of the limited partners.

          The Operating Partnership's other limited partners are persons who contributed their direct or indirect interests in certain self-storage properties to the Operating Partnership. The Operating Partnership is obligated to redeem each unit of limited partnership ("Unit") at the request of the holder thereof for cash equal to the fair market value of a share of the Company's common stock, par value $.01 per share ("Common Shares"), at the time of such redemption, provided that the Company at its option may elect to acquire any such Unit presented for redemption for one Common Share or cash. With each such redemption or acquisition by the Company, the Company's percentage ownership interest in the Operating Partnership will increase. In addition, whenever the Company issues Common Shares, the Company is obligated to contribute any net proceeds therefrom to the Operating Partnership and the Operating Partnership is obligated to issu e an equivalent number of Units to the Company.

          The Operating Partnership may issue additional Units to acquire additional self-storage properties in transactions that in certain circumstances defer some or all of the sellers' tax consequences. The Operating Partnership believes that many potential sellers of self-storage properties have a low tax basis in their properties and would be more willing to sell the properties in transactions that defer Federal income taxes. Offering Units instead of cash for properties may provide potential sellers partial Federal income tax deferral.

2

<page>

          At March 1, 2005, the Operating Partnership owned and/or managed 272 Properties consisting of approximately 16.5 million net rentable square feet, situated in 21 states. Eleven of the Properties are managed under an agreement with an unconsolidated joint venture that is 45% owned by the Operating Partnership. The Operating Partnership is the fifth largest operator of self-storage properties in the United States based on facilities owned and/or managed. The Properties conduct business under the user-friendly trade name "Uncle Bob's Self-Storage."

          The Operating Partnership's principal executive offices are located at 6467 Main Street, Buffalo, New York 14221, our telephone number is (716) 633-1850 and the Operating Partnership's web site is www.sovranss.com.

          We seek to enhance unitholder value through internal growth and acquisition of additional storage properties. Internal growth is achieved through aggressive property management: increasing rents, increasing occupancy levels, controlling costs, maximizing collections and strategically expanding and improving the Properties. Should economic conditions warrant, we may develop new properties. We believe that there continue to be opportunities for growth through acquisitions, and constantly seek to acquire self-storage properties that are susceptible to realization of increased economies of scale and enhanced performance through application of our expertise.

          We believe that self-storage facilities offer inexpensive storage space to residential and commercial users. In addition to fully enclosed and secure storage space, many facilities also offer outside storage for automobiles, recreational vehicles and boats. Better facilities are usually fenced and well lighted with gates that are either manually operated or automated and have a full-time manager/leasing agent. Customers have access to their storage area during business hours and in certain circumstances are provided with 24-hour access. Individual storage units are secured by the customer's lock, and the customer has sole control of access to the unit.

          According to published data, of the approximately 39,000 facilities in the United States, less than 12% are managed by the ten largest operators. The remainder of the industry is characterized by numerous small, local operators. The shortage of skilled operators, the scarcity of equity capital available to small operators for acquisitions and expansions, and the potential for savings through economies of scale are factors that are leading to consolidation in the industry. We believe that, as a result of this trend, significant growth opportunities exist for operators with proven management systems and sufficient capital resources.

         We believe that we have developed substantial expertise in managing self-storage facilities. Key elements of our management system include the following:

          Property managers attend a thorough orientation program and undergo continuous training that emphasizes closing techniques, identification of selected marketing opportunities, networking with possible referral sources, and familiarization with our customized management information system. In addition to frequent contact with Regional Team Leaders and other Operating Partnership personnel, property managers receive periodic newsletters via our intranet regarding a variety of operational issues, and from time to time attend "roundtable" seminars with other property managers.

          Responding to the increased customer demand for services, we have implemented several programs expected to increase occupancy and profitability. These programs include:

3

<page>

          Our customized computer system performs billing, collections and reservation functions for each Property, it also tracks information used in developing marketing plans based on occupancy levels and tenant demographics and histories. The system generates daily, weekly and monthly financial reports for each Property that are transmitted to our principal office each night. The system also requires a property manager to input a descriptive explanation for all debit and credit transactions, paid-to-date changes, and all other discretionary activities, which allows the accounting staff at our principal office to promptly review all such transactions. Late charges are automatically imposed. More sensitive activities, such as rental rate changes and unit size or number changes, are completed only by Regional Team Leaders. Our customized management information system permits us to add new facilities to our portfolio with minimal a dditional overhead expense.

          All of our properties are subject to regular and routine maintenance procedures, which are designed to maintain the structure and appearance of our buildings and grounds. A staff headquartered in our principal office is responsible for the upkeep of the properties, and all maintenance service is contracted through local providers, such as lawn service, snowplowing, pest control, gate maintenance, HVAC repairs, paving, painting, roofing, etc. A codified set of specifications has been designed and is applied to all work performed on our Uncle Bob's stores. As with many other aspects of the Operating Partnership, our size has allowed us to enjoy relatively low maintenance costs because we have the benefit of economies of scale in purchasing, travel and overhead absorption.

          We are subject to federal, state, and local environmental regulations that apply generally to the ownership of real property and the operation of self-storage facilities. We have not received notice from any governmental authority or private party of any material environmental noncompliance, claim, or liability in connection with any of the Properties, and are not aware of any environmental condition with respect to any of the Properties that could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.

          The Properties are also generally subject to the same types of local regulations governing other real property, including zoning ordinances. We believe that the Properties are in substantial compliance with all such regulations.

          Each of the Properties is covered by fire and property insurance (including comprehensive liability) and all-risk property insurance policies, which are provided by reputable companies and on commercially reasonable terms. In addition, we maintain a policy insuring against environmental liabilities resulting from tenant storage on terms customary for the industry, and title insurance insuring free title to the Operating Partnership-owned Properties in an aggregate amount that we believe to be adequate.

4

<page>

          The Operating Partnership does not pay federal income taxes because we qualify as a partnership for federal and state income tax purposes and our partners are required to include their respective shares of profits and losses in their income tax returns.

          The primary factors upon which competition in the self-storage industry is based are location, rental rates, suitability of the property's design to prospective customers' needs, and the manner in which the property is operated and marketed. We believe we compete successfully on these bases. The extent of competition depends in significant part on local market conditions. We seek to locate facilities so as not to cause our Properties to compete with one another for customers, but the number of self-storage facilities in a particular area could have a material adverse effect on the performance of any of the Properties.

          Several of our competitors, including Public Storage, Shurgard, U-Haul, and Storage USA, Inc., are larger and have substantially greater financial resources than we do. These larger operators may, among other possible advantages, be capable of greater leverage and the payment of higher prices for acquisitions.

          While we emphasize equity real estate investments, we may, at our discretion, invest in mortgage and other real estate interests related to self-storage properties in a manner consistent with the Company''s qualification as a REIT. We may also retain a purchase money mortgage for a portion of the sale price in connection with the disposition of Properties from time to time. Should investment opportunities become available, we may look to acquire self-storage properties via a joint-venture partnership or similar entity. We may or may not have a significant investment in such a venture, but would use such an opportunity to expand our portfolio of branded and managed properties.

          Subject to the percentage of ownership limitations and gross income tests necessary for the Company''s REIT qualification, we also may invest in securities of entities engaged in real estate activities or securities of other issuers, including for the purpose of exercising control over such entities.

          We periodically review the assets comprising our portfolio. Any disposition decision will be based on a variety of factors, including, but not limited to, the (i) potential to continue to increase cash flow and value, (ii) sale price, (iii) strategic fit with the rest of our portfolio, (iv) potential for, or existence of, environmental or regulatory issues, (v) alternative uses of capital, and (vi) maintaining qualification as a REIT.

          During 2004, as part of an asset management program, we sold five non-strategic storage facilities located in Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Ohio, and South Carolina to unaffiliated parties for $11.7 million, resulting in a net gain of $1.1 million. In 2000 and 2001, we "spun-off" non-core, slow-growth properties, into joint ventures. In cases where we have a less than 50% controlling interest in a joint venture and certain other criteria are met (see Note 2, Basis of Presentation, to our financial statements in Item  8), the Properties of that joint venture are removed from our balance sheet and an investment in the joint venture is recorded. We record only our percentage share of the operating results of unconsolidated joint ventures. These ventures may allow us to (i) increase incremental revenues through management fees, (ii) provide returns on our equity in the joint venture, and (iii) increase liquidity to all ow redeployment of equity to repay debt, acquire stock, or buy higher growth properties. In 2000, we sold seven facilities for approximately $20 million to an unconsolidated joint venture in which we retained a 45% interest. All eleven properties in the unconsolidated joint venture are managed by us under an agreement. In cases where we are deemed to have a greater than 50% controlling interest and certain other criteria are met (see Note 2, Basis of Presentation, to our financial statements in Item  8), the joint venture is consolidated with our financial statements and a minority interest is recorded on the balance sheet and statement of operations for the portion of the joint venture not owned by us.

5

<page>

          We intend to pay regular quarterly distributions to our unitholders. However, future distributions by us will be at the discretion of the Board of Directors and will depend on the actual cash available for distribution, our financial condition and capital requirements, the Company's annual distribution requirements under the REIT provisions of the Code and such other factors as the Board of Directors deems relevant. In order to maintain its qualification as a REIT, the Company must make annual distributions to shareholders of at least 90% of its REIT taxable income (which does not include capital gains). Under certain circumstances, the Company may be required to make distributions in excess of cash available for distribution in order to meet this requirement.

          Our Board of Directors currently limit the amount of debt that may be incurred by us to less than 50% of the sum of the market value of our issued and outstanding Common and Preferred Stock plus our debt (Market Capitalization). We, however, may from time to time re-evaluate and modify our borrowing policy in light of then current economic conditions, relative costs of debt and equity capital, market values of properties, growth and acquisition opportunities and other factors.

          On September 4, 2003, we entered into agreements relating to new unsecured credit arrangements, and received funds under those arrangements. In December 2004 we increased our line of credit capacity from $75 million to $100 million, and provided for an additional $100 million of available borrowing capacity if the line of credit is expanded in accordance with its terms. We also negotiated interest rate reductions on our $100 million five year note from LIBOR plus 1.50% to LIBOR plus 1.2%, and on the line of credit from LIBOR plus 1.375% to LIBOR plus 0.9%. Both the $100 million five year term note and the line of credit were extended by one year; the $100 million note now matures in September, 2009, and the line of credit expires in September 2007, with our option to extend to 2008.

          To the extent that we desire to obtain additional capital to pay distributions, to provide working capital, to pay existing indebtedness or to finance acquisitions, expansions or development of new properties, we may utilize amounts available under the revolving line of credit, preferred stock offerings, floating or fixed rate debt financing, retention of cash flow (subject to satisfying the Company''s distribution requirements under the REIT rules) or a combination of these methods. Additional debt financing may also be obtained through mortgages on our Properties, which may be recourse, non-recourse, or cross-collateralized and may contain cross-default provisions. We have not established any limit on the number or amount of mortgages that may be placed on any single Property or on our portfolio as a whole. For additional information regarding borrowings, see Item 7, "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Con dition and Results of Operations - Liquidity and Capital Resources" and Note 6 to the Consolidated Financial Statements filed herewith.

          We currently employ a total of 822 employees, including 272 Property Managers, 17 Regional Team Leaders, and 429 assistant managers and part-time employees. At our headquarters, in addition to our three executive officers, we employ 101 people engaged in various support activities, including accounting, customer care, and management information systems. None of our employees are covered by a collective bargaining agreement. We consider our employee relations to be excellent.

          We file with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission quarterly and annual reports on Forms 10-Q and 10-K, respectively, current reports on Form 8-K, and proxy statements pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, in addition to other information as required. The public may read and copy any materials that we file with the SEC at the SEC's Public Reference Room at 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549. The public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1 (800) SEC-0330. We file this information with the SEC electronically, and the SEC maintains an Internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC at

6

<page>

http://www.sec.gov. Our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and all amendments to those reports are available free of charge on our web site at http://www.sovranss.com as soon as reasonably practicable after such material is electronically filed with or furnished to the SEC. In addition, our code of ethics is available free of charge on our website at http://www.sovranss.com.

          Also, copies of the Company''s annual report will be made available, free of charge, upon written request to Sovran Self Storage, Inc., Attn: Investor Relations, 6467 Main Street, Buffalo, NY 14221.

          You should carefully consider the risks described below, together with all of the other information included in or incorporated by reference into our Form 10-K, as part of your evaluation of the Operating Partnership. If any of the following risks actually occur, our business could be harmed. In such case, the trading price of our securities could decline, and you may lose all or part of your investment.

          We have completed many acquisitions of self-storage facilities since our initial public offering of common stock in June 1995. Our strategy is to continue to grow by acquiring additional self-storage facilities. Acquisitions entail risks that investments will fail to perform in accordance with our expectations and that our judgments with respect to the prices paid for acquired properties and the costs of any improvements required to bring an acquired property up to standards established for the market position intended for that property will prove inaccurate. Acquisitions also involve general investment risks associated with any new real estate investment.

          Unsecured Credit Facility. We have a line of credit with a syndicate of financial institutions, which are our "lenders." This unsecured credit facility is recourse to us and the required payments are not reduced if the economic performance of any of the properties declines. The unsecured credit facility limits our ability to make distributions to our shareholders, except for distributions required by the real estate investment trust provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, which we refer to as the "Code" and in other limited circumstances. If there is an event of default, our lenders may seek to exercise their rights under the unsecured credit facility, which could have a material adverse effect on us and our ability to make expected distributions to unitholders.

          Rising Interest Rates. Indebtedness that we incur under the unsecured credit facility bears interest at a variable rate. Accordingly, increases in interest rates could increase our interest expense, which would reduce our cash available for distribution and our ability to pay expected distributions to our unitholders. We manage our exposure to rising interest rates using interest rate swaps and other available mechanisms. If the amount of our indebtedness bearing interest at a variable rate increases, our unsecured credit facility may require us to use those arrangements.

          Refinancing May Not Be Available. It may be necessary for us to refinance our unsecured credit facility through additional debt financing or equity offerings. If we were unable to refinance this indebtedness on acceptable terms, we might be forced to dispose of some of our properties upon disadvantageous terms, which might result in losses to us and might adversely affect the cash available for distribution. If prevailing interest rates or other factors at the time of refinancing result in higher interest rates on refinancings, our interest expense would increase, which would adversely affect our cash available for distribution and our ability to pay expected distributions to unitholders.

          Our Board of Directors currently has a policy of limiting the amount of our debt at the time of incurrence to less than 50% of the sum of the market value of the Company''s issued and outstanding common stock and preferred stock plus the amount of our debt including the debt proposed to be incurred. However, our organizational documents do not contain any limitation on the amount of indebtedness we might incur. Accordingly, the Company''s Board of Directors could alter or eliminate the current policy limitation on borrowing without a vote of our unitholders. We could become highly leveraged if this policy were changed. However, our ability to incur debt is limited by covenants in our bank credit arrangements and in our securities purchase agreement with holders of our Series C preferred stock.

          Our properties are subject to all operating risks common to the self-storage industry. These risks include but are not limited to the following:

          Our current strategy is to acquire interests only in self-storage facilities. Consequently, we are subject to risks inherent in investments in a single industry. Our Properties compete with other self-storage facilities in their geographic markets. As a result of competition, the Properties could experience a decrease in occupancy levels and rental rates, which would decrease our cash available for distribution. We compete in operations and for acquisition opportunities with companies that have substantial financial resources. Competition may reduce the number of suitable acquisition opportunities offered to us and increase the bargaining power of property owners seeking to sell. The self-storage industry has at times experienced overbuilding in response to perceived increases in demand. A recurrence of overbuilding might cause us to experience a decrease in occupancy levels, limit our ability to increase rents and compel u s to offer discounted rents.

          General Risks. Our investments are subject to varying degrees of risk generally related to the ownership of real property. The underlying value of our real estate investments and our income and ability to make distributions to our unitholders are dependent upon our ability to operate the properties in a manner sufficient to maintain or increase cash available for distribution. Income from our properties may be adversely affected by the following factors:

8

<page>

          Illiquidity of Real Estate May Limit its Value. Real estate investments are relatively illiquid. Our ability to vary our portfolio in response to changes in economic and other conditions is limited. In addition, provisions of the Code may limit our ability to profit on the sale of properties held for fewer than four years. We may be unable to dispose of a property when we find disposition advantageous or necessary and the sale price of any disposition may not equal or exceed the amount of our investment.

          Uninsured and Underinsured Losses Could Reduce the Value of our Properties. Some losses, generally of a catastrophic nature, that we potentially face with respect to our properties may be uninsurable or not insurable at an acceptable cost. For example, in 2004, our income was adversely affected by uninsured losses resulting from four hurricanes that hit the Eastern United States. Our management uses its discretion in determining amounts, coverage limits and deductibility provisions of insurance, with a view to acquiring appropriate insurance on our investments at a reasonable cost and on suitable terms. These decisions may result in insurance coverage that, in the event of a substantial loss, would not be sufficient to pay the full current market value or current replacement cost of our lost investment. Inflation, changes in building codes and ordinances, environmental considerations, and oth er factors also might make it infeasible to use insurance proceeds to replace a property after it has been damaged or destroyed. Under those circumstances, the insurance proceeds received by us might not be adequate to restore our economic position with respect to a particular property.

          Possible Liability Relating to Environmental Matters. Under various federal, state and local environmental laws, ordinances and regulations, a current or previous owner or operator of real property may be liable for the costs of removal or remediation of hazardous or toxic substances on, under or in that property. Those laws often impose liability even if the owner or operator did not cause or know of the presence of hazardous or toxic substances and even if the storage of those substances was in violation of a tenant's lease. In addition, the presence of hazardous or toxic substances, or the failure of the owner to address their presence on the property, may adversely affect the owner's ability to borrow using that real property as collateral. In connection with the ownership of the properties, we may be potentially liable for any of those costs.

          Americans with Disabilities Act. The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, or ADA, generally requires that buildings be made accessible to persons with disabilities. A determination that we are not in compliance with the ADA could result in imposition of fines or an award of damages to private litigants. If we were required to make modifications to comply with the ADA, our results of operations and ability to make expected distributions to our unitholders could be adversely affected.

9

<page>

           Limitation on Ownership and Transfer of Shares. To maintain the Company''s qualification as a REIT, not more than 50% in value of its outstanding shares of capital stock may be owned, directly or indirectly, by five or fewer individuals, as defined in the Code. To limit the possibility that it will fail to qualify as a REIT under this test, the Company''s Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation include ownership limits and transfer restrictions on shares of its capital stock. The Company''s Articles of Incorporation limit ownership of its issued and outstanding capital stock by any single shareholder to 9.8% of the aggregate value of its outstanding capital stock, except that the ownership by some of its shareholders is limited to 15%.

           These ownership limits may:

          Sovran''s Board of Directors may waive the ownership limits if it is satisfied that ownership by those shareholders in excess of those limits will not jeopardize its status as a REIT under the Code or in the event it determines that it is no longer in the Company''s best interests to be a REIT. Waivers have been granted to the holders of its Series C preferred stock. A transfer of Sovran''s common stock and/or preferred stock to a person who, as a result of the transfer, violates the ownership limits may not be effective under some circumstances.

          Shareholder Rights Plan. The Company has a shareholder rights plan that grants the holders of its common stock rights that generally become exercisable if a person:

          The shareholder rights plan generally provides that the initial holders of the Company''s Series C preferred stock are not considered acquiring persons by reason of their purchase from it of the Series C preferred stock or other related acquisitions, if those acquisitions are not made with the purpose or effect of changing or influencing control of Sovran. In the event a person becomes an acquiring person, each holder of a right (other than the acquiring person) would be entitled to acquire a number of shares of the Company''s Series A junior preferred stock that are equivalent to the shares of its common stock having a value of twice the then-current exercise price of the right. If the Company is acquired in a merger or other business combination transaction after that event, each holder of a right would then be entitled to purchase, at the then-current exercise price, shares of the acquiring company's common stock having a val ue of twice the exercise price of the right. The Company''s shareholder rights plan may have the effect of delaying or preventing a change in control of Sovran.

          Other Limitations. Other limitations could have the effect of discouraging a takeover or other transaction in which holders of some, or a majority, of the Company''s outstanding common stock might receive a premium for their shares of its common stock that exceeds the then prevailing market price or that those holders might believe to be otherwise in their best interest. The issuance of additional shares of preferred stock could have the effect of delaying or preventing a change in control of Sovran even if a change in control were in the shareholders' interest.

10

<page>

In addition, the Maryland General Corporation Law, or MGCL, imposes restrictions and requires that specified procedures be followed with respect to the acquisition of stated levels of share ownership and business combinations, including combinations with interested shareholders. These provisions of the MGCL could have the effect of delaying or preventing a change in control of Sovran even if a change in control were in the shareholders' interest. Waivers and exemptions have been granted to the initial purchasers of the Company''s Series C preferred stock in connection with these provisions of the MGCL. In addition, under the Operating Partnership's agreement of limited partnership, in general, we may not merge, consolidate or engage in any combination with another person or sell all or substantially all of our assets unless that transaction includes the merger or sale of all or substantially all of the assets of the Operating Partnership, which requires the approval of the holders of 75% of the limited partnership interests thereof. If the Company was to own less than 75% of the limited partnership interests in the Operating Partnership, this provision of the limited partnership agreement could have the effect of delaying or preventing us from engaging in some change of control transactions.

          The Company intends to operate in a matter that will permit it to qualify as a REIT under the Code. Qualification as a REIT involves the application of highly technical and complex Code provisions for which there are only limited judicial and administrative interpretations. Continued qualification as a REIT depends upon the Company''s continuing ability to meet various requirements concerning, among other things, the ownership of its outstanding stock, the nature of its assets, the sources of its income and the amount of its distributions to its shareholders. If the Company were to fail to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, it would not be allowed a deduction for distributions to shareholders in computing its taxable income and it would be subject to federal income tax (including any applicable alternative minimum tax) on its taxable income at regular corporate rates. Unless entitled to relief under certain Code provisions , the Company also would be ineligible for qualification as a REIT for the four taxable years following the year during which our qualification was lost. As a result, distributions to the shareholders would be reduced for each of the years involved. Although the Company currently intends to operate in a manner designed to qualify as a REIT, it is possible that future economic, market, legal, tax or other considerations may cause our Board of Directors to revoke our REIT election.

          At December 31, 2004, 107 of our 271 self-storage facilities are located in the States of Texas and Florida. For the year ended December 31, 2004, these facilities accounted for approximately 42% of our total revenues. This concentration of business in Texas and Florida exposes us to potential losses resulting from a downturn in the economies of those states. If economic conditions in those states deteriorate, we may experience a reduction in existing and new business, which may have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

          On May 28, 2003, President Bush signed into law the Jobs and Growth Tax Relief and Reconciliation Act of 2003, which provides favorable income tax rates for certain corporate dividends received by individuals through December 31, 2008. Under this new law, REIT dividends are not eligible for the preferential capital gain rates applicable to dividends unless the dividends are attributable to income that has been subject to corporate-level tax. As a result, substantially all of the distributions paid on shares of the Company''s stock are not expected to qualify for those lower rates. This new law could cause stock in non-REIT corporations to be more attractive to investors relative to stock in REITs, which may negatively affect the value of, and the market for, the Company''s common stock.

11

<page>

          Terrorist attacks and other acts of violence or war, such as those that took place on September 11, 2001, or the recent war with Iraq, could have a material adverse effect on our business and operating results. There may be further terrorist attacks against the United States. Attacks or armed conflicts that directly impact one or more of our properties could significantly affect our ability to operate those properties and, as a result, impair our ability to achieve our expected results. Furthermore, we may not have insurance coverage for losses caused by a terrorist attack. That insurance may not be available or, if it is available and we decide, or are required by our lenders, to obtain terrorism coverage, the cost for the insurance may be significant in relationship to the risk covered. In addition, the adverse effects terrorist acts and threats of future attacks could have on the U.S. economy could similarly have a ma terial adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Finally, further terrorist acts could cause the United States to enter into armed conflict, which could further impact our business, financial and operating results.

          At December 31, 2004, we owned and/or managed a total of 271 Properties situated in twenty-one states. Eleven of the properties are managed under an agreement with an unconsolidated joint venture that is 45% owned by us.

          Our self-storage facilities offer inexpensive, easily accessible, enclosed storage space to residential and commercial users on a month-to-month basis. Most of our Properties are fenced with computerized gates and are well lighted. A majority of the Properties are single-story, thereby providing customers with the convenience of direct vehicle access to their storage units. Our stores range in size from 21,000 to 190,000 net rentable square feet, with an average of approximately 60,000 net rentable square feet. The Properties generally are constructed of masonry or steel walls resting on concrete slabs and have standing seam metal, shingle, or tar and gravel roofs. All Properties have a Property Manager on-site during business hours. Customers have access to their storage areas during business hours, and some commercial customers are provided 24-hour access. Individual storage spaces are secured by a lock furnished by the c ustomer to provide the customer with control of access to the space.

          All of the Properties conduct business under the user-friendly trade name "Uncle Bob's Self-Storage."

          The following table provides certain information regarding the Properties owned and/or managed as of December 31, 2004:

12

<page>

(a) Includes 260 stores that are consolidated in our financial statements and 11 stores that are managed under an agreement with an unconsolidated joint venture that is 45% owned by us. See attached ""Schedule III: Combined Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation"" for a list of the stores consolidated in our financial statements.

          No matters were submitted during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year covered by this report to a vote of security holders, through the solicitation of proxies or otherwise.

         There is no established public trading market for Units. As of March 1, 2005, there were 14 holders of record of Units.

          The following table sets forth the quarterly distributions per Unit paid by the Operating Partnership to holders of its Units with respect to each such period.

13

<page>

the Board of Directors of Holdings, the general partner of the Operating Partnership and a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, and will depend on actual funds from operations of the Operating Partnership, its financial condition, capital requirements, the annual distribution requirements under the REIT provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and such other factors as the Board of Directors may deem relevant. The Board of Directors of Holdings may modify the Operating Partnership's distribution policy from time to time, subject to the terms of the Partnership Agreement.

          The Operating Partnership's line of credit contains customary representations, covenants and events of default, including covenants which restrict the ability of the Operating Partnership to make distributions in excess of stated amounts. In general, during any four consecutive fiscal quarters the Operating Partnership may only distribute up to 105% of the Operating Partnership's funds from operations (as defined in the related agreement). The line of credit contains exceptions to these limitations to allow the Operating Partnership to make any distributions necessary to allow the Company to maintain its status as a REIT. The Operating Partnership does not anticipate that this provision will adversely affect the ability of the Operating Partnership to make distributions, as currently anticipated.

The following table sets forth certain information as of December 31, 2004, with respect to equity compensation plans under which shares of the Company''s Common Stock may be issued.

          The following selected financial and operating information should be read in conjunction with ""Management''s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,"" and the financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K:

(1) In 2004 we sold five stores whose operations and gain are classified as discontinued operations for all years presented.

          The following discussion and analysis of the consolidated financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto included elsewhere in this report.

          When used in this discussion and elsewhere in this document, the words "intends," "believes," "expects," "anticipates," and similar expressions are intended to identify "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of that term in Section 27A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1933 and in Section 21F of the Securities Act of 1934. Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, which may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such factors include, but are not limited to, the effect of competition from new self-storage facilities, which would cause rents and occupancy rates to decline; our ability to evaluate, finance and integrate acquired businesses into our existing business and operations; our ability to effectively compete in the

15

<page>

industry in which we do business; our existing indebtedness may mature in an unfavorable credit environment, preventing refinancing or forcing refinancing of the indebtedness on terms that are not as favorable as the existing terms; interest rates may fluctuate, impacting costs associated with our outstanding floating rate debt; our ability to successfully extend our truck move-in program for new customers and Dri-guard product roll-out; our reliance on our call center; our cash flow may be insufficient to meet required payments of principal, interest and distributions; and tax law changes that may change the taxability of future income.

          We are the fifth largest operator of self-storage properties in the United States based on facilities owned or managed. All of our stores are operated under the user-friendly trade name ""Uncle Bob''s Self-Storage.""

Our operating strategy is designed to generate growth and enhance value by:

16

<page>

          We believe the supply and demand model in the self-storage industry is micro market specific in that a majority of our business comes from within a five mile radius of our stores. However, low interest rates available to developers over the past three years have resulted in increased supply on a national basis. We have experienced some of this excess supply in certain markets in Texas and New England, but because of the demand model, we have not seen a widespread effect on our stores. We have also observed an increase in the sales price of existing facilities as a result of the low interest rates, such that the capitalization rates on acquisitions (expected annual return on investment) have decreased from approximately 10% four years ago to 8.5% today. In 2004, we took advantage of these favorable capitalization rates by selling five stores for a gain of $1.1 million. With interest rates now on the rise we expect the trend of decreasing capitalization rates to reverse in the coming years and are forecasting acquisitions of $50 million in 2005 and no sales of existing stores.

          In 2004, the overall economy and our industry slowly gained momentum from the recovery that commenced in 2003. We experienced same store revenue growth of approximately 5% in each of 2004 and 2003. We attribute the same store growth to implementation of the call center, the free truck program for new move-in customers, use of improved technology and practices in the management of our rental rates and, to a lesser degree, general economic factors. We expect conditions in most of our markets to remain stable and are forecasting 4% revenue growth on a same store basis in 2005.

          Expenses related to operating a self-storage facility have increased substantially over the last five years as a result of expanded hours, increased health care costs, property insurance costs, and the costs of amenities (such as Uncle Bob''s trucks). We expect the trend of increasing costs to continue at a moderate pace and, while current operating margins are expected to be sustained, it is unlikely that much improvement in operating margins will be seen in the coming years as a result of cost reductions.

          The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the amounts reported in our financial statements and the accompanying notes. On an on-going basis, we evaluate our estimates and judgments, including those related to carrying values of storage facilities, bad debts, and contingencies and litigation. We base these estimates on experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions o r conditions.

17

<page>

          Carrying value of storage facilities: We believe our judgment regarding the impairment of the carrying value of our storage facilities is a critical accounting policy. Our policy is to assess any impairment of value whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying value of a storage facility may not be recoverable. Such events or circumstances would include negative operating cash flow or significant declining revenue per storage facility. Impairment is evaluated based upon comparing the sum of the expected undiscounted future cash flows to the carrying value of the storage facility, on a property by property basis. If the sum of the undiscounted cash flow is less than the carrying amount, an impairment loss is recognized for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the fair value of the asset. If cash flow projections are inaccurate and in the future it is determined that storage facility carrying values ar e not recoverable, impairment charges may be required at that time and could materially affect our operating results and financial position. At December 31, 2004 and 2003, no assets had been determined to be impaired under this policy.

          Estimated useful lives of long-lived assets: We believe that the estimated lives used for our depreciable, long-lived assets is a critical accounting policy. Changes in estimated useful lives of these assets could have a material adverse impact on our financial condition or results of operations.

          Qualification as a REIT: The Company operates, and intends to continue to operate, as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the Code), but no assurance can be given that we will at all times so qualify. To the extent that the Company continues to qualify as a REIT, it will not be taxed, with certain limited exceptions, on the taxable income that is distributed to its shareholders. If the Company fails to qualify as a REIT, any requirement to pay federal income taxes could have a material adverse impact on our financial conditions and results of operations.

          We recorded rental revenues of $119.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2004, an increase of $11.1 million or 10.2% when compared to 2003 rental revenues of $108.5 million. Of this increase, $5.3 million resulted from a 5% increase in rental revenues at the 244 core properties considered in same store sales (those properties included in the consolidated results of operations since January 1, 2003). The increase in same store rental revenues was achieved primarily through rate increases on select units, and a slight occupancy increase, which we believe resulted from improved responsiveness to customer demand created by our centralized call center and the availability of rental trucks at 207 of our stores. The remaining $5.8 million increase in rental revenues resulted from the acquisition of ten stores during 2004 and from having the 2003 acquisitions included for a full year of operations. Other income increased $0.8 mil lion due to increased insurance sales and the additional incidental revenue generated by truck rentals.

          Property operating and real estate tax expense increased $4.7 million or 12.1% in 2004 compared to 2003. Of this increase, $2.1 million was incurred by the facilities acquired in 2004 and from having the 2003 acquisitions included for a full year of operations. $1.9 million of the increase was due to increased insurance, personnel, truck, and maintenance expenses, and increased property taxes at the 244 core properties considered same stores. We also incurred approximately $0.7 million of uninsured losses relating to the four hurricanes that hit the Eastern United States in 2004. We expect the trend of increasing operating costs to continue at a moderate pace although we do not expect the uninsured hurricane losses to occur annually.

          General and administrative expenses increased $1.5 million or 15.1% from 2003 to 2004. The increase primarily resulted from increased costs in our call center, professional fees related to the documentation, analysis, and testing of internal controls required by Sarbanes-Oxley Section 404, and the increased costs associated with operating the properties acquired in 2004 and 2003.

          Depreciation and amortization expense increased to $19.9 million in 2004 from $18.7 million in 2003, primarily as a result of additional depreciation taken on real estate assets acquired in 2004 and a full year of depreciation on 2003 acquisitions.

18

<page>

          Income from operations increased from $44.6 million in 2003 to $49.1 million in 2004 as a result of the net effect of the aforementioned items.

          Interest expense increased from $15.1 million in 2003 to $17.4 million in 2004 as a result of higher interest rates associated with the fixed rate debt entered into in September 2003 and additional borrowings under our line of credit to purchase ten stores in 2004.

          During 2004, the Operating Partnership sold five non-strategic storage facilities for net cash proceeds of $11.7 million, resulting in a gain of $1.1 million. The operations of these five facilities and the gain on sale in 2004 are reported as discontinued operations.

          On August 2, 2004, the Operating Partnership redeemed all 1,200,000 outstanding shares of its 9.85% Series B Cumulative Preferred Units for $30 million plus accrued but unpaid distributions on those shares. The excess of the redemption amount over the carrying value of the Series B Preferred Units was $1.4 million and has been shown as a reduction in net income available to common unitholders.

          We recorded rental revenues of $108.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2003, an increase of $10.1 million or 10.3% when compared to 2002 rental revenues of $98.3 million. Of this increase, $4.7 million resulted from a 5% increase in rental revenues at the 225 core properties considered in same store sales (those properties included in the consolidated results of operations since January 1, 2002). The increase in same store rental revenues was achieved primarily through rate increases on select units, and slightly increased occupancy levels, which we believe resulted from our improved responsiveness to customer demand created by our centralized call center and the availability of rental trucks at 158 of our stores. Although the extensive discounting and promotional advertising seen in 2002 diminished in 2003, the storage industry as a whole was affected by a sluggish economy and a steady increase in supply of new storage units. The remaining $5.4 million increase in rental revenues resulted from the acquisition of two stores during 2003 and from having the 2002 acquisitions included for a full year of operations. Other income increased $0.8 million due to increased insurance sales and the additional incidental revenue generated by truck rentals.

          Property operating and real estate tax expense increased $5.5 million or 16.8% in 2003 compared to 2002. Of this, $1.7 million was incurred by the facilities acquired in 2003 and from having the 2002 acquisitions included for a full year of operations. The remaining $3.8 million increase was due to increased insurance, personnel, truck expense, maintenance, and increased property taxes at the 225 core properties considered same stores.

          General and administrative expenses increased $1.0 million or 12.0% from 2002 to 2003. The increase primarily resulted from increased costs in our call center, new training center, and the increased costs associated with operating the properties acquired in 2003 and 2002.

          Depreciation and amortization expense increased to $18.7 million in 2003 from $17.1 million in 2002, primarily as a result of additional depreciation taken on real estate assets acquired in 2003 and a full year of depreciation on 2002 acquisitions.

          Income from operations increased from $41.8 million in 2002 to $44.6 million in 2003 as a result of the net effect of the aforementioned items.

          Interest expense increased from $14.7 million in 2002 to $15.1 million in 2003 as a result of higher interest rates associated with the fixed rate debt entered into in September 2003.

19

<page>

          We believe that Funds from Operations (""FFO"") provides relevant and meaningful information about our operating performance that is necessary, along with net earnings and cash flows, for an understanding of our operating results.  FFO adds back historical cost depreciation, which assumes the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably in the future. In fact, real estate asset values increase or decrease with market conditions. Consequently, we believe FFO is a useful supplemental measure in evaluating our operating performance by disregarding (or adding back) historical cost depreciation.

          FFO is defined by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts, Inc. (""NAREIT"") as net income computed in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (""GAAP""), excluding gains or losses on sales of properties, plus depreciation and amortization and after adjustments to record unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures on the same basis.  We believe that to further understand our performance, FFO should be compared with our reported net income and cash flows in accordance with GAAP, as presented in our consolidated financial statements.

          Our computation of FFO may not be comparable to FFO reported by other REITs or real estate companies that do not define the term in accordance with the current NAREIT definition or that interpret the current NAREIT definition differently. FFO does not represent cash generated from operating activities determined in accordance with GAAP, and should not be considered as an alternative to net income (determined in accordance with GAAP) as an indication of our performance, as an alternative to net cash flows from operating activities (determined in accordance with GAAP) as a measure of our liquidity, or as an indicator of our ability to make cash distributions.

20

<page>

          Our ability to retain cash flow is limited because the Company operates as a REIT. In order to maintain its REIT status, a substantial portion of the Company''s operating cash flow must be used to pay distributions to our unitholders. We believe that our internally generated net cash provided by operating activities will continue to be sufficient to fund ongoing operations, capital improvements, distributions and debt service requirements through September 2007, at which time our revolving line of credit matures unless renewed at our option for one additional year.

          Cash flows from operating activities were $53.9 million, $50.9 million and $44.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003, and 2002, respectively. The increase for each year is primarily attributable to increased net income and increased non-cash charges for depreciation and amortization.

          On September 4, 2003, we entered into agreements relating to new unsecured credit arrangements, and received funds under those arrangements. In December 2004, the agreements were amended by increasing the line of credit availability from $75 million to $100 million (expandable to $200 million), reducing the interest rate from LIBOR plus 1.375% to LIBOR plus 0.90%, increasing the maturity by one year to September 2007, and retaining a one year extension option. In addition, the line of credit requires a facility fee of 0.20%. At December 31, 2004, there was $57 million available on our line of credit. The amendment also reduced the interest rate on the $100 million term note from LIBOR plus 1.50% to LIBOR plus 1.20%, and extended the maturity by one year to September 2009.

          In addition to the line of credit and term note mentioned above, in 2003 we also issued a $80 million unsecured term note bearing interest at a fixed rate of 6.26% and a $20 million unsecured term note bearing interest at a variable rate equal to LIBOR plus 1.50%. The term notes mature September 2013.

          The line of credit facility and term notes currently have investment grade ratings from Standard and Poor's (BBB-) and Fitch (BBB-).

          Our line of credit and term notes require us to meet certain financial covenants, including prescribed leverage, fixed charge coverage, minimum net worth, limitations on additional indebtedness and limitations on dividend payouts. As of December 31, 2004, we were in compliance with all covenants.

          In February 2002, the consolidated joint venture (Locke Sovran II, LLC) entered into a mortgage note of $48 million. The note is secured by the 27 properties owned by the joint venture with a carrying value of $73.9 million and $74.2 million at December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The 10-year note bears interest at a fixed rate of 7.19%.

          In July 1999, the Company issued 1,200,000 shares of 9.85% Series B Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock. The Company redeemed all outstanding shares of its Series B Preferred Stock on August 2, 2004 at a total cost of $30 million plus accrued but unpaid dividends on those shares. In accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force ("EITF") Topic D-42, "The Effect on the Calculation of Earnings per Share for the Redemption or Induced Conversion of Preferred Stock", we recorded a reduction of $1.4 million from 2004 net income to arrive at net income available to common unitholders relating to the difference between the Series B Preferred Stock carrying value and the redemption amount.

          On July 3, 2002, the Company entered into an agreement providing for the issuance of 2,800,000 shares of 8.375% Series C Convertible Cumulative Preferred Stock and warrants to purchase 379,166 shares of common stock at $32.60 per share in a privately negotiated transaction. The Company immediately issued 1,600,000 shares of the Series C Preferred and issued the remaining 1,200,000 shares on November 27, 2002. The offering price was $25.00 per share and the net proceeds of $67.9 million were used to reduce indebtedness that was incurred in the June 2002 acquisition of seven self-storage properties and to repay a portion of our borrowings under the line of credit. On August 4, 2004, the Company issued 306,748 shares of its common stock in connection with a written notice from one of the holders of its Series C Preferred Stock requesting the conversion of 400,000 shares of Series C Preferred Stock into common stock. As a res ult of this conversion, all such 400,000 shares of Series C Preferred Stock were retired leaving 2,400,000 shares outstanding at December 31, 2004.

21

<page>

          During 2004, the Company did not acquire any shares of its common stock via the Share Repurchase Program authorized by the Board of Directors. From January 1, 2003 through December 31, 2003, the Company acquired 145,816 shares of its common stock via this plan. From the inception of the Share Repurchase Program through December 31, 2004, the Company has reacquired a total of 1,171,886 shares pursuant to this program. From time to time, subject to market price and certain loan covenants, the Company may reacquire additional shares.

          During 2004, the Company issued approximately 1,389,000 shares via its Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan and Employee Stock Option Plan. We realized $49 million from the sale of such shares. The Company expects to issue shares when its share price and capital needs warrant such issuance.

          Future acquisitions, share repurchases and repayment of the credit line are expected to be funded with the revolving line of credit, issuance of secured or unsecured term notes, issuance of common or preferred stock, sale of properties, private placement solicitation of joint venture equity and other sources of capital.

          The following table summarizes our future contractual obligations:

          The above amounts for the line of credit, term notes and mortgage exclude interest.

          During 2004, we used operating cash flow and borrowings pursuant to the line of credit to acquire ten Properties in Connecticut, Florida, Tennessee, and Texas comprising one million square feet from unaffiliated storage operators. During 2003, we used operating cash flow, borrowings pursuant to the line of credit, and proceeds from the Company''s Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan to acquire two Properties in Texas comprising 148,098 square feet from unaffiliated storage operators. In 2002, we, along with the consolidated joint venture, used borrowings pursuant to the line of credit and a mortgage to acquire 23 Properties comprising 1.5 million square feet. At December 31, 2004, we owned and/or operated 271 self-storage facilities in 21 states. Of these facilities, 11 are managed by us for Locke Sovran I, LLC, an unconsolidated joint venture.

          Our external growth strategy is to increase the number of facilities we own by acquiring suitable facilities in markets in which we already have operations, or to expand in new markets by acquiring several facilities at once in those new markets.

          At December 31, 2004, we were in negotiations to acquire five stores for approximately $20 million. One of these stores was purchased on February 23, 2005 for $7.5 million.

22

<page>

          In addition, we plan, over the next three years, to implement a program that will add 450,000 to 600,000 square feet of rentable space at existing stores and convert up to an additional 250,000 to 300,000 square feet to premium (climate and humidity controlled) space. The projected cost of these revenue enhancing improvements is estimated at between $32 and $40 million. Funding of these and the above-mentioned improvements is expected to be provided primarily from borrowings under our line of credit, and issuance of common shares through the Company''s Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan.

          During 2004, as part of an asset management program, we sold five non-strategic storage facilities located in Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Ohio, and South Carolina to unaffiliated parties for $11.7 million resulting in a net gain of $1.1 million.

          During 2001, we sold eight Properties for approximately $24.5 million to Locke Sovran II, LLC. Because Locke Sovran II, LLC is a consolidated joint venture, no gain was recognized on the sale.

          In 2000, we sold seven Properties for approximately $20 million, recognizing a gain of $2.1 million. The gain recognized represents the proportion of the total gain not related to our ongoing ownership interest. The Properties were sold to an unconsolidated joint venture in which we retained a 45% interest and whose properties we manage for an ongoing fee. We invested $5 million of the proceeds to fund our 45% interest in the venture and received a short-term promissory note of approximately $15 million. The note was repaid in 2001 and we used the proceeds to pay down our outstanding line of credit, freeing up working capital for acquisitions and expansions done in 2001.

          We may seek to sell additional Properties to similar joint venture programs or third parties in 2005.

          Our off-balance sheet arrangements include an ownership interest in Locke Sovran I, LLC, which owns 11 self storage facilities throughout the United States, and an ownership interest in Iskalo Office Holdings, LLC, which owns the building that houses our headquarters and other tenants.

          In December 2000, we contributed seven self-storage properties to Locke Sovran I, LLC with a fair market value of $19.8 million, in exchange for a $15 million one year note receivable bearing interest at LIBOR plus 1.75%, which was repaid in 2001, and a 45% interest in Locke Sovran I, LLC. For the year ended December 31, 2004, our share of Locke Sovran I, LLC's income was $141,000, which is recorded as equity in income of joint ventures on our consolidated statements of income. We manage the storage facilities for Locke Sovran I, LLC and received fees of $322,000, $311,000, and $290,000, for the years ended 2004, 2003, and 2002, respectively.

          We also have a 49% ownership interest in Iskalo Office Holdings, LLC at December 31, 2004. During 2004, Iskalo Office Holdings obtained long-term financing and used the proceeds to repay the note payable to us of $1.4 million. Our remaining investment includes a capital contribution of $49. For the year ended December 31, 2004, our share of Iskalo Office Holdings, LLC's income was $27,000 and we received a distribution of $113,000. We paid rent to Iskalo Office Holdings, LLC of $426,000 in 2004 and $393,000 in 2003, and $255,000 in 2002. Also, during 2004 and 2003 we purchased land from Iskalo Office Holdings, LLC for $0.4 million and $1.2 million, respectively.

23

<page>

          A summary of the off-balance sheet arrangement''s financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2004 is as follows:

          We do not expect to have material future cash outlays relating to these joint ventures and we do not guarantee the debt of Locke Sovran I, LLC or Iskalo Office Holdings, LLC. A summary of our cash flows arising from the two off-balance sheet arrangements are as follows:

          As a REIT, the Company is not required to pay federal income tax on income that it distributes to its shareholders, provided that the amount distributed is equal to at least 90% of its taxable income. These distributions must be made in the year to which they relate, or in the following year if declared before the Company files its federal income tax return, and if it is paid before the first regular dividend of the following year. The first distribution of 2005 may be applied toward the Company's 2004 distribution requirement. The Company's source of funds for such distributions is solely and directly from the Operating Partnership.

24

<page>

          As a REIT, the Company must derive at least 95% of its total gross income from income related to real property, interest and dividends. In 2004, the Company's percentage of revenue from such sources exceeded 96%, thereby passing the 95% test, and no special measures are expected to be required to enable the Company to maintain its REIT designation.

          We have entered into interest rate swap agreements in order to mitigate the effects of fluctuations in interest rates on our floating rate debt. At December 31, 2004, we have three outstanding interest rate swap agreements. The first, entered into in March 2001, effectively fixes the LIBOR base rate at 5.36% through November 2005 on $50 million notional amount. The second, entered in September 2001, effectively fixes the LIBOR base rate at 4.485% through October 2006 on another $50 million notional amount. The third, also entered in September 2001, effectively fixes the LIBOR base rate at 4.805% through September 2008 on $30 million notional amount. We have an unsecured credit facility in place through September 2007 enabling us to borrow funds at rates of LIBOR plus 0.9%, an unsecured term note at rates of LIBOR plus 1.2% through September 2009, and an unsecured term note at rates of LIBOR plus 1.5% through September 2013. As a result of the above-described interest rate swap agreements, we have fixed our interest rate through November 2005 on $43 million at 5.45%, and $7 million at 6.56%, through October 2006 on $50 million at 5.685%, and through September 2008 on $30 million at 6.005%. Upon renewal or replacement of the credit facility, our total interest may change dependent on the terms we negotiate with the lenders; however, the LIBOR base rates have been contractually fixed on $130 million of our debt through the interest rate swap termination dates.

          Through November 2005, $210 million of our $243 million of unsecured debt is on a fixed rate basis after taking into account the interest rate swaps noted above. Based on our outstanding debt of $243 million at December 31, 2004, a 1% increase in interest rates would have a $330,000 effect on our interest expense annually.

          The table below summarizes our debt obligations and interest rate derivatives at December 31, 2004. The estimated fair value of financial instruments is subjective in nature and is dependent on a number of important assumptions, including discount rates and relevant comparable market information associated with each financial instrument. The use of different market assumptions and estimation methodologies may have a material effect on the reported estimated fair value amounts. Accordingly, the estimates presented below are not necessarily indicative of the amounts we would realize in a current market exchange.

          We do not believe that inflation has had or will have a direct effect on our operations. Substantially all of the leases at the facilities are on a month-to-month basis which provides us with the opportunity to increase rental rates as each lease matures.

25

<page>

          Our revenues typically have been higher in the third and fourth quarters, primarily because we increase rental rates on most of our storage units at the beginning of May and because self-storage facilities tend to experience greater occupancy during the late spring, summer and early fall months due to the greater incidence of residential moves during these periods. However, we believe that our customer mix, diverse geographic locations, rental structure and expense structure provide adequate protection against undue fluctuations in cash flows and net revenues during off-peak seasons. Thus, we do not expect seasonality to affect materially distributions to shareholders.

          In January 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (""FASB"") issued Interpretation No. 46 ("FIN 46"), "Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, an interpretation of ARB 51." The primary objectives of this interpretation are to provide guidance on the identification of entities for which control is achieved through means other than through voting rights ("variable interest entities") and how to determine when and which business enterprise (the "primary beneficiary") should consolidate the variable interest entity. This new model for consolidation applies to an entity in which either (i) the equity investors (if any) do not have a controlling financial interest; or (ii) the equity investment at risk is insufficient to finance that entity's activities without receiving additional subordinated financial support from other parties. In addition, FIN 46 requires that the primary beneficiary, as well as all other enterprises with a significant variable interest in a variable interest entity, make additional disclosures. Certain disclosure requirements of FIN 46 were effective for financial statements issued after January 31, 2003.

          In December 2003, the FASB issued FIN No. 46 (revised December 2003), "Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities" ("FIN 46-R") to address certain FIN 46 implementation issues. We have evaluated the impact of adopting FIN 46-R applicable to entities that are not special purpose entities created prior to February 1, 2003 and do not believe that any of our investments in joint ventures or partially owned subsidiaries require consolidation under the provisions of FIN46-R.

          Effective June 2003, the Operating Partnership adopted FASB Statement No. 150, "Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of Both Liabilities and Equity" (Statement No. 150). Statement No. 150 establishes standards for how an issuer classifies and measures certain financial instruments with characteristics of both liabilities and equity. It requires that an issuer classify a financial instrument within its scope as a liability. Many of these instruments were previously classified as equity. Statement No. 150 is effective for financial instruments entered into or modified after May 31, 2003, and otherwise is effective at the beginning of the first interim period beginning after June 15, 2003. In October 2003, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) SFAS 150-3, "Effective Date for Mandatorily Redeemable Financial Instruments of Certain Nonpublic Entities and Certain Mandatorily Redeemable Noncontrollin g Interests under SFAS 150", which defers certain provisions of Statement No. 150 as they apply to mandatorily redeemable noncontrolling interests. The deferral is expected to remain in effect while those issues are addressed in either Phase II of the FASB's Liabilities and Equity project or Phase II of the Business Combination project. Adoption of Statement No. 150 did not have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.

          On December 16, 2004, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment, which is a revision of FASB Statement No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation. Statement 123(R) supersedes APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and amends FASB Statement No. 95, Statement of Cash Flows. Generally, the approach in Statement 123(R) is similar to the approach described in Statement 123.  However, Statement 123(R) requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in the income statement based on their fair values. Pro forma disclosure is no longer an alternative. Statement 123(R) must be adopted no later than July 1, 2005. Early adoption will be permitted in periods in which financial statements have not yet been issued.  We expect to adopt Statement 123(R) on July 1, 2005.

26

<page>

          As permitted by Statement 123, the Operating Partnership currently accounts for share-based payments to employees using Opinion 25''s intrinsic value method and, as such, generally recognizes no compensation cost for employee stock options.  Accordingly, the adoption of Statement 123(R)''s fair value method will have an impact on our result of operations, although it will have no impact on our overall financial position. The impact of adoption of Statement 123(R) cannot be predicted at this time because it will depend on levels of share-based payments granted in the future.  However, had we adopted Statement 123(R) in prior periods, the impact of that standard would have approximated the impact of Statement 123 as described in the disclosure of pro forma net income and earnings per unit in Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements.

          The information required is incorporated by reference to the information appearing under the caption "Interest Rate Risk" in Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" above.

The Board of Directors and Partners of Sovran Acquisition Limited Partnership

          We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Sovran Acquisition Limited Partnership as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated statements of operations, partners'' capital, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2004. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15(a). These financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of the Operating Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedule based on our audits.

          We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

          In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Sovran Acquisition Limited Partnership at December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2004, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

27

<page>

28

<page>

See notes to financial statements.

29

<page>

30

<page>

See notes to financial statements.

31

<page>

Distributions declared but unpaid at December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 were $9,962, $8,918, and $8,124, respectively.

See notes to financial statements.

32

<page>

          Sovran Acquisition Limited Partnership (the "Operating Partnership") is the entity through which Sovran Self Storage, Inc. (the "Company"), a self-administered and self-managed real estate investment trust ("REIT"), conducts substantially all of its business and owns substantially all of its assets. On June 26, 1995, the Company commenced operations, through the Operating Partnership, effective with the completion of its initial public offering of 5,890,000 shares. At December 31, 2004 the Operating Partnership owned and/or managed 271 self-storage properties under the "Uncle Bob's Self Storage" registered trade name in 21 states.

          As of December 31, 2004, the Company was a 97.0% economic owner of the Operating Partnership and controls it through Sovran Holdings, Inc. ("Holdings"), a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company incorporated in Delaware and the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership (this structure is commonly referred to as an umbrella partnership REIT or "UPREIT"). The board of directors of Holdings, the members of which are also members of the Board of Directors of the Company, manages the affairs of the Operating Partnership by directing the affairs of Holdings. The Company's limited partner and indirect general partner interests in the Operating Partnership entitle it to share in cash distributions from, and in the profits and losses of, the Operating Partnership in proportion to its ownership interest therein and entitle the Company to vote on all matters requiring a vote of the limited partners.

         The other limited partners of the Operating Partnership are persons who contributed their direct or indirect interests in certain self-storage properties to the Operating Partnership. The Operating Partnership is obligated to redeem each unit of limited partnership ("Unit") at the request of the holder thereof for cash equal to the fair market value of a share of the Company's common stock ("Common Shares") at the time of such redemption, provided that the Company at its option may elect to acquire any Unit presented for redemption for one Common Share or cash. The Company presently anticipates that it will elect to issue Common Shares to acquire Units presented for redemption, rather than paying cash. With each such redemption the Company's percentage ownership interest in the Operating Partnership will increase. In addition, whenever the Company issues Common Shares, the Company is obligated to contribute any net proceeds therefro m to the Operating Partnership and the Operating Partnership is obligated to issue an equivalent number of Units to the Company. Such limited partners' redemption rights are reflected in "limited partners' capital interest" in the accompanying balance sheets at the cash redemption amount at the balance sheet date. Capital activity with regard to such limited partners' redemption rights is reflected in the accompanying statements of partners' capital.

          Basis of Presentation: Our consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Operating Partnership, and Locke Sovran II, LLC, which is a majority controlled joint venture. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated. Investments in joint ventures that are not majority owned are reported using the equity method.

          We consolidate all wholly owned subsidiaries. Partially owned subsidiaries and joint ventures are consolidated when we control the entity. We evaluate partially-owned subsidiaries and joint ventures held in partnership form in accordance with the provisions of Statement of Positions (SOP) 78-9, ""Accounting for Investments in Real Estate Ventures"", to determine whether the rights held by other investors constitute ""important rights"" as defined therein. For partially-owned subsidiaries or joint ventures held in corporate form (including limited liability companies with governance provisions that are the functional equivalent of regular corporations), we consider the guidance of SFAS No. 94 ""Consolidation of All Majority-Owned Subsidiaries"" and Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) 96-16, ""Investor''s Accounting for an Investee When the Investor has a Majority of the Voting Interest but the Mi nority Shareholder or Shareholders Have Certain Approval or Veto Rights"", and in particular, whether rights held by other investors would be viewed as ""participation rights"" as defined therein. To the extent that any minority investor has important rights in a partnership or substantive participating rights in a

33

<page>

          Cash and Cash Equivalents: The Operating Partnership considers all highly liquid investments purchased with maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents.

          Revenue and Expense Recognition: Rental income is recorded when earned. Rental income received prior to the start of the rental period is included in deferred revenue. Advertising costs are expensed as incurred and for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003, and 2002 were $0.5 million, $0.6 million, and $0.6 million, respectively.

          Other Income: Consists primarily of sales of storage-related merchandise (locks and packing supplies), management fees, insurance commissions, and incidental truck rentals.

          Investment in Storage Facilities: Storage facilities are recorded at cost. The purchase price of acquired facilities is allocated to land, building, and equipment based on the fair value of each component. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over estimated useful lives of forty years for buildings and improvements, and five to twenty years for furniture, fixtures and equipment. Expenditures for significant renovations or improvements that extend the useful life of assets are capitalized. Repair and maintenance costs are expensed as incurred.