UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
FORM 10-K
[X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001
or
[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from____________ to ____________.
Commission File Number: 001-16765
TRIZEC PROPERTIES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware 33-0387846
- ---------------------------------------------- ----------------------------
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification No.)
1114 Avenue of the Americas, 31st Floor
New York, NY 10036
- ---------------------------------------------- ----------------------------
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
212-382-9300
----------------------------------------------------
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of Each Class Name of Exchange on Which Registered
Common Stock, $0.01 par value New York Stock Exchange
Exchange Certificates, exchangeable New York Stock Exchange
for Common Stock
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Title of Each Class Name of Exchange on Which Registered
None None
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934
during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for at least the past 90 days. Yes [ ] No [X]
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405
of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the
best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. [X]
The registrant is unable to calculate the aggregate market value of its
outstanding common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant because there
is no public trading market for the registrant's common stock.
As of March 7, 2001, 38,220,000 shares of common stock were issued and
outstanding.
Table of Contents
Page
----
PART I.........................................................................3
Item 1. Business.....................................................3
Item 2. Properties..................................................24
Item 3. Legal Proceedings...........................................36
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.........36
PART II.......................................................................36
Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity and Related
Stockholder Matters.........................................36
Item 6. Selected Financial Data (including Unaudited Pro Forma
Condensed Combined Consolidated Financial Data).............39
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations.........................52
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About
Market Risk.................................................76
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.................76
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on
Accounting and Financial Disclosure.........................76
Part III......................................................................77
Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers............................77
Item 11. Executive Compensation......................................81
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and
Management and Related Stockholders.........................90
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions..............94
Part IV.......................................................................96
Item 14. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and
Reports on Form 8-K.........................................96
Forward-Looking Statements
This Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements relating to our
business and financial outlook, which are based on our current expectations,
estimates, forecasts and projections. In some cases, you can identify
forward-looking statements by terminology such as "may," "will," "should,"
"expects," "plans," "anticipates," "believes," "estimates," "predicts,"
"potential" or "continue" or the negative of these terms or other comparable
terminology. These forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future
performance and involve risks, uncertainties, estimates and assumptions that are
difficult to predict. Therefore, actual outcomes and results may differ
materially from those expressed in these forward-looking statements. You should
not place undue reliance on any of these forward-looking statements. Further,
any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date on which it is made,
and we undertake no obligation to update any such statement to reflect new
information, the occurrence of future events or circumstances or otherwise.
A number of important factors could cause actual results to differ
materially from those indicated by the forward-looking statements, including,
but not limited to, the risks described under "Item 1. Business - Risk Factors"
in this Form 10-K.
2
PART I
Item 1. Business
In this Form 10-K, the terms "we," "us," "our" and "our company" refer
to the combined operations of all of TrizecHahn Corporation's U.S. holdings,
substantially all of which are owned and operated by Trizec Properties, Inc.
(formerly known as TrizecHahn (USA) Corporation), TrizecHahn Developments Inc.
and their respective consolidated subsidiaries. The term "Trizec Properties"
refers to Trizec Properties, Inc. (formerly known as TrizecHahn (USA)
Corporation) and its consolidated subsidiaries. For purposes of this Form 10-K,
the subsidiaries of a person include all entities that such person controls.
Overview
TrizecHahn Corporation, our parent company, is currently proposing a
corporate reorganization. For additional information about the corporate
reorganization see " - The TrizecHahn Corporate Reorganization" below. As a
result of this reorganization, we expect to become a publicly traded REIT and to
own all of the U.S. assets that TrizecHahn Corporation currently owns, directly
or indirectly. Upon completion of the corporate reorganization, we will be the
second largest fully integrated, self-managed, publicly traded office company in
the United States based on the square footage of our owned and managed office
properties as of December 31, 2001, according to our internal estimates that are
based on publicly available information about our competitors as of February 15,
2002.
At December 31, 2001, we had total assets of $6.1 billion and owned
interests in or managed 76 office properties containing approximately 49 million
square feet, with our pro rata ownership interest totaling approximately 41
million square feet. Based on square footage, approximately 77% of our buildings
are located in central business districts, or CBDs, of major U.S. cities,
including Atlanta, Chicago, Dallas and Houston and the Los Angeles, New York and
Washington, D.C. areas, and approximately 76% of our buildings are Class A. We
consider Class A office buildings to be buildings that are professionally
managed and maintained, that attract high-quality tenants and command upper-tier
rental rates and that are modern structures or have been modernized to compete
with newer buildings. We also own land and development rights which would allow
us to develop an additional 6.5 million square feet of office properties in key
cities in the United States when and if market conditions warrant.
We are also completing the stabilization of three destination-oriented
retail and entertainment centers. We intend to complete the leasing of these
projects to achieve stable operating cash flows and then to dispose of these
assets in an orderly fashion over the next several years.
Trizec (USA) Holdings, Inc. was incorporated in Delaware on October 25,
1989, changed its name to TrizecHahn (USA) Corporation in 1996 and changed its
name to Trizec Properties, Inc. in 2002. We will elect to be taxed as a real
estate investment trust, or REIT, for U.S. federal income tax purposes
commencing in 2001. As a REIT, we generally will not be subject to U.S. federal
income tax if we distribute 100% of our taxable income and comply with a number
of organizational and operational requirements.
We own our office property portfolio through our wholly owned
subsidiary, TrizecHahn Office Properties Inc., and through some of its
subsidiaries, including TrizecHahn Centers Inc. Our affiliate, TrizecHahn
Developments Inc., or THDI, currently owns and manages our retail/entertainment
projects. THDI was distributed out of our company in September 1999 and is
currently an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of our ultimate parent company,
TrizecHahn Corporation. Prior to the completion of the corporate reorganization,
THDI will be contributed back to us.
Business and Growth Strategies
Our goal is to increase stockholder value through sustained growth in
operating cash flow, thereby increasing the value of our portfolio. In the near
term, we believe we can achieve our goal through the following strategies:
o intensively managing our properties and our portfolio to maximize
property operating income;
o improving the efficiency and productivity of our operations; and
3
o maintaining a prudent and flexible capital plan.
Intensively Managing Our Properties and Our Portfolio
By intensively managing our properties, we expect to maximize the
property operating income, or POI, from our properties. We define POI as our
total rental revenue including tenant recoveries and parking, fee and other
income less our operating expenses and property taxes, and including our share
of property net operating income from unconsolidated real estate joint ventures.
This measure excludes property related depreciation and amortization expense. To
maximize POI, we have focused on:
o narrowing the gap between market rents and in-place rents as
leases for our properties expire, and
o increasing occupancy in our properties.
In 2001, average net rental rates on 8.0 million square feet of new and
renewal leases increased $1.03 per square foot. This increase reflected the
impact of re-leasing space in properties with in-place rents below our estimate
of market rents. For our total portfolio, our estimates of market rents at
December 31, 2001 were on average approximately 25% above our in-place rents.
These market conditions, combined with a scheduled lease expiration profile of
approximately 11.5% of occupied space at December 31, 2001 expiring annually
over the next five fiscal years, should continue to contribute to future revenue
growth.
Vacant space in our portfolio, which approximated 5.7% or 2.4 million
square feet at December 31, 2001, represents an opportunity to increase our cash
flow.
Cash received on our rental revenue has and will continue to benefit
from contractual rental increases, opportunistic lease terminations and the
execution of "blend and extend" strategies, which allow early lease renewals at
rates that blend the rents of the current lease with the rents for the renewal
term. For the year ended December 31, 2001, the combined impact of these leasing
strategies resulted in a 6% increase in POI from comparable office properties,
i.e., those office properties owned both at December 31, 2001 and 2000, and in
each case for the full year.
Our portfolio strategy is to invest in office properties in the CBDs of
major metropolitan areas demonstrating high job growth. We believe that focusing
on our core markets, currently Atlanta, Chicago, Dallas, Houston, Los Angeles,
New York and the Washington, D.C. area, will allow us to achieve economies of
scale across a diverse base of tenants and provide for sustainable property cash
flow. For the year ended December 31, 2001, our seven core markets accounted for
80% of our total office property POI. In the second quarter of 2001, we
acquired, for $182 million, three Class A office buildings, totaling 818,000
square feet, located in our core markets of Chicago and Washington, D.C.
Improving the Efficiency and Productivity of Our Operations
Controlling both property operating expenses as well as general and
administrative expenses are key to achieving our goal of maximizing our
operating cash flow. In June 2001, we realigned and simplified our management
structure and announced plans for consolidating our seven regional accounting,
payroll and information services functions in Chicago. This reorganization will
result in a net reduction of approximately 85 employees by the end of 2002. We
expect our functional and office consolidations to generate general and
administrative expense savings over time.
In July 2001, to provide a foundation and foster a culture for
improving productivity and margins, we announced our Six Sigma quality
initiative. The Six Sigma initiative is a program for continuous process
improvement designed to generate bottom-line improvement through higher levels
of customer satisfaction and internal productivity. The program will focus on
gross margin improvement by growing revenues, reducing the downtime between
tenancies and achieving cost savings from internal productivity improvements.
4
Maintaining a Prudent and Flexible Capital Plan
We believe that, in order to maximize our cash flow growth, our asset
management and operating strategies must be complemented by a capital strategy
designed to maximize the return on our capital. Our capital strategy is to:
o establish adequate working capital and lines of credit to ensure
liquidity and flexibility;
o employ an appropriate degree of leverage;
o maintain floating rate debt at a level that allows us to execute
our portfolio realignment strategy without incurring significant
prepayment penalties; and
o actively manage our exposure to interest rate volatility through
the use of long-term fixed-rate debt and various hedging
strategies.
In May 2001, we significantly strengthened our balance sheet by
refinancing $1.16 billion of existing long-term debt through the private
placement issuance by a special-purpose vehicle created by one of our
subsidiaries of $1.44 billion of commercial mortgage pass-through certificates.
The certificates are backed by mortgages that secure loans on 28 office
properties and have maturities of five, seven and 10 years. At December 31,
2001, the weighted average interest rate on this debt was 4.9%, and it replaced
existing debt at 7.1%. The transaction addressed near-term maturities of
existing debt and also increased the ratio of fixed-rate debt to total debt to
71% at December 31, 2001 compared with 69% at the end of 2000. In addition, the
provisions of the financing relating to the release and substitution of
properties provide for ample flexibility to execute our portfolio realignment
strategy.
To facilitate execution of TrizecHahn Corporation's corporate
reorganization and to provide liquidity and flexibility in the future, we have
negotiated a $350 million senior unsecured revolving credit facility. In
December 2001, $200 million of the facility was committed and closed with a
group of four banks. The remaining $150 million of the facility was syndicated
to a group of seven banks and closed in early January 2002. The amount currently
eligible to be borrowed is $314 million.
Competition
The leasing of real estate is highly competitive. We compete for
tenants with lessors and developers of similar properties located in our
respective markets primarily on the basis of location, rent charged, services
provided, and the design and condition of our buildings. We also experience
competition when attempting to acquire real estate, including competition from
domestic and foreign financial institutions, other REITs, life insurance
companies, pension trusts, trust funds, partnerships and individual investors.
Industry Segments and Seasonality
Our primary business is the ownership and management of office
properties. Our long-term tenants are in a variety of businesses and no single
tenant is significant to our business. Our business is not seasonal.
Subsidiaries
The following table shows our subsidiaries with total assets that
constitute more than 10% of our consolidated assets as of December 31, 2001 or
total revenues that constitute more than 10% of our consolidated revenues for
the year ended December 31, 2001.
Subsidiary Jurisdiction of Organization
---------- ----------------------------
TrizecHahn Office Properties Inc. Delaware
TrizecHahn Centers Inc. California
5
Employees and Organizational Structure
At January 1, 2002, we had 1,193 employees, 972 of which were employed
in our integrated office portfolio operations and 221 of which were employed in
our retail/entertainment group. Of these employees, 155 were employed in our
corporate offices, with the remainder employed in the operation of our property
portfolio. Additionally, 160 of our employees that are employed in our office
portfolio operations are represented by labor unions. We consider our labor
relations to be positive and anticipate maintaining agreements with our labor
unions on terms satisfactory to all parties.
In 2001, as a result of a comprehensive review of operations directed
at simplifying our management structure and realizing benefits from functional
and office location consolidations, corporate leadership and portfolio
management functions were centralized in New York and Chicago. Consistent with
our focus on core cities, we have dedicated regional leasing and property
management teams based in Atlanta, Chicago, Houston, Los Angeles, New York and
Washington, D.C.
Our retail/entertainment business is based in Los Angeles and San
Diego, with standalone development, operating and financial services functions.
As part of our announced functional reorganization, we will centralize financial
service functions in Chicago during 2002.
RISK FACTORS
You should carefully consider the risks described below. These risks
are not the only ones that our company may face. Additional risks not presently
known to us or that we currently consider immaterial may also impair our
business operations and hinder our ability to make expected distributions to our
stockholders.
This Form 10-K also contains forward-looking statements that involve
risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from those
anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors,
including the risks faced by us described below or elsewhere in this Form 10-K.
Risks Relating to Our Business
Our economic performance and the value of our real estate assets are
subject to the risks incidental to the ownership and operation of real estate
properties
Our economic performance, the value of our real estate assets and,
therefore, the value of your investment are subject to the risks normally
associated with the ownership and operation of real estate properties,
including:
o changes in the general and local economic o the attractiveness of our properties
climate; to tenants;
o the cyclical nature of the real estate o changes in market rental rates and our
industry and possible oversupply of, or ability to rent space on favorable terms;
reduced demand for, space in our core
markets;
o trends in the retail industry, in o the bankruptcy or insolvency of
employment levels and in consumer spending tenants;
patterns;
o changes in household disposable income; o the need to periodically renovate,
repair and re-lease space and the costs
thereof;
o changes in interest rates and the o increases in maintenance, insurance
availability of financing; and operating costs; and
o competition from other properties; o civil unrest, acts of terrorism,
earthquakes and other natural disasters or
acts of God that may result in uninsured
losses.
6
In addition, applicable federal, state and local regulations, zoning
and tax laws and potential liability under environmental and other laws may
affect real estate values. Real estate investments are relatively illiquid and,
therefore, our ability to vary our portfolio quickly in response to changes in
economic or other conditions is limited. Further, we must make significant
expenditures, including property taxes, maintenance costs, mortgage payments,
insurance costs and related charges, throughout the period that we own real
property regardless of whether the property is producing any income. The risks
associated with real estate investments may adversely affect our operating
results and financial position, and therefore the funds available for
distribution to you as dividends.
Our inability to enter into renewal or new leases on favorable terms for all or
a substantial portion of space that is subject to expiring leases would
adversely affect our cash flows and operating results
Scheduled lease expirations in our U.S. office portfolio over the next
five fiscal years average approximately 11.5% annually, based on occupied space
at December 31, 2001. When leases for our properties expire, we may be unable to
promptly renew leases with existing tenants or lease the properties to new
tenants. In addition, even if we were able to enter into renewal or new leases
in a timely manner, the terms of those leases may be less favorable to us than
the terms of expiring leases because:
o the rental rates of the renewal or new leases may be
significantly lower than those of the expiring leases; or
o tenant installation costs, including the cost of required
renovations or concessions to tenants, may be significant.
We expect significant lease expirations in 2002 among our office
properties in Atlanta, Houston and the Washington, D.C. area. In order to enter
into renewal or new leases for large blocks of space in these markets, we may
incur higher tenant installation costs. If we are unable to enter into renewal
or new leases on favorable terms for all or a substantial portion of space that
is subject to expiring leases, our cash flows and operating results would
suffer.
If a significant number of our tenants defaulted or sought bankruptcy
protection, our cash flows and operating results would suffer
A tenant may experience a downturn in its business, which could cause
the loss of that tenant or weaken its financial condition and result in the
tenant's inability to make rental payments when due. In addition, a tenant of
any of our properties may seek the protection of bankruptcy, insolvency or
similar laws, which could result in the rejection and termination of such
tenant's lease and cause a reduction in our cash flows. Although we have not
experienced material losses from tenant bankruptcies, we cannot assure you that
tenants will not file for bankruptcy or similar protection in the future.
We cannot evict a tenant solely because of its bankruptcy. A court,
however, may authorize a tenant to reject and terminate its lease with us. In
such a case, our claim against the tenant for unpaid, future rent would be
subject to a statutory cap that might be substantially less than the remaining
rent owed under the lease. In any event, it is unlikely that a bankrupt tenant
will pay in full amounts it owes us under a lease. The loss of rental payments
from tenants would adversely affect our cash flows and operating results.
Our business is substantially dependent on the economic climates of seven core
markets
Our real estate portfolio consists mainly of office properties in seven
core markets: Atlanta, Chicago, Dallas, Houston and the Los Angeles, New York
and Washington, D.C. areas. As a result, our business is substantially dependent
on the economies of these markets. Although we believe that our real estate
portfolio is significantly diversified, a material downturn in demand for office
space in any one of our core markets could have a material impact on our ability
to lease the office space in our portfolio and may adversely impact our cash
flows and operating results.
7
Our competitors may adversely affect our ability to lease our properties, which
may cause our cash flows and operating results to suffer
We face significant competition from developers, managers and owners of
office, retail and mixed-use properties in seeking tenants for our properties.
Substantially all of our properties face competition from similar properties in
the same markets. These competing properties may have vacancy rates higher than
our properties, which may result in their owners being willing to make space
available at lower prices than the space in our properties. Competition for
tenants could have a material adverse effect on our ability to lease our
properties and on the rents that we may charge or concessions that we must
grant. If our competitors adversely impact our ability to lease our properties,
our cash flows and operating results may suffer.
We may be unable to complete the disposition of our non-core
retail/entertainment properties on a timely basis or on acceptable terms
We are currently completing the stabilization of three
retail/entertainment centers. We plan to hold all three of these projects until
their operations are stabilized in order to realize maximum value upon
disposition. A number of factors, however, may impair our ability to dispose of
these properties on a timely basis or on acceptable terms, including:
o physical characteristics, mixes of tenants and uses, required
operating resources and expertise and "anchor" tenants or other
attributes that might not be considered typical for a shopping
complex;
o the relatively large size and value of the assets;
o their relatively short operating histories;
o the requirements of, and dependence of the relevant project on,
contractual and working relationships with key tenants,
operators, government authorities and other third parties;
o the limited number of parties with the strategic interest and
financial capability to be potential buyers of these properties;
and
o competition for tenants or customers from other projects or
destinations.
One of these projects is Hollywood & Highland, a retail, entertainment
and hotel complex in Los Angeles, California that opened in late 2001.
Additional factors specific to that property that may adversely affect our
ability to sell it include:
o the extent to which its revenues are derived from sources other
than traditional leases of retail space; and
o risks normally associated with hotel properties, including
fluctuating and seasonal demands of business travelers and
tourism, and economic conditions that may affect the demand for
travel in general.
Another property, Desert Passage in Las Vegas, Nevada, adjoins the
Aladdin Hotel and Casino. The owners of the Aladdin filed for Chapter 11
reorganization in September 2001, which could adversely affect our ability to
sell Desert Passage by:
o impairing the public perception and interest of potential
shoppers, tenants and purchasers in Desert Passage as a result of
the perceived association with the Aladdin;
o limiting or delaying our collection or enforcement of amounts or
obligations owed to us by the Aladdin; and
o complicating or delaying the removal of liens potentially
affecting Desert Passage.
8
The bankruptcy of the Aladdin is likely to have a negative impact on
the property operating income of Desert Passage while we hold it for
disposition, which could adversely affect our operating results.
The September 2001 terrorist attacks may adversely affect the property operating
income from our properties, as well as our ability to sell properties that we
are holding for disposition on a timely basis or on acceptable terms
The September 2001 terrorist attacks in New York and Washington, D.C.
and related circumstances may adversely affect the U.S. economy and, in
particular, the economies of the U.S. cities that comprise our core markets.
This could have a material adverse impact on our ability to lease the office
space in our portfolio. As a result, the property operating income from our
office properties, and therefore our operating results, may suffer.
The September 2001 terrorist attacks also are likely to adversely
affect revenues from our retail/entertainment properties, particularly Hollywood
& Highland and Desert Passage, which depend on tourism for a significant portion
of their visitors. The potential adverse effects on Hollywood & Highland and
Desert Passage of the September 2001 terrorist attacks include:
o reducing tourist or convention visitors or spending levels in Los
Angeles and Las Vegas, particularly visitors arriving by air, a
source of business upon which Las Vegas is particularly
dependent;
o reducing the number of expected guests at the hotel portion of
Hollywood & Highland; and
o reducing the number of hotel guests and casino patrons at the
Aladdin Hotel and Casino and, therefore, visitors to Desert
Passage.
These and other factors are likely to have a negative effect on the
property operating income of our retail/entertainment properties while we hold
them for disposition, which could adversely affect our operating results. In
addition, the September 2001 terrorist attacks may reduce the number, financial
capabilities or strategic interest of potential buyers of these properties.
Until the full impact of the September 2001 terrorist attacks is known, we may
be unable to sell our retail/entertainment properties on a timely basis or on
acceptable terms.
In addition, as a consequence of the September 2001 terrorist attacks,
we have increased the level of security at our properties. We may not be able to
pass on all of the increased security costs to our tenants. As a result, the
property operating income from our properties, and therefore our operating
results, may suffer.
Our financial covenants could adversely affect our financial condition and
results of operations
The financings secured by our properties contain customary covenants
such as those that limit our ability, without the prior consent of the lender,
to further mortgage the applicable property or to discontinue insurance
coverage. In addition, our senior unsecured revolving credit facility contains
certain customary restrictions, requirements and other limitations on our
ability to incur indebtedness, including debt ratios that we will be required to
maintain.
We expect to rely on borrowings under our credit facility for working
capital and to finance acquisitions and development activities. Our ability to
borrow under our credit facility is subject to compliance with our financial and
other covenants. If we are unable to borrow under our credit facility, or to
refinance existing indebtedness, our financial condition and results of
operations would likely be adversely impacted. If we breach covenants in a debt
agreement, the lender can declare a default and require us to repay the debt
immediately and, if the debt is secured, can immediately take possession of the
property securing the loan. In addition, some of our financings are
cross-defaulted to our other indebtedness, which cross-default would give the
lenders under those financings the right also to declare a default and require
immediate repayment.
Our degree of leverage may adversely affect our business and the market price of
our common stock
At December 31, 2001, our leverage, which we define as the ratio of our
mortgage debt and other loans less cash and cash equivalents to the sum of net
debt and the book value of owner's equity, was approximately 52.8%. Furthermore,
our leverage likely will increase in the future upon our anticipated acquisition
of the Sears Tower in
9
2003. For additional information about our interest in the Sears Tower, see
"Item 2. Properties - Office Property Portfolio - Investment in Sears Tower" in
this Form 10-K.
Our degree of leverage could adversely affect our ability to obtain
additional financing for working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions,
developments or other general corporate purposes. Our degree of leverage could
also make us more vulnerable to a downturn in our business or the economy
generally. We have entered into certain financial agreements that contain
financial and operating covenants limiting our ability under certain
circumstances to incur additional secured and unsecured indebtedness. There is
also a risk that a significant increase in the ratio of our indebtedness to the
measures of asset value used by financial analysts may have an adverse effect on
the market price of our common stock.
Because we must distribute a substantial portion of our net income to qualify as
a REIT, we may be dependent on third-party sources of capital to fund our future
capital needs
To qualify as a REIT, we generally must distribute to our stockholders
at least 90% of our net taxable income each year, excluding capital gains.
Because of this distribution requirement, it is not likely that we will be able
to fund all of our future capital needs, including capital for property
acquisitions and developments, from our net income. Therefore, we may have to
rely on third-party sources of capital, which may not be available on favorable
terms or at all. Our access to third-party sources of capital depends on a
number of things, including the market's perception of our growth potential and
our current and potential future earnings. Moreover, additional debt financings
may substantially increase our leverage.
We face risks associated with the use of debt to finance our business, including
refinancing risk
We incur debt in the ordinary course of our business. We expect that we
will repay prior to maturity only a small portion of the principal of our debt.
We therefore plan to meet our maturing debt obligations partly with existing
cash and available credit, cash flows from operations and sales of non-core
assets, but primarily through the refinancing of maturing debt obligations with
other debt. We are subject to risks normally associated with debt financing, and
our ability to refinance our debt will depend on:
o our financial position;
o the value of our properties;
o liquidity in the debt markets;
o the availability on commercially acceptable terms of insurance
coverage required by lenders;
o general economic and real estate market conditions; and
o financial, competitive, business and other factors, including
factors beyond our control.
We cannot assure you that any refinancing of debt with other debt will
be possible on terms that are favorable or acceptable to us. If we cannot
refinance, extend or pay principal payments due at maturity with the proceeds of
other capital transactions, such as new equity capital, our cash flows will not
be sufficient in all years to repay all maturing debt.
Restrictions in loan agreements may limit the distributions we receive from our
operating subsidiaries and the amounts available for distributions to you as
dividends on our common stock
We conduct our operations through operating subsidiaries. We and some
of our subsidiaries, including subsidiaries that carry on a substantial part of
our overall business, are parties to loan agreements containing provisions that
require the maintenance of financial ratios and impose limitations on additional
indebtedness and distributions in respect of capital stock. These provisions may
limit the amount and flexibility of our current and future financings, the
receipt of cash distributions from some of our subsidiaries and, therefore, the
amounts that will be available for distributions to you as dividends on our
common stock. In addition, to qualify as a REIT we generally must distribute to
our stockholders at least 90% of our net taxable income each year, excluding
capital
10
gains. The provisions in loan agreements discussed above may impair our ability
to make the requisite distributions to our stockholders and may force us to
borrow funds on a short-term basis to meet the distribution requirements. We
cannot assure you that we will be able to borrow funds on terms that are
favorable to us.
If we are unable to manage our interest rate risk effectively, our cash flows
and operating results may suffer
As at December 31, 2001 we had approximately $889.7 million of debt
outstanding that is subject to variable interest rates, and we may incur
additional debt that bears interest at variable rates. Accordingly, if interest
rates increase, our debt costs will also increase. To manage our interest rate
risk, we enter into interest rate protection agreements consisting of swap
contracts and cap contracts. Despite our hedging activities, we cannot assure
you that we will be able to manage our interest rate risk effectively or that
our variable rate exposure will not have a material adverse effect on our cash
flows and operating results.
Environmental problems at our properties are possible, may be costly and may
adversely affect our operating results or financial condition
We are subject to various federal, state and local laws and regulations
relating to environmental matters. Under these laws, we are exposed to liability
primarily as an owner or operator of real property and, as such, we may be
responsible for the cleanup or other remediation of contaminated property.
Contamination for which we may be liable could include historic contamination,
spills of hazardous materials in the course of our tenants' regular business
operations and spills or releases of hydraulic or other toxic oils. An owner or
operator can be liable for contamination or hazardous or toxic substances in
some circumstances whether or not the owner or operator knew of, or was
responsible for, the presence of such contamination or hazardous or toxic
substances. In addition, the presence of contamination or hazardous or toxic
substances on property, or the failure to properly clean up or remediate such
contamination or hazardous or toxic substances when present, may materially and
adversely affect our ability to sell or rent such contaminated property or to
borrow using such property as collateral.
Asbestos-containing material, or ACM, is present in some of our
properties. Environmental laws govern the presence, maintenance and removal of
asbestos. We believe that we manage ACM in accordance with applicable laws. We
plan to continue managing ACM as appropriate and in accordance with applicable
laws and believe that the cost to do so will not be material.
Environmental laws and regulations can change rapidly, and we may
become subject to more stringent environmental laws and regulations in the
future. Compliance with more stringent environmental laws and regulations could
have a material adverse effect on our operating results or financial condition.
We believe that our exposure to environmental liabilities under currently
applicable laws is not material. We cannot assure you, however, that we
currently know of all circumstances that may give rise to such exposure.
If we were required to accelerate our efforts to comply with the Americans with
Disabilities Act, our cash flows and operating results could suffer
All of our properties must comply with the Americans with Disabilities
Act, or the ADA. The ADA has separate compliance requirements for "public
accommodations" and "commercial facilities," but generally requires that
buildings be made accessible to people with disabilities. Compliance with ADA
requirements could require us to remove access barriers, and non-compliance
could result in the imposition of fines by the U.S. government or an award of
damages to private litigants. We believe that the costs of compliance with the
ADA will not have a material adverse effect on our cash flows or operating
results. However, if we must make changes to our properties on a more
accelerated basis than we anticipate, our cash flows and operating results could
suffer.
Additional regulations applicable to our properties may require us to make
substantial expenditures to ensure compliance, which could adversely affect our
cash flows and operating results
Our properties are, and properties that we may acquire in the future
will be, subject to various federal, state and local regulatory requirements
such as local building codes and other similar regulations. If we fail to comply
with these requirements, governmental authorities may impose fines on us or
private litigants may be awarded damages against us.
11
We believe that our properties are currently in substantial compliance
with all applicable regulatory requirements. New regulations or changes in
existing regulations applicable to our properties, however, may require us to
make substantial expenditures to ensure regulatory compliance, which would
adversely affect our cash flows and operating results.
Our insurance may not cover some potential losses
We carry comprehensive general liability, fire, flood, extended
coverage and rental loss insurance with policy specifications, limits and
deductibles customarily carried for similar properties. Some types of risks,
generally of a catastrophic nature such as from war or environmental
contamination, however, are either uninsurable or not economically insurable.
Our properties are currently insured against acts of terrorism, subject
to policy limits and deductibles and subject to exceptions for terrorist acts
that constitute acts of war. Although we expect that the cost of insurance
covering terrorist acts will increase significantly in light of the September
2001 terrorist attacks in New York and Washington, D.C., we believe that we will
be able to maintain insurance coverage for terrorist acts with our current
insurers until at least December 2002 and that we will be able to pass a
substantial portion of any increased costs on to tenants through increased
rents. We cannot assure you, however, that insurance coverage for acts of
terrorism will continue to be available on commercially acceptable terms or that
we will be able to pass on a significant portion of any cost increases. In
addition, we cannot assure you that our insurers will be able to maintain
reinsurance sufficient to cover any losses that may be incurred as a result of
terrorist acts.
We currently have insurance for earthquake risks, subject to certain
policy limits and deductibles, and will continue to carry such insurance if it
is economical to do so. We cannot assure you that earthquakes may not seriously
damage our properties, several of which are located in California, historically
an earthquake-prone area, and that the recoverable amount of insurance proceeds
will be sufficient to fully cover reconstruction costs and losses suffered.
Should an uninsured or underinsured loss occur, we could lose our investment in,
and anticipated income and cash flows from, one or more of our properties, but
we would continue to be obligated to repay any recourse mortgage indebtedness on
such properties.
Additionally, although we generally obtain owner's title insurance
policies with respect to our properties, the amount of coverage under such
policies may be less than the full value of such properties. If a loss occurs
resulting from a title defect with respect to a property where there is no title
insurance or the loss is in excess of insured limits, we could lose all or part
of our investment in, and anticipated income and cash flows from, that property.
We do not have sole control over the properties that we hold with co-venturers
or partners or over the revenues and certain decisions associated with those
properties
We participate in nine office joint ventures or partnerships. The
office properties that we own through joint ventures or partnerships total
approximately 7.6 million square feet, with our ownership interest totaling 3.6
million square feet. We also own a hotel in a joint venture. A joint venture or
partnership involves risks, including the risk that a co-venturer or partner:
o may have economic or business interests or goals that are
inconsistent with our economic or business interests or goals;
o may take actions contrary to our instructions or requests, or
contrary to our policies or objectives with respect to our real
estate investments; and
o may have to give its consent with respect to certain major
decisions, including the decision to distribute cash, refinance a
property or sell a property.
We do not have sole control of certain major decisions relating to the
properties in which we have less than a 100% interest, including decisions
relating to:
o the sale of the properties;
12
o refinancing;
o timing and amount of distributions of cash from such properties
to us;
o capital improvements; and
o calling for capital contributions.
In some instances, although we are the property manager for a joint
venture, the other joint venturer retains approval rights over specific leases
or our leasing plan. In addition, the sale or transfer of interests in some of
our joint ventures and partnerships is subject to rights of first refusal or
first offer and some joint venture and partnership agreements provide for
buy-sell or similar arrangements. Such rights may be triggered at a time when we
may not want to sell but may be forced to do so because we may not have the
financial resources at that time to purchase the other party's interest. Such
rights may also inhibit our ability to sell our interest in a property or a
joint venture or partnership within our desired time frame or on any other
desired basis.
Our historical financial information may not be representative of our financial
position, operating results and cash flows as a separate company
Our combined consolidated financial statements have been carved out
from the consolidated financial statements of TrizecHahn Corporation using the
historical operating results and historical bases of the assets and liabilities
of the businesses that we comprise. Accordingly, the historical financial
information that we have included in this Form 10-K does not necessarily reflect
what our financial position, operating results and cash flows would have been
had we been a separate, stand-alone public entity during the periods presented.
TrizecHahn Corporation did account for us, and we operated, as
separate, stand-alone entities for the periods presented. Our costs and expenses
include payments made to TrizecHahn Corporation for direct reimbursement of
third-party purchased services and a portion of salaries, for certain employees,
for direct services rendered. We consider these charges to be reasonable
reflections of the use of services provided to us or the benefit that we
received.
Our historical financial information is not necessarily indicative of
what our operating results, financial position and cash flows will be in the
future. We have not made adjustments to our historical financial information to
reflect changes that will occur in our cost structure as a result of the
corporate reorganization, including increased costs associated with being a
publicly traded, stand-alone company. These incremental costs will include, but
are not limited to, additional senior management compensation expense, to
supplement the existing management team, and internal and external public
company corporate compliance costs.
Our failure to qualify as a REIT would decrease the funds available for
distribution to our stockholders and adversely affect the market price of our
common stock
Determination of REIT status is highly technical and complex. Even a
technical or inadvertent mistake could endanger our REIT status. The
determination that we qualify as a REIT requires an analysis of various factual
matters and circumstances that may not be within our control. For example, the
Internal Revenue Service, or IRS, could change tax laws and regulations or the
courts may issue new rulings that make it impossible for us to maintain REIT
status. We do not believe that any pending or proposed law changes could change
our REIT status.
If we fail to qualify for taxation as a REIT in any taxable year:
o we will be subject to tax on our taxable income at regular
corporate rates;
o we will not be able to deduct, and will not be required to make,
distributions to stockholders in any year in which we fail to
qualify as a REIT; and
o unless we are entitled to relief under specific statutory
provisions, we will be disqualified from taxation as a REIT for
the four taxable years following the year during which we lost
our qualification.
13
The consequences of failing to qualify as a REIT would adversely affect the
market price of our common stock.
Shearman & Sterling, our special counsel, has given us an opinion to
the effect that we are organized in conformity with the requirements for
qualification and taxation as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended, and that our proposed method of operation will enable us to continue to
meet the requirements for qualification and taxation as a REIT. Our special
counsel's opinion is based on assumptions and factual representations made by us
regarding our ability to meet the requirements for qualification as a REIT and
is not binding on the IRS or any court. Moreover, our special counsel does not
review or monitor our compliance with the requirements for REIT qualification on
an ongoing basis. We cannot guarantee that we will be qualified and taxed as a
REIT because our qualification and taxation as a REIT will depend upon our
ability to meet the requirements imposed under the Internal Revenue Code of
1986, as amended, on an ongoing basis.
In order to maintain our status as a REIT, we may be forced to borrow funds
during unfavorable market conditions
To qualify as a REIT, we generally must distribute to our stockholders
at least 90% of our net taxable income each year, excluding capital gains. This
requirement limits our ability to accumulate capital. We may not have sufficient
cash or other liquid assets to meet REIT distribution requirements. As a result,
we may need to incur debt to fund required distributions when prevailing market
conditions are not favorable. Difficulties in meeting distribution requirements
may arise as a result of:
o differences in timing between when we must recognize income for
U.S. federal income tax purposes and when we actually receive
income;
o the effect of non-deductible capital expenditures;
o the creation of reserves; or
o required debt or amortization payments.
If we are unable to borrow funds on favorable terms, our ability to
make distributions to our stockholders and our ability to qualify as a REIT may
suffer.
Risks Relating to Our Capital Stock
Our common stock has not traded publicly, and the market price of our common
stock and exchange certificates may decline
Prior to the corporate reorganization, there has not been a public
market for our common stock. We cannot assure you that the market price of our
common stock will remain at or above its initial market price. In addition, each
of our exchange certificates will represent one share of underlying common
stock. The value of our exchange certificates therefore will depend on the
market price of our common stock. If the market price of our common stock
declines, you may lose all or part of your investment in our common stock or
exchange certificates.
An ownership limitation in our certificate of incorporation may adversely affect
the market price of our common stock
Our certificate of incorporation contains an ownership limitation that
is designed to enable us to qualify as a "domestically-controlled REIT" within
the meaning of Section 897(h)(4)(B) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended. This limitation restricts any person that is not a qualifying U.S.
person from beneficially owning our capital stock if that person's holdings,
when aggregated with shares of our capital stock beneficially owned by all other
persons that are not qualifying U.S. persons, would exceed 45% by value of our
issued and outstanding capital stock.
As a result of our enforcement of this ownership limitation, persons
other than qualifying U.S. persons will be effectively excluded from the market
for our common stock. The inability of holders of our common stock to sell
14
their shares to persons other than qualifying U.S. persons, or the perception of
this inability, may adversely affect the market price of our common stock.
Higher market interest rates may adversely affect the market price of our common
stock
One of the factors that investors may consider important in deciding
whether to buy or sell shares of a real estate investment trust is the dividend
with respect to such real estate investment trust's shares as a percentage of
the price of those shares, relative to market interest rates. If market interest
rates go up, prospective purchasers of shares of our common stock may require a
higher yield on our common stock. Higher market interest rates would not,
however, result in more funds for us to distribute and, to the contrary, would
likely increase our borrowing costs and potentially decrease funds available for
distribution. Thus, higher market interest rates could cause the market price of
our common stock to go down.
If a large number of exchange certificates are delivered in the corporate
reorganization, the market price of our common stock may be adversely affected
over the short term
In connection with the corporate reorganization, TrizecHahn Corporation
shareholders who do not certify that they are qualifying U.S. persons may
receive exchange certificates representing underlying shares of our common
stock, which a custodian will hold for their benefit. During the three-month
period after the exchange certificates are first delivered, they will be
exchangeable for underlying shares of common stock on a one-for-one basis on the
condition that the exchange certificate holder provides us with certification
that it is a qualifying U.S. person. The exchange certificates will be freely
transferable. Any exchange certificates that remain unexchanged at the end of
the three-month exchange period will expire, and a third-party market agent will
automatically sell the underlying shares of common stock within five trading
days on the open market to qualifying U.S. persons on behalf of the exchange
certificate holders.
If a large number of exchange certificates are delivered in the
corporate reorganization to initial holders that cannot certify qualifying U.S.
person status, there may be significant sales of exchange certificates during
the three-month exchange period, which may adversely affect the market price of
our common stock over this period. Should a large number of exchange
certificates remain unexchanged at the end of the three-month exchange period,
the custodian will be required to sell a large number of underlying shares of
our common stock in a short time period, which may also adversely affect the
market price of our common stock.
As long as P.M. Capital Inc., a corporation controlled by Peter Munk, maintains
its ownership interest in Trizec Canada Inc., Peter Munk will control the
election of members of our board of directors until January 1, 2008 and may
exercise his voting power in a manner adverse to you
Peter Munk, the Chairman of TrizecHahn Corporation, controls P.M.
Capital Inc. After the completion of the corporate reorganization, P.M. Capital,
through its ownership of Trizec Canada Inc.'s multiple voting shares, will have
a majority of the votes in elections of Trizec Canada Inc.'s board of directors
and on other matters to be voted on by Trizec Canada Inc. shareholders. Trizec
Canada Inc., through its indirect ownership of our common stock and special
voting stock, will have a majority of the votes in elections of our board of
directors until January 1, 2008, provided that Trizec Canada Inc. or its
subsidiaries hold our special voting stock until such time. Peter Munk's
effective control of Trizec Canada Inc. will therefore enable him to elect our
entire board of directors and to exercise a controlling influence over our
business and affairs. Although a nominating committee composed of independent
members of our board of directors will nominate candidates for election to our
board, Peter Munk may exercise his control over us to elect alternative
candidates or to replace our board of directors at any time. Peter Munk may
exercise his controlling influence over our business and affairs in a manner
that is adverse to you.
The sale or availability for sale of approximately 60 million shares of our
common stock expected to be owned indirectly by Trizec Canada Inc. upon the
completion of the corporate reorganization or shares of our common stock that
may be issued thereafter could adversely affect the market price of our common
stock and exchange certificates
On completion of the corporate reorganization, we anticipate that
approximately 150 million shares of our common stock will be outstanding. Of
those shares, approximately 60% will be held by qualifying U.S. persons, and the
remaining approximately 40% will be held by Trizec Canada Inc. indirectly
through a wholly owned Hungarian subsidiary. Dispositions of this 40% of our
common stock may occur in the following circumstances:
15
o Trizec Canada Inc. shareholders will have the right to redeem
their shares from time to time, and Trizec Canada Inc. will have
the option of satisfying these redemptions with shares of our
common stock held by the Hungarian subsidiary.
o The Hungarian subsidiary will pledge as collateral for a secured
credit facility all shares of our common stock that it holds, and
in the event of a default the pledgee under that facility may
realize on the pledge and sell the shares.
o Trizec Canada Inc. may cause the Hungarian subsidiary to dispose
of some or all of the shares of our common stock held by the
Hungarian subsidiary at any time for any reason.
To permit market sales of our common stock in the circumstances
described above, including by subsequent holders, we intend to register all such
common stock under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
After completion of the corporate reorganization, we may issue
additional shares of our common stock:
o upon exercises of our stock options and warrants; and
o upon conversions of our Class F convertible stock; for additional
information on the conversion of our Class F convertible stock,
see " - The issuance of additional shares of our common stock
pursuant to the terms of our Class F convertible stock may dilute
your interest in our company and adversely affect the market
price of our common stock" below.
We expect to register all of these shares of our common stock under the
Securities Act of 1933.
We cannot predict what effect, if any, market sales of shares of our
common stock held indirectly by Trizec Canada Inc. or issued upon exercises of
our stock options or warrants or upon conversions of our Class F convertible
stock would have on the market price of our common stock and exchange
certificates. We are also unable to predict what effect, if any, the
availability of any of these shares for future sale may have on the market price
of our common stock and exchange certificates. Future sales of substantial
amounts of our common stock, or the perception that these sales could occur, may
adversely affect the market price of our common stock and exchange certificates.
Limits on changes of control may discourage takeover attempts that may be
beneficial to holders of our common stock
Provisions of our certificate of incorporation and bylaws, as well as
provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and Delaware
corporate law, may:
o delay or prevent a change of control over us or a tender offer
for our common stock, even if those actions might be beneficial
to holders of our common stock; and
o limit our stockholders' opportunity to receive a potential
premium for their shares of common stock over then-prevailing
market prices.
For example, primarily to facilitate the maintenance of our
qualification as a REIT, our certificate of incorporation generally prohibits
ownership, directly or indirectly, by any single stockholder of more than 9.9%
of the value of outstanding shares of our capital stock. Our board of directors
may modify or waive the application of this ownership limit with respect to one
or more persons if it receives a ruling from the Internal Revenue Service or an
opinion of counsel concluding that ownership in excess of this limit will not
jeopardize our status as a REIT. The ownership limit, however, may nevertheless
have the effect of inhibiting or impeding a change of control over us or a
tender offer for our common stock.
16
An anticipated increase in non-Canadian taxes applicable to dividends that we
pay to a Hungarian subsidiary of Trizec Canada Inc. may decrease the amount of
funds we have available for distribution as dividends on our common stock
On completion of the corporate reorganization, Trizec Canada Inc. will
own approximately 40% of our common stock indirectly through a wholly owned
Hungarian subsidiary that is currently an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of
TrizecHahn Corporation. The Hungarian subsidiary and its shareholders will be
subject to non-Canadian taxes, expected to be only U.S. and Hungarian
cross-border withholding taxes, in respect of dividends paid by us and by the
Hungarian subsidiary.
The Hungarian subsidiary currently holds and, on completion of the
corporate reorganization, will hold all of our special voting stock. As the
holder of this stock, the Hungarian subsidiary is entitled to dividends from us
that, when aggregated with dividends received by the Hungarian subsidiary on our
common stock and after deducting related non-Canadian taxes, will equal the
dividends received by our U.S. stockholders on our common stock on a per share
basis. Dividends on our special voting stock will be payable only in connection
with common stock dividends paid within 66 months after the effective date of
the corporate reorganization.
The U.S.-Hungary income tax treaty generally provides for a reduced
rate of U.S. cross-border withholding taxes applicable to dividends paid by us
to the Hungarian subsidiary. The income tax treaty is currently being
renegotiated. We expect that as a result of the renegotiation, the effective
rate of non-Canadian taxes required to be paid on the aforementioned common
stock and special voting stock dividends will increase from approximately 10% to
approximately 30%. We do not presently know how long the renegotiation process
will take. If, however, an increased tax rate took effect at any time prior to
the expiration of the dividend right on our special voting stock, any dividends
paid on our special voting stock would increase, thereby decreasing the amount
of funds available for distribution as dividends on our common stock.
The issuance of additional shares of our common stock pursuant to the terms of
our Class F convertible stock may dilute your interest in our company and
adversely affect the market price of our common stock
In general, a foreign corporation disposing of a U.S. real property
interest, including shares of U.S. corporations whose principal assets are U.S.
real estate, is subject to a tax, known as FIRPTA tax, equal to 35% of the gain
recognized on the disposition of that property interest. If, however, the
interest being disposed of is an interest in a REIT that qualifies as a
"domestically-controlled REIT" within the meaning of Section 897(h)(4)(B) of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, no FIRPTA tax is payable. Whether we
will qualify as a "domestically-controlled REIT" on any date will depend on our
ability to demonstrate that less than 50% of our capital stock, by value, has
been owned directly or indirectly by persons who are not qualifying U.S. persons
during a continuous five-year period ending on that date.
If TrizecHahn Corporation, Trizec Canada Inc. or their subsidiaries
incur FIRPTA tax and any related costs, interest and penalties in connection
with:
o the corporate reorganization, or
o specified future transactions or events that allow for the
conversion of our Class F convertible stock into common stock,
including:
o dispositions of our common stock in connection with major
corporate transactions or events, such as mergers,
requiring the approval of a specified portion of our common
stockholders or the tendering of a specified portion of our
common stock to effect those transactions or events, and
o transactions or events after the end of the five-year
period required for our qualification as a
"domestically-controlled REIT,"
our Class F convertible stock will be convertible into shares of our common
stock in the manner prescribed by our certificate of incorporation. The
indirect, wholly owned Hungarian subsidiary of TrizecHahn Corporation that,
after the corporate reorganization, will be an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary
of Trizec Canada Inc. holds all of our Class F convertible stock.
17
We believe that none of TrizecHahn Corporation, Trizec Canada Inc. or
their subsidiaries should incur a material amount of FIRPTA tax in connection
with any of the transfers made as part of the corporate reorganization. We
cannot assure you, however, that no material amount of FIRPTA tax would be
payable.
We are not currently planning to undertake any transactions or events
after the corporate reorganization that would allow for the conversion of our
Class F convertible stock, including any transactions or events requiring the
approval of a specified portion of our common stockholders or the tendering of a
specified portion of our common stock to effect those transactions or events. We
cannot assure you, however, that any of those transactions or events will not
take place during the five-year period required for our qualification as a
"domestically-controlled REIT." If any such transactions or events were to take
place at such time, Trizec Canada Inc. or its subsidiaries might incur at least
some amount of FIRPTA tax. Furthermore, the existence of our Class F Convertible
Stock may have the effect of inhibiting or impeding a change of control over us
or a tender offer for our common stock.
We believe that after the end of the five-year period required for our
qualification as a "domestically-controlled REIT," neither Trizec Canada Inc.
nor its subsidiaries should incur a material amount of FIRPTA tax under
circumstances that would allow the holder of our Class F convertible stock to
exercise its conversion right. Based on all of the facts and circumstances, we
believe that 63 months after the effective date of the corporate reorganization
we will be able to demonstrate that during the relevant time period less than
50% of our capital stock, by value, was owned directly or indirectly by persons
who were not qualifying U.S. persons and that, as a result, we will then qualify
as a "domestically-controlled REIT."
Our certificate of incorporation and corporate policies are designed to
enable us to qualify as a "domestically-controlled REIT" as planned. The
ownership restrictions relating to non-U.S. persons in our certificate of
incorporation will prohibit ownership by persons if such ownership would cause
us to violate the requirements for being a "domestically-controlled REIT." We
believe these provisions will be effective, although certainty in this regard is
not possible. Legislative developments during the relevant five-year
qualification period could also affect our ability to qualify as a
"domestically-controlled REIT." Therefore, we cannot assure you that we will
become a "domestically-controlled REIT" 63 months after the effective date of
the corporate reorganization.
If any of TrizecHahn Corporation, Trizec Canada Inc. or their
subsidiaries incur FIRPTA tax in connection with the circumstances discussed
above, our Class F convertible stock will be convertible into additional shares
of our common stock. If we are required to issue additional shares of our common
stock pursuant to the terms of our Class F convertible stock, all shares of our
common stock, including those held indirectly by Trizec Canada Inc., would
suffer immediate dilution. In addition, the sale of our common stock by Trizec
Canada Inc. or its subsidiaries to fund the payment of FIRPTA tax in the
circumstances discussed above may adversely affect the market price of our
common stock.
The TrizecHahn Corporate Reorganization
Overview
We are an indirect, substantially wholly owned subsidiary of TrizecHahn
Corporation and expect to qualify as a real estate investment trust, or REIT,
for U.S. federal income tax purposes effective as of January 2001. TrizecHahn
Corporation is currently proposing a corporate reorganization. As a result of
this reorganization, we expect to become a publicly traded REIT and to own all
of the U.S. assets that TrizecHahn Corporation and its subsidiaries currently
own. Also pursuant to this reorganization, we expect that TrizecHahn Corporation
will become an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of Trizec Canada Inc., a
company incorporated under the Canada Business Corporations Act.
TrizecHahn Corporation is pursuing the corporate reorganization to
remove the structural impediments that are currently negatively affecting market
recognition of the value of the business of our company. Specifically, this
reorganization is designed to create a publicly traded REIT while reducing
withholding tax liabilities and minimizing any current recognition of potential
tax liabilities on unrealized appreciation in value that are present in
TrizecHahn Corporation's current ownership structure. The corporate
reorganization is also intended to create economic equivalence between a share
of our common stock and a Trizec Canada Inc. subordinate voting share or
multiple voting share.
18
At the time of the completion of the corporate reorganization, we
expect that former holders of TrizecHahn Corporation subordinate voting shares
will own approximately 60% of our common stock, some of which may be represented
by exchange certificates, and that Trizec Canada Inc. will own indirectly
through its subsidiaries the remaining approximately 40% of our common stock. In
addition to owning shares of our common stock, Trizec Canada Inc., indirectly
through its subsidiaries, will own all shares of our Class F convertible stock
and special voting stock.
Trizec Canada Inc.'s ownership of our Class F convertible stock and
special voting stock is intended to maintain the economic equivalence described
above. The Class F convertible stock is convertible into our common stock in
certain tax-related circumstances described below so that Trizec Canada Inc. and
its subsidiaries, on the one hand, and our other stockholders, on the other
hand, may share ratably certain future taxes that TrizecHahn Corporation, Trizec
Canada Inc. or their subsidiaries may incur. In addition, to address certain
non-Canadian tax liabilities of Trizec Canada Inc.'s indirect, wholly owned
Hungarian subsidiary and its direct and indirect shareholders, Trizec Canada
Inc. will receive, directly or indirectly, dividends on our special voting
stock. These components of our capital structure are not typical of other
publicly traded REITs. As a result of this capital structure, conversions of our
Class F convertible stock may dilute your interest in our company and dividends
on our special voting stock will reduce the funds available for dividends on our
common stock.
Our special voting stock also entitles its holder to votes that, when
aggregated with votes of shares of common stock held by Trizec Canada Inc. or
its subsidiaries, represent a majority of the votes in elections of our board of
directors. As a result of the special voting right, provided that Trizec Canada
Inc. holds at least 5% of our common stock, Trizec Canada Inc. and its majority
shareholder will have voting control over the election of our directors, even
though Trizec Canada Inc. will not own a majority of our common stock. This
special voting right will expire on January 1, 2008.
TrizecHahn Corporation plans to effect the corporate reorganization
pursuant to a plan of arrangement, which we expect will become effective in the
second quarter of 2002. The plan of arrangement will require the approval of the
Ontario Superior Court of Justice and of TrizecHahn Corporation's shareholders,
including:
o a majority of the votes cast by TrizecHahn Corporation's
shareholders that are qualifying U.S. persons, voting as a class
on a one vote per share basis;
o a majority of the votes cast by TrizecHahn Corporation's other
shareholders, voting as a class on a one vote per share basis;
and
o a 66 2/3% majority of all votes cast by TrizecHahn Corporation's
shareholders, and for the purposes of this vote TrizecHahn
Corporation's multiple voting shares, in accordance with their
terms, will be entitled to a simple majority of the votes.
If the plan of arrangement receives the requisite court and shareholder
approvals, holders of TrizecHahn Corporation's subordinate voting shares will
exchange their shares on a one-for-one basis for one or more of the following
securities:
o shares of our common stock;
o exchange certificates representing underlying shares of our
common stock; or
o Trizec Canada Inc. subordinate voting shares.
Generally, holders of TrizecHahn Corporation subordinate voting shares
who are qualifying U.S. persons will receive shares of our common stock and all
other holders of TrizecHahn Corporation subordinate voting shares will receive
Trizec Canada Inc. subordinate voting shares in exchange for their TrizecHahn
Corporation shares. The holder of TrizecHahn Corporation multiple voting shares
will exchange them for Trizec Canada Inc. multiple voting shares in the
corporate reorganization.
Based on our understanding of the current composition of TrizecHahn
Corporation's shareholder base, we anticipate that qualifying U.S. persons will
hold approximately 50% - 55% of outstanding TrizecHahn Corporation
19
shares on the effective date of the corporate reorganization. We anticipate that
these shareholders will exchange their TrizecHahn Corporation shares on a
one-for-one basis for approximately 50% - 55% of our common stock. Additionally,
we anticipate that persons who are not qualifying U.S. persons will hold the
remaining approximately 40% - 45% of outstanding TrizecHahn Corporation shares
on the effective date of the corporate reorganization. We expect that these
shareholders will exchange pro rata approximately 5% - 10% of the outstanding
TrizecHahn Corporation shares on a one-for-one basis for exchange certificates
representing approximately 5% - 10% of our common stock, and that they will
exchange their remaining TrizecHahn Corporation shares on a one-for-one basis
for Trizec Canada Inc. subordinate voting shares or multiple voting shares.
If qualifying U.S. persons hold more than approximately 60% of
outstanding TrizecHahn Corporation shares on the effective date of the corporate
reorganization, then each of such shareholders likely would receive, in addition
to shares of our common stock, some Trizec Canada Inc. subordinate voting
shares. For example, if on the effective date of the corporate reorganization
qualifying U.S. persons electing to receive shares of our common stock hold 65%
of outstanding TrizecHahn Corporation shares, then such shareholders would
exchange pro rata approximately 60% of the TrizecHahn Corporation shares on a
one-for-one basis for approximately 60% of our common stock. These shareholders
would exchange their remaining TrizecHahn Corporation shares on a one-for-one
basis for Trizec Canada Inc. subordinate voting shares. Furthermore, under these
facts, the remaining 35% of outstanding TrizecHahn Corporation shares would be
exchanged for Trizec Canada Inc. subordinate voting shares or multiple voting
shares, and no exchange certificates would be delivered in the corporate
reorganization.
Any exchange certificates delivered in the corporate reorganization
will be freely transferable. During the three-month period after the exchange
certificates are first delivered, they will be exchangeable for our common stock
on a one-for-one basis on the condition that the holder provides us with
certification that it is a qualifying U.S. person. If the exchange certificates
are not exchanged by the end of the three-month exchange period, a third-party
market agent will automatically sell the remaining shares of common stock
underlying the exchange certificates on the open market to qualifying U.S.
persons within five trading days on behalf of the holders of expired exchange
certificates. Thereafter, these holders will receive their portion of the
proceeds from such sale, net of their portion of any sale commissions.
Outstanding options to purchase subordinate voting shares of TrizecHahn
Corporation will be cancelled and replaced as part of the corporate
reorganization. Under the plan of arrangement, all outstanding stock options of
TrizecHahn Corporation will be cancelled in exchange for either (1) options to
purchase our common stock, (2) warrants to purchase our common stock or (3)
options to purchase Trizec Canada Inc. subordinate voting shares. Consistent
with the one-for-one exchange ratio, the intrinsic value, i.e., the current
market value of the shares subject to the option or warrant less the exercise
price, of each such option or warrant to purchase shares of our common stock or
each option to purchase Trizec Canada Inc. shares immediately after the
effective date of the plan of arrangement will be substantially the same as the
intrinsic value, immediately prior to the effective date, of the replaced
TrizecHahn Corporation option. For additional information regarding the material
terms of our options, see "Item 11. Executive Compensation - 2002 Trizec
Properties, Inc. Stock Option Plan" in this Form 10-K. Additionally, to preserve
the economic equivalence between one share of our common stock and one Trizec
Canada Inc. subordinate voting share, Trizec Canada Inc. or a wholly owned
subsidiary of Trizec Canada Inc. will receive warrants to purchase one share of
our common stock for each Trizec Canada Inc. option issued in the corporate
reorganization.
Warrants to purchase our shares granted to former TrizecHahn
Corporation option holders, as well as to Trizec Canada Inc. as described above,
will have a fixed term that is not contingent on continued service with us or
Trizec Canada Inc. as an employee, officer or director. The warrants will be
freely transferable and fully vested and exercisable.
Class F Convertible Stock
FIRPTA tax is a U.S. tax generally imposed at a rate of 35% on capital
gains realized by foreign corporations who dispose of, among other things,
shares of U.S. corporations whose principal assets are U.S. real estate. In
order that Trizec Canada Inc. and its subsidiaries, on the one hand, and our
other stockholders, on the other hand, may share ratably the potential FIRPTA
tax that TrizecHahn Corporation, Trizec Canada Inc. or their subsidiaries may
incur in connection with the corporate reorganization or limited future
transactions or events, we have issued Class F convertible stock to an indirect,
wholly owned Hungarian subsidiary of TrizecHahn Corporation that, after the
corporate reorganization, will be an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of Trizec
Canada Inc.
20
The shares of Class F convertible stock are convertible into shares of
our common stock having an after-tax value equal to any FIRPTA tax that
TrizecHahn Corporation, Trizec Canada Inc. or their subsidiaries may incur in
connection with the corporate reorganization, specified major corporate
transactions entered into within 66 months after the effective date of the
corporate reorganization and specified transactions or events following the 63rd
month after the corporate reorganization. Based on all of the facts and
circumstances, however, we do not expect that TrizecHahn Corporation, Trizec
Canada Inc. or their subsidiaries will incur a material amount of FIRPTA tax in
connection with any of the transfers made as part of the corporate
reorganization. Furthermore, we are not currently planning to undertake any
transactions or events after the corporate reorganization that would allow for
the conversion of our Class F convertible stock. Additionally, in most
circumstances, a sale of shares of our common stock by Trizec Canada Inc. or its
subsidiaries in the 63-month period following the corporate reorganization will
not entitle a holder to convert any shares of Class F convertible stock into
shares of our common stock.
No FIRPTA tax is imposed on transfers and distributions of interests in
a "domestically-controlled REIT." In order that we may be in a position to
attain "domestically-controlled REIT" status, only TrizecHahn Corporation
shareholders who certify that they are qualifying U.S. persons will receive
shares of our common stock in the corporate reorganization. In addition, our
certificate of incorporation and corporate policies will be designed to enable
us to qualify as a U.S. "domestically-controlled REIT." Based on all of the
facts and circumstances, we expect to qualify as a "domestically-controlled
REIT" 63 months after the effective date of the corporate reorganization. If,
however, we fail to qualify as a "domestically-controlled REIT," Trizec Canada
Inc. or its subsidiaries will be liable for FIRPTA tax on subsequent
dispositions of our common stock. In such event, the Hungarian subsidiary or any
subsequent holder may be entitled to convert its shares of Class F convertible
stock into our common stock.
If the Hungarian subsidiary or any subsequent holder exercises the
right to convert any of its shares of the Class F convertible stock into common
stock, all shares of our common stock, including those held indirectly by Trizec
Canada Inc., will be diluted on a pro rata basis and the market price of our
common stock may decline. For additional information, see "Risk Factors -The
issuance of additional shares of our common stock pursuant to the terms of our
Class F convertible stock may dilute your interest in our company and adversely
affect the market price of our common stock" and "- The sale or availability for
sale of approximately 60 million shares of our common stock expected to be owned
indirectly by Trizec Canada Inc. upon the completion of the corporate
reorganization or shares of our common stock that may be issued thereafter could
adversely affect the market price of our common stock and exchange certificates"
in this Form 10-K.
Special Voting Stock
To maintain our REIT status, we generally will be required to
distribute to our stockholders at least 90% of our net taxable income each year,
excluding capital gains. Any dividends that we pay to our stockholders who are
foreign persons, however, will be subject to cross-border withholding taxes.
Currently, all of TrizecHahn Corporation's shareholders bear the burden of
cross-border withholding taxes on dividends that we pay because currently
TrizecHahn Corporation indirectly owns all of our company.
On completion of the corporate reorganization, dividends on the
approximately 60% of our common stock held by qualifying U.S. persons will no
longer be subject to the above-described cross-border withholding taxes.
However, because Trizec Canada Inc. will indirectly hold approximately 40% of
our common stock on completion of the corporate reorganization through its
wholly owned Hungarian subsidiary, dividends that we pay to this subsidiary and
dividends that the subsidiary pays to its shareholders will continue to be
subject to non-Canadian taxes, expected to be only cross-border withholding
taxes. The U.S.-Hungary income tax treaty generally provides for a reduced rate
of cross-border withholding taxes applicable to dividends paid by us to Trizec
Canada Inc.'s Hungarian subsidiary. The income tax treaty is currently being
renegotiated. We expect that as a result of the renegotiation, the effective
rate of non-Canadian taxes will ultimately increase from approximately 10% to
approximately 30%.
On completion of the corporate reorganization, Trizec Canada Inc.'s
Hungarian subsidiary will hold one share of our common stock for each
outstanding Trizec Canada Inc. share. An objective of the corporate
reorganization is to create economic equivalence between our common stock and
Trizec Canada Inc. shares. To help achieve this objective, Trizec Canada Inc.'s
Hungarian subsidiary, as the holder of our special voting stock, will be
entitled to dividends from us that, when aggregated with dividends received by
the Hungarian subsidiary on our common stock and after deducting related
non-Canadian taxes, will equal the dividends received by our U.S.
21
stockholders on our common stock on a per share basis. Dividends on our special
voting stock will be payable only in connection with common stock dividends paid
within 66 months after the effective date of the corporate reorganization.
In addition to providing the dividend right discussed above, our
special voting stock entitles its holder to votes that, when aggregated with
votes of shares of our common stock held by Trizec Canada Inc. or its
subsidiaries, represent a majority of the votes in elections of our board of
directors. This special voting right will expire on January 1, 2008. The special
voting stock does not entitle its holder to voting rights with respect to any
other matters, except as required by Delaware corporate law. By holding the
special voting stock indirectly through its Hungarian subsidiary and maintaining
this voting structure, Trizec Canada Inc. will continue TrizecHahn Corporation's
present primary business activity as a real estate management company and avoid
being inadvertently viewed as an "investment company" for purposes of the
Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended. That act imposes restrictions on an
investment company that are incompatible with Trizec Canada Inc.'s and our
continuing operations. For example, if we were to consider combining with
another REIT, the combination would likely require a vote or some other
investment decision by Trizec Canada Inc.'s shareholders that could constitute a
U.S. public offering by Trizec Canada Inc. If Trizec Canada Inc. were an
"investment company" for purposes of the Investment Company Act, it could not
conduct that "offering." Furthermore, the partner in any such combination could
be expected to require a legal opinion that Trizec Canada Inc. is not an
"investment company."
Additional Pre-Reorganization Transactions
Under "Item 6. Selected Financial Data - Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed
Combined Consolidated Financial Data" in this Form 10-K, we have identified and
given pro forma effect to transactions that we have undertaken since December
31, 2001 in connection with the corporate reorganization. We have also
identified and given pro forma effect to additional transactions that we have
not yet undertaken, but that we plan to consummate in connection with the
corporate reorganization prior to the effective date thereof. These transactions
include TrizecHahn Corporation's transfer to us of its operating property
located at 151 Front Street, Toronto, Ontario.
Additionally, TrizecHahn Corporation has been negotiating for some time
with Chelsfield plc to sell to Chelsfield plc all of TrizecHahn Corporation's
interest in Global Switch S.a.r.l. The sale of such interest is expected to be
for ordinary shares of Chelsfield plc, a UK real estate company whose shares are
listed on the London stock exchange or, at Chelsfield plc's option, for cash
payable in 2003. In connection with the negotiation of the sale transaction,
TrizecHahn Corporation agreed to advance to Chelsfield plc up to (pound)25
million by way of an unsecured loan to be used to provide working capital for
the Global Switch S.a.r.l. business and the buyout of the approximately 17%
interest of another shareholder of Global Switch S.a.r.l. The (pound) 25 million
unsecured loan is repayable in cash on June 28, 2002 or, in Chelsfield plc
ordinary shares, if Chelsfield plc elects to acquire TrizecHahn Corporation's
Global Switch S.a.r.l. interest for Chelsfield plc ordinary shares. Based on
assurances given by Chelsfield, plc's chairman, TrizecHahn Corporation expects
to complete a sale of its interest in Global Switch S.a.r.l. prior to the
effective date of the corporate reorganization. On March 4, 2002 we advanced to
TrizecHahn Corporation (pound) 25 million ($35.6 million) to fund its loan to
Chelsfield plc. TrizecHahn Corporation will transfer to us any shares of
Chelsfield plc or amounts receivable from Chelsfield plc as part of these
transactions prior to the effective date of the corporate reorganization.
22
Capitalization
The following table shows our total capitalization on an actual basis
as at December 31, 2001 and on a pro forma basis to reflect the transactions
described in Note 1 to our unaudited pro forma condensed combined consolidated
balance sheet appearing in this Form 10-K under the heading "Unaudited Pro Forma
Condensed Combined Consolidated Financial Data."
This table should be read in conjunction with "Item 7. Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and
our combined consolidated financial statements and notes thereto appearing
elsewhere in this Form 10-K.
As at December 31, 2001
-----------------------
Actual Pro Forma
------ ---------
(unaudited)
(in thousands)
-----------------------------
Mortgage debt and other loans .................................. $ 3,017,798 $ 3,233,298
------------- -------------
Redeemable Stock
Special voting stock, par value $0.01 per share; 100 shares
authorized, actual and pro forma; 100 shares issued and
outstanding, actual and pro forma.......................... 100 100
Class F convertible stock, par value $0.01 per share; 100,000
shares authorized, actual and pro forma; 100,000 shares
issued and outstanding, actual and pro forma............... 100 100
------------- -------------
200 200
------------- -------------
Owners' equity:
Common stock, par value $0.01 per share; 200,000,000 shares
authorized, actual; 500,000,000 shares authorized, pro
forma; 38,220,000 shares issued and outstanding, actual;
149,543,948 shares issued and outstanding, pro forma (1)... 382 1,495
Series B convertible preferred stock, par value $1.00 per
share; 1,100,000 shares authorized, actual and pro forma;
1,100,000 shares issued and outstanding, actual; no shares
issued and outstanding, pro forma......................... 1,100,000 -
Class C convertible preferred stock, par value $1.00 per
share; 750,000 authorized, actual and pro forma; 376,504
shares issued and outstanding, actual; no shares issued and
outstanding, pro forma..................................... 414,154 -
Warrants..................................................... - 20,890
Additional paid-in capital................................... 922,844 2,055,110
Retained earnings (deficit).................................. 6,514 3,749
Unearned compensation........................................ (6,701) (9,265)
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)................ (1,818) (1,818)
------------- -------------
Total owners' equity....................................... 2,435,375 2,070,161
------------- -------------
Total capitalization............................................ $ 5,453,373 $ 5,303,659
============= =============
- ----------------
(1) Excludes (a) approximately 8.6 million shares of common stock issuable
upon the exercise of vested and unvested options expected to be
outstanding on the effective date of the corporate reorganization; and
(b) approximately 8.7 million shares of common stock issuable upon the
exercise of warrants expected to be issued on the effective date of the
corporate reorganization.
23
Item 2. Properties
OVERVIEW
Office Property Portfolio
The supply of, and demand for, office space affect the performance of
our office property portfolio. Macroeconomic conditions, such as current and
expected economic trends, business and consumer confidence and employment
levels, drive this demand.
Geographic Diversity
Our geographically diversified asset base makes it more likely that we
will be able to generate sustainable cash flows throughout the various phases of
economic cycles than if we were less diversified. The following table summarizes
the major city focus and geographic distribution of our office property
portfolio at December 31, 2001.
Office Portfolio Summary
(At December 31, 2001)
POI for the Year
Ended Occupancy
Total Managed Area Owned Area December 31, 2001 Weighted
No. of ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ on Owned
Properties 000s sq. ft. % 000s sq. ft. % $ millions % Area
---------- ------------ ----- ------------ ----- ---------- ----- ----------
Core Markets
Atlanta 6 4,021 8% 4,021 10% 46.0 8% 89.9%
Chicago 5 5,946 12% 2,434 6% 30.8 6% 95.7%
Dallas 6 6,222 13% 5,457 13% 62.5 11% 90.1%
Houston 6 6,580 13% 6,056 15% 73.8 13% 97.1%
Los Angeles Area 6 3,167 7% 2,044 5% 23.3 4% 92.6%
New York Area 7 7,912 16% 6,462 16% 121.2 21% 99.1%
Washington, D.C. Area 22 5,014 11% 5,014 12% 96.3 17% 95.6%
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Core Markets 58 38,862 80% 31,488 77% 453.9 80% 94.7%
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Secondary Markets
Charlotte 3 1,644 3% 1,644 4% 18.7 4% 95.2%
Minneapolis 2 1,102 2% 1,102 3% 12.7 2% 96.6%
Pittsburgh 1 1,450 3% 1,450 3% 9.9 2% 87.9%
St. Louis 2 1,388 3% 1,388 3% 18.9 3% 90.8%
Other 10 4,416 9% 4,251 10% 50.4 9% 93.1%
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Secondary Markets 18 10,000 20% 9,835 23% 110.6 20% 92.8%
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Office Properties 76 48,862 100% 41,323 100% 564.5 100% 94.3%
==========================================================================================================================
Our portfolio benefited from its position in CBD office buildings
located in major markets, as leases in 2001 expired at an average net rent of
approximately $12.05 per square foot ($11.91 per square foot on a pro rata
basis) and were generally being signed at an average net rent per square foot of
approximately $13.08 ($12.72 per square foot on a pro rata basis). At December
31, 2001, management's estimates of market rents were on average approximately
25% above in-place rents. In light of weakening market conditions, estimated
average market rents were revised downward from $16.70 per square foot at
December 31, 2000 to $16.00 per square foot at December 31, 2001. The average
market rent for space in our buildings is weighted based on our owned area.
In-place net rents and market net rents exclude straight-line rent adjustments.
24
Market vs. In-Place Rental Rates
(At December 31, 2001)
Average Average
In-place Average Market Remaining
Net Rent Net Rent Lease Term
------------ -------------- ------------
(dollars per square foot) (years)
Core Markets
Atlanta $ 12.50 $ 12.30 2.9
Chicago 13.10 16.50 6.2
Dallas 11.00 9.70 4.6
Houston 10.10 13.50 4.1
Los Angeles Area 14.10 14.00 5.7
New York Area 16.50 32.90 8.1
Washington, D.C. Area 16.90 18.30 4.3
------------ -------------- ------------
Total Core Markets $ 13.50 $ 17.70 5.3
------------ -------------- ------------
Secondary Markets
Charlotte $ 10.30 $ 13.20 6.5
Minneapolis 10.20 8.80 2.8
Pittsburgh 6.70 6.30 4.0
St. Louis 13.40 13.70 4.4
Other 11.20 10.90 3.2
------------ -------------- ------------
Total Secondary Markets $ 10.60 $ 10.70 4.1
------------ -------------- ------------
Total Office Properties $ 12.80 $ 16.00 5.1
============ ============== ============
Over the next several years, we plan to concentrate our capital on our
core markets and to exit selectively from investments in our secondary markets
in an orderly fashion. We expect principally to redeploy proceeds from sales
into Class A office buildings in the CBDs of our core markets.
Lease Profile
For our office portfolio, market rents in 2001 were on average
approximately 25% above our in-place rents. We expect these market conditions,
combined with re-leasing of expiring space shown in the following lease
expiration table, to contribute positively to our cash flows in 2002 and future
years. Over the next five fiscal years, beginning in 2002, scheduled lease
expirations in our office portfolio average approximately 11.5% annually, based
on our occupied space at December 31, 2001. The data in the table are based on
our owned/occupied area. Expiration net rents exclude straight-line rent
adjustments.
Scheduled Annual Expirations of Office Leases
(At December 31, 2001)
2002 Expirations 2003 Expirations 2004 Expirations 2005 Expirations 2006 Expirations
---------------- ---------------- ---------------- ---------------- ----------------
000s 000s 000s 000s 000s
sq.ft. % $ psf sq.ft. % $ psf sq.ft. % $ psf sq.ft. % $ psf sq.ft. % $ psf
------- ----- ------- ------- ----- ------- ------ ----- ------ ------ ------ -------- ------ ------ -------
Core Markets
Atlanta 773 21% $11.30 647 18% $13.30 448 12% $13.60 558 15% $14.50 544 15% $16.20
Chicago 189 8% 10.30 96 4% 13.10 234 10% 11.50 124 5% 16.00 281 12% 11.00
Dallas 582 12% 9.70 800 16% 11.80 490 10% 13.10 449 9% 12.80 403 8% 11.80
Houston 913 16% 14.60 1,384 24% 8.90 656 11% 10.60 628 11% 9.50 285 5% 12.50
Los Angeles Area 180 10% 11.40 277 15% 18.20 261 14% 14.80 167 9% 16.80 237 13% 13.40
New York Area 235 4% 21.30 420 7% 14.10 821 13% 16.40 444 7% 19.30 231 4% 25.90
Washington, D.C. 826 17% 17.87 513 11% 18.40 427 9% 17.50 787 16% 18.80 273 6% 23.10
Area
------- ----- ------- ------- ----- ------- ------ ----- ------------- ------ -------- ------ ------ -------
Total Core Markets 3,698 12% $13.93 4,137 14% $12.60 3,337 11% $14.10 3,157 11% $15.20 2,254 8% $15.80
------- ----- ------- ------- ----- ------- ------ ----- ------------- ------ -------- ------ ------ -------
Secondary Markets
Charlotte 114 7% 14.70 127 8% 11.70 108 7% 12.00 239 15% 16.40 222 14% 14.10
Minneapolis 337 32% 9.40 180 17% 8.00 141 13% 7.70 70 7% 15.80 52 5% 12.10
Pittsburgh 201 16% 7.80 236 18% 6.20 149 12% 7.30 86 7% 7.50 109 9% 7.60
St. Louis 69 5% 9.70 104 8% 12.30 192 15% 12.40 213 17% 13.40 35 3% 14.70
Other 743 19% 10.70 957 24% 9.80 358 9% 10.60 398 10% 13.60 465 12% 13.00
------- ----- ------- ------- ----- ------- ------ ----- ------------- ------ -------- ------ ------ -------
Total Secondary
Markets 1,464 16% $10.30 1,604 18% $9.40 948 10% $10.20 1,006 11% $13.80 883 10% $12.60
------- ----- ------- ------- ----- ------- ------ ----- ------------- ------ -------- ------ ------ -------
Total Office
Properties 5,162 13% $12.90 5,741 15% $11.70 4,285 11% $13.20 4,163 11% $14.90 3,137 8% $14.90
------- ----- ------- ------- ----- ------- ------ ----- ------------- ------ -------- ------ ------ -------
25
Over the last three years, we have leased 23.2 million square feet of
new and renewal space. During 2001, we leased 8.0 million square feet as
indicated in the following table (7.2 million square feet on a pro rata basis).
Occupancy for the entire portfolio based on owned area increased to 94.3% at
December 31, 2001 from 94.2% at December 31, 2000.
Office Leasing Activity
1999 2000 2001
-------- -------- --------
(thousands of square feet)
Core Markets ----------------------------------------
Atlanta 730 941 1,023
Chicago 193 594 376
Dallas 591 1,130 1,290
Houston 1,256 680 1,126
Los Angeles Area 332 282 750
New York Area 546 787 310
Washington, D.C. Area 959 1,286 741
----------------------------------------
Total Core Markets 4,607 5,700 5,616
----------------------------------------
Secondary Markets
Charlotte 290 377 241
Minneapolis 136 208 92
Pittsburgh 191 268 306
St. Louis 218 111 110
Other 994 901 814
----------------------------------------
Total Secondary Markets 1,829 1,865 1,563
----------------------------------------
Total at Pro Rata Ownership 6,436 7,565 7,179
----------------------------------------
Total at 100% Ownership 7,050 8,170 7,978
========================================
Occupancy based on owned area at
December 31, 91.4% 94.2% 94.3%
========================================
Tenant Diversity
Our diversified tenant base adds to the durability of our future cash
flow. The following table summarizes the breadth and diversity of the
approximately 2,700 tenants in the portfolio at December 31, 2001.
Industry % Owned Area
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Banking/Securities Brokers 15%
Legal Services 10%
Computers/Communications 9%
Oil & Gas 8%
Insurance/Non-Bank Financial 8%
Miscellaneous Business Services 7%
Wholesalers/Retailers 6%
Engineering/Architectural Services 4%
Government 4%
Health Services 3%
This large tenant base and strong position in key markets allows us to
take advantage of economies of scale and drive internal growth in the areas of
parking, telecommunications and antennas, specialty retail leasing, signage and
branding opportunities, energy and national purchasing contracts.
Our 10 largest tenants accounted for approximately 17% of our POI
excluding straight-line rent adjustments for the year ended December 31, 2001.
No single tenant accounted for more than 4% of our POI. The following table sets
forth information concerning our 10 largest tenants at December 31, 2001.
26
Top Ten Tenants by POI % POI % Owned Area
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Prudential Securities 4% 3%
Goldman Sachs 2% 1%
GSA 2% 2%
Enron Corp. 2% 2%
Bank of America 2% 2%
Fried, Frank, Harris 1% 1%
Ernst & Young 1% 1%
Bank One 1% 1%
Entex 1% 1%
Continental Airlines 1% 2%
-----------------------------
Total Top Ten Tenants 17% 16%
=============================
On December 2, 2001, a group of Enron Corporation companies filed for
Chapter 11 reorganization. As indicated above, Enron is our fourth largest
tenant contributing 2% of POI and occupying 793,000 square feet, primarily at
the Allen Center in Houston, Texas. At December 31, 2001, Enron's average
in-place net rents were approximately $9.30 per square foot, while current
estimated market rents for the space are approximately $14 to $15 per square
foot. At this time, we expect Enron will reject its leases with us. The impact
on our property operating income will depend on how quickly we are able to
re-lease this space.
Our Top Office Properties
The following table summarizes our top 10 properties based on
contribution to our POI for the year ended December 31, 2001. All of the
properties in the table are 100% owned unless otherwise indicated.
Top Ten Properties by POI Contribution % POI % Owned Area
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Allen Center Houston, TX 8% 8%
One New York Plaza New York, NY 8% 6%
Galleria Towers I, II & III Dallas, TX 4% 3%
Newport Tower Jersey City, NJ 4% 3%
Renaissance Tower Dallas, TX 3% 4%
The Grace Building (50%) New York, NY 3% 2%
Continental Center I Houston, TX 3% 3%
Metropolitan Square St. Louis, MO 3% 3%
110 William Street New York, NY 2% 2%
World Apparel Center (50%) New York, NY 2% 1%
---------------------
Total Top Ten Properties 40% 35%
=====================
Our top five office properties are Allen Center, One New York Plaza,
Galleria Towers, Newport Tower and Renaissance Tower. POI for the year ended
December 31, 2001 for our top five office properties totaled $153.6 million, or
27%, of our total U.S. office POI. A description of these five properties is
provided below. For information on mortgage indebtedness encumbering these
properties, see " - Description of Certain Indebtedness" in this Form 10-K.
o Allen Center. We acquired Allen Center, located in the central
business district of Houston, Texas, in November 1996. For the
year ended December 31, 2001, this property contributed 8% to our
POI. The complex includes three towers ranging from 34 to 50
stories and comprising approximately 3.2 million square feet of
leaseable space. Parking capacity for more than 5,000 cars is
available within two parking garages, and additional surface
parking is available on the 2.5 acre expansion site. In addition
to the office buildings, we own a central plant that distributes
chilled air and heated water throughout the complex and to other
buildings in the area. Allen Center was 98.4% occupied at
December 31, 2001. The largest tenants in the Allen Center are
Amerada Hess Corporation with 10% of the total square footage,
Equiva Services LLC with 6% and Devon Energy with 6%. Enron Corp
has leases for 18% of the total square footage. As previously
noted, pursuant to its Chapter 11 reorganization, we expect Enron
to reject its leases on this property. The net book value per
square foot at December 31, 2001 was $77.
27
o One New York Plaza. We acquired this premier lower Manhattan
property in April 1999. For the year ended December 31, 2001,
this property contributed 8% to our POI. Prudential Securities
occupies approximately 56% of the total square footage of this
2.5 million-square-foot, 50-story tower. The building's other
major tenants are Goldman Sachs with 23% of the total square
footage and Fried Frank Harris with 12%. One New York Plaza was
99.6% occupied at December 31, 2001. There has been no disruption
to services as a result of the September 2001 terrorist attacks
in New York and Washington, D.C. and related circumstances. The
net book value per square foot at December 31, 2001 was $156.
o Galleria Towers. We acquired this suburban Dallas office property
in January 1999. For the year ended December 31, 2001, this
property contributed 4% to our POI. The complex consists of three
buildings ranging from 24 to 26 stories and comprising 1.4
million square feet. Federal National Mortgage occupies 8% of the
total square footage, Kinko's occupies 8% and Medical Care
International occupies 5%. Galleria Towers was 95.4% occupied at
December 31, 2001. The net book value per square foot at December
31, 2001 was $155.
o Newport Tower. We acquired this 37-story building in October
1997. For the year ended December 31, 2001, this property
contributed 4% to our POI. Newport Tower is located in Jersey
City, New Jersey, directly across the Hudson River from downtown
Manhattan in an area that is considered a sub-market of the
downtown Manhattan market. The property has approximately one
million square feet of leaseable area. First Chicago Trust
occupies approximately 23% of the total square footage, Brown
Brothers Harriman & Co. occupies 15% and Herzog Heine Geduld,
Inc. occupies 11%. The building was 99.7% occupied at December
31, 2001. The net book value per square foot at December 31, 2001
was $143.
o Renaissance Tower. We acquired Renaissance Tower, a 56-story
office tower located in Dallas, Texas, in December 1995. For the
year ended December 31, 2001, this property contributed 3% to our
POI. The property has 1.7 million square feet of leaseable area.
Major tenants include Blockbuster Videos, Inc., with 15% of total
square footage, Southwest Securities, Inc. with 13% and
Transamerica Real Estate Tax, with 10%. The property was 88.4%
occupied at December 31, 2001. The net book value per square foot
at December 31, 2000 was $65.
Investment in Sears Tower
The Sears Tower, located in Chicago, Illinois, is a 110-story, 3.5
million-square-foot office building that was 93.9% occupied at December 31,
2001. Major tenants include Ernst & Young, Goldman Sachs, Bank of America,
Merrill Lynch and Latham & Watkins. The Sears Tower and associated assets are
currently owned in a trust for the benefit of an affiliate of Sears, Roebuck and
Co.
On December 3, 1997, we purchased a subordinated mortgage together with
an option to purchase the Sears Tower for a total of $70 million and became the
residual beneficiary of the trust that owns the Sears Tower. In addition, we
assumed responsibility for property management and leasing services.
Our mortgage is subordinate to an existing non-recourse participating
first mortgage plus accrued interest and certain obligations. The first mortgage
has a principal plus accrued interest balance of $778.9 million at December 31,
2001. The first mortgage is currently serviced only to the extent of available
cash flows from the building. Beginning in 2002, minimum interest payments are
required under the first mortgage. The minimum interest payment for 2002 is
$37.5 million and it increases to $51.9 million for each of 2003 and 2004. The
maturity date for the first mortgage is July 2005. In order to retire all
amounts secured by the first mortgage, including the lender's participating
interest in cash flow, the lender must receive an amount sufficient to provide
it with an internal rate of return of 8.6858% on amounts advanced by it. Based
on projected cash flows for the Sears Tower, the amount required to provide this
required internal rate of return and fully retire the first mortgage at maturity
in July 2005 would be approximately $800 million.
Our subordinated mortgage, which matures in July 2010, has a principal
plus accrued interest balance of approximately $363.1 million at December 31,
2001, and also has participation rights on available cash flow.
The trust that owns the Sears Tower has a scheduled termination date of
January 1, 2003. A General Agreement dated November 7, 1994 by and among Sears,
a subsidiary of Sears, the holder of the first mortgage on the Sears Tower and
certain of our indirect subsidiaries, including Partner Tower, L.P., or PTLP,
sets forth Sears's
28
right to acquire title to the Sears Tower and our subsidiary's option to
purchase the building under various circumstances. Pursuant to the General
Agreement, at any time prior to 2003, Sears has the right to acquire title to
the Sears Tower from the trust in exchange for readily marketable securities
having a value equal to the amount, if any, by which the appraised value of the
building exceeds the amount of all indebtedness secured by the building.
If Sears acquired the building pursuant to its right of substitution,
the trust would immediately terminate and any marketable securities transferred
by Sears to the trust would be distributed to our subsidiary, PTLP, as the
residual beneficiary. Sears would hold title to the building subject to all
indebtedness, including our subordinated mortgage, and subject to our rights
under the option. PTLP's option to purchase the building would be exercisable
between January 2003 and July 2005 at a price of approximately $950 million plus
40% of the amount by which the appraised value of the building exceeded $1,063
million. If PTLP purchased the Sears Tower under the option, the building would
be acquired subject to all outstanding indebtedness secured by it, and the
amount of this indebtedness would be credited against the purchase price.
If Sears did not exercise its right of substitution, the Sears Tower
and the other assets of the trust would be distributed on the scheduled
termination date to PTLP as the residual beneficiary and we would assume the
participating first mortgage.
For managing and leasing the Sears Tower, we currently earn fees that
are funded from pre-debt service cash flows from the building.
Office Development Properties
One Alliance Center in Buckhead, Georgia, a strong sub-market in
Atlanta was recently completed in October 2001. This $100 million,
560,000-square-foot building is the first phase of a four-building complex and
at December 31, 2001 was 47% occupied and 75% leased. Major tenants include
Security First, Towers Perrin and BBDO South. The remaining three phases of the
complex, potentially totaling 1.2 million square feet of office space, would be
developed only after substantial pre-leasing is completed.
In addition, we have 5.3 million square feet of office development
potential in key U.S. markets, assuming receipt of all necessary permits,
licenses and approvals. This office development potential includes approximately
2.8 million square feet adjacent to four of our office buildings in Houston and
Dallas and a 600,000-square-foot development site in Rosslyn, Virginia. We will
pursue these projects only when customer need is evident and market conditions
warrant.
Retail/Entertainment Properties
We are completing the stabilization of three destination-oriented
retail/entertainment centers.
o Hollywood & Highland in Los Angeles, California, is a
645,000-square-foot, $380 million complex, net of $100 million of
municipal financing and contributions. We also developed a $160
million, 640-room hotel as part of the complex. The complex
opened on November 8, 2001. The hotel opened on December 26,
2001. The retail portion of the project was 72% occupied and 88%
leased at December 31, 2001.
o Construction is complete at Paseo Colorado, a
565,000-square-foot, $110 million (net of $25 million of
municipal contributions) mixed-use re-development in Pasadena,
California. The project opened on September 28, 2001 and was 84%
occupied and 93% leased at December 31, 2001.
o Desert Passage in Las Vegas, Nevada, a 475,000-square-foot, $290
million retail/entertainment complex within the Aladdin Hotel and
Casino complex, opened in August 2000. The project was 74%
occupied and 78% leased at December 31, 2001. On March 31, 2001,
the Desert Passage project partnership was restructured to
facilitate a sale, resulting in our having control over project
operations and its disposition, with the minority partner
participating only in project distributions, primarily those
arising upon disposition of the project.
29
Our net book value for these properties at December 31, 2001, was
approximately $650 million, on a pro rata ownership basis. In the fourth quarter
of 2001, we recorded an allowance for loss related to these properties of $234
million. Of this amount $217 million related to the Hollywood & Highland complex
and $17 million related to Desert Passage. This allowance for loss reflects the
negative impact of the September 2001 terrorist attacks on tourism, upon which
Hollywood & Highland and Desert Passage depend for a significant portion of
their visitors. In addition, Desert Passage was impacted by the September 2001
filing of a Chapter 11 reorganization for the Aladdin Hotel and Casino, which is
adjacent to Desert Passage and upon which Desert Passage further depends for a
significant portion of its visitors.
Consistent with our strategy to focus on the core U.S. office business,
we have decided to divest our non-core retail/entertainment assets. Our plan
calls for an orderly disposition over the next several years that will allow us
to achieve stabilized income in order to realize maximum value upon disposition.
Net proceeds will be redeployed into Class A office buildings in the CBDs of our
core markets or used to repay debt.
DESCRIPTION OF CERTAIN INDEBTEDNESS
Senior Secured Revolving Credit Facility
We have negotiated a three-year, $350 million senior unsecured
revolving credit facility with a group of banks. In December 2001, $200 million
of the facility was committed and closed with a group of four banks. The
remaining $150 million of the facility has been syndicated to a group of seven
banks and closed in early January 2002. The credit facility is available for our
general corporate purposes, including dividends and distributions to our
stockholders, subject to certain restrictions on our making any such dividends
or distributions. Interest will be calculated periodically on the borrowings
outstanding under the facility on a variable rate basis using a spread over
LIBOR. The spread will be dependent on our total leverage, or, if we obtain an
investment-grade credit rating from two rating agencies, on our credit rating.
In addition, we must pay to the lenders a fee based on the unused portion of the
credit facility.
The amount of the credit facility available to be borrowed at any time
is determined by the unencumbered properties that we, or our subsidiaries that
guarantee the credit facility, own and that satisfy certain conditions of
eligible properties. The amount currently eligible to be borrowed is $314
million. These conditions are not uncommon for credit facilities of this nature.
At December 31, 2001, no amounts were outstanding under this facility.
We are subject to covenants customary for credit facilities of this
nature, including financial covenants, restrictions on other indebtedness,
restriction on encumbrances of properties that we use in determining our
borrowing capacity, and certain customary investment restrictions. Our financial
covenants include a restriction on dividends or distributions of more than 90%
of our funds from operations. If we are in default in respect of our obligations
under the credit facility, dividends shall be limited to the amount necessary to
maintain REIT status.
TrizecHahn Office Properties Trust Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates
In May 2001, we refinanced $1.16 billion of existing long-term debt
through the private placement issuance by a special-purpose vehicle created by
one of our subsidiaries of $1.44 billion of commercial mortgage pass-through
certificates. The certificates are backed by mortgages that secure non-recourse
loans on 28 of our office properties and have maturities of five, seven and 10
years. At December 31, 2001, the weighted average interest rate on this debt was
4.9%, and it replaced existing debt at 7.1%.
One New York Plaza Trust Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates
In May 1999, we entered into a non-recourse acquisition loan in the
amount of $245.9 million to fund a portion of the purchase price for One New
York Plaza. The loan is secured by a first mortgage on the property, bears an
interest rate of 7.27% and matures in May 2006. Subsequently, the loan was
securitized through the private issuance of $245.9 million of commercial
mortgage pass-through certificates. The certificates are backed by the
non-recourse mortgage loan on the property.
30
Desert Passage Credit Facility
In May 1998, one of our subsidiaries entered into a loan agreement with
a group of banks to finance the construction of Desert Passage. The loan
facility is in the total amount of $194 million, of which $178.0 million had
been drawn as at December 31, 2001. The loan is secured by a mortgage on the
property and is also guaranteed by certain of our other subsidiaries. Interest
is calculated periodically on a variable rate basis using a spread over LIBOR.
The loan matures in May 2003, but may be extended up to May 2005 subject to
meeting certain conditions.
Hollywood & Highland Credit Facility
In May 1999, one of our subsidiaries entered into a loan agreement with
a group of banks to finance the construction of the retail and entertainment
component of the Hollywood & Highland project. The total loan facility is in the
amount of $150 million, of which $106.8 million had been drawn as at December
31, 2001. The loan is secured by a mortgage on the property and is also
guaranteed by TrizecHahn Holdings Ltd., TrizecHahn Office Properties Ltd. and
us. We expect that, prior to the time of the corporate reorganization,
TrizecHahn Holdings Ltd. and TrizecHahn Office Properties Ltd. will be released
under their respective guarantees. Interest is calculated periodically on a
variable rate basis using a spread over LIBOR. The loan matures in May 2002, but
may be converted to a term loan maturing May 2004 subject to meeting certain
conditions.
Hollywood Hotel Credit Facility
In April 2000, one of our subsidiaries entered into a loan agreement
with a group of banks to finance the construction of the Hollywood Hotel, of
which we currently own 84.5%. The total loan facility is in the amount of $98
million, of which $65.6 million had been drawn as of December 31, 2001 at our
pro rata share. The loan is secured by a mortgage on the property and is also
guaranteed by TrizecHahn Office Properties Ltd. We expect that, prior to the
time of the corporate reorganization, we will substitute our company for
TrizecHahn Office Properties Ltd. under its guarantee. Interest is calculated
periodically on a variable rate basis using a spread over LIBOR. The loan
matures in April 2003, but may be extended up to April 2005 subject to meeting
certain conditions.
Paseo Colorado Credit Facility
In June 2000, one of our subsidiaries entered into a loan agreement
with a group of banks to finance the construction of the Paseo Colorado
development. The total loan facility is in the amount of $88 million, of which
$58.9 million had been drawn as of December 31, 2001. The loan is secured by a
mortgage on the property and is also guaranteed by TrizecHahn Office Properties
Ltd. and certain of our other subsidiaries. We expect that, prior to the time of
the corporate reorganization, we will substitute our company for TrizecHahn
Office Properties Ltd. under its guarantee. Interest is calculated periodically
on a variable rate basis using a spread over LIBOR. The loan matures in June
2003, but may be extended up to September 2005 subject to meeting certain
conditions.
31
Office Portfolio Mortgage Debt
The following table sets forth information concerning mortgage debt
secured by office properties as of December 31, 2001.
Principal Term to
Property F/V (1) Maturity Date Current Rate Balance Maturity
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($ mil.) (Years)
Renaissance Tower F Jan-03 7.32% $ 60.1 1.0
Galleria Towers I, II and III F May-04 6.79% 137.5 2.4
One New York Plaza F May-06 7.27% 240.3 4.3
1065 Ave. of the Americas F Dec-04 7.18% 37.9 2.9
10 South Riverside F May-11 6.34% 10.5 9.4
120 South Riverside F May-11 6.34% 10.5 9.4
Newport Tower F Nov-04 7.09% 106.9 2.8
2000 L Street, N.W. V Feb-02 4.10% 41.2 0.1
Watergate Office Building F Feb-07 8.02% 19.1 5.1
1400 K Street, N.W. F May-06 7.20% 22.3 4.3
1250 23rd Street, N.W. F Mar-03 8.88% 9.9 1.2
Bethesda Crescent F Jan-08 7.10% 34.0 6.0
Bethesda Crescent Ground Lease F Jan-08 6.70% 2.8 6.0
Twinbrook Metro Plaza F Sep-08 6.65% 17.2 6.7
Goddard Corporate Park F May-09 7.00% 15.2 7.3
Two Ballston Plaza F Jun-08 6.91% 27.4 6.4
Rosslyn Gateway North F May-07 8.00% 11.2 5.3
Rosslyn Gateway South F May-02 8.25% 8.3 0.3
Sunrise Tech Park F Jan-06 6.75% 23.8 4.0
Bank of America Plaza (Charlotte) F Feb-04 7.43% 67.0 2.1
Northstar Center F Aug-02 7.75% 14.4 0.7
Gateway Center F Sep-10 8.50% 42.3 8.7
Metropolitan Square F Jan-08 7.05% 89.2 6.0
250 West Pratt Street F Apr-05 6.77% 29.9 3.3
Bank of America Plaza (Columbia) F Mar-05 6.90% 21.1 3.2
Esperante Office Building F Mar-05 6.52% 23.9 3.2
Franklin Garage F May-03 6.85% 26.9 1.3
One Alliance Center V Oct-03 3.93% 42.6 1.8
Inner Belt Drive V Oct-03 4.38% 15.6 1.8
CMBS Pass-Through Certificates (2)
Class A-1 FL V Apr-06 2.18% 256.6 4.3
Class A-2 F May-11 6.09% 74.9 9.4
Class A-3 FL V Mar-08 2.27% 236.7 6.2
Class A-3 F Mar-08 6.21% 78.9 6.2
Class A-4 F May-11 6.53% 240.6 9.4
Class B-1 FL V Apr-06 2.32% 47.9 4.3
Class B-3 FL V Mar-08 2.42% 43.5 6.2
Class B-3 F Mar-08 6.36% 14.5 6.2
Class B-4 F May-11 6.72% 47.0 9.4
Class C-3 F Mar-08 6.52% 101.4 6.2
Class C-4 F May-11 6.89% 45.6 9.4
Class D-3 F Mar-08 6.94% 106.1 6.2
Class D-4 F May-11 7.28% 40.7 9.4
Class E-3 F Mar-08 7.25% 73.3 6.2
Class E-4 F May-11 7.60% 32.3 9.4
----------------------------------------------
4.88% 1,440.0 6.9
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Office Mortgage Debt Pre Swap (3) 5.81% $2,649.0 5.4
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pre Swap (3) Post Swap (3)
------------ -------------
Total fixed rate debt: $1,956.7 $ 2,106.7
Total variable rate debt: $ 692.3 $ 542.3
Average rate: 5.81% 6.02%
- --------------------------------------
(1) "F" refers to fixed rate debt, "V" refers to variable rate debt.
(2) Related assets and allocated loan amounts ($1,440 million): 10 South
Riverside ($47.0), 110 William Street ($85.0), 120 South Riverside ($45.5),
1250 Connecticut Avenue ($29.8), 1550 & 1560 Wilson Boulevard ($31.0), 2401
Pennsylvania Avenue ($20.9), Allen Center ($350.4), Beaumeade Technology
Center ($18.0), Borden Building ($31.0), Capital Center II & III ($33.0),
Clark Tower ($31.0), Colony Square ($72.3), Continental Center I ($110.3),
Continental Center II ($22.5), Interstate North ($60.0), Lakeside Center
($31.0), McKinney Place ($8.8), Midtown Plaza ($49.6), Minnesota Center
($23.0), One Reston Crescent ($22.0), The Palisades ($48.8), Park Center I
& II ($8.5), Plaza of the Americas ($66.2), Reston Unisys ($24.0), Silver
Spring Center ($15.3), Silver Spring Metro Plaza ($68.8), Two North LaSalle
($49.0), Williams Center I & II ($37.5).
(3) $150 million of the 7 year floating rate tranche of the CMBS loan has been
swapped from one-month LIBOR +0.37% to 6.01% fixed rate.
32
PROPERTY PORTFOLIO DATA
Office Properties
Operating Properties
The following table sets forth key information as of December 31, 2001
with respect to our operating office properties. The economic interest of our
owning entity is 100% unless otherwise noted. The total occupancy rates for the
markets and portfolio as a whole in the table are weighted based on owned area.
Year of Owned Occupancy
completion/ Total area area Weighted on
Name (Ownership) Location renovation (sq. ft.) (sq. ft.) Owned Area
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Core Markets
Atlanta
Interstate North Parkway Atlanta, GA 1973/84/01 958,000 958,000 87.5%
Colony Square Atlanta, GA 1970/73/95 827,000 827,000 96.6%
The Palisades Atlanta, GA 1981/83/99 632,000 632,000 88.7%
Newmarket Business Park Atlanta, GA 1979/89 591,000 591,000 86.4%
Lakeside Centre Atlanta, GA 1984/86 509,000 509,000 83.0%
Midtown Plaza Atlanta, GA 1984/85 504,000 504,000 96.3%
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total - Atlanta (6 properties) 4,021,000 4,021,000 89.9%
Chicago
Sears Tower (1) Chicago, IL 1974 3,512,000 - 93.9%
Two North LaSalle Chicago, IL 1979 692,000 692,000 97.9%
10 South Riverside Chicago, IL 1965 685,000 685,000 92.2%
120 South Riverside Chicago, IL 1967 685,000 685,000 96.9%
550 West Washington Chicago, IL 2000 372,000 372,000 96.0%
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total - Chicago (5 properties) 5,946,000 2,434,000 95.7%
Dallas
Renaissance Tower Dallas, TX 1974/92 1,731,000 1,731,000 88.4%
Bank One Center (50%) Dallas, TX 1987 1,530,000 765,000 93.9%
Galleria Towers I, II and III Dallas, TX 1982/85/91 1,408,000 1,408,000 95.4%
Plaza of the Americas Dallas, TX 1980 1,150,000 1,150,000 85.7%
Park Central I & II Dallas, TX 1970/71 262,000 262,000 80.7%
McKinney Place Dallas, TX 1985 141,000 141,000 91.1%
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total - Dallas (6 properties) 6,222,000 5,457,000 90.1%
Houston
Allen Center Houston, TX 1972/78/80/95 3,184,000 3,184,000 98.4%
Cullen Center
Continental Center I Houston, TX 1984 1,110,000 1,110,000 95.1%
Continental Center II Houston, TX 1971 449,000 449,000 95.6%
M.W. Kellogg Tower (50%) Houston, TX 1978 1,048,000 524,000 95.3%
500 Jefferson Houston, TX 1962/83 390,000 390,000 93.3%
3700 Bay Area Blvd Houston, TX 1986 399,000 399,000 100.0%
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total - Houston (6 properties) 6,580,000 6,056,000 97.1%
Los Angeles Area
Ernst & Young Plaza (25%) Los Angeles, CA 1985 1,252,000 313,000 87.5%
Warner Center Los Angeles, CA 1980 377,000 377,000 98.6%
Marina Towers (50%) Los Angeles, CA 1971/76 368,000 184,000 90.0%
9800 La Cienega Los Angeles, CA 1985 336,000 336,000 85.9%
Landmark Square Long Beach, CA 1991 451,000 451,000 95.1%
Shoreline Square Long Beach, CA 1988 383,000 383,000 95.2%
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total - Los Angeles Area (6 properties) 3,167,000 2,044,000 92.6%
New York Area
One New York Plaza New York, NY 1970/95 2,458,000 2,458,000 99.6%
33
Year of Owned Occupancy
completion/ Total area area Weighted on
Name (Ownership) Location renovation (sq. ft.) (sq. ft.) Owned Area
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Grace Building (50%) New York, NY 1971 1,519,000 758,000 99.9%
World Apparel Center (50%) New York, NY 1970 1,150,000 574,000 98.3%
110 William Street New York, NY 1960 868,000 868,000 100.0%
1065 Ave. of the Americas (99%) New York, NY 1958 665,000 659,000 94.9%
1460 Broadway (50%) New York, NY 1951 214,000 107,000 100.0%
Newport Tower Jersey City, NJ 1990 1,038,000 1,038,000 99.7%
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total - New York Area (7 properties) 7,912,000 6,462,000 99.1%
Washington, D.C. Area
2000 L Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 1968/98 385,000 385,000 99.9%
Watergate Office Building Washington, D.C. 1965/91 257,000 257,000 99.7%
1225 Connecticut, N.W. Washington, D.C. 1968/94 224,000 224,000 99.8%
1400 K Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 1982 193,000 193,000 100.0%
1250 Connecticut, N.W. Washington, D.C. 1964/96 171,000 171,000 99.9%
1250 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 1990 117,000 117,000 100.0%
2401 Pennsylvania Washington, D.C. 1991 77,000 77,000 87.5%
Bethesda Crescent Bethesda, MD 1987 263,000 263,000 100.0%
Plaza West Bethesda, MD 1965 99,000 99,000 100.0%
Twinbrook Metro Plaza Rockville, MD 1986 165,000 165,000 100.0%
Silver Spring Metro Plaza Silver Spring, MD 1986 702,000 702,000 80.7%
Silver Spring Centre Silver Spring, MD 1987 216,000 216,000 91.9%
Goddard Corporate Park Lanham, MD 1993 203,000 203,000 100.0%
Hanover Office Park (2) Greenbelt, MD 1987 16,000 16,000 100.0%
Beaumeade Corporate Park Washington, D.C. 1990/98/2000 460,000 460,000 100.0%
Rosslyn Gateway Arlington, VA 1970 250,000 250,000 97.9%
Two Ballston Plaza Arlington, VA 1988 222,000 222,000 100.0%
1550 Wilson Boulevard Arlington, VA 1983 133,000 133,000 95.8%
1560 Wilson Boulevard Arlington, VA 1987 127,000 127,000 95.6%
Reston Unisys Reston, VA 1980 238,000 238,000 100.0%
One Reston Place Reston, VA 2000 184,000 184,000 99.8%
Sunrise Tech Park Reston, VA 1983/85 312,000 312,000 83.6%
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total - Washington, D.C. Area (22 properties) 5,014,000 5,014,000 95.4%
Secondary Markets
Charlotte
Bank of America Plaza Charlotte, NC 1974 876,000 876,000 99.2%
First Citizens Plaza Charlotte, NC 1985 454,000 454,000 97.5%
Perimeter Woods Charlotte, NC 1991/98 314,000 314,000 80.3%
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total - Charlotte (3 properties) 1,644,000 1,644,000 95.2%
Minneapolis
Northstar Center Minneapolis, MN 1916/62/86 813,000 813,000 97.1%
Minnesota Center Minneapolis, MN 1987 289,000 289,000 95.2%
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total - Minneapolis (2 properties) 1,102,000 1,102,000 96.6%
Pittsburgh
Gateway Center Pittsburgh, PA 1952/60 1,450,000 1,450,000 87.9%
St. Louis
Metropolitan Square St. Louis, MO 1989 1,051,000 1,051,000 94.0%
St. Louis Place St. Louis, MO 1983 337,000 337,000 80.9%
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total - St. Louis (2 properties) 1,388,000 1,388,000 90.8%
Other
New Center One (67%) Detroit, MI 1983 496,000 331,000 85.1%
250 West Pratt Street Baltimore, MD 1986 362,000 362,000 96.5%
Bank of America Plaza Columbia, SC 1989 302,000 302,000 91.6%
1441 Main Street Columbia, SC 1988 264,000 264,000 93.7%
1333 Main Street Columbia, SC 1983 217,000 217,000 95.2%
Borden Building Columbus, OH 1974 569,000 569,000 93.5%
34
Year of Owned Occupancy
completion/ Total area area Weighted on
Name (Ownership) Location renovation (sq. ft.) (sq. ft.) Owned Area
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Clark Tower Memphis, TN 1973/97 648,000 648,000 93.4%
Capital Center II & III Sacramento, CA 1984/85 541,000 541,000 100.0%
Williams Center I & II Tulsa, OK 1982/83 770,000 770,000 92.1%
Esperante Office Building West Palm Beach, FL 1989 247,000 247,000 84.7%
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total - Other (10 properties) 4,416,000 4,251,000 93.1%
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total (76 properties) 48,862,000 41,323,000 94.3%
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) We hold a subordinated mortgage and option to purchase the property and we
are the residual beneficiary of the trust that owns the property. In
addition, we have responsibility for property management and leasing.
Accordingly, the property is excluded from operating statistics other than
aggregate square footage calculations.
(2) Excludes condominium ownership.
Office Development Properties
The following table sets forth key information as of December 31, 2001
with respect to our office properties under development. The economic interest
of our owning entity is 100% unless otherwise noted.
Total Total Pro Rata
Project Name area Owned area Cost Cost
(Ownership) Location Completion (sq. ft.) (sq. ft.) ($ mil.) ($ mil.) Occupancy Leased
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
One Alliance Center Buckhead, GA Oct. 2001 560,000 560,000 100 100 47% 75%
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Retail/Entertainment Properties
Operating and Development Properties - Held for Disposition
The following table sets forth key information as of December 31, 2001
with respect to the retail/entertainment properties that we are holding for
disposition. The economic interest of our owning entity is 100% unless otherwise
noted.
Total
area Owned area
Project Name (Ownership) Location Completion (sq. ft.) (sq. ft.) Occupancy Leased
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Desert Passage Las Vegas, NV Aug. 2000 475,000 475,000 74% 78%
Paseo Colorado (1) Pasadena, CA Sept. 2001 565,000 410,000 84% 93%
Hollywood & Highland
Retail Los Angeles, CA Nov. 2001 645,000 645,000 72% 88%
Hotel (91%) (2) Los Angeles, CA Dec. 2001 600,000 546,000 n/a n/a
-------------------------------------------------
1,245,000 1,191,000
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Projects (3 projects) 2,285,000 2,076,000 76% 86%
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) Includes 155,000 square feet owned directly by department store anchor.
Leasing status excludes this space.
(2) Economic ownership interest at December 31, 2001 is 84.5%. It is
expected that our economic ownership interest will increase to 91% as a
consequence of our joint venture partner's conversion of $5 million of
equity into debt.
35
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
We are contingently liable under guarantees that are issued in the
normal course of business and with respect to litigation and claims that arise
from time to time. While we cannot predict with certainty the final outcome with
respect to pending claims and litigation, in our opinion any liability that may
arise from such contingencies would not have a material adverse effect on our
combined consolidated financial position, results of operations or liquidity.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
During the fourth quarter of 2001, matters were submitted to a vote of
our security holders on two occasions. On December 3, 2001, our then sole
stockholder, TrizecHahn Corporation's Hungarian subsidiary, approved by written
consent our second amended and restated certificate of incorporation and a
recapitalization agreement between such Hungarian subsidiary and us. On December
20, 2001, TrizecHahn Corporation's Hungarian subsidiary, which then held
38,000,000 shares of our common stock, approved by written consent our third
amended and restated certificate of incorporation. We did not solicit consents
with respect to this matter from holders of the remaining 220,000 shares of our
common stock outstanding at such time
PART II
Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters
Market for Our Common Stock
There is no established public trading market for our common stock. As
at March 1, 2002, there were 102 holders of our common stock.
We expect that our common stock, some of which may be represented by
xchange certificates, will be listed and traded on the New York Stock Exchange
on the effective date of the corporate reorganization. The New York Stock
Exchange has authorized the listing of our common stock and exchange
certificates under the symbols "TRZ" and "XTR," respectively.
Dividend Policy
Prior to the effective date of the corporate reorganization, we will
have always been an indirect, substantially wholly owned subsidiary of a larger
corporation, TrizecHahn Corporation. In the first quarter of 2002, TrizecHahn
Corporation shareholders are expected to receive a dividend of $0.0875 per
share. This expected dividend distribution is based on an aggregate dividend of
$0.35 per share expected to be paid on our common stock and on TrizecHahn
Corporation shares in 2002, which is the same as the dividend paid on TrizecHahn
Corporation shares in 2001. After completion of the corporate reorganization, we
expect to make three quarterly dividend distributions of $0.0875 per share to
holders of our common stock in the final three quarters of 2002. Commencing in
the first quarter of 2003 and thereafter, we intend to make distributions to the
holders of our common stock and special voting stock in an amount that is at
least equal to the minimum amount required to maintain REIT status each year
through regular quarterly dividends. We are required to distribute at least 90%
of our net taxable income each year, excluding capital gains, to our
stockholders in order to retain REIT status.
Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
Except as described below, there were no securities sold by the
registrant in 2001 that were not registered under the Securities Act.
On May 17, 2001, a special-purpose vehicle created by one of our
subsidiaries issued commercial mortgage pass-through certificates for $1.44
billion. Goldman, Sachs & Co. and Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated acted as
co-lead managers and joint bookrunners with respect to the certificates. The
certificates were issued to six investment banks, including Goldman, Sachs & Co.
and Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated, as the initial purchasers. This issuance
of certificates was exempt from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the
Securities Act and the rules and regulations promulgated under the Securities
Act on the basis that the transaction did not involve a
36
public offering. The certificates were eligible for resale by the initial
purchasers in the United States to qualified institutional buyers pursuant to
Rule 144A under the Securities Act and to institutional accredited investors
within the meaning of Rule 501(a)(1), (2), (3) or (7) under the Securities Act,
or outside the United States in accordance with Regulation S under the
Securities Act.
On December 3, 2001, we issued 357.6 shares of our common stock to an
indirect, wholly owned Hungarian subsidiary of TrizecHahn Corporation in
exchange for the delivery for cancellation to us of all previously outstanding
Series A convertible preferred stock in connection with the exercise of
conversion rights. The exemption from registration was pursuant to Section 4(2)
of the Securities Act and the rules and regulations promulgated under the
Securities Act on the basis that the transaction did not involve a public
offering.
On December 3, 2001, we issued 100 shares of our special voting stock,
100,000 shares of our Class F convertible stock and 38,000,000 shares of our
common stock to TrizecHahn Corporation's indirect Hungarian subsidiary in
exchange for the delivery for cancellation to us of all previously outstanding
common stock in connection with a recapitalization of our company. The exemption
from registration was pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act and the
rules and regulations promulgated under the Securities Act on the basis that the
transaction did not involve a public offering.
On December 11, 2001, we issued 180,000 shares of our common stock to
TrizecHahn Corporation in consideration for the contribution to us of all
outstanding shares of 823 Inc. common stock and the assignment to us of all
indebtedness of 823 Inc. to TrizecHahn Corporation. The exemption from
registration was pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act and the rules
and regulations promulgated under the Securities Act on the basis that the
transaction did not involve a public offering.
On December 28, 2001, we issued 376,500 shares of our Class C
convertible preferred stock to TrizecHahn Corporation's indirect Hungarian
subsidiary for aggregate cash proceeds of $414,150,000 and 4 shares of our Class
C convertible preferred stock to a minority shareholder of our common stock for
aggregate cash proceeds of $4,400. The exemption from registration was pursuant
to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act and the rules and regulations promulgated
under the Securities Act on the basis that the transactions did not involve a
public offering.
Terms of Conversion of Recently Issued Unregistered Convertible Securities
Holders of shares of Class C convertible preferred stock may at their
option convert all or part of their shares of Class C convertible preferred
stock into common stock at any time after April 1, 2002. Each share of Class C
convertible preferred stock shall be convertible into such number of shares of
our common stock equal to $1,100 divided by the fair market value of one share
of our common stock at the time of conversion, which is to be determined by our
board of directors.
Shares of our Class F convertible stock are convertible into shares of
our common stock in connection with certain triggering events that generally
relate to FIRPTA tax liability. If and to the extent that TrizecHahn
Corporation, Trizec Canada Inc. or their subsidiaries dispose of shares of our
stock at a time when that sale is not exempt from U.S. tax because we are not
then a "domestically-controlled REIT," TrizecHahn Corporation, Trizec Canada
Inc. and their subsidiaries will incur FIRPTA tax with respect to the gain
realized on such disposition. Holders of the Class F convertible stock will be
entitled to convert shares of Class F convertible stock into shares of our
common stock, in most cases on the business day following delivery of a
conversion notice to us, in connection with any of the following conversion
triggering events:
o FIRPTA tax is payable in connection with a disposition of our
capital stock pursuant to the corporate reorganization;
o FIRPTA tax is payable in connection with major corporate
transactions or events, such as mergers, requiring the approval
of a specified portion of our common stockholders or the
tendering of a specified portion of our common stock to effect
those transactions or events, where they occur within 66 months
following the effective date of the corporate reorganization;
o FIRPTA tax is payable in connection with a disposition of shares
of our capital stock by Trizec Canada Inc. or its subsidiaries
within a three-month period following the 63rd month after the
corporate
37
reorganization, and prior to such disposition we were unable to
deliver certification stating that we are a
"domestically-controlled REIT" at such time or we provided such
certification but FIRPTA tax is nevertheless payable on such
disposition;
o FIRPTA tax is payable in connection with a disposition of shares
of our capital stock by Trizec Canada Inc. or its subsidiaries
within a 60-month period following the 66th month after the
corporate reorganization, which shares were held by Trizec Canada
Inc. or its subsidiaries on the 66th-month anniversary of the
corporate reorganization; provided that in connection with a
disposition of our capital stock by Trizec Canada Inc. or its
subsidiaries in the three-month period following the 63rd month
after the corporate reorganization, we were unable to deliver
certification stating that we were a "domestically-controlled
REIT" at such time or we provided such certification but FIRPTA
tax was nevertheless payable on such disposition; and
o a FIRPTA tax liability is asserted by the Internal Revenue
Service but is disputed by the relevant taxpayer and such
taxpayer wishes to prepay the disputed amount pending resolution
of the dispute but is unable to finance on commercial terms such
prepayment and any associated taxes or costs; provided, however,
that following the settlement of the dispute the relevant
taxpayer will refund to us any amount that is in excess of such
taxpayer's FIRPTA tax liability plus any costs associated with
the dispute.
In order to convert a share of Class F convertible stock, the holder
must give a notice to us within 21 days after the occurrence of the relevant
conversion triggering event. In most circumstances, a sale of shares of our
common stock by Trizec Canada Inc. or its subsidiaries in the 63-month period
following the corporate reorganization will not entitle a holder to convert any
shares of Class F convertible stock into shares of our common stock. Based on
all of the facts and circumstances, we do not expect that TrizecHahn
Corporation, Trizec Canada Inc. or their subsidiaries will incur a material
amount of FIRPTA tax in connection with any of the transfers made as part of the
corporate reorganization. Furthermore, we are not currently planning to
undertake any transactions or events after the corporate reorganization that
would allow for the conversion of our Class F convertible stock. In addition,
based on all of the facts and circumstances, we expect to qualify as a
"domestically-controlled REIT" 63 months after the effective date of the
corporate reorganization.
Upon conversion, a holder of Class F convertible stock will generally
be entitled to a number of shares of our common stock such that the after-tax
proceeds from the sale thereof would equal the amount of the FIRPTA tax
incurred, plus any costs or penalties associated therewith. In the event that
our Class F convertible stock is convertible because FIRPTA tax is payable in
connection with a disposition of our stock in the 60-month period following the
66th month after the corporate reorganization as described above, the aggregate
number of shares of our common stock that may be received by the holder of our
Class F convertible stock pursuant to such conversions would be subject to a
limit based on a fixed amount of FIRPTA tax. Specifically, the aggregate number
of shares received will be limited so that the aggregate after-tax proceeds from
any sale thereof will not exceed the amount of FIRPTA tax that would have been
payable had all such shares been sold at the end of the 66th month after the
corporate reorganization. For the purposes of determining a holder's conversion
entitlement, the fair market value of our common stock will be calculated as
follows:
o Where common stock is sold before the conversion date to fund
applicable taxes or costs, the fair market value of our common
stock will be determined by the weighted average prices realized
on sales of our common stock, less costs associated with such
sales.
o Otherwise, the fair market value of our common stock will be
determined by the weighted average trading price of our common
stock on the day the conversion notice was delivered.
If we disagree with the calculation of the number of shares of common
stock resulting from conversion, we will be entitled to dispute the calculation
in arbitration proceedings.
38
Item 6. Selected Financial Data
The following financial data are derived from our audited combined
consolidated financial statements. The financial data set forth below should be
read in conjunction with "Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and our combined consolidated
financial statements and notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this Form 10-K.
The combined consolidated financial statements present all of
TrizecHahn Corporation's U.S. holdings, substantially all of which are owned and
operated by Trizec Properties, Inc., TrizecHahn Developments Inc. and their
respective consolidated subsidiaries. The combined entities and their
subsidiaries are under the common control of TrizecHahn Corporation and have
been presented utilizing the historical cost basis of TrizecHahn Corporation.
Years Ended December 31,
--------------------------------------------------------------
2001 2000 1999 1998 1997
--------------------------------------------------------------
(unaudited)
(in millions)
Operating Data:
Revenues:
Rental, parking and other...................... $ 912.3 $ 870.5 $ 801.7 $ 524.0 $ 326.9
--------------------------------------------------------------
Total revenues................................. 928.0 879.0 808.8 536.6 331.7
--------------------------------------------------------------
Expenses:
Operating and property taxes................... (378.9) (355.6) (333.9) (222.1) (152.3)
General and administrative..................... (25.9) (18.4) (16.7) (9.0) (9.1)
Interest....................................... (152.7) (265.7) (235.0) (160.9) (86.9)
Depreciation and amortization.................. (161.1) (154.1) (133.4) (70.6) (43.1)
Reorganization costs........................... (15.9) (6.7) (5.0) - -
Loss from securities investments
and derivatives............................. (15.9) - - - -
--------------------------------------------------------------
Total expenses................................. (750.4) (800.5) (724.0) (462.6) (291.4)
--------------------------------------------------------------
Income before allocation to minority interest,
income from unconsolidated real estate joint
ventures, real estate gain (loss), income
taxes, extraordinary item and effect of change
in accounting principle........................ 177.6 78.5 84.8 74.0 40.3
Minority interest................................ 0.4 0.6 1.5 1.1 -
Income from unconsolidated real estate joint
ventures....................................... 12.9 19.4 16.2 40.6 31.9
Real estate gain (loss).......................... (307.0) 33.2 (41.4) 535.0 1.9
(Provision for) benefit from income taxes........ (13.8) 252.8 (22.8) (248.4) (28.2)
Effect of change in accounting principle
and extraordinary item......................... (22.6) (1.5) - - -
--------------------------------------------------------------
Net income (loss)................................ $ (152.5) $ 383.0 $ 38.3 $ 402.3 $ 45.9
==============================================================
39
Years Ended December 31,
--------------------------------------------------------------
2001 2000 1999 1998 1997
--------------------------------------------------------------
(unaudited)
(in millions)
Combined Balance Sheet Data (at end of period):
Real estate, net of accumulated depreciation..... $ 4,960.4 $ 4,578.8 $ 4,734.4 $ 4,051.8 $ 1,999.6
Cash and cash equivalents........................ 297.4 70.2 80.4 78.6 72.7
Investment in unconsolidated real estate joint
ventures...................................... 289.2 384.0 342.0 305.1 738.9
Total assets..................................... 6,096.4 5,564.0 5,541.3 5,017.4 3,030.4
Mortgage debt and other loans.................... 3,017.8 2,326.9 2,587.2 2,257.7 1,368.4
Total liabilities................................ 3,661.0 2,917.2 4,011.4 3,149.5 1,564.8
Owner's equity................................... 2,435.4 2,646.8 1,529.9 1,867.9 1,465.6
Cash Flow Information:
Cash provided by (used for) operating activities. $ 462.9 $ 113.1 $ 490.7 $ (186.0) $ 142.7
Cash provided by (used for) investing activities. $ (597.0) $ (52.7) $ (873.2) $ (992.3) $ (155.1)
Cash provided by (used for) financing activities. $ 361.3 $ (70.6) $ 384.3 $ 1,184.0 $ 42.1
Other Data:
Number of office properties...................... 76 77 89 87 33
Net rentable square feet of office properties (in
millions)..................................... 48.9 49.8 52.0 48.0 27.9
Occupancy of office properties weighted on owned
area.......................................... 94.3% 94.2% 91.4% 90.4% 87.4%
Office property operating income (1) (5)......... $ 511.2 $ 508.2 $ 463.4 $ 265.4 $ 113.6
==============================================================
Office property operating income including pro rata
joint venture share (2) (5)................... $ 564.5 $ 558.4 $ 513.1 $ 310.9 $ 147.7
==============================================================
Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and
amortization (3) (5).......................... $ 580.8 $ 565.2 $ 513.1 $ 427.5 $ 292.3
============ =========== ============ ============ ===========
Funds from operations (4) (5).................... $ 360.5 $ 250.3 $ 242.1 $ 198.4 $ 139.0
============ =========== ============ ============ ===========
- ------------------------
(1) Office property operating income is defined as total rental revenue
including tenant recoveries and parking, fee and other income less
operating expenses and property taxes of our office portfolio. Office
property operating income is presented because this data is used by
some investors to evaluate the performance of, and to determine the
estimated fair market value of our office property portfolio. We
consider office property operating income to be an indicative measure
of our operating performance due to the significance of our office
property portfolio to our overall results, and because this data can be
used to evaluate our ability to effectively manage our portfolio.
However, this data should not be considered as an alternative to net
income, operating profit, cash flows from operations or any other
operating or liquidity performance measure prescribed by GAAP. In
addition, our definition and calculation of office property operating
income may not be comparable to similarly titled measures reported by
other companies. General and administrative, interest, taxes,
depreciation and amortization expenses, which are not reflected in the
presentation of office property operating income, have been, and will
be, incurred by us. Investors are cautioned that these excluded items
are significant components in understanding and assessing our financial
performance.
(2) Office property operating income including pro rata joint venture share
is defined as total rental revenue including tenant recoveries and
parking, fee and other income less operating expenses and property
taxes plus our pro rata share of property net operating income from
unconsolidated real estate joint ventures. Office property operating
income
40
including our pro rata joint venture share is presented because this
data is used by some investors to evaluate the performance of, and to
determine the estimated fair market value of our office property
portfolio. We consider office property operating income including pro
rata joint venture share to be an indicative measure of our operating
performance due to the significance of our office property portfolio to
our overall results, and because this data can be used to evaluate our
ability to effectively manage our portfolio. However, this data should
not be considered as an alternative to net income, operating profit,
cash flows from operations or any other operating or liquidity
performance measure prescribed by GAAP. In addition, our definition and
calculation of office property operating income including pro rata
joint venture share may not be comparable to similarly titled measures
reported by other companies. General and administrative, interest,
taxes, depreciation and amortization expenses, which are not reflected
in the presentation of office property operating income, have been, and
will be incurred by us. Investors are cautioned that these excluded
items are significant components in understanding and assessing our
financial performance.
(3) Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization is
defined as net income excluding interest expense, reorganization costs,
loss from securities investments and derivatives, income taxes,
depreciation and amortization, minority interest allocation, real
estate gain (loss), extraordinary items, effect of change in accounting
principle and income from investment in real estate joint ventures plus
our share of the earnings before interest, income taxes, depreciation
and amortization for the unconsolidated real estate ventures. Earnings
before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization is presented
because we believe this data is used by some investors to evaluate our
ability to meet debt service requirements. We consider earnings before
interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization to be an indicative
measure of our operating performance due to the significance of our
long-lived assets and because this data can be used to measure our
ability to service debt, fund capital expenditures and expand our
business. However, this data should not be considered as an alternative
to net income, operating profit, cash flows from operations or any
other operating or liquidity performance measure prescribed by GAAP. In
addition, earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and
amortization as calculated by us may not be comparable to similarly
titled measures reported by other companies. Interest, taxes and
depreciation and amortization, which are not reflected in the
presentation of earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and
amortization, have been, and will be, incurred by us. Investors are
cautioned that these excluded items are significant components in
understanding and assessing our financial performance.
(4) The White Paper on Funds from Operations approved by the Board of
Governors of the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts,
or NAREIT, in March 1995 defines funds from operations as net income
(loss), computed in accordance with GAAP, excluding gains (or losses)
from debt restructuring and sales of properties, plus real estate
related depreciation and amortization and after adjustments for
unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. In November 1999,
NAREIT issued a National Policy Bulletin effective January 1, 2000
clarifying the definition of funds from operations to include all
operating results, both recurring and non-recurring, except those
defined as extraordinary under GAAP. We believe that funds from
operations is helpful to investors as a measure of the performance of
an equity REIT because, along with cash flows from operating
activities, financing activities and investing activities, it provides
investors with an indication of our ability to incur and service debt,
to make capital expenditures and to fund other cash needs. We compute
funds from operations in accordance with standards established by
NAREIT, which may not be comparable to funds from operations reported
by other REITs that do not define the term in accordance with the
current NAREIT definition or that interpret the current NAREIT
definition differently than we do. Funds from operations does not
represent cash generated from operating activities in accordance with
GAAP, nor does it represent cash available to pay distributions and
should not be considered as an alternative to net income, determined in
accordance with GAAP, as an indication of our financial performance or
to cash flows from operating activities, determined in accordance with
GAAP, as a measure of our liquidity, nor is it indicative of funds
available to fund our cash needs, including our ability to make cash
distributions. For a reconciliation of net income to funds from
operations, see "Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Funds from Operations"
in this information statement.
(5) The following table reconciles net income to funds from operations;
earnings before interest, taxes depreciation and amortization; office
property operating income including pro rata joint ventures share; and,
office property operating income.
41
Years Ended December 31,
---------------------------------------------------------------------
2001 2000 1999 1998 1997
------------- ------------- ------------- ------------ ------------
(unaudited)
(in millions)
Net income................................. $ (152.5) $ 383.0 $ 38.3 $ 402.3 $ 45.9
Add/(deduct):
Minority interest.......................... (0.4) (0.6) (1.5) (1.1) -
Income from unconsolidated real estate
joint ventures........................... (12.9) (19.4) (16.2) (40.6) (31.9)
Real estate (gain) loss.................... 307.0 (33.2) 41.4 (535.0) (1.9)
(Provision for) benefit from income taxes.. 13.8 (252.8) 22.8 248.4 28.2
Effect of change in accounting principle
and extraordinary item................... 22.6 1.5 - - -
------------- ------------- ------------- ------------ ------------
Income before allocation to minority
interest, income from unconsolidated real
estate joint ventures, real estate gain
(loss), income taxes, extraordinary item
and cumulative effect of a change in
accounting principle..................... 177.6 78.5 84.8 74.0 40.3
Add/(deduct):
Income from unconsolidated real estate
joint ventures........................... 12.9 19.4 16.2 40.6 31.9
Depreciation and amortization (real estate
related) including share of
unconsolidated real estate joint ventures 174.9 161.8 142.3 85.8 69.1
Current operating taxes.................... (4.9) (9.4) (1.2) (2.0) (2.3)
------------- ------------- ------------- ------------ ------------
Funds from operations...................... 360.5 250.3 242.1 198.4 139.0
Add:
Interest expense including share of
unconsolidated real estate joint ventures 180.5 295.4 262.3 222.5 149.2
Non real estate related depreciation and
amortization including share of
unconsolidated real estate joint ventures 3.1 3.4 2.5 4.6 1.8
Reorganization costs....................... 15.9 6.7 5.0 - -
Loss from securities investments and
derivatives.............................. 15.9 - - - -
Current operating taxes.................... 4.9 9.4 1.2 2.0 2.3
------------- ------------- ------------- ------------ ------------
Earnings before interest, taxes,
depreciation and amortization............ 580.8 565.2 513.1 427.5 292.3
Add/(deduct):
General and administrative expense......... 25.9 18.4 16.7 9.0 9.1
Interest income including share of
unconsolidated real estate joint ventures (17.2) (12.0) (9.6) (20.1) (7.6)
Retail portfolio property operating income
including share of unconsolidated real
estate joint ventures.................... (25.0) (13.2) (7.1) (105.5) (146.1)
------------- ------------- ------------- ------------ ------------
Office property operating income including
pro rata joint venture share............. 564.5 558.4 513.1 310.9 147.7
Deduct:
Share of unconsolidated real estate joint
ventures office property operating income (53.3) (50.2) (49.7) (45.5) (34.1)
------------- ------------- ------------- ------------ ------------
Office property operating income........... $ 511.2 $ 508.2 $ 463.4 $ 265.4 $ 113.6
============= ============= ============= ============ ============
42
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Consolidated Financial Data
Basis of Presentation for Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Consolidated
Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2001
TrizecHahn Corporation, our ultimate parent company, is currently
proposing a corporate reorganization. On completion of this corporate
reorganization, we expect to become a publicly traded real estate investment
trust, or REIT, and to own all of the U.S. assets that TrizecHahn Corporation
currently owns, directly or indirectly.
Appearing elsewhere in this Form 10-K are our combined consolidated
historical financial statements as of December 31, 2001. The organization
presented in those combined financial statements is not a legal entity; it is a
combination of all of the U.S. assets held directly or indirectly by TrizecHahn
Corporation.
The unaudited pro forma condensed combined consolidated balance sheet
gives effect to transactions up to and including the effective date of the
proposed corporate reorganization, which have either occurred or will probably
occur subsequent to December 31, 2001, as if they had occurred on December 31,
2001. In the opinion of management, all significant adjustments necessary to
reflect the effects of the corporate reorganization have been made.
The unaudited pro forma condensed combined consolidated balance sheet
is presented for comparative purposes only and is not necessarily indicative of
what our actual future combined position would be. This unaudited pro forma
combined consolidated balance sheet should be read in conjunction with, and is
qualified in its entirety by, our historical combined consolidated financial
statements and notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this Form 10-K.
43
Pro Forma Condensed Combined Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 2001
Historical Pro Forma
Condensed Pro Forma Condensed
Combined Adjustments Combined
Consolidated (Note 1) Consolidated
---------------- ----------------- --------------
(unaudited) (unaudited)
(in thousands)
Assets
Real estate, net.................................................... $ 4,960,447 $ 30,000 $ 4,990,447
Cash and cash equivalents/(bank overdraft).......................... 297,434 (361,341) (63,907)
Investment in unconsolidated real estate joint ventures............. 289,242 - 289,242
Loan receivable from Chelsfield plc................................. - 35,641 35,641
Other assets........................................................ 458,679 - 458,679
Advances to parent and affiliated companies......................... 90,633 (90,633) -
---------------- ----------------- --------------
Total assets........................................................ $ 6,096,435 $ (386,333) $ 5,710,102
================ ================= ==============
Liabilities and Owners' Equity
Mortgage debt and other loans....................................... $ 3,017,798 $ 215,500 $ 3,233,298
Other liabilities................................................... 342,057 - 342,057
Deferred income taxes............................................... 60,000 - 60,000
Advances from parent and affiliated companies....................... 236,619 (236,619) -
---------------- ----------------- --------------
Total liabilities................................................... 3,656,474 (21,119) 3,635,355
---------------- ----------------- --------------
Minority interest................................................... 4,386 - 4,386
---------------- ----------------- --------------
Redeemable Stock.................................................... 200 - 200
---------------- ----------------- --------------
Owners' Equity
THDI common stock .................................................. - - -
Trizec Properties common stock...................................... 382 1,113 1,495
Series B convertible preferred stock................................ 1,100,000 (1,100,000) -
Class C convertible preferred stock................................. 414,154 (414,154) -
Warrants............................................................ - 20,890 20,890
Additional paid-in capital.......................................... 922,844 1,132,266 2,055,110
Retained earnings................................................... 6,514 (2,765) 3,749
Unearned compensation............................................... (6,701) (2,564) (9,265)
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)....................... (1,818) - (1,818)
---------------- ----------------- --------------
Total Owners' Equity................................................ 2,435,375 (365,214) 2,070,161
---------------- ----------------- --------------
Total Liabilities and Owners' Equity................................ $ 6,096,435 $ (386,333) $ 5,710,102
================ ================= ==============
44
Notes to Pro Forma Condensed Combined Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December
31, 2001 (unaudited)
(dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
1. Transactions that are planned to occur prior to or at the effective
date of the corporate reorganization.
Distributions
-------------
a. Prior to the effective date of the corporate reorganization,
Trizec Properties is expected to pay a cash dividend on its
Series B convertible preferred stock, Class C convertible
preferred stock and common stock representing its estimated 2002
taxable income and additional cash required by TrizecHahn
Corporation to complete the corporate reorganization. The
aggregate dividend is currently estimated to be approximately
$601,833. In addition, at that time, TrizecHahn Corporation will
repay its intercompany advance from Trizec Properties in the
amount of $90,633. This results in an estimated net distribution
of approximately $511,200. The final net distribution may vary
from this estimate.
This dividend of $601,833 has been charged to additional paid-in
capital, with $386,333 estimated to be funded from cash and cash
equivalents and the remaining $215,500 from our revolving credit
facility. The ultimate amount to be borrowed under the revolving
credit facility will be determined by such variables as the
actual amount of the dividend and the actual cash position of
Trizec Properties at the time the dividend is paid.
Stock Transactions and Inter-Company Transfers
----------------------------------------------
b. Prior to the effective date of the corporate reorganization,
TrizecHahn Corporation will contribute to Trizec Properties all
retail and entertainment assets that were owned by TrizecHahn
Developments Inc., or THDI. To effect the contribution,
TrizecHahn Corporation will contribute all issued and outstanding
THDI common stock and inter-company debt owed to it of $236,619
in exchange for newly issued shares of Trizec Properties Class C
convertible preferred stock and Trizec Properties common stock.
Given that the assets contributed are already included in our
combined historical balance sheet, the only impact of this
transfer will be an increase in Class C convertible preferred
stock of $236,619 and a reduction in advances from parent and
affiliated companies of the same amount.
c. Prior to the effective date of the corporate reorganization,
TrizecHahn Corporation will transfer to Trizec Properties the 151
Front Street, Toronto, Ontario property for consideration of
$30,000 in cash. This value represents TrizecHahn Corporation's
carrying value as at December 31, 2001. As a result, cash has
been reduced by $30,000 and real estate, net has been increased
by $30,000.
d. TrizecHahn Corporation expects to complete a sale of its interest
in Global Switch S.a.r.l. prior to the effective date of the
corporate reorganization. On March 4, 2002 Trizec Properties
advanced to TrizecHahn Corporation (pound) 25,000 ($35,641) to
fund TrizecHahn Corporation's loan commitment to Chelsfield plc
in connection with the negotiation of the Global Switch sale. It
is expected that once TrizecHahn Corporation has completed its
sale, it will transfer to Trizec Properties any shares of
Chelsfield plc or amounts receivable from Chelsfield plc prior to
the effective date of the corporate reorganization in
consideration for shares of Trizec Properties stock and repayment
of this intercompany advance. At December 31, 2001, TrizecHahn
Corporation's carrying value of its joint venture in Global
Switch was $39,500. The ultimate value of the consideration
Trizec Properties will pay for the transferred assets will vary
based on a number of factors including the value of any
Chelsfield plc share consideration that may be received at the
time of the Global Switch sale. Only the intercompany advance and
planned subsequent settlement, by transfer of the loan receivable
from Chelsfield plc, have been given pro forma effect. As a
result, cash has been reduced by $35,641 and loan receivable from
Chelsfield plc has increased by $35,641, on the assumption that
the full (pound) 25,000 will be drawn by Chelsfield, plc.
e. While we do not know the intention of the minority shareholder
which holds four shares of Trizec Properties Class C convertible
preferred stock, it is assumed for the purpose of this pro forma
presentation that prior to the effective date of the corporate
reorganization all of the Trizec Properties
45
Series B convertible preferred stock and Class C convertible
preferred stock will be converted into Trizec Properties common
stock. As a result, Series B convertible preferred stock and
Class C convertible preferred stock have been reduced by
$1,100,000 and $650,773 respectively with an offsetting increase
to additional paid-in capital.
As part of the corporate reorganization, Trizec Properties will
modify the number of its issued and outstanding shares of common
stock such that the number of its issued and outstanding shares
of common stock held by a subsidiary of Trizec Canada Inc. and
TrizecHahn Corporation's Hungarian subsidiary will in aggregate
equal the number of issued and outstanding TrizecHahn Corporation
subordinate voting shares and multiple voting shares.
We have assumed that the following shares of stock will be
outstanding at the effective date of the corporate
reorganization:
o 149,543,948 shares of common stock; and
o 100 shares of special voting stock; and
o 100,000 shares of Class F convertible stock.
The estimated number of shares of Trizec Properties common stock
is based on the actual number of TrizecHahn Corporation
subordinate voting shares and multiple voting shares outstanding
as of February 28, 2002. The actual number of shares of common
stock will vary based on the actual number of TrizecHahn
Corporation subordinate voting and multiple voting shares
outstanding as of the effective date of the corporate
reorganization.
As a result of the above, $1,113 is reclassified from additional
paid-in capital to Trizec Properties common stock to reflect the
par value of the common stock outstanding.
f. All outstanding options to purchase shares of TrizecHahn
Corporation will be cancelled and replaced as part of the
corporate reorganization with either (1) options to purchase our
common stock, (2) warrants to purchase our common stock or (3)
options to purchase Trizec Canada Inc. subordinate voting shares.
Cancelled TrizecHahn Corporation options that are in respect of
services provided to Trizec Properties are to be replaced with
options to purchase our common stock. These options are measured
for accounting purposes based on their intrinsic value on the
date they are exchanged. Intrinsic value is the current market
value of the shares subject to an option or warrant less the
exercise price of each such option or warrant. Based on an
estimate of 8.6 million options to be issued, and using $15.95
per share, which is the closing price of TrizecHahn Corporation
subordinate voting shares on the New York Stock Exchange on
February 28, 2002, the intrinsic value of these options for the
purpose of this pro forma balance sheet has been estimated to be
$5,329. To the extent the options are already vested, the
intrinsic value of $2,765 will be expensed to reorganization
costs with an offsetting increase to additional paid-in capital.
This is reflected on the pro forma balance sheet as a decrease to
retained earnings. To the extent the options remain unvested, the
aggregate intrinsic value of $2,564 will result in an increase to
unearned compensation with an offsetting increase to additional
paid-in capital within owners' equity on the balance sheet. This
amount is then amortized to general and administrative expense
over the vesting period.
Cancelled TrizecHahn Corporation options not to be replaced as
described in the preceding paragraph are to be replaced with
warrants to purchase our common stock or with Trizec Canada Inc.
options. For any Trizec Canada Inc. options to be issued we will
issue a similar number of warrants to purchase our common stock.
All warrants to be issued are not for services rendered to Trizec
Properties. As such, for accounting purposes they are measured at
fair market value, and considered a deemed dividend by us. Based
on an estimate of 8.7 million warrants to be issued and using the
binomial option pricing model, the fair market value of these
warrants and the amount of the deemed dividend is $20,890. This
amount is based on a trading value of Trizec Properties common
stock of $15.95 per
46
share, which is the trading value of TrizecHahn Corporation
subordinate voting shares at February 28, 2002, and is based on
other assumptions required for the binomial option pricing model
considered by management to be reasonable.
The intrinsic values and fair market values used in these pro
forma financial statements are subject to change as the actual
amounts on the date of the corporate reorganization may vary due
to such variables as the initial trading value of the Trizec
Properties common stock, the actual number of options
outstanding, and possible different assumptions in the binomial
option pricing model.
47
Pro Forma Adjustment Summary
Balance Sheet
December 31, 2001
The above transactions described in Note 1 can be summarized as follows:
a. b. c. d. e. f. Total
----------- ------------ ----------- ----------- ------------ ----------- -----------
Balance sheet caption increase (decrease) in:
(in thousands)
Real estate, net - - 30,000 - - - 30,000
Cash and cash equivalents/(bank overdraft) (295,700) - (30,000) (35,641) - - (361,341)
Loan receivable from Chelsfield plc - - - 35,641 - - 35,641
Advances to parent & affiliated companies (90,633) - - - - - (90,633)
Mortgage debt and other loans 215,500 - - - - - 215,500
Advances from parent & affiliated companies - (236,619) - - - - (236,619)
Trizec Properties common stock - - - - 1,113 - 1,113
Series B convertible preferred stock - - - - (1,100,000) - (1,100,000)
Series C convertible preferred stock - 236,619 - - (650,773) - (414,154)
Warrants - - - - - 20,890 20,890
Additional paid-in capital (601,833) - - - 1,749,660 (15,561) 1,132,266
Retained earnings - - - - - (2,765) (2,765)
Unearned compensation - - - - - (2,564) (2,564)
48
Basis of Presentation for Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Consolidated
Statement of Operations for the Year Ended December 31, 2001
TrizecHahn Corporation, our ultimate parent company, is currently
proposing a corporate reorganization. Upon completion of this corporate
reorganization, we expect to become a publicly traded real estate investment
trust, or REIT, and to own all of the U.S. assets that TrizecHahn Corporation
currently owns, directly or indirectly.
Appearing elsewhere in this Form 10-K are our combined consolidated
historical financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2001. The
organization presented in those combined financial statements is not a legal
entity; it is a combination of all of the U.S. assets held directly or
indirectly by TrizecHahn Corporation.
The unaudited pro forma condensed combined consolidated statement of
operations for the year ended December 31, 2001 gives effect to transactions up
to and including the effective date of the proposed corporate reorganization,
which will probably occur subsequent to December 31, 2001, as if they had
occurred on January 1, 2001. In the opinion of management, all significant
adjustments necessary to reflect the effects of the corporate reorganization
have been made.
The unaudited pro forma condensed combined consolidated statement of
operations is presented for comparative purposes only and is not necessarily
indicative of what our actual future combined results of operations would be.
The unaudited pro forma condensed combined consolidated statement of operations
should be read in conjunction with, and are qualified in their entirety by, our
historical combined consolidated financial statements and notes thereto
appearing elsewhere in this Form 10-K.
49
Pro Forma Condensed Combined Consolidated Statement of Operations For the Year Ended
December 31, 2001
Historical Condensed
Condensed Pro Forma Combined
Combined Adjustments Consolidated
Consolidated (Note 1) Pro Forma
------------- ----------- ------------
(unaudited) (unaudited)
(in thousands except share and per share amounts)
Revenues:
Rental, parking and other .................................................. $ 912,274 $ $ 912,274
------------- ------------ --------------
Total revenues ............................................................. 927,951 927,951
------------- ------------ --------------
Expenses:
Operating and property taxes ............................................... 378,951 378,951
General and administrative ................................................. 25,854 1,052 26,906
Interest ................................................................... 152,759 26,846 179,605
Depreciation and amortization .............................................. 161,078 161,078
Reorganization costs ....................................................... 15,922 15,922
Loss from securities investments and derivatives ........................... 15,827 15,827
------------- ------------ --------------
Total expense ................................................................ 750,391 27,898 778,289
------------- ------------ --------------
Income before allocation to minority interest, income from
unconsolidated real estate joint ventures, real estate gain (loss),
income taxes, extraordinary item and effect of change in
accounting principle ....................................................... 177,560 (27,898) 149,662
Minority interest ............................................................ 433 433
Income from unconsolidated real estate joint ventures ........................ 12,952 12,952
Real estate gain (loss) ...................................................... (307,044) (307,044)
(Provision for) benefit from income taxes .................................... (13,795) (13,795)
------------- ------------ --------------
Income (loss) from continuing operations before effect of
extraordinary item and change in accounting principle ...................... $ (129,894) $ (27,898) $ (157,792)
============= ============ ==============
Income (loss) from continuing operations before effect of change in
accounting principle and extraordinary item per share - basic .............. $ (1.06)
==============
Weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding ................ 149,543,948
==============
Income (loss) from continuing operations before effect of change in
accounting principle and extraordinary item per share - diluted ............ $ (1.06)
==============
Weighted average number of shares of common stock and common stock
equivalents outstanding .................................................... 149,543,948
==============
50
Notes to Pro Forma Condensed Combined Consolidated Statement of Operations For
the Year Ended December 31, 2001 (unaudited) (dollars in thousands, except share
and per share amounts)
1. Transactions that are planned to occur prior to or at the effective date of
the corporate reorganization
a. Distributions that are planned to occur result in increased interest
expense on Trizec Properties's revolving credit facility and reduced
interest income on reduced cash balances. This results in a charge to
interest expense of $26,846 for the year ended December 31, 2001. This
charge reflects a weighted average blended interest rate of
approximately 4.65% for the year ended December 31, 2001.
The ultimate charge to interest expense will vary based on such
variables as the actual amount of the distributions, the actual amount
of borrowings required to fund the distributions, and such other
factors as interest rates at that time. If interest rates had increased
by 1/8% this would have resulted in additional pro forma annualized
interest expense of approximately $721.
b. Trizec Properties will incur compensation expense for the amortization,
over the vesting period, of the unearned compensation expense of the
unvested TrizecHahn Corporation options exchanged for our unvested
options. Based on an estimated intrinsic value, this results in a
charge to general and administrative expense of $1,052 for the year
ended December 31, 2001. The actual amortization will vary based on the
intrinsic value of the stock options on the effective date of the
corporate reorganization.
2. Material non-recurring transactions directly attributable to the corporate
reorganization
The following non-recurring transaction is directly attributable to the
corporate reorganization and will result in a charge in our statement of
operations. This non-recurring transaction is not reflected in the pro forma
condensed combined consolidated statement of operations.
Trizec Properties will incur compensation expense for the vested options of
TrizecHahn Corporation that are to be exchanged for our vested options. This
will result in a charge of $2,765 to reorganization costs based on the
estimated intrinsic value. This amount will vary based on the intrinsic
value of the stock options on the effective date of the corporate
reorganization.
In addition, no pro forma adjustments have been presented to reflect the
operations of 151 Front St., Toronto, Ontario as it is held for near term
disposition.
3. Earnings per share
As part of the corporate reorganization, Trizec Properties will modify the
number of its issued and outstanding shares of common stock such that the
number of its issued and outstanding shares of common stock held by a
subsidiary of Trizec Canada Inc. and TrizecHahn Corporation's Hungarian
subsidiary will in aggregate equal the number of issued and outstanding
TrizecHahn Corporation subordinate voting shares and multiple voting shares.
We have assumed for the purposes of the pro forma presentation that this
will result in approximately 149,543,948 shares of common stock. This number
is based on the number of voting shares of TrizecHahn Corporation
outstanding on February 28, 2002. The number of shares actually issued will
differ from this amount based on the actual number of TrizecHahn Corporation
voting shares on the effective date of the corporate reorganization.
Unaudited basic and diluted income from continuing operations before effect
of change in accounting principle and extraordinary item per share have been
computed by dividing income from continuing operations before effect of
change in accounting principle and extraordinary item by the number of
voting shares of TrizecHahn Corporation outstanding at February 28, 2002.
All Trizec Properties common stock equivalents at February 28, 2002 that are
expected to be outstanding at the effective date of the corporate
reorganization were considered for the purposes of determining dilutive
shares outstanding.
51
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations
The following should be read in conjunction with "Forward-Looking
Statements" and our combined consolidated financial statements and notes thereto
appearing elsewhere in this Form 10-K.
Overview
We will be the second largest fully integrated, self-managed, publicly
traded office company in the United States based on the square footage of our
owned and managed properties as of December 31, 2001, according to our internal
estimates that are based on publicly available information about our competitors
as of February 15, 2002. We are principally engaged in owning and managing
office properties in the United States. At December 31, 2001, we had total
assets of $6.1 billion and owned interests in or managed 76 office properties
containing approximately 49 million square feet, with our pro rata ownership
interest totaling approximately 41 million square feet. Based on square footage,
approximately 77% of our buildings are located in central business districts, or
CBDs, of major U.S. cities, including Atlanta, Chicago, Dallas and Houston and
the Los Angeles, New York and Washington, D.C. areas, and approximately 76% of
our buildings are Class A. We consider Class A office buildings to be buildings
that are professionally managed and maintained, that attract high-quality
tenants and command upper-tier rental rates and that are modern structures or
have been modernized to compete with newer buildings.
We are also completing the stabilization of three destination-oriented
retail and entertainment centers, all of which are in operation. We intend to
complete the leasing of these projects to achieve stable operating cash flows
and then to dispose of these assets in an orderly fashion over the next several
years.
At the end of 2000, we decided to be taxed as a real estate investment
trust, or REIT, for U.S. federal income tax purposes commencing in 2001. As a
REIT we generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax if we
distribute 100% of our taxable income and comply with a number of organizational
and operational requirements.
Our goal is to increase stockholder value through sustained growth in
operating cash flows, thereby increasing the value of our portfolio. In the near
term, we believe we can accomplish our goal through the following strategies:
o intensively managing our properties and our portfolio;
o improving the efficiency and productivity of our operations; and
o maintaining a prudent and flexible capital plan.
Our portfolio strategy is to invest in office properties in the CBDs of
major metropolitan areas demonstrating high job growth, allowing us to achieve
economies of scale across a diverse base of tenants that provide for sustainable
property cash flows.
Critical Accounting Policies
The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of
operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been
prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. The
preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and
judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, revenues
and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the
date of our financial statements. Actual results may differ from these estimates
under different assumptions or conditions.
52
Critical accounting policies are defined as those that involve
significant judgment and potentially result in materially different results
under different assumptions and conditions. We believe the following critical
accounting policies are affected by our more significant judgments and estimates
used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements. For a detailed
description on the application of these and other accounting policies, see Note
2 in the notes to our consolidated financial statements.
Real Estate
With respect to real estate assets classified as held for disposition,
the determination of such classification is based on our intention and ability
to sell these properties within a stated timeframe. Real estate assets held for
disposition are carried at the lower of their carrying values or estimated fair
value less costs to sell. Estimated fair value is determined based on
management's estimates of amounts that would be realized if the property were
offered for sale in the ordinary course of business assuming a reasonable sales
period and under normal market conditions. Fair values are determined using
valuation techniques including third party appraisals when considered
appropriate in the circumstances. Estimates of value include assumptions
concerning future property cash flows, disposal dates and expected purchaser
risk adjusted rates of return requirements. Different assumptions could result
in significantly higher or lower estimates of fair value than those determined
by management. In addition, changes in future market conditions could result in
ultimate sale proceeds varying significantly from those assumed by management
resulting in future gains or losses being recorded.
We evaluate the recoverability of our real estate assets held for the
long term and record an impairment charge when there is an indicator of
impairment and the undiscounted projected cash flows of the property are less
than the carrying amount. A decline in operating results for a particular
property could be an indicator of impairment and therefore require a charge to
income in the future.
Investments
Investments in non-real estate assets consist primarily of marketable
equity securities and certain mortgages receivable, the most significant being
our mortgage receivable investment in the Sears Tower. The disclosure of fair
value of the Sears Tower mortgage receivable is based on estimated future cash
flows, expected risk adjusted rates of return and other factors, all of which
are subject to uncertainty. Accordingly, other fair values are possible.
We review, on a regular basis but not less than annually, or when
events or circumstances occur, for impairment to our mortgages receivable.
Impairment is recognized when the carrying values of the mortgages receivable
will not be recovered either as a result of the inability of the underlying
assets' performance to meet the contractual debt service terms of the underlying
debt and the fair values of the collateral assets are insufficient to cover the
obligations and encumbrances, including the carrying values of the mortgages
receivable, in a sale between unrelated parties in the normal course of
business. When a mortgage is considered impaired, an impairment charge is
measured based on the present value of the expected future cash flows discounted
at the effective rate of the mortgage or if the cash flows cannot be predicted
with reasonable reliability, then the impaired mortgage is valued at the fair
value of the underlying collateral. These estimates of future cash flow and fair
values could vary and result in a significantly different assessment of
impairment.
Revenue Recognition
Estimates are used to establish amounts receivable from tenants for
such things as common area maintenance, real estate taxes and other cost
recoveries. In addition, an estimate is made with respect to our provision for
allowance for doubtful accounts receivable. The allowance for doubtful accounts
reflects our estimate of the amounts of the recorded accounts receivable at the
balance sheet date that will not be realized from cash receipts in subsequent
periods. If cash receipts in subsequent periods vary from our estimates, or if
our tenants' financial condition deteriorates as a result of operating
difficulties, additional provisions to increase the allowance may be required.
53
Income Taxes
Historically, prior to electing REIT status, as part of the process of
preparing our consolidated financial statements we estimated our income tax
expense and required liabilities. This process involved us estimating our
current tax expense taking into consideration our tax planning strategies.
Significant judgment is required by us in determining our estimated deferred tax
liability, and ultimate liabilities for income taxes could be different from the
amounts recorded.
Results of Operations
The following discussion is based on our combined consolidated
financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999.
The combined consolidated financial statements present all of
TrizecHahn Corporation's U.S. holdings, substantially all of which are owned and
operated by Trizec Properties and TrizecHahn Developments Inc., TrizecHahn
Corporation's two primary U.S. operating and development companies. The combined
entities and their subsidiaries are under the common control of TrizecHahn
Corporation and have been presented utilizing the historical cost basis of
TrizecHahn Corporation.
We have had significant acquisition and disposition activity in our
property portfolio over the last three years. The table that follows is a
summary of our acquisition and disposition activity from January 1, 1999 to
December 31, 2001 and reflects our total portfolio at December 31, 2001. The
buildings and total square feet shown include properties that we own in joint
ventures with other partners and reflect the total square footage of the
properties and the square footage owned by us based on our pro rata economic
ownership in the respective joint venture or managed property.
54
Office Retail/Entertainment
---------------------------------------- -------------------------------------
Pro rata Pro rata
Total Owned Total Owned
Properties as of: Properties Sq.Ft. Sq.Ft. Properties Sq.Ft. Sq.Ft.
---------- -------- ---------- ---------- -------- --------
(in thousands) (in thousands
December 31, 1998 87 48,054 39,796 -- -- --
Acquisitions 3 4,026 4,026 -- -- --
Dispositions (1) (97) (97) -- -- --
Developments placed on-stream -- -- -- 1 363 363
---------- -------- ---------- ---------- -------- --------
December 31, 1999 89 51,983 43,725 1 363 363
Acquisitions -- -- -- -- -- --
Dispositions (12) (3,058) (3,058) (1) (363) (363)
Developments and additional
space placed on-stream 1 678 678 1 475 475
Reclassification to held for
development (1) (245) (196) -- -- --
Re-measurement -- 473 367 -- -- --
---------- -------- ---------- ---------- -------- --------
December 31, 2000 77 49,831 41,516 1 475 475
Acquisitions 3 818 818 -- -- --
Dispositions (4) (1,937) (1,161) -- -- --
Additional space placed on-stream -- 150 150 3 1,810 1,601
---------- -------- ---------- ---------- -------- --------
December 31, 2001 76 48,862 41,323 4 2,285 2,076
========== ======== ========= ========== ======== ========
As a result of the significant acquisition and disposition activity,
the financial information presented shows significant changes in revenues and
expenses from period to period, and we do not believe our period to period
financial data in isolation are necessarily comparable. Accordingly, the
analysis that follows focuses on changes resulting from properties that we owned
for the entire time during both periods, which we refer to as our "comparable
portfolio," and the changes attributable to our total portfolio.
In the financial information that follows, property revenue includes
rental revenue, recoveries from tenants for certain expenses, fee income and
parking and other revenue. Property operating expenses include property
operating expenses and property taxes, and excludes depreciation and
amortization expense. Property operating income is defined as property revenues
less property operating expenses, before general and administrative expense,
depreciation and amortization, interest expense and income taxes.
55
Comparison of Year Ended December 31, 2001 to Year Ended December 31, 2000
The following is a table comparing our summarized operating results for
the periods, including other selected information.
Year Ended
December 31,
--------------------------- Increase/ %
2001 2000 (Decrease) Change
------------ ------------- ------------- -----------
(dollars in thousands)
Property revenues $ 912,274 $ 870,550 $ 41,724 4.8%
Interest income 15,677 8,480 7,197 84.9
------------ ------------- ------------- -----------
Total revenues 927,951 879,030 48,921 5.6
------------ ------------- ------------- -----------
Property operating expenses 378,951 355,658 23,293 6.5
General and administrative 25,854 18,429 7,425 40.3
Interest expense 152,759 265,680 (112,921) (42.5)
Depreciation and amortization 161,078 154,118 6,960 4.5
Reorganization costs 15,922 6,680 9,242 138.4
Losses from securities investments 15,371 - 15,371 -
Derivative losses 456 - 456 -
------------ ------------- ------------- -----------
Total expenses 750,391 800,565 (50,174) (6.3)
------------ ------------- ------------- -----------
Income before allocation to minority
interest, income from unconsolidated
real estate joint ventures, gain
(loss) on sale of real estate and
allowance for loss on properties
held for disposition, income taxes,
extraordinary item and cumulative
effect of a change in accounting
principle 177,560 78,465 99,095 126.3
Minority interest 433 580 (147) (25.3)
Income from unconsolidated real estate
joint ventures 12,952 19,417 (6,465) (33.3)
Gain (loss) on sale of real estate
and allowance for loss on
properties held for disposition (307,044) 33,185 (340,229) (1,025.2)
(Provision for) benefit from income
and other taxes (13,795) 252,840 (266,635) (105.5)
Extraordinary item (17,966) (1,491) (16,475) (1,105.0)
Cumulative effect of a change in
accounting principle (4,631) - (4,631)
------------ ------------- ------------- -----------
Net income $ (152,491) $ 382,996 $ (535,487) (139.8)%
============ ============= ============= ===========
Straight line rent adjustment $ 18,399 $ 24,458 $ (6,059) (24.8)%
============ ============= ============= ===========
Lease termination fees $ 21,217 $ 5,575 $ 15,544 274.0 %
============ ============= ============= ===========
56
The table below presents selected operating information for our total
portfolio and for our comparable portfolio of 71 office properties, which we
owned both at December 31, 2001 and 2000, and in each case for the full year.
Year Ended
December 31,
--------------------------- Increase/ %
2001 2000 (Decrease) Change
------------ ------------- -------------- -----------
(dollars in thousands)
Total Portfolio
Office
Property revenues $ 873,340 $ 858,552 $ 14,788 1.7%
Property operating expenses 362,148 350,334 11,814 3.4
------------ ------------- -------------- -----------
Property operating income $ 511,192 $ 508,218 $ 2,974 0.6%
============ ============= ============== ===========
Retail
Property revenues $ 38,934 $ 11,998 $ 26,936 224.5%
Property operating expenses 16,803 5,324 11,479 215.6
------------ ------------- -------------- -----------
Property operating income $ 22,131 $ 6,674 $ 15,457 231.6%
============ ============= ============== ===========
Comparable Portfolio
Office
Property revenues $ 812,302 $ 769,069 $ 43,233 5.6%
Property operating expenses 354,559 335,258 19,301 5.8
------------ ------------- -------------- -----------
Property operating income $ 457,743 $ 433,811 $ 23,932 5.5%
============ ============= ============== ===========
Income from unconsolidated real
estate joint ventures $ 15,776 $ 14,925 $ 851 5.7%
============ ============= ============== ===========
The supply of, and demand for, office space affect the performance of
our office property portfolio. Macroeconomic conditions, such as current and
expected trends in the economy, business and consumer confidence and employment
levels, drive this demand.
During the year, the U.S. economy continued to show weakness. According
to Cushman and Wakefield, the national CBD vacancy rate was 12.0% at December
31, 2001 up from 7.1% at year-end 2000. The overall national suburban vacancy
rate was 17.0% at year-end 2001, its highest level in seven years.
During the course of the year, the office space demand profile
continued to weaken as the manufacturing and high-tech sector slowdown spread
throughout the economy across all industries. Furthermore, the September 2001
terrorist attacks in New York and Washington, D.C. and related circumstances
have created additional economic uncertainty and have reduced management's
expectations about the level of near-term growth . With substantial amounts of
sublease space being returned to office markets in 2001, many of the top CBD
markets have moved toward a condition where supply meets or exceeds demand for
office space.
Our portfolio is currently insured against acts of terrorism, subject
to policy limits and deductibles and subject to exceptions for terrorist attacks
that constitute acts of war. The term of this insurance policy extends through
the end of 2002. We cannot ensure that insurance coverage for acts of terrorism
will continue to be available on commercially acceptable terms beyond 2002.
Insurance costs are expected to increase significantly beyond 2002. There can be
no assurance that third party insurers will be able to maintain reinsurance
sufficient to cover any losses that may be incurred as a result of terrorist
acts. In addition, the level of security has been increased at certain
properties in response to the terrorist attacks. We expect to be able to pass on
a significant portion of these cost increases to tenants in the form of
increased rents.
On December 3, 2001, a group of Enron Corporation companies filed for
Chapter 11 reorganization. Enron is our fourth largest tenant contributing 2% of
NOI and occupying 793,000 square feet, primarily at the Allen Center
57
in Houston, Texas. At December 31, 2001, Enron's average in-place net rent was
approximately $9.30 per square foot, while current estimated market rents for
the space are approximately $14 to $15 per square foot. At this time, we expect
Enron will reject its leases with us. The impact on our property operating
income will depend on how quickly we are able to re-lease this space.
Our management believes our portfolio is well positioned to continue to
perform through these more uncertain economic times due to its diversified
tenant and geographic asset base, primarily located in CBD high job-growth
markets in the United States.
Property Operating Income - Property Revenue Less Property Operating
Expense
The $41.7 million total increase in property revenues for the
comparable period is the result of improved performance in the core market
office properties, a higher level of termination fees and the part year impact
of acquisitions and on-stream development properties, offset by the impact of
the disposition of 16 mature office properties with low-growth profiles.
For our total portfolio of 76 properties for the year ended December
31, 2001, we leased 8.0 million square feet (7.2 million square feet on a pro
rata basis) and occupancy increased to 94.3% compared with 94.2% at December 31,
2000, primarily due to the impact of the three properties acquired during the
second quarter of 2001, as they ended the year at an average occupancy of 98%.
We also achieved a $1.03 per square foot ($0.81 per square foot on a pro rata
basis) increase in net rental rates on new and renewal leasing, reflecting the
impact of space rolling over at properties with in-place rents below current
market levels.
For the comparable portfolio of 71 properties, occupancy decreased from
94.4% to 94.1% and rental rates increased in key markets such as the Washington
D.C. area, New York and Chicago. The average monthly occupancy for these 71
properties was 92.6% compared to 91.8% in 2000. For our 100% owned comparable
portfolio of 63 properties, property revenue increased $43.2 million or 5.6%.
Excluding termination fees from both periods, property revenue increased $37.0
million or 4.8%.
The acquisition of three Class A office buildings during the second
quarter of 2001 increased property revenue by $16.8 million. The buildings are
located in core markets and were acquired for a purchase price of $182 million
as a tax efficient re-investment of proceeds from non-core asset dispositions.
550 West Washington in Chicago with 372,000 square feet is 96% occupied. Its
average lease term is 8.3 years with no expirations in the first four years, and
4% expiring in the fifth year. 1225 Connecticut in Washington D.C. with 224,000
square feet is 99.8% occupied by Ernst & Young under a lease expiring in
mid-2007. Two Ballston in Arlington, Virginia with 222,000 square feet is 100%
occupied with an average lease term of 3.9 years.
In addition, current period revenue benefited $17.3 million from the
completion in late 2000 of 225,000 square feet at Beaumeade Corporate Park in
Washington, D.C. and the 184,000-square-foot One Reston Place in Reston,
Virginia. These buildings were both 100% leased at completion. Also contributing
to this increase was 150,000 square feet at 3100 Interstate North Parkway in
Marietta, Georgia, which was completed and came on-stream 86% leased in January
2001.
During the period, as planned we sold four non-core office properties.
These sales, combined with 12 properties sold in the second half of 2000,
reduced property rental revenue by $62.5 million for the current period.
Included in the above property revenue analysis are lease termination
fees. Lease termination fees are an element of ongoing real estate ownership,
and for the year ended December 31, 2001, we recorded $21.2 million of
termination fees (2000 - $5.7 million), which is included in parking and other
revenue. These fees relate to specific tenants who have paid a fee to terminate
their lease obligations before the end of the contractual term of their leases.
In 2001, a $9.4 million fee received from a tenant which leased all 184,000
square feet at One Reston Place in Reston, Virginia was recorded. In addition, a
$4.2 million fee received from a tenant at Galleria Towers in Dallas was also
recorded. We actively manage these situations by maintaining close relationships
with our tenants in order to better understand their short and long-term space
needs so that we may reclaim space with below-market rent in buildings with a
high probability of subsequent lease-up. Historically, annual amounts have
averaged approximately
58
$6 million for the total portfolio; however, we cannot predict accurately the
timing or amounts of future lease termination fees.
Retail property revenue increased $26.9 million due to the completion
of all three development projects and our gaining control of the Desert Passage
retail/entertainment joint venture project on March 31, 2001 and, as of April 1,
2001, consolidating 100% of its operating results, offset by the impact of the
disposition of Fashion Outlet of Las Vegas in September 2000. Previously, as a
jointly controlled partnership, 65% of the operating results from Desert
Passage, from when the project was completed in August 2000, were included in
income from unconsolidated real estate joint ventures. The revised project
partnership agreement resulted in us gaining control over project operations and
disposition, with the minority partner participating only in project
distributions, primarily those arising upon disposition of the project. The
retail/entertainment component of Hollywood & Highland in Los Angeles opened on
November 8, 2001 and at year end it was 88% leased with occupancy at 72%. Paseo
Colorado opened September 28, 2001 and at year end it was 93% leased with
occupancy at 84%.
Property operating expenses, which include real estate taxes,
utilities, repairs and maintenance, cleaning and other property related expenses
and exclude depreciation and amortization expense, increased due to the
portfolio composition changes described above. Excluding the impact on revenues
of lease termination fees our comparable office portfolio gross margin decreased
to 55.7% from 56.1% on a year-over-year basis. For our comparable portfolio,
operating expenses increased due to a higher level of bad debt expense, an
increase in property taxes due to higher assessments and increases in utilities,
mainly electricity expense.
Interest Income
The $7.2 million increase in interest income for the year ended
December 31, 2001 compared with the prior year period reflects interest income
earned on higher average cash balances resulting from disposition and
refinancing proceeds.
General and Administrative Expense and Reorganization Costs
General and administrative expense includes expenses for corporate and
portfolio asset management functions. Expenses for property management and
fee-based services are recorded as property operating expenses.
Based on TrizecHahn Corporation's strategic plan, we targeted general
and administrative expense savings to be derived from our focus on the office
portfolio and from both functional and office location consolidations. As a
result of a comprehensive review of our operations for this purpose, we
initiated a reorganization plan to simplify our management structure and
centralize accounting, payroll and information services functions in Chicago.
The reorganization plan will result in a net reduction of approximately 85
office employees by the end of 2002 in these areas. During the year we recorded
as reorganization costs a charge of $13.9 million, to provide for employee
severance, benefits and other costs associated with announced job redundancies
as result of implementing the reorganization plan. Included in the
reorganization charge are $2.2 million of non-cash costs, which include $1.2
million for the accelerated recognition of a portion of the entitlements
pursuant to the escrowed share grant arrangement for certain U.S. employees and
$1.0 million for the write-off of furniture, fixtures and leasehold costs at
redundant locations.
In addition, in 2001, for REIT qualification purposes, we issued and
donated 400 shares of common stock to each of 100 charitable organizations. The
aggregate 40,000 shares of common stock have been estimated by management to
have a fair value of approximately $2 million, and such amount has been recorded
as a donation expense and included in reorganization costs.
General and administrative expenses increased by approximately $7.4
million for the year ended December 31, 2001 compared with the prior year
period, due primarily to the $3.2 million impact of share-based compensation
arrangements, which were introduced in late 2000 and increased professional
fees. General and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2001
also includes $2.0 million of transition costs associated with implementing the
reorganization plan. These costs were incurred for relocation, hiring and
consulting services in connection with executing the plan.
59
Interest expense
Interest expense decreased by $112.9 million for the year ended
December 31, 2001 compared with the same prior year period primarily due to the
$86.2 million impact of $750 million of interest bearing parent advances, which
were settled for the issuance of equity in December 2000. In addition, interest
expense savings of $15.7 million from the disposition of non-core properties was
partially offset by the $12.0 million impact of acquisitions and on-stream
developments. The refinancing in May 2001, in which a special-purpose vehicle
created by one of our subsidiaries issued $1.44 billion of commercial mortgage
pass-through certificates, the proceeds of which were used to repay $1.16
billion of existing loans, generated $1.6 million of interest expense on the
incremental refinancing proceeds. Interest expense also benefited from
incremental interest capitalization of $8.8 million on equity invested in the
retail/entertainment projects under development and the $15.8 million impact of
a more favorable variable interest rate environment.
Depreciation and Amortization
For the year ended December 31, 2001, depreciation expense was $7.0
million higher than in the same prior year period due to the impact of
acquisitions, on-stream properties and increased depreciation and amortization
expense related to ongoing capitalized tenant installation costs, including
amortization of deferred leasing costs, offset by the impact of dispositions.
Properties classified as held for disposition are not depreciated. The
impact if properties held for disposition were depreciated would have been to
increase depreciation and amortization expense for the year ended December 31,
2001 by $7.3 million.
Losses from Securities Investments
In 2001, we fully provided for our securities investments in certain
building telecommunication and service providers, recording a $15.4 million
charge, net of $3.5 million of deferred revenue, as events and circumstances
confirmed that the decline in value of these assets was considered to be other
than temporary. This provision comprised our investments in Allied Riser
Communications Corporation, Broadband Office Inc., Cypress Communications Inc.,
OnSite Access Inc., and Captivate Network, Inc.
Derivative Losses
As a result of the adoption of SFAS 133, "Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities," we recorded derivative losses of $0.5
million during the period, which represents the ineffective portion of all cash
flow hedges.
Income from Unconsolidated Real Estate Joint Ventures
Income from unconsolidated real estate joint ventures decreased $6.5
million primarily due to the impact of interest expense attributable to the
Desert Passage retail/entertainment project. As previously noted, the project
came on-stream in August 2000 and was accounted for as a joint venture until
March 31, 2001.
Gain (loss) on Sales of Real Estate and Allowance for Loss on
Properties Held for Disposition
During the current period, we recorded a net loss of $2.1 million
related to the sale of four non-core office properties and residual land sites.
The prior year gain of $36.9 million related primarily to the sale of twelve
non-core office properties.
Two of the retail/entertainment properties that we are holding for
disposition, Hollywood & Highland in Los Angeles, California, and Desert Passage
in Las Vegas, Nevada, depend on tourism for a significant portion of their
visitors. The September 2001 terrorist attacks significantly impacted the levels
of tourism in Los Angeles and Las Vegas. In addition, the Aladdin Hotel and
Casino, which adjoins Desert Passage, filed for a Chapter 11 reorganization on
September 28, 2001, negatively impacting the number of visitors at Desert
Passage. During the
60
fourth quarter of 2001, we commissioned third-party appraisals of our
retail/entertainment properties. These appraisals indicated a decline in the
fair value of these assets and accordingly, for the year ended December 31,
2001, we recorded an allowance for loss of $239.4 million to reduce the carrying
value of these assets. Of this amount, $217.0 million relates to the Hollywood &
Highland complex and $22.4 million relates to Desert Passage and certain remnant
retail assets. We acquired three technology center development properties in
Seattle, Boston and Chicago, in late 2000. During 2001, we explored alternatives
other than developing these properties as technology centers. After considering
these alternatives, we decided to dispose of these properties in the near term
in an orderly manner. As a result the we recorded an allowance for loss of $62.9
million. In addition, an allowance for loss of $2.2 million was recorded related
to the planned sale of two non-core U.S. office assets. The five properties have
been reclassified as properties held for disposition.
Income and Other Taxes
The year over year change in income tax expense of $266.6 million is
primarily attributable to the fact that Trizec Properties determined to elect
REIT status effective as of January 1, 2001. Special counsel has opined that, as
a REIT, Trizec Properties should not be liable in the future for U.S. income
taxes on the earnings from our U.S. office portfolio, to the extent that the
requisite amount of those earnings is distributed. Accordingly, during 2001 we
did not provide for federal income taxes in the United States related to our
office properties operations. In 2000, as we were not a REIT, our effective tax
rate was 39.45%. At December 31, 2000, as Trizec Properties would not be liable
for U.S. income taxes, it recorded a credit to income of $311.7 million
representing the elimination of a net deferred tax liability position relating
to future years.
TrizecHahn Developments Inc., or THDI, was outside the Trizec
Properties group at December 31, 2001, but as part of the reorganization of
TrizecHahn Corporation it will be contributed to Trizec Properties prior to the
effective date of the reorganization and accordingly, THDI will no longer
provide for federal income taxes. For the year ended December 31, 2001, we
recorded a $1.6 million expense to eliminate a net deferred tax liability
position relating to future years upon the planned contribution of THDI to
Trizec Properties.
Included in income and other taxes are franchise, capital and
alternative minimum taxes related to ongoing real estate operations. These
current operating taxes for the year ended December 31, 2001 were $4.9 million
compared with $9.4 million in 2000.
Extraordinary Items
On May 17, 2001, we retired early $1.16 billion of existing long-term
debt, which we funded through the issuance by a special-purpose vehicle created
by one of our subsidiaries of $1.44 billion of commercial mortgage pass-through
certificates. As a consequence of these early retirements, we recorded an
extraordinary loss of $18.0 million, consisting of contractual redemption
premiums of $13.8 million and the write-off of unamortized deferred financing
costs of $4.2 million.
Cumulative Effect of Change in Accounting Principle
As a consequence of implementing SFAS 133, we wrote off deferred
financing charges of $0.3 million and reclassified the unrealized $4.4 million
loss related to certain telecommunication securities from accumulated other
comprehensive loss, a component of equity, to cumulative effect of a change in
accounting principle.
Comparison of the Year Ended December 31, 2000 to the Year Ended December 31,
1999
The following is a table comparing our summarized operating results for
the years, including other selected information.
61
Year Ended
December 31,
---------------------------- Increase/ %
2000 1999 (Decrease) Change
------------ -------------- -------------- ------------
(dollars in thousands)
Property revenues $ 870,550 $ 801,702 $ 68,848 8.6%
Interest income 8,480 7,118 1,362 19.1
------------ -------------- -------------- ------------
Total revenues 879,030 808,820 70,210 8.7
------------ -------------- -------------- ------------
Property operating expenses 355,658 333,941 21,717 6.5
General and administrative 18,429 16,725 1,704 10.2
Interest expense 265,680 234,992 30,688 13.1
Depreciation and amortization 154,118 133,352 20,766 15.6
Reorganization costs 6,680 4,950 1,730 34.9
------------ -------------- -------------- ------------
Total expenses 800,565 723,960 76,605 10.6
------------ -------------- -------------- ------------
Income before allocation to
minority interest, income from
unconsolidated real estate
joint ventures, gain (loss) on
sale of real estate and
allowance for loss on
properties held for disposition,
income taxes and extraordinary
item 78,465 84,860 (6,395) (7.5)
Minority interest 580 1,459 (879) (60.2)
Income from unconsolidated real
estate joint ventures 19,417 16,207 3,210 19.8
Gain (loss) on sale of real estate
and allowance for loss on
properties held for disposition 33,185 (41,373) 74,558 180.2
(Provision for) benefit from income
and other taxes 252,840 (22,815) 275,655 1,208.2
Extraordinary item (1,491) - (1,491) -
------------ -------------- -------------- ------------
Net income $ 382,996 $ 38,338 $ 344,658 899.0%
============ ============== ============== ============
Straight line rent adjustment $ 24,458 $ 30,787 $ (6,329) (20.6)%
============ ============== ============== ============
Lease termination fees $ 5,575 $ 17,498 $ (11,923) (68.1)%
============ ============== ============== ============
62
The table below presents selected operating information for our total
portfolio and for our comparable portfolio of 71 properties that were owned both
at December 31, 2000 and 1999 and in each case for the full year.
Year Ended
December 31,
--------------------------- Increase/ %
2000 1999 (Decrease) Change
------------ ------------- ------------- -----------
(dollars in thousands)
Total Portfolio
Office
Property revenues $ 858,552 $ 794,197 $ 64,355 8.1%
Property operating expenses 350,334 330,819 19,515 5.9
------------ ------------- ------------- -----------
Property operating income $ 508,218 $ 463,378 $ 44,840 9.7%
============ ============= ============= ===========
Retail
Property revenues $ 11,998 $ 7,505 $ 4,493 59.9%
Property operating expenses 5,324 3,122 2,202 70.5
------------ ------------- ------------- -----------
Property operating income $ 6,674 $ 4,383 $ 2,291 52.3%
============ ============= ============= ===========
Comparable Portfolio
Office
Property revenues $ 680,637 $ 642,698 $ 37,939 5.9%
Property operating expenses 301,480 289,737 11,743 4.1
------------ ------------- ------------- -----------
Property operating income $ 379,157 $ 352,961 $ 26,196 7.4%
============ ============= ============= ===========
Income from unconsolidated real
estate joint ventures $ 14,925 $ 14,939 $ (14) -
============ ============= ============= ===========
Property Operating Income - Property Revenue less Property Operating
Expense
In 2000, continued broad-based improvement in the economy resulted in
generally lower vacancy rates, as excess supply in the U.S. CBD office markets
was gradually depleted as a result of positive absorption.
The increase of $68.8 million in property revenues in 2000 compared
with 1999 was the result of improved performance in the core market office
properties and the full year benefit of acquisitions made in the first quarter
of 1999, offset by the sale of 12 mature properties with low-growth profiles and
a significantly reduced level of termination fees as compared to the prior year.
For our total portfolio of 77 properties, for the year ended December
31, 2000, we signed leases totaling 8.2 million square feet (7.6 million square
feet on a pro rata basis) and increased occupancy to 94.2% compared to 91.4% at
December 31, 1999. We also achieved a $2.00 per square foot ($2.60 per square
foot on a pro rata basis) increase in net rental rates on new and renewal leases
as the portfolio benefited from its presence in downtown office buildings
located in strong major markets.
For our comparable portfolio of 71 properties, revenue growth was
attributable to increased occupancy and rental rates. More specifically the
growth reflects increased occupancy of 3 percentage points to 93.6% and
increased rental rates in key markets such as New York, Houston and Chicago. For
our 100% owned comparable portfolio of 63 properties, property revenue increased
$37.9 million or 5.9%. Excluding termination fees from both periods, property
revenue increased $49.7 million or 7.9%.
Lease termination fees are an element of ongoing real estate ownership.
In 2000, termination fees were $5.6 million. In 1999, termination fees were
$17.5 million including an $8.0 million fee from a tenant at 3700 Bay Area
Boulevard in Houston. These fees relate to specific tenants who have paid a fee
to terminate their lease obligations before the end of the contractual term of
their leases. As a practice, we actively manage these situations by maintaining
close relationships with our tenants in order to better understand their short
and long-term space needs so that we may reclaim space with below-market rent in
buildings with a high probability of subsequent lease-
63
up. Historically, annual amounts have averaged approximately $6 million for the
total portfolio; however, we cannot predict with certainty the timing or amounts
of future lease termination fees.
Property revenue in 2000 also benefited by $25.8 million from the full
year impact of 4.0 million square feet of acquisitions at three properties early
in 1999. In addition, revenue increased by $6.3 million due to the completion,
in late 2000, of 225,000 square feet at Beaumeade Corporate Park in Washington,
D.C. and the 184,000-square-foot One Reston Place in Reston, Virginia. Also
contributing to this increase, earlier in the year, a 269,000-square-foot
building at the Palisades complex in Atlanta, Georgia came on-stream. The sale
of 12 non-core properties, comprising 3.1 million square feet, during the second
half of 2000 reduced property rental revenue by $5.7 million.
The increase in retail property revenue of $4.5 million primarily
reflects the impact of results from Fashion Outlet of Las Vegas prior to its
sale in September 2000. Prior to August 1999, as a jointly controlled
partnership, operating results were included in income from unconsolidated real
estate joint ventures. The 5% joint venture position was acquired in order to
facilitate the sale of this non-core asset.
Property operating expenses, which include property taxes, utilities,
repairs and maintenance, cleaning and other property related expenses and
exclude depreciation and amortization expense, increased due to the portfolio
composition changes described above. Excluding the impact on revenues of lease
termination fees, our comparable office portfolio gross margin improved to 55.4%
from 53.7% on a year-over-year basis. For our comparable portfolio, operating
expenses increased mainly due to an increase in property taxes due to higher
assessments in certain markets.
Interest Income
The $1.4 million increase in interest income reflects the impact of
interest income earned on the proceeds from the disposition of 12 non-core
office properties.
General and Administrative Expense
General and administrative expense includes expenses for corporate and
portfolio asset management functions. Expenses for property management and
fee-based services are recorded as property operating expenses. General and
administrative expense increased by $1.7 million in 2000 compared to the prior
year, due to the impact of share-based compensation arrangements that were
introduced in November 2000 and costs associated with pursuit of technology
center development sites in North America.
Interest Expense
Interest expense in 2000 increased by $30.7 million from 1999 levels
primarily due to a $24.6 million increase in inter-company interest expense
resulting from, on average approximately $120 million of higher levels of
interest bearing parent advances, with all advances for the year at higher
interest rates than the prior year. The balance of the increase was attributable
to the $6.9 million full year impact of the acquisitions completed in the first
quarter of 1999 and the $9.0 million impact of higher average debt balances
during 2000, offset by partial year savings of $3.0 million related to debt
repayments from the proceeds of dispositions in the later part of 2000 and the
benefit of incremental capitalization of $7.0 million on equity invested in the
retail/entertainment projects under development.
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation expense in 2000 was $20.8 million higher than the prior
year due, in part, to the full year impact of the acquisitions made in early
1999 as well as the effects of development properties coming on-stream, offset
by the impact of dispositions. Depreciation and amortization expense also
increased due to additional tenant installation costs, including deferred
leasing costs, which are amortized over the term of the respective lease.
64
Reorganization Costs
In 2000, we recorded a charge of $4.2 million for employee severance
and benefits associated with the wind down of our retail/entertainment business.
In addition, in each of 2000 and 1999, we incurred incremental professional
advisory fees of $2.5 million and $5.0 million, respectively, in order to
explore certain strategic transactions and to optimize our corporate structure
for tax purposes, including REIT qualification.
Income from Unconsolidated Real Estate Joint Ventures
Income from unconsolidated real estate joint ventures increased by $3.2
million primarily due to the impact of the Desert Passage retail entertainment
project coming on-stream in August 2000.
Gain (Loss) on Sales of Real Estate and Allowance for Loss on
Properties Held for Disposition
In 2000, we recorded a gain of $36.9 million related to the sale of 12
non-core office properties and one retail outlet mall. At the end of 2000,
consistent with our strategic plan to focus on the office business we decided to
divest four non-core office properties and our three retail/entertainment
centers. These properties were designated as held for disposition and a
provision for loss of $3.7 million was recorded to write-down the carrying value
of the office properties to net realizable value. As such, the total net gain
for 2000 was $33.2 million. In 1999, we recorded a loss of $41.4 million related
to the sale of retail development sites and recorded a provision for loss on the
planned sale of Fashion Outlet of Las Vegas.
Income and Other Taxes
Income and other taxes are significantly affected on a comparative
basis by the $311.7 million tax benefit related to Trizec Properties's decision,
at the end of 2000, to elect to become a REIT for U.S. federal income tax
purposes commencing in 2001. Special counsel has opined that, as a REIT, we
generally will not be liable in the future for U.S. income taxes on our earnings
to the extent that the requisite amount of those earnings is distributed. As
Trizec Properties will not be liable for U.S. income taxes, the existing $365.0
million net deferred tax liability position relating to future years was
eliminated at December 31, 2000 and credited to income. This deferred tax
recovery was offset by the recording of a $53.3 million liability payable in
fiscal 2002 resulting from the deemed liquidation, as a result of Trizec
Properties electing REIT status, of all of our subsidiary corporations.
Excluding the impact of the decision to elect REIT status, the tax
provision increased $36.0 million. This was due primarily to deferred tax
expense recorded on gains in 2000 on property sales as compared to deferred tax
benefits recorded on losses from property sales in 1999. In addition, franchise,
capital and alternative minimum taxes increased by $8.2 million due to the
transitional impact of modifying our corporate ownership structure in 1999 to
facilitate future REIT conversion.
Extraordinary Items
In conjunction with property sales in 2000, we incurred prepayment
premiums and wrote off unamortized deferred financing costs for the early
retirement of debt in the amount of $1.5 million, net of a tax benefit of $0.8
million.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our objective is to ensure, in advance, that there are ample resources
to fund ongoing operating expenses, capital expenditures, debt service
requirements, current development costs not covered by construction loans and
the distributions required to maintain REIT status. In the next year we believe
our needs will be fully funded through existing cash balances and cash flows
provided by operating and financing activities.
Beyond the next year we expect to meet liquidity requirements for
scheduled debt maturities, non-recurring capital improvements and future
property acquisitions or developments through the refinancing of mortgage debt
65
and cash flows from operations. In addition, dispositions of properties, in
particular the planned sale of the three retail/entertainment centers once
lease-up and stabilization is complete, will provide additional liquidity.
Financial flexibility will be provided through revolving credit
facilities. On August 10, 2001 our $300 million credit facility matured. We have
negotiated a three-year, $350 million senior unsecured revolving credit
facility. In December 2001, $200 million of the facility was committed and
closed with a group of four banks. The remaining $150 million of the facility
has been syndicated to a group of seven banks and closed in early January 2002.
The interest rate applicable to borrowing under the credit facility is to be
equal to the LIBOR rate or the base rate in effect from time-to-time plus a
spread, which will be dependent on our total leverage, or, if we have achieved
an investment grade credit-rating from two rating agencies, on our credit
rating.
The amount of the credit facility available at any time is determined
by the unencumbered properties that we, or our subsidiaries that guarantee the
credit facility, own and that satisfy certain conditions of eligible properties.
The amount currently eligible to be borrowed is $314 million. We are subject to
covenants customary for credit facilities of this nature, including financial
covenants, restriction on other indebtedness, restriction on encumbrances of
properties that we use in determining our borrowing capacity and certain
customary investment restrictions. The credit facility is available for general
corporate purposes, including dividends and distributions to our stockholders.
For REIT qualification purposes and to provide sufficient funding
required by TrizecHahn to complete the corporate reorganization, we expect to
make net distributions of approximately $511 million prior to the effective date
of the corporate reorganization, after deducting repayment of advances due from
our parent and affiliates, which will be repaid prior to the completion of the
corporate reorganization. These distributions and repayments will be funded from
a combination of cash on hand, and borrowings under our revolving credit
facility. We currently expect to initially borrow approximately $215 million on
that facility. The ultimate amount to be borrowed under the revolving credit
facility will be determined by such variables as the actual amount of the
distributions, and the actual cash position of the Company at the time the
distributions are made. We will not rely on advances from our parent and
affiliated companies subsequent to the corporate reorganization. Advances due to
our parent and affiliates in respect of THDI in the amount of approximately $237
million will be settled in exchange for newly issued shares when THDI is
contributed back to us prior to the completion of the corporate reorganization.
After completion of the corporate reorganization, we expect to make
three quarterly dividend distributions of $0.0875 per share to the holders of
our common stock in the final three quarters of 2002. Commencing in the first
quarter of 2003 and thereafter, we intend to make distributions to the holders
of our common stock and special voting stock at least equal to the minimum
amount required to maintain REIT status each year through regular quarterly
dividends.
After dividend distributions, our remaining cash from operations will
not be sufficient to allow us to retire all of our debt as it comes due.
Accordingly, we will be required to refinance maturing debt or repay it
utilizing proceeds from property dispositions or the issuance of equity
securities. There can be no assurance that such financing or proceeds will be
available or be available on economical terms when necessary in the future.
66
At December 31, 2001 we had $297.4 million in cash and cash
equivalents. The increase since December 31, 1998 of $218.9 million is a result
of the following cash flows:
Years Ended December 31,
------------------------------------------------- Total
2001 2000 1999 Period
----------------- -------------- -------------- --------------
(dollars in thousands)
Cash provided by operating activities $ 462,948 $ 113,121 $ 490,705 $ 1,066,774
Cash used for investing activities (596,988) (52,724) (873,176) (1,522,888)
Cash provided by (used in) financing activities 361,279 (70,554) 384,250 674,975
----------------- -------------- -------------- --------------
$ 227,239 $ (10,157) $ 1,779 $ 218,861
================= ============== ============== ==============
The increase in cash provided by operating activities in 2001 was
primarily due to an increase in operating results from the core market portfolio
and three acquisitions, offset by the sale of 16 non-core office properties
during 2000 and 2001. Operating cash flows are impacted by "like kind exchange"
transactions, as disposition proceeds of $87.4 million in 2000 and $294.2
million in 1998, which were contributed to escrow and restricted cash accounts,
were released in the subsequent period.
Net cash used for investing activities reflects the ongoing impact of
expenditures on recurring and non-recurring tenant installation costs and
capital expenditures and the impact of acquisitions, developments and
dispositions.
Tenant Installation Costs and Capital Expenditures
Tenant Installation Costs
Our office properties require periodic investments of capital for
tenant installation costs related to new and renewal leasing. For comparative
purposes, the absolute total dollar amount of tenant installation costs in any
given period is less relevant than the cost on a per square foot basis. This is
because the total is impacted by the square footage both leased and occupied in
any given period. Tenant installation costs consist of tenant allowances and
leasing costs. Leasing costs include leasing commissions paid to third-party
brokers representing tenants and costs associated with dedicated regional
leasing teams who represent us and deal with tenant representatives. The
following table reflects tenant installation costs for the total portfolio,
including our share of such costs incurred by non-consolidated joint ventures,
for both new and renewal office leases that commenced during the respective
year, regardless of when such costs were actually paid. The square feet leased
data in the table represents the pro rata owned share of square feet leased.
Years Ended December 31,
--------------------------------------
2001 2000 1999
---------- ------------ ------------
(in millions, except per square foot
amounts)
Square feet leased
- new leasing 4.5 4.8 3.7
- renewal leasing 2.7 2.8 2.7
Tenant installation costs $ 106.4 $ 88.0 $ 102.4
Tenant installation costs per square foot $ 14.80 $ 11.60 $ 16.00
Tenant allowance costs per square foot $ 9.40 $ 6.60 $ 10.00
67
For the year ended December 31, 2001, of the $106.4 million office
tenant installation costs, approximately $15.1 million or $5.60 per square foot
(year ended December 31, 2000 - $16 million or $6.00 per square foot; year ended
December 31, 1999 - $31 million or $11.00 per square foot) was incurred to renew
existing tenants.
During the later half of 2001, significant scheduled large tenant
lease expirations occurred in the Atlanta, Dallas, Washington, D.C. and Houston
portfolios and as such, tenant installation costs on a per square foot basis are
anticipated to rise as we re-lease these large blocks of space.
Capital Expenditures
To maintain the quality of our properties and preserve competitiveness
and long-term value, we pursue an ongoing program of capital expenditures,
certain of which are not recoverable from tenants. For the year ended December
31, 2001, recurring capital expenditures for the total portfolio, including our
share of such expenditures incurred by non-consolidated joint ventures, were
$8.0 million or $0.19 per square foot, compared with $8.3 million or $0.19 per
square foot in 2000 (1999 - $9.5 million or $0.17 per square foot). Recurring
capital expenditures include for example the cost of roof replacement and the
cost of replacing heating, ventilation, air conditioning and other building
systems. Management believes that recurring capital expenditures for the office
portfolio will average approximately $0.15 - $0.20 per square foot on an annual
basis.
In addition to recurring capital expenditures, expenditures are made
in connection with non-recurring events such as code-required enhancements and
upgrades to common areas, lobbies and elevators. Furthermore, as part of our
office acquisitions, we have routinely acquired and repositioned properties,
many of which have required significant capital improvements due to deferred
maintenance and the existence of shell space requiring initial tenant build-out
at the time of acquisition. Some of these properties required substantial
renovation to enable them to compete effectively. We take these capital
improvement and new leasing tenant inducement costs into consideration at the
time of acquisition when negotiating our purchase price. For the year ended
December 31, 2001, total non-recurring capital expenditures for the total
portfolio, including our share of such expenditures incurred by non-consolidated
joint ventures, were $22.3 million, compared with $44.9 million in 2000 (1999 -
$19.8 million). Management anticipates that non-recurring capital expenditures
for the existing portfolio will decline in future years as properties acquired
in 1998 and 1999 are brought to standard and repositioning is completed.
Reconciliation to Combined Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
The above information includes actual tenant installation costs,
including leasing costs, and capital expenditures for the total portfolio,
including our share of such costs and expenditures incurred by non-consolidated
joint ventures, for leases that commenced during the periods presented. The
amounts included in the combined consolidated statements of cash flows represent
the cash expenditures made during the periods excluding our share of such costs
and expenditures incurred by non-consolidated joint ventures. The reconciliation
between the above amounts and the combined consolidated statements of cash flows
is as follows:
68
Years Ended December 31,
----------------------------------------
2001 2000 1999
------------ ------------ ------------
(dollars in thousands)
Tenant installation costs, including leasing costs $ 106,438 $ 87,983 $102,381
Capital expenditures:
Recurring 8,009 8,342 9,549
Non-recurring 22,336 44,930 19,748
------------ ------------ ------------
136,783 141,255 131,678
Pro rata joint venture activity (22,419) (16,430) (21,907)
Timing differences 8,266 3,159 (10,907)
Retail activity 6,024 1,465 879
------------ ------------ ------------
Total tenant improvements, leasing costs and
capital expenditures per combined
consolidated statement of cash flows $ 128,654 $ 129,449 $ 99,743
============ ============ ============
Acquisitions, Development and Dispositions
Acquisitions
As previously described, in the second quarter of 2001 we purchased
three office properties in existing core markets for a price of approximately
$181.7 million. The net equity invested after acquisition financing of $27.5
million was $154.2 million. In the fourth quarter of 2001, we acquired ground
lease and other obligations related to two of our Chicago office buildings for
$21.0 million, which were fully financed resulting in no net equity investment.
Developments
Development expenditures reflect completion during 2000 of Beaumeade
Corporate Park in Washington, D.C., One Reston Place in Reston, Virginia and
3100 North Parkway in Marietta, Georgia for an aggregate cost of $60.9 million.
In addition, development expenditures were incurred for One Alliance
Center during 2000 and 2001. The project, located in Buckhead, Georgia, a strong
sub-market in Atlanta, opened in early October 2001. This $100 million,
560,000-square-foot building is the first phase of a four-building complex and
is currently 75% leased. Major tenants include Security First, Towers Perrin and
BBDO South. The remaining three phases, totaling a potential 1.2 million square
feet of office space, will only be developed once substantially pre-leased.
Consistent with our strategy to focus on the core U.S. office
business, we have decided to divest our non-core retail/entertainment assets.
The following table sets forth key information as of December 31, 2001 with
respect to the retail/entertainment properties that we are holding for
disposition. Our economic interest is 100% unless otherwise noted. Total costs
shown in the table are net of proceeds from the sale of land and tenant acquired
space and include all direct costs, including initial costs to rent, interest
expense on general and specific debt and other direct costs considered
applicable. The pro rata book value at December 31, 2001, shown in the following
table represent our economic share and costs net of government contributions.
The data for Paseo Colorado includes 153,000 square feet owned directly by a
department store anchor, and the leasing status excludes this space. Our
economic ownership interest for the Hollywood & Highland Hotel at December 31,
2001 was 84.5%. We expect that our economic ownership interest will increase to
91% as a consequence of our joint venture partner's conversion of $5 million of
equity into debt.
69
Pro Rata
Book Value
Year of Total December Occupancy Leased
Project Name Completion Area Owned Area 31, 2001 December December
(Ownership) Location /Acquisition (sq.ft.) (sq.ft.) ($ mil.) 31, 2001 31, 2001
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Desert Passage Las Vegas, NV Aug. 2000 475,000 475,000 260.1 74% 78%
Paseo Colorado Pasadena, CA Sept. 2001 565,000 412,000 82.8 84% 93%
Hollywood & Highland
Retail Los Angeles, CA Nov. 2001 645,000 645,000 72% 88%
Hotel (91%) Los Angeles, CA Dec. 2001 600,000 546,000 n/a n/a
--------------------------------------------------------------
1,245,000 1,191,000 307.6 72% 88%
--------------------------------------------------------------
2,285,000 2,078,000 650.5 76% 86%
==============================================================
At December 31, 2001, our share of expenditures required to complete
these properties under development was $45 million for which construction
financing facilities have been arranged.
By December 31, 2001, we had opened all of our retail/entertainment
projects. The retail/entertainment component of Hollywood & Highland opened on
November 8, 2001, while the hotel component opened on December 26, 2001. Paseo
Colorado opened on September 28, 2001, and Desert Passage opened in August 2000.
At the end of 2000, we classified all of these assets as held for disposition,
and carried them at the lower of their carrying values or estimated fair value
less costs to sell.
Our Hollywood & Highland and Desert Passage properties depend on
tourism for a significant portion of their visitors. The September 2001
terrorist attacks and related events significantly impacted the levels of
tourism in Los Angeles and Las Vegas, and furthermore created significant
general economic uncertainty. It is likely that near-term operating results for
these properties will be lower than originally anticipated as a result of the
decline in tourism following the September 2001 terrorist attacks.
In addition, the Aladdin Hotel and Casino, which adjoins Desert
Passage in Las Vegas, Nevada, filed for Chapter 11 reorganization on September
28, 2001. Although the Aladdin Hotel and Casino remain in operation and we are
hopeful that an experienced operator will be put in place through the
reorganization process, the number of visitors at Desert Passage and,
accordingly, its near-term operating results are likely to be negatively
impacted.
As previously noted, an allowance for loss of $234.5 million was
recorded for the year ended December 31, 2001. Of this amount $217 million is
related to the Hollywood & Highland complex and $17.5 million is related to
Desert Passage.
Dispositions
In 2001, we sold four non-core properties generating net proceeds,
after debt repayment, of $102.9 million. During 2000, we sold 12 non-core office
properties and generated net proceeds, after debt repayment, of $205.2 million.
Our plan calls for an orderly disposition of the three
retail/entertainment projects over the next several years, optimizing value over
reasonable sales periods. Planned disposition timelines will allow us to achieve
stabilized income in order to optimize realized values. Net proceeds will be
redeployed into our core office portfolio or used to repay mortgage debt. Our
ability to execute the disposition plan for these assets, as currently
contemplated, is dependent upon the future economic environment, joint venture
considerations and local property market conditions.
70
Financing Activities
Cash provided by financing activities during 2001 primarily reflects
the impact of the net increase in refinancing proceeds from the May 2001 CMBS
transaction. Cash provided by financing activities decreased in 2000 compared
with 1999 primarily as a result of no property acquisition related financing in
2000 and increased debt repayments due to a higher level of dispositions in
2000, partially offset by an increased level of parent advances, which funded
pre-construction financing equity requirements for the retail/entertainment
projects under development.
On December 31, 2001 our combined consolidated debt was approximately
$3.0 billion. The weighted average interest rate on our debt was 5.8% and the
weighted average maturity was approximately 5.2 years. The table that follows
summarizes the mortgage and other loan debt at December 31, 2001 and December
31, 2000:
Debt Summary December 31,
-------------------------------------
2001 2000
------------------ ------------------
(dollars in thousands)
Balance:
Fixed rate $ 2,128,064 $ 1,609,480
Variable rate 889,734 717,427
------------------ ------------------
Total $ 3,017,798 $ 2,326,907
================== ==================
Collateralized $ 2,992,772 $ 2,278,408
Unsecured 25,026 48,499
------------------ ------------------
Total $ 3,017,798 $ 2,326,907
================== ==================
Percent of total debt:
Fixed rate 70.5% 69.2%
Variable rate 29.5% 30.8%
------------------ ------------------
Total 100.0% 100.0%
================== ==================
Weighted average interest
rate at period end:
Fixed rate 6.91% 7.13%
Variable rate 3.01% 7.99%
------------------ ------------------
Total 5.76% 7.39%
================== ==================
Leverage ratio:
Net debt to net debt
plus book equity 52.8% 46.0%
================== ==================
As at December 31, 2001, we had fixed the interest rates on $150
million (as at December 31, 2000 - nil; 1999 - $12.7 million) of the debt
classified, as fixed in the above table, by way of interest rate swap contracts
with a weighted average interest rate of 6.01% and maturing on March 15, 2008.
The variable rate debt shown above bears interest based primarily on
various spreads over LIBOR. The leverage ratio is the ratio of mortgage and
other debt less cash and cash equivalents, or "net debt," to the sum of net debt
and the book value of owner's equity.
The increase in our leverage ratio from December 31, 2000 to December
31, 2001 in part reflects the fact that on May 17, 2001, we refinanced $1.16
billion of existing long-term debt through the private placement issuance by a
special-purpose vehicle created by one of our subsidiaries of $1.44 billion of
commercial mortgage pass-through certificates. The certificates are backed by
mortgages that secure loans on 28 U.S. office properties that have maturities of
five, seven and 10 years. At December 31, 2001, the weighted average cost of
this debt was 4.9% and it replaced existing debt at 7.1%. The transaction
addressed near-term maturities of existing debt and also
71
increased the ratio of fixed-rate debt to total debt to 70.5% at December 31,
2001 compared with 69.2% at the end of 2000.
The table below segregates long-term debt repayments between our
office group and retail properties that are held for disposition.
Mortgage Debt
--------------------------------- Other
Office Retail Loans Total
---------------- ---------------- ---------------- ---------------
(dollars in thousands)
Principal repayments due in
2002 $ 88,491 $ 106,791 $ 2,380 $ 197,662
2003 174,104 236,937 2,219 413,260
2004 361,199 - 1,584 362,783
2005 92,789 - 792 93,581
2006 731,273 - 448 731,721
Subsequent to 2006 1,201,188 - 17,603 1,218,791
---------------- ---------------- ---------------- ---------------
Total $ 2,649,044 $ 343,728 $ 25,026 $ 3,017,798
================ ================ ================ ===============
Weighted average interest rate as at
December 31, 2001 6.02% 3.57% 8.10% 5.76%
================ ================ ================ ===============
Weighted average term to maturity 5.4 yrs. 1.1 yrs. 46.7 yrs. 5.2 yrs.
================ ================ ================ ===============
Percentage of fixed rate debt 79.5% - % 85.5% 70.5%
================ ================ ================ ===============
Due to our intention to dispose of the three retail/entertainment
centers, the mortgage debt relating to these properties is all on a floating
rate basis.
The combined consolidated mortgage and other debt information
presented above does not reflect indebtedness secured by property owned in joint
venture partnerships as they are accounted for under the equity method. At
December 31, 2001 our pro rata share of this debt amounted to $351.1 million
(December 31, 2000 - $432.4 million).
Market Risk - Quantitative and Qualitative Information
Market risk is the risk of loss from adverse changes in market prices
and interest rates. Our future earnings, cash flows and fair values relevant to
financial instruments are dependent upon prevailing market interest rates. The
primary market risk facing us is long-term indebtedness, which bears interest at
fixed and variable rates. The fair value of our long-term debt obligations is
affected by changes in market interest rates. We manage our market risk by
matching long-term leases on our properties with long-term fixed rate
non-recourse debt of similar durations. At December 31, 2001, approximately
70.5% or $2,128.1 million of our outstanding debt has fixed interest rates,
which minimizes the interest rate risk until the maturity of such outstanding
debt.
We utilize certain derivative financial instruments at times to limit
interest rate risk. Interest rate protection agreements are used to convert
variable rate debt to a fixed rate basis or to hedge anticipated financing
transactions. Derivatives are used for hedging purposes rather than speculation.
We do not enter into financial instruments for trading purposes. We have entered
into hedging arrangements with financial institutions we believe to be
creditworthy counterparties. Our primary objective when undertaking hedging
transactions and derivative positions is to reduce our floating rate exposure,
which, in turn, reduces the risks that variable rate debt imposes on our cash
flows. Our strategy partially protects us against future increases in interest
rates. At December 31, 2001, we had hedge contracts totaling $150 million. The
hedging agreements convert variable rate debt at LIBOR + 0.37% to a fixed rate
of 6.01% and mature on March 15, 2008. We will consider entering into additional
hedging agreements with respect to all or a portion of our variable rate debt.
We may borrow additional money with variable rates in the future. Increases in
interest rates could increase interest expense, which, in turn, could affect
cash flows and our ability to service our debt. As a result of the hedging
agreements, decreases in interest rates could increase interest
72
expense as compared to the underlying variable rate debt and could result in us
making payments to unwind such agreements.
At December 31, 2001, our total outstanding debt was approximately
$3,017.8 million, of which approximately $889.7 million was variable rate debt
after the impact of the hedge agreements. At December 31, 2001, the average
interest rate on variable rate debt was approximately 3.0%. Taking the hedging
agreements into consideration, if market interest rates on our variable rate
debt were to increase by ten percent (or approximately 30 basis points), the
increase in interest expense on the variable rate debt would decrease future
earnings and cash flows by approximately $2.7 million annually. If market rates
of interest increased by 10%, the fair value of the total debt outstanding would
decrease by approximately $55.7 million.
If market rates of interest on the variable rate debt decrease by 10%
(or approximately 30 basis points), the decrease in interest expense on the
variable rate debt would increase future earnings and cash flows by
approximately $2.7 million annually. If market rates of interest decrease by
10%, the fair value of the total outstanding debt would increase by
approximately $58.1 million.
These amounts were determined solely by considering the impact of
hypothetical interest rates on our financial instruments. These analyses do not
consider the effect of the reduced level of overall economic activity that could
exist in such an environment. Further, in the event of a change of such
magnitude, management would likely take such actions to further mitigate its
exposure to the change. Due to the uncertainty of specific actions we may
undertake to minimize possible effects of market interest rate increases, this
analysis assumes no changes in our financial structure.
Competition
The leasing of real estate is highly competitive. We compete for
tenants with lessors and developers of similar properties located in our
respective markets primarily on the basis of location, rent charged, services
provided, and the design and condition of our buildings. We also experience
competition when attempting to acquire real estate, including competition from
domestic and foreign financial institutions, other REITs, life insurance
companies, pension trusts, trust funds, partnerships and individual investors.
Environmental Matters
We believe, based on our internal reviews and other factors, that the
future costs relating to environmental remediation and compliance will not have
a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or
liquidity. For a discussion of environmental matters, see "Item 1. Business -
Risk Factors - Environmental problems at our properties are possible, may be
costly and may adversely affect our operating results or financial condition" in
this Form 10-K.
Newly Issued Accounting Standards
In December 1999, the Securities Exchange Commission issued Staff
Accounting Bulletin, or SAB, No. 101, Revenue Recognition, which outlines basic
criteria that must be met to recognize revenue and provides guidance for the
presentation of revenue and for disclosure related to revenue recognition
policies in financial statements. The adoption of SAB 101 had no significant
impact on us.
In June 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued SFAS No.
141, "Business Combinations," and SFAS No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets." These new standards eliminate pooling as a method of accounting for
business combinations, and feature new accounting rules for goodwill and
intangible assets. SFAS No. 141 is effective for business combinations initiated
from July 1, 2001. SFAS No. 142 will be adopted on July 1, 2002. We are
currently assessing the impact of the adoption of SFAS No. 142.
On October 3, 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued
SFAS No. 144, "Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets."
SFAS No. 144 supersedes SFAS No. 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of
Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to Be Disposed Of." SFAS No. 144
applies to all
73
long-lived assets (including discontinued operations) and consequently amends
Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 30, "Reporting Results of Operations -
Reporting the Effects of Disposal of a Segment of a Business." SFAS No. 144
requires long-lived assets that are to be disposed of by sale be measured at the
lower of book value or fair value less cost to sell. Under SFAS No. 144, certain
conditions are required to be met for a property to be classified as held for
disposition. Under the transitional rules of the standard, properties held for
disposition as at the date of adoption are required to satisfy these conditions
within one year of adoption. Properties currently held for disposition that do
not meet such conditions by December 31, 2002 will be required to be
reclassified from held for disposition, to held and used at that date.
Reclassification, if any, is measured at the lower of the asset's carrying
amount before it was classified as held for disposition, adjusted for any
depreciation expense that would have been recognized had the asset been
continuously classified as held and used, or fair value at the date of
reclassification. We adopted this standard on January 1, 2002 and we do not
expect any impact with respect to the adoption of this standard.
Inflation
Substantially all of our leases provide for separate property tax and
operating expense escalations over a base amount. In addition, many of our
leases provide for fixed base rent increases or indexed increases. We believe
that inflationary increases may be at least partially offset by these
contractual rent increases.
Funds from Operations
Management believes that funds from operations, as defined by the
Board of Governors of the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts,
or NAREIT, to be an appropriate measure of performance for an equity REIT. While
funds from operations is a relevant and widely used measure of operating
performance of equity REITs, it does not represent cash flows from operations or
net income as defined by GAAP, and it should not be considered as an alternative
to these indicators in evaluating our liquidity or operating performance.
The following table reflects the calculation of funds from operations
for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999:
Years Ended December 31,
-----------------------------------------
2001 2000 1999
------------- ------------- -------------
(dollars in thousands)
Income before allocation to minority interest, income from
unconsolidated real estate joint ventures, gain (loss) on
sale of real estate and allowance for loss on properties
held for disposition, income taxes, extraordinary item and
cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle $ 177,560 $ 78,465 $ 84,860
Add/(deduct):
Income from unconsolidated real estate joint ventures 12,952 19,417 16,207
Depreciation and amortization (real estate related) including
share of unconsolidated real estate joint ventures 174,850 161,841 142,232
Current operating taxes (4,869) (9,406) (1,188)
------------- ------------- -------------
Funds from operations (1) 360,493 250,317 242,111
Less straight-line rent adjustments (21,639) (27,499) (32,967)
Add straight-line ground rent adjustments 2,499 2,508 2,560
------------- ------------- -------------
Adjusted funds from operations $ 341,353 $ 225,326 $ 211,704
============= ============= =============
(1) The White Paper on Funds from Operations approved by the Board of
Governors of the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts,
or NAREIT, in March 1995 defines funds from operations as net income
(loss), computed in accordance with GAAP, excluding gains (or losses)
from debt restructuring and sales of properties, plus real estate
related depreciation and amortization and after adjustments for
unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. In November 1999,
NAREIT issued a National Policy Bulletin effective January 1, 2000
clarifying the definition of funds from operations to include all
operating results, both recurring and non-recurring, except those
defined as extraordinary under GAAP. We believe that funds from
operations is helpful to
74
investors as a measure of the performance of an equity REIT because,
along with cash flows from operating activities, financing activities
and investing activities, it provides investors with an indication of
our ability to incur and service debt, to make capital expenditures and
to fund other cash needs. We compute funds from operations in
accordance with standards established by NAREIT, which may not be
comparable to funds from operations reported by other REITs that do not
define the term in accordance with the current NAREIT definition or
that interpret the current NAREIT definition differently than we do.
Funds from operations does not represent cash generated from operating
activities in accordance with GAAP, nor does it represent cash
available to pay distributions and should not be considered as an
alternative to net income, determined in accordance with GAAP, as an
indication of our financial performance or to cash flows from operating
activities, determined in accordance with GAAP, as a measure of our
liquidity, nor is it indicative of funds available to fund our cash
needs, including our ability to make cash distributions.
75
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Information about quantitative and qualitative disclosure about market
risk is incorporated herein by reference from "Item 7. Management's Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Market Risk -
Quantitative and Qualitative Information."
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
See "Index to Financial Statements" on page F-1 of this Form 10-K.
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and
Financial Disclosure
None.
76
Part III
Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers
The following table sets forth certain information about the persons
we expect to serve as our directors and executive officers after the corporate
reorganization.
Name Age Position
Peter Munk 74 Chairman of the Board of Directors
Christopher Mackenzie* 47 Chief Executive Officer, President and Director
Brian Mulroney 62 Director
Glenn Rufrano 52 Director
Richard Thomson 68 Director
Polyvios Vintiadis 66 Director
Stephen Volk 65 Director
Antonio Bismonte* 41 Executive Vice President, Leasing & Operations
Gregory Hanson* 45 Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
William Tresham 46 Executive Vice President, Six Sigma Initiatives
Lee Wagman 52 Executive Vice President
Casey Wold* 44 Executive Vice President, Corporate Development &
Capital Transactions
Brian Berry 35 Senior Vice President, Acquisitions, Dispositions &
Development
Stephen Budorick 41 Senior Vice President, Central Region
Jeffrey Echt 36 Senior Vice President, Finance & Treasury
Michael Escalante 41 Senior Vice President, Capital Allocations & Business
Development
Dennis Fabro 36 Senior Vice President, Investor Relations
Wendy Godoy 47 Senior Vice President, Retail & Entertainment
Financial Services
Paul Layne 44 Senior Vice President, Western Region
Richard Matthews 48 Senior Vice President, Public Relations & Corporate
Communications
Joanne Ranger 38 Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer
Linda Sands-Vankerk 41 Senior Vice President, Human Resources
Douglas Winshall 40 Senior Vice President, Eastern Region
- --------------
* Member of our management committee, of which Christopher Mackenzie is the
Chairman.
We expect that our board of directors will include five independent
directors after the corporate reorganization. Both our audit committee and our
nominating committee will be comprised entirely of independent directors.
Additionally, we expect that the members of our nominating committee will also
serve on our compensation committee.
The term of office for each of the above named directors will expire
at the time of our next annual meeting of stockholders. Holders of our shares of
common stock will have no right to cumulative voting in the election of
directors. Consequently, at each annual meeting of stockholders, the holders of
a majority of the votes will be able to elect all of the directors. The
candidates for election to our board of directors will be nominated by our
nominating committee.
The following is a summary of the background of each director and
executive officer.
Peter Munk. Mr. Munk will serve as the Chairman of our board of
directors after the corporate reorganization. Mr. Munk founded our parent
company, TrizecHahn Corporation, and since 1987 has served as the Chairman of
the board of directors. Prior to January 1, 2001, Mr. Munk also served as the
Chief Executive Officer of TrizecHahn Corporation. Mr. Munk founded and has been
the Chairman of the board of directors of Barrick
77
Gold Corporation, a gold mining company, since 1984. Mr. Munk will also serve as
the Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the board of directors of Trizec
Canada Inc. after the corporate reorganization.
Christopher Mackenzie. Mr. Mackenzie has served as our Chief Executive
Officer, our President, and a member of our board of directors since May 2001.
Mr. Mackenzie will also serve as the Chairman of our management committee after
the corporate reorganization. Since January 1, 2001, Mr. Mackenzie has served as
Chief Executive Officer and a member of the board of directors of TrizecHahn
Corporation. From July 1998 through December 2000, Mr. Mackenzie was a partner
of Clayton, Dubilier & Rice, a private equity partnership in New York and
London. From December 1993 to September 1997, Mr. Mackenzie was the President of
GE Capital Europe, the European financial services subsidiary of the General
Electric Company. During this period, Mr. Mackenzie also became a corporate
officer of the General Electric Company and in September 1997 he became a Senior
Vice President of GE Capital Corporation, the global financial services
subsidiary of the General Electric Company. Mr. Mackenzie is a director of WPP
Group plc. Mr. Mackenzie will also serve as a member of the board of directors
of Trizec Canada Inc. after the corporate reorganization.
Brian Mulroney. Mr. Mulroney will serve as a member of our board of
directors after the corporate reorganization. In addition, Mr. Mulroney serves
as a member of the board of directors of our parent corporation, TrizecHahn
Corporation, and of Barrick Gold Corporation, Cendant Corporation, Archer
Daniels Midland, Quebecor Inc. and Quebecor World Inc. Mr. Mulroney served as
the Prime Minister of Canada from September 1984 to June 1993. In August 1993,
Mr. Mulroney joined Ogilvy, Renault, a law firm based in Montreal, Canada, as
Senior Partner.
Glenn Rufrano. Mr. Rufrano will serve as a member of our board of
directors after the corporate reorganization. In addition, Mr. Rufrano serves as
a member of the board of directors of our parent corporation, TrizecHahn
Corporation, and of New Plan Excel Realty Trust. Mr. Rufrano joined New Plan
Excel Realty Trust, a real estate investment trust, in February 2000 where he
serves as the Chief Executive Officer and President and as a member of the
company's Investment Committee. Prior to joining New Plan Excel Realty Trust,
Mr. Rufrano concurrently served as a partner, President and Chief Operating
Officer at The O'Connor Group, a diversified real estate investment firm, and as
Co-Chairman of the Peabody Group, an association between The O'Connor Group and
J.P. Morgan & Co., Inc. investing in high-yield international real estate
opportunities.
Richard Thomson. Mr. Thomson will serve as a member of our board of
directors after the corporate reorganization. Mr. Thomson also serves as a
member of the board of directors of Inco Limited, Nexen Inc., S.C. Johnson &
Son, Inc., Prudential Financial Inc., The Thomson Corporation, The
Toronto-Dominion Bank and of our parent corporation, TrizecHahn Corporation. Mr.
Thomson served as Chief Executive Officer of The Toronto-Dominion Bank from 1977
to 1997 and as Chairman of the bank from 1978 to February 1998. Mr. Thomson
retired from The Toronto-Dominion Bank in February 1998.
Polyvios Vintiadis. Mr. Vintiadis will serve as a member of our board
of directors after the corporate reorganization. In addition, Mr. Vintiadis
serves as a member of the board of directors of Spectra-Physics Inc. and of
Morgens, Waterfall, Vintiadis & Co., a financial services firm based in New
York. Mr. Vintiadis served as the Chairman, President and Chief Executive
Officer of Towermarc Corporation, a full service real estate development
company, from 1984 to 2001. In addition, Mr. Vintiadis served as a principal
and/or consultant of Morgens, Waterfall, Vintiadis & Co. from 1981 until 1999.
Since 1999, Mr. Vintiadis has served as a consultant to Morgens, Waterfall,
Vintiadis & Co.
Stephen Volk. Mr. Volk will serve as a member of our board of
directors after the corporate reorganization. Mr. Volk also currently serves as
a member of the board of directors of Consolidated Edison, Inc. and of
Contigroup Companies, Inc. Mr. Volk served as Senior Partner of Shearman &
Sterling, a corporate law firm based in New York, from 1991 to June 2001. Mr.
Volk is now Chairman of Credit Suisse First Boston Corporation, an investment
bank.
Antonio Bismonte. Mr. Bismonte has served as our Executive Vice
President, Leasing & Operations since February 2002. Mr. Bismonte will serve a
member of our management committee after the corporate reorganization. From 1997
to 2000, Mr. Bismonte served as Senior Vice President, Leasing and from August
1996
78
to 1997, as a Vice President, Asset Management of our subsidiary, TrizecHahn
Office Properties Inc. From 2000 to February 2002, Mr. Bismonte served as
Executive Vice President, Leasing and Operations of our company.
Gregory Hanson. Mr. Hanson has served as an Executive Vice President
and our Chief Financial Officer since November 2001. Mr. Hanson will serve as a
member of our management committee after the corporate reorganization. Since
June 2001, Mr. Hanson has served as Chief Financial Officer of TrizecHahn
Corporation. From April 1992 through June 2001, Mr. Hanson was employed by
General Electric Capital Corporation in the capacity of Chief Financial Officer
of GE Capital Real Estate from December 1997 to June 2001 and as Chief Financial
Officer of GE Capital Commercial Finance from November 1996 to December 1997.
William Tresham. Mr. Tresham has served as our Executive Vice
President, Six Sigma Initiatives since February 2002. Since May 2000, Mr.
Tresham has served as an Executive Vice President of our subsidiary, TrizecHahn
Office Properties Inc. Mr. Tresham served as a Senior Vice President of
TrizecHahn Office Properties Ltd., a subsidiary of TrizecHahn Corporation, from
1995 to May 2000.
Lee Wagman. Mr. Wagman has served as an Executive Vice President since
February 2002. Mr. Wagman has served as the President of TrizecHahn Developments
Inc. and its predecessors since 1995.
Casey Wold. Mr. Wold has served as our Executive Vice President,
Corporate Development & Capital Transactions since February 2002. Mr. Wold will
serve as a member of our management committee after the corporate
reorganization. Since February 1995, Mr. Wold has served as an Executive Vice
President of TrizecHahn Corporation.
Brian Berry. Mr. Berry has served as our Senior Vice President,
Acquisitions, Dispositions & Development since February 2002. Since January
2000, Mr. Berry has served as a Senior Vice President, Acquisitions/Dispositions
of our subsidiary, TrizecHahn Office Properties Inc. Mr. Berry served as a Vice
President, Acquisitions of our subsidiary, TrizecHahn Office Properties Inc.,
from February 1998 to December 1999. Mr. Berry served as an Associate of The JBG
Companies from February 1997 to February 1998.
Stephen Budorick. Mr. Budorick has served as our Senior Vice
President, Central Region since February 2002. Since January 1999, Mr. Budorick
has served as a Senior Vice President, Central Region of our subsidiary,
TrizecHahn Office Properties Inc. Mr. Budorick served as a Regional Vice
President, Midwest Region of our subsidiary, TrizecHahn Office Properties Inc.,
from June 1998 to January 1999. Mr. Budorick served as the General Manager/Vice
President, Midwest-Sears Tower of our subsidiary, TrizecHahn Office Properties
Inc., from December 1997 to June 1998. Mr. Budorick served as a Senior Vice
President of Miglin Beitler Management Corporation from 1995 to December 1997.
Jeffrey Echt. Mr. Echt has served as our Senior Vice President,
Finance & Treasury since February 2002 and as our Treasurer since July 2001.
Since July 2001, Mr. Echt has also served as the Senior Vice President, Finance
and Treasury of our subsidiary, TrizecHahn Office Properties Inc. Mr. Echt
served as a Vice President of our company from July 2001 to February 2002. Mr.
Echt served as a Senior Vice President, Finance of our subsidiary, TrizecHahn
Office Properties Inc., from January 2000 to July 2001. Mr. Echt served as a
Vice President, Finance of our subsidiary, TrizecHahn Office Properties Inc.,
from August 1997 to December 1999. Mr. Echt served as a Director, Finance of
Equity Office Properties Trust from November 1993 to August 1997.
Michael Escalante. Mr. Escalante has served as our Senior Vice
President, Capital Allocations & Business Development since February 2002. Since
July 2001, Mr. Escalante has served as a Senior Vice President, Capital
Allocations/Business Development, of our subsidiary, TrizecHahn Office
Properties Inc. Mr. Escalante served as a Senior Vice President/Regional
Director, Western Region of our subsidiary, TrizecHahn Office Properties Inc.,
from March 1997 to June 2001.
Dennis Fabro. Mr. Fabro has served as our Senior Vice President,
Investor Relations since February 2002. Since May 2001, Mr. Fabro has served as
a Vice President, Investor Relations of TrizecHahn Corporation. Mr. Fabro served
as Director, Capital Markets of TrizecHahn Corporation from October 2000 to May
2001. Mr. Fabro served as Director, Ebusiness Development of TrizecHahn
Corporation from December 1999 to September 2000.
79
Mr. Fabro served as a Senior Analyst, Investor Relations of TrizecHahn
Corporation from October 1997 to December 1999. Mr. Fabro served as a Senior
Analyst of GE Capital Real Estate from June 1995 to October 1997.
Wendy Godoy. Ms. Godoy has served as our Senior Vice President, Retail
& Entertainment Financial Services since February 2002. From October 1995 to
February 2002, Ms. Godoy served as a Vice President of our company. Since July
1998, Ms. Godoy served as a Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
TrizecHahn Developments Inc., a subsidiary of TrizecHahn Corporation. Ms. Godoy
served as a Senior Vice President, Finance of TrizecHahn Centers Inc., a
subsidiary of TrizecHahn Corporation, from October 1995 to June 1998.
Paul Layne. Mr. Layne has served as our Senior Vice President, Western
Region since February 2002. Since July 2001, Mr. Layne has served as Senior Vice
President, Western Region of our subsidiary, TrizecHahn Office Properties Inc.
Mr. Layne served as Senior Vice President, Southwest/Southeast Region of our
subsidiary, TrizecHahn Office Properties Inc., from January 1999 to July 2001.
Mr. Layne served as a Regional Vice President, Southwest Region of our
subsidiary, TrizecHahn Office Properties Inc., from January 1997 to January
1999.
Richard Matthews. Mr. Matthews has served as our Senior Vice
President, Public Relations & Corporate Communications since February 2002.
Since September 2001, Mr. Matthews has served as a Senior Vice President, Public
Relations and Corporate Communications, of TrizecHahn Corporation. Mr. Matthews
served as a Senior Vice President of Rubenstein Associates from September 1998
to September 2001. Mr. Matthews served as a Director, Public Relations of The
Prudential Insurance Company of America from June 1975 to September 1998.
Joanne Ranger. Ms. Ranger has served as our Senior Vice President and
Chief Accounting Officer since February 2002. Since December 1998, Ms. Ranger
has served as a Vice President and Assistant Controller of TrizecHahn
Corporation. Ms. Ranger served as an Assistant Controller of TrizecHahn
Corporation from June 1996 to November 1998.
Linda Sands-Vankerk. Ms. Sands-Vankerk has served as our Senior Vice
President, Human Resources since February 2002. Since July 7, 2001, Ms.
Sands-Vankerk has served a Senior Vice President, Human Resources of our
subsidiary, TrizecHahn Office Properties Inc. Ms. Sands-Vankerk served as a Vice
President, Human Resources of our subsidiary, TrizecHahn Office Properties Inc.,
from January 1999 to July 2001. Ms. Sands-Vankerk served as a Director, Human
Resources of our subsidiary, TrizecHahn Office Properties Inc., from May 1998 to
December 1998. Ms. Sands-Vankerk served as a Vice President, Human Resources of
Candle Corporation of America, from August 1997 to May 1998. Ms. Sands-Vankerk
served as a Senior Manager, Human Resources of Sara Lee Corporation from
September 1987 to August 1997.
Douglas Winshall. Mr. Winshall has served as our Senior Vice
President, Eastern Region since February 2002. Since January 2000, Mr. Winshall
has served as a Senior Vice President, Eastern Region of our subsidiary,
TrizecHahn Office Properties Inc. Mr. Winshall served as a Vice President,
Northeast Region of our subsidiary, TrizecHahn Office Properties Inc., from
February 1997 to December 1999.
Current Management
The executive officers listed above currently serve our company in the
capacities indicated. Our current board of directors has the following three
members: Christopher Mackenzie, Robin Campbell and Gregory Hanson.
80
Item 11. Executive Compensation
Director Compensation
During 2001, we did not have any non-employee directors. Following the
corporate reorganization, the compensation committee of our board of directors
will determine the compensation for our non-employee directors.
Executive Compensation
The following table sets forth the compensation paid or accrued by
TrizecHahn Corporation and us during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001 to,
or on behalf of, our chief executive officer and our four most highly
compensated executive officers as of December 31, 2001. We refer to these
officers collectively as the named executive officers.
Summary Compensation Table
Long-Term
Annual Compensation Compensation
-------------------------------------------- ---------------
Other Number of
Annual Shares
Name and Bonus Compensation Underlying All Other
Principal Position Year Salary (1) (2) Options/SARs (3) Compensation
- ----------------------- ----- ------------- ------------- ------------- ---------------- ------------
Peter Munk, Chairman of 2001 $ 700,000 (4) $ 2,800,000(4) -- -- --
the Board of Directors
Christopher Mackenzie, 2001 $1,950,000 $ 1,675,000 -- -- $ 300,000 (5)
Chief Executive
Officer, President and
Director
Gregory Hanson, Executive 2001 $ 291,700 (6) $ 468,750 (7) -- 500,000 (8) --
Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
Lee Wagman, Executive 2001 $ 672,000 $ 268,800 -- 100,000 (9) $1,198,587 (10)
Vice President;
President, TrizecHahn
Developments Inc.
Casey Wold, Executive 2001 $ 650,000 $ 650,000 -- -- $ 6,400 (11)
Vice President,
Corporate Development
and Capital
Transactions
- ----------------
(1) Unless otherwise noted, amounts represent bonus payments under the
TrizecHahn Corporation annual variable incentive program for 2001.
(2) Aggregate amount of perquisites and other personal benefits for each
named executive officer does not exceed the lesser of $50,000 and 10% of
total annual salary and bonus.
(3) Amounts shown in this column refer to options.
(4) Although Mr. Munk's Annual Compensation (salary and bonus) from TrizecHahn
Corporation was $3,500,000 in 2001, he will be paid Annual Compensation of
$1,000,000 in 2002. Commencing on the effective date of the corporate
reorganization, Trizec Canada Inc. and Trizec Properties will each pay a
50% share of the remaining amount of Mr. Munk's salary payable in 2002.
(5) Under his employment agreement with TrizecHahn Corporation, which we
expect to assume, Mr. Mackenzie received a payment in January 2001 to
fund relocation-related expenses.
(6) Mr. Hanson's employment with TrizecHahn Corporation commenced on June
1, 2001 pursuant to an employment agreement, which we expect to assume.
(7) Mr. Hanson received a signing bonus of $250,000 upon execution of
his employment agreement with TrizecHahn Corporation and a pro-rated
annual bonus of $218,750.
(8) See note (2) to the table entitled "Option/SAR Grants in Last Fiscal Year."
(9) See note (3) to the table entitled "Option/SAR Grants in Last Fiscal Year."
81
(10) All Other Compensation for Mr. Wagman consists of (1) amounts contributed
by us under our 401(k) plan ($6,400) and under our deferred compensation
plan ($2,000), (2) the amount forgiven ($800,000) on an interest-free
loan in the amount of $4,594,000 pursuant to his amended employment
agreement with TrizecHahn Corporation, (3) imputed interest ($127,187) on
such loan, (4) funding of relocation expenses ($35,000), and (5) annual
cost of living allowance ($228,000).
(11) All Other Compensation for Mr. Wold consists of amounts contributed by us
under our 401(k) plan.
Stock Options
The following table contains information regarding option grants by
TrizecHahn Corporation to our named executive officers during the year ended
December 31, 2001 that, in connection with the corporate reorganization, are
expected to be cancelled in exchange for options to purchase our shares.
Option/SAR Grants in Last Fiscal Year
Individual Grants
------------------------------------------- Potential Realizable Value
% of Total at Assumed Annual Rates of
Number of Options/SARs Stock
Securities Granted to Exercise Price Appreciation
Underlying Employees in or Base Price for Option Term (5)
Options/SARs Fiscal Year ($/Share) Expiration ----------------------
Name Granted (1) (4) Date 5% ($) 10% ($)
- -------------------------- -------------- ------------ ------------- ----------- ----------- ----------
Peter Munk -- -- -- -- -- --
Christopher Mackenzie -- -- -- -- -- --
Gregory Hanson 100,000 (2) 11.0 $15.95 5/11/2008 $ 739,311 $1,637,853
22.0 16.89 5/11/2008 1,290,671 3,087,755
200,000 22.0 17.83 5/11/2008 1,102,721 2,899,805
200,000
Lee Wagman 33,334 3.7 $17.29 9/24/2008 $195,184 $492,176
33,333 3.7 18.23 9/24/2008 163,853 460,837
33,333 (3) 3.7 19.17 9/24/2008 132,529 429,512
Casey Wold -- -- -- -- -- --
- ---------------------------------
(1) Percentages based on 907,500 options granted by TrizecHahn Corporation to
employees that will be cancelled and exchanged for options to purchase
our shares in connection with the corporate reorganization.
(2) On May 11, 2001, pursuant to his employment agreement, Mr. Hanson was
granted non-assignable options to purchase up to 600,000 TrizecHahn
Corporation subordinate voting shares. As part of the corporate
reorganization, 500,000 of these options will be cancelled in exchange
for options to purchase our shares, as shown in the above table. The
options vest in tranches of 100,000, 200,000 and 200,000 on each of May
11, 2002, 2003 and 2004 and have a seven-year term. The first tranche of
options to vest has an exercise price of Cdn$25.46 per share, the second
tranche has an exercise price of Cdn$26.96 per share and the third has an
exercise price of Cdn$28.46 per share. The exercise price will be
converted to its U.S. dollar equivalent on the effective date of the
corporate reorganization based on the Cdn$/US$ exchange rate on such
date. Mr. Hanson will be required to exchange the remaining 100,000
TrizecHahn Corporation options, which have an exercise price of
Cdn$25.46, for, at his election, either warrants to purchase our shares
or options to purchase subordinate voting shares of Trizec Canada Inc.
(3) On September 24, 2001, pursuant to his employment agreement, Mr. Wagman
was granted non-assignable options to purchase up to 100,000 TrizecHahn
Corporation subordinate voting shares. As part of the corporate
reorganization, all of these options will be cancelled in exchange for
options to purchase our shares, as shown in the above table. The options
vest in equal amounts on each of September 24, 2002, 2003 and 2004 and
have a seven-year term. The first tranche of options to vest has an
exercise price of Cdn$27.60 per share, the second tranche has an exercise
price of Cdn$29.10 per share and the third has an exercise price of
Cdn$30.60 per share. The exercise price will be converted to its U.S.
dollar equivalent on the effective date of the corporate reorganization
based on the Cdn$/US$ exchange rate on such date.
82
(4) Amounts represent exercise prices that, for purposes of the table, have
been converted to U.S. dollars using an exchange rate of Cdn$1/US$.6265,
which was the rate for December 31, 2001, as published by Dow Jones &
Company.
(5) Calculated as the product of (a) the difference between (1) the product
of the closing price on the New York Stock Exchange on the date of grant
and the sum of one plus the adjusted stock price appreciation rate and
(2) the exercise price of the option; and (b) the number of securities
underlying the grant at fiscal year end.
Option Exercises and Year-End Option Values
The following table provides information about the number of shares of
TrizecHahn Corporation issued upon the exercise of options by our named
executive officers during the year ended December 31, 2001, and the value
realized by our named executive officers. The table also provides information
about the number and value of options of TrizecHahn Corporation held by our
named executive officers at December 31, 2001 that, in connection with the
corporate reorganization, are expected to be cancelled and exchanged for options
to purchase our shares.
Aggregated Option/SAR Exercises in Last Fiscal Year and
Fiscal Year-End Option/SAR Values
Number of Securities
Number of Underlying Unexercised Value of Unexercised
Shares Options/SARs at Fiscal In-the-Money Options at Fiscal
Acquired Year End (1) Year End (2)
on Value --------------------------- ------------------------------
Name Exercise Realized Exercisable Unexercisable Exercisable Unexercisable
- ------------------------ --------- -------------- ----------- ------------- ----------- -------------
Peter Munk -- -- -- (3) -- -- --
Christopher Mackenzie -- -- -- 1,000,000 (4) -- $830,000
Gregory Hanson -- -- -- 500,000 (5) -- --
Lee Wagman -- -- 875,000 275,000 $1,136,800 --
Casey Wold 217,500 $1,493,124 (6) 657,500 75,000 $ 20,670 $20,670
- -------------------
(1) The numbers in the two columns represent options to purchase our shares.
(2) The closing price of the subordinate voting shares of TrizecHahn
Corporation on the New York Stock Exchange on December 31, 2001 was
$15.70, based on an exchange rate of Cdn$1/US$.6265, as published by Dow
Jones & Company.
(3) The options previously granted to Mr. Munk by TrizecHahn Corporation will
not be exchanged for options to purchase our shares. He will receive
1,350,000 warrants to purchase our shares, in exchange for 1,350,000
TrizecHahn Corporation options that will be cancelled. He will also
receive options to purchase subordinate voting shares of Trizec Canada
Inc. in exchange for options to purchase 550,000 subordinate voting
shares of TrizecHahn Corporation that will be cancelled.
(4) In addition to the options shown in the table, in exchange for options to
purchase 500,000 subordinate voting shares of TrizecHahn Corporation that
will be cancelled, Mr. Mackenzie will receive warrants to purchase
500,000 of our shares.
(5) See note (2) to the table entitled "Option/SAR Grants in Last Fiscal
Year."
(6) On September 27, 2001, Mr. Wold purchased and sold 167,500 shares and on
September 28, 2001, he purchased and sold 50,000 shares. The value
realized is based on sales proceeds received and a per-share exercise
price of Cdn$17.24, which was the equivalent of $10.92 on September 27
and $11.00 on September 28, based on the Cdn$/US$ exchange rates of
Cdn$1/US$.6333 on September 27 and Cdn$1/US$.6382 on September 28.
2002 Trizec Properties, Inc. Stock Option Plan
As part of the corporate reorganization, we intend to establish and
maintain a 2002 stock option plan that will provide for grants of options to
purchase shares of our common stock to our directors, officers and employees. In
addition to making new grants under the plan, we intend to grant options to
purchase shares of our common stock under this plan in exchange for certain of
the outstanding options to purchase subordinate voting shares of TrizecHahn
Corporation that will be cancelled in connection with the corporate
reorganization, as described more fully in the section entitled "The TrizecHahn
Corporate Reorganization." These grants will be made to our directors, officers
and employees and to individuals holding options to purchase subordinate voting
shares of TrizecHahn Corporation who are our former employees as of the
effective date of the corporate reorganization. We anticipate that these stock
options will be of equivalent economic value to the options of TrizecHahn
Corporation that they will replace.
83
We anticipate that a maximum of 19,000,000 shares of our common stock
will be authorized for issuance under our stock option plan. The maximum number
of shares for which options may be granted to any individual in any calendar
year is 4,000,000. This per-individual limit will be applied consistent with the
rules and regulations under Section 162(m) of the Code. The number of options
awarded to employees may be adjusted in the event of a capital reorganization.
Options granted under this plan are not intended to qualify as incentive stock
options pursuant to Section 422 of the Code.
Options under our plan that are not granted in exchange for options to
purchase subordinate voting shares of TrizecHahn Corporation that are cancelled
in connection with the corporate reorganization will have the following terms
and conditions, unless otherwise determined by a committee of our board of
directors:
o An option may be exercised during the seven-year period
following the date of grant.
o An option will vest and become exercisable in 25% increments
over four years, beginning one year after the date of grant.
o The exercise price cannot be less than the fair market value
of a share of our common stock on the date of grant.
o Following a termination of employment for cause (as defined in
the applicable option agreement), all unexercised options will
immediately expire and, following a termination for other
reasons will remain exercisable for:
o 30 days if such options are vested and, if the
termination is for any reason, except cause (as
defined in the applicable option agreement), death or
disability; and
o one year whether or not previously vested, if the
termination is due to death or disability.
Options granted under our stock option plan to our directors,
officers, employees and individuals who are our former employees as of the
effective date of the corporate reorganization in replacement for options to
purchase subordinate voting shares of TrizecHahn Corporation will have terms
that are substantially the same as the terms of the replaced options, except
that the replaced options will not expire until the later of (1) the expiration
of the original term of the option and (2) 66 months following the effective
date of the corporate reorganization, as long as the holder remains employed by
us.
Pursuant to the terms of the stock option plan and to the extent
permitted by law, our board of directors may delegate authority under the stock
option plan to one or more committees or subcommittees of the board of directors
or to our executive officers. We anticipate that our board of directors will
delegate its authority under our stock option plan to a newly formed
compensation committee of the board of directors that will consist exclusively
of independent directors in compliance with the provisions of Section 162(m) of
the Code and Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
84
New Plan Benefits (1)
Plan Name
---------------------------------------------
Name and Position Dollar Value (2) Number of Options
- ---------------------------------------------------- -------------------- ------------------
Peter Munk, - -
Chairman of the Board of Directors
Christopher Mackenzie, $15,700,000 1,000,000
Chief Executive Officer, President, Director
Gregory Hanson, $ 9,263,000 590,000
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Lee Wagman, $18,055,000 1,150,000
Executive Vice President
Casey Wold, $12,913,250 822,500
Executive Vice President,
Corporate Development and Capital Transactions
All Executive Officers as a Group $86,436,209 5,505,491
All Directors that are not Executive Officers $ 2,220,577 141,438
All Employees (except Executive Officers) as a Group $25,465,400 1,622,000 (3)
- -----------------
(1) This table provides information regarding options to purchase our
shares that we expect to grant under our stock option plan in
connection with the corporate reorganization in exchange for cancelled
options to purchase subordinate voting shares of TrizecHahn Corporation
previously granted under the stock option plan of TrizecHahn
Corporation. The table includes options to purchase subordinate voting
shares of TrizecHahn Corporation granted in January 2002 that are not
reflected in the table entitled "Aggregated Option/SAR Exercises in
Last Fiscal Year and Fiscal Year-End Option/SAR Values."
(2) The Dollar Value is the market value of the subordinate voting shares
of TrizecHahn Corporation on December 31, 2001. See note (2) to the
table entitled "Aggregated Options/SAR Exercises in Last Fiscal Year
and Fiscal Year-End Option/SAR Values."
(3) This number does not include 1,384,855 options to purchase our shares
that will be granted to individuals who are our former employees as of
the date of the corporate reorganization.
Trizec Properties, Inc. Employee 401(k) Plan
In August 1999, we assumed the 401(k) plan, and the obligations
thereunder, originally established by our subsidiary, TrizecHahn Centers Inc. At
that time, the name of the plan became the TrizecHahn USA Employee 401(k) Plan
and all of our employees who satisfied the eligibility criteria set forth in the
plan were eligible to participate. As part of the corporate reorganization, the
name will be changed to the Trizec Properties, Inc. Employee 401(k) Plan. In
January 2000, our subsidiary, TrizecHahn Developments Inc. ceased to participate
in this plan and established a 401(k) plan for its employees that is
substantially the same as the August 1999 plan. Assets from the TrizecHahn
Centers Inc. plan were transferred to the TrizecHahn Developments Inc. plan. In
this discussion, any reference to our 401(k) plan or to our plan is a reference
to both plans.
The 401(k) plan is a tax-qualified defined contribution plan under
Section 401(k) of the Code. In general, all of our employees are eligible to
participate once they attain six months of service and age 18. The 401(k) plan
includes a salary deferral arrangement pursuant to which participants may elect
to reduce their current compensation by 1% to 30% up to the statutorily
prescribed limit, which is $11,000 in 2002, and will have the amount of the
reduction contributed to the 401(k) plan.
We make matching contributions on behalf of participants equal to 100%
of the first five percent of deferred compensation. However, the maximum
employer matching contribution contributed on behalf of our highly compensated
employees is $6,400.
85
Trizec Deferred Compensation Plan
TrizecHahn Centers Inc. and TrizecHahn Developments Inc., two of our
subsidiaries, currently maintain deferred compensation plans for their U.S.
employees. We intend to continue the TrizecHahn Centers Inc. deferred
compensation plan for eligible employees and, in connection with the corporate
reorganization, to rename it the Trizec Deferred Compensation Plan. During 2002,
we intend to terminate the TrizecHahn Developments Inc. plan. Since the
provisions of the plans are substantially the same, in this discussion, any
reference to the deferred compensation plan is a reference to both plans.
The TrizecHahn Deferred Compensation Plan permits a select group of
management and highly compensated employees (which includes officers at the Vice
President level and above) to defer up to 100% of their base salary and/or bonus
on a pretax basis and to notionally invest the deferred amount in various
investment options offered under the plan. Additionally, we may make
discretionary contributions under the plan on behalf of participants, which are
also notionally invested in accordance with participants' elections. Upon
completion of a minimum deferral period of four years, participants may elect to
receive a distribution of the deferred amount. Discretionary contributions may
also be distributed after a four-year deferral period.
Upon distribution of a deferred amount and discretionary contribution,
participants receive such amounts and any earnings on such amounts, as
determined by the performance of the notional investments elected by the
participants. Participants whose employment terminates are eligible to receive a
distribution based on their original election, either as a lump sum or in
quarterly installments, at the time of their termination. Under certain other
circumstances, participants who are employed by us may receive a distribution
prior to the end of the four-year deferral period.
We have established a rabbi trust to which we contribute amounts equal
to participant deferrals and any discretionary contributions. We determine the
manner in which such amounts are actually invested and are under no obligation
to invest the amounts in accordance with participants' notional investments.
Notwithstanding the trust, the deferred compensation plan is an unfunded plan,
and the assets of the trust are subject to the claims of our general creditors.
If a participant dies while employed, the beneficiary receives the
proceeds from a life insurance policy purchased by us. The basic and
supplemental policies, together, pay seventeen times base salary and bonus to a
maximum of $1,000,000.
Escrowed Share Grants
On November 9, 2000, TrizecHahn Corporation made grants of escrowed
shares to 26 U.S. employees under which an escrow agent purchased a total of
904,350 TrizecHahn Corporation subordinate voting shares in the open market and
deposited them in escrowed accounts. The employee is entitled to the voting
rights and dividends paid on the shares during the escrow period. One-third of
the share grant vests and is released to the employee on each of the anniversary
dates of the grant over a three-year period. Accordingly, the first tranche of
shares vested on November 9, 2001.
An employee who voluntarily terminates his employment, unless such
termination is the result of the alteration by us of the essential terms of
employment without the employee's consent in a manner materially adverse to the
employee, or whose employment is terminated for cause, forfeits any entitlement
to the shares not yet released from escrow. Fully accelerated vesting occurs if
an employee's employment is terminated by us without cause.
As a result of accelerated vesting in connection with two terminations
in 2001 and the vesting on November 9, 2001 of the first tranche of shares,
530,754 TrizecHahn Corporation subordinate voting shares remain in escrow
pursuant to the grants.
In connection with the corporate reorganization, these shares will be
exchanged in the same manner that all other subordinate voting shares of
TrizecHahn Corporation are exchanged.
86
Executive Employment Agreements
Executive Employment Agreement for Christopher Mackenzie
Mr. Mackenzie and TrizecHahn Corporation entered into an employment
agreement, dated December 21, 2000, pursuant to which Mr. Mackenzie has served
as TrizecHahn Corporation's Chief Executive Officer and Deputy Chairman since
January 1, 2001. Under that agreement, TrizecHahn Corporation agreed to employ
Mr. Mackenzie as Chief Executive Officer and Deputy Chairman for a three-year
term ending December 31, 2003, subject to extension beyond that date with the
mutual consent of both parties. We expect to assume Mr. Mackenzie's employment
agreement.
Under the agreement, TrizecHahn Corporation has agreed to pay Mr.
Mackenzie an annual salary equal to at least $1.95 million. The agreement also
provides for an annual bonus in an amount of not less than $1,425,000 and not
more than 150% of Mr. Mackenzie's annual salary during the applicable year.
TrizecHahn Corporation also agreed to pay $300,000 to Mr. Mackenzie to fund his
relocation-related expenses.
In the event that Mr. Mackenzie's employment is not continued beyond
December 31, 2003, he will be entitled to receive one year's compensation upon
termination of his employment. In the event that his employment is terminated by
TrizecHahn Corporation without cause during the initial three-year period or is
terminated by Mr. Mackenzie following a change in control of TrizecHahn
Corporation, he will be entitled to receive the compensation otherwise payable
to him during that period upon termination of his employment; provided, however,
that if such termination occurs during the last year of the three-year period,
he will be entitled to receive one year's compensation upon termination of his
employment.
Mr. Mackenzie also was granted non-assignable options to purchase up
to 1,500,000 TrizecHahn Corporation subordinate voting shares at an exercise
price of $14.87 per share, representing the closing price of such shares on the
New York Stock Exchange on the trading day prior to the grant of those options.
The options vest in equal annual increments over a period of three years and
have a seven-year term. In the event that Mr. Mackenzie's employment terminates
as set out in the preceding paragraph, he will be entitled to retain and
exercise those stock options, subject to continued vesting, until December 31,
2005.
In connection with the corporate reorganization, 1,000,000 of the
options granted to Mr. Mackenzie by TrizecHahn Corporation under the employment
agreement will be cancelled in exchange for an equal number of options to
purchase our shares, subject to the terms set forth in the section entitled
"Management - 2002 Trizec Properties, Inc. Stock Option Plan." The remaining
500,000 TrizecHahn Corporation options granted under the employment agreement
that are vested will be cancelled in exchange for 500,000 warrants to purchase
our shares.
Also on December 21, 2000, PM Capital Inc. granted to Mr. Mackenzie
the non-assignable right to purchase from PM Capital 1,000,000 TrizecHahn
Corporation subordinate voting shares at a purchase price of $14.87 per share.
The terms upon which Mr. Mackenzie is entitled to exercise that purchase right
mirror in all respects his rights under the stock options granted to him by
TrizecHahn Corporation as described above, including the vesting schedules.
However, if Mr. Mackenzie elects to exercise his right to purchase TrizecHahn
Corporation subordinate voting shares from PM Capital, PM Capital has the right
to cash settle that purchase by making payment to Mr. Mackenzie of an amount
equal to the difference between the then current trading price of TrizecHahn
Corporation subordinate voting shares and the exercise price required to be paid
by Mr. Mackenzie, multiplied by the number of shares proposed to be purchased by
Mr. Mackenzie. In connection with the corporate reorganization, the options to
purchase shares of TrizecHahn Corporation from PM Capital will be cancelled in
exchange for an equal number of options to purchase subordinate voting shares of
Trizec Canada Inc. that will be held by PM Capital.
Executive Employment Agreement for Gregory Hanson
Under an executive employment agreement dated May 22, 2001, TrizecHahn
Corporation agreed to employ Mr. Hanson as Chief Financial Officer for an
initial term of two years, beginning on June 1, 2001, which will be
87
renewed for successive one-year periods, subject to four months' notice by
either party. We expect to assume Mr. Hanson's employment agreement.
Mr. Hanson's annual base salary under the agreement is $500,000, which
will be increased to $550,000 beginning June 1, 2002. Mr. Hanson's annual bonus
will be between 50% and 100% of his annual salary and is targeted at 70% of his
annual salary. The agreement provides for an annual tax equalization payment,
payable in the event Mr. Hanson is subject to Canadian income or employment
taxes, so that Mr. Hanson will retain an amount equal to the after-tax amount he
would have retained if his salary and bonus were not subject to Canadian income
or employment taxes.
In the event that Mr. Hanson's employment is not continued beyond the
initial term or the applicable renewed term, he will be entitled to receive,
upon termination of his employment, his bonus for the five months ending May 31
in the year of termination, plus one year's compensation. In the event that,
during the initial term, his employment is terminated by TrizecHahn Corporation
without cause or is terminated by Mr. Hanson following a change in control of
TrizecHahn Corporation, he will be entitled to receive, upon termination of his
employment, the compensation otherwise payable to him during the initial term,
ending on May 31, 2003; provided, however, that if such termination occurs on or
after June 1, 2002, he will be entitled to receive one year's compensation. If,
during a renewed term, Mr. Hanson's employment is terminated by TrizecHahn
Corporation without cause or is terminated by Mr. Hanson following a change in
control of TrizecHahn Corporation, Mr. Hanson will also be entitled to receive
one year's compensation. Under Mr. Hanson's agreement, a change in control
includes our current chief executive officer ceasing to hold such position.
Mr. Hanson was granted non-assignable options to purchase up to
600,000 TrizecHahn Corporation subordinate voting shares. The options vest in
equal amounts on each of May 11, 2002, 2003 and 2004. The first tranche has an
exercise price of Cdn$25.46 per share, the second tranche has an exercise price
of Cdn$26.96 per share, and the third tranche has an exercise price of Cdn$28.46
per share. The options have a seven-year term. In the event that Mr. Hanson's
employment terminates as set out in the preceding paragraph, he will be entitled
to retain and exercise those stock options, whether or not vested, until one
year following the date of his termination.
In connection with the corporate reorganization, all unvested options
granted to Mr. Hanson by TrizecHahn Corporation will be cancelled in exchange
for an equal number of options to purchase our shares, subject to the terms set
forth in the section entitled "Management - 2002 Trizec Properties, Inc. Stock
Option Plan." Mr. Hanson may elect to exchange 100,000 vested TrizecHahn
Corporation options for either warrants to purchase our shares or options to
purchase subordinate voting shares of Trizec Canada Inc.
Executive Employment Agreement for Lee Wagman
Mr. Wagman and TrizecHahn Corporation entered into an employment
agreement as of August 15, 1997 for a term of five years subject to annual
extensions thereafter with the concurrence of both parties. This agreement has
been amended as described below. We expect to assume Mr. Wagman's employment
agreement, as amended.
In consideration for his services, Mr. Wagman is entitled to (a) an
annual salary of at least $625,000, (b) annual bonuses in the discretion of the
board of directors of TrizecHahn Corporation or a committee thereof, (c) an
initial award of options to purchase 300,000 subordinate voting shares and
additional awards of options to purchase a further 100,000 subordinate voting
shares following each of the second, third, fourth and fifth anniversaries of
the date of the agreement, all pursuant to TrizecHahn Corporation's stock option
plan, (d) an incentive award of $1.2 million in respect of each real estate
development project with a prescribed project cost undertaken by TrizecHahn
Corporation that meets certain prescribed targets for return on TrizecHahn
Corporation's investment within a prescribed period (generally, a six-year
period from the opening of a project), and (e) benefits consistent with those
provided to other U.S.-based senior executives of TrizecHahn Corporation and its
subsidiaries. Both salary and incentive awards are increased by at least the
percentage increases in the U.S. Consumer Price Index. The incentive awards
described above may be satisfied by TrizecHahn Corporation through the issuance
of subordinate voting shares.
Upon any termination of Mr. Wagman's employment by TrizecHahn
Corporation without cause, or by Mr. Wagman for good reason, as defined in his
employment agreement, Mr. Wagman shall be entitled to receive his
88
salary until the later of the expiration of the initial five-year term of the
agreement and the first anniversary of the date of termination and shall be
entitled to compensatory payments in lieu of receiving option awards and
incentive awards described above that have not then been made or earned.
The agreement was amended in September 2000 to provide for (a) a
one-year extension of the term of the agreement to August 15, 2003, (b) an
annual cost-of-living allowance of $228,000, (c) an additional incentive award
of $500,000 payable on the sale of all or a substantial interest in the Desert
Passage retail/entertainment center, and (d) a doubling of the incentive awards
potentially payable in respect of two of the three remaining U.S.
retail/entertainment projects if returns exceed the originally budgeted returns
by specified percentages.
Agreement with Casey Wold
Pursuant to Mr. Wold's engagement letter, if his employment is
terminated he will be entitled to one year's compensation.
Compensation Committee
In the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001, we did not have a
compensation committee or any other committee serving a similar function.
Decisions as to the compensation of our executives were made by the compensation
committee of the board of directors of TrizecHahn Corporation.
In connection with the corporate reorganization, we expect to
establish a compensation committee of our board of directors that will consist
of independent directors.
89
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and
Related Stockholders
The following table sets forth information with respect to the current
beneficial ownership of our voting stock by each person, or group of affiliated
persons, who beneficially owns more than 5% of our voting stock. Currently, none
of our executive officers or directors (other than Peter Munk) beneficially owns
any shares of our capital stock. The percent of class figure for the common
stock is based on 38,220,000 shares of our common stock currently outstanding
and does not include shares of our common stock that may be issued upon the
conversion of our Series B convertible preferred stock or Class C convertible
preferred stock, as described in footnote (3) below .
Name and Address Amount and Nature of Percent
Title of Class of Beneficial Owner Beneficial Ownership of Class
- -------------- ------------------- ------------------- --------
Special Voting Stock TrizecHahn Corporation 100 shares (1)(2) 100%
BCE Place, Wellington Tower, Suite 3900
Common Stock 181 Bay Street, Toronto, ON M5J 2T3 Canada 38,180,000 shares (1)(3) 99.9%
- ------------------------
(1) Peter Munk beneficially owns 2,198,152 subordinate voting shares and
7,522,283 multiple voting shares of TrizecHahn Corporation, which give
him voting control over TrizecHahn Corporation. Therefore, beneficial
ownership of all shares of our capital stock held by TrizecHahn
Corporation is attributable to Mr. Munk pursuant to Rule 13d-3 under the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
(2) TrizecHahn Corporation holds all outstanding shares of our special voting
stock through its indirect, wholly owned Hungarian subsidiary, which has
an address at Dohany utca 12, H-1074 Budapest, Hungary.
(3) TrizecHahn Corporation is the record owner of 180,000 shares of our
common stock and indirectly holds an additional 38,000,000 shares of our
common stock through TrizecHahn Corporation's indirect Hungarian
subsidiary. Furthermore, TrizecHahn Corporation indirectly holds through
its indirect Hungarian subsidiary (a) 1,100,000 shares of our Series B
convertible preferred stock, which are convertible at any time at the
option of their holder, and (b) 376,500 shares of our Class C convertible
preferred stock, which are convertible at any time after April 1, 2002 at
the option of their holder. The number of shares of our common stock to
be issued upon conversion of the Series B convertible preferred stock or
Class C convertible preferred stock is determined by dividing the issue
price of such stock ($1,000.00 per share and $1,100.00 per share,
respectively) by the fair market value of the common stock at the time of
conversion.
Anticipated Ownership After the Corporate Reorganization
The following table sets forth information with respect to the
beneficial ownership of our voting stock expected upon completion of the
corporate reorganization by each person, or group of affiliated persons, who we
anticipate will beneficially own more than 5% of our voting stock based on their
current ownership of TrizecHahn Corporation shares. The percent of class figure
for common stock is based on each identified person's current ownership of
TrizecHahn Corporation shares and the assumptions that:
o 150,000,000 shares of our common stock will be outstanding
immediately following the corporate reorganization; and
o in the corporate reorganization, 90,000,000 subordinate voting
shares of TrizecHahn Corporation will be exchanged on a
one-for-one basis for 90,000,000 shares of our common stock.
Beneficial ownership is defined in Rule 13d-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended. Except as otherwise noted, the persons or entities in this
table have sole voting and investing power with respect to all of the shares of
common stock beneficially owned by them, subject to community property laws,
where applicable.
90
Name and Address Amount and Nature of Percent
Title of Class of Beneficial Owner Beneficial Ownership of Class
- -------------- ------------------- -------------------- --------
Special Voting Stock 100 shares, indirectly through 100.0%
TrizecHahn Corporation's indirect
Hungarian subsidiary (1)
Common Stock Trizec Canada Inc. Approximately 60,000,000 shares, 40.0%
BCE Place, Wellington Tower, Suite 3900 indirectly through TrizecHahn
181 Bay Street, Toronto, ON M5J 2T3 Corporation's indirect Hungarian
subsidiary (1)(2)
Common Stock Southeastern Asset Management, Inc. 30,351,891 shares (3)(4) 20.2%
6410 Poplar Ave., Suite 900
Memphis, TN 38119
Common Stock Neuberger Berman, LLC 9,058,410 shares (3)(5) 6.0%
605 Third Avenue
New York, NY 10158-3698
- ------------------------
(1) We anticipate that the 2,198,152 subordinate voting shares and 7,522,283
multiple voting shares of TrizecHahn Corporation that Peter Munk
beneficially owned as of January 31, 2002 will be exchanged in the
corporate reorganization for an equivalent number of Trizec Canada Inc.
subordinate voting shares and multiple voting shares, respectively, which
would give Mr. Munk voting control over Trizec Canada Inc. Because of
this anticipated voting control, beneficial ownership of the 100 shares
of our special voting stock and approximately 60,000,000 shares of our
common stock that we expect Trizec Canada Inc. to hold, directly or
indirectly, on completion of the corporate reorganization is attributable
to Mr. Munk pursuant to Rule 13d-3 under the Securities and Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended. In addition, we expect that on completion of the
corporate reorganization Mr. Munk will beneficially own an additional
1,350,000 shares of our common stock issuable pursuant to the exercise of
warrants held by him.
(2) This amount does not include warrants to purchase our common stock that
we expect Trizec Canada Inc. will hold, directly or indirectly, and will
be entitled to exercise at any time after the corporate reorganization.
Although the number of these warrants is not yet determinable, the
beneficial ownership of the common stock underlying the warrants will be
attributable to Mr. Munk for the reasons described in footnote (1) above.
(3) Assuming that the shareholder certifies that it is a qualifying U.S.
person and exchanges all of its holdings of TrizecHahn Corporation
subordinate voting shares for shares of our common stock.
(4) Based on an amended Schedule 13G filed by Southeastern Asset Management,
Inc. on February 12, 2002. As of December 31, 2001, Southeastern Asset
Management, Inc. reported the following regarding its ownership of
TrizecHahn Corporation subordinate voting shares: (a) sole voting power
with respect to 14,209,791 shares; (b) shared voting power with respect
to 12,679,100 shares; (c) no voting power with respect to 3,445,000
shares; (d) sole dispositive power with respect to 17,606,891 shares; (e)
shared dispositive power with respect to 12,679,100 shares; and (f) no
dispositive power with respect to 47,900 shares. In Southeastern Asset
Management, Inc.'s amended Schedule 13G, Longleaf Partners Fund reported
that it held shared voting power and shared dispositive power with
respect to 10,579,100 TrizecHahn Corporation subordinate voting shares,
which are also beneficially owned by Southeastern Asset Management, Inc.
(5) Based on a Schedule 13G filed by Neuberger Berman, LLC on February 12,
2002. As of December 31, 2001, Neuberger Berman, LLC reported the
following regarding its ownership of TrizecHahn Corporation subordinate
voting shares: (a) sole voting power with respect to 6,768,510 shares;
and (b) shared dispositive power with respect to 9,058,410 shares.
To the extent that our directors and executive officers own
subordinate voting shares of TrizecHahn Corporation at the time of the corporate
reorganization, they will participate in the corporate reorganization on the
same terms as other holders of TrizecHahn Corporation subordinate voting shares.
Peter Munk will exchange his multiple voting shares of TrizecHahn Corporation
for multiple voting shares of Trizec Canada Inc. in the corporate
reorganization. The following table sets forth information with respect to the
beneficial ownership of our voting stock expected upon completion of the
corporate reorganization by each of our directors, each of our named executive
officers and all of our directors and executive officers as a group based on
their current ownership of TrizecHahn Corporation subordinate voting shares and
options exerciseable within 60 days. The percent of class figure for the common
stock is based on each identified person's current ownership of TrizecHahn
Corporation shares and the assumptions that:
o 150,000,000 shares of our common stock will be outstanding
immediately following the corporate reorganization;
91
o in the corporate reorganization, 90,000,000 subordinate voting
shares of TrizecHahn Corporation will be exchanged on a
one-for-one basis for 90,000,000 shares of our common stock;
o in the corporate reorganization, all officers and directors
(other than Peter Munk, Brian Mulroney and Richard Thomson)
identified in the following table will exchange on a
one-for-one basis all TrizecHahn Corporation subordinate
voting shares held by them for shares of our common stock; and
o in the corporate reorganization, all officers and directors
identified in the following table will exchange on a
one-for-one basis all of their fully vested and exerciseable
options to acquire TrizecHahn Corporation subordinate voting
shares for either fully vested and exerciseable options to
acquire shares of our common stock or warrants to acquire
shares of our common stock.
Beneficial ownership is defined in Rule 13d-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended. Except as otherwise noted, the persons or entities in this
table have sole voting and investing power with respect to all of the shares of
common stock beneficially owned by them, subject to community property laws,
where applicable.
Name of Director or Amount and Nature of Percent
Title of Class Executive Officer Beneficial Ownership of Class
- -------------- ----------------- -------------------- --------
Special Voting Stock Peter Munk 100 shares (1) 100%
Common Stock Peter Munk Approximately 61,350,000 shares (1)(2) 41%
Common Stock Christopher Mackenzie 507,500 shares (3) *
Common Stock Brian Mulroney 231,250 shares (4) *
Common Stock Glenn Rufrano 6,250 shares (5) *
Common Stock Richard Thomson 6,250 shares (6) *
Common Stock Lee Wagman 902,590 shares (7) *
Common Stock Casey Wold 846,759 shares (8) *
Common Stock Directors and executive officers as a 64,779,807 shares (9)(2) 42%
group
- ------------------------
* Represents less than one percent.
(1) We anticipate that the 2,198,152 subordinate voting shares and 7,522,283
multiple voting shares of TrizecHahn Corporation that Peter Munk
beneficially owned as of February 28, 2002 will be exchanged in the
corporate reorganization for an equivalent number of Trizec Canada Inc.
subordinate voting shares and multiple voting shares, respectively, which
would give Mr. Munk voting control over Trizec Canada Inc. Because of
this anticipated voting control, beneficial ownership of the 100 shares
of our special voting stock and approximately 60,000,000 shares of our
common stock that we expect Trizec Canada Inc. to hold, directly or
indirectly, on completion of the corporate reorganization is attributable
to Mr. Munk pursuant to Rule 13d-3 under the Securities and Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended. In addition, we expect that on completion of the
corporate reorganization Mr. Munk will beneficially own an additional
1,350,000 shares of our common stock issuable pursuant to the exercise of
warrants held by him.
(2) This amount does not include warrants to purchase our common stock that
we expect Trizec Canada Inc. will hold, directly or indirectly, and will
be entitled to exercise at any time after the corporate reorganization.
Although the number of these warrants is not yet determinable, the
beneficial ownership of the common stock underlying the warrants will be
attributable to Mr. Munk for the reasons described in footnote (1) above.
(3) Included in this number are fully vested options exerciseable within 60
days of February 28, 2002 to purchase 500,000 TrizecHahn Corporation
subordinate voting shares.
(4) This number represents fully vested options exerciseable within 60 days
of February 28, 2002 to purchase 231,250 TrizecHahn Corporation
subordinate voting shares that we anticipate will be exchanged in the
corporate reorganization for an equivalent number of our warrants. This
amount does not include 725 subordinate voting shares owned as of
February 28, 2002 that we anticipate will be exchanged in the corporate
reorganization for an equivalent number of Trizec Canada Inc. subordinate
voting shares.
(5) This number represents fully vested options exerciseable within 60 days
of February 28, 2002 to purchase 6,250 TrizecHahn Corporation subordinate
voting shares that we anticipate will be exchanged in the corporate
reorganization for an equivalent number of our warrants.
92
(6) This number represents fully vested options exerciseable within 60 days
of February 28, 2002 to purchase 6,250 TrizecHahn Corporation subordinate
voting shares that we anticipate will be exchanged in the corporate
reorganization for an equivalent number of our warrants. This amount does
not include 3,000 subordinate voting shares owned as of February 28, 2002
that we anticipate will be exchanged in the corporate reorganization for
an equivalent number of Trizec Canada Inc. subordinate voting shares.
(7) Included in this number are fully vested options exerciseable within 60
days of February 28, 2002 to purchase 900,000 TrizecHahn Corporation
subordinate voting shares.
(8) Included in this number are fully vested options exerciseable within 60
days of February 28, 2002 to purchase 657,500 shares of TrizecHahn
Corporation subordinate voting shares.
(9) As at February 28, 2002, all directors and executive officers as a group
owned fully vested options exerciseable within 60 days of such date to
purchase 4,251,025 shares of TrizecHahn Corporation subordinate voting
shares.
Controlling Stockholder
Peter Munk, the Chairman of TrizecHahn Corporation, controls P.M.
Capital Inc., which owns all of TrizecHahn Corporation's multiple voting shares.
P.M. Capital Inc.'s ownership of TrizecHahn Corporation's multiple voting shares
gives it a majority of the votes in elections of TrizecHahn Corporation's board
of directors and on other matters to be voted on by TrizecHahn Corporation
shareholders. Currently, we are a substantially wholly owned subsidiary of
TrizecHahn Corporation. Peter Munk therefore has the ability to control our
business and affairs.
After the completion of the corporate reorganization, P.M. Capital
Inc., through its ownership of Trizec Canada Inc.'s multiple voting shares, will
have a majority of the votes in elections of Trizec Canada Inc.'s board of
directors and on other matters to be voted on by Trizec Canada Inc.
shareholders. We expect that Trizec Canada Inc., indirectly through its
subsidiaries, will own approximately 40% of our common stock and all of our
shares of Class F convertible stock, as well as all of our shares of special
voting stock after the corporate reorganization. Trizec Canada Inc.'s indirect
ownership of our special voting stock, when combined with its indirect ownership
of our common stock, will provide it with a majority of the votes in elections
of members of our board of directors. P.M. Capital's effective control of Trizec
Canada Inc. will enable P.M. Capital to elect our entire board of directors and
to exercise a controlling influence over our business and affairs.
93
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
In the past, we and our subsidiaries have conducted our business
activities having regard to the consequences under Canadian tax legislation to
TrizecHahn Corporation and its Canadian subsidiaries. We have conducted certain
business activities in a manner that would not result in TrizecHahn Corporation
and its Canadian subsidiaries being subject to Canadian tax on our business
activities in the United States or on distributions made by us. In connection
with the corporate reorganization, we will enter into an agreement with
TrizecHahn Office Properties Ltd., a wholly owned, Canadian subsidiary of
TrizecHahn Corporation, pursuant to which we will agree to continue to conduct
our business activities having regard to the consequences under Canadian tax
legislation to TrizecHahn Office Properties Ltd., and related Canadian
corporations and Trizec Canada Inc. and in a manner that does not result in
adverse consequences under Canadian tax legislation to such entities. We believe
that such agreement will not result in any material change in the way we conduct
our business or any material constraint on our ability to carry on business in
the future.
In the past, we and our subsidiaries have been insured under certain
insurance policies maintained by TrizecHahn Corporation. In connection with the
corporate reorganization, we will enter into an agreement with TrizecHahn
Corporation, pursuant to which TrizecHahn Corporation will agree to continue to
maintain these insurance policies for the benefit of our company and our
subsidiaries through the end of 2002 and we will agree to pay for the insurance
costs attributable to us and our subsidiaries.
In connection with the proposed corporate reorganization, some
outstanding TrizecHahn Corporation employee stock options will be cancelled
under the plan of arrangement and replaced with options to acquire subordinate
voting shares of Trizec Canada Inc. For every outstanding option to acquire one
Trizec Canada Inc. subordinate voting share, Trizec Canada Inc. will, directly
or indirectly, hold one of our warrants entitling Trizec Canada Inc. to one
share of our common stock at any time prior to the respective warrant's
expiration date. We expect that Trizec Canada Inc. will exercise these warrants
whenever and to the extent that one or more options to acquire Trizec Canada
Inc. subordinate voting shares are exercised. Trizec Canada Inc.'s anticipated
acquisition of one share of our common stock whenever one of its stock options
is exercised is intended to maintain economic equivalence between shares of our
common stock and Trizec Canada Inc. subordinate voting shares.
Also in connection with the proposed corporate reorganization, we will
enter into agreements with Trizec Canada Inc. pursuant to which we will agree to
cause one or more registration statements on Form S-11 to be filed with and
declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission, and to be
maintained effective, registering the following offerings of our securities:
o a primary offering of shares of our common stock to be issued
upon the exercise of our warrants held by Trizec Canada Inc.;
o a secondary offering of shares of our common stock that may be
sold or exchanged by Trizec Canada Inc. in connection with
redemptions of its shares;
o a secondary offering of shares of our common stock that may be
sold by Trizec Canada Inc. in connection with the exercise of
dissent rights;
o a secondary offering of shares of our common stock that may be
sold by TrizecHahn Corporation's Hungarian subsidiary,
including in connection with any conversions of our Class F
convertible stock; and
o in connection with a pledge of our common stock pursuant to
certain Trizec Canada Inc. credit facilities, a secondary
offering of shares of our common stock that may be sold by the
pledgee in connection with an exercise on the pledge in the
event of default under the credit facilities.
The following persons were indebted to us or our subsidiaries during
2001 in an amount in excess of $60,000:
94
Lee Wagman, Executive Vice President, received an interest-free,
non-recourse loan from TrizecHahn Developments Inc. in mid 2000 in the amount of
$4,594,000 for the purpose of purchasing a home in connection with his transfer
to Los Angeles in 2000. The largest aggregate amount of indebtedness at any time
during 2001 was $4,594,000. In accordance with its terms, the loan was repaid on
September 1, 2001 upon the sale of Mr. Wagman's previous home, with $800,000 of
the loan having been forgiven.
William Tresham, Executive Vice President, received a loan from
TrizecHahn Office Properties Inc. in August 2000 in the amount of $200,000 for
the purpose of purchasing a home upon relocating from Toronto to Chicago in
2000. The largest aggregate amount of indebtedness at any time during 2001 was
$200,000. In accordance with its terms, the loan was repaid in full on August
28, 2001. During the term of the loan, Mr. Tresham paid interest at an annual
rate of 7%.
In 2001, Stephen Volk, who will serve as a member of our board of
directors after the corporate reorganization, served as Senior Partner of
Shearman & Sterling, a corporate law firm based in New York that provides legal
services to our company and certain of our affiliates.
95
Part IV
Item 14. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K
(a) Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedules
See "Index to Financial Statements" on page F-1 of this Form 10-K.
(b) Reports on Form 8-K
We filed a report on Form 8-K on March 7, 2001, which furnished
information under Item 9 regarding certain estimated year-end 2002 and 2003
operating results.
(c) Exhibits
Exhibit
Number Description
------- ------------
3.1 Fourth Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of
Trizec Properties, Inc., filed on February 11, 2002
(incorporated herein by reference to exhibit 3.1 to Trizec
Properties, Inc.'s registration statement on Form 10, File No.
001-16765).
3.2 Form of Amended and Restated Bylaws of Trizec Properties, Inc.
(incorporated herein by reference to exhibit 3.2 to Trizec
Properties, Inc.'s registration statement on Form 10, File No.
001-16765).
3.3 Form of Audit Committee Charter of Trizec Properties, Inc.
(incorporated herein by reference to exhibit 3.3 to Trizec
Properties, Inc.'s registration statement on Form 10, File No.
001-16765).
4.1 Form of Common Stock Certificates (incorporated herein by
reference to exhibit 4.1 to Trizec Properties, Inc.'s
registration statement on Form 10, File No. 001-16765).
4.2 Form of Exchange Certificates (incorporated herein by
reference to exhibit 4.2 to Trizec Properties, Inc.'s
registration statement on Form 10, File No. 001-16765).
4.3 Form of Custody Agreement relating to the Exchange
Certificates (incorporated herein by reference to exhibit 4.3
to Trizec Properties, Inc.'s registration statement on Form
10, File No. 001-16765).
10.1 Employment Agreement for Christopher Mackenzie (incorporated
herein by reference to exhibit 10.1 to Trizec Properties,
Inc.'s registration statement on Form 10, File No.
001-16765).*
10.2 Employment Agreement for Gregory Hanson (incorporated herein
by reference to exhibit 10.2 to Trizec Properties, Inc.'s
registration statement on Form 10, File No. 001-16765).*
10.3 Employment Agreement for Lee Wagman (incorporated herein by
reference to exhibit 10.3 to Trizec Properties, Inc.'s
registration statement on Form 10, File No. 001-16765).*
96
10.4 Letter Agreement for Casey Wold (incorporated herein by
reference to exhibit 10.4 to Trizec Properties, Inc.'s
registration statement on Form 10, File No. 001-16765).*
10.5 Trizec Deferred Compensation Plan and Trust Agreement
(incorporated herein by reference to exhibit 10.5 to Trizec
Properties, Inc.'s registration statement on Form 10, File No.
001-16765).*
10.6 TrizecHahn Developments Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan and
Trust Agreement (incorporated herein by reference to exhibit
10.6 to Trizec Properties, Inc.'s registration statement on
Form 10, File No. 001-16765).*
10.7 Form of 2002 Trizec Properties, Inc. Stock Option Plan
(incorporated herein by reference to exhibit 10.7 to Trizec
Properties, Inc.'s registration statement on Form 10, File No.
001-16765).*
10.8 General Agreement dated as of November 7, 1994 by and among
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, AEW Partners, L.P.,
Partners Tower, L.P., Tower Leasing, Inc., Sears, Roebuck and
Co. and ST Holdings, Inc. (incorporated herein by reference to
exhibit 10.8 to Trizec Properties, Inc.'s registration
statement on Form 10, File No. 001-16765).
21.1 Subsidiaries of Trizec Properties, Inc. (incorporated herein
by reference to exhibit 21.1 to Trizec Properties, Inc.'s
registration statement on Form 10, File No. 001-16765).
--------------------------
* Management contract or compensatory plan required to be filed as
an exhibit to this Form 10-K pursuant to Item 14(c).
97
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
TRIZEC PROPERTIES, INC.
Dated: March 8, 2002 By: /s/Gregory Hanson
---------------------------------------
Name: Gregory Hanson
Title: Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the
Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Dated: March 8, 2002 By: /s/Christopher Mackenzie
------------------------------------------
Name: Christopher Mackenzie
Title: President, Chief Executive Officer
and Director
By: /s/Gregory Hanson
------------------------------------------
Name: Gregory Hanson
Title: Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer and Director
By: /s/Joanne E. Ranger
------------------------------------------
Name: Joanne E. Ranger
Title: Senior Vice President and Chief
Accounting Officer
By: /s/Robin A. Campbell
------------------------------------------
Name: Robin A. Campbell
Title: Director
98
Index to Financial Statements
Report of Independent Accountants............................................F-2
Combined Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999..F-3
Combined Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income for the
years ended December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999.................................F-4
Combined Consolidated Statements of Changes in Owners' Equity for the years
ended December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999.......................................F-6
Combined Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31,
2001, 2000 and 1999..........................................................F-8
Notes to the Combined Consolidated Financial Statements.....................F-10
Schedule III - Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation..................... S-1
All other schedules for which provision is made in the applicable
accounting regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission are not
required under the related instructions or are inapplicable, and therefore have
been omitted.
F-1
Report of Independent Accountants
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
TrizecHahn Corporation
In our opinion, the combined consolidated financial statements listed in the
accompanying index on page F-1 present fairly, in all material respects, the
financial position of Trizec Properties, Inc. Combined (formerly known as
TrizecHahn (USA) Corporation Combined), as defined in Note 1, at December 31,
2001 and 2000 and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each
of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2001 in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In
addition, in our opinion, the combined consolidated financial statement schedule
listed in the accompanying index presents fairly, in all material respects, the
information set forth therein when read in conjunction with the related combined
consolidated financial statements. These financial statements and the financial
statement schedule are the responsibility of the Corporation's management; our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and the
financial statement schedule based on our audits. We conducted our audits of
these statements in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the
United States of America, which require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of
material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing
the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and
evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our
audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
As discussed in Note 2 to the combined consolidated financial statements,
effective January 1, 2001, the Corporation changed its method of accounting for
derivatives.
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Chicago, Illinois
February 11, 2002
F-2
Combined Consolidated Balance Sheets
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
December 31
---------------------------------
($ thousands) 2001 2000
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assets
Real estate $ 5,399,031 $ 4,883,826
Less: accumulated depreciation (438,584) (305,038)
--------------- ----------------
Real estate, net 4,960,447 4,578,788
Cash and cash equivalents 297,434 70,195
Escrows and restricted cash 28,180 127,595
Investment in unconsolidated real estate joint ventures 289,242 384,038
Investment in Sears Tower 70,000 70,000
Office tenant receivables, net 33,308 44,255
Other receivables, net 34,201 30,246
Deferred rent receivables, net 99,515 81,125
Deferred charges, net 138,054 97,622
Prepaid expenses and other assets 55,421 80,132
Advances to parent and affiliated companies 90,633 -
--------------- ----------------
Total Assets $ 6,096,435 $ 5,563,996
=============== ================
Liabilities and Owners' Equity
Liabilities
Mortgage debt and other loans $ 3,017,798 $ 2,326,907
Trade, construction and tenant improvements payables 91,646 105,720
Accrued interest expense 12,007 12,764
Accrued operating expenses and property taxes 108,276 95,063
Other accrued liabilities 76,266 69,346
Taxes payable 53,862 59,153
Deferred income taxes 60,000 50,767
Advances from parent and affiliated companies 236,619 192,640
--------------- ----------------
--------------- ----------------
Total Liabilities 3,656,474 2,912,360
--------------- ----------------
Minority Interest 4,386 4,819
--------------- ----------------
Redeemable Stock 200 -
--------------- ----------------
--------------- ----------------
Commitments and Contingencies
Owners' Equity
Owners' capital 2,437,380 2,290,219
Retained earnings 6,514 372,662
Unearned compensation (6,701) (11,713)
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (1,818) (4,351)
--------------- ----------------
Total Owners' Equity 2,435,375 2,646,817
--------------- ----------------
Total Liabilities and Owners' Equity $ 6,096,435 $ 5,563,996
=============== ================
See accompanying notes to the combined consolidated financial statements
F-3
Combined Consolidated Statements of Operations
and Comprehensive Income (Loss)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the years ended December 31
-----------------------------------------
($ thousands except share and per share amounts) 2001 2000 1999
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Revenues
Rentals $ 671,236 $ 666,888 $ 617,836
Recoveries from tenants 102,513 94,712 76,360
Parking and other 127,035 95,380 94,174
Fee income 11,490 13,570 13,332
Interest 15,677 8,480 7,118
------------- ------------ ------------
Total revenues 927,951 879,030 808,820
------------- ------------ ------------
Expenses
Operating 286,269 266,744 249,092
Property taxes 92,682 88,914 84,849
General and administrative 25,854 18,429 16,725
Interest 152,759 265,680 234,992
Depreciation and amortization 161,078 154,118 133,352
Reorganization costs 15,922 6,680 4,950
Loss from securities investments 15,371 - -
Derivative losses 456 - -
------------- ------------ ------------
Total expenses 750,391 800,565 723,960
------------- ------------ ------------
Income before allocation to Minority Interest, Income from
Unconsolidated Real Estate Joint Ventures, Gain (loss) on Sale
of Real Estate and Allowance for Loss on Properties Held for
Disposition, Income Taxes, Extraordinary Item and Cumulative Effect
of a Change in Accounting Principle 177,560 78,465 84,860
Minority interest 433 580 1,459
Income from unconsolidated real estate joint ventures 12,952 19,417 16,207
Gain (loss) on sale of real estate and allowance for loss on
properties held for disposition (307,044) 33,185 (41,373)
------------- ------------ ------------
Income (Loss) before Income Taxes, Extraordinary Item and Cumulative
Effect of a Change in Accounting Principle (116,099) 131,647 61,153
Benefit from (provision for) income and other corporate taxes (13,795) 252,840 (22,815)
------------- ------------ ------------
Income (Loss) before Extraordinary Item and Cumulative Effect of a
Change in Accounting Principle (129,894) 384,487 38,338
Loss on early debt retirement, net of taxes (17,966) (1,491) -
------------- ------------ ------------
Income (Loss) before Cumulative Effect of a Change in Accounting
Principle (147,860) 382,996 38,338
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle (4,631) - -
------------- ------------ ------------
Net Income (Loss) $ (152,491) $ 382,996 $ 38,338
============= ============ ============
See accompanying notes to the combined consolidated financial statements
F-4
Combined Consolidated Statements of Operations
and Comprehensive Income (Loss) (Continued)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the years ended December 31
---------------------------------------------------
($ thousands except share and per share amounts) 2001 2000 1999
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pro Forma per Share Amounts (unaudited)
Income (loss) per share before extraordinary item and
cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle
Basic $ (0.87) $ 2.57 $ 0.26
================ ================ ================
Diluted $ (0.87) $ 2.55 $ 0.25
================ ================ ================
Income (loss) per share before cumulative effect of a change in
accounting principle
Basic $ (0.99) $ 2.56 $ 0.26
================ ================ ================
Diluted $ (0.99) $ 2.54 $ 0.25
================ ================ ================
Net income (loss) per share
Basic $ (1.02) $ 2.56 $ 0.26
================ ================ ================
Diluted $ (1.02) $ 2.54 $ 0.25
================ ================ ================
Weighted average shares outstanding
Basic 149,349,698 149,349,698 149,349,698
================ ================ ================
Diluted 149,349,698 150,855,799 150,855,799
================ ================ ================
Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Net income (loss) $ (152,491) $ 382,996 $ 38,338
---------------- ---------------- ----------------
Other comprehensive income (loss), before taxes:
Unrealized gains (losses) on investments in securities:
Unrealized holding gains (losses) arising during the
period - (4,351) -
Reclassification adjustment for the cumulative effect of
a change in accounting principle included in income 4,351 - -
Unrealized derivative losses:
Effective portion of interest rate contracts (1,818) - -
Taxes on other comprehensive income (loss) - 1,716 -
Impact of REIT election - (1,716) -
---------------- ---------------- ----------------
Total other comprehensive income (loss) 2,533 (4,351) -
---------------- ---------------- ----------------
Comprehensive income (loss) $ (149,958) $ 378,645 $ 38,338
================ ================ ================
See accompanying notes to the combined consolidated financial statements
F-5
Combined Consolidated Statements
of Changes in Owners' Equity
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the years ended December 31
----------------------------------------------
($ thousands except share amounts) 2001 2000 1999
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Trizec Properties, Inc. (Trizec Properties)
Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, no shares authorized at
December 31, 2001 (2000 - 230,000; 1999 - 230,000), $1.00 par
value, no shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2001
(2000 - 212,000; 1999 - 212,000) - on December 3, 2001 all
authorized and issued shares were cancelled
Balance, beginning of year $ 212,000 $ 212,000 $ 212,000
Conversion to Common Stock in 2001 (212,000) - -
-------------- -------------- --------------
Balance, end of year $ - $ 212,000 $ 212,000
============== ============== ==============
Series B Convertible Preferred Stock, 1,100,000 (2000 - 1,100,000;
1999 - 350,000) shares authorized, $1.00 par value, 1,100,000
shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2001 (2000 -
1,100,000; 1999 - 350,000)
Balance, beginning of year $ 1,100,000 $ 350,000 $ -
Issuance of 750,000 shares in 2000 - 750,000 -
Issuance of 350,000 shares in 1999 - - 350,000
-------------- -------------- --------------
Balance, end of year $ 1,100,000 $ 1,100,000 $ 350,000
============== ============== ==============
Class C Convertible Preferred Stock, 750,000 shares authorized,
$1.00 par value, 376,504 shares issued and outstanding at
December 31, 2001 (2000 - nil; 1999 - nil)
Balance, beginning of year $ - $ - $ -
Issuance of 376,504 shares in 2001 for cash 414,154 - -
-------------- -------------- --------------
Balance, ending of year $ 414,154 $ - $ -
============== ============== ==============
Common Stock, 200,000,000 shares authorized (2000 - 10,000; 1999 -
10,000), $0.01 par value, 38,220,000 shares issued and
outstanding at December 31, 2001 (2000 - 1,068; 1999 - 1,068)
Balance, beginning of year $ - $ - $ -
Issuance of 357.6 shares in 2001 for conversion of Series A
Convertible Preferred shares - - -
Exchange of 1,425.6 shares in 2001 for 38,000,000 shares under 380 - -
recapitalization plan
Issuance of 180,000 shares in 2001 in consideration for net
assets received 2 - -
Issuance of 40,000 shares in 2001 as a donation - - -
-------------- -------------- --------------
Balance, end of year $ 382 $ - $ -
============== ============== ==============
See accompanying notes to the combined consolidated financial statements
F-6
Combined Consolidated Statements
of Changes in Owners Equity (Continued)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the years ended December 31
----------------------------------------------
($ thousands except share amounts) 2001 2000 1999
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TrizecHahn Developments Inc. ("THDI")
Common Stock, 1,000 shares authorized, $0.01 par value, 260 shares
issued and outstanding
Balance, beginning of year $ - $ - $ -
Issuance of 100 shares in 1999 for cash - - -
Issuance of 160 shares in 1999 as
consideration for net assets received - - -
-------------- -------------- --------------
Balance, end of year $ - $ - $ -
============== ============== ==============
Trizec Properties/THDI
Additional Paid-in Capital
Balance, beginning of year $ 978,219 $ 978,219 $ 1,244,090
THDI issuance of 160 shares of Common Stock in 1999 as
consideration for net assets received - - 175,834
Conversion of Trizec Properties Series A Preferred Stock to
Trizec Properties Common Stock in 2001 212,000 - -
Exchange of Trizec Properties Common Stock for Trizec
Properties Common Stock, Trizec Properties Special Voting
Stock and Trizec Properties Class F Convertible Preferred
Stock in 2001 (580) - -
Trizec Properties issuance of 180,000 shares of Common Stock in
2001 as consideration for net assets received 16,548 - -
Trizec Properties issuance of 40,000 shares of Common Stock in
2001 under recapitalization plan 2,000 - -
Common Stock dividends in excess of available retained
earnings (285,343) - (441,705)
-------------- -------------- --------------
Balance, end of year $ 922,844 $ 978,219 $ 978,219
============== ============== ==============
Total Owners' Capital, end of year $ 2,437,380 $ 2,290,219 $ 1,540,219
============== ============== ==============
Retained Earnings (Deficit)
Balance, beginning of year $ 372,662 $ (10,334) $ 410,957
Net income (loss) (152,491) 382,996 38,338
Common stock dividends (213,657) - (459,629)
-------------- -------------- --------------
Balance, end of year $ 6,514 $ 372,662 $ (10,334)
============== ============== ==============
Unearned Compensation
Balance, beginning of year $ (11,713) $ - $ -
Shares granted - (12,402) -
Amortization 5,012 689 -
-------------- -------------- --------------
Balance, end of year $ (6,701) $ (11,713) $ -
============== ============== ==============
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Balance, beginning of year $ (4,351) $ - $ -
Other comprehensive income (loss) 2,533 (4,351) -
-------------- -------------- --------------
Balance, end of year $ (1,818) $ (4,351) $ -
============== ============== ==============
See accompanying notes to the combined consolidated financial statements
F-7
Combined Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the years ended December 31
-----------------------------------------
($ thousands) 2001 2000 1999
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
Net income (loss) $ (152,491) $ 382,996 $ 38,338
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating
activities:
Income from unconsolidated real estate
joint ventures (12,952) (19,417) (16,207)
Depreciation and amortization expense 161,078 154,118 133,352
Amortization of financing costs 9,586 16,102 13,098
(Gain) loss on sale of real estate and allowance for loss on properties
held for 307,044 (33,185) 41,373
disposition
Minority interest (433) (580) (1,459)
Derivative losses 456 - -
Deferred compensation 5,012 689 -
Loss from securities investments 15,371 - -
Deferred income tax (benefit) expense 8,926 (315,540) 21,627
Loss on early debt retirement 4,211 - -
Reorganization costs 2,000 - -
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle 4,631 - -
Purchase of shares for escrowed share grant plan - (12,402) -
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Escrows and restricted cash 99,415 (88,945) 285,867
Office tenant receivables, net 10,947 (14,675) 6,558
Other receivables, net (3,955) (3,828) (9,511)
Deferred rent receivables, net (18,390) (26,369) (27,874)
Prepaid expenses and other assets 10,895 (12,298) (21,747)
Accounts payable, accrued liabilities and other liabilities 11,597 86,455 27,290
------------- ------------- -------------
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities 462,948 113,121 490,705
------------- ------------- -------------
Cash Flows from Investing Activities
Properties:
Acquisitions (202,740) (86,347) (649,625)
Development expenditures (362,425) (241,268) (136,442)
Tenant improvements and capital expenditures (88,740) (97,769) (68,096)
Tenant leasing costs (39,914) (31,680) (31,647)
Dispositions 111,553 426,950 17,070
Unconsolidated real estate joint ventures:
Investments (30,123) (53,263) (39,712)
Distributions 15,401 30,653 35,276
------------- ------------- -------------
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities (596,988) (52,724) (873,176)
------------- ------------- -------------
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
Long-term debt
Acquisition financing 48,500 - 383,100
Development financing 227,231 36,158 1,740
Property financings 1,441,390 60,909 655,907
Principal repayments (1,219,713) (88,208) (718,722)
Repaid on dispositions (1,321) (221,727) -
Refinancing expenditures (19,858) (1,622) (16,383)
Net advance (to) from parent company and affiliates 384,050 143,936 78,608
Dividends (499,000) - -
------------- ------------- -------------
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities 361,279 (70,554) 384,250
------------- ------------- -------------
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents 227,239 (10,157) 1,779
Cash and Cash Equivalents, beginning of year 70,195 80,352 78,573
------------- ------------- -------------
Cash and Cash Equivalents, end of year $ 297,434 $ 70,195 $ 80,352
============= ============= =============
See accompanying notes to the combined consolidated financial statements
F-8
Combined Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Continued)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the years ended December 31
-----------------------------------------
($ thousands) 2001 2000 1999
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Supplemental cash flow disclosures:
Cash paid during the year for:
Interest $ 177,124 $ 266,598 $ 242,713
============= ============= =============
Interest capitalized to properties under development $ 33,194 $ 22,044 $ 15,661
============= ============= =============
Other corporate taxes $ 10,160 $ 4,871 $ 5,729
============= ============= =============
Non-cash investing and financing activities:
Mortgage debt assumed upon obtaining control of joint venture $ 194,674 $ - $ 74,402
investment
============= ============= =============
Mortgage debt assumed by purchasers on property dispositions $ - $ 47,415 $ 19,583
============= ============= =============
Non-cash issuance of shares of preferred stock $ - $ 750,000 $ 350,000
============= ============= =============
Non-cash issuance of shares of common stock $ 16,550 $ - $ -
============= ============= =============
Dividends-in-kind $ - $ - $ 725,500
============= ============= =============
Other non-cash financings $ 3,000 $ - $ -
============= ============= =============
Transfer of joint venture interest to real estate upon obtaining $ 70,680 $ - $ 84,167
control
============= ============= =============
Contribution to non-consolidated joint ventures $ - $ - $ 45,699
============= ============= =============
See accompanying notes to the combined consolidated financial statements
F-9
Notes to the Combined Consolidated Financial Statements
($ thousands)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. ORGANIZATION AND DESCRIPTION OF THE BUSINESS
Organization
The organization presented in these combined financial statements is
not a legal entity. It is a combination of all the United States
("U.S.") assets that TrizecHahn Corporation ("TrizecHahn"), a Canadian
public real estate company, currently owns directly, or indirectly.
TrizecHahn is currently proposing a corporate reorganization to be
completed pursuant to a plan of arrangement (the "Reorganization").
The accompanying financial statements present, on a combined
consolidated basis, all of the U.S. assets of TrizecHahn, substantially
all of which are owned and operated by Trizec Properties, Inc. ("Trizec
Properties", formerly known as TrizecHahn (USA) Corporation) and
TrizecHahn Developments Inc. ("THDI"), TrizecHahn's two primary U.S.
operating and development companies. All of the combined entities,
through a series of vertically integrated corporations, are
wholly-owned subsidiaries of the common parent TrizecHahn. Collectively
the combination of all these assets is referred to as the
"Corporation", or "Trizec Properties, Inc. Combined".
On February 11, 2002, Trizec Properties filed its Fourth Amended and
Restated Certificate of Incorporation in which it changed its name to
Trizec Properties, Inc. In addition, the authorized number of shares of
Common Stock of the Corporation was increased to 500,000,000.
The Corporation operated as separate stand alone entities for the
periods presented, and as such no additional expenses incurred by
TrizecHahn or its related entities were, in management's view,
necessary to be allocated to the Corporation for the periods presented.
However, the historical financial results are not necessarily
indicative of future operating results and no adjustments have been
made to reflect possible incremental changes to the cost structure as a
result of the Reorganization. The incremental charges will include, but
are not limited to, additional senior management compensation expense
to supplement the existing senior management team and internal and
external public company corporate compliance costs.
TrizecProperties is a corporation organized under the laws of the State
of Delaware and is ultimately a wholly-owned subsidiary of TrizecHahn.
Trizec Properties is a direct wholly-owned subsidiary of Emerald Blue
Kft ("direct parent"), which in turn is a wholly-owned subsidiary of
TrizecHahn Office Properties Ltd. ("THOPL"), which in turn is a
wholly-owned subsidiary of TrizecHahn Holdings Limited ("THHL"), which
in turn is a wholly-owned subsidiary of TrizecHahn.
THDI is a corporation organized under the laws of the State of
Delaware. Prior to September 30, 1999, THDI was a wholly-owned
subsidiary of Trizec Properties. On that date, Trizec Properties
transferred its investment in THDI to THOPL by way of a
dividend-in-kind. THDI is currently a wholly-owned subsidiary of THOPL.
The Corporation operates solely in the U.S. where it owns, manages and
develops office buildings and mixed-use properties. At December 31,
2001, it has ownership interests in and manages a high-quality
portfolio of 76 U.S. office properties concentrated in the central
business districts of seven major U.S. cities. In addition, the
Corporation through THDI has completed the development and is
stabilizing the three retail/entertainment projects, which are being
held for disposition. At the end of 2000, Trizec Properties decided
that it would elect to be taxed as a real estate investment trust
("REIT") pursuant to Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue
Code of 1986, as amended, (the "Code"), commencing in 2001. The
Corporation intends to operate, function and be taxed as a REIT upon
completion of the Reorganization.
F-10
Notes to the Combined Consolidated Financial Statements
($ thousands)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
a. Basis of Presentation
The combined consolidated financial statements include the combined
accounts of Trizec Properties and THDI and of all subsidiaries in which
they have a controlling interest. Trizec Properties and THDI are
indirect wholly-owned subsidiaries under the common control of
TrizecHahn. The accompanying financial statements have been presented
using TrizecHahn's historical cost basis. All significant intercompany
balances and transactions have been eliminated.
b. Real Estate
Rental properties are recorded at cost, less accumulated depreciation,
reduced for impairment losses where appropriate. Depreciation of rental
properties is determined using the straight-line method over a 40 year
estimated useful life period, subject to the terms of any respective
ground leases.
Properties under development consist of rental properties under
construction and are recorded at cost, reduced for impairment losses
where appropriate. Properties are classified as properties under
development until the property is substantially completed and available
for occupancy, at which time such properties are classified as rental
properties. The cost of properties under development includes
qualifying costs incurred in connection with their acquisition,
development and construction. Such costs consist of all direct costs
including costs to rent real estate projects, interest on general and
specific debt and other direct expenses.
If events or circumstances indicate that the carrying value of a
completed rental property, a rental property under development, or a
property held for development may be impaired, a recoverability
analysis is performed based on estimated undiscounted future cash flows
to be generated from the property. If the analysis indicates that the
carrying value is not recoverable from future cash flows, the property
is written down to estimated fair value and an impairment loss is
recognized.
Properties held for disposition include certain properties that are
determined to no longer be core assets under the strategic plan of the
Corporation which was adopted in late 2000, and as such the Corporation
has decided to dispose of these properties in an orderly manner.
Properties held for disposition are carried at the lower of their
carrying values (i.e., cost less accumulated depreciation and any
impairment loss recognized, where applicable) or estimated fair values
less costs to sell. Estimated fair value is determined based on
management's estimate of amounts that would be realized if the property
were offered for sale in the ordinary course of business assuming a
reasonable sales period and under normal market conditions. Carrying
values are reassessed at each balance sheet date. Depreciation ceases
once a property is classified as held for disposition.
Tenant improvements are deferred and amortized on a straight-line basis
over the term of the respective lease.
Maintenance and repair costs are expensed against operations as
incurred. Planned major maintenance activities, (for example: roof
replacement and the replacement of heating, ventilation, air
conditioning and other building systems) significant building
improvements, replacements and major renovations, all of which improve
or extend the useful life of the properties are capitalized to rental
properties and amortized over their estimated useful lives.
F-11
Notes to the Combined Consolidated Financial Statements
($ thousands)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONT'D)
b. Real Estate (cont'd)
Furniture, equipment and certain improvements are depreciated on a
straight-line basis over periods of up to 10 years.
c. Revenue Recognition
The Corporation has retained substantially all of the benefits and
risks of ownership of its rental properties and therefore accounts for
leases with its tenants as operating leases. Rental revenues include
minimum rents and recoveries of operating expenses and property taxes.
Recoveries of operating expenses and property taxes are recognized in
the period the expenses are incurred. Certain leases provide for tenant
occupancy during periods for which no rent is due or where minimum rent
payments increase during the term of the lease.
The Corporation reports minimum rental revenue on a straight-line
basis, whereby the known amount of cash to be received under a lease is
recognized into income, over the term of the respective lease. The
amount by which straight-line rental revenue exceeds minimum rents
collected in accordance with the lease agreements is included in
deferred rent receivables. When a property is acquired, the term of
existing leases is considered to commence as of the acquisition date
for purposes of this calculation. The impact of the straight-line
adjustment increased revenue for the year ended December 31, 2001 by
$18,399 (year ended December 31, 2000 - $24,458; 1999 - $30,787).
The Corporation provides an allowance for doubtful accounts
representing that portion of tenant and other receivables and deferred
rent receivables which are estimated to be uncollectible. Such
allowances are reviewed periodically based upon the recovery experience
of the Corporation. Office tenant receivables in the accompanying
combined consolidated balance sheets are shown net of an allowance for
doubtful accounts of $8,320 as of December 31, 2001 (December 31, 2000
- $6,075). Other receivables, including retail tenant receivables, are
shown net of an allowance for doubtful accounts of $9,902 as at
December 31, 2001 (December 31, 2000 - $2,483). Deferred rent
receivables are shown net of an allowance for doubtful accounts of
$6,209 as at December 31, 2001 (December 31, 2000 - $2,968).
Income from the sale of properties is recorded when the collection of
the proceeds of sale is reasonably assured and all other significant
conditions and obligations are met.
Deferred revenue in respect of building telecommunication and service
provider license agreements is recognized to income over the effective
term of the license agreements. If a license agreement is terminated
early, any remaining unamortized balance is recognized in income at
that time.
F-12
Notes to the Combined Consolidated Financial Statements
($ thousands)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONT'D)
d. Investments
The Corporation accounts for its investments in unconsolidated real
estate joint ventures, which it does not control and investments over
which it has significant influence, using the equity method of
accounting. Under the equity method of accounting, the net equity
investment of the Corporation is reflected in the combined consolidated
balance sheets, and the Corporation's share of net income or loss is
included in the combined consolidated statements of operations. Any
difference between the carrying amounts of these investments and the
Corporation's share of the underlying equity in net assets is amortized
as an adjustment to income over the remaining useful life of the
properties to which the differences relate.
Investments in which the Corporation does not exercise significant
influence are accounted for by the cost method. Income is recognized
only to the extent of dividends or cash received.
The carrying value of investments which the Corporation determines to
have an impairment in value considered to be other than temporary are
written down to their estimated realizable value.
Marketable equity securities are accounted for in accordance with
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 115,
"Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities."
Unrealized gains and losses on marketable equity securities that are
designated as available-for-sale are included in combined Owners'
equity as accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). Investments in
securities of non-publicly traded companies are recorded at cost as
they are not considered marketable under SFAS No. 115. These equity
securities, which relate to building telecommunication and service
provider license agreements, are included in prepaid expenses and other
assets.
Mortgages receivable collaterized by real estate are carried at cost.
The Corporation reviews, on a regular basis but not less than annually,
or when events or circumstances occur, for impairment to its mortgages
receivable. Impairment is recognized when the carrying values of the
mortgages receivable will not be recovered either as a result of the
inability of the underlying assets' performance to meet the contractual
debt service terms of the underlying debt and the fair values of the
collateral assets are insufficient to cover the obligations and
encumbrances, including the carrying values of the mortgages
receivable, in a sale between unrelated parties in the normal course of
business. When a mortgage is considered impaired, an impairment charge
is measured based on the present value of the expected future cash
flows discounted at the effective rate of the mortgage or if the cash
flows cannot be predicted with reasonable reliability, then the
impaired mortgage is valued at the fair value of the underlying
collateral. Interest income is generally recognized based on the terms
and conditions of the mortgages receivable. Interest income ceases to
be recognized when the underlying assets do not meet the contractual
terms of the mortgages receivable, and are delinquent for a 90 day
period. At such time interest income is generally recognized on a cash
basis as payments are received.
F-13
Notes to the Combined Consolidated Financial Statements
($ thousands)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONT'D)
e. Income Taxes
In December 2000, Trizec Properties determined that it would elect to
be taxed as a real estate investment trust ("REIT") pursuant to
Sections 856 through 860 of the Code. The REIT election will be
effective as of January 1, 2001. In general, a corporation that
distributes at least 90% of its REIT taxable income to its shareholders
in any taxable year, and complies with certain other requirements
(relating primarily to its organization, the nature of its assets and
the sources of its revenues) is not subject to United States federal
income taxation to the extent of the income which it distributes.
Trizec Properties believes that it substantially met the qualifications
for REIT status as of December 31, 2001 and December 31, 2000 and
intends to satisfy all such qualifications in the future. Accordingly
no provision has been made in the combined consolidated financial
statements for federal income taxes in 2001 in respect of Trizec
Properties.
Deferred income taxes, where applicable, are accounted for using the
asset and liability method. Under this method, deferred income taxes
are recognized for temporary differences between the financial
reporting bases of assets and liabilities and their respective tax
bases and for operating loss and tax credit carryforwards based on
enacted tax rates expected to be in effect when such amounts are
realized or settled. However, deferred tax assets are recognized only
to the extent that it is more likely than not that they will be
realized based on consideration of available evidence, including tax
planning strategies and other factors.
f. Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The estimated fair value of mortgage debt and other loans is based on
the values derived using market interest rates of similar instruments.
In determining estimates of the fair value of financial instruments,
the Corporation must make assumptions regarding current market interest
rates, considering the term of the instrument and its risk. Current
market interest rates are generally selected from a range of
potentially acceptable rates and, accordingly, other effective rates
and/or fair values are possible.
The estimated fair value of the Investment in Sears Tower is based on
estimated future cash flow, expected risk adjusted rates of return and
other factors all of which are subject to uncertainty. Accordingly,
other fair values are possible.
The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, escrows and
restricted cash, accounts receivable, other assets, and accounts
payable and accrued liabilities approximate their fair value due to the
short maturities of these financial instruments.
g. Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents consist of currency on hand, demand deposits
with financial institutions, and short-term highly-liquid investments
with an original maturity of 90 days or less.
h. Escrows and Restricted Cash
Escrows consist primarily of amounts held by lenders to provide for
future property tax expenditures and tenant improvements, deposits on
acquisitions and net proceeds, intended to be reinvested, from sale of
real estate assets intended to qualify for tax deferred gain
recognition under Section 1031 of the Code. Restricted cash represents
amounts committed for various utility deposits and security deposits.
Certain of these amounts may be reduced upon the fulfillment of
specific obligations.
F-14
Notes to the Combined Consolidated Financial Statements
($ thousands)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONT'D)
i. Deferred Charges
Deferred charges include leasing and financing costs which are recorded
at cost. Deferred leasing costs are amortized on a straight-line basis,
over the terms of the respective leases. Deferred financing costs are
amortized over the terms of the respective financings on a basis which
approximates the effective yield method, and are included with interest
expense. Unamortized financing and leasing costs are charged to expense
upon the early repayment of financings or upon the early termination of
a lease.
j. Escrowed Share Grants
The Corporation has a compensation arrangement comprised of escrowed
share grants of TrizecHahn Corporation subordinate voting shares, which
is described in Note 14. Compensation expense, based on the quoted
market price of the underlying TrizecHahn shares at the date of grant,
is recognized in respect of these escrowed share grants over the three
year vesting period of the share grants on a straight-line basis. The
date of grant is the date the shares of TrizecHahn Corporation were
purchased and placed into a trust for the employees. The unamortized
portion is included in combined Owners' equity as unearned
compensation.
k. Income (Loss) Per Share (unaudited)
As part of the Reorganization, Trizec Properties will modify the number
of its issued and outstanding shares of common stock such that the
number of its issued and outstanding shares of common stock will in
aggregate equal the number of issued and outstanding TrizecHahn
Corporation subordinate voting shares and multiple voting shares. This
will result in approximately 149,349,698 shares of common stock based
on the number of voting shares of TrizecHahn Corporation outstanding on
December 31, 2001. The number of shares actually issued will differ
from this amount based on the actual number of TrizecHahn voting shares
on the effective date of the Reorganization.
Unaudited basic and diluted net income (loss) per share of common stock
have been computed by dividing the net income for each period presented
by the number of voting shares of TrizecHahn Corporation outstanding at
December 31, 2001. All Trizec Properties common stock equivalents at
December 31, 2001 that are expected to be outstanding at the effective
date of the Reorganization were considered for the purpose of
determining dilutive shares outstanding. The actual number of Trizec
Properties common stock equivalents will differ from this amount based
on the number of common stock equivalents on the date of the
Reorganization.
The Corporation has recognized an extraordinary loss that has increased
basic and diluted loss per share by $0.12 for the year ended December
31, 2001 (December 31, 2000 - decreased basic and diluted income per
share by $0.01; 1999 - nil). In addition, the Corporation has recorded
a cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle that has
increased basic and diluted loss per share by $0.03 for the year ended
December 31, 2001 (December 31, 2000 - nil; 1999 - nil).
For the year ended December 31, 2001, dilutive shares outstanding were
increased by nil (2000 - 1.5 million; 1999 - 1.5 million) in respect of
stock options of TrizecHahn that were dilutive and 16.3 million (2000 -
14.8 million; 1999 - 14.8 million) were not included in the computation
of diluted income (loss) per share because to do so would have been
anti-dilutive for the periods presented. On January 9, 2002, TrizecHahn
granted a further 1.2 million options which were not included in the
computation of diluted net income (loss) per share because to do so
would have been antidilutive for the periods presented.
F-15
Notes to the Combined Consolidated Financial Statements
($ thousands)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONT'D)
l. Derivative Instruments
The Corporation uses interest rate cap and swap agreements to manage
risk from fluctuations in interest rates. Prior to January 1, 2001 the
Corporation accounted for interest rate cap contracts as hedges and, as
a result, the carrying values of the financial instruments were not
adjusted to reflect their current market values. Any amounts receivable
or payable arising from interest rate cap contracts were recognized as
an adjustment of interest expense. Premiums paid to arrange interest
rate cap contracts were deferred and amortized to interest expense over
the term of the contracts. Under interest rate swap agreements,
payments or receipts were recognized as adjustments to interest
expense. The Corporation believes it deals with creditworthy financial
institutions as counterparties.
The Corporation adopted SFAS No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities" as amended by SFAS No. 137 and SFAS
No. 138 (collectively, "SFAS No. 133"), as of January 1, 2001. SFAS No.
133 establishes accounting and reporting standards for derivative
instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other
contracts, and hedging activities. It requires the recognition of all
derivative instruments as assets or liabilities in the Corporation's
combined consolidated balance sheet at fair value. Changes in the fair
value of derivative instruments that are not designated as hedges or
that do not meet the hedge accounting criteria in SFAS No. 133 are
required to be reported through the statement of operations. For
derivatives designated as hedging instruments in qualifying cash flow
hedges, the effective portion of changes in fair value of the
derivatives is recognized in other comprehensive income (loss) until
the forecasted transactions occur, and the ineffective portions are
recognized in the statement of operations.
The Corporation uses certain interest rate protection agreements to
manage risks from fluctuations in variable interest rates, as well as
to hedge anticipated future financing transactions. Upon adoption of
SFAS No. 133, the Corporation recorded an asset of approximately $709
(included in prepaid expenses and other assets) and recorded a
liability of approximately $709 (included in other accrued liabilities)
related to the fair values of these agreements. In addition, the
Corporation expensed deferred charges of $280 related to these
agreements. This was reflected in net income as a cumulative effect of
a change in accounting principle. The Corporation's derivatives also
include investments in warrants to purchase shares of common stock of
other public companies. Based on the terms of the warrant agreements,
the warrants meet the definition of a derivative and accordingly must
be marked to fair value with the impact reflected in the statement of
operations. Prior to January 1, 2001, the Corporation had been
recording the warrants at fair value through accumulated other
comprehensive income (loss) as available-for-sale securities under SFAS
No. 115. Upon adoption of SFAS No. 133, the Corporation reclassified
$4,351, the unrealized holding loss in respect of the warrants, from
accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) to a cumulative effect of
a change in accounting principle.
For the year ended December 31, 2001, the Corporation recorded
derivative losses of $456 through the statement of operations, which
included the total ineffectiveness of all cash flow hedges. The
Corporation also recorded a derivative loss and write-down of $15,371,
that has been included in loss from securities investments in the
statement of operations. In addition, the Corporation recorded
unrealized derivative loses through other comprehensive income of
$1,818. No material amounts are expected to be reclassified from other
comprehensive income into earnings within the next twelve months.
F-16
Notes to the Combined Consolidated Financial Statements
($ thousands)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONT'D)
m. Accounting Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported
amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets
and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the
reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.
Actual results may differ from those estimates.
n. Minority Interest
The Corporation currently owns 100% of the general partner units, and
98% of the limited partnership units ("Units") at December 31, 2001
(December 31, 2000 - 97%) of TrizecHahn Mid-Atlantic Limited
Partnership (the "Partnership"). The remaining Units are held by
unrelated limited partners who have a right to redeem their Units
before 2012, at a redemption value equal to the fair market value of an
equivalent number of subordinate voting ("SVS") shares of TrizecHahn.
Upon redemption of the Units the Partnership is required to pay cash to
the holder in an amount equal to the redemption value, or the
Corporation has the option of triggering the effective issuance of
freely tradable SVS shares of TrizecHahn. The redemption value of the
outstanding Units is $4,386 at December 31, 2001 (December 31, 2000 -
$4,819).
The change in redemption value is recorded as an allocation to minority
interest in the consolidated statements of operations.
o. Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In December 1999, the Securities Exchange Commission ("SEC") issued
Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 101 ("SAB 101"), Revenue Recognition,
which outlines basic criteria that must be met to recognize revenue and
provides guidance for presentation of revenue and for disclosure
related to revenue recognition policies in the financial statements.
The adoption of SAB 101 had no significant impact on the Corporation.
In June 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued
SFAS No. 141, "Business Combinations", and SFAS No. 142, "Goodwill and
Other Intangible Assets". These new standards eliminate pooling as a
method of accounting for business combinations, and feature new
accounting rules for goodwill and intangible assets. SFAS No. 141 was
effective for business combinations initiated from July 1, 2001. SFAS
No. 142 will be adopted on July 1, 2002. The Corporation is currently
assessing the impact of the adoption of SFAS No. 142.
F-17
Notes to the Combined Consolidated Financial Statements
($ thousands)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONT'D)
o. Recent Accounting Pronouncements (cont'd)
On October 3, 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 144, "Accounting for the
Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets". SFAS 144 supersedes SFAS
No. 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for
Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed Of". SFAS No. 144 applies to all
long-lived assets (including discontinued operations) and consequently
amends Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 30 ("APB 30"),
"Reporting Results of Operations - Reporting the Effects of Disposal of
a Segment of a Business". SFAS 144 requires long-lived assets that are
to be disposed of by sale be measured at the lower of book value or
fair value less cost to sell. Under SFAS No. 144, certain conditions
are required to be met for a property to be classified as held for
disposition. Under the transitional rules of the standard, properties
held for disposition as at the date of adoption are required to satisfy
these conditions within one year of adoption. Properties currently held
for disposition that do not meet such conditions by December 31, 2002
will be required to be reclassified from held for disposition to held
and used at that date. Reclassification, if any, is measured at the
lower of the asset's carrying amount before it was classified as held
for disposition, adjusting for any depreciation that would have been
recognized had the asset been continuously classified as held and used,
and fair value at the date of reclassification. The Corporation will
adopt this standard on January 1, 2002 and expects no impact with
respect to the adoption of this standard.
3. REAL ESTATE
The Corporation's investment in real estate is comprised of:
December 31
-----------------------------------
2001 2000
---------------- ----------------
Properties
Held for the long term $ 4,329,889 $ 4,243,712
Held for disposition 630,558 335,076
---------------- ----------------
$ 4,960,447 $ 4,578,788
================ ================
Properties held for disposition include certain properties that are
determined to no longer be core assets under the strategic plan of the
Corporation which was adopted in late 2000, and as such the Corporation
has decided to dispose of these properties in an orderly manner over a
reasonable sales period.
At December 31, 2001 properties held for disposition included three
retail/entertainment projects, three technology center development
properties, two non-core office properties and certain remnant retail
land sites.
F-18
Notes to the Combined Consolidated Financial Statements
($ thousands)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. REAL ESTATE (CONT'D)
a. Properties - Held for the Long Term
December 31
-----------------------------------
2001 2000
---------------- ------------------
Rental properties
Land $ 519,682 $ 472,831
Buildings and improvements 3,866,714 3,683,300
Tenant improvements 250,824 202,036
Furniture, fixtures and equipment 14,060 12,162
---------------- ------------------
4,651,280 4,370,329
Less: accumulated depreciation (432,562) (295,786)
---------------- ------------------
4,218,718 4,074,543
Properties under development 82,515 73,435
Properties held for future development 28,656 95,734
---------------- ------------------
$ 4,329,889 $ 4,243,712
================ ==================
b. Properties - Held for Disposition
December 31
---------------------------------------
2001 2000
------------------ ------------------
Rental properties $ 275,983 $ 108,154
Properties under development 306,630 223,625
Properties held for development 47,945 3,297
------------------ ------------------
$ 630,558 $ 335,076
================== ==================
These properties are carried at the lower of depreciated cost less
estimated impairment losses where appropriate, or estimated fair value
less costs to sell. Implicit in management's assessment of fair values
are estimates of future rental and other income levels for the
properties and their estimated disposal dates. In certain cases the
estimated fair values have been calculated taking into consideration
estimated disposal dates extending into 2004. Due to the significant
measurement uncertainty of determining fair value, actual proceeds to
be realized on the ultimate sale of these properties could vary
materially from their carrying value.
The results of operations of properties held for disposition are
included in revenues and expenses of the Corporation. The following
summarizes the condensed results of operations of the properties held
for disposition.
December 31
-----------------------------------
2001 2000
---------------- ------------------
Total revenues $ 50,292 $ 21,639
Less: Operating expenses and property taxes (23,236) (9,677)
---------------- ------------------
Property operating income $ 27,056 $ 11,962
================ ==================
The impact of ceasing to depreciate properties held for disposition
would have increased depreciation and amortization in the statement of
operations for the year ended December 31, 2001 by $7,349 (year ended
December 31, 2000 - nil; 1999 - nil).
F-19
Notes to the Combined Consolidated Financial Statements
($ thousands)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. REAL ESTATE (CONT'D)
c. Cost to complete
Expenditures required to complete properties under development are
estimated at $53,244 at December 31, 2001 (December 31, 2000 -
$352,281), for which construction financing facilities have been
arranged.
d. Ground Lease Obligations
Properties carried at a net book value of approximately $841,679 at
December 31, 2001 (December 31, 2000 - $630,683) are situated on land
subject to lease agreements expiring in the years 2017 to 2086. Minimum
land rental payments for each of the next five years and beyond are as
follows:
Years ending December 31, 2002 $ 1,720
2003 1,752
2004 1,787
2005 1,787
2006 1,789
Thereafter 259,406
-----------------
$ 268,241
=================
Additional rent is payable under certain land lease agreements based on
rental revenue or net cash flow from properties. Included in operating
expenses for the year ended December 31, 2001 is $5,120 of ground lease
payments (December 31, 2000 - $3,646; 1999 - $3,326).
e. Future Minimum Rents
Future minimum rentals to be received under non-cancellable tenant
leases in effect at December 31, 2001, excluding operating expense
recoveries, are as follows:
Years ending December 31, 2002 $ 670,814
2003 608,017
2004 544,162
2005 481,424
2006 415,107
Thereafter 1,437,260
--------------------
$ 4,156,784
====================
F-20
Notes to the Combined Consolidated Financial Statements
($ thousands)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. REAL ESTATE (CONT'D)
f. Acquisitions
During the years presented, the Corporation acquired the following
properties:
(i) Acquisitions during the year ended December 31, 2001
Total
Date Acquired Rentable Acquisition
Property Location Sq.ft. Cost
- ------------------- ------------------------------------------ --------------------- -------------- ----------------
(unaudited)
May 11 Two Balston Plaza Arlington, VA 222,000 $ 44,530
May 15 550 West Washington Chicago, IL 372,000 77,335
May 24 1225 Connecticut, N.W. Washington, DC 224,000 59,875
November 10 10 and 120 Riverside - acquisition of
ground lease and other obligations Chicago, IL - 21,000
----------------
$ 202,740
================
(ii) Acquisitions during the year ended December 31, 2000
Total
Acquisition
Date Acquired Development Sites Location Cost
- --------------------- --------------------------------- --------------------- ---------------
September 29 Valley Industrial Park Seattle, WA $ 46,791
October 15 150 and 200 Inner Belt Road Boston, MA 27,589
October 16 Clybourn Center Chicago, IL 11,967
---------------
$ 86,347
===============
(iii) Acquisitions during the year ended December 31, 1999
Total
Rentable Acquisition
Date Acquired Property Location Sq.ft. Cost
- --------------------- --------------------------------- -------------------------- -------------- ---------------
(unaudited)
January 11 1250 Connecticut Washington, DC 171,000 $ 43,884
January 15 Galleria Towers I, II and III Dallas, TX 1,408,000 218,163
April 30 One New York Plaza New York, NY 2,447,000 398,783
---------------
$ 660,830
===============
F-21
Notes to the Combined Consolidated Financial Statements
($ thousands)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. REAL ESTATE (CONT'D)
g. Dispositions
During the years presented, the Corporation disposed of the following
properties and recorded the following gain (loss) on sale of real
estate and allowance for loss on properties held for disposition:
(i) Dispositions during the year ended December 31, 2001
Gain/
Date Rentable Sales (Loss)
Sold Property Location Sq.ft. Price On Sale
- -------------- --------------------------------- --------------- -------------- -------------- --------------
(unaudited)
January 16 Camp Creek Business Center Atlanta, GA 258,000 $ 16,860 $ 497
January 19 First Stamford Place Stamford, CT 774,000 59,587 984
February 9 Fisher/Albert Kahn Detroit, MI 905,000 28,677 (5,116)
June 30 Park Central Land Dallas, TX - 2,092 1,179
- - Residual lands Various - 7,337 403
-------------- --------------
$ 114,553 (2,053)
--------------
Allowance for loss on properties held for disposition (304,991)
--------------
$ (307,044)
==============
Office properties
The Corporation acquired three technology center development properties
in Seattle, Boston and Chicago, in late 2000. During the current year,
the Corporation explored alternatives other than developing these
properties as technology centers. After considering these alternatives,
the Corporation decided to dispose of these properties in the near term
in an orderly manner. As a result, the Corporation recorded an
allowance for loss of $62,933 for the year ended December 31, 2001. In
addition, an allowance for loss of $2,614 was recorded related to the
planned sale of two non-core U.S. office assets. The five properties
have been reclassified to properties held for disposition.
U.S. retail/entertainment properties
By December 31, 2001, the Corporation had opened all of its
retail/entertainment projects. The retail/entertainment component of
Hollywood & Highland in Los Angeles, California opened on November 8,
2001, while the hotel component opened on December 26, 2001. Paseo
Colorado in Pasadena, California opened on September 28, 2001. Desert
Passage in Las Vegas, Nevada had opened in August 2000. Consistent with
the previously announced strategy to focus on the U.S. office business,
the Corporation intends to pursue an orderly disposition of these
properties. At the end of 2000, these assets were classified as held
for disposition, and are carried at the lower of cost and estimated
fair value less cost to sell.
Hollywood & Highland and Desert Passage depend on tourism for a
significant portion of their visitors. The events of September 11, 2001
have significantly impacted the levels of tourism, and furthermore have
created significant general economic uncertainty. In addition, the
Aladdin Hotel and Casino, which adjoins Desert Passage, filed for
Chapter 11 reorganization on September 28, 2001. During the fourth
quarter, the Corporation commissioned third party appraisals of its
retail/entertainment properties. These appraisals indicated a decline
in the fair value of these assets and accordingly, the Corporation
recorded an allowance for loss of $239,444 to reduce the carrying value
of these assets. Of this amount, $217,039 relates to the Hollywood &
Highland complex and $22,405 relates to Desert Passage and certain
remnant retail assets.
F-22
Notes to the Combined Consolidated Financial Statements
($ thousands)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. REAL ESTATE (CONT'D)
g. Dispositions (cont'd)
(ii) Dispositions during the year ended December 31, 2000
Gain/
Date Rentable Sales (Loss)
Sold Property Location Sq.ft. Price On Sale
- ------------------- -------------------------------------- --------------------- ------------- ------------ ------------
(unaudited)
June 15 The Interchange Atlanta, GA 118,000 $ 16,012 $ 1,533
August 7 Encino Gateway Los Angeles, CA 338,000 51,572 (361)
August 7 The Pinkerton Building Los Angeles, CA 200,000 32,462 6,360
September 1 Newmarket Business Park (Land) Atlanta, GA - 1,909 329
September 6 Fashion Outlet of Las Vegas Primm, NV 363,000 41,592 756
September 12 One Concord Center Concord, CA 346,000 53,579 14,957
September 28 Highlands Overlook Atlanta, GA 246,000 10,835 (2,437)
October 20 Courthouse Square Alexandria, VA 114,000 16,143 1,993
November 3 6006 Executive Blvd. Rockville, MD 42,000 7,504 (815)
November 3 Twinbrook Metro Park Rockville, MD 554,000 78,672 (10,031)
November 20 Two Pershing Square Kansas City, MO 511,000 70,693 8,092
December 15 Twinbrook Office Center Rockville, MD 163,000 26,897 (13)
December 21 Spring Park/Sugarland West Herndon, VA 426,000 66,495 16,499
------------ ------------
$ 474,365 36,862
============
Allowance for loss on properties held for disposition (3,677)
------------
$ 33,185
============
In conjunction with the sales in 2000, the Corporation incurred
prepayment premiums, wrote-off unamortized deferred financing costs and
incurred other costs for the early retirement of debt totalling $2,319
($1,491, net of tax). This has been recorded as an extraordinary item
in the statement of operations.
(iii) Dispositions during the year ended December 31, 1999
In the fourth quarter of 1999, the Corporation sold certain non-core
retail development sites and recorded an allowance for loss on the
planned sale of the remaining retail properties. The Corporation
recorded an aggregate estimated loss of $41,373.
F-23
Notes to the Combined Consolidated Financial Statements
($ thousands)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4. UNCONSOLIDATED REAL ESTATE JOINT VENTURES
The Corporation participates in incorporated and unincorporated joint
ventures and partnerships with other venturers in various operating
properties which are accounted for using the equity method. In most
instances, these projects are managed by the Corporation.
a. The following is a summary of the Corporation's ownership in
unconsolidated real estate joint ventures:
Corporation's Economic Interest(1)
December 31
------------------------------
Entity Property and Location 2001 2000
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------- --------------
Marina Airport Building, Ltd. Marina Towers North and South, Los Angeles, CA 50% 50%
WHTCP Realty L.L.C. Ernst & Young Tower, Los Angeles, CA 25% 25%
Dresser Cullen Venture M.W. Kellog Tower, Houston, TX 50% 50%
Main Street Partners, LP Bank One Center, Dallas, TX 50% 50%
Trizec New Center Development
Associates (A Partnership) New Center One, Detroit, MI 67% 67%
1114 TrizecHahn-Swig, L.L.C. The Grace Building, New York, NY 50% 50%
1141 TrizecHahn-Swig, L.L.C. World Apparel Center, New York, NY 50% 50%
1460 Leasehold TrizecHahn Swig L.L.C./
1460 Fee TrizecHahn Swig L.L.C. 1460 Broadway, New York, NY 50% 50%
TrizecHahn Waterview LP Waterview Development, Arlington, VA 80% 80%
TrizecHahn Hollywood Hotel L.L.C.(3)(4) Hollywood & Highland Hotel, Los Angeles, CA 84.5% 84.5%
Aladdin Bazaar L.L.C. (2)(3)(4) Desert Passage, Las Vegas, NV 100% 65%
(1) The amounts shown above approximate the Corporation's economic
ownership interest for the periods presented. Cash flow from
operations, capital transactions and net income are allocated to
the joint venture partners in accordance with their respective
partnership agreements. The Corporation's share of these items is
subject to change based on, among other things, the operations of
the property and the timing and amount of capital transactions.
The Corporation's legal ownership may differ.
(2) On March 30, 2001, Aladdin Bazaar's L.L.C. agreement was amended.
The amendment, among other provisions, gave the Corporation sole
authority to market and sell the shopping center and terminated
the other partner's right to participate in the management or
control of the shopping center. As of April 1, 2001 the
Corporation accounts for the property and its operations under the
consolidation method of accounting.
(3) The interest in Hollywood & Highland Hotel and Desert Passage have
been designated as held for disposition.
(4) As described in Note 3, the Corporation, in 2001, recorded
allowances for loss on sale in respect of these properties.
F-24
Notes to the Combined Consolidated Financial Statements
($ thousands)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4. UNCONSOLIDATED REAL ESTATE JOINT VENTURES (CONT'D)
b. Unconsolidated Real Estate Joint Venture Financial Information
The following represents combined summarized financial information of
the unconsolidated real estate joint ventures.
December 31
------------------------------
Balance Sheets 2001 2000
-------------- --------------
Assets
Real estate, net $ 1,206,887 $ 1,403,853
Other assets 157,973 183,672
-------------- --------------
Total Assets $ 1,364,860 $ 1,587,525
============== ==============
Liabilities
Mortgage debt $ 687,305 $ 834,140
Other liabilities 73,636 84,306
Partners' equity 603,919 669,079
-------------- --------------
Total Liabilities and Equity $ 1,364,860 $ 1,587,525
============== ==============
Corporation's Share of Equity $ 289,242 $ 384,038
============== ==============
Corporation's Share of Mortgage Debt $ 351,063 $ 432,445
============== ==============
For the years ended December 31
-----------------------------------------
Statements of Operations 2001 2000 1999
-----------------------------------------
Total Revenues $ 206,218 $ 215,847 $ 202,323
------------- ------------ ------------
Expenses
Operating and other 94,577 94,182 89,671
Interest 45,381 53,905 39,406
Depreciation and amortization 37,314 28,710 29,341
------------- ------------ ------------
Total Expenses 177,272 176,797 158,418
------------- ------------ ------------
Net Income $ 28,946 $ 39,050 $ 43,905
============= ============ ============
Corporation's Share of Net Income $ 12,952 $ 19,417 $ 16,207
============= ============ ============
c. Liability for Obligations of Partners
The Corporation is contingently liable for certain obligations of its
partners in such ventures. In each case, all of the assets of the
venture are available for the purpose of satisfying such obligations.
The Corporation had guaranteed or was otherwise contingently liable for
approximately $12,968 as of December 31, 2001 (December 31, 2000 -
$68,335) of its partners' share of recourse property debt.
F-25
Notes to the Combined Consolidated Financial Statements
($ thousands)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
5. INVESTMENT IN SEARS TOWER
Mortgage Receivable
On December 3, 1997, the Corporation purchased a subordinated mortgage
and an option to purchase the Sears Tower in Chicago (the "Investment
in Sears Tower"), for $70 million and became the residual beneficiary
of the trust that owns the Sears Tower. In addition, the Corporation
assumed responsibility for property management and leasing services.
The Corporation's mortgage is subordinate to an existing non-recourse
participating first mortgage which is serviced only to the extent of
available cash flow. Beginning in 2002, certain minimum interest
payments are required under the participating first mortgage. The
minimum interest payment for 2002 is $37,500, increasing to $51,900 for
each of 2003 and 2004. The maturity date for this mortgage is July
2005. In order to retire all amounts collateralized by the first
mortgage, including the lender's participating interest in cash flow,
the lender must receive an amount sufficient to provide it with an
internal rate of return of 8.6858%. Excluding the lender's
participating interest in cash flow, the balance of the first mortgage,
including accrued interest is $778,903 at December 31, 2001 (December
31, 2000 - $776,733).
The subordinated mortgage held by the Corporation, which matures in
July 2010, has a balance, including accrued interest, of $363,065 at
December 31, 2001, (December 31, 2000 - $345,694) and has certain
participation rights to the extent of available cash flow. As excess
cash flow is not currently available to service the subordinated
mortgage, no interest income has been recognized for the year ended
December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999. The fair value of the Investment in
Sears Tower is estimated by management to be approximately $70 million.
The Sears Tower is currently owned by a trust established for the
benefit of an affiliate of Sears, Roebuck and Co. ("Sears"). The trust
has a scheduled termination date of January 1, 2003. At any time prior
to January 1, 2003, Sears has the right to acquire title to the
building from the trust in exchange for readily marketable securities
having a value equal to the amount, if any, by which the appraised
value of the building exceeds the amount of all indebtedness
collateralized by the building.
If Sears acquires the building pursuant to its right of substitution,
the trust will immediately terminate and any marketable securities
transferred by Sears to the trust would be distributed to the
Corporation as residual beneficiary of the trust. Sears would hold
title to the building subject to all indebtedness, including the
Corporation's subordinated mortgage, subject to the Corporation's
rights under the option. The Corporation's option to purchase the
building is exercisable between January 2003 and July 2005 at a price
of approximately $950 million plus 40% of the amount by which the
appraised value of the building exceeds $1,063 million. If the building
is purchased under the option, it would be acquired subject to all
outstanding indebtedness collateralized by the building, and the amount
of such indebtedness would be credited against the purchase price.
If Sears does not exercise its right of substitution, the assets of the
trust, subject to the participating first mortgage, would be
distributed on the scheduled termination date to the Corporation as the
residual beneficiary.
F-26
Notes to the Combined Consolidated Financial Statements
($ thousands)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6. DEFERRED CHARGES
Deferred charges consist of the following:
December 31
-----------------------------------
2001 2000
---------------- ------------------
Leasing costs $ 147,570 $ 99,144
Financing costs 39,156 34,835
---------------- ------------------
186,726 133,979
Less: Accumulated amortization (48,672) (36,357)
---------------- ------------------
$ 138,054 $ 97,622
================ ==================
Interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2001 includes $9,586
of amortized deferred financing costs (year ended December 31, 2000 -
$16,102; 1999 - $13,098).
7. MORTGAGE DEBT AND OTHER LOANS
Properties Held for Properties Held for
the Long Term Disposition Total Debt
---------------------- ----------------------- -----------------------------------------------
Weighted Weighted Weighted Weighted
average average average average
interest interest interest interest
rates at rates at rates at rates at
Dec. 31, Dec. 31, Dec. 31, Dec. 31, Dec. 31, Dec. 31, Dec. 31, Dec. 31,
2001 2001 2001 2001 2001 2001 2000 2000
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Collateralized
property loans:
At fixed rates 6.89% $ 2,106,664 - $ - 6.89% $ 2,106,664 7.17% $ 1,566,018
At variable rates 2.58% 526,771 3.61% 359,337 3.00% 886,108 7.98% 712,390
Other loans 0.33% 8,360 12.00% 16,666 8.10% 25,026 5.89% 48,499
---------------------- ----------------------- ----------------------- -----------------------
6.01% $ 2,641,795 3.98% $ 376,003 5.76% $ 3,017,798 7.39% $ 2,326,907
====================== ======================= ======================= =======================
In the table above, mortgage debt and other loans have been presented
on a basis consistent with the classification of the underlying
collateralized properties, by properties held for the long term or held
for disposition.
a. Collateralized Property Loans
Property loans are collateralized by deeds of trust or mortgages on
properties, and mature at various dates between February 1, 2002 and
May 15, 2011. The carrying value, net of accumulated depreciation, of
encumbered properties at December 31, 2001 was approximately $4,280
million (December 31, 2000 - $3,845 million).
As at December 31, 2001, the Corporation has fixed the interest rates
on $150 million (as at December 31, 2000 - nil) of the debt classified
as fixed, in the above table, by way of interest rate swap contracts
with a weighted average interest rate of 6.01% and maturing on March
15, 2008. The cost to unwind these interest swap contracts is
approximately $3.6 million as at December 31, 2001 (year ended December
31, 2000 - $nil).
F-27
Notes to the Combined Consolidated Financial Statements
($ thousands)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
7. MORTGAGE DEBT AND OTHER LOANS (CONT'D)
b. Other Loans
The other loan in the amount of $16,666 matures on November 19, 2069.
c. Principal Repayments
Principal repayments of debt outstanding at December 31, 2001 are due
as follows:
Properties Held Properties Held
for the Long Term for Disposition Total
------------------ ----------------- ------------------
Years ending December 31, 2002 $ 90,871 $ 106,791 $ 197,662
2003 160,714 252,546 413,260
2004 362,783 - 362,783
2005 93,581 - 93,581
2006 731,721 - 731,721
Subsequent to 2006 1,202,125 16,666 1,218,791
------------------ ----------------- ------------------
$ 2,641,795 $ 376,003 $ 3,017,798
================== ================= ==================
The estimated fair value of the Corporation's long-term debt
approximates its carrying value at December 31, 2001 and 2000.
d. Refinancing and loss on early retirement of debt
On May 17, 2001, the Corporation retired early $1.2 billion of existing
long-term debt, which was funded through the issuance of $1.4 billion
of commercial mortgage-backed securities. As a consequence of these
early retirements, the Corporation recorded an extraordinary charge of
$17,967, consisting of contractual redemption premiums of $13,755, and
the write-off of unamortized deferred financing costs of $4,211.
e. Line of Credit
The Corporation has negotiated a three-year, $350 million unsecured
revolving credit facility with a group of banks. In December 2001, $200
million of the facility was committed and closed with a group of four
banks. The remaining $150 million of the facility has been syndicated
to a group of seven banks and closed in early January 2002.
The amount of the credit facility available to be borrowed at any time,
is determined by the unencumbered properties that the Corporation owns
and that satisfy certain conditions of eligible properties. The amount
currently eligible to be borrowed is $314 million. At December 31,
2001, no amounts were outstanding under this facility
F-28
Notes to the Combined Consolidated Financial Statements
($ thousands)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
7. MORTGAGE DEBT AND OTHER LOANS (CONT'D)
f. Limitations on Indebtedness
The Corporation conducts its operations through various subsidiaries
which are party to loan agreements containing provisions that require
the maintenance of financial ratios and impose limitation on additional
indebtedness and possible distribution in respect of capital stock.
g. Guarantees of Indebtedness
As at December 31, 2001, $241,616 (December 31, 2000 - $310,850) of
mortgage debt and other loans, including the Corporation's pro rata
share of certain unconsolidated joint venture mortgage debt, is
guaranteed by THOPL and/or THHL, both related parties.
8. REORGANIZATION COSTS
Based on the strategic plan adopted at the end 2000, the Corporation
has targeted general and administrative expense savings from the
benefits to be derived from both functional and office location
consolidations. As a result of a comprehensive review of its operations
during 2001 for this purpose, the Corporation initiated a
reorganization plan to simplify its management structure and centralize
accounting, payroll and information services functions in Chicago. The
reorganization plan will ultimately result in the separation of
approximately 150 employees, exclusive of any new hires, by the end of
2002.
During the year ended December 31, 2001, the Corporation recorded as
reorganization costs, a pre-tax charge of $15,922 to provide for
employee severance, benefits and other costs associated with
implementing the reorganization plan. Included in this charge are
$4,201 of non-cash costs which represent the accelerated recognition of
a portion of the entitlements pursuant to the escrowed share grant
arrangement for certain employees ($1,196), the donation of 40,000
shares of Common Stock ($2,000) and the write-off of furniture,
fixtures and leasehold costs at redundant locations ($1,005). As at
December 31, 2001, $6,718 of anticipated cash costs had been paid, with
$5,003 included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities.
In addition to the reorganization costs associated with executing the
plan, the Corporation anticipates incurring ongoing incremental
transition costs including relocation, hiring and consulting costs.
These costs are expensed as incurred. During the year ended December
31, 2001, the Corporation incurred $1,953 in such costs which are
included in general and administrative expense.
In the current year, for REIT qualification purposes, Trizec Properties
issued and donated 400 shares of its common stock, par value $0.01, to
each of 100 charitable organizations. The aggregate 40,000 shares of
Common Stock have, been estimated by management to have a fair value of
approximately $2,000, and such amount has been recorded as a donation
expense and included in reorganization costs.
During 2000, the Corporation recorded $4,200 for employee severance and
benefits associated with the planned wind-down of the
retail/entertainment business. In addition, the Corporation incurred
$2,480 (year ended December 31, 1999 - $4,950) of incremental
professional advisory fees in order to explore certain strategic
transactions and costs incurred to qualify as a REIT. At December 31,
2001, an amount of $13,342 (December 31, 2000 - $13,818) was included
in accrued severance liabilities relating to remaining liabilities with
respect to the retail/entertainment business.
F-29
Notes to the Combined Consolidated Financial Statements
($ thousands)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
9. LOSS FROM SECURITIES INVESTMENTS
During the year ended December 31, 2001, the Corporation fully provided
for the cost of securities investments in certain building
telecommunication and service providers, recording a $15,371 charge,
which was net of the recognition of $3,542 of deferred license revenue
on licenses that were terminated, as events and circumstances confirmed
that the decline in value of these assets was considered to be other
than temporary. This provision included the Corporation's investment in
Allied Riser Communications Corporation, Broadband Office Inc., Cypress
Communications Inc. and OnSite Access Inc., which were originally
received at no cash cost in exchange for providing licenses for
building access rights.
In addition, included in the loss from securities investment is the
investment in Captivate Network Inc., a privately held company, which
was the Corporation's only other investment in a building service
provider. This investment consisted of common stock and warrants
convertible into common stock. In November 2001, the Corporation's
subordinate ownership equity interest was significantly diluted as a
result of preferential funding by other investors.
10. INCOME AND OTHER CORPORATE TAXES
a. Trizec Properties REIT Election
In December 2000, Trizec Properties determined that it would elect to
be taxed as a REIT pursuant to Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. The election will be effective as of
January 1, 2001. In general, a corporation that distributes at least
90% of its REIT taxable income to its shareholders in any taxable year,
and complies with certain other requirements (relating primarily to its
organization, the nature of its assets and the sources of its revenues)
is not subject to United States federal income taxation to the extent
of the income which it distributes. Trizec Properties believes that it
substantially met the qualifications for REIT status as of December 31,
2001 and December 31, 2000 and intends to satisfy all such
qualifications in the future. Accordingly no provision has been made in
the combined financial statements for federal income taxes in 2001 in
respect of Trizec Properties.
TrizecProperties's conversion to REIT status had the following impact
on taxes for the year ended December 31, 2000:
For the year ended December 31 2000
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benefit (provision)
i. Elimination of Trizec Properties's net deferred tax liability at December 31, 2000 $ 364,950
ii. Current taxes payable arising from REIT election (53,294)
-----------
Net tax benefit $ 311,656
===========
i. Trizec Properties believes that it will not be liable for income
taxes at the federal level in the United States, or in most of the
states in which it operates, in future years. Accordingly, the
Corporation eliminated all of Trizec Properties's existing
deferred tax assets and liabilities relating to future years by
crediting the income statement with an amount totalling $364,950
at December 31, 2000.
ii. The election of REIT status will result in the deemed liquidation
of all subsidiaries owned by Trizec Properties. The gain arising
from this deemed liquidation will result in net taxes payable of
$53,294.
F-30
Notes to the Combined Consolidated Financial Statements
($ thousands)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
10. INCOME AND OTHER CORPORATE TAXES (CONT'D)
a. Trizec Properties REIT Election (cont'd)
iii. In connection with its election to be taxed as a REIT, Trizec
Properties will also elect to be subject to the "built-in gain"
rules. Under these rules, taxes may be payable at the time and to
the extent that the net unrealized gains on Trizec Properties's
assets at the date of conversion to REIT status are recognized in
taxable dispositions of such assets in the ten-year period
following conversion. Such net unrealized gains are estimated to
be approximately $2 billion. Management currently believes that
Trizec Properties will not incur such taxes on built-in gains
during the ten-year period as substantially all of its assets are
not held for disposition and due to the potential for Trizec
Properties to make non-taxable asset dispositions, such as
like-kind exchanges. At December 31, 2000, Trizec Properties has
disposed of certain assets and has identified assets for future
disposition but no material future tax liability is anticipated.
b. Deferred tax liability
The net deferred tax liability at December 31, 2001 of $60,000 (2000 -
$50,767) relates to differences in depreciation and amortization, the
tax basis of acquired assets and treatment of interest and certain
other costs.
c. Provision for income and other corporate taxes
The information which follows presents Trizec Properties on a pre and
post REIT qualification basis. The Corporation does not expect to
provide for deferred income taxes relating to Trizec Properties in
subsequent periods. The provision for income and other corporate taxes
is as follows:
For the year ended December 31
-----------------------------------------
2001 2000 1999
------------- ------------ ------------
Benefit from (Provision for)
Income taxes
Current
- REIT election $ - $ (53,294) $ -
Deferred
- operations (7,277) (49,410) (21,627)
- REIT election - 364,950 -
- contribution of retail/entertainment assets to REIT (1,649) - -
Franchise, capital and alternative minimum tax (4,869) (9,406) (1,188)
------------- ------------ ------------
$ (13,795) $ 252,840 $ (22,815)
============= ============ ============
TrizecProperties is part of a consolidated group for Federal and State
income tax filing purposes. For Trizec Properties, prior to electing to
be taxed as a REIT, and for other companies outside the Trizec
Properties group and included in the combined financial statements,
deferred income taxes are provided for the year ended December 31, 2001
at a rate of 35% (year ended December 31, 2000 - 39.45%; 1999 - 39.45%)
of income which reflected a Federal rate of 34% and a weighted average
State rate of 1% (December 31, 2000 - 4.45%; 1999 - 4.45%). Deferred
income taxes resulted primarily from temporary differences and the
timing of recognition of net operating loss carry-forwards and asset
cost bases, as well as differences in asset useful lives and
depreciation methods, for financial and tax reporting purposes.
F-31
Notes to the Combined Consolidated Financial Statements
($ thousands)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
10. INCOME AND OTHER CORPORATE TAXES (CONT'D)
c. Provision for income and other corporate taxes (cont'd)
Due to the planned contribution of THDI including its
retail/entertainment assets to Trizec Properties and the fact that
Trizec Properties is a REIT, all of THDI's remaining deferred tax
assets at December 31, 2001 of $1,649 relating to future years was
eliminated and charged to income tax expense in the current year.
d. The provision for taxes on income differs from the provision computed
at statutory rates as follows:
For the year ended December 31
-------------------------------------------
2001 2000 1999
------------ ------------- --------------
Income tax recovery (expense) computed at combined federal
and state statutory rates $ - $ (51,706) $ (23,549)
Franchise, capital and alternative minimum tax (4,869) (9,406) (1,188)
THDI income tax recovery computed at combined federal and
state statutory rates 73,768 - -
THDI allowance for loss not tax effected (82,734) - -
Contribution of THDI to REIT (1,649) - -
Impact of REIT election on Trizec Properties - 311,656 -
Other 1,689 2,296 1,922
------------ ------------- --------------
Total tax recovery (expense) $ (13,795) $ 252,840 $ (22,815)
============ ============= ==============
Trizec Properties has elected to be taxed as a REIT effective January 1, 2001.
11. RELATED PARTY INFORMATION
a. Transactions During 2001
i. On September 17, 2001, $34,000 in cash dividends were paid on
Trizec Properties Common Stock.
ii. Pursuant to the Reorganization the Corporation completed the
following transactions during 2001.
o The Corporation declared and paid a cash dividend of $465,000
to all common stockholders, representing pre-REIT earnings
and profits and estimated 2001 taxable income.
o On December 3, 2001 Trizec Properties Series A Convertible
Preferred Stock were converted into 357.6 shares of Trizec
Properties Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share.
o On December 3, 2001 Trizec Properties entered into a
recapitalization agreement with its sole shareholder pursuant
to which all issued and outstanding shares of Trizec
Properties Common Stock were exchanged for:
o 38,000,000 shares of Trizec Properties Common Stock, par
value $0.01 per share; o Trizec Properties issued 100
shares of Trizec Properties Special Voting Stock, par
value $0.01 per share; and, o Trizec Properties issued
100,000 shares of Trizec Properties Class F Convertible
Stock, par value $0.01 per share.
F-32
Notes to the Combined Consolidated Financial Statements
($ thousands)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
11. RELATED PARTY INFORMATION (CONT'D)
a. Transactions During 2001 (cont'd)
o On December 11, 2001 certain U.S. technology center assets that
were included in these combined consolidated financial statements
but held directly by TrizecHahn were transferred to the
Corporation. Pursuant to the Reorganization, these assets, net of
related debt and other liabilities, which were held by a separate
subsidiary of TrizecHahn ("823 Inc."), were contributed to the
Corporation in consideration for issuing to TrizecHahn 180,000
Trizec Properties Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share. As a
result of this transaction, Trizec Properties Common Stock and
Additional paid-in capital was increased by $2 and $16,548
respectively, with a corresponding decrease to Advances to parent
and affiliated companies. As a consequence 823 Inc. became a
wholly-owned subsidiary of Trizec Properties.
o On December 28, 2001 the Corporation filed an amended and restated
Certificate of Incorporation authorizing 750,000 shares of Class C
Convertible Preferred Stock, par value $1.00 per share. Pursuant
to a private placement offering of Class C Convertible Preferred
Stock to its common stockholders, and subscription thereof, Class
C Convertible Preferred Stock was subscribed for in the amount of
$414,154. The price per share was $1,100.
b. Transactions During 2000
On December 18, 2000, the Corporation issued 750,000 shares of Series B
Preferred Stock to THOPL. The consideration for the preferred shares
was a reduction, pursuant to the trust indenture, in the amount of
$750,000, of the principal amount of the 12% Senior Notes due to THOPL
by the Corporation.
On December 19, 2000, THOPL contributed the 750,000 shares of Series B
Preferred Stock to Trizec Properties's direct parent company.
c. Transactions During 1999
i. On September 20, 1999, the Corporation completed an intercompany
debt reorganization by entering into a trust indenture relating to
the issue by the Corporation of up to $1,100,000 principal amount
of Senior Notes at a rate of 12% per annum due September 30, 2009
(the "Indenture") pursuant to which:
o Trizec Properties repaid $70,000 of intercompany debt owing
to its indirect parent company, using funds drawn under an
existing credit facility;
o Trizec Properties repaid $55,000 of outstanding loans, using
funds borrowed from its indirect parent company in
consideration for the issuance of $55,000 of 12% Senior Notes
pursuant to the Indenture;
o Trizec Properties amended the terms of the remaining
intercompany debt owing to its indirect parent company and
issued $319,500 of 12% Senior Notes in connection therewith;
and
o Trizec Properties issued $725,500 of 12% Senior Notes to
its immediate parent company as a dividend-in-kind.
F-33
Notes to the Combined Consolidated Financial Statements
($ thousands)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
11. RELATED PARTY INFORMATION (CONT'D)
c. Transactions During 1999 (cont'd)
ii. On September 30, 1999, Trizec Properties declared and paid a
dividend-in-kind consisting of all of the outstanding shares of
common stock of THDI which, up until that time was a wholly-owned
subsidiary of Trizec Properties. The increase in combined
additional paid-in capital of the Corporation in the amount of
$175,834 reflects the contribution to additional paid-in capital,
upon THDI's formation. The net asset book values used in recording
the dividend amount were as follows:
Real estate $ 83,771
Cash and short-term investments 3,882
Investment in unconsolidated real estate ventures 90,624
Other assets 39,490
-------------
217,767
Long-term debt 24,663
Other liabilities 17,270
-------------
Net assets $ 175,834
=============
iii. On December 21, 1999, the $725,500 of 12% Senior Notes were
transferred by the direct Parent company to THOPL. In addition,
Trizec Properties issued 350,000 shares of Series B Preferred
Stock to THOPL. The consideration for the preferred shares was a
reduction, in the amount of $350,000, of the principal amount of
the 12% Senior Notes due to THOPL by the Corporation.
d. Other Related Party Information
December 31
------------------------------
2001 2000
-------------- --------------
Non-interest bearing advances from Trizec Properties to the parent and
affiliated companies $ 90,633 $ -
============== ==============
Advances from the parent and affiliated companies:
Non-interest bearing advances to Trizec Properties $ - $ 13,187
Non-interest bearing advances to THDI 236,619 179,453
-------------- --------------
$ 236,619 $ 192,640
============== ==============
The non-interest bearing advances from and to the parent and affiliated
companies are unsecured and due on demand.
Included in interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2001 is $
nil (year ended December 31, 2000 - $86,200; 1999 - $61,600) of
interest expense paid to the parent and affiliated companies. On
December 18, 2000 the Corporation repaid $750,000 Senior Notes payable
through the issuance of Series B Preferred Stock. These notes bore
interest at 12%.
For the periods presented, the Corporation, in the normal course of
business, reimbursed its parent and/or affiliates for direct third
party purchased services and a portion of salaries for certain
employees for direct services rendered. A significant portion of the
reimbursements were for allocated or direct insurance premiums which,
for the year ended December 31, 2001, amounted to $7,102 (year ended
December 31, 2000 - $7,428; 1999 - $8,350).
F-34
Notes to the Combined Consolidated Financial Statements
($ thousands)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
12. REDEEMABLE STOCK
The following classes of stock have been presented on the balance sheet
outside of owner's equity as a result of the redemption features
available to the holders of the stock.
Trizec Properties
i. Class F Convertible Stock
On December 3, 2001 the Corporation issued 100,000 shares (authorized
100,000 shares) of Class F Convertible Stock with a par value $0.01 of
per share.
The Class F Convertible Stock are non-voting, entitled to cumulative
dividends at a fixed rate per annum of $0.05 per share, redeemable at
the Corporation's option or the holder's option after the expiration of
the conversion period for $1.00 per share plus unpaid declared
dividends and convertible at the holder's option only upon the
occurrence of certain defined events during a defined conversion period
into a number of shares of Common Stock based on a defined formula.
The stock is convertible into additional shares of the Corporation's
Common Stock so that TrizecHahn and its subsidiaries will not bear a
disproportionate burden if tax pursuant to the Foreign Investment in
Real Property Tax Act of 1980, or FIRPTA, is payable in connection with
the corporate reorganization or other limited types of transactions or
events.
Cumulative undeclared dividends on the Class F Convertible Stock are
nil (2000 - nil; 1999 - nil).
The Corporation cannot declare or pay dividends on any of the other
classes of stock (see Note 12) nor can the Corporation redeem or
purchase for cancellation any of the other classes of stock unless all
unpaid and undeclared cumulative dividends have been declared and paid.
The Corporation has recorded the holder's redemption feature at $100 at
December 31, 2001.
ii. Special Voting Stock
On December 3, 2001, the Corporation issued 100 shares (authorized 100
shares) of Special Voting Stock with a par value $0.01 of per share.
The Special Voting Stock have special voting rights that give the
holder, together with the voting rights of the holder and affiliated
companies pursuant to ownership of Common Stock, a majority of votes in
elections of directors to the Board of Directors of the Corporation at
any time prior to January 1, 2008. Thereafter, the Special Voting Stock
are non-voting. In addition, for 66 months after the effective date of
the corporate reorganization, this stock will entitle its holder to
cash dividends that reflect non-Canadian taxes, principally
cross-border withholding taxes, payable in respect of common stock
dividends and special voting stock dividends paid to TrizecHahn or its
subsidiaries. The Special Voting Stock is redeemable at the
Corporation's or the holder's option after a defined date at $1,000 per
share plus unpaid declared dividends.
The Corporation has recorded the holder's redemption feature at $100 at
December 31, 2001.
F-35
Notes to the Combined Consolidated Financial Statements
($ thousands)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
13. OWNERS' EQUITY
Trizec Properties
i. Series A Convertible Preferred Stock
The Series A Preferred Stock were non-voting, entitled to
non-participating and non-cumulative dividends as may have been
determined by the Board of Directors, redeemable at the Corporation's
option at $1,000 per share, and convertible at the holder's option into
a number of shares of Common Stock based on a defined formula. On
December 3, 2001, all outstanding Series A Convertible Preferred Stock
were cancelled and converted into 357.6 shares of Common Stock.
ii. Series B Convertible Preferred Stock
The Series B Convertible Preferred Stock are non-voting, entitled to
cumulative dividends at a fixed rate per annum of 7.5% of the
redemption value, redeemable at the Corporation's option at $1,000 per
share plus unpaid cumulative dividends and convertible at the holder's
option into a number of Common Stock equal to $1,000 divided by the
fair market value of one share of Common Stock at the time of
conversion as determined by the Board of Directors.
During 2000, 750,000 shares of Series B Preferred Stock with a par
value of $1.00 were authorized and issued to the indirect parent
company.
During 1999, 350,000 shares of Series B Preferred Stock with a par
value of $1.00 were authorized and issued to the indirect parent
company.
Cumulative undeclared dividends on the Series B Preferred Stock are
$137,723 at December 31, 2001 (2000 - $55,223; 1999 - $26,969).
iii. Class C Convertible Preferred Stock
The Class C Convertible Preferred Stock are non-voting, entitled to
cumulative dividends at a fixed rate per annum of 7% of the redemption
value, redeemable at the Corporation's option after December 28, 2006
at $1,100 per share plus unpaid cumulative dividends and convertible at
the holder's option into a number of Common Stock equal to $1,100
divided by the fair market value of one share of Common Stock at the
time of the conversion as determined by the Board of Directors.
Cumulative undeclared dividends on the Class C Convertible Preferred
Stock are $238 at December 31, 2001 (2000 - nil: 1999 - nil).
iv. Common Stock Dividends
On September 17, 2001, $34,000 in cash dividends were paid on Trizec
Properties Common Stock. On December 17, 2001, $465,000 in cash
dividends were paid on Trizec Properties Common Stock. These cash
dividends have been reflected as a distribution of retained earnings of
$213,657 and as a reduction of additional paid-in capital of $285,343
being the amount in excess of available Trizec Properties combined
retained earnings at the time these dividends were declared. For
federal income tax purposes, 98.3% of the dividends paid in 2001
represented ordinary income; 0.9% represented a return of capital; 0.4%
represented capital gains at 20%; and, 0.4% represented capital gains
at 25%.
F-36
Notes to the Combined Consolidated Financial Statements
($ thousands)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
13. OWNERS' EQUITY (CONT'D)
Trizec Properties
iv. Common Stock Dividends (cont'd)
During 1999, Trizec Properties issued two dividends-in-kind in the
amounts of $725,500 and $175,834 million. These dividends-in-kind have
been reflected as a distribution of retained earnings of $459,629 and
as a reduction of additional paid-in capital of $441,705 being, the
amount in excess of available Trizec Properties retained earnings at
the time these dividends were declared.
v. Priority
The capital stock of the Corporation have the following ranking upon
the voluntary or involuntary liquidation, dissolution or winding up of,
or any distribution of the assets of the Corporation among its
shareholders for the purpose of winding up its affairs (from most
senior to the least): Class F Convertible Stock; Special Voting Stock;
Class C Convertible Preferred Stock; Class B Convertible Preferred
Stock; and Common Stock.
vi. Restrictions on Ownership
Pursuant to the planned reorganization, ownership of the Corporation's
capital stock by persons other than qualifying U.S. persons will be
limited to 45% by value in the aggregate so that the Corporation will
be in a position to attain "domestically-controlled REIT" status for
U.S. federal income tax purposes within 63 months after the effective
date of the corporate reorganization.
F-37
Notes to the Combined Consolidated Financial Statements
($ thousands)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
14. SEGMENTED INFORMATION
The Corporation is a fully integrated real estate operating and
development company. Its activities include the acquisition,
development and operation of office properties and retail/entertainment
projects.
The Corporation has determined that its reportable segments are those
that are based on the Corporation's method of internal reporting, which
classifies its core office operations by regional geographic area. This
reflects a management structure with dedicated regional leasing,
property management and development teams. The Corporation's reportable
segments by geographic region for office operations in the United
States are: Northeast, Mid-Atlantic, Southeast, Midwest, Southwest and
West. A separate management group heads the retail/entertainment
development segment. The Corporation primarily evaluates operating
performance based on property operating income which is defined as
total revenue including tenant recoveries, parking, fee and other
income less operating expenses and property taxes. This excludes
property related depreciation and amortization expense. The accounting
policies for purposes of internal reporting are the same as those
described for the Corporation in Note 2 - Significant Accounting
Policies, except that real estate operations conducted through joint
ventures are consolidated on a proportionate line-by-line basis, as
opposed to the equity method of accounting. All key financing,
investing, capital allocation and human resource decisions are managed
at the corporate level. Asset information by reportable segment is not
reported since the Corporation does not use this measure to assess
performance; therefore, the depreciation and amortization expenses are
not allocated among segments.
The following presents internal property net operating income by
reportable segment for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2000 and
1999.
F-38
Notes to the Combined Consolidated Financial Statements
($ thousands)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
14. SEGMENTED INFORMATION (CONT'D)
For the year ended December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999
Office Properties
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northeast Mid-Atlantic Southeast
------------------ ------------------- ------------------
2001 2000 1999 2001 2000 1999 2001 2000
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- -------- ---------- ----------
Property operations
Total property revenue $ 194,962 $ 189,048 $ 156,445 $ 152,982 $ 148,641 $ 134,158 $ 140,003 $ 133,164
Total property expense (75,136) (70,124) (58,602) (46,961) (48,839) (48,123) (56,384) (51,364)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Internal property operating
income
$ 119,826 $ 118,924 $ 97,843 $ 106,021 $ 99,802 $ 86,035 $ 83,619 $ 81,800
======================================================================================
----------------------------------------
Midwest
-------------------
1999 2001 2000 1999
---------- ---------- --------- ----------
$ 120,756 $ 171,870 $164,904 $ 149,891
(49,523) (90,890) (89,957) (83,910)
-----------------------------------------
$ 71,233 $ 80,980 $ 74,947 $ 65,981
=========================================
Office Properties (cont'd)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Southwest West Total
---------------------- ----------------------- ----------------------
2001 2000 1999 2001 2000 1999 2001 2000 1999
---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ----
Property operations
Total property revenue $ 256,404 $ 246,714 $ 250,684 $ 54,853 $ 68,421 $ 72,377 $ 971,074 $ 950,892 $ 884,311
Total property expense (116,117) (107,378) (103,790) (21,037) (24,834) (27,297) (406,525) (392,496) (371,245)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Internal property
operating income
$ 140,287 $ 139,336 $ 146,894 $ 33,816 $ 43,587 $ 45,080 $ 564,549 $ 558,396 $ 513,066
=======================================================================================================
Total assets $ 5,433,533 $ 5,137,099
=========================
Retail/Entertainment
Properties Total
--------------------- -----------------------
2001 2000 1999 2001 2000 1999
---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ----
$ 44,205 $ 22,966 $ 14,132 $ 1,015,279 $ 973,858 $ 898,443
(19,215) (9,699) (6,985) (425,740) (402,195) (378,230)
------------------------------------------------------------------
$ 24,990 $ 13,267 $ 7,147 $ 589,539 $ 571,663 $ 520,213
==================================================================
$ 662,902 $426,897 $ 6,096,435 $ 5,563,996
===================== =======================
F-39
Notes to the Combined Consolidated Financial Statements
($ thousands)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
14. SEGMENTED INFORMATION (CONT'D)
The following is a reconciliation of internal property net operating
income to income before income taxes, extraordinary items and
cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle.
----------------
(U.S. $ thousands) 2001
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Internal property revenue $ 1,015,279
Less: real estate joint venture property revenue (103,005)
Interest income 15,677
--------------
Total revenues 927,951
--------------
Internal property operating expenses (425,740)
Add: real estate joint venture operating expenses 46,789
--------------
Total operating expenses and property taxes (378,951)
--------------
General and administrative expense (25,854)
Interest expense (152,759)
Depreciation and amortization expense (161,078)
Reorganization costs (15,922)
Loss from securities investments (15,371)
Derivative losses (456)
Minority interest 433
Income from unconsolidated real estate joint ventures 12,952
Gain (loss) on sale of real estate and allowance for loss on properties held for disposition (307,044)
--------------
Income (Loss) before Income Taxes, Extraordinary Item and Cumulative Effect of Change in Accounting
Principle $ (116,099)
==============
For the years
ended December 31
------------------------------
2000 1999
------------------------------
$ 973,858 $ 898,443
(103,308) (96,741)
8,480 7,118
-------------- --------------
879,030 808,820
-------------- --------------
(402,195) (378,230)
46,537 44,289
-------------- --------------
(355,658) (333,941)
-------------- --------------
(18,429) (16,725)
(265,680) (234,992)
(154,118) (133,352)
(6,680) (4,950)
- -
- -
580 1,459
19,417 16,207
33,185 (41,373)
-------------- --------------
$ 131,647 $ 61,153
============== ==============
F-40
Notes to the Combined Consolidated Financial Statements
($ thousands)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
15. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
a. 401 (k) Plans
The TrizecHahn USA Employee 401 (k) Plan and the TrizecHahn
Developments Employee 401 (k) Plan (the "401 (k) Plans") were
established to cover eligible employees of Trizec Properties and THDI
and employees of any designated affiliates. The 401 (k) Plans permit
eligible persons to defer up to 20% of their annual compensation,
subject to certain limitations imposed by the Code. The employees'
elective deferrals are immediately vested and non-forfeitable upon
contribution to the 401 (k) Plans. In 2001, Trizec Properties and THDI
matched dollar for dollar employee contributions to the 401 (k) Plans
up to 5% of the employee's annual compensation not to exceed $6.4. The
Corporation incurred expense for the year ended December 31, 2001 of
approximately $2,137 (year ended December 31, 2000 - $2,621; 1999 -
$2,295), related to the 401 (k) Plans.
b. Deferred Compensation Plan
On February 1, 1998, the Corporation commenced a deferred compensation
plan for a select group of management and highly compensated employees.
Under the plan employees are permitted to defer up to 100% of their
base salary and/or bonus on a pre-tax basis and to notionally invest
the deferred amount in various investment options. Additionally, the
Corporation may make discretionary contributions under the plan on
behalf of participants. Upon completion of a minimum deferral period of
four years, participants' may elect to release a portion of the
deferred amount. In connection with the deferred compensation plan, a
grantor trust has been established and contributions are made to the
trust in amounts equal to participants' deferrals and any discretionary
contributions. Amounts deferred, and discretionary contributions if
any, are expensed as funded. The amount expensed for the period ended
December 31, 2001 was $25 (December 31, 2000 - $28; 1999 - $20). As at
December 31, 2001, the Corporation has assets, included in prepaid
expenses and other assets, together with an equal amount in accounts
payable of $2,770 (December 31, 2000 - $3,086) representing the
contributions to the plan and obligations to the employees.
16. ESCROWED SHARE GRANTS
On November 9, 2000, the Corporation made grants of escrowed shares to
certain U.S. employees under which an escrow agent purchased 904,350 of
TrizecHahn's subordinate voting shares in the open market, and
deposited them in escrowed accounts. The employee is entitled to the
voting rights and dividends paid on the shares during the period.
One-third of the share grants vest and are released to the employees on
each of the anniversary dates of the grant over a three-year period.
Under certain employment termination conditions, the employee's
entitlement to the shares is forfeited and the shares are returned for
cancellation, while fully accelerated vesting occurs if an employee is
terminated without cause. The cost of acquiring the shares of $12,402
is being amortized to compensation expense, on a straight-line basis,
over the vesting period. Amounts expensed recognized in respect of the
escrowed share grants totaled $5,012 for the year ended December 31,
2001 and $689 for the year ended December 31, 2000.
F-41
Notes to the Combined Consolidated Financial Statements
($ thousands)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
17. CONTINGENCIES
a. Litigation
The Corporation is contingently liable under guarantees that are issued
in the normal course of business and with respect to litigation and
claims that arise from time to time. While the final outcome with
respect to claims and litigation pending at December 31, 2001, cannot
be predicted with certainty, in the opinion of management, any
liability which may arise from such contingencies would not have a
material adverse effect on the consolidated financial position, results
of operations or liquidity of the Corporation.
b. Concentration of Credit Risk
The Corporation maintains its cash and cash equivalents at financial
institutions. The combined account balances at each institution
typically exceed Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insurance
coverage and, as a result, there is a concentration of credit risk
related to amounts on deposit in excess of FDIC insurance coverage.
Management believes that this risk is not significant.
The Corporation performs ongoing credit evaluations of tenants and may
require tenants to provide some form of credit support such as
corporate guarantees and/or other financial guarantees. Although the
Corporation's properties are geographically diverse and tenants operate
in a variety of industries, to the extent the Corporation has a
significant concentration of rental revenue from any single tenant, the
inability of that tenant to make its lease payment could have an
adverse effect on the company.
c. Environmental
The Corporation, as an owner of real estate, is subject to various
environmental laws of federal and local governments. Compliance by the
Corporation with existing laws has not had a material adverse effect on
the Corporation's financial condition and results of operations, and
management does not believe it will have such an impact in the future.
However, the Corporation cannot predict the impact of new or changed
laws or regulations on its current properties or on properties that it
may acquire in the future.
d. Insurance
The Corporation carries with third party insurers, comprehensive
general liability, fire, flood, extended coverage and rental loss
insurance with policy specifications, limits and deductibles
customarily carried for similar properties. There are, however, certain
types of risks (generally of a catastrophic nature such as from wars or
environmental contamination) which are either uninsurable or not
economically insurable.
F-42
Notes to the Combined Consolidated Financial Statements
($ thousands)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
17. CONTINGENCIES (CONT'D)
d. Insurance (cont'd)
The Corporation currently has insurance for earthquake risks, subject
to certain policy limits and deductibles, and will continue to carry
such insurance if it is economical to do so. There can be no assurance
that earthquakes may not seriously damage the Corporation's properties
(several of which are located in California, historically an
earthquake-prone area) and that the recoverable amount of insurance
proceeds will be sufficient to fully cover reconstruction costs and
other losses suffered. The Corporation currently has insurance against
acts of terrorism, subject to policy limits and deductibles, and
subject to exemption for terrorist acts that constitute acts of war.
There can be no assurance that insurance coverage for acts of terrorism
will be available on commercially acceptable terms in the future. In
addition, there can be no assurance that third party insurers will be
able to maintain reinsurance sufficient to cover any losses that my be
incurred as a result of terrorist acts. Should an uninsured or
underinsured loss occur, the Corporation could lose its investment in,
and anticipated income and cash flows from, one or more of its
properties, but the Corporation would continue to be obligated to repay
any recourse mortgage indebtedness on such properties.
Additionally, although the Corporation generally obtains Owners' title
insurance policies with respect to its properties, the amount of
coverage under such policies may be less than the full value of such
properties. If a loss occurs resulting from a title defect with respect
to a property where there is no title insurance or the loss is in
excess of insured limits, the Corporation could lose all or part of its
investment in, and anticipated income and cash flows from, such
property.
18. PRO FORMA STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED)
The pro forma data presented below is included to illustrate the effect
on the Corporation's operations as a result of the following
transactions which occurred in 1999 and 2000 as if they occurred on
January 1, 1999 and transactions which occurred in 2001 as if they
occurred on January 1, 2000:
o The acquisition of properties (see note 3)
o The disposition of properties (see note 3)
The accompanying unaudited pro forma condensed financial information
has been prepared by management of the Corporation and do not purport
to be indicative of the results which would actually have been obtained
had the transactions described above been completed on the dates
indicated or which may be obtained in the future.
For the year ended December 31 2001 2000 1999
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Revenues $ 928,849 $ 813,774 $ 751,295
============== ============== ==============
Operating and property tax expenses $ 377,355 $ 333,988 $ 318,393
============== ============== ==============
Net income (loss) $ (149,541) $ 353,732 $ 23,516
============== ============== ==============
F-43
Notes to the Combined Consolidated Financial Statements
($ thousands)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
19. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS (UNAUDITED)
TrizecHahn is currently negotiating with Chelsfield plc to sell to
Chelsfield plc all of TrizecHahn's interest in Global Switch S.a.r.l a
joint venture, for which Chelsfield plc is one of the other joint
venture partners. The sale of this interest is expected to be for
ordinary shares of Chelsfield plc, a UK real estate company whose
shares are listed on the London stock exchange or, at Chelsfield plc's
option, for cash payable in 2003. In connection with the negotiation of
the sale transaction, TrizecHahn subsequent to December 31, 2001 agreed
to advance to Chelsfield plc up to (pound) 25 million by way of an
unsecured loan commitment to be used to provide working capital for the
Global Switch S.a.r.l. business and their buyout of the approximately
17% interest of another shareholder of Global Switch S.a.r.l. The
(pound) 25 million unsecured loan is repayable in cash on June 28, 2002
or, in Chelsfield plc ordinary shares, if Chelsfield plc elects to
acquire TrizecHahn's Global Switch S.a.r.l. interest for Chelsfield plc
ordinary shares. TrizecHahn expects to complete a sale of its interest
in Global Switch S.a.r.l. prior to the effective date of the
Reorganization. On March 4, 2002 the Corporation advanced to TrizecHahn
(pound) 25 million ($35.6 million) to fund TrizecHahn's loan commitment
to Chelsfield plc. It is expected that once TrizecHahn has completed
its sale, they will transfer to the Corporation any shares of
Chelsfield plc or loans receivable from Chelsfield plc prior to the
effective date of the Reorganization in consideration for shares of the
Corporation's stock and repayment of this intercompany advance. At
December 31, 2001, TrizecHahn's carrying value of its joint venture
investment in Global Switch was $39.5 million. The ultimate value of
the consideration the Corporation will pay for the transferred assets
will vary based on a number of factors including the value of any
Chelsfield plc share consideration.
F-44
Schedule III- Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation as at December 31, 2001
($ thousands)
Initial Cost to Subsequent Costs
Company Capitalized, Net
--------------- ----------------
Encumbrances Building Building
-------------- and and
Description Notes Location at 12/31/01 Land additions Land additions
----------- ----- -------- ------------ ---- --------- ---- ---------
Properties held for the long term
- -------------------------------------
Rental Properties
Atlanta
Interstate North Parkway 4 Atlanta, GA $ (60,000) $ 6,900 $ 63,619 $ - $ 23,544
Colony Square Atlanta, GA (72,250) 8,900 53,408 - 19,599
The Palisades Atlanta, GA (48,800) 7,650 67,499 - 15,558
Newmarket Business Park Atlanta, GA - 4,450 40,172 - 2,978
Lakeside Centre Atlanta, GA (31,000) 4,700 41,740 - 3,098
Midtown Plaza Atlanta, GA (49,590) 9,093 52,923 - 5,041
--------------------------------------------------------
Total - Atlanta (261,640) 41,693 319,361 - 69,818
---------------------------------------------------------
Chicago
Franklin Garage Chicago, IL (26,852) 30,438 10,612 - 488
Two North LaSalle Chicago, IL (49,000) 9,305 54,094 - 13,644
10 South Riverside Chicago, IL (57,500) 10,838 63,171 - 18,536
120 South Riverside Chicago, IL (56,000) 10,838 53,222 - 23,239
550 West Washington Chicago, IL - 11,505 65,830 - 155
-----------------------------------------------------------
Total - Chicago (189,352) 72,924 246,929 - 56,062
-----------------------------------------------------------
Dallas
Renaissance Tower Dallas, TX (60,065) 3,150 105,834 - 28,296
Galleria Towers I, II and III Dallas, TX (137,514) 21,435 196,728 - 15,792
Plaza of the Americas Dallas, TX (66,160) 12,500 114,459 - 5,207
Park Central I & II Dallas, TX (8,500) 748 12,493 - 2,647
McKinney Place Dallas, TX (8,780) 1,035 8,557 - 1,541
-----------------------------------------------------------
Total - Dallas (281,019) 38,868 438,071 - 53,483
-----------------------------------------------------------
Houston
Allen Center Houston, TX (350,411) 21,375 236,851 - 20,168
Continental Center I Houston, TX (110,310) 14,756 69,741 - 30,253
Continental Center II Houston, TX (22,541) 1,500 9,793 - 14,133
500 Jefferson Houston, TX - 413 7,937 - 3,383
3700 Bay Area Blvd Houston, TX - 3,675 33,659 - 2,974
-----------------------------------------------------------
Total - Houston (483,262) 41,719 357,981 - 70,911
-----------------------------------------------------------
Los Angeles Area
Warner Center Los Angeles, CA - 5,115 25,692 - 5,326
9800 La Cienega Los Angeles, CA - 3,405 18,041 - 6,003
Landmark Square Long Beach, CA - 18,477 68,813 - 4,045
Shoreline Square Long Beach, CA - 5,707 59,138 - 3,620
-----------------------------------------------------------
Total - Los Angeles Area - 32,704 171,684 - 18,994
-----------------------------------------------------------
Schedule III- Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation as at December 31, 2001
($ thousands)
Total Cost at 12/31/01
---------------------------------------------
Building Date of
and Accumulated Construction/ Date Depreciable
Land additions Total (1) Depreciation Renovation Acquired Lives (2)
---- --------- ------ ------------ ---------- -------- ---------
$ 6,900 $ 87,163 $ 94,063 $ (6,251) 1973/84 Dec. 10/98 40
8,900 73,007 81,907 (11,837) 1970/73/95 Dec. 23/96 40
7,650 83,057 90,707 (7,562) 1981/83/99 Dec. 16/98 40
4,450 43,150 47,600 (3,617) 1979/89 Dec. 16/98 40
4,700 44,838 49,538 (3,416) 1984/86 Dec. 16/98 40
9,093 57,964 67,057 (6,792) 1984/85 Nov. 19/97 40
- ----------------------------------------------
41,693 389,179 430,872 (39,475)
- ----------------------------------------------
30,438 11,100 41,538 (1,268) 1974 Dec. 3/97 40
9,305 67,738 77,043 (5,978) 1979 Dec. 10/98 40
10,838 81,707 92,545 (6,310) 1965 Dec. 10/98, Nov. 10/01 40
10,838 76,461 87,299 (6,980) 1967 Dec. 10/98, Nov. 10/01 40
11,505 65,985 77,490 (1,034) 2000 May 15/01 40
- ----------------------------------------------
72,924 302,991 375,915 (21,570)
- ----------------------------------------------
3,150 134,130 137,280 (24,192) 1974/92 Oct. 31/96 40
21,435 212,520 233,955 (15,426) 1982/85/91 Jan. 15/99 40
12,500 119,666 132,166 (10,801) 1980 Aug. 4/98 40
748 15,140 15,888 (1,322) 1970/71 Dec. 10/98 40
1,035 10,098 11,133 (1,868) 1985 Oct. 31/96 40
- ----------------------------------------------
38,868 491,554 530,422 (53,609)
- ----------------------------------------------
21,375 257,019 278,394 (36,016) 1972/78/80/95 Nov. 19/96 40
14,756 99,994 114,750 (19,742) 1984 Oct. 31/96 40
1,500 23,926 25,426 (5,422) 1971 Oct. 31/96 40
413 11,320 11,733 (2,116) 1962/83 Oct. 31/96 40
3,675 36,633 40,308 (3,036) 1986 Aug. 5/98 40
- ----------------------------------------------
41,719 428,892 470,611 (66,332)
- ----------------------------------------------
5,115 31,018 36,133 (5,071) 1980 Oct. 31/96 40
3,405 24,044 27,449 (5,619) 1985 Oct. 31/96 40
18,477 72,858 91,335 (6,639) 1991 Aug. 11/98 40
5,707 62,758 68,465 (5,411) 1988 Sep. 24/98 40
- ----------------------------------------------
32,704 190,678 223,382 (22,740)
- ----------------------------------------------
S-1
New York Area
One New York Plaza New York, NY (240,318) 58,676 340,107 - 8,187
110 William Street New York, NY (85,000) 12,450 77,711 - 10,863
1065 Ave. of the Americas 3 New York, NY (37,864) 19,518 44,433 - 5,789
Newport Tower Jersey City, NJ (106,892) 2,054 161,582 - 1,613
-------------------------------------------------------
Total - New York Area (470,074) 92,698 623,833 - 26,452
-------------------------------------------------------
Washington, D.C. Area
2000 L Street, N.W. Washington, DC (41,243) 7,728 56,767 - 18,843
Watergate Office Building Washington, DC (19,108) 4,853 45,281 - 3,755
1400 K Street, N.W. Washington, DC (22,275) 11,905 18,100 - 8,846
1250 Connecticut, N.W. Washington, DC (29,750) 6,457 37,427 - 1,325
1250 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, DC (9,854) 3,515 24,922 - 347
2401 Pennsylvania Washington, DC (20,870) 4,419 24,674 - 1,167
1225 Connecticut Washington, DC - 8,865 51,010 - 154
Bethesda Crescent Bethesda, MD (36,774) 7,359 55,509 - 2,655
Plaza West Bethesda, MD - 1,950 12,805 - 3,408
Twinbrook Metro Plaza Rockville, MD (17,199) 4,250 24,003 - 1,039
Silver Spring Metro Plaza Silver Spring, MD (68,790) 5,311 98,142 - 6,967
Silver Spring Centre Silver Spring, MD (15,280) 3,320 20,399 - 720
Goddard Corporate Park Lanham, MD (15,183) 3,842 24,437 - 911
Beaumeade Corporate Park Washington, DC (18,000) 2,103 11,733 - 10,442
Rosslyn Gateway Arlington, VA (19,523) 5,546 38,297 - 3,274
1550 & 1560 Wilson Boulevard Arlington, VA (31,000) 4,958 28,849 - 6,775
2 Ballston Plaza Arlington, VA (27,360) 6,691 37,837 - 105
Reston Unisys Reston, VA (23,970) 5,706 34,934 - 3
Reston Crescent - Phase 2 Reston, VA (22,000) 4,145 810 - 19,958
Sunrise Tech Park Reston, VA (23,833) 6,346 36,618 - 282
-------------------------------------------------------
Total-Washington, D.C. Area (462,012) 109,269 682,554 - 90,976
-------------------------------------------------------
Charlotte
Bank of Americas Plaza Charlotte, NC (67,002) 11,250 103,530 - 4,740
First Citizens Plaza Charlotte, NC - - 61,348 - 4,000
-------------------------------------------------------
Total - Charlotte (67,002) 11,250 164,878 - 8,740
-------------------------------------------------------
Minneapolis
Northstar Center Minneapolis, MN (14,399) 2,500 44,501 - 20,447
Minnesota Center Minneapolis, MN (23,000) 2,841 43,606 - 4,142
-------------------------------------------------------
Total - Minneapolis (37,399) 5,341 88,107 - 24,589
-------------------------------------------------------
Pittsburgh
Gateway Center Pittsburgh, PA (42,329) 6,260 55,627 - 28,046
-------------------------------------------------------
St. Louis
Metropolitan Square St. Louis, MO (89,190) 13,625 125,636 - 4,725
St. Louis Place St. Louis, MO - 3,500 32,169 - 821
-------------------------------------------------------
Total - St. Louis (89,190) 17,125 157,805 - 5,546
-------------------------------------------------------
58,676 348,294 406,970 (23,051) 1970/95 Apr. 30/99 40
12,450 88,574 101,024 (7,159) 1960 Dec. 10/98 40
19,518 50,222 69,740 (5,157) 1958 Jan. 5/97 40
2,054 163,195 165,249 (17,016) 1990 Feb. 24/97 40
- ----------------------------------------------
92,698 650,285 742,983 (52,383)
- ----------------------------------------------
7,728 75,610 83,338 (8,796) 1968/98 Feb. 2/98 40
4,853 49,036 53,889 (5,776) 1965/91 Feb. 2/98 40
11,905 26,946 38,851 (3,308) 1982 Feb. 2/98 40
6,457 38,752 45,209 (3,109) 1964/96 Jan. 11/99 40
3,515 25,269 28,784 (3,156) 1990 Feb. 2/98 40
4,419 25,841 30,260 (1,986) 1991 Dec. 16/98 40
8,865 51,164 60,029 (745) 1968/94 May 24/01 40
7,359 58,164 65,523 (7,409) 1987 Dec. 23/97 40
1,950 16,213 18,163 (1,900) 1965 Feb. 2/98 40
4,250 25,042 29,292 (2,141) 1986 Aug. 20/98 40
5,311 105,109 110,420 (8,243) 1986 Dec. 2/98 40
3,320 21,119 24,439 (1,963) 1987 Apr. 30/98 40
3,842 25,348 29,190 (3,112) 1987 Feb. 2/98 40
2,103 22,175 24,278 (1,306) 1990/98/00 Dec. 16/98 40
5,546 41,571 47,117 (5,163) 1970 Feb. 2/98 40
4,958 35,624 40,582 (3,164) 1983/1987 Dec. 10/98 40
6,691 37,942 44,633 (668) 1988 May 11/01 40
5,706 34,937 40,643 (4,519) 1980 Feb. 2/98 40
4,145 20,768 24,913 (773) 2000 Feb. 2/98 40
6,346 36,900 43,246 (2,818) 1983/85 Dec. 15/98 40
- ----------------------------------------------
109,269 773,530 882,799 (70,055)
- ----------------------------------------------
11,250 108,270 119,520 (7,872) 1974 Dec. 21/98 40
- 65,348 65,348 (6,480) 1985 Jul. 15/98 40
- ----------------------------------------------
11,250 173,618 184,868 (14,352)
- ----------------------------------------------
2,500 64,948 67,448 (6,719) 1916/62/86 Oct. 31/96 40
2,841 47,748 50,589 (4,491) 1987 Oct. 1/98 40
- ----------------------------------------------
5,341 112,696 118,037 (11,210)
- ----------------------------------------------
6,260 83,673 89,933 (18,723) 1952/60 Oct. 31/96 40
- ----------------------------------------------
13,625 130,361 143,986 (13,262) 1989 Dec. 8/97 40
3,500 32,990 36,490 (2,679) 1983 Sep. 24/98 40
- ----------------------------------------------
17,125 163,351 180,476 (15,941)
- ----------------------------------------------
S-2
Other
250 West Pratt Street Baltimore, MD (29,867) 7,238 41,853 - 1,258
Bank of America Plaza Columbia, SC (21,106) 5,590 32,378 - 1,494
1441 Main Street Columbia, SC - 3,154 18,374 - 1,858
1333 Main Street Columbia, SC - 3,025 17,468 - 1,165
Borden Building Columbus, OH (31,000) 5,784 44,140 - 4,348
Clark Tower Memphis, TN (31,000) 5,450 50,089 - 3,146
Capital Center II & III Sacramento, CA (33,000) 8,384 42,529 - 8,502
Williams Center I & II Tulsa, OK (37,500) 5,400 49,554 - 1,913
Esperante Office Building West Palm Beach, FL (23,856) 5,806 33,877 - 3,145
--------------------------------------------------------
Total - Other (207,329) 49,831 330,262 - 26,829
--------------------------------------------------------
Total rental properties (2,590,608) 519,682 3,637,092 - 480,446
--------------------------------------------------------
Properties under development
One Alliance Center Buckhead, GA (42,828) 10,079 - - 72,436
--------------------------------------------------------
Total properties under development (42,828) 10,079 - - 72,436
--------------------------------------------------------
Properties held for future development
Other residual land Various - 22,222 - 3,786 2,648
--------------------------------------------------------
7,238 43,111 50,349 (4,364) 1986 Feb. 17/98 40
5,590 33,872 39,462 (3,526) 1989 Feb. 19/98 40
3,154 20,232 23,386 (2,785) 1988 Dec. 13/96 40
3,025 18,633 21,658 (2,092) 1983 Apr. 30/97 40
5,784 48,488 54,272 (4,401) 1974 Dec. 1/98 40
5,450 53,235 58,685 (5,297) 1973/97 May 11/98 40
8,384 51,031 59,415 (7,702) 1984/85 Apr. 10/98 40
5,400 51,467 56,867 (3,999) 1982/83 Dec. 10/98 40
5,806 37,022 42,828 (3,635) 1989 Feb. 2/98 40
- ----------------------------------------------
49,831 357,091 406,922 (37,801)
- ----------------------------------------------
519,682 4,117,538 4,637,220 (424,191)
- ----------------------------------------------
10,079 72,436 82,515 - n/a Dec. 16/98 -
- ----------------------------------------------
10,079 72,436 82,515 -
- ----------------------------------------------
26,008 2,648 28,656 -
- ----------------------------------------------
S-3
Properties held for disposition
- -------------------------------------
Rental properties
Hanover Office Park 5 Greenbelt, MD - 225 1,456 - (667)
Perimeter Woods 5 Charlotte, NC - 1,661 14,698 - (476)
Desert Passage 5 Las Vegas, NV (178,011) 28,131 240,150 - (3,173)
---------------------------------------------------------
Total rental properties (178,011) 30,017 256,304 - (4,316)
---------------------------------------------------------
Properties under development
Paseo Colorado Pasadena, CA (58,927) 359 11,807 - 70,619
Hollywood & Highland - retail 5 Los Angeles, CA (106,760) - - - 210,962
Inner Belt 5 Boston, MA (15,608) 24,027 3,562 (11,144) (3,562)
---------------------------------------------------------
Total properties under development (181,325) 24,386 15,369 (11,144) 278,019
---------------------------------------------------------
Properties held for future
development
Perimeter Woods 5 Charlotte, NC - 10,883 - - -
Valley Industrial Park 5 Seattle, WA - 6,900 39,891 - (19,189)
Clybourn Center 5 Chicago, IL - 11,967 - (2,507) -
---------------------------------------------------------
Total properties held for future
development - 29,750 39,891 (2,507) (19,189)
---------------------------------------------------------
Total properties held for disposition (359,336) 84,153 311,564 (13,651) 254,514
---------------------------------------------------------
Management business
Furniture, fixtures and equipment - - 14,060 - -
---------------------------------------------------------
- - 14,060 - -
---------------------------------------------------------
Total real estate $(2,992,772) $636,136 $3,962,716 $(9,865) $810,044
=========================================================
225 789 1,014 (202) 1987 Feb. 2/98 n/a
1,661 14,222 15,883 (859) 1991/98 Dec. 16/98 n/a
28,131 236,977 265,108 (4,961) 2000 Mar. 31/01 n/a
- ----------------------------------------------------
30,017 251,988 282,005 (6,022)
- ----------------------------------------------------
359 82,426 82,785 - n/a Oct. 31/96 -
- 210,962 210,962 - n/a Mar. 11/97 -
12,883 - 12,883 - n/a Oct. 15/00 -
- ----------------------------------------------------
13,242 293,388 306,630 -
- ----------------------------------------------------
10,883 - 10,883 - n/a Dec. 16/98 -
6,900 20,702 27,602 - n/a Sept. 29/00 -
9,460 - 9,460 - n/a Oct. 16/00 -
- ----------------------------------------------------
27,243 20,702 47,945 -
- ----------------------------------------------------
70,502 566,078 636,580 (6,022)
- ----------------------------------------------------
- 14,060 14,060 (8,371)
- ----------------------------------------------------
- 14,060 14,060 (8,371)
- ----------------------------------------------------
$ 626,271 $ 4,772,760 $ 5,399,031 $ (438,584)
====================================================
S-4
Schedule III- Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation as at December 31, 2001
($ thousands)
Notes:
1. The aggregate cost for Federal Income Tax purposes as of December 31,
2001 was approximately $3.7 billion.
2. The life to compute depreciation on buildings is 40 years. The life to
compute depreciation on building improvements is over the term of the
related lease. Furniture, fixtures and equipment are depreciated over
periods of up to 10 years.
3. The Corporation has a 99% legal ownership interest in this property.
4. This property was previously under development and was placed into
service in 2001.
5. During the year ended December 31, 2001, the Corporation recorded the
following allowance for loss related to these properties:
Desert Passage $ 17,544
Hollywood Highland - Retail 170,139
Inner Belt 21,600
Valley Industrial Park 32,800
Clybourn Center 8,533
Perimeter Woods 1,887
Hanover Office park 727
-------------
$ 253,230
=============
A summary of activity of investment in real estate and accumulated depreciation
is as follows:
The changes in investment in real estate for the years ended December 31, 2001,
2000 and 1999, are as follows:
December 31 December 31 December 31
2001 2000 1999
------------------- -------------------- --------------------
Balance, beginning of the year $4,883,826 $4,940,601 $4,143,038
Additions during year:
Acquisitions 202,740 86,347 660,830
Improvements 428,081 340,875 213,875
Previously held in a non-consolidated joint
venture now consolidated 268,281 - 84,167
Deductions during year:
Properties disposed of (124,024) (478,669) (120,656)
Allowance for loss on properties held for
disposition (253,230) - -
Contribution to non-consolidated joint ventures - - (37,037)
Write-off of fully depreciated assets (6,643) (5,328) (3,616)
------------------- -------------------- --------------------
Balance, end of year $5,399,031 $4,883,826 $4,940,601
=================== ==================== ====================
The changes in accumulated depreciation for the years ended December 31, 2001,
2000 and 1999, are as follows:
December 31 December 31 December 31
2001 2000 1999
------------------- -------------------- --------------------
Balance, beginning of the year $ (305,038) $ (206,248) $ (91,229)
Additions during year:
Depreciation (144,680) (141,607) (120,977)
Previously held in a non-consolidated joint
venture now consolidated (2,927) - -
Deductions during year:
Properties disposed of 7,418 37,489 2,342
Write-off of fully depreciated assets 6,643 5,328 3,616
------------------- -------------------- --------------------
Balance, end of year $ (438,584) $ (305,038) $ (206,248)
=================== ==================== ====================
S-5