Back to GetFilings.com
================================================================================
FORM 10-K
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
(Mark One)
[X] Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000
or
[ ] Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934
For the transition period from _____________ to _______________
Commission File Number 000-23543
UNION COMMUNITY BANCORP
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
INDIANA 35-2025237
(State or other Jurisdiction (I.R.S. Employer Identification
of Incorporation or Organization) Number)
221 East Main Street
Crawfordsville, Indiana 47933
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)
Registrant's telephone number including area code:
(765) 362-2400
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
None
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Common Stock, Without Par Value
(Title of Class)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was
required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days.
YES X NO ____
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405
of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the
best of Registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. [ ](N/A)
The aggregate market value of the issuer's voting stock held by non-affiliates,
as of March 19, 2001 was $25,942,000.
The number of shares of the Registrant's Common Stock, without par value,
outstanding as of March 19, 2001 was 2,275,000 shares.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the Annual Report to Shareholders for the year ended December 31,
2000, are incorporated into Part II. Portions of the Proxy Statement for the
2001 Annual Meeting of Shareholders are incorporated in Part I and Part III.
Exhibit Index on Page E-1
Page 1 of 31 Pages
================================================================================
UNION COMMUNITY BANCORP
Form 10-K
INDEX
Page
Forward Looking Statement......................................................3
PART I
Item 1 Business...................................................... 3
Item 2. Properties....................................................26
Item 3. Legal Proceedings.............................................26
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders...........26
Item 4.5. Executive Officers of the Registrant..........................26
PART II
Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity and Related
Shareholder Matters.......................................28
Item 6. Selected Financial Data.......................................28
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations.......................28
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risks...28
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data...................28
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on
Accounting and Financial Disclosure.......................28
PART III
Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of Registrant................29
Item 11. Executive Compensation........................................29
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and
Management................................................29
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions................29
PART IV
Item 14. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, and
Reports on Form 8-K.......................................29
SIGNATURES ..........................................................30
FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENT
This Annual Report on Form 10-K ("Form 10-K") contains statements which
constitute forward looking statements within the meaning of the Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements appear in a number of
places in this Form 10-K and include statements regarding the intent, belief,
outlook, estimate or expectations of the Holding Company (as defined below), its
directors or its officers primarily with respect to future events and the future
financial performance of the Holding Company. Readers of this Form 10-K are
cautioned that any such forward looking statements are not guarantees of future
events or performance and involve risks and uncertainties, and that actual
results may differ materially from those in the forward looking statements as a
result of various factors. The accompanying information contained in this Form
10-K identifies important factors that could cause such differences. These
factors include changes in interest rates; loss of deposits and loan demand to
other savings and financial institutions; substantial changes in financial
markets; changes in real estate values and the real estate market; regulatory
changes; or unanticipated results in pending legal proceedings.
Item 1. Business
General
Union Community Bancorp, an Indiana corporation (the "Holding Company"
and together with "Union Federal", as defined below, the "Company"), was
organized in September 1997. On December 29, 1997, it acquired the common stock
of Union Federal Savings and Loan Association ("Union Federal") upon the
conversion of Union Federal from a federal mutual savings and loan association
to a federal stock savings and loan association.
Union Federal was organized as a state-chartered savings and loan
association in 1913. Since then, Union Federal has conducted its business from
its full-service office located in Crawfordsville, Indiana. Union Federal's
principal business consists of attracting deposits from the general public and
originating fixed-rate and adjustable-rate loans secured primarily by first
mortgage liens on one- to four-family residential real estate. Union Federal's
deposit accounts are insured up to applicable limits by the Savings Association
Insurance Fund ("SAIF") of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation ("FDIC").
Management believes that it has developed a solid reputation among its
loyal customer base because of its commitment to personal service and because of
strong support of the local community. Union Federal offers a number of
financial services, including: (i) residential real estate loans; (ii)
multi-family loans; (iii) commercial real estate loans; (iv) construction loans;
(v) home improvement loans; (vi) money market demand accounts ("MMDAs"); (vii)
passbook savings accounts; and (viii) certificates of deposit.
Lending Activities
Union Federal has historically concentrated its lending activities on the
origination of loans secured by first-mortgage liens for the purchase,
construction or refinancing of one- to four-family residential real property.
One- to four-family residential mortgage loans continue to be the major focus of
Union Federal's loan origination activities, representing 74.5% of its total
loan portfolio at December 31, 2000. Union Federal also offers multi-family
mortgage loans, commercial real estate loans, construction loans, commercial
loans and consumer loans consisting of loans secured by deposits and home
improvement loans. Mortgage loans secured by multi-family properties and
commercial real estate totaled approximately 7.7% and 11.6%, respectively, of
Union Federal's total loan portfolio at December 31, 2000. Construction loans
totaled approximately 2.9% of Union Federal's total loans as of December 31,
2000. Commercial loans totaled approximately 3.3% of Union Federal's total loans
as of December 31, 2000. Consumer loans, which consist of personal installment
loans and passbook loans, constituted approximately .2% of Union Federal's total
loan portfolio at December 31, 2000.
Loan Portfolio Data. The following table sets forth the composition of
Union Federal's loan portfolio by loan type and security type as of the dates
indicated, including a reconciliation of gross loans receivable after
consideration of the allowance for loan losses and loans in process.
At December 31,
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
---------------------- -------------------- --------------------
Percent Percent Percent
Amount of Total Amount of Total Amount of Total
------ -------- ------ -------- ------ --------
(Dollars in thousands)
TYPE OF LOAN
Real estate mortgage loans:
One- to four-family.............. $83,012 74.48% $80,552 74.27% $71,823 77.19%
Multi-family..................... 8,522 7.65 9,549 8.80 10,609 11.40
Commercial....................... 12,878 11.55 12,410 11.44 6,355 6.83
Real estate construction loans...... 3,221 2.89 4,380 4.04 3,993 4.29
Commercial loans.................... 3,661 3.28 1,394 1.29 51 .06
Consumer loans ..................... 165 .15 177 .16 213 .23
-------- ------ -------- ------ ------- ------
Gross loans receivable......... $111,459 100.00% $108,462 100.00% $93,044 100.00%
======== ====== ======== ====== ======= ======
TYPE OF SECURITY
One- to four-family real estate.. $85,100 76.35% $83,558 77.04% $73,130 78.60%
Multi-family real estate......... 9,010 8.08 10,063 9.28 12,037 12.93
Commercial real estate........... 13,523 12.13 13,270 12.24 7,666 8.24
Deposits......................... 49 .05 124 .11 160 .17
Other............................ 3,777 3.39 1,447 1.33 51 .06
-------- ------ -------- ------ ------- ------
Gross loans receivable......... 111,459 100.00 108,462 100.00 93,044 100.00
Deduct:
Allowance for loan losses........... 480 .43 422 .39 362 .39
Deferred loan fees.................. 290 .26 334 .31 334 .36
Loans in process.................... 1,184 1.06 1,532 1.41 1,448 1.55
-------- ------ -------- ------ ------- ------
Net loans receivable............. $109,505 98.25% $106,174 97.89% $90,900 97.70%
======== ====== ======== ====== ======= ======
Mortgage Loans:
Adjustable-rate.................. $26,028 24.18% $21,724 20.32% $19,954 21.51%
Fixed-rate....................... 81,605 75.82 85,167 79.68 72,826 78.49
-------- ------ -------- ------ ------- ------
Total.......................... $107,633 100.00% $106,891 100.00% $92,780 100.00%
======== ====== ======== ====== ======= ======
The following table sets forth certain information at December 31, 2000,
regarding the dollar amount of loans maturing in Union Federal's loan portfolio
based on the contractual terms to maturity. Demand loans having no stated
schedule of repayments and no stated maturity are reported as due in one year or
less. This schedule does not reflect the effects of possible prepayments or
enforcement of due-on-sale clauses. Management expects that prepayments will
cause actual maturities to be shorter.
Due During Years Ended December 31,
Balance -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Outstanding at 2004 2006 2011 2016
December 31, to to to and
2000 2001 2002 2003 2005 2010 2015 following
-------------- ------- ------- ------ ------- -------- -------- ---------
(In thousands)
Real estate mortgage loans:
Residential loans.................. $ 83,012 $ 380 $ 300 $ 284 $ 980 $ 26,623 $ 30,248 $ 24,197
Multi-family loans............... 8,522 0 0 276 1,361 2,334 4,551 0
Commercial loans................... 12,878 0 11 14 365 2,776 2,825 6,887
Construction loans.................... 3,221 1,230 0 0 0 246 155 1,590
Commercial loans...................... 3,661 2,294 76 118 714 459 0 0
Loans secured by deposits............. 49 49 0 0 0 0 0 0
Personal loans........................ 116 36 13 5 55 7 0 0
-------- ------- ------- ------ ------- -------- -------- --------
Total............................ $111,459 $ 3,989 $ 400 $ 697 $ 3,475 $ 32,445 $ 37,779 $ 32,674
======== ======= ======= ====== ======= ======== ======== ========
The following table sets forth, as of December 31, 2000, the dollar amount
of all loans due after one year that have fixed interest rates and floating or
adjustable interest rates.
Due After December 31, 2001
-------------------------------------------
Fixed Rates Variable Rates Total
----------- -------------- -----
(In thousands)
Real estate mortgage loans:
Residential loans........... $70,214 $12,418 $ 82,632
Multi-family loans.......... 4,639 3,883 8,522
Commercial loans............ 4,721 8,157 12,878
Construction loans............. 428 1,563 1,991
Commercial loans............... 799 568 1,367
Installment loans.............. 77 3 80
Loans secured by deposits...... 0 0 0
------- ------- --------
Total....................... $80,878 $26,592 $107,470
======= ======= ========
One- to Four-Family Residential Loans. Union Federal's primary lending
activity consists of originating one- to four-family residential mortgage loans
secured by property located in its primary market area. Union Federal generally
does not originate one- to four-family residential mortgage loans if the ratio
of the loan amount to the lesser of the current cost or appraised value of the
property (the "Loan-to-Value Ratio") exceeds 95%. Union Federal requires private
mortgage insurance on loans with a Loan-to-Value Ratio in excess of 80%, and
factors the cost of such insurance into the annual percentage rate on such
loans. Union Federal originates and retains fixed rate loans which provide for
the payment of principal and interest over a 15- or 20-year period, or balloon
loans having terms of up to 15 years with principal and interest payments
calculated using a 30-year amortization period.
Union Federal also offers adjustable-rate mortgage ("ARM") loans. The
interest rate on ARM loans is indexed to the one-year U.S. Treasury securities
yields adjusted to a constant maturity. Union Federal may offer discounted
initial interest rates on ARM loans, but requires that the borrower qualify for
the ARM loan at the fully-indexed rate (the index rate plus the margin). A
substantial portion of the ARM loans in Union Federal's portfolio at December
31, 2000 provide for maximum rate adjustments per year and over the life of the
loan of 1% and 5%, respectively. Union Federal's residential ARMs are amortized
for terms up to 25 years.
ARM loans decrease the risk associated with changes in interest rates by
periodically repricing, but involve other risks because, as interest rates
increase, the underlying payments by the borrower also increase, thus increasing
the potential for default by the borrower. At the same time, the marketability
of the underlying collateral may be adversely affected by higher interest rates.
Upward adjustment of the contractual interest rate is also limited by the
maximum periodic and lifetime interest rate adjustment permitted by the loan
documents, and, therefore, is potentially limited in effectiveness during
periods of rapidly rising interest rates. At December 31, 2000, approximately
24.2% of Union Federal's real estate mortgage loans had adjustable rates of
interest.
All of the one- to four-family residential mortgage loans that Union
Federal originates include "due-on-sale" clauses, which give it the right to
declare a loan immediately due and payable in the event that, among other
things, the borrower sells or otherwise disposes of the real property subject to
the mortgage and the loan is not repaid. However, Union Federal occasionally
permits assumptions of existing residential mortgage loans on a case-by-case
basis.
At December 31, 2000, approximately $83.0 million, or 74.5% of Union
Federal's portfolio of loans, consisted of one- to four-family residential
loans. Approximately $255,000, or .3% of total residential loans, were included
in non-performing assets as of that date. See "--Non-Performing and Problem
Assets."
Multi-Family Loans. At December 31, 2000, approximately $8.5 million, or
7.7% of Union Federal's total loan portfolio, consisted of mortgage loans
secured by multi-family dwellings (those consisting of more than four units).
Union Federal's multi-family loans are generally written as one-year adjustable
rate loans indexed to the one-year U.S. Treasury rate with an original term of
up to 20 years. Union Federal writes multi-family loans with maximum
Loan-to-Value ratios of 80%. Union Federal's largest multi-family loan as of
December 31, 2000 had a balance of approximately $928,000 and was secured by 28
duplexes located in Crawfordsville, Indiana. On the same date, Union Federal had
a $133,000 multi-family loan included in non-performing assets.
Multi-family loans, like commercial real estate loans, involve a greater
risk than do residential loans. See "-- Commercial Real Estate Loans" below.
Commercial Real Estate Loans. Union Federal's commercial real estate loans
are secured by churches, office buildings, and other commercial properties.
Union Federal generally originates commercial real estate loans as one-year
adjustable rate loans indexed to the one-year U.S. Treasury securities yield
adjusted to a constant maturity, with a maximum term of 20 years and a maximum
Loan-to-Value ratio of 80%. At December 31, 2000, Union Federal's largest
commercial loan had an outstanding balance of $1.7 million and was secured by
farm property in Montgomery County. At December 31, 2000, approximately $12.9
million, or 11.6% of Union Federal's total loan portfolio, consisted of
commercial real estate loans. On the same date, Union Federal had a $18,000
commercial real estate loan included in non-performing assets.
Loans secured by commercial real estate generally are larger than one- to
four-family residential loans and involve a greater degree of risk. Commercial
real estate loans often involve large loan balances to single borrowers or
groups of related borrowers. Payments on these loans depend to a large degree on
results of operations and management of the properties and may be affected to a
greater extent by adverse conditions in the real estate market or the economy in
general. Accordingly, the nature of the loans makes them more difficult for
management to monitor and evaluate.
Construction Loans. Union Federal offers construction loans with respect
to residential and commercial real estate and, in certain cases, to builders or
developers constructing such properties on a speculative basis (i.e., before the
builder/developer obtains a commitment from a buyer). Union Federal provides
construction loans only to borrowers who commit to permanent financing on the
finished project. At December 31, 2000, approximately $3.2 million, or 2.9% of
Union Federal's total loan portfolio, consisted of construction loans. The
largest construction loan had a balance of $418,000 on December 31, 2000 and was
secured by a condominium project in Crawfordsville, Indiana. None of Union
Federal's construction loans were included in non-performing assets on that
date.
Construction loans generally match the term of the construction contract,
are written as fixed-rate loans with interest calculated on the amount disbursed
under the loan and are payable monthly. The maximum Loan-to-Value Ratio for a
construction loan is based upon the nature of the construction project. For
example, a construction loan for a one- to four-family residence may be written
with a maximum Loan-to-Value Ratio of 95%, while a construction loan for a
multi-family project may be written with a maximum Loan-to-Value Ratio of 80%.
Inspections are made prior to any disbursement under a construction loan. Union
Federal does not normally charge commitment fees for construction loans.
While providing Union Federal with a comparable, and in some cases higher,
yield than conventional mortgage loans, construction loans involve a higher
level of risk. For example, if a project is not completed and the borrower
defaults, Union Federal may have to hire another contractor to complete the
project at a higher cost. Also, a project may be completed, but may not be
salable, resulting in the borrower defaulting and Union Federal's taking title
to the project.
Commercial Loans. Union Federal offers commercial loans, which consist
primarily of loans to businesses that are secured by assets other than real
estate. As of December 31, 2000, commercial loans amounted to $3.7 million, or
3.3% of Union Federal's total loan portfolio. Commercial loans tend to bear
somewhat greater risk than residential mortgage loans, depending on the ability
of the underlying enterprise to repay the loan. Although commercial loans have
not historically comprised a large portion of Union Federal's portfolio, Union
Federal intends to increase the amount of loans it makes to small businesses in
the future in order to increase its rate of return and diversify its portfolio.
As of December 31, 2000, none of Union Federal's commercial loans were included
in nonperforming assets.
Consumer Loans. Union Federal's consumer loans, consisting of passbook
loans and personal installment loans, aggregated approximately $165,000 at
December 31, 2000, or .2% of its total loan portfolio. Union Federal's passbook
loans are made up to 90% of the deposit account balance and, at December 31,
2000, accrued at a rate of 8.2%. This rate may change but will always be at
least 3% over the underlying passbook or certificate of deposit rate. Interest
on loans secured by deposits is paid semi-annually. At December 31, 2000, none
of Union Federal's consumer loans were included in non-performing assets. See
"-- Non-Performing and Problem Assets."
Origination, Purchase and Sale of Loans. Union Federal historically has
originated its mortgage loans pursuant to its own underwriting standards which
do not conform with the standard criteria of the Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Corporation ("FHLMC") or the Federal National Mortgage Association ("FNMA"). In
the event that Union Federal begins originating fixed-rate residential mortgage
loans for sale to the FHLMC in the secondary market, such loans will be
originated in accordance with the guidelines established by the FHLMC and will
be sold promptly after they are originated. Union Federal has no intention to
originate loans for sale to the FHLMC at this time, however.
Union Federal confines its loan origination activities primarily to
Montgomery County and the surrounding counties of Boone, Hendricks, Putnam,
Parke and Fountain. Union Federal has also originated several loans in Marion
County. At December 31, 2000, Union Federal also had six loans which it
originated, totaling approximately $574,000, secured by property located outside
of Indiana. Union Federal's loan originations are generated from referrals from
existing customers, real estate brokers, and newspaper and periodical
advertising. Loan applications are underwritten and processed at Union Federal's
office.
Union Federal's loan approval process is intended to assess the borrower's
ability to repay the loan, the viability of the loan and the adequacy of the
value of the property that will secure the loan. To assess the borrower's
ability to repay, Union Federal studies the employment and credit history and
information on the historical and projected income and expenses of its
mortgagors. All mortgage loans are approved or ratified by Union Federal's board
of directors.
Union Federal generally requires appraisals on all real property securing
its loans and requires an attorney's opinion and a valid lien on the mortgaged
real estate. Appraisals for all real property securing mortgage loans are
performed by independent appraisers who are state-licensed. Union Federal
requires fire and extended coverage insurance in amounts at least equal to the
principal amount of the loan and also requires flood insurance to protect the
property securing its interest if the property is in a flood plain. Union
Federal also generally requires private mortgage insurance for all residential
mortgage loans with Loan-to-Value Ratios of greater than 80%, and escrow
accounts for insurance premiums and taxes for loans that require private
mortgage insurance.
Union Federal's underwriting standards for consumer loans are intended to
protect against some of the risks inherent in making consumer loans. Borrower
character, paying habits and financial strengths are important considerations.
Union Federal occasionally purchases participation interests in loans
originated by other financial institutions in order to diversify its portfolio,
supplement local loan demand and to obtain more favorable yields. The
participations that Union Federal purchases normally represent a portion of
residential or commercial real estate loans originated by other Indiana
financial institutions, most of which are secured by property located in
Indiana. As of December 31, 2000, Union Federal held in its loan portfolio
participations in mortgage loans aggregating $7.2 million that it purchased, all
of which were serviced by others. Included within this amount were
participations in the aggregate amount of $662,000 which were secured by
property located outside of Indiana. The largest participation loan in Union
Federal's portfolio at December 31, 2000 was a $757,000 interest in a loan
secured by a nursing home located in Greensburg, Indiana.
The following table shows Union Federal's loan origination and repayment
activity during the periods indicated:
Year Ended December 31,
-----------------------------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
------ ------ ------
(In thousands)
Gross loans receivable
at beginning of period..................................... $108,462 $93,044 $81,135
Loans originated:
Real estate mortgage loans:
One-to-four family loans............................... 10,794 23,539 24,763
Multi-family loans..................................... 0 908 1,052
Commercial loans....................................... 1,753 3,461 3,763
Construction loans....................................... 2,435 4,719 3,163
Commercial loans......................................... 5,796 3,655 51
Loans secured by deposits................................ 18 224 155
Personal installment loans............................... 110 392 30
------- -------- -------
Total originations................................... 20,906 36,898 32,977
Purchases (sales) of participation loans, net................. 375 1,139 800
Reductions:
Principal loan repayments................................ 18,372 22,424 21,853
Loans transferred to (from) foreclosed real estate....... (88) 195 15
------- -------- -------
Total reductions..................................... 18,284 22,619 21,868
------- -------- -------
Total gross loans receivable at
end of period.............................................. $111,459 $108,462 $93,044
======== ======== =======
Union Federal's residential loan originations during the year ended
December 31, 2000 totaled $10.8 million, compared to $23.5 million and $24.8
million in the years ended December 31, 1999 and 1998, respectively.
Origination and Other Fees. Union Federal realizes income from late
charges, checking account service charges, and fees for other miscellaneous
services. Union Federal currently charges a commitment fee of $200 on all loans
and an additional $500 origination fee on construction loans. Union Federal also
may charge points on a mortgage loan as consideration for a lower interest rate,
although it does so infrequently. Late charges are generally assessed if payment
is not received within a specified number of days after it is due. The grace
period depends on the individual loan documents.
Non-Performing and Problem Assets
After a mortgage loan becomes 30 days past due, Union Federal delivers a
delinquency notice to the borrower. When loans are 30 to 60 days in default,
Union Federal sends additional delinquency notices and makes personal contact by
telephone with the borrower to establish an acceptable repayment schedule. When
loans become 60 days in default, Union Federal again contacts the borrower, this
time in person, to establish an acceptable repayment schedule. When a mortgage
loan is 90 days delinquent, Union Federal will have either entered into a
workout plan with the borrower or referred the matter to its attorney for
collection. Management is authorized to commence foreclosure proceedings for any
loan upon making a determination that it is prudent to do so.
Union Federal reviews mortgage loans on a regular basis and places such
loans on a non-accrual status when they become 90 days delinquent. Generally,
when loans are placed on a non-accrual status, unpaid accrued interest is
written off and further income is recognized only to the extent received.
Non-performing Assets. At December 31, 2000, $415,000, or .3% of Union
Federal's total assets, were non-performing (non-performing loans, non-accruing
loans and foreclosed real estate) compared to $263,000, or .2%, of its total
assets at December 31, 1999. At December 31, 2000, residential loans accounted
for $255,000 of Union Federal's non-performing assets. Union Federal had real
estate owned ("REO") properties in the amount of $9,000 as of December 31, 2000.
The table below sets forth the amounts and categories of Union Federal's
non-performing assets (non-performing loans, foreclosed real estate and troubled
debt restructurings) for the last three years. It is Union Federal's policy to
review all earned but uncollected interest on all loans monthly to determine if
any portion thereof should be classified as uncollectible for any loan past due
in excess of 90 days. Delinquent loans that are 90 days or more past due are
considered non-performing assets.
At December 31,
-----------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
---- ---- ----
(Dollars in thousands)
Non-performing assets:
Non-performing loans....................$406 $166 $349
Foreclosed real estate.................. 9 97 ---
---- ---- ----
Total non-performing assets...........$415 $263 $349
==== ==== ====
Non-performing loans to total loans........ .36% .16% .38%
Non-performing assets to total assets...... .33% .22% .32%
Interest income of $25,000, $7,000 and $30,000 was recogniaed on the
non-performing loans summarized above for the years ended December 31, 2000,
1999 and 1998, respectively. Interest income of $34,000, $13,000 and $33,000
would have been recognized under the original terms of these non-performing
loans for the years ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998, respectively.
At December 31, 2000, Union Federal held loans delinquent from 30 to 89
days totaling approximately $1,382,000. Other than in connection with these
loans and the other delinquent loans disclosed elsewhere in this section,
management was not aware of any other borrowers who were experiencing financial
difficulties.
Delinquent Loans. The following table sets forth certain information at
December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998, relating to delinquencies in Union Federal's
portfolio. Delinquent loans that are 90 days or more past due are considered
non-performing assets.
At December 31, 2000 At December 31, 1999 At December 31, 1998
--------------------------------- --------------------------------- ---------------------------------
30-89 Days 90 Days or More 30-89 Days 90 Days or More 30-89 Days 90 Days or More
---------------- ---------------- ---------------- ---------------- ---------------- ----------------
Principal Principal Principal Principal Principal Principal
Number Balance Number Balance Number Balance Number Balance Number Balance Number Balance
of of of of of of of of of of of of
Loans Loans Loans Loans Loans Loans Loans Loans Loans Loans Loans Loans
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
(Dollars in thousands)
One- to four-
family loans....... 12 $632 5 $255 9 $429 4 $166 6 $406 3 $50
Commercial
real estate loans.. 0 0 1 18 2 61 --- --- 1 17 2 89
Multi-family
loans.............. 2 750 1 133 1 132 --- --- --- --- 1 210
Loans secured
by deposits........ 0 0 0 0 --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
---- ------ ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ----
Total.............. 14 $1,382 7 $406 12 $622 4 $166 7 $423 6 $349
==== ====== ==== ==== ==== ==== ==== ==== ==== ==== ==== ====
Delinquent loans to
total loans........ 1.63% .74% .85%
==== ==== ====
Classified assets. Federal regulations and Union Federal's Asset
Classification Policy provide for the classification of loans and other assets
such as debt and equity securities considered by the OTS to be of lesser quality
as "substandard," "doubtful" or "loss" assets. An asset is considered
"substandard" if it is inadequately protected by the current net worth and
paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any.
"Substandard" assets include those characterized by the "distinct possibility"
that the institution will sustain "some loss" if the deficiencies are not
corrected. Assets classified as "doubtful" have all of the weaknesses inherent
in those classified "substandard," with the added characteristic that the
weaknesses present make "collection or liquidation in full," on the basis of
currently existing facts, conditions, and values, "highly questionable and
improbable." Assets classified as "loss" are those considered "uncollectible"
and of such little value that their continuance as assets without the
establishment of a specific loss reserve is not warranted.
An insured institution is required to establish general allowances for
loan losses in an amount deemed prudent by management for loans classified
substandard or doubtful, as well as for other problem loans. General allowances
represent loss allowances which have been established to recognize the inherent
risk associated with lending activities, but which, unlike specific allowances,
have not been allocated to particular problem assets. When an insured
institution classifies problem assets as "loss," it is required either to
establish a specific allowance for losses equal to 100% of the amount of the
asset so classified or to charge off such amount. An institution's determination
as to the classification of its assets and the amount of its valuation
allowances is subject to review by the OTS which can order the establishment of
additional general or specific loss allowances.
At December 31, 2000, the aggregate amount of Union Federal's classified
assets and its general and specific loss allowances were as follows:
At December 31, 2000
--------------------
(In thousands)
Substandard assets........................................ $1,376
Doubtful assets........................................... ---
Loss assets............................................... ---
------
Total classified assets............................... $1,376
======
General loss allowances................................... $480
Specific loss allowances.................................. ---
------
Total allowances...................................... $480
======
Union Federal regularly reviews its loan portfolio to determine whether
any loans require classification in accordance with applicable regulations.
Included in substandard assets at December 31, 2000, Union Federal had two
multi-family loans, in the aggregate sum of $961,000, that were performing. The
loans were classified as substandard as a result of a regulatory examination.
Allowance for Loan Losses
The allowance for loan losses is maintained through the provision for loan
losses, which is charged to earnings. The allowance for loan losses is
determined in conjunction with Union Federal's review and evaluation of current
economic conditions (including those of its lending area), changes in the
character and size of the loan portfolio, loan delinquencies (current status as
well as past and anticipated trends) and adequacy of collateral securing loan
delinquencies, historical and estimated net charge-offs, and other pertinent
information derived from a review of the loan portfolio. In management's
opinion, Union Federal's allowance for loan losses is adequate to absorb
probable losses inherent in the loan portfolio at December 31, 2000. However,
there can be no assurance that regulators, when reviewing Union Federal's loan
portfolio in the future, will not require increases in Union Federal's
allowances for loan losses or that changes in economic conditions will not
adversely affect its loan portfolio.
Summary of Loan Loss Experience. The following table analyzes changes in
the allowance during the past three fiscal years ended December 31, 2000.
Year Ended December 31,
-------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
------ ------ ------
(Dollars in thousands)
Balance at beginning of period.................. $422 $362 $252
Gross charge-offs - residential loans........... (2) --- ---
Provision for losses on loans................... 60 60 110
---- ---- ----
Balance end of period........................ $480 $422 $362
==== ==== ====
Allowance for loan losses as a percent of
total loans outstanding...................... .44% .40% .40%
Ratio of net charge-offs to average
loans outstanding............................ --- --- ---
Allocation of Allowance for Loan Losses. The following table presents an
analysis of the allocation of Union Federal's allowance for loan losses at the
dates indicated. The allocation of the allowance to each category is not
necessarily indicative of future loss in any particular category and does not
restrict Union Federal's use of the allowance to absorb losses in other
categories.
At December 31,
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
--------------------- --------------------- --------------------
Percent Percent Percent
of loans of loans of loans
in each in each in each
category category category
to total to total total
Amount loans Amount loans Amount loans
------ ----- ------ ----- ------ -----
(Dollars in thousands)
Balance at end of period applicable to:
Real estate mortgage loans:
Residential............... $102 74.48% $90 74.27% $75 77.19%
Commercial................ 130 7.65 124 8.80 67 6.83
Multi-family.............. 124 11.55 115 11.44 134 11.40
Construction loans.......... 4 2.89 11 4.04 19 4.29
Commercial loans............ 77 3.28 32 1.29 --- .06
Loans secured by deposits... --- .05 --- .11 --- .17
Personal installment loans.. 3 .10 2 .05 --- .06
Unallocated................. 40 --- 48 --- 67 ---
---- ------ ---- ------ ---- ------
Total..................... $480 100.00% $422 100.00% $362 100.00%
==== ====== ==== ====== ==== ======
Investments
Investments. The Company's investment portfolio generally consists of U.S.
Treasury and federal agency securities, mortgaged-backed securities, marketable
equity securities, FHLB stock and an investment in Pedcor Investments - 1993 -
XVI, L.P. See "--Service Corporation Subsidiary." At December 31, 2000,
approximately $9.6 million, or 7.6%, of the Company's total assets consisted of
such investments. The Company also had $4.5 million, or 3.6% of its assets, in
interest-earning deposits as of that date.
The following table sets forth the amortized cost and the market value of
the Company's investment portfolio at the dates indicated.
At December 31,
------------------------------------------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
------------------ ------------------ --------------------
Amortized Market Amortized Market Amortized Market
Cost Value Cost Value Cost Value
---- ------ ---- ------ ---- ------
(In thousands)
Investment securities:
Available for sale:
Marketable equity securities....... $ --- $ --- $ 290 $ 315 $ --- $ ---
Held to maturity:
Federal agencies.................... 5,015 4,945 4,715 4,386 4,500 4,479
Mortgage-backed securities.......... 2,582 2,637 2,807 2,813 3,526 3,696
------ ----- ----- ------ ------- -------
Total investment securities
held to maturity................ 7,597 7,582 7,522 7,199 8,026 8,175
Investment in limited partnership...... 912 (1) 1,012 (1) 1,055 (1)
FHLB stock (2)......................... 1,044 1,044 1,044 1,044 745 745
------ ------ -------
Total investments...................... $9,553 $9,868 $ 9,826
====== ====== =======
(1) Market values are not available
(2) Market value is based on the price at which stock may be resold to the FHLB
of Indianapolis.
The following table sets forth the amount of investment securities
(excluding mortgage-backed securities, marketable equity securities, FHLB stock
and investment in limited partnership) which mature during each of the periods
indicated and the weighted average yields for each range of maturities at
December 31, 2000.
Amount at December 31, 2000 which matures in
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
One Year One Year Five Years
or Less to Five Years to Ten Years After Ten Years
------------------- ------------------ ------------------- ------------------
Amortized Average Amoritzed Average Amortized Average Amortized Average
Cost Yield Cost Yield Cost Yield Cost Yield
---- ----- ---- ----- ---- ----- ---- -----
(Dollars in thousands)
Federal agency securities........ $--- ---% $2,415 5.97% $300 8.20% $2,300 6.64%
Mortgage-backed Securities
The following table sets forth the composition of Union Federal's
mortgage-backed securities portfolio at the dates indicated.
December 31,
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
-------------------------- ------------------------- --------------------------
Amortized Percent Market Amortized Percent Market Amortized Percent Market
Cost of Total Value Cost of Total Value Cost of Total Value
---- -------- ----- ---- -------- ----- ---- -------- -----
(In thousands)
Governmental National
Mortgage Corporation.................... $ 622 24.1% $ 666 $ 689 24.5% $ 748 $ 991 28.1% $1,095
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation..... 1,897 73.5 1,911 2,043 72.8 1,995 2,395 67.9 2,464
Federal National
Mortgage Corporation.................... 55 2.1 52 63 2.3 58 123 3.5 120
Other...................................... 8 .3 8 12 .4 12 17 .5 17
------ ----- ------ ------ ----- ------ ------ ----- ------
Total mortgage- backed securities....... $2,582 100.0% $2,637 $2,807 100.0% $2,813 $3,526 100.0% $3,696
====== ===== ====== ====== ===== ====== ====== ===== ======
The following table sets forth the amount of mortgage-backed securities
which mature during each of the periods indicated and the weighted average
yields for each range of maturities at December 31, 2000.
Amount at December 31, 2000 which matures in
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
One Year to Five Years to After
Five Years Ten Years Ten Years
----------------------- ----------------------- ----------------------
Weighted Weighted Weighted
Amortized Average Amortized Average Amortized Average
Cost Yield Cost Yield Cost Yield
---- ----- ---- ----- ---- -----
(Dollars in thousands)
Mortgage-backed securities...................... $25 9.65% $377 8.71% $2,180 7.01%
The following table sets forth the changes in Union Federal's
mortgage-backed securities portfolio for the years ended December 31, 2000, 1999
and 1998.
For the Year Ended
December 31,
------------------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
---- ---- ----
(In thousands)
Beginning balance.............. $2,807 $3,526 $2,124
Purchases...................... --- --- 2,004
Repayments..................... (190) (731) (607)
Premium and discount
amortization, net........... (35) 12 5
------- ------ ------
Ending balance................. $2,582 $2,807 $3,526
====== ====== ======
Sources of Funds
General. Deposits have traditionally been Union Federal's primary source
of funds for use in lending and investment activities. In addition to deposits,
Union Federal derives funds from scheduled loan payments, investment maturities,
loan prepayments, retained earnings, income on earning assets and borrowings.
While scheduled loan payments and income on earning assets are relatively stable
sources of funds, deposit inflows and outflows can vary widely and are
influenced by prevailing interest rates, market conditions and levels of
competition. Borrowings from the FHLB of Indianapolis may be used in the
short-term to compensate for reductions in deposits or deposit inflows at less
than projected levels.
Deposits. Union Federal attracts deposits principally from within
Montgomery County through the offering of a broad selection of deposit
instruments, including fixed-rate passbook accounts, NOW accounts, variable rate
money market accounts, fixed-term certificates of deposit and savings accounts.
Union Federal does not actively solicit or advertise for deposits outside of
Montgomery County, and substantially all of its depositors are residents of that
county. Deposit account terms vary, with the principal differences being the
minimum balance required, the amount of time the funds remain on deposit and the
interest rate. Union Federal does not pay broker fees for any deposits it
receives.
Union Federal establishes the interest rates paid, maturity terms, service
fees and withdrawal penalties on a periodic basis. Determination of rates and
terms are predicated on funds acquisition and liquidity requirements, rates paid
by competitors, growth goals, and applicable regulations. Union Federal relies,
in part, on customer service and long-standing relationships with customers to
attract and retain its deposits. Union Federal also closely prices its deposits
to the rates offered by its competitors.
The flow of deposits is influenced significantly by general economic
conditions, changes in money market and other prevailing interest rates and
competition. The variety of deposit accounts that Union Federal offers has
allowed it to be competitive in obtaining funds and to respond with flexibility
to changes in consumer demand. Union Federal has become more susceptible to
short-term fluctuations in deposit flows as customers have become more interest
rate conscious. Union Federal manages the pricing of its deposits in keeping
with its asset/liability management and profitability objectives. Based on Union
Federal's experience, management believes that its passbook, NOW and MMDAs are
relatively stable sources of deposits. However, the ability to attract and
maintain certificates of deposit, and the rates paid on these deposits, has been
and will continue to be significantly affected by market conditions.
An analysis of the Company's deposit accounts by type, maturity, and rate
at December 31, 2000, is as follows:
Minimum Balance at Weighted
Opening December 31, % of Average
Type of Account Balance 2000 Deposits Rate
- - --------------- ------- ---- -------- ----
(Dollars in thousands)
Withdrawable:
Fixed rate, passbook accounts.............................. $ 10 $ 2,773 3.81% 4.00%
Variable rate, money market................................ 10 16,423 22.55 5.58
NOW accounts and other transaction accounts................ 500 2,905 3.99 1.74
Total withdrawable....................................... 22,101 30.35 4.88
Certificates (original terms):
3 months or less........................................... 1,000 12 .02 4.79
6 months................................................... 1,000 2,356 3.24 5.70
12 months.................................................. 1,000 4,873 6.69 6.27
18 months.................................................. 1,000 5,789 7.95 6.23
24 months.................................................. 1,000 3,827 5.26 5.93
30 months.................................................. 1,000 9,635 13.23 5.75
36 months ................................................. 1,000 4,521 6.21 6.34
48 months.................................................. 1,000 642 .88 6.21
60 months.................................................. 1,000 5,123 7.03 6.03
Jumbo certificates - $100,000 and over........................ 100,000 13,937 19.14 6.35
------- ------
Total certificates............................................ 50,715 69.65 6.12
------- ------
Total deposits................................................ $72,816 100.00% 5.74
======= ======
The following table sets forth by various interest rate categories the
composition of time deposits of Union Federal at the dates indicated:
At December 31,
------------------------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
---- ---- ----
(In thousands)
3.00 to 3.99%......... $ --- $ 1 $ ---
4.00 to 4.99%......... 3,294 11,957 4,193
5.00 to 5.99%......... 16,321 22,850 27,459
6.00 to 6.99%......... 27,406 11,800 17,119
7.00 to 7.99%......... 3,694 17 26
------- ------- -------
Total.............. $50,715 $46,625 $48,797
======= ======= =======
The following table represents, by various interest rate categories, the
amounts of time deposits maturing during each of the three years following
December 31, 2000. Matured certificates, which have not been renewed as of
December 31, 2000, have been allocated based upon certain rollover assumptions.
Amounts at December 31, 2000 Maturing In
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
One Year Two Three Greater Than
or Less Years Years Three Years
------- ----- ----- -----------
(In thousands)
3.00 to 3.99%............................... $ --- $ --- $ --- $ ---
4.00 to 4.99%............................... 3,196 164 --- ---
5.00 to 5.99%............................... 12,283 1,684 1,728 1,199
6.00 to 6.99%............................... 13,116 8,189 4,216 1,830
7.00 to 7.99%............................... 398 1,463 850 399
------- ------- ------- ------
Total.................................... $28,993 $11,500 $ 6,794 $3,428
======= ======= ======= ======
The following table indicates the amount of the Company's other
certificates of deposit of $100,000 or more by time remaining until maturity as
of December 31, 2000.
At December 31, 2000
--------------------
Maturity Period (In thousands)
Three months or less................................... $ 3,667
Greater than three months through six months........... 1,650
Greater than six months through twelve months.......... 3,199
Over twelve months..................................... 5,421
-------
Total............................................. $13,937
=======
The following table sets forth the dollar amount of savings deposits in
the various types of deposits that the Company offers at the dates indicated,
and the amount of increase or decrease in such deposits as compared to the
previous period.
DEPOSIT ACTIVITY
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Balance Increase Balance Increase Balance
at (Decrease) at (Decrease) at
December 31, % of from December 31, % of from December 31, % of
2000 Deposits 1999 1999 Deposits 1998 1998 Deposits
---- -------- ---- ---- -------- ---- ---- --------
(Dollars in thousands)
Withdrawable:
Fixed rate, passbook accounts...... $2,773 3.81% $(411) $3,184 4.62% $(226) $3,410 5.26%
Variable rate, money market........ 16,423 22.55 94 16,329 23.67 5,535 10,794 16.65
NOW accounts and other
transaction accounts............. 2,905 3.99 53 2,852 4.13 1,007 1,845 2.84
------- ------ ------ ------- ------ ------ ------- ------
Total withdrawable............... 22,101 30.35 (264) 22,365 32.42 6,316 16,049 24.75
------- ------ ------ ------- ------ ------ ------- ------
Certificates (original terms):
3 months........................... 12 .02 2 10 .01 (91) 101 .16
6 months........................... 2,356 3.24 (384) 2,740 3.97 (446) 3,186 4.91
12 months.......................... 4,873 6.69 1,204 3,669 5.32 (262) 3,931 6.06
18 months.......................... 5,789 7.95 (210) 5,999 8.69 (2,056) 8,055 12.42
24 months.......................... 3,827 5.26 253 3,574 5.18 (1,870) 5,444 8.40
30 months.......................... 9,635 13.23 (745) 10,380 15.05 1,390 8,990 13.86
36 months ......................... 4,521 6.21 1,564 2,957 4.29 (511) 3,468 5.35
48 months.......................... 642 .88 85 557 .81 48 509 .78
60 months.......................... 5,123 7.03 (916) 6,039 8.75 277 5,762 8.89
Jumbo certificates.................... 13,937 19.14 3,237 10,700 15.51 1,349 9,351 14.42
------- ------ ------ ------- ------ ------ ------- ------
Total certificates.................... 50,715 69.65 4,090 46,625 67.58 (2,172) 48,797 75.25
------- ------ ------ ------- ------ ------ ------- ------
Total deposits........................ $72,816 100.00% $3,826 $68,990 100.00% $4,144 $64,846 100.00%
======= ====== ====== ======= ====== ====== ======= ======
Total deposits at December 31, 2000 were approximately $72.8 million,
compared to approximately $69.0 million at December 31, 1999. Union Federal's
deposit base depends somewhat upon the manufacturing sector of Montgomery
County's economy. Although Montgomery County's manufacturing sector is
relatively diversified and does not significantly depend upon any industry, a
loss of a material portion of the manufacturing workforce could adversely affect
Union Federal's ability to attract deposits due to the loss of personal income
attributable to the lost manufacturing jobs and the attendant loss in service
industry jobs.
In the unlikely event of Union Federal's liquidation after the Conversion,
all claims of creditors (including those of deposit account holders, to the
extent of their deposit balances) would be paid first followed by distribution
of the liquidation account to certain deposit account holders, with any assets
remaining thereafter distributed to the Holding Company as the sole shareholder
of Union Federal.
Borrowings. Management focuses on generating high quality loans and then
seeking the best source of funding from deposits, investments or borrowings. At
December 31, 2000, Union Federal had borrowings in the amount of $14.5 million
from the FHLB of Indianapolis which bear fixed and variable interest rates and
are due at various dates through 2010. Union Federal is required to maintain
eligible loans in its portfolio of at least 160% of outstanding advances as
collateral for advances from the FHLB of Indianapolis. Union Federal does not
anticipate any difficulty in obtaining advances appropriate to meet its
requirements in the future. Union Federal also owes Pedcor Investments 1993-XVI,
L.P. ("Pedcor") $655,000 under a note payable that is not included in the
following table. See "--Service Corporation Subsidiary."
The following table presents certain information relating to Union
Federal's borrowings at or for the years ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998.
At or for the Year
Ended December 31,
---------------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
---- ---- ----
(Dollars in thousands)
FHLB Advances:
Outstanding at end of period.................... $14,535 $11,659 $772
Average balance outstanding for period.......... 11,612 6,043 873
Maximum amount outstanding at any
month-end during the period................... 14,535 11,659 1,272
Weighted average interest rate
during the period............................. 6.42% 5.66% 5.84%
Weighted average interest rate
at end of period.............................. 6.31 5.76 5.71
Return on Equity and Assets
2000 1999 1998
---- ---- ----
Return on assets (net income
divided by average total assets)............. 1.59% 1.72% 1.82%
Return on equity (net income
divided by average equity)................... 5.17 5.02 4.65
Dividend payout ratio (dividends
per share divided by net
income per share)............................ 67.24 57.41 50.71
Equity to assets ratio (average
equity divided by average
total assets)................................ 30.77 34.25 39.24
Service Corporation Subsidiary
OTS regulations permit federal savings associations to invest in the
capital stock, obligations or other specified types of securities of
subsidiaries (referred to as "service corporations") and to make loans to such
subsidiaries and joint ventures in which such subsidiaries are participants in
an aggregate amount not exceeding 2% of the association's assets, plus an
additional 1% of assets if the amount over 2% is used for specified community or
inner-city development purposes. In addition, federal regulations permit
associations to make specified types of loans to such subsidiaries (other than
special purpose finance subsidiaries) in which the association owns more than
10% of the stock, in an aggregate amount not exceeding 50% of the association's
regulatory capital if the association's regulatory capital is in compliance with
applicable regulations. A savings association that acquires a non-savings
association subsidiary, or that elects to conduct a new activity within a
subsidiary, must give the FDIC and the OTS at least 30 days advance written
notice. The FDIC may, after consultation with the OTS, prohibit specified
activities if it determines such activities pose a serious threat to the SAIF.
Moreover, a savings association must deduct from capital, for purposes of
meeting the core capital, tangible capital and risk-based capital requirements,
its entire investment in and loans to a subsidiary engaged in activities not
permissible for a national bank (other than exclusively agency activities for
its customers or mortgage banking subsidiaries).
Union Federal currently owns one subsidiary, UFS Service Corp. ("UFS"),
whose sole asset is its investment in Pedcor, which is an Indiana limited
partnership that was established to organize, build, own, operate and lease a
48-unit apartment complex in Crawfordsville, Indiana known as Shady Knoll II
Apartments (the "Project"). Union Federal owns the limited partner interest in
Pedcor. The general partner is Pedcor Investments LLC. The Project, operated as
a multi-family, low- and moderate-income housing project, is completed and is
performing as planned. Because UFS engages exclusively in activities that are
permissible for a national bank, OTS regulations permit Union Federal to include
its investment in UFS in its calculation of regulatory capital.
A low- and moderate-income housing project qualifies for certain federal
income tax credits if (i) it is a residential rental property, (ii) the units
are used on a nontransient basis, and (iii) 20% or more of the units in the
project are occupied by tenants whose incomes are 50% or less of the area median
gross income, adjusted for family size, or alternatively, at least 40% of the
units in the project are occupied by tenants whose incomes are 60% of the area
median gross income. Qualified low income housing projects generally must comply
with these and other rules for fifteen years, beginning with the first year the
project qualified for the tax credit, or some or all of the tax credit together
with interest may be recaptured. The tax credit is subject to the limitations on
the use of general business credit, but no basis reduction is required for any
portion of the tax credit claimed.
UFS committed to invest approximately $1.8 million in Pedcor at the
inception of the project in November 1993. Through December 31, 2000, UFS had
invested cash of approximately $1.2 million in Pedcor with four additional
annual capital contributions remaining to be paid in January of each year
through January 2004, totaling $655,000. The additional contributions will be
used for operating and other expenses of the partnership. In addition, Union
Federal borrowed funds from the FHLB of Indianapolis to advance to Pedcor, and
Pedcor currently owes Union Federal $535,000 pursuant to a promissory note
payable in installments through January 1, 2004 and bearing interest at an
annual rate of 9%.
UFS transfers the tax credits resulting from Pedcor's operation of the
Project to Union Federal. These tax credits will be available to Union Federal
through 2003. Although Union Federal has reduced income tax expense by the full
amount of the tax credit available each year, it has not been able to fully
utilize available tax credits to reduce income taxes payable because it may not
use tax credits that would reduce its regular corporate tax liability below its
alternative minimum tax liability. Union Federal may carry forward unused tax
credits for a period of fifteen years and management believes that Union Federal
will be able to utilize the available tax credits during the carry forward
period. Additionally, Pedcor has incurred operating losses in the early years of
its operations primarily due to its accelerated depreciation of assets. UFS has
accounted for its investment in Pedcor on the equity method and, accordingly,
has recorded its share of these losses as reductions to its investment in
Pedcor, which at December 31, 2000, was $912,000. As of December 31, 2000, 92%
of the units in the Project were occupied, and 100% of the tenants met the
income test required for the tax credits. UFS does not engage in any activity or
hold any assets other than its investment in Pedcor.
The following summarizes UFS's equity in Pedcor's losses and tax credits
recognized in Union Federal's consolidated financial statements.
Year Ended December 31,
---------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
---- ---- ----
(In Thousands)
Investment in Pedcor:
Net of equity in losses..................$ 912 $ 1,012 $ 1,055
====== ======= =======
Equity in losses, net
of income tax effect.....................$ (60) $ (26) $ (73)
Tax credit.................................. 178 178 178
------ ------- -------
Increase in after-tax net income from
Pedcor investment........................$ 118 $ 152 $ 105
====== ======= =======
Employees
As of December 31, 2000, Union Federal employed 16 persons on a full-time
basis. Union Federal does not have any part-time employees. None of Union
Federal's employees is represented by a collective bargaining group. Management
considers its employee relations to be good.
Employee benefits for Union Federal's full-time employees include, among
other things, an employee stock ownership plan, a Pentegra Group (formerly known
as Financial Institutions Retirement Fund) defined benefit pension plan, a
noncontributory, multiple-employer comprehensive pension plan (the"Pension
Plan"), and hospitalization/major medical insurance, dental and eye care
insurance, long-term disability insurance, life insurance, and participation in
the Financial Institutions Thrift Plan.
Management considers its employee benefits to be competitive with those
offered by other financial institutions and major employers in the area. See
"Executive Compensation" and "Certain Relationships and Related Transactions of
Union Federal."
COMPETITION
Union Federal originates most of its loans to and accepts most of its
deposits from residents of Montgomery County, Indiana. Union Federal is subject
to competition from various financial institutions, including state and national
banks, state and federal savings associations, credit unions, and certain
nonbanking consumer lenders that provide similar services in Montgomery County
with significantly larger resources than are available to Union Federal. In
total, there are twelve other financial institutions located in Montgomery
County, including eight banks, two credit unions and two other savings
associations. Union Federal also competes with money market funds with respect
to deposit accounts.
The primary factors influencing competition for deposits are interest
rates, service and convenience of office locations. Union Federal competes for
loan originations primarily through the efficiency and quality of the services
that it provides borrowers and through interest rates and loan fees charged.
Competition is affected by, among other things, the general availability of
lendable funds, general and local economic conditions, current interest rate
levels, and other factors that management cannot readily predict.
REGULATION
General
As a federally chartered, SAIF-insured savings association, Union
Federal is subject to extensive regulation by the OTS and the FDIC. For example,
Union Federal must obtain OTS approval before it may engage in certain
activities and must file reports with the OTS regarding its activities and
financial condition. The OTS periodically examines Union Federal's books and
records and, in conjunction with the FDIC in certain situations, has examination
and enforcement powers. This supervision and regulation are intended primarily
for the protection of depositors and federal deposit insurance funds. A savings
association must pay a semi-annual assessment to the OTS based upon a marginal
assessment rate that decreases as the asset size of the savings association
increases, and which includes a fixed-cost component that is assessed on all
savings associations. The assessment rate that applies to a savings association
depends upon the institution's size, condition, and the complexity of its
operations. Union Federal's semi-annual assessment is $17,950.
Union Federal is also subject to federal and state regulation as to
such matters as loans to officers, directors, or principal shareholders,
required reserves, limitations as to the nature and amount of its loans and
investments, regulatory approval of any merger or consolidation, issuances or
retirements of Union Federal's securities, and limitations upon other aspects of
banking operations. In addition, Union Federal's activities and operations are
subject to a number of additional detailed, complex and sometimes overlapping
federal and state laws and regulations. These include state usury and consumer
credit laws, state laws relating to fiduciaries, the Federal Truth-In-Lending
Act and Regulation Z, the Federal Equal Credit Opportunity Act and Regulation B,
the Fair Credit Reporting Act, the Community Reinvestment Act, anti-redlining
legislation and antitrust laws.
Savings and Loan Holding Company Regulation
The Holding Company is regulated as a "non-diversified savings and loan
holding company" within the meaning of the Home Owners' Loan Act, as amended
(the "HOLA"), and subject to regulatory oversight of the Director of the OTS. As
such, the Holding Company is registered with the OTS and is thereby subject to
OTS regulations, examinations, supervision and reporting requirements. As a
subsidiary of a savings and loan holding company, Union Federal is subject to
certain restrictions in its dealings with the Holding Company and with other
companies affiliated with the Holding Company.
In general, the HOLA prohibits a savings and loan holding company,
without obtaining the prior approval of the Director of the OTS, from acquiring
control of another savings association or savings and loan holding company or
retaining more than 5% of the voting shares of a savings association or of
another holding company which is not a subsidiary. The HOLA also restricts the
ability of a director or officer of the Holding Company, or any person who owns
more than 25% of the Holding Company's stock, from acquiring control of another
savings association or savings and loan holding company without obtaining the
prior approval of the Director of the OTS.
The Holding Company currently operates as a unitary savings and loan
holding company. Prior to the enactment of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (the "GLB
Act") on November 12, 1999, there were no restrictions on the permissible
business activities of a unitary savings and loan holding company. The GLB Act
included a provision that prohibits any new unitary savings and loan holding
company, defined as a company that acquires a thrift after May 4, 1999, from
engaging in commercial activities. This provision also includes a grandfather
clause, however, that permits a company that was a savings and loan holding
company as of May 4, 1999, or had an application to become a savings and loan
holding company on file with the OTS as of that date, to acquire and continue to
control a thrift and to continue to engage in commercial activities. Because the
Holding Company qualifies under this grandfather provision, the GLB Act did not
affect the Holding Company's authority to engage in diversified business
activities.
Notwithstanding the above rules as to permissible business activities
of unitary savings and loan holding companies, if the savings association
subsidiary of such a holding company fails to meet the Qualified Thrift Lender
("QTL") test, then such unitary holding company would be deemed to be a bank
holding company subject to all of the provisions of the Bank Holding Company Act
of 1956 and other statutes applicable to bank holding companies, to the same
extent as if the Holding Company were a bank holding company and Union Federal
were a bank. See "-Qualified Thrift Lender." At December 31, 2000, Union
Federal's asset composition was in excess of that required to qualify as a
Qualified Thrift Lender.
If the Holding Company were to acquire control of another savings
association other than through a merger or other business combination with Union
Federal, the Holding Company would thereupon become a multiple savings and loan
holding company. Except where such acquisition is pursuant to the authority to
approve emergency thrift acquisitions and where each subsidiary savings
association meets the QTL test, the activities of the Holding Company and any of
Union Federal's subsidiaries (other than Union Federal or other subsidiary
savings associations) would thereafter be subject to further restrictions. The
HOLA provides that, among other things, no multiple savings and loan holding
company or subsidiary thereof which is not a savings association shall commence
or continue for a limited period of time after becoming a multiple savings and
loan holding company or subsidiary thereof, any business activity other than (i)
furnishing or performing management services for a subsidiary savings
association, (ii) conducting an insurance agency or escrow business, (iii)
holding, managing, or liquidating assets owned by or acquired from a subsidiary
savings association, (iv) holding or managing properties used or occupied by a
subsidiary savings association, (v) acting as trustee under deeds of trust, (vi)
those activities in which multiple savings and loan holding companies were
authorized (by regulation) to directly engage on March 5, 1987, or (vii) those
activities authorized by the Federal Reserve Board (the "FRB") as permissible
for bank holding companies, unless the Director of the OTS by regulation
prohibits or limits such activities for savings and loan holding companies.
Those activities described in (vii) above must also be approved by the Director
of the OTS before a multiple savings and loan holding company may engage in such
activities.
The Director of the OTS may also approve acquisitions resulting in the
formation of a multiple savings and loan holding company which controls savings
associations in more than one state, if the multiple savings and loan holding
company involved controls a savings association which operated a home or branch
office in the state of the association to be acquired as of March 5, 1987, or if
the laws of the state in which the association to be acquired is located
specifically permit associations to be acquired by state-chartered associations
or savings and loan holding companies located in the state where the acquiring
entity is located (or by a holding company that controls such state-chartered
savings associations). Also, the Director of the OTS may approve an acquisition
resulting in a multiple savings and loan holding company controlling savings
associations in more than one state in the case of certain emergency thrift
acquisitions.
Indiana law permits federal and state savings association holding
companies with their home offices located outside of Indiana to acquire savings
associations whose home offices are located in Indiana and savings association
holding companies with their principal place of business in Indiana ("Indiana
Savings Association Holding Companies") upon receipt of approval by the Indiana
Department of Financial Institutions. Moreover, Indiana Savings Association
Holding Companies may acquire savings associations with their home offices
located outside of Indiana and savings association holding companies with their
principal place of business located outside of Indiana upon receipt of approval
by the Indiana Department of Financial Institutions.
No subsidiary savings association of a savings and loan holding company
may declare or pay a dividend or make a capital distribution on its permanent or
nonwithdrawable stock unless it first gives the Director of the OTS 30 days
advance notice of such declaration and payment. Any dividend declared during
such period or without giving notice shall be invalid.
Federal Home Loan Bank System
Union Federal is a member of the FHLB system, which consists of 12
regional banks. The Federal Housing Finance Board ("FHFB"), an independent
agency, controls the FHLB System including the FHLB of Indianapolis. The FHLB
System provides a central credit facility primarily for member financial
institutions. At December 31, 2000, Union Federal's investment in stock of the
FHLB of Indianapolis was $1.0 million. For the fiscal year ended December 31,
2000, the FHLB of Indianapolis paid approximately $86,000 in dividends to Union
Federal.
All 12 FHLB's are required to provide funds to establish affordable
housing programs through direct loans or interest subsidies on advances to
members to be used for lending at subsidized interest rates for low- and
moderate-income, owner-occupied housing projects, affordable rental housing, and
certain other community projects. These contributions and obligations could
adversely affect the value of FHLB stock in the future. A reduction in the value
of such stock may result in a corresponding reduction in Union Federal's
capital.
The FHLB of Indianapolis serves as a reserve or central bank for member
institutions within its assigned region. It is funded primarily from proceeds
derived from the sale of consolidated obligations of the FHLB System. It makes
advances to members in accordance with policies and procedures established by
the FHLB and the Board of Directors of the FHLB of Indianapolis.
All FHLB advances must be fully secured by sufficient collateral as
determined by the FHLB. Eligible collateral includes first mortgage loans not
more than 90 days delinquent or securities evidencing interests therein,
securities (including mortgage-backed securities) issued, insured or guaranteed
by the federal government or any agency thereof, cash or FHLB deposits, certain
small business and agricultural loans of smaller institutions and real estate
with readily ascertainable value in which a perfected security interest may be
obtained. Other forms of collateral may be accepted as additional security or,
under certain circumstances, to renew outstanding advances. All long-term
advances are required to provide funds for residential home financing and the
FHLB has established standards of community service that members must meet to
maintain access to long-term advances.
Interest rates charged for advances vary depending upon maturity, the
cost of funds to the FHLB of Indianapolis and the purpose of the borrowing.
Insurance of Deposits
Deposit Insurance. The FDIC is an independent federal agency that
insures the deposits, up to prescribed statutory limits, of banks and thrifts
and safeguards the safety and soundness of the banking and thrift industries.
The FDIC administers two separate insurance funds, the BIF for commercial banks
and state savings banks and the SAIF for savings associations such as Union
Federal and banks that have acquired deposits from savings associations. The
FDIC is required to maintain designated levels of reserves in each fund. During
1996, the reserves of the SAIF were below the level required by law, primarily
because a significant portion of the assessments paid into the SAIF had been
used to pay the cost of prior thrift failures, while the reserves of the BIF met
the level required by law. In 1996, however, legislation was enacted to
recapitalize the SAIF and eliminate the premium disparity between the BIF and
SAIF. See "- Assessments" below.
Assessments. The FDIC is authorized to establish separate annual
assessment rates for deposit insurance for members of the BIF and members of the
SAIF. The FDIC may increase assessment rates for either fund if necessary to
restore the fund's ratio of reserves to insured deposits to the target level
within a reasonable time and may decrease these rates if the target level has
been met. The FDIC has established a risk-based assessment system for both SAIF
and BIF members. Under this system, assessments vary depending on the risk the
institution poses to its deposit insurance fund. An institution's risk level is
determined based on its capital level and the FDIC's level of supervisory
concern about the institution.
In 1996, legislation was enacted that included provisions designed to
recapitalize the SAIF and eliminate the significant premium disparity between
the BIF and the SAIF. Under the new law, Union Federal was charged a one-time
special assessment equal to $.657 per $100 in assessable deposits at March 31,
1995. Union Federal recognized this one-time assessment as a non-recurring
operating expense of approximately $1.3 million ($785,000 after tax) during the
three-month period ending September 30, 1996, and paid this assessment during
the fourth quarter of 1996. The assessment was fully deductible for both federal
and state income tax purposes. Beginning January 1, 1997, Union Federal's annual
deposit insurance premium was reduced from .23% to .0644% of total assessable
deposits. In addition to the assessment for deposit insurance, savings
institutions are required to pay on bonds issued in the late 1980s by the
Financing Corporation ("FICO"), which is a federally-chartered corporation that
was organized to provide some of the financing to resolve the thrift crisis in
the 1980s. During 1998, FICO payments for SAIF members approximated 6.10 basis
points, while BIF members paid 1.22 basis points. By law, payments on Financing
Corporation obligations have been shared equally between BIF members and SAIF
members since January 1, 2000.
Although Congress has considered merging the SAIF and the BIF, until
then, savings associations with SAIF deposits may not transfer deposits into the
BIF system without paying various exit and entrance fees. Such exit and entrance
fees need not be paid if a SAIF institution converts to a bank charter or merges
with a bank, as long as the resulting bank continues to pay applicable insurance
assessments to the SAIF, and as long as certain other conditions are met.
Savings Association Regulatory Capital
Currently, savings associations are subject to three separate minimum
capital-to-assets requirements: (i) a leverage limit, (ii) a tangible capital
requirement, and (iii) a risk-based capital requirement. The leverage limit
requires that savings associations maintain "core capital" of at least 3% of
total assets. Core capital is generally defined as common shareholders' equity
(including retained income), noncumulative perpetual preferred stock and related
surplus, certain minority equity interests in subsidiaries, qualifying
supervisory goodwill, purchased mortgage servicing rights and purchased credit
card relationships (subject to certain limits) less nonqualifying intangibles.
The OTS requires a core capital level of 3% of total adjusted assets for savings
associations that receive the highest rating for safety and soundness, and 4% to
5% for all other savings associations. Under the tangible capital requirement, a
savings association must maintain tangible capital (core capital less all
intangible assets except purchased mortgage servicing rights which may be
included after making the above-noted adjustment in an amount up to 100% of
tangible capital) of at least 1.5% of total assets. Under the risk-based capital
requirements, a minimum amount of capital must be maintained by a savings
association to account for the relative risks inherent in the type and amount of
assets held by the savings association. The risk-based capital requirement
requires a savings association to maintain capital (defined generally for these
purposes as core capital plus general valuation allowances and permanent or
maturing capital instruments such as preferred stock and subordinated debt, less
assets required to be deducted) equal to 8.0% of risk-weighted assets. Assets
are ranked as to risk in one of four categories (0-100%). A credit risk-free
asset, such as cash, requires no risk-based capital, while an asset with a
significant credit risk, such as a non-accrual loan, requires a risk factor of
100%. Moreover, a savings association must deduct from capital, for purposes of
meeting the core capital, tangible capital and risk-based capital requirements,
its entire investment in and loans to a subsidiary engaged in activities not
permissible for a national bank (other than exclusively agency activities for
its customers or mortgage banking subsidiaries). At December 31, 2000, Union
Federal was in compliance with all capital requirements imposed by law.
The OTS has promulgated a rule which sets forth the methodology for
calculating an interest rate risk component to be used by savings associations
in calculating regulatory capital. The OTS has delayed the implementation of
this rule, however. The rule requires savings associations with "above normal"
interest rate risk (institutions whose portfolio equity would decline in value
by more than 2% of assets in the event of a hypothetical 200-basis-point move in
interest rates) to maintain additional capital for interest rate risk under the
risk-based capital framework. Even though the OTS has delayed implementing this
rule, Union Federal nevertheless measures its interest rate risk in conformity
with the OTS regulation and, as of December 31, 2000, would have been required
to deduct $1.4 million from its total capital available to calculate its
risk-based capital requirement. The OTS recently proposed an amendment to its
interest rate risk rule that would delete the requirement that a savings
association with excess exposure to interest rate risk make this capital
deduction. The OTS has also revised its standards regarding the management of
interest rate risk to include summary guidelines to assist savings associations
in determining their exposures to interest rate risk. If an association is not
in compliance with the capital requirements, the OTS is required to prohibit
asset growth and to impose a capital directive that may restrict, among other
things, the payment of dividends and officers' compensation. In addition, the
OTS and the FDIC generally are authorized to take enforcement actions against a
savings association that fails to meet its capital requirements. These actions
may include restricting the operating activities of the association, imposing a
capital directive, cease and desist order, or civil money penalties, or imposing
harsher measures such as appointing a receiver or conservator or forcing the
association to merge into another institution.
Prompt Corrective Regulatory Action
The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991
("FedICIA") requires, among other things, that federal bank regulatory
authorities take "prompt corrective action" with respect to institutions that do
not meet minimum capital requirements. For these purposes, FedICIA establishes
five capital tiers: well capitalized, adequately capitalized, undercapitalized,
significantly undercapitalized, and critically undercapitalized. At December 31,
2000, Union Federal was categorized as "well capitalized," meaning that its
total risk-based capital ratio exceeded 10%, its Tier I risk-based capital ratio
exceeded 6%, its leverage ratio exceeded 5%, and it was not subject to a
regulatory order, agreement or directive to meet and maintain a specific capital
level for any capital measure.
The FDIC may order savings associations which have insufficient capital
to take corrective actions. For example, a savings association which is
categorized as "undercapitalized" would be subject to growth limitations and
would be required to submit a capital restoration plan, and a holding company
that controls such a savings association would be required to guarantee that the
savings association complies with the restoration plan. "Significantly
undercapitalized" savings associations would be subject to additional
restrictions. Savings associations deemed by the FDIC to be "critically
undercapitalized" would be subject to the appointment of a receiver or
conservator.
Dividend Limitations
The OTS also restricts the amount of "capital distributions" that may
be made by savings associations. The regulation defines a capital distribution
as a distribution of cash or other property to a savings association's owners,
made on account of their ownership. This definition includes a savings
association's payment of cash dividends to shareholders, or any payment by a
savings association to repurchase, redeem, retire, or otherwise acquire any of
its shares or debt instruments that are included in total capital, and any
extension of credit to finance an affiliate's acquisition of those shares or
interests. The amended regulation does not apply to dividends consisting only of
a savings association's shares or rights to purchase such shares.
The regulation exempts certain savings associations from filing either
a notice or an application with the OTS before making any capital distribution
and requires a savings association to file an application for approval of a
proposed capital distribution with the OTS if the association is not eligible
for expedited treatment under OTS's application processing rules, or the total
amount of all capital distributions, including the proposed capital
distribution, for the applicable calendar year would exceed an amount equal to
the savings association's net income for that year to date plus the savings
association's retained net income for the preceding two years (the "retained net
income standard"). At December 31, 2000, Union Federal's retained net income
standard was approximately $3.9 million. A savings association must also file an
application for approval of a proposed capital distribution if, following the
proposed distribution, the association would not be at least adequately
capitalized under the OTS prompt corrective action regulations, or if the
proposed distribution would violate a prohibition contained in any applicable
statute, regulation, or agreement between the association and the OTS or the
FDIC.
The regulation requires a savings association to file a notice of a
proposed capital distribution in lieu of an application if the association or
the proposed capital distribution do not meet the conditions described above,
and: (1) the savings association will not be at least well capitalized (as
defined under the OTS prompt corrective action regulations) following the
capital distribution; (2) the capital distribution would reduce the amount of,
or retire any part of the savings association's common or preferred stock, or
retire any part of debt instruments such as notes or debentures included in the
association's capital under the OTS capital regulation; or (3) the savings
association is a subsidiary of a savings and loan holding company. Because Union
Federal is a subsidiary of a savings and loan holding company, this latter
provision requires, at a minimum, that Union Federal file a notice with the OTS
30 days before making any capital distributions to the Holding Company.
In addition to these regulatory restrictions, Union Federal's Plan of
Conversion imposes additional limitations on the amount of capital distributions
it may make to the Holding Company. The Plan of Conversion requires Union
Federal to establish and maintain a liquidation account for the benefit of
Eligible Account Holders and Supplemental Eligible Account Holders and prohibits
Union Federal from making capital distributions to the Holding Company if its
net worth would be reduced below the amount required for the liquidation
account.
Limitations on Rates Paid for Deposits
Regulations promulgated by the FDIC pursuant to FedICIA place
limitations on the ability of insured depository institutions to accept, renew
or roll over deposits by offering rates of interest which are significantly
higher than the prevailing rates of interest on deposits offered by other
insured depository institutions having the same type of charter in the
institution's normal market area. Under these regulations, "well-capitalized"
depository institutions may accept, renew or roll such deposits over without
restriction, "adequately capitalized" depository institutions may accept, renew
or roll such deposits over with a waiver from the FDIC (subject to certain
restrictions on payments of rates) and "undercapitalized" depository
institutions may not accept, renew or roll such deposits over. The regulations
contemplate that the definitions of "well-capitalized," "adequately-capitalized"
and "undercapitalized" will be the same as the definition adopted by the
agencies to implement the corrective action provisions of FedICIA. Management
does not believe that these regulations will have a materially adverse effect on
Union Federal's current operations.
Liquidity
The Financial Regulatory Relief and Economic Efficiency Act of 2000,
which was signed into law on December 27, 2000, repealed the former statutory
requirement that all savings associations maintain an average daily balance of
liquid assets in a minimum amount of not less than 4% or more than 10% of their
withdrawable accounts plus short-term borrowings. The OTS adopted an interim
final rule in March 2001 that implemented this revised statutory requirement,
although savings associations remain subject to the OTS regulation that requires
them to maintain sufficient liquidity to ensure their safe and sound operation.
Safety and Soundness Standards
In 1995, the federal banking agencies adopted final safety and
soundness standards for all insured depository institutions. The standards,
which were issued in the form of guidelines rather than regulations, relate to
internal controls, information systems, internal audit systems, loan
underwriting and documentation, compensation and interest rate exposure. In
general, the standards are designed to assist the federal banking agencies in
identifying and addressing problems at insured depository institutions before
capital becomes impaired. If an institution fails to meet these standards, the
appropriate federal banking agency may require the institution to submit a
compliance plan. Failure to submit a compliance plan may result in enforcement
proceedings. During 1996, the federal banking agencies added asset quality and
earning standards to the safety and soundness guidelines.
Real Estate Lending Standards
OTS regulations require savings associations to establish and maintain
written internal real estate lending policies. Each association's lending
policies must be consistent with safe and sound banking practices and be
appropriate to the size of the association and the nature and scope of its
operations. The policies must establish loan portfolio diversification
standards; establish prudent underwriting standards, including loan-to-value
limits, that are clear and measurable; establish loan administration procedures
for the association's real estate portfolio; and establish documentation,
approval, and reporting requirements to monitor compliance with the
association's real estate lending policies. The association's written real
estate lending policies must be reviewed and approved by the association's Board
of Directors at least annually. Further, each association is expected to monitor
conditions in its real estate market to ensure that its lending policies
continue to be appropriate for current market conditions.
Loans to One Borrower
Under OTS regulations, Union Federal may not make a loan or extend
credit to a single or related group of borrowers in excess of 15% of its
unimpaired capital and surplus. Additional amounts may be lent, not in excess of
10% of unimpaired capital and surplus, if such loans or extensions of credit are
fully secured by readily marketable collateral, including certain debt and
equity securities but not including real estate. In some cases, a savings
association may lend up to 30% of unimpaired capital and surplus to one borrower
for purposes of developing domestic residential housing, provided that the
association meets its regulatory capital requirements and the OTS authorizes the
association to use this expanded lending authority. Union Federal has
established an "in-house" lending limit of $2 million to a single or related
group of borrowers, which is significantly lower than the regulatory lending
limit described above. Any loan that exceeds this "in-house" lending limit up to
the regulatory lending limit must first be approved by Union Federal's board of
directors. At December 31, 2000, Union Federal had no loan relationships that
exceeded its "in-house" lending limit. Also on that date, Union Federal did not
have any loans or extensions of credit to a single or related group of borrowers
in excess of its regulatory lending limits. Management does not believe that the
loans-to-one-borrower limits will have a significant impact on Union Federal's
business operations or earnings.
Qualified Thrift Lender
Savings associations must meet a QTL test that requires the association
to maintain an appropriate level of qualified thrift investments ("QTIs")
(primarily residential mortgages and related investments, including certain
mortgage-related securities) and otherwise to qualify as a QTL. The required
percentage of QTIs is 65% of portfolio assets (defined as all assets minus
intangible assets, property used by the association in conducting its business
and liquid assets equal to 10% of total assets). Certain assets are subject to a
percentage limitation of 20% of portfolio assets. In addition, savings
associations may include shares of stock of the FHLBs, FNMA, and FHLMC as QTIs.
Compliance with the QTL test is determined on a monthly basis in nine out of
every twelve months. As of December 31, 2000, Union Federal was in compliance
with its QTL requirement, with approximately 91.5% of its assets invested in
QTIs.
A savings association which fails to meet the QTL test must either
convert to a bank (but its deposit insurance assessments and payments will be
those of and paid to the SAIF) or be subject to the following penalties: (i) it
may not enter into any new activity except for those permissible for a national
bank and for a savings association; (ii) its branching activities shall be
limited to those of a national bank; (iii) it shall be bound by regulations
applicable to national banks respecting payment of dividends. Three years after
failing the QTL test the association must dispose of any investment or activity
not permissible for a national bank and a savings association. If such a savings
association is controlled by a savings and loan holding company, then such
holding company must, within a prescribed time period, become registered as a
bank holding company and become subject to all rules and regulations applicable
to bank holding companies (including restrictions as to the scope of permissible
business activities).
Acquisitions or Dispositions and Branching
The Bank Holding Company Act specifically authorizes a bank holding
company, upon receipt of appropriate regulatory approvals, to acquire control of
any savings association or holding company thereof wherever located. Similarly,
a savings and loan holding company may acquire control of a bank. Moreover,
federal savings associations may acquire or be acquired by any insured
depository institution. Regulations promulgated by the FRB restrict the
branching authority of savings associations acquired by bank holding companies.
Savings associations acquired by bank holding companies may be converted to
banks if they continue to pay SAIF premiums, but as such they become subject to
branching and activity restrictions applicable to banks.
Subject to certain exceptions, commonly-controlled banks and savings
associations must reimburse the FDIC for any losses suffered in connection with
a failed bank or savings association affiliate. Institutions are commonly
controlled if one is owned by another or if both are owned by the same holding
company. Such claims by the FDIC under this provision are subordinate to claims
of depositors, secured creditors, and holders of subordinated debt, other than
affiliates.
The OTS has adopted regulations which permit nationwide branching to
the extent permitted by federal statute. Federal statutes permit federal savings
associations to branch outside of their home state if the association meets the
domestic building and loan test in ss. 7701(a)(19) of the Code or the asset
composition test of ss. 7701(c) of the Code. Branching that would result in the
formation of a multiple savings and loan holding company controlling savings
associations in more than one state is permitted if the law of the state in
which the savings association to be acquired is located specifically authorizes
acquisitions of its state-chartered associations by state-chartered associations
or their holding companies in the state where the acquiring association or
holding company is located. Moreover, Indiana banks and savings associations are
permitted to acquire other Indiana banks and savings associations and to
establish branches throughout Indiana.
Finally, The Riegle-Neal Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency
Act of 1994 (the "Riegle-Neal Act") permits bank holding companies to acquire
banks in other states and, with state consent and subject to certain
limitations, allows banks to acquire out-of-state branches either through merger
or de novo expansion. The State of Indiana enacted legislation establishing
interstate branching provisions for Indiana state-chartered banks consistent
with those established by the Riegle-Neal Act (the "Indiana Branching Law"). The
Indiana Branching Law, which became effective in 1996, authorizes Indiana banks
to branch interstate by merger or de novo expansion, provided that such
transactions are not permitted to out-of-state banks unless the laws of their
home states permit Indiana banks to merge or establish de novo banks on a
reciprocial basis.
Transactions with Affiliates
Union Federal is subject to Sections 22(h), 23A and 23B of the Federal
Reserve Act, which restrict financial transactions between banks and their
directors, executive officers and affiliated companies. The statute limits
credit transactions between a bank or savings association and its executive
officers and its affiliates, prescribes terms and conditions for bank affiliate
transactions deemed to be consistent with safe and sound banking practices, and
restricts the types of collateral security permitted in connection with a bank's
extension of credit to an affiliate.
Federal Securities Law
The shares of Common Stock of the Holding Company have been registered
with the SEC under the 1934 Act and, as a result, the Holding Company is subject
to the information, proxy solicitation, insider trading restrictions and other
requirements of the 1934 Act and the rules of the SEC thereunder. After three
years following Union Federal's conversion to stock form, if the Holding Company
has fewer than 300 shareholders, it may deregister its shares under the 1934 Act
and cease to be subject to the foregoing requirements.
Shares of Common Stock held by persons who are affiliates of the
Holding Company may not be resold without registration unless sold in accordance
with the resale restrictions of Rule 144 under the 1933 Act. If the Holding
Company meets the current public information requirements under Rule 144, each
affiliate of the Holding Company who complies with the other conditions of Rule
144 (including those that require the affiliate's sale to be aggregated with
those of certain other persons) would be able to sell in the public market,
without registration, a number of shares not to exceed, in any three-month
period, the greater of (i) 1% of the outstanding shares of the Holding Company
or (ii) the average weekly volume of trading in such shares during the preceding
four calendar weeks.
Community Reinvestment Act Matters
Federal law requires that ratings of depository institutions under the
Community Reinvestment Act of 1977 ("CRA") be disclosed. The disclosure includes
both a four-unit descriptive rating -- outstanding, satisfactory, needs to
improve, and substantial noncompliance -- and a written evaluation of an
institution's performance. Each FHLB is required to establish standards of
community investment or service that its members must maintain for continued
access to long-term advances from the FHLBs. The standards take into account a
member's performance under the CRA and its record of lending to first-time home
buyers. The OTS has designated Union Federal's record of meeting community
credit needs as satisfactory.
TAXATION
Federal Taxation
Historically, savings associations, such as Union Federal, have been
permitted to compute bad debt deductions using either the bank experience method
or the percentage of taxable income method. However, for years beginning after
December 31, 1995, no savings association may use the percentage of taxable
income method of computing its allowable bad debt deduction for tax purposes.
Instead, all savings associations are required to compute their allowable
deduction using the experience method. As a result of the repeal of the
percentage of taxable income method, reserves taken after 1987 using the
percentage of taxable income method generally must be included in future taxable
income over a six-year period, although a two-year delay may be permitted for
associations meeting a residential mortgage loan origination test. Union Federal
will recapture approximately $55,000 over a six-year period that began with the
year ended December 31, 1996. In addition, the pre-1988 reserve, for which no
deferred taxes have been recorded, need not be recaptured into income unless (i)
the savings association no longer qualifies as a bank under the Code, or (ii)
the savings association pays out excess dividends or distributions.
Depending on the composition of its items of income and expense, a savings
association may be subject to the alternative minimum tax. A savings association
must pay an alternative minimum tax on the amount (if any) by which 20% of
alternative minimum taxable income ("AMTI"), as reduced by an exemption varying
with AMTI, exceeds the regular tax due. AMTI equals regular taxable income
increased or decreased by certain tax preferences and adjustments, including
depreciation deductions in excess of that allowable for alternative minimum tax
purposes, tax-exempt interest on most private activity bonds issued after August
7, 1986 (reduced by any related interest expense disallowed for regular tax
purposes), the amount of the bad debt reserve deduction claimed in excess of the
deduction based on the experience method and 75% of the excess of adjusted
current earnings over AMTI (before this adjustment and before any alternative
tax net operating loss). AMTI may be reduced only up to 90% by net operating
loss carryovers, but alternative minimum tax paid can be credited against
regular tax due in later years.
For federal income tax purposes, Union Federal has been reporting its
income and expenses on the accrual method of accounting. Union Federal's federal
income tax returns have not been audited in recent years.
State Taxation
Union Federal is subject to Indiana's Financial Institutions Tax ("FIT"),
which is imposed at a flat rate of 8.5% on "adjusted gross income." "Adjusted
gross income," for purposes of FIT, begins with taxable income as defined by
Section 63 of the Code and, thus, incorporates federal tax law to the extent
that it affects the computation of taxable income. Federal taxable income is
then adjusted by several Indiana modifications. Other applicable state taxes
include generally applicable sales and use taxes plus real and personal property
taxes.
Union Federal's state income tax returns have not been audited in recent
years.
Item 2. Properties.
The following table provides certain information with respect to Union
Federal's office as of December 31, 2000:
Net Book
Value of
Property, Approximate
Description Owned or Year Total Furniture & Square
and Address leased Opened Deposits Fixtures Footage
----------- ------ ------ -------- -------- -------
(Dollars in thousands)
221 East Main Street Owned 1913 $72,816 $374 19,065
Crawfordsville, Indiana 47933
Union Federal has also contracted for data processing and reporting
services from Intrieve, Incorporated in Cincinnati, Ohio. The cost of these data
processing services is approximately $6,500 per month.
Union Federal has also executed a Correspondent Services Agreement with
the FHLB of Indianapolis under which it receives item processing and other
services for a fee of approximately $1,500 per month.
Union Federal also receives income from leasing office space on the second
floor of its building and parking spaces located behind its building. Union
Federal's gross income from renting the office space was $25,000 for the year
ended December 31, 2000, and its gross income from renting the parking spaces
was approximately $8,000 for the year ended December 31, 2000.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings.
Although Union Federal is involved, from time to time, in various legal
proceedings in the normal course of business, there are no material legal
proceedings to which it presently is a party or to which any of its property is
subject.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
No matter was submitted to a vote of the Holding Company's shareholders
during the quarter ended December 31, 2000.
Item 4.5. Executive Officers of the Registrant.
The executive officers of the Holding Company are identified below. The
executive officers of the Holding Company are elected annually by the Holding
Company's Board of Directors.
Name Position with Holding Company
---- -----------------------------
Joseph E. Timmons Chairman of the Board, President and Chief
Executive Officer
Denise E. Swearingen Secretary and Treasurer
Ronald L. Keeling Vice President
Alan L. Grimble Vice President
Joseph E. Timmons (age 66) has served as President and Chief Executive
Officer of the Holding Company since 1997, of Union Federal since 1974 and of
UFS Service Corp. since its inception in 1994. He has been an employee of Union
Federal since 1954.
Denise E. Swearingen (age 42) has served as the Holding Company's
Secretary and Treasurer since 1997 and as Union Federal's Secretary and
Controller/Treasurer since 1995. She has worked for Union Federal since 1983.
Ronald L. Keeling (age 49) has served as the Holding Company's Vice
President since 1997, as Union Federal's Vice President and Assistant Secretary
since 1984 and as Senior Loan Officer since 1979. He has worked for Union
Federal since 1971.
Alan L. Grimble (age 44) has served as the Holding Company's Vice
President since 2000, as Union Federal's Executive Vice President since 2000 and
as a Commercial Loan Officer since 1998. He has worked for Union Federal since
1998.
PART II
Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity and Related Shareholder Matters.
The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to
the material under the heading "Shareholder Information" on page 43 of the
Holding Company's 2000 Shareholder Annual Report (the "Shareholder Annual
Report").
Item 6. Selected Financial Data.
The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to
the material under the heading "Selected Consolidated Financial Data" on pages 2
and 3 of the Shareholder Annual Report.
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operation.
The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to
pages 3 through 15 of the Shareholder Annual Report.
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risks
The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to
pages 13 through 15 of the Shareholder Annual Report.
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
The Holding Company's Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes
thereto contained on pages 16 through 38 of the Shareholder Annual Report are
incorporated herein by reference. The Holding Company's supplementary financial
information required by this item is incorporated by reference to page 13 of the
Shareholder annual report.
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and
Financial Disclosure.
There were no such changes or disagreements during the applicable
period.
PART III
Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant.
The information required by this item with respect to Directors is
incorporated by reference to pages 2 to 4 and pages 6 to 7 of the Holding
Company's Proxy Statement for its Annual Shareholder meeting to be held April
18, 2001 (the "2001 Proxy Statement"). The information concerning the Holding
Company's executive officers is included in Item 4.5 in Part I of this report.
Item 11. Executive Compensation.
The information required by this item with respect to Directors is
incorporated by reference to pages 5 to 7 of the Holding Company's 2001 Proxy
Statement.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
The information required by this item with respect to Directors is
incorporated by reference to page 3 of the Holding Company's 2001 Proxy
Statement.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.
The information required by this item with respect to Directors is
incorporated by reference to pages 7 and 8 of the Holding Company's 2001 Proxy
Statement.
PART IV
Item 14. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, and Reports on Form 8-K.
(a) List the following documents filed as part of the report:
Annual Report
Page No.
Financial Statements:
Independent Auditor's Report 16
Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 2000 and 1999 17
Consolidated Statement of Income for the Years Ended
December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 18
Consolidated Statement of Shareholders' Equity for the
Years Ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998. 19
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the Years Ended
December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 20
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 21
(b) Reports on Form 8-K.
The Holding Company filed no reports on Form 8-K during the quarter
ended December 31, 2000.
(c) The exhibits filed herewith or incorporated by reference herein are set
forth on the Exhibit Index on page E-1. Included in those exhibits is
an executive compensation plan and arrangement which is identified as
Exhibit 10(5).
(d) All schedules are omitted as the required information either is not
applicable or is included in the Consolidated Financial Statements or
related notes.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirement of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the Registrant has duly caused this report to
be signed on behalf of the undersigned, thereto duly authorized.
UNION COMMUNITY BANCORP
Date: March 29, 2001 By: \s\ Joseph E. Timmons
------------------------------
Joseph E. Timmons, President and
Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of
the Registrant and in the capacities indicated on this 29th day of March, 2001.
Signatures Title Date
---------- ----- ----
(1) Principal Executive Officer:
\s\ Joseph E. Timmons
---------------------------------
)
Joseph E. Timmons President and )
Chief Executive )
Officer )
)
)
(2) Principal Financial and Accounting )
Officer: )
)
\s\ Denise E. Swearingen )
--------------------------------- Treasurer )
Denise E. Swearingen )
)
) March 29, 2001
)
(3) The Board of Directors: )
)
\s\ Philip L. Boots )
--------------------------------- Director )
Philip L. Boots )
)
\s\ Marvin L. Burkett )
--------------------------------- Director )
Marvin L. Burkett )
)
\s\ Phillip E. Grush )
--------------------------------- Director )
Phillip E. Grush )
)
\s\ Samuel H. Hildebrand )
--------------------------------- Director )
Samuel H. Hildebrand )
)
\s\ John M. Homer )
--------------------------------- Director )
John M. Horner )
)
\s\ Harry A. Siamas )
--------------------------------- Director )
Harry A. Siamas )
)
\s\ Joseph E. Timmons )
--------------------------------- Director )
Joseph E. Timmons )
)
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit No. Description Page
- - ----------- ----------- ----
3 (1) Registrant's Articles of Incorporation are
incorporated by reference to to Exhibit 3(1) to the
Registrant's Registration Statement on form S-1
filed with the Commission on September17, 1997 (the
"Registration Statement")
(2) Registrant's Code of By-Laws is incorporated by
reference to to Exhibit 3(2) to the Registration
Statement
10 (2) Union Community Bancorp Stock Option Plan
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(2) to the
Registration Statement
(3) Union Federal Savings and Loan Association
Recognition and Retention Plan and Trust
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(3) to the
Registration Statement
(4) Union Community Bancorp Employee Stock Ownership
Plan and Trust Agreement incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10(4) to the Registration Statement
(5) Employment Agreement between Union Federal Savings
and Loan Association and Joseph E. Timmons
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(5) to the
Registration Statement
(6) Exempt Loan and Share Purchase Agreement between
Trust under Union Community Bancorp Employee Stock
Ownership Plan and Trust Agreement and Union
Community Bancorp incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10(6) to the Registration Statement
13 2000 Annual Report
21 Subsidiaries of the Registrant
23 Consent of Independent Auditors