Back to GetFilings.com
[Logo]
TRIARC COMPANIES, INC.
FORM 10-K
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 2000
________________________________________________________________________________
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
-------------------
FORM 10-K
(MARK ONE)
[x] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
OF 1934
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000.
OR
[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934
FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM ________________ TO ________________.
COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 1-2207
-------------------
TRIARC COMPANIES, INC.
(EXACT NAME OF REGISTRANT AS SPECIFIED IN ITS CHARTER)
-------------------
DELAWARE 38-0471180
(STATE OR OTHER JURISDICTION OF (I.R.S. EMPLOYER
INCORPORATION OR ORGANIZATION) IDENTIFICATION NO.)
280 PARK AVENUE 10017
NEW YORK, NEW YORK (ZIP CODE)
(ADDRESS OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICES)
REGISTRANT'S TELEPHONE NUMBER, INCLUDING AREA CODE: (212) 451-3000
-------------------
SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OF THE ACT:
NAME OF EACH EXCHANGE
TITLE OF EACH CLASS ON WHICH REGISTERED
------------------- -------------------
Class A Common Stock, $.10 par value New York Stock Exchange
SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(G) OF THE ACT:
None
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [x] No [ ]
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to
Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained,
to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information
statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any
amendment to this Form 10-K. [ ]
The aggregate market value of the outstanding shares of the registrant's
Class A Common Stock (the only class of the registrant's voting securities) held
by non-affiliates of the registrant was approximately $364,523,640 as of
March 15, 2001. There were 20,250,469 shares of the registrant's Class A Common
Stock and 1,999,207 shares of the registrant's Class B Common Stock outstanding
as of March 15, 2001.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Part III of this 10-K incorporates information by reference from an
amendment hereto or to the registrant's definitive proxy statement, in either
case which will be filed no later than 120 days after December 31, 2000.
________________________________________________________________________________
PART I
SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS AND PROJECTIONS
Certain statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, including statements
under 'Item 1. Business' and 'Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations,' that are not historical facts,
including most importantly, information concerning possible or assumed future
results of operations of Triarc Companies, Inc. and its subsidiaries and those
statements preceded by, followed by, or that include the words 'may,'
'believes,' 'expects,' 'anticipates,' or the negation thereof, or similar
expressions, constitute 'forward-looking statements' within the meaning of the
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All statements which address
operating performance, events or developments that are expected or anticipated
to occur in the future, including statements relating to revenue growth,
earnings per share growth or statements expressing general optimism about future
operating results, are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the
Reform Act. These forward-looking statements are based on our current
expectations, speak only as of the date of this Form 10-K and are susceptible to
a number of risks, uncertainties and other factors. Our actual results,
performance and achievements may differ materially from any future results,
performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking
statements. For those statements, we claim the protection of the safe-harbor for
forward-looking statements contained in the Reform Act. Many important factors
could affect our future results and could cause those results to differ
materially from those expressed in the forward-looking statements contained
herein. Such factors include, but are not limited to, the following:
Competition, including new product and concept development and pricing
pressures resulting from competitive discounting;
Success of operating initiatives;
The ability to attract and retain franchisees;
Development and operating costs;
The effectiveness of advertising and promotional efforts;
Brand awareness;
The existence or absence of adverse publicity;
Market acceptance of new product offerings;
Changing trends in consumer tastes and preferences (including changes
resulting from health or safety concerns with respect to the consumption of
beef) and in spending and demographic patterns;
The business viability of our key franchisees;
Availability, location and terms of sites for restaurant development by
franchisees;
The ability of franchisees to open new restaurants in accordance with their
development commitments, including the ability of franchisees to finance
restaurant development;
The performance by material suppliers of their obligations under their
supply agreements with franchisees;
Changes in business strategy or development plans;
Quality of the Company's and franchisees' management;
Availability, terms and deployment of capital;
Business abilities and judgment of the Company's and franchisees'
personnel;
Availability of qualified personnel to the Company and to franchisees;
Labor and employee benefit costs;
Availability and cost of raw materials, ingredients and supplies and the
potential impact on royalty revenues and franchisees' restaurant level
sales that could arise from interruptions in the distribution of supplies
of food and other products to franchisees;
General economic, business and political conditions in the countries and
territories in which franchisees operate;
1
Changes in, or failure to comply with, government regulations, including
franchising laws, accounting standards, environmental laws and taxation
requirements;
The costs, uncertainties and other effects of legal and administrative
proceedings;
The impact of general economic conditions on consumer spending;
Adverse weather conditions; and
Other risks and uncertainties referred to in this Form 10-K and in our
other current and periodic filings with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, all of which are difficult or impossible to predict accurately
and many of which are beyond our control.
We will not undertake and specifically decline any obligation to publicly
release the result of any revisions which may be made to any forward-looking
statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of such statements
or to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events. In
addition, it is our policy generally not to make any specific projections as to
future earnings, and we do not endorse any projections regarding future
performance that may be made by third parties.
ITEM 1. BUSINESS.
INTRODUCTION
We are a holding company and, through our subsidiaries, a restaurant
franchisor. Through our subsidiary Arby's, Inc. (which does business as the
Triarc Restaurant Group) and its subsidiaries, we are the franchisor of the
Arby's'r' restaurant system.
Our corporate predecessor was incorporated in Ohio in 1929. We
reincorporated in Delaware in June 1994. Our principal executive offices are
located at 280 Park Avenue, New York, New York 10017 and our telephone number is
(212) 451-3000. Our website address is: www.triarc.com. Information contained on
our website is not part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
BUSINESS STRATEGY
The key elements of our business strategy include (i) focusing our resources
on our restaurant franchising business, (ii) evaluating and making various
acquisitions and business combinations to augment our current and future
businesses, (iii) building strong operating management teams for each of our
current and future businesses and (iv) providing strategic leadership and
financial resources to enable such management teams to develop and implement
specific, growth-oriented business plans. The implementation of this business
strategy may result in increases in expenditures for, among other things,
acquisitions and, over time, marketing and advertising. See 'Item 7.
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations.' It is our policy to publicly announce an acquisition or business
combination only after an agreement with respect to such acquisition or business
combination has been reached.
Taking into account the recently completed sale of the Snapple Beverage
Group and the consummation of the Arby's securitization (each described below in
this Item 1), the Company's cash, cash equivalents (including restricted cash)
and investment position, net of current cash tax liabilities related to the
beverage group sale, at December 31, 2000 was approximately $705 million.
At such date, the Company's consolidated indebtedness was approximately $309
million, including approximately $289 million of Arby's non-recourse debt.
The Company's cash, cash equivalents and investments (other than approximately
$30.7 million of restricted cash) do not secure such Arby's debt. The Company
is evaluating its options for the use of this significant cash and investment
position, including acquisitions, share repurchases and investments.
SALE OF BEVERAGE BUSINESS
On October 25, 2000, we completed the sale of our beverage business by
selling all the outstanding capital stock of Snapple Beverage Group, Inc. and
Royal Crown Company, Inc. to affiliates of Cadbury Schweppes plc for
approximately $896 million in cash, subject to post-closing adjustment, plus the
assumption by such affiliates of Cadbury of approximately $425 million of debt.
Approximately $427 million of the cash received was used to repay outstanding
amounts under a senior bank credit facility maintained by Snapple Beverage
Corp., Mistic Brands, Inc., Stewart's Beverages, Inc., Royal Crown and RC/Arby's
Corporation. The
2
transaction included the sale of the Snapple Beverage Group's premium beverage
business -- Snapple'r', Mistic'r' and Stewart's'r' -- and soft drink
concentrates business -- Royal Crown'r', Diet Rite'r', RC Edge and Nehi'r'.
ARBY'S SECURITIZATION
On November 21, 2000 our subsidiary Arby's Franchise Trust, a newly formed
special purpose financing vehicle, completed an offering of $290 million of
7.44% non-recourse fixed rate insured notes due 2020 pursuant to Rule 144A of
the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The notes are secured by Arby's'r'
branded United States and Canadian franchise royalty payments and fees. The
notes are rated Aaa, AAA and AAA by Moody's Investors Services, Inc., Standard &
Poor's Ratings Services and Fitch, Inc., respectively. Timely payment of
interest and the remaining outstanding principal of the notes on the legal final
payment date are guaranteed by a financial guaranty insurance policy issued by
Ambac Assurance Corporation, reinsured on a first loss basis by European
Reinsurance Company of Zurich, Bermuda branch, a subsidiary of Swiss Re Group.
Triarc received net cash available proceeds of approximately $250 million from
the financing, which is net of approximately $30 million of proceeds that are in
a reserve account, as well as transaction fees and expenses.
In connection with the financing, Arby's engaged in a corporate
restructuring pursuant to which it formed a wholly-owned Delaware statutory
business trust, Arby's Franchise Trust, which became the franchisor of the
Arby's restaurant system in the United States and Canada. Arby's contributed its
U.S. and Canadian franchise agreements, development agreements, license option
agreements and the rights to the revenues from those agreements to Arby's
Franchise Trust. Arby's also formed a new wholly-owned Delaware statutory
business trust, Arby's IP Holder Trust, and contributed to it all of the
intellectual property, including the Arby's trademark, necessary to operate the
Arby's franchise system in the United States and Canada. Arby's IP Holder Trust
has granted Arby's Franchise Trust a 99-year exclusive license to use such
intellectual property. Arby's continues to service the franchise agreements
relating to U.S. franchises, and Arby's of Canada, Inc., a wholly-owned
subsidiary of Arby's, services the franchise agreements relating to Canadian
franchises with the assistance of Arby's. The servicing functions are performed
pursuant to separate servicing agreements with Arby's Franchise Trust pursuant
to which the servicers receive servicing fees from Arby's Franchise Trust equal
to their expenses, subject to a specified cap for any 12-month period. Any
residual cash flow received by Arby's Franchise Trust, after taking into account
all required monthly payments under the notes, including interest and targeted
principal repayments, may be distributed by Arby's Franchise Trust to Arby's.
See Note 9 to our Consolidated Financial Statements.
The Notes are not registered and will not be registered under the Securities
Act, and may not be offered or sold within the United States except pursuant to
an exemption from the Securities Act, or in a transaction not subject to the
registration requirements of the Securities Act. This Form 10-K shall not
constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy such Notes, nor
shall there be any sale of Notes in any state or jurisdiction in which such
offer, solicitation or sale would be unlawful prior to registration or
qualification under the securities laws of any such state or jurisdiction.
REPURCHASE OF CLASS B COMMON STOCK
On August 19, 1999, we announced that our Board of Directors had unanimously
approved a stock purchase agreement between the Company and two entities
controlled by Victor Posner, Victor Posner Trust No. 6 and Security Management
Corp., pursuant to which we will acquire from the Posner entities all of the
5,997,622 issued and outstanding shares of our non-voting Class B Common Stock
in three separate transactions. Pursuant to the agreement we acquired one-third
of the shares (1,999,208 shares) on August 19, 1999, at a price of $20.44 per
share (which was the trading price of our Class A Common Stock at the time the
transaction was negotiated), for an aggregate cost of approximately $40.9
million and one-third of the shares (1,999,207 shares) on August 10, 2000, at a
price of $21.18 per share, for an aggregate cost of approximately $42.3 million.
We will acquire the remaining shares (1,999,207 shares) on or before August 19,
2001, subject to extension in certain limited circumstances, at a price of
$21.93 per share (an aggregate cost of approximately $43.8 million). The Posner
entities have placed the shares to be acquired at the subsequent closing in
escrow pending their repurchase.
3
FISCAL YEAR
Effective January 1, 1997, we adopted a 52/53 week fiscal year convention
for the Company and our subsidiaries (other than National Propane Corporation)
whereby our fiscal year ends each year on the Sunday that is closest to
December 31 of such year. Each fiscal year generally will be comprised of four
13 week fiscal quarters, although in some years the fourth quarter will
represent a 14 week period.
BUSINESS SEGMENT
RESTAURANT FRANCHISING SYSTEM (ARBY'S)
THE ARBY'S RESTAURANT SYSTEM
Through the Arby's restaurant franchising business, we participate in the
approximately $100 billion quick service restaurant segment of the domestic
restaurant industry. There are over 3,200 Arby's restaurants in the United
States and Canada and Arby's is the largest restaurant franchising system
specializing in the roast beef sandwich segment of the quick service restaurant
industry. Arby's celebrated its 36th anniversary in 2000 and according to
Nation's Restaurant News, is the 10th largest quick service restaurant chain in
the United States. In addition to various slow-roasted roast beef sandwiches,
Arby's also offers an extensive menu of chicken, turkey, ham and submarine
sandwiches, side-dishes and salads. In 2001, Arby's is introducing its Market
Fresh'TM' line of premium sandwiches on a nationwide basis. Arby's also owns the
T.J. Cinnamons'r' concept, which consists of gourmet cinnamon rolls, gourmet
coffees and other related products, and the Pasta Connection'r' concept, which
includes pasta dishes with a variety of different sauces. Some Arby's
franchisees multi-brand with T.J. Cinnamons or Pasta Connection within their
Arby's restaurants. Currently, all of the Arby's restaurants are owned and
operated by franchisees. As of December 31, 2000, 409 franchisees operated 3,319
separate restaurants, of which 3,153 operate within the United States and 166
operate outside the United States. Of the domestic restaurants, approximately
325 are multi-branded locations that sell T.J. Cinnamons products and
approximately 65 are multi-branded locations that sell Pasta Connection
products. At December 31, 2000, T.J. Cinnamons gourmet coffees were also sold in
an additional approximately 1,440 Arby's restaurants. Arby's is not currently
offering to sell any additional Pasta Connection franchises.
From 1996 to 2000, Arby's system-wide sales grew at a compound annual growth
rate of 5.7% to $2.5 billion. Through December 31, 2000, the Arby's system has
experienced four consecutive years of domestic same store sales growth compared
to the prior year. During 2000, our franchisees opened 156 new Arby's and closed
65 underperforming Arby's. In addition, Arby's franchisees opened 25 T.J.
Cinnamons units and six Pasta Connection units in Arby's units in 2000. As of
December 31, 2000, franchisees have committed to open approximately 970 Arby's
restaurants over the next 10 years. You should read the information contained in
'Risk Factors -- Arby's is Dependent on Restaurant Revenues and Openings.'
GENERAL
As the franchisor of the Arby's restaurant system, Arby's, through its
subsidiaries, licenses the owners and operators of independent businesses to use
the Company's brand name and trademarks in the operation of Arby's restaurants.
The Company provides its franchisee customers with services designed to increase
their revenue and the profitability of the Arby's restaurants that they own. The
more important of these services are providing quality control services,
operational training and counseling regarding, and approval of, site selection.
Because Arby's owns no restaurants, it avoids the significant capital costs
and real estate and operating risks associated with restaurant operations.
Arby's and its subsidiaries derive their revenues from two principal sources:
(i) franchise royalties received from all Arby's restaurants; and (ii) up-front
franchise fees from its restaurant operators for each new unit opened. Arby's
current domestic franchise royalty rate is 4.0%. Because of lower royalty rates
still in effect under earlier agreements, the average royalty rate paid by
franchisees was approximately 3.3% during both 1999 and 2000.
On November 21, 2000 Arby's Franchise Trust completed an offering of $290
million of 7.44% non-recourse fixed rate insured notes due 2020 pursuant to
Rule 144A of the Securities Act. As a result of the financing and related
restructuring, Arby's continues to service the franchise agreements relating to
U.S. franchises and a subsidiary services the franchise agreements relating to
Canadian franchises with the assistance of Arby's. (See 'Item 1.
Business -- Arby's Securitization').
4
ARBY'S RESTAURANTS
Arby's opened its first restaurant in Youngstown, Ohio in 1964. As of
December 31, 2000, franchisees operated Arby's restaurants in 49 states and 8
foreign countries. As of December 31, 2000, the six leading states by number of
operating units were: Ohio, with 253 restaurants; Michigan, with 170
restaurants; Indiana, with 169 restaurants; Texas, with 169 restaurants;
California, with 159 restaurants; and Georgia, with 159 restaurants. With 125
restaurants, Canada is the country outside the United States with the most
operating units.
Arby's restaurants in the United States and Canada typically range in size
from 2,500 square feet to 3,000 square feet. Restaurants in other countries
typically are larger than U.S. and Canadian restaurants. Restaurants typically
have a manager, assistant manager and as many as 30 full and part-time
employees. Staffing levels, which vary during the day, tend to be heaviest
during the lunch hours.
The following table sets forth the number of Arby's restaurants at the
beginning and end of each year from 1998 to 2000:
1998 1999 2000
---- ---- ----
Restaurants open at beginning of period......... 3,092 3,135 3,228
Restaurants opened during period................ 130 159 156
Restaurants closed during period................ 87 66 65
----- ----- -----
Restaurants open at end of period............... 3,135 3,228 3,319
----- ----- -----
----- ----- -----
During the period from January 1, 1998 through December 31, 2000, 445 new
Arby's restaurants were opened and 218 underperforming Arby's restaurants have
closed. We believe that closing underperforming Arby's restaurants has
contributed to an increase in the average annual unit sales volume of the Arby's
system, as well as to an improvement of the overall brand image of Arby's.
FRANCHISE NETWORK
Arby's seeks to identify potential franchisees that have experience in
owning and operating multiple quick-service restaurant units, have a willingness
to develop and operate multiple Arby's restaurants and have a significant net
worth. Arby's identifies applicants through targeted mailings, maintaining a
presence at industry trade shows and conventions, existing customer and supplier
contacts and regularly placed advertisements in trade and other publications.
Prospective franchisees are contacted by an Arby's sales agent and complete an
application for a franchise. As part of the application process, Arby's requires
and reviews substantial documentation, including financial statements and
documents relating to the corporate or other business organization of the
applicant. Franchisees that already operate one or more Arby's restaurants must
satisfy certain criteria in order to be eligible to enter into additional
franchise agreements, including capital resources commensurate with the proposed
development plan submitted by the franchisee, a commitment by the franchisee to
employ trained restaurant management and to maintain proper staffing levels,
compliance by the franchisee with all of its existing franchise agreements, a
record of operation in compliance with Arby's operating standards, a
satisfactory credit rating and the absence of any existing or threatened legal
disputes between Arby's and such franchisee. The initial term of the typical
'traditional' franchise agreement is 20 years. Arby's does not offer any
financing arrangements to its franchisees.
Arby's franchisees opened 16 new restaurants in seven foreign countries
during 2000. Arby's also has territorial agreements with international
franchisees in three countries as of December 31, 2000. Under the terms of these
territorial agreements, many of the international franchisees have the exclusive
right to open Arby's restaurants in specific regions or countries.
Arby's offers franchises for the development of both single and multiple
'traditional' restaurant locations. Both new and existing franchisees may enter
into either a master development agreement, which requires the franchisee to
develop two or more Arby's restaurants in a particular geographic area within a
specified time period, or a license option agreement that grants the franchisee
the option, exercisable for a one year period, to build an Arby's restaurant on
a specified site. All franchisees are required to execute standard franchise
agreements. Arby's standard U.S. franchise agreement currently requires an
initial $37,500 franchise fee for the first franchised unit and $25,000 for each
subsequent unit and a monthly royalty payment equal to 4.0% of
5
restaurant sales for the term of the franchise agreement. Franchisees typically
pay a $10,000 commitment fee, credited against the franchise fee during the
development process for a new restaurant. Because of lower royalty rates still
in effect under earlier agreements, the average royalty rate paid by franchisees
was approximately 3.3% during both 1999 and 2000.
Franchised restaurants are required to be operated under uniform operating
standards and specifications relating to the selection, quality and preparation
of menu items, signage, decor, equipment, uniforms, suppliers, maintenance and
cleanliness of premises and customer service. Arby's monitors franchisee
operations and inspects restaurants periodically to ensure that company
practices and procedures are being followed.
ADVERTISING AND MARKETING
The Arby's system, through its franchisees, advertises primarily through
regional television, radio and newspapers. Payment for advertising time and
space is made by local advertising cooperatives in which owners of local
franchised restaurants participate. Franchisees contribute 0.7% of net sales to
the AFA Service Corporation, which produces advertising and promotional
materials for the system. Each franchisee is also required to spend a reasonable
amount, but not less than 3% of its monthly net sales, for local advertising.
This amount is divided between the franchisee's individual local market
advertising expense and the expenses of a cooperative area advertising program
with other franchisees who are operating Arby's restaurants in that area.
Contributions by franchisees to the cooperative area advertising program are
determined by the participants in the program and are generally in the range of
3% to 5% of monthly net sales. Arby's and AFA Service Corporation have entered
into an agreement pursuant to which the Arby's system will have eight flights of
national advertising over the 2001-2003 period. Under the agreement, Arby's will
contribute $8.2 million over the three-year period for the eight flights.
Franchisees will be required to contribute incremental dues to AFA Service
Corporation equal to 0.5% of net sales to help fund the program, and AFA Service
Corporation will contribute an additional $2.8 million to the program.
PROVISIONS AND SUPPLIES
Five independent meat processors provide all of Arby's roast beef in the
United States. Franchise operators are required to obtain roast beef from one of
the five approved suppliers. ARCOP, Inc., a non-profit purchasing cooperative,
negotiates contracts with approved suppliers on behalf of Arby's franchisees.
Arby's believes that satisfactory arrangements could be made to replace any of
the current roast beef suppliers, if necessary, on a timely basis.
Franchisees may obtain other products, including food, beverage,
ingredients, paper goods, equipment and signs, from any source that meets Arby's
specifications and approval. Through ARCOP, Arby's franchisees purchase food,
proprietary paper and operating supplies through national contracts employing
volume purchasing. You should read the information contained in
'Item. 1. -- Risk Factors -- Arby's is Dependent on Restaurant Revenues and
Openings.'
QUALITY ASSURANCE
Arby's has developed a quality assurance program designed to maintain
standards and uniformity of the menu selections at each of its franchised
restaurants. Arby's assigns a full-time quality assurance employee to each of
the five independent processing facilities that processes roast beef for Arby's
domestic restaurants. The quality assurance employee inspects the roast beef for
quality and uniformity and to assure compliance with quality and safety
specifications of the United States Department of Agriculture and the United
States Food and Drug Administration. In addition, a laboratory at Arby's
headquarters tests samples of roast beef periodically from franchisees. Each
year, Arby's representatives conduct unannounced inspections of operations of a
number of franchisees to ensure that Arby's policies, practices and procedures
are being followed. Arby's field representatives also provide a variety of
on-site consultative services to franchisees. Arby's has the right to terminate
franchise agreements if franchisees fail to comply with quality standards.
6
GENERAL
TRADEMARKS
We own several trademarks that are considered material to our business,
including Arby's, T.J. Cinnamons, Pasta Connection and Satisfy Your Grown Up
Tastes'TM'.
Our material trademarks are registered trademarks in the U.S. Patent and
Trademark Office and various foreign jurisdictions. Registrations for such
trademarks in the United States will last indefinitely as long as the trademark
owners continue to use and police the trademarks and renew filings with the
applicable governmental offices. There are no challenges pending to our right to
use any of our material trademarks in the United States.
COMPETITION
Arby's faces direct and indirect competition from numerous well-established
competitors, including national and regional fast food chains, for example,
McDonald's, Burger King and Wendy's. In addition, Arby's competes with locally
owned restaurants, drive-ins, diners and other similar establishments. Key
competitive factors in the quick service restaurant industry are price, quality
of products, quality and speed of service, advertising, name identification,
restaurant location and attractiveness of facilities.
Many of the leading restaurant chains have focused on new unit development
as one strategy to increase market share through increased consumer awareness
and convenience. This has led operators to employ other strategies, including
frequent use of price promotions and heavy advertising expenditures.
Additional competitive pressures for prepared food purchases have come more
recently from operators outside the restaurant industry. Several major grocery
chains have begun offering fully prepared food and meals to go as part of their
deli sections. Some of these chains also have added in-store cafes with service
counters and tables where consumers can order and consume a full menu of items
prepared especially for this portion of the operation.
Many of our competitors have substantially greater financial, marketing,
personnel and other resources than we do.
GOVERNMENTAL REGULATIONS
Various state laws and the Federal Trade Commission regulate Arby's
franchising activities. The Federal Trade Commission requires that franchisors
make extensive disclosure to prospective franchisees before the execution of a
franchise agreement. Several states require registration and disclosure in
connection with franchise offers and sales and have 'franchise relationship
laws' that limit the ability of franchisors to terminate franchise agreements or
to withhold consent to the renewal or transfer of these agreements. Furthermore,
the United States Congress has also considered, and there is currently pending,
legislation governing various aspects of the franchise relationship. In
addition, Arby's franchisees must comply with the Fair Labor Standards Act and
the Americans with Disabilities Act, which requires that all public
accommodations and commercial facilities meet federal requirements related to
access and use by disabled persons, and various state laws governing matters
that include, for example, minimum wages, overtime and other working conditions.
We cannot predict the effect on our operations, particularly on our relationship
with franchisees, of any pending or future legislation. We believe that the
operations of our subsidiaries comply substantially with all applicable
governmental rules and regulations.
ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS
Our past and present operations are governed by federal, state and local
environmental laws and regulations concerning the discharge, storage, handling
and disposal of hazardous or toxic substances. These laws and regulations
provide for significant fines, penalties and liabilities, sometimes without
regard to whether the owner or operator of the property knew of, or was
responsible for, the release or presence of the hazardous or toxic substances.
In addition, third parties may make claims against owners or operators of
properties for personal injuries and property damage associated with releases of
hazardous or toxic substances. We cannot predict what environmental legislation
or regulations will be enacted in the future or how existing or future
7
laws or regulations will be administered or interpreted. We similarly cannot
predict the amount of future expenditures which may be required to comply with
any environmental laws or regulations or to satisfy any claims relating to
environmental laws or regulations. We currently own no restaurants and lease our
material facilities (see 'Item 2. Properties' below). We believe that our
operations comply substantially with all applicable environmental laws and
regulations. Accordingly, the environmental matters in which we are involved
generally relate either to properties that we own, but on which we no longer
have any operations, or properties that we have sold to third parties, but for
which we remain liable or contingently liable for any related environmental
costs. Based on currently available information and our current reserve levels,
we do not believe that the ultimate outcome of any environmental matters in
which we are involved will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated
financial position or results of operations. See 'Item 7. Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations' below.
SEASONALITY
Our restaurant franchising business is seasonal. The royalty revenues of our
restaurant franchising business are somewhat higher in our fourth quarter and
somewhat lower in our first quarter. Accordingly, consolidated revenues will
generally be highest during the fourth fiscal quarter of each year. Our EBITDA
and operating profit are also highest during the fourth fiscal quarter of each
year and lowest in the first fiscal quarter.
EMPLOYEES
As of December 31, 2000, we had approximately 216 employees, including 192
salaried employees and 24 hourly employees. We believe that employee relations
are satisfactory. As of December 31, 2000, none of our employees were covered by
a collective bargaining agreement.
RISK FACTORS
We wish to caution readers that in addition to the important factors
described elsewhere in this Form 10-K, the following important factors, among
others, sometimes have affected, or in the future could affect, our actual
results and could cause our actual consolidated results during 2001, and beyond,
to differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statements made
by us or on our behalf.
HOLDING COMPANY STRUCTURE
Because we are a holding company, our ability to service debt and pay
dividends, including dividends on our common stock, is primarily dependent upon,
in addition to our cash, cash equivalents and short term investments on hand,
cash flows from our subsidiaries, including loans, cash dividends and
reimbursement by subsidiaries to us in connection with providing certain
management services and payments by subsidiaries under certain tax sharing
agreements.
Under the terms of the indenture relating to the notes issued in the Arby's
securitization, there are restrictions on the ability of certain of our
subsidiaries to pay dividends and/or make loans or advances to us. The ability
of any of our subsidiaries to pay cash dividends and/or make loans or advances
to us is also dependent upon the respective abilities of such entities to
achieve sufficient cash flows after satisfying their respective cash
requirements, including debt service, to enable the payment of such dividends or
the making of such loans or advances.
In addition, our equity interests in our subsidiaries rank junior to all of
the respective indebtedness, whenever incurred, of such entities in the event of
their respective liquidation or dissolution. As of December 31, 2000, our
subsidiaries had aggregate indebtedness of approximately $309 million excluding
intercompany indebtedness.
WE WILL HAVE BROAD DISCRETION IN THE USE OF THE PROCEEDS OF THE DISPOSITION
OF OUR BEVERAGE BUSINESS AND THE ARBY'S SECURITIZATION.
We have not designated any specific use for the proceeds we received in
connection with the sale of our beverage business and the Arby's securitization
(see 'Item 1. Business -- Sale of Beverage Business' and ' -- Arby's
Securitization'). We are evaluating options for the use of these proceeds,
including acquisitions,
8
share repurchases and investments. We have significant flexibility in selecting
the opportunities that we will pursue.
ACQUISITIONS ARE A KEY ELEMENT OF OUR BUSINESS STRATEGY, BUT WE CANNOT
ASSURE YOU THAT WE WILL BE ABLE TO IDENTIFY APPROPRIATE ACQUISITION TARGETS
IN THE FUTURE AND THAT WE WILL BE ABLE TO SUCCESSFULLY INTEGRATE ANY FUTURE
ACQUISITIONS INTO OUR EXISTING OPERATIONS.
Acquisitions involve numerous risks, including difficulties assimilating new
operations and products. In addition, our acquisition program may require
significant management time and capital resources. We cannot assure you that we
will have access to the capital required to finance potential acquisitions on
satisfactory terms, that any acquisition would result in long-term benefits to
us or that management would be able to manage effectively the resulting
business. Future acquisitions are likely to result in the incurrence of
additional indebtedness or the issuance of additional equity securities.
WE MAY HAVE TO TAKE ACTIONS THAT WE WOULD NOT OTHERWISE TAKE SO AS NOT TO BE
DEEMED AN 'INVESTMENT COMPANY'.
The Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the '1940 Act'), requires
the registration of, and imposes various restrictions on, companies that do not
meet certain financial tests regarding the composition of their assets and
source of income. A company may be deemed to be an investment company if it owns
'investment securities' with a value exceeding 40% of its total assets
(excluding government securities and cash items) or if more than 45% of its
total assets consists of, or more than 45% of its income/loss is derived from,
securities of companies it does not control. Our acquisition strategy may
require us to take actions that we would not otherwise take so as not to be
deemed an 'investment company' under the 1940 Act. Investment companies are
subject to registration under, and compliance with, the 1940 Act unless a
particular exclusion or safe harbor provision applies. If we were to be deemed
an investment company, we would become subject to the requirements of the 1940
Act. We intend to make acquisitions and other investments in a manner so as not
to be deemed an investment company. As a result, we may forego investments that
we might otherwise make or retain or dispose of investments or assets that we
might otherwise sell or hold on to.
IN THE FUTURE WE MAY HAVE TO TAKE ACTIONS THAT WE WOULD NOT OTHERWISE TAKE
SO AS NOT TO BE SUBJECT TO TAX AS A 'PERSONAL HOLDING COMPANY'.
If at any time during the last half of our taxable year, five or fewer
individuals own or are deemed to own more than 50% of the total value of our
shares and if during such taxable year we receive 60% or more of our gross
income from specified passive sources, we would be classified as a 'personal
holding company' for the U.S. federal income tax purposes. If this were the
case, we would be subject to additional taxes at the rate of 39.6% on a portion
of our income, to the extent this income is not distributed to shareholders. We
do not currently expect to have any liability for tax under the personal holding
company rules in 2001. However, we cannot assure you that we will not become
liable for such tax in the future. Because we do not wish to be classified as a
personal holding company or to incur any personal holding company tax, we may be
required in the future to take actions that we would not otherwise take. These
actions may influence our strategic and business decisions, including causing us
to conduct our business and acquire or dispose of investments differently than
we otherwise would.
OUR SUBSIDIARIES ARE SUBJECT TO VARIOUS RESTRICTIONS, AND SUBSTANTIALLY ALL
OF THEIR ASSETS ARE PLEDGED, UNDER CERTAIN DEBT AGREEMENTS.
Under our subsidiaries' debt agreements, substantially all of our
subsidiaries' assets, other than cash, cash equivalents and short term
investments, are pledged as collateral security. The indenture relating to the
notes issued in the Arby's securitization contains financial covenants that,
among other things, require Arby's Franchise Trust to maintain certain financial
ratios and restrict its ability to incur debt, enter into certain fundamental
transactions (including sales of all or substantially all of its assets and
certain mergers and consolidations) and create or permit liens. If Arby's
Franchise Trust is unable to generate sufficient cash flow or otherwise obtain
the funds necessary to make required payments of interest or principal under, or
are unable to comply with covenants of, the indenture, we would be in default
under the terms thereof which would, under
9
certain circumstances, permit the insurer of the notes to accelerate the
maturity of the balance thereof. You should read the information we have
included in Note 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
ARBY'S IS DEPENDENT ON RESTAURANT REVENUES AND OPENINGS
Arby's and its subsidiaries' principal source of revenues are royalty fees
received from franchisees. Accordingly, Arby's and its subsidiaries' future
revenues will be highly dependent on the gross revenues of Arby's franchisees
and the number of Arby's restaurants that its franchisees operate. In
January 2000, the major distributor of food and other products to Arby's
franchisees filed for bankruptcy. That bankruptcy and the subsequent change of
distributors by franchisees did not have a significant adverse effect on us.
However, it is possible that interruptions in the distribution of supplies to
Arby's franchisees could adversely affect sales by such franchisees and cause a
decline in the royalty fees that we receive from them.
GROSS REVENUES OF ARBY'S RESTAURANTS
Competition among national brand franchisors and smaller chains in the
restaurant industry to grow their franchise systems is intense. Arby's
franchisees are generally in competition for customers with franchisees of other
national and regional fast food chains and locally owned restaurants. We cannot
assure you that the level of gross revenues of Arby's franchisees, upon which
our royalty fees are dependent, will continue.
NUMBER OF ARBY'S RESTAURANTS
Numerous factors beyond our control affect restaurant openings. These
factors include the ability of a potential restaurant owner to obtain financing,
locate an appropriate site for a restaurant and obtain all necessary state and
local construction, occupancy or other permits and approvals. Although as of
December 31, 2000 franchisees had signed commitments to open approximately 970
Arby's restaurants and have made or are required to make non-refundable deposits
of $10,000 per restaurant, we cannot assure you that these commitments will
result in open restaurants. In addition, we cannot assure you that our
franchisees will successfully develop and operate their restaurants in a manner
consistent with our standards.
ARBY'S FRANCHISE REVENUES DEPEND, TO A LARGE EXTENT, ON A SMALL NUMBER OF
LARGE FRANCHISEES AND A DECLINE IN THEIR REVENUE MAY INDIRECTLY ADVERSELY
AFFECT US.
During 2000, Arby's received approximately 27% of its royalties from RTM,
Inc. and its affiliates, which are franchisees of approximately 780 Arby's
restaurants, and received approximately 6% of its royalties from each of two
other franchisees. Arby's franchise royalties could decline from their present
levels if any of these franchisees suffered significant declines in their
businesses.
In addition, RTM has assumed certain lease obligations and indebtedness in
connection with the restaurants that it acquired from Arby's. We remain
contingently liable if RTM fails to make payments on those leases and
indebtedness. You should read the information we have included in Notes 9 and 21
to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
COMPETITION FROM RESTAURANT COMPANIES COULD ADVERSELY AFFECT US
The sole source of Arby's revenues is royalties and fees paid to it by
franchisees. The business sectors in which Arby's franchisees compete are highly
competitive (e.g., with respect to price, food quality and presentation,
service, location, and the nature and condition of the financed business
unit/location), and are affected by changes in tastes and eating habits, local,
regional and national economic conditions and population and traffic patterns.
Arby's franchisees compete with a variety of locally-owned restaurants, as well
as competitive regional and national chains and franchises. In addition, Arby's
franchisees may be at risk of competition from restaurants within the Arby's
system. Moreover, new companies may enter the franchisees' respective market
area and target sales audience. Such competition may have, among other things,
lower operating costs, lower debt service requirements, better locations, better
facilities, better management, more effective marketing and more efficient
operations. All such competition may adversely affect Arby's franchisees'
revenues and profits and the ability of franchisees to make required payments to
Arby's. Furthermore, Arby's franchisees face competition for competent employees
and high levels of employee turnover, which also can have
10
an adverse effect on the operations and revenues of the franchisees and on their
respective abilities to make required payments to Arby's. Many of Arby's
competitors have substantially greater financial, marketing, personnel and other
resources than Arby's.
CHANGES IN CONSUMER TASTES AND PREFERENCES AND IN SPENDING AND DEMOGRAPHIC
PATTERNS, AS WELL AS CONCERNS ABOUT FOOD QUALITY, COULD RESULT IN A LOSS OF
CUSTOMERS AND REDUCE THE ROYALTIES THAT WE RECEIVE.
The quick service restaurant industry is often affected by changes in
consumer tastes, national, regional and local economic conditions, discretionary
spending priorities, demographic trends, traffic patterns and the type, number
and location of competing restaurants. Consumer preferences could also be
affected by health or safety concerns with respect to the consumption of beef.
We and our franchisees are, from time to time, the subject of complaints or
litigation from customers alleging illness, injury or other food quality, health
or operational concerns. Adverse publicity resulting from these allegations may
harm the reputation of Arby's restaurants, regardless of whether the allegations
are valid, we are found liable or those concerns relate only to a single
restaurant or a limited number of restaurants. Moreover, complaints, litigation
or adverse publicity experienced by one or more of our franchisees could also
adversely affect our business as a whole. If Arby's is unable to adapt to
changes in consumer preferences and trends, or we have adverse publicity due to
any of these concerns, our franchisees may lose customers and the resulting
royalties that Arby's receives from its franchisees may decline.
WE MAY NOT BE ABLE TO ADEQUATELY PROTECT OUR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, WHICH
COULD HARM THE VALUE OF OUR BRANDS AND ADVERSELY AFFECT OUR BUSINESS.
Our intellectual property is material to the conduct of our business. We
rely on a combination of trademarks, copyrights, service marks, trade secrets
and similar intellectual property rights to protect our brands and other
intellectual property. The success of our business strategy depends, in part, on
our continued ability to use our existing trademarks and service marks in order
to increase brand awareness and further develop our branded products in both
domestic and international markets. If our efforts to protect our intellectual
property are not adequate, or if any third party misappropriates or infringes on
our intellectual property, either in print or on the Internet, the value of our
brands may be harmed, which could have a material adverse effect on our
business, including the failure of our brands to achieve and maintain market
acceptance.
We franchise our restaurants to various franchisees. While we try to ensure
that the quality of our brands is maintained by all of our franchisees, we
cannot assure you that these franchisees will not take actions that adversely
affect the value of our intellectual property or the reputation of the Arby's
restaurant system.
We have registered certain trademarks and have other trademark registrations
pending in the U.S. and certain foreign jurisdictions. The trademarks that we
currently use have not been registered in all of the countries in which we do
business and may never be registered in all of these countries.
We cannot assure you that all of the steps we have taken to protect our
intellectual property in the U.S. and foreign countries will be adequate. In
addition, the laws of some foreign countries do not protect intellectual
property rights to the same extent as the laws of the U.S.
GEOGRAPHIC CONCENTRATIONS.
Approximately 33% of Arby's restaurants are located in the states of Ohio,
Texas, Michigan, Indiana, Georgia and California. In general, these geographic
concentrations of Arby's franchisees increase the exposure of Arby's to adverse
economic or other developments in these states, including extended periods of
adverse weather conditions, which may decrease the amount of royalties and fees
to be paid to Arby's.
ENVIRONMENTAL LIABILITIES.
Certain of our current and past operations are or have been subject to
federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations concerning the
discharge, storage, handling and disposal of hazardous or toxic substances. Such
laws and regulations provide for significant fines, penalties and liabilities,
in certain cases without regard to whether the owner or operator of the property
knew of, or was responsible for, the release or
11
presence of such hazardous or toxic substances. In addition, third parties may
make claims against owners or operators of properties for personal injuries and
property damage associated with releases of hazardous or toxic substances.
Although we believe that our operations comply in all material respects with all
applicable environmental laws and regulations, we cannot predict what
environmental legislation or regulations will be enacted in the future or how
existing or future laws or regulations will be administered or interpreted. We
cannot predict the amount of future expenditures which may be required in order
to comply with any environmental laws or regulations or to satisfy any such
claims.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES.
We believe that our properties, taken as a whole, are generally well
maintained and are adequate for our current and foreseeable business needs. We
lease each of our material properties.
The following table contains information about our material facilities as of
December 31, 2000:
APPROXIMATE
SQ. FT. OF
ACTIVE FACILITIES FACILITIES--LOCATION LAND TITLE FLOOR SPACE
----------------- -------------------- ---------- -----------
Triarc Corporate Headquarters............... New York, NY 1 leased 30,670
Restaurant Franchising Headquarters......... Ft. Lauderdale, FL 1 leased 47,300*
- ---------
* Approximately 3,500 square feet of this space is subleased from Arby's by a
third party.
Arby's also owns three and leases four properties which are leased or sublet
principally to franchisees and has leases for five inactive properties. Our
other subsidiaries also own or lease a few inactive facilities and undeveloped
properties, none of which are material to our financial condition or results of
operations.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.
We are a party to two consolidated actions in the United States District
Court for the Southern District of New York involving three former court
appointed directors of the Company's Board. In March 1995, we paid fees to the
former directors for their services as court appointed directors and, in
connection with the payment of those fees, the former directors executed
release/agreements in our favor.
In November 1995, we commenced the first of the consolidated actions, in the
New York State Supreme Court, New York County, alleging that the former court
appointed directors violated the release/agreements by initiating legal
proceedings, subsequently dismissed, for the purpose of obtaining additional
fees of $3.0 million. The former directors filed a third-party complaint in that
action against Nelson Peltz for indemnification. In June 1996, the former court
appointed directors commenced the second of the consolidated actions in the
United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, asserting claims
against Nelson Peltz and others. In an amended complaint, the former court
appointed directors alleged, among other things, that the defendants conspired
to mislead a federal court in connection with the change of control of Triarc in
April 1993 and in connection with the payment of the former court appointed
directors' fees. The former court appointed directors also alleged that
Mr. Peltz and Steven Posner conspired to frustrate collection of amounts owed by
Steven Posner to the United States. The amended complaint sought, among other
relief, damages in an amount not less than $4.5 million, an order returning the
former court appointed directors to our Board and rescission of the 1993 change
of control transaction. In February 1999, the court granted Mr. Peltz's motion
for summary judgment with respect to all the claims against him in the
consolidated actions. In September 1999, the three former directors filed a
notice of appeal from the dismissal of their claims against Mr. Peltz. In
October 1999, the District Court entered an order agreed to by the parties
dismissing the remaining claims without prejudice. In March 2000 the District
Court entered an order dismissing the former court appointed directors' appeal
for failure to comply with the Court's scheduling order. In August 2000, the
Court of Appeals affirmed the decision of the District Court. In
September 2000, the Court of Appeals denied the plaintiff's request for a
rehearing.
On June 25, 1997, Kamran Malekan and Daniel Mannion, allegedly stockholders
of the Company, commenced an action in the Delaware Court of Chancery, New
Castle County against the directors and certain former directors of the Company,
and naming the Company as a nominal defendant. The action purported to
12
assert claims on behalf of the Company and a class of all persons who held stock
of the Company on April 25, 1994. The plaintiffs alleged that the defendants
violated their fiduciary duties and duties of good faith to the Company and its
stockholders and violated representations in the Company's 1994 Proxy Statement
by granting certain compensation to Nelson Peltz, our Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer, and Peter May, our President and Chief Operating Officer, in
1994-1997, including special bonuses to Messrs. Peltz and May in 1996. The
plaintiffs further alleged that the 1994 Proxy Statement contained false and
misleading statements concerning the Company's compensation plans. The amended
complaint sought, among other remedies, rescission of all option grants to
Messrs. Peltz and May that allegedly contravened the representations in the 1994
Proxy Statement, an order directing Messrs. Peltz and May to repay to the
Company their 1996 special bonuses, an order enjoining the defendants from
awarding compensation to Messrs. Peltz and May in violation of the
representations in the 1994 Proxy Statement and damages. In August 2000, the
parties entered into a settlement agreement pursuant to which, among other
things, (i) the Malekan case would be dismissed with prejudice;
(ii) Messrs. Peltz and May would deliver a note to the Company in the amount of
$5.0 million, the principal of which is payable in three equal installments on
March 31, 2001, March 31, 2002 and March 31, 2003; and (iii) Messrs. Peltz and
May would surrender an aggregate of 775,000 performance options awarded to them
in 1994. On January 30, 2001, the Chancery Court entered an Order and Final
Judgment approving the settlement in full and the deadline for an appeal has
passed. Accordingly, the settlement became effective on March 1, 2001.
Messrs. Peltz and May denied culpability, and the Order and Final Judgment did
not contain any evidence or admission by any party that any acts of wrongdoing
had been committed. The Order and Final Judgment also dismissed the action with
prejudice as to all parties, including the directors and certain former
directors of the Company named as defendants.
On August 13, 1997, Ruth LeWinter and Calvin Shapiro, both allegedly Company
stockholders, commenced a purported class and derivative action in the United
States District Court for the Southern District of New York that is
substantially identical to the Malekan action discussed above. In October 1997,
five former directors of the Company, including the three former court-appointed
directors, filed cross-claims in the LeWinter action against the Company and
Nelson Peltz seeking indemnification in connection with the LeWinter action,
damages in an unspecified amount in excess of $75,000, and costs and attorneys'
fees. The cross-claims alleged that Mr. Peltz violated an undertaking given to a
federal court in February 1993 by failing to vote his shares to keep the former
directors on the Company's Board, and that he conspired with Steven Posner to
violate a court order prohibiting Mr. Posner from serving as an officer or
director of the Company. In September 1999, the court entered an order staying
that case pending a resolution of the Malekan action described above. On
March 15, 2001, the court entered an order agreed to by the parties dismissing
this action with prejudice and without costs and attorneys' fees to any party.
In October 1998 we received a proposal from Nelson Peltz and Peter W. May
for the acquisition by an entity to be formed by them of all of the outstanding
shares of our common stock, other than those owned by an affiliate of
Messrs. Peltz and May. Various class actions were brought on behalf of our
stockholders in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware challenging that
proposal. These class actions name Triarc, Messrs. Peltz and May and directors
of Triarc as defendants. The class actions allege that consummation of the offer
by Messrs. Peltz and May would constitute a breach of the fiduciary duties of
our directors, that the proposed consideration to be paid for our common stock
in the proposed going private transaction was unfair, and demand, in addition to
damages and costs, that consummation of the offer by Messrs. Peltz and May be
enjoined. In March 1999, Messrs. Peltz and May withdrew their proposal and we
commenced a 'Dutch Auction' self-tender offer to acquire up to 5.5 million
shares of our common stock. On March 26, 1999, four of the plaintiffs in the
foregoing actions filed an amended complaint alleging that the defendants
violated fiduciary duties owed to our stockholders by failing to disclose, in
connection with the self-tender offer, that the Special Committee of the Board
of Directors that had been formed to evaluate the proposal by Messrs. Peltz and
May had allegedly determined that the proposed going private transaction was
unfair. The Dutch Auction self-tender offer was completed in April 1999. The
amended complaint seeks an injunction enjoining consummation of the self-tender
offer unless the alleged disclosure violations are cured, and requiring us to
provide additional disclosure, together with damages in an unspecified amount.
In October 2000 the parties agreed to stay this action pending determination of
the Salsitz action that is described below.
On March 23, 1999, Norman Salsitz, allegedly a stockholder of Triarc, filed
a complaint in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New
York against Triarc, Nelson Peltz and Peter May. The complaint purports to
assert a claim for alleged violation of Section 14(e) of the Securities Exchange
Act of
13
1934, as amended, on behalf of all persons who held our stock as of March 10,
1999. The complaint alleges that our tender offer statement filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission in connection with the proposed Dutch Auction
self-tender offer was materially false and misleading in that, among other
things, it failed to disclose alleged recent valuations of Triarc, which the
complaint alleges showed that the self-tender price was unfair to our
stockholders. The complaint seeks damages in an amount to be determined,
together with prejudgment interest, the costs of suit, including attorneys'
fees, and unspecified other relief. In June 1999, the Company, Mr. Peltz and
Mr. May moved to dismiss the complaint or alternatively to stay the Salsitz
action pending the resolution of the Delaware action. In March 2000, the court
denied the motion for a stay and granted in part and denied in part the motion
to dismiss. In April 2000, Salsitz filed an amended complaint. In addition to
the matters alleged in the original complaint, the amended complaint seeks an
order permitting all shareholders who tendered their shares in the Dutch Auction
Tender Offer to rescind the transaction. In May 2000, the defendants filed an
answer to the amended complaint. Discovery has commenced in the action.
On September 14, 1999, William Pallot filed a purported derivative action
against our directors and other defendants, and naming us as a nominal
defendant, in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County. The
complaint alleges that the defendants breached their fiduciary duties and aided
and abetted breaches of fiduciary duties by causing us to enter into an
agreement to purchase shares of the Company's Class B common stock owned by
affiliates of Victor Posner. The complaint seeks, among other relief, damages in
an unspecified amount, a declaration that the stock purchase agreement is void,
rescission of our purchase of shares pursuant to the stock purchase agreement
and an injunction against consummating additional purchases under the agreement,
and removal of Messrs. Peltz and May as directors and officers of Triarc. In
November 1999, we and the director defendants filed a motion to dismiss the
complaint. On February 2, 2000, the plaintiff filed an amended complaint, which,
in addition, to reiterating the allegations discussed above, alleged that the
defendants violated their fiduciary duties and wasted corporate assets by
approving the Company's lease and purchase of aircraft from Triangle Aircraft
Services Corporation. The amended complaint further alleges that between 1994
and 1997, the directors caused Triarc to award Messrs. Peltz and May
unauthorized compensation. In addition to the relief sought in the original
complaint, the amended complaint seeks an award of damages against the
defendants, purportedly on behalf of the Company, in an unspecified amount. On
February 17, 2000, before the defendants had responded to the amended complaint,
the plaintiffs filed a second amended complaint containing additional factual
allegations relating to the matters asserted in the original and first amended
complaint, and seeking additional equitable relief, including rescission of the
aircraft and helicopter lease and purchase transactions. In March 2000 the
defendants moved to dismiss the second amended complaint. On October 31, 2000
the court granted the defendants motion to dismiss the action. On November 13,
2000, Mr. Pallot served a notice of appeal to the Appellate Division of the
Supreme Court of the State of New York.
It is our opinion that the outcome of any of the matters described above or
any of the other matters that have arisen in the ordinary course of our business
will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition
or results of operations.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.
We held our 2000 Annual Meeting of Stockholders on June 22, 2000. The
matters acted upon by the stockholders at that meeting were reported in our
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 31, 2000.
14
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.
The principal market for our Class A Common Stock is the New York Stock
Exchange ('NYSE') (symbol: TRY). The high and low market prices for our Class A
Common Stock, as reported in the consolidated transaction reporting system, are
set forth below:
MARKET PRICE
------------------------------
FISCAL QUARTERS HIGH LOW
--------------- ---- ---
1999
First Quarter ended April 4........................ $17 7/16 $14 3/4
Second Quarter ended July 4........................ 21 13/16 16 15/16
Third Quarter ended October 3...................... 22 1/8 19 7/8
Fourth Quarter ended January 2, 2000............... 21 7/16 17 1/4
2000
First Quarter ended April 2........................ $22 3/4 $16 13/16
Second Quarter ended July 2........................ 22 7/16 18 15/16
Third Quarter ended October 1...................... 28 20 5/8
Fourth Quarter ended December 31................... 25 15/16 22 7/8
We did not pay any dividends on our common stock in 1999, 2000 or in the
current year to date and do not presently anticipate the declaration of cash
dividends on our common stock in the near future. We have no class of equity
securities currently issued and outstanding except for the Class A Common Stock
and the Class B Common Stock.
Because we are a holding company, our ability to meet our cash requirements,
including required interest and principal payments on our indebtedness, is
primarily dependent upon, in addition to our cash, cash equivalents and short
term investments on hand, cash flows from our subsidiaries. Under the terms of
the indenture relating to the notes issued in the Arby's securitization (see
'Item 1. Business -- Arby's Securitization'), the ability of Arby's to pay any
dividends or make any loans or advances to us is limited by the debt service
requirements of its subsidiaries. You should read the information we have
included in 'Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations -- Liquidity and Capital Resources' and Note 9 to our
Consolidated Financial Statements.
As of March 15, 2001, there were 1,999,207 shares of our Class B Common
Stock outstanding, all of which were owned by entities controlled by Victor
Posner. All of the shares of Class B Common Stock can be converted without
restriction into shares of Class A Common Stock if they are sold to a third
party unaffiliated with Victor Posner or such entities. In August 1999, we
entered into an agreement pursuant to which we are obligated to acquire all of
the outstanding shares of Class B Common Stock on or prior to August 19, 2001,
subject to extension in certain limited circumstances. Pursuant to that
agreement, in August 1999 we repurchased 1,999,208 shares of our Class B Common
Stock for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $40.9 million and in
August 2000 we repurchased 1,999,207 shares of our Class B Common Stock for an
aggregate purchase price of approximately $42.3 million. We are obligated to
repurchase the remaining 1,999,207 shares of our Class B Common Stock on or
before August 19, 2001, subject to extension in certain limited circumstances.
You should read the information we have included in 'Item 1.
Business -- Repurchase of Class B Common Stock'.
Our management has been authorized, when and if market conditions warrant,
to purchase from time to time up to an aggregate of $80 million worth of our
Class A Common Stock pursuant to a $30 million stock repurchase program that
ends on May 25, 2001 and a $50 million stock repurchase program that ends on
January 18, 2002. Through March 15, 2001, we had repurchased 1,196,434 shares,
at an average cost of approximately $24.78 per share (including commissions),
for an aggregate cost of approximately $29,646,000, pursuant to the $30 million
stock repurchase program. Through March 15, 2001 we have not repurchased any
shares pursuant to the $50 million stock repurchase program. We cannot assure
you that we will repurchase any additional shares pursuant to either of these
stock repurchase programs.
As of March 15, 2001, there were approximately 3,714 holders of record of
our Class A Common Stock and two holders of record of our Class B Common Stock.
15
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA(1)
YEAR ENDED
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DECEMBER 31, DECEMBER 28, JANUARY 3, JANUARY 2, DECEMBER 31,
1996 1997(2) 1999(2) 2000(2) 2000(2)
---- ------- ------- ------- -------
(IN THOUSANDS EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
Revenues and other $452,791 $152,601 $ 88,964 $ 102,161 $ 118,856
earnings...............
Income (loss) from
continuing operations
before income taxes.... (85,177)(5) (2,607)(6) 8,019 24,854 (9) 2,211 (11)
Income (loss) from
continuing
operations............. (58,682)(5) (3,660)(6) 3,187 17,702 (9) (10,157)(11)
Income from discontinued
operations............. 50,197 3,825 11,449 4,519 472,078
Extraordinary charges.... (5,416) (3,781) -- (12,097) (20,680)
Net income (loss)........ (13,901)(5) (3,616)(6) 14,636(8) 10,124 (9) 441,241 (11)
Basic income (loss) per
share (3):
Continuing
operations......... (1.96) (.12) .11 .68 (.44)
Discontinued
operations......... 1.68 .13 .37 .18 20.32
Extraordinary
charges............ (.18) (.13) -- (.47) (.89)
Net income (loss).... (.46) (.12) .48 .39 18.99
Diluted income (loss) per
share (3):
Continuing
operations......... (1.96) (.12) .10 .66 (.44)
Discontinued
operations......... 1.68 .13 .36 .16 20.32
Extraordinary
charges............ (.18) (.13) -- (.45) (.89)
Net income (loss).... (.46) (.12) .46 .37 18.99
Total assets............. 552,724 481,681 462,417 378,424 1,067,424
Long-term debt........... 281,110 279,606 279,226 3,792 291,718
Stockholders' equity
(deficit)(4)........... 6,765 44,521 (7) 11,272 (166,726)(10) 282,310 (12)
Weighted-average common
shares outstanding..... 29,898 30,132 30,306 26,015 (10) 23,232
- ---------
(1) Selected Financial Data for the years prior to the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2000 have been reclassified to reflect the discontinuance of
the Company's beverage businesses sold in October 2000. In addition,
Selected Financial Data for the years ended on or prior to the fiscal year
ended January 2, 2000 reflect the discontinuance of the Company's propane
business sold in July 1999 and for the years ended on or prior to the
fiscal year ended December 28, 1997 reflect the discontinuance of the
Company's dyes and specialty chemicals business sold in December 1997.
(2) The Company changed its fiscal year from a calendar year to a year
consisting of 52 or 53 weeks ending on the Sunday closest to December 31
effective for the 1997 fiscal year. In accordance with this method, the
Company's 1997, 1999 and 2000 fiscal years contained 52 weeks and its
fiscal year 1998 contained 53 weeks.
(3) Basic and diluted income (loss) per share are the same for each of the
years in the two-year period ended December 28, 1997 and for the year ended
December 31, 2000 since all potentially dilutive securities would have had
an antidilutive effect for each of those years. The shares used in the
calculation of diluted income (loss) per share for the years ended
January 3, 1999 (31,527,000) and January 2, 2000 (26,943,000) consist of
the weighted average common shares outstanding and potential common shares
reflecting the effect of dilutive stock options of 1,221,000 and 818,000,
respectively, and for the year ended January 2, 2000 the effect of a
dilutive forward purchase obligation for common stock of 110,000 shares.
(4) The Company has not paid any dividends on its common shares during any of
the years presented.
(footnotes continued on next page)
16
(footnotes continued from previous page)
(5) Reflects certain significant charges and credits recorded during 1996 as
follows: $71,300,000 charged to loss from continuing operations before
income taxes representing (1) a $64,300,000 charge for impairment of
long-lived assets, principally company-owned restaurants and related exit
costs, (2) a $2,500,000 charge for facilities relocation and corporate
restructuring and (3) a $4,500,000 loss on sale of business; $46,974,000
charged to loss from continuing operations representing the aforementioned
$71,300,000 less $24,326,000 of related income tax benefit; and $6,695,000
charged to net loss representing (1) the aforementioned $46,974,000 charged
to loss from continuing operations, (2) $6,317,000 included in the loss
from operations of the discontinued businesses consisting of
(a) $6,300,000 of facilities relocation and corporate restructuring charges
and (b) $3,675,000 of loss on sale of business, both less $3,658,000 of
related income tax benefit and (3) a $5,416,000 extraordinary charge from
the early extinguishment of debt, all less $52,012,000 of gain on disposal
of discontinued operations.
(6) Reflects certain significant charges and credits recorded during 1997 as
follows: $9,698,000 charged to loss from continuing operations before
income taxes representing (1) a $5,609,000 charge to facilities relocation
and corporate restructuring costs and (2) $4,089,000 of loss on sale of
business; $5,865,000 charged to loss from continuing operations
representing the aforementioned $9,698,000 less $3,833,000 of related
income tax benefit; and $4,716,000 charged to net loss representing
(1) the aforementioned $5,865,000 charged to loss from continuing
operations, (2) $19,999,000 included in the loss from operations of the
discontinued businesses consisting of (a) $31,815,000 of charges for
post-acquisition related transition, integration and changes to business
strategies and (b) $1,466,000 of facilities relocation and corporate
restructuring charges, less (a) $576,000 of gain on sale of business and
(b) $12,706,000 of related income tax benefit and (3) a $3,781,000
extraordinary charge from the early extinguishment of debt, all less
$24,929,000 of gain on disposal of discontinued operations.
(7) In connection with the acquisition of Stewart's Beverages, Inc., the
Company issued 1,566,858 shares of its common stock with a value of
$37,409,000 for all of the then outstanding stock of Stewart's and issued
154,931 stock options with a value of $2,788,000 in exchange for all of the
outstanding stock options of Stewart's resulting in an increase in
stockholders' equity, net of expenses, of $39,547,000. In October 2000,
Stewart's was sold as part of the sale of the beverage businesses.
(8) Reflects certain significant credits recorded during 1998 as follows:
$7,074,000 credited to net income representing (1) $3,067,000 included in
the income from operations of the discontinued businesses consisting of
$5,016,000 of gain on sale of businesses less $1,949,000 of related income
taxes and (2) $4,007,000 of gain on disposal of discontinued operations.
(9) Reflects certain significant charges and credits recorded during 1999 as
follows: $926,000 credited to income from continuing operations before
income taxes representing $3,052,000 of reversal of excess interest expense
accruals for interest due the Internal Revenue Service in connection with
the consummation of their examinations of the Company's Federal income tax
returns for prior years less a $2,126,000 charge for a capital structure
reorganization related charge related to equitable adjustments made to the
terms of outstanding stock options for stock of a former subsidiary held by
corporate employees; $5,789,000 credited to income from continuing
operations representing (1) the aforementioned $926,000 credited to income
from continuing operations before income taxes less $264,000 of related
income taxes and (2) $5,127,000 of release of excess reserves for income
taxes in connection with the consummation of IRS examinations of the
Company's Federal income tax returns; and $3,897,000 credited to net income
representing (1) the aforementioned $5,789,000 credited to income from
continuing operations, (2) $15,102,000 of gain on disposal of discontinued
operations, less (i) $4,897,000 of charges reported in income from
operations of the discontinued businesses consisting of (a) a $3,348,000
charge for a capital structure reorganization related charge, similar to
the charge in continuing operations, relating to option holders who were
employees of the sold businesses, (b) $411,000 of provision for interest
due the IRS in connection with the consummation of their examination of the
Company's Federal income tax returns, both less $1,464,000 of related
income taxes and (c) $2,602,000 of provision for income taxes in connection
with the consummation of IRS examinations of the Company's Federal income
tax returns and (ii) a $12,097,000 extraordinary charge from the early
extinguishment of debt.
(footnotes continued on next page)
17
(footnotes continued from previous page)
(10) In 1999 the Company repurchased for treasury 3,805,015 shares of its
Class A common stock and 1,999,208 shares of Class B common stock for
$117,160,000 and recorded a forward purchase obligation for two future
purchases of Class B common stock that occurred or are to occur on August
10, 2000 and on or before August 19, 2001 for $42,343,000 and $43,843,000,
respectively. These transactions resulted in an aggregate $203,346,000
reduction to stockholders' equity in 1999 resulting in a stockholders'
deficit as of January 2, 2000 and a reduction of 3,376,000 shares in the
weighted-average common shares outstanding.
(11) Reflects certain significant charges and credits recorded during 2000 as
follows: $36,432,000 charged to income from continuing operations before
income taxes representing (1) a $26,010,000 charge for capital market
transaction related compensation and (2) a $10,422,000 charge resulting
from the Company's repurchase of 1,045,834 shares of its Class A common
stock which certain of the Company's officers and a director received upon
exercises of stock options within six months after exercise of the related
stock options; $32,914,000 charged to loss from continuing operations
representing the aforementioned $36,432,000 less $3,518,000 of related
income tax benefit; and $427,352,000 credited to net income representing
$480,946,000 of gain on disposal of discontinued operations less (1) the
aforementioned $32,914,000 charged to loss from continuing operations and
(2) a $20,680,000 extraordinary charge from the early extinguishment of
debt.
(12) The increase in stockholders' equity during 2000 principally reflects net
income of $441,241,000 which includes a gain on disposal of discontinued
operations of $480,946,000.
18
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS.
INTRODUCTION
We currently operate in one business, the franchising of Arby's restaurants,
from which we derive our revenues principally in the form of franchise royalties
and franchise fees. While over half of our existing royalty agreements and all
of our new domestic royalty agreements are for 4% of franchise revenues, our
average rate was 3.3% in 2000. We also derive investment income from our
investment portfolio of cash equivalents, short-term investments and non-current
investments. As discussed below under 'Liquidity and Capital Resources,' we are
presently evaluating our options for the use of our significant cash, cash
equivalent and investment position, including business acquisitions, repurchases
of Triarc common shares and investments.
We incur general and administrative, depreciation and amortization and
interest expense, but no cost of goods sold, in our restaurant franchising
business. In addition, we incur general corporate expenses, including investment
activity related expenses, in those same expense categories. Our restaurant
franchising business does not require significant capital expenditures since we
do not own any restaurants.
We previously operated in the premium beverage and soft drink concentrate
businesses. On October 25, 2000 we completed the sale, which we refer to as the
Snapple Beverage Sale, of Snapple Beverage Group, Inc., the parent company of
Snapple Beverage Corp., Mistic Brands, Inc. and Stewart's Beverages, Inc., and
Royal Crown Company, Inc. to affiliates of Cadbury Schweppes plc, which we refer
to as Cadbury. Our former premium beverage business consisted of Snapple
Beverage Group and our former soft drink concentrate business consisted of Royal
Crown Company. The premium beverage and soft drink concentrate businesses,
formerly reported as business segments, have been accounted for as discontinued
operations in 2000 through the date of sale and the consolidated financial
statements included elsewhere herein for 1998 and 1999 have been reclassified
accordingly.
On July 19, 1999 we completed the sale of 41.7% of our remaining 42.7%
interest in National Propane Partners L.P. and a subpartnership, National
Propane, L.P., which operated a propane business, retaining a 1% limited partner
interest. Accordingly, the propane business, formerly reported as a business
segment, was accounted for as a discontinued operation in 1999 through the date
of sale and the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere herein for
1998 were previously reclassified accordingly.
In recent years our restaurant franchising business has experienced the
following trends:
Consistent growth of the restaurant industry as a percentage of total
food-related spending
Increased competitive pressures from the emphasis by competitors on new
unit development to increase market share leading to frequent use of
price promotions and heavy advertising expenditures within the industry
Increased price competition in the quick service restaurant industry,
particularly as evidenced by the value menu concept which offers
comparatively lower prices on some menu items, the combination meals
concept which offers a combination meal at an aggregate price lower
than the individual food and beverage items, couponing and other price
discounting
Additional competitive pressures for prepared food purchases from
operations outside the restaurant industry such as deli sections and
in-store cafes of several major grocery store chains
The addition of selected higher-priced premium quality items to menus,
which appeal more to adult tastes and recover some of the margins lost
in the discounting of other menu items
We experience the effects of these trends only to the extent they affect our
royalties and franchise fees.
PRESENTATION OF FINANCIAL INFORMATION
This 'Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations' should be read in conjunction with our consolidated
financial statements included elsewhere herein. Certain statements we make
constitute 'forward-looking statements' under the Private Securities Litigation
Reform Act of 1995. See 'Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements and
Projections' in 'Part I' preceding 'Item 1.'
We report on a fiscal year consisting of 52 or 53 weeks ending on the Sunday
closest to December 31. Our 1998 fiscal year commenced December 29, 1997 and
ended on January 3, 1999, our 1999 fiscal year
19
commenced January 4, 1999 and ended on January 2, 2000 and our 2000 fiscal year
commenced on January 3, 2000 and ended on December 31, 2000. As a result of our
fiscal year convention, our 1999 and 2000 fiscal years contained 52 weeks and
our 1998 fiscal year contained 53 weeks. We do not believe the extra week in the
1998 fiscal year has a material impact on the discussion below of our results of
operations. When we refer to '1998' we mean the period from December 29, 1997 to
January 3, 1999; when we refer to '1999' we mean the period from January 4, 1999
to January 2, 2000; and when we refer to '2000' we mean the period from
January 3, 2000 to December 31, 2000.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
2000 COMPARED WITH 1999
Royalties and Franchise Fees
Our royalties and franchise fees, which are generated entirely from our
restaurant franchising business, increased $6.0 million, or 7.4%, to $87.2
million in 2000 from $81.2 million in 1999 reflecting higher royalty revenue and
slightly higher franchise fee revenue. The increase in royalty revenue resulted
from an average net increase of 91, or 2.8%, franchised restaurants and a 0.9%
increase in same-store sales of franchised restaurants.
Our royalties and franchise fees have no associated cost of sales.
Investment Income, Net
Investment income, net increased $13.8 million, or 81.7%, to $30.7 million
in 2000 from $16.9 million in 1999. This increase reflects (1) $10.4 million of
higher recognized net gains, realized or unrealized as applicable, on our
investments, primarily our gain on the sale of Ascent Entertainment Group, Inc.,
(2) a $4.2 million increase in interest income on cash equivalents and
short-term investments, (3) a $0.9 million decrease in the provision recognized
in 2000 compared with 1999 for unrealized losses on investments deemed to be
other than temporary and (4) a $0.8 million increase in distributions, including
dividends, from certain of our investments. Such increases were partially offset
by a $2.3 million decrease to a loss of $0.1 million in 2000 from income of $2.2
million in 1999 in equity in earnings or losses of investment limited
partnerships and similar investment entities accounted for under the equity
method. The increased interest income is due to higher average amounts of cash
equivalents and short-term investments in 2000 compared with 1999 as a result of
the cash provided from the Snapple Beverage Sale and the securitization of
Arby's franchise fees and royalties. The recognized net gains on our securities
and the provision for other than temporary losses on our securities may not
recur in future periods.
Gain on Sale of Business
Gain on sale of business of $1.2 million in 1999 was recognized from the
reduction in our percentage ownership of MCM Capital Group, Inc., an investment
accounted for under the equity method, as a result of the sale of common stock
issued by MCM.
Other Income, Net
Other income, net decreased $1.9 million, or 68.4%, to $0.9 million in 2000
from $2.8 million in 1999. This decrease was principally due to (1) a loss of
$2.3 million in 2000 in our net equity in the income or losses of investees
other than investment limited partnerships and similar investment entities
compared with an essentially break-even position in 1999 and (2) non-recurring
interest income of $1.3 million in 1999 for the receipt of interest income
relating to both income tax refunds and casualty insurance collateral. The
reduction in the equity in the income or loss of investees was principally due
to an aggregate $1.8 million of equity in the write-down of certain assets of an
investee in 2000. The decreases of $3.6 million were partially offset by
(1) the collection in 2000 of $0.9 million of a receivable from a former
affiliate which was written off in years prior to 1998 due to such company
filing for bankruptcy protection and (2) a $0.7 million reduction in the fair
value of a written call option on our Class A common stock effectively
established in connection with the assumption by the purchaser in the Snapple
Beverage Sale of our zero coupon convertible subordinated debentures due 2018,
which we refer to as the Debentures. Although the Debentures were assumed by
20
Cadbury, they remain convertible into our Class A common stock and as such we
have recorded the liability for such conversion at fair value and the reduction
in the fair value of the liability from the October 25, 2000 date of sale to
December 31, 2000 was recognized in other income.
General and Administrative
Our general and administrative expenses increased $11.7 million, or 17.1%,
to $80.2 million in 2000 from $68.5 million in 1999. This increase principally
reflects (1) stock option compensation costs of $11.4 million in 2000 consisting
of (a) $10.4 million resulting from our repurchase of Class A common stock from
certain officers and a director within six months of the exercise of related
stock options by such officers and director and (b) $1.0 million resulting from
other stock option activity relating to the Snapple Beverage Sale, (2) higher
expenses of $1.4 million from $6.7 million in 1999 to $8.1 million in 2000
related to the full period effect in 2000 compared with the period from May 3,
1999 to January 2, 2000 in 1999 of executive salary arrangements and an
executive bonus plan effective May 3, 1999, (3) higher charitable contributions
of $1.4 million, (4) provisions of $1.2 million in 2000 for costs to support a
change in distributors for a majority of franchisees in our restaurant
franchising business for food and other products and (5) other inflationary
increases. These increases were partially offset by (1) non-recurring 1999
expenses of $2.9 million related to our lease of an airplane from Triangle
Aircraft Services Corporation, a company owned by our Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer and President and Chief Operating Officer, through
January 19, 2000 at which time we acquired 280 Holdings, LLC, the entity that at
the time of the acquisition owned the airplane and (2) the recognition in 2000
of a $1.5 million note receivable that we received as a portion of the sales
proceeds of an insurance subsidiary that we sold in 1998 as a result of the
collection of the note in 2000 due to favorable settlement of insurance claims
by the purchaser of the insurance subsidiary. The $1.5 million note received in
connection with the sale of a former insurance subsidiary had not been
previously recognized due to uncertainty surrounding its collection which was
dependent on the favorable settlement of insurance claims. The gain from
realization of the note was included as a reduction of general and
administrative expenses since the gain effectively represents an adjustment of
prior period insurance reserves.
Depreciation and Amortization, Excluding Amortization of Deferred Financing
Costs
Our depreciation and amortization, excluding amortization of deferred
financing costs, decreased $0.1 million, or 2.0%, to $5.3 million in 2000 from
$5.4 million in 1999. This decrease in depreciation and amortization principally
reflects (1) a decrease in amortization of $1.5 million reflecting (a) an
increase in the estimated useful lives on $8.9 million of airplane leasehold
improvements as a result of the acquisition of 280 Holdings on January 19, 2000
and (b) the termination of amortization effective January 2000 on a $2.5 million
payment made in 1997 principally for the option to continue to lease the
airplane for five years since the remaining unamortized portion was repaid to us
in connection with the acquisition of 280 Holdings and (2) a decrease in the
amortization of below market stock options of $0.3 million in 2000 as those
stock options became fully vested in March 2000. These decreases were almost
entirely offset by the 2000 depreciation of $1.7 million on the airplane
commencing with the acquisition of 280 Holdings on January 19, 2000.
Capital Market Transaction Related Compensation
The capital market transaction related compensation charge of $26.0 million
in 2000 resulted from incentive compensation costs directly related to the
completion of the Snapple Beverage Sale and the issuance in November 2000 of
insured non-recourse securitization notes in the principal amount of $290.0
million. Such compensation consisted of $22.5 million to the Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer and the President and Chief Operating Officer which was
invested in deferred compensation trusts for their benefit in January 2001 and
$3.5 million paid to other officers and employees in January 2001. There was no
similar charge in 1999.
Capital Structure Reorganization Related Charge
The capital structure reorganization related charge decreased $1.8 million,
or 85.6%, to $0.3 million in 2000 from $2.1 million in 1999. Such charges
reflect equitable adjustments that were made in 1999 to the terms of then
outstanding options under the stock option plan of Snapple Beverage Group to the
extent the option holders were employees of Triarc.
21
The Snapple Beverage Group stock option plan provided for an equitable
adjustment of options in the event of a recapitalization or similar event. The
exercise prices of then outstanding options under the Snapple Beverage Group
plan were equitably adjusted in 1999 to adjust for the effects of net
distributions of $91.3 million, principally consisting of transfers of cash and
deferred tax assets from Snapple Beverage Group to Triarc partially offset by
the effect of the contribution of Stewart's to Snapple Beverage Group effective
May 17, 1999. We have accounted for the equitable adjustment in accordance with
the intrinsic value method. In addition to reducing the exercise prices of the
Snapple Beverage Group stock options which did not result in the recognition of
any expense because those modifications to the options did not create a new
measurement date under the intrinsic value method, a cash payment of $51.34 per
share for the options outstanding at December 31, 1997 and $39.40 per share for
the options granted in 1998 was due from us to the option holder following the
exercise of the stock options and the occurrence of certain other events. The
initial charge relating to the cash payment portion of these equitable
adjustments was recorded in the 1999 first quarter and, therefore, the charge of
$2.1 million in 1999 includes the portion of the aggregate cash payment which
was due from us to the extent of the vesting of the stock options through
January 2, 2000. The $0.3 million charge recognized in 2000 represents the
portion of the cash due in connection with the exercise of the stock options to
the extent of the vesting of the options during the period from January 3, 2000
to October 25, 2000, the date of the Snapple Beverage Sale, net of credits for
forfeitures of non-vested stock options of terminated employees. As a result of
the Snapple Beverage Sale, all outstanding Snapple Beverage Group stock options
remained the responsibility of Snapple Beverage Group under Cadbury's ownership
and are no longer our responsibility. The accrual for such cash payment
recognized by Triarc, which was $2.4 million as of October 25, 2000, was
reversed in the 2000 fourth quarter as a component of the gain on sale of the
beverage businesses included in discontinued operations.
Interest Expense
Interest expense increased $3.5 million, or 281.3%, to $4.8 million in 2000
from $1.3 million in 1999. This increase in interest expense is primarily
attributable to (1) the reversal in 1999 of $3.1 million of interest accruals
relating to income tax matters due to the finalization of our income tax
liabilities resulting from the consummation of Internal Revenue Service
examinations of our income tax returns for the fiscal years from 1989 to 1992
and the tentative completion of the examinations of our income tax returns for
fiscal 1993 and the eight-month transition period ended December 31, 1993 during
1999, (2) interest of $2.4 million in 2000 on 7.44% insured non-recourse
securitization notes in the principal amount of $290.0 million issued on
November 21, 2000 and (3) interest of $1.5 million in 2000 on an $18.0 million
secured promissory note assumed in connection with the acquisition of 280
Holdings on January 19, 2000. These increases were partially offset by (1) $1.4
million of 1999 interest expense on $300.0 million of 10 1/4% senior
subordinated notes due 2009 co-issued by Snapple Beverage Group and Triarc
Consumer Products Group, LLC, a subsidiary of ours, which was allocated to our
restaurant franchising business in 1999 but which was no longer allocated in
2000 and (2) non-recurring 1999 interest of $1.4 million on $275.0 million of
9 3/4% senior secured notes due 2000 of RC/Arby's Corporation, the former parent
company of Royal Crown and Arby's, Inc., reported in continuing operations
consisting of the portion related to Arby's and RC/Arby's. The 9 3/4% notes were
repaid in the first quarter of 1999 in connection with a debt refinancing which
consisted of (1) the co-issuance by Snapple Beverage Group and Triarc Consumer
Products Group of $300.0 million of 10 1/4% senior subordinated notes due 2009
and (2) $475.0 million borrowed by the beverage businesses under a senior bank
credit facility and the repayment of (1) $284.3 million under a prior credit
facility of Snapple Beverage Group and (2) the $275.0 million of 9 3/4% notes.
Outstanding borrowings under the credit facility of Snapple Beverage Group and
the 10 1/4% notes were repaid by us or assumed by Cadbury, as applicable, in
connection with the Snapple Beverage Sale.
Income Taxes
The provision for income taxes represented effective rates of 559% in 2000
and 29% in 1999. The effective rate is unusually high in 2000 principally due to
the relatively low amount of pretax income and the effect thereon of
non-deductible compensation costs, which were significantly higher in 2000
compared with 1999. The effective rate is lower than the United States Federal
statutory rate of 35% in 1999 principally due to the 1999 release of excess
income tax reserves of $5.1 million as a result of the settlement of Internal
22
Revenue Service examinations of our tax returns for fiscal 1989 to 1992 and the
tentative completion of Internal Revenue Service examinations of our tax returns
for fiscal 1993 and the eight-month transition period ended December 31, 1993
during 1999, partially offset by the effect of non-deductible compensation costs
and state income taxes.
Discontinued Operations
Income from discontinued operations was $472.0 million in 2000 compared with
$4.5 million in 1999. Such income from discontinued operations includes the loss
from operations of the discontinued businesses and the gain on disposal of the
discontinued businesses. The loss from operations component improved $1.7
million to a loss of $8.9 million in 2000 from a loss of $10.6 million in 1999.
The gain on disposal component increased $465.8 million to $480.9 million in
2000 from $15.1 million in 1999.
The improvement in the loss from operations of the discontinued businesses
of $1.7 million was due to the non-recurring $1.6 million after-tax equity in
the loss from discontinued operations of the former propane business in 1999 and
a $0.1 million decrease in the net loss of our discontinued beverage businesses
in 2000. See below for a discussion of the operating results of the discontinued
beverage businesses.
The gain on disposal of discontinued businesses of $480.9 million in 2000
entirely results from the Snapple Beverage Sale. The gain on disposal of
discontinued businesses of $15.1 million in 1999 results from (1) a $12.4
million gain relating to the sale of our propane business consisting of (a) an
$11.2 million gain from the July 1999 sale of 41.7% of our then remaining 42.7%
interest in National Propane Partners and (b) the recognition in 1999 of $1.2
million of previously deferred gains from the 1996 sale of 57.3% of our interest
in National Propane Partners and (2) a $2.7 million reduction of previously
recognized estimated disposal losses related to certain discontinued operations
of SEPSCO, LLC, a subsidiary of ours. The $2.7 million adjustment relating to
SEPSCO in 1999 was principally due to the receipt by SEPSCO of an income tax
refund and the release of income tax reserves no longer required based on the
results of Internal Revenue Service examinations of our tax returns for the
fiscal years from 1989 through 1993.
Revenues and other earnings of the beverage businesses decreased $94.0
million, or 12.1%, to $681.0 million in 2000 from $775.0 million in 1999
reflecting a decrease of $75.5 million, or 11.6%, for the premium beverage
business and an $18.5 million, or 15.1%, decrease for the soft drink concentrate
business. The decrease in revenues and other earnings for both the premium
beverage business and the soft drink concentrate business was due to the Snapple
Beverage Sale on October 25, 2000 whereby our 2000 results reflect the
operations of the beverage businesses only through the date of sale compared
with a full year in 1999. Revenues and other earnings for the period
October 26, 1999 to January 2, 2000 amounted to $93.0 million for the premium
beverage business and $19.8 million for the soft drink concentrate business.
Adjusting our 1999 results by excluding the revenues and other earnings of the
beverage businesses for the period from October 26, 1999 to January 2, 2000,
revenues and other earnings of the beverage businesses increased $18.8 million,
or 2.8%, for the comparable periods through October 25 of each year reflecting
an increase of $17.5 million, or 3.1%, for the premium beverage business and an
increase of $1.3 million, or 1.3% for the soft drink concentrate business. The
$17.5 million increase for the premium beverage business was principally due to
increased sales volume resulting from newer product introductions such as
Snapple Elements'TM', a product platform of herbally enhanced drinks introduced
in April 1999, and Mistic Zotics'TM' introduced in April 2000 and increased
cases sold to retailers through two premium beverage distributors principally
reflecting the effect of an increased focus on our products as a result of our
ownership of these distributors from February 25, 1999 and January 2, 2000,
respectively, until the sale of the premium beverage business on October 25,
2000. These increases were partially offset by decreased sales volume of Whipper
Snapple'r' and Mistic tropical fruit juices. The $1.3 million increase for the
soft drink concentrate business was principally due to (1) a shift primarily
during the first half of 2000 in private label sales to sales of higher priced
flavor concentrates from sales of lower priced cola concentrates and (2) an
increase in international branded concentrate volume. Domestic branded
concentrate sales remained relatively unchanged as the effect of higher average
selling prices resulting from domestic concentrate price increases effective
November 1999 was offset entirely by a decline in domestic branded concentrate
volume.
The pretax loss of the beverage businesses increased $4.8 million, or
150.6%, to $8.0 million in 2000 from $3.2 million in 1999. The pretax loss for
the period October 26, 1999 to January 2, 2000 amounted to $4.6 million.
Adjusting our 1999 results by excluding the pretax loss of the beverage
businesses for the period
23
from October 26, 1999 to January 2, 2000, the pretax income (loss) of the
beverage businesses declined $9.4 million to a loss of $8.0 million in 2000 from
income of $1.4 million in 1999 for the comparable periods through October 25 of
each year principally due to a $28.2 million increase in costs and expenses of
the beverage businesses partially offset by an $18.8 million increase in their
revenues and other earnings, as described in the preceding paragraph. The $28.2
million increase in costs and expenses of the beverage businesses was due to
(1) an $8.0 million increase in interest expense principally as a result of
higher average interest rates in the 2000 period and, to a lesser extent, higher
average levels of debt during the 2000 period due to the full period effect of
increases from a February 25, 1999 debt refinancing discussed above under
'Interest Expense' and (2) a $22.9 million increase in operating costs and
expenses, including amortization of costs in excess of net assets of acquired
companies, which we refer to as Goodwill, trademarks and other intangibles,
primarily as a result of the acquisition of two premium beverage distributors on
February 25, 1999 and January 2, 2000, respectively, as well as other increases
approximately proportionate to the increase in revenues and other earnings. Such
increases were partially offset by (3) a $2.7 million decrease in the capital
structure reorganization charge recognized by Snapple Beverage Group, comparable
to the related charge recognized by Triarc which is explained in detail under
'Capital Structure Reorganization Related Charge' above.
The beverage businesses had provisions for income taxes of $0.9 million in
2000 and $5.8 million in 1999 despite a loss before income taxes principally due
to (1) the amortization of non-deductible Goodwill and (2) the differing impact
of the mix of pretax loss or income among the combined entities since we file
state income tax returns on an individual company basis.
Extraordinary Charges
The extraordinary charges of $20.7 million in 2000 resulted from the early
assumption by Cadbury or extinguishment by us, as applicable, of (1) borrowings
under a senior bank credit facility maintained by Snapple, Mistic, Stewart's,
Royal Crown and RC/Arby's, (2) $300.0 million of 10 1/4% senior subordinated
notes due 2009 co-issued by Triarc Consumer Products Group and Snapple Beverage
Group and (3) zero coupon convertible subordinated debentures due 2018. These
extraordinary charges consisted of (1) the write-off of previously unamortized
deferred financing costs of $27.5 million and (2) the payment of prepayment
penalties and fees of $5.5 million, both less income tax benefit of $12.3
million. The extraordinary charges of $12.1 million in 1999 resulted from the
early extinguishment of borrowings under a prior credit facility of Snapple
Beverage Group and RC/Arby's 9 3/4% notes and consisted of (1) the write-off of
previously unamortized (a) deferred financing costs of $11.3 million and
(b) interest rate cap agreement costs of $0.1 million and (2) the payment of a
$7.7 million redemption premium on RC/Arby's 9 3/4% notes, both less income tax
benefit of $7.0 million.
1999 COMPARED WITH 1998
Royalties and Franchise Fees
Our royalties and franchise fees increased $3.1 million, or 4.0%, to $81.2
million in 1999 from $78.1 million in 1998 reflecting higher royalty revenue and
slightly higher franchise fee revenue. The increase in royalty revenue resulted
from an average net increase of 70, or 2.3%, franchised restaurants and a 2.0%
increase in same-store sales of franchised restaurants.
Investment Income, Net
Investment income, net increased $7.0 million, or 71.4%, to $16.9 million in
1999 from $9.9 million in 1998. This increase reflects (1) reduced provisions of
$4.7 million recognized in 1999 compared with 1998 for unrealized losses on
short-term investments and other investments deemed to be other than temporary,
(2) a $2.7 million increase in 1999 in interest income on cash equivalents and
short-term investments resulting from the investment of excess proceeds from the
first quarter 1999 debt refinancing discussed above under 'Interest Expense' in
the comparison of the years 2000 and 1999 and (3) a $1.6 million increase in
equity in earnings of investment limited partnerships and similar investment
entities accounted for under the equity method. Such increases were partially
offset by $2.0 million of lower net recognized gains, realized or unrealized as
applicable, on our investments to $6.8 million in 1999.
24
Gain on Sale of Business
The gain on sale of business of $1.2 million in 1999 was recognized from the
reduction in our ownership of MCM, as previously discussed in the comparison of
the years 2000 and 1999.
Other Income, Net
Other income, net increased $1.8 million, or 175.4%, to $2.8 million in 1999
from $1.0 million in 1998 primarily due to $1.3 million of interest income in
1999 from the receipt of interest income relating to both income tax refunds and
casualty insurance collateral. There was no comparable interest income
recognized in 1998 due to the timing of the income tax refunds and the
uncertainty of the realization of interest income on the casualty insurance
collateral.
General and Administrative
Our general and administrative expenses increased $5.5 million, or 8.7%, to
$68.5 million in 1999 from $63.0 million in 1998. This increase principally
reflects (1) expenses of $6.7 million in 1999 related to new executive salary
arrangements and an executive bonus plan effective May 3, 1999 and (2) other
increases in compensation and benefit costs, all partially offset by
non-recurring provisions in 1998 of (1) $2.5 million relating to legal
settlements consisting of (a) the then anticipated settlement of a lawsuit with
Arby's Mexican master franchisee which was ultimately settled in October 1999
and (b) the settlement of a lawsuit with ZuZu, Inc., a former affiliate with
which we were developing dual-branding strategies and (2) $1.5 million for a
severance arrangement under the last of our 1993 employment agreements.
Depreciation and Amortization, Excluding Amortization of Deferred Financing
Costs
Our depreciation and amortization, excluding amortization of deferred
financing costs, increased $0.5 million, or 10.3%, to $5.4 million in 1999 from
$4.9 million in 1998 principally due to $1.1 million of amortization of
leasehold improvements made during 1999 to a corporate airplane which was leased
from an affiliate partially offset by (1) a $0.5 million decrease in
amortization of below market stock options due to a portion of those options
becoming fully vested in the first quarter of 1999 and (2) non-recurring 1998
amortization of $0.3 million of certain franchise rights and a non-compete
agreement of the restaurant franchising business becoming fully amortized in
1998.
Capital Structure Reorganization Related Charge
The capital structure reorganization related charge of $2.1 million in 1999
related to equitable adjustments that were made in 1999 to the terms of then
outstanding options under a stock option plan of Snapple Beverage Group to the
extent the option holders were employees of Triarc, as previously discussed in
more detail in the comparison of the years 2000 and 1999. The initial charge
relating to the cash payment portion of these equitable adjustments was recorded
in the 1999 first quarter and, therefore, the charge of $2.1 million for all of
1999 includes the portion of the aggregate cash which was due from us to the
extent of the vesting of the stock options through January 2, 2000. There was no
similar charge in 1998 since the equitable adjustments did not occur until the
first quarter of 1999.
Interest Expense
Interest expense decreased $11.7 million, or 90.3%, to $1.3 million in 1999
from $13.0 million in 1998 principally due to (1) a $5.8 million decrease in
interest to $1.4 million in 1999 and a $2.0 million decrease in amortization of
deferred financing costs resulting from the first quarter 1999 repayment of
$275.0 million of RC/Arby's 9 3/4% notes and (2) the reversal in 1999 of $3.1
million of interest accruals relating to income tax matters, as previously
discussed in the comparison of the years 2000 and 1999, compared with a
provision for interest relating to income tax matters of $2.0 million in 1998.
These decreases were partially offset by $1.4 million of 1999 interest expense
on the $300.0 million of 10 1/4% notes which was allocated to our restaurant
franchising business. Interest expense on the RC/Arby's 9 3/4% notes reported in
continuing operations consists of the portion relating to Arby's and RC/Arby's.
The RC/Arby's 9 3/4% notes were repaid in the first quarter of 1999 in
connection with a debt refinancing as previously discussed in the comparison of
the years 2000 and
25
1999. As a result of the debt refinancing, the decrease in interest expense from
continuing operations was more than offset by an increase in interest expense
included in discontinued operations. See below under the discussion of
'Discontinued Operations.'
Provision for Income Taxes
The provision for income taxes represented effective rates of 29% for 1999
and 60% for 1998. The effective rate is lower in the 1999 period principally due
to (1) the 1999 release of excess income tax reserves as a result of the
settlement of Internal Revenue Service examinations of our tax returns for
fiscal 1989 to 1992 and the tentative completion of Internal Revenue Service
examinations of our tax returns for fiscal 1993 and the eight-month transition
period ended December 31, 1993 and (2) higher state income taxes in 1998,
despite lower pretax income, due to the effect in 1998 of the sale of the
propane business.
Discontinued Operations
Income from discontinued operations was $4.5 million in 1999 compared with
$11.4 million in 1998. Such income from discontinued operations includes income
(loss) from operations of the discontinued businesses and the gain on disposal
of the discontinued businesses. The income (loss) from operations component
decreased $18.0 million to a loss of $10.6 million in 1999 from income of $7.4
million in 1998. The gain on disposal component increased $11.1 million to $15.1
million in 1999 from $4.0 million in 1998.
The decrease in the income (loss) from operations of the discontinued
businesses of $18.0 million was due to a $20.0 million decline in net income of
our discontinued beverage businesses partially offset by a $2.0 million decrease
in the after-tax equity in the loss from discontinued operations of the former
propane business. See below for a discussion of the operating results of the
discontinued beverage businesses.
The gain on disposal of discontinued businesses of $15.1 million in 1999
results from (1) the $12.4 million gain relating to the sale of our propane
business consisting of (a) an $11.2 million gain from the July 1999 sale of
41.7% of our then remaining 42.7% interest in National Propane Partners and
(b) the recognition in 1999 of $1.2 million of previously deferred gains from
the 1996 sale of 57.3% of our interest in National Propane Partners and (2) a
$2.7 million reduction of previously recognized estimated disposal losses
related to certain discontinued operations of SEPSCO, LLC. The gain on disposal
of discontinued businesses of $4.0 million in 1998 results from (1) a $2.6
million reduction of previously recognized estimated disposal losses related to
certain discontinued operations of SEPSCO, LLC and (2) the recognition in 1998
of $1.4 million of previously deferred gains from the 1996 sale of 57.3% of our
interest in National Propane Partners. The $2.7 million adjustment relating to
SEPSCO in 1999 was discussed in the comparison of the years 2000 and 1999. The
$2.6 million adjustment relating to SEPSCO in 1998 resulted from the collection
of a note receivable not previously recognized.
Revenues and other earnings of the beverage businesses increased $30.7
million, or 4.1%, to $775.0 million in 1999 from $744.3 in 1998 reflecting an
increase of $34.7 million, or 5.6%, for the premium beverage business partially
offset by a $4.0 million, or 3.1%, decrease for the soft drink concentrate
business. The $34.7 million increase for the premium beverage business was
principally due to higher sales of finished product of $39.5 million partially
offset by the absence in 1999 of a non-recurring $4.7 million gain in 1998 from
the sale of our 20% interest in Select Beverages, Inc. The increase in sales
reflects higher volume and, to a lesser extent, higher average selling prices in
1999. The increase in volume principally reflects (1) 1999 sales of Snapple
Elements'TM', (2) increased cases sold to retailers through a premium beverage
distributor principally reflecting the effect of an increased focus on our
products as a result of our ownership of this distributor since February 25,
1999, (3) higher sales of diet teas and other diet beverages and juice drinks
and (4) higher sales of Stewart's products as a result of increased distribution
in existing and new markets and the December 1998 introduction of Stewart's
grape soda. The higher average selling prices principally reflect (1) the effect
of the acquisition of a premium beverage distributor since February 25, 1999
whereby we sold product at higher prices directly to retailers compared with
sales at lower prices to an independent distributor and (2) selective price
increases. The $4.0 million decrease for the soft drink concentrate business was
principally attributable to lower sales of (1) concentrate of $2.4 million, or
1.9%, and (2) finished goods of $1.4 million, or 100%, which the soft drink
concentrate business no longer sold in 1999. The decrease in Royal Crown sales
of concentrate reflects a $7.8 million decline in branded sales, primarily due
to lower domestic volume reflecting continued
26
competitive pricing pressures experienced by our bottlers, and lower
international volume primarily due to the continued depressed economic
conditions experienced in Russia which commenced in August of 1998, partially
offset by a $5.4 million volume increase in private label sales reflecting a
general business recovery experienced by our private label customer.
Pretax income (loss) of the beverage businesses declined $27.3 million to a
loss of $3.2 million in 1999 from income of $24.1 million in 1998. This $27.3
million was principally due to a $58.0 million increase in costs and expenses of
the beverage businesses partially offset by the $30.7 million increase in their
revenues and other earnings. The $58.0 million increase in costs and expenses of
the beverage businesses was due to (1) a $28.1 million increase in interest
expense principally as a result of higher average levels of debt in 1999 due to
a refinancing in the first quarter of 1999 discussed under 'Interest Expense' in
the comparison of the years 2000 and 1999 and, to a lesser extent, higher
average interest rates, (2) a $3.3 million capital structure reorganization
charge recognized by Snapple Beverage Group, comparable to the related charge
recognized by Triarc which is explained in detail under 'Capital Structure
Reorganization Related Charge' in the comparison of the years 2000 and 1999, and
(3) a $26.6 million increase in operating costs and expenses approximately
proportionate to the increase in revenues and other earnings.
The beverage businesses had a provision for income taxes despite a loss
before income taxes for 1999 and an effective income tax rate in 1998, of 54%,
which was higher than the 35% United States Federal Statutory rate, principally
due to (1) the amortization of non-deductible Goodwill and (2) the differing
impact of the mix of pretax loss or income among the combined entities since we
file state income tax returns on an individual company basis.
Extraordinary Charges
The extraordinary charges of $12.1 million in 1999 resulted from the early
extinguishment of borrowings under a prior credit facility of Snapple Beverage
Group and the RC/Arby's 9 3/4% notes, as explained in more detail in the
comparison of the years 2000 and 1999.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Snapple Beverage Sale
On October 25, 2000, we completed the Snapple Beverage Sale for cash of
$896.2 million, subject to any additional post-closing adjustment, and the
assumption by the purchaser of $425.1 million of debt and related accrued
interest. The assumed debt and accrued interest consisted of (1) $300.0 million
of 10 1/4% senior subordinated notes due 2009 co-issued by Triarc Consumer
Products Group and its then subsidiary, Snapple Beverage Group, (2) $119.1
million, net of unamortized original issue discount of $240.9 million, of
Triarc's zero coupon convertible subordinated debentures due 2018 and (3) $6.0
million of accrued interest. In connection with the closing of the Snapple
Beverage Sale, we repaid (1) principal of $436.4 million, (2) accrued interest
of $1.1 million, (3) related prepayment penalties of $5.5 million and (4) fees
of $0.1 million under a senior bank credit facility maintained by Snapple,
Mistic, Stewart's, Royal Crown and RC/Arby's.
As of December 31, 2000, we have $672.1 million of cash, cash equivalents
and investments, net of current cash tax liabilities related to the Snapple
Beverage Sale. We are presently evaluating our options for the use of our
significant cash and investment position, including business acquisitions,
repurchases of Triarc common shares (see 'Treasury Stock Purchases' below) and
investments.
This discussion of liquidity and capital resources reflects only our
continuing operations and excludes any effect of our premium beverage and soft
drink concentrate businesses prior to their sale on October 25, 2000 and the
long-term debt assumed by the purchaser or repaid in connection with the sale of
the beverage businesses.
Cash Flows From Continuing Operations
Our consolidated operating activities from continuing operations provided
cash and cash equivalents, which we refer to in this discussion as cash, of
$49.3 million during 2000 reflecting (1) non-cash charges of $43.6 million,
principally capital market transaction related compensation, a deferred income
tax provision and depreciation and amortization, (2) the tax benefit from the
early extinguishment of debt of $12.4 million,
27
(3) the reclassification of $10.4 million to financing activities representing
the compensation expense from repurchases of common stock issued upon exercise
of stock options and (4) cash provided by changes in operating assets and
liabilities of $3.7 million. These sources were partially offset by (1) the loss
from continuing operations of $10.2 million, (2) prepayment penalties and fees
of $5.5 million associated with the early extinguishment of debt and
(3) operating investment adjustments of $5.1 million.
The cash provided by changes in operating assets and liabilities of $3.7
million reflects an increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses of $6.4
million partially offset by an increase in receivables of $2.7 million. The
increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses is primarily due to the
existence as of December 31, 2000 of a $7.4 million payable for common shares
repurchased from two of our officers on December 29, 2000 which were not settled
until January 2, and 3, 2001. There was no similar payable as of January 2,
2000. The increase in accounts receivable was primarily due to a $2.2 million
increase in accrued interest receivable principally on our higher level of cash
equivalents.
We expect continued positive cash flows from operations during 2001.
Working Capital and Capitalization
Working capital, which equals current assets less current liabilities, was
$596.3 million at December 31, 2000, reflecting a current ratio, which equals
current assets divided by current liabilities, of 2.8:1. Working capital
increased $355.9 million from $240.4 million at January 2, 2000 principally due
to (1) net cash provided by discontinued operations of $401.5 million primarily
from the Snapple Beverage Sale, (2) net proceeds of $246.9 million from the
issuance of $290.0 million principal amount of insured securitization notes
described below and (3) working capital generated by continuing operations
partially offset by (1) a current income tax liability of $235.5 million from
the Snapple Beverage Sale, (2) the repurchase of $42.3 million of our Class B
common stock discussed below under 'Treasury Stock Purchases,' and (3) cash
capital expenditures of $12.0 million.
Our total capitalization at December 31, 2000 was $634.8 million consisting
of stockholders' equity of $282.3 million, $308.7 million of long-term debt,
including current portion, and a $43.8 million forward purchase obligation for
common stock discussed below under 'Treasury Stock Purchases.' Our total
capitalization increased $709.0 million from a net deficit of $74.2 million at
January 2, 2000 principally due to (1) net income of $441.2 million, (2) the
issuance of the $290.0 million of securitization notes described below and
(3) the assumption of $18.0 million of indebtedness in connection with the
acquisition of 280 Holdings also discussed below under 'Capital Expenditures,'
all partially offset by the repurchase of $42.3 million of our Class B common
stock discussed below.
Securitization Notes
On November 21, 2000 we issued $290.0 million principal amount of 7.44%
insured non-recourse securitization notes through Arby's Franchise Trust, a
special purpose financing vehicle, pursuant to Rule 144A of the Securities Act
of 1933, as amended. We received net proceeds of $246.9 million, which is net of
$30.7 million of proceeds held in a reserve account and $12.4 million of
estimated fees and expenses. The net proceeds increased our position in cash
equivalents. The subsequent uses of such proceeds may include business
acquisitions, repurchases of Triarc common shares and investments.
The remaining principal of the securitization notes of $288.7 million as of
December 31, 2000 is due no later than December 2020. However, based on current
projections and assuming the adequacy of available funds, as defined, we
currently estimate that we will repay $14.8 million in 2001 with increasing
annual payments to $37.4 million in 2011 in accordance with a targeted principal
payment schedule. Available funds to Arby's Franchise Trust to pay principal on
the securitization notes are franchisee fees, royalties and other payments
received by Arby's Franchise Trust after October 31, 2000 under the franchising
agreements after (1) operating expenses of Arby's Franchise Trust,
(2) servicing fees payable to Arby's and one of its subsidiaries to cover the
costs of administering the franchise license agreements, (3) insurance premiums
related to insuring the payment of principal and interest on the securitization
notes and (4) interest on the securitization notes have been paid. Any remaining
cash through January 31, 2001 is available for distribution by Arby's Franchise
Trust to its parent and thereafter is available for distribution as long as
Arby's Franchise Trust meets the minimum debt service coverage ratio, as defined
under the indenture for the securitization notes. That
28
requirement is initially 1.2:1 subject to increases to a maximum of 1.7:1.
Effective March 1, 2001 the securitization notes are subject to mandatory
redemption if the Arby's Franchise Trust debt service coverage ratio is less
than 1.2:1, until such time as the ratio exceeds 1.2:1 for six consecutive
months. The debt service coverage ratio is based on the preceding four calendar
months of activity and was 1.5:1 for the four months ended February 28, 2001.
The securitization notes are redeemable by us at an amount equal to remaining
principal, accrued interest and the excess, if any, of the discounted value of
remaining principal and interest payments over the principal amount of the
securitization notes.
Obligations under the securitization notes are insured by a financial
guarantee company and are collateralized by cash, including a cash reserve
account of $30.7 million as of December 31, 2000, and royalty receivables of
Arby's Franchise Trust, with a total book value of $45.7 million as of
December 31, 2000.
The indenture for the securitization notes contains various covenants which
(1) require periodic financial reporting, (2) require meeting the debt service
coverage ratio test and (3) restrict, among other matters, (a) the incurrence of
indebtedness, (b) asset dispositions and (c) the payment of distributions. As
of December 31, 2000 Arby's Franchise Trust had $0.6 million available for the
payment of distributions to Triarc through its parent. We were in compliance
with all of such covenants as of December 31, 2000.
Other Long-Term Debt
We have an 8.95% secured promissory note payable over seven years in an
outstanding principal amount of $16.6 million as of December 31, 2000 of which
$1.6 million is due during 2001. This note was assumed during the first quarter
of 2000 in connection with the acquisition of 280 Holdings described below under
'Capital Expenditures.'
Our total scheduled long-term debt repayments during 2001 are $17.0 million
consisting principally of the $14.8 million due under the securitization notes
and the $1.6 million due on the 8.95% secured promissory note.
Guarantees and Commitments
On July 19, 1999 we sold through our wholly-owned subsidiary, National
Propane Corporation, 41.7% of our remaining 42.7% interest in our former propane
business retaining a 1% special limited partner interest in National Propane,
L.P. National Propane Corporation, whose principal asset following the sale of
the propane business is a $30.0 million intercompany note receivable from
Triarc, agreed that while it remains a special limited partner of National
Propane, L.P., it would indemnify the purchaser of National Propane, L.P. for
any payments the purchaser makes related to the purchaser's obligations under
certain of the debt of National Propane, L.P., aggregating approximately $138.0
million as of December 31, 2000, if National Propane, L.P. is unable to repay or
refinance such debt, but only after recourse by the purchaser to the assets of
National Propane, L.P. Under the purchase agreement, either the purchaser or
National Propane Corporation may require National Propane, L.P. to repurchase
the 1% special limited partner interest. We believe that it is unlikely that we
will be called upon to make any payments under this indemnity.
Arby's, Inc., a subsidiary of RC/Arby's, sold all of its company-owned
restaurants in 1997. Arby's remains contingently responsible for operating and
capitalized lease payments, if the purchaser of the Arby's restaurants does not
make the required lease payments, assumed by the purchaser in connection with
the restaurants' sale, of approximately $81.0 million as of December 31, 2000,
assuming the purchaser of the Arby's restaurants has made all scheduled payments
through that date. Triarc has guaranteed mortgage and equipment notes payable to
FFCA Mortgage Corporation assumed by the purchaser in connection with the
restaurants' sale of approximately $47.0 million as of December 31, 2000,
assuming the purchaser of the Arby's restaurants has made all scheduled
repayments through that date. In addition, a subsidiary of ours is a co-obligor
with the purchaser of the Arby's restaurants and Triarc is a guarantor under
certain mortgage and equipment notes, the repayments of which are being made by
the purchaser, with a total principal amount of $0.5 million as of December 31,
2000.
On January 12, 2000 we entered into an agreement to guarantee $10.0 million
principal amount of senior notes issued by MCM Capital Group, Inc., a 12.2%
equity investee of ours, to a major financial institution. In consideration for
the guarantee, we received a fee of $0.2 million and warrants to purchase
100,000 shares of MCM Capital Group common stock at $.01 per share with an
estimated fair value on the date of grant of $0.3
29
million. The $10.0 million guaranteed amount has been reduced to $6.7 million as
of December 31, 2000 and will be further reduced by (1) any repayments of the
notes, (2) any purchases of the notes by us and (3) the amount of certain
investment banking or financial advisory services fees paid to the financial
institution or its affiliates or, under certain circumstances, other financial
institutions by us, MCM Capital Group or another significant stockholder of MCM
Capital Group or any of their affiliates. Certain of our officers, including
entities controlled by them, collectively owned approximately 15.7% of MCM
Capital Group as of its July 14, 1999 initial public stock offering and certain
of these officers have made additional open market purchases. These officers are
not parties to this note guaranty and could indirectly benefit from it.
In addition to the note guaranty, we and certain other stockholders of MCM
Capital Group, including our officers referred to above, on a joint and several
basis, have entered into agreements to guarantee up to $15.0 million of
revolving credit borrowings of a subsidiary of MCM Capital Group, of which we
would be responsible for approximately $1.8 million assuming the full $15.0
million was borrowed and all of the parties to the guaranties of the revolving
credit borrowings and certain related agreements fully perform thereunder. As of
December 31, 2000 MCM Capital Group had $12.9 million of outstanding revolving
credit borrowings. At December 31, 2000 we had placed $15.0 million of highly
liquid United States government debt securities in a custodian account at the
financial institution referred to in the preceding paragraph. Such securities
under the guaranties of the revolving credit borrowings are subject to set off
under certain circumstances if the parties to these guaranties of the revolving
credit borrowings and related agreements fail to perform their obligations
thereunder. MCM Capital Group has encountered cash flow and liquidity
difficulties. We currently believe that it is possible, but not probable, that
we will be required to make payments under the note guaranty and/or the bank
guaranties.
In addition to the guarantees described above, we and the officers who
invested in MCM Capital Group and certain of its other stockholders, through a
newly formed limited liability company, CTW Funding, LLC, made available to MCM
Capital Group a $2.0 million revolving credit facility which presently extends
through June 30, 2001 to meet working capital requirements. We own an 8.7%
interest in CTW Funding and should any borrowings under this revolving credit
facility occur all members of CTW Funding are required to fund the borrowings in
accordance with their percentage interests. In return CTW Funding has
cumulatively received warrants to purchase 150,000 shares of MCM common stock at
$.01 per share. The revolving credit facility may be renewed quarterly
thereafter through December 31, 2001 by MCM Capital Group for additional
warrants to purchase 50,000 shares of its common stock at $.01 per share. Any
borrowings under the MCM Revolver bear interest at 12% and are due on
December 31, 2001; however through March 26, 2001 there have been no borrowings
under this revolving credit facility.
Capital Expenditures
Cash capital expenditures amounted to $12.0 million during 2000. On
January 19, 2000, we acquired 280 Holdings, the entity which owns the airplane
that we had previously leased from Triangle Aircraft Services through
January 19, 2000, for $27.2 million. The purchase price consisted of (1) cash of
$9.2 million, included in the $12.0 million of cash capital expenditures
referred to above, and (2) the assumption of the 8.95% secured promissory note
payable with a principal amount of $18.0 million at the time we acquired 280
Holdings. The purchase price was based on independent appraisals and was
approved by our Audit Committee and Board of Directors.
We expect that cash capital expenditures will approximate $1.5 million for
2001 for which there were $0.4 million of outstanding commitments as of
December 31, 2000.
Income Taxes
The Internal Revenue Service has completed its examination of our Federal
income tax returns for the fiscal year ended April 30, 1993 and the eight-month
transition period ended December 31, 1993. In connection with this examination,
our net operating loss carryforwards subsequently utilized in 2000 were
increased by $7.5 million and we were entitled to a refund of $2.7 million. The
IRS paid $1.5 million to us in July 2000 and offset the remaining $1.2 million
against amounts otherwise due the IRS from audits of years ending prior to
April 30, 1993. We had settled the final income tax liabilities resulting from
the IRS examination of our income tax returns for the tax years from 1989 to
1992 during 1999. During 2000 we paid
30
$1.0 million of interest accrued in prior years in connection with the
finalization of the interest computation by the IRS for the 1989 to 1992
examinations.
In March 2001 we paid $235.3 million of estimated income taxes principally
related to the Snapple Beverage Sale and expect to pay an additional $4.0
million in April 2001.
In connection with the Snapple Beverage Sale, we have entered into a related
tax agreement with the purchaser whereby both we and the purchaser intend to
jointly elect to treat certain portions of the transaction as an asset sale in
lieu of a stock sale under the provisions of section 338 (h)(10) of the United
States Internal Revenue Code. Assuming this election is executed by both parties
to the agreement, we will be reimbursed $200.0 million by the purchaser for the
estimated additional income taxes expected to be incurred by us as a result of
this election. This amount has not been reflected in the accompanying
consolidated financial statements since we will recover the additional income
taxes from the purchaser. Should either we or the purchaser default on this tax
agreement and not make the election, the defaulting party would owe $30.0
million to the other party.
Treasury Stock Purchases
Our management has been authorized, when and if market conditions warrant,
to repurchase up to $80.0 million of our Class A common stock under a $30.0
million stock repurchase program that ends on May 25, 2001 and a $50.0 million
stock repurchase program that ends on January 18, 2002. Under the $30.0 million
stock repurchase program, we repurchased 1,045,834 shares for a total cost of
$25.9 million during 2000 and an additional 150,600 shares for a total cost of
$3.7 million subsequent thereto through March 26, 2001. Through March 26, 2001
we have not repurchased any shares under the $50.0 million stock repurchase
program. We cannot assure you that we will repurchase any additional shares
under the remaining $50.4 million authorized under these stock repurchase
programs.
Pursuant to a contract entered into in August 1999, on August 10, 2000 we
repurchased an aggregate of 1,999,207 shares of our Class B common stock held by
affiliates of Victor Posner, our former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer,
for $42.3 million. Under the contract, a remaining purchase of 1,999,207 shares
is to occur on or before August 19, 2001 for $43.8 million. The August 10, 2000
payment and the remaining payment are at negotiated fixed prices of $21.18 and
$21.93 per share, respectively, based on the fair market value of our Class A
common stock at the time the transaction was negotiated.
Cash Requirements
As of December 31, 2000, our consolidated cash requirements for 2001,
exclusive of operating cash flow requirements, consist principally of (1) the
payment of $239.3 million of estimated income taxes principally in connection
with the Snapple Beverage Sale, (2) a payment of $43.8 million for the
repurchase of 1,999,207 shares of our Class B common stock from affiliates of
Victor Posner, (3) payments of $3.7 million through March 26, 2001 and up to
$50.4 million of additional payments, if any, for repurchases of our Class A
common stock for treasury under our existing stock repurchase programs,
(4) scheduled debt principal repayments aggregating $17.0 million, (5) capital
expenditures of approximately $1.5 million and (6) the cost of business
acquisitions, if any. We anticipate meeting all of these requirements through
(1) an aggregate $896.0 million of existing cash and cash equivalents and
short-term investments, net of $14.1 million of obligations for short-term
investments sold but not yet purchased included in 'Accrued expenses' in our
accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2000, and (2) cash
flows from operations.
LEGAL MATTERS
In October 1998 we received a going-private proposal from our Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer and President and Chief Operating Officer for the
acquisition by an entity to be formed by them of all of the outstanding shares
of our common stock, other than those owned by an affiliate controlled by them.
Subsequently, a series of purported class action lawsuits on behalf of
stockholders were filed challenging the proposed transaction. Each of the
pending lawsuits names us and the members of our Board of Directors as
defendants. The complaints allege, among other things, that the proposed
transaction would constitute a breach of the directors' fiduciary duties and
that the proposed consideration to be paid for the shares of our Class A common
stock is unfair and demand, in addition to damages and costs, that the proposed
transaction be
31
enjoined. In March 1999, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and President
and Chief Operating Officer withdrew their proposal and we commenced a tender
offer to acquire up to 5.5 million shares of our common stock. On March 26,
1999, certain plaintiffs in the actions challenging the proposed transaction
filed an amended complaint alleging that the defendants violated fiduciary
duties by failing to disclose, in connection with the tender offer, that a
special committee formed by our Board of Directors to evaluate the proposal had
allegedly determined that the proposal was unfair. The tender offer was
completed in April 1999. The amended complaint seeks, among other items, damages
in an unspecified amount. In October 2000 the parties agreed to stay this action
pending the determination of the March 23, 1999 action described immediately
below.
On March 23, 1999, an alleged stockholder filed a complaint on behalf of
persons who held our Class A common stock as of March 10, 1999 which alleges
that our statement related to the tender offer described above filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission was false and misleading and seeks damages in
an unspecified amount, together with prejudgment interest, the costs of suit,
including attorneys' fees, and unspecified other relief. The complaint names us
and our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and President and Chief Operating
Officer as defendants. In June 1999 we and those officers moved to dismiss the
complaint or alternatively stay the action. In March 2000, the court denied the
motion for a stay and granted in part and denied in part the motion to dismiss.
In April 2000 an amended complaint was filed alleging the matters in the
original complaint and seeking an order to permit all shareholders who tendered
their shares of our common stock in the tender offer to rescind the transaction.
In May 2000 the defendants filed an answer to the amended complaint. Discovery
has commenced in the action.
On June 25, 1997 a class action lawsuit was filed which asserted, among
other things, claims relating to certain awards of compensation to our Chairman
and Chief Executive Officer and President and Chief Operating Officer in 1994
through 1997. In August 2000 the parties to the lawsuit entered into a
settlement agreement whereby, (1) the case would be dismissed with prejudice,
(2) we would receive a three-year note receivable from those officers in the
aggregate amount of $5.0 million receivable in three equal installments due
March 31, 2001, 2002 and 2003 and (3) those officers would surrender an
aggregate of 775,000 stock options awarded to them in 1994. On January 30, 2001,
the court entered an order and final judgment approving the settlement in full,
which became effective March 1, 2001. We will record pretax income of $5.0
million in the first quarter of our 2001 fiscal year for the note receivable
from those officers.
In addition to the shareholder lawsuits described above, we are involved in
other litigation and claims incidental to our businesses. We have reserves for
all of such legal matters aggregating $1.7 million as of December 31, 2000.
Although the outcome of such matters cannot be predicted with certainty and some
of these may be disposed of unfavorably to us, based on currently available
information and given our aforementioned reserves, we do not believe that such
legal matters will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial
position or results of operations.
INFLATION AND CHANGING PRICES
Management believes that inflation did not have a significant effect on our
consolidated results of operations during 1998, 1999 and 2000, since inflation
rates generally remained at relatively low levels. The impact of any future
inflation in our restaurant franchising business should be limited since our
restaurant operations are exclusively franchising.
SEASONALITY
Our continuing operations are not significantly impacted by seasonality,
however our restaurant franchising royalty revenues are somewhat higher in our
fourth quarter and somewhat lower in our first quarter.
RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In June 1998 the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 133 'Accounting for Derivative Instruments
and Hedging Activities.' Statement 133, as amended by Statements of Financial
Accounting Standards Nos. 137 and 138, provides a comprehensive standard for the
recognition and measurement of derivatives and hedging activities. The standard
requires derivatives be recorded on the balance sheet at fair value and
establishes more restrictive criteria for hedge accounting. Statement 133, as
amended, is effective for our fiscal year beginning January 1, 2001. The only
32
derivatives we presently have are (1) the conversion component of our short-term
investments in convertible debt securities, (2) a written call option on our
common stock with physical settlement with respect to the conversion component
of the zero coupon convertible subordinated debentures assumed by the purchaser
in connection with the Snapple Beverage Sale and (3) a forward purchase
obligation for our common stock. In addition, we enter into put and call options
on equity and debt securities, although we did not have any at December 31,
2000. Since the derivatives in our common stock are excluded from the
derivatives within the scope of Statement 133 and since all of these other
derivatives are currently carried at fair value with the corresponding changes
recorded in results of operations, the accounting for them would not be impacted
by Statement 133. As such, the requirement to state the conversion component of
our investments in convertible bonds and the put and call options at fair value
should have no impact on our consolidated financial position or results of
operations. We historically have not had transactions to which hedge accounting
applied and, accordingly, the more restrictive criteria for hedge accounting in
Statement 133 should have no effect on our consolidated financial position or
results of operations.
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
We are exposed to the impact of interest rate changes, changes in the market
value of our investments and foreign currency fluctuations.
Policies and procedures -- In the normal course of business, we employ
established policies and procedures to manage our exposure to changes in
interest rates, changes in the market value of our investments and fluctuations
in the value of foreign currencies using financial instruments we deem
appropriate.
Interest Rate Risk
Our objective in managing our exposure to interest rate changes is to limit
the impact of interest rate changes on earnings and cash flows. Our debt as of
December 31, 2000 aggregated $308.7 million and consisted entirely of fixed-rate
debt. In connection with the Snapple Beverage Sale on October 25, 2000, $855.6
million of our long-term debt was repaid or assumed by the Purchaser and as of
January 2, 2000 the outstanding balance of this debt was included as a component
of 'Net non-current liabilities of discontinued operations' or 'Net current
assets of discontinued operations,' as appropriate, in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheet. Prior to the Snapple Beverage Sale, we assessed the
relative proportions of our debt under fixed versus variable rates to achieve
our objectives. We generally used interest rate caps on a portion of our
variable-rate debt to limit our exposure to increases in short-term interest
rates. These cap agreements usually were at significantly higher than market
interest rates prevailing at the time the cap agreements were entered into and
were intended to protect against very significant increases in short-term
interest rates. At January 2, 2000 we had one interest rate cap agreement
relating to interest on $235.0 million of our aggregate $470.1 million of
variable-rate term loans under our former senior bank credit facility which
provided for a cap which was approximately 2% higher than the prevailing
interest rate at January 2, 2000. All of our variable-rate debt under our former
senior bank credit facility was included in the debt repaid as a result of the
Snapple Beverage Sale. Accordingly, at December 31, 2000 we have no interest
rate cap agreements outstanding. In addition to our fixed-rate and variable-rate
debt, our investment portfolio includes debt securities that are subject to
interest rate risk reflecting the portfolio's maturities between six months and
eighteen years. The fair market value of all of our investments in debt
securities will decline in value if interest rates increase.
Equity Market Risk
Our objective in managing our exposure to changes in the market value of our
investments is also to balance the risk of the impact of such changes on
earnings and cash flows with our expectations for long-term investment returns.
Our primary exposure to equity price risk relates to our investments in equity
securities, equity derivatives, securities sold but not yet purchased and
investment limited partnerships and similar investment entities. We have
established policies and procedures governing the type and relative magnitude of
investments which we can make. We have a management investment committee whose
duty it is to oversee our continuing compliance with the restrictions embodied
in our policies.
33
Foreign Currency Risk
Our objective in managing our exposure to foreign currency fluctuations is
also to limit the impact of such fluctuations on earnings and cash flows. Our
primary exposure to foreign currency risk relates to our investments in certain
investment limited partnerships and similar investment entities that hold
foreign securities, including those of entities based in emerging market
countries and other countries which experience volatility in their capital and
lending markets. To a more limited extent, we have foreign currency exposure
when our investment managers buy or sell foreign currencies or financial
instruments denominated in foreign currencies for our account or the accounts of
investment limited partnerships and similar investment entities in which we have
invested. We monitor these exposures and periodically determine our need for use
of strategies intended to lessen or limit our exposure to these fluctuations. We
also have a relatively limited amount of exposure to (1) investments in foreign
subsidiaries and (2) export revenues and related receivables denominated in
foreign currencies which are subject to foreign currency fluctuations. Our
primary export revenue exposures relate to royalties in Canada and, prior to the
Snapple Beverage Sale, related to sales in Canada, the Caribbean and Europe. As
a result of the Snapple Beverage Sale, a portion of such foreign operations and
such export sales are included as a component of 'Income from discontinued
operations' in the accompanying consolidated income statements. Foreign
operations and foreign export revenues of continuing operations for each of the
years ended January 2, 2000 and December 31, 2000 represented only 4% of our
total revenues, and an immediate 10% change in foreign currency exchange rates
versus the United States dollar from their levels at January 2, 2000 and
December 31, 2000 would not have had a material effect on our consolidated
financial position or results of operations.
Overall Market Risk
With regard to overall market risk, we attempt to mitigate our exposure to
such risks by assessing the relative proportion of our investments in cash and
cash equivalents and the relatively stable and risk-minimized returns available
on such investments. We periodically interview asset managers to ascertain the
investment objectives of such managers and invest amounts with selected managers
in order to avail ourselves of higher but more risk inherent returns from the
selected investment strategies of these managers. We seek to identify
alternative investment strategies also seeking higher returns with attendant
increased risk profiles for a portion of our investment portfolio. We
periodically review the returns from each of our investments and may maintain,
liquidate or increase selected investments based on this review of past returns
and prospects for future returns.
We maintain investment portfolio holdings of various issuers, types and
maturities. As of January 2, 2000 and December 31, 2000, such investments
consisted of the following (in thousands):
YEAR-END
-------------------
1999 2000
---- ----
Cash equivalents included in 'Cash and cash equivalents' on
our consolidated balance sheets........................... $125,576 $575,117
Short-term investments...................................... 151,634 314,017
Restricted cash equivalents................................. 1,939 32,684
Non-current investments..................................... 14,155 11,595
-------- --------
$293,304 $933,413
-------- --------
-------- --------
34
At January 2, 2000 such investments are classified in the following general
types or categories:
INVESTMENTS AT
INVESTMENTS FAIR VALUE OR CARRYING
TYPE AT COST EQUITY VALUE PERCENTAGE
---- ------- ------ ----- ----------
(IN THOUSANDS)
Cash equivalents.................... $125,576 $125,576 $125,576 43%
Restricted cash equivalents......... 1,939 1,939 1,939 1%
Company-owned securities accounted
for as:
Trading securities.............. 23,942 28,767 28,767 10%
Available-for-sale securities... 48,147 49,504 49,504 17%
Investments in investment limited
partnerships and similar
investment entities accounted for
at:
Cost............................ 47,211 51,864 47,211 16%
Equity.......................... 18,740 29,649 29,649 10%
Other non-current investments
accounted for at:
Cost............................ 4,550 4,550 4,550 1%
Equity.......................... 5,313 6,108 6,108 2%
-------- -------- -------- ----
Total cash equivalents and long
investment positions.............. $275,418 $297,957 $293,304 100%
-------- -------- -------- ----
-------- -------- -------- ----
Securities sold with an obligation
for us to purchase accounted for
as trading securities............. $(16,236) $(21,138) $(21,138) N/A
-------- -------- -------- ----
-------- -------- -------- ----
At December 31, 2000 such investments are classified in the following
general types or categories:
INVESTMENTS AT
INVESTMENTS FAIR VALUE OR CARRYING
TYPE AT COST EQUITY VALUE PERCENTAGE
---- ------- ------ ----- ----------
(IN THOUSANDS)
Cash equivalents.................... $575,117 $575,117 $575,117 62%
Restricted cash equivalents......... 32,684 32,684 32,684 3%
Company-owned securities accounted
for as:
Trading securities.............. 17,484 17,460 17,460 2%
Available-for-sale securities... 259,978 264,468 264,468 28%
Investments in investment limited
partnerships and similar
investment entities accounted for
at:
Cost............................ 34,966 43,091 34,966 4%
Equity.......................... 1,500 1,972 1,972 -- %
Other non-current investments
accounted for at:
Cost............................ 4,910 4,910 4,910 1%
Equity.......................... 3,280 1,836 1,836 -- %
-------- -------- -------- ----
Total cash equivalents and long
investment positions.............. $929,919 $941,538 $933,413 100%
-------- -------- -------- ----
-------- -------- -------- ----
Securities sold with an obligation
for us to purchase accounted for
as trading securities............. $(13,754) $(14,129) $(14,129) N/A
-------- -------- -------- ----
-------- -------- -------- ----
Our marketable securities are classified and accounted for either as
'available-for-sale' or 'trading' and are reported at fair market value with the
related net unrealized gains or losses reported as a component of other
comprehensive income, net of income taxes reported as a component of
stockholders' equity (deficit) or included as a component of net income,
respectively. Investment limited partnerships and similar investment entities
and other non-current investments in which we do not have significant influence
over the investee are accounted for at cost. Realized gains and losses on
investment limited partnerships and similar investment entities and other
non-current investments recorded at cost are reported as investment income or
loss in the period in which the securities are sold. Investment limited
partnerships and similar investment entities and other non-current investments
in which we have significant influence over the investee are accounted for in
accordance with the
35
equity method of accounting under which our results of operations include our
share of the income or loss of such investees. We review all of our investments
in which we have unrealized losses for any unrealized losses deemed to be other
than temporary. We recognize an investment loss currently for any such other
than temporary losses. The cost of such investments as reflected in the table
above represents original cost less unrealized losses that were deemed to be
other than temporary.
SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS
For purposes of this disclosure, market risk sensitive instruments are
divided into two categories: instruments entered into for trading purposes and
instruments entered into for purposes other than trading. Our measure of market
risk exposure represents an estimate of the potential change in fair value of
our financial instruments. Market risk exposure is presented for each class of
financial instruments held by us at January 2, 2000 and December 31, 2000 for
which an immediate adverse market movement represents a potential material
impact on our financial position or results of operations. We believe that the
rates of adverse market movements described below represent the hypothetical
loss to future earnings and do not represent the maximum possible loss nor any
expected actual loss, even under adverse conditions, because actual adverse
fluctuations would likely differ. In addition, since our investment portfolio is
subject to change based on our portfolio management strategy as well as in
response to changes in market conditions, these estimates are not necessarily
indicative of the actual results which may occur.
The following tables reflect the estimated effects on the market value of
our financial instruments as of January 2, 2000 and December 31, 2000 based upon
assumed immediate adverse effects as noted below.
TRADING PORTFOLIO:
YEAR-END
---------------------------------------------
1999 2000
--------------------- ---------------------
CARRYING EQUITY CARRYING EQUITY
VALUE PRICE RISK VALUE PRICE RISK
----- ---------- ----- ----------
(IN THOUSANDS)
Equity securities......................... $ 23,449 $(2,345) $ 16,290 $(1,629)
Debt securities........................... 5,318 (532) 1,170 (117)
Securities sold but not yet purchased..... (21,138) 2,114 (14,129) 1,413
The debt securities included in the trading portfolio are predominately
investments in convertible bonds which primarily trade on the conversion feature
of the securities rather than the stated interest rate and, as such, there is no
material interest rate risk since a change in interest rates of one percentage
point would not have a material impact on our consolidated financial position or
results of operations. The securities included in the trading portfolio do not
include any investments denominated in foreign currency and, accordingly, there
is no foreign currency risk.
The sensitivity analysis of financial instruments held for trading purposes
assumes an instantaneous 10% decrease in the equity markets in which we invest
from their levels at January 2, 2000 and December 31, 2000, with all other
variables held constant. For purposes of this analysis, our debt securities,
primarily convertible bonds, were assumed to primarily trade based upon the
conversion feature of the securities and be perfectly correlated with the
assumed equity index.
OTHER THAN TRADING PORTFOLIO:
YEAR-END 1999
-------------------------------------------------
CARRYING INTEREST EQUITY FOREIGN
VALUE RATE RISK PRICE RISK CURRENCY RISK
----- --------- ---------- -------------
(IN THOUSANDS)
Cash equivalents...................... $125,576 $ (155) $ -- $ --
Restricted cash equivalents........... 1,939 (2) -- --
Available-for-sale equity
securities.......................... 31,041 -- (3,104) --
Available-for-sale debt securities.... 18,463 (1,846) -- --
Other investments..................... 87,518 (1,040) (4,823) (1,132)
Long-term debt........................ 6,346 (199) -- --
36
YEAR-END 2000
-------------------------------------------------
CARRYING INTEREST EQUITY FOREIGN
VALUE RATE RISK PRICE RISK CURRENCY RISK
----- --------- ---------- -------------
(IN THOUSANDS)
Cash equivalents...................... $575,117 $ (709) $ -- $ --
Restricted cash equivalents........... 32,684 (81) -- --
Available-for-sale equity
securities.......................... 19,862 -- (1,986) --
Available-for-sale government debt
securities.......................... 244,134 (1,940) -- --
Available-for-sale corporate debt
securities.......................... 472 (47) -- --
Other investments..................... 43,684 (1,084) (2,410) (1,000)
Long-term debt........................ 308,735 (14,770) -- --
The sensitivity analysis of financial instruments held for purposes other
than trading assumes an instantaneous change in market interest rates of one
percentage point from their levels at January 2, 2000 and December 31, 2000 and
an instantaneous 10% decrease in the equity markets in which we are invested
from their levels at January 2, 2000 and December 31, 2000, both with all other
variables held constant. Our cash equivalents and restricted cash equivalents
are short-term in nature with a maturity of three months or less when acquired
and, for purposes of this sensitivity analysis, have been assumed to have
average maturities of 45 days and 90 days, respectively. Our available-for-sale
government debt securities are short-term in nature with a maturity of six to
twelve months when acquired and, for purposes of this sensitivity analysis, have
been assumed to have an average maturity of 290 days. For purposes of this
sensitivity analysis our available-for-sale corporate debt securities are
assumed to have an average maturity of ten years. The interest rate risk
reflects, for each of these investments, the effect of the assumed decrease of
one percentage point in market interest rates over the average maturity of each
of these investments. To the extent interest rates continue to be one percentage
point below their levels at January 2, 2000 and December 31, 2000 at the time
these securities mature and assuming the Company reinvested in similar
securities, the effect of the interest rate risk would continue beyond the
maturities assumed. The interest rate risk presented with respect to long-term
debt represents the potential impact the indicated change has on the fair value
of such debt and on our financial position and not our results of operations
since all of our debt at January 2, 2000 and December 31, 2000 fixed-rate debt.
The analysis also assumes an instantaneous 10% change in the foreign currency
exchange rates versus the United States dollar from their levels at January 2,
2000 and December 31, 2000, with all other variables held constant. For purposes
of this analysis, with respect to investments in investment limited partnerships
and similar investment entities accounted for at cost, the decrease in the
equity markets and the change in foreign currency were assumed to be other than
temporary. Further, this analysis assumed no market risk for other investments,
other than investment limited partnerships and similar investment entities and
other non-current investments which trade in public equity markets.
Pursuant to a contract entered into in 1999, as of January 2, 2000 and
December 31, 2000 we had a remaining obligation to repurchase an aggregate of
3,998,414 shares and 1,999,207 shares, respectively, of our Class B common stock
of which 1,999,207 shares were repurchased in August 2000 and 1,997,207 shares
are required to be repurchased on or before August 19, 2001. At January 2, 2000
and December 31, 2000 the aggregate obligation of $86,186,000 and $43,843,000,
respectively, related to this remaining purchase has been reflected as a
separate line item between the liabilities and stockholders' equity (deficit)
sections in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets with an equal
offsetting increase to stockholders' equity (deficit). Although these purchases
were negotiated at fixed prices, any decrease in the equity market in which our
stock is traded would have a negative impact on the fair value of the recorded
obligation. However, that same decrease would have a corresponding positive
impact on the fair value of the offsetting amount included in stockholders'
equity (deficit). Accordingly, since any change in the equity markets would have
an offsetting effect upon our financial position, no market risk has been
assumed for this financial instrument.
37
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA.
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
PAGE
----
Independent Auditors' Report................................ 39
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of January 2, 2000 and
December 31, 2000......................................... 40
Consolidated Income Statements for the fiscal years ended
January 3, 1999, January 2, 2000 and December 31, 2000.... 41
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity for the
fiscal years ended January 3, 1999, January 2, 2000 and
December 31, 2000......................................... 42
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the fiscal years
ended January 3, 1999, January 2, 2000 and December 31,
2000...................................................... 45
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.................. 47
38
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
TRIARC COMPANIES, INC.:
New York, New York
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Triarc
Companies, Inc. and subsidiaries (the 'Company') as of December 31, 2000 and
January 2, 2000, and the related consolidated income statements, statements of
stockholders' equity (deficit) and statements of cash flows for each of the
three fiscal years in the period ended December 31, 2000. These financial
statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on
our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally
accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan
and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31,
2000 and January 2, 2000, and the results of their operations and their cash
flows for each of the three fiscal years in the period ended December 31, 2000
in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
of America.
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
New York, New York
March 26, 2001
39
TRIARC COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(IN THOUSANDS EXCEPT SHARE DATA)
JANUARY 2, DECEMBER 31,
2000 2000
---- ----
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash (including cash equivalents of $125,576 and
$575,117) (Note 8).................................... $ 127,843 $ 596,135
Short-term investments (Note 5)......................... 151,634 314,017
Receivables (Note 6).................................... 11,584 14,565
Deferred income tax benefit (Note 11)................... 6,070 9,659
Prepaid expenses........................................ 646 677
Net current assets relating to discontinued operations
(Note 18)............................................. 14,537 --
---------- ----------
Total current assets................................ 312,314 935,053
Restricted cash equivalents (Note 7)........................ 1,939 32,684
Investments (Note 8)........................................ 14,155 11,595
Properties (Note 6)......................................... 13,587 40,097
Unamortized costs in excess of net assets of acquired
companies (Note 6)........................................ 19,606 18,764
Other intangible assets (Note 6)............................ 6,696 6,070
Deferred costs and other assets (Note 6).................... 10,127 23,161
---------- ----------
$ 378,424 $1,067,424
---------- ----------
---------- ----------
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)
Current liabilities:
Current portion of long-term debt (Note 9).............. $ 2,554 $ 17,017
Accounts payable (Note 12).............................. 3,284 11,923
Accrued expenses (Note 6)............................... 66,077 65,365
Net current liabilities relating to discontinued
operations (Note 18).................................. -- 244,429
---------- ----------
Total current liabilities........................... 71,915 338,734
Long-term debt (Note 9)..................................... 3,792 291,718
Deferred compensation payable to related parties (Note
14)....................................................... -- 22,500
Net non-current liabilities relating to discontinued
operations (Note 18)...................................... 337,794 --
Deferred income taxes (Note 11)............................. 29,641 69,922
Deferred income and other liabilities (Note 12)............. 15,822 18,397
Commitments and contingencies (Notes 3, 8, 11, 20, 21 and
23)
Forward purchase obligation for common stock (Note 12)...... 86,186 43,843
Stockholders' equity (deficit) (Note 12):
Class A common stock, $.10 par value; authorized
100,000,000 shares, issued 29,550,663 shares.......... 2,955 2,955
Class B common stock, $.10 par value; authorized
25,000,000 shares, issued 5,997,622 shares............ 600 600
Additional paid-in capital.............................. 204,231 211,967
Retained earnings (accumulated deficit)................. (90,680) 350,561
Common stock held in treasury........................... (202,625) (242,772)
Common stock to be acquired............................. (86,186) (43,843)
Accumulated other comprehensive income.................. 5,040 2,842
Unearned compensation................................... (61) --
---------- ----------
Total stockholders' equity (deficit)................ (166,726) 282,310
---------- ----------
$ 378,424 $1,067,424
---------- ----------
---------- ----------
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
40
TRIARC COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENTS
(IN THOUSANDS EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
YEAR ENDED
--------------------------------------
JANUARY 3, JANUARY 2, DECEMBER 31,
1999 2000 2000
---- ---- ----
Revenues and other earnings:
Royalties and franchise fees.......................... $78,067 $ 81,221 $ 87,241
Investment income, net (Note 16)...................... 9,863 16,904 30,715
Gain on sale of business (Note 8)..................... -- 1,188 --
Other income, net (Note 17)........................... 1,034 2,848 900
------- -------- --------
Total revenues and other earnings................. 88,964 102,161 118,856
------- -------- --------
Costs and expenses:
General and administrative (Notes 3, 12 and 13)....... 62,998 68,498 80,212
Depreciation and amortization, excluding amortization
of deferred financing costs......................... 4,916 5,423 5,313
Capital market transaction related compensation (Note
14)................................................. -- -- 26,010
Capital structure reorganization related charge (Note
15)................................................. -- 2,126 306
Interest expense...................................... 13,031 1,260 4,804
------- -------- --------
Total costs and expenses.......................... 80,945 77,307 116,645
------- -------- --------
Income from continuing operations before
income taxes................................ 8,019 24,854 2,211
Provision for income taxes (Note 11)...................... (4,832) (7,152) (12,368)
------- -------- --------
Income (loss) from continuing operations...... 3,187 17,702 (10,157)
------- -------- --------
Income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes
(Note 18):
Income (loss) from operations......................... 7,442 (10,583) (8,868)
Gain on disposal...................................... 4,007 15,102 480,946
------- -------- --------
Total income from discontinued operations......... 11,449 4,519 472,078
------- -------- --------
Income before extraordinary charges........... 14,636 22,221 461,921
Extraordinary charges (Note 19)........................... -- (12,097) (20,680)
------- -------- --------
Net income.................................... $14,636 $ 10,124 $441,241
------- -------- --------
------- -------- --------
Basic income (loss) per share (Note 4):
Continuing operations......................... $ .11 $ .68 $ (.44)
Discontinued operations....................... .37 .18 20.32
Extraordinary charges......................... -- (.47) (.89)
------- -------- --------
Net income.................................... $ .48 $ .39 $ 18.99
------- -------- --------
------- -------- --------
Diluted income (loss) per share (Note 4):
Continuing operations......................... $ .10 $ .66 $ (.44)
Discontinued operations....................... .36 .16 20.32
Extraordinary charges......................... -- (.45) (.89)
------- -------- --------
Net income.................................... $ .46 $ .37 $ 18.99
------- -------- --------
------- -------- --------
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
41
TRIARC COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)
(IN THOUSANDS)
ACCUMULATED OTHER
COMPREHENSIVE
INCOME (DEFICIT)
-----------------
UNREALIZED
COMMON GAIN (LOSS) ON
ADDITIONAL STOCK AVAILABLE- CURRENCY
COMMON PAID-IN ACCUMULATED TREASURY TO BE UNEARNED FOR-SALE TRANSLATION
STOCK CAPITAL DEFICIT STOCK ACQUIRED COMPENSATION INVESTMENTS ADJUSTMENT
----- ------- ------- ----- -------- ------------ ----------- ----------
Balance at December 28,
1997................... $3,555 $204,291 $(115,440) $ (45,456) $ -- $(1,450) $ (737) $(242)
Comprehensive income
(loss):
Net income......... -- -- 14,636 -- -- -- -- --
Net change in
currency
translation
adjustment....... -- -- -- -- -- -- -- (22)
Unrealized gains on
available-for-sale
investments
(Note 5)......... -- -- -- -- -- -- 401 --
Comprehensive
income........... -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Purchases of common
shares for treasury
(Note 12).......... -- -- -- (54,680) -- -- -- --
Issuances of common
shares from
treasury upon
exercise of stock
options
(Note 12).......... -- (1,169) -- 5,108 -- -- -- --
Tax benefit from
exercises of stock
options............ -- 1,410 -- -- -- -- -- --
Amortization of below
market stock
options
(Note 12).......... -- -- -- -- -- 982 -- --
Other................ -- 7 -- 65 -- 13 -- --
------ -------- --------- --------- -------- ------- ------ -----
Balance at January 3,
1999................... $3,555 $204,539 $(100,804) $ (94,963) $ -- $ (455) $ (336) $(264)
------ -------- --------- --------- -------- ------- ------ -----
TOTAL
-----
Balance at December 28,
1997................... $ 44,521
Comprehensive income
(loss):
Net income......... 14,636
Net change in
currency
translation
adjustment....... (22)
Unrealized gains on
available-for-sale
investments
(Note 5)......... 401
---------
Comprehensive
income........... 15,015
---------
Purchases of common
shares for treasury
(Note 12).......... (54,680)
Issuances of common
shares from
treasury upon
exercise of stock
options
(Note 12).......... 3,939
Tax benefit from
exercises of stock
options............ 1,410
Amortization of below
market stock
options
(Note 12).......... 982
Other................ 85
---------
Balance at January 3,
1999................... $ 11,272
---------
42
TRIARC COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT) -- CONTINUED
(IN THOUSANDS)
ACCUMULATED OTHER
COMPREHENSIVE
INCOME (DEFICIT)
-----------------
UNREALIZED
COMMON GAIN (LOSS) ON
ADDITIONAL STOCK AVAILABLE- CURRENCY
COMMON PAID-IN ACCUMULATED TREASURY TO BE UNEARNED FOR-SALE TRANSLATION
STOCK CAPITAL DEFICIT STOCK ACQUIRED COMPENSATION INVESTMENTS ADJUSTMENT
----- ------- ------- ----- -------- ------------ ----------- ----------
Balance at January 3,
1999................... $3,555 $204,539 $(100,804) $ (94,963) $ -- $ (455) $ (336) $(264)
Comprehensive income
(loss):
Net income......... -- -- 10,124 -- -- -- -- --
Net change in
currency
translation
adjustment....... -- -- -- -- -- -- -- (94)
Unrealized gains on
available-for-sale
investments
(Note 5)......... -- -- -- -- -- -- 5,734 --
Comprehensive
income........... -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Purchases of common
shares for treasury
(Note 12).......... -- -- -- (117,160) -- -- -- --
Issuance of common
shares from
treasury upon
exercise of stock
options
(Note 12).......... -- (1,974) -- 9,397 -- -- -- --
Tax benefit from
exercises of stock
options............ -- 1,538 -- -- -- -- -- --
Modification of stock
option terms
(Note 12).......... -- 410 -- -- -- -- -- --
Amortization of below
market stock
options
(Note 12).......... -- -- -- -- -- 388 -- --
Common stock to be
acquired under
future purchase
obligation
(Note 12).......... -- -- -- -- (86,186) -- -- --
Other................ -- (282) -- 101 -- 6 -- --
------ -------- --------- --------- -------- ------- ------ -----
Balance at January 2,
2000................... $3,555 $204,231 $ (90,680) $(202,625) $(86,186) $ (61) $5,398 $(358)
------ -------- --------- --------- -------- ------- ------ -----
TOTAL
-----
Balance at January 3,
1999................... $ 11,272
Comprehensive income
(loss):
Net income......... 10,124
Net change in
currency
translation
adjustment....... (94)
Unrealized gains on
available-for-sale
investments
(Note 5)......... 5,734
---------
Comprehensive
income........... 15,764
---------
Purchases of common
shares for treasury
(Note 12).......... (117,160)
Issuance of common
shares from
treasury upon
exercise of stock
options
(Note 12).......... 7,423
Tax benefit from
exercises of stock
options............ 1,538
Modification of stock
option terms
(Note 12).......... 410
Amortization of below
market stock
options
(Note 12).......... 388
Common stock to be
acquired under
future purchase
obligation
(Note 12).......... (86,186)
Other................ (175)
---------
Balance at January 2,
2000................... $(166,726)
---------
43
TRIARC COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT) -- CONTINUED
(IN THOUSANDS)
RETAINED COMMON
ADDITIONAL EARNINGS STOCK
COMMON PAID-IN (ACCUMULATED TREASURY TO BE UNEARNED
STOCK CAPITAL DEFICIT) STOCK ACQUIRED COMPENSATION
----- ------- -------- ----- -------- ------------
Balance at January 2,
2000...................... $3,555 $204,231 $(90,680) $(202,625) $(86,186) $(61)
Comprehensive income
(loss):
Net income............ -- -- 441,241 -- -- --
Net change in currency
translation
adjustment........... -- -- -- -- -- --
Unrealized losses on
available-for-sale
investments
(Note 5)............. -- -- -- -- -- --
Unrecognized pension
loss (Note 20)....... -- -- -- -- -- --
Comprehensive
income............... -- -- -- -- -- --
Purchases of common shares
for treasury from
certain officers and a
director with related
recognition of
compensation
(Note 12)............... -- 10,422 -- (25,942) -- --
Common stock acquired
under future purchase
obligation (Note 12).... -- -- -- (42,373) 42,343 --
Issuance of common shares
from treasury upon
exercise of stock
options (Note 12)....... -- (5,338) -- 28,009 -- --
Tax benefit from exercises
of stock options........ -- 1,263 -- -- -- --
Equity in the issuance of
Snapple Beverage Group,
Inc. below market stock
options (Note 12)....... -- 1,157 -- -- -- --
Modification of stock
option terms
(Note 12)............... -- 491 -- -- -- --
Amortization of below
market stock options
(Note 12)............... -- -- -- -- -- 61
Other..................... -- (259) -- 159 -- --
------ -------- -------- --------- -------- -------
Balance at December 31,
2000...................... $3,555 $211,967 $350,561 $(242,772) $(43,843) $ --
------ -------- -------- --------- -------- -------
------ -------- -------- --------- -------- -------
ACCUMULATED OTHER
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (DEFICIT)
------------------------------
UNREALIZED
GAIN (LOSS) ON
AVAILABLE- CURRENCY UNRECOGNIZED
FOR-SALE TRANSLATION PENSION
INVESTMENTS ADJUSTMENT LOSS TOTAL
----------- ---------- ---- -----
Balance at January 2,
2000...................... $ 5,398 $(358) $-- $(166,726)
Comprehensive income
(loss):
Net income............ -- -- -- 441,241
Net change in currency
translation
adjustment........... -- 322 -- 322
Unrealized losses on
available-for-sale
investments
(Note 5)............. (2,322) -- -- (2,322)
Unrecognized pension
loss (Note 20)....... -- -- (198) (198)
---------
Comprehensive
income............... -- -- -- 439,043
---------
Purchases of common shares
for treasury from
certain officers and a
director with related
recognition of
compensation
(Note 12)............... -- -- -- (15,520)
Common stock acquired
under future purchase
obligation (Note 12).... -- -- -- (30)
Issuance of common shares
from treasury upon
exercise of stock
options (Note 12)....... -- -- -- 22,671
Tax benefit from exercises
of stock options........ -- -- -- 1,263
Equity in the issuance of
Snapple Beverage Group,
Inc. below market stock
options (Note 12)....... -- -- -- 1,157
Modification of stock
option terms
(Note 12)............... -- -- -- 491
Amortization of below
market stock options
(Note 12)............... -- -- -- 61
Other..................... -- -- -- (100)
------- ----- ----- ---------
Balance at December 31,
2000...................... $ 3,076 $ (36) $(198) $ 282,310
------- ----- ----- ---------
------- ----- ----- ---------
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
44
TRIARC COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(IN THOUSANDS)
Year Ended
---------------------------------------
January 3, January 2, December 31,
1999 2000 2000
---- ---- ----
Cash flows from continuing operating activities:
Net income......................................... $ 14,636 $ 10,124 $ 441,241
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
provided by (used in) continuing operating
activities:
Income from discontinued operations............ (11,449) (4,519) (472,078)
Write-off of unamortized deferred financing
costs and, in 1999, interest rate cap
agreement costs.............................. -- 11,446 27,491
Capital market transaction related
compensation................................. -- -- 26,010
Compensation expense from repurchases of common
stock issued upon exercise of stock
options...................................... -- -- 10,422
Deferred income tax provision (benefit)........ (1,397) 2,261 9,745
Depreciation and amortization of properties.... 1,702 2,888 3,394
Amortization of costs in excess of net assets
of acquired companies, other intangible
assets and certain other items............... 3,214 2,535 1,919
Amortization of deferred financing costs and
original issue discount...................... 2,645 643 121
Equity in losses of investees, net............. 447 -- 2,331
Operating investment adjustments, net (see
below)....................................... (24,990) 7,082 (5,084)
Gain on sale of business....................... -- (1,188) --
Other, net..................................... 712 (139) 114
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Increase in receivables.................... (2,251) (1,706) (2,667)
Decrease (increase) in prepaid expenses.... 1,502 463 (31)
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and
accrued expenses......................... 2,200 (5,396) 6,350
--------- --------- ---------
Net cash provided by (used in)
continuing operating activities...... (13,029) 24,494 49,278
--------- --------- ---------
Cash flows from continuing investing activities:
Investment activities, net (see below)............. (7,688) (55,184) (167,479)
Capital expenditures............................... (5,234) (7,743) (11,955)
Business acquisition............................... (3,000) -- --
Cash of Chesapeake Insurance Company Limited
sold............................................. (8,864) -- --
Other.............................................. (1,117) 197 1,400
--------- --------- ---------
Net cash used in continuing investing
activities........................... (25,903) (62,730) (178,034)
--------- --------- ---------
Cash flows from continuing financing activities:
Proceeds from long-term debt....................... -- -- 289,963
Repayments of long-term debt....................... (1,901) (1,084) (5,574)
Proceeds from stock option exercises............... 3,939 7,370 22,671
Repurchases of common stock for treasury........... (54,680) (117,160) (68,315)
Restricted cash equivalents transferred to reserve
account.......................................... -- -- (30,745)
Deferred financing costs........................... -- -- (12,445)
--------- --------- ---------
Net cash provided by (used in)
continuing financing activities...... (52,642) (110,874) 195,555
--------- --------- ---------
Net cash provided by (used in) continuing operations... (91,574) (149,110) 66,799
Net cash provided by discontinued operations........... 106,367 157,956 401,493
--------- --------- ---------
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents.............. 14,793 8,846 468,292
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year......... 104,204 118,997 127,843
--------- --------- ---------
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year............... $ 118,997 $ 127,843 $ 596,135
--------- --------- ---------
--------- --------- ---------
45
TRIARC COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS -- (CONTINUED)
(IN THOUSANDS)
YEAR ENDED
--------------------------------------
JANUARY 3, JANUARY 2, DECEMBER 31,
1999 2000 2000
---- ---- ----
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
Operating investment adjustments, net:
Proceeds from sales of trading securities.......... $ 30,412 $ 76,490 $ 61,271
Cost of trading securities purchased............... (55,394) (64,961) (52,533)
Net recognized (gains) losses from trading
securities....................................... (2,236) (12,914) 2,658
Net recognized (gains) losses from transactions in
other than trading securities, including equity
in investment limited partnerships, and short
positions........................................ 2,228 8,467 (16,480)
--------- --------- ---------
$ (24,990) $ 7,082 $ (5,084)
--------- --------- ---------
--------- --------- ---------
Investing investment activities, net:
Cost of available-for-sale securities and other
investments purchased............................ $(107,093) $(113,373) $(314,368)
Proceeds from sales of available-for-sale
securities and other investments................. 78,065 73,521 150,671
Proceeds of securities sold short.................. 45,585 53,281 42,922
Payments to cover short positions in securities.... (24,245) (68,613) (46,704)
--------- --------- ---------
$ (7,688) $ (55,184) $(167,479)
--------- --------- ---------
--------- --------- ---------
Cash paid during the year for continuing operations
for:
Interest........................................... $ 15,560 $ 2,076 $ 3,911
--------- --------- ---------
--------- --------- ---------
Income taxes, net of refunds....................... $ 10,627 $ 1,361 $ 1,360
--------- --------- ---------
--------- --------- ---------
Due to their noncash nature, the following transactions are not reflected in
the 1999 and 2000 consolidated statements of cash flows (amounts in whole shares
and dollars):
As part of a contract entered into on August 19, 1999, the Company agreed to
repurchase 1,999,207 shares of its Class B common stock on or before August 19,
2000 for $42,343,000 and 1,999,207 shares of its Class B common stock on or
before August 19, 2001 for $43,843,000. The first such purchase occurred on
August 10, 2000. The aggregate obligation for these purchases of $86,186,000 and
$43,843,000 as of January 2, 2000 and December 31, 2000, respectively, has been
recorded by the Company as 'Forward purchase obligation for common stock' with
an equal offsetting reduction to the 'Common stock to be acquired' component of
stockholders' equity (deficit). See Note 12 for further disclosure of this
transaction.
On January 19, 2000, in addition to a cash payment of $9,210,000 included in
'Capital expenditures,' the Company assumed an $18,000,000 secured promissory
note in connection with the acquisition of 280 Holdings, LLC, which owns an
airplane previously leased by the Company. Such $18,000,000 was reported as an
addition to 'Transportation and office equipment' (see Note 6) with an
offsetting increase in long-term debt (see Note 9). See Note 22 for further
disclosure of this transaction.
In connection with the October 25, 2000 sale of the Company's beverage
businesses and the related assumption by the purchaser of the Company's
convertible debt, the Company effectively established a written call option on
the Company's common stock relating to the conversion feature of such debt. The
fair value of the written call option of $1,476,000 as of October 25, 2000 was
recorded as a reduction of the gain on the sale of the beverage businesses
included in discontinued operations with an equal offsetting credit to 'Deferred
income and other liabilities.' The reduction in the fair value of the written
call option during the period October 26, 2000 to December 31, 2000 was reported
as a component of 'Other income, net.' See Note 12 for further disclosure of
this transaction.
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
46
TRIARC COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2000
(1) SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Triarc
Companies, Inc. (referred to herein as 'Triarc' and, collectively with its
subsidiaries, as the 'Company') and its subsidiaries. The principal subsidiary
of the Company, wholly-owned as of December 31, 2000, is Arby's Acquisition, LLC
which owns 100% of Arby's, Inc. ('Arby's'). The Company's wholly-owned
subsidiaries at December 31, 2000 also included National Propane Corporation
('National Propane') and SEPSCO, LLC ('SEPSCO'). The Company also owned 100%
(99.9% prior to October 25, 2000) of (1) Snapple Beverage Group, Inc. ('Snapple
Beverage Group'), formerly Triarc Beverage Holdings Corp., which owned 100% of
Snapple Beverage Corp. ('Snapple'), Mistic Brands, Inc. ('Mistic'), and
Stewart's Beverages, Inc. ('Stewart's') and (2) Royal Crown Company, Inc.
('Royal Crown'), prior to the October 25, 2000 sale of such companies. These
beverage businesses through the date of sale have been accounted for as
discontinued operations in 2000 and the accompanying consolidated financial
statements for 1998 and 1999 have been reclassified accordingly. National
Propane and its subsidiary National Propane SGP, Inc., wholly-owned by the
Company, owned a combined 42.7% interest in National Propane Partners, L.P. (the
'Propane Partnership') and a subpartnership prior to the July 19, 1999 sale of
substantially all of such interest. The propane business of the Propane
Partnership through the date of sale was accounted for as a discontinued
operation in 1999 and the accompanying consolidated financial statements for
1998 have been reclassified accordingly. All significant intercompany balances
and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. See Notes 3 and 18 for
further disclosure of the dispositions referred to above.
FISCAL YEAR
The Company reports on a year consisting of 52 or 53 weeks ending on the
Sunday closest to December 31. In accordance therewith, the Company's 1998
fiscal year contained 53 weeks and commenced December 29, 1997 and ended on
January 3, 1999, and its 1999 and 2000 fiscal years each contained 52 weeks and
commenced January 4, 1999 and ended on January 2, 2000 and commenced January 3,
2000 and ended on December 31, 2000, respectively. Such periods are referred to
herein as (1) 'the year ended January 3, 1999' or '1998' and (2) 'the year ended
January 2, 2000' or '1999' and 'the year ended December 31, 2000' or '2000,'
respectively. January 2, 2000 and December 31, 2000 are referred to herein as
'Year-End 1999' and 'Year-End 2000,' respectively.
CASH EQUIVALENTS
All highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less when
acquired are considered cash equivalents. The Company typically invests its
excess cash in United States government agency debt securities, interest-bearing
brokerage accounts, money market mutual funds, commercial paper of high
credit-quality entities and United States Treasury bills.
INVESTMENTS
Short-Term Investments
Short-term investments include marketable debt and equity securities with
readily determinable fair values and other short-term investments, including
investments in limited partnerships, which are not readily marketable. The
Company's marketable securities are classified and accounted for either as
'available-for-sale' or 'trading' and are reported at fair market value with the
resulting net unrealized gains or losses, net of income taxes, reported as a
separate component of stockholders' equity (deficit) or included as a component
of net income, respectively. Other short-term investments consist of investments
in which the Company has significant influence over the investees and
investments in which the Company does not have significant
47
TRIARC COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- CONTINUED
DECEMBER 31, 2000
influence over the investees and are not readily marketable. Other short-term
investments in which the Company has significant influence over the investees
('Equity Investments') are accounted for in accordance with the equity method
(the 'Equity Method') of accounting under which the consolidated results include
the Company's proportionate share of income or loss of such investees. The
carrying value of the Company's investment in each of its short-term Equity
Investments is equal to the underlying equity in net assets of each investee.
Other short-term investments in which the Company does not have significant
influence over the investees and are not readily marketable (the 'Cost
Investments') are accounted for at cost. The cost of securities sold for all
marketable securities is determined using the specific identification method.
Non-Current Investments
The Company's non-current investments consist of Equity Investments which
are accounted for in accordance with the Equity Method and Cost Investments
which are accounted for at cost. The excess, if any, of the carrying value of
the Company's non-current Equity Investments over the underlying equity in net
assets of each investee at the time of their acquisition is being amortized to
equity in earnings (losses) of investees included in 'Other income, net' (see
Note 17) on a straight-line basis over 15 years. See Note 8 for further
discussion of the Company's non-current investments.
Securities Sold But Not Yet Purchased
Securities sold but not yet purchased are reported at fair market value with
the resulting net unrealized gains or losses included as a component of net
income.
All Investments
The Company reviews all of its investments in which the Company has
unrealized losses for any such unrealized losses deemed to be other than
temporary. The Company recognizes an investment loss currently for any such
other than temporary losses.
Gain on Issuance of Investee Stock
The Company recognizes a gain or loss upon an investee's sale of any
previously unissued stock to third parties to the extent of the decrease in the
Company's ownership of the investee, where realization of the gain by the
Company is reasonably assured.
PROPERTIES AND DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION
Properties are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and
amortization. Depreciation of transportation and office equipment is computed on
the straight-line basis using the estimated useful lives of 3 to 15 years.
Leasehold improvements are amortized over the shorter of their estimated useful
lives or the terms of the respective leases.
AMORTIZATION OF INTANGIBLES
Costs in excess of net assets of acquired companies ('Goodwill') are being
amortized on the straight-line basis over 15 to 40 years. Trademarks are being
amortized on the straight-line basis over 15 years. A non-compete agreement is
being amortized on the straight-line basis over 5 years. Distribution rights are
being amortized on the straight-line basis over 3 to 15 years. Deferred
financing costs and original issue debt discount are being amortized as interest
expense over the lives of the respective debt using the interest rate method.
48
TRIARC COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- CONTINUED
DECEMBER 31, 2000
IMPAIRMENTS
Intangible Assets
The amount of impairment, if any, in unamortized Goodwill is measured based
on projected future operating performance. To the extent future operating
performance of the enterprise (Arby's) to which the Goodwill relates through the
period such Goodwill is being amortized is sufficient to absorb the related
amortization, the Company has deemed there to be no impairment of Goodwill.
Long-Lived Assets
The Company reviews its long-lived assets and certain identifiable
intangibles for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate
that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. If such review
indicates an asset may not be recoverable, the impairment loss is recognized for
the excess of the carrying value over the fair value of an asset to be held and
used or over the net realizable value of an asset to be disposed.
DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The Company's derivatives consist of (1) the conversion component of
short-term investments in corporate convertible debt securities which are
accounted for as trading securities (see Note 5), (2) put and call options on
equity and corporate debt securities which are accounted for as trading
securities (see Note 5), (3) a written call option on Triarc's common stock with
physical settlement (see Note 12) and (4) a forward purchase obligation for
Triarc's common stock with cash settlement (see Note 12). The conversion
component of corporate convertible debt securities, put and call options on
equity and corporate debt securities and the call option on Triarc's common
stock with physical settlement are recorded at fair value. The forward purchase
obligation for Triarc's common stock with cash settlement is recorded at the
cash redemption amount.
STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
The Company measures compensation costs for its employee stock-based
compensation under the intrinsic value method. Accordingly, compensation cost
for the Company's stock options is measured as the excess, if any, of the market
price of the Company's common stock at the date of grant or at any subsequent
measurement date as a result of certain types of modifications to the terms of
its stock options over the amount an employee must pay to acquire the stock.
Such amounts are being amortized as compensation expense over the vesting period
of the related stock options. Additional compensation cost for stock options
settled in cash or for shares of common stock repurchased by the Company within
six months after exercise is measured as the excess of cash paid to an employee
over, if applicable, the amount an employee paid to exercise the options. Any
compensation cost is recognized as expense only to the extent it exceeds
compensation expense previously recognized for such stock options. Compensation
cost for stock appreciation rights is recognized currently based on the change
in the market price of the Company's common stock during each period.
TREASURY STOCK
Treasury stock is stated at cost. The cost of issuances of shares from
treasury stock is determined at average cost.
FOREIGN CURRENCY TRANSLATION
Financial statements of foreign subsidiaries are prepared in their
respective local currencies and translated into United States dollars at the
current exchange rates for assets and liabilities and an average rate for the
year for revenues, costs and expenses. Net gains or losses resulting from the
translation of foreign financial
49
TRIARC COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- CONTINUED
DECEMBER 31, 2000
statements, including those of discontinued operations through their date of
disposition, are charged or credited directly to the 'Currency translation
adjustment' component of 'Accumulated other comprehensive income (deficit)' in
'Stockholders' equity (deficit).'
INCOME TAXES
The Company files a consolidated Federal income tax return with all of its
subsidiaries except Chesapeake Insurance Company Limited (through its sale on
December 30, 1998), a foreign corporation. Deferred income taxes are provided to
recognize the tax effect of temporary differences between the bases of assets
and liabilities for tax and financial statement purposes.
REVENUE RECOGNITION
Franchise fees are recognized as income when a franchised restaurant is
opened since all material services and conditions related to the franchise fee
have been substantially performed by the Company upon the restaurant opening.
Franchise fees for multiple area development agreements represent the aggregate
of the franchise fees for the number of restaurants in the area being developed
and are recognized as income when each restaurant is opened in the same manner
as franchise fees for individual restaurants. Royalties are based on a
percentage of restaurant sales of the franchised store and are accrued as
earned.
RECLASSIFICATIONS
Certain amounts included in the prior years' consolidated financial
statements have been reclassified to (1) reflect Snapple Beverage Group and
Royal Crown as discontinued operations (see Note 18) and (2) otherwise conform
with the current year's presentation.
(2) SIGNIFICANT RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES
NATURE OF OPERATIONS
The Company franchises Arby's'r' quick service restaurants representing the
largest restaurant franchising system specializing in slow-roasted roast beef
sandwiches. Arby's also offers an extensive menu of chicken, turkey, ham and
submarine sandwiches, side dishes and salads. Some Arby's restaurants are
multi-branded with the Company's T.J. Cinnamons'r' and/or Pasta Connection
product lines. The Company's franchised restaurants are principally throughout
the United States and, to a much lesser extent, Canada. Information concerning
the number of Arby's restaurants is as follows:
1998 1999 2000
---- ---- ----
Franchised restaurants opened.............................. 130 159 156
Franchised restaurants closed.............................. 87 66 65
Franchised restaurants open at end of year................. 3,135 3,228 3,319
USE OF ESTIMATES
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with
United States generally accepted accounting principles requires management to
make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the consolidated financial statements and the reported amount of revenues and
expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those
estimates.
50
TRIARC COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- CONTINUED
DECEMBER 31, 2000
CERTAIN RISK CONCENTRATIONS
The Company believes that its vulnerability to risk concentrations related
to its restaurant operations is somewhat mitigated due to the significance of
its investment portfolios and the related investment income. The Company has one
significant franchisee which accounted for 24%, 21% and 20% of consolidated
revenues and other earnings in 1998, 1999 and 2000, respectively, the loss of
which would have a material adverse impact on the Company's business. The
Company's restaurant franchise operations could also be adversely affected by
changing consumer preferences resulting from health or safety concerns with
respect to the consumption of beef. The Company believes that its vulnerability
to risk concentrations related to significant vendors and sources of its raw
materials for its franchisees is not significant. The Company also believes that
its vulnerability to risk concentrations related to geographical concentration
is minimized since the Company's franchisees generally operate throughout the
United States with minimal foreign exposure.
(3) BUSINESS ACQUISITIONS AND DISPOSITIONS
2000 TRANSACTION
Sale of Beverage Businesses
On October 25, 2000, the Company sold (the 'Snapple Beverage Sale') Snapple
Beverage Group (the Company's former premium beverage business) and Royal Crown
(the Company's former soft drink concentrate business) to affiliates of Cadbury
Schweppes plc ('Cadbury'). The consideration paid to the Company consisted of
(1) cash of $896,250,000, subject to any additional post-closing adjustment, and
(2) the assumption by Cadbury of $425,112,000 of debt and related accrued
interest. The assumed debt and accrued interest consisted of (1) $300,000,000 of
10 1/4% senior subordinated notes due 2009 (the 'Senior Notes') co-issued by
Triarc Consumer Products Group, LLC ('TCPG'), the parent company of Snapple
Beverage Group and Royal Crown and a subsidiary of Triarc, and Snapple Beverage
Group, (2) $119,130,000, net of unamortized original issue discount of
$240,870,000, of Triarc's zero coupon convertible subordinated debentures due
2018 (the 'Debentures') and (3) $5,982,000 of accrued interest. The Snapple
Beverage Sale resulted in an after-tax gain in 2000 recorded in the 'Gain on
disposal' component of 'Total income from discontinued operations' in the
accompanying consolidated income statement (see Note 18) of $480,946,000,
subject to any additional post-closing purchase price adjustment, and net of
$19,134,000 of related fees and expenses and $226,765,000 of income tax
provision. In connection with the closing of the Snapple Beverage Sale, the
Company repaid the outstanding (1) principal of $436,433,000, (2) accrued
interest of $1,119,000, (3) related prepayment penalties of $5,509,000 and
(4) fees of $57,000 under a senior bank credit facility (the 'Beverage Credit
Facility') maintained by Snapple, Mistic, Stewart's, Royal Crown and RC/Arby's
Corporation ('RC/Arby's'), the then parent company of Royal Crown and a
subsidiary of TCPG.
1999 TRANSACTION
Sale of Propane Business
On July 19, 1999 the Company sold (the 'Propane Partnership Sale') 41.7% of
its remaining 42.7% interest in the Propane Partnership and a subpartnership,
National Propane, L.P. (the 'Operating Partnership'), to Columbia Propane, L.P.
('Columbia'), retaining a 1% limited partner interest. The consideration paid to
the Company consisted of (1) cash of $2,866,000 and (2) the forgiveness of
$15,816,000 of a note payable to the Operating Partnership by Triarc (the
'Partnership Note') with a remaining principal balance of $30,700,000
immediately prior to the Propane Partnership Sale. The $2,866,000 of cash
consisted of $2,101,000 of consideration for the Company's sold interests in the
Propane Partnership and the Operating Partnership and $1,033,000 representing
the reimbursement of interest expense incurred and paid by the Company on the
Partnership Note, both partially offset by $268,000 of amounts equivalent to
interest on advances made by Columbia in a tender offer for the then publicly
traded common units representing the 57.3% interest not
51
TRIARC COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- CONTINUED
DECEMBER 31, 2000
owned by the Company subsequent to the Propane Partnership IPO (see below). The
Propane Partnership Sale resulted in an after-tax gain in 1999, recorded in the
'Gain on disposal' component of 'Total income from discontinued operations' in
the accompanying consolidated income statement (see Note 18), of $11,204,000,
net of $3,477,000 of related fees and expenses and $6,282,000 of income tax
provision. In connection with the closing of the Propane Partnership Sale, the
Company repaid the remaining principal balance of the Partnership Note of
$14,884,000 and the Propane Partnership merged into Columbia.
Prior to the Propane Partnership Sale, the Company owned a 42.7% combined
interest in the Propane Partnership and the Operating Partnership; the remaining
57.3% interest the Company did not own was sold in an initial public offering
(the 'Propane Partnership IPO') consummated by the Propane Partnership in 1996.
The Propane Partnership IPO resulted in a 1996 pretax gain to the Company of
$83,852,000 with an additional $15,539,000 of gain deferred at the date of the
Propane Partnership IPO (see Note 18 for discussion of the subsequent
recognition of this deferred gain).
In connection with the Propane Partnership Sale, National Propane, whose
principal asset following the Propane Partnership Sale is a $30,000,000
intercompany note receivable from Triarc, retained a 1% special limited partner
interest in the Operating Partnership and agreed that while it remains a special
limited partner, National Propane would indemnify ('the Indemnification')
Columbia for any payments made by Columbia, only after recourse to the assets of
the Operating Partnership, related to Columbia's obligations under certain of
the debt of the Operating Partnership, aggregating approximately $138,000,000 as
of December 31, 2000, if the Operating Partnership is unable to repay or
refinance such debt. Under the purchase agreement, both Columbia and National
Propane may require the Operating Partnership to repurchase the 1% special
limited partner interest. The Company believes that it is unlikely that it will
be called upon to make any payments under the Indemnification.
1998 TRANSACTIONS
Sale of Insurance Operations
Effective December 30, 1998 the Company sold (the 'Chesapeake Sale') all of
the stock of Chesapeake Insurance Company Limited ('Chesapeake Insurance') to
International Advisory Services Ltd. for $250,000 in cash and a $1,500,000 note
(the 'IAS Note') bearing interest at an annual rate of 6% and due in 2003.
Chesapeake Insurance (1) prior to October 1993 provided certain property
insurance coverage for the Company and reinsured a portion of casualty and group
life insurance coverage which the Company and certain former affiliates
maintained with an unaffiliated insurance company and (2) prior to April 1993
reinsured insurance risks of unaffiliated third parties. The collectibility of
the IAS Note was subject to the favorable settlement of claims existing at
December 30, 1998 and there would have been no realization if such claims were
settled for $8,245,000 or more. Due to the uncertainty surrounding such
collection, the IAS Note was fully reserved as of December 30, 1998. The IAS
Note was fully collectible if the claims were settled for no more than
$6,245,000 and during 2000 the Company collected the full $1,500,000 under the
IAS Note which was recognized as income in 2000. The $1,086,000 excess of the
book value of Chesapeake Insurance of $1,332,000 and related expenses of $4,000
over the cash proceeds of $250,000 was recognized in 1998 as the pretax loss on
the Chesapeake Sale. The $1,500,000 of income in 2000 and $1,086,000 of loss in
1998 were included in 'General and administrative' expenses since they
effectively represent adjustments of prior period insurance reserves. The
Company's reserve for insurance claims of $8,421,000 as of December 29, 1997 was
utilized during 1998 of which $197,000 was payment of claims and $8,224,000 was
released in connection with the Chesapeake Sale.
Acquisition of T.J. Cinnamons
On August 27, 1998 the Company acquired from Paramark Enterprises, Inc.
('Paramark,' formerly known as T.J. Cinnamons, Inc.) all of Paramark's franchise
agreements for full concept bakeries of T.J. Cinnamons, an operator and
franchisor of retail bakeries specializing in gourmet cinnamon rolls and related
52
TRIARC COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- CONTINUED
DECEMBER 31, 2000
products, and Paramark's wholesale distribution rights for T.J. Cinnamons
products, as well as settling remaining contingent payments from the 1996
acquisition of the trademarks, service marks, recipes and proprietary formulae
of T.J. Cinnamons. The aggregate consideration in 1998 of $3,910,000 consisted
of cash of $3,000,000 and a $1,000,000 (discounted value of $910,000)
non-interest bearing obligation paid in equal monthly installments through
August 2000.
PURCHASE PRICE ALLOCATIONS OF T.J. CINNAMONS
The following table sets forth the allocation of the purchase price of T.J.
Cinnamons discussed above to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed and a
reconciliation to business acquisition in the accompanying 1998 consolidated
statement of cash flows (in thousands):
Goodwill........................................ $ 411
Other intangible assets, including trademarks of
$3,389........................................ 3,499
------
3,910
Less long-term debt issued to sellers........... 910
------
$3,000
------
------
(4) INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE
Basic income (loss) per share for 1998, 1999 and 2000 has been computed by
dividing the income or loss by the weighted average number of common shares
outstanding of 30,306,000, 26,015,000 and 23,232,000, respectively. Diluted
income (loss) per share for 1998 and 1999 has been computed by dividing the
income (loss) by an aggregate 31,527,000 and 26,943,000 shares, respectively.
Diluted income (loss) per share for 2000 is the same as the basic income (loss)
per share since the Company reported a loss from continuing operations and,
therefore, the effect of all potentially dilutive securities to the loss from
continuing operations would have been antidilutive. The shares used for diluted
income (loss) per share consist of the weighted average number of common shares
outstanding and potential common shares reflecting (1) the effect of dilutive
stock options of 1,221,000 and 818,000 shares for 1998 and 1999, respectively,
computed using the treasury stock method and (2) the effect of a dilutive
forward purchase obligation for common stock (see Note 12) of 110,000 shares for
1999. The shares for diluted income (loss) per share exclude any effect of
(1) the assumed conversion of the Debentures through the date of their
assumption by Cadbury and (2) a written call option for common stock which
commenced following the assumption of the Debentures by Cadbury (see Note 12)
since the effect of each of these on income (loss) from continuing operations
would have been antidilutive.
(5) SHORT-TERM INVESTMENTS AND SECURITIES SOLD BUT NOT YET PURCHASED
SHORT-TERM INVESTMENTS
The Company's short-term investments are stated at fair value, except for
other short-term investments which are stated either at cost, as reduced by any
unrealized losses deemed to be other than temporary, or at equity. Cost, as set
forth in the table below, represents amortized cost as reduced by any unrealized
losses deemed other than temporary (see Note 16) for United States government
debt securities and corporate debt securities and cost as reduced by any
unrealized losses deemed to be other than temporary for other short-term
investments. The cost, gross unrealized gains and losses, fair value and
carrying value, as appropriate, of the Company's short-term investments at
January 2, 2000 and December 31, 2000 were as follows (in thousands):
53
TRIARC COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- CONTINUED
DECEMBER 31, 2000
YEAR-END 1999 YEAR-END 2000
---------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------
GROSS UNREALIZED GROSS UNREALIZED
------------------- FAIR CARRYING -------------------
COST GAINS LOSSES VALUE VALUE COST GAINS LOSSES
---- ----- ------ ----- ----- ---- ----- ------
Marketable securities
Available-for-sale:
United States government
debt securities......... $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $243,873 $ 295 $ (34)
Corporate debt
securities.............. 18,976 39 (552) 18,463 18,463 527 2 (57)
Equity securities......... 29,171 4,105 (2,235) 31,041 31,041 15,578 4,313 (29)
-------- ------ ------- -------- -------- -------- ------ -----
Total
available-for-sale
marketable
securities........... 48,147 $4,144 $(2,787) 49,504 49,504 259,978 $4,610 $(120)
-------- ------ ------- -------- -------- -------- ------ -----
------ ------- ------ -----
Trading:
Equity securities......... 19,216 23,449 23,449 15,095
Corporate debt
securities.............. 4,726 5,318 5,318 2,389
-------- -------- -------- --------
Total trading
securities........... 23,942 28,767 28,767 17,484
-------- -------- -------- --------
Other short-term
investments............... 63,793 77,738 73,363 31,617
-------- -------- -------- --------
$135,882 $156,009 $151,634 $309,079
-------- -------- -------- --------
-------- -------- -------- --------
YEAR-END 2000
-------------------
FAIR CARRYING
VALUE VALUE
----- -----
Marketable securities
Available-for-sale:
United States government
debt securities......... $244,134 $244,134
Corporate debt
securities.............. 472 472
Equity securities......... 19,862 19,862
-------- --------
Total
available-for-sale
marketable
securities........... 264,468 264,468
-------- --------
Trading:
Equity securities......... 16,290 16,290
Corporate debt
securities.............. 1,170 1,170
-------- --------
Total trading
securities........... 17,460 17,460
-------- --------
Other short-term
investments............... 40,047 32,089
-------- --------
$321,975 $314,017
-------- --------
-------- --------
United States government debt securities and corporate debt securities at
December 31, 2000 which are classified as available-for-sale mature as follows
(in thousands):
FAIR
FISCAL YEARS COST VALUE
- ------------ ---- -----
2001........................................................ $243,873 $244,134
2002........................................................ 304 306
2003........................................................ 223 166
-------- --------
$244,400 $244,606
-------- --------
-------- --------
Proceeds from sales of available-for-sale marketable securities were
$63,562,000, $72,552,000 and $82,392,000 in 1998, 1999 and 2000, respectively.
Gross realized gains and gross realized losses on those sales are included in
'Investment income, net' in the accompanying consolidated income statements (see
Note 16) and are as follows (in thousands):
1998 1999 2000
---- ---- ----
Gross realized gains................................... $5,072 $7,514 $14,441
Gross realized losses.................................. (550) (865) (8,689)
------ ------ -------
$4,522 $6,649 $ 5,752
------ ------ -------
------ ------ -------
54
TRIARC COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- CONTINUED
DECEMBER 31, 2000
The net change in the unrealized gains on available-for-sale securities and
the equity in an unrealized gain on a retained interest of MCM Capital Group,
Inc., an Equity Investment included in non-current investments (see Note 8),
included in other comprehensive income (loss) consisted of the following (in
thousands):
1998 1999 2000
---- ---- ----
Net change in unrealized gains on available-for-sale
securities:
Change in unrealized appreciation of
available-for-sale securities..................... $ 462 $ 9,843 $ 4,549
Less reclassification adjustments for prior year
appreciation of securities sold during the year... (468) (668) (8,098)
----- ------- -------
(6) 9,175 (3,549)
Equity in the increase (decrease) in unrealized gain
on a retained interest............................ 596 (234) (117)
Income tax (provision) benefit...................... (189) (3,207) 1,344
----- ------- -------
$ 401 $ 5,734 $(2,322)
----- ------- -------
----- ------- -------
The change in the net unrealized gain or loss on trading securities resulted
in income of $2,675,000 and $2,143,000 in 1998 and 1999, respectively, and a
loss of $4,848,000 in 2000 and are included in 'Investment income, net' in the
accompanying consolidated income statements (see Note 16).
Other short-term investments represent investments in limited partnerships,
limited liability companies and similar investment entities which invest in
securities; primarily consisting of debt securities, common and preferred equity
securities, convertible preferred equity and debt securities, stock warrants and
rights and stock options. These investments are focused on both domestic and
foreign securities, including those of emerging market countries. Certain of
these investments are accounted for in accordance with the equity method.
SECURITIES SOLD BUT NOT YET PURCHASED
The Company also enters into short sales of debt and equity securities as
part of its portfolio management strategy. The Company's short sales are
commitments to sell such debt and equity securities not owned at the time of
sale that require purchase of such debt and equity securities at a future date.
Such short sales resulted in proceeds of $45,585,000, $53,281,000 and
$42,922,000 in 1998, 1999 and 2000, respectively. The change in the net
unrealized losses on securities sold but not yet purchased resulted in losses of
$3,069,000 and $1,834,000 in 1998 and 1999, respectively, and income of
$4,527,000 in 2000 and are included in 'Investment income, net' (see Note 16).
The fair value and carrying value of the liability for securities sold but not
yet purchased was $21,138,000 and $14,129,000 at January 2, 2000 and December
31, 2000, respectively, and is included in 'Accrued expenses' (see Note 6).
55
TRIARC COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- CONTINUED
DECEMBER 31, 2000
(6) BALANCE SHEET DETAIL
RECEIVABLES
The following is a summary of the components of receivables (in thousands):
YEAR-END
-----------------
1999 2000
---- ----
Receivables:
Trade................................................... $ 9,867 $10,749
Affiliates.............................................. 742 112
Other................................................... 2,346 4,876
------- -------
12,955 15,737
Less allowance for doubtful accounts........................ 1,371 1,172
------- -------
$11,584 $14,565
------- -------
------- -------
The following is an analysis of the allowance for doubtful accounts, all of
which relates to trade receivables (in thousands):
1998 1999 2000
---- ---- ----
Balance at beginning of year........................... $1,316 $1,306 $1,371
Provision for doubtful accounts........................ 1,217 461 292
Uncollectible accounts written off..................... (1,227) (396) (491)
------ ------ ------
$1,306 $1,371 $1,172
------ ------ ------
------ ------ ------
Certain trade receivables aggregating $7,609,000 as of December 31, 2000 are
pledged as collateral for securitization notes (see Note 9).
PROPERTIES
The following is a summary of the components of properties (in thousands):
YEAR-END
-----------------
1999 2000
---- ----
Land........................................................ $ 728 $ 750
Transportation and office equipment......................... 5,753 41,909
Leasehold improvements...................................... 16,417 9,342
------- -------
22,898 52,001
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization.............. 9,311 11,904
------- -------
$13,587 $40,097
------- -------
------- -------
Certain transportation equipment with a net book balance of $32,282,000 as
of December 31, 2000 is pledged as collateral for a secured promissory note (see
Note 9).
UNAMORTIZED COSTS IN EXCESS OF NET ASSETS OF ACQUIRED COMPANIES
The following is a summary of the components of unamortized costs in excess
of net assets of acquired companies (in thousands):
56
TRIARC COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- CONTINUED
DECEMBER 31, 2000
YEAR-END
-----------------
1999 2000
---- ----
Costs in excess of net assets of acquired companies......... $29,599 $29,599
Less accumulated amortization............................... 9,993 10,835
------- -------
$19,606 $18,764
------- -------
------- -------
OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS
The following is a summary of the components of other intangible assets (in
thousands):
YEAR-END
-----------------
1999 2000
---- ----
Trademarks.................................................. $ 8,003 $ 8,003
Non-compete agreement....................................... 2,214 2,214
Other....................................................... 229 229
------- -------
10,446 10,446
Less accumulated amortization............................... 3,750 4,376
------- -------
$ 6,696 $ 6,070
------- -------
------- -------
DEFERRED COSTS AND OTHER ASSETS
The following is a summary of the components of deferred costs and other
assets (in thousands):
YEAR-END
-----------------
1999 2000
---- ----
Deferred financing costs.................................... $ 140 $12,585
Other....................................................... 11,516 11,335
------- -------
11,656 23,920
Less accumulated amortization............................... 1,529 759
------- -------
$10,127 $23,161
------- -------
------- -------
ACCRUED EXPENSES
The following is a summary of the components of accrued expenses (in
thousands):
YEAR-END
-----------------
1999 2000
---- ----
Accrued compensation and related benefits................... $17,177 $25,678
Securities sold but not yet purchased (Note 5).............. 21,138 14,129
Accrued interest............................................ 5,553 6,520
Accrued taxes............................................... 4,471 5,710
Other....................................................... 17,738 13,328
------- -------
$66,077 $65,365
------- -------
------- -------
57
TRIARC COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- CONTINUED
DECEMBER 31, 2000
(7) RESTRICTED CASH EQUIVALENTS
The following is a summary of the components of restricted cash equivalents
(in thousands):
YEAR-END
-----------------
1999 2000
---- ----
Collateral supporting obligations under the securitization
notes (Note 9)............................................ $ -- $30,745
Support for letter of credit securing payments due under a
lease..................................................... 1,939 1,939
------- -------
$ 1,939 $32,684
------- -------
------- -------
(8) INVESTMENTS
The following is a summary of the components of investments classified as
non-current (in thousands):
INVESTMENT YEAR-END 2000
----------------- -----------------------------------
YEAR-END INTEREST IN
----------------- UNDERLYING MARKET
1999 2000 % OWNED EQUITY VALUE
---- ---- ------- ------ -----
MCM Capital Group, Inc., at
equity less, in 2000, an
other than temporary
unrealized loss............. $ 4,189 $ 230 8.4% $846 $230
EBT Holding Company, LLC, at
equity...................... 372 381 18.6% 381
280 KPE Holdings, LLC in 2000
and Clarion KPE Investors,
LLC in 1999, at equity...... 694 705 25.3% 653
Limited partnerships and
limited liability companies,
at equity................... 853 520 8.7% to 13.5% 520
Non-marketable preferred and
common stock, at cost....... 4,550 4,910
Other, at cost................ 3,497 4,849
------- -------
$14,155 $11,595
------- -------
------- -------
The Company's investment in MCM Capital Group, Inc. ('MCM') at December 31,
2000 was less than its interest in MCM's underlying equity as a result of the
Company's write-down of its investment in MCM to its fair market value based
upon the closing bid price for its common stock at December 31, 2000, as
described in more detail below. Prior to the write-down of the Company's
investment in MCM, its investment in MCM exceeded the underlying equity in MCM's
net assets. During 1998, 1999 and 2000 amortization of such excess amounted to
$104,000, $113,000 and $107,000, respectively, which is included in the equity
in earnings or losses of MCM. The Company's investment in 280 KPE Holdings, LLC
('280 KPE') at December 31, 2000 exceeded its interest in 280 KPE's underlying
equity as a result of outstanding receivables due from members of 280 KPE which
are reflected as a reduction of members' equity of 280 KPE.
The Company's consolidated equity in the earnings (losses) of investees
accounted for under the equity method and classified as non-current and included
as a component of 'Other income, net' (see Note 17) in the accompanying
consolidated income statements consisted of the following components (in
thousands):
1998 1999 2000
---- ---- ----
MCM Capital Group, Inc., at equity...................... $ 834 $(147) $(2,099)
Limited partnerships and limited liability companies, at
equity................................................ (1,281) 157 (208)
------- ----- -------
$ (447) $ 10 $(2,307)
------- ----- -------
------- ----- -------
58
TRIARC COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- CONTINUED
DECEMBER 31, 2000
The equity in the earnings (losses) of investees included in 'Other income,
net' in the table above excludes the equity in the income or loss of 280 KPE and
EBT Holding Company, LLC ('EBT'), investment limited liability companies, which
is included in 'Investment income, net' (see Note 16).
The Company and certain of its officers have co-invested in MCM. MCM is a
financial services company specializing in the recovery, restructuring, resale
and securitization of charged-off receivable portfolios acquired at deep
discounts. On July 14, 1999 MCM consummated an initial public offering (the
'MCM IPO') of 2,250,000 shares of its common stock resulting in a decrease in
the Company's percentage ownership interest to 8.4% from 12.2%. The Company
recorded a non-cash gain as a result of the MCM IPO of $1,188,000 reported as
'Gain on sale of business' in the accompanying consolidated income statement in
1999.
On January 12, 2000 the Company entered into an agreement (the 'Note
Guaranty') to guarantee $10,000,000 principal amount of senior notes maturing
January 2007 (the 'MCM Notes') issued by MCM to a major financial institution in
consideration for a fee of $200,000 and warrants to purchase 100,000 shares of
MCM common stock at $.01 per share with an estimated fair value on the date of
grant of $305,000. The $10,000,000 guaranteed amount has been reduced to
$6,698,000 as of December 31, 2000 and will be further reduced by (1) any
repayments of the MCM Notes, (2) any purchases of the MCM Notes by the Company
and (3) the amount of certain investment banking or financial advisory services
fees paid to the financial institution or its affiliates or, under certain
circumstances, other financial institutions by the Company, MCM or another
significant stockholder of MCM or any of their affiliates. Certain officers of
the Company, including entities controlled by them, collectively owned 15.7% of
MCM at the consummation of the MCM IPO and certain of these officers have made
additional open market purchases subsequent to the MCM IPO. These officers are
not parties to the Note Guaranty and could indirectly benefit therefrom. In
addition to the Note Guaranty, the Company and certain other stockholders of
MCM, including the officers of the Company referred to above, on a joint and
several basis, have entered into guaranties (the 'Bank Guaranties') and certain
related agreements to guarantee up to $15,000,000 of revolving credit borrowings
of a subsidiary of MCM, of which the Company would be responsible for
approximately $1,800,000 assuming the full $15,000,000 was borrowed and all of
the parties, other than the Company, to the Bank Guaranties and the related
agreements fully perform thereunder. As of December 31, 2000 MCM had $12,947,000
of outstanding revolving credit borrowings. In connection therewith, at
December 31, 2000 the Company has placed $15,000,000 of highly liquid United
States government debt securities in a custodian account at such financial
institution which under the Bank Guaranties is subject to set off under certain
circumstances if the parties to the Bank Guaranties and related agreements fail
to perform their obligations thereunder. Such United States government debt
securities are included in 'Cash and cash equivalents' in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheet. MCM has encountered cash flow and liquidity
difficulties. While it is not currently possible to determine if MCM may
eventually default on any of the aforementioned obligations, management of the
Company currently believes that it is possible, but not probable, that the
Company will be required to make payments under the Note Guaranty and/or the
Bank Guaranties.
On October 31, 2000 the Company, the Company officers who invested in MCM
and certain other stockholders of MCM, through a newly formed limited liability
company, CTW Funding, LLC ('CTW'), entered into an agreement to make available
to MCM a $2,000,000 revolving credit facility (the 'MCM Revolver') to be used
through December 31, 2000 to meet working capital requirements. The Company owns
an 8.7% interest in CTW and should any borrowings under the MCM Revolver occur
all members of CTW are required to fund such borrowings in accordance with their
percentage interests. In return CTW received warrants to purchase 50,000 shares
of MCM common stock at $.01 per share with an estimated fair value on the date
of grant of $24,000. Any borrowings under the MCM Revolver bear interest at 12%
and are due on December 31, 2001; however during 2000 there were no borrowings
under the MCM Revolver. Subsequent to December 31, 2000 the MCM Revolver was
renewed twice, each time for one quarter, so that it now extends through
June 30, 2001, for warrants to purchase an aggregate additional 100,000 shares
of MCM common stock each at $.01 per share. The MCM Revolver may be renewed
quarterly thereafter through December 31, 2001 by MCM for additional warrants to
purchase 50,000 shares of MCM common stock at $.01 per share. The
59
TRIARC COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- CONTINUED
DECEMBER 31, 2000
Company accounts for its investment in CTW in accordance with the equity method
and had equity in the earnings of CTW of $2,000 in 2000.
As of December 31, 2000 the fair market value of the MCM common stock was
$.33 per share, or $2.89 per share less than the Company's carrying value. The
MCM common stock has traded at depressed levels throughout the second half of
2000 ranging from $.13 to $.88 per share. Further, as discussed above MCM has
encountered cash flow and liquidity difficulties. As a result, the Company has
deemed the loss on its investment in MCM to be other than temporary and reduced
its investment in MCM by $2,047,000, or to $.33 per share, as of December 31,
2000. Such other than temporary unrealized loss is included in 'Investment
income, net' (see Note 16) in the accompanying consolidated income statement.
The Company and certain of its officers and employees have co-invested in
EBT, resulting in the Company owning 18.6% and the officers and employees owning
56.4%. The Company advanced the funds for the purchases by the officers and
employees and transferred such ownership to the officers and employees for cash
aggregating $376,000 and notes due the Company aggregating $752,000, of which
one-half, or $376,000, are non-recourse notes. Such notes bear interest (9.5% at
December 31, 2000) at the prime rate adjusted annually in December and as of
December 31, 2000 notes aggregating $734,000 remain outstanding. The Company
accounts for its investment in EBT in accordance with the equity method.
However, the only operating assets of EBT are its investment in the
non-cumulative preferred stock of EBondTrade.com, Inc. ('Ebondtrade') which is
accounted for at cost and a note receivable from Ebondtrade dated January 5,
2000. Accordingly, the Company had no equity in the earnings or losses of EBT in
1999 and had only equity in the earnings of EBT of $9,000 in 2000.
The Company and certain of its officers have co-invested in 280 KPE
resulting in the Company owning 25.3% and the officers owning 74.7%. 280 KPE
owns a 38.6% interest in Clarion KPE Investors, LLC ('Clarion') which owns the
non-cumulative preferred stock of KPE, Inc. ('KPE') and has co-invested with KPE
in other entities. The Company advanced the funds for the purchases by the
officers. In consideration for the transfer of such ownership to the officers
and to provide for future cash commitments to Clarion, the Company received cash
aggregating $683,000 and notes due the Company aggregating $1,194,000, of which
one-half, or $597,000, are non-recourse notes. Such notes bear interest (8 3/4%
at December 31, 2000) at the prime rate adjusted annually in March. Prior to
March 2000 and since November 1999, the Company had owned the entire 38.6%
interest in Clarion directly. In March 2000 the Company effectively sold to
certain of its officers 74.7% of its interest in Clarion. The Company accounts
or accounted for its investment in 280 KPE and formerly its direct investment in
Clarion in accordance with the equity method. The only asset of 280 KPE is its
investment in Clarion which is also accounted for in accordance with the equity
method. However, the only operating asset of Clarion is its investment in KPE
which is accounted for at cost, although Clarion incurs certain administrative
expenses. Accordingly, the Company's equity in losses of Clarion from
November 1999 to March 2000 and of 280 KPE from March 2000 through December 31,
2000 amounted to $21,000 in 1999 and $33,000 in 2000.
The Company provides certain officers and employees opportunities to
co-invest as part of its overall retention efforts.
The Company's investments accounted for in accordance with the equity method
include MCM, a financial services company as described above, entities that
develop and operate golf courses and several investment limited partnerships and
limited liability companies, including EBT and 280 KPE, which generally invest
in diversified portfolios of securities. As such, the summary balance sheet and
income statement information presented below combines assets, liabilities,
revenues and expenses which vary greatly in nature and are taken from certain
balance sheets which do not distinguish between current and long-term assets and
liabilities. In addition, certain entities included as of December 31, 1999 are
no longer included since they were either sold or are no longer accounted for
under the equity method. The largest components of total assets and liabilities
represent the short-term investments and securities sold but not yet purchased
of the investment entities. Other assets primarily represent properties of the
golf courses and investments in receivable portfolios. Other
60
TRIARC COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- CONTINUED
DECEMBER 31, 2000
liabilities primarily represent long-term debt. Revenues relate to the
operations of golf courses as well as operating revenues of the financial
services company. Investment income, net relates to the investment entities.
Summary unaudited information as to assets, liabilities, equity and results
of operations for the Company's investments accounted for in accordance with the
equity method as of and for the years ended December 31, 1999 and 2000, the year
ends of such investments, is as follows (in thousands):
DECEMBER 31,
-------------------
1999 2000
---- ----
Assets, liabilities and equity information:
Short-term investments................................. $683,629 $ 28,442
Other assets........................................... 289,396 191,008
-------- --------
$973,025 $219,450
-------- --------
-------- --------
Securities sold but not yet purchased.................. $540,081 $ 4,899
Other liabilities...................................... 92,484 146,954
Partners' capital/Members' capital/Stockholders'
equity............................................... 340,460 67,597
-------- --------
$973,025 $219,450
-------- --------
-------- --------
YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31,
-------------------
1999 2000
---- ----
Results of operations information:
Revenues............................................... $ 37,185 $ 49,098
Investment income (loss), net.......................... 60,236 (13,121)
Income (loss) before income taxes...................... 61,152 (53,491)
Net income (loss)...................................... 63,065 (46,234)
(9) LONG-TERM DEBT
Long-term debt consisted of the following (in thousands):
YEAR-END
-----------------
1999 2000
---- ----
Insured securitization notes bearing interest at 7.44%
scheduled to mature through 2011, net of unamortized
original issue discount of $37 as of December 31, 2000
(a)....................................................... $ -- $288,743
Secured promissory note bearing interest at 8.95% due
through 2006 (b).......................................... -- 16,577
Mortgage and equipment notes payable to FFCA Mortgage
Corporation bearing interest at a weighted average rate of
10.38% as of December 31, 2000 due through 2016 (c)....... 3,582 3,415
Other....................................................... 2,764 --
------ --------
Total debt.......................................... 6,346 308,735
Less amounts payable within one year................ 2,554 17,017
------ --------
$3,792 $291,718
------ --------
------ --------
61
TRIARC COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- CONTINUED
DECEMBER 31, 2000
Aggregate annual maturities of long-term debt were as follows as of
December 31, 2000 (in thousands):
FISCAL YEAR AMOUNT
- ----------- ------
2001...................................................... $ 17,017
2002...................................................... 21,053
2003...................................................... 22,643
2004...................................................... 24,390
2005...................................................... 26,304
Thereafter................................................ 197,365
--------
308,772
Less unamortized original issue discount.................. 37
--------
$308,735
--------
--------
- ---------
(a) The Company, through Arby's Franchise Trust (the 'Arby's Trust'), an
indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Arby's, issued insured non-recourse
securitization notes (the 'Securitization Notes') in the principal amount
of $290,000,000, with a discounted amount of $289,963,000, on November 21,
2000 pursuant to Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
Effective November 21, 2000 Arby's Trust owns the rights under all of the
franchising agreements (the 'Franchising Agreements') for Arby's
restaurants located in the United States and Canada, all market development
agreements and other agreements relating to the development of future
Arby's restaurants in the United States and Canada and all rights to expand
and administer the Arby's restaurant system in the United States and Canada
through sales of new franchises and other means. In addition, the Arby's
Trust holds a 99 year license to use the Arby's trademarks, service marks
and all other intellectual property rights throughout the United States and
Canada.
The remaining principal of the Securitization Notes of $288,743,000 as of
December 31, 2000 is due no later than December 2020. However, based on
current projections and assuming the adequacy of available funds, as
defined, the Company currently estimates it will repay $14,789,000 in 2001
with increasing annual payments to $37,377,000 in 2011 in accordance with a
targeted principal payment schedule. Available funds to Arby's Trust to pay
principal on the Securitization Notes are franchisee fees, royalties and
other payments received by the Arby's Trust after October 31, 2000 pursuant
to the Franchising Agreements after (1) operating expenses of the Arby's
Trust, (2) servicing fees payable to Arby's and one of its subsidiaries to
cover the costs of administering the Franchise Agreements, (3) insurance
premiums related to insuring the payment of principal and interest on the
Securitization Notes and (4) interest on the Securitization Notes have been
paid. Any remaining cash through January 31, 2001 is available for
distribution by Arby's Trust to its parent and thereafter is available for
such distribution as long as Arby's Trust meets the minimum debt service
coverage ratio, as defined under the indenture pursuant to which the
Securitization Notes were issued. Such requirement is initially 1.2:1
subject to increases to a maximum of 1.7:1. Effective March 1, 2001 the
Securitization Notes are subject to mandatory redemption if the Arby's
Trust debt service coverage ratio is less than 1.2:1, until such time as
the ratio exceeds 1.2:1 for six consecutive calendar months. Such debt
service coverage ratio is based on the preceding four calendar months of
activity and was 1.5:1 for the four months ended February 28, 2001. The
Securitization Notes are redeemable by the Arby's Trust at an amount equal
to remaining principal, accrued interest and the excess, if any, of the
discounted value of remaining principal and interest payments over the
principal amount of the Securitization Notes.
Obligations under the Securitization Notes are insured by a financial
guarantee company and are collateralized by cash, including a cash reserve
account of $30,745,000 (see Note 7) as of December 31,
(footnotes continued on next page)
62
TRIARC COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- CONTINUED
DECEMBER 31, 2000
(footnotes continued from previous page)
2000, and royalty receivables of Arby's Trust, with an aggregate book value
of $45,665,000 as of December 31, 2000.
The issuance of the Securitization Notes has been accounted for as a
financing transaction and, accordingly, the Securitization Notes are
included in the Company's debt balances. The cash reserve account is
included in 'Restricted cash equivalents' in the accompanying consolidated
balance sheet (see Note 7) as of December 31, 2000. In connection with the
issuance of the Securitization Notes, the Company incurred $12,445,000 of
estimated fees and expenses which are included in 'Deferred costs and other
assets' in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet (see Note 6) as of
December 31, 2000.
The indenture pursuant to which the Securitization Notes were issued
contains various covenants which (1) require periodic financial reporting,
(2) require meeting the debt service coverage ratio test and (3) restrict,
among other matters, (a) the incurrence of indebtedness, (b) asset
dispositions and (c) the payment of distributions. As of December 31, 2000
Arby's Trust had $594,000 available for the payment of distributions to its
parent. The Company was in compliance with all of such covenants as of
December 31, 2000.
(b) The Company assumed an $18,000,000 secured promissory note (the 'Promissory
Note') in connection with its acquisition of 280 Holdings, LLC (see
Note 22) on January 19, 2000. The remaining principal of the Promissory
Note of $16,577,000 as of December 31, 2000 is due $1,556,000 in 2001,
$1,701,000 in 2002, $1,860,000 in 2003, $2,033,000 in 2004, $2,223,000 in
2005 and $7,204,000 in 2006. The Promissory Note is secured by certain of
the Company's transportation equipment with a net book value of $32,282,000
as of December 31, 2000.
(c) The Company remains liable for $3,415,000 of mortgage and equipment notes
payable to FFCA Mortgage Corporation as of December 31, 2000, of which it
is a co-obligor for notes aggregating $523,000 as of December 31, 2000. In
addition, Triarc has guaranteed obligations under an aggregate $54,682,000
of mortgage and equipment notes which were assumed by affiliates of RTM,
Inc. ('RTM'), the largest franchisee in the Arby's system, in connection
with the May 1997 sale of all of the 355 then company-owned restaurants
(the 'Restaurant Sale'), of which approximately $49,000,000 and $47,000,000
were outstanding as of January 2, 2000 and December 31, 2000, respectively,
assuming the purchaser has made all scheduled repayments through such
dates.
(10) FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The Company has the following financial instruments for which the disclosure
of fair values is required: cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and
payable, accrued expenses, short-term investments, other non-current
investments, at cost, long-term debt, a written call option on Triarc's common
stock (see Note 12) and a forward purchase obligation for Triarc's common stock
(see Note 12). In addition, the Company has non-marketable investments in
preferred and common stock, at cost (see Note 8) for which it is not practicable
to estimate fair value because the investments are non-marketable and are in
start-up enterprises. The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents,
accounts payable and accrued expenses approximated fair value due to the
short-term maturities of such assets and liabilities. The carrying amount of
accounts receivable approximated fair value due to the related allowance for
doubtful accounts. The fair values of short-term investments are based on quoted
market prices or statements of account received from investment managers or from
the investees and are set forth in Note 5. The carrying value of the written
call option on Triarc's common stock is equal to its fair value which was
determined by independent third-party consultants using the Black-Scholes option
pricing model. The carrying value of the Company's forward purchase obligation
for Triarc's common stock approximated fair value since the related contract was
recently entered into in August 1999, the required cash settlement method and/or
the contract is of a relatively short duration with a payment made in August
2000 and the remaining payment is required no later than August 19, 2001. The
carrying amounts and fair values of other non-current investments, at cost and
long-term debt were as follows (in thousands):
63
TRIARC COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- CONTINUED
DECEMBER 31, 2000
YEAR-END
---------------------------------------
1999 2000
----------------- -------------------
CARRYING FAIR CARRYING FAIR
AMOUNT VALUE AMOUNT VALUE
------ ----- ------ -----
Other non-current investments, at cost
(Note 8).................................. $3,497 $3,775 $ 4,849 $ 5,018
------ ------ -------- --------
------ ------ -------- --------
Long-term debt (Note 9):
Securitization Notes.................... $ -- $ -- $288,743 $297,530
Promissory Note......................... -- -- 16,577 17,193
Other long-term debt.................... 6,346 6,428 3,415 3,758
------ ------ -------- --------
$6,346 $6,428 $308,735 $318,481
------ ------ -------- --------
------ ------ -------- --------
The fair values of the Company's other non-current investments, at cost are
almost entirely based on statements of account received from such investees
which are principally based on quoted market prices. The fair value of the
Securitization Notes, the Promissory Note and certain other long-term debt are
determined by discounting the future scheduled payments using an interest rate
assuming the same original issuance spread over a current Treasury bond yield
for securities with similar durations. The fair value of all other long-term
debt were assumed to reasonably approximate their carrying amounts since the
remaining maturities are relatively short-term or the carrying amounts of such
debt are relatively insignificant.
(11) INCOME TAXES
Income from continuing operations before income taxes consisted of the
following components (in thousands):
1998 1999 2000
---- ---- ----
Domestic............................................... $7,941 $24,763 $2,334
Foreign................................................ 78 91 (123)
------ ------- ------
$8,019 $24,854 $2,211
------ ------- ------
------ ------- ------
The provision for income taxes from continuing operations consisted of the
following components (in thousands):
1998 1999 2000
---- ---- ----
Current:
Federal............................................ $ (54) $1,847 $(1,164)
State.............................................. 5,871 2,681 3,465
Foreign............................................ 412 363 322
------- ------ -------
6,229 4,891 2,623
------- ------ -------
Deferred:
Federal............................................ 284 2,389 10,377
State.............................................. (1,681) (128) (632)
------- ------ -------
(1,397) 2,261 9,745
------- ------ -------
Total.......................................... $ 4,832 $7,152 $12,368
------- ------ -------
------- ------ -------
64
TRIARC COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- CONTINUED
DECEMBER 31, 2000
The net current deferred income tax benefit and the net non-current deferred
income tax (liability) resulted from the following components (in thousands):
YEAR-END
-------------------
1999 2000
---- ----
Current deferred income tax benefit (liability):
Accrued employee benefit costs.......................... $ 5,098 $ 7,229
Investment write-downs for unrealized losses deemed
other than temporary.................................. 4,619 1,971
Accrued liabilities of SEPSCO discontinued operations
(Note 18)............................................. 1,189 1,142
Allowance for doubtful accounts......................... 533 456
Closed facilities reserves.............................. 630 309
Investment limited partnerships basis differences....... (3,325) (2,313)
Unrealized (gains) losses, net, on available-for-sale
and trading marketable securities and securities sold
but not yet purchased (Note 5)........................ (2,846) (1,429)
Other, net.............................................. 172 2,294
-------- --------
6,070 9,659
-------- --------
Non-current deferred income tax benefit (liability):
Gain on sale of propane business........................ (37,003) (37,003)
Investment in propane business other basis
differences........................................... (19,894) (15,925)
Net operating loss and other tax credit carryforwards
and (reserve for income tax contingencies and other
tax matters), net..................................... 27,294 (15,161)
Accelerated depreciation................................ (473) (2,700)
Other, net.............................................. 435 867
-------- --------
(29,641) (69,922)
-------- --------
$(23,571) $(60,263)
-------- --------
-------- --------
The increase in the net deferred income tax liability from $23,571,000 at
January 2, 2000 to $60,263,000 at December 31, 2000, or an increase of
$36,692,000, exceeds the 2000 provision for deferred income taxes of $9,745,000.
Such difference of $26,947,000 is principally due to the utilization of net
operating loss and other tax credit carryforwards to offset pretax income from
discontinued operations. As of December 31, 2000 the Company had no remaining
net operating loss carryforwards for Federal income tax purposes.
The difference between the reported provision for income taxes and the
provision that would result from applying the 35% Federal statutory rate to the
income from continuing operations before income taxes is reconciled as follows
(in thousands):
65
TRIARC COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- CONTINUED
DECEMBER 31, 2000
1998 1999 2000
---- ---- ----
Income tax provision computed at Federal statutory
rate................................................ $ 2,807 $ 8,699 $ 774
Increase (decrease) in Federal tax provision resulting
from:
Non-deductible compensation....................... -- 1,509 9,702
State income taxes, net of Federal income tax
benefit......................................... 2,723 1,659 1,841
Amortization of non-deductible Goodwill........... 290 287 284
Effect of net operating losses for which no tax
carryback benefit is available.................. 348 -- --
Reversal of provision for income tax
contingencies................................... -- (5,127) --
Basis differences in investments in subsidiaries
no longer permanently reinvested principally due
to the 1998 Chesapeake Sale..................... (1,500) -- --
Other, net........................................ 164 125 (233)
------- ------- -------
$ 4,832 $ 7,152 $12,368
------- ------- -------
------- ------- -------
During 1999, the Internal Revenue Service (the 'IRS') completed its
examination of the Company's Federal income tax returns for the fiscal years
ended April 30, 1989 through April 30, 1992 (the '1989 through 1992
Examinations') and the Company reached a final settlement with the IRS relating
thereto. During 1999, the IRS also tentatively completed its examination of the
Company's Federal income tax returns for the fiscal year ended April 30, 1993
and eight-month transition period ended December 31, 1993 (the '1993
Examinations') and during 2000 the Company reached a final settlement with the
IRS relating thereto. The liabilities for such settlements, including interest
thereon, had principally been provided for in years prior to 1998 supplemented
by an additional $2,000,000 provision to 'Interest expense' in 1998. As a result
of the then completion of the 1989 through 1992 Examinations and the tentative
completion of the 1993 Examinations in 1999, the Company determined that it had
excess income tax reserves and interest accruals relating to continuing
operations of $5,127,000 and $3,052,000, respectively, and, accordingly,
released such amounts as reductions of the 'Provision for income taxes' and
'Interest expense,' respectively, in 1999. With respect to any examinations of
the Company's income tax returns subsequent to the 1993 Examinations and through
the October 25, 2000 date of the Snapple Beverage Sale, Cadbury has agreed to
reimburse the Company up to $2,915,000 of any resulting income tax liabilities
and up to $653,000 of interest thereon relating to Snapple Beverage Group and
Royal Crown.
In connection with the Snapple Beverage Sale, the Company has entered into a
related tax agreement with Cadbury whereby both the Company and Cadbury intend
to jointly elect to treat certain portions of the transaction as an asset sale
in lieu of a stock sale under the provisions of section 338 (h)(10) of the
United States Internal Revenue Code (the '338 Election'). Assuming the 338
Election is executed by both parties to the agreement, the Company will be
reimbursed $200,000,000 by Cadbury for the estimated additional income taxes
expected to be incurred by the Company as a result of the 338 Election. Such
amount has not been reflected in the accompanying consolidated financial
statements since the Company will recover the additional income taxes from
Cadbury. Should either the Company or Cadbury default on this tax agreement and
not make the 338 Election, the defaulting party would owe $30,000,000 to the
other party.
(12) STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)
Common Stock
The Company's common stock consists of class A common stock (the 'Class A
Common Stock') and class B common stock (the 'Class B Common Stock'), which are
identical, except that Class A Common Stock has one vote per share and Class B
Common Stock is non-voting and that if the Class B Common Stock were to be held
by a person(s) not affiliated with Victor Posner ('Posner'), the former Chairman
and Chief Executive Officer of Triarc, each share of Class B Common Stock would
be convertible into one share of Class A Common
66
TRIARC COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- CONTINUED
DECEMBER 31, 2000
Stock. All outstanding shares of Class B Common Stock are held by affiliates
(the 'Posner Entities') of Posner. However, as described in more detail below
under 'Treasury Stock,' the Company is in the process of repurchasing for
treasury all of the Class B Common Stock over an approximate two year period
through no later than August 2001. There were no changes in the 29,550,663
issued shares of Class A Common Stock or the 5,997,622 issued shares of Class B
Common Stock throughout 1998, 1999 and 2000.
Preferred Stock
The Company has 25,000,000 authorized shares of preferred stock including
5,982,866 designated as redeemable preferred stock, none of which were issued
throughout 1998, 1999 and 2000.
Treasury Stock
A summary of the changes in the number of shares of Class A Common Stock
held in treasury and Class B Common Stock held in treasury is as follows (in
thousands):
1998 1999 2000
------- ----------------- -----------------
CLASS A CLASS A CLASS B CLASS A CLASS B
------- ------- ------- ------- -------
Number of shares at beginning of year..... 3,951 6,251 -- 9,773 1,999
Common shares acquired from certain
officers and a director of the Company
(a)..................................... -- -- -- 1,046 --
Common shares acquired in connection with
a tender offer (b)...................... -- 3,805 -- -- --
Common shares acquired in connection with
the issuance of the Debentures (Note
3)...................................... 1,000 -- -- -- --
Common shares acquired in open market
transactions............................ 1,673 295 -- -- --
Common shares issued from treasury upon
exercise of stock options............... (369) (572) -- (1,585) --
Common shares issued from treasury for
director fees........................... (4) (6) -- (9) --
Common shares issued from treasury upon
settlement of stock options on a net
share basis............................. -- -- -- (1) --
Common shares acquired from Posner
Entities (c)............................ -- -- 1,999 -- 1,999
----- ----- ----- ------ -----
Number of shares at end of year........... 6,251 9,773 1,999 9,224 3,998
----- ----- ----- ------ -----
----- ----- ----- ------ -----
- ---------
(a) During December 2000 the Company repurchased 1,045,834 shares of its
Class A Common Stock from certain of its officers and a director for an
aggregate cost of $25,942,000 (see discussion below).
(b) On April 27, 1999 the Company repurchased 3,805,015 shares of its Class A
Common Stock for $18.25 per share in connection with a tender offer (the
'Tender Offer') for an aggregate cost of $70,051,000, including fees and
expenses of $609,000.
(c) On August 19, 1999 Triarc entered into a contract to repurchase in three
separate transactions the 5,997,622 shares of Triarc's Class B Common Stock
then held by the Posner Entities for an aggregate of $127,050,000. Triarc
completed the purchases of 1,999,208 and 1,999,207 shares of Class B Common
Stock (the 'Class B Repurchases') on August 19, 1999 and August 10, 2000,
respectively. The August 19, 1999 Class B Repurchase was for an aggregate
of $40,864,000 at a price of $20.44 per share, which was the fair market
value of the Class A Common Stock at the time the transaction was
negotiated. The August 10, 2000 Class B Repurchase was for an aggregate of
$42,343,000 at a negotiated price of $21.18 plus
(footnotes continued on next page)
67
TRIARC COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- CONTINUED
DECEMBER 31, 2000
(footnotes continued from previous page)
expenses of $30,000. Pursuant to the contract, the third purchase of
$43,843,000 for 1,999,207 shares at a negotiated fixed price of $21.93 per
share is to occur on or before August 19, 2001. The remaining obligations
of $86,186,000 and $43,843,000 as of January 2, 2000 and December 31, 2000,
respectively, for the unpurchased Class B Common Stock have been recorded
by the Company as 'Forward purchase obligation for common stock' with an
equal offsetting reduction to the 'Common stock to be acquired' component
of 'Stockholders' equity (deficit).'
Written Call Option
Although Cadbury assumed the Debentures and the Company was released as an
obligor, the Debentures remain convertible into shares of the Company's Class A
Common Stock. The Debentures are convertible at a conversion rate of 9.465
shares per $1,000 principal amount at maturity, which represents a conversion
price of $35.37 per share of Class A Common Stock as of December 31, 2000. The
conversion price increases through 2018 at an annual rate of 6.5%. Should a
Debenture holder elect to convert a Debenture into the Company's Class A Common
Stock, Cadbury may, but is not required to, cause the Company to issue such
shares effectively establishing a written call option on the Company's Class A
Common Stock (the 'Written Call Option'). Should the Company be required to
issue Class A Common Stock upon any conversion, the Company would be compensated
for the accreted value of each of the Debentures converted, which as of
December 31, 2000 would have been $35.37 for each share issued upon any
conversion. Accordingly, the Written Call Option would be settled by physical
delivery of the Company's Class A Common Stock. As of December 31, 2000, the
conversion of all of the Debentures, assuming that subsequent to October 25,
2000 none have been redeemed by Cadbury and no Debenture holder has converted
without the Company issuing the related shares, would result in the issuance of
3,407,000 shares of Class A Common Stock. The Debentures are redeemable by
Cadbury commencing February 9, 2003 and Cadbury has agreed to use their best
efforts to so redeem the Debentures. The fair value of the Written Call Option
of $1,476,000 as of October 25, 2000 was recorded as a reduction of the 'Gain on
disposal' component of 'Total income from discontinued operations' in the
accompanying consolidated income statement (see Note 18) for the year ended
December 31, 2000. The fair value of the Written Call Option of $823,000 as of
December 31, 2000 was reported as a liability included in 'Deferred income and
other liabilities' in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of
December 31, 2000, with the reduction in the fair value of the Written Call
Option of $653,000 from October 25, 2000 to December 31, 2000 reported as a
component of 'Other income, net' (see Note 17). The fair value of the Written
Call Option as of October 25, 2000 and December 31, 2000 was determined by
independent third-party consultants using the Black-Scholes option pricing
model.
Stock-Based Compensation
The Company maintains several equity plans (the 'Equity Plans') which
collectively provide or provided for the grant of stock options to certain
officers, key employees, consultants and non-employee directors and shares of
Class A Common Stock pursuant to automatic grants in lieu of annual retainer or
meeting attendance fees to non-employee directors. There remain 2,232,475 shares
available for future grants under the Equity Plans as of December 31, 2000.
68
TRIARC COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- CONTINUED
DECEMBER 31, 2000
A summary of changes in outstanding stock options under the Equity Plans is
as follows:
WEIGHTED AVERAGE
OPTIONS OPTION PRICE OPTION PRICE
------- ------------ ------------
Outstanding at December 29, 1997....... 9,641,435 $4.07 - $30.00 $17.16
Granted during 1998 (a)................ 119,250 $21.75 - $27.00 $25.82
Exercised during 1998.................. (368,700) $4.07 - $21.00 $10.69
Terminated during 1998................. (218,672) $10.125 - $23.3125 $17.41
----------
Outstanding at January 3, 1999......... 9,173,313 $6.39 - $30.00 $17.53
Granted during 1999 (a)................ 2,221,000 $16.875 - $21.5625 $17.65
Exercised during 1999.................. (571,750) $6.39 - $21.00 $12.98
Terminated during 1999................. (210,998) $10.125 - $27.00 $18.17
----------
Outstanding at January 2, 2000......... 10,611,565 $6.39 - $30.00 $17.78
Granted during 2000 (a)................ 1,018,000 $19.00 - $25.4375 $25.17
Exercised during 2000.................. (1,584,545) $6.39 - $23.3125 $14.31
Stock options settled for cash or on a
net share basis (b).................. (868,755) $10.125 - $23.6875 $16.60
Terminated during 2000................. (257,847) $10.125 - $27.00 $19.55
----------
Outstanding at December 31, 2000....... 8,918,418 $10.125 - $30.00 $19.31
----------
----------
Exercisable at December 31, 2000....... 3,468,671 $10.125 - $30.00 $17.16
----------
----------
- ---------
(a) The weighted average grant date fair values of stock options granted under
the Equity Plans during 1998, 1999 and 2000, all of which were granted at
exercise prices equal to the market price of the stock on the grant date,
were $11.94, $7.92 and $11.37, respectively.
(b) Includes 856,169 stock options held by the employees of Snapple Beverage
Group and Royal Crown who chose to surrender these options prior to the
Snapple Beverage Sale (see discussion below).
The following table sets forth information relating to stock options
outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 2000 under the Equity Plans:
STOCK OPTIONS OUTSTANDING STOCK OPTIONS EXERCISABLE
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------
OUTSTANDING AT WEIGHTED WEIGHTED OUTSTANDING AT WEIGHTED
YEAR-END AVERAGE YEARS AVERAGE YEAR-END AVERAGE
OPTION PRICE 2000 REMAINING OPTION PRICE 2000 OPTION PRICE
------------ ---- --------- ------------ ---- ------------
$10.125 - $13.375......... 1,115,836 5.0 $11.22 1,113,002 $11.22
$16.25 - $17.75........... 1,162,165 8.7 $17.45 317,169 $17.45
$18.00 - $20.00........... 1,158,000 2.7 $18.21 1,115,000 $18.16
$20.125................... 3,500,000 3.3 $20.13 -- $--
$20.375 - $24.75.......... 935,833 6.4 $22.62 851,332 $22.71
$25.4375 - $30.00......... 1,046,584 9.7 $25.54 72,168 $26.83
--------- ---------
8,918,418 5.2 3,468,671
--------- ---------
--------- ---------
Stock options under the Equity Plans generally have maximum terms of ten
years and vest ratably over periods not exceeding five years from date of grant.
However, an aggregate 3,500,000 stock options outstanding at December 31, 2000
granted on April 21, 1994 to the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and the
President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company (the 'Executives') at an
exercise price of $20.125 per option vest on October 21, 2003. Subsequently, as
of March 4, 2001 the Executives surrendered an aggregate 775,000 of these stock
options in connection with the settlement of a class action shareholder lawsuit
(see Note 23).
69
TRIARC COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- CONTINUED
DECEMBER 31, 2000
Stock options under the Equity Plans are generally granted at the fair
market value of the Class A Common Stock at the date of grant. However, options
granted in 1997 included 1,331,000 options issued at a weighted average option
price of $12.70 which was below the $14.82 weighted average fair market value of
the Class A Common Stock on the respective dates of grant (based on the closing
price on such dates), resulting in aggregate unearned compensation, representing
the initial intrinsic value, of $2,823,000 reported in the 'Unearned
compensation' component of 'Stockholders' equity (deficit).' Such unearned
compensation was being amortized as compensation expense over the applicable
vesting period of one to three years. During 1998, 1999 and 2000, $982,000,
$388,000 and $61,000, respectively, of compensation was credited to 'Unearned
compensation,' of which $778,000, $298,000 and $49,000 relating to employees of
Triarc and Arby's was charged to 'General and administrative' during 1998, 1999
and 2000, respectively, and $204,000, $90,000 and $12,000 relating to employees
of Snapple Beverage Group, Royal Crown and the Propane Partnership in 1998 and
1999 was reported in the 'Income (loss) from operations' component of 'Total
income from discontinued operations' during 1998, 1999 and 2000, respectively.
During December 2000, certain of the Company's officers and a director
exercised stock options under the Equity Plans and the Company repurchased the
1,045,834 shares of its Class A Common Stock received by these individuals upon
such exercises on the respective exercise dates. Since such shares of Class A
Common Stock were repurchased within six months after exercise of the related
stock options, the Company recognized aggregate compensation cost of $10,422,000
representing the excess of the market prices on the dates of purchase by the
Company over the exercise prices of the underlying stock options per option, net
of any amortization related to such stock options issued below market. Such
amount was charged to 'General and administrative' with an offsetting credit to
'Additional paid-in capital.' Shares repurchased from two officers of the
Company on December 29, 2000 for an aggregate cost of $7,429,000 were not
settled until January 2, and 3, 2001 and are included in 'Accounts payable' in
the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2000.
As disclosed above, during October 2000 certain employees of Snapple
Beverage Group and Royal Crown who held stock options for Triarc's Class A
Common Stock surrendered 856,169 stock options prior to the Snapple Beverage
Sale. Such option holders received an amount initially equal to the excess of
$23.75 per option over the respective exercise prices of the underlying stock
option, or an aggregate $6,159,000 of cash, in this settlement. Such cash
payment, less $274,000 previously amortized for stock options issued below
market, has been recorded in the 'Gain on disposal' component of 'Total income
from discontinued operations' in the accompanying consolidated income statement
for the year ended December 31, 2000. Further, Triarc agreed to pay cash
compensation to certain of these individuals in an amount per option surrendered
by such individuals equal to the excess of the average of the five highest daily
closing prices of Triarc's Class A Common Stock during the 90-day period
following the October 25, 2000 date of the Snapple Beverage Sale over the $23.75
price used in the settlement, or an aggregate $599,000, which was paid in
January 2001. Since each of the five highest daily closing prices occurred
during 2000, the Company recorded the liability for the full $599,000 in 2000
with an equal offsetting charge to 'General and administrative' expenses.
During 1999 and 2000 there were certain other modifications to the terms of
stock options relating to certain terminated employees of the Company. Such
modifications resulted in aggregate compensation of $410,000 and $491,000 during
1999 and 2000, respectively, which was credited to 'Additional paid-in-capital'
and of which (1) $64,000 and $465,000 relating to employees of Triarc was
charged to 'General and administrative' during 1999 and 2000, respectively, and
(2) $346,000 relating to employees of the Propane Partnership during 1999 and
$26,000 relating to employees of Snapple Beverage Group and Royal Crown during
2000 was reported in the 'Income (loss) from operations' component of 'Total
income from discontinued operations.'
Snapple Beverage Group maintained a stock option plan (the 'Snapple Beverage
Plan') which provided for the grant of options to purchase shares of Snapple
Beverage Group's common stock (the 'Snapple Beverage Common Stock') to key
employees, officers, directors and consultants of Snapple Beverage Group and the
70
TRIARC COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- CONTINUED
DECEMBER 31, 2000
Company. Effective with the Snapple Beverage Sale on October 25, 2000, the
Company is no longer responsible for the 149,284 then outstanding stock options
under the Snapple Beverage Plan which remain the responsibility of Snapple
Beverage Group under Cadbury's ownership and which at the time of the Snapple
Beverage Sale had an aggregate intrinsic value of $123,638,000. A summary of
changes in outstanding stock options under the Snapple Beverage Plan is as
follows:
WEIGHTED AVERAGE
OPTIONS OPTION PRICE OPTION PRICE
------- ------------ ------------
Outstanding at December 29, 1997... 76,250 $147.30 $147.30
Granted during 1998................ 72,175 $191.00 $191.00
Terminated during 1998............. (3,000) $147.30 $147.30
--------
Outstanding at January 3, 1999..... 145,425 $147.30 and $191.00 $168.99
Changes in options relating to
equitable adjustments of option
prices during 1999 discussed
below:
Cancellation................... (144,675) $147.30 and $191.00 $169.10
Reissuance..................... 144,675 $107.05 and $138.83 $122.90
Granted during 1999................ 4,850 $311.99 $311.99
Exercised during 1999.............. (500) $107.05 $107.05
Terminated during 1999............. (2,325) $107.05 - $311.99 $170.72
--------
Outstanding at January 2, 2000..... 147,450 $107.05 - $311.99 $128.55
Granted during 2000................ 2,501 $456.14 $456.14
Terminated during 2000............. (667) $138.83 - $311.99 $182.18
Stock options no longer the
responsibility of the Company
(see disclosure above)........... (149,284) $107.05 - $456.14 $133.80
--------
Outstanding at December 31, 2000... --
--------
--------
Stock options under the Snapple Beverage Plan were generally granted at the
fair value of Snapple Beverage Common Stock at the date of grant as determined
by independent appraisals. However, all 2,501 options granted in 2000 were
issued at option prices below the fair market value of Snapple Beverage Common
Stock on the date of grant resulting in aggregate compensation expense of
$1,157,000, of which $412,000 relating to an employee of Triarc was included in
'General and administrative' and $745,000 relating to employees of Snapple
Beverage Group was reported in the 'Income (loss) from operations' component of
'Total income from discontinued operations.' The weighted average grant date
fair value of the options granted during 1998 and 2000 was $60.01 and $462.53,
respectively. The weighted average grant date fair value under the Black-Scholes
option pricing model of the options granted during 1999 was $222.69 for the
144,675 reissued options (see below) and $102.75 for the 4,850 newly granted
options. Stock options under the Snapple Beverage Plan had maximum terms of ten
years and generally vested ratably over periods approximating three years. The
options reissued in 1999 vested or would have vested ratably on July 1 of 1999,
2000 and 2001.
The Snapple Beverage Plan provided for an equitable adjustment of options in
the event of a recapitalization or similar event. The exercise prices of the
Snapple Beverage Group options outstanding at December 29, 1997 and granted in
1998 were equitably adjusted in 1999 to adjust for the effects of net
distributions of $91,342,000, principally consisting of transfers of cash and
deferred tax assets from Snapple Beverage Group to Triarc, partially offset by
the effect of the contribution of Stewart's to Snapple Beverage Group effective
May 17, 1999. The exercise prices of the options outstanding at December 29,
1997 and granted in 1998 were equitably adjusted from $147.30 and $191.00 per
share, respectively, to $107.05 and $138.83 per share, respectively, and a cash
payment (the 'Cash Payment') of $51.34 and $39.40 per share, respectively, was
due from the Company to the option holder following the exercise of the stock
options and the occurrence of certain other events (collectively, the 'Cash
Payment Events'). The Company has accounted for
71
TRIARC COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- CONTINUED
DECEMBER 31, 2000
the equitable adjustment of the Snapple Beverage Group stock options in
accordance with the intrinsic value method. In accordance therewith, the
equitable adjustment, exclusive of the Cash Payment, was considered a
modification to the terms of existing stock options. For purposes of disclosure,
including the determination of the pro forma compensation expense set forth
below, the equitable adjustment is reflected in accordance with the fair value
method whereby it results in the deemed cancellation of existing options and the
reissuance of new options. Compensation expense for the Cash Payment was
recognized ratably over the vesting period of the stock options through the date
such options were no longer the responsibility of the Company in connection with
the Snapple Beverage Sale. Such compensation expense with respect to option
holders who were employees of Snapple Beverage Group was charged to the 'Income
(loss) from operations' component of 'Total income from discontinued operations'
and, upon the release of the Company's obligation for such Cash Payment, the
release of the related accruals was reported in the 'Gain on disposal' component
of 'Total income from discontinued operations.' See Note 15 for disclosure of
the effect of the Cash Payment for option holders who were employees of Triarc.
No compensation expense was recognized for the changes in the exercise prices of
the outstanding options because such modifications to the options did not create
a new measurement date under generally accepted accounting principles.
As disclosed in Note 1, the Company accounts for stock options in accordance
with the intrinsic value method and, accordingly, has not recognized any
compensation expense for those stock options granted at option prices equal to
the fair market value of the Class A Common Stock or the Snapple Beverage Common
Stock, as applicable, at the respective dates of grant. The pro forma net income
and basic and diluted income per share set forth below adjusts such data as set
forth in the accompanying consolidated income statements to reflect for the
Equity Plans and the Snapple Beverage Plan through October 25, 2000
(1) compensation expense for all 1995 through 2000 stock option grants,
including those granted at below market option prices, and options reissued in
1999 as a result of equitable adjustments of option prices under the Snapple
Beverage Plan, based on the fair value method, (2) the reduction in compensation
expense recorded in accordance with the intrinsic value method and (3) the
income tax effects thereof. In 2000 the reduction in compensation expense
recorded in accordance with the intrinsic value method exceeded the compensation
expense based on the fair value method due to the inclusion in expense in
accordance with the intrinsic value method of (a) $10,422,000 for the Company's
repurchase of Class A Common Stock from certain officers and a director
representing the excess of the market prices on the dates of purchase by the
Company over the exercise prices of the underlying stock options and
(b) $5,885,000 related to certain employees of Snapple Beverage Group and Royal
Crown who surrendered 856,169 stock options for Triarc's Class A Common Stock
prior to the Snapple Beverage Sale for cash, at prices in excess of the exercise
prices of the underlying stock options, both as discussed in more detail above.
Such pro forma net income and basic and diluted income per share are as follows
(in thousands except per share data):
1998 1999 2000
----------------- ----------------- -------------------
AS PRO AS PRO AS PRO
REPORTED FORMA REPORTED FORMA REPORTED FORMA
-------- ----- -------- ----- -------- -----
Net income................. $14,636 $6,613 $10,124 $1,545 $441,241 $444,625
Basic income per share..... .48 .22 .39 .06 18.99 19.14
Diluted income per share... .46 .21 .37 .06 18.99 19.14
The fair value of stock options granted on the date of grant other than
stock options granted during 2000 under the Snapple Beverage Plan was estimated
using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the weighted average
assumptions set forth below. The fair value of stock options granted in 2000
under the Snapple Beverage Plan was assumed to be their intrinsic value since
such options were issued shortly before the October 25, 2000 date of the Snapple
Beverage Sale.
72
TRIARC COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- CONTINUED
DECEMBER 31, 2000
1998 1999 2000
---------------- --------------------- ------
SNAPPLE
EQUITY BEVERAGE EQUITY SNAPPLE EQUITY
PLANS PLAN PLANS BEVERAGE PLAN PLANS
----- ---- ----- ------------- -----
Risk-free interest rate.......... 5.72% 5.54% 6.08% 5.69% 5.19%
Expected option life............. 7 years 7 years 7 years 5.7 years (a) 7 years
Expected volatility.............. 31.95% N/A 28.76% N/A 32.22%
Dividend yield................... None None None None None
- ---------
(a) Adjusted to reflect the then remaining expected life of the 144,675
reissued options for which the original vesting dates were not changed.
(13) CORPORATE RESTRUCTURING CREDITS
In years prior to 1998 the Company provided for corporate restructuring
charges associated with the May 1997 Restaurant Sale. During 1999 the Company
reversed $303,000 of remaining excess accruals to 'General and administrative'
in the accompanying 1999 consolidated income statement. The components of
corporate restructuring credits in 1999 and an analysis of related activity
during 1998 and 1999 in the corporate restructuring accrual, all of which
represent cash obligations, are as follows (in thousands):
1998
-------------------------------------------------------
BALANCE BALANCE
DECEMBER 29, JANUARY 3,
1997 (a) PAYMENTS ADJUSTMENTS (b) 1999
-------- -------- --------------- ----
Employee severance and related
termination costs................ $1,809 $(1,236) $ -- $ 573
Employee relocation costs.......... 373 (24) (65) 284
Estimated costs related to the
sublease of excess office
space............................ 155 (53) (102) --
------ ------- ------ ------
$2,337 $(1,313) $ (167) $ 857
------ ------- ------ ------
------ ------- ------ ------
1999
-------------------------------------------------------
BALANCE BALANCE
JANUARY 4, JANUARY 2,
1999 PAYMENTS CREDITS (c) 2000
---- -------- ----------- ----
Employee severance and related
termination costs................ $ 573 $ (457) $ (116) $ --
Employee relocation costs.......... 284 (97) (187) --
------ ------- ------ ------
$ 857 $ (554) $ (303) $ --
------ ------- ------ ------
------ ------- ------ ------
- ---------
(a) The corporate restructuring accrual as of December 29, 1997 resulted from
the remaining balances from provisions in 1996 and 1997 and consisted
principally of (1) employee severance and related termination costs
associated with restructuring the restaurant business in connection with
the Restaurant Sale, (2) employee relocation costs, which are expensed as
incurred, associated with the Restaurant Sale and (3) estimated losses on
planned subleases of surplus headquarters and divisional office space of
the restaurant business principally for rent and common area maintenance
costs for the estimated period the surplus space would remain unoccupied as
a result of the then planned Restaurant Sale. The severance and termination
costs were as a result of the termination in 1997 of 54 employees
principally in finance and
(footnotes continued on next page)
73
TRIARC COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- CONTINUED
DECEMBER 31, 2000
(footnotes continued from previous page)
accounting, owned restaurant operations, marketing and human resources as
well as the president and chief executive officer of Arby's.
(b) The 1998 adjustments principally relate to the sublease of excess office
space and resulted from subsequent favorable lease negotiations with the
landlord.
(c) The 1999 corporate restructuring credits resulted from relatively
insignificant changes to the original estimates used in determining the
related provisions for the employee relocation costs and employee severance
and related termination cost components of the original corporate
restructuring charges in 1996 and 1997 which aggregated $5,597,000.
(14) CAPITAL MARKET TRANSACTION RELATED COMPENSATION
The capital market transaction related compensation results from incentive
compensation directly related to the consummation of the Snapple Beverage Sale
and the issuance of the Securitization Notes consisting of (1) $22,500,000 to
the Executives which was invested in a deferred compensation trust for their
benefit in January 2001 and included in 'Deferred compensation payable to
related parties' in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet and
(2) $3,510,000 paid to other officers and employees in January 2001.
(15) CAPITAL STRUCTURE REORGANIZATION RELATED CHARGE
As disclosed in Note 12, the Company was required to make cash payments of
$51.34 and $39.40 per share for Snapple Beverage Group stock options outstanding
at December 31, 1997 and granted in 1998, respectively, upon the Cash Payment
Events. The Cash Payment obligation relating to option holders who were
employees of Triarc was recognized as 'Capital structure reorganization related
charges.' The capital structure reorganization related charges of $2,126,000 and
$306,000 in 1999 and 2000, represent (1) the vested portion as of January 2,
2000 of the then aggregate maximum $2,592,000 cash payments to be recognized
over the full vesting period and (2) the additional vested portion during 2000
through the date of the release of the Company's obligation for such Cash
Payment as a result of the Snapple Beverage Sale, respectively. Since the
obligation for the Snapple Beverage Group stock options are no longer the
responsibility of the Company but remain the responsibility of Snapple Beverage
Group under Cadbury's ownership, the remaining accrual for these cash payments
of $2,433,000 was released and reported in the 'Gain on disposal' component of
'Total income from discontinued operations' in the accompanying consolidated
income statement (see Note 18) for the year ended December 31, 2000.
74
TRIARC COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- CONTINUED
DECEMBER 31, 2000
(16) INVESTMENT INCOME, NET
Investment income, net consisted of the following components (in thousands):
1998 1999 2000
---- ---- ----
Interest income...................................... $ 9,494 $ 12,238 $16,478
Realized gains on sales of investment limited
partnerships and similar investment entities....... 4,186 91 10,891
Realized gains on available-for-sale marketable
securities......................................... 4,522 6,649 5,752
Realized gains (losses) on trading marketable
securities......................................... (439) 10,771 2,190
Realized gains (losses) on securities sold and
subsequently purchased............................. 809 (11,039) (1,295)
Unrealized gains (losses) on trading marketable
securities......................................... 2,675 2,143 (4,848)
Unrealized gains (losses) on securities sold short... (3,069) (1,834) 4,527
Distributions, including dividends................... 715 767 1,599
Other than temporary unrealized losses (a)........... (9,298) (4,560) (3,669)
Equity in the earnings (losses) of investment limited
partnerships and similar investment entities....... 623 2,226 (116)
Investment fees...................................... (355) (548) (794)
------- -------- -------
$ 9,863 $ 16,904 $30,715
------- -------- -------
------- -------- -------
- ---------
(a) The Company recorded charges for unrealized losses on certain investments
in limited partnerships, marketable securities classified as
available-for-sale and its investment in MCM and reduced the cost basis of
those investments. Such losses were deemed to be other than temporary due
to global economic conditions, volatility in capital and lending markets or
declines in the underlying economics of specific marketable equity and debt
securities and MCM.
(17) OTHER INCOME, NET
Other income, net consisted of the following income (expense) components (in
thousands):
1998 1999 2000
---- ---- ----
Settlement of bankruptcy claims with a former
affiliate previously written off.................. $ -- $ -- $ 859
Reduction in fair value of the Written Call Option
(Note 12)......................................... -- -- 653
Interest income..................................... 457 1,608 686
Recognition of deferred gain on sale of
restaurants....................................... 310 -- 471
Gain on lease termination........................... 577 651 337
Amortization of debt guarantee reserve.............. 191 222 247
Fees from restaurant franchisees other than
royalties and franchise fees...................... 361 382 206
Equity in earnings (losses) of investees
(Note 8).......................................... (447) 10 (2,307)
Insurance premiums on Securitization Notes
(Note 9).......................................... -- -- (550)
Cost of proposed going-private transaction in 1998
and proposed acquisition in 1999 not
consummated....................................... (900)(a) (416) --
Other income........................................ 656 641 334
Other expenses...................................... (171) (250) (36)
------ ------ -------
$1,034 $2,848 $ 900
------ ------ -------
------ ------ -------
(footnote on next page)
75
TRIARC COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- CONTINUED
DECEMBER 31, 2000
(footnote from previous page)
(a) On October 12, 1998 the Company announced that its Board of Directors had
formed a special committee (the 'Special Committee') to evaluate a proposal
(the 'Proposal') it had received from the Executives for the acquisition by
an entity to be formed by them of all of the outstanding shares of Triarc's
common stock (other than 5,982,867 shares owned by an affiliate controlled
by the Executives) for $18.00 per share payable in cash and securities (the
'Proposed Transaction'). On March 10, 1999 the Company announced that it
had been advised by the Executives that they had withdrawn the Proposal.
Since the Proposed Transaction would not be consummated, the Company
recorded a 1998 charge for the estimated fees and expenses incurred as of
January 3, 1999 in connection with the Proposed Transaction aggregating
$900,000.
(18) DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
On October 25, 2000, the Company consummated the Snapple Beverage Sale (see
Note 3) and, as set forth in Note 1, these beverage businesses have been
accounted for as discontinued operations in the year 2000 through the date of
sale and the accompanying consolidated financial statements for 1998 and 1999
have been reclassified accordingly. In addition, on July 19, 1999, the Company
consummated the Propane Partnership Sale (see Note 3) and, as set forth in
Note 1, the propane business has been accounted for as a discontinued operation
in 1999 through the date of sale and the accompanying consolidated financial
statements for 1998 have been reclassified accordingly. Further, prior to 1998
the Company sold the stock or the principal assets of the companies comprising
SEPSCO's utility and municipal services and refrigeration business segments (the
'SEPSCO Discontinued Operations') which have been accounted for as discontinued
operations and of which there remain certain obligations not transferred to the
buyers of the discontinued businesses to be liquidated and incidental properties
of the refrigeration business to be sold.
The income from discontinued operations consisted of the following (in
thousands):
1998 1999 2000
---- ---- ----
Income (loss) from operations, net of income tax
expense of $10,983, $4,850 and $915............... $ 7,442 $(10,583) $ (8,868)
Gain on disposal, net of income taxes of $2,192,
$4,512 and $226,765............................... 4,007 15,102 480,946
------- -------- --------
$11,449 $ 4,519 $472,078
------- -------- --------
------- -------- --------
The after-tax gain on disposal of discontinued operations resulted from the
following (in thousands):
1998 1999 2000
---- ---- ----
Gain on the Snapple Beverage Sale (Note 3)........... $ -- $ -- $480,946
Gain on the Propane Partnership Sale (Note 3)........ -- 11,204 --
Recognition of deferred gain from the 1996 Propane
Partnership IPO.................................... 1,407 1,171 --
Additional gain from SEPSCO Discontinued
Operations......................................... 2,600 2,727 --
------ ------- --------
$4,007 $15,102 $480,946
------ ------- --------
------ ------- --------
The recognition of deferred gain (the 'Propane Deferred Gain') from the 1996
Propane Partnership IPO (see Note 3) occurred as the Company received cash
distributions from the Propane Partnership despite the Company's equity in the
losses of the Propane Partnership operations. The Company's investment in the
Propane Partnership was fully offset by the Propane Deferred Gain from the 1996
Propane Partnership IPO subsequent thereto through the 1999 Propane Partnership
Sale. Accordingly, as the Company received such cash distributions and the
Propane Partnership incurred losses, the Company recognized the aggregate amount
of the cash distributions plus the Company's equity in the losses of the Propane
Partnership such that the
76
TRIARC COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- CONTINUED
DECEMBER 31, 2000
Company's investment remained fully offset by the Propane Deferred Gain. The
additional gain on disposal of the SEPSCO Discontinued Operations represents
reductions of previously recognized losses on disposal of the SEPSCO
Discontinued Operations recognized before 1998. During 1998 the Company settled
a $3,000,000 note receivable from National Cold Storage, Inc., a company formed
by two then officers of SEPSCO to purchase one of SEPSCO's refrigeration
businesses, for $2,600,000. The note, which had an original due date of December
20, 2000, was not recognized prior to its collection since at the time of sale,
collection thereof was not reasonably assured. In connection with such
collection and a reevaluation of the remaining obligations of the SEPSCO
Discontinued Operations, during 1998 the Company recognized a $4,000,000
reduction, before an income tax provision of $1,400,000, of its previously
recognized estimated disposal losses. During 1999, the Company resolved all
remaining tax issues relating to the IRS examination of its tax returns for the
fiscal years 1989 through 1993 and the eight-month transition period ended
December 31, 1993 (see Note 11). In connection therewith, the Company recognized
a $2,727,000 reduction of its previously recognized estimated disposal losses
principally representing the receipt by SEPSCO of an income tax refund and the
release by SEPSCO of income tax reserves no longer deemed required based on the
results of such IRS examination.
The income or loss from discontinued operations relating to Snapple Beverage
Group and Royal Crown through their date of sale of October 25, 2000 and the
Company's 42.7% interest in the Propane Partnership through its date of sale of
July 19, 1999 reflecting the Propane Partnership under the equity method,
consisted of the following (in thousands):
1998 1999 2000
---- ---- ----
Revenues and other earnings....................... $744,265 $775,026 $681,063
Income (loss) before income taxes................. 18,425 (5,733) (7,953)
Provision for income taxes........................ (10,983) (4,850) (915)
Net income (loss)................................. 7,442 (10,583) (8,868)
The Company's discontinued operations had a provision for income taxes
representing an effective rate of 60% for the fiscal year 1998 which was in
excess of the United States Federal statutory tax rate of 35% and a provision
for income taxes despite a loss before income taxes for the fiscal years 1999
and 2000 principally due to (1) the amortization of non-deductible unamortized
costs in excess of net assets of acquired companies and (2) the differing impact
of the mix of pretax loss or income among the combined entities since the
Company files state income tax returns on an individual company basis.
Net current assets (liabilities) as of January 2, 2000 and December 31, 2000
and net non-current liabilities as of January 2, 2000 relating to discontinued
operations consisted of the following (in thousands):
77
TRIARC COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- CONTINUED
DECEMBER 31, 2000
YEAR-END
---------------------
1999 2000
---- ----
Current assets (liabilities):
Cash................................................... $ 34,040 $ --
Receivables............................................ 67,700 --
Inventories............................................ 61,736 --
Other current assets................................... 18,795 --
Current portion of long-term debt...................... (39,640) --
Accounts payable....................................... (55,183) --
Accrued income taxes................................... (1,057) (235,529)
Other accrued expenses................................. (68,691) (5,872)
Net current liabilities of SEPSCO Discontinued
Operations (net of assets held for sale of $234)..... (3,163) (3,028)
--------- ---------
$ 14,537 $(244,429)
--------- ---------
--------- ---------
Non-current assets (liabilities):
Properties............................................. $ 22,811
Unamortized costs in excess of net assets of acquired
companies............................................ 242,060
Trademarks............................................. 244,745
Other intangible assets................................ 31,302
Deferred costs and other non-current assets............ 39,059
Long-term debt......................................... (847,067)
Deferred income taxes.................................. (61,670)
Deferred income and other liabilities.................. (9,034)
---------
$(337,794)
---------
---------
Accrued income taxes of $235,529,000 as of December 31, 2000 represent the
Company's current estimate of income taxes payable with respect to the Snapple
Beverage Sale. The $226,765,000 provision for taxes included in the 'Gain on
disposal' component of 'Total income from discontinued operations' consists of
such current provision of $235,529,000 less the reversal of $8,764,000 of
deferred income tax liabilities which are no longer required as a result of the
Snapple Beverage Sale.
Losses associated with the SEPSCO Discontinued Operations were provided for
in their entirety in years prior to 1998. After consideration of the amounts
provided in prior years, the Company expects the liquidation of the remaining
liabilities associated with the SEPSCO Discontinued Operations as of January 2,
2000 will not have any material adverse impact on its financial position or
results of operations.
During the year ended December 28, 1997, the Company recorded charges to
post-acquisition transition, integration and changes to business strategies
attributed to the acquisition of Snapple and Stewart's during that year
consisting of cash obligations aggregating $16,029,000 and non-cash charges
aggregating $15,786,000. The components of the remaining reserves related to
such charges as of December 29, 1997 and an analysis of related activity are as
follows (in thousands):
78
TRIARC COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- CONTINUED
DECEMBER 31, 2000
1998
-----------------------------------------------------------
WRITE-OFF
OF ACCOUNTS
BALANCE DETERMINED BALANCE
DECEMBER 29, TO BE JANUARY 3,
1997 UNCOLLECTIBLE PAYMENTS 1999
---- ------------- -------- ----
Non-cash reserve:
Additional reserve for doubtful
accounts based on the Company's
change in estimate of the related
write-off to be incurred (a)........ $ 2,254 $(1,080) $-- $1,174
Cash obligations:
Additional reserve for legal matters
based on the Company's change in
estimate from the amounts estimated
by the seller of Snapple to the
amounts required reflecting the
Company's plans and estimates of
costs to resolve such
matters (b)......................... 6,697 -- (6,697) --
Incentive compensation in connection
with the successful consummation of
the acquisition of Snapple and a
Mistic debt refinancing (c)......... 2,000 -- (2,000) --
------- ------- ------- ------
$10,951 $(1,080) $(8,697) $1,174
------- ------- ------- ------
------- ------- ------- ------
1999
------------------------------------------------------------
WRITE-OFF
OF ACCOUNTS
BALANCE DETERMINED BALANCE
JANUARY 4, TO BE JANUARY 2,
1999 UNCOLLECTIBLE ADJUSTMENTS (A) 2000
---- ------------- --------------- ----
Non-cash reserve:
Additional reserve for doubtful
accounts based on the Company's
change in estimate of the related
write-off to be incurred (a)........ $ 1,174 $ (624) $ (550) $--
------- ------ ------ ------
------- ------ ------ ------
- ---------
(a) In the transition following the acquisition of Snapple, the Company decided
that, in order to improve its relationships with customers, it would not
actively seek to collect certain past due balances, disputed amounts or
amounts that were not sufficiently supportable and provided an additional
reserve for doubtful accounts. The adjustment in 1999 represented a credit
related to post-acquisition transition, integration and changes to business
strategies included in income (loss) before income taxes in the summary of
the income or loss from discontinued operations set forth above and
resulted from changes in the estimated amount of the additional Snapple
reserve for doubtful accounts from the amount originally provided by the
Company.
(b) In the transition following the acquisition of Snapple, the Company decided
that, in order to improve relationships with customers and reverse
Snapple's sales decline, it would attempt to settle as many of the legal
matters pending at the time of the acquisition of Snapple as quickly as
possible. Accordingly, the Company provided $6,697,000 representing the
excess of the Company's estimate to settle such claims over the existing
reserve established by the seller of Snapple as of the date of the
acquisition of Snapple.
(c) The Company paid supplemental incentive compensation payments to certain of
its executives directly involved with the acquisition of Snapple and a
related debt refinancing. Such payments were incremental
(footnotes continued on next page)
79
TRIARC COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- CONTINUED
DECEMBER 31, 2000
(footnotes continued from previous page)
and above recurring incentive compensation payments to such executives and
would not have been paid without the acquisition of Snapple and related
debt refinancing.
(19) EXTRAORDINARY CHARGES
The 1999 extraordinary charges resulted from the early extinguishment of (1)
$284,333,000 of outstanding obligations under a former credit facility of
Snapple Beverage Group and (2) $275,000,000 of 9 3/4% senior notes due 2000 of
RC/Arby's. The 2000 extraordinary charges resulted from the early assumption or
extinguishment, as applicable, of (1) the Senior Notes co-issued by TCPG and
Snapple Beverage Group, (2) the Beverage Credit Facility maintained by Snapple,
Mistic, Stewart's, Royal Crown and RC/Arby's and (3) the Triarc Debentures. The
components of such extraordinary charges were as follows (in thousands):
1999 2000
---- ----
Write-off of previously unamortized deferred financing
costs..................................................... $11,300 $27,491
Payment of prepayment penalties............................. 7,662 5,509
Fees........................................................ -- 17
Write-off of previously unamortized interest rate cap
agreement costs........................................... 146 --
------- -------
19,108 33,017
Income tax benefit.......................................... 7,011 12,337
------- -------
$12,097 $20,680
------- -------
------- -------
(20) RETIREMENT BENEFIT PLANS
The Company maintains a 401(k) defined contribution plan (the 'Plan')
covering all of the Company's employees who meet certain minimum requirements
and elect to participate. Under the provisions of the Plan, employees may
contribute various percentages of their compensation ranging up to a maximum of
15%, subject to certain limitations. The Plan provides for Company matching
contributions at 50% of employee contributions up to the first 6% thereof
effective September 1, 1999 and up to the first 5% thereof prior thereto. In
addition, the Plan provides for annual Company profit-sharing contributions of a
discretionary aggregate amount to be determined by the employer regardless of
whether the employee otherwise elects to participate in the Plan. In connection
with both of these employer contributions, the Company provided as compensation
expense $648,000, $757,000 and $924,000 in 1998, 1999 and 2000, respectively.
The Company maintains defined benefit plans for eligible employees through
December 31, 1988 of certain subsidiaries, benefits under which were frozen in
1992. The net periodic pension cost for 1998, 1999 and 2000, as well as the
accrued pension cost as of January 2, 2000 and December 31, 2000, were
insignificant. As of December 31, 2000 the actuarial present value of
accumulated benefits exceeds plan assets and accrued pension liabilities
resulting in a minimum pension liability of $320,000. Since the Company has no
unrecognized prior service cost, $198,000, representing the $320,000 minimum
pension liability less $122,000 of related deferred income tax benefit, has been
reported as 'Unrecognized Pension Loss' as a reduction of comprehensive income
for the 2000 fiscal year as reported in the accompanying consolidated statement
of stockholders' equity (deficit).
(21) LEASE COMMITMENTS
The Company leases office space and transportation and office equipment
under operating lease agreements that do not provide for any contingent rental
charges. Rental expense under operating leases consisted of the following
components (in thousands):
80
TRIARC COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- CONTINUED
DECEMBER 31, 2000
1998 1999 2000
---- ---- ----
Rental expense........................................... $ 7,011 $ 6,568 $ 3,701(a)
Less sublease rental income.............................. 543 336 327
------- ------- -------
$ 6,468 $ 6,232 $ 3,374
------- ------- -------
------- ------- -------
- ---------
(a) Rental expense decreased in 2000 from 1999 since as of January 19, 2000 the
Company owns the asset through its ownership of 280 Holdings, LLC that had
previously been leased (see Note 22).
In connection with the Restaurant Sale, substantially all operating and
capitalized lease obligations associated with the sold restaurants were assumed
by RTM, although the Company remains contingently liable if the future lease
payments (which could potentially aggregate a maximum of approximately
$81,000,000 as of December 31, 2000 assuming RTM has made all scheduled payments
to date under such lease obligations) are not made by RTM. The Company's future
rental payments, excluding the lease obligations assumed by RTM, and sublease
rental receipts for noncancelable leases having an initial lease term in excess
of one year as of December 31, 2000 are as follows (in thousands):
SUBLEASE
RENTAL RENTAL
FISCAL YEAR PAYMENTS RECEIPTS
- ----------- -------- --------
2001........................................................ $ 3,805 $273
2002........................................................ 3,597 167
2003........................................................ 3,207 72
2004........................................................ 3,007 40
2005........................................................ 2,275 40
Thereafter.................................................. 9,829 117
------- ----
Total minimum payments.................................. $25,720 $709
------- ----
------- ----
(22) TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PARTIES
On January 19, 2000 the Company acquired 280 Holdings, LLC ('280 Holdings')
for $27,210,000 consisting of cash of $9,210,000 and the assumption of an
$18,000,000 secured promissory note with a third-party commercial lender payable
over seven years. 280 Holdings was a subsidiary of Triangle Aircraft Services
Corporation ('TASCO'), a company owned by the Executives, that at the time of
such sale was the owner and lessor to the Company of an airplane that had
previously been leased from TASCO. The purchase price was based on independent
appraisals and was approved by the Audit Committee and the Board of Directors.
Prior thereto the Company leased the airplane and a helicopter from TASCO or
subsidiaries of TASCO under a dry lease for a base annual rent, adjusted to
$3,310,000 as of December 29, 1997, plus annual cost of living (the 'COLA')
adjustments. Pursuant to this dry lease, the Company also paid the operating
expenses, including repairs and maintenance, of the aircraft directly to third
parties. During 1999 the Company incurred $2,207,000 of repairs and maintenance
for the aircraft, principally relating to the airplane for required inspections
and overhaul of the engines and landing gear in accordance with Federal Aviation
Administration standards, and $7,278,000 of capitalized improvements to the
airplane. As of January 19, 2000 the annual rent had increased to $3,447,000, of
which $3,078,000 was deemed to represent rent for the airplane and $369,000 was
deemed to represent rent for the helicopter. The Company continues to lease the
helicopter from a subsidiary of TASCO for the annual rent of $369,000 from
January 19, 2000 through September 30, 2000, increasing to $382,000 as of
October 1, 2000 in connection with the COLA adjustment, and owns the airplane
through its ownership of 280 Holdings. In addition, in 1997 the Company paid
TASCO $2,500,000 for (1) an option (the 'Option') to continue the lease for five
years effective September 30, 1997 and (2) the agreement by TASCO to replace the
helicopter then covered under the lease. The Option was being amortized over a
five-year
81
TRIARC COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- CONTINUED
DECEMBER 31, 2000
period until the Company was reimbursed $1,200,000 by TASCO representing the
portion of the $1,242,000 unamortized amount of the Option as of January 2, 2000
relating to the airplane now owned by 280 Holdings. In connection with the lease
of the airplane through January 19, 2000, the lease of the helicopter and the
amortization of the Option through January 19, 2000, the Company had rent
expense to TASCO and its subsidiaries of $3,885,000, $3,850,000 and $574,000 for
1998, 1999 and 2000, respectively.
See also Notes 8, 12, 14, 17 and 23 with respect to other transactions with
related parties.
(23) LEGAL MATTERS
Subsequent to the receipt of the Proposal (see Note 17), a series of
purported class action lawsuits on behalf of stockholders were filed challenging
the Proposed Transaction. Each of the pending lawsuits names the Company and the
members of its Board of Directors as defendants. The complaints allege, among
other things, that the Proposed Transaction would constitute a breach of the
directors' fiduciary duties and that the proposed consideration to be paid for
the shares of Class A Common Stock was unfair and demand, in addition to damages
and costs, that the Proposed Transaction be enjoined. On March 26, 1999, certain
plaintiffs in the actions challenging the Proposed Transaction filed an amended
complaint alleging that the defendants violated fiduciary duties by failing to
disclose, in connection with the Tender Offer (see Note 12), that the Special
Committee had allegedly determined that the Proposal was unfair. The amended
complaint seeks, among other items, damages in an unspecified amount. In
October 2000 the parties agreed to stay this action pending the determination of
the March 23, 1999 action described immediately below.
On March 23, 1999, an alleged stockholder filed a complaint on behalf of
persons who held Triarc Class A Common Stock as of March 10, 1999 which alleges
that the Company's statement related to the Tender Offer filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission was false and misleading and seeks damages in
an unspecified amount, together with prejudgment interest, the costs of suit,
including attorneys' fees, and unspecified other relief. The complaint names the
Company and the Executives as defendants. In June 1999 the Company and the
Executives moved to dismiss the complaint or alternatively stay the action. In
March 2000, the court denied the motion for a stay and granted in part and
denied in part the motion to dismiss. In April 2000 an amended complaint was
filed alleging the matters in the original complaint and seeking an order to
permit all shareholders who tendered their shares of Triarc Class A Common Stock
in the Tender Offer to rescind the transaction. In May 2000 the defendants filed
an answer to the amended complaint. Discovery has commenced in the action.
On June 25, 1997 a class action lawsuit was filed which asserted, among
other things, claims relating to certain awards of compensation to the
Executives in 1994 through 1997. In August 2000 the parties to the lawsuit
entered into a settlement agreement whereby, (1) the case would be dismissed
with prejudice, (2) the Company would receive a note receivable from the
Executives in the aggregate amount of $5,000,000 receivable in three equal
installments due March 31, 2001, 2002 and 2003 and (3) as set forth in Note 12,
the Executives would surrender an aggregate of 775,000 stock options awarded to
them in 1994. On January 30, 2001, the court entered an order and final judgment
approving the settlement in full, which became effective March 1, 2001. The
Company will record pretax income of $5,000,000 in the first quarter of the
fiscal year ended December 30, 2001 for the note receivable from the Executives.
In addition to the shareholder lawsuits described above, the Company is
involved in other litigation and claims incidental to its businesses. The
Company has reserves for all of such legal matters aggregating $1,740,000 as of
December 31, 2000. Although the outcome of such matters cannot be predicted with
certainty and some of these may be disposed of unfavorably to the Company, based
on currently available information and given the Company's aforementioned
reserves, the Company does not believe that such legal matters will have a
material adverse effect on its consolidated financial position or results of
operations.
82
TRIARC COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- CONTINUED
DECEMBER 31, 2000
(24) QUARTERLY INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)
On October 25, 2000, the Company consummated the Snapple Beverage Sale which
has been accounted for as a discontinued operation through the date of sale. The
quarterly information set forth below for 1999 and the first two quarters of
2000 has been reclassified to account for these businesses as discontinued
operations. See Notes 3 and 18 for additional information regarding the Snapple
Beverage Sale and the reclassifications of its operations to discontinued
operations.
QUARTER ENDED
----------------------------------------------------------
APRIL 4, (b) JULY 4, OCTOBER 3, JANUARY 2, 2000 (c)
------------ ------- ---------- -------------------
(IN THOUSANDS EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
1999
Revenues and other earnings... $ 22,836 $ 28,224 $26,112 $24,989
Income from continuing
operations before income
taxes....................... 4,096 10,259 4,297 6,202
Income from continuing
operations.................. 2,215 5,899 2,159 7,429
Income (loss) from
discontinued operations..... (3,463) (1,679) 12,087 (2,426)
Extraordinary charges (Note
19)......................... (12,097) -- -- --
Net income (loss)............. (13,345) 4,220 14,246 5,003
Basic income (loss) per share
(a):
Income from continuing
operations.............. .08 .22 .09 .31
Income (loss) from
discontinued
operations.............. (.12) (.06) .49 (.10)
Extraordinary charges..... (.42) -- -- --
Net income (loss)......... (.46) .16 .58 .21
Diluted income (loss) per
share (a):
Income from continuing
operations.............. .07 .21 .08 .30
Income (loss) from
discontinued
operations.............. (.12) (.06) .47 (.10)
Extraordinary charges..... (.40) -- -- --
Net income (loss)......... (.45) .15 .55 .20
83
TRIARC COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- CONTINUED
DECEMBER 31, 2000
QUARTER ENDED
--------------------------------------------------
APRIL 2, JULY 2, OCTOBER 1, DECEMBER 31, (d)
-------- ------- ---------- ----------------
(IN THOUSANDS EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
2000
Revenues and other earnings....... $35,557 $26,428 $29,638 $ 27,233
Income (loss) from continuing
operations before income
taxes........................... 14,753 7,217 10,923 (30,682)
Income (loss) from continuing
operations...................... 8,429 4,154 6,705 (29,445)
Income (loss) from discontinued
operations...................... (5,709) 436 (3,337) 480,688
Extraordinary charges (Note 19)... -- -- -- (20,680)
Net income........................ 2,720 4,590 3,368 430,563
Basic income (loss) per share (a):
Income (loss) from continuing
operations.................. .35 .17 .29 (1.32)
Income (loss) from
discontinued operations..... (.24) .02 (.14) 21.56
Extraordinary charges......... -- -- -- (.93)
Net income.................... .11 .19 .15 19.31
Diluted income (loss) per share
(a):
Income (loss) from continuing
operations.................. .34 .16 .28 (1.32)
Income (loss) from
discontinued operations..... (.23) .02 (.14) 21.56
Extraordinary charges......... -- -- -- (.93)
Net income.................... .11 .18 .14 19.31
- ---------
(a) Basic and diluted income (loss) per share have been computed consistently
with the annual calculations explained in Note 4. Basic and diluted income
(loss) per share are the same for the quarter ended December 31, 2000 since
all potentially dilutive securities would have had an antidilutive effect.
(b) The income from continuing operations for the quarter ended April 4, 1999
was materially affected by a capital structure reorganization related
charge (see Note 15) of $1,400,000, or $896,000 after income tax benefit of
$504,000, resulting from the equitable adjustments to the terms of Snapple
Beverage Plan stock options granted prior to 1999. The Company recognized
additional charges relating to this adjustment in the following three
quarters of 1999 and each of the four quarters of 2000 for much less
significant amounts.
(c) The income from continuing operations for the quarter ended January 2, 2000
was materially affected by (1) a reversal of excess interest expense
accruals for IRS examinations (see Note 11) of $3,052,000, or $2,022,000
net of income tax provision of $1,030,000 and (2) a release of excess
reserves for IRS examinations of $5,127,000 (see Note 11).
(d) The income from continuing operations for the quarter ended December 31,
2000 was materially affected by (1) a charge for capital market transaction
related compensation (see Note 14) of $26,010,000, or $24,746,000 after
income tax benefit of $1,264,000, and (2) compensation cost of $10,422,000,
or $8,168,000 after income tax benefit of $2,254,000, resulting from the
Company repurchasing 1,045,834 shares of its Class A Common Stock which
certain of the Company's officers and a director received upon exercise of
stock options (see Note 12).
84
PART III
ITEMS 10, 11, 12 AND 13.
The information required by items 10, 11, 12 and 13 will be furnished on or
prior to April 30, 2001 (and is hereby incorporated by reference) by an
amendment hereto or pursuant to a definitive proxy statement involving the
election of directors pursuant to Regulation 14A which will contain such
information.
PART IV
ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES, AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K.
(A) 1. Financial Statements:
See Index to Financial Statements (Item 8).
2. Financial Statement Schedules:
All schedules have been omitted since they are either not applicable or the
information is contained elsewhere in 'Item 8. Financial Statements and
Supplementary Data.'
3. Exhibits:
Copies of the following exhibits are available at a charge of $.25 per page
upon written request to the Secretary of Triarc at 280 Park Avenue, New York,
New York 10017.
EXHIBIT
NO. DESCRIPTION
--- -----------
2.1 --Agreement and Plan of Merger dated September 15, 2000, among Cadbury Schweppes plc, CSN
Acquisition Inc., CRC Acquisition Inc., Triarc Companies, Inc., Snapple Beverage Group, Inc. and
Royal Crown Company, Inc., incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to Triarc's Current Report
on Form 8-K dated September 20, 2000 (SEC file no. 1-2207).
3.1 --Certificate of Incorporation of Triarc, as currently in effect, incorporated herein by reference
to Exhibit 3.1 to Triarc's Registration Statement on Form S-4 dated October 22, 1997 (SEC file no.
1-2207).
3.2 --By-laws of Triarc, as currently in effect, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to
Triarc's Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 30, 2001 (SEC file no. 1-2207).
4.1 --Master Agreement dated as of May 5, 1997, among Franchise Finance Corporation of America, FFCA
Acquisition Corporation, FFCA Mortgage Corporation, Triarc, Arby's Restaurant Development
Corporation ('ARDC'), Arby's Restaurant Holding Company ('ARHC'), Arby's Restaurant Operations
Company ('AROC'), Arby's, RTM Operating Company, RTM Development Company, RTM Partners, Inc.
('Holdco'), RTM Holding Company, Inc., RTM Management Company, LLC and RTM, Inc. ('RTM'),
incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.16 to Triarc's Registration Statement on Form S-4
dated October 22, 1997 (SEC file no. 1-2207).
4.2 --Indenture dated as of February 9, 1998 between Triarc Companies, Inc. and The Bank of New York, as
Trustee, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Triarc's Current Report on Form 8-K/A
dated March 6, 1998 (SEC file no. 1-2207).
4.3 --Indenture dated of February 25, 1999 among Triarc Consumer Products Group, LLC ('TCPG'), Triarc
Beverage Holdings Corp. ('TBHC'), as Issuers, the subsidiary guarantors party thereto and The Bank
of New York, as Trustee, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Triarc's Current Report
on Form 8-K dated March 11, 1999 (SEC file no. 1-2207).
4.4 --Supplemental Indenture, dated as of February 26, 1999, among TCPG, TBHC, Millrose Distributors,
Inc., and The Bank of New York as Trustee, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.6 to
Amendment No. 2 to Registration Statement on Form S-4 filed by TCPG and TBHC, dated October 1, 1999
(Registration Nos. 333-78625; 333-78625-01 through 333-78625-28).
4.5 --Supplemental Indenture No. 2, dated as of September 8, 1999, among TCPG, TBHC, the subsidiary
guarantors party thereto and The Bank of New York, as Trustee, incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 4.7 to Amendment No. 2 to Registration Statement on Form S-4 filed by TCPG and TBHC, dated
October 1, 1999 (Registration Nos. 333-78625; 333-78625-01 through 333-78625-28).
4.6 --Supplemental Indenture No. 3, dated as of December 16, 1999 among TCPG, TBHC, MPAS Holdings, Inc.,
Millrose, L.P., and The Bank of New York, as Trustee, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit
4.1 to Triarc's Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 30, 2000 (SEC file no. 1-2207).
85
EXHIBIT
NO. DESCRIPTION
--- -----------
4.7 --Supplemental Indenture No. 4, dated as of January 2, 2000
among TCPG, TBHC, Snapple Distributors of Long Island,
Inc. and The Bank of New York, as Trustee, incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Triarc's Current
Report on Form 8-K dated March 30, 2000 (SEC file no. 1-
2207).
4.8 --Supplemental Indenture No. 1, dated as of October 25,
2000, by and among Triarc Companies, Inc., SBG Holdings
Inc. and The Bank of New York, incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Triarc's Current Report on
Form 8-K dated November 8, 2000 (SEC file no. 1-2207).
4.9 --Supplemental Indenture No. 5, dated as of October 25,
2000, by and among Triarc Consumer Products Group LLC,
Snapple Beverage Group, Inc., RCAC, LLC, Promociones
Holdings, LLC and The Bank of New York, incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Triarc's Current
Report on Form 8-K dated November 8, 2000 (SEC file no.
1-2207).
4.10 --Supplemental Indenture No. 6, dated as of October 25,
2000, by and among Triarc Consumer Products Group, LLC,
Snapple Beverage Group, Inc., Arby's Acquisition, LLC,
RCAC, LLC and The Bank of New York, incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Triarc's Current Report on
Form 8-K dated November 8, 2000 (SEC file no. 1-2207).
4.11 --Supplemental Indenture No. 7, dated as of October 25,
2000, by and among Triarc Consumer Products Group, LLC,
Snapple Beverage Group, Inc., SBG Holdings Inc., the
Subsidiary Guarantors party thereto and The Bank of New
York, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to
Triarc's Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 8, 2000
(SEC file no. 1-2207).
4.12 --Supplemental Indenture No. 8, dated as of November 14,
2000, among SBG Holdings Inc., and Snapple Beverage Group,
Inc., as issuers, the Subsidiary Guarantors parties
thereto and The Bank of New York, as trustee, incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Triarc's Current
Report on Form 8-K dated March 30, 2001 (SEC file no.
1-2207).
4.13 --Indenture dated as of November 21, 2000 among Arby's
Franchise Trust, as issuer, Ambac Assurance Corporation,
as insurer, and BNY Midwest Trust Company, a Bank of New
York Company, as Indenture Trustee, incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Triarc's Current Report on
Form 8-K dated March 30, 2001 (SEC file no. 1-2207).
10.1 --Triarc's 1993 Equity Participation Plan, as amended,
incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to
Triarc's Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 31, 1997
(SEC file no. 1-2207).
10.2 --Form of Non-Incentive Stock Option Agreement under
Triarc's Amended and Restated 1993 Equity Participation
Plan, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to
Triarc's Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 31, 1997
(SEC file no. 1-2207).
10.3 --Form of Restricted Stock Agreement under Triarc's Amended
and Restated 1993 Equity Participation Plan, incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 13 to Triarc's Current
Report on Form 8-K dated April 23, 1993 (SEC file no.
1-2207).
10.4 --Form of Indemnification Agreement, between Triarc and
certain officers, directors, and employees of Triarc,
incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit F to the 1994
Proxy (SEC file no. 1-2207).
10.5 --Guaranty dated as of May 5, 1997 by RTM, RTM Parent,
Holdco, RTMM and RTMOC in favor of Arby's, ARDC, ARHC,
AROC and Triarc, incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit10.31 to Triarc's Registration Statement on Form
S-4 dated October 22, 1997 (SEC file no. 1-2207).
10.6 --Triarc Companies, Inc. 1997 Equity Participation Plan
(the '1997 Equity Plan'), incorporated herein by reference
to Exhibit 10.5 to Triarc's Current Report on Form 8-K
dated March 16, 1998 (SEC file no. 1-2207).
10.7 --Form of Non-Incentive Stock Option Agreement under the
1997 Equity Plan, incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 10.6 to Triarc's Current Report on Form 8-K dated
March 16, 1998 (SEC file no. 1-2207).
10.8 --Triarc's 1998 Equity Participation Plan, as currently in
effect, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1
to Triarc's Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 13, 1998
(SEC file no. 1-2207).
10.9 --Form of Non-Incentive Stock Option Agreement under
Triarc's 1998 Equity Participation Plan, incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Triarc's Current
Report on Form 8-K dated May 13, 1998 (SEC file no.
1-2207).
10.10 --Form of Guaranty Agreement dated as of March 23, 1999
among National Propane Corporation, Triarc Companies, Inc.
and Nelson Peltz and Peter W. May, incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 10.30 to Triarc's Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 3, 1999 (SEC
file no. 1-2207).
86
EXHIBIT
NO. DESCRIPTION
--- -----------
10.11 --Amended and Restated Stock Purchase Agreement dated
August 19, 1999 by and among Triarc, Victor Posner Trust
No. 6 and Security Management Corp., incorporated herein
by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Triarc's Current Report on
Form 8-K dated August 19, 1999 (SEC file no. 1-2207).
10.12 --Purchase Agreement dated January 19, 2000 by and among
Triarc, Triangle Aircraft Services Corporation, Nelson
Peltz and Peter W. May, incorporated herein by reference
to Exhibit 10.2 to Triarc's Current Report on Form 8-K
dated January 21, 2000 (SEC file no. 1-2207).
10.13 --1999 Executive Bonus Plan, incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit A to Triarc's 1999 Proxy Statement
(SEC file no. 1-2207).
10.14 --Employment Agreement dated as of May 1, 1999 between
Triarc and Nelson Peltz, incorporated herein by reference
to Exhibit 10.1 to Triarc's Current Report on Form 8-K
dated March 30, 2000 (SEC file no. 1-2207).
10.15 --Employment Agreement dated as of May 1, 1999 between
Triarc and Peter W. May, incorporated herein by reference
to Exhibit 10.2 to Triarc's Current Report on Form 8-K
dated March 30, 2000 (SEC file no. 1-2207).
10.16 --Employment Agreement dated as of February 24, 2000
between Triarc and John L. Barnes, Jr., incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Triarc's Current
Report on Form 8-K dated March 30, 2000 (SEC file no.
1-2207).
10.17 --Employment Agreement dated as of February 24, 2000
between Triarc and Eric D. Kogan, incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 4.4 to Triarc's Current Report on
Form 8-K dated March 30, 2000 (SEC file no. 1-2207).
10.18 --Employment Agreement dated as of February 24, 2000
between Triarc and Brian L. Schorr, incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 10.5 to Triarc's Current Report on
Form 8-K dated March 30, 2000 (SEC file no. 1-2207).
10.19 --Deferral Plan for Senior Executive Officers of Triarc
Companies, Inc., incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to Triarc's Current Report on Form 8-K dated
March 30, 2001 (SEC file no. 1-2207).
10.20 --Trust Agreement for the Deferral Plan for Senior
Executive Officers of Triarc Companies, Inc., dated as of
January 23, 2001, between Triarc and Wilmington Trust
Company, as trustee, incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 10.2 to Triarc's Current Report on Form 8-K dated
March 30, 2001 (SEC file no. 1-2207).
10.21 --Trust Agreement for the Deferral Plan for Senior
Executive Officers of Triarc Companies, Inc., dated as of
January 23, 2001, between Triarc and Wilmington Trust
Company, as trustee, incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 10.3 to Triarc's Current Report on Form 8-K dated
March 30, 2001 (SEC file no. 1-2207).
10.22 --Tax Agreement dated as of September 15, 2000, by and
among Cadbury Schweppes plc, SBG Holdings, Inc., Triarc
Companies, Inc. and Triarc Consumer Products Group, LLC,
incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to
Triarc's Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 20,
2000 (SEC file no. 1-2207).
10.23 --Indemnity Agreement, dated as of October 25, 2000 between
Cadbury Schweppes plc and Triarc Companies, Inc.,
incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to
Triarc's Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 8, 2000
(SEC file no. 1-2207).
10.24 --Servicing Agreement, dated as of November 21, 2000, among
Arby's Franchise Trust, as Issuer, Arby's, Inc., as
Servicer, and BNY Midwest Trust Company, a Bank of New
York Company, as Indenture Trustee, incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 10.4 to Triarc's Current Report on
Form 8-K dated March 30, 2001 (SEC file no. 1-2207).
10.25 --Promissory Note, dated April 1, 2000, issued by Nelson
Peltz and Peter W. May to Triarc in the original principal
amount of $5,000,000, incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 10.5 to Triarc's Current Report on Form 8-K dated
arch 30, 2001 (SEC file no. 1-2207).
10.26 --Stipulation and Agreement of Compromise, Settlement and
Release, dated August 17, 2000, incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 10.6 to Triarc's Current Report on
Form 8-K dated March 30, 2001 (SEC file no. 1-2207).
21.1 --Subsidiaries of the Registrant*
23.1 --Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP*
23.2 --Consent of Ernst & Young LLP*
99.1 --Consolidated Financial Statements of MCM Capital Group,
Inc.*
- -------------------
* Filed herewith
87
(b)Reports on Form 8-K:
On October 12, 2000, Triarc filed a Current Report on Form 8-K, which
included information under Item 5 of such form.
On October 30, 2000, Triarc filed a Current Report on Form 8-K, which
included information under Item 5 and an exhibit under Item 7 of such form.
On October 31, 2000, Triarc filed a Current Report on Form 8-K, which
included information under Item 9 of such form.
On November 3, 2000, Triarc filed a Current Report on Form 8-K, which
included an exhibit under Item 7 of such form.
On November 8, 2000, Triarc filed a Current Report on Form 8-K, which
included exhibits under Item 7 of such form.
On November 9, 2000, Triarc filed a Current Report on Form 8-K, which
included information under Items 2 and 7 of such form.
On December 1, 2000, Triarc filed Amendment No. 1 on Form 8-K/A to Current
Report on Form 8-K, which included information under Item 7 of such form.
(d)Separate financial statements of subsidiaries not consolidated and fifty
percent or less owned persons:
The consolidated financial statements of MCM Capital Group Inc., an
investment of the Company accounted for in accordance with the equity method,
are hereby incorporated by reference from Item 8. 'Consolidated Financial
Statements' from the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2000 of MCM Capital Group, Inc. (SEC file no. 000-26489). A copy of the
consolidated financial statements incorporated by reference in this Item
14(d) is included as Exhibit 99.1 to this Form 10-K.
88
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
TRIARC COMPANIES, INC.
(Registrant)
NELSON PELTZ
....................................
NELSON PELTZ
CHAIRMAN AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
Dated: March 30, 2001
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this
report has been signed below on March 30, 2001 by the following persons on
behalf of the registrant in the capacities indicated.
SIGNATURE TITLES
--------- ------
NELSON PELTZ Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and Director
......................................... (Principal Executive Officer)
(NELSON PELTZ)
PETER W. MAY President and Chief Operating Officer, and Director
......................................... (Principal Operating Officer)
(PETER W. MAY)
JOHN L. BARNES, JR. Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
......................................... (Principal Financial Officer)
(JOHN L. BARNES, JR.)
FRED H. SCHAEFER Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer
......................................... (Principal Accounting Officer)
(FRED H. SCHAEFER)
HUGH L. CAREY Director
.........................................
(HUGH L. CAREY)
CLIVE CHAJET Director
.........................................
(CLIVE CHAJET)
JOSEPH A. LEVATO Director
.........................................
(JOSEPH A. LEVATO)
DAVID E. SCHWAB II Director
.........................................
(DAVID E. SCHWAB II)
JEFFREY S. SILVERMAN Director
.........................................
(JEFFREY S. SILVERMAN)
RAYMOND S. TROUBH Director
.........................................
(RAYMOND S. TROUBH)
GERALD TSAI, JR. Director
.........................................
(GERALD TSAI, JR.)
89
STATEMENT OF DIFFERENCES
------------------------
The trademark symbol shall be expressed as............................... 'TM'
The registered trademark symbol shall be expressed as.................... 'r'