UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Form 10-Q
þ
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 | |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004 | ||
or | ||
o
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 | |
For the transition period from to |
Commission file number 1-8972
IndyMac Bancorp, Inc.
Delaware
|
95-3983415 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) | |
155 North Lake Avenue Pasadena, California (Address of principal executive offices) |
91101-7211 (Zip Code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code:
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes þ No o
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
Common stock outstanding as of July 26, 2004: 61,246,075 shares
FORM 10-Q QUARTERLY REPORT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Form 10-Q contains statements that may be deemed to be forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Forward-looking statements include statements regarding our projected financial condition and results of operations, plans, objectives, future performance and business. Forward-looking statements typically include the words anticipate, believe, estimate, expect, project, plan, forecast, intend, goal, target and other similar expressions. These statements reflect our current views with respect to future events and financial performance. They are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause future results to differ materially from historical results or from the results anticipated. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of their dates or as of the date hereof if no other date is identified. We undertake no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. For further information on our key operating risks, refer to IndyMacs annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003.
References to IndyMac Bancorp or the Parent Company refer to the parent company alone while references to IndyMac, the Company, or we refer to IndyMac Bancorp, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries. References to IndyMac Bank or the Bank refer to our subsidiary IndyMac Bank, F.S.B. and its consolidated subsidiaries. The following discussion addresses the Companys financial condition and results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004.
ITEM 2. | MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
HIGHLIGHTS FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2004
On March 9, 2004, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 105, Application of Accounting Principles to Loan Commitments (SAB No. 105). In SAB No. 105, the SEC determined that an interest rate lock commitment should generally be valued at zero at inception. Profits inherent in the rate lock will be recognized at the time of the sale of the underlying loan. The Company adopted this standard effective April 1, 2004, which affected the second quarter 2004 gain on sale of loans with a one-time negative impact of $52.2 million before-tax, or $31.6 million after-tax.
In the table below, in addition to the financial information presented in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), we have presented certain pro forma non-GAAP financial measures that are marked with footnote (1). These pro forma non-GAAP financial measures are calculated based on the GAAP gain on sale of loans but adjusted to exclude the effect of the SAB No. 105 change in accounting principle related to rate lock commitments described above. We believe these pro forma non-GAAP financial measures provide useful information to investors in evaluating and comparing our financial condition and results of operations on a consistent basis from period to period, and it is on this basis that our management internally assesses our performance. Further, while the calculation of segment measures for internal performance evaluation remains unchanged, the effect of the change in rate lock accounting has been reflected in two separate columns of the segment table in the Our Business section at page 5.
2
Although we believe these pro forma non-GAAP financial measures are useful to the investors, they should not be considered a substitute for, or superior to, GAAP results.
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | March 31, | June 30, | June 30, | ||||||||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | 2004 | 2004 | 2003 | ||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions, except per share data) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Income Statement
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income after provision for loan
losses
|
$ | 104 | $ | 61 | $ | 92 | $ | 196 | $ | 121 | ||||||||||||
Gain on sale of loans
|
66 | 102 | 84 | 150 | 186 | |||||||||||||||||
Other (loss) income
|
(11 | ) | 11 | 9 | (2 | ) | 24 | |||||||||||||||
Net revenues
|
159 | 173 | 185 | 344 | 330 | |||||||||||||||||
Operating expenses
|
121 | 105 | 115 | 236 | 200 | |||||||||||||||||
Net earnings
|
23 | 41 | 42 | 65 | 78 | |||||||||||||||||
Basic earnings per share
|
0.39 | 0.75 | 0.74 | 1.13 | 1.43 | |||||||||||||||||
Diluted earnings per share
|
$ | 0.38 | $ | 0.73 | $ | 0.70 | $ | 1.08 | $ | 1.39 | ||||||||||||
Pro Forma Income Statement Items Excluding the
Effect of the Change in Accounting Principle in the Current
Period
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Gain on sale of loans(1)
|
$ | 118 | $ | 102 | $ | 84 | $ | 202 | $ | 186 | ||||||||||||
Net revenues(1)
|
211 | 173 | 185 | 396 | 330 | |||||||||||||||||
Net earnings(1)
|
55 | 41 | 42 | 96 | 78 | |||||||||||||||||
Basic earnings per share(1)
|
0.94 | 0.75 | 0.74 | 1.68 | 1.43 | |||||||||||||||||
Diluted earnings per share(1)
|
$ | 0.90 | $ | 0.73 | $ | 0.70 | $ | 1.60 | $ | 1.39 | ||||||||||||
Other Per Share Data
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends paid per share
|
0.30 | 0.10 | 0.25 | 0.55 | 0.20 | |||||||||||||||||
Book value per share at end of quarter
|
19.35 | 16.48 | 18.26 | 19.35 | 16.48 | |||||||||||||||||
Closing price per share
|
$ | 31.60 | $ | 25.42 | $ | 36.29 | $ | 31.60 | $ | 25.42 | ||||||||||||
Average Common Shares (in thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Basic
|
58,137 | 55,015 | 56,997 | 57,548 | 54,922 | |||||||||||||||||
Diluted
|
60,588 | 56,711 | 59,791 | 60,180 | 56,345 | |||||||||||||||||
Performance Ratios
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Return on average equity (annualized)(1)
|
19.46 | % | 18.34 | % | 16.16 | % | 17.88 | % | 17.79 | % | ||||||||||||
Return on average assets (annualized)(1)
|
1.29 | % | 1.52 | % | 1.16 | % | 1.23 | % | 1.51 | % | ||||||||||||
Dividend payout ratio(1,2)
|
33.33 | % | 13.70 | % | 35.71 | % | 34.38 | % | 14.39 | % | ||||||||||||
Net interest income to pretax income(1)
|
118.65 | % | 98.74 | % | 135.53 | % | 125.99 | % | 100.88 | % | ||||||||||||
Average cost of funds
|
2.29 | % | 2.94 | % | 2.32 | % | 2.30 | % | 3.07 | % | ||||||||||||
Net interest margin
|
2.75 | % | 2.73 | % | 2.83 | % | 2.78 | % | 2.76 | % | ||||||||||||
Efficiency ratio(1,3)
|
56 | % | 58 | % | 62 | % | 59 | % | 59 | % | ||||||||||||
Capital to net revenue ratio(1,4)
|
131 | % | 125 | % | 140 | % | 135 | % | 130 | % | ||||||||||||
Capital adjusted efficiency ratio(1,5)
|
74 | % | 73 | % | 87 | % | 80 | % | 77 | % | ||||||||||||
Operating expenses to loan production
|
1.24 | % | 1.28 | % | 1.61 | % | 1.40 | % | 1.36 | % |
3
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | March 31, | June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | 2004 | 2004 | 2003 | |||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions, except per share data) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Balance Sheet and Asset Quality
Ratios
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Average interest-earning assets
|
$ | 15,669 | $ | 9,909 | $ | 13,370 | $ | 14,519 | $ | 9,525 | |||||||||||
Average equity
|
$ | 1,127 | $ | 905 | $ | 1,043 | $ | 1,085 | $ | 887 | |||||||||||
Debt to equity ratio(6)
|
12.1:1 | 10.7:1 | 12.7:1 | 12.1:1 | 10.7:1 | ||||||||||||||||
Core capital ratio(7)
|
7.65 | % | 8.53 | % | 7.50 | % | 7.65 | % | 8.53 | % | |||||||||||
Risk-based capital ratio(7)
|
13.10 | % | 14.46 | % | 13.25 | % | 13.10 | % | 14.46 | % | |||||||||||
Non-performing assets to total assets
|
0.73 | % | 0.88 | % | 0.75 | % | 0.73 | % | 0.88 | % | |||||||||||
Allowance for loan losses to total loans held for
investment
|
0.76 | % | 1.09 | % | 0.78 | % | 0.76 | % | 1.09 | % | |||||||||||
Allowance for loan losses and other reserves to
non-performing loans
|
78 | % | 97 | % | 80 | % | 78 | % | 97 | % | |||||||||||
Allowance for loan losses to annualized net
charge-offs
|
522 | % | 176 | % | 645 | % | 580 | % | 233 | % | |||||||||||
Provision for loan losses to net charge-offs
|
127 | % | 97 | % | 74 | % | 103 | % | 93 | % | |||||||||||
Provision to net charge-offs (core loan
portfolio)(8)
|
117 | % | 120 | % | 40 | % | 86 | % | 119 | % | |||||||||||
Other Selected Items
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Loans serviced for others(9)
|
$ | 34,618 | $ | 29,858 | $ | 32,122 | $ | 34,618 | $ | 29,858 | |||||||||||
Loan production(10)
|
9,727 | 8,193 | 7,146 | 16,873 | 14,778 | ||||||||||||||||
Pipeline of mortgage loans in process
|
5,179 | 6,929 | 5,949 | 5,179 | 6,929 | ||||||||||||||||
Loans sold
|
$ | 7,638 | $ | 6,336 | $ | 4,907 | $ | 12,524 | $ | 11,860 | |||||||||||
Net margin on sale of loans(1)
|
1.55 | % | 1.61 | % | 1.71 | % | 1.61 | % | 1.57 | % |
(1) | For the three and six months ended June 30, 2004, the data is presented on a pro forma basis excluding the effect of a one-time deferral of gain on sale of loans revenue of $52.2 million before-tax or $31.6 million after-tax pursuant to the change in accounting principle for rate lock commitments under SAB No. 105. A full reconciliation between the pro forma and GAAP amounts, with the relevant performance ratios, is included in the segment table on page 6. | |
(2) | Dividends declared per common share as a percentage of diluted earnings per share. | |
(3) | Defined as operating expenses divided by net interest income and other income. | |
(4) | Average equity divided by net interest income and other income. | |
(5) | Efficiency ratio multiplied by the capital to net revenue ratio. | |
(6) | Debt includes deposits. | |
(7) | IndyMac Bank, F.S.B. (excludes unencumbered cash at the Parent Company available for investment in IndyMac Bank). Risk-based capital ratio is based on the regulatory standard risk weighting. With IndyMac Banks additional subprime risk weightings, the ratios are 12.47%, 13.22% and 12.61% for the quarters ended June 30, 2004, June 30, 2003 and March 31, 2004, respectively. | |
(8) | Represents the total loan portfolio excluding amounts of loans from discontinued product lines. | |
(9) | Represents the unpaid principal balance on loans sold with servicing retained by IndyMac. |
(10) | Includes newly originated commitments on construction loans. |
4
OVERALL RESULTS
IndyMac continued to demonstrate strong execution on its strategies focused on single-family residential mortgage lending during the second quarter of 2004. The Company achieved record mortgage production and pro forma earnings during the quarter while the overall mortgage industry, according to the July Mortgage Finance Forecast published by the Mortgage Bankers Association (MBA) was 29% below its mid-year 2003 peak level. Based on the MBAs Mortgage Finance Forecast dated July 14, 2004, IndyMacs mortgage market share was up 66% over the second quarter of 2003. IndyMacs pro forma earnings per share of $0.90 were up 23% over the second quarter of 2003. Comparing second quarter 2004 to second quarter 2003, pro forma net revenues increased 22% and operating expenses increased 16%, resulting in pro forma net earnings of $54 million, up 32% over the prior year. In addition, the Company continued to deploy capital to facilitate balance sheet growth and achieved record total assets of $15.5 billion as of June 30, 2004.
The second quarter 2004 pro forma revenues, earnings, and earnings per share (EPS) referred to above excludes the impact to earnings and EPS for the change in accounting for rate locks pursuant to SAB No. 105. On a GAAP basis, net earnings and EPS for the second quarter 2004 were $23 million and $0.38, respectively.
For the six months ended June 30, 2004, IndyMac earned $96 million, or $1.60 per share on a pro forma basis excluding the change in accounting for rate locks in the second quarter, compared to $78 million, or $1.39 per share during the six months ended June 30, 2003. On a GAAP basis, the Company earned $65 million, or $1.08 per share, during the six months ended June 30, 2004.
BUSINESS ACQUISITION
On July 16, 2004, we completed the acquisition of 93.75% of the outstanding shares of common stock of Financial Freedom Holdings Inc. (Financial Freedom), the leading provider of reverse mortgages in the United States, and the related assets from Lehman Brothers Bank, F.S.B. and its affiliates for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $83 million. The remaining shares (6.25%) of the common stock of Financial Freedom are held by its Chief Executive Officer and will be accounted for as a minority interest. The acquisition will result in approximately $45 million in goodwill.
OUR BUSINESS
IndyMac is structured to achieve synergies among its operations and enhance customer service. Operating through its four main segments, IndyMac Mortgage Bank, IndyMac Consumer Bank, the Home Equity Division and the Investment Portfolio Group, the common denominator of the Companys business is providing consumers with single-family residential mortgages through relationships with each segments core customers via the channel in which each operates. IndyMac Mortgage Bank provides consumers with mortgage products through relationships with the Companys business customers mortgage brokers, mortgage bankers, community financial institutions, real estate professionals and homebuilders. IndyMac Consumer Bank provides the platform for the mortgage and deposit services that IndyMac offers directly to consumers. The Home Equity Division is a product-focused division that supports the production of home equity lines of credit (HELOCs) and other home equity products through all of IndyMacs relationship and consumer direct production channels. The Investment Portfolio Group serves as the main link to customers whose mortgages we service. Through its investments in single-family residential (SFR) mortgages, mortgage-backed securities (MBS) and mortgage servicing rights (MSRs), the Investment Portfolio Group generates core spread and fee income and provides critical support to IndyMacs mortgage lending operations.
While our segments are structured to achieve synergies with our varying customer base and marketing strategies, our operating activities primarily consist of three broad categories: mortgage banking activities, investing activities and HELOC activities. All of these activities are performed to varying degrees by each of our main segments as shown in the tables that follow. Mortgage banking activities are characterized by high asset turnover (the production and sale of mortgage loans) and efficient utilization of capital but can be cyclical in nature depending on interest rates. Revenues generated by mortgage banking activities include gain on sale of mortgage loans, fee income and net spread (interest) income during the period loans are held
5
The following tables summarize the Companys financial results for the three months ended June 30, 2004, illustrating the revenues earned in its mortgage banking activities, investing and HELOC activities by each of its divisions. The profitability of each operating segment is measured on a fully-leveraged basis after allocating capital based on regulatory capital rules. Operating segments that originate mortgage loans are credited with gain on sale at funding based on the estimated fair value. Any difference between the actual gain on sale realized and the estimate is credited or charged to the operating segment in the period the loan is sold or transferred to the held for investment portfolio. Differences between the gain on sale credited to the operating segments and the consolidated gain on sale due to timing of loan sales or transfers to the held for investment portfolio are eliminated in consolidation. The Company uses a funds transfer pricing (FTP) system to allocate interest income and expense to the operating segments. Each operating segment is allocated funding with maturities and interest rates matched with the expected lives and repricing frequencies of the segments assets. The Retail Bank division within the Consumer Banking Group receives a funding credit for deposits using a similar methodology. The difference between these allocations and the Companys actual net interest income and capital levels resulting from centralized management of funding costs is reported in the Treasury unit. Corporate overhead costs related to managing the Company as a whole are not allocated to the operating segments.
The following table summarizes the segment financial highlights for the three months ended June 30, 2004:
Home | Investment | Total | SAB | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage | Consumer | Equity | Portfolio | Company | No. 105 | Company | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bank | Bank | Division | Group | Other | Pro Forma | Adjustment | GAAP | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating Results
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage Banking Activities
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income
|
$ | 37,739 | $ | 5,040 | $ | | $ | 8,030 | $ | | $ | 50,809 | $ | | $ | 50,809 | ||||||||||||||||||
Gain (loss) on sale of loans
|
89,678 | 17,341 | | 20,632 | (9,344 | ) | 118,307 | (52,223 | ) | 66,084 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other income
|
11,117 | 3,427 | | | 242 | 14,786 | | 14,786 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net revenues (expense)
|
138,534 | 25,808 | | 28,662 | (9,102 | ) | 183,902 | (52,223 | ) | 131,679 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating expenses
|
47,302 | 20,392 | | 1,155 | | 68,849 | | 68,849 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pretax income (loss)
|
91,232 | 5,416 | | 27,507 | (9,102 | ) | 115,053 | (52,223 | ) | 62,830 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investing Activities
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income
|
18,227 | | | 34,040 | 2,720 | 54,987 | | 54,987 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Provision for loan losses
|
(1,300 | ) | | | (1,800 | ) | | (3,100 | ) | | (3,100 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Service fee (expense) income
|
| | | (31,538 | ) | 3,371 | (28,167 | ) | | (28,167 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
(Loss) gain on sale of securities
|
| | | (4,500 | ) | 1,086 | (3,414 | ) | | (3,414 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Other income
|
1,704 | | | 1,615 | 847 | 4,166 | 4,166 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net revenues (expense)
|
18,631 | | | (2,183 | ) | 8,024 | 24,472 | 24,472 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating expenses
|
10,214 | | | 11,854 | | 22,068 | | 22,068 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pretax income (loss)
|
8,417 | | | (14,037 | ) | 8,024 | 2,404 | 2,404 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6
Home | Investment | Total | SAB | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage | Consumer | Equity | Portfolio | Company | No. 105 | Company | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bank | Bank | Division | Group | Other | Pro Forma | Adjustment | GAAP | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
HELOC Activities
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income
|
$ | 3,698 | $ | 1,482 | $ | 1,025 | $ | | $ | | $ | 6,205 | $ | | $ | 6,205 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Provision for loan losses
|
(24 | ) | (68 | ) | (8 | ) | | | (100 | ) | | (100 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Service fee income
|
| | 360 | | | 360 | | 360 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other income
|
507 | 383 | 282 | | | 1,172 | | 1,172 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net revenues
|
4,181 | 1,797 | 1,659 | | | 7,637 | | 7,637 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating expenses
|
393 | 268 | 1,343 | | | 2,004 | | 2,004 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pretax income
|
3,788 | 1,529 | 316 | | | 5,633 | | 5,633 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Financing and Other Activities
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income (loss)
|
| 7,672 | | | (12,695 | ) | (5,023 | ) | | (5,023 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other income
|
| 537 | | | 113 | 650 | | 650 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net revenues (expense)
|
| 8,209 | | | (12,582 | ) | (4,373 | ) | | (4,373 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating expenses
|
| 5,027 | | | 23,525 | 28,552 | | 28,552 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pretax income (loss)
|
| 3,182 | | | (36,107 | ) | (32,925 | ) | | (32,925 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total pretax income (loss)
|
103,437 | 10,127 | 316 | 13,470 | (37,185 | ) | 90,165 | (52,223 | ) | 37,942 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss)
|
$ | 62,580 | $ | 6,127 | $ | 191 | $ | 8,149 | $ | (22,497 | ) | $ | 54,550 | $ | (31,595 | ) | $ | 22,955 | ||||||||||||||||||
Ratios
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Percentage of average total assets
|
39 | % | 5 | % | 1 | % | 50 | % | 5 | % | 100 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Percentage of total revenue
|
76 | % | 17 | % | 1 | % | 12 | % | (6 | )% | 100 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Percentage of pretax income
|
115 | % | 11 | % | 0 | % | 15 | % | (41 | )% | 100 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance Sheet Data
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average interest-earning assets(1)
|
$ | 6,551,261 | $ | 821,759 | $ | 136,456 | $ | 7,851,383 | $ | 308,016 | $ | 15,668,875 | $ | 15,668,875 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Average total assets
|
$ | 6,647,762 | $ | 859,409 | $ | 148,333 | $ | 8,503,788 | $ | 827,190 | $ | 16,986,482 | $ | 16,986,482 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Allocated capital
|
$ | 432,191 | $ | 56,243 | $ | 9,997 | $ | 490,376 | $ | 138,481 | $ | 1,127,288 | $ | 1,127,288 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Capital allocated to mortgage banking activities
|
$ | 249,977 | $ | 35,396 | $ | | $ | 31,607 | $ | | $ | 316,980 | $ | 316,980 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Capital allocated to investing activities
|
$ | 152,544 | $ | | $ | | $ | 458,769 | $ | | $ | 611,313 | $ | 611,313 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Capital allocated to HELOC activities
|
$ | 29,670 | $ | 18,784 | $ | 9,997 | $ | | $ | | $ | 58,451 | $ | 58,451 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Capital allocated to financing and other
activities
|
$ | | $ | 2,063 | $ | | $ | | $ | 138,481 | $ | 140,544 | $ | 140,544 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Allocated capital/ average total assets
|
6.50 | % | 6.54 | % | 6.74 | % | 5.77 | % | 16.74 | % | 6.64 | % | 6.64 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Loans Produced
|
$ | 8,189,309 | $ | 1,076,157 | $ | 43,894 | $ | 417,669 | $ | | $ | 9,727,029 | $ | 9,727,029 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Purchase mortgages
|
47 | % | 12 | % | N/A | 1 | % | 41 | % | 41 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash-out refinance mortgages
|
34 | % | 55 | % | N/A | 1 | % | 35 | % | 35 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rate and term refinance mortgages
|
19 | % | 33 | % | N/A | 98 | % | 24 | % | 24 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Performance Ratios
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Return on equity (ROE)
|
58 | % | 44 | % | 8 | % | 7 | % | 19 | % | 8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
ROE mortgage banking activities
|
89 | % | 37 | % | | 212 | % | 88 | % | 48 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
ROE investing activities
|
13 | % | | | (7 | )% | 1 | % | 1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ROE HELOC activities
|
31 | % | 20 | % | 8 | % | | 23 | % | 23 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
ROE financing and other activities
|
| 375 | % | | | (57 | )% | (57 | )% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Return on assets (ROA)
|
3.79 | % | 2.87 | % | 0.52 | % | 0.39 | % | 1.29 | % | 0.54 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest margin
|
3.66 | % | 6.95 | % | 3.02 | % | 2.16 | % | 2.75 | % | 2.75 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Efficiency ratio
|
36 | % | 72 | % | 81 | % | 46 | % | 56 | % | 75 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Capital adjusted efficiency ratio
|
24 | % | 28 | % | 121 | % | 199 | % | 74 | % | 129 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average Full-Time Equivalent Employees
(FTE)
|
2,090 | 876 | 16 | 445 | 634 | 4,061 | 4,061 |
(1) | The allowance for loan losses is excluded from average loan balances for purposes of calculating average interest-earning assets. |
7
The following table provides additional detail on the segment results for the Mortgage Bank for the three months ended June 30, 2004:
Relationship Businesses IndyMac Mortgage Bank | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
B2B | B2R | HCL | HBD | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating Results
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage Banking Activities
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income
|
$ | 30,913 | $ | 626 | $ | 4,942 | $ | 1,258 | $ | 37,739 | ||||||||||||||
Gain on sale of loans
|
71,643 | 1,667 | 14,250 | 2,118 | 89,678 | |||||||||||||||||||
Other income
|
8,054 | 323 | 2,390 | 350 | 11,117 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net revenues
|
110,610 | 2,616 | 21,582 | 3,726 | 138,534 | |||||||||||||||||||
Operating expenses
|
40,306 | 3,519 | 1,163 | 2,314 | 47,302 | |||||||||||||||||||
Pretax income (loss)
|
70,304 | (903 | ) | 20,419 | 1,412 | 91,232 | ||||||||||||||||||
Investing Activities
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income
|
| | 10,862 | 7,365 | 18,227 | |||||||||||||||||||
Provision for loan losses
|
| | (1,030 | ) | (270 | ) | (1,300 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Service fee income
|
| | | | | |||||||||||||||||||
Gain (loss) on sale of securities
|
| | | | | |||||||||||||||||||
Other income
|
| | 1,640 | 64 | 1,704 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net revenues
|
| | 11,472 | 7,159 | 18,631 | |||||||||||||||||||
Operating expenses
|
| | 8,285 | 1,929 | 10,214 | |||||||||||||||||||
Pretax income
|
| | 3,187 | 5,230 | 8,417 | |||||||||||||||||||
HELOC Activities
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income
|
3,392 | 152 | 38 | 116 | 3,698 | |||||||||||||||||||
Provision for loan losses
|
(125 | ) | 109 | (6 | ) | (2 | ) | (24 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Service fee income
|
| | | | | |||||||||||||||||||
Other income
|
455 | 33 | 10 | 9 | 507 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net revenues
|
3,722 | 294 | 42 | 123 | 4,181 | |||||||||||||||||||
Operating expenses
|
352 | 24 | 5 | 12 | 393 | |||||||||||||||||||
Pretax income
|
3,370 | 270 | 37 | 111 | 3,788 | |||||||||||||||||||
Financing and Other Activities
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income
|
| | | | | |||||||||||||||||||
Other income
|
| | | | | |||||||||||||||||||
Net revenues
|
| | | | | |||||||||||||||||||
Operating expenses
|
| | | | | |||||||||||||||||||
Pretax income
|
| | | | | |||||||||||||||||||
Total pretax income (loss)
|
73,674 | (633 | ) | 23,643 | 6,753 | 103,437 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss)
|
$ | 44,573 | $ | (383 | ) | $ | 14,304 | $ | 4,086 | $ | 62,580 | |||||||||||||
Ratios
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Percentage of assets
|
24 | % | 1 | % | 10 | % | 4 | % | 39 | % | ||||||||||||||
Percentage of total revenue
|
54 | % | 1 | % | 16 | % | 5 | % | 76 | % | ||||||||||||||
Percentage of pretax income
|
82 | % | (1 | )% | 26 | % | 8 | % | 115 | % |
8
Relationship Businesses IndyMac Mortgage Bank | ||||||||||||||||||||
B2B | B2R | HCL | HBD | Total | ||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Balance Sheet Data
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Average interest-earning assets
|
$ | 4,003,605 | $ | 93,562 | $ | 1,673,034 | $ | 781,060 | $ | 6,551,261 | ||||||||||
Average total assets
|
$ | 4,089,252 | $ | 95,259 | $ | 1,678,708 | $ | 784,543 | $ | 6,647,762 | ||||||||||
Allocated capital
|
$ | 255,474 | $ | 5,267 | $ | 93,911 | $ | 77,539 | $ | 432,191 | ||||||||||
Capital allocated to mortgage banking activities
|
$ | 228,395 | $ | 3,767 | $ | 10,493 | $ | 7,322 | $ | 249,977 | ||||||||||
Capital allocated to investing activities
|
$ | | $ | | $ | 83,170 | $ | 69,374 | $ | 152,544 | ||||||||||
Capital allocated to HELOC activities
|
$ | 27,079 | $ | 1,500 | $ | 248 | $ | 843 | $ | 29,670 | ||||||||||
Capital allocated to financing and other
activities
|
$ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | ||||||||||
Allocated capital/total average assets
|
6.25 | % | 5.53 | % | 5.59 | % | 9.88 | % | 6.50 | % | ||||||||||
Loans Produced
|
$ | 6,380,571 | $ | 152,723 | $ | 1,070,114 | $ | 585,901 | $ | 8,189,309 | ||||||||||
Purchase mortgages
|
38 | % | 45 | % | 98 | % | 85 | % | 47 | % | ||||||||||
Cash out refinance mortgages
|
40 | % | 32 | % | 0 | % | 10 | % | 34 | % | ||||||||||
Rate and term refinance mortgages
|
22 | % | 23 | % | 2 | % | 5 | % | 19 | % | ||||||||||
Performance Ratios
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Return on equity (ROE)
|
70 | % | (29 | )% | 61 | % | 21 | % | 58 | % | ||||||||||
ROE mortgage banking activities
|
75 | % | (58 | )% | 474 | % | 47 | % | 89 | % | ||||||||||
ROE investing activities
|
| | 9 | % | 18 | % | 13 | % | ||||||||||||
ROE HELOC activities
|
30 | % | 44 | % | 36 | % | 32 | % | 31 | % | ||||||||||
ROE financing and other activities
|
| | | | | |||||||||||||||
Return on assets (ROA)
|
4.38 | % | (1.62 | )% | 3.43 | % | 2.09 | % | 3.79 | % | ||||||||||
Net interest margin
|
3.45 | % | 3.34 | % | 3.81 | % | 4.50 | % | 3.66 | % | ||||||||||
Efficiency ratio
|
36 | % | 126 | % | 28 | % | 38 | % | 36 | % | ||||||||||
Capital adjusted efficiency ratio
|
20 | % | 59 | % | 19 | % | 65 | % | 24 | % | ||||||||||
Average FTE
|
1,502 | 125 | 285 | 178 | 2,090 |
IndyMac Mortgage Bank Divisions
B2B | Business-to-Business division, its major lending channels are via relationships with mortgage professionals: mortgage brokers, mortgage bankers and financial institutions | |
B2R | Business-to-Realtor division, provides mortgage loan services through relationships with Realtors | |
HCL | Home Construction Lending division, provides construction-to-permanent mortgages and lot loans to individuals who are in the process of building their own homes, through IndyMacs B2B relationships and directly with consumers | |
HBD | Homebuilder division, provides financing to subdivision developers and generates mortgage loans through its relationships with these entities |
9
The following table provides additional details on the segment results for the Consumer Bank and the Home Equity Division for the three months ended June 30, 2004:
Consumer Direct Businesses | ||||||||||||||||||||
IndyMac Consumer Bank | ||||||||||||||||||||
Home Equity | ||||||||||||||||||||
B2C | Retail Bank | Total | Division | |||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Operating Results
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage Banking Activities
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income
|
$ | 4,494 | $ | 546 | $ | 5,040 | $ | | ||||||||||||
Gain on sale of loans
|
16,165 | 1,176 | 17,341 | | ||||||||||||||||
Other income
|
3,075 | 352 | 3,427 | | ||||||||||||||||
Net revenues
|
23,734 | 2,074 | 25,808 | | ||||||||||||||||
Operating expenses
|
17,789 | 2,603 | 20,392 | | ||||||||||||||||
Pretax income (loss)
|
5,945 | (529 | ) | 5,416 | | |||||||||||||||
Investing Activities
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income
|
| | | | ||||||||||||||||
Provision for loan losses
|
| | | | ||||||||||||||||
Service fee income
|
| | | | ||||||||||||||||
Gain (loss) on sale of securities
|
| | | | ||||||||||||||||
Other income
|
| | | | ||||||||||||||||
Net revenues
|
| | | | ||||||||||||||||
Operating expenses
|
| | | | ||||||||||||||||
Pretax income
|
| | | | ||||||||||||||||
HELOC Activities
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income
|
1,289 | 193 | 1,482 | 1,025 | ||||||||||||||||
Provision for loan losses
|
(59 | ) | (9 | ) | (68 | ) | (8 | ) | ||||||||||||
Service fee income
|
| | | 360 | ||||||||||||||||
Other income
|
352 | 31 | 383 | 282 | ||||||||||||||||
Net revenues
|
1,582 | 215 | 1,797 | 1,659 | ||||||||||||||||
Operating expenses
|
227 | 41 | 268 | 1,343 | ||||||||||||||||
Pretax income
|
1,355 | 174 | 1,529 | 316 | ||||||||||||||||
Financing and Other Activities
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income
|
| 7,672 | 7,672 | | ||||||||||||||||
Other income
|
| 537 | 537 | | ||||||||||||||||
Net revenues
|
| 8,209 | 8,209 | | ||||||||||||||||
Operating expenses
|
| 5,027 | 5,027 | | ||||||||||||||||
Pretax income
|
| 3,182 | 3,182 | | ||||||||||||||||
Total pretax income
|
7,300 | 2,827 | 10,127 | 316 | ||||||||||||||||
Net income
|
$ | 4,417 | $ | 1,710 | $ | 6,127 | $ | 191 | ||||||||||||
Ratios
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Percentage of assets
|
4 | % | 1 | % | 5 | % | 1 | % | ||||||||||||
Percentage of total revenue
|
12 | % | 5 | % | 17 | % | 1 | % | ||||||||||||
Percentage of pretax income
|
8 | % | 3 | % | 11 | % | 0 | % |
10
Consumer Direct Businesses | ||||||||||||||||
IndyMac Consumer Bank | ||||||||||||||||
Home Equity | ||||||||||||||||
B2C | Retail Bank | Total | Division | |||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Balance Sheet Data
|
||||||||||||||||
Average interest-earning assets
|
$ | 720,364 | $ | 101,395 | $ | 821,759 | $ | 136,456 | ||||||||
Average total assets
|
$ | 737,274 | $ | 122,135 | $ | 859,409 | $ | 148,333 | ||||||||
Allocated capital
|
$ | 48,469 | $ | 7,774 | $ | 56,243 | $ | 9,997 | ||||||||
Capital allocated to mortgage banking activities
|
$ | 32,572 | $ | 2,824 | $ | 35,396 | $ | | ||||||||
Capital allocated to investing activities
|
$ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | ||||||||
Capital allocated to HELOC activities
|
$ | 15,897 | $ | 2,887 | $ | 18,784 | $ | 9,997 | ||||||||
Capital allocated to financing and other
activities
|
$ | | $ | 2,063 | $ | 2,063 | $ | | ||||||||
Allocated capital/total average assets
|
6.57 | % | 6.37 | % | 6.54 | % | 6.74 | % | ||||||||
Loans Produced
|
$ | 936,471 | $ | 139,686 | $ | 1,076,157 | $ | 43,894 | ||||||||
Purchase mortgages
|
10 | % | 24 | % | 12 | % | N/A | |||||||||
Cash out refinance mortgages
|
56 | % | 51 | % | 55 | % | N/A | |||||||||
Rate and term refinance mortgages
|
34 | % | 25 | % | 33 | % | N/A | |||||||||
Performance Ratios
|
||||||||||||||||
Return on equity (ROE)
|
37 | % | 88 | % | 44 | % | 8 | % | ||||||||
ROE mortgage banking activities
|
44 | % | (46 | )% | 37 | % | | |||||||||
ROE investing activities
|
| | | | ||||||||||||
ROE HELOC activities
|
21 | % | 15 | % | 20 | % | 8 | % | ||||||||
ROE financing and other activities
|
| 375 | % | 375 | % | | ||||||||||
Return on assets (ROA)
|
2.41 | % | N/A | 2.87 | % | 0.52 | % | |||||||||
Net interest margin
|
3.23 | % | N/A | 6.95 | % | 3.02 | % | |||||||||
Efficiency ratio
|
71 | % | 73 | % | 72 | % | 81 | % | ||||||||
Capital adjusted efficiency ratio
|
34 | % | 14 | % | 28 | % | 121 | % | ||||||||
Average FTE
|
606 | 270 | 876 | 16 |
IndyMac Consumer Bank and Home Equity Divisions
B2C | Business-to-Consumer division, offers SFR mortgage loans directly to consumers via the Internet and centralized call center | |
Retail Bank | Retail Bank division, offers direct lending and deposit products to our depositors through our retail branch network, on-line contact center and institutional money desk | |
Home Equity Division | The Home Equity Division is a product-focused division that supports the production of home equity lines of credit (HELOCs) and other home equity products through all of our relationship and consumer direct production channels |
11
The following table provides additional details on the segment results for the Investment Portfolio Group for the three months ended June 30, 2004:
Investment Portfolio Group | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Servicing-Related | SFR Mortgage | Discontinued | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Assets(1) | Loans(2) | MBS(3) | Products(4) | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating Results
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage Banking Activities
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income
|
$ | 8,030 | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 8,030 | ||||||||||||||
Gain on sale of loans
|
9,169 | 11,463 | | | 20,632 | |||||||||||||||||||
Other income
|
| | | | | |||||||||||||||||||
Net revenues
|
17,199 | 11,463 | | | 28,662 | |||||||||||||||||||
Operating expenses
|
1,155 | | | | 1,155 | |||||||||||||||||||
Pretax income
|
16,044 | 11,463 | | | 27,507 | |||||||||||||||||||
Investing Activities
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income
|
8,882 | 15,446 | 8,609 | 1,103 | 34,040 | |||||||||||||||||||
Provision for loan losses
|
| (301 | ) | | (1,499 | ) | (1,800 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Service fee expense
|
(31,538 | ) | | | | (31,538 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Gain (loss) on sale of securities
|
(5,000 | ) | | 500 | | (4,500 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Other income
|
588 | 1,027 | | | 1,615 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net (expense) revenues
|
(27,068 | ) | 16,172 | 9,109 | (396 | ) | (2,183 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Operating expenses
|
10,123 | 685 | 300 | 746 | 11,854 | |||||||||||||||||||
Pretax (loss) income
|
(37,191 | ) | 15,487 | 8,809 | (1,142 | ) | (14,037 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
HELOC Activities
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income
|
| | | | | |||||||||||||||||||
Provision for loan losses
|
| | | | | |||||||||||||||||||
Service fee income
|
| | | | | |||||||||||||||||||
Other income
|
| | | | | |||||||||||||||||||
Net revenues
|
| | | | | |||||||||||||||||||
Operating expenses
|
| | | | | |||||||||||||||||||
Pretax income
|
| | | | | |||||||||||||||||||
Financing and Other Activities
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income
|
| | | | | |||||||||||||||||||
Other income
|
| | | | | |||||||||||||||||||
Net revenues
|
| | | | | |||||||||||||||||||
Operating expenses
|
| | | | | |||||||||||||||||||
Pretax income
|
| | | | | |||||||||||||||||||
Total pretax (loss) income
|
(21,147 | ) | 26,950 | 8,809 | (1,142 | ) | 13,470 | |||||||||||||||||
Net (loss) income
|
$ | (12,794 | ) | $ | 16,305 | $ | 5,329 | $ | (691 | ) | $ | 8,149 | ||||||||||||
Ratios
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Percentage of assets
|
10 | % | 28 | % | 12 | % | 0 | % | 50 | % | ||||||||||||||
Percentage of total revenue
|
(5 | )% | 13 | % | 4 | % | 0 | % | 12 | % | ||||||||||||||
Percentage of pretax income
|
(24 | )% | 30 | % | 10 | % | (1 | )% | 15 | % | ||||||||||||||
Balance Sheet Data
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average interest-earning assets
|
$ | 1,016,929 | $ | 4,820,823 | $ | 1,950,173 | $ | 63,458 | $ | 7,851,383 | ||||||||||||||
Average total assets
|
$ | 1,617,352 | $ | 4,835,011 | $ | 1,995,009 | $ | 56,416 | $ | 8,503,788 | ||||||||||||||
Allocated capital
|
$ | 205,192 | $ | 236,595 | $ | 43,036 | $ | 5,553 | $ | 490,376 |
12
Investment Portfolio Group | ||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage | ||||||||||||||||||||
Servicing-Related | SFR Mortgage | Discontinued | ||||||||||||||||||
Assets(1) | Loans(2) | MBS(3) | Products(4) | Total | ||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Capital allocated to mortgage banking activities
|
$ | 31,607 | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 31,607 | ||||||||||
Capital allocated to investing activities
|
$ | 173,585 | $ | 236,595 | $ | 43,036 | $ | 5,553 | $ | 458,769 | ||||||||||
Capital allocated to HELOC activities
|
$ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | ||||||||||
Capital allocated to financing and other
activities
|
$ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | ||||||||||
Allocated capital/ total average assets
|
12.69 | % | 4.89 | % | 2.16 | % | 9.84 | % | 5.77 | % | ||||||||||
Loans Produced
|
$ | 417,669 | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 417,669 | ||||||||||
Performance Ratios
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Return on equity (ROE)
|
(25 | )% | 28 | % | 50 | % | (50 | )% | 7 | % | ||||||||||
ROE mortgage banking activities
|
124 | % | | | | 212 | % | |||||||||||||
ROE investing activities
|
(52 | )% | 16 | % | 50 | % | (50 | )% | (7 | )% | ||||||||||
ROE HELOC activities
|
| | | | | |||||||||||||||
ROE financing and other activities
|
| | | | | |||||||||||||||
Return on assets (ROA)
|
(3.18 | )% | 1.36 | % | 1.07 | % | (4.93 | )% | 0.39 | % | ||||||||||
Net interest margin
|
6.69 | % | 1.29 | % | 1.78 | % | 6.99 | % | 2.16 | % | ||||||||||
Efficiency ratio
|
(114 | )% | 2 | % | 3 | % | 68 | % | 46 | % | ||||||||||
Capital adjusted efficiency ratio
|
594 | % | 5 | % | 4 | % | 85 | % | 199 | % | ||||||||||
Average FTE
|
407 | 9 | 4 | 25 | 445 |
The Investment Portfolio Group
(1) | Mortgage servicing-related assets include the following: (i) MSRs, interest-only strips and residual securities, (ii) securities held as hedges of such assets, including principal-only securities, agency debentures and U.S. Treasury bonds, (iii) loans acquired through clean-up calls or through the Investment Portfolio Groups customer retention programs and (iv) investment and non-investment grade securities. |
(2) | Assets include all single-family residential loans held for investment other than discontinued products. |
(3) | Assets include AAA-rated agency and private label MBS. |
(4) | Discontinued products are home improvement and manufactured housing loans. |
13
The following table provides additional details on the segment results for all others for the three months ended June 30, 2004:
Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Company | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Before Corp. | Total | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Treasury | Overhead and | Corporate | Company | SAB No. 105 | Company | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Group(1) | Eliminations | Overhead | Eliminations | Pro Forma | Adjustment | GAAP | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating Results
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage Banking Activities
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income
|
$ | | $ | 50,809 | $ | | $ | | $ | 50,809 | $ | | $ | 50,809 | ||||||||||||||||||
Gain (loss) on sale of loans(2)
|
| 127,651 | | (9,344 | ) | 118,307 | (52,223 | ) | 66,084 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Other income
|
| 14,544 | | 242 | 14,786 | | 14,786 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net revenues (expense)
|
| 193,004 | | (9,102 | ) | 183,902 | (52,223 | ) | 131,679 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating expenses
|
| 68,849 | | | 68,849 | | 68,849 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pretax income (loss)
|
| 124,155 | | (9,102 | ) | 115,053 | (52,223 | ) | 62,830 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Investing Activities
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income
|
| 52,267 | | 2,720 | 54,987 | | 54,987 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Provision for loan losses
|
| (3,100 | ) | | | (3,100 | ) | | (3,100 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Service fee (expense) income
|
| (31,538 | ) | | 3,371 | (28,167 | ) | | (28,167 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Gain (loss) on sale of securities
|
| (4,500 | ) | | 1,086 | (3,414 | ) | | (3,414 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Other income
|
| 3,319 | 847 | | 4,166 | | 4,166 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net revenues
|
| 16,448 | 847 | 7,177 | 24,472 | | 24,472 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating expenses
|
| 22,068 | | | 22,068 | | 22,068 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pretax (loss) income
|
| (5,620 | ) | 847 | 7,177 | 2,404 | | 2,404 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
HELOC Activities
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income
|
| 6,205 | | | 6,205 | | 6,205 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Provision for loan losses
|
| (100 | ) | | | (100 | ) | | (100 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Service fee income
|
| 360 | | | 360 | | 360 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other income
|
| 1,172 | | | 1,172 | | 1,172 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net revenues
|
| 7,637 | | | 7,637 | | 7,637 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating expenses
|
| 2,004 | | | 2,004 | | 2,004 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pretax income
|
| 5,633 | | | 5,633 | | 5,633 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Financing and Other Activities
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest loss
|
(11,250 | ) | (3,578 | ) | (1,445 | ) | | (5,023 | ) | | (5,023 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Other income
|
113 | 650 | | | 650 | | 650 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net expense
|
(11,137 | ) | (2,928 | ) | (1,445 | ) | | (4,373 | ) | | (4,373 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Operating expenses
|
744 | 5,771 | 22,781 | | 28,552 | | 28,552 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pretax loss
|
(11,881 | ) | (8,699 | ) | (24,226 | ) | | (32,925 | ) | | (32,925 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total pretax (loss) income
|
(11,881 | ) | 115,469 | (23,379 | ) | (1,925 | ) | 90,165 | (52,223 | ) | 37,942 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net (loss) income
|
$ | (7,188 | ) | $ | 69,859 | $ | (14,144 | ) | $ | (1,165 | ) | $ | 54,550 | $ | (31,595 | ) | $ | 22,955 | ||||||||||||||
Ratios
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Percentage of assets
|
3 | % | 98 | % | 2 | % | 0 | % | 100 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Percentage of total revenue
|
(5 | )% | 101 | % | 0 | % | (1 | )% | 100 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Percentage of pretax income
|
(13 | )% | 128 | % | (26 | )% | (2 | )% | 100 | % |
14
Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Company | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Before Corp. | Total | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Treasury | Overhead and | Corporate | Company Pro | SAB No. 105 | Company | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Group(1) | Eliminations | Overhead | Eliminations | Forma | Adjustment | GAAP | ||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance Sheet Data
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average interest-earning assets
|
$ | 326,046 | $ | 15,686,905 | $ | (18,030 | ) | $ | | $ | 15,668,875 | $ | 15,668,875 | |||||||||||||||
Average total assets
|
$ | 554,841 | $ | 16,714,133 | $ | 272,349 | $ | | $ | 16,986,482 | $ | 16,986,482 | ||||||||||||||||
Allocated capital
|
$ | 27,742 | $ | 1,016,549 | $ | 110,739 | $ | | $ | 1,127,288 | $ | 1,127,288 | ||||||||||||||||
Capital allocated to mortgage banking activities
|
$ | | $ | 316,980 | $ | | $ | | $ | 316,980 | $ | 316,980 | ||||||||||||||||
Capital allocated to investing activities
|
$ | | $ | 611,313 | $ | | $ | | $ | 611,313 | $ | 611,313 | ||||||||||||||||
Capital allocated to HELOC activities
|
$ | | $ | 58,451 | $ | | $ | | $ | 58,451 | $ | 58,451 | ||||||||||||||||
Capital allocated to financing and other
activities
|
$ | 27,742 | $ | 29,805 | $ | 110,739 | $ | | $ | 140,544 | $ | 140,544 | ||||||||||||||||
Allocated capital/total average assets
|
5.00 | % | 6.08 | % | 40.66 | % | | 6.64 | % | 6.64 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Loans Produced
|
$ | | $ | 9,727,029 | $ | | $ | | $ | 9,727,029 | $ | 9,727,029 | ||||||||||||||||
Purchase mortgages
|
N/A | 41 | % | 41 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash out refinance mortgages
|
N/A | 35 | % | 35 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Rate and term refinance mortgages
|
N/A | 24 | % | 24 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Performance Ratios
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Return on equity (ROE)
|
28 | % | 19 | % | 8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
ROE mortgage banking
|
95 | % | 88 | % | 48 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
ROE investing activities
|
(2 | )% | 1 | % | 1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
ROE HELOC activities
|
23 | % | 23 | % | 23 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
ROE financing and other activities
|
(71 | )% | (57 | )% | (57 | )% | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Return on assets (ROA)
|
1.68 | % | 1.29 | % | 0.54 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest margin
|
2.71 | % | 2.75 | % | 2.75 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Efficiency ratio
|
45 | % | 56 | % | 75 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Capital adjusted efficiency ratio
|
53 | % | 74 | % | 129 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Average FTE
|
24 | 3,451 | 610 | 4,061 | 4,061 |
(1) | During the three months ended June 30, 2004, the Treasury Group reported net interest expense of $11.3 million. This amount includes interest expense related to the trust preferred debentures issued by the Company in 2003 and 2001 which is not allocated to the business units. The Treasury Group also credits the Retail Bank and Investment Portfolio Group amounts in addition to their normal FTP credit to reward their raising of core deposits. Additionally, the net expense in Treasury reflects the cost of maintaining adequate corporate liquidity, as well as certain fixed rate deposits with longer maturities raised in prior years, the higher cost of which is not allocated to the business units. |
15
The following table compares the quarterly detail segment results of operations by period:
Relationship Businesses IndyMac Mortgage Bank | ||||||||||||||||||||
B2B | B2R | HCL | HBD | Total | ||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage Banking Activities
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Q2 04 Pretax income (loss)
|
$ | 70,304 | $ | (903 | ) | $ | 20,419 | $ | 1,412 | $ | 91,232 | |||||||||
Q1 04 Pretax income (loss)
|
45,561 | (1,122 | ) | 8,728 | 667 | 53,834 | ||||||||||||||
Annualized Percent Change
|
217 | % | 78 | % | 536 | % | 447 | % | 278 | % | ||||||||||
Q2 03 Pretax income
|
59,741 | 1,000 | 8,003 | 1,227 | 69,971 | |||||||||||||||
Percent Change
|
18 | % | (190 | )% | 155 | % | 15 | % | 30 | % | ||||||||||
Investing Activities
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Q2 04 Pretax income
|
| | 3,187 | 5,230 | 8,417 | |||||||||||||||
Q1 04 Pretax income
|
| | 3,470 | 4,803 | 8,273 | |||||||||||||||
Annualized Percent Change
|
| | (33 | )% | 36 | % | 7 | % | ||||||||||||
Q2 03 Pretax income
|
| | 3,622 | 6,245 | 9,867 | |||||||||||||||
Percent Change
|
| | (12 | )% | (16 | )% | (15 | )% | ||||||||||||
HELOC Activities
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Q2 04 Pretax income
|
3,370 | 270 | 37 | 111 | 3,788 | |||||||||||||||
Q1 04 Pretax income
|
2,546 | 114 | 41 | 70 | 2,771 | |||||||||||||||
Annualized Percent Change
|
129 | % | 547 | % | (39 | )% | 234 | % | 147 | % | ||||||||||
Q2 03 Pretax income (loss)
|
1,032 | 31 | (59 | ) | 27 | 1,031 | ||||||||||||||
Percent Change
|
227 | % | 771 | % | 163 | % | 311 | % | 267 | % | ||||||||||
Financing and Other Activities
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Q2 04 Pretax income
|
| | | | | |||||||||||||||
Q1 04 Pretax income
|
| | | | | |||||||||||||||
Q2 03 Pretax income
|
| | | | | |||||||||||||||
Net Income
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Q2 04 Net income (loss)
|
44,573 | (383 | ) | 14,304 | 4,086 | 62,580 | ||||||||||||||
Q1 04 Net income (loss)
|
29,105 | (610 | ) | 7,405 | 3,351 | 39,251 | ||||||||||||||
Annualized Percent Change
|
213 | % | 149 | % | 373 | % | 88 | % | 238 | % | ||||||||||
Q2 03 Net income
|
36,768 | 624 | 6,997 | 4,537 | 48,926 | |||||||||||||||
Percent Change
|
21 | % | (161 | )% | 104 | % | (10 | )% | 28 | % | ||||||||||
Performance Ratios
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Q2 04
|
||||||||||||||||||||
ROE
|
70 | % | (29 | )% | 61 | % | 21 | % | 58 | % | ||||||||||
ROA
|
4.38 | % | (1.62 | )% | 3.43 | % | 2.09 | % | 3.79 | % | ||||||||||
NIM
|
3.45 | % | 3.34 | % | 3.81 | % | 4.50 | % | 3.66 | % | ||||||||||
Efficiency ratio
|
36 | % | 126 | % | 28 | % | 38 | % | 36 | % | ||||||||||
Capital adjusted efficiency ratio
|
20 | % | 59 | % | 19 | % | 65 | % | 24 | % | ||||||||||
Average FTE
|
1,502 | 125 | 285 | 178 | 2,090 | |||||||||||||||
Q1 04
|
||||||||||||||||||||
ROE
|
69 | % | (48 | )% | 37 | % | 19 | % | 49 | % | ||||||||||
ROA
|
4.52 | % | (3.13 | )% | 1.95 | % | 1.94 | % | 3.23 | % | ||||||||||
NIM
|
4.33 | % | 3.52 | % | 3.76 | % | 4.53 | % | 4.16 | % | ||||||||||
Efficiency ratio
|
43 | % | 139 | % | 41 | % | 42 | % | 45 | % | ||||||||||
Capital adjusted efficiency ratio
|
22 | % | 68 | % | 39 | % | 76 | % | 31 | % | ||||||||||
Average FTE
|
1,378 | 134 | 278 | 157 | 1,947 | |||||||||||||||
Q2 03
|
||||||||||||||||||||
ROE
|
88 | % | 35 | % | 44 | % | 26 | % | 64 | % | ||||||||||
ROA
|
5.71 | % | 2.17 | % | 2.43 | % | 2.71 | % | 4.33 | % | ||||||||||
NIM
|
4.31 | % | 4.01 | % | 4.29 | % | 4.91 | % | 4.39 | % | ||||||||||
Efficiency ratio
|
35 | % | 79 | % | 37 | % | 22 | % | 36 | % | ||||||||||
Capital adjusted efficiency ratio
|
15 | % | 27 | % | 31 | % | 38 | % | 22 | % | ||||||||||
Average FTE
|
1,231 | 158 | 204 | 101 | 1,694 |
The Mortgage Bank segments net income increased by 59%, or $23.3 million compared to first quarter 2004, and 28% or $13.7 million from the second quarter of 2003. The increase was primarily due to an increase in mortgage production and higher loan sales. Our operating expenses continued to increase as we expanded our sales force to support continued growth in mortgage production and our pursuit of increased market share.
16
The following table compares the quarterly detail segment results of operations by period, continued:
Consumer Direct Businesses | ||||||||||||||||
IndyMac Consumer Bank | ||||||||||||||||
Home Equity | ||||||||||||||||
B2C | Retail Bank | Total | Division | |||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Mortgage Banking Activities
|
||||||||||||||||
Q2 04 Pretax income (loss)
|
$ | 5,945 | $ | (529 | ) | $ | 5,416 | $ | | |||||||
Q1 04 Pretax income
|
7,647 | 664 | 8,311 | | ||||||||||||
Annualized Percent Change
|
(89 | )% | (719 | )% | (139 | )% | | |||||||||
Q2 03 Pretax income
|
22,645 | 1,348 | 23,993 | | ||||||||||||
Percent Change
|
(74 | )% | (139 | )% | (77 | )% | | |||||||||
Investing Activities
|
||||||||||||||||
Q2 04 Pretax income
|
| | | | ||||||||||||
Q1 04 Pretax income
|
| | | | ||||||||||||
Annualized Percent Change
|
| | % | | ||||||||||||
Q2 03 Pretax income
|
| | | | ||||||||||||
Percent Change
|
| | % | | ||||||||||||
HELOC Activities
|
||||||||||||||||
Q2 04 Pretax income
|
1,355 | 174 | 1,529 | 316 | ||||||||||||
Q1 04 Pretax income
|
1,115 | 118 | 1,233 | 177 | ||||||||||||
Annualized Percent Change
|
86 | % | 190 | % | 96 | % | 314 | % | ||||||||
Q2 03 Pretax income (loss)
|
650 | 31 | 681 | (403 | ) | |||||||||||
Percent Change
|
108 | % | 461 | % | 125 | % | 178 | % | ||||||||
Financing and Other Activities
|
||||||||||||||||
Q2 04 Pretax income
|
| 3,182 | 3,182 | | ||||||||||||
Q1 04 Pretax income
|
| 164 | 164 | | ||||||||||||
Q2 03 Pretax loss
|
| (3,608 | ) | (3,608 | ) | | ||||||||||
Net Income
|
||||||||||||||||
Q2 04 Net income
|
4,417 | 1,710 | 6,127 | 191 | ||||||||||||
Q1 04 Net income
|
5,301 | 572 | 5,873 | 107 | ||||||||||||
Annualized Percent Change
|
(67 | )% | 796 | % | 17 | % | 314 | % | ||||||||
Q2 03 Net income (loss)
|
14,093 | (1,348 | ) | 12,745 | (244 | ) | ||||||||||
Percent Change
|
(69 | )% | 227 | % | (52 | )% | 178 | % | ||||||||
Performance Ratios
|
||||||||||||||||
Q2 04
|
||||||||||||||||
ROE
|
37 | % | 88 | % | 44 | % | 8 | % | ||||||||
ROA
|
2.41 | % | | 2.87 | % | 0.52 | % | |||||||||
NIM
|
3.23 | % | | 6.95 | % | 3.02 | % | |||||||||
Efficiency ratio
|
71 | % | 73 | % | 72 | % | 81 | % | ||||||||
Capital adjusted efficiency ratio
|
34 | % | 14 | % | 28 | % | 121 | % | ||||||||
Average FTE
|
606 | 270 | 876 | 16 | ||||||||||||
Q1 04
|
||||||||||||||||
ROE
|
47 | % | 44 | % | 47 | % | 4 | % | ||||||||
ROA
|
3.40 | % | | 3.33 | % | 0.38 | % | |||||||||
NIM
|
3.54 | % | | 6.32 | % | 2.88 | % | |||||||||
Efficiency ratio
|
68 | % | 87 | % | 72 | % | 83 | % | ||||||||
Capital adjusted efficiency ratio
|
28 | % | 15 | % | 26 | % | 192 | % | ||||||||
Average FTE
|
599 | 258 | 857 | 15 | ||||||||||||
Q2 03
|
||||||||||||||||
ROE
|
114 | % | (59 | )% | 87 | % | (30 | )% | ||||||||
ROA
|
7.44 | % | NM | 6.02 | % | (2.92 | )% | |||||||||
NIM
|
3.77 | % | NM | 4.27 | % | 1.07 | % | |||||||||
Efficiency ratio
|
43 | % | 158 | % | 53 | % | (412 | )% | ||||||||
Capital adjusted efficiency ratio
|
13 | % | 95 | % | 17 | % | 4,530 | % | ||||||||
Average FTE
|
622 | 219 | 841 | 11 |
The Consumer Bank segments net income is comparable to first quarter 2004, and decreased by 52% or $6.6 million compared to second quarter 2003. The decrease from the second quarter 2003 was primarily due to a 36% decrease in mortgage production, partially offset by the increase in the FTP credit earned by the Retail Bank.
The Home Equity Division generated net income of $191 thousand during the second quarter 2004 as compared to a net income of $107 thousand in the first quarter of 2004, and a net loss of $244 thousand in the second quarter 2003. The increase in net income from both quarters was driven by the increase in net interest income, resulting from an increase in average interest-earning assets as the Home Equity Division continues to grow.
17
The following table compares the quarterly detail segment results of operations by period, continued:
Investment Portfolio Group | ||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage | ||||||||||||||||||||
Servicing- | SFR | |||||||||||||||||||
Related | Mortgage | Discontinued | ||||||||||||||||||
Assets | Loans | MBS | Products | Total | ||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage Banking Activities
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Q2 04 Pretax income
|
$ | 16,044 | $ | 11,463 | $ | | $ | | $ | 27,507 | ||||||||||
Q1 04 Pretax income
|
20,505 | 296 | | | 20,801 | |||||||||||||||
Annualized Percent Change
|
(87 | )% | 15,091 | % | | | 129 | % | ||||||||||||
Q2 03 Pretax income
|
15,901 | 2,732 | | | 18,633 | |||||||||||||||
Percent Change
|
1 | % | 320 | % | | | 48 | % | ||||||||||||
Investing Activities
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Q2 04 Pretax (loss) income
|
(37,191 | ) | 15,487 | 8,809 | (1,142 | ) | (14,037 | ) | ||||||||||||
Q1 04 Pretax (loss) income
|
(13,740 | ) | 18,074 | 8,639 | (1,051 | ) | 11,922 | |||||||||||||
Annualized Percent Change
|
(683 | )% | (57 | )% | 8 | % | (35 | )% | (871 | )% | ||||||||||
Q2 03 Pretax (loss) income
|
(14,246 | ) | 2,328 | (1,427 | ) | (1,221 | ) | (14,566 | ) | |||||||||||
Percent Change
|
(161 | )% | 565 | % | 717 | % | 6 | % | 4 | % | ||||||||||
HELOC Activities
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Q2 04 Pretax income
|
| | | | | |||||||||||||||
Q1 04 Pretax income
|
| | | | | |||||||||||||||
Annualized Percent Change
|
| | | | | |||||||||||||||
Q2 03 Pretax income
|
| | | | | |||||||||||||||
Percent Change
|
| | | | | |||||||||||||||
Financing and Other Activities
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Q2 04 Pretax income
|
| | | | | |||||||||||||||
Q1 04 Pretax income
|
| | | | | |||||||||||||||
Q2 03 Pretax income
|
| | | | | |||||||||||||||
Net Income
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Q2 04 Net (loss) income
|
(12,794 | ) | 16,305 | 5,329 | (691 | ) | 8,149 | |||||||||||||
Q1 04 Net income (loss)
|
4,093 | 11,114 | 5,227 | (636 | ) | 19,798 | ||||||||||||||
Annualized Percent Change
|
(1,650 | )% | 187 | % | 8 | % | (35 | )% | (235 | )% | ||||||||||
Q2 03 Net income (loss)
|
1,001 | 3,061 | (863 | ) | (739 | ) | 2,460 | |||||||||||||
Percent Change
|
(1,378 | )% | 433 | % | 717 | % | 6 | % | 231 | % | ||||||||||
Performance Ratios
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Q2 04
|
||||||||||||||||||||
ROE
|
(25 | )% | 28 | % | 50 | % | (50 | )% | 7 | % | ||||||||||
ROA
|
(3.18 | )% | 1.36 | % | 1.07 | % | (4.93 | )% | 0.39 | % | ||||||||||
NIM
|
6.69 | % | 1.29 | % | 1.78 | % | 6.99 | % | 2.16 | % | ||||||||||
Efficiency ratio
|
(114 | )% | 2 | % | 3 | % | 68 | % | 46 | % | ||||||||||
Capital adjusted efficiency ratio
|
594 | % | 5 | % | 4 | % | 85 | % | 199 | % | ||||||||||
Average FTE
|
407 | 9 | 4 | 25 | 445 | |||||||||||||||
Q1 04
|
||||||||||||||||||||
ROE
|
8 | % | 19 | % | 57 | % | (43 | )% | 17 | % | ||||||||||
ROA
|
1.02 | % | 0.92 | % | 1.30 | % | (4.23 | )% | 0.98 | % | ||||||||||
NIM
|
6.05 | % | 1.52 | % | 2.03 | % | 6.56 | % | 2.28 | % | ||||||||||
Efficiency ratio
|
59 | % | 5 | % | 3 | % | 96 | % | 26 | % | ||||||||||
Capital adjusted efficiency ratio
|
179 | % | 14 | % | 4 | % | 128 | % | 69 | % | ||||||||||
Average FTE
|
437 | 11 | 4 | 29 | 481 | |||||||||||||||
Q2 03
|
||||||||||||||||||||
ROE
|
2 | % | 11 | % | (9 | )% | (39 | )% | 3 | % | ||||||||||
ROA
|
0.32 | % | 0.50 | % | (0.26 | )% | (3.75 | )% | 0.19 | % | ||||||||||
NIM
|
7.13 | % | 0.94 | % | (1.01 | )% | 7.05 | % | 1.57 | % | ||||||||||
Efficiency ratio
|
85 | % | 8 | % | (15 | )% | 56 | % | 55 | % | ||||||||||
Capital adjusted efficiency ratio
|
382 | % | 24 | % | 121 | % | 69 | % | 243 | % | ||||||||||
Average FTE
|
382 | 8 | 6 | 34 | 430 |
The Investment Portfolio Group segments net income decreased by 59%, or $11.6 million compared to first quarter 2004, and increased by 231% or $5.7 million compared to second quarter 2003. The decrease from the first quarter 2004 was primarily due to larger losses in servicing due to increased amortization as a result of accelerated prepayment activity during the quarter and losses from hedge instruments exceeding servicing income and positive valuation adjustments in the second quarter 2004. The increase over the second quarter 2003 was primarily due to an increase in net interest income as the average earning assets of the Investment Portfolio Group grew by 77% or $3.4 billion.
18
The following table compares the quarterly detail segment results of operations by period, continued:
Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Company | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
before Corp. | Total | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Treasury | Overhead and | Corporate | Company | SAB 105 | Company | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Group | Eliminations | Overhead | Eliminations | Pro Forma | Adjustment | GAAP | ||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage Banking Activities
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Q2 04 Pretax income (loss)
|
$ | | $ | 124,155 | $ | | $ | (9,102 | ) | $ | 115,053 | $ | (52,223 | ) | $ | 62,830 | ||||||||||||
Q1 04 Pretax income (loss)
|
| 82,946 | | (8,125 | ) | 74,821 | | 74,821 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Annualized Percent Change
|
| 199 | % | | (48 | )% | 215 | % | | (64 | )% | |||||||||||||||||
Q2 03 Pretax income (loss)
|
| 112,597 | | (9,753 | ) | 102,844 | | 102,844 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Percent Change
|
| 10 | % | | 7 | % | 12 | % | | (39 | )% | |||||||||||||||||
Investing Activities
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Q2 04 Pretax (loss) income
|
| (5,620 | ) | 847 | 7,177 | 2,404 | | 2,404 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Q1 04 Pretax income
|
| 20,195 | 708 | 4,984 | 25,887 | | 25,887 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Annualized Percent Change
|
| (511 | )% | 79 | % | 176 | % | (363 | )% | | (363 | )% | ||||||||||||||||
Q2 03 Pretax (loss) income
|
| (4,699 | ) | 105 | 2,653 | (1,941 | ) | | (1,941 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Percent Change
|
| (20 | )% | 707 | % | 171 | % | 224 | % | | 224 | % | ||||||||||||||||
HELOC Activities
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Q2 04 Pretax income
|
| 5,633 | | | 5,633 | | 5,633 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Q1 04 Pretax income
|
| 4,181 | | | 4,181 | | 4,181 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Annualized Percent Change
|
| 139 | % | | | 139 | % | | 139 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
Q2 03 Pretax income
|
| 1,309 | | | 1,309 | | 1,309 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Percent Change
|
| 330 | % | | | 330 | % | | 330 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
Financing and Other Activities
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Q2 04 Pretax loss
|
(11,881 | ) | (8,699 | ) | (24,226 | ) | | (32,925 | ) | | (32,925 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Q1 04 Pretax (loss) income
|
(11,441 | ) | (11,277 | ) | (24,309 | ) | 3 | (35,583 | ) | | (35,583 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Q2 03 Pretax (loss) income
|
(8,776 | ) | (12,384 | ) | (21,457 | ) | 7 | (33,834 | ) | | (33,834 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Net Income
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Q2 04 Net (loss) income
|
(7,188 | ) | 69,859 | (14,144 | ) | (1,165 | ) | 54,550 | (31,595 | ) | 22,955 | |||||||||||||||||
Q1 04 Net (loss) income
|
(6,922 | ) | 58,107 | (14,279 | ) | (1,898 | ) | 41,930 | | 41,930 | ||||||||||||||||||
Annualized Percent Change
|
(15 | )% | 81 | % | 4 | % | 154 | % | 120 | % | | (181 | )% | |||||||||||||||
Q2 03 Net (loss) income
|
(5,309 | ) | 58,578 | (12,918 | ) | (4,291 | ) | 41,369 | | 41,369 | ||||||||||||||||||
Percent Change
|
(35 | )% | 19 | % | (9 | )% | 73 | % | 32 | % | | (45 | )% | |||||||||||||||
Performance Ratios
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Q2 04
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ROE
|
| 28 | % | | | 19 | % | 8 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
ROA
|
| 1.68 | % | | | 1.29 | % | 0.54 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
NIM
|
| 2.71 | % | | | 2.75 | % | 2.75 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
Efficiency ratio
|
| 45 | % | | | 56 | % | 75 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
Capital adjusted efficiency ratio
|
| 53 | % | | | 74 | % | 129 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
Average FTE
|
24 | 3,451 | 610 | | 4,061 | 4,061 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Q1 04
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ROE
|
| 26 | % | | | 16 | % | 16 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
ROA
|
| 1.63 | % | | | 1.16 | % | 1.16 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
NIM
|
| 2.79 | % | | | 2.82 | % | 2.82 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
Efficiency ratio
|
| 48 | % | | | 62 | % | 62 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
Capital adjusted efficiency ratio
|
| 57 | % | | | 87 | % | 87 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
Average FTE
|
25 | 3,325 | 596 | | 3,921 | 3,921 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Q2 03
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ROE
|
| 32 | % | | | 18 | % | 18 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
ROA
|
| 2.18 | % | | | 1.52 | % | 1.52 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
NIM
|
| 2.67 | % | | | 2.73 | % | 2.73 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
Efficiency ratio
|
| 45 | % | | | 58 | % | 58 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
Capital adjusted efficiency ratio
|
| 44 | % | | | 73 | % | 73 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
Average FTE
|
23 | 2,999 | 506 | | 3,505 | 3,505 |
19
MORTGAGE BANKING ACTIVITIES
Loan Production
During the second quarter of 2004, the Companys loan production was a record $9.7 billion, a 36% increase over the $7.1 billion of loans produced during the first quarter of 2004 and a 19% increase over the $8.2 billion loans produced in the second quarter of 2003. Our focus on less cyclical products, such as Alt-A, subprime, HELOCs and consumer construction, resulted in continued growth in each of these products in the second quarter 2004 compared to the first quarter of 2004 and second quarter 2003. This increase more than offset the decrease in our agency conforming and jumbo products which are more cyclical in nature, closely tracking changes in the overall mortgage market. Additionally, we continued to further penetrate the purchase market, increasing our purchase transactions 61% year over year and successfully adapted our production mix to the demand for adjustable rate mortgages (ARMs) with 61% of our mortgage production now consisting of ARMs compared with only 29% a year ago. Further, our Investment Portfolio Groups customer retention program continues to show strong production, originating $418 million in loans, a 48% increase over the first quarter 2004 volume.
Total production by loan type was as follows:
Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | Percent | March 31, | Percent | ||||||||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | Change | 2004 | Change | ||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Volume by product
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Prime(1)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Alt-A
|
$ | 6,447 | $ | 4,081 | 58 | % | $ | 4,584 | 41 | % | ||||||||||||
Agency conforming
|
511 | 1,471 | (65 | )% | 608 | (16 | )% | |||||||||||||||
Jumbo
|
730 | 1,192 | (39 | )% | 407 | 79 | % | |||||||||||||||
Subprime(1)
|
567 | 465 | 22 | % | 458 | 24 | % | |||||||||||||||
Home equity line of credit(2)
|
408 | 229 | 78 | % | 244 | 67 | % | |||||||||||||||
Consumer construction(2)
|
760 | 518 | 47 | % | 603 | 26 | % | |||||||||||||||
Subtotal mortgage production
|
9,423 | 7,956 | 18 | % | 6,904 | 36 | % | |||||||||||||||
Subdivision construction commitments
|
304 | 237 | 28 | % | 242 | 26 | % | |||||||||||||||
Total production volume
|
$ | 9,727 | $ | 8,193 | 19 | % | $ | 7,146 | 36 | % | ||||||||||||
Mortgage Web-based
production
|
$ | 5,973 | $ | 5,994 | 0 | % | $ | 4,319 | 38 | % | ||||||||||||
Mortgage pipeline at period end(3)
|
$ | 5,179 | $ | 6,929 | (25 | )% | $ | 5,949 | (13 | )% |
(1) | Fundings. |
(2) | New commitments. |
(3) | Includes rate lock commitments for loans in process plus loans that have been submitted for processing, but not yet rate locked. |
The table below provides the mix of production for the quarters ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, and March 31, 2004, based on the interest rate characteristics and amortization type of the loan:
Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | March 31, | ||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | 2004 | ||||||||||
Fixed Rate Mortgages
|
39 | % | 71 | % | 44 | % | ||||||
Hybrid ARMs
|
36 | % | 16 | % | 44 | % | ||||||
ARMs
|
25 | % | 13 | % | 12 | % |
The following table details the mix of our production and pipeline between purchase, cash-out refinance and rate/term refinance transactions as of and for the quarters ended June 30, 2004, June 30, 2003, and
20
As of and for the Quarters Ended Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | Percent | March 31, | Percent | ||||||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | Change | 2004 | Change | ||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage loan production:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Purchase transactions
|
$ | 3,882 | $ | 2,408 | 61 | % | $ | 2,669 | 45 | % | ||||||||||
Cash-out refinance transactions
|
3,301 | 3,213 | 3 | % | 2,562 | 29 | % | |||||||||||||
Rate/term refinance transactions
|
2,240 | 2,335 | (4 | )% | 1,673 | 34 | % | |||||||||||||
Total mortgage loan production
|
$ | 9,423 | $ | 7,956 | 18 | % | $ | 6,904 | 36 | % | ||||||||||
% purchase transactions
|
41 | % | 30 | % | 39 | % | ||||||||||||||
Mortgage pipeline:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Purchase transactions
|
$ | 2,542 | $ | 1,714 | 48 | % | $ | 2,249 | 13 | % | ||||||||||
Cash-out refinance transactions
|
1,737 | 2,560 | (32 | )% | 1,900 | (9 | )% | |||||||||||||
Rate/term refinance transactions
|
900 | 2,655 | (66 | )% | 1,800 | (50 | )% | |||||||||||||
Mortgage pipeline at period end
|
$ | 5,179 | $ | 6,929 | (25 | )% | $ | 5,949 | (13 | )% | ||||||||||
% purchase transactions
|
49 | % | 25 | % | 38 | % |
During the six months ended June 30, 2004, the Company produced $16.9 billion of loans, which was a 14% increase over the $14.8 billion of loans produced during the six months ended June 30, 2003. Total production by loan type was as follows:
Six Months Ended | ||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | Percent | ||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | Change | ||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | ||||||||||||||
Volume by product
|
||||||||||||||
Prime(1)
|
||||||||||||||
Alt-A
|
$ | 11,031 | $ | 7,098 | 55 | % | ||||||||
Agency conforming
|
1,119 | 2,892 | (61 | )% | ||||||||||
Jumbo
|
1,137 | 2,205 | (48 | )% | ||||||||||
Subprime(1)
|
1,025 | 849 | 21 | % | ||||||||||
Home equity line of credit(2)
|
652 | 409 | 59 | % | ||||||||||
Consumer construction(2)
|
1,363 | 958 | 42 | % | ||||||||||
Subtotal mortgage production
|
16,327 | 14,411 | 13 | % | ||||||||||
Subdivision construction commitments
|
546 | 367 | 49 | % | ||||||||||
Total production volume
|
$ | 16,873 | $ | 14,778 | 14 | % | ||||||||
Mortgage Web-based
production
|
$ | 10,292 | $ | 10,914 | (6 | )% |
(1) | Fundings. |
(2) | New commitments. |
Mortgage Production by Division and Channel
IndyMac generates its mortgage production through multiple channels on a nationwide basis with a concentration in those regions of the country in which we have regional offices or in which there are higher home prices, including California, Florida, New Jersey and New York. Our highest concentration of mortgage
21
IndyMac Mortgage Bank produces mortgages through its Business-to-Business (B2B), Business-to-Realtor (B2R), Consumer Construction (Home Construction Lending or HCL) and Homebuilder (HBD) divisions. IndyMac Consumer Bank produces mortgages through its Business-to-Consumer (B2C) and Retail Bank divisions. The Home Equity Division supports the production of HELOCs through all of IndyMac channels of production and markets directly to consumers through targeted marketing and cross selling activities. The Investment Portfolio Group generates loan production through its customer retention program in connection with its servicing portfolio.
The following table shows production and key performance indicators of the various relationship businesses of IndyMac Mortgage Bank during the three and six months ended June 30, 2004.
Relationship Businesses IndyMac Mortgage Bank | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended June 30, 2004 | B2B | B2R | HCL | HBD | Total | |||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Volume by Channel and Customer
Source
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Wholesale
|
$ | 3,669 | $ | | $ | 560 | $ | | $ | 4,229 | ||||||||||||
Correspondent/ Mortgage bankers
|
864 | | 310 | | 1,174 | |||||||||||||||||
Correspondent/ Financial institutions
|
55 | | | | 55 | |||||||||||||||||
Conduit
|
1,792 | | | | 1,792 | |||||||||||||||||
Realtors
|
| 153 | | | 153 | |||||||||||||||||
Builder/Builder affiliates
|
| | 52 | 282 | 334 | |||||||||||||||||
Consumer direct marketing by HCL
|
| | 148 | | 148 | |||||||||||||||||
Subtotal mortgage production
|
6,380 | 153 | 1,070 | 282 | 7,885 | |||||||||||||||||
Builder and subdivision construction commitments
|
| | | 304 | 304 | |||||||||||||||||
Total relationship businesses production volume
|
$ | 6,380 | $ | 153 | $ | 1,070 | $ | 586 | $ | 8,189 | ||||||||||||
Percentage of total production
|
65.6 | % | 1.6 | % | 11.0 | % | 6.0 | % | 84.2 | % | ||||||||||||
Total production second quarter 2003
|
$ | 5,072 | $ | 279 | $ | 748 | $ | 358 | $ | 6,457 | ||||||||||||
Total production first quarter 2004
|
$ | 4,472 | $ | 109 | $ | 872 | $ | 409 | $ | 5,862 | ||||||||||||
Composition of mortgage production
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Purchase transactions
|
38 | % | 45 | % | 98 | % | 85 | % | 47 | % | ||||||||||||
Cash-out refinance transactions
|
40 | % | 32 | % | 0 | % | 10 | % | 34 | % | ||||||||||||
Rate/term refinance transactions
|
22 | % | 23 | % | 2 | % | 5 | % | 19 | % | ||||||||||||
Key Performance Indicators for the Three
Months Ended June 30, 2004
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Active Customers:(1)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Average monthly active customers
|
2,527 | 138 | 453 | 57 | 3,175 | |||||||||||||||||
Active customers during the quarter
|
4,273 | 262 | 1,079 | 88 | 5,702 | |||||||||||||||||
Net new customers during the quarter(2)
|
874 | 162 | N/A | 29 | 1,065 | |||||||||||||||||
Sales personnel
|
476 | 57 | 119 | 56 | 708 | |||||||||||||||||
Cost per funded mortgage loan (bps)
|
62 | 269 | 82 | 120 | N/A |
22
Relationship Businesses IndyMac Mortgage Bank | |||||||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended June 30, 2004 | B2B | B2R | HCL | HBD | Total | ||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Percentage Change for the Three Months
Ended
June 30, 2004 vs. June 30, 2003 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Active Customers:(1)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Average monthly active customers
|
14 | % | (45 | )% | 80 | % | 90 | % | 16 | % | |||||||||||
Active customers during the quarter
|
25 | % | (48 | )% | 77 | % | 80 | % | 25 | % | |||||||||||
Sales personnel
|
47 | % | (4 | )% | 83 | % | 157 | % | 47 | % | |||||||||||
Cost per funded mortgage loan (bps)
|
(15 | )% | 42 | % | 2 | % | 16 | % | N/A |
(1) | Active customers are defined as customers who funded at least one loan during the period. The HCL division utilizes the B2B marketing relationships with mortgage brokers and mortgage bankers to produce consumer construction loans. As a result, there is some overlap of the two active customer statistics and new customers. |
(2) | Net new customers are the number of new customers signed up during the period less those terminated. |
Relationship Businesses IndyMac Mortgage Bank | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Six Months Ended June 30, 2004 | B2B | B2R | HCL | HBD | Total | ||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Volume by Channel and Customer
Source
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Wholesale
|
$ | 6,320 | $ | | $ | 993 | $ | | $ | 7,313 | |||||||||||||
Correspondent/ Mortgage bankers
|
1,475 | | 578 | | 2,053 | ||||||||||||||||||
Correspondent/ Financial institutions
|
95 | | | | 95 | ||||||||||||||||||
Conduit
|
2,962 | | | | 2,962 | ||||||||||||||||||
Realtors
|
| 262 | | | 262 | ||||||||||||||||||
Builder/Builder affiliates
|
| | 90 | 449 | 539 | ||||||||||||||||||
Consumer direct marketing by HCL
|
| | 281 | | 281 | ||||||||||||||||||
Subtotal mortgage production
|
10,852 | 262 | 1,942 | 449 | 13,505 | ||||||||||||||||||
Builder and subdivision construction commitments
|
| | | 546 | 546 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total relationship businesses production volume
|
$ | 10,852 | $ | 262 | $ | 1,942 | $ | 995 | $ | 14,051 | |||||||||||||
Percentage of total production
|
64.3 | % | 1.6 | % | 11.5 | % | 5.9 | % | 83.3 | % | |||||||||||||
Total production for the six months ended
June 30, 2003 |
$ | 9,075 | $ | 526 | $ | 1,428 | $ | 580 | $ | 11,609 | |||||||||||||
Composition of mortgage production
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Purchase transactions
|
36 | % | 48 | % | 98 | % | 85 | % | 47 | % | |||||||||||||
Cash-out refinance transactions
|
41 | % | 32 | % | 0 | % | 10 | % | 34 | % | |||||||||||||
Rate/term refinance transactions
|
23 | % | 20 | % | 2 | % | 5 | % | 19 | % | |||||||||||||
Key Performance Indicators for the Six Months
Ended June 30, 2004
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Active Customers:(1)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Average monthly active customers
|
2,294 | 131 | 389 | 46 | 2,860 | ||||||||||||||||||
Active customers during the period
|
5,321 | 391 | 1,560 | 102 | 7,374 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net new customers during the period(2)
|
1,605 | 417 | N/A | 61 | 2,083 | ||||||||||||||||||
Cost per funded mortgage loan (bps)
|
68 | 311 | 89 | 136 | N/A |
23
Relationship Businesses IndyMac Mortgage Bank | |||||||||||||||||||||
Six Months Ended June 30, 2004 | B2B | B2R | HCL | HBD | Total | ||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Percentage Change for the Six Months Ended
June 30, 2004 vs. June 30, 2003 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Active Customers:(1)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Average monthly active customers
|
9 | % | (45 | )% | 72 | % | 59 | % | 10 | % | |||||||||||
Active customers during the period
|
28 | % | (45 | )% | 73 | % | 55 | % | 27 | % | |||||||||||
Cost per funded mortgage loan (bps)
|
(9 | )% | (57 | )% | 13 | % | 29 | % | N/A |
(1) | Active customers are defined as customers who funded at least one loan during the period. The HCL division utilizes the B2B marketing relationships with mortgage brokers and mortgage bankers to produce consumer construction loans. As a result, there is some overlap of the two active customer statistics and new customers. |
(2) | Net new customers are the number of new customers signed up during the period less those terminated. |
IndyMac Mortgage Banks production increased 40% from the three months ended March 31, 2004 to the three months ended June 30, 2004, due to strong execution on IndyMacs strategies to increase market share in the mortgage industry. Active customers during the quarter in our largest channel B2B grew 25% compared to the second quarter of 2003. This growth is the direct result of IndyMacs focus on increasing the size of its sales force nationwide and the newer sales people demonstrating increasing effectiveness as they gain experience with IndyMacs products and technology. We have been successful in attracting experienced, quality salespeople because of our less interest-rate sensitive products combined with our technology advantage. In addition, we have improved our production of subprime mortgages and purchase mortgages through a specific focus on sales people with experience in these areas to generate relationships with purchase-oriented and subprime-oriented originators.
Our construction lending divisions continued to take advantage of the strong purchase market as new home construction starts remained near seasonally adjusted record levels. Our consumer construction division, Home Construction Lending (HCL) produced new consumer construction loan commitments of $760 million, 26% higher than the first quarter of 2004. Similarly, our Home Builder Division (HBD) produced new construction financing commitments of $304 million, up 26% from the first quarter of 2004, and permanent home mortgages of $282 million reflecting an increase of 69% relative to the first quarter of this year.
Our Realtor channel B2R continued its efforts to refocus on its core purpose, which is to capture purchase volume and build long-term relationships with Realtors. Steps taken during the first quarter of this year to improve execution resulted in a 40% increase in loan volume from our Realtor customers. We continue to expect this business to show improvement with Realtors as the year progresses.
The following table shows production and other key performance indicators of the various consumer direct businesses of IndyMac Consumer Bank and Home Equity Division during the three and six months ended June 30, 2004. In addition, during the second quarter and six months ended June 30, 2004, as shown
24
Consumer Direct Businesses | ||||||||||||||||||||||
IndyMac Consumer Bank | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Home | Investment | |||||||||||||||||||||
Retail | Equity | Portfolio | ||||||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended June 30, 2004 | B2C | Bank | Total | Division(1) | Group | |||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Volume by Channel and Source
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Web-based Production:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Direct at www.indymacmortgage.com
|
$ | 125 | $ | | $ | 125 | $ | | $ | | ||||||||||||
Indirect Web-based leads
|
122 | | 122 | | | |||||||||||||||||
Cross-marketing and portfolio refinancing
|
517 | 55 | 572 | | 418 | |||||||||||||||||
Direct telemarketing and affinity relationships
|
172 | | 172 | 44 | | |||||||||||||||||
Retail banking branches
|
| 85 | 85 | | | |||||||||||||||||
Total consumer direct production volume
|
$ | 936 | $ | 140 | $ | 1,076 | $ | 44 | $ | 418 | ||||||||||||
Percentage of total production
|
9.6 | % | 1.5 | % | 11.1 | % | 0.5 | % | 4.2 | % | ||||||||||||
Total production second quarter 2003
|
$ | 1,571 | $ | 119 | $ | 1,690 | $ | 46 | N/A | |||||||||||||
Total production first quarter 2004
|
$ | 878 | $ | 89 | $ | 967 | $ | 35 | $ | 282 | ||||||||||||
Composition of mortgage production:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Purchase transactions
|
10 | % | 24 | % | 12 | % | N/A | 1 | % | |||||||||||||
Cash-out refinance transactions
|
56 | % | 51 | % | 55 | % | N/A | 1 | % | |||||||||||||
Rate/term refinance transactions
|
34 | % | 25 | % | 33 | % | N/A | 98 | % |
Consumer Direct Businesses | ||||||||||||||||||||||
IndyMac Consumer Bank | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Home | Investment | |||||||||||||||||||||
Retail | Equity | Portfolio | ||||||||||||||||||||
Six Months Ended June 30, 2004 | B2C | Bank | Total | Division(1) | Group | |||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Volume by Channel and Source
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Web-based Production:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Direct at www.indymacmortgage.com
|
$ | 234 | $ | | $ | 234 | $ | | $ | | ||||||||||||
Indirect Web-based leads
|
261 | | 261 | | | |||||||||||||||||
Cross-marketing and portfolio refinancing
|
964 | 89 | 1,053 | | 700 | |||||||||||||||||
Direct telemarketing and affinity relationships
|
355 | | 355 | 79 | | |||||||||||||||||
Retail banking branches
|
| 140 | 140 | | | |||||||||||||||||
Total consumer direct production volume
|
$ | 1,814 | $ | 229 | $ | 2,043 | $ | 79 | $ | 700 | ||||||||||||
Percentage of total production
|
10.8 | % | 1.3 | % | 12.1 | % | 0.5 | % | 4.1 | % | ||||||||||||
Total production for the six months ended
June 30, 2003
|
$ | 2,885 | $ | 197 | $ | 3,082 | $ | 87 | N/A | |||||||||||||
Composition of mortgage production:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Purchase transactions
|
9 | % | 25 | % | 11 | % | N/A | 0 | % | |||||||||||||
Cash-out refinance transactions
|
57 | % | 51 | % | 56 | % | N/A | 1 | % | |||||||||||||
Rate/term refinance transactions
|
34 | % | 24 | % | 33 | % | N/A | 99 | % |
(1) | The amount represents the loans produced only by the Home Equity Division. HELOC loans produced by other business divisions totaled $364 million and $573 million during the three and six months ended June 30, 2004, respectively. HELOC loans produced by business divisions other than the Home Equity Division are included in the production volume of the respective originating business division. |
25
B2Cs production volume declined 40% for the three months ended June 30, 2004, compared to the three months ended June 30, 2003. The B2C division is currently our most established consumer-direct business, generating 61% of the total consumer-direct business. This business is generally skewed to the refinance environment with its web-centralized call center approach and as such, is expected to be more cyclical in response to changes in interest rates. The Home Equity Division was established during 2002 to facilitate targeted marketing of our HELOC product directly to consumers in addition to the production of HELOCs within our other production channels. Through a streamlined application process and competitive pricing, this division provides homeowners the ability to easily access the excess equity in their homes for a variety of uses. The HELOC product tends to be somewhat counter-cyclical to the mortgage industry. As interest rates rise, consumers who want to access the equity in their home are more inclined to utilize a HELOC product rather than a cash-out refinance of their existing low-rate mortgage loan. As a result, we expect the Home Equity Divisions production to increase as the market transitions to a higher interest rate environment.
Loan Sales
The Company sold $7.6 billion and $6.3 billion of loans during the three months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively, and $12.5 billion and $11.9 billion for the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The Companys gain on sale of loans of $66.1 million in the second quarter of 2004 reflected a one-time deferral of $52.2 million of revenue on the adoption of SAB No. 105. Had the accounting principle been applied consistently with prior periods, the gain on sale of loans would have been $118.3 million for the second quarter of 2004 compared to $102.1 million for the same quarter of 2003, reflecting a 16% increase. The increase in gain on sale of loans was primarily due to the 21% increase in the amount of loans sold year over year.
The Company hedges the interest rate risk inherent in its pipeline of mortgage loans held for sale to protect its margin on sale of loans. Hedging practices can vary significantly from company to company ranging across a broad spectrum. At one extreme, a mortgage banker may choose not to hedge its pipeline at all. Mortgage bankers who choose not to hedge their pipeline will typically report higher earnings and profit margins in a falling interest rate environment, and lower earnings and profit margins in a rising interest rate environment. This would be the most profitable strategy over an indefinite period of time as more production is done in the declining rate environment, assuming that rates rise as often as and as much as they fall. However, such a strategy results in highly volatile earnings and could result in losses for an extended period of time potentially risking the depletion of capital reserves. Conversely at the other extreme, a mortgage banker can choose to hedge 100% of its pipeline with option-based instruments to closely offset the free option enjoyed by the mortgage loan applicant to not close on his or her loan (i.e. fallout). This hedging strategy will generally produce stable and consistent results, but profitability is significantly reduced as the cost of the options can be prohibitive.
Generally, prudent mortgage bankers will choose a strategy that falls within the boundaries of the above extremes. IndyMac tends to utilize instruments such as forward sale agreements whose change in value as interest rates change is expected to offset the change in value of its underlying mortgage pipeline based on expected closing ratios. Utilizing this strategy we focus on trying to maintain stable profit margins with an emphasis on forecasting expected fallout to more precisely estimate our required hedge coverage ratio and minimize hedge costs. By closely monitoring key factors such as product type, origination channels, progress or status of transactions, as well as changes in market interest rates since we committed a rate to the borrower (rate lock commitments), the Company seeks to quantify the optional component of each rate lock, and in turn, the aggregate rate lock pipeline. By accurately evaluating these factors, the Company has been able to minimize the purchase of options and also stabilize gain on sale margins over different rate environments. Companies with lower coverage ratios may tend to follow the market increasing their hedge costs and reducing their profit margins as interest rates rise. In comparing financial results, investors should be aware of the varying results that can be achieved under different hedge strategies.
26
The following tables illustrate the impact of the Companys pipeline hedging activities (second quarter 2004 is reflected on a pro forma basis(1)).
Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | Percent | March 31, | Percent | ||||||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | Change | 2004 | Change | ||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Gross gain on mortgage loan sales(1)
|
$ | 54 | $ | 163 | (67 | )% | $ | 126 | (57 | )% | ||||||||||
Gross margin before hedging
|
0.71 | % | 2.57 | % | (72 | )% | 2.58 | % | (72 | )% | ||||||||||
Hedging gains (losses)
|
$ | 64 | $ | (61 | ) | (205 | )% | $ | (42 | ) | (252 | )% | ||||||||
Net gains on sale(1)
|
$ | 118 | $ | 102 | 16 | % | $ | 84 | 40 | % | ||||||||||
Net margin after hedging(1)
|
1.55 | % | 1.61 | % | (4 | )% | 1.71 | % | (9 | )% |
(1) | The gain on mortgage loan sales for the three months ended June 30, 2004 in the tables excludes the $52 million before-tax revenue deferral as a result of adoption of SAB No. 105 in the second quarter of 2004. The GAAP gain on mortgage loan sales reported was $66 million for the three months ended June 30, 2004. The GAAP net margin after hedging was 0.87% for the three months ended June 30, 2004. |
Six Months Ended | ||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | Percent | ||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | Change | ||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | ||||||||||||
Gross gain on mortgage loan sales(1)
|
$ | 181 | $ | 281 | (36 | )% | ||||||
Gross margin before hedging
|
1.44 | % | 2.37 | % | (39 | )% | ||||||
Hedging gains (losses)
|
$ | 21 | $ | (95 | ) | (122 | )% | |||||
Net gains on sale(1)
|
$ | 202 | $ | 186 | 9 | % | ||||||
Net margin after hedging(1)
|
1.61 | % | 1.57 | % | 3 | % |
(1) | The gain on mortgage loan sales for the six months ended June 30, 2004 in the tables excludes the $52 million before-tax revenue deferral as a result of adoption of SAB No. 105 in the second quarter of 2004. The GAAP gain on mortgage loan sales reported was $150 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004. The GAAP net margin after hedging was 1.20% for the six months ended June 30, 2004. |
During the quarter ended June 30, 2004 the Companys pipeline hedging activities resulted in hedging gains of $64 million compared to hedging losses of $61 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2003. The hedging gains in the second quarter of 2004 were consistent with the increasing interest rate environment. The yield on the 10-year Treasury increased by 76 basis points from March 31, 2004 to June 30, 2004.
The gain on sale margin was 1.55% in the quarter ended June 30, 2004 compared to 1.61% in the quarter ended June 30, 2003 and 1.71% in the quarter ended March 31, 2004. The lower gain on sale margin during the second quarter of 2004 is primarily due to a higher percentage of loans originated through the conduit and correspondent channels, which operate with smaller profit margins.
In addition to mortgage loans held for sale, the pipeline also includes rate lock commitments. Rate lock commitments on mortgage loans that are intended to be sold are considered to be derivatives pursuant to SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, (SFAS 133) and, therefore, were recorded at fair value prior to April 1, 2004. On April 1, 2004, the Company adopted SAB No. 105, and in accordance with this standard, for rate lock commitments entered into after April 1, 2004, only the change in the fair value is recorded by the Company.
The Company hedges the risk of changes in fair value of rate lock commitments by selling forward contracts on securities of Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac, Euro Dollar futures and other hedge instruments as the Company deems appropriate to prudently manage this risk. These forward contracts are also accounted for as derivatives and recorded at fair value. As of June 30, 2004, the fair value of the rate lock commitments, net of related hedges, was $1.3 million, significantly decreased from $30.8 million at March 31, 2004 due to the adoption of SAB No. 105.
27
The following two tables present the gain on sale margins by product type for the quarters ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, and March 31, 2004 and for the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003:
Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, 2004 | June 30, 2003 | March 31, 2004 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gain on Sale Margins by | Amount | Gain on | Amount | Gain on | Amount | Gain on | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Product Type(1) | Sold | Sale | Margin | Sold | Sale | Margin | Sold | Sale | Margin | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Alt-A and Jumbo
|
$ | 5,938 | $ | 88.0 | 1.48 | % | $ | 4,326 | $ | 69.9 | 1.62 | % | $ | 3,463 | $ | 53.9 | 1.56 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
Agency conforming
|
924 | 6.4 | 0.69 | % | 1,589 | 18.4 | 1.16 | % | 725 | 6.5 | 0.89 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subprime
|
476 | 13.2 | 2.77 | % | 264 | 6.6 | 2.50 | % | 426 | 14.9 | 3.50 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consumer Lot Loans
|
192 | 8.2 | 4.27 | % | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loans acquired through clean-up calls
|
108 | 2.5 | 2.31 | % | 157 | 7.2 | 4.59 | % | 293 | 8.4 | 2.86 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total gain on sale of loans(1)
|
$ | 7,638 | $ | 118.3 | 1.55 | % | $ | 6,336 | $ | 102.1 | 1.61 | % | $ | 4,907 | $ | 83.7 | 1.71 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
(1) | The gain on mortgage loan sales for the three months ended June 30, 2004 has been adjusted to exclude the $52 million before-tax negative impact as a result of adoption of SAB No. 105 in the second quarter of 2004. The gain on mortgage loan sales reported on the statements of earnings was $66 million for the three months ended June 30, 2004. |
Six Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Gain on Sale Margins by | Amount | Gain on | Amount | Gain on | ||||||||||||||||||||
Product Type(1) | Sold | Sale | Margin | Sold | Sale | Margin | ||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Alt-A and Jumbo
|
$ | 9,401 | $ | 141.9 | 1.51 | % | $ | 8,128 | $ | 129.1 | 1.59 | % | ||||||||||||
Agency conforming
|
1,649 | 12.9 | 0.78 | % | 3,131 | 35.3 | 1.13 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Subprime
|
903 | 28.1 | 3.11 | % | 264 | 6.6 | 2.50 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Consumer Lot Loans
|
192 | 8.2 | 4.27 | % | | | | |||||||||||||||||
Loans acquired through clean-up calls
|
400 | 10.9 | 2.71 | % | 337 | 14.9 | 4.43 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total gain on sale of loans(1)
|
$ | 12,545 | $ | 202.0 | 1.61 | % | $ | 11,860 | $ | 185.9 | 1.57 | % | ||||||||||||
(1) | The gain on mortgage loan sales for the six months ended June 30, 2004 has been adjusted to exclude the $52 million before-tax negative impact as a result of adoption of SAB No. 105 in the second quarter of 2004. The gain on mortgage loan sales reported on the statements of earnings was $150 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004. |
The gain on sale margins declined on the Alt-A and agency conforming products during the second quarter 2004. The decline in Alt-A and Jumbo margins was caused by origination channel mix, including an increase in loans funded through the conduit and correspondent channels, and a shift to adjustable rate products. In the second quarter of 2004, 61% of loans originated were adjustable rate compared to 56% in the first quarter of 2004. In addition, 60% of the sales in the quarter ended June 30, 2004 were ARM loans, compared to 45% in the quarter ended March 31, 2004. The demand for the ARM market is somewhat less than the demand for the fixed rate agency and non-agency markets.
In addition to the gain on sale, IndyMac earns spread and fee income on its mortgage loans held for sale. It is important to look at the entire mortgage banking revenue stream in evaluating performance, as these components may vary in differing interest rate environments and sale strategies. The following table depicts
28
Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, | % of loans | June 30, | % of loans | March 31, | % of loans | |||||||||||||||||||
2004 | sold | 2003 | sold | 2004 | sold | |||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gain on sale of loans(1)
|
$ | 118,307 | 1.55 | % | $ | 102,146 | 1.61 | % | $ | 83,668 | 1.70 | % | ||||||||||||
Net interest income
|
50,809 | 0.67 | % | 40,592 | 0.64 | % | 41,800 | 0.85 | % | |||||||||||||||
Fee income
|
14,786 | 0.19 | % | 18,007 | 0.29 | % | 12,107 | 0.25 | % | |||||||||||||||
Total mortgage banking revenue
|
$ | 183,902 | 2.41 | % | $ | 160,745 | 2.54 | % | $ | 137,575 | 2.80 | % | ||||||||||||
Loans sold
|
$ | 7,638,446 | $ | 6,335,907 | $ | 4,906,724 |
Six Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||
% of loans | % of loans | |||||||||||||||
June 30, 2004 | sold | June 30, 2003 | sold | |||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Gain on sale of loans(1)
|
$ | 201,975 | 1.61 | % | $ | 185,929 | 1.57 | % | ||||||||
Net interest income
|
92,609 | 0.74 | % | 77,033 | 0.65 | % | ||||||||||
Fee income
|
26,893 | 0.21 | % | 32,798 | 0.28 | % | ||||||||||
Total mortgage banking revenue
|
$ | 321,477 | 2.56 | % | $ | 295,760 | 2.50 | % | ||||||||
Loans sold
|
$ | 12,545,170 | $ | 11,859,608 |
(1) | The gain on mortgage loan sales for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004 is the pro forma amount which has been adjusted to exclude the $52 million before-tax negative impact as a result of adoption of SAB No. 105 in the second quarter of 2004. The gain on mortgage loan sales reported on the statements of earnings was $66 million and $150 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004, respectively. |
Total mortgage banking revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2004 was $321.5 million compared to $295.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2003. The increase in revenue was driven by the additional loan sales of $685.6 million in the first half of 2004. Mortgage banking revenue increased to $183.9 million in the quarter ended June 30, 2004 compared to $160.7 million in the quarter ended June 30, 2003. However, as a percentage of loans sold, the total revenue declined to 2.41% from 2.54% due to the higher percentage of conduit and correspondent loan production in the second quarter of 2004.
The following table shows the various channels through which loans were distributed.
Three Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, | Distribution | June 30, | Distribution | March 31, | Distribution | ||||||||||||||||||||
2004 | Percentages | 2003 | Percentages | 2004 | Percentages | ||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sales to the GSEs(1)
|
$ | 2,249 | 25 | % | $ | 3,459 | 48 | % | $ | 2,304 | 45 | % | |||||||||||||
Private-label securitizations
|
3,845 | 43 | % | 1,617 | 23 | % | 1,085 | 21 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Whole loan sales
|
1,544 | 17 | % | 1,260 | 18 | % | 1,518 | 30 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Subtotal sales
|
7,638 | 86 | % | 6,336 | 89 | % | 4,907 | 96 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Investment portfolio acquisitions(2)
|
1,236 | 14 | % | 798 | 11 | % | 195 | 4 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total loan distribution
|
$ | 8,874 | 100 | % | $ | 7,134 | 100 | % | $ | 5,102 | 100 | % | |||||||||||||
29
Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||
June 30, | Distribution | June 30, | Distribution | ||||||||||||||
2004 | Percentages | 2003 | Percentages | ||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | |||||||||||||||||
Sales to the GSEs(1)
|
$ | 4,553 | 33 | % | $ | 6,923 | 53 | % | |||||||||
Private-label securitizations
|
4,930 | 35 | % | 3,088 | 24 | % | |||||||||||
Whole loan sales
|
3,062 | 22 | % | 1,849 | 14 | % | |||||||||||
Subtotal sales
|
12,545 | 90 | % | 11,860 | 91 | % | |||||||||||
Investment portfolio acquisitions(2)
|
1,431 | 10 | % | 1,200 | 9 | % | |||||||||||
Total loan distribution
|
$ | 13,976 | 100 | % | $ | 13,060 | 100 | % | |||||||||
(1) | Government-sponsored enterprises. |
(2) | Loan production that IndyMac elected to retain in its investment portfolio. |
Loan sales to GSEs dropped to 25% of total sales for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 compared to 48% for the same period a year ago and 45% for the previous quarter ended March 31, 2004. The increase in the amount of adjustable rate mortgages sold resulted in a higher percentage of loans being sold in private-label securitizations.
In conjunction with the sale of mortgage loans in private-label securitizations and government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs) transactions, the Company generally retains certain assets. The primary assets retained include MSRs and, to a lesser degree, AAA-rated and agency interest-only strips, investment-grade securities, non-investment grade securities and residual securities. The allocated cost of the retained assets at the time of sale is recorded as an asset with an offsetting increase to the gain on sale of loans (or a reduction in the cost basis of the loans sold). The calculation of the $118 million in gain on sale of loans, excluding the $52 million SAB No. 105 adjustment, earned during the three months ended June 30, 2004, included the retention of $122 million of servicing-related assets, $62 million of other investment-grade and $21 million of non-investment grade securities. During the three months ended June 30, 2004, assets previously retained generated cash flows of $90.6 million. More information on the valuation assumptions related to IndyMacs retained assets can be found under the heading, Valuation of Servicing-Related Assets below.
30
INVESTING AND HELOC ACTIVITIES
The following table details the assets associated with our investing and HELOC activities as of June 30, 2004, and December 31, 2003:
December 31, | ||||||||||||
June 30, 2004 | 2003 | |||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||
SFR mortgage loans held for
investment
|
$ | 4,639,993 | $ | 4,945,439 | ||||||||
Consumer construction
|
1,301,688 | 1,145,526 | ||||||||||
Builder construction
|
561,538 | 484,397 | ||||||||||
HELOC
|
217,368 | 711,494 | ||||||||||
Income property
|
7,432 | 36,285 | ||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities, U.S. Treasury
securities and agency notes:
|
||||||||||||
Trading securities:
|
||||||||||||
AAA-rated and agency interest-only strips
|
166,799 | 148,275 | ||||||||||
AAA-rated principal-only securities
|
83,964 | 8,518 | ||||||||||
Other investment grade securities
|
9,093 | 8,922 | ||||||||||
Other non-investment grade securities
|
478 | 1,760 | ||||||||||
Non-investment grade residual securities
|
49,535 | 56,157 | ||||||||||
Subtotal trading securities
|
309,869 | 223,632 | ||||||||||
Available for sale securities:
|
||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury securities and agency notes
|
47,703 | 143,689 | ||||||||||
AAA-rated non-agency securities
|
2,450,258 | 1,407,984 | ||||||||||
AAA-rated agency securities
|
18,519 | 25,193 | ||||||||||
AAA-rated principal-only securities
|
20,102 | | ||||||||||
Other investment grade securities
|
82,139 | 26,926 | ||||||||||
Other non-investment grade securities
|
29,304 | 10,182 | ||||||||||
Non-investment grade HELOC residual securities
|
23,097 | | ||||||||||
Subtotal available for sale securities
|
2,671,122 | 1,613,974 | ||||||||||
Total mortgage-backed securities,
U.S. Treasury securities and agency notes
|
2,980,991 | 1,837,606 | ||||||||||
Mortgage servicing rights
|
493,876 | 443,688 | ||||||||||
Other assets
|
277,876 | 280,467 | ||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 10,480,762 | $ | 9,884,902 | ||||||||
Percentage of securities portfolio rated
investment grade
|
97% | 96% | ||||||||||
Percentage of securities portfolio rated AAA
|
94% | 94% |
Our HELOC loans held for investment decreased by $494 million from December 31, 2003, to June 30, 2004, primarily due to the recharacterization of $500 million of HELOCs into mortgage-backed securities via an on-balance sheet securitization in March 2004 and the reclassification of $342 million of HELOCs from the held for investment classification to the held for sale classification in June 2004 to reflect the Companys intent to securitize these loans. Similarly, our AAA-rated non-agency securities increased from $1.4 billion at December 31, 2003, to $2.5 billion at June 30, 2004, resulting from the recharacterization of the $500 million of HELOCs from loans to securities as previously noted and the reclassification of $516 million of SFR mortgage loans that were securitized with retention of $353 million as mortgage-backed securities available for
31
AAA-rated and agency interest-only strips, and non-investment grade residual securities and securities used to hedge these securities, are classified as trading securities. Changes in the fair value of these securities are recorded in earnings. All other mortgage-backed securities and HELOC residuals are classified as available for sale, and changes in fair value of these assets are recorded in equity.
The following table shows average annualized net returns for all of our investing and HELOC activities, which are calculated by dividing the sum of net interest income after allocated interest expense (see Note 4 Segment Reporting in the accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements for further information on our method of allocating interest expense to the operating segments) and provision for loan losses, service fee income and related net gains or losses by the average balance of investment assets. Service fee income includes gross service fee income, amortization of MSRs, valuation adjustments and net hedging gains and losses. Gross service fee income includes reinvestment income, prepayment and late fee income net of compensating interest paid to borrowers and investors in addition to the contractual servicing fees.
Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | March 31, | ||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | 2004 | ||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||
Net interest income after provision for loan
losses
|
$ | 57,992 | $ | 26,743 | $ | 57,278 | ||||||
Service fee loss
|
(27,807 | ) | (1,401 | ) | (3,144 | ) | ||||||
Loss on mortgage-backed securities, net
|
(3,414 | ) | (9,258 | ) | (4,987 | ) | ||||||
Other income
|
5,338 | 2,718 | 4,004 | |||||||||
Average balance of interest-earning assets and
MSRs
|
$ | 10,493,236 | $ | 6,518,704 | $ | 9,792,163 | ||||||
Investing activities return on
interest-earning assets and MSRs (annualized)
|
1.23 | % | 1.16 | % | 2.18 | % | ||||||
Six Months Ended | ||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||
2004 | 2003 | |||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||
Net interest income after provision for loan
losses
|
$ | 115,270 | $ | 58,067 | ||||
Service fee (loss) income
|
(30,951 | ) | 982 | |||||
Loss on mortgage-backed securities, net
|
(8,401 | ) | (16,168 | ) | ||||
Other income
|
9,342 | 5,211 | ||||||
Average balance of interest-earning assets and
MSRs
|
$ | 10,142,700 | $ | 6,462,416 | ||||
Investing activities return on
interest-earning assets and MSRs (annualized)
|
1.69 | % | 1.50 | % | ||||
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
IndyMacs Investment Portfolio Group complements the Companys mortgage banking activities and serves to diversify the Companys revenue stream through its investments in SFR mortgage loans, mortgage-backed securities and servicing-related assets.
The Investment Portfolio Groups investment in prime SFR loans, mortgage-backed securities and mortgage loan servicing-related assets helps to provide stable earnings in periods when mortgage banking revenues decline. Should loan production decline due to factors such as increasing interest rates, the value and fee income of the Investment Portfolio Groups MSRs generally rises, as there is less incentive for borrowers to refinance at a higher interest rate. Similarly, when loan production increases, the value of the MSRs and the
32
In addition to the Investment Portfolio Groups investments, certain investing activities through investments in construction loans also take place in the Mortgage Bank and the Home Equity Division. These activities include the investment in construction loans and HELOCs by these business units.
SFR Mortgage Loans Held for Investment
The Companys portfolio of mortgage loans held for investment is comprised primarily of SFR mortgage loans, with a concentration in adjustable-rate and hybrid adjustable-rate mortgage loans to mitigate interest rate risk. The Company plans on increasing its portfolio of mortgage loans held for investment to achieve better balance in its investing activities relative to its mortgage banking activities, which tend to be more cyclical. The Company added $1.4 billion of mortgage loans in accordance with this strategy during the six months ended June 30, 2004; however, the portfolio actually declined relative to December 31, 2003. The decline was the result of the Companys decision to sell approximately $600 million of loans in the second quarter and recharacterized approximately $516 million of loans as securities in line with overall balance sheet management objectives. The Company plans to continue to securitize portions of its SFR mortgage loans held for investment periodically, with the intent to retain most of the securities, to optimize return on equity, reduce hedging costs and enhance the liquidity of the loan portfolio. The following table shows the composition of the portfolio as of June 30, 2004, and December 31, 2003, and relevant credit quality characteristics at June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003.
June 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2004 | 2003 | |||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||
SFR mortgage loans held for investment
|
$ | 4,639,993 | $ | 4,945,439 | ||||
Average loan size
|
$ | 289 | $ | 286 | ||||
Non-performing loans as a percentage of SFR loans
|
0.40 | % | 0.38 | % | ||||
Estimated average life in years(1)
|
2.3 | 3.1 | ||||||
Estimated average duration in years(2)
|
1.7 | 1.4 | ||||||
Yield
|
4.21 | % | 4.43 | % | ||||
Fixed-rate mortgages
|
9 | % | 6 | % | ||||
Adjustable-rate mortgages
|
28 | % | 39 | % | ||||
Hybrid adjustable-rate mortgages
|
63 | % | 55 | % |
33
June 30, | December 31, | |||||||||
2004 | 2003 | |||||||||
Additional Information as of June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003 | ||||||||||
Average FICO score(3)
|
713 | 707 | ||||||||
Average loan to value ratio
|
71 | % | 73 | % | ||||||
Geographic distribution:
|
||||||||||
Southern California
|
35 | % | 39 | % | ||||||
Northern California
|
21 | % | 22 | % | ||||||
Michigan
|
5 | % | 3 | % | ||||||
New York
|
4 | % | 4 | % | ||||||
Florida
|
4 | % | 3 | % | ||||||
New Jersey
|
2 | % | 2 | % | ||||||
Georgia
|
2 | % | 2 | % | ||||||
Colorado
|
2 | % | 2 | % | ||||||
Washington
|
2 | % | 2 | % | ||||||
Other (each individually less than 2%)
|
23 | % | 21 | % | ||||||
Total
|
100 | % | 100 | % | ||||||
(1) | Represents the estimated length of time, on average, the SFR loan portfolio will remain outstanding based on the Companys estimates for prepayments. |
(2) | Average duration measures the expected change in the value of a financial instrument in response to changes in interest rates. |
(3) | FICO scores are the result of a credit scoring system developed by Fair Isaacs and Co. and are generally used by lenders to evaluate a borrowers credit history. FICO scores of 700 or higher are generally considered in the mortgage industry to be very high quality borrowers with low risk of default, but in general, the secondary market will consider FICO scores of 620 or higher to be prime. |
Mortgage-Backed Securities, U.S. Treasury Securities and Agency Notes
The Companys portfolio of mortgage-backed securities, U.S. Treasury securities and agency notes totaled $3.0 billion and $1.8 billion at June 30, 2004, and December 31, 2003, respectively. These securities are recorded at fair value. The Company invests in high quality mortgage-backed securities to provide net interest income. At June 30, 2004, 94% of the portfolio was rated AAA with an expected weighted-average life of 3.3 years. U.S. Treasury securities are purchased to hedge the interest rate risk associated with servicing-related assets, among other types of investments. AAA-rated principal-only securities are retained from securitizations or purchased in the secondary market to hedge servicing related assets.
34
The fair value of other investment grade and non-investment grade securities by credit rating as of June 30, 2004, and December 31, 2003, follows:
June 30, 2004 | December 31, 2003 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Current | (Discount) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Face | To Face | Amortized | Fair | |||||||||||||||||||
Value | Value | Cost | Value | Fair Value | ||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment grade mortgage-backed
securities:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
AAA
|
$ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 8,001 | ||||||||||||
AA
|
31,255 | (43 | ) | 31,212 | 31,321 | | ||||||||||||||||
A
|
301 | (21 | ) | 280 | 285 | | ||||||||||||||||
BBB
|
44,577 | (2,545 | ) | 42,032 | 43,424 | 24,198 | ||||||||||||||||
BBB-
|
17,050 | (1,430 | ) | 15,620 | 16,202 | 3,649 | ||||||||||||||||
Total other investment grade mortgage-backed
securities
|
$ | 93,183 | $ | (4,039 | ) | $ | 89,144 | $ | 91,232 | $ | 35,848 | |||||||||||
Non-investment grade mortgage-backed
securities:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
BB
|
$ | 27,137 | $ | (4,461 | ) | $ | 22,676 | $ | 23,444 | $ | 7,896 | |||||||||||
B
|
14,617 | (10,147 | ) | 4,470 | 4,599 | 186 | ||||||||||||||||
CCC
|
| | | | 1,165 | |||||||||||||||||
C
|
2,277 | (1,799 | ) | 478 | 478 | 1,934 | ||||||||||||||||
D
|
1,728 | (1,417 | ) | 311 | 311 | 676 | ||||||||||||||||
NR
|
10,364 | (9,514 | ) | 850 | 950 | 85 | ||||||||||||||||
Total other non-investment grade mortgage-backed
securities
|
$ | 56,123 | $ | (27,338 | ) | $ | 28,785 | $ | 29,782 | $ | 11,942 | |||||||||||
At June 30, 2004, of the total other investment grade and non-investment grade mortgage-backed securities, $90.0 million was collateralized by prime loans, $30.5 million by subprime loans and $0.5 million by manufactured housing loans.
Mortgage Servicing and Mortgage Servicing Rights
In addition to its own loans, IndyMac serviced $34.6 billion of mortgage loans owned by others at June 30, 2004, with a weighted average coupon of 6.15%. In comparison, IndyMac serviced $30.8 billion of mortgage loans owned by others at December 31, 2003, with a weighted average coupon of 6.53%. The table below shows the activity in the servicing portfolios during the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2004.
Servicing Portfolio | ||||||||
Three Months | Six Months | |||||||
Ended | Ended | |||||||
June 30, 2004 | June 30, 2004 | |||||||
(Dollars in millions) | ||||||||
Unpaid principal balance at beginning of period
|
$ | 32,122 | $ | 30,774 | ||||
Additions
|
7,086 | 11,762 | ||||||
Clean-up calls exercised
|
(672 | ) | (991 | ) | ||||
Loan payments and prepayments
|
(3,918 | ) | (6,927 | ) | ||||
Unpaid principal balance at June 30, 2004
|
$ | 34,618 | $ | 34,618 | ||||
35
The capitalized value of MSRs totaled $493.9 million as of June 30, 2004, and $443.7 million as of December 31, 2003, reflecting an increase of $50.2 million. The table below shows the activity in MSRs.
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | March 31, | June 30, | June 30, | ||||||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | 2004 | 2004 | 2003 | ||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at beginning of period
|
$ | 414,358 | $ | 343,544 | $ | 443,688 | $ | 443,688 | $ | 300,539 | ||||||||||
Additions
|
92,190 | 73,732 | 50,753 | 142,943 | 141,474 | |||||||||||||||
Transfers to AAA-rated agency interest-only
securities
|
(14,293 | ) | (17,812 | ) | | (14,293 | ) | (17,812 | ) | |||||||||||
Clean-up calls exercised
|
(8,226 | ) | (1,481 | ) | (3,790 | ) | (12,016 | ) | (3,956 | ) | ||||||||||
Scheduled amortization
|
(38,747 | ) | (21,832 | ) | (22,860 | ) | (61,607 | ) | (42,982 | ) | ||||||||||
Valuation/impairment
|
48,594 | (40,424 | ) | (53,433 | ) | (4,839 | ) | (41,536 | ) | |||||||||||
Balance at end of period
|
$ | 493,876 | $ | 335,727 | $ | 414,358 | $ | 493,876 | $ | 335,727 | ||||||||||
Although we have been hedging our MSRs using interest rate swaps on an economic basis, we elected not to designate fair value hedge accounting on MSRs prior to January 1, 2004, and they were carried at the lower of the initial carrying value, adjusted for amortization, or fair value. On January 1, 2004, we started to designate fair value hedges on certain selected tranches of MSRs. The changes in the fair value of the designated MSRs, and the fair value of the designated interest rate swaps, are recorded through income, if the hedging relationships are proven to be effective under the provisions of SFAS No. 133.
Each quarter, we evaluate the MSRs for impairment in accordance with SFAS No. 140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities. We first stratify our MSRs based on predominant risk characteristics, underlying loan type, interest rate type, and interest rate band. Then, for each stratum, we determine the fair value of MSRs using our valuation models, which are validated quarterly by third party opinions of value. If the carrying value exceeds the fair value by individual stratum, a valuation allowance is recorded as a charge to service fee income in current earnings; however, if such impairment is determined to be other-than-temporary and the recoverability of the value is remote, we recognize a direct write-down. Unlike a valuation allowance, a direct write-down permanently reduces the carrying value of the MSR asset and the related valuation allowance. During the quarter ended June 30, 2004, we recorded a positive valuation adjustment of $48.6 million due to reduced expected prepayments on our servicing portfolio. As of June 30, 2004, the valuation allowance on MSRs totaled $70.5 million.
AAA-Rated and Agency Interest-Only Strips and Residuals |
We evaluate the carrying value of our AAA-rated and agency interest-only strips and residual securities by discounting estimated net future cash flows. For these securities, estimated net future cash flows are primarily based on assumptions related to prepayment speeds, in addition to expected credit loss assumptions on the residual securities.
36
A summary of the activity in the AAA-rated and agency interest-only strips and residual securities portfolios for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, and for the three months ended March 31, 2004, follows:
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | March 31, | June 30, | June 30, | ||||||||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | 2004 | 2004 | 2003 | ||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
AAA-rated and agency interest-only
securities
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Beginning balance
|
$ | 153,460 | $ | 157,775 | $ | 148,275 | $ | 148,275 | $ | 188,043 | ||||||||||||
Retained investments from securitizations
|
13,180 | 12,327 | 35,777 | 48,957 | 26,347 | |||||||||||||||||
Transfer from MSRs
|
14,293 | 17,812 | | 14,293 | 17,812 | |||||||||||||||||
Sales(1)
|
(15,171 | ) | | | (15,171 | ) | | |||||||||||||||
Clean-up calls exercised
|
(1,655 | ) | (7,077 | ) | (1,151 | ) | (2,806 | ) | (19,125 | ) | ||||||||||||
Cash received, net of accretion
|
(12,240 | ) | (13,705 | ) | (12,200 | ) | (24,440 | ) | (27,834 | ) | ||||||||||||
Valuation gains (losses) before hedges
|
14,932 | (29,932 | ) | (17,241 | ) | (2,309 | ) | (48,043 | ) | |||||||||||||
Ending balance
|
$ | 166,799 | $ | 137,200 | $ | 153,460 | $ | 166,799 | $ | 137,200 | ||||||||||||
Residual securities
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Beginning balance
|
$ | 61,324 | $ | 76,435 | $ | 56,157 | $ | 56,157 | $ | 77,757 | ||||||||||||
Retained investments from securitizations
|
11,827 | (198 | ) | 16,507 | 28,334 | 13,824 | ||||||||||||||||
Sales
|
| | | | (10,525 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Clean-up calls exercised
|
| | 159 | 159 | | |||||||||||||||||
Cash received, net of accretion
|
(3,706 | ) | (6,113 | ) | (11,249 | ) | (14,955 | ) | (12,920 | ) | ||||||||||||
Valuation gains (losses) before hedges
|
3,187 | (6,029 | ) | (250 | ) | 2,937 | (4,041 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Ending balance
|
$ | 72,632 | $ | 64,095 | $ | 61,324 | $ | 72,632 | $ | 64,095 | ||||||||||||
(1) | Represents the AAA-rated interest-only security that was created during the first quarter in connection with a private-label securitization transaction and subsequently sold in the second quarter. |
Valuation of Servicing-Related Assets
MSRs, AAA-rated and agency interest-only strips and residual securities are recorded at fair market value. MSRs, except for certain tranches for which we have applied hedge accounting, are further subject to the lower of cost or market limitations. Relevant information and assumptions used to value the Companys
37
Actual | Valuation Assumptions | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross Wtd. | Servicing | 3-Month | Weighted | Lifetime | 3-Month | Remaining | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Book | Collateral | Average | Fee/Interest | Prepayment | Average | Prepayment | Prepayment | Discount | Cumulative | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value | Balance | Coupon | Strip | Speeds | Multiple | Speeds | Speeds | Yield | Loss Rate(1) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, 2004
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AAA-rated/agency interest- only strips
|
$ | 166,799 | $ | 16,280,985 | 6.55 | % | 0.38 | % | 43.0 | % | 2.70 | 16.7 | % | 23.3 | % | 10.8 | % | N/A | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Prime residual securities
|
$ | 20,059 | $ | 2,320,207 | 6.88 | % | 2.31 | % | 63.5 | % | 0.37 | 32.2 | % | 37.3 | % | 16.9 | % | 0.5 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Subprime and HELOC residual securities(2)
|
52,574 | $ | 1,843,879 | 7.43 | % | 4.35 | % | 40.6 | % | 0.66 | 35.8 | % | 32.2 | % | 21.7 | % | 2.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total non-investment grade residual securities
|
$ | 72,633 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MSRs
|
$ | 493,876 | $ | 34,618,427 | 6.15 | % | 0.32 | % | 35.6 | % | 4.46 | 16.2 | % | 15.9 | % | 11.4 | % | N/A | ||||||||||||||||||||||
March 31, 2004
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AAA-rated/agency interest- only strips
|
$ | 153,146 | $ | 15,253,063 | 6.68 | % | 0.43 | % | 33.7 | % | 2.34 | 20.1 | % | 35.9 | % | 9.1 | % | N/A | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Prime residual securities
|
$ | 18,875 | $ | 2,210,176 | 6.94 | % | 1.89 | % | 55.6 | % | 0.45 | 27.5 | % | 37.6 | % | 15.9 | % | 0.5 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Subprime and HELOC residual securities(2)
|
42,448 | $ | 1,545,047 | 7.69 | % | 4.21 | % | 35.4 | % | 0.65 | 38.2 | % | 38.7 | % | 21.5 | % | 2.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total non-investment grade residual securities
|
$ | 61,323 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MSRs
|
$ | 414,358 | $ | 32,121,562 | 6.36 | % | 0.32 | % | 29.2 | % | 4.03 | 18.9 | % | 32.1 | % | 9.0 | % | N/A | ||||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2003
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AAA-rated/agency interest- only strips
|
$ | 148,275 | $ | 14,740,915 | 6.90 | % | 0.38 | % | 34.0 | % | 2.65 | 17.2 | % | 35.5 | % | 9.8 | % | N/A | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Prime residual securities
|
$ | 23,518 | $ | 2,406,030 | 7.00 | % | 1.48 | % | 60.0 | % | 0.66 | 26.3 | % | 36.0 | % | 15.8 | % | 0.5 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Subprime residual securities
|
32,639 | $ | 1,286,694 | 8.65 | % | 4.34 | % | 38.4 | % | 0.58 | 33.4 | % | 32.9 | % | 23.6 | % | 2.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total non-investment grade residual securities
|
$ | 56,157 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MSRs
|
$ | 443,688 | $ | 30,773,545 | 6.53 | % | 0.32 | % | 31.0 | % | 4.51 | 16.8 | % | 31.5 | % | 10.0 | % | N/A | ||||||||||||||||||||||
(1) | As a percentage of the original pool balance, the actual cumulative loss rate to date totaled 0.09% and 1.41% for prime and subprime residuals, respectively, at June 30, 2004. |
(2) | As of June 30, 2004, subprime and HELOC residual securities include residuals from the securitization of home equity loans in the amount of $23 million. Although our HELOC loans are made to high credit quality, prime borrowers, the assumptions on HELOC-related residuals are similar to subprime as they are second trust deed loans. |
The lifetime prepayment speeds represent the annual constant prepayment rate (CPR) we estimate for the remaining life of the collateral supporting the asset. For MSRs and AAA-rated and agency interest-only strips, we project prepayment rates using an industry standard prepayment model. The model considers key factors such as refinance incentive, housing turnover, seasonality and aging of the pool of loans. Prepayment speeds incorporate expectations of future rates implied by the market forward LIBOR/swap curve as well as collateral specific current coupon information.
38
The weighted average multiple for MSRs, AAA-rated and agency interest-only strips and residual securities represents the book value divided by the product of collateral balance and servicing fee/interest strip. While the weighted average life of such assets is a function of the undiscounted cash flows, the multiple is a function of the discounted cash flows. With regard to AAA-rated and agency interest-only strips, the marketplace frequently uses calculated multiples to assess the overall impact valuation assumptions have on value. Collateral type, coupon, loan age and the size of the interest strip must be considered when comparing these multiples. The mix of collateral types supporting servicing-related assets is primarily non-conforming/conventional, which may make comparisons of the Companys MSR multiples misleading relative to peer multiples whose product mix is substantially different.
The lifetime prepayment speed assumptions incorporate expectations of future rates implied by the market forward LIBOR/swap curve. In contrast, the refinance incentive reflected in short term prepayment speeds incorporates recent actual mortgage current coupon information and generally will be higher than lifetime speeds due to aging and burnout effects of the portfolio; however, three-month projected prepayment speeds for the MSRs dropped considerably compared to the first quarter in response to an increase in 10-year swap rates of approximately 80 basis points from the first quarter. Substantial new MSR capitalization further contributed to the overall decrease in expected short term speeds.
Similar to the decrease in three-month prepayment speeds, the lifetime prepayment speed assumptions for subprime and HELOC residual securities and MSRs have dropped compared to March 31, 2004, due to an increase in 10-year swap rates from the first quarter. However, the lifetime prepayment speed assumptions for prime residual securities have increased from that of the first quarter 2004 as they are predominantly collateralized by ARM loans that tend to have higher prepayment speeds. The discount rate assumptions increased reflecting the increase in benchmark rates and the extension of the expected life of the underlying loans.
Hedging Interest Rate Risk on Servicing-Related Assets |
With respect to the investment in servicing-related assets (AAA-rated and agency interest-only strips, non-investment grade residual securities and MSRs), the Company is exposed to interest rate risk as a result of other than predicted prepayment of loans. Our Investment Portfolio Group is responsible for the management of interest rate and prepayment risks in the Investment Portfolio, subject to policies and procedures established by, and oversight from, our management level Asset and Liability Committee (ALCO), management level Enterprise Risk Management Group (ERM), and our Board of Directors level ALCO.
The objective of our hedging strategy is to mitigate the impact of changes in interest rates on the net economic value of the balance sheet and quarterly earnings, not to speculate on interest rates. As such, we manage the comprehensive interest rate risk of our servicing-related assets using financial instruments and our servicing portfolio retention efforts. Historically, we have hedged servicing-related assets using a mix of securities on our balance sheet, such as AAA-rated principal-only securities, buying and/or selling mortgage-backed or U.S. Treasury securities, as well as derivatives such as futures, floors, interest rate swaps, or options. Recently, clean-up call revenues and retention programs have also been added to our overall servicing asset management program. As there are no hedge instruments that would be perfectly correlated with these hedged assets, we use a mix of the above instruments designed to correlate well with the hedged servicing assets and our anticipated servicing retention rates.
We recorded a positive $48.6 million valuation adjustment to increase our mortgage servicing asset during the second quarter of 2004 as a result of increasing long-term interest rates; however, this increase was more than offset by losses of $67.5 million on our related hedging instruments. Several factors contributed to the net valuation loss in this quarter. Prepayment speeds experienced in the portfolio during the second quarter were faster than projected as the lower rates during the first quarter of this year resulted in significantly higher levels of prepayments in the second quarter than anticipated. In addition, our hedges were negatively impacted by market volatility rates reaching multi-year lows during the quarter, and a flattening of the yield curve.
39
Our portfolio retention activities contributed to the increased prepayments during the quarter. The positive benefits of these activities are reflected in our segment results and in the table on page 32, as these benefits are realized in higher net interest income and gain on sale results. In line with our expectations, we have observed a slowing of prepayment speeds more recently, and as a result, we currently expect improved performance in our servicing segment in the second half of 2004.
The following table breaks out the components of service fee expense and the net loss on mortgage-backed securities.
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | March 31, | June 30, | June 30, | ||||||||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | 2004 | 2004 | 2003 | ||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Service fee (expense) income:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross service fee income
|
$ | 29,879 | $ | 25,510 | $ | 28,080 | $ | 57,959 | $ | 49,567 | ||||||||||||
Amortization
|
(38,747 | ) | (21,832 | ) | (22,860 | ) | (61,607 | ) | (42,982 | ) | ||||||||||||
Service fee (expense) income, net of
amortization
|
(8,868 | ) | 3,678 | 5,220 | (3,648 | ) | 6,585 | |||||||||||||||
Valuation adjustments on MSRs
|
48,594 | (40,424 | ) | (53,433 | ) | (4,839 | ) | (41,536 | ) | |||||||||||||
Hedge (loss) gain on MSRs
|
(67,533 | ) | 35,345 | 45,069 | (22,464 | ) | 35,933 | |||||||||||||||
Total service fee
(expense) income
|
$ | (27,807 | ) | $ | (1,401 | ) | $ | (3,144 | ) | $ | (30,951 | ) | $ | 982 | ||||||||
Net loss on securities:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Realized gain on available for sale securities
|
$ | 631 | $ | 2,022 | $ | 900 | $ | 1,531 | $ | 2,022 | ||||||||||||
Impairment on available for sale securities
|
(565 | ) | (808 | ) | (101 | ) | (666 | ) | (1,388 | ) | ||||||||||||
Unrealized gain (loss) on AAA-rated and agency
interest-only and residual securities
|
18,119 | (35,962 | ) | (17,492 | ) | 627 | (52,085 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Net (loss) gain on trading securities and other
instruments used to hedge AAA-rated and agency interest-only and
residual securities
|
(21,599 | ) | 25,490 | 11,706 | (9,893 | ) | 35,283 | |||||||||||||||
Total loss on mortgage-backed securities,
net
|
$ | (3,414 | ) | $ | (9,258 | ) | $ | (4,987 | ) | $ | (8,401 | ) | $ | (16,168 | ) | |||||||
Total Clean-Up Call and Retention Program Income
|
$ | 17,199 | $ | 16,087 | $ | 21,192 | $ | 38,391 | $ | 26,987 |
The income from the clean-up call and retention programs is recognized as a component of gain on sale and net interest income in the Investment Portfolio Groups mortgage banking activities. As shown in our segment results on page 12, the effect of the clean-up call and retention program activities allowed the mortgage servicing business to generate positive returns during the historical refinance boom periods, with the exception of the current quarter.
The income from the clean-up call and retention programs totaled $17.2 million during the second quarter of 2004, a decrease of $4.0 million compared to the quarter ended March 31, 2004. The reduction is primarily due to the decrease in net interest income as the remaining clean-up call loans and loans acquired through retention programs had lower weighted average coupon rates.
As master servicer for our various securitizations, we maintain the right to call selected transactions when the outstanding loan balances in the securitization trust decline to a specified level, typically 10% of the original collateral balance. During the quarter ended June 30, 2004, we sold approximately $104.0 million of called loans with a pretax gain of $2.5 million, and $450.2 million of loans acquired through retention programs for a pretax gain of $11.1 million. We expect to exercise our option to call additional loans of approximately $221 million during the remainder of 2004, the exact timing and amount of which is dependent upon the future interest rate environment and borrower prepayment behavior.
40
Mortgage loan servicing provides a key advantage to mortgage originators in a declining interest rate environment, as there is an existing base of customers that could potentially be in the market for a refinance mortgage. The gains from providing a new mortgage to an existing customer, serve to mitigate the decline in value of the mortgage servicing asset for the early prepayment of the original loan. Prior to the third quarter of 2003, servicing referrals and direct marketing to IndyMacs servicing customers was performed by the consumer direct (B2C) segment. IndyMac began to transition this customer retention activity to the mortgage servicing segment beginning in the third quarter of last year and completed this transition in the second quarter of this year. In order to evaluate the overall profitability of the servicing segment, we believe it is important to view the profitability including all of the retention activities performed at the Company, both by the consumer direct segment and the mortgage servicing segment.
When looked at as a whole, the retention activities significantly enhance the servicing returns. The second quarter of 2004 is the first quarter in which IndyMac has suffered a loss in its servicing activities net of the retention profits. The table below shows the total return on servicing and retained assets including an estimate of the consumer direct retention profits.
Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | Percent | March 31, | Percent | ||||||||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | Change | 2004 | Change | ||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net revenues:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Servicing-related assets segment
|
$ | (9,869 | ) | $ | 10,835 | (191 | )% | $ | 16,655 | (159 | )% | |||||||||||
B2C servicing retention revenue
|
10,018 | 16,958 | (41 | )% | 11,182 | (10 | )% | |||||||||||||||
Total net revenues
|
149 | 27,793 | (99 | )% | 27,837 | (99 | )% | |||||||||||||||
Operating expenses:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Servicing-related assets segment
|
11,278 | 9,180 | 23 | % | 9,890 | 14 | % | |||||||||||||||
B2C servicing retention revenue
|
4,838 | 7,857 | (38 | )% | 4,651 | 4 | % | |||||||||||||||
Total operating expenses
|
16,116 | 17,037 | (5 | )% | 14,541 | 11 | % | |||||||||||||||
Earnings before tax
|
(15,967 | ) | 10,756 | (248 | )% | 13,296 | (220 | )% | ||||||||||||||
Net earnings
|
$ | (9,660 | ) | $ | 6,507 | (248 | )% | $ | 8,044 | (220 | )% | |||||||||||
Average capital allocated:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Servicing-related assets segment
|
$ | 205,192 | $ | 195,570 | 5 | % | $ | 200,874 | 2 | % | ||||||||||||
B2C servicing retention revenue
|
6,719 | 10,912 | (38 | )% | 6,460 | 4 | % | |||||||||||||||
Total average capital
|
$ | 211,911 | $ | 206,482 | 3 | % | $ | 207,334 | 2 | % | ||||||||||||
ROE
|
(18 | )% | 13 | % | (238 | )% | 16 | % | (213 | )% |
Construction Lending
IndyMac provides construction financing for individual consumers who are in the process of building their own home (consumer construction) and for residential subdivision developers (builder construction). With respect to consumer construction, the primary product is a construction-to-permanent residential mortgage loan. This product provides financing for the 9 to 12 month term of construction and automatically converts to a permanent mortgage loan at the end of construction. As a result, this product represents a hybrid activity between our portfolio lending activities and mortgage banking activities. The Company earns net interest income during the construction phase. These loans are typically fixed-rate loans. When the loan converts to permanent status the loan is transferred into the Companys pipeline of mortgage loans held for sale. Consumer construction loan originations grew 26% from the first quarter of 2004 and 47% over the same quarter of 2003, as we continue to take advantage of the strong new home purchase market. Overall, HCL is ranked as the second largest custom residential lender in the nation and the largest in California. Consumer construction loans outstanding at June 30, 2004, were $1.3 billion, up 14% compared to the amount at December 31, 2003.
41
With respect to builder construction loans, our activities have been increasingly focused on those homebuilders that provide our mortgage loans to their customers when they sell the completed residence. Builder construction loans are typically based on prime rates. During the second quarter 2004, we entered into new tract construction commitments of $304 million, up 28%, or $67 million, from the second quarter 2003. Builder loans outstanding at June 30, 2004, including construction and land and other mortgage loans, totaled $738.9 million, a $133.7 million, or 22% increase compared to December 31, 2003. A substantial portion of our builder construction loans is secured by corporate or personal guarantees of the builders as well as the underlying real estate.
The following tables present further information on our construction loan portfolios.
As of | ||||||||||||||||
June 30, 2004 | December 31, 2003 | |||||||||||||||
Consumer | Builder | Consumer | Builder | |||||||||||||
Construction | Construction | Construction | Construction | |||||||||||||
Loans | Loans | Loans | Loans | |||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Construction loans
|
$ | 1,301,688 | $ | 561,538 | $ | 1,145,526 | $ | 484,397 | ||||||||
Land and other mortgage loans
|
$ | 73,063 | $ | 177,337 | $ | 87,045 | $ | 120,751 | ||||||||
Outstanding commitments
|
$ | 2,335,273 | $ | 1,329,717 | $ | 2,091,853 | $ | 1,120,893 | ||||||||
Average construction loan commitment
|
$ | 389 | $ | 2,467 | $ | 391 | $ | 3,046 | ||||||||
Non-performing loans
|
0.74 | % | 1.24 | % | 0.78 | % | 1.60 | % | ||||||||
Yield
|
5.66 | % | 6.44 | % | 5.81 | % | 6.63 | % | ||||||||
Fixed-rate loans
|
95 | % | 0 | % | 94 | % | 1 | % | ||||||||
Adjustable-rate loans
|
5 | % | 98 | % | 6 | % | 97 | % | ||||||||
Hybrid adjustable-rate loans
|
0 | % | 2 | % | 0 | % | 2 | % |
Additional Information as of June 30, 2004
Consumer | Builder | ||||||||||
Construction | Construction | ||||||||||
Loans | Loans | ||||||||||
Average loan-to-value ratio(1)
|
74 | % | 73 | % | |||||||
Average FICO score(2)
|
706 | N/A | |||||||||
Geographic distribution
|
|||||||||||
Southern California
|
30 | % | Southern California | 45 | % | ||||||
Northern California
|
18 | % | Northern California | 22 | % | ||||||
New York
|
5 | % | Illinois | 12 | % | ||||||
Hawaii
|
5 | % | Florida | 7 | % | ||||||
Florida
|
4 | % | Massachusetts | 4 | % | ||||||
Colorado
|
3 | % | |||||||||
Connecticut
|
3 | % | |||||||||
Washington
|
2 | % | |||||||||
New Jersey
|
2 | % | |||||||||
Nevada
|
2 | % | |||||||||
Other (each individually
less than 2%) |
26 | % |
Other (each
individually less than 2%) |
10 | % | ||||||
Total Consumer Construction
|
100 | % | Total Builder Construction | 100 | % | ||||||
(1) | The average loan-to-value ratio is based on the estimated appraised value of the completed project compared to the commitment amount at June 30, 2004. |
(2) | FICO scores are not calculated for corporate entities and, therefore, are not applicable to the builder construction portfolio. |
For information related to the Companys balance of non-performing assets and related credit reserves, see discussion in the Credit Risk and Reserves section at page 48.
42
HELOC Portfolio
Our managed HELOC portfolio reached the $1 billion level during the second quarter 2004. The portfolio grew 50% during the first half of the year from $711.5 million at December 31, 2003, to $1.1 billion at June 30, 2004, including the HELOC securitized servicing portfolio. The majority of the HELOC production was driven by our internal channels and produced concurrently with a first mortgage.
During the first quarter 2004, the Company financed $500 million in HELOC loans through a securitization trust. The trust issued AAA-rated asset-backed certificates that are guaranteed by a third party insurer. The Company pledged the certificates to secure $500 million of nonrecourse debt. As a result of this transaction, the Company recharacterized the net book value of the HELOCs as securities available for sale and servicing rights. The nonrecourse notes are reflected in other borrowings. The Company recognized no gain or loss on this secured financing transaction. The primary objectives of these transactions were to (1) lower our cost of funds, (2) improve our liquidity profile, and (3) improve our risk profile through the use of mortgage insurance.
On June 30, 2004, we reclassified $342 million of HELOC loans, representing the planned amount of loans to be securitized in the third quarter 2004, from held for investment to held for sale on the consolidated balance sheet. This reclassification did not result in any basis adjustment to the loans and had no impact on second quarter earnings.
The following table presents information on the combined HELOCs held for sale and held for investment as of and for the three months ended June 30, 2004, March 31, 2004, and December 31, 2003. All HELOC loans are adjustable rate loans and indexed to the prime rate.
June 30, | March 31, | December 31, | ||||||||||
2004 | 2004 | 2003 | ||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||
Outstanding balance
|
$ | 559,406 | $ | 322,351 | $ | 711,494 | ||||||
Outstanding commitments(1)
|
$ | 1,095,532 | $ | 638,210 | $ | 1,189,213 | ||||||
Average spread over prime
|
1.99 | % | 2.07 | % | 1.92 | % | ||||||
Average FICO score
|
716 | 711 | 710 | |||||||||
Average CLTV ratio(2)
|
75 | % | 76 | % | 77 | % |
Average Loan | 30+ Days | ||||||||||||||||||||
Outstanding | Commitment | Average Spread | Average | Delinquency | |||||||||||||||||
CLTV | Balance | Balance | Over Prime | FICO | Percentage | ||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||||
>= 96% &< = 100%
|
$ | 25,492 | $ | 64 | 3.06 | % | 722 | 1.47 | % | ||||||||||||
>= 91% &< = 95%
|
65,322 | 61 | 3.08 | % | 715 | 0.76 | % | ||||||||||||||
>= 81% &< = 90%
|
188,316 | 63 | 2.52 | % | 699 | 1.40 | % | ||||||||||||||
>= 71% &< = 80%
|
154,098 | 98 | 1.31 | % | 715 | 0.95 | % | ||||||||||||||
<= 70%
|
126,178 | 99 | 1.23 | % | 733 | 0.53 | % | ||||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 559,406 | $ | 80 | 1.99 | % | 716 | 1.00 | % | ||||||||||||
(1) | On funded loans. |
(2) | The CLTV combines the loan to value on both the first mortgage loan and the HELOC. |
43
NET INTEREST INCOME
The following table sets forth information regarding our consolidated average balance sheets (all segments are combined), along with the total dollar amounts of interest income and interest expense and the weighted average interest rates for the periods presented. Average balances are calculated on a daily basis. Non-performing loans are included in the average balances for the periods presented. The allowance for loan losses is excluded from the average loan balances.
Three Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, 2004 | June 30, 2003 | March 31, 2004 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average | Yield | Average | Yield | Average | Yield | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance | Interest | Rate | Balance | Interest | Rate | Balance | Interest | Rate | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Securities
|
$ | 2,877,174 | $ | 34,365 | 4.80 | % | $ | 1,553,656 | $ | 16,111 | 4.16 | % | $ | 2,105,468 | $ | 26,855 | 5.13 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
Loans held for sale
|
5,282,806 | 69,395 | 5.28 | % | 3,467,140 | 52,460 | 6.07 | % | 3,688,650 | 54,746 | 5.97 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage loans held for investment
|
5,424,545 | 56,827 | 4.21 | % | 3,173,541 | 37,201 | 4.70 | % | 5,608,258 | 58,042 | 4.16 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Builder construction and income property
|
546,597 | 8,820 | 6.49 | % | 570,944 | 9,768 | 6.86 | % | 506,668 | 8,039 | 6.38 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consumer construction
|
1,208,522 | 17,003 | 5.66 | % | 899,204 | 14,639 | 6.53 | % | 1,140,371 | 15,995 | 5.64 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment in Federal Home Loan Bank stock
and other
|
329,231 | 3,898 | 4.76 | % | 244,552 | 2,298 | 3.77 | % | 320,321 | 2,882 | 3.62 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total interest-earning assets
|
15,668,875 | 190,308 | 4.88 | % | 9,909,037 | 132,477 | 5.36 | % | 13,369,736 | 166,559 | 5.01 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other
|
1,317,607 | 972,687 | 1,178,636 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total assets
|
$ | 16,986,482 | $ | 10,881,724 | $ | 14,548,372 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing deposits
|
$ | 4,076,509 | 23,697 | 2.34 | % | $ | 2,996,427 | 21,950 | 2.94 | % | $ | 3,838,511 | 22,482 | 2.36 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank
|
5,775,468 | 33,919 | 2.36 | % | 3,588,032 | 28,308 | 3.16 | % | 5,207,135 | 30,920 | 2.39 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other borrowings
|
4,800,920 | 25,714 | 2.15 | % | 2,276,959 | 14,704 | 2.59 | % | 3,532,004 | 19,224 | 2.19 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total interest-bearing liabilities
|
14,652,897 | 83,330 | 2.29 | % | 8,861,418 | 64,962 | 2.94 | % | 12,577,650 | 72,626 | 2.32 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other
|
1,206,297 | 1,115,755 | 927,400 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities
|
15,859,194 | 9,977,173 | 13,505,050 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stockholders equity
|
1,127,288 | 904,551 | 1,043,322 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
$ | 16,986,482 | $ | 10,881,724 | $ | 14,548,372 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income
|
$ | 106,978 | $ | 67,515 | $ | 93,933 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest spread
|
2.59 | % | 2.42 | % | 2.69 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest margin
|
2.75 | % | 2.73 | % | 2.83 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
44
Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, 2004 | June 30, 2003 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average | Yield | Average | Yield | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance | Interest | Rate | Balance | Interest | Rate | ||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Securities
|
$ | 2,491,321 | $ | 61,220 | 4.94 | % | $ | 1,737,151 | $ | 37,072 | 4.30 | % | |||||||||||||
Loans held for sale
|
4,485,728 | 124,141 | 5.57 | % | 3,167,344 | 97,661 | 6.22 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Mortgage loans held for investment
|
5,516,402 | 114,868 | 4.19 | % | 2,966,721 | 73,164 | 4.97 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Builder construction and income property
|
526,633 | 16,860 | 6.44 | % | 570,915 | 19,488 | 6.88 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Consumer construction
|
1,174,446 | 32,998 | 5.65 | % | 869,488 | 29,035 | 6.73 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Investment in Federal Home Loan Bank stock
and other
|
324,776 | 6,780 | 4.20 | % | 212,910 | 4,254 | 4.03 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Total interest-earning assets
|
14,519,306 | 356,867 | 4.94 | % | 9,524,529 | 260,674 | 5.52 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Other
|
1,248,121 | 933,665 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Total assets
|
$ | 15,767,427 | $ | 10,458,194 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing deposits
|
$ | 3,957,510 | 46,179 | 2.35 | % | $ | 2,866,625 | 43,638 | 3.07 | % | |||||||||||||||
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank
|
5,491,302 | 64,839 | 2.37 | % | 3,148,520 | 53,866 | 3.45 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Other borrowings
|
4,166,462 | 44,938 | 2.17 | % | 2,544,684 | 32,630 | 2.59 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Total interest-bearing liabilities
|
13,615,274 | 155,956 | 2.30 | % | 8,559,829 | 130,134 | 3.07 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Other
|
1,066,848 | 1,010,978 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities
|
14,682,122 | 9,570,807 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Stockholders equity
|
1,085,305 | 887,387 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
$ | 15,767,427 | $ | 10,458,194 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income
|
$ | 200,911 | $ | 130,540 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest spread
|
2.64 | % | 2.45 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest margin
|
2.78 | % | 2.76 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
The net interest margin during the second quarter 2004 was 2.75%, a decline from 2.83% for the first quarter 2004. The decrease is primarily due to a 13 basis point decline in yield on interest-earning assets. The lower yield on interest-earning assets was the result of an increase in the mix of monthly adjustable 12-MAT loans held for sale that carry a lower yield in the initial period, generally the first month.
The dollar amounts of interest income and interest expense fluctuate depending upon changes in the average balances and interest rates of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. The following table details changes attributable to (i) changes in volume (changes in average outstanding balances multiplied by the prior periods rate), (ii) changes in the rate (changes in the average interest rate multiplied
45
Three Months Ended June 30, 2004 vs. 2003 | ||||||||||||||||||
Increase/(Decrease) Due to | ||||||||||||||||||
Volume | Rate | Mix | Total Change | |||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||
Interest income
|
||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities
|
$ | 13,643 | $ | 2,497 | $ | 2,114 | $ | 18,254 | ||||||||||
Loans held for sale
|
27,254 | (6,791 | ) | (3,528 | ) | 16,935 | ||||||||||||
Mortgage loans held for investment
|
26,213 | (3,864 | ) | (2,723 | ) | 19,626 | ||||||||||||
Builder construction and income property
|
(442 | ) | (530 | ) | 24 | (948 | ) | |||||||||||
Consumer construction
|
4,983 | (1,953 | ) | (665 | ) | 2,365 | ||||||||||||
Investment in Federal Home Loan Bank stock
and other
|
787 | 605 | 207 | 1,599 | ||||||||||||||
Total interest income
|
72,438 | (10,036 | ) | (4,571 | ) | 57,831 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense
|
||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing deposits
|
7,831 | (4,484 | ) | (1,600 | ) | 1,747 | ||||||||||||
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank
|
17,133 | (7,178 | ) | (4,344 | ) | 5,611 | ||||||||||||
Other borrowings
|
16,214 | (2,475 | ) | (2,729 | ) | 11,010 | ||||||||||||
Total interest expense
|
41,178 | (14,137 | ) | (8,673 | ) | 18,368 | ||||||||||||
Net interest income
|
$ | 31,260 | $ | 4,101 | $ | 4,102 | $ | 39,463 | ||||||||||
Six Months Ended June 30, 2004 vs. 2003 | ||||||||||||||||||
Increase/(Decrease) Due to | ||||||||||||||||||
Volume | Rate | Mix | Total Change | |||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||
Interest income
|
||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities
|
$ | 16,242 | $ | 5,497 | $ | 2,409 | $ | 24,148 | ||||||||||
Loans held for sale
|
41,035 | (10,249 | ) | (4,306 | ) | 26,480 | ||||||||||||
Mortgage loans held for investment
|
63,257 | (11,559 | ) | (9,993 | ) | 41,705 | ||||||||||||
Builder construction and income property
|
(1,462 | ) | (1,262 | ) | 95 | (2,629 | ) | |||||||||||
Consumer construction
|
10,292 | (4,673 | ) | (1,656 | ) | 3,963 | ||||||||||||
Investment in Federal Home Loan Bank stock
and other
|
2,253 | 178 | 94 | 2,525 | ||||||||||||||
Total interest income
|
131,617 | (22,068 | ) | (13,357 | ) | 96,192 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense
|
||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing deposits
|
16,774 | (10,281 | ) | (3,952 | ) | 2,541 | ||||||||||||
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank
|
40,342 | (16,793 | ) | (12,577 | ) | 10,972 | ||||||||||||
Other borrowings
|
20,944 | (5,260 | ) | (3,376 | ) | 12,308 | ||||||||||||
Total interest expense
|
78,060 | (32,334 | ) | (19,905 | ) | 25,821 | ||||||||||||
Net interest income
|
$ | 53,557 | $ | 10,266 | $ | 6,548 | $ | 70,371 | ||||||||||
OVERALL INTEREST RATE RISK MANAGEMENT
In addition to our hedging activities to mitigate the interest rate risk in our pipeline of mortgage loans held for sale and our investment in servicing-related assets, we perform extensive overall interest rate risk analyses. The primary measurement tool used to evaluate interest rate risk over the comprehensive balance
46
The following table sets forth the NPV and change in NPV that we estimate might result from a 100 basis point change in interest rates as of June 30, 2004, and December 31, 2003. Our NPV model has been built to focus on the Bank alone as the $256 million of assets at the holding company have very little interest rate risk exposure.
June 30, 2004 | December 31, 2003 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effect of Change in | Effect of Change in | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest Rates | Interest Rates | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Decrease | Increase | Decrease | Increase | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair Value | 100 bps | 100 bps | Fair Value | 100 bps | 100 bps | ||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$ | 329,377 | $ | 329,377 | $ | 329,377 | $ | 111,203 | $ | 111,203 | $ | 111,203 | |||||||||||||
Trading securities
|
302,950 | 286,052 | 301,068 | 206,484 | 180,197 | 228,880 | |||||||||||||||||||
Available for sale securities
|
2,046,266 | 2,094,812 | 1,988,411 | 1,611,958 | 1,662,715 | 1,553,103 | |||||||||||||||||||
Loans held for sale
|
3,985,286 | 4,006,073 | 3,909,136 | 2,573,248 | 2,606,028 | 2,519,059 | |||||||||||||||||||
Loans held for investment
|
6,978,583 | 7,044,745 | 6,877,960 | 7,396,475 | 7,448,389 | 7,304,464 | |||||||||||||||||||
MSRs
|
495,086 | 393,432 | 548,086 | 443,688 | 311,777 | 534,672 | |||||||||||||||||||
Other assets
|
708,404 | 695,147 | 718,896 | 683,213 | 697,356 | 669,062 | |||||||||||||||||||
Derivatives
|
92,317 | (33,952 | ) | 224,760 | 106,119 | 91,598 | 169,246 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total assets
|
$ | 14,938,269 | $ | 14,815,686 | $ | 14,897,694 | $ | 13,132,388 | $ | 13,109,263 | $ | 13,089,689 | |||||||||||||
Deposits
|
$ | 4,745,202 | $ | 4,789,176 | $ | 4,704,339 | $ | 4,367,400 | $ | 4,404,900 | $ | 4,335,433 | |||||||||||||
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank
|
5,567,651 | 5,602,862 | 5,533,274 | 4,949,477 | 4,979,962 | 4,919,147 | |||||||||||||||||||
Other borrowings
|
2,885,675 | 2,886,937 | 2,884,415 | 2,438,695 | 2,440,538 | 2,436,665 | |||||||||||||||||||
Other liabilities
|
371,885 | 338,708 | 400,730 | 156,711 | 156,800 | 156,599 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities
|
13,570,413 | 13,617,683 | 13,522,758 | 11,912,283 | 11,982,200 | 11,847,844 | |||||||||||||||||||
Stockholders equity (NPV)
|
$ | 1,367,856 | $ | 1,198,003 | $ | 1,374,936 | $ | 1,220,105 | $ | 1,127,063 | $ | 1,241,845 | |||||||||||||
% Change from base case
|
(12.42 | )% | 0.52 | % | (7.63 | )% | 1.78% | ||||||||||||||||||
The increase in the net present value of equity from December 31, 2003, to June 30, 2004, is primarily due to the net income of $70 million for the first six months of 2004, and the $80 million capital contributed by the holding company to the Bank from the equity offering in June. See Issuance of Common Stock at page 57 for further information regarding the offering. The June 30, 2004 results indicate that the Bank is better positioned for rising rates in an up 100 basis point scenario. It should be noted that this analysis does not reflect changes in volumes and profits from our mortgage banking operations that would be expected to result from the simulated change in interest rate environment.
The assumptions inherent in our interest rate shock models include expected valuation changes in an instantaneous and parallel interest rate shock and assumptions as to the degree of correlation between the hedges and hedged assets and liabilities. These assumptions may not adequately reflect factors such as the spread-widening or spread-tightening risk among the changes in rates on Treasury, LIBOR/swap curve and mortgages. In addition, the sensitivity analysis described in the prior paragraph is limited by the fact that it is performed at a particular point in time and does not incorporate other factors that would impact our financial performance in these scenarios, such as increases in income associated with the increase in production volume that could result from a decrease in interest rates. Consequently, the preceding estimates should not be viewed as a forecast, and it is reasonable to expect that actual results could vary significantly from the analyses discussed above.
47
The Companys Board of Directors-level and management-level Asset Liability Committees (ALCOs) monitor our hedging activities to determine whether the value of our hedge positions, their correlation to the balance sheet item being hedged, and the amounts being hedged, continue to provide effective protection against interest rate risk. While there can be no assurances that our interest rate management strategies will be effective, we believe we have adequate internal controls to monitor and manage our interest rate risk within reasonable levels.
CREDIT RISK AND RESERVES
GENERAL
The following table summarizes the Companys allowance for loan losses/credit discounts and non-performing assets as of June 30, 2004.
Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reserves as a | QTD Net | YTD Net | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Allowance | Credit | Percentage | Non- | Charge | Charge | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
For Loan | Discounts | of Book | Performing | Offs/Net | Offs/Net | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Type of Loan | Book Value | Losses | (2) | Value | Assets | REO (Gains) | REO (Gains) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Held for investment portfolio
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
SFR mortgage loans and HELOCs
|
$ | 4,796,027 | $ | 18,596 | $ | | 0.39 | % | $ | 12,625 | $ | 1,120 | $ | 2,046 | ||||||||||||||||||
Land and other mortgage
|
182,352 | 3,170 | | 1.74 | % | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Builder construction and income property
|
568,970 | 13,058 | | 2.30 | % | 9,162 | 10 | 10 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consumer construction
|
1,301,688 | 10,464 | | 0.80 | % | 10,203 | 329 | 404 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total core held for investment loans
|
6,849,037 | 45,288 | | 0.66 | % | 31,990 | 1,459 | 2,460 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Discontinued product lines(1)
|
61,334 | 7,508 | | 12.24 | % | 6,024 | 1,071 | 2,089 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total held for investment portfolio
|
6,910,371 | $ | 52,796 | | 0.76 | % | 38,014 | 2,530 | 4,549 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Held for sale portfolio
|
4,026,779 | $ | 14,572 | 0.36 | % | 47,823 | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total loans
|
$ | 10,937,150 | 85,837 | $ | 2,530 | $ | 4,549 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Foreclosed assets
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Core portfolios | 26,533 | $ | (139 | ) | $ | (599 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Discontinued product lines | 783 | (57 | ) | 160 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total foreclosed assets | 27,316 | $ | (196 | ) | $ | (439 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total non-performing assets | $ | 113,153 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total non-performing assets as a percentage of total assets | 0.73 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(1) | Discontinued product lines include manufactured home loans and home improvement loans. |
(2) | The amount represents the lower of cost or market adjustments on non-performing loans in the held for sale portfolio. |
48
The following tables provide additional comparative data on non-performing assets relative to the allowance for loan losses.
June 30, | June 30, | December 31, | |||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | 2003 | |||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||||||
Loans held for investment
|
|||||||||||||||
Portfolio loans
|
|||||||||||||||
SFR mortgage loans
|
$ | 12,625 | $ | 11,059 | $ | 12,414 | |||||||||
Land and other mortgage loans
|
| 2,214 | 71 | ||||||||||||
Builder construction
|
9,162 | 1,605 | 9,704 | ||||||||||||
Consumer construction
|
10,203 | 10,654 | 8,954 | ||||||||||||
Total portfolio non-performing loans
|
31,990 | 25,532 | 31,143 | ||||||||||||
Discontinued product lines
|
6,024 | 7,126 | 6,449 | ||||||||||||
Total non-performing loans held for investment
|
38,014 | 32,658 | 37,592 | ||||||||||||
Non-performing loans held for sale
|
47,823 | 30,054 | 38,855 | ||||||||||||
Total non-performing loans
|
85,837 | 62,712 | 76,447 | ||||||||||||
Foreclosed assets
|
27,316 | 31,028 | 23,677 | ||||||||||||
Total non-performing assets
|
$ | 113,153 | $ | 93,740 | $ | 100,124 | |||||||||
Total non-performing assets to total assets
|
0.73 | % | 0.88 | % | 0.76 | % | |||||||||
Allowance for loan losses to non-performing loans
held for investment
|
139 | % | 153 | % | 140 | % | |||||||||
The following shows the activity in the allowance for loan losses during the indicated periods:
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | 2004 | 2003 | |||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||
Core portfolio loans
|
||||||||||||||||||
Balance, beginning of period
|
$ | 45,043 | $ | 41,524 | $ | 45,644 | $ | 41,314 | ||||||||||
Provision for loan losses
|
1,701 | 5,000 | 2,101 | 6,525 | ||||||||||||||
Charge-offs net of recoveries
|
||||||||||||||||||
SFR mortgage loans
|
(1,120 | ) | (691 | ) | (2,046 | ) | (1,857 | ) | ||||||||||
Builder construction
|
(10 | ) | (3,066 | ) | (10 | ) | (3,066 | ) | ||||||||||
Consumer construction
|
(329 | ) | (421 | ) | (404 | ) | (570 | ) | ||||||||||
Charge-offs net of recoveries
|
(1,459 | ) | (4,178 | ) | (2,460 | ) | (5,493 | ) | ||||||||||
Balance, end of period
|
45,285 | 42,346 | 45,285 | 42,346 |
49
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | 2004 | 2003 | |||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||
Discontinued product lines
|
||||||||||||||||||
Balance, beginning of period
|
7,083 | 8,722 | 7,001 | 9,447 | ||||||||||||||
Provision for loan losses
|
1,499 | 1,900 | 2,599 | 3,475 | ||||||||||||||
Charge-offs net of recoveries
|
(1,071 | ) | (2,926 | ) | (2,089 | ) | (5,226 | ) | ||||||||||
Balance, end of period
|
7,511 | 7,696 | 7,511 | 7,696 | ||||||||||||||
Total allowance for loan losses
|
$ | 52,796 | $ | 50,042 | $ | 52,796 | $ | 50,042 | ||||||||||
Annualized charge-offs to average loans
|
0.14 | % | 0.61 | % | 0.13 | % | 0.49 | % | ||||||||||
Annualized charge-offs to quarterly production
|
0.10 | % | 0.36 | % | 0.05 | % | 0.28 | % | ||||||||||
Core portfolio loans only:
|
||||||||||||||||||
Net charge-offs to average loans
|
0.08 | % | 0.37 | % | 0.07 | % | 0.24 | % | ||||||||||
Net charge-offs to quarterly production
|
0.06 | % | 0.20 | % | 0.03 | % | 0.16 | % |
Total credit-related reserves, including the allowance for loan losses and the market valuation reserves, amounted to $67.4 million at June 30, 2004, compared to $66.6 million at December 31, 2003. As of June 30, 2004, the allowance for loan losses of $52.8 million for loans held for investment, represented 0.76% of total loans held for investment. This compares to an allowance for loan losses of $52.7 million, or 0.71% of total loans held for investment, at December 31, 2003. Charge-offs improved significantly during the second quarter 2004, both in our core portfolio loans and discontinued product lines. Total second quarter net charge-offs of $2.5 million decreased 64% relative to the second quarter 2003. In relation to annualized charge-offs, our coverage improved year-over-year with the allowance representing 5.2 times of the annualized charge-offs for the second quarter 2004 compared with 1.8 times of the annualized charge-offs for the second quarter 2003.
Loans are generally placed on non-accrual status when they are 90 days past due. Non-performing assets include non-performing loans and foreclosed assets. We recorded the balance of our assets acquired in foreclosure or by deed in lieu of foreclosure at estimated net realizable value. The ratio of non-performing assets to total assets also improved from 0.76% at December 31, 2003 to 0.73% at June 30, 2004. Total non-performing assets amounted to $113.2 million at June 30, 2004 as compared to $100.1 million at December 31, 2003. The increase in non-performing loans was driven by a $9.0 million increase in mortgage loans held for sale primarily due to the loans acquired through clean-up calls exercised during the first half of 2004. The exercises of the clean-up call options have also driven the increase in foreclosed assets.
With respect to the portfolio of loans held for investment in IndyMacs core businesses, the allowance for loan losses at June 30, 2004 was $45.2 million, or 0.66% of the loan balance, compared to the 0.62% of total loan balance at December 31, 2003.
With respect to IndyMacs non-core liquidating portfolios, consisting primarily of manufactured housing and home improvement loans, net charge-offs totaled $1.1 million during the second quarter of 2004, down from the $2.9 million of net charge-offs on these portfolios during the second quarter of 2003. After provision for loan losses of $1.5 million, the allocated allowance for loan losses was $7.5 million, or 12.24% of the remaining principal balance of such liquidating portfolios, compared to the 10.07% reserve coverage at December 31, 2003.
Our determination of the level of the allowance for loan losses and, correspondingly, the provision for loan losses, is based on managements judgments and assumptions regarding various matters, including general economic conditions, loan portfolio composition, delinquency trends and prior loan loss experience. In assessing the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses, management reviews the performance in the portfolios of loans held for investment and the non-core portfolio of discontinued product lines, which consists of manufactured housing and home improvement loans. The allocation of the allowance among the various loan
50
While we consider the allowance for loan losses to be adequate based on information currently available, future adjustments to the allowance may be necessary due to changes in economic conditions, delinquency levels, foreclosure rates, or loss rates. The level of our allowance for loan losses is also subject to review by our primary federal regulator, the Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS). Our regulator may require that our allowance for loan losses be increased based on its evaluation of the information available to it at the time of its examination of the Bank.
With respect to mortgage loans held for sale, IndyMac does not provide an allowance for loan losses, pursuant to the applicable accounting rules. Instead, a component for credit risk related to loans held for sale is embedded in the market valuation for these loans. Market valuation adjustments on loans held for sale totaled $14.6 million at June 30, 2004.
SECONDARY MARKET RESERVE
We do not sell loans with recourse in our loan sale activities. However, we can be required to repurchase loans from investors when our loan sales contain individual loans that do not conform with the representations and warranties we make at the time of sale. We have made significant investments in our pre-production and post-production quality control processes to identify potential systemic issues that could cause repurchases. We believe that these efforts have improved our production quality; however, possible increases in default rates due to an economic slowdown could cause the overall rate of repurchases to remain constant or even increase. Since inception in 1993, the Company has repurchased only a very small amount of loans from its securitization trusts. The increase in repurchase activity in recent years has been primarily a function of IndyMacs diversification of its loan sale channels to whole loan and GSE sales. While sales through these channels generate enhanced cash flows, they tend to have a greater level of representation and warranty risk. The following table shows the amount of loans we have repurchased from each distribution channel, since the Company began active lending operations in January 1993.
Amount | Percentage | |||||||||||||
Repurchased | Total Sold | Repurchased | ||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | ||||||||||||||
Loans Sold:
|
||||||||||||||
GSEs and whole loans
|
$ | 127.1 | $ | 49,043 | 0.26 | % | ||||||||
Securitization trusts
|
9.3 | 61,525 | 0.02 | % | ||||||||||
Total Loans Sold
|
$ | 136.4 | $ | 110,568 | 0.12 | % | ||||||||
The Company maintains secondary market reserves for losses that arise in connection with loans that we are required to repurchase from whole loan sales or securitization transactions. These reserves, which totaled $37.3 million at June 30, 2004, have two general components: reserves for repurchases arising from representation and warranty claims, and reserves for disputes with investors and vendors with respect to contractual obligations pertaining to mortgage operations. The table below shows the activity in the reserves during the three and six months ended June 30, 2004.
Three | Six | |||||||
Months | Months | |||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||
Balance, beginning of period
|
$ | 34,000 | $ | 34,000 | ||||
Additions/provisions
|
7,493 | 15,979 | ||||||
Claims reimbursement and estimated discounts on
loans held for sale/charge-offs
|
(5,223 | ) | (14,319 | ) | ||||
Recoveries on previous claims
|
980 | 1,590 | ||||||
Balance, June 30, 2004
|
$ | 37,250 | $ | 37,250 | ||||
51
Reserve levels are a function of expected losses based on actual pending claims and repurchase requests, historical experience, loan volume and loan sales distribution channels and the assessment of probable vendor or investor claims. While the ultimate amount of repurchases and claims is uncertain, management believes that the reserves are adequate. We will continue to evaluate the adequacy of our reserves and may continue to allocate a portion of our gain on sale proceeds to these reserves going forward. The entire balances of our secondary market reserves are included on the consolidated balance sheets as a component of other liabilities.
OPERATING EXPENSES
A summary of operating expenses follows:
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | March 31, | June 30, | June 30, | ||||||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | 2004 | 2004 | 2003 | ||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Salaries and related
|
$ | 64,231 | $ | 57,030 | $ | 63,038 | $ | 127,269 | $ | 110,125 | ||||||||||
Premises and equipment
|
9,938 | 8,138 | 9,593 | 19,531 | 16,444 | |||||||||||||||
Loan purchase costs
|
10,244 | 7,810 | 7,307 | 17,551 | 14,868 | |||||||||||||||
Professional services
|
5,844 | 5,086 | 5,073 | 10,917 | 9,696 | |||||||||||||||
Data processing
|
8,580 | 8,131 | 8,591 | 17,171 | 14,895 | |||||||||||||||
Office
|
5,758 | 5,860 | 5,979 | 11,737 | 11,120 | |||||||||||||||
Advertising and promotion
|
9,167 | 6,580 | 8,856 | 18,023 | 12,644 | |||||||||||||||
Operations and sale of foreclosed assets
|
1,419 | 794 | 2,135 | 3,554 | 1,750 | |||||||||||||||
Other
|
6,113 | 5,329 | 4,626 | 10,739 | 8,874 | |||||||||||||||
$ | 121,294 | $ | 104,758 | $ | 115,198 | $ | 236,492 | $ | 200,416 | |||||||||||
General and administrative expenses, including salaries, increased during the quarter ended June 30, 2004, to $121.3 million, compared to $104.8 million during the same period in 2003. The increase was largely driven by increases in salaries, loan purchase costs, advertising and promotion, and infrastructure and technology related expenses as a result of the Companys increased mortgage loan production and operational expansions. Total loan production increased 19% year over year, from $8.2 billion for the quarter ended June 30, 2003, to $9.7 billion for the quarter ended June 30, 2004. In a continuing effort to penetrate the market and gain market share, the Company also incurred costs to expand its sales force infrastructure with dedicated resources focused on new customer activation, customer training and support, and improving its conversion of loan submissions to fundings. As a result of the increased production volume and investments made in sales and customer service, the Companys average full-time equivalent employees increased during the year by 16%, from 3,505 during the quarter ended June 30, 2003, to 4,061 during the quarter ended June 30, 2004. Additionally, the Company continues to increase its investment in direct marketing costs to further promote its new product offerings, subprime and HELOC products. Furthermore, the Company made investments in data processing costs to (1) enhance its quality controls and compliance structure to ensure continued improvement in asset quality and support the growth of higher margin products; (2) strengthen its technology platform; and (3) enhance its customer service response performance. In spite of the increase in total operating expense for the second quarter 2004, our efficiency ratio has improved from 58% for the second quarter 2003 to 56% for the second quarter 2004.
DIVIDEND POLICY
IndyMacs Board of Directors declared a cash dividend of $0.32 per share for the third quarter of 2004, up 6.7% from the dividend declared and paid in the second quarter of this year. The cash dividend is payable September 9, 2004 to stockholders of record on August 12, 2004. The current dividend represents an annualized increase of 27% relative to the dividend declared on April 28, 2004, and IndyMacs fifth consecutive quarterly dividend increase. Over this period of time, IndyMac has successfully increased its
52
FUTURE OUTLOOK
On average, U.S. mortgage debt outstanding has grown approximately 7% to 8% per year over the last two decades and is projected, based on economic demographics, to continue this level of approximate growth. At this rate, mortgage debt outstanding roughly doubles every decade. We believe, based on our confidence in our employees, hybrid thrift/mortgage banking business model, capital strength and ability to gain market share, that we are positioned to grow earnings per share at a compounded growth rate of approximately 15% over the long run, or approximately double the rate of the industry. In fact, IndyMacs historical track record has exceeded this target over the last eleven years with compounded annual growth of 27% under its current management team.
With that said, the past three years have been extraordinary years for the mortgage industry. Industry mortgage production has achieved historic highs as a result of historically low interest rates, which led to record refinancing of mortgages. The industry is in the midst of a major transition from these historic highs back to more normalized levels. The MBA is projecting that industry production will decline 33% in 2004. Given the significant industry transition, IndyMac expects that its earnings per share in 2004 could lag its long-term growth rate as we make this transition.
However, given IndyMacs performance in the first half of 2004, our acquisition of Financial Freedom, our strong rate lock volume during the second quarter and continued strong pipeline of mortgage loans in process, solid customer growth, market share gains and balance sheet strength, we now expect that earnings per share will range from $3.35 to $3.55 in 2004, an increase of 11% to 18% over 2003 and an improvement from our prior range of $3.10 to $3.30 provided three months earlier.
The 2004 earnings projection above represents a pro forma number that excludes the $31.5 million, or $0.52 per share, impact to earnings and EPS for the change in industry accounting for rate locks pursuant to SAB 105 discussed earlier. Including the SAB 105 adjustment in the second quarter of 2004 the range for the full year 2004 is $2.83 to $3.03 per share.
This Future Outlook section contains certain forward-looking statements. See the section of this Form 10-Q entitled Forward-Looking Statements for a description of factors which may cause our actual results to differ from those anticipated.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
OVERVIEW
Our principal financing needs are to fund acquisitions of mortgage loans and our investment in mortgage loans, mortgage-backed securities and MSRs. Our primary sources of funds used to meet these financing needs are loan sales and securitizations, deposits, advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank, borrowings and retained earnings. The sources used vary depending on such factors as rates paid, collateral requirements, maturities and the impact on our capital. Additionally, we may occasionally securitize mortgage loans that we intend to hold for investment to lower our costs of borrowing against such assets and reduce the capital requirement associated with such assets. During the quarter ended June 30, 2004, we had average total liquidity of $1,043 million, which is represented by unpledged liquid assets on hand plus amounts that may be immediately raised through the pledging of other available assets as collateral pursuant to committed financing facilities. On June 8, 2004, we issued 3.2 million shares of common stock, generating net cash proceeds of $96.52 million, a portion of which was utilized to finance the acquisition of Financial Freedom Holdings Inc. We anticipate using the remaining net proceeds for general corporate purposes, including, but not limited to,
53
PRINCIPAL SOURCES OF CASH
Loan Sales and Securitizations
Our business model relies heavily upon selling the majority of our mortgage loans shortly after acquisition. The proceeds of these sales are a critical component of the liquidity necessary for our ongoing operations. During the three months ended June 30, 2004, we sold 86% of our funded mortgage loans through three channels: (1) GSEs; (2) private label securitizations; and (3) whole loan sales. The remainder we retained in our investment portfolio. If any of our sales channels were disrupted, our liquidity could be negatively impacted. Disruptions in our whole loan sales and mortgage securitization transactions can occur as a result of the performance of our existing securitizations, as well as economic events or other factors beyond our control.
Deposits/ Retail Bank
We solicit deposits from the general public and institutions by offering a variety of accounts and rates through our network of 10 branches in Southern California, telebanking and internet channels. Through our Web site at www.indymacbank.com, consumers can access their accounts 24-hours a day, seven days a week. Online banking allows customers to access their accounts, view balances, transfer funds between accounts, view transactions, download account information and pay their bills conveniently from any computer terminal.
Our deposit products include regular savings accounts, demand deposit accounts, money market accounts, certificates of deposit and individual retirement accounts.
The following table sets forth the balance of deposits, by deposit category, as of the following period ends.
June 30, 2004 | June 30, 2003 | December 31, 2003 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
% of | % of | % of | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | Total | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Amount | Deposits | Amount | Deposits | Amount | Deposits | ||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Non-interest-bearing checking
|
$ | 49,299 | 1 | % | $ | 40,483 | 1 | % | $ | 44,353 | 1 | % | |||||||||||||
Interest-bearing checking
|
42,030 | 1 | % | 37,256 | 1 | % | 39,761 | 1 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Savings
|
1,757,560 | 37 | % | 1,225,707 | 32 | % | 1,515,771 | 35 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Custodial accounts
|
616,470 | 13 | % | 716,578 | 18 | % | 528,724 | 12 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total core deposits
|
2,465,359 | 52 | % | 2,020,024 | 52 | % | 2,128,609 | 49 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Certificates of deposit
|
2,293,196 | 48 | % | 1,883,461 | 48 | % | 2,222,164 | 51 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total deposits
|
$ | 4,758,555 | 100 | % | $ | 3,903,485 | 100 | % | $ | 4,350,773 | 100 | % | |||||||||||||
The increase in our savings deposits from $1,515.8 million at December 31, 2003 to $1,757.6 million at June 30, 2004, is mainly due to our competitive money market products.
54
The following table sets forth the balance of deposits, by deposit channel, as of the following period ends:
June 30, 2004 | June 30, 2003 | December 31, 2003 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
% of | % of | % of | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | Total | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Amount | Deposits | Amount | Deposits | Amount | Deposits | ||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Branch
|
$ | 1,903,211 | 40 | % | $ | 1,526,351 | 39 | % | $ | 1,717,314 | 39 | % | |||||||||||||
Telebanking
|
520,536 | 11 | % | 488,575 | 13 | % | 463,755 | 11 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Internet
|
486,926 | 10 | % | 476,645 | 12 | % | 555,029 | 13 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Money desk
|
1,231,412 | 26 | % | 695,336 | 18 | % | 1,085,951 | 25 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Custodial
|
616,470 | 13 | % | 716,578 | 18 | % | 528,724 | 12 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total deposits
|
$ | 4,758,555 | 100 | % | $ | 3,903,485 | 100 | % | $ | 4,350,773 | 100 | % | |||||||||||||
Included in deposits at June 30, 2004, and December 31, 2003, were non-interest-bearing custodial accounts, primarily related to our GSE servicing portfolio, totaling $616.5 million and $528.7 million, respectively.
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank
The Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) system functions as a borrowing source for regulated financial depositories and similar institutions that are engaged in residential housing finance. As a member of the FHLB of San Francisco, we are required to own capital stock of the FHLB and are authorized to apply for advances from the FHLB, on a secured basis, in amounts determined by reference to available collateral. SFR mortgage loans, agency and AAA-rated mortgage-backed securities are the principal collateral that may be used to secure these borrowings, although certain other types of loans and other assets may also be accepted pursuant to FHLB policies and statutory requirements. Currently, the Bank is approved for collateralized advances of up to $6.9 billion, of which $5.6 billion were outstanding at June 30, 2004. The FHLB offers several credit programs, each with its own fixed or floating interest rate, and a range of maturities.
Trust Preferred Securities and Warrants
On November 14, 2001, we completed an offering of Warrants and Income Redeemable Equity Securities (WIRES) to investors. Gross proceeds of the transaction were $175 million. The securities were offered as units consisting of a trust preferred security, issued by a trust formed by us, and a warrant to purchase IndyMac Bancorps common stock. In both the months of July and December 2003, we issued an additional $30 million of trust preferred securities, yielding 6.05% and 6.30%, respectively. The proceeds of these securities will also be used in operations. These securities did not contain any warrants on IndyMac Bancorp common stock.
Upon the adoption of FASB Interpretation No. 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, an Interpretation of Accounting Research Bulletin (ARB) No. 51, on July 1, 2003, the trusts have been deconsolidated from the financial statements of the Company. Trust preferred debentures, representing the liabilities due from IndyMac Bancorp to IndyMac Capital Trusts, amounted to $184.0 million and $183.6 million at June 30, 2004, and December 31, 2003, respectively. These debentures are included in Other Borrowings on the consolidated balance sheets.
Other Borrowings, Excluding Trust Preferred Debentures
Other borrowings, excluding trust preferred debentures, consist of loans and securities sold under committed financing facilities and uncommitted agreements to repurchase, CMO collateral and notes payable. Total other borrowings increased to $3,479.9 million at June 30, 2004, from $2,438.5 million at December 31, 2003. The increase of $1,041.4 million was primarily the result of additional draws on our credit facilities to fund mortgage loan originations, the issuance of $500 million non-recourse AAA-rated HELOC-backed notes
55
At June 30, 2004, we had $4.4 billion in committed financing facilities, of which $2.2 billion was utilized. For the second quarter 2004, we had an average of $763.8 million in operating liquidity available for use, based on eligible collateral. Decisions by our lenders and investors to make additional funds available to us in the future will depend upon a number of factors. These include our compliance with the terms of existing credit arrangements, our financial performance, eligible collateral, changes in our credit rating, industry and market trends in our various businesses, the general availability and interest rates applicable to financing and investments, the lenders and/or investors own resources and policies concerning loans and investments and the relative attractiveness of alternative investment or lending opportunities. As of June 30, 2004, we were in compliance with all representations, warranties and financial covenants under our borrowing facilities.
PRINCIPAL USES OF CASH
In addition to the financing sources discussed above, cash uses are funded by net cash flows from operations, sales of mortgage-backed securities and principal and interest payments on loans and securities. The amounts of net acquisitions of loans held for sale and trading securities included as components of net cash used in operating activities totaled $3.1 billion during the six months ended June 30, 2004 and $1.3 billion during the six months ended June 30, 2003. Excluding the purchase and sale activity for loans held for sale and trading securities, the net cash provided by the Companys operating activities totaled $211.3 million and $154.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively. During the third quarter 2003, the Company started to purchase swaptions and more caps and floors to hedge certain liabilities and servicing-related assets. The net decrease in premiums for these derivative instruments totaled $30.1 million and none for the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The net cash provided by the Companys operating activities before the activities for trading securities, loans held for sale and purchase of derivative instruments amounted to $181.2 million and $154.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
Accumulated other comprehensive loss was $(15.1) million at June 30, 2004, compared to $(26.5) million at December 31, 2003. This change was a result of the increase in the fair value of the swaps and swaptions designated as cash flow hedges of floating rate borrowings, partially offset by the decline in fair value of securities classified as available for sale. It should be noted that accumulated other comprehensive loss does not include the increases in the fair value of loans held for investment that are funded by borrowings that are hedged by a portion of these interest rate swaps and swaptions. Accumulated other comprehensive loss is not a component of the determination of regulatory capital.
REGULATORY CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS
The Bank is subject to regulatory capital regulations administered by the federal banking agencies. In addition, as a condition to its approval of our acquisition of SGV Bancorp, Inc. in July 2000, the OTS required that the Bank hold Tier 1 (core) capital of at least 8% of adjusted total assets for three years following the consummation of the transaction and maintain a total risk-based capital position of at least 10% of total risk-weighted assets. This particular condition expired on July 1, 2003. As of June 30, 2004, the Bank met all of the requirements of a well-capitalized institution under the general regulatory capital regulations.
During 2001, the OTS issued guidance for subprime lending programs, which requires a lender to quantify the additional risks in its subprime lending activities and determine the appropriate amounts of allowances for loan losses and capital it needs to offset those risks. The Company generally classifies all loans in a first lien position with a FICO score less than 620 and all loans in a second lien position with a FICO score less than 660 as subprime. Loans meeting this definition are supported by capital two times that of similar prime loans. We report our subprime loan calculation in an addendum to the Thrift Financial Report that we
56
The following table presents the Banks actual and required capital ratios and the minimum required capital ratios to be categorized as well-capitalized at June 30, 2004. The impact of the additional risk-weighting criteria related to subprime loans had the effect of reducing IndyMacs total risk-based capital by 63 basis points as noted in the table below.
As Reported | Adjusted for | ||||||||||||
Pre-Subprime | Additional Subprime | Well-Capitalized | |||||||||||
Risk-Weighting | Risk-Weighting | Minimum | |||||||||||
Capital Ratios:
|
|||||||||||||
Tangible
|
7.65 | % | 7.65 | % | 2.00 | % | |||||||
Tier 1 core
|
7.65 | % | 7.65 | % | 5.00 | % | |||||||
Tier 1 risk-based
|
12.54 | % | 11.94 | % | 6.00 | % | |||||||
Total risk-based
|
13.10 | % | 12.47 | % | 10.00 | % |
We believe that, under current regulations, the Bank will continue to meet its well-capitalized minimum capital requirements in the foreseeable future. The Banks regulatory capital compliance could be impacted, however, by a number of factors, such as changes to applicable regulations, adverse action by our regulators, changes in the our mix of assets, interest rate fluctuations, loan loss provisions and credit losses, or significant changes in the economy in areas where we have most of our loans. Any of these factors could cause our actual future results to vary from anticipated future results and consequently could have an adverse impact on the ability of the Bank to meet its future minimum capital requirements.
ISSUANCE OF COMMON STOCK
On June 8, 2004, we issued 3,200,000 shares of common stock at a market price of $31.75 through a public offering. On July 12, 2004, we issued an additional 130,000 shares of common stock at a market price of $31.75 upon the exercise of the underwriters over-allotment options. The cash proceeds from the initial closing, net of expenses, of $96.25 million were recorded as equity during the second quarter of 2004. The cash proceeds from the exercise of the over-allotment option will be similarly applied during the third quarter of 2004. Certain of the proceeds were used to finance the acquisition of Financial Freedom Holdings Inc. and the remaining proceeds are expected to be used for general corporate purposes, including, but not limited to, continued asset growth for IndyMac Bank.
SHARE REPURCHASES
In June 1999, our Board of Directors approved a $100 million share repurchase program, which has since been amended to increase to $500 million and include a special repurchase of 3,640,860 shares from Countrywide Credit Industries, Inc. (Countrywide). From the share repurchase programs inception through December 31, 2002, we repurchased 28 million shares in open market transactions and from Countrywide at an average price of approximately $18.02 per share, for an aggregate investment of $504.4 million. At June 30, 2004, we had $63.6 million of remaining capacity to repurchase under the current authorization from the Board of Directors. No share repurchases under this program were made since December 31, 2002.
57
From time to time, we also repurchase shares from certain employees and officers at the then-current market price under the Companys internal benefit programs. The following table summarizes the share repurchase activities from our employees and officers during the first half of 2004:
Weighted Average | |||||||||
Months | Number of Shares | Price Per Share | |||||||
January
|
15,275 | $ | 29.84 | ||||||
February
|
| | |||||||
March
|
2,177 | 35.23 | |||||||
First Quarter Total
|
17,452 | 30.51 | |||||||
Second Quarter Total
|
| | |||||||
Six Months Total
|
17,452 | $ | 30.51 | ||||||
OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
In the ordinary course of our business, we engage in financial transactions that are not recorded on our balance sheet. These transactions are structured to manage our interest rate, credit or liquidity risks, to diversify funding sources or to optimize our capital.
Substantially all of our off-balance sheet arrangements relate to the securitization of mortgage loans. Our mortgage loan securitizations are normally structured as sales in accordance with SFAS 140, which involves the transfer of the mortgage loans to qualifying special-purpose entities that are not subject to consolidation. In a securitization, an entity transferring the assets is able to convert those assets into cash. Special-purpose entities used in such securitizations obtain cash to acquire the assets by issuing securities to investors. We also, generally, have the right to repurchase mortgage loans from the special-purpose entity if the remaining outstanding balance of the mortgage loans falls to a level where the cost of servicing the loans exceeds the revenues we earn.
In connection with our loan sales that are securitization transactions, there are $23.7 billion in loans owned by off-balance sheet trusts as of June 30, 2004. The trusts have issued bonds secured by these loans. We have no obligation to provide funding support to either the third party investors or the off-balance sheet trusts. The third party investors or the trusts generally have no recourse to our assets or us and have no ability to require us to repurchase their loans other than for non-credit-related recourse that can arise under standard representations and warranties. We maintain secondary market reserves for losses that could arise in connection with loans that we are required to repurchase from whole loan sales or securitization transactions.
We often retain certain interests, which may include subordinated classes of securities, MSRs, AAA-rated and agency interest-only strips and residual securities in the securitization trust. The performance of the loans in the trusts will impact our ability to realize the current estimated fair value of these assets that are included on our balance sheet.
Management does not believe that any of its off-balance sheet arrangements have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future material effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.
58
AGGREGATE CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS
The following table summarizes our material contractual obligations as of June 30, 2004. The payment amounts represent those amounts contractually due to the recipient and do not include any unamortized premiums or discounts, hedge basis adjustments, or other similar carrying value adjustments. There have been no material changes outside the ordinary course of our business in any specified contractual obligations during the second quarter 2004.
Payment Due | ||||||||||||||||||||
July 1, 2004 | January 1, | January 1, | ||||||||||||||||||
through | 2005 through | 2008 through | After | |||||||||||||||||
December 31, | December 31, | December 31, | December 31, | |||||||||||||||||
2004 | 2007 | 2009 | 2009 | Total | ||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Deposits without a stated maturity
|
$ | 2,465,359 | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 2,465,359 | ||||||||||
Custodial Accounts and Certificates of Deposits
|
1,231,123 | 1,048,316 | 13,757 | | 2,293,196 | |||||||||||||||
FHLB Advances
|
4,283,936 | 1,075,000 | 200,000 | | 5,558,936 | |||||||||||||||
Repurchase Agreements
|
2,981,598 | | | | 2,981,598 | |||||||||||||||
HELOC Notes
|
| | | 498,137 | 498,137 | |||||||||||||||
CMOs
|
| | | 198 | 198 | |||||||||||||||
Trust Preferred
|
| | | 183,955 | 183,955 | |||||||||||||||
Accrued Interest Payable
|
28,448 | | | | 28,448 | |||||||||||||||
Deferred Compensation(1)
|
| | | 18,448 | 18,448 | |||||||||||||||
Operating Leases(2)
|
6,676 | 40,213 | 20,531 | 7,684 | 75,104 | |||||||||||||||
Employment Agreements(1)
|
4,877 | 18,067 | | | 22,944 | |||||||||||||||
Purchase Obligations
|
3,861 | 13,883 | | | 17,744 | |||||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 11,005,878 | $ | 2,195,479 | $ | 234,288 | $ | 708,422 | $ | 14,144,067 | ||||||||||
(1) | The amount excludes $6.5 million of deferred compensation that is included in obligations under employment agreements. |
(2) | The lease commitments had a net increase of $4.2 million from first quarter 2004, largely due to a new lease entered into in May 2004, which has a total commitment of $10.7 million. |
A schedule of significant commitments at June 30, 2004, follows:
Payment Due | |||||
(Dollars in thousands) | |||||
Investment portfolio commitments to:
|
|||||
Purchase loans pursuant to exercising clean-up
calls
|
$ | 9,845 | |||
Undisbursed loan commitments:
|
|||||
Builder construction
|
574,963 | ||||
Consumer construction
|
1,032,396 | ||||
HELOCs
|
707,156 | ||||
Letters of credit
|
6,816 |
Additionally, in connection with standard representations and warranties on loan sales and securitizations, we are occasionally required to repurchase loans or make certain payments to settle breaches of these representations and warranties. From inception of our active mortgage banking operations on January 1, 1993, through June 30, 2004, we sold $110.6 billion in loans, and repurchased $136.4 million in loans, or 0.12% of total loans sold. To provide for probable future losses related to loans sold, we have established a reserve based on estimated losses on actual pending claims and repurchase requests, historical experience, loan sales volume
59
KEY OPERATING RISKS
Like all businesses, we assume a certain amount of risk in order to earn returns on our capital. The following is a summary discussion of key operating risks. For further information on these and other key operating risks, refer to IndyMacs annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003.
INTEREST RATE RISK
Due to the characteristics of our financial assets and liabilities and the nature of our business activities, our liquidity, financial position and results of operations may be materially affected by changes in interest rates in various ways. While we have devised and implemented a comprehensive asset/liability management strategy that seeks, on an economic and an accounting basis, to mitigate significant fluctuations in our financial position and results of operations likely to be caused by market interest rate changes, there can be no assurance that this strategy (including assumptions concerning the correlation thought to exist among different types of instruments) or its implementation will be successful in any particular interest rate environment.
VALUATION RISK
In connection with the loan sale process, we retain certain assets for which the market is limited and illiquid. As a result, valuations are derived using complex modeling and significant assumptions and judgments, in the absence of active market quotations or sale information to value such assets. The assets include AAA-rated and agency interest-only securities, MSRs, non-investment grade securities and residuals. In addition, from time to time, we may acquire these types of securities from third party issuers. These assets represented 5% of total assets and 65% of total equity at June 30, 2004. The fair value of these assets could vary significantly as market conditions change. We periodically obtain appraisals from mortgage servicing brokers and consider these appraisals in the estimation of fair value.
CREDIT RISK
A significant portion of our Investment Portfolio consists of prime residential SFR loans held for investment, and non-investment grade securities and residuals collateralized by mortgage loans. We also provide construction lending to consumers and developers to build residential properties. The credit risk profile on consumer loans is very similar to that of our permanent mortgage loans, while builder construction loans tend to have higher credit risk profile than permanent mortgage loans. While the majority of our loans are to prime quality borrowers and secured by residential property, there is no guarantee that, in the event of borrower default, we will be able to recoup the full principal amount and interest due on a loan. We have adopted underwriting and loan quality monitoring systems, procedures and credit policies, including the establishment and review of the allowance for loan losses, that management believes are prudent and appropriate to minimize this risk by tracking loan performance, assessing the likelihood of nonperformance and diversifying our loan portfolio. Such policies and procedures, however, may not prevent unexpected losses that could adversely affect our results. In addition, while we have discontinued our home improvement and manufactured housing lending programs, we continue to liquidate portfolios of these loans, which have greater credit risk than that of our core mortgage loan portfolios. At June 30, 2004, the book value of these non-core portfolios was $53.8 million, net of reserves.
We also sell loans to GSEs, to outside investors, and to securitization trusts. In these instances, we are subject to repurchase risk in the event of breaches of representations or warranties we make in connection with the loan sales. While we have established what we believe to be adequate secondary marketing reserves, there
60
LIQUIDITY RISK/ACCESS TO CAPITAL MARKETS
We finance a substantial portion of our assets through consumer deposits insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) and through borrowings from the FHLB. We also obtain financing from investment and commercial banks. There is no guarantee that these sources of funds will continue to be available to us, or that our borrowings can be refinanced upon maturity, although we are not aware of any trends, events or uncertainties that we believe are reasonably likely to cause a decrease in our liquidity from these sources.
We utilize three sales channels to sell loans to the secondary market: whole loan sales, sales to the GSEs, and private-label securitizations. A disruption in the securitization market could adversely impact our ability to fund mortgage loans and our gains on sale, leading to a corresponding decrease in revenue and earnings. Likewise, a deterioration in the performance of our private-label securities could adversely impact the availability and pricing of future transactions.
GOVERNMENT REGULATION AND MONETARY POLICY
The banking industry in general is extensively regulated at the federal and state levels. Insured depository institutions and their holding companies are subject to comprehensive regulation and supervision by financial regulatory authorities covering all aspects of their organization, management and operations. The OTS and the FDIC are primarily responsible for the federal regulation and supervision of the Bank and its affiliated entities. In addition to their regulatory powers, these two agencies also have significant enforcement authority that they can use to address unsafe and unsound banking practices, violations of laws, and capital and operational deficiencies. Enforcement powers can be exercised in a number of ways, through either formal or informal actions. Informal enforcement actions customarily remain confidential between the regulator and the financial institution, while more formal enforcement actions are customarily publicly disclosed. Further, the Banks operations are subject to regulation at the state level, including a variety of consumer protection provisions. Banking institutions also are affected by the various monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, including those of the Federal Reserve Board, and these policies can influence financial regulatory actions. Accordingly, the actions of those governmental authorities responsible for regulatory, fiscal and monetary affairs can have a significant impact on the activities of financial services firms such as ours.
The Companys financial condition and results of operations are reported in accordance with U.S. GAAP. While not impacting economic results, future changes in accounting principles issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board could impact our operational results as reported under U.S. GAAP.
COMPETITION
We face significant competition in acquiring and selling loans. In our mortgage banking operations, we compete with other mortgage bankers, GSEs, established third party lending programs, investment banking firms, banks, savings and loan associations, and other lenders and entities purchasing mortgage assets. With regard to mortgage-backed securities issued through our mortgage banking operations, we face competition from other investment opportunities available to prospective investors. We estimate our market share of the U.S. mortgage market to be approximately 1%. A number of our competitors have significantly larger market share and financial resources. We seek to compete with financial institutions and mortgage companies through an emphasis on quality of service, diversified products and maximum use of technology.
The GSEs have made and we believe will continue to make significant technological and economic advances to broaden their customer bases. When the GSEs contract or expand, there are both positive and negative impacts on our mortgage banking lending operations. As GSEs expand, additional liquidity is brought to the market, and loan products can be resold more quickly. Conversely, expanding GSEs increase
61
The primary competition for our Mortgage Banking Group comes from banks and other financial institutions and mortgage companies. We seek to compete with financial institutions and mortgage companies through an emphasis on quality of service, diversified products and maximum use of technology.
OTHER RISKS
We are subject to various other risks, including changes in the demand for mortgage loans, which historically tends to decrease as interest rates increase. Also, a majority of our loan acquisitions are geographically concentrated in certain states, including California, New York, Florida and New Jersey. Any adverse economic conditions in these markets could cause the number of loans acquired to decrease and delinquencies to increase, causing a corresponding decline in revenues. Further, there are no guarantees as to our degree of success in managing loan portfolio concentrations, anticipating and taking advantage of technological advances, or executing upon our growth plans for our mortgage banking operations. Lastly, political conditions could impact the Companys earnings. Acts or threats of war or terrorism, as well as actions taken by the U.S. or other governments in response to such acts or threats, could impact business and economic conditions in which the Company operates.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Various elements of our accounting policies, by their nature, are inherently subject to estimation techniques, valuation assumptions and other subjective assessments. In particular, we have identified six policies, that, due to the judgments, estimates and assumptions inherent in those policies, are critical to an understanding of our financial statements. These policies relate to (a) the valuation of AAA-rated and agency interest-only strips; (b) the valuation of MSRs; (c) the valuation of non-investment grade securities and residuals; (d) derivatives and other hedging instruments; (e) the methodology for determining our allowance for loan losses; and (f) the valuation of our secondary market reserve. Management discusses these critical accounting policies and related judgments with IndyMacs audit committee and external auditors on a quarterly basis. We believe that the judgments, estimates and assumptions used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements are appropriate given the factual circumstances at the time; however, given the sensitivity of our consolidated financial statements to these critical accounting policies, the use of other judgments, estimates and assumptions could result in material differences in our results of operations or financial condition. For further information on the Companys critical accounting policies and the impact of SAB No. 105 on our accounting policy for rate lock loan commitments, refer to IndyMacs annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 and Note 2 Newly Adopted Accounting Guidance, accompanying the consolidated financial statements on page 67.
ITEM 3. | QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK |
See Overall Interest Rate Risk Management beginning on page 46 for quantitative and qualitative disclosure about market risk.
62
ITEM 1. | FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) |
INDYMAC BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
June 30, | December 31, | |||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | |||||||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||
ASSETS | ||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$ | 329,763 | $ | 115,485 | ||||||||
Securities classified as trading
($143.4 million and $70.9 million pledged as
collateral for borrowings at June 30, 2004 and
December 31, 2003, respectively)
|
309,869 | 223,632 | ||||||||||
Securities classified as available for sale,
amortized cost of $2.7 billion and $1.6 billion at
June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively
($2.0 billion and $1.5 billion pledged as collateral
for borrowings at June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003,
respectively)
|
2,671,122 | 1,613,974 | ||||||||||
Loans receivable:
|
||||||||||||
Loans held for sale
|
||||||||||||
Prime
|
3,239,737 | 2,196,488 | ||||||||||
Subprime
|
361,250 | 295,008 | ||||||||||
HELOC
|
342,038 | | ||||||||||
Consumer lot loans
|
68,048 | 81,752 | ||||||||||
Total loans held for sale
|
4,011,073 | 2,573,248 | ||||||||||
Loans held for investment
|
||||||||||||
SFR mortgage
|
4,639,993 | 4,945,439 | ||||||||||
Consumer construction
|
1,301,688 | 1,145,526 | ||||||||||
Builder construction
|
561,538 | 484,397 | ||||||||||
HELOC
|
217,368 | 711,494 | ||||||||||
Land and other mortgage
|
182,352 | 126,044 | ||||||||||
Income property
|
7,432 | 36,285 | ||||||||||
Allowance for loan losses
|
(52,796 | ) | (52,645 | ) | ||||||||
Total loans held for investment
|
6,857,575 | 7,396,540 | ||||||||||
Total loans receivable ($8.5 billion and
$7.6 billion pledged as collateral for borrowings at
June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively)
|
10,868,648 | 9,969,788 | ||||||||||
Mortgage servicing rights
|
493,876 | 443,688 | ||||||||||
Investment in Federal Home Loan Bank stock,
at cost
|
345,781 | 313,284 | ||||||||||
Interest receivable
|
58,477 | 51,758 | ||||||||||
Goodwill and other intangible assets
|
33,330 | 33,697 | ||||||||||
Foreclosed assets
|
27,316 | 23,677 | ||||||||||
Other assets
|
400,334 | 451,408 | ||||||||||
Total assets
|
$ | 15,538,516 | $ | 13,240,391 | ||||||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY | ||||||||||||
Deposits
|
$ | 4,758,555 | $ | 4,350,773 | ||||||||
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank
|
5,558,936 | 4,934,911 | ||||||||||
Other borrowings
|
3,663,887 | 2,622,094 | ||||||||||
Other liabilities
|
374,834 | 315,182 | ||||||||||
Total liabilities
|
14,356,212 | 12,222,960 | ||||||||||
Stockholders Equity
|
||||||||||||
Preferred stock authorized,
10,000,000 shares of $0.01 par value; none issued
|
| | ||||||||||
Common stock authorized,
200,000,000 shares of $0.01 par value; issued
90,270,718 shares (61,099,027 outstanding) at June 30,
2004, and issued 85,914,552 shares (56,760,313 outstanding)
at December 31, 2003
|
903 | 859 | ||||||||||
Additional paid-in-capital
|
1,164,622 | 1,043,856 | ||||||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
(15,080 | ) | (26,454 | ) | ||||||||
Retained earnings
|
551,630 | 518,408 | ||||||||||
Treasury stock, 29,171,691 shares and
29,154,239 shares at June 30, 2004, and
December 31, 2003, respectively
|
(519,771 | ) | (519,238 | ) | ||||||||
Total stockholders equity
|
1,182,304 | 1,017,431 | ||||||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
$ | 15,538,516 | $ | 13,240,391 | ||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
63
INDYMAC BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
For the Three Months | For the Six Months | |||||||||||||||||
Ended June 30, | Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | 2004 | 2003 | |||||||||||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data) | ||||||||||||||||||
Interest income
|
||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed and other securities
|
$ | 34,365 | $ | 16,111 | $ | 61,220 | $ | 37,072 | ||||||||||
Loans held for sale
|
||||||||||||||||||
Prime
|
58,842 | 43,344 | 103,173 | 80,768 | ||||||||||||||
Subprime
|
7,681 | 7,142 | 16,189 | 13,386 | ||||||||||||||
Consumer lot loans
|
2,872 | 1,974 | 4,779 | 3,507 | ||||||||||||||
Total loans held for sale
|
69,395 | 52,460 | 124,141 | 97,661 | ||||||||||||||
Loans held for investment
|
||||||||||||||||||
SFR mortgage
|
49,744 | 30,458 | 98,962 | 59,973 | ||||||||||||||
Consumer construction
|
17,003 | 14,639 | 32,998 | 29,035 | ||||||||||||||
Builder construction
|
8,621 | 8,682 | 16,147 | 17,283 | ||||||||||||||
HELOC
|
4,325 | 4,951 | 10,684 | 9,098 | ||||||||||||||
Land and other mortgage
|
2,758 | 1,792 | 5,222 | 4,093 | ||||||||||||||
Income property
|
199 | 1,086 | 713 | 2,205 | ||||||||||||||
Total loans held for investment
|
82,650 | 61,608 | 164,726 | 121,687 | ||||||||||||||
Other
|
3,898 | 2,298 | 6,780 | 4,254 | ||||||||||||||
Total interest income
|
190,308 | 132,477 | 356,867 | 260,674 | ||||||||||||||
Interest expense
|
||||||||||||||||||
Deposits
|
23,697 | 21,950 | 46,179 | 43,638 | ||||||||||||||
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank
|
33,919 | 28,308 | 64,839 | 53,866 | ||||||||||||||
Trust preferred securities
|
3,823 | 2,765 | 7,638 | 5,528 | ||||||||||||||
Other borrowings
|
21,891 | 11,939 | 37,300 | 27,102 | ||||||||||||||
Total interest expense
|
83,330 | 64,962 | 155,956 | 130,134 | ||||||||||||||
Net interest income
|
106,978 | 67,515 | 200,911 | 130,540 | ||||||||||||||
Provision for loan losses
|
3,200 | 6,900 | 4,700 | 10,000 | ||||||||||||||
Net interest income after provision for loan
losses
|
103,778 | 60,615 | 196,211 | 120,540 | ||||||||||||||
Other income
|
||||||||||||||||||
Gain on sale of loans
|
66,084 | 102,146 | 149,752 | 185,929 | ||||||||||||||
Service fee (loss) income
|
(27,807 | ) | (1,401 | ) | (30,951 | ) | 982 | |||||||||||
Losses on mortgage-backed securities, net
|
(3,414 | ) | (9,258 | ) | (8,401 | ) | (16,168 | ) | ||||||||||
Fee and other income
|
20,774 | 21,251 | 37,496 | 38,979 | ||||||||||||||
Total other income
|
55,637 | 112,738 | 147,896 | 209,722 | ||||||||||||||
Net revenues
|
159,415 | 173,353 | 344,107 | 330,262 | ||||||||||||||
Other expense
|
||||||||||||||||||
Operating expenses
|
121,294 | 104,758 | 236,492 | 200,416 | ||||||||||||||
Amortization of other intangible assets
|
179 | 217 | 367 | 448 | ||||||||||||||
Total other expense
|
121,473 | 104,975 | 236,859 | 200,864 | ||||||||||||||
Earnings before provision for income taxes
|
37,942 | 68,378 | 107,248 | 129,398 | ||||||||||||||
Provision for income taxes
|
14,987 | 27,009 | 42,363 | 51,112 | ||||||||||||||
Net earnings
|
$ | 22,955 | $ | 41,369 | $ | 64,885 | $ | 78,286 | ||||||||||
Earnings per share
|
||||||||||||||||||
Basic
|
$ | 0.39 | $ | 0.75 | $ | 1.13 | $ | 1.43 | ||||||||||
Diluted
|
$ | 0.38 | $ | 0.73 | $ | 1.08 | $ | 1.39 | ||||||||||
Weighted average shares outstanding
|
||||||||||||||||||
Basic
|
58,137 | 55,015 | 57,548 | 54,922 | ||||||||||||||
Diluted
|
60,588 | 56,711 | 60,180 | 56,345 | ||||||||||||||
Dividends declared per share
|
$ | 0.32 | $ | 0.10 | $ | 0.62 | $ | 0.20 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
64
INDYMAC BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Accumulated | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Additional | Comprehensive | Total | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Common | Paid-In- | Income | Retained | Comprehensive | Treasury | Stockholders | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Outstanding | Stock | Capital | (Loss) | Earnings | Income | Stock | Equity | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2002
|
54,829,486 | $ | 840 | $ | 1,007,936 | $ | (17,747 | ) | $ | 377,707 | $ | (518,771 | ) | $ | 849,965 | |||||||||||||||||
Common stock options exercised
|
385,624 | 5 | 6,132 | | | | | 6,137 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Directors and officers notes
receivable
|
| | 196 | | | | | 196 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deferred compensation, restricted stock
|
172,587 | | 1,050 | | | | | 1,050 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net loss on mortgage- backed securities available
for sale, net of tax
|
| | | (7,014 | ) | | (7,014 | ) | | (7,014 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net unrealized loss on derivatives used in cash
flow hedges, net of tax
|
| | | (4,595 | ) | | (4,595 | ) | | (4,595 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Purchases of common stock
|
(23,426 | ) | | | | | | (448 | ) | (448 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Cash dividends
|
| | | | (11,018 | ) | | | (11,018 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net earnings
|
| | | | 78,286 | 78,286 | | 78,286 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income
|
| | | | | $ | 66,677 | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at June 30, 2003
|
55,364,271 | $ | 845 | $ | 1,015,314 | $ | (29,356 | ) | $ | 444,975 | $ | (519,219 | ) | $ | 912,559 | |||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2003
|
56,760,313 | $ | 859 | $ | 1,043,856 | $ | (26,454 | ) | $ | 518,408 | $ | (519,238 | ) | $ | 1,017,431 | |||||||||||||||||
Common stock issued
|
3,200,000 | 32 | 96,218 | | | | | 96,250 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common stock options exercised
|
1,049,051 | 10 | 23,290 | | | | | 23,300 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Directors and officers notes
receivable
|
| | 33 | | | | | 33 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deferred compensation, restricted stock
|
107,115 | 2 | 1,225 | | | | | 1,227 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net loss on mortgage- backed securities available
for sale, net of tax
|
| | | (15,515 | ) | | (15,515 | ) | | (15,515 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net unrealized gain on derivatives used in cash
flow hedges, net of tax
|
| | | 26,889 | | 26,889 | | 26,889 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Purchases of common stock
|
(17,452 | ) | | | | | | (533 | ) | (533 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Cash dividends
|
| | | | (31,663 | ) | | | (31,663 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net earnings
|
| | | | 64,885 | 64,885 | | 64,885 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income
|
| | | | | $ | 76,259 | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at June 30, 2004
|
61,099,027 | $ | 903 | $ | 1,164,622 | $ | (15,080 | ) | $ | 551,630 | $ | (519,771 | ) | $ | 1,182,304 | |||||||||||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
65
INDYMAC BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
For the Six Months Ended | |||||||||||
June 30, | |||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | ||||||||||
(Unaudited) | |||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||
Cash flows from operating
activities:
|
|||||||||||
Net earnings
|
$ | 64,885 | $ | 78,286 | |||||||
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash
used in operating activities:
|
|||||||||||
Total amortization and depreciation
|
104,391 | 99,159 | |||||||||
Provision for valuation adjustment of mortgage
servicing rights
|
4,839 | 41,536 | |||||||||
Gain on sale of loans
|
(149,752 | ) | (185,929 | ) | |||||||
Loss on mortgage-backed securities, net
|
8,401 | 16,168 | |||||||||
Provision for loan losses
|
4,700 | 10,000 | |||||||||
Net decrease in other assets and liabilities
|
143,706 | 94,860 | |||||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities before
activity for trading securities, premiums paid for derivative
instruments, and loans held for sale
|
181,170 | 154,080 | |||||||||
Net (purchases) sales of trading securities
|
(31,501 | ) | 520,647 | ||||||||
Net decrease on premiums paid for derivative
instruments
|
30,102 | | |||||||||
Net purchases of loans held for sale
|
(3,053,980 | ) | (1,843,049 | ) | |||||||
Net cash used in operating activities
|
(2,874,209 | ) | (1,168,322 | ) | |||||||
Cash flows from investing
activities:
|
|||||||||||
Net sales of and payments from loans held for
investment
|
1,089,165 | 272,790 | |||||||||
Net (purchases of) payments from securities
available for sale
|
(111,018 | ) | 400,890 | ||||||||
Net increase in investment in Federal Home
Loan Bank stock, at cost
|
(32,497 | ) | (76,902 | ) | |||||||
Net purchases of property, plant and equipment
|
(17,790 | ) | (16,240 | ) | |||||||
Net cash provided by investing activities
|
927,860 | 580,538 | |||||||||
Cash flows from financing
activities:
|
|||||||||||
Net increase in deposits
|
407,782 | 762,983 | |||||||||
Net increase in advances from Federal Home
Loan Bank
|
624,001 | 730,914 | |||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in borrowings
|
1,041,457 | (688,879 | ) | ||||||||
Net proceeds from issuance of common stock
|
96,250 | | |||||||||
Net proceeds from stock options and notes
receivable
|
23,333 | 6,333 | |||||||||
Cash dividends paid
|
(31,663 | ) | (11,018 | ) | |||||||
Purchases of common stock
|
(533 | ) | (448 | ) | |||||||
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
2,160,627 | 799,885 | |||||||||
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
214,278 | 212,101 | |||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
115,485 | 196,720 | |||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$ | 329,763 | $ | 408,821 | |||||||
Supplemental cash flow information:
|
|||||||||||
Cash paid for interest
|
$ | 147,122 | $ | 132,804 | |||||||
Cash paid for income taxes
|
$ | 31,330 | $ | 6,208 | |||||||
Supplemental disclosure of noncash investing
and financing activities:
|
|||||||||||
Net transfer of loans held for sale to loans held
for investment
|
$ | 1,089,351 | $ | 925,550 | |||||||
Transfer of loans held for investment to
mortgage-backed securities available for sale
|
$ | 500,012 | $ | | |||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
66
INDYMAC BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Note 1 | Basis of Presentation |
IndyMac Bancorp, Inc. is a savings and loan holding company. References to IndyMac Bancorp refer to the parent company alone while references to IndyMac or we refer to IndyMac Bancorp and its consolidated subsidiaries. Our primary business is single family residential mortgage lending, using a hybrid thrift business model including portfolio lending and thrift financing. We offer a wide array of home mortgage products using a technology-based approach, leveraged across multiple products, channels and customers.
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of IndyMac Bancorp and its subsidiaries, including IndyMac Bank®, F.S.B. (IndyMac Bank). All significant intercompany balances and transactions with IndyMacs consolidated subsidiaries have been eliminated in consolidation. The consolidated financial statements of IndyMac are prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (US GAAP). The foregoing financial statements are unaudited; however, in the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments necessary for a fair statement of the results for the interim periods have been included. Operating results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004, are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2004. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in IndyMacs annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003.
Note 2 | Newly Adopted Accounting Guidance |
On March 9, 2004, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 105, Application of Accounting Principles to Loan Commitments, which provides guidance regarding loan commitments that are accounted for as derivative instruments. In this Bulletin, the SEC determined that an interest rate lock commitment should generally be valued at zero at inception. The rate locks will continue to be adjusted for changes in value resulting from changes in market interest rates. The Company adopted this new standard prospectively effective April 1, 2004. Under the new accounting guidance, the Company no longer recognizes any revenue at the inception of the rate lock. Profits inherent in the rate lock are recognized at the time of the sale of the underlying loans. The implementation of the standard had a one-time negative impact on gain on sale totaling $52.2 million before-tax, or $31.6 million after-tax.
Note 3 | Securities |
The following table details our securities classified as trading and securities available for sale as of June 30, 2004, and December 31, 2003:
June 30, | December 31, | |||||||||
2004 | 2003 | |||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||
Securities Classified as Trading:
|
||||||||||
AAA-rated and agency interest-only strips
|
$ | 166,799 | $ | 148,275 | ||||||
AAA-rated principal-only securities
|
83,964 | 8,518 | ||||||||
Other investment grade securities
|
9,093 | 8,922 | ||||||||
Other non-investment grade securities
|
478 | 1,760 | ||||||||
Non-investment grade residual securities
|
49,535 | 56,157 | ||||||||
Total securities classified as trading
|
$ | 309,869 | $ | 223,632 | ||||||
67
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
June 30, | December 31, | |||||||||
2004 | 2003 | |||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||
Securities Classified as Available for Sale:
|
||||||||||
U.S. Treasury and agency notes
|
$ | 47,703 | $ | 143,689 | ||||||
AAA-rated principal-only mortgage-backed
securities
|
20,102 | | ||||||||
AAA-rated agency mortgage-backed securities
|
18,519 | 25,193 | ||||||||
AAA-rated non-agency mortgage-backed securities
|
2,450,258 | 1,407,984 | ||||||||
Other investment grade mortgage-backed securities
|
82,139 | 26,926 | ||||||||
Other non-investment grade mortgage-backed
securities
|
29,304 | 10,182 | ||||||||
Non-investment grade HELOC residual securities
|
23,097 | | ||||||||
Total securities classified as available for sale
|
$ | 2,671,122 | $ | 1,613,974 | ||||||
The significant increase in AAA-rated non-agency mortgage-backed securities from $1.4 billion at December 31, 2003, to $2.5 billion at June 30, 2004 was primarily due to the reclassification of approximately $500 million HELOC loans to securities and the retention of a $346 million senior note from our SFR mortgage loans held for investment securitization during the first quarter 2004.
Note 4 | Segment Reporting |
IndyMac operates through its four main segments: IndyMac Mortgage Bank, IndyMac Consumer Bank, Home Equity Division, and Investment Portfolio Group. IndyMac Mortgage Bank is centered on providing consumers with mortgage products through relationships with the Companys business customers mortgage brokers, mortgage bankers, financial institutions, real estate professionals and homebuilders. The Home Equity Division is a product-focused division that supports the production of home equity lines of credit (HELOCs) and other home equity products through all of IndyMacs relationship and consumer direct production channels. IndyMac Consumer Bank provides the platform for the mortgage and deposit services that IndyMac offers directly to consumers. Loans produced by IndyMac Mortgage Bank, IndyMac Consumer Bank and the Home Equity Division are then securitized through the issuance of mortgage-backed securities, sold to GSEs, resold in bulk whole loan sales to investors, or transferred to and retained by our Investment Portfolio Group. The Investment Portfolio Group serves as the main link to customers whose mortgages we service. Through its investments in single-family residential mortgages, mortgage-backed securities and mortgage servicing rights, it serves a critical support function for IndyMacs mortgage lending operations.
The profitability of each operating segment is measured on a fully-leveraged basis after allocating capital based on regulatory capital rules. Operating segments that originate mortgage loans are credited with gain on sale at funding based on the estimated fair value. Any difference between the actual gain on sale realized and the estimate is credited or charged to the operating segment in the period the loan is sold or transferred to the held for investment portfolio. Differences between the gain on sale credited to the operating segments and the consolidated gain on sale due to timing of loan sales or transfers to the held for investment portfolio are eliminated in consolidation. The Company uses a fund transfer pricing system to allocate net interest income to the operating segments. Each operating segment is allocated funding with maturities and interest rates matched with the expected lives and repricing frequencies of the segments assets. Deposits receive a funding credit using a similar methodology. The difference between these allocations and the Companys actual net interest income and capital levels resulting from centralized management of funding costs is reported in the line item titled Other. Also included in the line item titled Other are unallocated corporate costs such as corporate salaries and related expenses, excess capital, and non-recurring corporate items.
68
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Segment information for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, was as follows:
IndyMac | IndyMac | Investment | Home | SAB | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage | Consumer | Portfolio | Equity | Pro Forma | No. 105 | GAAP | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bank | Bank | Group | Division | Other | Consolidated | Adjustment | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Three months ended June 30, 2004
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income (expense)
|
$ | 59,664 | $ | 14,194 | $ | 42,070 | $ | 1,025 | $ | (9,975 | ) | $ | 106,978 | $ | | $ | 106,978 | ||||||||||||||||
Net revenues (expense)
|
161,346 | 35,814 | 26,479 | 1,659 | (13,660 | ) | 211,638 | (52,223 | ) | 159,415 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Net earnings (loss)
|
62,580 | 6,127 | 8,149 | 191 | (22,497 | ) | 54,550 | (31,595 | ) | 22,955 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Assets as of June 30, 2004
|
$ | 5,730,641 | $ | 636,776 | $ | 8,219,882 | $ | 245,156 | $ | 706,061 | $ | 15,538,516 | $ | | $ | 15,538,516 | |||||||||||||||||
Three months ended June 30, 2003
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income (expense)
|
$ | 48,288 | $ | 8,387 | $ | 17,362 | $ | 70 | $ | (6,592 | ) | $ | 67,515 | $ | | $ | 67,515 | ||||||||||||||||
Net revenues (expense)
|
128,201 | 45,093 | 14,975 | (98 | ) | (14,818 | ) | 173,353 | | 173,353 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Net earnings (loss)
|
48,926 | 12,745 | 2,460 | (244 | ) | (22,518 | ) | 41,369 | | 41,369 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Assets as of June 30, 2003
|
$ | 4,265,091 | $ | 749,644 | $ | 4,880,072 | $ | 61,952 | $ | 704,636 | $ | 10,661,395 | $ | | $ | 10,661,395 | |||||||||||||||||
Six months ended June 30, 2004
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income (expense)
|
$ | 109,369 | $ | 24,675 | $ | 84,463 | $ | 1,771 | $ | (19,367 | ) | $ | 200,911 | $ | | $ | 200,911 | ||||||||||||||||
Net revenues (expense)
|
278,858 | 70,684 | 71,367 | 2,747 | (27,326 | ) | 396,330 | (52,223 | ) | 344,107 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Net earnings (loss)
|
101,831 | 12,000 | 27,947 | 298 | (45,596 | ) | 96,480 | (31,595 | ) | 64,885 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Assets as of June 30, 2004
|
$ | 5,730,641 | $ | 636,776 | $ | 8,219,882 | $ | 245,156 | $ | 706,061 | $ | 15,538,516 | $ | | $ | 15,538,516 | |||||||||||||||||
Six months ended June 30, 2003
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income (expense)
|
$ | 94,081 | $ | 16,039 | $ | 35,705 | $ | (138 | ) | $ | (15,147 | ) | $ | 130,540 | $ | | $ | 130,540 | |||||||||||||||
Net revenues (expense)
|
246,282 | 79,939 | 34,525 | 252 | (30,736 | ) | 330,262 | | 330,262 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net earnings (loss)
|
94,087 | 21,293 | 8,420 | (583 | ) | (44,931 | ) | 78,286 | | 78,286 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Assets as of June 30, 2003
|
$ | 4,265,091 | $ | 749,644 | $ | 4,880,072 | $ | 61,952 | $ | 704,636 | $ | 10,661,395 | $ | | $ | 10,661,395 |
Note 5 | Stock-Based Compensation |
We have two stock incentive plans, the 2002 Incentive Plan, as amended and restated, and the 2000 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended (collectively, the Plans), which provide for the granting of non-qualified stock options, incentive stock options, restricted stock awards, performance stock awards, stock bonuses and other awards to our employees (including officers and directors). Options and awards are granted at the average market price of our stock on the grant date, vest over varying periods generally beginning at least one year from the date of grant, and expire ten years from the date of grant.
As permitted by SFAS 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation (SFAS 123), we continue to measure and recognize compensation expense using the intrinsic value method specified in Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees (APB 25). As required
69
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
under the provisions of SFAS 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation Transition and Disclosure, the following table discloses the pro forma net income and pro forma basic and diluted earnings per share had the fair value method been applied to all stock awards for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003:
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | 2004 | 2003 | |||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands, | (Dollars in thousands, | |||||||||||||||||
except per share data) | except per share data) | |||||||||||||||||
Net Earnings
|
||||||||||||||||||
As reported
|
$ | 22,955 | $ | 41,369 | $ | 64,885 | $ | 78,286 | ||||||||||
Stock-based compensation expense
|
(2,859 | ) | (4,575 | ) | (5,687 | ) | (9,110 | ) | ||||||||||
Tax effect
|
1,129 | 1,807 | 2,246 | 3,598 | ||||||||||||||
Pro forma
|
$ | 21,225 | $ | 38,601 | $ | 61,444 | $ | 72,774 | ||||||||||
Basic Earnings Per Share
|
||||||||||||||||||
As reported
|
$ | 0.39 | $ | 0.75 | $ | 1.13 | $ | 1.43 | ||||||||||
Pro forma
|
$ | 0.37 | $ | 0.70 | $ | 1.07 | $ | 1.33 | ||||||||||
Diluted Earnings Per Share
|
||||||||||||||||||
As reported
|
$ | 0.38 | $ | 0.73 | $ | 1.08 | $ | 1.39 | ||||||||||
Pro forma
|
$ | 0.35 | $ | 0.68 | $ | 1.02 | $ | 1.29 |
In addition, during the three months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, we recognized compensation expense of $721,000 ($436,000, net of taxes) and $561,000 ($339,000, net of taxes), respectively, related to restricted stock awards. These expenses were included in net earnings as reported.
Note 6 | Defined Benefit Pension Plan Net Periodic Cost |
We provided a defined benefit pension plan (the DBP Plan) to substantially all of our employees hired prior to January 1, 2003. The net periodic benefit cost of the DBP Plan, which is based on actuarial assumptions, is presented in the following table for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003:
Three Months | Six Months | |||||||||||||||
Ended June 30, | Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | 2004 | 2003 | |||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Service cost
|
$ | 1,209 | $ | 932 | $ | 2,418 | $ | 1,864 | ||||||||
Interest cost
|
323 | 222 | 646 | 444 | ||||||||||||
Expected return on assets
|
(294 | ) | (165 | ) | (588 | ) | (330 | ) | ||||||||
Amortization of net loss
|
73 | 47 | 146 | 94 | ||||||||||||
Amortization of prior service cost
|
14 | 14 | 28 | 28 | ||||||||||||
Net periodic benefit costs
|
$ | 1,325 | $ | 1,050 | $ | 2,650 | $ | 2,100 | ||||||||
70
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The actuarial assumptions used in accounting for the net periodic cost at June 30, 2004 and 2003, were as follows:
Three Months | ||||||||
Ended June 30, | ||||||||
2004 | 2003 | |||||||
Assumed discount rate
|
6.00 | % | 6.75 | % | ||||
Rate of compensation increase
|
4.00 | % | 4.00 | % | ||||
Expected return on assets
|
7.50 | % | 7.50 | % |
The Company is expected to contribute $6 million to the DBP Plan in 2004, which will be made as a one lump sum payment later in the year. No contribution was made during the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2004.
Note 7 Legal Matters
On February 3, 2004, Washington Mutual Mortgage Securities Corporation filed a lawsuit against IndyMac in the Superior Court of the State of California. The lawsuit involves a contractual dispute about standard representations and warranties on single-family mortgage loans that were sold to PNC Mortgage Corporation during the period 1997 to 2000, prior to Washington Mutuals acquisition of PNC Mortgage Corporation in 2001. Washington Mutual alleges damages of approximately $50 million, the bulk of which includes the principal balance of the loans in question, with the remainder of the amount consisting of interest and alleged losses. The loans in question represent less than 1% of the nearly $6 billion in loans that were sold to PNC between 1997 and 2000. IndyMac maintains a reserve for potential losses related to its standard representations and warranties on loans sold and discusses such reserve in its financial statements filed with the SEC. Management believes that the resolution of this dispute will not have a material impact on the financial condition of IndyMac.
We are involved in other litigation including class actions lawsuits arising from normal operations. Management has accrued for those that are both probable and reasonably estimable. In the opinion of management in consultation with counsel, none of these matters are likely to have a material adverse effect on our financial condition.
Note 8 Subsequent Event
On July 16, 2004, the Company completed the acquisition of 93.75% of the outstanding shares of common stock of Financial Freedom Holdings Inc. (Financial Freedom), the leading provider of reverse mortgages in the United States, and the related assets from Lehman Brothers Bank, F.S.B. and its affiliates for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $83 million. The remaining shares (6.25%) of the common stock of Financial Freedom are held by its Chief Executive Officer and will be accounted for as minority interest. The acquisition will result in approximately $45 million in goodwill.
71
ITEM 4. | CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES |
As of June 30, 2004, an evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of the Companys management, including the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO), of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures. Based on that evaluation, the Companys management, including the CEO and CFO, concluded that the Companys disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of June 30, 2004. There have been no significant changes in the Companys internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to June 30, 2004.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. | LEGAL PROCEEDINGS |
On February 3, 2004, Washington Mutual Mortgage Securities Corporation filed a lawsuit against IndyMac in the Superior Court of the State of California. The lawsuit involves a contractual dispute about standard representations and warranties on single-family mortgage loans that were sold to PNC Mortgage Corporation during the period 1997 to 2000, prior to Washington Mutuals acquisition of PNC Mortgage Corporation in 2001. Washington Mutual alleges damages of approximately $50 million, the bulk of which includes the principal balance of the loans in question, with the remainder of the amount consisting of interest and alleged losses. The loans in question represent less than 1% of the nearly $6 billion in loans that were sold to PNC between 1997 and 2000. IndyMac maintains a reserve for potential losses related to its standard representations and warranties on loans sold and discusses such reserve in its financial statements filed with the SEC. Management believes that the resolution of this dispute will not have a material impact on the financial condition of IndyMac.
We are involved in other litigation including class actions lawsuits arising from normal operations. Management has accrued for those that are both probable and reasonably estimable. In the opinion of management in consultation with counsel, none of these matters are likely to have a material adverse effect on our financial condition.
ITEM 4. | SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS |
At the annual meeting of IndyMac Bancorps stockholders held on April 28, 2004, the stockholders voted to elect IndyMac Bancorps directors. The votes cast in this regard were as follows:
Shares For | Shares Withheld | |||||||
Michael W. Perry
|
51,733,211 | 2,148,222 | ||||||
Louis E. Caldera
|
51,713,490 | 2,167,943 | ||||||
Lyle E. Gramley
|
51,696,044 | 2,185,389 | ||||||
Hugh M. Grant
|
52,211,099 | 1,670,334 | ||||||
Patrick C. Haden
|
31,460,969 | 22,420,464 | ||||||
Terrance G. Hodel
|
53,131,746 | 749,687 | ||||||
Robert L. Hunt II
|
51,350,590 | 2,530,843 | ||||||
James R. Ukropina, Esq.
|
51,354,772 | 2,526,661 |
In addition, the stockholders voted to approve the IndyMac Bancorp, Inc. 2002 Incentive Plan, as Amended and Restated. The votes cast in this regard were as follows:
Number of Votes Cast | ||||
For
|
33,397,958 | |||
Against
|
10,374,149 | |||
Abstain (including broker non-votes)
|
270,385 |
72
Finally, the stockholders voted to ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as IndyMac Bancorps independent public accountants for the year ending December 31, 2004. The votes cast in this regard were as follows:
Number of Votes Cast | ||||
For
|
49,872,166 | |||
Against
|
3,927,068 | |||
Abstain (including broker non-votes)
|
82,199 |
ITEM 6. | EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K |
(a) Exhibits
4.1 | IndyMac Bancorp, Inc. 2002 Incentive Plan, as Amended and Restated. | |||
10.1 | IndyMac Bancorp, Inc. Amended Director Emeritus Plan effective as of April 27, 2004. | |||
31.1 | Chief Executive Officers Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |||
31.2 | Chief Financial Officers Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |||
32.1 | Chief Executive Officers Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |||
32.2 | Chief Financial Officers Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
(b) Reports on Form 8-K
The Company furnished a report on Form 8-K on April 28, 2004. Items included: Item 12. Disclosure of Results of Operations and Financial Condition Press Release announcing results of operations and financial condition for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 and related webcast presentation.
The Company filed a report on Form 8-K on May 5, 2004. Items included: Item 5. Other Events Press Release announcing the signing of a definitive agreement by IndyMac Bank to acquire 93.75% of the outstanding shares of common stock of Financial Freedom Holdings, Inc.
The Company furnished a report on Form 8-K on May 6, 2004. Items included: Item 9. Regulation FD Disclosure Webcast presentation on Financial Freedom acquisition.
The Company filed a report on Form 8-K on June 10, 2004. Items included: Item 5. Other Events Announcement of offering price for 3.2 million shares of common stock, and Item 7. Financial Statements and Exhibits Underwriting Agreement for the offering of 3.2 million shares of common stock.
73
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Pasadena, State of California, on July 29, 2004.
INDYMAC BANCORP, INC. | |
(Registrant) |
By: | /s/ MICHAEL W. PERRY |
|
|
Michael W. Perry | |
Chairman of the Board of Directors | |
and Chief Executive Officer |
By: | /s/ SCOTT KEYS |
|
|
Scott Keys | |
Executive Vice President | |
and Chief Financial Officer |
74