Back to GetFilings.com
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-K
(Mark One)
|
|
þ |
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2004 |
or
|
|
o |
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period
from to |
Commission file number: 1-8972
INDYMAC BANCORP, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware |
|
95-3983415 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation) |
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
155 North Lake Avenue, Pasadena, California
|
|
91101-7211 |
(Address of principal executive offices) |
|
(Zip Code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code:
(800) 669-2300
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the
Act:
|
|
|
Title of each class |
|
Name of each exchange on which registered |
|
|
|
Common Stock, $.01 Par Value
(including related preferred stock purchase rights)
|
|
New York Stock Exchange |
WIRES Units
(Trust Preferred Securities and Warrants) |
|
New York Stock Exchange |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the
Act:
[None.]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject
to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not
contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of
registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or information
statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this
Form 10-K or any amendment to this
Form 10-K þ.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated
filer (as defined in Exchange Act
Rule 12b-2). Yes þ No o
Based on the closing price for shares of Common Stock as of
June 30, 2004, the aggregate market value of Common Stock
held by non-affiliates of the registrant was approximately
$1,919,920,310. For the purposes of the foregoing calculation
only, in addition to affiliated companies, all directors and
executive officers of the registrant have been deemed affiliates.
As of February 18, 2005, 62,165,649 shares of IndyMac
Bancorp, Inc. Common Stock, $.01 par value per share, were
outstanding.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Proxy Statement for the 2005 Annual Meeting
Part III
INDYMAC BANCORP, INC.
2004 ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1
INDYMAC BANCORP, INC.
2004 ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Item 1. and Item 7.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
48 |
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
85 |
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
|
94 |
|
4
PART I
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Certain statements contained in this Form 10-K may be
deemed to be forward-looking statements within the meaning of
Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and
Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Forward-looking statements include statements regarding our
financial condition, results of operations, plans, objectives
and future performance and business. Forward-looking statements
typically include the words anticipate,
believe, estimate, expect,
project, plan, forecast,
intend, and other similar expressions. These
statements reflect our current views with respect to future
events and financial performance. They are subject to risks and
uncertainties, including, among others, those identified in the
Key Operating Risks and Risk Factors That May
Affect Future Results discussions below, which could cause
future results to differ materially from historical results or
from the results anticipated. Readers are cautioned not to place
undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak
only as of their dates or as of the date hereof if no other date
is identified. We undertake no obligation to update or revise
any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new
information, future events or otherwise.
We are the holding company for IndyMac Bank, F.S.B., a Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) insured savings
and loan association (IndyMac Bank or
Bank). IndyMac Bank® is the largest savings and
loan headquartered in Los Angeles County, California and the
10th largest nationwide, based on assets. IndyMac is in the
business of designing, manufacturing, and distributing
cost-efficient financing for the acquisition, development, and
improvement of single-family homes. IndyMac also provides
financing secured by single-family homes to facilitate
consumers personal financial goals, and strategically
invests in single-family related assets. We facilitate the
acquisition, development, and improvement of single-family homes
through our award-winning e-MITS® (Electronic Mortgage
Information and Transaction System) platform that automates
underwriting, risk-based pricing and rate locking on a
nationwide basis via the Internet. IndyMacs mortgage
products and services are tailored to meet the needs of both
consumers and businesses.
IndyMac (then known as Countrywide Mortgage Investments, Inc.)
was founded as a passive mortgage real estate investment trust
(REIT) in 1985 and transitioned its business model
to become an active, operating mortgage lender in 1993. In
response to the global liquidity crisis in the fourth quarter of
1998 in which many non-regulated financial institutions,
mortgage lenders and mortgage REITs were adversely impacted or
did not survive, we determined that it would be advantageous to
become a depository institution. The depository structure
provides significant advantages in the form of diversified
financing sources, the retention of capital to support growth,
and a strong platform for the origination of mortgages.
Accordingly, effective January 1, 2000, we terminated our
status as a REIT and converted to a fully taxable entity, and,
on July 1, 2000, we acquired SGV Bancorp, Inc.
(SGVB), which then was the parent of First Federal
Savings and Loan Association of San Gabriel Valley, a
federal savings association. We contributed substantially all of
our assets and operations to the subsidiary savings association,
which we renamed IndyMac Bank.
On July 16, 2004, we completed the acquisition of 93.75% of
the outstanding shares of common stock of Financial Freedom
Holdings, Inc. (FFHI), the leading provider of
reverse mortgages in the United States of America, and the
related assets from Lehman Brothers Bank, F.S.B. and its
affiliates for an aggregate cash purchase price of approximately
$84.6 million. The remaining shares of the common stock of
FFHI, constituting 6.25% of the outstanding shares of common
stock, were held by its chief executive officer after the
acquisition. The acquisition was consummated as FFHIs
focus on the reverse mortgage industry aligns well with our
strategy to increase market share by offering niche mortgage
products and servicing a broad customer base. In November 2004,
as part of an internal reorganization, FFHI merged into its then
wholly owned subsidiary Financial Freedom Senior Funding
Corporation (collectively with FFHI, Financial
Freedom). As a result of the merger, the Company owns
93.75%, and Financial Freedoms chief executive officer
owns 6.25%, of the outstanding shares of common stock of
Financial Freedom. Financial Freedom currently operates as a
subsidiary of IndyMac Bank.
5
References to IndyMac Bancorp or the Parent
Company refer to the parent company alone, while
references to IndyMac, or the Company
refer to the parent company and its consolidated subsidiaries.
BUSINESS MODEL
IndyMacs hybrid thrift/mortgage banking business model is
the framework for our corporate structure. Our primary business
is the origination of and investment in single-family
residential mortgage assets. A mortgage banking company
originates mortgage loans for sale to investors, and services
such loans on an on-going basis for the investors. As such, a
mortgage banking company has a higher asset turnover rate than a
traditional savings and loan association, and generates a higher
portion of its income from gains on the sale of loans and
servicing fees, and a lower portion from net interest income.
Mortgage loan production can also be held on the balance sheet
in the form of loans and mortgage-backed securities
(MBS), similar to a more traditional savings and
loan, providing a source of revenues that is designed to be
counter-cyclical to mortgage banking revenues. These revenues
consist primarily of interest income and servicing fees. IndyMac
is strategically focused on increasing the relative size of its
portfolios of prime mortgage and home equity loans, as well as
mortgage servicing rights, to achieve greater balance between
its mortgage banking activities and its core investing
activities. We believe that our investing activities will
increasingly serve to stabilize IndyMacs core income.
The mortgage market is a trillion-dollar industry, with
mortgages outstanding growing an average of 7 to 8 percent
annually over the last several decades. IndyMacs long-term
strategy focuses on gaining a larger share of the mortgage
origination market without compromising profitability goals.
During 2004, we successfully executed our strategy and reached a
record level of production while the market volume declined 25%.
According to the National Mortgage News, by the fourth quarter
of 2004, we were one of the top 12 originators of mortgage loans
in the United States of America and our market share was 1.71%.
During 2004, our market share approximated 1.33% based on our
mortgage loan origination volume of $37.9 billion, a 73%
increase from our market share of 0.77% in 2003. We will
continue to leverage our mortgage-banking infrastructure,
increase our marketing and sales efforts, and expand our
geographic presence in an effort to gain additional market share
in the future. To complement our mortgage banking activities, we
will continue to add high quality single-family residential and
home equity loans or securities backed by these loans to the
investment portfolio to help mitigate fluctuations in earnings
during the mortgage origination cycle.
We offer many types of home mortgage products using a
technology-based approach, leveraged across multiple products,
channels and customers. We serve a wide range of customers,
including consumers, mortgage brokers, mortgage bankers,
community financial institutions, homebuilders, and real estate
professionals. The environment of historically low interest
rates over the past several years has been very favorable for
mortgage lenders who effectively hedged their mortgage servicing
rights. Consumers continued to refinance existing loans and
historically low mortgage rates opened the door for home
ownership to many first time buyers. The Mortgage Bankers
Association forecasts a modest increase in interest rates in
2005 with total origination volume decreasing 11% to
$2.5 trillion, while the purchase mortgage originations
will continue strong and remain near the 2004 level. Given the
significant industry transition, forecasting continues to be
difficult. We currently expect EPS to be approximately
$4.05 per share in 2005 before the implementation of FASB
Statement No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based
Payment, which requires the expensing of stock options. This
forecast reflects an increase of 19% from the $3.40 per
share earned on a pro forma basis in 2004. We estimate that the
implementation of stock option expensing will reduce EPS by
approximately $0.12 in 2005, resulting in a full year forecast
of $3.93 per share, including the expensing of stock
options. However, the economy, interest rates and our industry
remain volatile and as a result, our actual results could vary
by as much as ten percent from this forecast.
MORTGAGE BANKING ACTIVITIES
We offer single-family residential mortgage products in all
50 states using a technology-based approach. Our ability to
leverage our technology investment over multiple channels,
products and customers creates an efficient, low-cost operating
platform. Our Internet-based, e-MITS platform is an automated
loan submission, underwriting, and risk-based pricing system
that allows any of our mortgage loan customers, both business and
6
consumer, to conduct business with us electronically through our
mortgage loan Internet sites. During 2004, 63.7% of the loan
balance of mortgage loans we acquired was processed through
e-MITS.
We provide our mortgage banking customers with a range of
choices designed to meet their financial needs. Our broad
product line includes adjustable-rate mortgages
(ARMs) offering borrowers multiple payment options,
and fixed-rate mortgages, both conforming and non-conforming (a
conforming loan is one that falls within the maximum loan size
and meets other criteria for inclusion in the guarantee programs
of Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac). We also offer subprime loans and
reverse mortgages.
When we have accumulated a sufficient volume of loans with
similar characteristics, generally $50 million to
$1 billion in principal amount, we sell the loans in the
secondary market. The length of time between when we purchase a
mortgage loan and when we sell or securitize the mortgage loan
generally ranges from 10 to 90 days, depending on factors
such as loan volume by product type and market fluctuations in
the prices of MBS. On average during 2004, we sold loans within
61 days of purchase or origination.
We sell the majority of the mortgage loans that we originate or
purchase (82% in 2004). The loans are usually sold on a
non-recourse basis, but we do make certain representations and
warranties concerning the loans. We generally retain the
servicing rights with respect to loans sold to the government
sponsored enterprises, or GSEs (primarily Fannie Mae and Freddie
Mac). The credit losses on these loans are absorbed by the GSEs.
We pay guarantee fees to the GSEs to compensate them for their
assumption of credit risk. We also sell loans to the Federal
Home Loan Bank of San Francisco (FHLB),
for which we retain the servicing rights. Loans sold to the FHLB
typically contain a risk-sharing arrangement in which we benefit
from the performance of the loans sold. This benefit is
typically less than 10 basis points of the loan amount sold
and is recorded as a residual and included as a component of
securities classified as trading.
We also sell loans through private-label securitizations. Loans
sold through private-label securitizations consist primarily of
non-conforming loans and subprime loans. The securitization
process involves the sale of the loans to one of our wholly
owned bankruptcy remote special purpose entities which then
sells the loans to a separate, transaction-specific
securitization trust in exchange for cash and certain trust
interests that we retain. The securitization trust issues and
sells undivided interests to third party investors that entitle
the investors to specified cash flows generated from the
securitized loans. These undivided interests are usually
represented by certificates with varying interest rates and are
secured by the payments on the loans acquired by the trust, and
commonly include senior and subordinated classes. The senior
class securities are usually rated AAA by at least
two of the major independent rating agencies and have priority
over the subordinated classes in the receipt of payments. We
have no obligation to provide funding support (other than
temporary servicing advances) to either the third party
investors or securitization trusts. The third party investors or
the securitization trusts have no recourse to our assets or us
and have no ability to require us to repurchase their
securities. We do make certain representations and warranties
concerning the loans, such as lien status or mortgage insurance
coverage, and if we are found to have breached a representation
or warranty we could be required to repurchase the loan from the
securitization trust. We do not guarantee any securities issued
by the securitization trusts. The securitization trusts
represent qualified special purpose entities which
meet the legal isolation criteria of Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 140, Accounting for
Transfer and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments
of Liabilities (SFAS 140), and are
therefore not consolidated for financial reporting purposes. To
a lesser extent, we also sell loans on a whole-loan basis to
institutional investors with either servicing retained by us or
released to the institutional investors.
In addition to the cash we receive from the sale of MBS, we
typically retain certain interests in the securitization trust
as payment for the loans. These retained interests may include
mortgage servicing rights (MSRs), AAA-rated
interest-only securities, AAA-rated senior securities,
subordinated classes of securities, residual securities,
securities associated with prepayment charges on the underlying
mortgage loans, cash reserve funds, or an overcollateralization
account. Other than AAA-rated interest-only securities, the
AAA-rated senior securities, the securities associated with
prepayment charges on the underlying mortgage loans, and the
MSRs, these retained interests are subordinated and serve as
credit enhancement for the more senior securities issued by the
securitization trust. We are entitled to receive payment on most
of these retained interests only after the third party investors
are repaid their investment plus interest and there is excess
cash in
7
the securitization trust. Our ability to obtain repayment of our
residual interests depends solely on the performance of the
underlying mortgage loans. Material adverse changes in
performance of the loans, including actual credit losses and
prepayment speeds, may have a significant adverse effect on the
value of these retained interests.
We usually retain the servicing rights for the securitized
mortgage loans, as discussed in the description of servicing
operations below under the caption Loan Servicing
Operations. As a servicer, we are entitled to receive a
servicing fee equal to a specified percentage of the outstanding
principal balance of each loan. This servicing fee is calculated
and payable on a monthly basis. We may also be entitled to
receive additional servicing compensation, such as late payment
fees or prepayment charges. Our servicing fees have priority in
payment over each class of securities issued by the
securitization trusts.
In addition to securitization trusts, from time to time we use
Net Interest Margin (NIM) trusts to securitize our
interest in residual securities and securities associated with
prepayment charges on the underlying mortgage loans from prior
or recently completed securitization transactions. NIM trusts
issue notes to outside investors secured by the residual
securities and securities associated with prepayment charges on
the underlying mortgage loans we contribute to the trusts. The
cash proceeds from the sale of the NIM notes to investors are
paid to us as payment for the securities. The NIM notes are
obligations of the NIM trusts and are collateralized only by the
residual securities and securities associated with prepayment
charges on the underlying mortgage loans. We are not obligated
to make any payments on the NIM notes. These entities represent
qualified special purpose entities and are therefore not
consolidated for financial reporting purposes in accordance with
SFAS 140. At inception, the outside investors have the
majority interest in the fair value of the residual securities
and securities associated with prepayment charges on the
underlying mortgage loans. We receive cash flows from our
retained interests in the NIM trusts once the NIM notes issued
to the investors are fully paid off. At December 31, 2004,
these NIM trusts held assets valued at $142.6 million and
our retained interests in these NIM trusts are valued at
$42.5 million. Our retained interests in the NIM trusts are
included as a component of securities classified as trading
securities on our consolidated balance sheets.
Our mortgage banking revenue consists primarily of gain on the
sale of loans, net interest income, and fee income associated
with the loans held for sale. We sell our loans through three
distribution channels in the secondary market: GSEs,
private-label securitizations, and whole loan sales.
Additionally, we transfer loans to our investment portfolio,
which currently consists primarily of ARM and hybrid ARM loans.
Because many of our mortgage banking activities are tied to the
purchase and sale of single-family residences, our business is
subject to some seasonal volatility. Typically, loan
originations tend to be higher in summer months and lower in
winter months.
INVESTING AND HELOC ACTIVITIES
Investments
In an effort to generate continuing earnings that are more
stable and complement our mortgage banking activities, we invest
in single-family residential (SFR) mortgage loans,
construction loans, home equity lines of credit
(HELOC), mortgage securities, and MSRs either
retained in connection with our mortgage banking activities or
purchased in the secondary mortgage market. The strategy of our
Investing and HELOC activities is to: 1) leverage and scale
infrastructure with prudent mortgage related asset growth to
stabilize and diversify company-wide earnings, targeting a
return on equity ranging from 15% to 20%; and 2) hedge the
interest rate and prepayment risks attendant with
servicing-related assets.
Mortgage loans held for investment are generally originated or
acquired through our Mortgage Banking Divisions and transferred
to the Investing Divisions. Held for investment loans may also
be acquired from third party sellers. Such loans are typically
prime loans as the majority of the subprime loans originated are
securitized in private transactions or sold to GSEs. The
Investing Divisions invest in loans for which they can earn an
acceptable return on equity. We are currently investing
primarily in ARMs in order to minimize interest rate risk, and
to a lesser extent, loan products which we believe the market
does not properly price. We may also retain a portion of the
loans acquired through our exercise of clean-up calls as these
loans are
8
generally high quality, seasoned loans that generate an
above-market yield. In addition to the investments in SFR
mortgage loans, we also invest in construction financing for
single-family residences provided directly to individual
consumers, builder construction financing facilities for larger
residential subdivision loans, and HELOCs.
A substantial portion of the servicing-related assets retained
by the Investing Divisions are generated in connection with
issuances of private-label securities and agency loan sales by
our mortgage banking operations. Retained assets typically
include MSRs and, to a lesser degree, AAA-rated and agency
interest-only securities, AAA-rated senior securities,
non-investment grade securities and residuals. In addition to
retaining assets from our private-label securitizations and
agency loan sales, the Investing Divisions also purchase MBS
issued by other lenders in the secondary mortgage market. Our
investment grade securities include AAA-rated and agency
interest-only securities, agency MBS and debentures, and other
MBS. In addition to hedging the AAA-rated and agency
interest-only securities portfolio, the Investing Divisions also
manage and hedge our investment in MSRs. Substantially all MSRs
were created in connection with our mortgage banking activities
and include both primary and master servicing, as further
discussed below. However, we may purchase MSRs from other
servicers if we believe the investment will generate appropriate
returns.
The primary sources of revenue for the Investing Divisions are
net interest income on loans and securities, service fee income
from MSRs, and to a lesser extent, the gain on sale of HELOCs.
Valuation changes related to MSRs (subject to lower of amortized
cost or fair value limitations), AAA-rated and agency
interest-only securities and their related hedges are also
recognized through earnings. Periodically, trading gains or
losses may also be recognized through earnings, although trading
is not a core investing activity.
Loan Servicing Operations
At December 31, 2004, primarily through our Home Loan
Servicing operation in Kalamazoo, Michigan, we serviced
$56.0 billion of mortgage loans, of which
$50.2 billion was serviced for others. The servicing
portfolio includes servicing for prime and subprime loans,
HELOCs, reverse mortgages, manufactured housing loans and home
improvement loans.
Servicing of mortgage loans includes: collecting loan payments;
responding to customers inquiries; accounting for
principal and interest; holding custodial (impound) funds
for payment of property taxes and insurance; making physical
inspections of the mortgaged property, as necessary; counseling
delinquent mortgagors; modifying and refinancing loans;
supervising foreclosures and liquidation of foreclosed property;
performing required tax reporting; and performing other loan
administration functions necessary to protect investors
interests and comply with applicable laws and regulations.
Servicing operations also include remitting loan payments, less
servicing fees, to trustees and, in some cases, advancing
delinquent borrower payments to investors, subject to a right of
reimbursement.
SEGMENTS
IndyMac is structured to achieve synergies among its operations
and to enhance customer service, operating through its four main
segments, Mortgage Banking Divisions, IndyMac Consumer Bank,
Specialty Product Divisions and Investing Divisions. The common
denominator of the Companys business is providing
consumers with single-family residential mortgages through
relationships with each segments core customers via the
channel in which each operates. Mortgage Banking Divisions
provide consumers with single-family permanent mortgage lending
through relationships with mortgage professionals
mortgage brokers, mortgage bankers, as well as through community
financial institutions, real estate professionals, and
consumers. IndyMac Consumer Bank provides the platform for the
mortgage and deposit services that IndyMac offers directly to
consumers through its branch network. Specialty Product
Divisions support the production of niche products including
construction lending, HELOCs, and reverse mortgages through all
of IndyMacs relationship and consumer direct production
channels. The Investing Divisions serve as the main link to
customers whose mortgages we service. Through their investments
in single-family residential (SFR) mortgages,
9
MBS and MSRs, the Investing Divisions generate core spread and
fee income and provide critical support to IndyMacs
mortgage lending operations.
Mortgage Banking Divisions
Mortgage Professionals
Our largest production channel, mortgage professionals, was
responsible for 49% of our total mortgage production during
2004. This group acquires mortgage loans through its
relationships with mortgage professionals, including mortgage
brokers, mortgage bankers and financial institutions. When
originating or purchasing mortgage loans, we generally acquire
the rights to service the mortgage loans (as
described below). When we sell the loans, we may either retain
the related servicing rights and service the loans through our
Home Loan Servicing division or sell those rights. See
Loan Servicing Operations above. This groups
production volume includes both purchases and originations.
Originations are defined as loans that are generated by the
mortgage broker, but closed in our name (also referred to as
table funded loans).
This division targets customers based on their loan production
volume, product mix and projected revenue to us. The sales force
is responsible for maintaining and increasing loan production
from these customers by marketing our strengths, which include a
one stop shop for all products, competitive pricing
and response time efficiencies in the loan purchase process
through our e-MITS underwriting process and high customer
service standards.
During 2004, to continue our emphasis on increasing production
capacity and geographic penetration to build market share, the
division opened two new regional centers. With these two new
centers, the division currently has nine regional centers.
Looking ahead, we plan to add a minimum of six new regional
offices over the next five years as a way of increasing
geographic penetration to gain market share in target markets,
improving customer service, and improving operational
efficiencies.
Real Estate Professionals
Through our LoanWorks® brand, we serve real estate
professionals who are interested in cross-selling mortgage loans
as an additional service to their home purchase clients.
LoanWorks.com allows real estate agents to utilize our Web-based
e-MITS technology as their in-house mortgage processing center
and their online origination management system.
Our marketing focus on real estate agents includes participation
in local real estate forums, trade shows, seminars and
continuing education courses aimed at individual real estate
agents, and advertising in national and regional trade
publications. Additionally, this division generates
single-family residential mortgage loans through subdivision
developers. Our strategy includes developing relationships with
homebuilders through direct customer contact and program
presentations, as well as drawing upon existing construction
lending builder relationships and industry contacts. Although
this division produces a relatively small volume of mortgage
loans, we believe this channel provides a growth opportunity as
it leverages our existing technology and infrastructure and
recognizes the important role that Realtors and homebuilders
play in the home purchase mortgage process.
Web & Direct Mail
This channel originates retail mortgage loans on a centralized
basis using multiple marketing channels, including direct
originations through our Web site, which is supported by our
e-MITS technology, direct mail, indirect Internet leads provided
by various multi-lender sites, direct Internet leads developed
through online advertising, and affinity relationships.
Our website offers a wide range of home loan products directly
to consumers nationwide. This site enables consumers to apply
for a mortgage loan, obtain loan approvals, lock in an interest
rate and receive a printable approval letter, all online, and
all within minutes. The website also features online loan status
information, daily rate comparisons to major competitors, and a
quick mortgage rate pricing tool. Through the telemarket-
10
ing operations and our Southern California retail banking branch
network, loan consultants counsel consumers with respect to the
loan application process, process loan applications utilizing
our e-MITS technology and make lending decisions.
IndyMac Conduit
The division is responsible for leveraging our mortgage
infrastructure to purchase loans in bulk from mortgage bankers,
financial institutions and other capital market participants
across the country. Our specialized niche products provide an
attractive offering for this customer base. This channel was
responsible for 20% of our total mortgage production during 2004.
IndyMac Consumer Bank
Through our website at www.IndyMacBank.com, consumers can
access their accounts 24-hours a day, seven days a week.
Online banking allows customers to access their accounts, view
balances, transfer funds between accounts, view transactions,
download account information and pay their bills conveniently
from any computer terminal. Consumers can also conduct
transactions through our telebanking operation or in one of our
Southern California branches. Our deposit products include
regular savings accounts, demand deposit accounts, money market
accounts, certificate of deposit accounts, and individual
retirement accounts.
Specialty Product Divisions
Consumer Construction
Our Consumer Construction Lending division offers a variety of
residential construction programs and lot financing through our
relationship channels and directly to consumers. Through our
streamlined e-MITS online application process, the division
offers a single-close construction-to-permanent loan that
provides borrowers with the funds to build a primary residence
or vacation home. Our customers have convenient online access to
construction funds and loan information at any time. When the
home is completed, the loan automatically converts to a
permanent 30- or 15-year loan, which we typically sell, without
any additional costs or closing documents required. The product
represents a hybrid activity between our portfolio lending and
our mortgage banking activities.
Subdivision Financing
We provide acquisition, development and construction financing
for small to large residential subdivision builders in target
markets through this division. Local expert account officers
work directly with builders in providing financing and
overseeing the progress of the financed projects, while our
highly automated central operations in Pasadena oversee credit,
loan closing and loan administration functions. This division
works closely with the Real Estate Professionals division to
provide permanent mortgage loans to their customers when they
sell the completed residence. A substantial portion of our
builder construction loans is secured by corporate or personal
guarantees of the builders as well as the real estate. Builder
construction loans are typically based on Prime interest rates.
HELOC
IndyMacs HELOC division specializes in providing HELOC and
second mortgages nationwide through direct marketing to
homeowners. With a streamlined application process and
competitive pricing, this division provides homeowners the
ability to easily tap the excess equity in their homes for a
variety of uses. With the HELOC product, homeowners have
convenient access to their funds using equity checks or a
Visa® credit card. IndyMacs home equity products are
available across all IndyMacs mortgage channels to new and
existing mortgage or banking customers.
11
Financial Freedom
Through the acquisition of Financial Freedom, we have become the
leading provider of reverse mortgages in the United States.
Reverse mortgages allow homeowners age 62 and older to
convert home equity into cash to supplement their retirement
income. The equity may be withdrawn in a lump sum, as
annuity-style monthly payments, as a credit line, or any
combination thereof. Reverse mortgages offered by us feature: no
recourse to the borrower, no repayment during the
borrowers occupancy of the home, and a repayment amount
that cannot exceed the value of the home (after costs of sale).
With the increased familiarity that senior homeowners and their
financial advisors have with this product, and the appreciation
of home prices, the reverse mortgage market is expected to grow
dramatically.
Investing Divisions
Our Investing Divisions complement the Companys mortgage
banking activities and serve to diversify the Companys
revenue stream through its investments. The assets included in
these divisions are broken down into four main groups:
|
|
|
|
(1) |
SFR mortgage loans, including all single-family residential
loans held for investment other than discontinued products. |
|
|
(2) |
Loan servicing & retained assets, which include the
following: |
|
|
|
|
|
MSRs, interest-only strips, and residual securities, |
|
|
|
non-investment grade mortgage backed securities, |
|
|
|
securities and derivatives, all of which are held as hedges for
the divisions assets, including principal-only securities,
agency debentures, and U.S. treasury bonds, and |
|
|
|
loans held for sale acquired through the exercise of clean-up
calls or through the Companys customer retention programs. |
(3) MBS, which include AAA-rated agency and private label
MBS, and investment-grade securities.
(4) Discontinued products, which include home improvement
and manufactured housing loans.
In addition to generating revenue for the Company, the Investing
Divisions perform the mortgage servicing function, which
includes payment processing, customer service, collections, loss
mitigations and investor reporting. Select Investing Divisions
are also engaged in mortgage banking activities. At
December 31, 2004, total assets of our Investing Divisions
were $8.4 billion, of which 19% were loan servicing and
retained assets, 53% were SFR mortgage loans, 27% were MBS, and
1% were discontinued products. Our policy is that all of our
Investing Divisions assets, including assets acquired from
Mortgage Banking Divisions or IndyMac Consumer Bank, must meet
or exceed minimum targeted return requirements. In addition to
the Investing Divisions investments, certain investing
activities also take place in the Mortgage Banking Divisions,
Specialty Product Divisions and IndyMac Consumer Bank segments.
These activities generate assets which include construction
loans and HELOCs.
For further information on the revenues earned and expenses
incurred by each of our segments, refer to
Note 3 Segment Reporting included
in the Companys consolidated financial statements
incorporated herein.
REGULATION AND SUPERVISION
GENERAL
As a savings and loan holding company, IndyMac Bancorp is
subject to regulation by the Office of Thrift Supervision
(OTS) under the savings and loan holding company
provisions of the Federal Home Owners Loan Act
(HOLA). As a federally chartered and insured savings
and loan association, IndyMac Bank is subject to regulation,
supervision and periodic examination by the OTS, which is the
primary federal regulator
12
of savings associations, and the FDIC, in its role as federal
deposit insurer. The primary purpose of regulatory examination
and supervision is to protect depositors, financial institutions
and the financial system as a whole rather than the shareholders
of financial institutions or their holding companies. The
following summary is not intended to be a complete description
of the applicable laws and regulations or their effects on us,
and it is qualified in its entirety by reference to the
particular statutory and regulatory provisions described.
REGULATION OF INDYMAC BANK
General
Both IndyMac Bank and the Company are required to file periodic
reports with the OTS concerning our activities and financial
condition. The OTS has substantial enforcement authority with
respect to savings associations, including authority to bring
enforcement actions against a savings association and any of its
institution-affiliated parties, which term includes
directors, officers, employees, controlling shareholders, agents
and other persons who participate in the conduct of the affairs
of the institution. The FDIC has backup enforcement
authority over us and has the power to terminate a savings
associations FDIC deposit insurance. In addition, we are
subject to regulations of the Federal Reserve Board relating to
equal credit opportunity, electronic fund transfers, collection
of checks, truth in lending, truth in savings, and availability
of funds for deposit customers.
Qualified Thrift Lender Test
Like all savings and loan holding company subsidiaries, IndyMac
Bank is required to meet a qualified thrift lender
(QTL) test to avoid certain restrictions on our
operations, including the activities restrictions applicable to
multiple savings and loan holding companies, restrictions on our
ability to branch interstate and IndyMac Bancorps
mandatory registration as a bank holding company under the Bank
Holding Company Act of 1956. A savings association satisfies the
QTL test if: (i) on a monthly average basis, for at least
nine months out of each twelve month period, at least 65% of a
specified asset base of the savings association consists of
loans to small businesses, credit card loans, educational loans,
or certain assets related to domestic residential real estate,
including residential mortgage loans and mortgage securities; or
(ii) at least 60% of the savings associations total
assets consist of cash, U.S. government or government
agency debt or equity securities, fixed assets, or loans secured
by deposits, real property used for residential, educational,
church, welfare, or health purposes, or real property in certain
urban renewal areas. IndyMac Bank is currently, and expects to
remain, in compliance with QTL standards.
Regulatory Capital Requirements
OTS capital regulations require savings associations to satisfy
three sets of capital requirements: tangible capital,
Tier 1 (leverage) capital, and risk-based capital. In
general, an associations tangible capital, which must be
at least 1.5% of adjusted total assets, is the sum of common
shareholders equity adjusted for the effects of other
comprehensive income (OCI), less goodwill and other
disallowed assets. An associations ratio of Tier 1
capital to adjusted total assets (the core capital
or leverage ratio) must be at least 3% for the most
highly rated associations and 4% for others. Higher capital
ratios may be required if warranted by the particular
circumstances, risk profile, or growth rate of a given
association. Under the risk-based capital requirement, a savings
association must have Tier 1 capital equal to at least 4%
of risk-weighted assets and total capital (core capital plus
supplementary capital) equal to at least 8% of risk-weighted
assets. Tier 1 capital must represent at least 50% of total
capital and consists of core capital elements, which include
common shareholders equity, qualifying noncumulative,
nonredeemable perpetual preferred stock, and minority interests
in the equity accounts of consolidated subsidiaries, but exclude
goodwill and certain other intangible assets. Supplementary
capital mainly consists of qualifying subordinated debt,
preferred stock that does not meet Tier 1 capital
requirements, and portions of allowance for loan losses.
The above capital requirements are viewed as minimum standards
by the OTS. The OTS regulations also specify minimum
requirements for a savings association to be considered a
well-capitalized institution as
13
defined in the prompt corrective action regulation
described below. A well-capitalized savings
association must have a total risk-based capital ratio of 10% or
greater, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 6% or greater
and a leverage ratio of 5% or greater. IndyMac Bank currently
meets, and expects to continue to meet, all of the requirements
of a well-capitalized institution.
The OTS regulations include prompt corrective action provisions
that require certain remedial actions and authorize certain
other discretionary actions to be taken by the OTS against a
savings association that falls within specified categories of
capital deficiency. The relevant regulations establish five
categories of capital classification for this purpose, ranging
from well-capitalized or adequately
capitalized through undercapitalized,
significantly undercapitalized and critically
undercapitalized. In general, the prompt corrective action
regulations prohibit an OTS-regulated institution from declaring
any dividends, making any other capital distributions, or paying
a management fee to a controlling person, such as its parent
holding company, if, following the distribution or payment, the
institution would be within any of the three undercapitalized
categories.
Insurance of Deposit Accounts
Deposits of the Bank are presently insured by the Savings
Association Insurance Fund (SAIF), which is
administered by the FDIC, up to $100,000 per depositor. The
FDIC has established a risk-based system for setting deposit
insurance assessments. Under the risk-based assessment system, a
savings associations insurance assessments vary according
to the level of capital the institution holds and the degree to
which it is the subject of supervisory concern. Insurance of
deposits may be terminated by the FDIC upon a finding that the
savings association has engaged in unsafe or unsound practices,
is in an unsafe or unsound condition to continue operations or
has violated any applicable law, regulation, rule, order or
condition imposed by the FDIC or the OTS.
Capital Distribution Regulations
OTS regulations limit capital distributions by
savings associations, which include, among other things,
dividends and payments for stock repurchases. A savings
association that is a subsidiary of a savings and loan holding
company must notify the OTS of a capital distribution at least
30 days prior to the proposed declaration of dividend or
the approval by the associations board of directors of the
proposed capital distribution. The 30-day period provides the
OTS with an opportunity to object to the proposed distribution
if it believes that the distribution would not be advisable.
An application to the OTS for specific approval to pay a
dividend, rather than the notice procedure described above, is
required if: (a) the total of all capital distributions
made during a calendar year (including the proposed
distribution) exceeds the sum of the institutions
year-to-date net income and its retained income for the
preceding two years, (b) the institution is not eligible
under OTS regulations for expedited treatment (which
is generally available to institutions the OTS regards as well
run and adequately capitalized), (c) the institution would
not be at least adequately capitalized following the
proposed capital distribution, or (d) the distribution
would violate an applicable statute, regulation, agreement, or
written condition imposed on the institution by the OTS.
Community Reinvestment Act and the Fair Lending
Laws
Savings associations are examined under the Community
Reinvestment Act (CRA) and related regulations of
the OTS on the extent of their efforts to help meet the credit
needs of their communities, including low and moderate-income
neighborhoods. In addition, the Equal Credit Opportunity Act and
the Fair Housing Act, together known as the Fair Lending
Laws, prohibit lenders from discriminating in their
lending practices on the basis of characteristics specified in
those statutes. Enforcement of these regulations has been an
important focus of federal regulatory authorities and of
community groups in recent years. A failure by IndyMac Bank to
comply with the provisions of the CRA could, at a minimum,
result in adverse action on branch and certain other corporate
applications, and regulatory restrictions on our activities, and
14
failure to comply with the Fair Lending Laws could result in
enforcement actions by the OTS, as well as other federal
regulatory agencies and the Department of Justice. IndyMac Bank
received an overall Satisfactory rating during our
most recent CRA evaluation.
Privacy Protection
The OTS has adopted privacy protection regulations which require
each savings association to adopt procedures to protect
consumers and customers nonpublic personal
information. It is IndyMac Banks policy not to share
customers information with any unaffiliated third parties,
except as expressly permitted by law, or to allow third party
companies to provide marketing services on our behalf, or under
joint marketing agreements between us and other unaffiliated
financial institutions. In addition to federal laws and
regulations, we are required to comply with any privacy
requirements prescribed by California and other states in which
we do business that afford consumers with protections greater
than those provided under federal law.
KEY OPERATING RISKS
Like all businesses, we assume a certain amount of risk in order
to earn returns on our capital. For further information on these
and other key operating risks, see Item 7.
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations.
INCOME TAX CONSIDERATIONS
We report our income on a calendar year basis using the accrual
method of accounting. We are subject to federal income taxation
under existing provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986,
as amended, in generally the same manner as other corporations.
We are also subject to state taxes in the areas in which we
conduct business.
EMPLOYEES
As of December 31, 2004, we had 5,323 full-time
equivalent employees, including 673 temporary employees. We
believe that we have generally good relations with our employees.
COMPETITION
We face significant competition in acquiring and selling loans.
In our mortgage banking operations, we compete with other
mortgage bankers, GSEs, established third party lending
programs, investment banking firms, banks, savings and loan
associations, and other lenders and entities purchasing mortgage
assets. With regard to MBS issued through our mortgage banking
operations, we face competition from other investment
opportunities available to prospective investors. We estimate
our market share of the U.S. mortgage market to be
approximately 1.71% based on the fourth quarter 2004 mortgage
production. A number of our competitors have significantly
larger market share and financial resources. We seek to compete
with financial institutions and mortgage companies through an
emphasis on quality of service, diversified products and maximum
use of technology.
The GSEs have made and we believe will continue to make
significant technological and economic advances to broaden their
customer bases. When the GSEs contract or expand, there are both
positive and negative impacts on our mortgage banking lending
operations. As GSEs expand, additional liquidity is brought to
the market, and loan products can be resold more quickly.
Conversely, expanding GSEs increase competition for loans, which
may reduce profit margins on loan sales. We seek to address
these competitive pressures by making a strong effort to
maximize our use of technology, by diversifying into other
residential mortgage products that are less affected by GSEs,
and by operating in a more cost-effective manner than our
competitors.
15
WEBSITE ACCESS TO UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION FILINGS
All reports filed electronically by us with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (SEC), including Annual Reports
on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, and
current event reports on Form 8-K, as well as any
amendments to those reports, are made accessible as soon as
reasonably practicable after filing with the SEC at no cost on
our website at www.IndyMacBank.com. These filings are
also accessible on the SECs website at www.sec.gov.
We have a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that is applicable
to all of our employees, officers and directors, including the
principal executive officer, the principal financial officer and
the principal accounting officer. We also adopted formal
corporate governance standards in January 2002, which the
Nominating and Governance Committee of the Board of Directors
reviews annually to ensure they incorporate recent corporate
governance developments and generally meet the corporate
governance needs of IndyMac. You may obtain copies of each of
the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and the Board of
Directors Guidelines for Corporate Governance Issues by
accessing the Corporate Governance subsection of the
Investors section of www.IndyMacBank.com, or
by writing to our Corporate Secretary at IndyMac Bancorp, Inc.,
155 North Lake Avenue, Pasadena, California 91101.
ITEM
2. PROPERTIES
Our significant leased properties are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Approximate | |
|
Principal Lease | |
Purpose |
|
Location |
|
Square Feet | |
|
Expiration | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Corporate Headquarters/ Administration
|
|
Pasadena, California |
|
|
193,000 |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
Corporate Headquarters/ Administration*
|
|
Pasadena, California |
|
|
83,000 |
|
|
|
2016 |
|
Corporate Headquarters/ Administration, Legal,
Compliance Financial Freedom
|
|
Irvine, California |
|
|
22,000 |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
Mortgage Banking, Legal/ Administration
|
|
Irvine, California |
|
|
12,000 |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
Mortgage Banking
|
|
Ontario, California |
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
Mortgage Banking
|
|
Chicago, Illinois |
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
Home Loan Servicing Customer Service and
Loan Administration
|
|
Kalamazoo, Michigan |
|
|
38,000 |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
Home Loan Servicing Master Servicing and Investor
Reporting
|
|
Pasadena, California |
|
|
36,000 |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
Web & Direct Mail Headquarters/ Operations, Legal/
Administration
|
|
Irvine, California |
|
|
138,000 |
|
|
|
2012 |
|
Regional Mortgage Banking Center, Consumer Direct Operations and
Sales
|
|
Kansas City, Missouri |
|
|
53,000 |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
Regional Mortgage Banking Center
|
|
Sacramento, California |
|
|
27,000 |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
Regional Mortgage Banking Center
|
|
Atlanta (Norcross), Georgia |
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
Regional Mortgage Banking Center
|
|
Scottsdale, Arizona |
|
|
13,000 |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
Regional Mortgage Banking Center
|
|
Marlton, New Jersey |
|
|
35,000 |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
Regional Mortgage Banking Center
|
|
Columbia, South Carolina |
|
|
27,000 |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
Regional Mortgage Banking Center
|
|
Dallas (Irving), Texas |
|
|
41,000 |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
Regional Mortgage Banking Center
|
|
Seattle (Bellevue), Washington |
|
|
31,000 |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Approximate | |
|
Principal Lease | |
Purpose |
|
Location |
|
Square Feet | |
|
Expiration | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Eastern Operations Center Financial Freedom
|
|
Atlanta, Georgia |
|
|
22,000 |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
Western Operations Center Financial Freedom
|
|
Sacramento (Roseville), California |
|
|
16,000 |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
Loan Servicing, Accounting and Finance Financial
Freedom
|
|
San Francisco, California |
|
|
12,000 |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
Consumer Bank Retail Operations**
|
|
15 locations in Southern California |
|
|
66,000 |
|
|
|
2005-2012 |
|
Other Sales Offices and Locations
|
|
44 locations in various states |
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
2005-2010 |
|
|
|
* |
Commencing in 2005 |
|
** |
7 leases commencing in 2005 |
In addition to the above leased office space, we own the
building that houses our mortgage banking headquarters, located
in Pasadena, California, totaling 265,000 square feet. We
also own a building in La Mirada, California with
16,500 square feet, which houses our information technology
data center. We own an additional 4 retail banking
properties, containing an aggregate of approximately
56,000 square feet, located in Southern California.
|
|
ITEM 3. |
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS |
In the ordinary course of business, the Company and its
subsidiaries are defendants in or parties to a number of legal
actions. Certain of such actions involve alleged violations of
employment laws, unfair trade practices, consumer protection
laws, including claims relating to the Companys loan
origination and collection efforts, and other federal and state
banking laws. Certain of such actions include claims for breach
of contract, restitution, compensatory damages, punitive damages
and other forms of relief. The Company reviews these actions on
an on-going basis and follows the provisions of Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 5, Accounting
for Contingencies when making accrual and disclosure
decisions. When assessing reasonably possible and probable
outcomes, the Company bases its decisions on the evidence
discovered and in its possession, the strength of probable
witness testimony, the viability of its defenses and the
likelihood of prevailing at trial or resolving the matter
through alternative dispute resolution. Due to the difficulty of
predicting the outcome of such actions, the Company can give no
assurance that it will prevail on all claims made against it;
however, management believes, based on current knowledge and
after consultation with counsel, that these legal actions,
individually and in the aggregate, and the losses, if any,
resulting from the final outcome thereof, will not have a
material adverse effect on the Corporation and its
subsidiaries financial position, but may have a material
impact on the results of operations of particular periods.
|
|
ITEM 4. |
SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY
HOLDERS |
No matters were submitted to a vote of shareholders during the
quarter ended December 31, 2004.
PART II
|
|
ITEM 5. |
MARKET FOR INDYMAC BANCORP, INC.S COMMON EQUITY,
RELATED STOCK HOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY
SECURITIES |
STOCK INFORMATION
IndyMac Bancorp Inc.s common stock is traded on the New
York Stock Exchange (NYSE) under the symbol
NDE.
17
The following table sets forth the high and low sales prices (as
reported by Bloomberg Financial Service) for shares of IndyMac
Bancorp Inc.s common stock for the years ended
December 31, 2004 and 2003.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
High($) | |
|
Low($) | |
|
High($) | |
|
Low($) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
First Quarter
|
|
|
36.86 |
|
|
|
29.30 |
|
|
|
20.51 |
|
|
|
17.65 |
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
37.44 |
|
|
|
29.21 |
|
|
|
26.96 |
|
|
|
19.00 |
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
37.01 |
|
|
|
30.83 |
|
|
|
27.33 |
|
|
|
21.17 |
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
38.10 |
|
|
|
30.87 |
|
|
|
31.97 |
|
|
|
23.20 |
|
ISSUANCE OF COMMON STOCK
On June 8, 2004, we issued 3,200,000 shares of common
stock at a market price of $31.75 through a public offering. On
July 12, 2004, we issued an additional 130,000 shares
of common stock at a market price of $31.75 upon the exercise of
the underwriters over-allotment option. The cash proceeds
of $96.25 million from the initial closing, net of
expenses, were recorded as equity during the second quarter of
2004. The cash proceeds from the exercise of the over-allotment
option, net of expenses, of $3.9 million were recorded as
equity during the third quarter of 2004. Certain of the proceeds
were used to finance the acquisition of Financial Freedom and
the remaining proceeds have been used for general corporate
purposes, including, but not limited to, continued asset growth
for IndyMac Bank.
SHARE REPURCHASE ACTIVITIES
In June 1999, our Board of Directors approved a
$100.0 million share repurchase program, which was
subsequently increased by the Board to $500.0 million. The
Board of Directors also approved a special repurchase of
3,640,860 shares from Countrywide Financial Corporation,
Inc. (Countrywide), which was not a part of our
share repurchase program. From the share repurchase
programs inception through December 31, 2002, we
repurchased 28 million shares in open market transactions
and from Countrywide at an average price of approximately
$18.02 per share, for an aggregate investment of
$504.4 million. At December 31, 2004, we had
$63.6 million of remaining capacity to repurchase shares
under the current authorization from the Board of Directors. No
share repurchases under the share repurchase program have been
made since December 31, 2002.
18
From time to time, we also repurchase shares from certain
employees and officers at the then-current market price under
the Companys stock incentive plans. The following table
summarizes the share repurchase activities from our employees
and officers during 2004, as well as the information during the
same period regarding our publicly announced share repurchase
program described above:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum Approximate | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of | |
|
Dollar Value (in | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased as | |
|
millions) of Shares | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part of Publicly | |
|
that May Yet Be | |
|
|
Number of | |
|
Weighted Average | |
|
Announced Plans or | |
|
Purchased Under the | |
Period |
|
Shares(1) | |
|
Price Per Share | |
|
Programs | |
|
Plans or Programs(2) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
January 1, 2004 January 31, 2004
|
|
|
15,275 |
|
|
$ |
29.84 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
63.6 |
|
February 1, 2004 February 29, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63.6 |
|
March 1, 2004 March 31, 2004
|
|
|
2,177 |
|
|
|
35.23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter Total
|
|
|
17,452 |
|
|
|
30.51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2004 April 30, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63.6 |
|
May 1, 2004 May 31, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63.6 |
|
June 1, 2004 June 30, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Quarter Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 1, 2004 July 31, 2004
|
|
|
314 |
|
|
|
31.36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63.6 |
|
August 1, 2004 August 31, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63.6 |
|
September 1, 2004 September 30, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third Quarter Total
|
|
|
314 |
|
|
|
31.36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 1, 2004 October 31, 2004
|
|
|
1,236 |
|
|
|
36.75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63.6 |
|
November 1, 2004 November 30, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63.6 |
|
December 1, 2004 December 31, 2004
|
|
|
256 |
|
|
|
32.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth Quarter Total
|
|
|
1,492 |
|
|
|
35.98 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Total
|
|
|
19,258 |
|
|
$ |
30.97 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
All shares purchased during the periods indicated were purchased
pursuant to the Companys stock incentive plans at the
then-current market prices. |
|
(2) |
Our Board of Directors approved a $100.0 million share
repurchase program in June of 1999, which was subsequently
increased by the Board to $500.0 million. The Board of
Directors also approved a special repurchase of
3,640,860 shares from Countrywide, which was not a part of
our share repurchase program. |
As of February 18, 2005, 62,165,649 shares of IndyMac
Bancorp Inc.s common stock were held by approximately
1,787 shareholders of record.
DIVIDEND POLICY
IndyMacs Board of Directors initiated a dividend policy in
2003. Since that time IndyMac has successfully increased its
dividend payout ratio to be more in line with other financial
institution payout ratios, which range from 30% to 50%. Looking
forward, IndyMac expects to continue to increase its dividend at
the discretion of the Board of Directors based on IndyMacs
operating performance and financial position. As a result,
IndyMac expects to increase future dividends within a targeted
range between IndyMacs long-term earnings per share growth
goal of 15% and its historical earnings per share growth rate of
26% since 1992 under current management.
19
Cash dividends declared were as follows during 2004 and 2003:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend | |
|
Dividend | |
|
|
per share | |
|
payout ratio(1) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
First Quarter 2004
|
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
|
36 |
% |
Second Quarter 2004
|
|
$ |
0.30 |
|
|
|
33 |
% |
Third Quarter 2004
|
|
$ |
0.32 |
|
|
|
36 |
% |
Fourth Quarter 2004
|
|
$ |
0.34 |
|
|
|
37 |
% |
First Quarter 2003
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
|
15 |
% |
Second Quarter 2003
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
|
14 |
% |
Third Quarter 2003
|
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
|
|
17 |
% |
Fourth Quarter 2003
|
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
|
|
27 |
% |
|
|
(1) |
Dividend payout ratio for the second, third, and fourth quarters
of 2004 was calculated using the dividend declared divided by
pro forma diluted earnings per share of $0.90, $0.88, and $0.91,
respectively. The pro forma diluted earnings per share for the
second quarter 2004 excludes the $52.2 million, before-tax,
negative impact on gain on sale of loans as a result of the
adoption of Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 105,
Application of Accounting Principles to
Loan Commitments (SAB No. 105)
on April 1, 2004. For the third and fourth quarters of
2004, the diluted earnings per share excludes the carry over
SAB No. 105 impact of $5.1 million, before-tax,
and $2.2 million, before-tax, respectively, as well as the
purchase accounting adjustments of $6.0 million,
before-tax, and $1.9 million, before-tax, respectively,
related to the Financial Freedom acquisition in July 2004. See
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA for further discussions
on SAB No. 105 adjustments and purchase accounting
adjustments from the Financial Freedom acquisition. The diluted
earnings per share calculated in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles were $0.38, $0.78, and $0.87 for
the second, third and fourth quarters of 2004, respectively. |
In 2004 and 2003, we funded the payment of dividends primarily
from the cash on hand at the Company. The future principal
source of funds for the dividend payments is anticipated to be
the dividends we will receive from IndyMac Bank. The payment of
dividends by IndyMac Bank is subject to regulatory requirements
and review. See the Capital Distribution Regulations
section on page 14 for further information.
EQUITY COMPENSATION PLANS INFORMATION
The equity compensation plans information required by this
Item 5 is hereby incorporated by reference to IndyMac
Bancorps definitive proxy statement, to be filed pursuant
to Regulation 14A within 120 days after the end of our
2004 fiscal year.
|
|
ITEM 6. |
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA |
On March 9, 2004, the Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC) issued Staff Accounting
Bulletin No. 105, Application of Accounting
Principles to Loan Commitments
(SAB No. 105). In
SAB No. 105, the SEC determined that an interest rate
lock commitment should generally be valued at zero at inception.
Profits inherent in the rate lock will be recognized at the time
of the sale of the underlying loan. The Company adopted this
standard effective April 1, 2004, which affected the second
quarter 2004 gain on sale of loans with a negative impact of
$52.2 million before-tax, and had carryover impact of
$5.1 million before-tax, and $2.2 million before-tax
on the earnings of the third and fourth quarters of 2004,
respectively. Since all loans that were rate locked prior to
April 1, 2004, have been sold, SAB No. 105 will
no longer have a negative impact on earnings in 2005.
Additionally, on July 16, 2004, the Company acquired 93.75%
of the outstanding shares of common stock of FFHI and related
assets from Lehman Brothers Bank, F.S.B. and its affiliates for
an aggregate cash
20
purchase price of $84.6 million. FFHI was merged into its
then wholly owned subsidiary in November 2004, with the
surviving entity referred to as Financial Freedom, and now
IndyMac Bank owns 93.75%, and the chief executive officer of
Financial Freedom owns 6.25% of the outstanding shares of common
stock of Financial Freedom. The acquisition from Lehman Brothers
Bank, F.S.B. was accounted for using the purchase accounting
method and the results of Financial Freedoms operations
have been included in the consolidated financial statements
since the acquisition date. As part of the allocation of the
purchase price, we recorded loans held for sale and the loan
application pipeline at their fair values at the acquisition
date. By allocating a portion of the purchase price to these
assets, we increased the cost basis of loans that are
subsequently sold. This increased cost basis decreases the gain
on sale when the related loans are sold. We allocated a total of
$7.9 million in purchase price to the loan portfolio and
loan application pipeline. Of this amount, $6.0 million was
recognized as the related loans were sold during the third
quarter of 2004, and $1.9 million was recognized in the
fourth quarter of 2004.
In the table below, in addition to the financial information
presented in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles (GAAP), we have presented certain pro
forma non-GAAP financial measures that are marked with footnote
(1). These pro forma non-GAAP financial measures are calculated
based on the GAAP gain on sale of loans but adjusted to exclude
the effect of the SAB No. 105 change in accounting
principle related to rate lock commitments as well as the impact
of the purchase accounting adjustments for the Financial Freedom
acquisition described above. We believe these pro forma non-GAAP
financial measures provide useful information to investors in
evaluating and comparing our financial condition and results of
operations on a consistent basis from period to period, and it
is on this basis that our management internally assesses our
performance.
Although we believe these pro forma non-GAAP financial measures
are useful to investors, they should not be considered a
substitute for, or superior to, GAAP results.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2001 | |
|
2000 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data) | |
Operating Results for the Year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
$ |
767,608 |
|
|
$ |
575,841 |
|
|
$ |
477,104 |
|
|
$ |
544,940 |
|
|
$ |
442,750 |
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
362,546 |
|
|
|
264,904 |
|
|
|
267,816 |
|
|
|
342,318 |
|
|
|
283,355 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income before provision for loan losses
|
|
|
405,062 |
|
|
|
310,937 |
|
|
|
209,288 |
|
|
|
202,622 |
|
|
|
159,395 |
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
8,170 |
|
|
|
19,700 |
|
|
|
16,154 |
|
|
|
22,022 |
|
|
|
15,974 |
|
|
Net gain (loss) on sale of loans
|
|
|
363,813 |
|
|
|
387,311 |
|
|
|
300,800 |
|
|
|
229,444 |
|
|
|
123,637 |
|
|
Other income (loss), net
|
|
|
43,669 |
|
|
|
29,591 |
|
|
|
81,372 |
|
|
|
88,096 |
|
|
|
70,040 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
|
804,374 |
|
|
|
708,139 |
|
|
|
575,306 |
|
|
|
498,140 |
|
|
|
337,098 |
|
|
|
Total other expenses
|
|
|
522,078 |
|
|
|
425,457 |
|
|
|
345,146 |
|
|
|
281,593 |
|
|
|
196,018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before provision for income taxes and minority interests
|
|
|
282,296 |
|
|
|
282,682 |
|
|
|
230,160 |
|
|
|
216,547 |
|
|
|
141,080 |
|
|
Provision for income taxes(2)
|
|
|
111,507 |
|
|
|
111,379 |
|
|
|
86,767 |
|
|
|
89,974 |
|
|
|
23,154 |
|
|
Minority interests
|
|
|
267 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before cumulative effect of a change in accounting
principle
|
|
|
170,522 |
|
|
|
171,303 |
|
|
|
143,393 |
|
|
|
126,573 |
|
|
|
117,926 |
|
|
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,185 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
$ |
170,522 |
|
|
$ |
171,303 |
|
|
$ |
143,393 |
|
|
$ |
116,388 |
|
|
$ |
117,926 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2001 | |
|
2000 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data) | |
Operating Results for the Year Excluding the Effect of the
Change in Accounting Principle and the Effect of Purchase
Accounting Adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net gain (loss) on sale of loans(1)
|
|
$ |
431,226 |
|
|
$ |
387,311 |
|
|
$ |
300,800 |
|
|
$ |
229,444 |
|
|
$ |
123,637 |
|
|
Net revenues(1)
|
|
|
871,787 |
|
|
|
708,139 |
|
|
|
575,306 |
|
|
|
498,140 |
|
|
|
337,098 |
|
|
Earnings before provision for income taxes and minority
interests(1)
|
|
|
349,709 |
|
|
|
282,682 |
|
|
|
230,160 |
|
|
|
216,547 |
|
|
|
141,080 |
|
|
Provision for income taxes(1)
|
|
|
138,136 |
|
|
|
111,379 |
|
|
|
86,767 |
|
|
|
89,974 |
|
|
|
23,154 |
|
|
Net earnings(1)
|
|
$ |
211,306 |
|
|
$ |
171,303 |
|
|
$ |
143,393 |
|
|
$ |
116,388 |
|
|
$ |
117,926 |
|
Per Share Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share before cumulative effect of a change in
accounting principle
|
|
$ |
2.87 |
|
|
$ |
3.10 |
|
|
$ |
2.47 |
|
|
$ |
2.07 |
|
|
$ |
1.73 |
|
|
Diluted earnings per share before cumulative effect of a change
in accounting principle
|
|
$ |
2.74 |
|
|
$ |
3.01 |
|
|
$ |
2.41 |
|
|
$ |
2.00 |
|
|
$ |
1.69 |
|
|
Pro forma basic earnings per share(1)
|
|
$ |
3.55 |
|
|
$ |
3.10 |
|
|
$ |
2.47 |
|
|
$ |
2.07 |
|
|
$ |
1.73 |
|
|
Pro forma diluted earnings per share(1)
|
|
$ |
3.40 |
|
|
$ |
3.01 |
|
|
$ |
2.41 |
|
|
$ |
2.00 |
|
|
$ |
1.69 |
|
|
Dividends declared per share
|
|
$ |
1.21 |
|
|
$ |
0.55 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
Dividends payout ratio (1,3)
|
|
|
35.59 |
% |
|
|
18.27 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Book value per share at December 31
|
|
$ |
20.39 |
|
|
$ |
17.93 |
|
|
$ |
15.50 |
|
|
$ |
14.00 |
|
|
$ |
11.71 |
|
|
Closing price per share
|
|
$ |
34.45 |
|
|
$ |
29.79 |
|
|
$ |
18.49 |
|
|
$ |
23.38 |
|
|
$ |
29.50 |
|
|
Average Common Shares (in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
59,513 |
|
|
|
55,247 |
|
|
|
58,028 |
|
|
|
60,927 |
|
|
|
68,343 |
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
62,152 |
|
|
|
56,926 |
|
|
|
59,592 |
|
|
|
63,191 |
|
|
|
69,787 |
|
|
Shares Outstanding at December 31 (in thousands)
|
|
|
61,995 |
|
|
|
56,760 |
|
|
|
54,829 |
|
|
|
60,366 |
|
|
|
62,176 |
|
Performance Ratios
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on average equity(1)
|
|
|
18.34 |
% |
|
|
18.30 |
% |
|
|
16.60 |
% |
|
|
15.27 |
% |
|
|
14.54 |
% |
|
Return on average assets(1)
|
|
|
1.25 |
% |
|
|
1.46 |
% |
|
|
1.80 |
% |
|
|
1.64 |
% |
|
|
2.42 |
% |
|
Net interest income to pretax income after minority interest
(before cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle)(1)
|
|
|
115.92 |
% |
|
|
110.00 |
% |
|
|
90.93 |
% |
|
|
93.57 |
% |
|
|
112.98 |
% |
|
Average cost of funds
|
|
|
2.48 |
% |
|
|
2.74 |
% |
|
|
4.14 |
% |
|
|
5.53 |
% |
|
|
7.11 |
% |
|
Net interest margin
|
|
|
2.61 |
% |
|
|
2.91 |
% |
|
|
2.89 |
% |
|
|
3.09 |
% |
|
|
3.50 |
% |
|
Efficiency ratio (1,4)
|
|
|
59 |
% |
|
|
58 |
% |
|
|
58 |
% |
|
|
53 |
% |
|
|
55 |
% |
|
Capital to net revenue ratio (1,5)
|
|
|
130.93 |
% |
|
|
128.61 |
% |
|
|
146.04 |
% |
|
|
146.54 |
% |
|
|
229.71 |
% |
|
Capital adjusted efficiency ratio (1,6)
|
|
|
78 |
% |
|
|
75 |
% |
|
|
85 |
% |
|
|
78 |
% |
|
|
126 |
% |
|
Operating expenses to loan production
|
|
|
1.33 |
% |
|
|
1.41 |
% |
|
|
1.65 |
% |
|
|
1.59 |
% |
|
|
1.92 |
% |
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2001 | |
|
2000 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data) | |
Balance Sheet Data at December 31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
$ |
3,689,471 |
|
|
$ |
1,837,606 |
|
|
$ |
2,339,093 |
|
|
$ |
1,564,359 |
|
|
$ |
1,154,303 |
|
|
Loans held for sale, net
|
|
|
4,445,572 |
|
|
|
2,573,248 |
|
|
|
2,227,683 |
|
|
|
2,080,763 |
|
|
|
1,420,772 |
|
|
Loans held for investment, net
|
|
|
6,696,862 |
|
|
|
7,396,540 |
|
|
|
3,910,887 |
|
|
|
2,938,657 |
|
|
|
2,560,885 |
|
|
Mortgage servicing rights
|
|
|
640,794 |
|
|
|
443,688 |
|
|
|
300,539 |
|
|
|
321,316 |
|
|
|
211,127 |
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
16,825,644 |
|
|
|
13,240,391 |
|
|
|
9,574,454 |
|
|
|
7,497,311 |
|
|
|
5,740,204 |
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
5,743,479 |
|
|
|
4,350,773 |
|
|
|
3,140,502 |
|
|
|
3,238,864 |
|
|
|
797,935 |
|
|
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank
|
|
|
6,162,000 |
|
|
|
4,934,911 |
|
|
|
2,721,783 |
|
|
|
1,999,378 |
|
|
|
1,264,457 |
|
|
Borrowings
|
|
|
2,947,036 |
|
|
|
2,438,451 |
|
|
|
2,491,715 |
|
|
|
1,053,670 |
|
|
|
2,850,189 |
|
|
Trust preferred securities
|
|
|
215,205 |
|
|
|
183,643 |
|
|
|
116,819 |
|
|
|
116,287 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
1,263,971 |
|
|
|
1,017,431 |
|
|
|
849,965 |
|
|
|
845,138 |
|
|
|
727,893 |
|
Balance Sheet and Asset Quality Ratios
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average interest-earning assets
|
|
$ |
15,520,859 |
|
|
$ |
10,674,704 |
|
|
$ |
7,230,156 |
|
|
$ |
6,567,140 |
|
|
$ |
4,554,903 |
|
|
Average equity
|
|
$ |
1,152,115 |
|
|
$ |
936,070 |
|
|
$ |
863,776 |
|
|
$ |
762,261 |
|
|
$ |
811,039 |
|
|
Debt to equity ratio(7)
|
|
|
12.3:1 |
|
|
|
12.0:1 |
|
|
|
10.3:1 |
|
|
|
7.9:1 |
|
|
|
6.9:1 |
|
|
Core capital ratio(8)
|
|
|
7.66 |
% |
|
|
7.56 |
% |
|
|
8.70 |
% |
|
|
9.16 |
% |
|
|
8.27 |
% |
|
Risk-based capital ratio(8)
|
|
|
12.02 |
% |
|
|
12.29 |
% |
|
|
14.03 |
% |
|
|
14.59 |
% |
|
|
12.26 |
% |
|
Average equity to average assets
|
|
|
6.83 |
% |
|
|
7.99 |
% |
|
|
10.86 |
% |
|
|
10.71 |
% |
|
|
16.64 |
% |
|
Equity to total assets at year end
|
|
|
7.51 |
% |
|
|
7.68 |
% |
|
|
8.88 |
% |
|
|
11.27 |
% |
|
|
12.68 |
% |
|
Non-performing assets to total assets
|
|
|
0.73 |
% |
|
|
0.76 |
% |
|
|
1.05 |
% |
|
|
1.55 |
% |
|
|
1.98 |
% |
|
Allowance for loan losses to total loans held for investment
|
|
|
0.78 |
% |
|
|
0.71 |
% |
|
|
1.28 |
% |
|
|
1.93 |
% |
|
|
2.25 |
% |
|
Allowance for loan losses and other credit reserves to
non-performing loans
|
|
|
61.62 |
% |
|
|
87.17 |
% |
|
|
90.73 |
% |
|
|
66.95 |
% |
|
|
66.79 |
% |
|
Allowance for loan losses to net charge-offs
|
|
|
667.48 |
% |
|
|
295.49 |
% |
|
|
219.80 |
% |
|
|
247.81 |
% |
|
|
541.33 |
% |
|
Provision for loan losses to net charge-offs
|
|
|
103.10 |
% |
|
|
110.57 |
% |
|
|
69.95 |
% |
|
|
94.58 |
% |
|
|
146.66 |
% |
|
Provision for loan losses to net charge-offs (core loan
portfolio)(9)
|
|
|
89.98 |
% |
|
|
150.67 |
% |
|
|
95.56 |
% |
|
|
79.11 |
% |
|
|
423.45 |
% |
Other Selected Items
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans serviced for others (in millions)(10)
|
|
|
50,219 |
|
|
|
30,774 |
|
|
|
28,376 |
|
|
|
24,471 |
|
|
|
19,487 |
|
|
Loan production(11)
|
|
|
39,048 |
|
|
|
30,036 |
|
|
|
20,882 |
|
|
|
17,549 |
|
|
|
10,097 |
|
|
Loans sold
|
|
$ |
31,036 |
|
|
$ |
23,176 |
|
|
$ |
16,825 |
|
|
$ |
13,901 |
|
|
$ |
7,524 |
|
|
Net margin on sale of loans(1)
|
|
|
1.39 |
% |
|
|
1.67 |
% |
|
|
1.79 |
% |
|
|
1.65 |
% |
|
|
1.64 |
% |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
For the year ended December 31, 2004, the data is
presented on a pro forma basis excluding the effect of change in
accounting principle for rate lock commitments under
SAB No. 105 effective April 1, 2004, and for the
impact of the purchase accounting adjustments for Financial
Freedom. The SAB No. 105 impact for the year ended
December 31, 2004 was $59.5 million. Additionally, the
impact of the purchase accounting adjustment for Financial
Freedom totaled $7.9 million before-tax. A full
reconcili- |
23
|
|
|
|
|
ation between the pro forma and GAAP amounts, with the
relevant performance ratios, is included at page 27. |
|
|
|
|
(2) |
The provision for income taxes in 2000 was reduced by a
one-time tax benefit totaling $36.1 million due to the
termination of our REIT status. |
|
|
(3) |
Dividends declared per common share as a percentage of
diluted earnings per share. |
|
|
(4) |
Defined as operating expenses divided by net interest income
and other income. |
|
|
(5) |
Average equity divided by net interest income and other
income. |
|
|
(6) |
Efficiency ratio multiplied by the capital to net revenue
ratio. |
|
|
(7) |
Debt includes deposits. |
|
|
(8) |
IndyMac Bank, F.S.B. (excludes unencumbered cash at the
Parent Company available for investment in IndyMac Bank).
Risk-based capital ratio is based on the regulatory standard
risk weighting adjusted for the additional risk weightings for
subprime loans. |
|
|
(9) |
Represents the total loan portfolio excluding amounts of
loans from discontinued product lines. |
|
|
(10) |
Represents the unpaid principal balance on loans sold with
servicing retained by IndyMac. |
|
(11) |
Includes newly originated commitments on construction
loans. |
24
|
|
ITEM 7. |
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
OVERVIEW
IndyMac is a leading hybrid thrift/mortgage banking company. We
offer a wide range of home mortgage products to a broad customer
base using a technology-based approach. IndyMac is structured to
achieve synergies among its operations and to enhance customer
service. We are now operating through four main segments:
Mortgage Banking Divisions, IndyMac Consumer Bank, Specialty
Product Divisions and Investing Divisions. The common
denominator of the Companys business is providing
consumers with single-family residential mortgages through
relationships with each segments core customers via the
channel in which each operates. Mortgage Banking Divisions
provide consumers with single-family permanent mortgage lending
through relationships with mortgage professionals
mortgage brokers, mortgage bankers, as well as through community
financial institutions, real estate professionals, and
consumers. IndyMac Consumer Bank provides the platform for the
mortgage and deposit services that IndyMac offers directly to
consumers through its branch network. Specialty Product
Divisions support the production of niche products including
construction lending, HELOCs, and reverse mortgages through all
of IndyMacs relationship and consumer direct production
channels. The Investing Divisions serve as the main link to
customers whose mortgages we service. Through its investments in
SFR mortgages, MBS and MSRs, the Investing Divisions generate
core spread and fee income and provide critical support to
IndyMacs mortgage lending operations.
Our operating activities primarily consist of three broad
categories: mortgage banking activities, investing activities
and HELOC activities. All of these activities are performed to
varying degrees by each of our main segments as shown in the
tables that follow. Mortgage banking activities are
characterized by high asset turnover (the production and sale of
mortgage loans) and efficient utilization of capital but can be
cyclical in nature depending on interest rates. Revenues
generated by mortgage banking activities include gain on sale of
mortgage loans, fee income and net spread (interest) income
during the period loans are held pending sale. Investing and
HELOC activities tend to provide a source of revenues that is
generally counter-cyclical to mortgage banking revenues,
comprised primarily of net interest income and servicing fees.
IndyMac is strategically focused on increasing the relative size
of its portfolios of mortgage loans, securities, and mortgage
servicing and investments in HELOC-related assets to achieve
greater balance between its mortgage banking activities and its
core investing activities. We believe that our investing
activities have and will continue to stabilize IndyMacs
core income. In addition to its revenue contribution, the
Investing Divisions perform the mortgage servicing function,
which includes payment processing, customer service, default
management and reporting to investors in our securitizations.
The mortgage servicing function creates added opportunities to
retain customers when the interest rate environment makes it
attractive for them to refinance and to cross-market customers
with other Company products. Default management, which includes
the processes of collections, loss mitigation, foreclosure,
bankruptcy, and foreclosed assets management, enables IndyMac to
proactively manage credit risk for the Company and its investors
in its securities. See Item 1. Business for
further descriptions of our operating segments.
Record revenues, earnings and earnings per share, on a pro forma
basis, as a result of record level mortgage production,
characterized IndyMacs overall results for the year ended
December 31, 2004. The Companys mortgage production
achieved a new record level of $37.9 billion for 2004, and
increased our mortgage industry market share to 1.33% for the
year, up 73% from 2003 and by the fourth quarter of 2004, our
market share was
1.71%(1)
based on the MBAs Mortgage Finance Forecast dated
January 27, 2005, up
|
|
(1) |
Our market share is calculated based on our total loan
production, both purchased (correspondent and conduit) and
originated (retail and wholesale), in all of our channels (the
numerator) divided by the MBAs estimate of the overall
mortgage market (the denominator) per their January 27,
2005 Mortgage Finance Forecast. As we review industry
publications such as National Mortgage News, we have confirmed
that our calculation is consistent with their methodologies for
reporting market share of IndyMac and our mortgage banking
peers. It is important to note that these industry calculations
cause purchased mortgages to be counted more than once, i.e.,
first when they are originated and again by the purchasers
(through correspondent and conduit channels) of the mortgages.
Therefore, our market share calculation may not be
mathematically precise in the absolute sense, but it is
consistent with industry calculations, which provide investors
with a good view of our relative standing compared to the other
top mortgage lending peers. |
25
71% from the market share of approximately 1.00% for the fourth
quarter of 2003. For the year ended December 31, 2004,
IndyMac earned $211.3 million, or $3.40 per share on a
pro forma basis excluding the change in accounting for rate
locks pursuant to SAB No. 105 and the purchase
accounting adjustment for the acquisition of Financial Freedom,
compared to $171.3 million, or $3.01 per share during
the year ended December 31, 2003. On a GAAP basis, the
Company earned $170.5 million, or $2.74 per share,
during the year ended December 31, 2004. In addition, in
line with our strategic objectives, the Company continued to
deploy capital to facilitate balance sheet growth and achieved
record total assets of $16.9 billion as of
December 31, 2004.
The following table provides a reconciliation of IndyMacs
GAAP results including the SAB No. 105 accounting
change and the purchase accounting adjustment, and on a pro
forma basis excluding these two items:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
GAAP | |
|
Adjustments(1) | |
|
Pro Forma | |
|
GAAP | |
|
GAAP | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data) | |
Net interest income after provision for loan losses
|
|
$ |
396,892 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
396,892 |
|
|
$ |
291,237 |
|
|
$ |
193,134 |
|
Gain on sale of loans
|
|
|
363,813 |
|
|
|
67,413 |
|
|
|
431,226 |
|
|
|
387,311 |
|
|
|
300,800 |
|
Other income
|
|
|
43,669 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,669 |
|
|
|
29,591 |
|
|
|
81,372 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
|
804,374 |
|
|
|
67,413 |
|
|
|
871,787 |
|
|
|
708,139 |
|
|
|
575,306 |
|
Other expenses
|
|
|
522,078 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
522,078 |
|
|
|
425,457 |
|
|
|
345,146 |
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
111,507 |
|
|
|
26,629 |
|
|
|
138,136 |
|
|
|
111,379 |
|
|
|
86,767 |
|
Minority Interest
|
|
|
267 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
267 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
$ |
170,522 |
|
|
$ |
40,784 |
|
|
$ |
211,306 |
|
|
$ |
171,303 |
|
|
$ |
143,393 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share
|
|
$ |
2.74 |
|
|
$ |
0.66 |
|
|
$ |
3.40 |
|
|
$ |
3.01 |
|
|
$ |
2.41 |
|
|
|
(1) |
The pro forma results for the year ended December 31,
2004 were prepared by adding to GAAP earnings the amount of
additional gain on sale revenue related to rate locks
($59.5 million) that the Company would have recognized had
SAB No. 105 not been adopted as of April 1, 2004.
In addition, pro forma results for year ended December 31,
2004 also reflect the amount of gain on sale revenue
($7.9 million) that was reduced for GAAP purposes by the
higher cost basis in certain loans that were sold by Financial
Freedom during the year. This higher cost basis was created by
the allocation at the closing of a portion of the purchase price
paid for Financial Freedom to the acquired loans held for sale
and the loan application pipeline. The pro forma results are not
necessarily indicative of the results that would have been
reported had SAB No. 105 been applied to all previous
periods. |
The following tables summarize the Companys financial
results for the year ended December 31, 2004, illustrating
the revenues earned in its mortgage banking activities,
investing and HELOC activities by each of its operating
segments. The profitability of each operating segment is
measured on a fully-leveraged basis after allocating capital
based on regulatory capital rules. Operating segments that
originate mortgage loans are credited with gain on sale at
funding based on the estimated fair value. Any difference
between the actual gain on sale realized and the estimate is
credited or charged to the operating segment in the period the
loan is sold or transferred to the held for investment
portfolio. Differences between the gain on sale credited to the
operating segments and the consolidated gain on sale due to
timing of loan sales or transfers to the held for investment
portfolio are eliminated in consolidation. The Company uses a
funds transfer pricing (FTP) system to allocate
interest income and expense to the operating segments. Each
operating segment is allocated funding with maturities and
interest rates matched with the expected lives and repricing
frequencies of the segments assets. IndyMac Consumer Bank
receives a funding credit for deposits using a similar
methodology. The difference between these allocations and the
Companys actual net interest income and capital levels
resulting from centralized management of funding costs is
reported in the Treasury Group. Corporate overhead costs related
to managing the Company as a whole are not allocated to the
operating segments.
26
The following table summarizes the segment financial highlights
for the year ended December 31, 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage | |
|
IndyMac | |
|
Specialty | |
|
|
|
|
|
Total | |
|
|
|
Total | |
|
|
Banking | |
|
Consumer | |
|
Product | |
|
Investing | |
|
|
|
Company | |
|
|
|
Company | |
|
|
Divisions | |
|
Bank | |
|
Divisions | |
|
Divisions | |
|
Other | |
|
Pro Forma | |
|
Adjustments | |
|
GAAP | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Operating Results
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage Banking Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
$ |
129,107 |
|
|
$ |
1,718 |
|
|
$ |
16,561 |
|
|
$ |
25,533 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
172,919 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
172,919 |
|
Gain (loss) on sale of loans
|
|
|
326,597 |
|
|
|
3,710 |
|
|
|
64,420 |
|
|
|
45,625 |
|
|
|
(11,413 |
) |
|
|
428,939 |
|
|
|
(67,413 |
) |
|
|
361,526 |
|
Other income
|
|
|
45,374 |
|
|
|
1,063 |
|
|
|
10,312 |
|
|
|
459 |
|
|
|
(985 |
) |
|
|
56,223 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56,223 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues (expense)
|
|
|
501,078 |
|
|
|
6,491 |
|
|
|
91,293 |
|
|
|
71,617 |
|
|
|
(12,398 |
) |
|
|
658,081 |
|
|
|
(67,413 |
) |
|
|
590,668 |
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
263,677 |
|
|
|
8,472 |
|
|
|
21,296 |
|
|
|
5,091 |
|
|
|
369 |
|
|
|
298,905 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
298,905 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pretax income (loss)
|
|
|
237,401 |
|
|
|
(1,981 |
) |
|
|
69,997 |
|
|
|
66,526 |
|
|
|
(12,767 |
) |
|
|
359,176 |
|
|
|
(67,413 |
) |
|
|
291,763 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74,512 |
|
|
|
139,110 |
|
|
|
8,350 |
|
|
|
221,972 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
221,972 |
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,079 |
) |
|
|
(5,397 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(8,479 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,479 |
) |
Service fee income (expense)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,644 |
|
|
|
(31,281 |
) |
|
|
14,437 |
|
|
|
(14,200 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,200 |
) |
(Loss) gain on sale of securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(29,262 |
) |
|
|
5,458 |
|
|
|
(23,804 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23,804 |
) |
Other income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,968 |
|
|
|
5,999 |
|
|
|
2,929 |
|
|
|
15,896 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,896 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81,045 |
|
|
|
79,169 |
|
|
|
31,171 |
|
|
|
191,385 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
191,385 |
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,049 |
|
|
|
45,530 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90,579 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90,579 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pretax income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,996 |
|
|
|
33,639 |
|
|
|
31,171 |
|
|
|
100,806 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,806 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HELOC Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
24,986 |
|
|
|
1,088 |
|
|
|
2,603 |
|
|
|
114 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,791 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,791 |
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
(169 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
490 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
309 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
309 |
|
Gain on Sale of loans
|
|
|
1,768 |
|
|
|
136 |
|
|
|
306 |
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,287 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,287 |
|
Service fee income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,747 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,747 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,747 |
|
Other income
|
|
|
3,463 |
|
|
|
165 |
|
|
|
1,156 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,787 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,787 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
|
30,048 |
|
|
|
1,377 |
|
|
|
6,302 |
|
|
|
194 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,921 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,921 |
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
3,254 |
|
|
|
185 |
|
|
|
5,877 |
|
|
|
231 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,547 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,547 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pretax income
|
|
|
26,794 |
|
|
|
1,192 |
|
|
|
425 |
|
|
|
(37 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,374 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,374 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing and Other Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,817 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(51,437 |
) |
|
|
(18,620 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18,620 |
) |
Other income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,563 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
457 |
|
|
|
3,020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues (expense)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,380 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(50,980 |
) |
|
|
(15,600 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,600 |
) |
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,187 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
103,127 |
|
|
|
123,314 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
123,314 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pretax income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,193 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(154,107 |
) |
|
|
(138,914 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(138,914 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total pretax income (loss)
|
|
|
264,195 |
|
|
|
14,404 |
|
|
|
106,418 |
|
|
|
100,128 |
|
|
|
(135,703 |
) |
|
|
349,442 |
|
|
|
(67,413 |
) |
|
|
282,029 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
159,839 |
|
|
$ |
8,713 |
|
|
$ |
64,384 |
|
|
$ |
60,577 |
|
|
$ |
(82,207 |
) |
|
$ |
211,306 |
|
|
$ |
(40,784 |
) |
|
$ |
170,522 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratios
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of average total assets
|
|
|
29 |
% |
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
15% |
|
|
|
50 |
% |
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
100% |
|
Percentage of total revenue
|
|
|
61 |
% |
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
20% |
|
|
|
17 |
% |
|
|
(3 |
)% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
100% |
|
Percentage of pretax income
|
|
|
76 |
% |
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
30% |
|
|
|
29 |
% |
|
|
(39 |
)% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
100% |
|
Balance Sheet Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average interest-earning assets(1)
|
|
$ |
4,797,535 |
|
|
$ |
97,795 |
|
|
$ |
2,547,930 |
|
|
$ |
7,744,045 |
|
|
$ |
333,554 |
|
|
$ |
15,520,859 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
15,520,859 |
|
Average total assets
|
|
$ |
4,894,248 |
|
|
$ |
119,829 |
|
|
$ |
2,610,595 |
|
|
$ |
8,421,413 |
|
|
$ |
824,550 |
|
|
$ |
16,870,635 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
16,870,635 |
|
Allocated capital
|
|
$ |
318,760 |
|
|
$ |
7,456 |
|
|
$ |
203,057 |
|
|
$ |
506,077 |
|
|
$ |
116,765 |
|
|
$ |
1,152,115 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,152,115 |
|
Capital allocated to mortgage banking activities
|
|
$ |
254,765 |
|
|
$ |
2,323 |
|
|
$ |
39,060 |
|
|
$ |
25,863 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
322,011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
322,011 |
|
Capital allocated to investing activities
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
149,683 |
|
|
$ |
480,101 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
629,784 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
629,784 |
|
Capital allocated to HELOC activities
|
|
$ |
63,995 |
|
|
$ |
3,652 |
|
|
$ |
14,314 |
|
|
$ |
113 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
82,074 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
82,074 |
|
Capital allocated to financing and other activities
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,481 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
116,765 |
|
|
$ |
118,246 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
118,246 |
|
Allocated capital/average total assets
|
|
|
6.51 |
% |
|
|
6.22 |
% |
|
|
7.78% |
|
|
|
6.01 |
% |
|
|
14.16 |
% |
|
|
6.83 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.83% |
|
Loans Produced
|
|
$ |
30,974,452 |
|
|
$ |
461,997 |
|
|
$ |
6,252,974 |
|
|
$ |
1,358,937 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
39,048,360 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
39,048,360 |
|
Purchase mortgages
|
|
|
39 |
% |
|
|
26 |
% |
|
|
73% |
|
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
42 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
42% |
|
Cash-out refinance mortgages
|
|
|
44 |
% |
|
|
56 |
% |
|
|
21% |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
40% |
|
Rate and term refinance mortgages
|
|
|
17 |
% |
|
|
18 |
% |
|
|
6% |
|
|
|
80 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
18% |
|
Performance Ratios
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on equity (ROE)
|
|
|
50 |
% |
|
|
117 |
% |
|
|
32% |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
18.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.8% |
|
ROE mortgage banking activities
|
|
|
56 |
% |
|
|
(52 |
)% |
|
|
108% |
|
|
|
156 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
67 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
55% |
|
ROE investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15% |
|
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10% |
|
ROE HELOC activities
|
|
|
25 |
% |
|
|
20 |
% |
|
|
2% |
|
|
|
(20 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
21% |
|
ROE financing and other activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
621 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(71 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(71 |
)% |
Return on assets (ROA)
|
|
|
3.27 |
% |
|
|
N/M (2 |
) |
|
|
2.47% |
|
|
|
0.72 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.25 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.01% |
|
Net interest margin
|
|
|
3.21 |
% |
|
|
N/M (2 |
) |
|
|
3.68% |
|
|
|
2.13 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.61 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.61% |
|
Efficiency ratio
|
|
|
50 |
% |
|
|
67 |
% |
|
|
40% |
|
|
|
33 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
59 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
64% |
|
Capital adjusted efficiency ratio
|
|
|
30 |
% |
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
45% |
|
|
|
105 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
78 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
91% |
|
Average Full-Time Equivalent Employees (FTE)
|
|
|
2,474 |
|
|
|
268 |
|
|
|
629 |
|
|
|
485 |
|
|
|
714 |
|
|
|
4,570 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,570 |
|
|
|
(1) |
The allowance for loan losses is excluded from average loan
balances for purposes of calculating average interest-earning
assets. |
|
(2) |
Not meaningful. |
27
The following table provides additional detail on the segment
results for the Mortgage Banking Divisions for the year ended
December 31, 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage Banking Divisions | |
|
|
| |
|
|
IndyMac | |
|
Mortgage | |
|
Real Estate | |
|
Web & | |
|
|
|
|
Conduit | |
|
Professionals | |
|
Professionals | |
|
Direct Mail | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Operating Results
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage Banking Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
$ |
40,504 |
|
|
$ |
66,672 |
|
|
$ |
7,232 |
|
|
$ |
14,699 |
|
|
$ |
129,107 |
|
Gain on sale of loans
|
|
|
11,457 |
|
|
|
241,313 |
|
|
|
12,630 |
|
|
|
61,197 |
|
|
|
326,597 |
|
Other (loss) income
|
|
|
(666 |
) |
|
|
32,829 |
|
|
|
2,443 |
|
|
|
10,768 |
|
|
|
45,374 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
|
51,295 |
|
|
|
340,814 |
|
|
|
22,305 |
|
|
|
86,664 |
|
|
|
501,078 |
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
14,610 |
|
|
|
154,702 |
|
|
|
21,030 |
|
|
|
73,335 |
|
|
|
263,677 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pretax income
|
|
|
36,685 |
|
|
|
186,112 |
|
|
|
1,275 |
|
|
|
13,329 |
|
|
|
237,401 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service fee income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale of securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pretax income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HELOC Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
3,944 |
|
|
|
13,960 |
|
|
|
1,182 |
|
|
|
5,900 |
|
|
|
24,986 |
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(192 |
) |
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
(80 |
) |
|
|
(169 |
) |
Gain on sale of loans
|
|
|
359 |
|
|
|
1,141 |
|
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
1,768 |
|
Service fee income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
1,897 |
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
1,360 |
|
|
|
3,463 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
|
4,309 |
|
|
|
16,806 |
|
|
|
1,656 |
|
|
|
7,277 |
|
|
|
30,048 |
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
691 |
|
|
|
1,456 |
|
|
|
161 |
|
|
|
946 |
|
|
|
3,254 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pretax income
|
|
|
3,618 |
|
|
|
15,350 |
|
|
|
1,495 |
|
|
|
6,331 |
|
|
|
26,794 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing and Other Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pretax income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total pretax income
|
|
|
40,303 |
|
|
|
201,462 |
|
|
|
2,770 |
|
|
|
19,660 |
|
|
|
264,195 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
24,383 |
|
|
$ |
121,886 |
|
|
$ |
1,675 |
|
|
$ |
11,895 |
|
|
$ |
159,839 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratios
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of assets
|
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
17 |
% |
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
29 |
% |
Percentage of total revenue
|
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
41 |
% |
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
61 |
% |
Percentage of pretax income
|
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
58 |
% |
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
76 |
% |
Balance Sheet Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average interest-earning assets
|
|
$ |
1,075,540 |
|
|
$ |
2,830,232 |
|
|
$ |
249,564 |
|
|
$ |
642,199 |
|
|
$ |
4,797,535 |
|
Average total assets
|
|
$ |
1,090,957 |
|
|
$ |
2,890,601 |
|
|
$ |
254,796 |
|
|
$ |
657,894 |
|
|
$ |
4,894,248 |
|
Allocated capital
|
|
$ |
71,374 |
|
|
$ |
186,119 |
|
|
$ |
15,154 |
|
|
$ |
46,113 |
|
|
$ |
318,760 |
|
Capital allocated to mortgage banking activities
|
|
$ |
61,448 |
|
|
$ |
153,823 |
|
|
$ |
12,058 |
|
|
$ |
27,436 |
|
|
$ |
254,765 |
|
Capital allocated to investing activities
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Capital allocated to HELOC activities
|
|
$ |
9,926 |
|
|
$ |
32,296 |
|
|
$ |
3,096 |
|
|
$ |
18,677 |
|
|
$ |
63,995 |
|
Capital allocated to financing and other activities
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Allocated capital/total average assets
|
|
|
6.54 |
% |
|
|
6.44 |
% |
|
|
5.95 |
% |
|
|
7.01 |
% |
|
|
6.51 |
% |
Loans Produced
|
|
$ |
7,652,503 |
|
|
$ |
18,568,839 |
|
|
$ |
1,667,002 |
|
|
$ |
3,086,108 |
|
|
$ |
30,974,452 |
|
Purchase mortgages
|
|
|
42 |
% |
|
|
40 |
% |
|
|
75 |
% |
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
39 |
% |
Cash-out refinance mortgages
|
|
|
37 |
% |
|
|
46 |
% |
|
|
18 |
% |
|
|
64 |
% |
|
|
44 |
% |
Rate and term refinance mortgages
|
|
|
21 |
% |
|
|
14 |
% |
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
26 |
% |
|
|
17 |
% |
Performance Ratios
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on equity (ROE)
|
|
|
34 |
% |
|
|
65 |
% |
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
26 |
% |
|
|
50 |
% |
ROE mortgage banking activities
|
|
|
36 |
% |
|
|
73 |
% |
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
29 |
% |
|
|
56 |
% |
ROE investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ROE HELOC activities
|
|
|
22 |
% |
|
|
29 |
% |
|
|
29 |
% |
|
|
21 |
% |
|
|
25 |
% |
ROE financing and other activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on assets (ROA)
|
|
|
2.24 |
% |
|
|
4.22 |
% |
|
|
0.66 |
% |
|
|
1.81 |
% |
|
|
3.27 |
% |
Net interest margin
|
|
|
4.13 |
% |
|
|
2.85 |
% |
|
|
3.37 |
% |
|
|
3.21 |
% |
|
|
3.21 |
% |
Efficiency ratio
|
|
|
28 |
% |
|
|
44 |
% |
|
|
89 |
% |
|
|
79 |
% |
|
|
50 |
% |
Capital adjusted efficiency ratio
|
|
|
35 |
% |
|
|
23 |
% |
|
|
56 |
% |
|
|
39 |
% |
|
|
30 |
% |
Average FTE
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
1,604 |
|
|
|
228 |
|
|
|
582 |
|
|
|
2,474 |
|
Mortgage Banking Divisions
|
|
|
IndyMac Conduit |
|
This division is responsible for purchasing mortgage loans in
bulk from mortgage bankers, financial institutions and other
capital market participants. |
Mortgage Professionals |
|
This group is responsible for the production of mortgage loans
through relationships with mortgage professionals, including
mortgage brokers, mortgage bankers and financial institutions. |
Real Estate Professionals |
|
This group provides mortgage loan services through relationships
with Realtors and homebuilders. |
Web & Direct Mail |
|
This channel offers consumers mortgage lending through the
Internet, direct mail, and affinity relationships. |
28
The following table provides additional details on the segment
results for the IndyMac Consumer Bank and Specialty Product
Divisions for the year ended December 31, 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specialty Product Divisions | |
|
|
IndyMac | |
|
| |
|
|
Consumer | |
|
Consumer | |
|
Subdivision | |
|
|
|
Financial | |
|
|
|
|
Bank | |
|
Construction | |
|
Construction | |
|
HELOC | |
|
Freedom | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Operating Results
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage Banking Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
$ |
1,718 |
|
|
$ |
15,853 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
708 |
|
|
$ |
16,561 |
|
Gain on sale of loans
|
|
|
3,710 |
|
|
|
35,720 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,700 |
|
|
|
64,420 |
|
Other income
|
|
|
1,063 |
|
|
|
8,320 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,992 |
|
|
|
10,312 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
|
6,491 |
|
|
|
59,893 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,400 |
|
|
|
91,293 |
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
8,472 |
|
|
|
3,995 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,301 |
|
|
|
21,296 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pretax (loss) income
|
|
|
(1,981 |
) |
|
|
55,898 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,099 |
|
|
|
69,997 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,590 |
|
|
|
28,922 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74,512 |
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,169 |
) |
|
|
(910 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,079 |
) |
Service fee income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,644 |
|
|
|
2,644 |
|
Gain on sale of securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,567 |
|
|
|
333 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
6,968 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,988 |
|
|
|
28,345 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,712 |
|
|
|
81,045 |
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,296 |
|
|
|
8,712 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,041 |
|
|
|
45,049 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pretax income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,692 |
|
|
|
19,633 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
671 |
|
|
|
35,996 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HELOC Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
1,088 |
|
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,468 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,603 |
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
497 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
490 |
|
Gain on sale of loans
|
|
|
136 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
306 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
306 |
|
Service fee income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,747 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,747 |
|
Other income
|
|
|
165 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,125 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,156 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
|
1,377 |
|
|
|
159 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,143 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,302 |
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
185 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,860 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,877 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pretax income
|
|
|
1,192 |
|
|
|
142 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
283 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
425 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing and Other Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
32,817 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
2,563 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
|
35,380 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
20,187 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pretax income
|
|
|
15,193 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total pretax income
|
|
|
14,404 |
|
|
|
71,732 |
|
|
|
19,633 |
|
|
|
283 |
|
|
|
14,770 |
|
|
|
106,418 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
8,713 |
|
|
$ |
43,398 |
|
|
$ |
11,879 |
|
|
$ |
171 |
|
|
$ |
8,936 |
|
|
$ |
64,384 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratios
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of assets
|
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
15 |
% |
Percentage of total revenue
|
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
13 |
% |
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
20 |
% |
Percentage of pretax income
|
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
21 |
% |
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
30 |
% |
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specialty Product Divisions | |
|
|
IndyMac | |
|
| |
|
|
Consumer | |
|
Consumer | |
|
Subdivision | |
|
|
|
Financial | |
|
|
|
|
Bank | |
|
Construction | |
|
Construction | |
|
HELOC | |
|
Freedom | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Balance Sheet Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average interest-earning assets
|
|
$ |
97,795 |
|
|
$ |
1,700,188 |
|
|
$ |
635,981 |
|
|
$ |
158,444 |
|
|
$ |
53,317 |
|
|
$ |
2,547,930 |
|
Average total assets
|
|
$ |
119,829 |
|
|
$ |
1,704,848 |
|
|
$ |
634,926 |
|
|
$ |
172,342 |
|
|
$ |
98,479 |
|
|
$ |
2,610,595 |
|
Allocated capital
|
|
$ |
7,456 |
|
|
$ |
92,482 |
|
|
$ |
68,585 |
|
|
$ |
14,054 |
|
|
$ |
27,936 |
|
|
$ |
203,057 |
|
Capital allocated to mortgage banking activities
|
|
$ |
2,323 |
|
|
$ |
11,124 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
27,936 |
|
|
$ |
39,060 |
|
Capital allocated to investing activities
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
81,098 |
|
|
$ |
68,585 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
149,683 |
|
Capital allocated to HELOC activities
|
|
$ |
3,652 |
|
|
$ |
260 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
14,054 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
14,314 |
|
Capital allocated to financing and other activities
|
|
$ |
1,481 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Allocated capital/total average assets
|
|
|
6.22 |
% |
|
|
5.42 |
% |
|
|
10.80 |
% |
|
|
8.15 |
% |
|
|
28.37 |
% |
|
|
7.78 |
% |
Loans Produced
|
|
$ |
461,997 |
|
|
$ |
4,008,645 |
|
|
$ |
1,146,038 |
|
|
$ |
205,202 |
|
|
$ |
893,089 |
|
|
$ |
6,252,974 |
|
Purchase mortgages
|
|
|
26 |
% |
|
|
93 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73 |
% |
Cash out refinance mortgages
|
|
|
56 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
21 |
% |
Rate and term refinance mortgages
|
|
|
18 |
% |
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
% |
Performance Ratios
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on equity (ROE)
|
|
|
117 |
% |
|
|
47 |
% |
|
|
17 |
% |
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
32 |
% |
|
|
32 |
% |
ROE mortgage banking activities
|
|
|
(52 |
)% |
|
|
304 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
% |
|
|
108 |
% |
ROE investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
17 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
% |
ROE HELOC activities
|
|
|
20 |
% |
|
|
33 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
% |
ROE financing and other activities
|
|
|
621 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on assets (ROA)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.55 |
% |
|
|
1.87 |
% |
|
|
0.10 |
% |
|
|
9.07 |
% |
|
|
2.47 |
% |
Net interest margin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.62 |
% |
|
|
4.55 |
% |
|
|
1.56 |
% |
|
|
1.33 |
% |
|
|
3.68 |
% |
Efficiency ratio
|
|
|
67 |
% |
|
|
34 |
% |
|
|
30 |
% |
|
|
104 |
% |
|
|
57 |
% |
|
|
40 |
% |
Capital adjusted efficiency ratio
|
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
28 |
% |
|
|
70 |
% |
|
|
258 |
% |
|
|
46 |
% |
|
|
45 |
% |
Average FTE
|
|
|
268 |
|
|
|
294 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
248 |
|
|
|
629 |
|
IndyMac Consumer Bank and Specialty Product Divisions
|
|
|
Consumer Bank |
|
The Consumer Bank offers direct lending and deposit products to
our depositors through our retail branch network, on-line
contact center and institutional money desk. |
Consumer Construction |
|
This division is responsible for the production of
construction-to-permanent and lot loans to individuals who are
in the process of building their own homes, through mortgage
professionals and direct to consumers. |
Subdivision Construction
HELOC |
|
This division provides financing to subdivision developers.
This group is primarily responsible for the production of home
equity lines of credit (HELOCs) and closed-end seconds through
marketing strategies focused on direct interaction with
consumers. |
Financial Freedom |
|
This group is responsible for the generation of predominantly
reverse mortgage products with senior customers (age 62 or
older) via a relationship sales force and a loan officer sales
force. |
30
The following table provides additional details on the segment
results for the Investing Divisions for the year ended
December 31, 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing Divisions | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Loan Servicing and | |
|
SFR Mortgage | |
|
|
|
Discontinued | |
|
|
|
|
Retained Assets | |
|
Loans | |
|
MBS | |
|
Products | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Operating Results
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage Banking Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
$ |
25,533 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
25,533 |
|
Gain on sale of loans
|
|
|
31,063 |
|
|
|
14,562 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,625 |
|
Other income
|
|
|
459 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
459 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
|
57,055 |
|
|
|
14,562 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71,617 |
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
5,091 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,091 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pretax income
|
|
|
51,964 |
|
|
|
14,562 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66,526 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
36,560 |
|
|
|
68,664 |
|
|
|
29,808 |
|
|
|
4,078 |
|
|
|
139,110 |
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,298 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,099 |
) |
|
|
(5,397 |
) |
Service fee (loss) income
|
|
|
(31,281 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(31,281 |
) |
(Loss) gain on sale of securities
|
|
|
(30,922 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,659 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(29,262 |
) |
Other income
|
|
|
2,530 |
|
|
|
3,468 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
5,999 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (expense) revenues
|
|
|
(23,113 |
) |
|
|
70,834 |
|
|
|
31,467 |
|
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
79,169 |
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
38,731 |
|
|
|
3,052 |
|
|
|
935 |
|
|
|
2,812 |
|
|
|
45,530 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pretax (loss) income
|
|
|
(61,844 |
) |
|
|
67,782 |
|
|
|
30,532 |
|
|
|
(2,831 |
) |
|
|
33,639 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HELOC Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
114 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
114 |
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale of loans
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77 |
|
Service fee income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
|
194 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
194 |
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
231 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
231 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pretax (loss)
|
|
|
(37 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(37 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing and Other Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pretax income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total pretax (loss) income
|
|
|
(9,917 |
) |
|
|
82,344 |
|
|
|
30,532 |
|
|
|
(2,831 |
) |
|
|
100,128 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$ |
(5,999 |
) |
|
$ |
49,819 |
|
|
$ |
18,471 |
|
|
$ |
(1,714 |
) |
|
$ |
60,577 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratios
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of assets
|
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
28 |
% |
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
50 |
% |
Percentage of total revenue
|
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
% |
Percentage of pretax income
|
|
|
(3 |
)% |
|
|
24 |
% |
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
(1 |
)% |
|
|
29 |
% |
Balance Sheet Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average interest-earning assets
|
|
$ |
974,359 |
|
|
$ |
4,790,453 |
|
|
$ |
1,917,668 |
|
|
$ |
61,565 |
|
|
$ |
7,744,045 |
|
Average total assets
|
|
$ |
1,618,028 |
|
|
$ |
4,802,458 |
|
|
$ |
1,946,424 |
|
|
$ |
54,503 |
|
|
$ |
8,421,413 |
|
Allocated capital
|
|
$ |
224,763 |
|
|
$ |
233,974 |
|
|
$ |
41,931 |
|
|
$ |
5,409 |
|
|
$ |
506,077 |
|
Capital allocated to mortgage banking activities
|
|
$ |
25,863 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
25,863 |
|
Capital allocated to investing activities
|
|
$ |
198,787 |
|
|
$ |
233,974 |
|
|
$ |
41,931 |
|
|
$ |
5,409 |
|
|
$ |
480,101 |
|
Capital allocated to HELOC activities
|
|
$ |
113 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
113 |
|
Capital allocated to financing and other activities
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Allocated capital/ total average assets
|
|
|
13.89 |
% |
|
|
4.87 |
% |
|
|
2.15 |
% |
|
|
9.92 |
% |
|
|
6.01 |
% |
Loans Produced
|
|
$ |
1,358,937 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,358,937 |
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing Divisions | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Loan Servicing and | |
|
SFR Mortgage | |
|
|
|
Discontinued | |
|
|
|
|
Retained Assets | |
|
Loans | |
|
MBS | |
|
Products | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Performance Ratios
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on equity (ROE)
|
|
|
(3 |
)% |
|
|
21 |
% |
|
|
44 |
% |
|
|
(32 |
)% |
|
|
12 |
% |
ROE mortgage banking activities
|
|
|
122 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
156 |
% |
ROE investing activities
|
|
|
(19 |
)% |
|
|
18 |
% |
|
|
44 |
% |
|
|
(32 |
)% |
|
|
4 |
% |
ROE HELOC activities
|
|
|
(20 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20 |
)% |
ROE financing and other activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on assets (ROA)
|
|
|
(0.37 |
)% |
|
|
1.04 |
% |
|
|
0.95 |
% |
|
|
(3.14 |
)% |
|
|
0.72 |
% |
Net interest margin
|
|
|
6.38 |
% |
|
|
1.43 |
% |
|
|
1.55 |
% |
|
|
6.62 |
% |
|
|
2.13 |
% |
Efficiency ratio
|
|
|
129 |
% |
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
69 |
% |
|
|
33 |
% |
Capital adjusted efficiency ratio
|
|
|
850 |
% |
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
91 |
% |
|
|
105 |
% |
Average FTE
|
|
|
464 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
485 |
|
Investing Divisions
|
|
|
Loan Servicing and
Retained Assets |
|
Loan servicing and retained assets include the following:
(i) MSRs, interest-only securities and residual securities,
(ii) securities and derivatives, all of which are held as
hedges of such assets, including principal-only securities,
agency debentures and U.S. Treasury bonds, (iii) loans
held for sale acquired through clean-up calls or through the
Companys customer retention programs and
(iv) investment and non-investment grade securities. |
SFR Mortgage Loans |
|
Assets include all single-family residential loans held for
investment other than discontinued products. |
MBS |
|
Assets include AAA-rated agency and private label MBS. |
Discontinued Products |
|
Discontinued products are home improvement and manufactured
housing loans. |
32
The following table provides additional details on the segment
results for all others for the year ended December 31, 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company Before | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate | |
|
|
|
|
|
Total | |
|
|
|
Total | |
|
|
Treasury | |
|
Overhead and | |
|
Corporate | |
|
Eliminations | |
|
Company | |
|
|
|
Company | |
|
|
Group(1) | |
|
Eliminations | |
|
Overhead | |
|
(2) | |
|
Pro Forma | |
|
Adjustments | |
|
GAAP | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Operating Results
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage Banking Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
172,919 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
172,919 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
172,919 |
|
Gain (loss) on sale of loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
440,352 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,413 |
) |
|
|
428,939 |
|
|
|
(67,413 |
) |
|
|
361,526 |
|
Other income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57,208 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(985 |
) |
|
|
56,223 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56,223 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues (expense)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
670,479 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,398 |
) |
|
|
658,081 |
|
|
|
(67,413 |
) |
|
|
590,668 |
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
298,536 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
369 |
|
|
|
298,905 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
298,905 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pretax income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
371,943 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,767 |
) |
|
|
359,176 |
|
|
|
(67,413 |
) |
|
|
291,763 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
213,622 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,350 |
|
|
|
221,972 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
221,972 |
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,476 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(8,479 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,479 |
) |
Service fee (expense) income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(28,637 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,437 |
|
|
|
(14,200 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,200 |
) |
(Loss) gain on sale of securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(29,262 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,458 |
|
|
|
(23,804 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23,804 |
) |
Other income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,967 |
|
|
|
2,929 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,896 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,896 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
160,214 |
|
|
|
2,929 |
|
|
|
28,242 |
|
|
|
191,385 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
191,385 |
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90,579 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90,579 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90,579 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pretax income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69,635 |
|
|
|
2,929 |
|
|
|
28,242 |
|
|
|
100,806 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,806 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HELOC Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,791 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,791 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,791 |
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
309 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
309 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
309 |
|
Gain on Sale of loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,287 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,287 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,287 |
|
Service fee income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,747 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,747 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,747 |
|
Other income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,787 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,787 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,787 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,921 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,921 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,921 |
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,547 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,547 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,547 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pretax income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,374 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,374 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,374 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing and Other Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest loss
|
|
|
(44,262 |
) |
|
|
(11,445 |
) |
|
|
(7,175 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18,620 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18,620 |
) |
Other income
|
|
|
454 |
|
|
|
3,017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
3,020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (expense) revenues
|
|
|
(43,808 |
) |
|
|
(8,428 |
) |
|
|
(7,175 |
) |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
(15,600 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,600 |
) |
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
1,846 |
|
|
|
22,033 |
|
|
|
101,281 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
123,314 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
123,314 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pretax (loss) income
|
|
|
(45,654 |
) |
|
|
(30,461 |
) |
|
|
(108,456 |
) |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
(138,914 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(138,914 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total pretax (loss) income
|
|
|
(45,654 |
) |
|
|
439,491 |
|
|
|
(105,527 |
) |
|
|
15,478 |
|
|
|
349,442 |
|
|
|
(67,413 |
) |
|
|
282,029 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$ |
(27,622 |
) |
|
$ |
265,891 |
|
|
$ |
(63,951 |
) |
|
$ |
9,366 |
|
|
$ |
211,306 |
|
|
$ |
(40,784 |
) |
|
$ |
170,522 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratios
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of assets
|
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
99 |
% |
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
% |
Percentage of total revenue
|
|
|
(5 |
)% |
|
|
99 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
% |
Percentage of pretax income
|
|
|
(13 |
)% |
|
|
126 |
% |
|
|
(30 |
)% |
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
% |
Balance Sheet Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average interest-earning assets
|
|
$ |
344,210 |
|
|
$ |
15,531,515 |
|
|
$ |
(10,656 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
15,520,859 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
15,520,859 |
|
Average total assets
|
|
$ |
603,525 |
|
|
$ |
16,649,610 |
|
|
$ |
221,025 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
16,870,635 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
16,870,635 |
|
Allocated capital
|
|
$ |
30,563 |
|
|
$ |
1,065,913 |
|
|
$ |
86,202 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,152,115 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,152,115 |
|
Capital allocated to mortgage banking activities
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
322,011 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
322,011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
322,011 |
|
Capital allocated to investing activities
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
629,784 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
629,784 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
629,784 |
|
Capital allocated to HELOC activities
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
82,074 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
82,074 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
82,074 |
|
Capital allocated to financing and other activities
|
|
$ |
30,563 |
|
|
$ |
32,044 |
|
|
$ |
86,202 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
118,246 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
118,246 |
|
Allocated capital/total average assets
|
|
|
5.06 |
% |
|
|
6.40 |
% |
|
|
39.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.83 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.83 |
% |
33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company Before | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate | |
|
|
|
|
|
Total | |
|
|
|
Total | |
|
|
Treasury | |
|
Overhead and | |
|
Corporate | |
|
Eliminations |
|
Company | |
|
|
|
Company | |
|
|
Group(1) | |
|
Eliminations | |
|
Overhead | |
|
(2) |
|
Pro Forma | |
|
Adjustments |
|
GAAP | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Loans Produced
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
39,048,360 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
39,048,360 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
39,048,360 |
|
Purchase mortgages
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
42 |
% |
Cash out refinance mortgages
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
% |
Rate and term refinance mortgages
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
% |
Performance Ratios
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on equity (ROE)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.8 |
% |
ROE mortgage banking
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
55 |
% |
ROE investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
% |
ROE HELOC activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
% |
ROE financing and other activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(58 |
)% |
|
|
N/M (3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(71 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(71 |
)% |
Return on assets (ROA)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.60 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.25 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.01 |
% |
Net interest margin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.60 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.61 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.61 |
% |
Efficiency ratio
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
64 |
% |
Capital adjusted efficiency ratio
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
91 |
% |
Average FTE
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
3,882 |
|
|
|
688 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,570 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,570 |
|
|
|
(1) |
During the year ended December 31, 2004, the Treasury Group
reported net interest expense of $44.3 million. This amount
includes interest expense related to the debentures underlying
trust preferred securities issued by the Company in 2004, 2003
and 2001 which is not allocated to the business units.
Additionally, the net expense in Treasury reflects the cost of
maintaining adequate corporate liquidity, as well as certain
fixed rate deposits with longer maturities raised in prior
years, the higher cost of which is not allocated to the business
units. |
|
(2) |
The amounts in this column include primarily the differences
between the actual gain on sale credited to the operating
segments and the consolidated gain on sale due to timing of loan
sales or transfers, and the elimination of premiums on
inter-company transactions. |
|
(3) |
Not meaningful. |
34
The following table compares the detail segment results of
operations for the year ended December 31, 2004 to the year
ended December 31, 2003:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage Banking Divisions | |
|
|
| |
|
|
IndyMac | |
|
Mortgage | |
|
Real Estate | |
|
Web & | |
|
|
|
|
Conduit | |
|
Professionals | |
|
Professionals | |
|
Direct Mail | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Mortgage Banking Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 Pretax income
|
|
$ |
36,685 |
|
|
$ |
186,112 |
|
|
$ |
1,275 |
|
|
$ |
13,329 |
|
|
$ |
237,401 |
|
2003 Pretax income
|
|
|
26,921 |
|
|
|
217,148 |
|
|
|
7,101 |
|
|
|
72,848 |
|
|
|
324,018 |
|
Percent Change
|
|
|
36 |
% |
|
|
(14 |
)% |
|
|
(82 |
)% |
|
|
(82 |
)% |
|
|
(27 |
)% |
Investing Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 Pretax income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003 Pretax income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent Change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HELOC Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 Pretax income
|
|
|
3,618 |
|
|
|
15,350 |
|
|
|
1,495 |
|
|
|
6,331 |
|
|
|
26,794 |
|
2003 Pretax income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,587 |
|
|
|
294 |
|
|
|
1,973 |
|
|
|
6,854 |
|
Percent Change
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
235 |
% |
|
|
409 |
% |
|
|
221 |
% |
|
|
291 |
% |
Financing and Other Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 Pretax income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003 Pretax income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 Net income
|
|
|
24,383 |
|
|
|
121,886 |
|
|
|
1,675 |
|
|
|
11,895 |
|
|
|
159,839 |
|
2003 Net income
|
|
|
16,288 |
|
|
|
134,149 |
|
|
|
4,475 |
|
|
|
45,266 |
|
|
|
200,178 |
|
Percent Change
|
|
|
50 |
% |
|
|
(9 |
)% |
|
|
(63 |
)% |
|
|
(74 |
)% |
|
|
(20 |
)% |
Performance Ratios
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ROE
|
|
|
34 |
% |
|
|
65 |
% |
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
26 |
% |
|
|
50 |
% |
ROA
|
|
|
2.24 |
% |
|
|
4.22 |
% |
|
|
0.66 |
% |
|
|
1.81 |
% |
|
|
3.27 |
% |
NIM
|
|
|
4.13 |
% |
|
|
2.85 |
% |
|
|
3.37 |
% |
|
|
3.21 |
% |
|
|
3.21 |
% |
Efficiency ratio
|
|
|
28 |
% |
|
|
44 |
% |
|
|
89 |
% |
|
|
79 |
% |
|
|
50 |
% |
Capital adjusted efficiency ratio
|
|
|
35 |
% |
|
|
23 |
% |
|
|
56 |
% |
|
|
39 |
% |
|
|
30 |
% |
Average FTE
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
1,604 |
|
|
|
228 |
|
|
|
582 |
|
|
|
2,474 |
|
2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ROE
|
|
|
60 |
% |
|
|
101 |
% |
|
|
42 |
% |
|
|
95 |
% |
|
|
92 |
% |
ROA
|
|
|
4.22 |
% |
|
|
6.42 |
% |
|
|
2.59 |
% |
|
|
6.38 |
% |
|
|
5.96 |
% |
NIM
|
|
|
5.14 |
% |
|
|
4.30 |
% |
|
|
4.13 |
% |
|
|
3.72 |
% |
|
|
4.27 |
% |
Efficiency ratio
|
|
|
15 |
% |
|
|
36 |
% |
|
|
74 |
% |
|
|
47 |
% |
|
|
40 |
% |
Capital adjusted efficiency ratio
|
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
14 |
% |
|
|
27 |
% |
|
|
15 |
% |
|
|
16 |
% |
Average FTE
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
1,260 |
|
|
|
206 |
|
|
|
610 |
|
|
|
2,084 |
|
The Mortgage Banking Divisions net income decreased by
20%, or $40.3 million compared to 2003. The decreases were
primarily due to decreases in gain on sale of loans and net
interest income from the mortgage pipeline as a result of margin
compression caused by a change in channel mix to more
correspondent and conduit business, a change in product mix to
more adjustable rate mortgages and competitive pricing
pressures. Our operating expenses also increased as we expanded
our sales force to support significant growth in mortgage
production and our pursuit of market share.
35
The following table compares the detail segment results of
operations for the year ended December 31, 2004 to the year
ended December 31, 2003, continued:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specialty Product Divisions | |
|
|
IndyMac | |
|
| |
|
|
Consumer | |
|
Consumer | |
|
Subdivision | |
|
|
|
Financial | |
|
|
|
|
Bank | |
|
Construction | |
|
Construction | |
|
HELOC | |
|
Freedom | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Mortgage Banking Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 Pretax (loss) income
|
|
$ |
(1,981 |
) |
|
$ |
55,898 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
14,099 |
|
|
$ |
69,997 |
|
2003 Pretax income
|
|
|
4,189 |
|
|
|
39,052 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,052 |
|
Percent Change
|
|
|
(147 |
)% |
|
|
43 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
79 |
% |
Investing Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 Pretax income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,692 |
|
|
|
19,633 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
671 |
|
|
|
35,996 |
|
2003 Pretax income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,559 |
|
|
|
22,409 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,968 |
|
Percent Change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
% |
|
|
(12 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
HELOC Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 Pretax income
|
|
|
1,192 |
|
|
|
142 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
283 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
425 |
|
2003 Pretax income (loss)
|
|
|
169 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,179 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,155 |
) |
Percent Change
|
|
|
605 |
% |
|
|
492 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
124 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
137 |
% |
Financing and Other Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 Pretax income
|
|
|
15,193 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003 Pretax (loss)
|
|
|
(8,791 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 Net income
|
|
|
8,713 |
|
|
|
43,398 |
|
|
|
11,879 |
|
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
8,936 |
|
|
|
64,384 |
|
2003 Net (loss) income
|
|
|
(2,682 |
) |
|
|
31,844 |
|
|
|
13,557 |
|
|
|
(713 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,688 |
|
Percent Change
|
|
|
425 |
% |
|
|
36 |
% |
|
|
(12 |
)% |
|
|
124 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
44 |
% |
Performance Ratios
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ROE
|
|
|
117 |
% |
|
|
47 |
% |
|
|
17 |
% |
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
32 |
% |
|
|
32 |
% |
ROA
|
|
|
N/M |
(1) |
|
|
2.55 |
% |
|
|
1.87 |
% |
|
|
0.10 |
% |
|
|
9.07 |
% |
|
|
2.47 |
% |
NIM
|
|
|
N/M |
(1) |
|
|
3.62 |
% |
|
|
4.55 |
% |
|
|
1.56 |
% |
|
|
1.33 |
% |
|
|
3.68 |
% |
Efficiency ratio
|
|
|
67 |
% |
|
|
34 |
% |
|
|
30 |
% |
|
|
104 |
% |
|
|
57 |
% |
|
|
40 |
% |
Capital adjusted efficiency ratio
|
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
28 |
% |
|
|
70 |
% |
|
|
258 |
% |
|
|
46 |
% |
|
|
45 |
% |
Average FTE
|
|
|
268 |
|
|
|
294 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
248 |
|
|
|
629 |
|
2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ROE
|
|
|
37 |
% |
|
|
47 |
% |
|
|
21 |
% |
|
|
(16 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
33 |
% |
ROA
|
|
|
N/M |
(1) |
|
|
2.57 |
% |
|
|
2.24 |
% |
|
|
(1.54 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.37 |
% |
NIM
|
|
|
N/M |
(1) |
|
|
4.23 |
% |
|
|
4.93 |
% |
|
|
1.94 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.41 |
% |
Efficiency ratio
|
|
|
120 |
% |
|
|
37 |
% |
|
|
24 |
% |
|
|
164 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
% |
Capital adjusted efficiency ratio
|
|
|
41 |
% |
|
|
29 |
% |
|
|
50 |
% |
|
|
504 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
% |
Average FTE
|
|
|
227 |
|
|
|
225 |
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
298 |
|
IndyMac Consumer Banks net income increased
$11.4 million from year 2003. The growth in net income
during 2004 was generated by an increase in their allocated net
interest income through the FTP credit from the Treasury Group.
The Specialty Product Divisions generated net income of
$64.4 million during 2004 compared to $44.7 million in
the second quarter of 2004, or an increase of 44%. The increase
in net income year over year was driven by the higher gain on
sale of loans in 2004, coupled with the net income earned by
Financial Freedom for the period since the acquisition on
July 16, 2004 to December 31, 2004.
(1) Not meaningful.
36
The following table compares the detail segment results of
operations for the year ended December 31, 2004 to the year
ended December 31, 2003, continued:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing Divisions | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Loan Servicing | |
|
SFR | |
|
|
|
|
and Retained | |
|
Mortgage | |
|
|
|
Discontinued | |
|
|
|
|
Assets | |
|
Loans | |
|
MBS | |
|
Products | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Mortgage Banking Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 Pretax income
|
|
$ |
51,964 |
|
|
$ |
14,562 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
66,526 |
|
|
2003 Pretax income
|
|
|
81,633 |
|
|
|
4,325 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85,958 |
|
|
Percent Change
|
|
|
(36 |
)% |
|
|
237 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23 |
)% |
Investing Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 Pretax (loss) income
|
|
|
(61,844 |
) |
|
|
67,782 |
|
|
|
30,532 |
|
|
|
(2,831 |
) |
|
|
33,639 |
|
|
2003 Pretax (loss) income
|
|
|
(55,223 |
) |
|
|
26,410 |
|
|
|
3,983 |
|
|
|
(4,438 |
) |
|
|
(29,268 |
) |
|
Percent Change
|
|
|
(12 |
)% |
|
|
157 |
% |
|
|
667 |
% |
|
|
36 |
% |
|
|
215 |
% |
HELOC Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 Pretax (loss)
|
|
|
(37 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(37 |
) |
|
2003 Pretax income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent Change
|
|
|
(100 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(100 |
)% |
Financing and Other Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 Pretax income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003 Pretax income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 Net (loss) income
|
|
|
(5,999 |
) |
|
|
49,819 |
|
|
|
18,471 |
|
|
|
(1,714 |
) |
|
|
60,577 |
|
|
2003 Net income (loss)
|
|
|
15,978 |
|
|
|
18,594 |
|
|
|
2,410 |
|
|
|
(2,685 |
) |
|
|
34,297 |
|
|
Percent Change
|
|
|
(138 |
)% |
|
|
168 |
% |
|
|
666 |
% |
|
|
36 |
% |
|
|
77 |
% |
Performance Ratios
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ROE
|
|
|
(3 |
)% |
|
|
21 |
% |
|
|
44 |
% |
|
|
(32 |
)% |
|
|
12 |
% |
|
ROA
|
|
|
(0.37 |
)% |
|
|
1.04 |
% |
|
|
0.95 |
% |
|
|
(3.14 |
)% |
|
|
0.72 |
% |
|
NIM
|
|
|
6.38 |
% |
|
|
1.43 |
% |
|
|
1.55 |
% |
|
|
6.62 |
% |
|
|
2.13 |
% |
|
Efficiency ratio
|
|
|
129 |
% |
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
69 |
% |
|
|
33 |
% |
|
Capital adjusted efficiency ratio
|
|
|
850 |
% |
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
91 |
% |
|
|
105 |
% |
|
Average FTE
|
|
|
464 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
485 |
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ROE
|
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
15 |
% |
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
(37 |
)% |
|
|
9 |
% |
|
ROA
|
|
|
0.94 |
% |
|
|
0.67 |
% |
|
|
0.18 |
% |
|
|
(3.55 |
)% |
|
|
0.58 |
% |
|
NIM
|
|
|
6.03 |
% |
|
|
1.21 |
% |
|
|
0.22 |
% |
|
|
6.98 |
% |
|
|
2.11 |
% |
|
Efficiency ratio
|
|
|
58 |
% |
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
16 |
% |
|
|
59 |
% |
|
|
39 |
% |
|
Capital adjusted efficiency ratio
|
|
|
188 |
% |
|
|
26 |
% |
|
|
130 |
% |
|
|
74 |
% |
|
|
129 |
% |
|
Average FTE
|
|
|
392 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
438 |
|
The Investing Divisions segments net income increased by
77%, or $26.3 million compared to 2003. The increase was
primarily due to an increase in net interest income as the
average earning assets of the segment grew by 47% or
$2.5 billion over prior year. However, this increase was
partially offset by the losses in servicing due to a lower
amount of called loans sold during 2004 and a less amount of
gain on sale of loans recognized.
37
The following table compares the detail segment results of
operations for the year ended December 31, 2004 to the year
ended December 31, 2003, continued:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Company | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Before Corporate | |
|
|
|
|
|
Total | |
|
|
|
Total | |
|
|
Treasury | |
|
Overhead and | |
|
Corporate | |
|
|
|
Company | |
|
|
|
Company | |
|
|
Group | |
|
Eliminations | |
|
Overhead | |
|
Eliminations | |
|
Pro Forma | |
|
Adjustments | |
|
GAAP | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Mortgage Banking Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 Pretax income (loss)
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
371,943 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(12,767 |
) |
|
$ |
359,176 |
|
|
$ |
(67,413 |
) |
|
$ |
291,763 |
|
2003 Pretax income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
453,217 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(57,980 |
) |
|
|
395,237 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
395,237 |
|
Percent Change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
78 |
% |
|
|
(9 |
)% |
|
|
(100 |
)% |
|
|
(26 |
)% |
Investing Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 Pretax income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69,635 |
|
|
|
2,929 |
|
|
|
28,242 |
|
|
|
100,806 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,806 |
|
2003 Pretax income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,700 |
|
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
12,757 |
|
|
|
19,568 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,568 |
|
Percent Change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
939 |
% |
|
|
2,539 |
% |
|
|
121 |
% |
|
|
415 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
415 |
% |
HELOC Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 Pretax income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,374 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,374 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,374 |
|
2003 Pretax income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,868 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,868 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,868 |
|
Percent Change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
384 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
384 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
384 |
% |
Financing and Other Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 Pretax (loss) income
|
|
|
(45,654 |
) |
|
|
(30,461 |
) |
|
|
(108,456 |
) |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
(138,914 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(138,914 |
) |
2003 Pretax (loss) income
|
|
|
(40,017 |
) |
|
|
(48,808 |
) |
|
|
(89,196 |
) |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
(137,991 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(137,991 |
) |
Net Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 Net (loss) income
|
|
|
(27,622 |
) |
|
|
265,891 |
|
|
|
(63,951 |
) |
|
|
9,366 |
|
|
|
211,306 |
|
|
|
(40,784 |
) |
|
|
170,522 |
|
2003 Net (loss) income
|
|
|
(24,210 |
) |
|
|
252,271 |
|
|
|
(53,615 |
) |
|
|
(27,353 |
) |
|
|
171,303 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
171,303 |
|
Percent Change
|
|
|
(14 |
)% |
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
(19 |
)% |
|
|
134 |
% |
|
|
23 |
% |
|
|
(100 |
)% |
|
|
(1 |
)% |
Performance Ratios
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ROE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.8 |
% |
ROA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.60 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.25 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.01 |
% |
NIM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.60 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.61 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.61 |
% |
Efficiency ratio
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
64 |
% |
Capital adjusted efficiency ratio
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
91 |
% |
Average FTE
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
3,882 |
|
|
|
688 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,570 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,570 |
|
Performance Ratios
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ROE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
% |
ROA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.18 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.46 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.46 |
% |
NIM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.88 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.91 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.91 |
% |
Efficiency ratio
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
58 |
% |
Capital adjusted efficiency ratio
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
75 |
% |
Average FTE
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
3,070 |
|
|
|
523 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,593 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.593 |
|
Pursuant to IndyMacs intercompany accounting policies, the
Investing Divisions purchase mortgage loans at fair value from
the Mortgage Banking Divisions. The premium paid for the loans
is eliminated as part of the Eliminations column. As time
passes, the Investing Divisions amortize the higher intercompany
premium paid as part of its divisional results and this
amortization is eliminated, reversing the timing difference. The
negative amount in the prior year elimination is the result of a
substantial sale of loans to the Investing Divisions at the end
of 2003. The eliminated premium exceeded prior amortization. The
positive
38
elimination amount in the current year reflects lower
intercompany gain elimination, which does not offset the
intercompany premium amortized.
The increase in corporate overhead year over year is principally
due to expenses incurred to strengthen enterprise risk
management at IndyMac, including compliance with Sarbanes-Oxley
legislation.
The following discussion and analysis should be read in
conjunction with our consolidated financial statements, and the
notes thereto and the other information incorporated by
reference herein.
39
OPERATIONS
MORTGAGE BANKING ACTIVITIES
Loan Production
During the year ended December 31, 2004, we produced a
record $39.0 billion of loans, which was a 30% increase
over the $30.0 billion of loans produced during the year
ended December 31, 2003. The strong production volume
reflects our continued penetration of the purchase and cash-out
refinance market and growth in our products that are less
interest rate sensitive, and includes $893 million in
reverse mortgages originated by Financial Freedom. The vast
majority of these reverse mortgages are insured by the FHA and
are sold to Fannie Mae within 30 days of origination.
Our focus on less cyclical products, such as Alt-A, subprime,
HELOCs, reverse mortgages and consumer construction loans,
resulted in continued growth in each of these products in 2004
compared to 2003. This increase more than offset the decrease in
our agency conforming and jumbo products which are more cyclical
in nature, closely tracking changes in the overall mortgage
market. Additionally, we continued to further penetrate the
purchase and cash-out refinance market, increasing our purchase
and cash-out refinance transactions 49% year over year and
successfully adapting our production mix to the demand for
adjustable rate mortgages (ARMs) and hybrid ARMs with 68% of our
mortgage production now consisting of ARMs and hybrid ARMs
compared with only 39% a year ago.
Total production by loan type was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Percentage | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
Change | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in millions) | |
Volume by product
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prime(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alt-A
|
|
$ |
25,416 |
|
|
$ |
15,496 |
|
|
|
64 |
% |
|
Agency conforming
|
|
|
1,709 |
|
|
|
5,096 |
|
|
|
(66 |
)% |
|
Jumbo
|
|
|
1,903 |
|
|
|
3,727 |
|
|
|
(49 |
)% |
|
Reverse Mortgages
|
|
|
893 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A |
|
Subprime(1)
|
|
|
3,333 |
|
|
|
1,855 |
|
|
|
80 |
% |
Home equity line of credit(2)
|
|
|
1,855 |
|
|
|
932 |
|
|
|
99 |
% |
Consumer construction(2)
|
|
|
2,793 |
|
|
|
2,130 |
|
|
|
31 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal mortgage production
|
|
|
37,902 |
|
|
|
29,236 |
|
|
|
30 |
% |
Subdivision construction commitments
|
|
|
1,146 |
|
|
|
800 |
|
|
|
43 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total production volume
|
|
$ |
39,048 |
|
|
$ |
30,036 |
|
|
|
30 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage Web-based production
|
|
$ |
24,126 |
|
|
$ |
21,167 |
|
|
|
14 |
% |
Mortgage pipeline at period end(3)
|
|
$ |
6,307 |
|
|
$ |
4,116 |
|
|
|
53 |
% |
|
|
(1) |
Fundings. |
|
(2) |
New commitments. |
|
(3) |
Includes rate lock commitments for loans in process plus loans
that have been submitted for processing, but not yet rate locked. |
40
The tables below provide the production by delivery method and
interest rate amortization type for the years ended
December 31, 2004 and 2003:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
Percentage | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
Change | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in millions) | |
Production by Delivery Method:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wholesale(1)
|
|
$ |
18,546 |
|
|
$ |
15,518 |
|
|
|
20 |
% |
Correspondent(2)
|
|
|
13,682 |
|
|
|
7,549 |
|
|
|
81 |
% |
Retail(3)
|
|
|
5,674 |
|
|
|
6,169 |
|
|
|
(8 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total mortgage production
|
|
|
37,902 |
|
|
|
29,236 |
|
|
|
30 |
% |
Subdivision construction lending
|
|
|
1,146 |
|
|
|
800 |
|
|
|
43 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Production
|
|
$ |
39,048 |
|
|
$ |
30,036 |
|
|
|
30 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Loans obtained through relationships with mortgage brokers and
funded by IndyMac Bank. |
|
(2) |
Closed loans acquired by IndyMac through relationships with
mortgage bankers and financial institutions on a flow basis, as
well as loans obtained through bulk purchases by our conduit
group. |
|
(3) |
Direct to consumer channels. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Fixed Rate Mortgages
|
|
|
32 |
% |
|
|
61 |
% |
Hybrid ARMs
|
|
|
38 |
% |
|
|
24 |
% |
ARMs
|
|
|
30 |
% |
|
|
15 |
% |
In addition to the record production volume, we have shown
strong growth in purchase mortgages. The following table details
the mix of our pipeline and production between purchase,
cash-out refinance, and rate/term refinance transactions at
December 31, 2004 and 2003.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of and For the Year Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
Percentage | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
Change | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in millions) | |
Mortgage loan production:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase transactions
|
|
$ |
16,071 |
|
|
$ |
9,809 |
|
|
|
64 |
% |
Cash-out refinance transactions
|
|
|
15,156 |
|
|
|
11,141 |
|
|
|
36 |
% |
Rate/term refinance transactions
|
|
|
6,675 |
|
|
|
8,286 |
|
|
|
(19 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total mortgage loan production
|
|
$ |
37,902 |
|
|
$ |
29,236 |
|
|
|
30 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% purchase and cash-out refinance transactions
|
|
|
82 |
% |
|
|
72 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Mortgage pipeline:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase transactions
|
|
$ |
2,606 |
|
|
$ |
1,586 |
|
|
|
64 |
% |
Cash-out refinance transactions
|
|
|
2,727 |
|
|
|
1,568 |
|
|
|
74 |
% |
Rate/term refinance transactions
|
|
|
974 |
|
|
|
962 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage pipeline at period end
|
|
$ |
6,307 |
|
|
$ |
4,116 |
|
|
|
53 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% purchase and cash-out refinance transactions
|
|
|
85 |
% |
|
|
77 |
% |
|
|
|
|
41
Mortgage Production by Division
IndyMac generates its mortgage production through multiple
channels on a nationwide basis with a concentration in those
regions of the country in which IndyMac has regional offices or
in which there are higher home prices, including California,
Florida, New Jersey and New York. Our highest concentration of
mortgage loans relates to properties in California. Mortgages
secured by California properties accounted for 42% of the
mortgage loans we produced in the year ended December 31,
2004 based on dollar value, and 36% based on number of loans. We
expect this level of concentration will trend down in the future
as we execute on our plan to double the number of regional
offices outside of California over the next five years.
IndyMac produces mortgages through its Mortgage Banking
Divisions, IndyMac Consumer Bank, Specialty Product Divisions,
and Investing Divisions.
The following tables show total production by divisions for the
years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
Percentage | |
Production By Divisions |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
Change | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in millions) | |
Mortgage Banking Divisions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IndyMac Conduit
|
|
$ |
7,652 |
|
|
$ |
2,407 |
|
|
|
218 |
% |
|
Mortgage Professionals
|
|
|
18,569 |
|
|
|
15,756 |
|
|
|
18 |
% |
|
Real Estate Professionals
|
|
|
1,667 |
|
|
|
1,478 |
|
|
|
13 |
% |
|
Web and Direct Mail
|
|
|
3,086 |
|
|
|
5,310 |
|
|
|
(42 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Mortgage Banking Divisions
|
|
|
30,974 |
|
|
|
24,951 |
|
|
|
24 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IndyMac Consumer Bank
|
|
|
462 |
|
|
|
428 |
|
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specialty Product Divisions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer Construction
|
|
|
4,009 |
|
|
|
3,112 |
|
|
|
29 |
% |
|
Subdivision Construction
|
|
|
1,146 |
|
|
|
800 |
|
|
|
43 |
% |
|
HELOC
|
|
|
205 |
|
|
|
199 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
Financial Freedom
|
|
|
893 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Specialty Product Divisions
|
|
|
6,253 |
|
|
|
4,111 |
|
|
|
52 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing Divisions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Servicing
|
|
|
1,359 |
|
|
|
546 |
|
|
|
149 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Investing Divisions
|
|
|
1,359 |
|
|
|
546 |
|
|
|
149 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Production
|
|
$ |
39,048 |
|
|
$ |
30,036 |
|
|
|
30 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our largest segment, the Mortgage Banking Divisions, increased
production by 24% year over year due to strong execution of
IndyMacs strategies to increase market share by continuing
its focus on less interest rate-sensitive products such as Alt-A
and subprime, by increasing the size of its sales force, by
investing in geographic expansion, and by growing its purchase
business. Active wholesale customers during the year grew 42%
from the prior year. This growth is the direct result of
IndyMacs focus on increasing the size of its sales force
nationwide and the newer sales people demonstrating increasing
effectiveness as they gain experience with IndyMacs
products and technology. We have been successful in attracting
experienced, quality salespeople due to the combination of our
less interest-rate sensitive products and our salespeoples
ability to market a broad array of products. During 2004, we
opened two new operation centers in Phoenix, Arizona and
Columbia, South Carolina. Our Web & Direct Mail channel
was down 42% compared to 2003. This particular channel tends to
be more rate/term refinance oriented and, thus, as expected and
consistent with market contraction, has underperformed relative
to our other businesses that have stronger ties to the purchase
and cash-out refinance market.
42
The production for Specialty Product Divisions increased 52%
from the prior year. The growth from the prior year is largely
driven by our continued penetration in customers and loan
commitments by both construction lending units. Additionally, as
a result of Financial Freedom acquisition in July 2004, we have
originated $893 million loans in reverse mortgages.
The table below provides the key performance indicators for our
Mortgage Banking Divisions for the years ended December 31,
2004 and 2003:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
Percent | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
Change | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Key Performance Indicators:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active Customers(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Monthly Active Customers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage Professionals
|
|
|
2,939 |
|
|
|
2,055 |
|
|
|
43 |
% |
|
|
Real Estate Professionals
|
|
|
144 |
|
|
|
185 |
|
|
|
(22 |
)% |
|
Active Customers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage Professionals
|
|
|
5,047 |
|
|
|
3,547 |
|
|
|
42 |
% |
|
|
Real Estate Professionals
|
|
|
276 |
|
|
|
407 |
|
|
|
(32 |
)% |
|
Net New Customers During the Year(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage Professionals
|
|
|
1,407 |
|
|
|
718 |
|
|
|
96 |
% |
|
|
Real Estate Professionals
|
|
|
225 |
|
|
|
158 |
|
|
|
42 |
% |
Sales Personnel at Period End
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage Professionals
|
|
|
573 |
|
|
|
390 |
|
|
|
47 |
% |
|
|
Real Estate Professionals
|
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
(11 |
)% |
|
|
Consumers
|
|
|
209 |
|
|
|
237 |
|
|
|
(12 |
)% |
|
|
(1) |
Active customers are defined as customers who funded at least
one loan during the most recent 90-day period. |
|
(2) |
Net new customers are the number of new customers signed up
during the period less those terminated. |
Loan Sales
The Company sold $31.0 billion and $23.2 billion for
the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
The Companys gain on sale of loans of $363.8 million
for the year ended December 31, 2004 was net of the
SAB No. 105 impact of $59.5 million as well as the
effect of the allocation of a portion of the purchase price of
Financial Freedom to loans held for sale and the loan
application pipeline totaling $7.9 million, which
effectively decreased gain on sale of loans when the related
loans were sold. Excluding these two items, the gain on sale of
loans would have been $431.2 million for the year ended
December 31, 2004 compared to $387.3 million for the
year ended 2003. The increase in gain on sale of loans for the
year ended December 31, 2004 is primarily due to a 34%
increase in the amount of loans sold, resulting from our record
level mortgage production in 2004, partially offset by
28 basis points decline in margin from 1.67% at
December 31, 2003 to 1.39% at December 31, 2004. Our
profit margin has been negatively impacted by the change in our
product mix to more hybrid ARM and ARM loans, the shift in our
channel mix to lower margin conduit and correspondent channels,
as well as the impact of increased competition in 2004.
The Company hedges the interest rate risk inherent in its
pipeline of mortgage loans held for sale to protect its margin
on sale of loans. Hedging practices can vary significantly from
company to company ranging across a broad spectrum. At one
extreme, a mortgage banker may choose not to hedge its pipeline
at all. Mortgage bankers who choose not to hedge their pipeline
will typically report higher earnings and profit margins in a
falling interest rate environment, and lower earnings and profit
margins in a rising interest rate environment. This will be the
most profitable strategy over an indefinite period of time as
more production is
43
done in the declining rate environment, assuming the rates rise
as often as they fall. However, such a strategy results in
highly volatile earnings and could result in losses for an
extended period of time potentially risking the depletion of
capital reserves. Conversely at the other extreme, a mortgage
banker can choose to hedge 100% of its pipeline with
option-based instruments to closely offset the free
option enjoyed by the mortgage loan applicant to not close
on his or her loan (i.e. fallout). This hedging
strategy will generally produce stable and consistent results,
but profitability is significantly reduced as the cost of the
options can be prohibitive.
Generally, prudent mortgage bankers will choose a strategy that
falls within the boundaries of the above extremes. IndyMac tends
to utilize instruments such as forward sale agreements whose
change in value as interest rates change is expected to offset
the change in value of its underlying mortgage pipeline based on
expected closing ratios. Utilizing this strategy we focus on
trying to maintain stable profit margins with an emphasis on
forecasting expected fallout to more precisely estimate our
required hedge coverage ratio and minimize hedge costs. By
closely monitoring key factors such as product type, business
units, progress or status of transactions, as well
as changes in market interest rates since we committed a rate to
the borrower (rate lock commitments), the Company
seeks to quantify the optional component of each rate lock, and
in turn, the aggregate rate lock pipeline. By accurately
evaluating these factors, the Company has been able to minimize
the purchase of options and also stabilize gain on sale margins
over different rate environments. Companies with lower coverage
ratios may tend to follow the market increasing their hedge
costs and reducing their profit margins as interest rates rise.
In comparing financial results, investors should be aware of the
varying results that can be achieved under different hedge
strategies.
The table below illustrates the impact of the Companys
pipeline hedging activities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
% Change | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in millions) | |
Gross gain on mortgage loan sales(1)
|
|
$ |
484 |
|
|
$ |
419 |
|
|
|
15.51 |
% |
Gross margin before hedging
|
|
|
1.56 |
% |
|
|
1.81 |
% |
|
|
(13.81 |
)% |
Hedging (losses) gains
|
|
$ |
(53 |
) |
|
$ |
(32 |
) |
|
|
65.63 |
% |
Net gains on sale(1)
|
|
$ |
431 |
|
|
$ |
387 |
|
|
|
11.37 |
% |
Net margin after hedging(1)
|
|
|
1.39 |
% |
|
|
1.67 |
% |
|
|
(16.77 |
)% |
|
|
(1) |
The gain on mortgage loan sales for the year ended
December 31, 2004 excludes the $59.5 million
before-tax SAB No. 105 and $7.9 million
before-tax purchase accounting adjustments related to the
Financial Freedom acquisition. The GAAP gain on mortgage loan
sales was $363.8 million for the year ended
December 31, 2004 representing a net margin after hedging
of 1.17%. |
In addition to mortgage loans held for sale, the pipeline also
includes rate lock commitments. Rate lock commitments on
mortgage loans that are intended to be sold are considered to be
derivatives pursuant to SFAS No. 133,
Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities, (SFAS 133) and,
therefore, are recorded at fair value prior to April 1,
2004. On April 1, 2004, the Company adopted
SAB No. 105, and in accordance with this standard, for
rate lock commitments entered into on and after April 1,
2004, only the change in fair value is recorded by the Company.
The Company hedges the risk of changes in fair value of rate
lock commitments generally by selling forward contracts on
securities of Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac, Euro-Dollar futures and
other hedge instruments as the Company deems appropriate to
prudently manage this risk. These forward contracts are also
accounted for as derivatives and recorded at fair value.
44
The following table presents the gain on sale margins by product
type for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2004 | |
|
Year Ended December 31, 2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Gain on Sale Margins |
|
Amount | |
|
Gain on | |
|
|
|
Amount | |
|
Gain on | |
|
|
by Product Type |
|
Sold | |
|
Sale | |
|
Margin | |
|
Sold | |
|
Sale | |
|
Margin | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in millions) | |
Alt-A and Jumbo
|
|
$ |
23,739 |
|
|
$ |
293.3 |
|
|
|
1.24 |
% |
|
$ |
15,146 |
|
|
$ |
257.1 |
|
|
|
1.70 |
% |
Agency conforming
|
|
|
2,460 |
|
|
|
18.0 |
|
|
|
0.73 |
% |
|
|
6,056 |
|
|
|
70.4 |
|
|
|
1.16 |
% |
Reverse mortgages
|
|
|
932 |
|
|
|
28.6 |
|
|
|
3.08 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subprime
|
|
|
2,749 |
|
|
|
62.9 |
|
|
|
2.29 |
% |
|
|
994 |
|
|
|
26.2 |
|
|
|
2.64 |
% |
Consumer Lot loans
|
|
|
382 |
|
|
|
13.9 |
|
|
|
3.64 |
% |
|
|
154 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
2.08 |
% |
HELOC Loans
|
|
|
329 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
0.61 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans acquired through clean-up calls
|
|
|
445 |
|
|
|
12.5 |
|
|
|
2.81 |
% |
|
|
826 |
|
|
|
30.4 |
|
|
|
3.68 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gain on sale of loans(1)
|
|
$ |
31,036 |
|
|
$ |
431.2 |
|
|
|
1.39 |
% |
|
$ |
23,176 |
|
|
$ |
387.3 |
|
|
|
1.67 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
The gain on mortgage loan sales for the year ended
December 31, 2004 excludes the $59.5 million
before-tax SAB No. 105 and $7.9 million
before-tax purchase accounting adjustments related to the
Financial Freedom acquisition. The GAAP gain on mortgage loan
sales was $363.8 million for the year ended
December 31, 2004 representing a net margin after hedging
of 1.17%. |
The overall gain on sale of loans margin has declined from 2003
to 2004, caused by a shift in our origination channel mix,
including an increase in loans funded through the conduit and
correspondent channels, a shift to adjustable rate products and
competitive pricing pressure. The margins on ARM loans have
historically been lower than on fixed-rate loans due to their
shorter durations and resulting lower interest rate risk profile.
In addition to the gain on sale, IndyMac earns spread and fee
income on its mortgage loans held for sale. It is important to
look at the entire mortgage banking revenue stream in evaluating
performance as these components may vary in differing interest
rate environments and sale strategies. The following table
depicts the total revenue margin on mortgage loans sold, which
is calculated by dividing the sum of gain on sale of loans, net
interest income, and fee income by the amount of loans sold:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
% of | |
|
|
|
% of | |
|
|
Amount | |
|
Loans | |
|
Amount | |
|
Loans | |
|
|
Sold | |
|
Sold | |
|
Sold | |
|
Sold | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Gain on sale of loans(1)
|
|
$ |
431,226 |
|
|
|
1.39 |
% |
|
$ |
387,311 |
|
|
|
1.67 |
% |
Net interest income
|
|
|
172,919 |
|
|
|
0.56 |
% |
|
|
173,704 |
|
|
|
0.75 |
% |
Fee income
|
|
|
56,221 |
|
|
|
0.18 |
% |
|
|
62,977 |
|
|
|
0.27 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total mortgage banking revenue
|
|
$ |
660,366 |
|
|
|
2.13 |
% |
|
$ |
623,992 |
|
|
|
2.69 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans sold
|
|
$ |
31,035,878 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
23,175,841 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
The gain on mortgage loan sales for the year ended
December 31, 2004 excludes the $59.5 million
before-tax SAB No. 105 and $7.9 million
before-tax purchase accounting adjustments related to the
Financial Freedom acquisition. The GAAP gain on mortgage loan
sales was $363.8 million for the year ended
December 31, 2004 representing a net margin after hedging
of 1.17%. |
45
The following table shows the various channels through which
loans were distributed:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Loan | |
|
Distribution | |
|
Loan | |
|
Distribution | |
|
|
Distribution | |
|
Percentage | |
|
Distribution | |
|
Percentage | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in millions) | |
Sales to the GSEs(1)
|
|
$ |
8,038 |
|
|
|
24 |
% |
|
$ |
13,870 |
|
|
|
50 |
% |
Private-label securitizations
|
|
|
16,031 |
|
|
|
47 |
% |
|
|
5,778 |
|
|
|
21 |
% |
Whole loan sales
|
|
|
6,967 |
|
|
|
20 |
% |
|
|
3,528 |
|
|
|
13 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal sales
|
|
|
31,036 |
|
|
|
91 |
% |
|
|
23,176 |
|
|
|
84 |
% |
Investment portfolio acquisitions(2)
|
|
|
3,239 |
|
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
4,353 |
|
|
|
16 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loan distribution
|
|
$ |
34,275 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
27,529 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Government-sponsored enterprises. |
|
(2) |
Loan production that IndyMac elected to retain in its investment
portfolio. |
Loan sales to GSEs dropped to 24% of total sales for the year
ended December 31, 2004 compared to 50% for 2003. The
decrease reflects the fact that a higher percentage of loan
production consisted of ARMs and subprime mortgages, which the
Company does not ordinarily sell to the GSEs.
In conjunction with the sale of mortgage loans in private-label
securitizations and GSE transactions, the Company generally
retains certain assets. The primary assets retained include
MSRs, to a lesser degree, AAA-rated interest-only securities,
AAA-rated principal-only securities, non-investment grade
securities, securities associated with prepayment charges on the
underlying mortgage loans, and residual securities. The
allocated cost of the retained assets at the time of sale is
recorded as an asset with an offsetting increase to the gain on
sale of loans (or a reduction in the cost basis of the loans
sold). The calculation of the $431.2 million in gain on
sale of loans (pro forma basis) earned during the year ended
December 31, 2004 included the retention of
$552.0 million of servicing-related assets and
$223.2 million of other investment and non-investment grade
securities. During the year ended December 31, 2004, the
assets previously retained generated cash flows of
$404.8 million. More information on the valuation
assumptions related to IndyMacs retained assets can be
found under the heading, Valuation of Servicing-Related
Assets, on page 53.
46
INVESTING AND HELOC ACTIVITIES
The following table details the assets associated with our
investing and HELOC activities as of December 31, 2004 and
2003:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Loans held for investment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SFR mortgage
|
|
$ |
4,458,784 |
|
|
$ |
4,945,439 |
|
|
Consumer construction
|
|
|
1,443,450 |
|
|
|
1,145,526 |
|
|
Builder construction
|
|
|
643,116 |
|
|
|
484,397 |
|
|
HELOC
|
|
|
45,932 |
|
|
|
711,494 |
|
|
Land and other mortgage
|
|
|
158,468 |
|
|
|
126,044 |
|
|
Income property
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
36,285 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans held for investment
|
|
|
6,749,753 |
|
|
|
7,449,185 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities, U.S. Treasury securities and
agency notes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AAA-rated and agency interest-only securities
|
|
|
124,109 |
|
|
|
148,275 |
|
|
|
AAA-rated principal-only securities
|
|
|
18,599 |
|
|
|
8,518 |
|
|
|
Other investment grade securities
|
|
|
9,219 |
|
|
|
8,922 |
|
|
|
Other non-investment grade securities
|
|
|
4,198 |
|
|
|
1,760 |
|
|
|
Non-investment grade residual securities
|
|
|
78,911 |
|
|
|
56,157 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total trading securities
|
|
|
235,036 |
|
|
|
223,632 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for sale securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities and agency notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
143,689 |
|
|
|
AAA-rated non-agency securities
|
|
|
3,166,600 |
|
|
|
1,407,984 |
|
|
|
AAA-rated agency securities
|
|
|
14,903 |
|
|
|
25,193 |
|
|
|
Other investment grade securities
|
|
|
137,603 |
|
|
|
26,926 |
|
|
|
Other non-investment grade securities
|
|
|
78,854 |
|
|
|
10,182 |
|
|
|
Non-investment grade HELOC residual securities
|
|
|
56,475 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total available for sale securities
|
|
|
3,454,435 |
|
|
|
1,613,974 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total mortgage-backed securities, U.S. Treasury securities
and agency notes
|
|
|
3,689,471 |
|
|
|
1,837,606 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage servicing rights
|
|
|
640,794 |
|
|
|
443,688 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
11,080,018 |
|
|
$ |
9,730,479 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of securities portfolio rated investment grade
|
|
|
94 |
% |
|
|
96 |
% |
Percentage of securities portfolio rated AAA
|
|
|
90 |
% |
|
|
94 |
% |
Our HELOC loans held for investment decreased by
$665.6 million from December 31, 2003 to
December 31, 2004, primarily due to the recharacterization
of nearly $1.0 billion of HELOCs into MBS via two separate
on-balance sheet securitizations. Similarly, our AAA-rated
non-agency securities increased from $1.4 billion at
December 31, 2003, to $3.2 billion at
December 31, 2004, resulting from the recharacterization of
the $1.0 billion of HELOCs from loans to securities as
previously noted and the reclassification of $516.5 million
of SFR mortgage loans that were securitized with retention of
$353.0 million as MBS available for sale during the first
quarter of 2004. Refer to the Investing Activities
and the HELOC Portfolio sections below for further
discussions on SFR mortgage and HELOC securitizations.
47
AAA-rated interest-only securities, non-investment grade
residual securities and securities used to hedge these
securities, are classified as trading securities. Changes in the
fair value of these securities are recorded in earnings. All
other MBS and HELOC residuals are classified as available for
sale, and changes in fair value of these assets are recorded in
equity.
The following table shows average annualized net returns for all
of our investing and HELOC activities, which are calculated by
dividing the sum of net interest income after allocated interest
expense and provision for loan losses, service fee income and
related net gains or losses by the average balance of investment
assets. Service fee income includes gross service fee income,
amortization of MSRs, valuation adjustments and net hedging
gains and losses. Gross service fee income includes reinvestment
income, prepayment and late fee income net of compensating
interest paid to borrowers and investors in addition to the
contractual servicing fees.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Net interest income after provision for loan losses
|
|
$ |
242,593 |
|
|
$ |
144,918 |
|
Service fee (loss)
|
|
|
(12,453 |
) |
|
|
(16,081 |
) |
Loss on mortgage-backed securities, net
|
|
|
(23,804 |
) |
|
|
(30,853 |
) |
Other income
|
|
|
20,683 |
|
|
|
11,375 |
|
Average balance of interest-earning assets and MSRs
|
|
$ |
10,755,188 |
|
|
$ |
7,346,974 |
|
Investing activities return on interest-earning assets and
MSRs (annualized)
|
|
|
2.11 |
% |
|
|
1.49 |
% |
Investing Activities
IndyMacs investing activities complement the mortgage
banking activities and serve to diversify IndyMacs revenue
stream through its investments in SFR mortgage loans, MBS and
servicing-related assets.
Our investments in prime SFR loans, MBS and mortgage loan
servicing-related assets help to provide stable earnings in
periods when mortgage banking revenues decline. Should loan
production and/or margins decline due to factors such as
increasing interest rates, the value and fee income of the MSRs
generally rises, as there is less incentive for borrowers to
refinance at a higher interest rate. Similarly, when loan
production increases, the value of the MSRs and the associated
income streams generally decrease. We believe this serves to
stabilize the Companys revenue stream through increased
interest and servicing fee income when production slows.
In addition to the investments in SFR mortgage loans, MBS and
servicing-related assets, certain investing activities through
investments in construction loans and HELOCs also take place in
Specialty Products Divisions.
SFR Mortgage Loans Held for Investment
The Companys portfolio of mortgage loans held for
investment is comprised primarily of SFR mortgage loans, with a
concentration in adjustable-rate and hybrid adjustable-rate
mortgage loans to mitigate interest rate risk. The Company plans
on increasing its portfolio of mortgage loans held for
investment to achieve better balance in its investing activities
relative to its mortgage banking activities, which tend to be
more cyclical. The Company added $3.2 billion of mortgage
loans in accordance with this strategy during the year ended
December 31, 2004; however, the portfolio actually declined
relative to December 31, 2003. The decline was the result
of the Companys decision to sell approximately
$2.3 billion of loans and to recharacterize approximately
$516.5 million of loans as securities in line with overall
balance sheet management objectives during the year ended
December 31, 2004. The Company may securitize portions of
its SFR mortgage loans held for investment periodically, with
the intent to retain most of the securities, to optimize return
on equity, reduce hedging costs and enhance the liquidity of the
loan portfolio. At December 31, 2004, the non-
48
performing loans as a percentage of SFR loans remained low at
0.60%. The increase from 0.38% at December 31, 2003 was
primarily due to the transfer of approximately $6.9 million
non-performing loans from our loans held for sale portfolio. See
the Credit Risk and Reserves section at page 64
for further information on our non-performing loans for both
loans held for investment and loans held for sale.
The following table shows the composition of the portfolio as of
December 31, 2004 and 2003, and relevant credit quality
characteristics at December 31, 2004 and 2003:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
SFR mortgage loans held for investment
|
|
$ |
4,458,784 |
|
|
$ |
4,945,439 |
|
Average loan size
|
|
$ |
305 |
|
|
$ |
286 |
|
Non-performing loans as a percentage of SFR loans
|
|
|
0.60 |
% |
|
|
0.38% |
|
Estimated average life in years(1)
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
Estimated average duration in years(2)
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
Yield
|
|
|
4.27 |
% |
|
|
4.63% |
|
Fixed-rate mortgages
|
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
6% |
|
Adjustable-rate mortgages
|
|
|
18 |
% |
|
|
39% |
|
Hybrid adjustable-rate mortgages
|
|
|
73 |
% |
|
|
55% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
Additional Information |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Average FICO score(3)
|
|
|
720 |
|
|
|
707 |
|
Average loan to value ratio
|
|
|
71 |
% |
|
|
73 |
% |
Geographic distribution:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Southern California
|
|
|
31 |
% |
|
|
39 |
% |
|
Northern California
|
|
|
21 |
% |
|
|
22 |
% |
|
Michigan
|
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
3 |
% |
|
New York
|
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
4 |
% |
|
Florida
|
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
3 |
% |
|
Georgia
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
2 |
% |
|
New Jersey
|
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
2 |
% |
|
Colorado
|
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
2 |
% |
|
Washington
|
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
2 |
% |
|
Other (each individually less than 2%)
|
|
|
25 |
% |
|
|
21 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Represents the estimated length of time, on average, the SFR
loan portfolio will remain outstanding based on the
Companys estimates for prepayments. |
|
(2) |
Average duration measures the expected change in the value of a
financial instrument in response to changes in interest rates. |
|
(3) |
FICO scores are the result of a credit scoring system developed
by Fair Isaacs and Co. and are generally used by lenders to
evaluate a borrowers credit history. FICO scores of 700 or
higher are generally considered in the mortgage industry to be
very high quality borrowers with low risk of default, but in
general, the secondary market will consider FICO scores of 620
or higher to be prime. |
Mortgage-Backed Securities, U.S. Treasury Securities
and Agency Notes
The Companys portfolio of MBS, U.S. Treasury
securities and agency notes totaled $3.7 billion and
$1.8 billion at December 31, 2004 and 2003,
respectively. These securities are recorded at fair value. The
49
Company invests in high quality MBS to provide net interest
income. At December 31, 2004, 90% of the portfolio was
rated AAA with an expected weighted-average life of
2.6 years. U.S. Treasury securities are purchased to
hedge the interest rate risk associated with servicing-related
assets, among other types of investments. AAA-rated
principal-only securities are retained from securitizations or
purchased in the secondary market to hedge servicing-related
assets.
The fair value of other investment grade and non-investment
grade securities by credit rating as of December 31, 2004
and 2003, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premium | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current | |
|
(Discount) | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Face | |
|
to Face | |
|
Amortized | |
|
|
|
|
Value | |
|
Value | |
|
Cost | |
|
Fair Value | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
December 31, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment grade mortgage-backed securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AA
|
|
$ |
76,678 |
|
|
$ |
357 |
|
|
$ |
77,035 |
|
|
$ |
76,941 |
|
|
|
A-
|
|
|
5,129 |
|
|
|
(141 |
) |
|
|
4,988 |
|
|
|
5,087 |
|
|
|
BBB
|
|
|
34,782 |
|
|
|
(1,729 |
) |
|
|
33,053 |
|
|
|
33,764 |
|
|
|
BBB-
|
|
|
32,761 |
|
|
|
(2,679 |
) |
|
|
30,082 |
|
|
|
31,030 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other investment grade mortgage-backed securities
|
|
$ |
149,350 |
|
|
$ |
(4,192 |
) |
|
$ |
145,158 |
|
|
$ |
146,822 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-investment grade mortgage-backed securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BB
|
|
$ |
60,511 |
|
|
$ |
(8,278 |
) |
|
$ |
52,233 |
|
|
$ |
53,065 |
|
|
|
BB-
|
|
|
13,516 |
|
|
|
(245 |
) |
|
|
13,271 |
|
|
|
13,516 |
|
|
|
B+
|
|
|
468 |
|
|
|
(367 |
) |
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
B
|
|
|
28,423 |
|
|
|
(14,072 |
) |
|
|
14,351 |
|
|
|
14,449 |
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
20,684 |
|
|
|
(18,983 |
) |
|
|
1,701 |
|
|
|
1,921 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other non-investment grade mortgage-backed securities
|
|
$ |
123,602 |
|
|
$ |
(41,945 |
) |
|
$ |
81,657 |
|
|
$ |
83,052 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment grade mortgage-backed securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AAA
|
|
$ |
7,922 |
|
|
$ |
77 |
|
|
$ |
7,999 |
|
|
$ |
8,001 |
|
|
|
BBB
|
|
|
25,121 |
|
|
|
(1,546 |
) |
|
|
23,575 |
|
|
|
24,198 |
|
|
|
BBB-
|
|
|
4,000 |
|
|
|
(351 |
) |
|
|
3,649 |
|
|
|
3,649 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other investment grade mortgage-backed securities
|
|
$ |
37,043 |
|
|
$ |
(1,820 |
) |
|
$ |
35,223 |
|
|
$ |
35,848 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-investment grade mortgage-backed securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BB
|
|
$ |
9,016 |
|
|
$ |
(1,292 |
) |
|
$ |
7,724 |
|
|
$ |
7,896 |
|
|
|
B
|
|
|
830 |
|
|
|
(644 |
) |
|
|
186 |
|
|
|
186 |
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
15,150 |
|
|
|
(11,677 |
) |
|
|
3,473 |
|
|
|
3,860 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other non-investment grade mortgage-backed securities
|
|
$ |
24,996 |
|
|
$ |
(13,613 |
) |
|
$ |
11,383 |
|
|
$ |
11,942 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2004, of the total other investment grade
and non-investment grade MBS, $180.7 million was
collateralized by prime loans, $40.3 million by subprime
loans and $0.2 million by manufactured housing loans.
50
The following table sets forth certain information regarding the
weighted-average yields and remaining contractual maturities of
our MBS portfolio as of December 31, 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More than One Year | |
|
More than Five | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
One Year or Less | |
|
to Five Years | |
|
Years to Ten Years | |
|
More than Ten Years | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Weighted- | |
|
|
|
Weighted- | |
|
|
|
Weighted- | |
|
|
|
Weighted- | |
|
|
|
Weighted- | |
|
|
Carrying |
|
Average | |
|
Carrying | |
|
Average | |
|
Carrying | |
|
Average | |
|
Carrying | |
|
Average | |
|
Carrying | |
|
Average | |
|
|
Value |
|
Yield | |
|
Value | |
|
Yield | |
|
Value | |
|
Yield | |
|
Value | |
|
Yield | |
|
Value | |
|
Yield | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AAA-rated and agency interest-only securities
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
59 |
|
|
|
15.00 |
% |
|
$ |
2,200 |
|
|
|
7.62 |
% |
|
$ |
121,850 |
|
|
|
10.12 |
% |
|
$ |
124,109 |
|
|
|
10.08 |
% |
|
AAA-rated principal-only securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,599 |
|
|
|
6.21 |
% |
|
|
18,599 |
|
|
|
6.21 |
% |
|
AAA-rated agency securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
8.65 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,851 |
|
|
|
2.31 |
% |
|
|
14,903 |
|
|
|
2.33 |
% |
|
AAA-rated non- agency securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,166,600 |
|
|
|
3.61 |
% |
|
|
3,166,600 |
|
|
|
3.61 |
% |
|
Other investment grade mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
146,822 |
|
|
|
6.81 |
% |
|
|
146,822 |
|
|
|
6.81 |
% |
|
|
Total investment grade mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
12.02 |
% |
|
|
2,200 |
|
|
|
7.62 |
% |
|
|
3,468,722 |
|
|
|
3.22 |
% |
|
|
3,471,033 |
|
|
|
3.23 |
% |
|
Non-investment grade residual securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,628 |
|
|
|
20.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
129,758 |
|
|
|
20.80 |
% |
|
|
135,386 |
|
|
|
20.77 |
% |
|
Other non-investment grade mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,322 |
|
|
|
12.53 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72,730 |
|
|
|
11.99 |
% |
|
|
83,052 |
|
|
|
12.05 |
% |
|
|
Total non-investment grade mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,950 |
|
|
|
15.16 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
202,488 |
|
|
|
17.64 |
% |
|
|
218,438 |
|
|
|
17.46 |
% |
|
|
Total mortgage-backed securities
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
16,061 |
|
|
|
15.14 |
% |
|
$ |
2,200 |
|
|
|
7.62 |
% |
|
$ |
3,671,210 |
|
|
|
4.02 |
% |
|
$ |
3,689,471 |
|
|
|
4.07 |
% |
Given prepayments on the underlying collateral of our MBS, we do
not expect our MBS to remain outstanding throughout their
contractual maturity periods. Therefore, contractual maturity is
not a relevant measure of the timing of our future expected cash
flows. Actual economic cash flows are expected to be received
much sooner.
Mortgage Servicing and Mortgage Servicing Rights
In addition to its own loans, IndyMac serviced
$50.2 billion of mortgage loans owned by others at
December 31, 2004, with a weighted-average coupon of 5.73%.
In comparison, IndyMac serviced $30.8 billion of mortgage
loans owned by others at December 31, 2003, with a
weighted-average coupon of 6.53%. The table below shows the
activity in the servicing portfolios during the years ended
December 31, 2004 and 2003.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Servicing Portfolio | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in millions) | |
Unpaid principal balance at beginning of period
|
|
$ |
30,774 |
|
|
$ |
28,376 |
|
Additions from Financial Freedom
|
|
|
4,280 |
|
|
|
|
|
Additions from normal operations
|
|
|
30,026 |
|
|
|
21,269 |
|
Clean-up calls exercised
|
|
|
(1,777 |
) |
|
|
(1,612 |
) |
Loan payments and prepayments
|
|
|
(13,084 |
) |
|
|
(17,259 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unpaid principal balance at end of period
|
|
$ |
50,219 |
|
|
$ |
30,774 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51
The capitalized value of MSRs totaled $640.8 million as of
December 31, 2004 and $443.7 million as of
December 31, 2003, reflecting an increase of
$197.1 million. The table below shows the activity in MSRs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Balance at beginning of period
|
|
$ |
443,688 |
|
|
$ |
300,539 |
|
|
$ |
321,316 |
|
Additions from Financial Freedom
|
|
|
41,003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions from normal operations
|
|
|
381,253 |
|
|
|
291,849 |
|
|
|
230,894 |
|
Conversion of MSRs to interest-only securities
|
|
|
(5,362 |
) |
|
|
(47,311 |
) |
|
|
(75,371 |
) |
Clean-up calls exercised
|
|
|
(18,754 |
) |
|
|
(10,256 |
) |
|
|
(685 |
) |
Scheduled amortization
|
|
|
(146,491 |
) |
|
|
(85,590 |
) |
|
|
(68,228 |
) |
Valuation (impairment)
|
|
|
(40,666 |
) |
|
|
(5,543 |
) |
|
|
(107,387 |
) |
FAS 133 basis adjustments
|
|
|
(9,627 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
$ |
645,044 |
|
|
$ |
443,688 |
|
|
$ |
300,539 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Although we have been hedging our MSRs on an economic basis, we
elected not to designate fair value hedge accounting on MSRs
prior to January 1, 2004, and they were carried at the
lower of the initial carrying value, adjusted for amortization,
or fair value. On January 1, 2004, we started to designate
fair value hedges on certain selected tranches of MSRs. The
changes in the fair value of the designated MSRs, and the fair
value of the designated hedges, are recorded through income, if
the hedging relationships are proven to be effective under the
provisions of SFAS No. 133.
Each quarter, we evaluate the MSRs for impairment in accordance
with SFAS No. 140, Accounting for Transfers
and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of
Liabilities. We stratify our MSRs based on predominant
risk characteristics, underlying loan type, interest rate type,
and interest rate band. Then, for each stratum, we determine the
fair value of MSRs using our valuation models, which are
benchmarked quarterly to third party opinions of value. If the
carrying value exceeds the fair value by individual stratum, a
valuation allowance is recorded as a charge to service fee
income in current earnings; however, if such impairment is
determined to be other-than-temporary and the recoverability of
the value is remote, we recognize a direct write-down. Unlike a
valuation allowance, a direct write-down permanently reduces the
carrying value of the MSR asset and the related valuation
allowance. As of December 31, 2004, the valuation allowance
on MSRs totaled $88.0 million.
AAA-Rated and Agency Interest-Only Securities and
Residuals
We evaluate the carrying value of our AAA-rated and agency
interest-only securities and residual securities by discounting
estimated net future cash flows. For these securities, estimated
net future cash flows are primarily based on assumptions related
to prepayment speeds, in addition to expected credit loss
assumptions on the residual securities.
52
A summary of the activity in the AAA-rated and agency
interest-only securities and residual securities portfolios for
the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003 follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
AAA-rated securities and agency interest-only securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance
|
|
$ |
148,275 |
|
|
$ |
188,043 |
|
|
|
Retained investments from securitizations
|
|
|
70,724 |
|
|
|
49,247 |
|
|
|
Transfers from MSRs
|
|
|
5,362 |
|
|
|
47,311 |
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
(15,171 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clean-up calls exercised
|
|
|
(3,547 |
) |
|
|
(40,333 |
) |
|
|
Cash received, net of accretion
|
|
|
(42,655 |
) |
|
|
(51,939 |
) |
|
|
Valuation losses before hedges
|
|
|
(38,879 |
) |
|
|
(44,054 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
$ |
124,109 |
|
|
$ |
148,275 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residual securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance
|
|
$ |
56,157 |
|
|
$ |
77,757 |
|
|
|
Retained investments from securitizations
|
|
|
93,383 |
|
|
|
22,070 |
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,525 |
) |
|
|
Cash received, net of accretion
|
|
|
(19,704 |
) |
|
|
(22,819 |
) |
|
|
Valuation (losses) gains before hedges
|
|
|
5,550 |
|
|
|
(10,326 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
$ |
135,386 |
|
|
$ |
56,157 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation of Servicing-Related Assets
MSRs, AAA-rated and agency interest-only securities and residual
securities are recorded at fair market value. MSRs, except for
certain tranches for which we have applied hedge accounting, are
further subject to the lower of cost or market limitations.
Relevant information and assumptions used to value the
Companys servicing related assets and residual securities
at December 31, 2004 and 2003 are shown below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual | |
|
Valuation Assumptions | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Gross Wtd. | |
|
Servicing | |
|
3-Month | |
|
Weighted | |
|
Lifetime | |
|
3-Month | |
|
|
|
Remaining | |
|
|
Book | |
|
Collateral | |
|
Average | |
|
Fee/Interest | |
|
Prepayment | |
|
Average | |
|
Prepayment | |
|
Prepayment | |
|
Discount | |
|
Cumulative | |
|
|
Value | |
|
Balance | |
|
Coupon | |
|
Strip | |
|
Speeds | |
|
Multiple | |
|
Speeds | |
|
Speeds | |
|
Yield | |
|
Loss Rate(1) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
December 31, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MSRs
|
|
$ |
640,794 |
|
|
$ |
50,218,965 |
|
|
|
5.73 |
% |
|
|
0.36 |
% |
|
|
24.0 |
% |
|
|
3.54 |
|
|
|
20.8 |
% |
|
|
21.9 |
% |
|
|
10.3 |
% |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AAA-rated/agency interest-only securities
|
|
$ |
124,109 |
|
|
$ |
16,099,163 |
|
|
|
6.65 |
% |
|
|
0.38 |
% |
|
|
34.3 |
% |
|
|
2.03 |
|
|
|
14.9 |
% |
|
|
26.9 |
% |
|
|
11.3 |
% |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prime residual securities
|
|
$ |
6,495 |
|
|
$ |
1,668,429 |
|
|
|
6.55 |
% |
|
|
1.00 |
% |
|
|
40.9 |
% |
|
|
0.39 |
|
|
|
36.9 |
% |
|
|
37.3 |
% |
|
|
15.0 |
% |
|
|
0.21 |
% |
Lot loan residual securities
|
|
|
17,675 |
|
|
|
441,884 |
|
|
|
7.02 |
% |
|
|
4.13 |
% |
|
|
36.5 |
% |
|
|
0.97 |
|
|
|
41.0 |
% |
|
|
41.6 |
% |
|
|
19.3 |
% |
|
|
0.42 |
% |
HELOC residual securities
|
|
|
66,077 |
|
|
$ |
1,352,181 |
|
|
|
6.48 |
% |
|
|
3.41 |
% |
|
|
32.1 |
% |
|
|
1.43 |
|
|
|
36.7 |
% |
|
|
43.4 |
% |
|
|
19.0 |
% |
|
|
0.91 |
% |
Subprime residual securities
|
|
|
45,139 |
|
|
$ |
2,757,236 |
|
|
|
7.44 |
% |
|
|
3.29 |
% |
|
|
24.1 |
% |
|
|
0.50 |
|
|
|
33.6 |
% |
|
|
22.8 |
% |
|
|
24.7 |
% |
|
|
2.55 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-investment grade residual securities
|
|
$ |
135,386 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual | |
|
Valuation Assumptions | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Gross Wtd. | |
|
Servicing | |
|
3-Month | |
|
Weighted | |
|
? Lifetime | |
|
3-Month | |
|
|
|
Remaining | |
|
|
Book | |
|
Collateral | |
|
Average | |
|
Fee/Interest | |
|
Prepayment | |
|
Average | |
|
Prepayment | |
|
Prepayment | |
|
Discount | |
|
Cumulative | |
|
|
Value | |
|
Balance | |
|
Coupon | |
|
Strip | |
|
Speeds | |
|
Multiple | |
|
Speeds | |
|
Speeds | |
|
Yield | |
|
Loss Rate(1) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
December 31, 2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MSRs
|
|
$ |
443,688 |
|
|
$ |
30,773,545 |
|
|
|
6.53 |
% |
|
|
0.32 |
% |
|
|
31.0 |
% |
|
|
4.51 |
|
|
|
16.8 |
% |
|
|
31.5 |
% |
|
|
10.0 |
% |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AAA-rated/agency interest-only securities
|
|
$ |
148,275 |
|
|
$ |
14,740,915 |
|
|
|
6.90 |
% |
|
|
0.38 |
% |
|
|
34.0 |
% |
|
|
2.65 |
|
|
|
17.2 |
% |
|
|
35.5 |
% |
|
|
9.8 |
% |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prime residual securities
|
|
$ |
15,073 |
|
|
$ |
2,215,618 |
|
|
|
7.09 |
% |
|
|
0.90 |
% |
|
|
60.1 |
% |
|
|
0.76 |
|
|
|
23.8 |
% |
|
|
35.3 |
% |
|
|
15.0 |
% |
|
|
0.52 |
% |
Lot loan residual securities
|
|
|
8,445 |
|
|
|
190,411 |
|
|
|
6.55 |
% |
|
|
4.41 |
% |
|
|
57.8 |
% |
|
|
1.01 |
|
|
|
38.8 |
% |
|
|
39.5 |
% |
|
|
20.0 |
% |
|
|
0.29 |
% |
Subprime residual securities
|
|
|
32,639 |
|
|
|
1,286,694 |
|
|
|
8.65 |
% |
|
|
4.34 |
% |
|
|
38.4 |
% |
|
|
0.58 |
|
|
|
33.4 |
% |
|
|
32.9 |
% |
|
|
23.6 |
% |
|
|
2.26 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-investment grade residual securities
|
|
$ |
56,157 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
As a percentage of the original pool balance, the actual
cumulative loss rate to date totaled 0.03%, 1.14%, 0.01% and
0.00% for prime, subprime, and HELOC and Lot loan residuals,
respectively, at December 31, 2004. |
The lifetime prepayment speeds represent the annual constant
prepayment rate (CPR) we estimate for the remaining
life of the collateral supporting the asset. For MSRs and
AAA-rated and agency interest-only securities, we project
prepayment rates using an industry standard prepayment model.
The model considers key factors such as refinance incentive,
housing turnover, seasonality and aging of the pool of loans.
Prepayment speeds incorporate expectations of future rates
implied by the market forward LIBOR/swap curve as well as
collateral specific current coupon information.
The weighted-average multiple for MSRs, AAA-rated and agency
interest-only securities and residual securities represents the
book value divided by the product of collateral balance and
servicing fee/interest strip. While the weighted-average life of
such assets is a function of the undiscounted cash flows, the
multiple is a function of the discounted cash flows. With regard
to AAA-rated and agency interest-only securities, the
marketplace frequently uses calculated multiples to assess the
overall impact valuation assumptions have on value. Collateral
type, coupon, loan age and the size of the interest strip must
be considered when comparing these multiples. The mix of
collateral types supporting servicing-related assets is
primarily non-conforming/conventional, which may make
comparisons of the Companys MSR multiples misleading
relative to peer multiples whose product mix is substantially
different.
As of December 31, 2004, the weighted-average multiple for
MSRs has decreased compared to December 31, 2003, primarily
due to the higher lifetime prepayment speeds assumption than a
year ago. During 2004, our servicing portfolio has shifted from
predominantly fixed-rate loans to an increased percentage of
hybrid-ARM and ARM loans, which tend to prepay faster. The
decrease in the weighted-average multiple for our AAA-rated and
agency interest-only securities reflected our adjustments to the
valuation based on the market pricing of similar traded
interest-only securities. The weighted-average multiples for lot
and subprime residuals were comparable to last year, while the
weighted-average multiple for prime residuals has decreased due
to accelerated prepayments.
Hedging Interest Rate Risk on Servicing-Related
Assets
With respect to the investment in servicing-related assets
(AAA-rated and agency interest-only securities, non-investment
grade residual securities, and MSRs), the Company is exposed to
interest rate risk as a result of other than predicted
prepayment of loans. Our Investing Divisions are responsible for
the management of interest rate and prepayment risks in the
servicing-related assets, subject to policies and procedures
established by, and oversight from, our management-level Asset
and Liability Committee (ALCO), management level
Enterprise Risk Management group (ERM), and our
Board of Directors-level ERM.
The objective of our hedging strategy is to mitigate the impact
of changes in interest rates on the net economic value of the
balance sheet and quarterly earnings, not to speculate on
interest rates. As such, we
54
manage the comprehensive interest rate risk of our
servicing-related assets using financial instruments and our
servicing portfolio retention efforts. Historically, we have
hedged servicing-related assets using a mix of securities on our
balance sheet, such as AAA-rated principal-only securities,
buying and/or selling mortgage-backed or U.S. Treasury
securities, as well as derivatives such as futures, floors,
interest rate swaps, or options. During 2003, clean-up call
revenues and retention programs also were added to our overall
servicing asset management program. As there are no hedge
instruments that would be perfectly correlated with these hedged
assets, we use a mix of the above instruments designed to
correlate well with the hedged servicing assets and our
anticipated servicing retention rates.
As shown in the table below, our return on servicing-related
assets has continued to be negatively impacted by high
short-term prepayment speeds.
The following table breaks out the components of service fee
income/expense and the net loss on MBS.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
Percentage | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
Change | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Service fee (expense) income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross service fee income
|
|
$ |
142,266 |
|
|
$ |
105,063 |
|
|
|
35 |
% |
|
Amortization
|
|
|
(146,491 |
) |
|
|
(85,590 |
) |
|
|
71 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service fee (expense) income net of amortization
|
|
|
(4,225 |
) |
|
|
19,473 |
|
|
|
(122 |
)% |
|
Valuation adjustments on MSRs
|
|
|
(50,293 |
) |
|
|
(5,543 |
) |
|
|
(807 |
)% |
|
Hedging (loss) gains
|
|
|
42,065 |
|
|
|
(30,011 |
) |
|
|
240 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total service fee (expense) income
|
|
$ |
(12,453 |
) |
|
$ |
(16,081 |
) |
|
|
23 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) gain on securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized gain on available-for-sale securities
|
|
$ |
3,972 |
|
|
$ |
2,080 |
|
|
|
91 |
% |
|
Impairment on available-for-sale securities
|
|
|
(1,582 |
) |
|
|
(2,336 |
) |
|
|
32 |
% |
|
Unrealized loss on AAA-rated and agency interest-only securities
and residual securities
|
|
|
(33,329 |
) |
|
|
(54,382 |
) |
|
|
39 |
% |
|
Net gain on securities and other instruments used to hedge
AAA-rated and agency interest-only securities and residual
securities
|
|
|
7,135 |
|
|
|
23,785 |
|
|
|
(70 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total (loss) gain on mortgage-backed securities, net
|
|
$ |
(23,804 |
) |
|
$ |
(30,853 |
) |
|
|
23 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total clean-up call and retention program income
|
|
$ |
57,055 |
|
|
$ |
82,890 |
|
|
|
(31 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As master servicer for our various securitizations, we maintain
the right to call selected transactions when the outstanding
loan balances in the securitization trust decline to a specified
level, typically 10% of the original collateral balance. During
the year ended December 31, 2004, we sold approximately
$445.0 million of called loans with a pretax gain of
$12.5 million. We expect to exercise our option to call
additional loans of approximately $99.0 million for 2005,
versus the 2004 volume of $446.3 million, the exact timing
and amount of which is dependent upon the future interest rate
environment and borrower prepayment behavior.
Mortgage loan servicing provides a key advantage to mortgage
originators in a declining interest rate environment, as there
is an existing base of customers that could potentially be in
the market for a refinance mortgage. The gains from providing a
new mortgage to an existing customer serve to mitigate the
decline in value of the mortgage servicing asset for the early
prepayment of the original loan. Prior to the third quarter of
2003, servicing referrals and direct marketing to IndyMacs
servicing customers was performed by the Web & Direct
Mail segment. IndyMac began to transition this customer
retention activity to the mortgage servicing segment beginning
in the third quarter of 2004 and completed the transition by the
end of 2004. In order to evaluate the overall profitability of
the servicing segment, we believe it is important to view the
profitability
55
including all of the retention activities performed at the
Company, both by the Web & Direct Mail segment and the
mortgage servicing segment.
The income from the clean-up call and retention programs is
recognized as a component of gain on sale and net interest
income in the Investing Divisions mortgage banking
activities. As shown in our segment results on page 31, the
effect of the clean-up call and retention program activities
allowed the mortgage servicing business to generate positive
returns during the historical refinance boom periods.
The income from the clean-up call and retention programs totaled
$57.1 million during 2004, a decrease of $25.2 million
compared to the year ended December 31, 2003. The reduction
is primarily due to the significant decreases in the amount of
clean-up loans called and loans acquired through retention
programs in 2004, combined with lower weighted-average coupon
rates on loans acquired, compared to the same period of 2003.
When looked at as a whole, the retention activities
significantly enhance the servicing returns. The second quarter
of 2004 was the only quarter in which IndyMac has suffered a
loss in its servicing activities net of the retention profits.
The table below shows the total return on servicing and retained
assets including an estimate of the Web & Direct Mail
segment retention profits.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
Percent | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
Change | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Net revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Servicing-related assets segment
|
|
$ |
34,136 |
|
|
$ |
63,156 |
|
|
|
(46 |
)% |
|
Web and Direct Mail servicing retention revenue
|
|
|
27,111 |
|
|
|
58,938 |
|
|
|
(54 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenues
|
|
|
61,247 |
|
|
|
122,094 |
|
|
|
(50 |
)% |
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Servicing-related assets segment
|
|
|
44,053 |
|
|
|
36,746 |
|
|
|
20 |
% |
|
Web and Direct Mail servicing retention expenses
|
|
|
12,254 |
|
|
|
27,307 |
|
|
|
(55 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
56,307 |
|
|
|
64,053 |
|
|
|
(12 |
)% |
Earnings before tax
|
|
|
4,940 |
|
|
|
58,041 |
|
|
|
(91 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
$ |
2,989 |
|
|
$ |
35,115 |
|
|
|
(91 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average capital allocated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Servicing-related assets segment
|
|
$ |
224,763 |
|
|
$ |
203,623 |
|
|
|
10 |
% |
|
Web and Direct Mail servicing retention revenue
|
|
|
4,311 |
|
|
|
9,482 |
|
|
|
(55 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total average capital
|
|
$ |
229,074 |
|
|
$ |
213,105 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ROE
|
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
17 |
% |
|
|
(94 |
)% |
Construction Lending
IndyMac provides construction financing for individual consumers
who are in the process of building their own home (consumer
construction) and for residential subdivision developers
(builder construction). With respect to consumer construction,
the primary product is a construction-to-permanent residential
mortgage loan. This product provides financing for the 9 to
12 month term of construction and automatically converts to
a permanent mortgage loan at the end of construction. As a
result, this product represents a hybrid activity between our
portfolio lending activities and mortgage banking activities.
The construction loans are typically fixed-rate loans during the
construction phase, and the Company earns net interest income
during this time period. When the loan converts to permanent
status, it is transferred into the Companys pipeline of
mortgage loans held for sale, and its interest rate may be
adjusted based on the underlying note. As of December 31,
2004, we expect approximately 50% of the construction loans to
be converted to adjustable-rate permanent loans, 35% to hybrid
adjustable-rate loans, and 15% to fixed-rate loans. Consumer
construction loan
56
originations grew 31% over 2003, as we continue to take
advantage of the strong new home purchase market.
Overall, the Consumer Construction group is one of the largest
custom residential construction lenders in the nation. Consumer
construction loans outstanding at December 31, 2004 were
$1.4 billion, up 26% compared to the amount at
December 31, 2003.
Builder construction loans are typically adjustable rate and
based on prime rates. During the year ended December 31,
2004, we entered into new tract construction commitments of
$1.1 billion, up 43% from 2003. Builder loans outstanding
at December 31, 2004, including construction land, and
other mortgage loans, totaled $797.2 million, a
$192.1 million, or 32% increase compared to
December 31, 2003. A substantial portion of our builder
construction loans is secured by corporate or personal
guarantees of the builders as well as the underlying real estate.
The following tables present further information on our
construction loan portfolios.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of | |
|
|
| |
|
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
December 31, 2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Consumer | |
|
Builder | |
|
Consumer | |
|
Builder | |
|
|
Construction | |
|
Construction | |
|
Construction | |
|
Construction | |
|
|
Loans | |
|
Loans | |
|
Loans | |
|
Loans | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Construction loans
|
|
$ |
1,443,450 |
|
|
$ |
643,116 |
|
|
$ |
1,145,526 |
|
|
$ |
484,397 |
|
Land and other mortgage loans
|
|
$ |
37,172 |
|
|
$ |
154,123 |
|
|
$ |
87,045 |
|
|
$ |
157,036 |
|
Outstanding commitments
|
|
$ |
2,528,054 |
|
|
$ |
1,461,296 |
|
|
$ |
2,091,853 |
|
|
$ |
1,120,893 |
|
Average construction loan commitment
|
|
$ |
410 |
|
|
$ |
1,941 |
|
|
$ |
391 |
|
|
$ |
3,046 |
|
Non-performing loans
|
|
|
0.65 |
% |
|
|
1.45 |
% |
|
|
0.78 |
% |
|
|
1.60 |
% |
Annual yield on construction loans
|
|
|
5.62 |
% |
|
|
6.73 |
% |
|
|
6.32 |
% |
|
|
6.75 |
% |
Fixed-rate loans
|
|
|
98 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
94 |
% |
|
|
1 |
% |
Adjustable-rate loans
|
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
98 |
% |
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
97 |
% |
Hybrid adjustable-rate loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Aggregate Maturities of Loan Balances Due | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Within One Year or Less | |
|
Between One to Five Years | |
|
After Five Years | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
By Interest Rate Type | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Fixed | |
|
Floating | |
|
Fixed | |
|
Floating | |
|
Fixed | |
|
Floating | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Consumer Construction
|
|
$ |
1,428,712 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
14,738 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Builder Construction
|
|
$ |
123,551 |
|
|
$ |
340,697 |
|
|
$ |
11,439 |
|
|
$ |
167,429 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Loans
|
|
$ |
1,552,263 |
|
|
$ |
340,697 |
|
|
$ |
26,177 |
|
|
$ |
167,429 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57
Additional Information as of December 31, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer | |
|
|
Construction | |
|
|
Loans | |
|
|
| |
Average loan-to-value ratio(1)
|
|
|
74 |
% |
Average FICO score(2)
|
|
|
707 |
|
Geographic distribution
|
|
|
|
|
|
Southern California
|
|
|
29 |
% |
|
Northern California
|
|
|
17 |
% |
|
Hawaii
|
|
|
6 |
% |
|
New York
|
|
|
5 |
% |
|
Florida
|
|
|
5 |
% |
|
Washington
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
Colorado
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
Nevada
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
New Jersey
|
|
|
2 |
% |
|
Georgia
|
|
|
2 |
% |
|
Other (each individually less than 2%)
|
|
|
25 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Consumer Construction
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Builder | |
|
|
Construction | |
|
|
Loans | |
|
|
| |
Average loan-to-value ratio(1)
|
|
|
70 |
% |
Average FICO score(2)
|
|
|
N/A |
|
Southern California
|
|
|
42 |
% |
Northern California
|
|
|
22 |
% |
Illinois
|
|
|
11 |
% |
Florida
|
|
|
6 |
% |
Massachusetts
|
|
|
3 |
% |
Nevada
|
|
|
3 |
% |
New York
|
|
|
3 |
% |
Other (each individually less than 2%)
|
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Total Builder Construction
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
The average loan-to-value ratio is based on the estimated
appraised value of the completed project compared to the
commitment amount at December 31, 2004. |
|
(2) |
FICO scores are not calculated for corporate entities and,
therefore, are not applicable to the builder construction
portfolio. |
For information related to the Companys balance of
non-performing assets and related credit reserves, see
discussion in the Credit Risk and Reserves section
at page 64.
HELOC Portfolio
The HELOC portfolio, including the HELOCs we securitized during
2004, grew 141% during the year ended December 31, 2004,
from $0.7 billion at December 31, 2003, to
$1.7 billion at December 31, 2004. The HELOC
production was largely from our internal and conduit channels.
HELOC loans that we currently plan to sell or securitize are
classified as held for sale.
During 2004, the Company financed $1.0 billion in HELOC
loans through two separate securitization transactions. The
trusts issued AAA-rated asset-backed certificates that are
guaranteed by a third party insurer. The Company pledged the
certificates to secure $1.0 billion of nonrecourse debt. As
a result of these transactions, the Company recharacterized the
net book value of the HELOCs as securities available for sale
and servicing rights. The nonrecourse notes are reflected in
other borrowings. The Company recognized no gain or loss on
these secured financing transactions. The primary objectives of
these transactions were to (1) lower our cost of funds,
(2) improve our liquidity profile, and (3) improve our
risk profile through the use of bond insurance. Additionally,
the Company sold $329.2 million of HELOC loans during the
fourth quarter of 2004 and recognized a $2.0 million gain
on sale of loans, in addition to the net interest income earned
before the loans were sold.
58
The following table presents information on our HELOCs as of
December 31, 2004 and 2003. All HELOC loans are adjustable
rate loans and indexed to the prime rate.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Outstanding book value
|
|
$ |
404,342 |
|
|
$ |
711,494 |
|
Outstanding commitments(1)
|
|
$ |
838,534 |
|
|
$ |
1,189,213 |
|
Average spread over prime
|
|
|
1.41 |
% |
|
|
1.92 |
% |
Non-performing loans
|
|
|
0.30 |
% |
|
|
0.17 |
% |
Average FICO score
|
|
|
726 |
|
|
|
710 |
|
Average CLTV ratio(2)
|
|
|
76 |
% |
|
|
77 |
% |
Additional Information as of December 31, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total | |
|
Average Loan | |
|
|
|
|
|
30+ Days | |
|
|
Outstanding | |
|
Commitment | |
|
Average Spread | |
|
Average | |
|
Delinquency | |
CLTV |
|
Book Value | |
|
Balance | |
|
Over Prime | |
|
FICO | |
|
Percentage | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
96% to 100%
|
|
$ |
80,392 |
|
|
$ |
69 |
|
|
|
2.18% |
|
|
|
733 |
|
|
|
0.13% |
|
91% to 95%
|
|
|
40,842 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
2.14% |
|
|
|
717 |
|
|
|
0.92% |
|
81% to 90%
|
|
|
104,239 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
1.83% |
|
|
|
709 |
|
|
|
1.09% |
|
71% to 80%
|
|
|
87,936 |
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
0.79% |
|
|
|
724 |
|
|
|
0.78% |
|
70% or less
|
|
|
90,933 |
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
0.53% |
|
|
|
741 |
|
|
|
0.20% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
404,342 |
|
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
1.41% |
|
|
|
726 |
|
|
|
0.61% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) On funded loans.
|
|
(2) |
The CLTV combines the loan-to-value on both the first mortgage
loan and the HELOC. |
59
NET INTEREST INCOME
The following table sets forth information regarding our
consolidated average balance sheets (all segments are combined),
along with the total dollar amounts of interest income and
interest expense and the weighted-average interest rates for the
periods presented. Average balances are calculated on a daily
basis. Non-performing loans are included in the average balances
for the periods presented. The allowance for loan losses is
excluded from the average loan balances.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Average | |
|
|
|
Yield/ | |
|
Average | |
|
|
|
Yield/ | |
|
Average | |
|
|
|
Yield/ | |
|
|
Balance | |
|
Interest | |
|
Rate | |
|
Balance | |
|
Interest | |
|
Rate | |
|
Balance | |
|
Interest | |
|
Rate | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Securities
|
|
$ |
2,906,547 |
|
|
$ |
143,351 |
|
|
|
4.93% |
|
|
$ |
1,794,630 |
|
|
$ |
83,903 |
|
|
|
4.68% |
|
|
$ |
1,828,694 |
|
|
$ |
112,065 |
|
|
|
6.13% |
|
Loans held for sale
|
|
|
5,188,810 |
|
|
|
277,494 |
|
|
|
5.35% |
|
|
|
3,438,677 |
|
|
|
214,338 |
|
|
|
6.23% |
|
|
|
2,222,838 |
|
|
|
148,498 |
|
|
|
6.68% |
|
Mortgage loans held for investment
|
|
|
5,271,841 |
|
|
|
224,962 |
|
|
|
4.27% |
|
|
|
3,680,554 |
|
|
|
170,290 |
|
|
|
4.63% |
|
|
|
1,707,409 |
|
|
|
111,450 |
|
|
|
6.53% |
|
Builder construction and income property
|
|
|
555,754 |
|
|
|
37,427 |
|
|
|
6.73% |
|
|
|
549,582 |
|
|
|
37,114 |
|
|
|
6.75% |
|
|
|
595,711 |
|
|
|
42,726 |
|
|
|
7.17% |
|
Consumer construction
|
|
|
1,249,931 |
|
|
|
70,288 |
|
|
|
5.62% |
|
|
|
956,211 |
|
|
|
60,392 |
|
|
|
6.32% |
|
|
|
731,476 |
|
|
|
55,660 |
|
|
|
7.61% |
|
Investment in Federal Home Loan Bank stock and other
|
|
|
347,976 |
|
|
|
14,086 |
|
|
|
4.05% |
|
|
|
255,050 |
|
|
|
9,804 |
|
|
|
3.84% |
|
|
|
144,028 |
|
|
|
6,705 |
|
|
|
4.66% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-earning assets
|
|
|
15,520,859 |
|
|
|
767,608 |
|
|
|
4.95% |
|
|
|
10,674,704 |
|
|
|
575,841 |
|
|
|
5.39% |
|
|
|
7,230,156 |
|
|
|
477,104 |
|
|
|
6.60% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
1,349,776 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,037,578 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
721,659 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
16,870,635 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
11,712,282 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7,951,815 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing deposits
|
|
$ |
4,277,667 |
|
|
$ |
103,612 |
|
|
|
2.42% |
|
|
$ |
3,162,221 |
|
|
$ |
87,828 |
|
|
|
2.78% |
|
|
$ |
2,665,942 |
|
|
$ |
105,188 |
|
|
|
3.95% |
|
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank
|
|
|
5,809,913 |
|
|
|
145,925 |
|
|
|
2.51% |
|
|
|
3,820,076 |
|
|
|
113,032 |
|
|
|
2.96% |
|
|
|
2,092,972 |
|
|
|
101,647 |
|
|
|
4.86% |
|
Other borrowings
|
|
|
4,560,357 |
|
|
|
113,009 |
|
|
|
2.48% |
|
|
|
2,697,909 |
|
|
|
64,044 |
|
|
|
2.37% |
|
|
|
1,710,659 |
|
|
|
60,981 |
|
|
|
3.56% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities
|
|
|
14,647,937 |
|
|
|
362,546 |
|
|
|
2.48% |
|
|
|
9,680,206 |
|
|
|
264,904 |
|
|
|
2.74% |
|
|
|
6,469,573 |
|
|
|
267,816 |
|
|
|
4.14% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
1,070,583 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,096,006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
618,466 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
15,718,520 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,776,212 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,088,039 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
1,152,115 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
936,070 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
863,776 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
$ |
16,870,635 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
11,712,282 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7,951,815 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
405,062 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
310,937 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
209,288 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest spread
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.47% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.66% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.46% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest margin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.61% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.91% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.89% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on average equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18.34% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18.30% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.60% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on average assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.25% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.46% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.80% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The net interest margin for 2004 was 2.61%, a decline of
30 basis points from 2.91% for the year ended
December 31, 2003. The margin decline year over year was
primarily due to our mortgage loans held for sale
60
portfolio. As shown in the table below, the net interest margin
in this portfolio declined 123 basis points from 2003. The
decline was attributable to increases in short-term interest
rates and a shift in portfolio composition to lower rate ARM
products.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
December 31, 2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Average | |
|
Net | |
|
Net | |
|
Average | |
|
Net | |
|
Net | |
|
|
Earning | |
|
Interest | |
|
Interest | |
|
Earning | |
|
Interest | |
|
Interest | |
|
|
Assets | |
|
Income | |
|
Margin | |
|
Assets | |
|
Income | |
|
Margin | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
By Business Activity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing, HELOC & Financing
|
|
$ |
10,645,206 |
|
|
$ |
232,143 |
|
|
|
2.18% |
|
|
$ |
7,044,017 |
|
|
$ |
137,233 |
|
|
|
1.95 |
% |
Mortgage banking
|
|
|
4,875,653 |
|
|
|
172,919 |
|
|
|
3.55% |
|
|
|
3,630,687 |
|
|
|
173,704 |
|
|
|
4.78 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Company
|
|
$ |
15,520,859 |
|
|
$ |
405,062 |
|
|
|
2.61% |
|
|
$ |
10,674,704 |
|
|
$ |
310,937 |
|
|
|
2.91 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The dollar amounts of interest income and interest expense
fluctuate depending upon changes in the average balances and
interest rates of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing
liabilities. The following table details changes attributable to:
|
|
|
|
|
changes in volume (changes in average outstanding balances
multiplied by the prior periods rate), |
|
|
|
changes in the rate (changes in the average interest rate
multiplied by the prior periods volume), and |
|
|
|
changes in rate/volume (mix) (changes in rates times
the changes in volume). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31 | |
|
|
2004 vs. 2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Increase/(Decrease) Due to | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Volume | |
|
Rate | |
|
Mix | |
|
Total Change | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Interest income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
$ |
51,985 |
|
|
$ |
4,608 |
|
|
$ |
2,855 |
|
|
$ |
59,448 |
|
|
Loans held for sale
|
|
|
109,088 |
|
|
|
(30,440 |
) |
|
|
(15,492 |
) |
|
|
63,156 |
|
|
Mortgage loans held for investment
|
|
|
73,625 |
|
|
|
(13,232 |
) |
|
|
(5,721 |
) |
|
|
54,672 |
|
|
Builder construction and income property
|
|
|
417 |
|
|
|
(103 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
313 |
|
|
Consumer construction
|
|
|
18,551 |
|
|
|
(6,621 |
) |
|
|
(2,034 |
) |
|
|
9,896 |
|
|
Investment in Federal Home Loan Bank stock and other
|
|
|
3,572 |
|
|
|
521 |
|
|
|
189 |
|
|
|
4,282 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income
|
|
|
257,238 |
|
|
|
(45,267 |
) |
|
|
(20,204 |
) |
|
|
191,767 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing deposits
|
|
|
30,981 |
|
|
|
(11,234 |
) |
|
|
(3,963 |
) |
|
|
15,784 |
|
|
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank
|
|
|
58,877 |
|
|
|
(17,085 |
) |
|
|
(8,899 |
) |
|
|
32,893 |
|
|
Other borrowings
|
|
|
41,096 |
|
|
|
4,413 |
|
|
|
3,456 |
|
|
|
48,965 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense
|
|
|
130,954 |
|
|
|
(23,906 |
) |
|
|
(9,406 |
) |
|
|
97,642 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
$ |
126,284 |
|
|
$ |
(21,361 |
) |
|
$ |
(10,798 |
) |
|
$ |
94,125 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
2003 vs. 2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Increase/(Decrease) Due to | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Volume | |
|
Rate | |
|
Mix | |
|
Total Change | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Interest income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed Securities
|
|
$ |
(2,087 |
) |
|
$ |
(26,570 |
) |
|
$ |
495 |
|
|
$ |
(28,162 |
) |
|
Loans held for sale
|
|
|
81,225 |
|
|
|
(9,946 |
) |
|
|
(5,439 |
) |
|
|
65,840 |
|
|
Mortgage loans held for investment
|
|
|
128,796 |
|
|
|
(32,453 |
) |
|
|
(37,503 |
) |
|
|
58,840 |
|
|
Builder construction and income property
|
|
|
(3,308 |
) |
|
|
(2,497 |
) |
|
|
193 |
|
|
|
(5,612 |
) |
|
Consumer construction
|
|
|
17,100 |
|
|
|
(9,461 |
) |
|
|
(2,907 |
) |
|
|
4,732 |
|
|
Investment in Federal Home Loan Bank stock and other
|
|
|
5,169 |
|
|
|
(1,169 |
) |
|
|
(901 |
) |
|
|
3,099 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income
|
|
|
226,895 |
|
|
|
(82,096 |
) |
|
|
(46,062 |
) |
|
|
98,737 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing deposits
|
|
|
19,581 |
|
|
|
(31,143 |
) |
|
|
(5,798 |
) |
|
|
(17,360 |
) |
|
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank
|
|
|
83,878 |
|
|
|
(39,718 |
) |
|
|
(32,775 |
) |
|
|
11,385 |
|
|
Other borrowings
|
|
|
35,193 |
|
|
|
(20,373 |
) |
|
|
(11,757 |
) |
|
|
3,063 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense
|
|
|
138,652 |
|
|
|
(91,234 |
) |
|
|
(50,330 |
) |
|
|
(2,912 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
$ |
88,243 |
|
|
$ |
9,138 |
|
|
$ |
4,268 |
|
|
$ |
101,649 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62
OVERALL INTEREST RATE RISK MANAGEMENT
In addition to our hedging activities to mitigate the interest
rate risk in our pipeline of mortgage loans held for sale and
our investment in servicing-related assets, we perform extensive
overall interest rate risk analyses. The primary measurement
tool used to evaluate interest rate risk over the comprehensive
balance sheet is a net portfolio value (NPV)
analysis that simulates the effects changes in interest rates
have on the fair value of shareholders equity.
The following table sets forth the NPV and change in NPV that we
estimate might result from a 100 basis point change in
interest rates as of December 31, 2004 and 2003. Our NPV
model has been built to focus on the Bank alone as the
$1.3 billion of assets at the holding company and its
non-bank subsidiaries have very little interest rate risk
exposure.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
December 31, 2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Effect of Change in | |
|
|
|
Effect of Change in | |
|
|
|
|
Interest Rates | |
|
|
|
Interest Rates | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Decrease | |
|
Increase | |
|
|
|
Decrease | |
|
Increase | |
|
|
Fair Value | |
|
100 bps | |
|
100 bps | |
|
Fair Value | |
|
100 bps | |
|
100 bps | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
352,664 |
|
|
$ |
352,664 |
|
|
$ |
352,664 |
|
|
$ |
111,203 |
|
|
$ |
111,203 |
|
|
$ |
111,203 |
|
Trading securities
|
|
|
215,480 |
|
|
|
202,801 |
|
|
|
224,716 |
|
|
|
206,484 |
|
|
|
180,197 |
|
|
|
228,880 |
|
Available for sale securities
|
|
|
2,362,108 |
|
|
|
2,398,485 |
|
|
|
2,303,858 |
|
|
|
1,611,958 |
|
|
|
1,662,715 |
|
|
|
1,553,103 |
|
Loans held for sale
|
|
|
4,474,459 |
|
|
|
4,530,902 |
|
|
|
4,385,744 |
|
|
|
2,573,248 |
|
|
|
2,606,028 |
|
|
|
2,519,059 |
|
Loans held for investment
|
|
|
6,725,541 |
|
|
|
6,792,345 |
|
|
|
6,616,173 |
|
|
|
7,396,475 |
|
|
|
7,448,389 |
|
|
|
7,304,464 |
|
MSRs
|
|
|
640,794 |
|
|
|
509,099 |
|
|
|
728,703 |
|
|
|
443,688 |
|
|
|
311,777 |
|
|
|
534,672 |
|
Other assets
|
|
|
898,496 |
|
|
|
959,259 |
|
|
|
926,602 |
|
|
|
789,332 |
|
|
|
788,954 |
|
|
|
838,308 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
15,669,542 |
|
|
$ |
15,745,555 |
|
|
$ |
15,538,460 |
|
|
$ |
13,132,388 |
|
|
$ |
13,109,263 |
|
|
$ |
13,089,689 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
$ |
5,688,988 |
|
|
$ |
5,741,396 |
|
|
$ |
5,640,149 |
|
|
$ |
4,367,400 |
|
|
$ |
4,404,900 |
|
|
$ |
4,335,433 |
|
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank
|
|
|
6,160,151 |
|
|
|
6,189,573 |
|
|
|
6,131,386 |
|
|
|
4,949,477 |
|
|
|
4,979,962 |
|
|
|
4,919,147 |
|
Other borrowings
|
|
|
1,865,801 |
|
|
|
1,867,124 |
|
|
|
1,864,481 |
|
|
|
2,438,695 |
|
|
|
2,440,538 |
|
|
|
2,436,665 |
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
299,876 |
|
|
|
300,119 |
|
|
|
299,631 |
|
|
|
156,711 |
|
|
|
156,800 |
|
|
|
156,599 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
14,014,816 |
|
|
|
14,098,212 |
|
|
|
13,935,647 |
|
|
|
11,912,283 |
|
|
|
11,982,200 |
|
|
|
11,847,844 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity (NPV)
|
|
$ |
1,654,726 |
|
|
$ |
1,647,343 |
|
|
$ |
1,602,813 |
|
|
$ |
1,220,105 |
|
|
$ |
1,127,063 |
|
|
$ |
1,241,845 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% change from base case
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.45 |
)% |
|
|
(3.14 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7.63 |
)% |
|
|
1.78 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in the net present value of equity from
December 31, 2003, to December 31, 2004, is primarily
due to (i) the increase in retained earnings of IndyMac
Bank in the amount of $144.3 million, (ii) a capital
contribution of $120.0 million from IndyMac Bancorp to
IndyMac Bank, and (iii) lower relative valuation of certain
liabilities as interest rates have increased. The
December 31, 2004 results indicate that IndyMac Bank has a
more neutral profile in an up and down 100 basis point
scenarios than 2003. It should be noted that this analysis is
based on instantaneous change in interest rates and does not
reflect (i) the impact of changes in hedging activities as
interest rates change, and (ii) changes in volumes and
profits from our mortgage banking operations that would be
expected to result from the interest rate environment.
The assumptions inherent in our interest rate shock models
include expected valuation changes in an instantaneous and
parallel interest rate shock and assumptions as to the degree of
correlation between the hedges and hedged assets and
liabilities. These assumptions may not adequately reflect
factors such as the spread-widening or spread-tightening risk
among the changes in rates on Treasury, LIBOR/swap curve, and
mortgages. In addition, the sensitivity analysis described in
the prior paragraph is limited by the fact that it is performed
at a particular point in time and does not incorporate other
factors that would impact our financial performance in these
scenarios, such as increases in income associated with the
increase in production volume that could result from a decrease
in interest rates. Consequently, the preceding estimates should
not be viewed
63
as a forecast, and it is reasonable to expect that actual
results could vary significantly from the analyses discussed
above.
CREDIT RISK AND RESERVES
The following table presents the details of our loan portfolio.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2001 | |
|
2000 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
% of | |
|
|
|
% of | |
|
|
|
% of | |
|
|
|
% of | |
|
|
|
% of | |
|
|
|
|
Total | |
|
|
|
Total | |
|
|
|
Total | |
|
|
|
Total | |
|
|
|
Total | |
|
|
Balance | |
|
Loans | |
|
Balance | |
|
Loans | |
|
Balance | |
|
Loans | |
|
Balance | |
|
Loans | |
|
Balance | |
|
Loans | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
SFR mortgage loans and HELOCs
|
|
$ |
4,450,921 |
|
|
|
39.8 |
% |
|
$ |
5,587,409 |
|
|
|
55.7 |
% |
|
$ |
2,311,753 |
|
|
|
37.4 |
% |
|
$ |
1,168,808 |
|
|
|
23.0 |
% |
|
$ |
1,002,640 |
|
|
|
24.8 |
% |
Land and other mortgage loans
|
|
|
158,468 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
% |
|
|
126,044 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
% |
|
|
130,455 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
% |
|
|
327,100 |
|
|
|
6.4 |
% |
|
|
283,311 |
|
|
|
7.0 |
% |
Builder construction and income property loans
|
|
|
643,119 |
|
|
|
5.7 |
% |
|
|
520,682 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
% |
|
|
546,461 |
|
|
|
8.8 |
% |
|
|
654,889 |
|
|
|
12.9 |
% |
|
|
611,745 |
|
|
|
15.1 |
% |
Consumer construction loans
|
|
|
1,443,450 |
|
|
|
12.9 |
% |
|
|
1,145,526 |
|
|
|
11.4 |
% |
|
|
875,335 |
|
|
|
14.1 |
% |
|
|
725,200 |
|
|
|
14.3 |
% |
|
|
372,394 |
|
|
|
9.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total core held for investment loans
|
|
|
6,695,958 |
|
|
|
59.8 |
% |
|
|
7,379,661 |
|
|
|
73.6 |
% |
|
|
3,864,004 |
|
|
|
62.4 |
% |
|
|
2,875,997 |
|
|
|
56.6 |
% |
|
|
2,270,090 |
|
|
|
56.1 |
% |
Discontinued product lines(1)
|
|
|
53,795 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
% |
|
|
69,524 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
% |
|
|
97,644 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
% |
|
|
120,360 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
% |
|
|
349,757 |
|
|
|
8.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total held for investment portfolio
|
|
|
6,749,753 |
|
|
|
60.3 |
% |
|
|
7,449,185 |
|
|
|
74.3 |
% |
|
|
3,961,648 |
|
|
|
64.0 |
% |
|
|
2,996,357 |
|
|
|
59.0 |
% |
|
|
2,619,847 |
|
|
|
64.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total held for sale portfolio
|
|
|
4,445,572 |
|
|
|
39.7 |
% |
|
|
2,573,248 |
|
|
|
25.7 |
% |
|
|
2,227,683 |
|
|
|
36.0 |
% |
|
|
2,080,763 |
|
|
|
41.0 |
% |
|
|
1,420,772 |
|
|
|
35.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans
|
|
$ |
11,195,325 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
10,022,433 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
6,189,331 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
5,077,120 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
4,040,619 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Discontinued product lines include manufactured home loans and
home improvement, which were discontinued during 1999. |
64
The following table summarizes our allowance for loan
losses/credit discounts and non-performing assets as of
December 31, 2004.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Charge-offs/ | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Reserves | |
|
|
|
Net REO | |
|
|
|
|
Allowance | |
|
Credit | |
|
as a | |
|
Non- | |
|
(Gains) Losses | |
|
|
|
|
For Loan | |
|
Discounts | |
|
Percentage of | |
|
Performing | |
|
| |
Type of Loan |
|
Book Value | |
|
Losses | |
|
(2) | |
|
Book Value | |
|
Assets | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Held for investment portfolio
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SFR mortgage loans and HELOCs
|
|
$ |
4,450,921 |
|
|
$ |
17,969 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
0.40 |
% |
|
$ |
22,155 |
|
|
$ |
3,060 |
|
|
$ |
3,888 |
|
|
Land and other mortgage
|
|
|
158,468 |
|
|
|
4,421 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.79 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
Builder construction and income property loans
|
|
|
643,119 |
|
|
|
12,485 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.94 |
% |
|
|
11,546 |
|
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
3,268 |
|
|
Consumer construction loans
|
|
|
1,443,450 |
|
|
|
10,316 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.71 |
% |
|
|
9,553 |
|
|
|
1,387 |
|
|
|
1,378 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total core held for investment loans
|
|
|
6,695,958 |
|
|
|
45,191 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.67 |
% |
|
|
43,254 |
|
|
|
4,523 |
|
|
|
8,545 |
|
|
Discontinued product lines(1)
|
|
|
53,795 |
|
|
|
7,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.31 |
% |
|
|
5,868 |
|
|
|
3,401 |
|
|
|
9,271 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total held for investment portfolio
|
|
$ |
6,749,753 |
|
|
$ |
52,891 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.78 |
% |
|
|
49,122 |
|
|
|
7,924 |
|
|
|
17,816 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Held for sale portfolio
|
|
|
4,456,604 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,032 |
|
|
|
0.25 |
% |
|
|
54,611 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans
|
|
$ |
11,206,357 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
103,733 |
|
|
$ |
7,924 |
|
|
$ |
17,816 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreclosed assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core portfolios |
|
|
18,534 |
|
|
$ |
(661 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,261 |
) |
Discontinued product lines |
|
|
627 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total foreclosed assets |
|
|
19,161 |
|
|
$ |
(617 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,288 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing assets |
|
$ |
122,894 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing assets as a percentage of total assets |
|
|
0.73% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Discontinued product lines include manufactured home loans, home
improvement and warehouse lending, which were discontinued
during 1999. |
|
(2) |
This amount represents the lower of cost or market adjustments
on non-performing loans in the held for sale portfolio. |
65
The following table provides additional comparative data on
non-performing assets.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2001 | |
|
2000 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Loans held for investment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portfolio loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SFR mortgage loans
|
|
$ |
22,155 |
|
|
$ |
12,414 |
|
|
$ |
15,097 |
|
|
$ |
21,354 |
|
|
$ |
32,261 |
|
|
|
Land and other mortgage loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
8,376 |
|
|
|
7,514 |
|
|
|
3,838 |
|
|
|
Builder construction and income property loans
|
|
|
11,546 |
|
|
|
9,704 |
|
|
|
9,275 |
|
|
|
21,347 |
|
|
|
30,275 |
|
|
|
Consumer construction
|
|
|
9,553 |
|
|
|
8,954 |
|
|
|
10,257 |
|
|
|
6,722 |
|
|
|
2,551 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total core portfolio non-performing loans
|
|
|
43,254 |
|
|
|
31,143 |
|
|
|
43,005 |
|
|
|
56,937 |
|
|
|
68,925 |
|
|
|
|
Discontinued product lines
|
|
|
5,868 |
|
|
|
6,449 |
|
|
|
10,005 |
|
|
|
15,894 |
|
|
|
15,454 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing loans portfolio
|
|
|
49,122 |
|
|
|
37,592 |
|
|
|
53,010 |
|
|
|
72,831 |
|
|
|
84,379 |
|
Non-performing loans held for sale
|
|
|
54,611 |
|
|
|
38,855 |
|
|
|
10,626 |
|
|
|
24,036 |
|
|
|
13,235 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing loans
|
|
|
103,733 |
|
|
|
76,447 |
|
|
|
63,636 |
|
|
|
96,867 |
|
|
|
97,614 |
|
Foreclosed assets
|
|
|
19,161 |
|
|
|
23,677 |
|
|
|
36,526 |
|
|
|
19,372 |
|
|
|
16,265 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing assets
|
|
$ |
122,894 |
|
|
$ |
100,124 |
|
|
$ |
100,162 |
|
|
$ |
116,239 |
|
|
$ |
113,879 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing assets to total assets
|
|
|
0.73 |
% |
|
|
0.76 |
% |
|
|
1.05 |
% |
|
|
1.55 |
% |
|
|
1.98 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses to non-performing loans held for
investment
|
|
|
108 |
% |
|
|
140 |
% |
|
|
96 |
% |
|
|
79 |
% |
|
|
70 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66
The following shows the activity in the allowance for loan
losses during the indicated periods:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2001 | |
|
2000 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Core portfolio loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of period
|
|
$ |
45,644 |
|
|
$ |
41,314 |
|
|
$ |
41,770 |
|
|
$ |
43,350 |
|
|
$ |
37,916 |
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
4,070 |
|
|
|
12,875 |
|
|
|
9,807 |
|
|
|
5,985 |
|
|
|
7,114 |
|
Charge-offs net of recoveries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SFR mortgage loans
|
|
|
(3,060 |
) |
|
|
(3,888 |
) |
|
|
(5,783 |
) |
|
|
(3,073 |
) |
|
|
(1,006 |
) |
|
|
Land and other mortgage loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
(1,658 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Builder construction
|
|
|
(76 |
) |
|
|
(3,268 |
) |
|
|
(2,584 |
) |
|
|
(3,879 |
) |
|
|
(462 |
) |
|
|
Consumer construction
|
|
|
(1,387 |
) |
|
|
(1,378 |
) |
|
|
(238 |
) |
|
|
(613 |
) |
|
|
(212 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charge-offs net of recoveries
|
|
|
(4,523 |
) |
|
|
(8,545 |
) |
|
|
(10,263 |
) |
|
|
(7,565 |
) |
|
|
(1,680 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period
|
|
|
45,191 |
|
|
|
45,644 |
|
|
|
41,314 |
|
|
|
41,770 |
|
|
|
43,350 |
|
Discontinued product lines
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of period
|
|
|
7,001 |
|
|
|
9,447 |
|
|
|
15,930 |
|
|
|
15,612 |
|
|
|
15,964 |
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
4,100 |
|
|
|
6,825 |
|
|
|
6,348 |
|
|
|
16,037 |
|
|
|
8,860 |
|
|
Charge-offs net of recoveries
|
|
|
(3,401 |
) |
|
|
(9,271 |
) |
|
|
(12,831 |
) |
|
|
(15,719 |
) |
|
|
(9,212 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period
|
|
|
7,700 |
|
|
|
7,001 |
|
|
|
9,447 |
|
|
|
15,930 |
|
|
|
15,612 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total allowance for loan losses
|
|
$ |
52,891 |
|
|
$ |
52,645 |
|
|
$ |
50,761 |
|
|
$ |
57,700 |
|
|
$ |
58,962 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charge-offs to average loans held for investment
|
|
|
0.11 |
% |
|
|
0.34 |
% |
|
|
0.76 |
% |
|
|
0.83 |
% |
|
|
0.43 |
% |
Charge-offs to production
|
|
|
0.02 |
% |
|
|
0.06 |
% |
|
|
0.11 |
% |
|
|
0.13 |
% |
|
|
0.11 |
% |
Core portfolio loans only
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charge-offs to average loans held for investment
|
|
|
0.06 |
% |
|
|
0.17 |
% |
|
|
0.34 |
% |
|
|
0.27 |
% |
|
|
0.07 |
% |
Charge-offs to production
|
|
|
0.01 |
% |
|
|
0.03 |
% |
|
|
0.05 |
% |
|
|
0.04 |
% |
|
|
0.02 |
% |
67
The allowance for loan losses is allocated to the following
categories for segment reporting purposes. The overall adequacy
of the allowance for loan losses is based on the allowance in
its entirety. The allocation amongst the various loan products
is representative of our judgments and assumptions at a specific
point in time and may be reallocated in the future based on
changes in performance and other circumstances. Allocation of
the allowance for loan losses to each category, and the
corresponding percentage of the loan category, at the dates
indicated are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2001 | |
|
2000 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
% of | |
|
|
|
% of | |
|
|
|
% of | |
|
|
|
% of | |
|
|
|
% of | |
|
|
|
|
Loan | |
|
|
|
Loan | |
|
|
|
Loan | |
|
|
|
Loan | |
|
|
|
Loan | |
|
|
Balance | |
|
Category | |
|
Balance | |
|
Category | |
|
Balance | |
|
Category | |
|
Balance | |
|
Category | |
|
Balance | |
|
Category | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Portfolio loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SFR mortgage loans
|
|
$ |
17,969 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
% |
|
$ |
20,038 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
% |
|
$ |
13,053 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
% |
|
$ |
11,659 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
% |
|
$ |
13,616 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
% |
|
Land and other mortgage loans
|
|
|
4,421 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
% |
|
|
3,167 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
% |
|
|
2,555 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
% |
|
|
4,541 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
% |
|
|
3,405 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
% |
|
Builder construction and income property loans
|
|
|
12,485 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
% |
|
|
12,509 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
% |
|
|
15,334 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
% |
|
|
18,155 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
% |
|
|
20,584 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
% |
|
Consumer construction loans
|
|
|
10,316 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
% |
|
|
9,930 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
% |
|
|
10,372 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
% |
|
|
7,415 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
% |
|
|
5,745 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total portfolio loans
|
|
|
45,191 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
% |
|
|
45,644 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
% |
|
|
41,314 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
% |
|
|
41,770 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
% |
|
|
43,350 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
% |
Discontinued product lines
|
|
|
7,700 |
|
|
|
14.3 |
% |
|
|
7,001 |
|
|
|
10.1 |
% |
|
|
9,447 |
|
|
|
9.7 |
% |
|
|
15,930 |
|
|
|
13.2 |
% |
|
|
15,612 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total allowance for loan losses
|
|
$ |
52,891 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
% |
|
$ |
52,645 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
% |
|
$ |
50,761 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
% |
|
$ |
57,700 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
% |
|
$ |
58,962 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total credit-related reserves, including the allowance for loan
losses and the market valuation reserves, amounted to
$63.9 million at December 31, 2004, compared to
$66.6 million at December 31, 2003. As of
December 31, 2004, the allowance for loan losses of
$52.9 million for loans held for investment, represented
0.78% of total loans held for investment, comparable to the
allowance for loan losses to total loans held for investment of
0.71% at December 31, 2003. For the full year 2004,
charge-offs of $7.9 million were down 56% relative to 2003.
Loans are generally placed on non-accrual status when they are
90 days past due. Non-performing assets include
non-performing loans and foreclosed assets. We recorded the
balance of our assets acquired in foreclosure or by deed in lieu
of foreclosure at estimated net realizable value. The ratio of
non-performing assets to total assets of 0.73% remained
comparable to 0.76% at December 31, 2003. Total
non-performing assets amounted to $122.9 million at
December 31, 2004 as compared to $100.1 million at
December 31, 2003, mainly due to the growth of our loan
portfolio by $1.2 billion in 2004 and the exercise of
clean-up calls during the year 2004.
As master servicer for our various securitizations, we retain
the right to call the securities when the outstanding loan
balance in the securitization trust declines to a specified
level, typically 10%, of the original balance. When the fair
value of performing loans remaining within a securitization
exceeds the expected losses on non-performing loans and the cost
of exercise, we will typically exercise our option to call. A
portion of the loans we acquired pursuant to clean-up calls was
delinquent or non-performing. At December 31, 2004, total
non-performing assets acquired through clean-up calls amounted
to $45.9 million, of which $36.1 million is
non-performing loans included in loans held for sale.
With respect to the portfolio of loans held for investment in
IndyMacs core businesses, the allowance for loan losses at
December 31, 2004, was $45.2 million, or 0.67% of the
loan balance, compared to the 0.62% of total loan balance at
December 31, 2003.
68
With respect to IndyMacs non-core liquidating portfolios,
consisting of manufactured housing and home improvement loans,
net charges-offs for the full year 2004 have significantly
improved from prior year. After provision for loan losses of
$4.1 million in 2004, the allocated allowance for loan
losses at December 31, 2004 was $7.7 million, or
14.31% of the remaining principal balance of such liquidating
portfolios, compared to the 10.07% reserve coverage at
December 31, 2003.
Our determination of the level of the allowance for loan losses
and, correspondingly, the provision for loan losses, is based on
managements judgments and assumptions regarding various
matters, including general economic conditions, loan portfolio
composition, loan demand, delinquency trends and prior loan loss
experience. In assessing the adequacy of the allowance for loan
losses, management reviews the performance in the portfolios of
loans held for investment and the non-core portfolios of
discontinued product lines which consists of manufactured
housing loans and home improvement loans.
While we consider the allowance for loan losses to be adequate
based on information currently available, future adjustments to
the allowance may be necessary due to changes in economic
conditions, delinquency levels, foreclosure rates, or loss
rates. The level of our allowance for loan losses is also
subject to review by our primary federal regulator, the Office
of Thrift Supervision (OTS). The OTS may require
that our allowance for loan losses be increased based on its
evaluation of the information available to it at the time of its
examination of the Bank.
With respect to mortgage loans held for sale, we do not provide
an allowance for loan losses, pursuant to the applicable
accounting rules. Instead, a component for credit risk related
to loans held for sale is embedded in the market valuation for
these loans. Lower of cost or market valuation adjustment
related to the credit risk on loans held for sale totaled
$11.0 million at December 31, 2004.
SECONDARY MARKET RESERVE
We do not generally sell loans with recourse in our loan sale
activities. However, we can be required to repurchase loans from
investors when our loan sales contain individual loans that do
not conform with the representations and warranties we made at
the time of sale. We have made significant investments in our
pre-production and post-production quality control processes to
identify potential systemic issues that could cause repurchases.
We believe that these efforts have improved our production
quality; however, possible increases in default rates due to an
economic slowdown could cause the overall rate of repurchases to
remain constant or even increase. Since inception in 1993, the
Company has repurchased only a very small number of loans from
its securitization trusts. The increase in repurchase activity
in recent years has been primarily a function of IndyMacs
diversification of its loan sale channels to whole loan and GSE
sales. While sales through these channels generate enhanced cash
flows, they tend to have a greater level of representation and
warranty and repurchase risk. The following table shows the
amount of loans we have repurchased from each distribution
channel, since the Company began active lending operations in
January 1993.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount | |
|
|
|
Percentage | |
|
|
Repurchased | |
|
Total Sold | |
|
Repurchased | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in millions) | |
Loans sold:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GSEs and whole loans
|
|
$ |
141.0 |
|
|
$ |
56,433 |
|
|
|
0.25 |
% |
Securitization trusts
|
|
|
9.6 |
|
|
|
72,626 |
|
|
|
0.01 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
150.6 |
|
|
$ |
129,059 |
|
|
|
0.12 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company maintains secondary market reserves for losses that
arise in connection with loans that we are required to
repurchase from whole loan sales or securitization transactions.
These reserves, which totaled $35.6 million at
December 31, 2004, have two general components: reserves
for repurchases arising from representation and warranty claims,
and reserves for disputes with investors and vendors with
respect to contractual obligations pertaining to mortgage
operations. See further discussion on legal matters associated
with loans sold in Note 21 Commitments
and Contingencies included in the Companys
consolidated
69
financial statements incorporated herein. The table below shows
the activity in the reserves during the years ended
December 31, 2004 and 2003.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Balance, beginning of period,
|
|
$ |
34,000 |
|
|
$ |
37,636 |
|
Additions/provisions
|
|
|
22,922 |
|
|
|
26,706 |
|
Claims reimbursement and estimated discounts on loans held for
sale/charge-offs
|
|
|
(24,843 |
) |
|
|
(34,805 |
) |
Recoveries on previous claims
|
|
|
3,531 |
|
|
|
4,463 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period
|
|
$ |
35,610 |
|
|
$ |
34,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve levels are a function of expected losses based on actual
pending and expected claims and repurchase requests, historical
experience, loan volume and loan sales distribution channels and
the assessment of the probability of vendor or investor claims.
While the ultimate amount of repurchases and claims is
uncertain, management believes that the reserves are adequate.
We will continue to evaluate the adequacy of our reserves and
may continue to allocate a portion of our gain on sale proceeds
to these reserves going forward. The entire balance of our
secondary market reserve is included on the consolidated balance
sheets as a component of other liabilities.
OPERATING EXPENSES
General
A summary of operating expenses follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Salaries and related
|
|
$ |
286,121 |
|
|
$ |
228,931 |
|
|
$ |
202,030 |
|
Premises and equipment
|
|
|
43,621 |
|
|
|
35,899 |
|
|
|
30,946 |
|
Loan purchase costs
|
|
|
34,790 |
|
|
|
29,916 |
|
|
|
23,349 |
|
Professional services
|
|
|
25,836 |
|
|
|
20,706 |
|
|
|
22,997 |
|
Data processing
|
|
|
36,181 |
|
|
|
36,236 |
|
|
|
20,500 |
|
Office
|
|
|
21,870 |
|
|
|
22,925 |
|
|
|
18,151 |
|
Advertising and promotion
|
|
|
43,488 |
|
|
|
26,803 |
|
|
|
13,705 |
|
Operations and sale of foreclosed assets
|
|
|
6,693 |
|
|
|
4,572 |
|
|
|
1,216 |
|
Other
|
|
|
22,777 |
|
|
|
18,617 |
|
|
|
11,164 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
521,377 |
|
|
$ |
424,605 |
|
|
$ |
344,058 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses, including
$19.3 million from Financial Freedom with
$12.3 million in salaries and related costs, increased
during the year ended December 31, 2004 to
$521.4 million, compared to $424.6 million during the
same period in 2003. Excluding the expenses related to Financial
Freedom, the increase was largely driven by increases in
salaries, advertising and promotion, and premises and equipment
as a result of the Companys operational expansion and
continued record-level of production volume. In a continuing
effort to penetrate the market and gain market share, the
Company increased its investment in direct marketing to further
promote its less interest rate sensitive product offerings:
subprime and HELOC products. Also, the Company incurred costs to
expand its sales force infrastructure with dedicated resources
focused on new customer activation, to enhance customer training
and support, and to improve its conversion of loan submissions
to fundings. As a result of the Financial Freedom acquisition,
increased production volume and investments made in sales and
customer service, the Companys average full-time equivalent
70
employees increased during the year by 17.7%, from 3,882 during
the year ended December 31, 2003, to 4,570 during the year
ended December 31, 2004.
Income Taxes
Income tax provisions of $111.5 million for the year ended
December 31, 2004 represented an effective tax rate of 40%.
Income tax provisions of $111.4 million for the year ended
December 31, 2003 represented an effective tax rate of 39%.
Our effective tax rate for 2005 is expected to approximate that
of 2004.
ISSUANCE OF COMMON STOCK
On June 8, 2004, we issued 3,200,000 shares of common
stock at a market price of $31.75 through a public offering. On
July 12, 2004, we issued an additional 130,000 shares
of common stock at a market price of $31.75 upon the exercise of
the underwriters over-allotment option. The cash proceeds
of $96.25 million from the initial closing, net of
expenses, were recorded as equity during the second quarter of
2004. The cash proceeds from the exercise of the over-allotment
option, net of expenses, of $3.9 million were recorded as
equity during the third quarter of 2004. Certain of the proceeds
were used to finance the acquisition of Financial Freedom and
the remaining proceeds have been used for general corporate
purposes, including, but not limited to, continued asset growth
for IndyMac Bank.
SHARE REPURCHASE ACTIVITIES
In June 1999, our Board of Directors approved a
$100.0 million share repurchase program, which was
subsequently increased by the Board to $500.0 million. The
Board of Directors also approved a special repurchase of
3,640,860 shares from Countrywide Financial Corporation,
Inc. (Countrywide), which was not a part of our
share repurchase program. From the share repurchase
programs inception through December 31, 2002, we
repurchased 28 million shares in open market transactions
and from Countrywide at an average price of approximately
$18.02 per share, for an aggregate investment of
$504.4 million. At December 31, 2004, we had
$63.6 million of remaining capacity to repurchase under the
current authorization from the Board of Directors. No share
repurchases under this program have been made since
December 31, 2002.
From time to time, we also repurchase shares from certain
employees and officers at the then-current market price under
the Companys stock incentive plans. The following table
summarizes the share repurchase activities from our employees
and officers during 2004, as well as the information during the
same period regarding our publicly announced share repurchase
program described above:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum Approximate | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of | |
|
Dollar Value (in | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased | |
|
millions) of Shares | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
as Part of Publicly | |
|
that May Yet Be | |
|
|
Number of | |
|
Weighted-Average | |
|
Announced Plans or | |
|
Purchased Under the | |
Period |
|
Shares(1) | |
|
Price Per Share | |
|
Programs | |
|
Plans or Programs(2) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
January 1, 2004 January 31, 2004
|
|
|
15,275 |
|
|
$ |
29.84 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
63.6 |
|
February 1, 2004 February 29, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63.6 |
|
March 1, 2004 March 31, 2004
|
|
|
2,177 |
|
|
|
35.23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter Total
|
|
|
17,452 |
|
|
|
30.51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2004 April 30, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63.6 |
|
May 1, 2004 May 31, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63.6 |
|
June 1, 2004 June 30, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Quarter Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum Approximate | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of | |
|
Dollar Value (in | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased | |
|
millions) of Shares | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
as Part of Publicly | |
|
that May Yet Be | |
|
|
Number of | |
|
Weighted-Average | |
|
Announced Plans or | |
|
Purchased Under the | |
Period |
|
Shares(1) | |
|
Price Per Share | |
|
Programs | |
|
Plans or Programs(2) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
July 1, 2004 July 31, 2004
|
|
|
314 |
|
|
|
31.36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63.6 |
|
August 1, 2004 August 31, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63.6 |
|
September 1, 2004 September 30, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third Quarter Total
|
|
|
314 |
|
|
|
31.36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 1, 2004 October 31, 2004
|
|
|
1,236 |
|
|
|
36.75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63.6 |
|
November 1, 2004 November 30, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63.6 |
|
December 1, 2004 December 31, 2004
|
|
|
256 |
|
|
|
32.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth Quarter Total
|
|
|
1,492 |
|
|
|
35.98 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Total
|
|
|
19,258 |
|
|
$ |
30.97 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
All shares purchased during the periods indicated were purchased
pursuant to the Companys stock incentive plans at the
then-current market prices. |
|
(2) |
Our Board of Directors approved a $100.0 million share
repurchase program in June of 1999, which was subsequently
increased by the Board to $500.0 million. The Board of
Directors also approved a special repurchase of
3,640,860 shares from Countrywide, which was not a part of
our share repurchase program. |
The Company repurchased 24,178 shares of stocks during 2003
from certain employees and officers under the Companys
internal benefit programs offered to employees and officers.
FUTURE OUTLOOK
On average, U.S. mortgage debt outstanding has grown
approximately 7% to 8% per year over the last two decades
and is projected, based on economic demographics, to continue
this level of approximate growth. At this rate, mortgage debt
outstanding roughly doubles every decade. We believe, based on
our confidence in our employees, hybrid thrift/mortgage banking
business model, capital strength and ability to gain market
share, that we are positioned to grow earnings per share at a
compounded growth rate of approximately 15% over the long run,
or approximately double the rate of the industry. In fact,
IndyMacs historical track record has exceeded this target
over the last twelve years with compounded annual growth of 26%
under its current management team.
With that said, the past few years have been extraordinary years
for the mortgage industry. Industry mortgage production has
achieved historic highs as a result of historically low interest
rates, which led to record refinancing of mortgages. The
industry is in the midst of a major transition from these
historic highs back to more normalized levels. According to the
forecasts published by the MBA, industry volumes declined 25% in
2004 and are expected to decline an additional 11% in 2005 from
the current level.
Given the significant industry transition, forecasting continues
to be difficult. We currently expect EPS to be approximately
$4.05 per share in 2005 before the implementation of FASB
Statement No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based
Payment, which requires the expensing of stock options. This
forecast is up from our prior forecast of $3.98 per share
and reflects an increase of 19% from the $3.40 per share
earned on a pro forma basis this year. We estimate that the
implementation of stock option expensing will reduce EPS by
approximately $0.12 in 2005, resulting in a full year forecast
including the expensing of stock options of $3.93 per
share. This EPS forecast is considered our best estimation in
light of current market expectations for interest rates and
industry volumes in 2005. However, the economy, interest rates
and our industry remain volatile and as a result, our actual
results could vary by as much as ten percent from this forecast.
72
This Future Outlook section contains certain
forward-looking statements. See the section of this
Form 10-K entitled Forward-Looking Statements
for a description of factors which may cause our actual results
to differ from those anticipated
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
OVERVIEW
Our principal financing needs are to fund acquisitions of
mortgage loans and our investment in mortgage loans, MBS and
MSRs. Our primary sources of funds used to meet these financing
needs are loan sales and securitizations, deposits, advances
from the Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB),
deposits, borrowings, custodial balances and retained earnings.
The sources used vary depending on such factors as rates paid,
collateral requirements, maturities and the impact on our
capital. Additionally, we may occasionally securitize mortgage
loans that we intend to hold for investment to lower our costs
of borrowing against such assets and reduce the capital
requirement associated with such assets. During the year ended
December 31, 2004, we had average operating liquidity of
$1.1 billion, which is represented by unpledged liquid
assets on hand plus amounts that may be immediately raised
through the pledging of other available assets as collateral
pursuant to committed financing facilities. We currently believe
that our liquidity level is in excess of that necessary to
satisfy our operating requirements and to meet our obligations
and commitments in a timely and cost effective manner.
PRINCIPAL SOURCES OF CASH
Loan Sales and Securitizations
Our business model relies heavily upon selling the majority of
our mortgage loans shortly after acquisition. The proceeds of
these sales are a critical component of the liquidity necessary
for our ongoing operations. During the year ended
December 31, 2004, we sold 91% of our funded mortgage loans
through three channels: (1) GSEs (generated $8 billion
of cash proceeds); (2) private label securitizations
(generated $16 billion of cash proceeds); and
(3) whole loan sales (generated $7 billion of cash
proceeds). The remainder we retained in our investment
portfolio. If any of our sales channels were disrupted, our
liquidity could be negatively impacted. Disruptions in our whole
loan sales and mortgage securitization transactions can occur as
a result of the performance of our existing securitizations, as
well as economic events or other factors beyond our control.
We elected to retain the remaining balance of the mortgage
loans, totaling $3 billion, for our portfolio of mortgage
loans held for investment to provide future interest income for
the Company. Had we needed to raise more cash for liquidity
reasons, these loans could have been sold via one of the above
mentioned channels.
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank
The Federal Home Loan Bank system functions as a borrowing
source for regulated financial depositories and similar
institutions that are engaged in residential housing finance. As
a member of the FHLB of San Francisco, we are required to
own capital stock of the FHLB and are authorized to apply for
advances from the FHLB, on a secured basis, in amounts
determined by reference to available collateral. SFR mortgage
loans, agency and AAA-rated MBS are the principal collateral
that may be used to secure these borrowings, although, certain
other types of loans and other assets may also be accepted
pursuant to FHLB policies and statutory requirements. Currently,
the Bank is approved for collateralized advances of up to
$8.7 billion, of which $6.2 billion were outstanding
at December 31, 2004. The FHLB offers several credit
programs, each with its own fixed or floating interest rate, and
a range of maturities.
73
Deposits/Retail Bank
We solicit deposits from the general public and institutions by
offering a variety of accounts and rates through our network of
13 branches in Southern California, telebanking, and internet
channels. Through our website at www.indymacbank.com,
consumers can access their accounts 24-hours a day, seven
days a week. Online banking allows customers to access their
accounts, view balances, transfer funds between accounts, view
transactions, download account information and pay their bills
conveniently from any computer terminal.
Included in deposits at December 31, 2004 and 2003 were
non-interest bearing custodial accounts totaling
$622.6 million and $528.7 million, respectively. These
balances consist primarily of payments pending remittance on
loans we service for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
Our deposit products include regular savings accounts, demand
deposit accounts, money market accounts, certificates of deposit
and individual retirement accounts. The following table sets
forth the average balance of, and the average interest rate paid
on deposits, by deposit category for the years ended
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Amount | |
|
Rate | |
|
Amount | |
|
Rate | |
|
Amount | |
|
Rate | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Interest-bearing checking
|
|
$ |
41,818 |
|
|
|
0.93 |
% |
|
$ |
38,196 |
|
|
|
0.92 |
% |
|
$ |
34,935 |
|
|
|
1.25 |
% |
Savings
|
|
|
1,650,381 |
|
|
|
1.96 |
% |
|
|
1,185,563 |
|
|
|
2.08 |
% |
|
|
521,322 |
|
|
|
2.55 |
% |
Certificates of deposit
|
|
|
2,585,468 |
|
|
|
2.74 |
% |
|
|
1,938,462 |
|
|
|
3.25 |
% |
|
|
2,109,685 |
|
|
|
4.34 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing deposits
|
|
|
4,277,667 |
|
|
|
2.42 |
% |
|
|
3,162,221 |
|
|
|
2.78 |
% |
|
|
2,665,942 |
|
|
|
3.95 |
% |
Non-interest-bearing checking
|
|
|
50,360 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
|
40,534 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
|
31,264 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
% |
Custodial accounts
|
|
|
660,877 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
|
694,710 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
|
330,095 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits
|
|
$ |
4,988,904 |
|
|
|
2.07 |
% |
|
$ |
3,897,465 |
|
|
|
2.26 |
% |
|
$ |
3,027,301 |
|
|
|
3.48 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued but unpaid interest on deposits included in other
liabilities totaled $965,000, $166,000 and $124,000 at
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.
Trust Preferred Securities and Warrants
On November 14, 2001, we completed an offering of Warrants
and Income Redeemable Equity Securities (WIRES) to
investors. Gross proceeds of the transaction were
$175 million. The securities were offered as units
consisting of trust preferred securities, issued by a trust
formed by us, and warrants to purchase IndyMac
Bancorps common stock. As part of this transaction,
IndyMac Bancorp issued subordinated debentures to the trust and
purchased common securities from the trust. The yield on the
subordinated debentures and the common securities is the same as
the yield on the trust preferred securities. The proceeds from
the offering are used in ongoing operations and will fund future
growth and/or repurchases of IndyMac Bancorp common stock under
its share repurchase program (see Share Repurchase
Activities above).
In both the months of July and December 2003, two trusts formed
by each of us issued $30.0 million of trust preferred
securities, yielding 6.05% and 6.30%, respectively. In December
2004, a trust formed by us issued an additional
$30.0 million of trust preferred securities with a yield of
5.83%. In each of these transactions, IndyMac Bancorp issued
subordinated debentures to, and purchased common securities
from, each of the trusts. The yield on the subordinated
debentures and the common securities in each of these
transactions matches the yields on the related trust preferred
securities. The proceeds of these securities have been used in
ongoing operations.
Upon the adoption of FASB Interpretation No. 46,
Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, an
Interpretation of Accounting Research Bulletin
(ARB) No. 51, on July 1, 2003, the
trusts have been deconsolidated from the financial statements of
the Company. The subordinated debentures underlying the trust
preferred securities, and which represent the liabilities due
from IndyMac Bancorp to the trusts,
74
amounted to $215.2 million and $183.6 million at
December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. These
subordinated debentures are included in Other Borrowings on the
consolidated balance sheets.
Other Borrowings, Excluding Subordinated Debentures
underlying Trust Preferred Securities
Other borrowings, excluding the subordinated debentures
underlying the trust preferred securities, consist of loans and
securities sold under committed financing facilities and
uncommitted agreements to repurchase, CMO collateral and notes
payable. Total other borrowings increased to $2.9 billion
at December 31, 2004, from $2.4 billion at
December 31, 2003. The increase of $0.5 billion was
primarily the result of additional draws to fund our asset
growth, the issuance of $1.0 billion in non-recourse
AAA-rated HELOC-backed notes, and the reductions of other
borrowings using the funds from FHLB advances and deposits
during the year ended December 31, 2004.
At December 31, 2004, we had $5.0 billion in committed
financing facilities, of which $2.9 billion was utilized
and $1.0 billion was available for use, based on eligible
collateral. Decisions by our lenders and investors to make
additional funds available to us in the future will depend upon
a number of factors. These include our compliance with the terms
of existing credit arrangements, our financial performance,
eligible collateral, changes in our credit rating, industry and
market trends in our various businesses, the general
availability and interest rates applicable to financing and
investments, the lenders and/or investors own
resources and policies concerning loans and investments and the
relative attractiveness of alternative investment or lending
opportunities. As of December 31, 2004, we believe we were
in compliance with all representations, warranties, and
financial covenants under our borrowing facilities.
The table below provides additional information related to our
repurchase agreements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Average balance during the year
|
|
$ |
3,734,377 |
|
|
$ |
2,458,977 |
|
|
$ |
1,428,685 |
|
Maximum balance outstanding(1)
|
|
|
4,694,704 |
|
|
|
3,223,671 |
|
|
|
2,505,230 |
|
Balance at December 31,
|
|
|
1,930,686 |
|
|
|
2,438,059 |
|
|
|
2,401,554 |
|
Interest rate, end of year
|
|
|
2.7 |
% |
|
|
1.4 |
% |
|
|
1.7 |
% |
Weighted-average coupon rate during the year
|
|
|
2.2 |
% |
|
|
2.0 |
% |
|
|
2.0 |
% |
(1) The maximum amount of borrowings outstanding occurred
in May 2004, October 2003 and October 2002.
75
The following table summarizes our sources of financing as of
December 31, 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Committed | |
|
Outstanding | |
|
|
|
|
Financial Institution or Instrument |
|
Financing | |
|
Balances | |
|
Type of Financing | |
|
Maturity Date | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in millions) | |
|
|
|
|
Merrill Lynch
|
|
$ |
1,500 |
|
|
$ |
533 |
|
|
|
Repurchase Agreement |
|
|
|
May-05 |
|
UBS Warburg
|
|
|
750 |
|
|
|
368 |
|
|
|
Repurchase Agreement |
|
|
|
Apr-05 |
|
UBS LTD.
|
|
|
386 |
|
|
|
386 |
|
|
|
Long Term Repo |
|
|
|
Dec-05 |
|
Morgan Stanley
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
417 |
|
|
|
Repurchase Agreement |
|
|
|
Oct-05 |
|
Greenwich Capital
|
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
Revolving Bank Line |
|
|
|
Nov-05 |
|
Lehman Brothers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
175 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank of America
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
Revolving Bank Line |
|
|
|
Feb-05 |
|
Credit Suisse First Boston Bank
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Borrowings
|
|
|
4,036 |
|
|
|
1,951 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank
|
|
|
8,673 |
|
|
|
6,162 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Committed Financing
|
|
$ |
12,709 |
|
|
|
8,113 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,743 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HELOC Note Trust (2004-1)
|
|
|
499 |
|
|
|
499 |
|
|
|
Note Trust |
|
|
|
Apr-26 |
|
HELOC Note Trust (2004-2)
|
|
|
498 |
|
|
|
498 |
|
|
|
Note Trust |
|
|
|
Oct-36 |
|
Trust Preferred Debentures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
216 |
|
|
|
Trust Preferred Debentures |
|
|
|
Nov-31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Financing
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
15,069 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our credit facilities do not have default triggers tied to our
credit rating. While a change in rating would thus not directly
affect our current borrowing capacity in a material manner, it
might affect our lenders decisions to renew credit
facilities with us or it may change market perceptions and
impact our trading and loan sales activities. As of
December 31, 2004, the corporate ratings assigned to both
IndyMac Bancorp and IndyMac Bank were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standard & Poors | |
|
Fitch, IBCA, Duff & Phelps | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
IndyMac Bancorp:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outlook
|
|
|
Stable |
|
|
|
Stable |
|
Long term issuer credit
|
|
|
BB+ |
|
|
|
BBB |
|
Short term issuer credit
|
|
|
B |
|
|
|
F2 |
|
IndyMac Bank:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outlook
|
|
|
Stable |
|
|
|
Stable |
|
Long term issuer credit
|
|
|
BBB |
|
|
|
BBB |
|
Short term issuer credit
|
|
|
A-3 |
|
|
|
F2 |
|
PRINCIPAL USES OF CASH
In addition to the financing sources discussed above, cash uses
are funded by net cash flows from operations, sales of MBS and
principal and interest payments on loans and securities. The
amounts of net acquisitions of loans held for sale and trading
securities included as components of net cash (used in)
operating activities totaled $5.6 billion during the year
ended December 31, 2004 and $2.4 billion during the
year ended December 31, 2003. Excluding the purchase and
sale activity for loans held for sale and trading securities,
the net cash provided by the Companys operating activities
totaled $444.6 million and $86.9 million for the year
ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
76
ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
Accumulated other comprehensive loss was $(20.3) million at
December 31, 2004, compared to $(26.5) million at
December 31, 2003. This change was a result of the increase
in the fair value of the swaps and swaptions designated as cash
flow hedges of floating rate borrowings, partially offset by the
decrease in the fair value of securities classified as available
for sale. It should be noted that accumulated other
comprehensive loss does not include the increases in the fair
value of loans held for investment that are funded by borrowings
that are hedged by a portion of these interest rate swaps and
swaptions. Accumulated other comprehensive loss is not a
component of the determination of regulatory capital.
REGULATORY CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS
IndyMac Bank is subject to regulatory capital regulations
administered by the federal banking agencies. In addition, as a
condition to its approval of our acquisition of SGV Bancorp,
Inc. in July 2000, the OTS required that IndyMac Bank hold
Tier 1 (core) capital of at least 8% of adjusted total
assets for three years following the consummation of the
transaction and maintain a total risk-based capital position of
at least 10% of total risk-weighted assets. This particular
condition expired on July 1, 2003. As of December 31,
2004, IndyMac Bank met all of the requirements of a
well-capitalized institution under the general
regulatory capital regulations.
During 2001, the OTS issued guidance for subprime lending
programs, which requires a lender to quantify the additional
risks in its subprime lending activities and determine the
appropriate amounts of allowances for loan losses and capital it
needs to offset those risks. The Company generally classifies
all loans in a first lien position with a FICO score less than
620 and all loans in a second lien position with a FICO score
less than 660 as subprime. Loans meeting this definition are
supported by capital two times that of similar prime loans. We
report our subprime loan calculation in an addendum to the
Thrift Financial Report that we file with the OTS. As of
December 31, 2004, subprime loans totaled
$695.8 million as calculated for regulatory reporting
purposes, of which $612.5 million were loans held for sale.
The following table presents IndyMac Banks actual and
required capital ratios and the minimum required capital ratios
to be categorized as well-capitalized at
December 31, 2004. The impact of the additional
risk-weighting criteria related to subprime loans had the effect
of reducing IndyMacs total risk-based capital by
64 basis points as noted in the table below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As Reported | |
|
Adjusted for | |
|
|
|
|
Pre-Subprime | |
|
Additional Subprime | |
|
Well-Capitalized | |
|
|
Risk-Weighting | |
|
Risk-Weighting | |
|
Minimum | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Capital Ratios:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tangible
|
|
|
7.66% |
|
|
|
7.66% |
|
|
|
2.00% |
|
Tier 1 core
|
|
|
7.66% |
|
|
|
7.66% |
|
|
|
5.00% |
|
Tier 1 risk-based
|
|
|
12.14% |
|
|
|
11.53% |
|
|
|
6.00% |
|
Total risk-based
|
|
|
12.66% |
|
|
|
12.02% |
|
|
|
10.00% |
|
We believe that, under current regulations, IndyMac Bank will
continue to meet its well-capitalized minimum
capital requirements in the foreseeable future. IndyMac
Banks regulatory capital compliance could be impacted,
however, by a number of factors, such as changes to applicable
regulations, adverse action by our regulators, changes in the
mix of assets, interest rate fluctuations, loan loss provisions
and credit losses, or significant changes in the economy in
areas where we have most of our loans. Any of these factors
could cause our actual future results to vary from anticipated
future results and consequently could have an adverse impact on
the ability of IndyMac Bank to meet its future minimum capital
requirements.
77
OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
In the ordinary course of our business, we engage in financial
transactions that are not recorded on our balance sheet. These
transactions are structured to manage our interest rate, credit
or liquidity risks, to diversify funding sources, or to optimize
our capital usage.
Substantially all of our off-balance sheet arrangements relate
to the securitization of mortgage loans. Our mortgage loan
securitizations are normally structured as sales in accordance
with SFAS 140, which involves the transfer of the mortgage
loans to qualifying special-purpose entities that
are not subject to consolidation. In a securitization, an entity
transferring the assets is able to convert those assets into
cash. Special-purpose entities used in such securitizations
obtain cash to acquire the assets by issuing securities to
investors. We also, generally, have the right to repurchase
mortgage loans from the special-purpose entities if the
remaining outstanding balance of the mortgage loans falls to a
level where the cost of servicing the loans exceeds the revenues
we earn.
In connection with our loan sales that are securitization
transactions, there are $32.3 billion in loans owned by
off-balance sheet trusts as of December 31, 2004. The
trusts have issued bonds secured by these loans. We have no
obligation to provide funding support to either the third party
investors or the off-balance sheet trusts. Generally, neither
the third party investors nor the trusts have recourse to our
assets or us, and they have no ability to require us to
repurchase their loans other than for non-credit-related
recourse that can arise under standard representations and
warranties. We maintain secondary market reserves for losses
that could arise in connection with loans that we are required
to repurchase from GSEs and whole loan sales. For information on
the sales proceeds and cash flows from our securitizations for
2004 see Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Liquidity and Capital Resources Principal Sources of
Cash Loan Sales and Securitizations.
We often retain certain interests, which may include
subordinated classes of securities, MSRs, AAA-rated
interest-only securities and residual securities in the
securitization trust. The performance of the loans in the trusts
will impact our ability to realize the current estimated fair
value of these assets that are included on our balance sheet.
Retained interests (excluding MSRs) were approximately
$508.0 million at December 31, 2004. See
Note 14 Transfers and Servicing of
Financial Assets in the accompanying notes to the
consolidated financial statements for further disclosure of
credit exposure associated with our securitizations.
Management does not believe that any of its off-balance sheet
arrangements have or are reasonably likely to have a current or
future material effect on our financial condition, changes in
financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of
operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital
resources. However, for additional information on certain risks
involved in our securitizations see Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations Risk Factors that May Affect Future
Results Credit Risk Loan Sales and
Qualifying Special Purpose Entities and
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations Risk Factors
That May Affect Future Results Credit
Risk Loan Sales and Securitizations.
78
AGGREGATE CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS
The following table summarizes our material contractual
obligations as of December 31, 2004. The payment amounts
represent those amounts contractually due to the recipient and
do not include any unamortized premiums or discounts, hedge
basis adjustments, or other similar carrying value adjustments.
Further discussion of the nature of each obligation is included
in the referenced note to the consolidated financial statements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payment Due | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
January 1, 2005 | |
|
January 1, 2006 | |
|
January 1, 2008 | |
|
|
|
|
Note | |
|
through | |
|
through | |
|
through | |
|
After | |
|
|
|
|
Reference | |
|
December 31, 2005 | |
|
December 31, 2007 | |
|
December 31, 2009 | |
|
December 31, 2009 | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Deposits Without a Stated Maturity
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
$ |
1,625,131 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,625,131 |
|
Custodial Accounts and Certificates of Deposits
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
3,513,666 |
|
|
|
573,635 |
|
|
|
31,047 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,118,348 |
|
FHLB Advances
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
4,595,000 |
|
|
|
1,487,000 |
|
|
|
80,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,162,000 |
|
Repurchase Agreements
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
1,949,871 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,949,871 |
|
HELOC Notes(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
996,976 |
|
|
|
996,976 |
|
CMOs
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
189 |
|
|
|
189 |
|
Trust Preferred Debentures
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
215,205 |
|
|
|
215,205 |
|
Accrued Interest Payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,414 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,414 |
|
Deferred Compensation(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,040 |
|
|
|
28,040 |
|
Operating Leases(3)
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
18,571 |
|
|
|
37,342 |
|
|
|
30,206 |
|
|
|
31,184 |
|
|
|
117,303 |
|
Employment Agreements(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,713 |
|
|
|
11,307 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,020 |
|
Purchase Obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,790 |
|
|
|
3,579 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,369 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
11,766,156 |
|
|
$ |
2,112,863 |
|
|
$ |
141,253 |
|
|
$ |
1,271,594 |
|
|
$ |
15,291,866 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
HELOC notes are non-recourse and secured by AAA-rated HELOC
certificates. |
|
(2) |
The amount excludes $6.5 million of deferred compensation
that is included in obligations under employment agreements. |
|
(3) |
Total lease commitments are net of sublease rental income. |
|
(4) |
Represents compensation for ten senior executives and includes
both base salary and estimated bonuses. Amount is calculated
based on the terms in their respective written employment
agreements and includes $6.5 million deferred compensation
noted in (2). |
A schedule of significant commitments at December 31, 2004
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payment Due | |
|
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Investment portfolio commitments to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase loans pursuant to an exercise clean-up calls
|
|
$ |
58,858 |
|
Undisbursed loan commitments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Builder construction
|
|
|
598,841 |
|
|
Consumer construction
|
|
|
1,142,409 |
|
|
HELOCs
|
|
|
434,192 |
|
Letters of credit
|
|
|
10,577 |
|
Additionally, in connection with standard representations and
warranties on loan sales and securitizations, we are
occasionally required to repurchase loans or make certain
payments to settle claims based on breaches
79
of these representations and warranties. From inception of our
active mortgage banking operations on January 1, 1993
through December 31, 2004, we have sold $129.1 billion
in loans, and repurchased $150.6 million loans, or 0.12% of
total loans sold. To provide for probable future losses related
to loans sold, we have established a reserve based on estimated
losses on actual pending claims and repurchase requests,
historical experience, loan sales volume and loan sale
distribution channels, which is included in Other Liabilities on
the consolidated balance sheets. The balance in this reserve
totaled $35.6 million at December 31, 2004. See the
caption Secondary Market Reserve above for further
information.
RISK FACTORS THAT MAY AFFECT FUTURE RESULTS
INTEREST RATE RISK
Asset/Liability Management
Due to the characteristics of our financial assets and
liabilities and the nature of our business activities, our
liquidity, financial position, and results of operations may be
materially affected by changes in interest rates in various
ways. The objective of our hedging strategies is to mitigate the
impact of interest rate changes, on an economic and accounting
basis, on net interest income and the NPV of our balance sheet.
We invest in MSRs and AAA-rated and agency interest-only
securities to generate core interest income. The value of these
instruments and the income they provide tends to be
counter-cyclical to the changes in production volumes and gain
on sale of loans that result from changes in interest rates. We
also purchase derivative instruments to hedge our mortgage
pipeline, MSRs and AAA-rated and agency interest-only securities
to guard against losses resulting from increased prepayments in
declining interest rate environments. The overall effectiveness
of these hedging strategies is subject to market conditions, the
quality of our execution, the accuracy of our asset valuation
assumptions and other sources of interest rate risk discussed
further below.
Mortgage Loans Held for Sale
We hedge the risks associated with our mortgage pipeline. The
mortgage pipeline consists of our commitments to purchase
mortgage loans (rate locks) and funded mortgage
loans that will be sold in the secondary market. The risk
associated with the mortgage pipeline is that interest rates
will fluctuate between the time we commit to purchase a loan at
a pre-determined price, or the customer locks in the interest
rate on a loan, and the time we sell or commit to sell the
mortgage loan. These commitments are recorded net of the
anticipated loan funding probability or fallout factor.
Generally speaking, if interest rates increase, the value of an
unhedged mortgage pipeline decreases, and gain on sale margins
are adversely impacted. Typically, we hedge the risk of overall
changes in fair value of loans held for sale by either entering
into forward loan sale agreements or selling forward Fannie Mae
or Freddie Mac MBS to hedge loan commitments and to create fair
value hedges against the funded loan portfolios.
AAA-Rated Interest-Only Securities and Mortgage Servicing
Rights
The primary risk associated with AAA-rated and agency
interest-only securities and MSRs is that they will lose a
substantial portion of their value as a result of higher than
anticipated prepayments occasioned by declining interest rates.
Conversely, these assets generally increase in value in a rising
rate environment. As of December 31, 2004, we held
$124.1 million of AAA-rated and agency interest-only
securities and $640.8 million of MSRs.
To hedge changes in the value of our AAA-rated interest-only
securities portfolio and MSRs, we generally use a combination of
several financial instruments, including but not limited to,
buying and/or selling mortgage-backed or U.S. Treasury
securities, futures, floors, swaps, or options. In managing the
composition of our hedge position, we consider a number of
factors including, but not limited to, the characteristics of
the mortgage loans supporting the hedged assets, market
conditions, the cost of alternate hedges, and internal and
regulatory risk tolerances for interest rate sensitivity. We use
hedging instruments to reduce our exposure to interest rate
risk, rather than to speculate on the direction of market
interest rates. These hedging strategies are highly susceptible
to prepayment risk, basis risk, market volatility and changes in
80
the shape of the yield curve among other factors as described
below. While our hedging strategies have been generally
effective, there can be no assurance that these strategies will
succeed under any particular interest rate scenario.
Other Securities
Certain financial instruments that we invest in tend to decrease
in value as interest rates increase and tend to increase in
value as interest rates decline. These include fixed rate
investment grade and non-investment grade mortgage-backed and
asset-backed securities, principal-only securities and
U.S. Treasury bonds. The principal-only securities and
U.S. Treasury bonds generally act as hedges to our
servicing-related assets. To a lesser extent, mortgage
securities supported by adjustable rate mortgage loans may
change in value as interest rates change, if the timing or
absolute level of interest rate adjustments on the underlying
loans do not correspond to applicable changes in market interest
rates. While such MBS are highly rated instruments from a credit
standpoint, these securities are considered complex mortgage
securities because actual future cash flows may vary from
expected cash flows primarily due to borrower prepayment
behavior.
Sources of Interest Rate Hedging Risk
We seek to mitigate our interest rate risks through the various
hedging strategies described above. However, there can be no
assurance that these strategies (including assumptions
concerning the correlation thought to exist between different
types of instruments) or their implementation will be successful
in any particular interest rate environment, as market
volatility cannot be predicted. The following are the primary
sources of risk that we must manage in our hedging strategies.
Basis Risk. In connection with our interest rate risk
management, basis risk is most prevalent in our hedging
activities, in that the change in value of hedges may not equal
or completely offset the change in value of the financial asset
or liability being hedged. While we choose hedges we believe
will correlate effectively with the hedged asset or liability
under a variety of market conditions, perfect hedges
are not available for the assets or liabilities we attempt to
hedge. For example, we hedge our pipeline of non-conforming
mortgage loans with forward commitments to sell Fannie Mae or
Freddie Mac securities of comparable maturities and
weighted-average interest rates. However, our non-conforming
mortgage loans typically trade at a discount (or require an
incremental yield spread) relative to conforming GSE collateral,
due to the higher perceived ratings of Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac
obligations. In certain interest rate environments, the relative
price movement of the non-conforming mortgage loans and the
agency securities may differ, as the market may require a larger
or smaller discount for the non-conforming loans. Consequently,
the change in value of the non-conforming mortgage loan (the
hedged asset), which is a function of the size of the discount,
is typically not perfectly correlated with the change in value
of the Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac securities sold (the hedge)
resulting in basis risk.
To hedge our MSRs and AAA-rated and agency interest-only
securities, which are primarily backed by non-conforming
mortgage loan collateral, we use a combination of LIBOR swaps,
LIBOR/swap-based options, treasury and agency futures and
private-label MBS. As there are no hedge instruments which would
be perfectly correlated with these hedged assets, we use the
above instruments because we believe they generally correlate
well with the hedged assets. Further, we make assumptions in our
financial models as to how LIBOR/swap, treasury, agency and
private-label mortgage rates will change in relation to one
another. From time to time, in certain interest rate
environments, the relative movement of these different interest
rates and the corresponding change in value of the applicable
hedge instruments do not change as we anticipate, resulting in
an imperfect correlation between the values of the hedges and
the hedged assets.
Options Risk. An option provides the holder the right,
but not the obligation, to buy, sell, or in some manner alter
the cash flows of an instrument or financial contract. Options
may be stand-alone instruments such as exchange-traded options
and over-the-counter contracts, or they may be embedded within
standard instruments. Instruments with embedded options include
bonds and notes with call or put provisions, loans that give
borrowers the right to prepay balances, and adjustable rate
loans with interest rate caps or floors that
81
limit the amount by which the rate may adjust. Loans that give
borrowers the right to prepay balances present the most
significant option risk that we must manage.
Repricing Risk. Repricing risks arise from the timing
difference in the maturity and/or repricing of assets,
liabilities and off-balance sheet positions. While such
repricing mismatches are fundamental to our business, they can
expose us to fluctuations in income and economic value as
interest rates vary. For example, if a long-term, fixed-rate
loan is funded with a short-term deposit, future net interest
income would be susceptible to a decline as interest rates
increase. This decline would occur because the interest income
from the loan is fixed, while the interest paid on the deposit
will be reset each time the deposit matures. We monitor and
manage repricing risk by calculating and monitoring the duration
gap on our individual positions and in the aggregate, and
maintaining certain risk tolerances. This internal risk
management process, however, does not eliminate repricing risk.
Yield Curve Risk. The value of certain loans, securities
and hedges we hold is based on a number of factors, including
the shape or slope of the appropriate yield curve, as the market
values financial assets and hedge instruments based on
expectations for interest rates in the future. Yield curves
typically reflect the markets expectations for future
interest rates. In valuing our assets and related hedge
instruments, in formulating our hedging strategies and in
evaluating the interest rate sensitivity for risk management
purposes, our models use market yield curves, which are
constantly changing. If the shape or slope of the market yield
curves change unexpectedly, the market values of our assets and
related hedges may be negatively impacted and/or changes in the
value of the hedges may not be effectively correlated with the
changes in the value of the hedged assets or liabilities.
VALUATION RISK
General
We hold assets in our investment portfolio that we create in
connection with the sale or securitization of mortgage loans.
These assets include AAA-rated and agency interest-only
securities, MSRs, non-investment grade securities and residuals.
In addition, from time to time, we may acquire these types of
securities from third party issuers. These assets represented 6%
of total assets and 78% of total equity at December 31,
2004. We value them with complex financial models that
incorporate significant assumptions and judgments, which could
vary significantly as market conditions change.
Modeling Risk
We use third party vendor financial models to value each of the
asset types referred to above. These models are complex and use
asset specific collateral data and market inputs for interest
rates. While this level of complexity of our valuation models
can result in more precise valuations, increased hedging
effectiveness and improved risk management practices, the
increased complexity must be managed to ensure, among other
things, that the models are properly calibrated, the assumptions
are reasonable, the mathematical relationships used in the model
are predictive and remain so over time, and the data and
structure of the assets and hedges being modeled are properly
input.
The modeling requirements of MSRs and residual securities are
significantly more complex than those of AAA-rated and agency
interest-only securities. This is because of the high number of
variables that drive cash flows associated with MSRs (including,
among others, escrow balances, reinvestment rates, defaults and
the cost to service mortgage loans) and the complex cash flow
structures, which may differ on each securitization, that
determine the value of residual securities. To mitigate this
risk, we maintain significant internal oversight of the
valuation process. In addition, we have our models or valuations
independently assessed by third party specialists. We will
continue to obtain such independent assessments on a quarterly
basis to address this risk.
82
Assumption Risk
Even if the general accuracy of the valuation model is
validated, valuations are highly dependent upon the
reasonableness of our assumptions and the predictability of the
relationships which drive the results of the model. Such
assumptions are complex as we must make judgments about the
effect of matters that are inherently uncertain. As the number
of variables and assumptions affecting the possible future
resolution of the uncertainties increases, those judgments
become even more complex.
In volatile markets like we experienced in 2004, there is
increased risk that our actual results may be significantly
different than those results derived from using our assumptions.
As the time period over which the uncertainty will be resolved
increases, those estimates will likely change over a greater
number of periods, potentially adding further volatility to the
model results. For example, assumptions regarding prepayment
speeds and loan loss levels are used in estimating values of
certain assets. If loans prepay faster than estimated, or loan
loss levels are higher than anticipated, we may be required to
write down the value of such assets. While we build in
discounting factors to our assumptions and implement hedging
strategies to mitigate the change in interest rates which drive
the change in prepayment rates, asset write downs and write ups
typically occur over the lives of the assets. This occurs
because actual prepayments and losses are driven by borrower
behavior, which cannot be precisely predicted.
The above assumptions are just a few examples of assumptions
incorporated into our valuations. Whenever active markets exist
to provide relevant information, we use third party valuations
and related assumptions determined from trading activity or
market analysis. Our valuations are also subject to extensive
review procedures, including a management-level ALCO and a Board
of Directors-level ALCO. We also benchmark the overall valuation
through third party reviews as discussed above. Further
discussion of how we form our assumptions is included under
Critical Accounting Policies and Judgments below.
CREDIT RISK
General
We have assumed a degree of credit risk in connection with our
investments in certain mortgage securities and loans held for
investment and sale, as well as in connection with our
construction lending operations and our mortgage banking
activities. We have established risk management and credit
committees to manage our exposure to credit losses in each of
these business operations. We have also established a central
credit risk management committee to monitor the adequacy of loan
loss reserves for our lending products and the valuation of
credit sensitive securities. The central credit risk management
committee implements changes that seek to balance our credit
risk with our production, pricing and profitability goals.
Mortgage Loans
We have two principal underwriting methods designed to be
responsive to the needs of our mortgage loan customers:
traditional underwriting and e-MITS underwriting. In 2004, we
generated 64% of our mortgage loans through the e-MITS
underwriting process. Through the traditional underwriting
method, customers submit mortgage loans that are underwritten by
us in accordance with our guidelines prior to purchase. As
discussed above under the caption Mortgage Banking
Activities in Item 1. Business, e-MITS is
our automated, Internet-based underwriting and risk-based
pricing system. e-MITS enables us to more accurately estimate
expected credit loss, interest rate risk and prepayment risk, so
that we can acquire loans at prices that more accurately reflect
these risks. Risk-based pricing is based on a number of borrower
and loan characteristics, including, among other loan variables,
credit score, occupancy, documentation type, purpose,
loan-to-value ratio and prepayment assumptions based on an
analysis of interest rates.
Because our risk-based pricing models, including the risk-based
pricing models utilized in e-MITS, are based primarily on
standard industry loan loss data supplemented by our historical
loan loss data and proprietary logic developed by us, and
because the models cannot predict the effect of financial market
and other economic performance factors, there are no assurances
that our risk-based pricing models are a complete and accurate
reflection of the risks associated with our loan products.
83
We are also subject to fraud and compliance risk in connection
with the purchase or origination of mortgage loans. Fraud risk
includes the risk of intentional misstatement of information in
property appraisals or other underwriting documentation. This
risk is typically higher in the acquisition of a loan from a
third party seller. Compliance risk is the risk that loans are
not originated in compliance with applicable laws and
regulations, and to our standards.
We mitigate fraud risk through a number of controls, including
credit checks and reference checks to validate loan quality and
annual recertification of our third-party sellers. We address
compliance risk with a quality control program through which we
monitor the completeness of loan files throughout several stages
of the loan process and identify corrective actions to be taken
either by our third-party sellers or in-house origination staff.
Lastly, we perform ongoing quality control reviews to ensure
that purchased loans meet our quality standards. We also have
the ability to require our broker or seller counterparties to
repurchase loans for representation and warranty breaches.
However, there is no guarantee the broker or seller counterparty
will have the financial capability to repurchase the loans.
Loan Sales and Qualifying Special Purpose Entities
Loan sales and securitization transactions comprise a
significant source of our overall funding. Our sales channels
include whole loan sales, sales to GSEs and private-label
securitizations. Private-label securitizations involve transfers
of loans to off-balance sheet qualifying special purpose
entities. In some transactions, we have retained a relatively
small interest in securities issued by the qualifying special
purpose entity. Pursuant to SFAS 140, Accounting
for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and
Extinguishments of Liabilities, the assets and
liabilities of the qualifying special purpose entities are not
consolidated with our financial statements as these entities
meet the legal isolation criteria in SFAS 140.
We retain limited credit exposure from the sale of mortgage
loans. We make standard representations and warranties to the
transferee in connection with all such dispositions. These
representations and warranties do not assure against credit risk
associated with the transferred loans, but if individual
mortgage loans are found not to have fully complied with the
associated representations and warranties, we may be required to
repurchase the loans from the transferee or we may make payments
in lieu of curing such breaches of these representations and
warranties. We have established a reserve for losses that arise
in connection with representations and warranties for loans
sold. This secondary market reserve is included on the
consolidated balance sheets in Other Liabilities.
We occasionally retain non-investment grade securities and
residuals that are created in a mortgage loan securitization.
Residuals represent the first loss position and are not
typically rated by a nationally recognized rating agency.
Non-investment grade securities (rated below BBB) may or may not
represent the second loss position, depending on the rating, but
are typically subject to a disproportionate amount of the credit
risk. See further discussion below under Securities
Portfolio.
See Note 14 Transfers and Servicing of
Financial Assets in the accompanying notes to the
consolidated financial statements for further disclosure of
credit exposure associated with securitizations.
Securities Portfolio
We have assumed a certain degree of credit risk in connection
with our investments in investment and non-investment grade MBS
and residual securities. These securities may be purchased from
third party issuers or retained from our own securitization
transactions. In general, non-investment grade securities bear
losses prior to the more senior investment grade securities.
These securities therefore bear a disproportionate amount of the
credit risk with respect to the underlying collateral. With
regard to retained non-investment grade and residual securities,
a fair value is calculated and assigned to these securities and
(a) this value is reflected in the gain or (loss) on sale
realized from the disposition of the mortgage loans and
(b) the securities are initially reflected at this value on
our balance sheet and subsequently adjusted to reflect the
changes in fair value. The ultimate value of the security may be
more or less than the initial calculated and assigned value
depending upon the credit performance, among other assumptions,
of the mortgage loans collateralizing the securities. The fair
value of the security may change from time to time based upon
actual default and loss experience of
84
the collateral pool, actual and projected prepayment rates,
economic trends and other variables. Our non-investment grade
securities and residual portfolio of $218.4 million
represented approximately 1% of total assets and 17% of
shareholders equity at December 31, 2004.
Non-investment grade securities represent leveraged credit risk
as they absorb a disproportionate share of credit risk as
compared to investment grade securities. These securities are
recorded on our books net of discount that is based upon, among
other things, the estimated credit losses, expected prepayments,
as estimated by internal loss models and/or perceived by the
market, and the coupons, associated with these securities. Our
non-investment grade securities were recorded at a discount of
$41.9 million to the securities face value and
represented 34% of the face value of these securities at
December 31, 2004. The adequacy of this discount is
dependent upon how accurate our estimate is of both the amount
and timing of the cash flows paid to the non-investment grade
securities, which is primarily based upon our estimate of the
amount and timing of credit losses and prepayments on the
underlying loan collateral.
Residual securities possess a greater degree of risk because
they are relatively illiquid, represent the first loss position
and require a higher reliance on financial models in determining
their fair value. At December 31, 2004, our investment in
residual securities totaled $135.4 million, which
represented less than 1% of total assets and 11% of total
shareholders equity. Realization of this fair value is
dependent upon the discount rate used and the accuracy of our
estimate of both the amount and timing of the cash flows paid to
the residual securities, which are based primarily on our
estimate of the amount and timing of credit losses on the
underlying loan collateral and to a lesser extent prepayment
rates on the underlying loan collateral.
Counterparty Risk
In connection with our trading and hedging activities, we do
business only with counterparties that we believe are
established and sufficiently capitalized. In addition, with
respect to hedging activities on the pipeline of mortgage loans
held for sale, we enter into master netting
agreements with an independent clearinghouse known as the Fixed
Income Clearing Corporation. This entity collects and pays daily
margin deposits to reduce the risk associated with counterparty
credit quality. We do not engage in any foreign currency
trading. All interest rate hedge contracts are with entities
(including their subsidiaries) that are approved by a committee
of our Board of Directors and that generally must have a long
term credit rating of A or better (by one or more
nationally recognized statistical rating organization) at the
time the relevant contract is consummated. Accordingly, we do
not believe that we are exposed to more than a nominal amount of
counterparty risk associated with our trading and hedging
activities.
Builder Construction Loan Risk
The primary credit risks associated with builder construction
lending are underwriting, project risks and market risks.
Project risks include cost overruns, borrower credit risk,
project completion risk, general contractor credit risk, and
environmental and other hazard risks. Market risks are risks
associated with the sale of the completed residential units.
They include affordability risk, which is the risk of
affordability of financing by borrowers in a rising interest
rate environment, product design risk, and risks posed by
competing projects.
We attempt to mitigate some of these risks through the
management and credit committee review process and utilization
of independent experts in the areas of environmental reviews and
project market appraisals; however, there can be no assurance
that this review process will fully mitigate the foregoing
risks. In our experience, absorption rates of new single-family
homes have been good in markets served by us. However, it is
unclear whether the economic cycle in certain geographic markets
has peaked, which may have an impact on new loans generation or
timely payoff of existing loans. We employ geographic
concentration limits and borrower concentration limits for
builder construction lending, which are intended to mitigate
some of the effects of a slowing economic cycle in some areas.
Also, the majority of our builder construction lending
commitments have personal or corporate guarantees.
85
LIQUIDITY RISK
General
Our principal financing needs are to fund our acquisition of
mortgage loans and our investment in mortgage loans and MBS. Our
primary sources of funds to meet these financing needs include
loan sales and securitizations, deposits, advances from the
FHLB, committed borrowings and capital. Our ability to attract
and maintain deposits and control our cost of funds has been,
and will continue to be, significantly affected by market
conditions.
Our ability to maintain our borrowing facilities is subject to
the renewal of those facilities. Decisions by our lenders and
investors to make additional funds available to us in the future
will depend upon a number of factors. These include our
compliance with the terms of existing credit arrangements, our
financial performance and changes in our credit rating, industry
and market trends in our various businesses, the general
availability of, and rates applicable to, financing and
investments, these lenders and/or investors own
resources and policies concerning loans and investments, and the
relative attractiveness of alternative investment or lending
opportunities.
We are in compliance with all debt covenants and other terms of
our credit arrangements. Such arrangements include traditional
terms and restrictions. For example, each of our collateralized
borrowing facilities permits the lender or lenders thereunder to
require us to repay amounts outstanding and/or pledge additional
assets in the event that the value of the pledged collateral
declines due to changes in market interest rates. We utilize
operating liquidity to cover potential changes in value of
pledged assets. While there are no guarantees as to the market
conditions that may affect our performance, based on current
market conditions, we do not expect to fall out of compliance
with the terms of our credit arrangements.
Loan Sales and Securitizations
Our business model relies heavily upon the ability to sell our
majority of the mortgage loans shortly after we acquire them.
The proceeds of these sales are a critical component of the
liquidity necessary for our ongoing operations.
The key channels through which we sell mortgage loans are bulk
sales of loan pools to GSEs, sales on a whole loan basis and the
private securitization of loan pools, whereby the loans are sold
to securitization trusts. In 2004, sales to GSEs were 26% of our
total loan sales, whole loan sales were 22%, and private
securitizations were 52%. We have ready access to all three of
these distribution channels at this time; however, a disruption
in this access could negatively impact our liquidity position
and our ability to execute on our business plan. The secondary
mortgage market is generally a very liquid market with
continuing demand for mortgage-backed security issuances. If a
temporary disruption to this market did occur, our depository
structure provides us with the limited ability to hold mortgage
loans on our balance sheet, somewhat mitigating this risk. In
addition, we have substantial liquidity resources
($1.6 billion as of December 31, 2004) and the ability
to raise additional funding. However, at our current production
levels, if the disruption were to last for more than a month or
two, we would have to radically restructure our business to slow
volume and would have difficulty sustaining our earnings
performance as a significant portion of our earnings depends on
our ability to sell our mortgage production.
In connection with our private-label securitizations, we do not
provide contractual legal recourse beyond standard
representations and warranties to third party investors that
purchase securities issued by the QSPEs beyond the credit
enhancement inherent in any retained subordinated interest
(i.e., retained non-investment grade and residual securities). A
deterioration in the performance of our private-label securities
could adversely impact the availability and pricing of future
transactions.
CYCLICAL INDUSTRY
The mortgage industry is a cyclical business that generally
performs better in a low interest rate environment such as the
current one. The environment of historically low interest rates
over the past three
86
years has been very favorable for mortgage bankers, such as us.
As the industry transitions to a higher interest rate
environment, the demand for mortgage loans is expected to
decrease, which would cause a lower level of growth, or even a
reduction, in earnings per share, in the short run. In addition,
other external factors, including tax laws, the strength of
various segments of the economy and demographics of our lending
markets, could influence the level of demand for mortgage loans.
Gain on sale of loans is a large component of our revenue and
would be adversely impacted by a significant decrease in our
mortgage loan volume. We have grown our investment in mortgage
loans during 2004 to provide a level of core net interest income
in an effort to mitigate the cyclicality.
COMPETITION
We face significant competition in acquiring and selling loans.
In our mortgage banking operations, we compete with other
mortgage bankers, GSEs, established third party lending
programs, investment banking firms, banks, savings and loan
associations, and other lenders and entities purchasing mortgage
assets. With regard to MBS issued through our mortgage banking
operations, we face competition from other investment
opportunities available to prospective investors. We estimate
our market share of the U.S. mortgage market to be
approximately 1.7%. A number of our competitors have
significantly larger market share and financial resources. We
seek to compete with financial institutions and mortgage
companies through an emphasis on quality of service, diversified
products and maximum use of technology.
The GSEs have made and we believe will continue to make
significant technological and economic advances to broaden their
customer bases. When the GSEs contract or expand, there are both
positive and negative impacts on our mortgage banking lending
operations. As GSEs expand, additional liquidity is brought to
the market, and loan products can be resold more quickly.
Conversely, expanding GSEs increase competition for loans, which
may reduce profit margins on loan sales. We seek to address
these competitive pressures by making a strong effort to
maximize our use of technology, by diversifying into other
residential mortgage products that are less affected by GSEs,
and by operating in a more cost-effective manner than our
competitors.
LAWS AND REGULATIONS
The banking industry in general is extensively regulated at the
federal and state levels. Insured depository institutions and
their holding companies are subject to comprehensive regulation
and supervision by financial regulatory authorities covering all
aspects of their organization, management and operations. The
OTS and the FDIC are primarily responsible for the federal
regulation and supervision of the Bank and its affiliated
entities. In addition to their regulatory powers, these two
agencies also have significant enforcement authority that they
can use to address unsafe and unsound banking practices,
violations of laws, and capital and operational deficiencies.
Enforcement powers can be exercised in a number of ways, through
either formal or informal actions. Informal enforcement actions
customarily remain confidential between the regulator and the
financial institution, while more formal enforcement actions are
customarily publicly disclosed. Further, the Banks
operations are subject to regulation at the state level,
including a variety of consumer protection provisions. Banking
institutions also are affected by the various monetary and
fiscal policies of the U.S. government, including those of
the Federal Reserve Board, and these policies can influence
financial regulatory actions. Accordingly, the actions of those
governmental authorities responsible for regulatory, fiscal and
monetary affairs can have a significant impact on the activities
of financial services firms such as ours. See further
information in Item 1. Business
Regulation and Supervision.
The Companys financial condition and results of operations
are reported in accordance with U.S. GAAP. While not
impacting economic results, future changes in accounting
principles issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board
could impact our operational results as reported under
U.S. GAAP.
Additionally, political conditions could impact the
Companys earnings. Acts or threats of war or terrorism, as
well as actions taken by the U.S. or other governments in
response to such acts or threats, could impact business and
economic conditions in which the Company operates.
87
GEOGRAPHIC CONCENTRATION
A majority of our loans are geographically concentrated in
certain states, including California, New York, Florida and New
Jersey with 52% of our loan receivable balance at
December 31, 2004 being in California. Any adverse economic
conditions in these markets could cause the number of loans
acquired to decrease, likely resulting in a corresponding
decline in revenues. Also, we could be adversely affected by
business disruptions triggered by natural disasters or acts of
war or terrorism in these geographic areas.
BUSINESS EXECUTION AND TECHNOLOGY RISK
Our business performance is highly dependent on solidly
executing our mortgage banking business model. We must properly
price and continue to expand our products, customer base and
market share. In addition, the execution of our hedging
activities is critical as we have significant exposure to
changes in interest rates.
We are highly dependent on the use of technology in all areas of
our business and we must take advantage of advances in
technology to stay competitive. There are no guarantees as to
our degree of success in anticipating and taking advantage of
technological advances or that we will be more successful in the
use of technology than our competitors.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND JUDGMENTS
Several of the critical accounting policies that are very
important to the portrayal of our financial condition and
results of operations require management to make difficult and
complex judgments that rely on estimates about the effect of
matters that are inherently uncertain due to the impact of
changing market conditions and/or consumer behavior. We believe
our most critical accounting policies relate to (1) assets
that are highly dependent on internal valuation models and
assumptions rather than market quotations, including, AAA-rated
and agency interest-only securities, MSRs and non-investment
grade securities and residuals, (2) derivatives and other
hedging instruments, (3) our allowance for loan losses
(ALL) and (4) our secondary market reserve.
With the exception of the ALL, these items are generally created
in connection with our loan sale and securitization process. The
allocated cost of the retained assets at the time of the sale is
recorded as a component of the net gain on sale of loans. We
recognized a total of $431.2 million in gain on sale of
loans, excluding the total impact of $67 million,
before-tax, of SAB No. 105 and purchase accounting
adjustments, during the year ended December 31, 2004. Such
retained assets were comprised primarily of MSRs (49%) and, to a
much lesser degree, AAA-rated and agency interest-only
securities and investment grade securities and residual
securities.
There is a risk that at times we might not satisfy the
requirements for fair value hedge accounting under
SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities, as amended, for a
portion of our loans held for sale because we do not meet the
required complex hedge correlation tests. This could cause
temporary fluctuations in our reported income but not in the
ultimate economic results. The fluctuation in our reported
income if hedge accounting is not achieved would be over a very
short period as we sold our mortgage loans on average in
61 days during 2004 and the economic effect of both the
hedges and loans would be recorded once the sale was completed.
In addition, any imprecision in valuation of these items would
be adjusted and recorded in a short period through our gain on
sale margin once the sale of the loans was completed.
Fair values for these assets are determined by using available
market information, historical performance of the assets
underlying collateral and internal valuation models as
appropriate. The reasonableness of fair values will vary
depending upon the availability of third party market
information, which is a function of the market liquidity of the
asset being valued. In connection with our mortgage banking and
investment portfolio operations, we invest in assets created
from the loan sale and securitization process, for which markets
are relatively limited and illiquid. As a result, the valuation
of these assets is subject to our assumptions about future
events rather than market quotations. These assets include
AAA-rated and agency interest-only
88
securities, MSRs, non-investment grade securities and residuals.
As the number of variables and assumptions used to estimate fair
value increases and as the time period increases over which the
estimates are made, such estimates will likely change in a
greater number of periods, potentially adding volatility to our
valuations and financial results. For further information
regarding the sensitivity of the fair value of these assets to
changes in the underlying assumptions, refer to
Note 14 Transfers and Servicing of
Financial Assets in the accompanying consolidated
financial statements of the Company.
AAA-RATED INTEREST-ONLY SECURITIES
AAA-rated interest-only securities are created upon the sale of
loans through private-label securitizations or, to a much lesser
degree, purchased from third party issuers. The asset values of
AAA-rated interest-only securities represents the present value
of the estimated future cash flows to be received from the
excess spread. Future cash flows are estimated by taking the
coupon rate of the loans collateralizing the transaction less
the interest rate (coupon) paid to the investors less
contractually specified servicing and trustee fees, after giving
effect to estimated prepayments of the underlying loans. The AAA
rating of the interest-only securities reflects the fact that
they are exposed to very low credit risk, but does not reflect
the fact that their interest rate risk can be significant.
We classify our AAA-rated interest-only securities as trading
and they are therefore carried at fair value, with changes in
fair value being recorded through earnings. Valuation changes,
net of related hedge gains and losses, are included in
Gain on mortgage-backed securities, net in the
Consolidated Statements of Earnings. We use third party models
and an option adjusted spread (OAS) valuation
methodology to value these securities. The key assumptions
include projected lifetime prepayment rates based on collateral
type, option adjusted spreads, and future delinquency and
default rates. Based on these assumptions, our model calculates
implied discount rates, which we compare to market discount
rates and risk premiums to determine if our valuations are
reasonable.
In addition to considering actual prepayment trends, future
prepayment rates are estimated based on the following four
factors:
|
|
|
1) Relative Coupon Rate. The
interest rate the borrower is currently paying relative to
current market rates for that type of loan is the primary
predictor of the borrowers likelihood to prepay. We assume
that a borrowers propensity to prepay increases when the
borrowers loan rate exceeds the current market rates. |
|
|
2) Seasoning. Based on
prepayment curves and other studies performed by industry
analysts of prepayment activity over the life of a pool of
loans, a pattern has been identified whereby prepayments
typically peak in years 1 to 3, consistent with borrower
moving habits. |
|
|
3) Seasonality. Seasonality
refers to the time of the year that prepayments occur. All else
being constant, prepayments tend to be higher in summer months
due to borrowers tendency to move outside of the school
year and lower in winter months due to the holiday season. |
|
|
4) Burn Out. Burn out is
associated with a pool of mortgage loans which has endured a
variety of high prepayment environments such that it may be
assumed that the remaining borrowers are insensitive to any
subsequent decline in interest rates. Consequently, all else
being equal, projected prepayment speeds for such a pool of
loans would be lower than a newly originated loan pool with
comparable characteristics. |
As cash flows must be estimated over the life of the pool of
mortgage loans underlying the AAA-rated interest-only
securities, assumptions must be made about the level of interest
rates over that same time horizon, which is primarily three to
five years, as these securities have a weighted-average life of
approximately that period. We utilize a credit spread over the
market LIBOR/swap forward curve to estimate the level of
mortgage interest rates over the life of the pool of loans. We
believe a forward curve, as opposed to static or spot interest
rates, incorporates the market perception about expected changes
in interest rates and provides a more realistic estimate of
lifetime interest rates and therefore prepayment rates.
89
The discount rate represents the implicit yield a knowledgeable
investor would require to purchase or own the projected cash
flows. Using an OAS model, embedded options and other cash flow
uncertainties are quantified across a large number of
hypothetical interest rate environments. The OAS is essentially
the credit spread over the risk free rate after the option costs
(e.g., hedge costs) are considered. Overall, we evaluate the
reasonableness of the discount rate based on the spread over the
risk free rate (duration adjusted LIBOR securities) relative to
other cash flow sensitive investments with higher and lower risk
profiles.
MORTGAGE SERVICING RIGHTS
MSRs are created upon the sale of loans to GSEs, in
private-label securitizations, and sometimes, from the sale of
whole loans. We also purchase MSRs from time to time from third
parties. The carrying value of MSRs in our financial statements
represents our estimate of the present value of future cash
flows to be received by us as servicer of the loans. In general,
future cash flows are estimated by projecting the service fee,
plus late fees and reinvestment income associated with interest
earned on float, after subtracting guarantee fees on
agency portfolios, the cost of reimbursing investors for
compensating interest associated with the early pay-off of
loans, the market cost to service the loans, and the cost of
mortgage insurance premiums (if applicable), and after giving
effect to estimated prepayments.
MSRs are recorded at the lower of amortized cost or fair value
with valuation changes, net of hedges, being reported in service
fee income in the consolidated statements of earnings. We use a
third party valuation model and OAS. The key assumptions include
prepayment rates and, to a lesser degree, reinvestment income
and discount rates. Prepayment speeds and OAS derived discount
rates are determined using the methodology described above for
AAA-rated and agency interest-only securities.
Reinvestment income represents the interest earned on custodial
balances, often referred to as float. Custodial
balances are generated from the collection of borrower principal
and interest and escrow balances which we generally hold on
deposit for a short period until the required monthly remittance
of such funds to a trustee. Reinvestment income is reduced by
compensating interest, or interest shortfall, which
we must pay to investors to compensate for interest lost on the
early payoff of loans pursuant to our servicing obligations. Our
estimate of reinvestment income is a function of float, which is
derived from our estimate of prepayment speeds, and an estimate
of the interest rate we will earn by temporarily investing these
balances. The reinvestment rate is typically based on the
Federal Funds rate, and we factor in the market forward curve to
derive a long-term estimate.
The valuation of MSRs includes numerous assumptions of varying
lower sensitivities in addition to the assumptions discussed
above. For example, other assumptions include, but are not
limited to, market cost to service loans, prepayment penalties,
delinquencies and the related late fees and escrow balances. We
believe our valuation of MSRs as of December 31, 2004 was
reasonable given market conditions at December 31, 2004 and
quarterly valuations obtained from third parties.
NON-INVESTMENT GRADE SECURITIES AND RESIDUALS
General
Non-investment grade securities and residuals are created upon
the issuance of private-label securitizations and to a lesser
extent purchased from third parties. Non-investment grade
securities (rated below BBB) represent leveraged credit risk as
they typically absorb a disproportionate amount of credit losses
before such losses affect senior or other investment grade
securities. Residuals represent the first loss position and are
not typically rated by the nationally recognized agencies. The
asset value of residuals represents the present value of future
cash flows expected to be received by us from the excess cash
flows created in the securitization transaction. In general,
future cash flows are estimated by taking the coupon rate of the
loans underlying the transaction less the interest rate paid to
the investors, less contractually specified servicing and
trustee fees, and after giving effect to estimated prepayments
and credit losses.
90
Cash flows are also dependent upon various restrictions and
conditions specified in each transaction. For example, residual
securities are not typically entitled to any cash flows unless
over-collateralization has reached a certain level. The
over-collateralization represents the difference between the
bond balance and the collateral underlying the security. A
sample over-collateralization structure may require 2% of the
original collateral balance for 36 months. At month 37, it
may require 4%, but on a declining balance basis. Due to
prepayments, that 4% requirement is generally less than the 2%
required on the original balance. In addition, the transaction
may include an over-collateralization trigger event,
the occurrence of which may require the over-collateralization
to be increased. An example of such a trigger event is
delinquency rates or cumulative losses on the underlying
collateral that exceed stated levels. If over-collateralization
targets were not met, the trustee would apply cash flows that
would otherwise flow to the residual security until such targets
are met. A delay or reduction in the cash flows received will
result in a lower valuation of the residual.
We consider certain of our investment grade securities to be
hedges of our AAA-rated interest-only securities and residual
securities. We therefore classify them as trading securities in
order to reflect changes in their fair values in our current
income. Residual securities are generally classified as trading
securities so that the accounting for these securities will
mirror the economic hedging activities. All other MBS, including
the majority of our non-investment grade securities, are
classified as available for sale. At least quarterly, we
evaluate the carrying value of non-investment grade and residual
securities in light of the actual performance of the underlying
loans. If fair value is less than amortized cost and the
estimated undiscounted cash flows have decreased compared to the
prior period, the impairment is recorded through earnings. We
classify our non-investment grade residuals as trading and
therefore record them at our estimate of their fair value, with
changes in fair value being recorded through earnings. We use a
third party model, using the cash-out method to
value these securities. This method reflects when we receive the
cash, which may be later than when the trust receives the cash.
The model takes into consideration the cash flow structure
specific to each transaction (such as over-collateralization
requirements and trigger events). The key valuation assumptions
include credit losses, prepayment rates and, to a lesser degree,
discount rates.
Loss Estimates
We use a proprietary loss estimation model to project credit
losses. This model was developed utilizing our actual loss
experience for prime and subprime loans. The modeling logic has
been reviewed by a third party specialist in this area and
validated. The expected loan loss is a function of loan amount,
conditional default probability and projected loss severity.
Characteristics that impact default probability vary depending
on loan type and current delinquency status, but generally
include the borrowers credit score, loan-to-value ratio,
loan amount, debt-to-income ratio, and loan purpose, among other
variables. Characteristics that impact loss severity includes
unpaid principal balance, loan-to-value, days to liquidation,
mortgage insurance status, cash-out versus no cash-out financing
and primary residence status. The loss estimation model also
includes conditional default curves, which relate to the
expected timing of the estimated loss. In our experience,
default probabilities generally reach a peak within two to three
years of loan origination and become less likely after four to
five years. While there can be no assurance as to the accuracy
of the model in predicting losses, we and a third party
specialist have back tested our model and have
validated the models default probability logic. The model
is updated and recalibrated periodically based on our on-going
actual loss experience.
Prepayment Speeds
We estimate prepayments on a collateral-specific basis and
consider actual prepayment activity for the collateral pool. We
also consider the current interest rate environment, the market
forward curve projections and prepayments estimated on similar
collateral pools where we own MSRs. Increasing prepayments tend
to benefit the valuation of non-investment grade securities as
the projected loss gets reduced due to the shorter loan life.
However, increasing prepayments may reduce the value of residual
securities since these securities represent excess spread on the
underlying collateral. Higher prepayments reduce the life of the
residual and total cash flows resulting in a reduction in the
fair value of the residual.
91
Discount Rates
We determine static discount rates based on a number of factors,
including but not limited to the collateral type and quality,
structure of the transaction, market interest rates and our
ability to generate an appropriate after tax return on equity
given the other valuation assumptions and resulting projected
cash flows. We also review the discount rates used by other
investors for similar securities to evaluate the appropriateness
of our assumptions. As non-investment grade securities and
residuals are our highest risk profile assets, and liquidity is
generally the lowest for these assets on a duration adjusted
basis, the spread over the risk free rate is also the highest of
all of our cash flow sensitive assets.
DERIVATIVES AND OTHER HEDGING INSTRUMENTS
The accounting and reporting standards for derivative financial
instruments are established in SFAS 133. SFAS 133
requires that we recognize all derivative instruments on the
balance sheet at fair value. The accounting for changes in fair
value of these instruments depends on the intended use of the
derivative and the associated designation. If certain conditions
are met, hedge accounting may be applied and the derivative
instrument may be specifically designated as a fair value hedge
or a cash flow hedge. In designating hedges of certain funded
mortgage loans in our pipeline and our borrowings and advances
as fair value hedges and cash flow hedges, respectively, we are
required by SFAS 133 to establish at the inception of the
hedge the method we will use in assessing the effectiveness of
the hedging relationship, for hedge accounting qualification,
and in measuring and recognizing hedge ineffectiveness, for
financial reporting purposes. In accordance with the
requirements of SFAS 133, these methods are consistent with
our approach to managing risk.
In complying with the requirements of SFAS 133, our
management team has made certain judgments in identifying
derivative instruments, designating hedged risks, calculating
hedge effectiveness, and measuring, recognizing, and classifying
changes in value. Critical judgments made with respect to our
hedge designations include:
|
|
|
|
|
Hedge Effectiveness Testing Methodology. SFAS 133
requires that we identify and consistently follow a methodology
justifying our expectation that our hedges will continue to be
highly effective at achieving offsetting changes in value. In
devising such a methodology, which is consistent with our risk
management policy, we have exercised judgment in identifying
(1) the scope and the types of historical data and
observations, (2) the mathematical formulas and
quantitative steps to calculate hedge effectiveness, and
(3) the frequency and necessity of updates to our
calculations and assumptions. As discussed in the footnotes to
our financial statements, we have designated certain forwards,
futures, and swaps to hedge the benchmark interest rate risk in
our funded mortgage loan pipeline and borrowings exposures,
respectively, as SFAS 133 hedges. If the results of our
hedge effectiveness tests determine that our hedges are not
effective, we do not adjust the basis of our pipeline mortgage
loans, in the case of disqualified fair value hedges, or defer
derivative gains and losses in Other Comprehensive Income
(OCI), in the case of disqualified cash flow hedges,
from the date our hedges were last effective to the date they
are again compliant with SFAS 133. Therefore, the ability
to recognize hedge accounting basis adjustments and OCI
deferrals may cause us to report materially different results
under different conditions or using different assumptions. |
|
|
|
Hedge Ineffectiveness Measurement. Regardless of our
method of proving hedge effectiveness, we are required to
recognize hedge ineffectiveness to the extent that exact offset
is not achieved, as defined by SFAS 133. As discussed in
the footnotes to the financial statements, the estimated fair
value amounts of our financial instruments have been determined
using available market information and valuation methods that we
believe are appropriate under the circumstances. These estimates
are inherently subjective in nature and involve matters of
significant uncertainty and judgment to interpret relevant
market and other data. The use of different market assumptions
and/or estimation methods may have a material effect on the
estimated fair value amounts, and therefore on the recognition
of basis adjustments and OCI deferrals for hedged mortgage loans
and forecasted borrowing/advance cash flows, respectively, as
well as the hedge ineffectiveness recognized in the income
statement for both hedge types. |
92
Some of our hedges, certain elements of our pipeline which are
required to be carried at fair value as a derivative instrument
in accordance with SFAS 133, and other derivative
instruments (including those we consider economic
hedges as opposed to accounting hedges) for which we do not
designate hedging relationships, involve estimates of fair value
where no direct exchange-traded or indirect proxy
market prices are immediately available. As noted above and in
the footnotes to our financial statements, we employ available
market information and valuation methods that we believe are
appropriate under the circumstances and, as applicable, within
the range of industry practice. Changes in either the mix of
market information or the valuation methods used would change
the fair values carried on the balance sheet, the associated
impact on the income statement, and the application and impacts
of SFAS 133 hedge accounting.
Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 105,
Application of Accounting Principles to
Loan Commitments, provides guidance regarding
loan commitments that are accounted for as derivative
instruments. As noted in the footnotes to the financial
statements, interest rate lock commitments are generally valued
at zero at inception. The rate locks are adjusted for changes in
value resulting from changes in market interest rates.
Non-derivative contracts sometimes contain embedded terms
meeting the definition of a derivative instrument under
SFAS 133. In certain circumstances, management has
concluded that such terms are appropriately excluded from fair
value accounting as they are clearly and closely related to the
economic characteristics of the non-derivative host
contract, in accordance with SFAS 133. Under different
facts and circumstances, should such embedded terms not be
considered clearly and closely related, recognition of such
embedded derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value would be
required by SFAS 133.
ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES
We utilize several methodologies to estimate the adequacy of our
ALL and to ensure that the allocation of the ALL to the various
portfolios is reasonable given current trends and the economic
outlook. In this regard, we segregate assets into homogeneous
pools of loans and heterogeneous loans.
Homogeneous pools of loans exhibit similar characteristics and,
as such, can be evaluated as pools of assets through the
assessment of default probabilities and corresponding loss
severities. Our homogeneous pools include residential mortgage
loans, manufactured home loans and home improvement loans. The
estimate of the allowance for loan losses for homogeneous pools
is based on expected inherent losses resulting from three
methodologies:
|
|
|
1) Internal
Loan Loss Estimation Model This model estimates
losses based on several key loan characteristics. For further
discussion regarding this model, see the previous section
entitled Non-Investment Grade Securities and
Residuals Loss Estimates. |
|
|
2) Delinquency
Trend Analysis This analysis provides the basis
for estimating the direction of NPA and loss severity levels
into future periods. |
|
|
3) Historical
Loss Analysis This analysis compares the level
of allowance to the historical losses actually incurred in prior
years. |
Our builder construction loans generally carry higher balances
and involve unique loan characteristics that cannot be evaluated
solely through the use of default rates, loss severities and
trend analysis. To estimate an appropriate level of ALL for our
heterogeneous loans, we constantly screen the portfolios on an
individual asset basis to classify problem credits and to
estimate potential loss exposure. In this estimation, we
determine the level of adversely classified assets (using the
classification criteria described below) in a portfolio and the
related loss potential and extrapolate the weighting of those
two factors across all assets in the portfolio.
93
Our asset classification methodology was designed in accordance
with guidelines established by our supervisory regulatory
agencies as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Pass Assets classified Pass are assets that
are well protected by the net worth and paying capacity of the
borrower or by the value of the asset or underlying collateral. |
|
|
|
Special Mention Special Mention assets have
potential weaknesses that require close attention, but have not
yet jeopardized the timely repayment of the asset in full. |
|
|
|
Substandard This is the first level of
adverse classification. Assets in this category are inadequately
protected by the net worth and paying capacity of the borrower
or by the value of the collateral. Substandard assets are
characterized by the distinct possibility that some loss will
occur if the deficiencies are not corrected. |
|
|
|
Doubtful Assets in this category have the
same weaknesses as a substandard asset, with the added
characteristic that based on current facts, conditions and
values, liquidation of the asset in full is highly improbable. |
|
|
|
Loss Assets in the Loss category are
considered uncollectible and of such little value that the
continuance as an asset, without establishment of a specific
valuation allowance, is not warranted. |
SECONDARY MARKET RESERVE
As part of the normal course of business involving loans sold to
the secondary market, we are occasionally required to repurchase
loans or make payments to settle breaches of the standard
representations and warranties made as part of our loan sales or
securitizations. The secondary market reserve includes probable
losses on repurchases arising from representation and warranty
claims, and probable obligations related to disputes with
investors and vendors with respect to contractual obligations
pertaining to mortgage origination activity. The reserve level
is a function of expected losses based on actual pending claims
and repurchase requests, historical experience, loan volume and
loan sales distribution channels and the assessment of probable
vendor or investor claims. An increase to this reserve is
recorded as a reduction of the gain on sale of loans in our
consolidated statements of earnings and the corresponding
reserve is recorded in other liabilities in our consolidated
balance sheets. At the time we repurchase a loan, the estimated
loss on the loan is charged against this reserve and recorded as
a reduction of the basis of the loan.
SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS
Changing the assumptions used to estimate the fair value of
AAA-rated and agency interest-only securities, MSRs and
non-investment grade securities and residuals (the
retained assets) could materially impact the amount
recorded in gain on sale of loans. Initially, the estimation of
the fair value of the retained assets from loan securitizations
and sales impacts the financial statements of our
mortgage-banking segment. Thereafter, adjustments to fair value
impact the investment portfolios financial statements.
Provisions to the secondary market reserve and adjustments to
the ALL may impact any of our segments. Refer to
Note 13 Transfers and Servicing of
Financial Assets in the consolidated financial statements
of IndyMac for further information on the hypothetical effect on
the fair value of our retained assets using various unfavorable
variations of the expected levels of certain key assumptions
used in valuing these assets at December 31, 2004.
|
|
ITEM 7A. |
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET
RISK |
Market risk is the exposure to loss resulting from changes in
interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates, commodity
prices and equity prices. The primary market risk to which we
are exposed is interest rate risk, including fluctuations in
short and long term interest rates. An additional risk is the
early prepayment of loans held for investment, MBS and mortgage
loans underlying our MSRs, AAA-rated and agency interest-only
securities and residuals. The Investing Divisions are
responsible for the management of interest rate and prepayment
risks subject to policies and procedures established by our
management-level ALCO and board of
94
directors-level ERM. See Item 7. Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations Risk Factors That May Affect Future
Results above for further discussion of risks.
We utilize a variety of means in order to manage interest rate
risk. We invest in MSRs and AAA-rated and agency interest-only
securities to generate core interest and fee income. The value
of these instruments and the income they provide tends to be
counter-cyclical to the changes in production volumes and gain
on sale of loans that result from changes in interest rates.
With regard to the pipeline of mortgage loans held for sale, in
general, we hedge this asset with forward commitments to sell
Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac securities of comparable maturities
and weighted-average interest rates. To hedge our investments in
AAA-rated and agency interest-only securities and MSRs, we use
several strategies, including buying and/or selling
mortgage-backed or U.S. Treasury securities, futures,
floors, swaps, or options, depending on several factors. Lastly,
we enter into swap agreements and utilize FHLB advances to
mitigate interest rate risk on mortgage loans held for
investment. In connection with all of the above strategies, we
use hedging instruments to reduce our exposure to interest rate
risk, not to speculate on the direction of market interest rates.
The primary measurement tool used to evaluate risk is an NPV
analysis. An NPV analysis simulates the effects of an
instantaneous and sustains change in interest rates (in a
variety of basis point increments) to parallel interest rate
shifts, on our assets and liabilities, commitments and hedges.
The result is an estimate of the increase or decrease to net
portfolio value. See Item 7. Managements
Discussion and Analysis Overall Interest Rate Risk
Management for a further discussion of our NPV analysis.
|
|
ITEM 8. |
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTAL DATA |
The information called for by this Item 8 is set forth
beginning at page F-1 of this Form 10-K.
|
|
ITEM 9. |
CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON
ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE |
None.
|
|
ITEM 9A. |
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES |
The management of IndyMac is responsible for establishing and
maintaining effective disclosure controls and procedures, as
defined under Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934. As of December 31, 2004, an
evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the
participation of the Companys management, including the
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the
effectiveness of the design and operation of IndyMacs
disclosure controls and procedures. Based on that evaluation,
management concluded that IndyMacs disclosure controls and
procedures as of December 31, 2004 were effective in
ensuring that information required to be disclosed in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K (Annual Report) was
recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time
period required by the SECs rules and forms.
Managements responsibilities related to establishing and
maintaining effective disclosure controls and procedures include
maintaining effective internal controls over financial reporting
that are designed to produce reliable financial statements in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States. As disclosed in the Report of Management on
Internal Control over Financial Reporting (Report of
Management) included in this Annual Report, management
assessed the Companys internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2004, in relation to criteria
for effective internal control over financial reporting as
described in Internal Control Integrated
Framework, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this
assessment, management believes that, as of December 31,
2004, the Companys system of internal control over
financial reporting met those criteria. The independent
registered public accounting firm that audited the financial
statements included in this Annual Report has issued an
attestation report on managements assessment of the
Companys internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2004. The Report of Management and the
attestation report are included in this Annual Report
Exhibit 99.1.
95
There have been no significant changes in the Companys
internal controls or in other factors that could significantly
affect the Companys disclosure of controls and procedures
subsequent to December 31, 2004.
|
|
ITEM 9B. |
OTHER INFORMATION |
None.
PART III
|
|
ITEM 10. |
DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE
REGISTRANT |
The information required by this Item 10 is hereby
incorporated by reference to IndyMac Bancorps definitive
proxy statement, to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A
within 120 days after the end of our 2004 fiscal year.
|
|
ITEM 11. |
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION |
The information required by this Item 11 is hereby
incorporated by reference to IndyMac Bancorps definitive
proxy statement, to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A
within 120 days after the end of our 2004 fiscal year.
|
|
ITEM 12. |
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND
MANAGEMENT |
The information required by this Item 12 is hereby
incorporated by reference to IndyMac Bancorps definitive
proxy statement, to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A
within 120 days after the end of our 2004 fiscal year.
|
|
ITEM 13. |
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED
TRANSACTIONS |
The information required by this Item 13 is hereby
incorporated by reference to IndyMac Bancorps definitive
proxy statement, to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A
within 120 days after the end of our 2004 fiscal year.
PART IV
|
|
ITEM 14. |
PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES |
The information required by this Item 14 is hereby
incorporated by reference to IndyMac Bancorps definitive
proxy statement, to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A
within 120 days after the end of our 2004 fiscal year.
|
|
ITEM 15. |
EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES |
(a)(1) and (2) Financial Statements and Schedules
The information required by this section of Item 15 is set
forth in the Index to Financial Statements and Schedules at page
F-2 of this Form 10-K.
96
(3) Exhibits
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
No. |
|
Description |
|
|
|
2.1*
|
|
Amended and Restated Agreement and Plan of Merger by and between
SGV Bancorp, Inc. (SGV-B) and IndyMac Bancorp
(formerly known as IndyMac Mortgage Holdings, Inc.), dated as of
July 12, 1999 and Amended and Restated as of
October 25, 1999 (incorporated by reference to
Appendix A to the definitive joint proxy statement of
IndyMac Bancorp and SGVB filed with the SEC on November 5,
1999). |
3.1*
|
|
Restated Certificate of Incorporation of IndyMac Bancorp
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to IndyMac
Bancorps Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2000). |
3.2*
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of IndyMac Bancorp (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 3.2 to IndyMac Bancorps
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2000). |
4.1*
|
|
Indenture (the Indenture), dated as of
December 1, 1985, between Countrywide Mortgage Obligations,
Inc. (CMO, Inc.) and Bankers Trust Company, as
Trustee (BTC) (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.1 to CMO, Inc.s Form 8-K filed with
the SEC on January 24, 1986). |
4.2*
|
|
Series A Supplement, dated as of December 1, 1985, to
the Indenture (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to
CMO, Inc.s Form 8-K filed with the SEC on
January 24, 1986). |
4.3*
|
|
Indenture Supplement, dated as of September 1, 1987, among
Countrywide Mortgage Obligations III, Inc.
(CMO III, Inc.), CMO, Inc. and BTC
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to CMO III,
Inc.s Form 8-K filed with the SEC on October 9,
1987). |
4.4*
|
|
Indenture dated as of November 14, 2001 between IndyMac
Bancorp and The Bank of New York (BoNY), as Trustee
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.8 to IndyMac
Bancorps Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2001). |
4.5*
|
|
First Supplemental Indenture dated as of November 14, 2001
between IndyMac Bancorp and BoNY, as Trustee (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.9 to IndyMac Bancorps
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001). |
4.6*
|
|
Rights Agreement dated as of October 17, 2001 between
IndyMac Bancorp and BoNY, as Rights Agent (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.1 to IndyMac Bancorps
Form 8-K filed with the SEC on October 18, 2001). |
4.7*
|
|
2000 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.1 to IndyMac Bancorps Form 8-K
filed with the SEC on October 29, 2004). |
4.8*
|
|
2002 Incentive Plan, as Amended and Restated (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.2 to IndyMac Bancorps
Form 8-K filed with the SEC on October 29, 2004). |
10.1*
|
|
Amended and Restated Trust Agreement dated as of
November 14, 2001 between IndyMac Bancorp, as Sponsor,
Roger H. Molvar and Richard L. Sommers, as Administrative
Trustees, Wilmington Trust Company, as Property Trustee and
as Delaware Trustee, BoNY, as Paying Agent, Registrar, Transfer
Agent and Authenticating Agent and several Holders of the
Securities (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to
IndyMac Bancorps Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2001). |
10.2*
|
|
Unit Agreement dated as of November 14, 2001 between
IndyMac Bancorp, IndyMac Capital Trust I, Wilmington
Trust Company, as Property Trustee, and BoNY, as Agent
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to IndyMac
Bancorps Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2001). |
10.3*
|
|
Warrant Agreement dated as of November 14, 2001 between
IndyMac Bancorp and BoNY, as Warrant Agent (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.13 to IndyMac Bancorps
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001). |
10.4*
|
|
Guarantee Agreement dated as of November 14, 2001 between
IndyMac Bancorp, as Guarantor, and BoNY, as Guarantee Trustee
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to IndyMac
Bancorps Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2001). |
10.5*
|
|
Director Emeritus Plan Agreement and Consulting Agreement dated
January 22, 2002 between IndyMac Bancorp and Thomas J.
Kearns (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20 to
IndyMac Bancorps Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2002). |
97
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
No. |
|
Description |
|
|
|
10.6*
|
|
Employment Agreement dated February 28, 2002 between
IndyMac Bank and Scott Keys (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to IndyMac Bancorps Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended March 31, 2002). |
10.7*
|
|
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated July 23,
2002 between IndyMac Bancorp and Michael W. Perry (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to IndyMac Bancorps
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2002). |
10.8*
|
|
Director Emeritus Agreement dated August 1, 2002 between
IndyMac Bancorp and Frederick J. Napolitano (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.23 to IndyMac Bancorps
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002). |
10.9*
|
|
Employment Agreement dated September 1, 2002 between
IndyMac Bank and S. Blair Abernathy (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.2 to IndyMac Bancorps Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 2002). |
10.10*
|
|
Employment Agreement dated October 1, 2002 between IndyMac
Bank and John Olinski (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.25 to IndyMac Bancorps Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2002). |
10.11*
|
|
Employment Agreement dated November 1, 2002 between IndyMac
Bank and Richard Wohl (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.26 to IndyMac Bancorps Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2002). |
10.12*
|
|
Form of Director Indemnification Agreement (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.27 to IndyMac Bancorps
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002). |
10.13*
|
|
Retirement Agreement dated February 10, 2003 between
IndyMac Bancorp and David S. Loeb (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.28 to IndyMac Bancorps Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2002). |
10.14*
|
|
IndyMac Bank Deferred Compensation Plan, Amended and Restated
Effective as of September 15, 2003, as amended
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to IndyMac
Bancorps Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2003). |
10.15*
|
|
Employment Agreement dated July 31, 2003 between IndyMac
Bank and Charles Allen Williams (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.5 to IndyMac Bancorps Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended September 30, 2003). |
10.16*
|
|
Employment Agreement dated September 15, 2003 between
IndyMac Bank and Sherry DuPont (incorporated by referenced to
Exhibit 10.2 to IndyMac Bancorps Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended September 30, 2003). |
10.17*
|
|
Employment Agreement dated September 29, 2003 between
IndyMac Bank and Ashwin Adarkar (incorporated by referenced to
Exhibit 10.1 to IndyMac Bancorps Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended September 30, 2003). |
10.18*
|
|
Agreement of Purchase and Sale and Joint Escrow Instructions
dated October 31, 2003 by and between MS Pasadena, LLC
(Seller) and IndyMac Bank (Buyer) for Pasadena Corporate Center,
3453, 3455, 3465, 3475 East Foothill Boulevard, Pasadena,
California (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.24 to
IndyMac Bancorps Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2003). |
10.19*
|
|
Employment Agreement dated March 15, 2004 between IndyMac
Bank and John DelPonti (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to IndyMac Bancorps Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended March 31, 2004). |
10.20*
|
|
IndyMac Bancorp, Inc. Amended Director Emeritus Plan effective
as of April 27, 2004 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to IndyMac Bancorps Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended June 30, 2004). |
10.21*
|
|
IndyMac Bancorp, Inc. Board Compensation Policy & Stock
Ownership Requirements (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to IndyMac Bancorps Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended September 30, 2004). |
10.22*
|
|
IndyMac Bancorp, Inc. Cash Incentive Award Program Under the
2002 Incentive Plan, As Amended and Restated (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.2 to IndyMac Bancorps
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004). |
98
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
No. |
|
Description |
|
|
|
10.23*
|
|
Summary of Terms of Stock Option Awards Granted to Executive
Officers (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to
IndyMac Bancorps Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2004). |
10.24
|
|
Employment Agreement dated July 31, 2004 between IndyMac
Bank and R. Patterson Jackson. |
21.1
|
|
List of Subsidiaries. |
23.1
|
|
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. |
31.1
|
|
Chief Executive Officers Certification pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
31.2
|
|
Chief Financial Officers Certification pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
32.1
|
|
Chief Executive Officers Certification pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
32.2
|
|
Chief Financial Officers Certification pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
99.1
|
|
Reports on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting |
|
|
* |
Incorporated by reference. |
99
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Pasadena, State of
California, on March 1, 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
Michael W. Perry |
|
Chief Executive Officer |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, this report has been signed by the following persons on
behalf of the Registrant in the capacities and on the dates
indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature |
|
Title |
|
Date |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Michael W. Perry
Michael
W. Perry |
|
Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive
Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
March 1, 2005 |
|
/s/ Scott Keys
Scott
Keys |
|
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
|
March 1, 2005 |
|
/s/ Louis E. Caldera
Louis
E. Caldera |
|
Director |
|
March 1, 2005 |
|
/s/ Lyle E. Gramley
Lyle
E. Gramley |
|
Director |
|
March 1, 2005 |
|
/s/ Hugh M. Grant
Hugh
M. Grant |
|
Director |
|
March 1, 2005 |
|
/s/ Patrick C. Haden
Patrick
C. Haden |
|
Director |
|
March 1, 2005 |
|
/s/ Terrance G. Hodel
Terrance
G. Hodel |
|
Director |
|
March 1, 2005 |
|
/s/ Robert L.
Hunt II
Robert
L. Hunt II |
|
Director |
|
March 1, 2005 |
|
/s/ Senator John Seymour
(ret.)
Senator
John Seymour (ret.) |
|
Director |
|
March 1, 2005 |
|
/s/ James R. Ukropina
James
R. Ukropina |
|
Director |
|
March 1, 2005 |
100
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
INDYMAC BANCORP, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
F-1
INDYMAC BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page | |
|
|
| |
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
|
|
F-3 |
|
Financial Statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
|
|
F-4 |
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Earnings
|
|
|
F-6 |
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders Equity and
Comprehensive Income
|
|
|
F-7 |
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
|
|
|
F-8 |
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
|
F-9 |
|
F-2
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Board of Directors and Shareholders
IndyMac Bancorp, Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
IndyMac Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) as of
December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated
statements of earnings, shareholders equity and
comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the three years
in the period ended December 31, 2004. These financial
statements are the responsibility of the Companys
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above
present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated
financial position of IndyMac Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiaries at
December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the consolidated results of
their operations and their cash flows for each of the three
years in the period ended December 31, 2004, in conformity
with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial
statements, effective April 1, 2004 the Company changed its
method of valuing interest rate lock commitments accounted for
as derivative instruments under Staff Accounting
Bulletin No. 105, Application of Accounting
Principles to Loan Commitments issued by the
Securities and Exchange Commission.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
effectiveness of IndyMac Bancorp, Inc.s internal control
over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, based on
criteria established in Internal Control Integrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of
the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 23,
2005 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
Los Angeles, California
February 23, 2005
F-3
INDYMAC BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Assets |
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
356,157 |
|
|
$ |
115,485 |
|
Securities classified as trading ($54.4 million and
$70.9 million pledged as collateral for borrowings at
December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively)
|
|
|
235,036 |
|
|
|
223,632 |
|
Securities classified as available for sale, amortized cost of
$3.5 billion and $1.6 billion at December 31,
2004 and 2003, respectively ($2.3 billion and
$1.5 billion pledged as collateral for borrowings at
December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively)
|
|
|
3,454,435 |
|
|
|
1,613,974 |
|
Loans receivable:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans held for sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prime
|
|
|
3,491,064 |
|
|
|
2,196,488 |
|
|
|
Subprime
|
|
|
563,274 |
|
|
|
295,008 |
|
|
|
HELOC
|
|
|
358,410 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer lot loans
|
|
|
32,824 |
|
|
|
81,752 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans held for sale
|
|
|
4,445,572 |
|
|
|
2,573,248 |
|
|
Loans held for investment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SFR mortgage
|
|
|
4,458,784 |
|
|
|
4,945,439 |
|
|
|
Consumer construction
|
|
|
1,443,450 |
|
|
|
1,145,526 |
|
|
|
Builder construction
|
|
|
643,116 |
|
|
|
484,397 |
|
|
|
HELOC
|
|
|
45,932 |
|
|
|
711,494 |
|
|
|
Land and other mortgage
|
|
|
158,471 |
|
|
|
162,329 |
|
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
(52,891 |
) |
|
|
(52,645 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans held for investment
|
|
|
6,696,862 |
|
|
|
7,396,540 |
|
|
|
Total loans receivable ($8.1 billion and $7.6 billion
pledged as collateral for borrowings at December 31, 2004
and 2003, respectively)
|
|
|
11,142,434 |
|
|
|
9,969,788 |
|
Mortgage servicing rights
|
|
|
640,794 |
|
|
|
443,688 |
|
Investment in Federal Home Loan Bank stock
|
|
|
390,716 |
|
|
|
313,284 |
|
Interest receivable
|
|
|
78,827 |
|
|
|
51,758 |
|
Goodwill and other intangible assets
|
|
|
81,445 |
|
|
|
33,697 |
|
Foreclosed assets
|
|
|
19,161 |
|
|
|
23,677 |
|
Other assets
|
|
|
426,639 |
|
|
|
451,408 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
16,825,644 |
|
|
$ |
13,240,391 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Liabilities and Shareholders Equity |
Deposits
|
|
$ |
5,743,479 |
|
|
$ |
4,350,773 |
|
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank
|
|
|
6,162,000 |
|
|
|
4,934,911 |
|
Other borrowings
|
|
|
3,162,241 |
|
|
|
2,622,094 |
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
493,953 |
|
|
|
315,182 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
15,561,673 |
|
|
|
12,222,960 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock authorized, 10,000,000 shares
of $0.01 par value; none issued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock authorized, 200,000,000 shares of
$0.01 par value; issued 91,168,915 shares (61,995,480
outstanding) at December 31, 2004, and issued
85,914,552 shares (56,760,375 outstanding) at
December 31, 2003
|
|
|
912 |
|
|
|
859 |
|
|
Additional paid-in-capital
|
|
|
1,186,682 |
|
|
|
1,043,856 |
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(20,304 |
) |
|
|
(26,454 |
) |
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
616,516 |
|
|
|
518,408 |
|
|
Treasury stock, 29,173,435 shares and
29,154,177 shares at December 31, 2004 and 2003,
respectively
|
|
|
(519,835 |
) |
|
|
(519,238 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
1,263,971 |
|
|
|
1,017,431 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
$ |
16,825,644 |
|
|
$ |
13,240,391 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
F-5
INDYMAC BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, | |
|
|
except per share data) | |
Interest income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed and other securities
|
|
$ |
143,351 |
|
|
$ |
83,903 |
|
|
$ |
112,065 |
|
Loans held for sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prime
|
|
|
212,711 |
|
|
|
180,630 |
|
|
|
127,571 |
|
|
Subprime
|
|
|
40,841 |
|
|
|
26,009 |
|
|
|
12,416 |
|
|
HELOC
|
|
|
14,298 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,929 |
|
|
Consumer lot loans
|
|
|
9,644 |
|
|
|
7,699 |
|
|
|
1,582 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans held for sale
|
|
|
277,494 |
|
|
|
214,338 |
|
|
|
148,498 |
|
Loans held for investment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SFR mortgage
|
|
|
201,722 |
|
|
|
140,588 |
|
|
|
89,864 |
|
|
Consumer construction
|
|
|
70,288 |
|
|
|
60,392 |
|
|
|
55,660 |
|
|
Builder construction
|
|
|
36,427 |
|
|
|
33,321 |
|
|
|
37,501 |
|
|
HELOC
|
|
|
11,951 |
|
|
|
21,885 |
|
|
|
3,124 |
|
|
Land and other mortgage
|
|
|
12,289 |
|
|
|
11,610 |
|
|
|
23,687 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans held for investment
|
|
|
332,677 |
|
|
|
267,796 |
|
|
|
209,836 |
|
Other
|
|
|
14,086 |
|
|
|
9,804 |
|
|
|
6,705 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income
|
|
|
767,608 |
|
|
|
575,841 |
|
|
|
477,104 |
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
103,612 |
|
|
|
87,828 |
|
|
|
105,188 |
|
|
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank
|
|
|
145,925 |
|
|
|
113,032 |
|
|
|
101,647 |
|
|
Other borrowings
|
|
|
113,009 |
|
|
|
64,044 |
|
|
|
60,981 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense
|
|
|
362,546 |
|
|
|
264,904 |
|
|
|
267,816 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
405,062 |
|
|
|
310,937 |
|
|
|
209,288 |
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
8,170 |
|
|
|
19,700 |
|
|
|
16,154 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income after provision for loan losses
|
|
|
396,892 |
|
|
|
291,237 |
|
|
|
193,134 |
|
Other income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale of loans
|
|
|
363,813 |
|
|
|
387,311 |
|
|
|
300,800 |
|
|
Service fee (loss) income
|
|
|
(12,453 |
) |
|
|
(16,081 |
) |
|
|
19,197 |
|
|
(Loss) gain on mortgage-backed securities, net
|
|
|
(23,804 |
) |
|
|
(30,853 |
) |
|
|
4,439 |
|
|
Fee and other income
|
|
|
79,926 |
|
|
|
76,525 |
|
|
|
57,736 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income
|
|
|
407,482 |
|
|
|
416,902 |
|
|
|
382,172 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
|
804,374 |
|
|
|
708,139 |
|
|
|
575,306 |
|
Other expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
521,377 |
|
|
|
424,605 |
|
|
|
344,058 |
|
|
Amortization of other intangible assets
|
|
|
701 |
|
|
|
852 |
|
|
|
1,088 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other expense
|
|
|
522,078 |
|
|
|
425,457 |
|
|
|
345,146 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before provision for income taxes and minority interests
|
|
|
282,296 |
|
|
|
282,682 |
|
|
|
230,160 |
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
111,507 |
|
|
|
111,379 |
|
|
|
86,767 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings before minority interest
|
|
|
170,789 |
|
|
|
171,303 |
|
|
|
143,393 |
|
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
(267 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
$ |
170,522 |
|
|
$ |
171,303 |
|
|
$ |
143,393 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$ |
2.87 |
|
|
$ |
3.10 |
|
|
$ |
2.47 |
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$ |
2.74 |
|
|
$ |
3.01 |
|
|
$ |
2.41 |
|
Weighted-average shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
59,513 |
|
|
|
55,247 |
|
|
|
58,028 |
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
62,152 |
|
|
|
56,926 |
|
|
|
59,592 |
|
Dividends declared per share
|
|
$ |
1.21 |
|
|
$ |
0.55 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
F-6
INDYMAC BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY AND
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional | |
|
Comprehensive | |
|
|
|
Total | |
|
|
|
Total | |
|
|
Shares | |
|
Common | |
|
Paid-In- | |
|
Income | |
|
Retained | |
|
Comprehensive | |
|
Treasury | |
|
Shareholders | |
|
|
Outstanding | |
|
Stock | |
|
Capital | |
|
(Loss) | |
|
Earnings | |
|
Income | |
|
Stock | |
|
Equity | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Balance at December 31, 2001
|
|
|
60,366,266 |
|
|
$ |
833 |
|
|
$ |
996,649 |
|
|
$ |
570 |
|
|
$ |
234,314 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(387,228 |
) |
|
$ |
845,138 |
|
Common stock options exercised
|
|
|
617,243 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
9,803 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,810 |
|
Net directors and officers notes receivable payments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(168 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(168 |
) |
Deferred compensation, restricted stock
|
|
|
28,447 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,619 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,619 |
|
Net gain on mortgage securities available for sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
476 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
476 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
476 |
|
Net unrealized loss on derivatives used in cash flow hedges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18,793 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18,793 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18,793 |
) |
Purchases of common stock
|
|
|
(6,183,811 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(131,543 |
) |
|
|
(131,543 |
) |
Dividend reinvestment plan
|
|
|
1,341 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33 |
|
Net earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
143,393 |
|
|
|
143,393 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
143,393 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
125,076 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2002
|
|
|
54,829,486 |
|
|
|
840 |
|
|
|
1,007,936 |
|
|
|
(17,747 |
) |
|
|
377,707 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(518,771 |
) |
|
|
849,965 |
|
Common stock options exercised
|
|
|
1,740,786 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
33,114 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,133 |
|
Net directors and officers notes receivable payments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
502 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
502 |
|
Deferred compensation, restricted stock
|
|
|
214,219 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,304 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,304 |
|
Net loss on mortgage securities available for sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,414 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,414 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,414 |
) |
Net unrealized loss on derivatives used in cash flow hedges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,293 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,293 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,293 |
) |
Purchases of common stock
|
|
|
(24,116 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(467 |
) |
|
|
(467 |
) |
Cash dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30,602 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30,602 |
) |
Net earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
171,303 |
|
|
|
171,303 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
171,303 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
162,596 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2003
|
|
|
56,760,375 |
|
|
|
859 |
|
|
|
1,043,856 |
|
|
|
(26,454 |
) |
|
|
518,408 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(519,238 |
) |
|
|
1,017,431 |
|
Common stock issued
|
|
|
3,330,000 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
100,138 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,171 |
|
Common stock options exercised
|
|
|
1,798,215 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
39,796 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,816 |
|
Net directors and officers notes receivable payments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65 |
|
Deferred compensation, restricted stock
|
|
|
126,148 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,827 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,827 |
|
Net loss on mortgage securities available for sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,243 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,243 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,243 |
) |
Net unrealized gain on derivatives used in cash flow hedges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,393 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,393 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,393 |
|
Purchases of common stock
|
|
|
(19,258 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(597 |
) |
|
|
(597 |
) |
Cash dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(72,414 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(72,414 |
) |
Net earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
170,522 |
|
|
|
170,522 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
170,522 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
176,672 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2004
|
|
|
61,995,480 |
|
|
$ |
912 |
|
|
$ |
1,186,682 |
|
|
$ |
(20,304 |
) |
|
$ |
616,516 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(519,835 |
) |
|
$ |
1,263,971 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
F-7
INDYMAC BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
$ |
170,522 |
|
|
$ |
171,303 |
|
|
$ |
143,393 |
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by
(used in) operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total amortization and depreciation
|
|
|
225,272 |
|
|
|
186,801 |
|
|
|
139,850 |
|
|
|
Provision for valuation adjustment of mortgage servicing rights
|
|
|
40,666 |
|
|
|
5,543 |
|
|
|
107,387 |
|
|
|
Gain on sale of loans
|
|
|
(363,813 |
) |
|
|
(387,311 |
) |
|
|
(300,800 |
) |
|
|
Loss (gain) on mortgage-backed securities, net
|
|
|
23,804 |
|
|
|
30,853 |
|
|
|
(4,439 |
) |
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
8,170 |
|
|
|
19,700 |
|
|
|
16,154 |
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in deferred tax liability
|
|
|
40,011 |
|
|
|
57,942 |
|
|
|
(6,953 |
) |
|
|
Net decrease (increase) in mortgage servicing rights
|
|
|
69,382 |
|
|
|
7,527 |
|
|
|
(376 |
) |
|
|
Net decrease (increase) in other assets and liabilities
|
|
|
230,542 |
|
|
|
(5,470 |
) |
|
|
(56,041 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities before activity for
trading securities and loans held for sale
|
|
|
444,556 |
|
|
|
86,888 |
|
|
|
38,175 |
|
|
Net sales (purchases) of trading securities
|
|
|
100,687 |
|
|
|
597,848 |
|
|
|
(227,708 |
) |
|
Net purchases of loans held for sale
|
|
|
(5,677,096 |
) |
|
|
(3,031,498 |
) |
|
|
(723,617 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) operating activities
|
|
|
(5,131,853 |
) |
|
|
(2,346,762 |
) |
|
|
(913,150 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sale (purchases) of and payments from loans held for
investment
|
|
|
2,655,524 |
|
|
|
(861,473 |
) |
|
|
(529,004 |
) |
|
Net purchases of mortgage-backed securities available for sale
|
|
|
(211,137 |
) |
|
|
(43,774 |
) |
|
|
(361,476 |
) |
|
Net increase in investment in Federal Home Loan Bank stock,
at cost
|
|
|
(77,432 |
) |
|
|
(157,841 |
) |
|
|
(55,447 |
) |
|
Net purchases of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
(59,140 |
) |
|
|
(102,600 |
) |
|
|
(37,425 |
) |
|
Purchase of Financial Freedom, net of cash received
|
|
|
(82,152 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
2,225,663 |
|
|
|
(1,165,688 |
) |
|
|
(983,352 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in deposits
|
|
|
1,392,706 |
|
|
|
1,210,271 |
|
|
|
(98,368 |
) |
|
Net increase in advances from Federal Home Loan Bank
|
|
|
1,227,000 |
|
|
|
2,212,914 |
|
|
|
722,170 |
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in borrowings
|
|
|
430,114 |
|
|
|
(53,498 |
) |
|
|
1,436,374 |
|
|
Net proceeds from issuance of common stock
|
|
|
100,171 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net proceeds from issuance of trust preferred debentures
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
58,962 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net proceeds from stock options and notes receivable
|
|
|
39,882 |
|
|
|
33,635 |
|
|
|
11,294 |
|
|
Cash dividends paid
|
|
|
(72,414 |
) |
|
|
(30,602 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of common stock
|
|
|
(597 |
) |
|
|
(467 |
) |
|
|
(131,543 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
3,146,862 |
|
|
|
3,431,215 |
|
|
|
1,939,927 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
240,672 |
|
|
|
(81,235 |
) |
|
|
43,425 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
|
|
|
115,485 |
|
|
|
196,720 |
|
|
|
153,295 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
|
|
$ |
356,157 |
|
|
$ |
115,485 |
|
|
$ |
196,720 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental cash flow information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest
|
|
$ |
329,746 |
|
|
$ |
262,518 |
|
|
$ |
268,842 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for income taxes
|
|
$ |
35,865 |
|
|
$ |
42,362 |
|
|
$ |
57,595 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing and financing
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net transfer of loans held for sale to loans held for investment
|
|
$ |
2,897,097 |
|
|
$ |
2,794,344 |
|
|
$ |
473,959 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recharacterization of loans to mortgage-backed securities
available for sale
|
|
$ |
1,419,400 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net transfer of mortgage-backed securities available for sale to
trading
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
219,749 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net transfer of mortgage servicing rights to trading securities
|
|
$ |
5,362 |
|
|
$ |
47,311 |
|
|
$ |
75,371 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
F-8
INDYMAC BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
NOTE 1 |
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES |
IndyMac Bancorp, Inc. is a savings and loan holding company.
References to IndyMac Bancorp or the Parent
Company refer to the parent company alone while references
to IndyMac, the Company, we
or us refer to IndyMac Bancorp and its consolidated
subsidiaries.
On July 16, 2004, the Company acquired 93.75% of the
outstanding common stock of Financial Freedom Holdings Inc.
(FFHI) and related assets from Lehman Brothers Bank,
F.S.B. and its affiliates for an aggregate cash purchase price
of $84.6 million. Subsequent to the acquisition, FFHI
merged into its wholly owned subsidiary, Financial Freedom
Senior Funding Corporation (FFSFC) in November 2004,
with FFSFC as the surviving entity. As a result of the merger of
FFHI and FFSFC, the Company now owns 93.75% of the outstanding
common stock of FFSFC, with the remaining 6.25% ownership held
by its chief executive officer (FFHI and FFSFC are referred to
collectively as Financial Freedom herein).
The acquisition of Financial Freedom has been accounted for
using the purchase method of accounting and accordingly, the
results of operations of Financial Freedom since the acquisition
date have been included in the consolidated financial statements
of the Company. Financial Freedom is now operating as a
majority-owned subsidiary of IndyMac Bank.
New Accounting Pronouncements
During 2004, several new accounting pronouncements related to
our industry were issued by the Securities Exchange Commission
(SEC), the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB), and the American Institute of Certified
Public Accountants (AICPA).
On March 9, 2004, the SEC issued Staff Accounting
Bulletin No. 105, Application of Accounting
Principles to Loan Commitments, which provides
guidance regarding loan commitments that are accounted for as
derivative instruments. In this Bulletin, the SEC determined
that the expected future cash flows related to the associated
servicing of a loan should not be incorporated into the
measurement of a loan commitment derivatives fair value.
As a result, loan commitments should generally have a fair value
of zero at inception. The rate locks will continue to be
adjusted for changes in value resulting from changes in market
interest rates. The Company adopted this new standard
prospectively effective April 1, 2004. Under the new
accounting guidance, the Company no longer recognizes any
revenue at the inception of the rate lock. Initial value
inherent in the rate lock at origination is recognized at the
time of the sale of the underlying loans.
In December 2004, the FASB issued Statement No. 123
(revised 2004), Share-Based Payment
(SFAS No. 123(R)), which requires the cost
resulting from stock options be measured at fair value and
recognized in earnings. This Statement replaces Statement
No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation and supersedes Accounting Principles
Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued
to Employees, which permitted the recognition of
compensation expense using the intrinsic value method.
SFAS No. 123(R) will be effective July 1,
2005. We estimate that the impact of adoption of
SFAS No. 123(R) will approximate the impact of the
adjustments made to determine pro forma net income and pro forma
earnings per share under Statement No. 123. The Company
plans to adopt SFAS No. 123(R) on July 1, 2005
using the modified-retrospective method, revising all prior
periods.
AICPA Statement of Position 03-3, Accounting for
Certain Loans or Debt Securities Acquired in a Transfer
(SOP 03-3), addresses the accounting for
differences between contractual cash flows and expected cash
flows related to purchased debt securities and loans held for
investment, if those differences are attributable, at least in
part, to credit quality. The Company adopted SOP 03-3 on
January 1, 2005 and there was no cumulative adjustments
required.
F-9
INDYMAC BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
In addition, the EITF reached consensus on each of the following
issues:
|
|
|
|
|
EITF 02-14, Whether an Investor Should Apply the
Equity Method of Accounting to Investments Other Than Common
Stock |
|
|
|
EITF 04-10, Applying Paragraph 19 of FASB
Statement No. 131, Disclosures about Segments of an
Enterprise and Related Information in Determining Whether to
Aggregate Operating Segments That Do Not Meet The Quantitative
Thresholds |
These pronouncements did not have a material impact on our
consolidated financial statements in 2004. We are currently not
involved in any transactions that would result in a material
impact from these new accounting pronouncements on our future
results of operations, financial position, or liquidity.
Financial Statement Presentation
For the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 the
consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
IndyMac Bancorp and all of its wholly-owned and majority-owned
subsidiaries, including IndyMac Bank. All significant
intercompany balances and transactions with IndyMacs
consolidating subsidiaries have been eliminated in
consolidation. Minority interests in the IndyMacs
majority-owned subsidiary are included in other
liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets and the
minority interests on IndyMacs earnings are reported
separately. The consolidated financial statements of IndyMac are
prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America
(U.S. GAAP). Certain prior year amounts have
been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
U.S. GAAP requires us to make estimates and assumptions
that affect the amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and
expenses reported and the disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities. Significant estimates include the allowance for
loan losses, the secondary market reserve and the value of our
hedging instruments, mortgage servicing rights
(MSRs), AAA-rated interest-only securities,
non-investment grade securities and residuals for which active
markets do not exist. Actual results may differ significantly
from those estimates and assumptions.
Derivative Instruments
In seeking to protect our financial assets and liabilities from
the effects of changes in market interest rates, we have devised
and implemented a comprehensive asset/liability management
strategy that seeks, on an economic and accounting basis, to
mitigate significant fluctuations in our financial position and
results of operations. We invest in MSRs and AAA-rated and
agency interest-only securities to generate core fee and
interest income. The value of these instruments and the income
they provide tends to be somewhat counter-cyclical to the
changes in production volumes and gain on sale of loans that
result from changes in interest rates. With regard to the
pipeline of mortgage loans held for sale, in general, we hedge
these assets with forward commitments to sell Fannie Mae
(FNMA) or Freddie Mac (FHLMC) securities
with comparable maturities and weighted-average interest rates.
Also, we use futures or options in our pipeline hedging. To
hedge our investments in AAA-rated and agency interest-only
securities and MSRs, we use several strategies, including buying
and/or selling mortgage-backed or U.S. Treasury securities,
futures, floors, swaps, or options, depending on several
factors. Lastly, we enter into swap and swaption agreements to
hedge the cash flows on advances or borrowings that are
collateralized by our mortgage loans held for investment and
mortgage-backed securities (MBS).
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS)
No. 133, Accounting For Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities, as amended and interpreted
(SFAS 133) requires that we recognize all
F-10
INDYMAC BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
derivative instruments on the balance sheet at fair value. If
certain conditions are met, hedge accounting may be applied and
the derivative instrument may be specifically designated as:
|
|
|
(a) a hedge of the exposure to changes in the fair value of
a recognized asset or liability or unrecognized firm commitment,
referred to as a fair value hedge, or |
|
|
(b) a hedge of the exposure to the variability of cash
flows of a recognized asset, liability or forecasted
transaction, referred to as a cash flow hedge. |
In the case of a qualifying fair value hedge, changes in the
value of the derivative instruments that are highly effective
(as defined in SFAS 133) are recognized in current earnings
along with the change in value of the designated hedged item. In
the case of a qualifying cash flow hedge, changes in the value
of the derivative instruments that are highly effective are
recognized in accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income
(OCI), until the hedged item is recognized in
earnings. The ineffective portion of a derivatives change
in fair value is recognized through earnings. Upon the
occasional termination of a cash flow hedge, the remaining cost
of that hedge is amortized over the remaining life of the hedged
item in proportion to the change in the hedged forecasted
transaction. We have derivatives in place to hedge the exposure
to the variability in future cash flows for forecasted
transactions through 2024. Derivatives that are non-designated
hedges, as defined in SFAS 133, are adjusted to fair value
through earnings. We formally document all qualifying hedge
relationships, as well as our risk management objective and
strategy for undertaking each hedge transaction. We are not a
party to any foreign currency hedge relationships.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents include non-restricted cash on deposit
and overnight investments.
Mortgage-Backed and Agency Notes
MBS and agency notes consist of AAA-rated senior securities,
investment and non-investment grade securities, AAA-rated
interest-only and principal-only securities, prepayment penalty
securities, residual securities, and agency notes. AAA-rated
interest-only securities, prepayment penalty securities, and
residual securities, as well as the securities that the Company
considers as hedges of its AAA-rated interest-only securities,
residual securities and MSRs, are carried as trading securities.
All other MBS are classified as available for sale. All
securities are carried at fair value, which is estimated based
on market quotes, when available, or on discounted cash flow
techniques using assumptions for prepayment rates, market yield
requirements and credit losses when market quotes are not
available. We estimate future prepayment rates based upon
current and expected future interest rate levels, collateral
seasoning and market forecasts, as well as relevant
characteristics of the collateral underlying the assets, such as
loan types, prepayment penalties, interest rates and recent
prepayment experience. These assumptions are estimates as of a
specific point in time and will change as interest rates or
economic conditions change. Premiums or discounts on securities
available for sale are amortized or accreted into income using
the effective interest method.
Securities classified as trading are carried at fair value with
changes in fair value being recorded through current earnings.
Accordingly, the hedge accounting provisions of SFAS 133
are not required. Unrealized gains and losses resulting from
fair value adjustments on investment and MBS available for sale
are excluded from earnings and reported as a separate component
of OCI, net of taxes, in shareholders equity. If we
determine a decline in fair value of an available for sale
security is other than temporary, an impairment write down is
recognized in current earnings. Realized gains and losses are
calculated using the specific identification method.
F-11
INDYMAC BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Loans Held for Sale
Loans held for sale consist primarily of residential mortgage
loans, which are secured by one-to-four family residential real
estate located throughout the United States. We originate and
purchase mortgage loans generally with the intent to sell them
in the secondary market. Loans held for sale are carried at the
lower of aggregate cost, net of purchase discounts or premiums,
deferred fees, deferred origination costs and effects of hedge
accounting, or fair value. We determine the fair value of loans
held for sale using current secondary market prices for loans
with similar coupons, maturities and credit quality. As
discussed earlier, the Company adopted SAB No. 105 on
April 1, 2004. The Company no longer recognizes any revenue
at the inception of a rate lock commitment, and thus excludes
the day one value on rate lock commitments from the fair value
of loans held for sale. Initial value inherent in the rate lock
commitments at origination is recognized at the time of the sale
of the underlying loans.
The fair value of mortgage loans is subject to change primarily
due to changes in market interest rates. Under our risk
management policy, we hedge the changes in fair value of our
loans held for sale primarily by selling forward contracts on
agency securities. We formally designate and document certain of
these hedging relationships as fair value hedges and record the
changes in the fair value of hedged loans held for sale as an
adjustment to the carrying basis of the loan through gain on
sale of loans in current earnings. We record the related hedging
instruments at fair value with changes in fair value being
recorded also in gain on sale of loans in current earnings. The
non-designated pipeline hedges are recorded at fair value in
gain on sale of loans in current earnings.
As part of our mortgage banking operations, we enter into
commitments to purchase or originate loans whereby the interest
rate on the loans is determined prior to funding (rate
lock commitments). We report rate lock commitments on
loans we intend to sell as derivatives as defined in
SFAS 133 and determine the fair value of rate lock
commitments using current secondary market prices for underlying
loans with similar coupons, maturity and credit quality, subject
to the anticipated loan funding probability, or fallout factor.
Similar to loans held for sale, the fair value of rate lock
commitments is subject to change primarily due to changes in
interest rates. In addition, the value of rate lock commitments
is affected by changes in the anticipated loan funding
probability or fallout factor. Under our risk management policy,
we hedge these changes in fair value primarily by selling
forward contracts on agency securities. Both the rate lock
commitments and the related hedging instruments are recorded at
fair value with changes in fair value being recorded in current
earnings in gain on sale of loans.
Our recognition of gain or loss on the sale of loans is
accounted for in accordance with SFAS 140,
Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial
Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities.
SFAS 140 requires that a transfer of financial assets
in which we surrender control over the assets be accounted for
as a sale to the extent that consideration other than beneficial
interests in the transferred assets is received in exchange. The
carrying value of the assets sold is allocated between the
assets sold and the retained interests based on their relative
fair values.
SFAS 140 requires, for certain transactions completed after
the initial adoption date, a true sale analysis of
the treatment of the transfer under state law as if the Company
was a debtor under the bankruptcy code. A true sale
legal analysis includes several legally relevant factors, such
as the nature and level of recourse to the transferor and the
nature of retained servicing rights. The analytical conclusion
as to a true sale is never absolute and
unconditional, but contains qualifications based on the inherent
equitable powers of a bankruptcy court, as well as the unsettled
state of the common law. Once the legal isolation test has been
met under SFAS 140, other factors concerning the nature and
extent of the transferors control over the transferred
assets are taken into account in order to determine whether
derecognition of assets is warranted, including whether the
special-purpose entity (SPE) has complied with rules
concerning qualifying special-purpose entities.
F-12
INDYMAC BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The Company is not eligible to become a debtor under the
bankruptcy code. Instead, the insolvency of the Company is
generally governed by the relevant provisions of the Federal
Deposit Insurance Act and the FDICs regulations. However,
the true sale legal analysis with respect to the
Company is similar to the true sale analysis that
would be done if the Company were subject to the bankruptcy code.
A legal opinion regarding legal isolation for each
securitization has been obtained by the Company. The true
sale opinion provides reasonable assurance the purchased
assets would not be characterized as the property of the
transferring Companys receivership or conservatorship
estate in the event of insolvency and also states the transferor
would not be required to substantively consolidate the assets
and liabilities of the purchaser SPE with those of the
transferor upon such event.
The securitization process involves the sale of the loans to one
of our wholly-owned bankruptcy remote special-purpose entities
which then sells the loans to a separate, transaction-specific
securitization trust in exchange for the considerations
generated by the sale of the MBS issued by the securitization
trust. The securitization trust issues and sells undivided
interests to third party investors that entitle the investors to
specified cash flows generated from the securitized loans. These
undivided interests are usually represented by certificates with
varying interest rates, and are secured by the payments on the
loans acquired by the trust, and commonly include senior and
subordinated classes. The senior class securities are usually
rated AAA by at least two of the major independent
rating agencies and have priority over the subordinated classes
in the receipt of payments. We have no obligation to provide
credit support to either the third party investors or the
securitization trusts. The third party investors or the
securitization trusts generally have no recourse to our assets
or us and have no ability to require us to repurchase their
securities other than through enforcement of the standard
representations and warranties. We do make certain
representations and warranties concerning the loans, such as
lien status or mortgage insurance coverage, and if we are found
to have breached a representation or warranty, we may be
required to repurchase the loan from the securitization trust.
We do not guarantee any securities issued by the securitization
trusts. The securitization trusts represent qualified
special-purpose entities, which meet the certain criteria
of SFAS 140, and are therefore not consolidated for
financial reporting purposes.
In addition to the cash we receive from the sale of MBS, we
often retain certain interests in the securitization trust.
These retained interests may include subordinated classes of
securities, MSRs, AAA-rated interest-only securities, residual
securities, cash reserve funds, securities associated with
prepayment charges on the underlying mortgage loans, or an over
collateralization account. Other than MSRs, AAA-rated
interest-only securities, and securities associated with
prepayment charges on the underlying mortgage loans, these
retained interests are subordinated and serve as credit
enhancement for the more senior securities issued by the
securitization trust. AAA-rated interest-only securities,
securities associated with prepayment charges on the underlying
mortgage loans, and non-HELOC residual interests retained are
included in securities classified as trading and other
subordinated securities retained and HELOC residuals are
included in MBS available for sale on the consolidated balance
sheets.
We usually retain the servicing function for the securitized
mortgage loans. As a servicer, we are entitled to receive a
servicing fee equal to a specified percentage of the outstanding
principal balance of the loans. We may also be entitled to
receive additional servicing compensation, such as late payment
fees or prepayment charges.
Transaction costs associated with the securitizations are
recognized as a component of the gain or loss at the time of
sale.
Loans Held for Investment
Loans are classified as held for investment based on
managements intent and ability to hold the loans for the
foreseeable future. Loans held for investment are recorded at
their unpaid principal balance, net of
F-13
INDYMAC BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
discounts and premiums, unamortized net deferred loan
origination costs and fees and allowance for loan losses.
Discounts, premiums, and net deferred loan origination costs and
fees are amortized to income over the contractual life of the
loan using the effective interest method.
Interest is recognized as revenue when earned according to the
terms of the loans and when, in the opinion of management, it is
collectible. Loans are evaluated for collectability and, if
appropriate, interest accrual is discontinued and previously
accrued interest is reversed.
Allowance for Loan Losses
We maintain an allowance for loan losses on loans held for
investment. Additions to the allowance are based on assessments
of certain factors, including but not limited to, estimated
probable losses on the loans, borrower credit quality,
delinquency, prior loan loss experience and general economic
conditions. Additions to the allowance are provided through a
charge to earnings. Specific valuation allowances may be
established for loans that are deemed impaired, if default by
the borrower is deemed probable, and if the fair value of the
loan or the collateral is estimated to be less than the gross
carrying value of the loan. Actual losses on loans are recorded
as a reduction to the allowance through charge-offs. Subsequent
recoveries of amounts previously charged off are credited to the
allowance.
We classify loans as impaired when, based upon current
information and events, it is probable that we will be unable to
collect all amounts due, both principal and interest, according
to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Loans are
generally placed on non-accrual status when they are
90 days past due and charged off upon foreclosure. Large
groups of smaller-balance homogeneous loans are collectively
evaluated for impairment. Impairment is measured based on the
present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the
loans effective interest rate, based on a loans
observable market price, or the fair value of the collateral if
the loan is collateral dependent. Specific factors used in the
impaired loan identification process include, but are not
limited to, delinquency status, loan-to-value ratio, the
condition of the underlying collateral, credit history, and debt
coverage. For impaired loans on non-accrual status, cash
receipts are applied, and interest income is recognized, on a
cash basis. For all other impaired loans, cash receipts are
applied to principal and interest in accordance with the
contractual terms of the loan and interest income is recognized
on the accrual basis. Generally, a loan may be returned to
accrual status when all delinquent principal and interest are
brought current in accordance with the terms of the loan
agreement and certain performance criteria have been met. The
estimated loss upon liquidation on all other loans held for
investment are charged off upon foreclosure.
Secondary Market Reserve
The Company maintains a secondary market reserve for losses that
arise in connection with loans that we are required to
repurchase from GSEs and whole loan sales. This reserve, which
totaled $35.6 million at December 31, 2004, has two
general components: reserves for repurchases arising from
representation and warranty claims, and reserves for disputes
with investors and vendors with respect to contractual
obligations pertaining to mortgage operations. Reserve levels
are a function of expected losses based on expected and actual
pending claims and repurchase requests, historical experience,
loan volume and loan sales distribution channels and the
assessment of probability related to such claims. While the
ultimate amount of repurchases and claims is uncertain,
management believes that the reserves are adequate. We will
continue to evaluate the adequacy of our reserves and may
continue to allocate a portion of our gain on sale proceeds to
these reserves going forward. Changes in the level of provision
to this reserve impacts the overall gain on sale margin from
quarter to quarter. The reserve is included in other liabilities
in the consolidated balance sheets.
F-14
INDYMAC BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Mortgage Servicing Rights
We retain MSRs in connection with our mortgage banking
operations. Under primary servicing agreements, we collect
monthly principal, interest and escrow payments from individual
mortgagors and perform certain accounting and reporting
functions on behalf of the mortgage investors. Under master
servicing agreements, we collect monthly payments from various
sub-servicers and perform certain accounting and reporting
functions on behalf of the mortgage investors.
We recognize MSRs as separate assets only when servicing is
contractually separated from the underlying mortgage loans by
sale or securitization of the loans with servicing retained or
by separate purchase or assumption of the servicing. The
carrying value of mortgage loans sold or securitized is
allocated between loans and mortgage servicing rights based upon
the relative fair values of each. Purchased MSRs are initially
recorded at cost. All MSRs were subsequently carried at the
lower of the initial carrying value, adjusted for amortization,
or fair value prior to January 1, 2004. On January 1,
2004, we started to designate fair value hedges on certain
tranches of MSRs. The changes in the fair value of the
designated MSRs, and the fair value of the designated hedges,
are recorded through income, if the hedging relationships are
proven to be effective under the provisions of
SFAS No. 133. MSRs are amortized over the period of,
and in proportion to, the estimated future net servicing income.
Because a limited and illiquid market exists for MSRs, we
determine the fair value of our MSRs using discounted cash flow
techniques. Using models primarily purchased from third parties,
we determine the fair value of recognized MSRs by estimating the
present value of anticipated future net cash flows. Estimates of
fair value involve several assumptions, including the key
valuation assumptions about market expectations of future
prepayment rates, interest rates and discount rates, which are
subject to change over time. Changes in these underlying
assumptions could cause the fair value of MSRs to change
significantly in the future. For purposes of impairment
evaluation and measurement, we stratify our MSRs based on
predominant risk characteristics, underlying loan type, interest
rate type, and interest rate level. To the extent that the
carrying value of MSRs exceeds fair value by individual strata,
a valuation reserve is recorded as a charge to service fee
income in current earnings. Valuation reserves for each stratum
are then adjusted in subsequent periods to reflect changes in
the measurement of impairment. Quarterly, we obtain third party
opinions of value to test the reasonableness of our valuation
models.
Foreclosed Assets
Real estate acquired in settlement of loans is initially
recorded at fair value of the underlying property less estimated
costs to sell through a charge to the allowance for loan losses.
Subsequent operating activity and declines in value are charged
to earnings.
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
Goodwill, representing the excess of purchase price over the
fair value of net assets acquired, resulted from acquisitions we
have made. The core deposit intangible asset is being amortized
using an accelerated method of amortization over a period of
10 years, which is the estimated life of the deposits
acquired. The goodwill is not amortized, and we review our
goodwill and other intangible assets for other-than-temporary
impairment at least annually. If circumstances indicate that
other-than-temporary impairment might exist, recoverability of
the asset is assessed based on expected undiscounted net cash
flows.
Fixed Assets
Fixed assets are included in other assets in the consolidated
balance sheets at December 31, 2004 and 2003. Fixed assets
are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation and
amortization. Depreciation is provided using the straight-line
method in amounts sufficient to relate the cost of depreciable
assets to current earnings
F-15
INDYMAC BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
over their estimated service lives. Estimated service lives of
furniture and equipment generally range from three to seven
years and 20 to 40 years for buildings. Leasehold
improvements are amortized using the straight-line method over
the lesser of the life of the lease or the service lives of the
improvements.
Software Development
We capitalize external direct costs of materials and services
consumed in developing or obtaining internal-use computer
software and direct salary and benefit costs relating to the
respective employees time spent on the software project
during the application development stage. The estimated service
lives for capitalized software generally range from three to
seven years.
Income Taxes
Deferred income taxes in the accompanying consolidated financial
statements are computed using the liability method. Under this
method, deferred income taxes are provided for differences
between the book and tax basis of our assets and liabilities.
Stock-Based Compensation
Our stock-based compensation is provided to employees in
accordance with the 2000 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended, and
the 2002 Incentive Plan, as amended and restated, which allow
for the grant of various types of awards (the
Awards) including, but not limited to, non-qualified
stock options, incentive stock options, restricted stock awards,
performance stock awards, and stock bonuses to our employees,
including officers and directors. Awards are granted at the
average market price of our stock on the grant date.
As permitted by SFAS 123, Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation (SFAS 123),
we continued to recognize compensation expense using the
intrinsic value method specified in Accounting Principles Board
Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to
Employees (APB 25) in 2004.
Had compensation expense been recorded in accordance with
SFAS 123, our net after tax earnings and earnings per share
would have been as follows for the years ended December 31,
2004, 2003 and 2002:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, | |
|
|
except per share data) | |
Net Earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As reported
|
|
$ |
170,522 |
|
|
$ |
171,303 |
|
|
$ |
143,393 |
|
|
|
Stock-based employee compensation expense
|
|
|
(11,326 |
) |
|
|
(16,319 |
) |
|
|
(38,360 |
) |
|
|
Tax effect
|
|
|
4,474 |
|
|
|
6,446 |
|
|
|
15,152 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted
|
|
$ |
163,670 |
|
|
$ |
161,430 |
|
|
$ |
120,185 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic Earnings Per Share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As reported
|
|
$ |
2.87 |
|
|
$ |
3.10 |
|
|
$ |
2.47 |
|
|
Adjusted
|
|
$ |
2.75 |
|
|
$ |
2.92 |
|
|
$ |
2.07 |
|
Diluted Earnings Per Share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As reported
|
|
$ |
2.74 |
|
|
$ |
3.01 |
|
|
$ |
2.41 |
|
|
Adjusted
|
|
$ |
2.63 |
|
|
$ |
2.84 |
|
|
$ |
2.02 |
|
In addition, during the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003
and 2002, we recognized compensation expense of
$2.8 million ($1.7 million, net of taxes),
$2.3 million ($1.4 million, net of taxes) and
$1.6 million
F-16
INDYMAC BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
($980,000, net of taxes), respectively, related to restricted
stock awards. These expenses were included in net earnings as
reported.
The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of
grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The
following weighted-average assumptions were used for grants in
2004, 2003 and 2002: dividend yield ranging from 0% to 4.2%;
expected volatility ranging from 28.2% to 39.6%; risk-free
interest rates ranging from 3.2% to 5.4%, and expected lives for
options granted ranged from three to five years for each of the
three years ended December 31, 2004. The weighted-average
fair value of options granted during 2004, 2003 and 2002 was
$8.35, $6.11 and $7.82 per share, respectively.
NOTE 2 BUSINESS COMBINATION
On July 16, 2004, the Company acquired 93.75% of the
outstanding common stock of FFHI and related assets from Lehman
Brothers Bank, F.S.B and its affiliates for an aggregate cash
purchase price of $84.6 million. The transaction has been
accounted for using the purchase method of accounting and
accordingly, the results of operations of Financial Freedom
since the acquisition date have been included in the
consolidated financial statements of the Company. In accordance
with SFAS 141, Business Combinations, the
Company allocated the purchase price of the acquisition to the
tangible assets, liabilities and intangible assets acquired
based on their estimated fair values. The acquisition increased
loans held for sale by $70.9 million and mortgage servicing
rights by $41.0 million, respectively. The excess purchase
price over the fair value of the net assets acquired amounted to
$48.4 million and was recorded as goodwill.
Pro forma results of operations reflecting the acquisition of
Financial Freedom has not been presented because the results of
operations of Financial Freedom are not material to the
Companys consolidated results of operations.
|
|
NOTE 3 |
SEGMENT REPORTING |
IndyMac operates through four main segments, Mortgage Banking
Divisions, IndyMac Consumer Bank, Specialty Product Divisions
and Investing Divisions. The common denominator of the
Companys business is providing consumers with
single-family residential (SFR) mortgages through
relationships with each segments core customers via the
channel in which each operates. Mortgage Banking Divisions
provide consumers with all single-family permanent mortgage
lending through relationships with mortgage
professionals mortgage brokers, mortgage bankers,
community financial institutions, real estate professionals, and
consumers. IndyMac Consumer Bank provides the platform for the
mortgage and deposit services that IndyMac offers directly to
consumers through its branch network. Specialty Product
Divisions support the production of construction lending, home
equity lines of credit (HELOCs), reverse mortgages,
and other non-SFR permanent mortgage products through all of
IndyMacs relationship and consumer direct production
channels. Investing Divisions serves as the main link to
customers whose mortgages we service. Through their investments
in SFR mortgages, mortgage-backed securities (MBS)
and mortgage servicing rights (MSRs), the Investing
Divisions generate core spread and fee income and provides
critical support to IndyMacs mortgage lending operations.
The profitability of each operating segment is measured on a
fully-leveraged basis after allocating capital based on
regulatory capital rules. Operating segments that originate
mortgage loans are credited with gain on sale at funding based
on the estimated fair value. Any difference between the actual
gain on sale realized and the estimate is credited or charged to
the operating segment in the period the loan is sold or
transferred to the held for investment portfolio. Differences
between the gain on sale credited to the operating segments and
the consolidated gain on sale due to timing of loan sales or
transfers to the held for investment portfolio are eliminated in
consolidation. The Company uses a fund transfer pricing system
to allocate net interest income to the operating segments. Each
operating segment is allocated funding with maturities and
interest rates matched with the expected lives and repricing
frequencies of the segments assets. Deposits receive a
funding
F-17
INDYMAC BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
credit using a similar methodology. The difference between these
allocations and the Companys actual net interest income
and capital levels resulting from centralized management of
funding costs is reported in the line item titled
Other. Also included in the line item titled
Other are unallocated corporate costs such as
corporate salaries and related expenses, excess capital,
non-recurring corporate items, and the eliminations of
differences between segment reporting and GAAP.
Segment information for the years ended December 31, 2004,
2003 and 2002 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage | |
|
IndyMac | |
|
Specialty | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banking | |
|
Consumer | |
|
Product | |
|
Investing | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Divisions | |
|
Bank | |
|
Divisions | |
|
Divisions | |
|
Other | |
|
Consolidated | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income (expense)
|
|
$ |
154,093 |
|
|
$ |
35,623 |
|
|
$ |
93,676 |
|
|
$ |
164,757 |
|
|
$ |
(43,087 |
) |
|
$ |
405,062 |
|
Net revenues (expense)
|
|
|
531,126 |
|
|
|
43,248 |
|
|
|
178,640 |
|
|
|
150,980 |
|
|
|
(99,620 |
) |
|
|
804,374 |
|
Net earnings (loss)
|
|
|
159,839 |
|
|
|
8,713 |
|
|
|
64,384 |
|
|
|
60,577 |
|
|
|
(122,991 |
) |
|
|
170,522 |
|
Assets as of December 31, 2004
|
|
$ |
4,815,044 |
|
|
$ |
111,414 |
|
|
$ |
2,671,982 |
|
|
$ |
8,396,092 |
|
|
$ |
831,112 |
|
|
$ |
16,825,644 |
|
2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income (expense)
|
|
$ |
138,584 |
|
|
$ |
12,417 |
|
|
$ |
82,581 |
|
|
$ |
111,084 |
|
|
$ |
(33,729 |
) |
|
$ |
310,937 |
|
Net revenues (expense)
|
|
|
553,847 |
|
|
|
20,975 |
|
|
|
115,110 |
|
|
|
100,889 |
|
|
|
(82,682 |
) |
|
|
708,139 |
|
Net earnings (loss)
|
|
|
200,178 |
|
|
|
(2,682 |
) |
|
|
44,688 |
|
|
|
34,297 |
|
|
|
(105,178 |
) |
|
|
171,303 |
|
Assets as of December 31, 2003
|
|
$ |
2,719,147 |
|
|
$ |
69,847 |
|
|
$ |
2,105,516 |
|
|
$ |
8,118,153 |
|
|
$ |
227,728 |
|
|
$ |
13,240,391 |
|
2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income (expense)
|
|
$ |
92,790 |
|
|
$ |
10,691 |
|
|
$ |
82,593 |
|
|
$ |
69,675 |
|
|
$ |
(46,461 |
) |
|
$ |
209,288 |
|
Net revenues (expense)
|
|
|
430,337 |
|
|
|
14,670 |
|
|
|
106,739 |
|
|
|
97,383 |
|
|
|
(73,823 |
) |
|
|
575,306 |
|
Net earnings (loss)
|
|
|
157,676 |
|
|
|
(4,292 |
) |
|
|
43,632 |
|
|
|
36,047 |
|
|
|
(89,670 |
) |
|
|
143,393 |
|
Assets as of December 31, 2002
|
|
$ |
2,489,580 |
|
|
$ |
65,095 |
|
|
$ |
1,742,497 |
|
|
$ |
4,945,188 |
|
|
$ |
332,094 |
|
|
$ |
9,574,454 |
|
F-18
INDYMAC BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
NOTE 4 |
MORTGAGE-BACKED SECURITIES AND AGENCY NOTES |
As of December 31, 2004 and 2003, our MBS and agency notes
were comprised of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Mortgage-backed securities Trading
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AAA-rated and agency interest-only securities
|
|
$ |
124,109 |
|
|
$ |
148,275 |
|
|
AAA-rated principal-only securities
|
|
|
18,598 |
|
|
|
8,518 |
|
|
Other investment grade securities
|
|
|
9,219 |
|
|
|
8,922 |
|
|
Other non-investment grade securities
|
|
|
4,198 |
|
|
|
1,760 |
|
|
Non-investment grade residual securities
|
|
|
78,912 |
|
|
|
56,157 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total mortgage-backed securities Trading
|
|
$ |
235,036 |
|
|
$ |
223,632 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities and agency notes
Available for sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AAA-rated agency securities
|
|
$ |
14,903 |
|
|
$ |
25,193 |
|
|
AAA-rated non-agency securities
|
|
|
3,166,600 |
|
|
|
1,407,984 |
|
|
AAA-rated agency notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
143,689 |
|
|
Other investment grade securities
|
|
|
137,603 |
|
|
|
26,926 |
|
|
Other non-investment grade securities
|
|
|
78,854 |
|
|
|
10,182 |
|
|
Non-investment grade residual securities
|
|
|
56,475 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total mortgage-backed securities and agency notes
Available for sale
|
|
$ |
3,454,435 |
|
|
$ |
1,613,974 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contractual maturities of the MBS and agency notes generally
range from 10 to 30 years. Expected weighted-average lives
of these securities generally range from several months to five
years due to borrower prepayments occurring prior to the
contractual maturity.
The following table summarizes the amortized cost and estimated
fair value of mortgage-backed securities classified as available
for sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Amortized cost
|
|
$ |
3,467,076 |
|
|
$ |
1,622,906 |
|
Gross unrealized holding gains
|
|
|
9,669 |
|
|
|
5,714 |
|
Gross unrealized holding losses
|
|
|
(22,310 |
) |
|
|
(14,646 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated fair value
|
|
$ |
3,454,435 |
|
|
$ |
1,613,974 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-19
INDYMAC BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The unrealized losses and fair value of securities that have
been in a continuous unrealized loss position for less than
12 months and 12 months or greater were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Less Than 12 Months | |
|
12 Months or Greater | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Unrealized | |
|
|
|
Unrealized | |
|
|
|
Unrealized | |
|
|
|
|
Losses | |
|
Fair Value | |
|
Losses | |
|
Fair Value | |
|
Losses | |
|
Fair Value | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Securities Available for Sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AAA-rated agency securities
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(210 |
) |
|
$ |
6,726 |
|
|
$ |
(210 |
) |
|
$ |
6,726 |
|
|
AAA-rated non-agency securities
|
|
|
(13,237 |
) |
|
|
1,390,023 |
|
|
|
(8,622 |
) |
|
|
337,679 |
|
|
|
(21,859 |
) |
|
|
1,727,702 |
|
|
Other investment grade securities
|
|
|
(221 |
) |
|
|
30,233 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(221 |
) |
|
|
30,233 |
|
|
Other non-investment grade securities
|
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
630 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
630 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Securities Available for Sale
|
|
$ |
(13,478 |
) |
|
$ |
1,420,886 |
|
|
$ |
(8,832 |
) |
|
$ |
344,405 |
|
|
$ |
(22,310 |
) |
|
$ |
1,765,291 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The securities that have been in unrealized loss position for
12 months or more are primarily related to 17 AAA-rated
securities issued by private institutions. These unrealized
losses are primarily attributable to changes in interest rates
and individually were 5% or less of their respective amortized
cost basis.
As a result of our periodic reviews for impairment in accordance
with EITF 99-20, Recognition of Interest Income and
Impairment on Certain Investments (EITF
99-20), during the years ended December 31, 2004,
2003 and 2002, we recorded $1.6 million, $2.3 million
and $2.5 million, respectively, in impairment charges on
non-investment grade and residual securities.
We value AAA-rated interest-only securities using an
option-adjusted spread (OAS) methodology, in which
discount rates and future cash flows vary over time with the
level of rates implied by each of 200 randomly-generated forward
interest rate paths. When available, market information is used
to validate these assumptions. The prepayment rates used to
value our AAA-rated interest-only securities portfolio are based
primarily on four-factor prepayment models which incorporate
relative weighted-average coupon (WAC), seasoning,
burnout, and seasonality, as well as expectations of future
rates implied by the forward LIBOR/swap curve. At
December 31, 2004, the weighted-average constant lifetime
prepayment rate assumption was 14.9%, and the implied yield was
11.3%.
The fair value of our residual securities is determined by
discounting estimated net future cash flows, using discount
rates that approximate current market rates and expected
prepayment rates. Estimated net future cash flows include
assumptions related to expected credit losses on these
securities. We maintain a model that evaluates the default rate
and severity of loss on the residual securities
collateral, considering such factors as loss experience,
delinquencies, loan-to-value ratio, borrower credit scores and
property type. The following table details the assumptions used
in valuing the residual securities as of December 31, 2004
and 2003:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Prime | |
|
Subprime | |
|
Lot | |
|
HELOC | |
|
Prime | |
|
Subprime | |
|
Lot | |
|
HELOC | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Weighted-average discount rate
|
|
|
15.0 |
% |
|
|
24.7 |
% |
|
|
19.3 |
% |
|
|
19.0 |
% |
|
|
15.0 |
% |
|
|
23.6 |
% |
|
|
20.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Projected prepayment rate
|
|
|
36.9 |
% |
|
|
33.6 |
% |
|
|
41.0 |
% |
|
|
36.7 |
% |
|
|
23.8 |
% |
|
|
33.4 |
% |
|
|
38.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Remaining cumulative losses
|
|
|
0.2 |
% |
|
|
2.5 |
% |
|
|
0.4 |
% |
|
|
0.9 |
% |
|
|
0.5 |
% |
|
|
2.3 |
% |
|
|
0.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
F-20
INDYMAC BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The fair value of all of our other investment and non-investment
grade mortgage-backed securities is estimated based on
discounted cash flow techniques using assumptions for prepayment
rates, market yield requirements and credit losses, and market
information when available.
As of December 31, 2004, the aggregate amount of the
securities from each of the following three issuers was greater
than 10% of the shareholders equity. These issuers are
qualifying special-purpose entities created by the Company in
conjunction with the securitization transactions with the
objective to recharacterize loans as securities for the purposes
of (1) lower our cost of funds, (2) improve our
liquidity profile, and (3) improve our risk profile through
the use of bond insurance. Of the total securities from these
issuers, $1,198.0 million of the securities are AAA-rated
asset-backed certificates with approximately $1 billion
insured by a third party.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized | |
|
Fair Market | |
Name of Issuer |
|
Cost | |
|
Value | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Residential Asset Securitization Trust Series 2004
IndyPort1
|
|
$ |
211,391 |
|
|
$ |
208,808 |
|
IndyMac Certificate Trust 2004-1
|
|
|
532,667 |
|
|
|
532,667 |
|
IndyMac Certificate Trust 2004-2
|
|
|
532,696 |
|
|
|
532,696 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
1,276,754 |
|
|
$ |
1,274,171 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 5 |
LOANS RECEIVABLE |
A summary of loans receivable follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Principal balance of loans held for sale
|
|
$ |
4,356,315 |
|
|
$ |
2,500,504 |
|
Unamortized premiums and fees
|
|
|
90,313 |
|
|
|
37,525 |
|
Hedge effects and other valuation adjustments
|
|
|
(1,056 |
) |
|
|
35,219 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans held for sale
|
|
|
4,445,572 |
|
|
|
2,573,248 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal balance of mortgage loans held for investment
|
|
|
4,588,700 |
|
|
|
5,671,956 |
|
Unamortized premium and fees on mortgage loans held for
investment
|
|
|
74,484 |
|
|
|
111,021 |
|
Outstanding balances on commitments on construction and income
property loans
|
|
|
2,087,246 |
|
|
|
1,666,158 |
|
Unamortized net deferred loan fees on construction and income
property loans
|
|
|
(677 |
) |
|
|
50 |
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
(52,891 |
) |
|
|
(52,645 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans held for investment
|
|
|
6,696,862 |
|
|
|
7,396,540 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans receivable
|
|
$ |
11,142,434 |
|
|
$ |
9,969,788 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Substantially all of the mortgage loans that we acquired are
non-conforming loans secured by first liens on single-family
residential properties. Approximately 52% of the principal
amount of mortgage loans held for investment at
December 31, 2004 was collateralized by properties located
in California.
F-21
INDYMAC BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Our impaired loans by collateral type consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Builder construction loans
|
|
$ |
11,546 |
|
|
$ |
9,704 |
|
Consumer construction loans
|
|
|
9,553 |
|
|
|
8,953 |
|
Specific reserves
|
|
|
(3,622 |
) |
|
|
(2,161 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total impaired loans
|
|
$ |
17,477 |
|
|
$ |
16,496 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average balance during the year
|
|
$ |
21,188 |
|
|
$ |
18,420 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If interest on impaired construction loans had been recognized,
such income, net of recoveries, would have been
$1.3 million, $1.4 million and $3.7 million
during the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002,
respectively. Interest income of $0.2 million,
$0.5 million and $0.7 million was recognized on a cash
basis on impaired construction loans for the years ended
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.
|
|
NOTE 6 |
ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES |
Our determination of the level of the allowance for loan losses
and, correspondingly, the provision for loan losses, is based
upon judgments and assumptions about various matters, including
general economic conditions, loan portfolio composition, prior
loan loss experience, delinquency trends and our ongoing
examination process. The allowance for loan losses of
$52.9 million is considered adequate to cover probable
losses inherent in the loan portfolio at December 31, 2004.
However, no assurance can be given that we will not, in any
particular period, sustain loan losses that exceed the
allowance, or that subsequent evaluation of the loan portfolio,
in light of then-prevailing factors, including economic
conditions, credit quality of the assets comprising the
portfolio and the ongoing examination process, will not require
significant changes in the allowance for loan losses.
The table below summarizes the changes to the allowance for loan
losses for the years ended:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Balance, beginning of period
|
|
$ |
52,645 |
|
|
$ |
50,761 |
|
|
$ |
57,700 |
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
8,170 |
|
|
|
19,700 |
|
|
|
16,154 |
|
Charge-offs net of recoveries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SFR mortgage loans
|
|
|
(3,060 |
) |
|
|
(3,888 |
) |
|
|
(5,783 |
) |
|
Land and other mortgage loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
(1,658 |
) |
|
Builder construction
|
|
|
(76 |
) |
|
|
(3,268 |
) |
|
|
(2,584 |
) |
|
Consumer construction
|
|
|
(1,387 |
) |
|
|
(1,378 |
) |
|
|
(238 |
) |
|
Discontinued product lines*
|
|
|
(3,401 |
) |
|
|
(9,271 |
) |
|
|
(12,830 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charge-offs net of recoveries
|
|
|
(7,924 |
) |
|
|
(17,816 |
) |
|
|
(23,093 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period
|
|
$ |
52,891 |
|
|
$ |
52,645 |
|
|
$ |
50,761 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Include manufactured home loans and home improvement loans,
which were discontinued.
F-22
INDYMAC BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
NOTE 7 |
MORTGAGE SERVICING RIGHTS |
The carrying value of our capitalized MSRs was
$640.8 million and $443.7 million at December 31,
2004 and 2003, respectively.
The assumptions used to value MSRs at December 31, 2004 and
2003 follow:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual | |
|
Valuation Assumptions | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Remaining | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3-Month | |
|
Weighted- | |
|
Lifetime | |
|
|
|
|
Book | |
|
Collateral | |
|
Gross | |
|
Servicing | |
|
Prepayment | |
|
Average | |
|
Prepayment | |
|
Discount | |
|
|
Value | |
|
Balance | |
|
WAC | |
|
Fee | |
|
Speed | |
|
Multiple | |
|
Speeds (CPR) | |
|
Yield | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
December 31, 2004
|
|
$ |
640,794 |
|
|
$ |
50,218,965 |
|
|
|
5.73% |
|
|
|
0.36% |
|
|
|
24.0% |
|
|
|
3.54 |
|
|
|
20.8% |
|
|
|
10.3% |
|
December 31, 2003
|
|
$ |
443,688 |
|
|
$ |
30,773,545 |
|
|
|
6.53% |
|
|
|
0.32% |
|
|
|
31.0% |
|
|
|
4.51 |
|
|
|
16.8% |
|
|
|
10.0% |
|
The changes in MSRs are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Balance at beginning of period
|
|
$ |
443,688 |
|
|
$ |
300,539 |
|
|
$ |
321,316 |
|
Additions from normal operations
|
|
|
377,003 |
|
|
|
291,849 |
|
|
|
230,894 |
|
Additions from Financial Freedom acquisition
|
|
|
41,003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conversion of MSRs to interest-only securities
|
|
|
(5,362 |
) |
|
|
(47,311 |
) |
|
|
(75,371 |
) |
Clean-up calls exercised
|
|
|
(18,754 |
) |
|
|
(10,256 |
) |
|
|
(685 |
) |
Scheduled amortization
|
|
|
(146,491 |
) |
|
|
(85,590 |
) |
|
|
(68,228 |
) |
Valuation/impairment
|
|
|
(40,666 |
) |
|
|
(5,543 |
) |
|
|
(107,387 |
) |
FAS 133 basis adjustments
|
|
|
(9,627 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
$ |
640,794 |
|
|
$ |
443,688 |
|
|
$ |
300,539 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in the valuation allowance for impairment of MSRs are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Balance at beginning of period
|
|
$ |
(59,529 |
) |
|
$ |
(179,586 |
) |
|
$ |
(72,440 |
) |
Provision for valuation
|
|
|
(40,666 |
) |
|
|
(5,543 |
) |
|
|
(107,387 |
) |
Clean-up calls exercised
|
|
|
8,353 |
|
|
|
10,107 |
|
|
|
|
|
Permanent impairment
|
|
|
3,845 |
|
|
|
115,315 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
178 |
|
|
|
241 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
$ |
(87,997 |
) |
|
$ |
(59,529 |
) |
|
$ |
(179,586 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 8 |
INVESTMENT IN FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK STOCK |
The investment in Federal Home Loan Bank stock consisted of
capital stock, at cost, totaling $390.7 million and
$313.3 million as of December 31, 2004 and 2003,
respectively. Total dividend income recognized was
$13.9 million, $9.6 million and $6.3 million,
respectively, in 2004, 2003 and 2002. We earned a yield of
4.04%, 4.23% and 5.74% in 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. The
investment in Federal Home Loan Bank stock is required to
permit IndyMac Bank to borrow from the Federal Home
Loan Bank of San Francisco.
F-23
INDYMAC BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The major components of other assets are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Fixed assets and software development, net
|
|
$ |
174,637 |
|
|
$ |
140,421 |
|
Hedging related deposits
|
|
|
23,883 |
|
|
|
17,457 |
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
53,746 |
|
|
|
68,991 |
|
Derivative financial instruments at fair value
|
|
|
95,932 |
|
|
|
138,959 |
|
Servicing related advances
|
|
|
36,948 |
|
|
|
38,016 |
|
Investment in non-consolidated subsidiary
|
|
|
9,188 |
|
|
|
7,802 |
|
Other
|
|
|
32,305 |
|
|
|
39,762 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other assets
|
|
$ |
426,639 |
|
|
$ |
451,408 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in fixed assets and software development was
primarily due to the increase in software development and data
processing equipment. Software development consists primarily of
loan origination and processing systems, our internal loan
approval and pricing system, e-MITS® (Electronic Mortgage
Information and Transaction System), software for our banking
system (including Internet banking), and other purchased and
internally-developed software.
Hedging related deposits represent margin deposits with our
clearing agent or counterparties associated with our hedge
positions. For further information on our derivative financial
instruments, see Footnote 15 Derivative
Instruments.
Software development and fixed assets included in other assets
are detailed below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Software development
|
|
$ |
87,532 |
|
|
$ |
56,234 |
|
Accumulated amortization
|
|
|
(33,930 |
) |
|
|
(26,410 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net software development
|
|
|
53,602 |
|
|
|
29,824 |
|
Data processing equipment
|
|
|
65,183 |
|
|
|
50,701 |
|
Furniture and equipment
|
|
|
34,667 |
|
|
|
28,241 |
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
|
14,024 |
|
|
|
9,919 |
|
Land and buildings
|
|
|
59,724 |
|
|
|
55,006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
173,598 |
|
|
|
143,867 |
|
Accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(65,350 |
) |
|
|
(45,099 |
) |
Land
|
|
|
12,787 |
|
|
|
11,829 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed assets and software development, net
|
|
$ |
174,637 |
|
|
$ |
140,421 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization expense was $36.0 million,
$27.6 million and $19.5 million, for the years ended
December 31, 2004, 2003, and 2002, respectively.
F-24
INDYMAC BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
A summary of the carrying value of deposits, rates, and
maturities of certificates of deposit follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Amount | |
|
Rate | |
|
Amount | |
|
Rate | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Non interest-bearing checking
|
|
$ |
55,359 |
|
|
|
0.0% |
|
|
$ |
44,353 |
|
|
|
0.0% |
|
Non interest-bearing checking Loan servicing accounts
|
|
|
622,589 |
|
|
|
0.0% |
|
|
|
528,643 |
|
|
|
0.0% |
|
Interest-bearing checking
|
|
|
42,306 |
|
|
|
1.0% |
|
|
|
39,761 |
|
|
|
0.9% |
|
Savings
|
|
|
1,527,466 |
|
|
|
2.2% |
|
|
|
1,515,852 |
|
|
|
1.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total core deposits
|
|
|
2,247,720 |
|
|
|
1.5% |
|
|
|
2,128,609 |
|
|
|
1.3% |
|
Certificates of deposit, due:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within one year
|
|
|
2,891,077 |
|
|
|
2.7% |
|
|
|
1,642,592 |
|
|
|
2.4% |
|
|
One to two years
|
|
|
510,012 |
|
|
|
3.4% |
|
|
|
457,229 |
|
|
|
3.4% |
|
|
Two to three years
|
|
|
63,623 |
|
|
|
3.6% |
|
|
|
102,275 |
|
|
|
4.6% |
|
|
Three to four years
|
|
|
27,739 |
|
|
|
3.8% |
|
|
|
17,412 |
|
|
|
3.8% |
|
|
Four to five years
|
|
|
3,308 |
|
|
|
3.8% |
|
|
|
2,656 |
|
|
|
3.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total certificates of deposit
|
|
|
3,495,759 |
|
|
|
2.8% |
|
|
|
2,222,164 |
|
|
|
2.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits
|
|
$ |
5,743,479 |
|
|
|
2.3% |
|
|
$ |
4,350,773 |
|
|
|
2.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The interest expense by deposit type for the years ended
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 is summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Interest-bearing checking
|
|
$ |
390 |
|
|
$ |
350 |
|
|
$ |
435 |
|
Savings
|
|
|
32,488 |
|
|
|
24,623 |
|
|
|
13,313 |
|
Certificates of deposit
|
|
|
70,734 |
|
|
|
62,855 |
|
|
|
91,440 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense on deposits
|
|
$ |
103,612 |
|
|
$ |
87,828 |
|
|
$ |
105,188 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes certificates of deposit in
amounts of $100,000 or more by remaining contractual maturity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Three months or less
|
|
$ |
374,317 |
|
|
$ |
109,813 |
|
Three to six months
|
|
|
481,035 |
|
|
|
200,091 |
|
Six to twelve months
|
|
|
835,093 |
|
|
|
306,067 |
|
Over twelve months
|
|
|
275,008 |
|
|
|
237,634 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total certificates of deposit ($100,000 or more)
|
|
$ |
1,965,453 |
|
|
$ |
853,605 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-25
INDYMAC BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
NOTE 11 |
ADVANCES FROM THE FHLB |
As a member of the FHLB, we maintain a credit line that is based
largely on a percentage of total regulatory assets. Advances
totaled $6.2 billion at December 31, 2004 and
$4.9 billion at December 31, 2003, and are
collateralized in the aggregate by loans, securities, all FHLB
stock owned and by deposits with the FHLB. The maximum amount of
credit that the FHLB will extend for purposes other than meeting
withdrawals varies from time to time in accordance with its
policies. The interest rates charged by the FHLB for advances
typically vary depending upon maturity, the cost of funds of the
FHLB, and the collateral for the borrowing.
Scheduled maturities of advances from the FHLB were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
December 31, 2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Amount | |
|
Rate | |
|
Amount | |
|
Rate | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Within one year
|
|
$ |
4,595,000 |
|
|
|
2.3% |
|
|
$ |
3,679,911 |
|
|
|
1.6% |
|
One to two years
|
|
|
1,125,000 |
|
|
|
2.7% |
|
|
|
610,000 |
|
|
|
2.4% |
|
Two to three years
|
|
|
362,000 |
|
|
|
3.5% |
|
|
|
375,000 |
|
|
|
3.1% |
|
Three to four years
|
|
|
80,000 |
|
|
|
3.6% |
|
|
|
190,000 |
|
|
|
3.8% |
|
Four to five years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80,000 |
|
|
|
3.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
6,162,000 |
|
|
|
2.5% |
|
|
$ |
4,934,911 |
|
|
|
1.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial data pertaining to advances from the FHLB were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate/Amount | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Weighted-average coupon rate, end of year
|
|
|
2.5 |
% |
|
|
1.9 |
% |
Weighted-average rate during the year, including hedge effect
|
|
|
2.5 |
% |
|
|
3.0 |
% |
Average balance of advances from FHLB
|
|
$ |
5,809,913 |
|
|
$ |
3,820,076 |
|
Maximum amount of advances from FHLB at any month end
|
|
$ |
6,777,000 |
|
|
$ |
5,144,907 |
|
Interest expense for the year
|
|
$ |
145,925 |
|
|
$ |
113,032 |
|
As of December 31, 2004, no advances from the FHLB were
subject to call or put options. As of December 31, 2003,
the portfolio of advances included $200 million of advances
subject to call features and no advances subject to put options.
We had $2.5 billion and $667 million of unused
committed financing from the FHLB at December 31, 2004 and
2003, respectively.
F-26
INDYMAC BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
NOTE 12 |
OTHER BORROWINGS |
Other borrowings of the Company consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Loans and securities sold under agreements to repurchase
|
|
$ |
1,930,686 |
|
|
$ |
2,438,059 |
|
HELOC notes payable
|
|
|
996,976 |
|
|
|
|
|
Trust preferred debentures
|
|
|
215,205 |
|
|
|
183,643 |
|
Revolving syndicated bank credit facilities
|
|
|
19,185 |
|
|
|
185 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations
|
|
|
189 |
|
|
|
207 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,162,241 |
|
|
$ |
2,622,094 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans and Securities Sold Under Agreements to
Repurchase
We sold, under agreements to repurchase, securities of the
U.S. government and its agencies, specific loans and other
approved investments to various broker-dealers pursuant to
committed and uncommitted credit facilities totaling
$3.9 billion at December 31, 2004. The amounts
outstanding under these repurchase agreements were
$1.9 billion and $2.4 billion at December 31,
2004 and 2003, respectively. Our outstanding repurchase
agreements have an average maturity of less than 30 days.
These repurchase agreements generally reprice on an
overnight-to-one-month basis for loans, and a one-to-three-month
basis for securities, bearing interest at rates indexed to LIBOR
or the federal funds rate, plus an applicable margin. For the
years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, the
weighted-average borrowing rate on repurchase agreements was
2.2% and 2.0%, respectively. We were in compliance with all
material financial covenants under these repurchase agreements
at December 31, 2004 and 2003.
HELOC Notes Payable
During 2004, the Company financed $1.0 billion in HELOC
loans through two separate securitization transactions. The
securitization trusts issued AAA-rated asset-backed
certificates, and the Company pledged the certificates to secure
these nonrecourse notes payable. Interest rates on the notes are
based on LIBOR plus a margin. For the year ended
December 31, 2004, the cost of funds on these notes was
1.95%.
Trust Preferred Securities and Warrants
On November 14, 2001, we completed an offering of Warrants
and Income Redeemable Equity Securities (WIRES) to
investors. Gross proceeds of the transaction were
$175 million. The securities were offered as units
consisting of trust preferred securities, issued by a trust
formed by us, and a warrant to purchase IndyMac
Bancorps common stock. As part of this transaction,
IndyMac Bancorp issued subordinated debentures to the trust and
purchased common securities from the trust. The yield on the
subordinated debentures and common securities is the same as the
yield on the trust preferred securities. The proceeds from the
offering are used in ongoing operations and to fund future
growth and/ or repurchases of IndyMac Bancorp stock under its
share repurchase program.
In each of the months of July and December 2003, two trusts
formed by us each issued $30.0 million of trust preferred
securities, yielding 6.05% and 6.30%, respectively. In December
2004, a trust formed by us issued an additional
$30.0 million of trust preferred securities with a yield of
5.83%. In each of these transactions, IndyMac Bancorp issued
subordinated debentures to, and purchased common securities
from, each of the trusts. The yield on the subordinated
debentures and the common securities in each of those
F-27
INDYMAC BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
transactions matches the yields on the related trust preferred
securities. The proceeds of these securities have been used in
ongoing operations.
Our investment in these non-consolidated trusts totaled
$9.2 million and $7.8 million at December 31,
2004 and 2003, respectively, and is included in Other Assets.
The subordinated debentures underlying the trust preferred
securities, and which represent the liabilities due from IndyMac
Bancorp to the trusts, amounted to $215.2 million and
$183.6 million at December 31, 2004 and 2003,
respectively. These subordinated debentures are included in
Other Borrowings on the consolidated balance sheets.
Revolving Syndicated Bank Credit Facilities
In July of 2002, we renewed a committed credit facility in the
aggregate amount of $100 million with Bank of America. We
paid off this facility in full in January 2005 and elected not
to renew it.
Interest rates are based on LIBOR or the federal funds rate plus
an applicable margin, which may vary by the type of collateral.
The applicable margin and a facility fee are determined based on
our investment rating. For the years ended December 31,
2004 and 2003, the weighted-average borrowing rate under these
facilities was 2.6% and 2.1%, respectively. The amount of
borrowings outstanding under these facilities at
December 31, 2004 and 2003 was $19.2 million and
$0.2 million, respectively. At December 31, 2004 and
2003, we were in compliance with all material financial
covenants under these revolving credit facilities.
Collateralized Mortgage Obligations
Collateralized mortgage obligations (CMOs) are
secured by a pledge of mortgage loans, MBS and residual cash
flows from such securities. As required by the indentures
relating to the CMOs, the pledged collateral is held in the
custody of trustees. The trustees collect principal and interest
payments on the underlying collateral, reinvest such amounts in
the guaranteed investment contracts, and make corresponding
principal and interest payments on the CMOs to the bondholders.
Our net equity investments in CMOs amounted to $151,000 and
$152,000 at December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The
weighted-average coupon on CMOs was 11.5% at both
December 31, 2004 and 2003.
Commitment Fees
At December 31, 2004 and 2003, we had deferred commitment
fees totaling $1.2 million and $1.7 million,
respectively, net of accumulated amortization of
$2.7 million and $2.5 million, respectively. We
amortize these fees over the contractual life of the borrowings.
F-28
INDYMAC BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Pledged Borrowings
We pledged certain of our loans and securities for our
borrowings, which mainly consist of advances from FHLB and loans
and securities sold under agreements to repurchase. The
following table provides information related to such pledged
assets as of December 31, 2004 and 2003.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In millions) | |
Loans pledged for FHLB
|
|
$ |
5,684 |
|
|
$ |
5,579 |
|
Securities pledged for FHLB
|
|
|
1,482 |
|
|
|
362 |
|
Loans pledged for repurchase agreements
|
|
|
2,248 |
|
|
|
1,726 |
|
Securities pledged for repurchase agreements
|
|
|
903 |
|
|
|
1,238 |
|
Loans pledged for other
|
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
317 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total pledged
|
|
$ |
10,452 |
|
|
$ |
9,222 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2004, pledged assets exceeded our
borrowings by approximately $2.3 billion. The excess
collateral was held by a trustee and pledged to our lenders. The
following table details the amounts allocated amongst the
various lenders.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In millions) | |
Merrill Lynch
|
|
$ |
914 |
|
|
$ |
235 |
|
Morgan Stanley
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
121 |
|
UBS Warburg
|
|
|
185 |
|
|
|
159 |
|
FHLB
|
|
|
1,004 |
|
|
|
1,006 |
|
Bank of America
|
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
115 |
|
Federal Reserve
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
202 |
|
Other
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total excess
|
|
$ |
2,339 |
|
|
$ |
1,845 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt Covenants
The Company is subject to various debt covenants as a condition
of its borrowing facilities. As of December 31, 2004, in
addition to the standard covenants of timely repayments of
interest and principal, the key debt covenants include
maintaining minimum well-capitalized capital ratios (5%, 6%, and
10% for core capital, Tier 1 risk-based and total
risk-based capital, respectively), no less than B
rating on the corporate bond by Standard & Poors
or Fitch, minimum net worth of $500 million for IndyMac
Bank and $300 million for the Company. As of
December 31, 2004, we believe we were in compliance with
all material financial covenants under our borrowing facilities.
F-29
INDYMAC BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
NOTE 13 PARENT COMPANY FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
The following tables present IndyMac Bancorp parent only
financial information:
Condensed Balance Sheets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$ |
105,086 |
|
|
$ |
109,710 |
|
Loans held for investment, net
|
|
|
3,342 |
|
|
|
5,819 |
|
Securities classified as trading
|
|
|
19,556 |
|
|
|
17,148 |
|
Securities classified as available for sale
|
|
|
92,085 |
|
|
|
2,016 |
|
Investment in and advances to subsidiaries
|
|
|
1,326,430 |
|
|
|
1,053,323 |
|
Foreclosed assets
|
|
|
7,315 |
|
|
|
950 |
|
Intercompany receivables
|
|
|
9,199 |
|
|
|
5,679 |
|
Investment in non-consolidated subsidiary
|
|
|
9,188 |
|
|
|
7,802 |
|
Other assets
|
|
|
7,574 |
|
|
|
9,741 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
1,579,775 |
|
|
$ |
1,212,188 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Shareholders Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trust preferred debentures
|
|
$ |
215,205 |
|
|
$ |
183,643 |
|
Borrowings
|
|
|
85,423 |
|
|
|
692 |
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
13,109 |
|
|
|
10,422 |
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
1,266,038 |
|
|
|
1,017,431 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
$ |
1,579,775 |
|
|
$ |
1,212,188 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-30
INDYMAC BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Condensed Statements of Earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Interest income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
$ |
543 |
|
|
$ |
1,197 |
|
|
$ |
2,520 |
|
|
Securities available for sale and trading
|
|
|
6,033 |
|
|
|
5,069 |
|
|
|
7,539 |
|
|
Intercompany notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
169 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
2,274 |
|
|
|
1,065 |
|
|
|
2,174 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income
|
|
|
8,850 |
|
|
|
7,331 |
|
|
|
12,402 |
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trust preferred debentures
|
|
|
15,319 |
|
|
|
12,221 |
|
|
|
11,581 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
2,409 |
|
|
|
894 |
|
|
|
443 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense
|
|
|
17,728 |
|
|
|
13,115 |
|
|
|
12,024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest (loss) income
|
|
|
(8,878 |
) |
|
|
(5,784 |
) |
|
|
378 |
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
(1,476 |
) |
|
|
890 |
|
|
|
1,503 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest loss after provision for loan losses
|
|
|
(7,402 |
) |
|
|
(6,674 |
) |
|
|
(1,125 |
) |
Other income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries
|
|
|
183,111 |
|
|
|
179,878 |
|
|
|
143,639 |
|
|
Net gain on securities
|
|
|
3,972 |
|
|
|
5,760 |
|
|
|
7,357 |
|
|
Other income, net
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income
|
|
|
187,103 |
|
|
|
185,656 |
|
|
|
151,020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
|
179,701 |
|
|
|
178,982 |
|
|
|
149,895 |
|
Expenses
|
|
|
8,983 |
|
|
|
13,147 |
|
|
|
6,725 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before provision for income tax
|
|
|
170,718 |
|
|
|
165,835 |
|
|
|
143,170 |
|
|
Income tax benefit
|
|
|
(4,712 |
) |
|
|
(5,468 |
) |
|
|
(223 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
$ |
175,430 |
|
|
$ |
171,303 |
|
|
$ |
143,393 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-31
INDYMAC BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Condensed Statements of Cash Flows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
$ |
175,430 |
|
|
$ |
171,303 |
|
|
$ |
143,393 |
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash (used in)
provided by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and net amortization (accretion)
|
|
|
2,550 |
|
|
|
(1,306 |
) |
|
|
(5,595 |
) |
|
|
Gain on mortgage-backed securities, net
|
|
|
(3,972 |
) |
|
|
(5,760 |
) |
|
|
(5,566 |
) |
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
(1,476 |
) |
|
|
889 |
|
|
|
1,503 |
|
|
|
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries
|
|
|
(183,111 |
) |
|
|
(179,878 |
) |
|
|
(143,639 |
) |
|
|
Payments from mortgage and other loans held for sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,427 |
|
|
|
Net purchase of trading securities
|
|
|
(18,961 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments from trading securities
|
|
|
17,860 |
|
|
|
28,363 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (increase) decrease in other assets and liabilities
|
|
|
1,711 |
|
|
|
10,791 |
|
|
|
(23,415 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities
|
|
|
(9,969 |
) |
|
|
24,402 |
|
|
|
(31,892 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in loans held for investment
|
|
|
3,908 |
|
|
|
8,207 |
|
|
|
7,882 |
|
|
Net purchases of securities available for sale
|
|
|
(138,260 |
) |
|
|
(3,104 |
) |
|
|
(5,021 |
) |
|
Payments on available for sale securities
|
|
|
51,078 |
|
|
|
312 |
|
|
|
6,357 |
|
|
Cash dividends received from IndyMac Bank
|
|
|
38,518 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in investment in and advances to subsidiaries, net of
cash payments
|
|
|
(8,496 |
) |
|
|
(12,114 |
) |
|
|
(2,472 |
) |
|
Capital contributions to IndyMac Bank
|
|
|
(120,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net purchases of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
(2,661 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in note receivable from IndyMac Bank
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,266 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities
|
|
|
(175,913 |
) |
|
|
(6,699 |
) |
|
|
34,012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of trust preferred debentures
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
58,962 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in borrowings
|
|
|
84,216 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net proceeds from issuance of common stock
|
|
|
100,171 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net proceeds from stock options and notes receivable
|
|
|
39,882 |
|
|
|
33,635 |
|
|
|
11,294 |
|
|
Cash dividends paid
|
|
|
(72,414 |
) |
|
|
(30,602 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of common stock
|
|
|
(597 |
) |
|
|
(467 |
) |
|
|
(131,543 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
181,258 |
|
|
|
61,528 |
|
|
|
(120,249 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(4,624 |
) |
|
|
79,231 |
|
|
|
(118,129 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
109,710 |
|
|
|
30,479 |
|
|
|
148,608 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$ |
105,086 |
|
|
$ |
109,710 |
|
|
$ |
30,479 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-32
INDYMAC BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
NOTE 14 |
TRANSFERS AND SERVICING OF FINANCIAL ASSETS |
Retained Assets
In conjunction with the sale of mortgage loans in private-label
securitizations and GSE transactions, the Company generally
retains certain assets. The primary assets retained include
MSRs, to a lesser degree, AAA-rated interest-only securities,
AAA-rated principal-only securities, investment grade
securities, non-investment grade securities, and residual
securities. The allocated cost of the retained assets at the
time of sale is recorded as an asset with an offsetting increase
to the gain on sale of loans (or a reduction in the cost basis
of the loans sold). The calculation of the $363.8 million
in gain on sale of loans earned during the year ended
December 31, 2004 included the retention of
$552.0 million of servicing-related assets, and
$223.2 million of other investment and non-investment grade
securities. For the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002,
we recognized a total of $387.3 million and
$300.8 million in gain on sale of loans, respectively. The
fair value of retained assets totaling $385.5 million and
$361.8 million in 2003 and 2002, respectively, was included
as a component of these gains.
The portfolio of AAA-rated and agency interest only securities
at December 31, 2004 was predominantly comprised of
AAA-rated interest only securities retained in our loan
securitization activities. Agency interest only securities were
created by securitizing a portion of the contractual servicing
fee related to loans sold to the GSEs. These securities
represent the unconditional right to receive cash flows based on
the cash flow from the underlying loans. These securities are
legally separate from contractual servicing fees and can be sold
or pledged by the Company without restriction.
The key assumptions used in measuring the fair value of retained
assets at the time of securitization during the year ended
December 31, 2004 on a weighted-average basis were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projected | |
|
|
Retained | |
|
Lifetime | |
|
Discount | |
|
Loss | |
|
|
Balance | |
|
CPR | |
|
Yield | |
|
Rate | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Mortgage servicing rights, excluding amount acquired in
Financial Freedom acquisition
|
|
$ |
377,003 |
|
|
|
22.30 |
% |
|
|
11.40 |
% |
|
|
N/A |
|
AAA-rated interest-only securities
|
|
|
70,724 |
|
|
|
36.16 |
% |
|
|
12.29 |
% |
|
|
N/A |
|
AAA-rated principal-only securities
|
|
|
10,908 |
|
|
|
6.40 |
% |
|
|
6.09 |
% |
|
|
N/A |
|
Investment grade mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
130,161 |
|
|
|
29.54 |
% |
|
|
6.05 |
% |
|
|
N/A |
|
Non-investment grade mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
93,050 |
|
|
|
31.76 |
% |
|
|
12.69 |
% |
|
|
0.64 |
% |
Non-investment grade residual securities
|
|
|
93,383 |
|
|
|
43.94 |
% |
|
|
20.63 |
% |
|
|
1.28 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
775,229 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-33
INDYMAC BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table shows the hypothetical effect on the fair
value of our retained assets using various unfavorable
variations of the expected levels of certain key assumptions
used in valuing these assets at December 31, 2004.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AAA-rated | |
|
AAA-rated | |
|
Investment Grade | |
|
Non-investment | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage | |
|
Interest- | |
|
Principal- | |
|
Mortgage- | |
|
Grade Mortgage- | |
|
Residual | |
|
|
|
|
Servicing | |
|
Only | |
|
Only | |
|
Backed Securities | |
|
Backed Securities | |
|
Securities | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Balance sheet carrying value of retained interests
|
|
$ |
640,794 |
|
|
$ |
124,109 |
|
|
$ |
18,599 |
|
|
$ |
146,822 |
|
|
$ |
83,052 |
|
|
$ |
135,386 |
|
|
$ |
1,148,762 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepayment speed assumption
|
|
|
20.78 |
% |
|
|
14.93 |
% |
|
|
8.87 |
% |
|
|
34.15 |
% |
|
|
33.10 |
% |
|
|
35.60 |
% |
|
|
N/A |
|
Impact on fair value of 10% adverse change of prepayment speed
|
|
$ |
35,112 |
|
|
$ |
(3,155 |
) |
|
$ |
451 |
|
|
$ |
(354 |
) |
|
$ |
703 |
|
|
$ |
7,582 |
|
|
$ |
40,339 |
|
Impact on fair value of 20% adverse change of prepayment speed
|
|
$ |
66,449 |
|
|
$ |
(5,468 |
) |
|
$ |
940 |
|
|
$ |
(688 |
) |
|
$ |
1,546 |
|
|
$ |
13,438 |
|
|
$ |
76,217 |
|
Discount rate assumption
|
|
|
10.29 |
% |
|
|
11.26 |
% |
|
|
6.12 |
% |
|
|
6.64 |
% |
|
|
12.10 |
% |
|
|
20.70 |
% |
|
|
N/A |
|
Impact on fair value of 100 basis point adverse change
|
|
$ |
19,570 |
|
|
$ |
(2,204 |
) |
|
$ |
909 |
|
|
$ |
1,553 |
|
|
$ |
2,089 |
|
|
$ |
2,457 |
|
|
$ |
24,374 |
|
Impact on fair value of 200 basis point adverse change
|
|
$ |
37,888 |
|
|
$ |
(4,239 |
) |
|
$ |
1,737 |
|
|
$ |
2,032 |
|
|
$ |
4,124 |
|
|
$ |
4,802 |
|
|
$ |
46,344 |
|
Net credit loss assumption
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
0.70 |
% |
|
|
1.30 |
% |
|
|
N/A |
|
Impact on fair value of 10% adverse change in credit losses
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
$ |
1,963 |
|
|
$ |
4,333 |
|
|
$ |
6,296 |
|
Impact on fair value of 20% adverse change in credit losses
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
$ |
3,975 |
|
|
$ |
8,503 |
|
|
$ |
12,478 |
|
These sensitivities are hypothetical and should be used with
caution. Changes in fair value based on a ten percent variation
in assumptions generally cannot be extrapolated because the
relationship of the change in assumption to the change in fair
value may not be linear. The effect of a variation in a
particular assumption on the fair value of the retained interest
is calculated without changing any other assumption, or
considering the offsetting hedging impacts. In reality, changes
in one factor may result in changes in another, such as hedging
strategies and associated gains or losses, which might magnify
or counteract the sensitivities.
F-34
INDYMAC BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Credit Risk on Securitizations
With regard to the issuance of private-label securitizations, we
retain certain limited credit exposure in that we may choose to
retain non-investment grade securities and residuals. These
securities are subordinate to investors investment-grade
interests. We do not have credit exposure associated with
non-performing loans in securitizations beyond our investment in
retained interests in non-investment grade securities and
residuals. The value of our retained interests include credit
loss assumptions on the underlying collateral pool to estimate
this risk. The following table summarizes the collateral balance
associated with our servicing portfolio of sold loans, and the
balance of non-investment grade securities and residual
securities retained at December 31, 2004.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance of Retained Assets | |
|
|
|
|
With Credit Exposure | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Total Loans | |
|
Non-investment | |
|
|
|
|
Serviced | |
|
Grade Securities | |
|
Residuals | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Prime
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IndyMac securitizations
|
|
$ |
17,417,909 |
|
|
$ |
82,767 |
|
|
$ |
88,457 |
|
|
GSEs
|
|
|
24,294,453 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,790 |
|
|
Whole loan sales
|
|
|
5,377,338 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subprime
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IndyMac securitizations
|
|
|
2,764,684 |
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
45,139 |
|
|
Whole loan sales
|
|
|
218,552 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manufactured housing securitization
|
|
|
146,029 |
|
|
|
184 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
50,218,965 |
|
|
$ |
83,052 |
|
|
$ |
135,386 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As part of the normal course of business involving loans sold to
the secondary market, we are occasionally required to repurchase
loans or make certain payments to settle breaches of our
standard representations and warranties made as part of the loan
sales or securitizations. In anticipation of future expected
losses related to these loans, we have established a secondary
market reserve and have recorded provisions of
$22.9 million and $26.7 million to this reserve as
reductions to our gain on sale of loans during 2004 and 2003,
respectively. The balance in this reserve was $35.6 million
and $34.0 million at December 31, 2004 and 2003,
respectively, which is included on the consolidated balance
sheets as a component of other liabilities. The calculation of
the reserve is a function of estimated losses based on expected
and actual pending claims and repurchase requests, historical
experience, loan volume and loan sale distribution channels.
Qualifying Special-Purpose Entities
All loans sold in our private-label securitizations are issued
through securitization trusts, which are qualifying
special-purpose entities under SFAS 140
Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial
F-35
INDYMAC BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities. Cash
flows received from and paid to securitization trusts during the
years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Proceeds from new securitizations
|
|
$ |
12,205,539 |
|
|
$ |
5,276,875 |
|
|
$ |
6,179,221 |
|
Servicing fees received
|
|
|
27,024 |
|
|
|
17,347 |
|
|
|
23,398 |
|
Other cash flows received on retained interests
|
|
|
255,266 |
|
|
|
94,341 |
|
|
|
133,159 |
|
Clean-up calls
|
|
|
(677,318 |
) |
|
|
(1,611,841 |
) |
|
|
(124,238 |
) |
Loan repurchases for representations and warranties
|
|
|
(1,100 |
) |
|
|
(1,900 |
) |
|
|
(3,467 |
) |
As part of our normal servicing operations, the Company advanced
cash to investors totaling $65.1 million and
$91.4 million during the years ended December 31, 2004
and 2003, respectively, and received cash reimbursements from
investors totaling $65.0 million and $89.7 million,
respectively.
From time to time, IndyMac creates Net Interest Margin
(NIM) trusts for the securitization of residual
securities and securities associated with prepayment charges on
the underlying mortgage loans from prior or recently completed
securitization transactions. NIM trusts issue notes to outside
investors secured by the residual securities and securities
associated with prepayment charges on the underlying mortgage
loans we contribute to the trusts. The NIM notes are obligations
of the NIM trusts and are collateralized only by the residual
securities and securities associated with prepayment charges on
the underlying mortgage loans. We are not obligated to make any
payments on the notes. These entities represent qualified
special-purpose entities and meet the legal isolation criteria
of SFAS 140. Therefore, these entities are not consolidated
for financial reporting purposes, in accordance with
SFAS 140. At inception, the outside investors have the
majority interest in the fair value of the residual securities
and securities associated with prepayment charges on the
underlying mortgage loans. We receive cash flows from our
retained interests in the NIM trusts once the notes issued to
the investors are fully paid off. We created three NIM trust
during 2004 and one NIM trust during 2003. At inception of the
trusts, we retained a 19.4% and 13.9% interest in these trusts
during 2004 and 2003, respectively. At December 31, 2004
and 2003, these NIM trusts held assets valued at
$142.6 million and $46.9 million, respectively, and
our retained interests in these NIM trusts were valued at
$42.5 million and $16.0 million, respectively. Our
retained interests in the NIM trusts are included as a component
of securities classified as trading securities on the
consolidated balance sheets.
|
|
NOTE 15 |
DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS |
We follow the provisions of SFAS 133, as amended, for our
derivative instruments and hedging activities, which requires us
to recognize all derivative instruments on the consolidated
balance sheets at fair value. The following derivative financial
instruments were identified and recorded at fair value as of
December 31, 2004 and 2003:
|
|
|
|
|
FNMA and FHLMC forward contracts |
|
|
|
Interest rate swap agreements |
|
|
|
Interest rate swaption agreements |
|
|
|
Interest rate floor agreements |
|
|
|
Interest rate cap agreements |
|
|
|
Euro-dollar futures |
|
|
|
Rate lock commitments |
F-36
INDYMAC BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Generally speaking, if interest rates increase, the value of our
rate lock commitments and funded loans decrease and loan sale
margins are adversely impacted. We hedge the risk of overall
changes in fair value of loans held for sale and rate lock
commitments generally by selling forward contracts on securities
of GSEs and by using futures and options to economically hedge
the fair value of loan commitments and the funded loan
portfolio. Under SFAS 133, certain of these positions
qualify as a fair value hedge of a portion of the funded loan
portfolio and result in adjustments to the carrying value of
designated loans through gain on sale based on value changes
attributable to the hedged risk. The forward contracts used to
economically hedge the loan commitments are accounted for as
non-designated hedges and naturally offset loan commitment
mark-to-market gains and losses recognized as a component of
gain on sale. Effective April 1, 2004, upon the adoption of
SAB No. 105, the loan commitments are initially valued
at zero, and the Company only records the change in the fair
value of the loan commitments. The initial value inherent in the
loan commitments at origination is recorded as a component of
gain on sale of loans when the underlying loan is sold. At
December 31, 2004 and 2003, the fair value of these
commitments amounted to $1.4 million and
$25.0 million, respectively.
We use interest rate swap and swaption agreements to reduce our
exposure to interest rate risk inherent in a portion of the
current and anticipated borrowings and advances. A swap
agreement is a contract between two parties to exchange cash
flows based on specified underlying notional amounts and
indices. A swaption agreement is an option to enter into a swap
agreement in the future. Under SFAS 133, both the swap and
swaption agreements used to hedge our anticipated borrowings and
advances qualify as cash flow hedges. As of the years ended
December 31, 2004 and 2003, the net deferred gain and loss
on our interest rate swap and swaption agreements on an after
tax basis was $8.4 million and $3.3 million,
respectively, which was recorded as a component of OCI. Future
effective changes in fair value on these interest rate swap and
swaption agreements will be adjusted through OCI as long as the
cash flow hedge requirements continue to be met. Accumulated
other comprehensive income contains approximately
$0.5 million in deferred cash flow hedge gains (losses)
that the company expects to be realized into income over the
next 12 months, based on the respective December 31,
2004 valuations.
In 2004, the Company elected to apply the fair value hedge
provisions of SFAS 133 on certain tranches of our MSR
asset. Economically, the positions we use to hedge the MSR asset
include futures, interest rate floors, caps, and swaps, which
are intended to mitigate valuation declines that result from
changes and volatility in the interest rate environment. Gains
and losses on both designated and undesignated derivative
financial instruments are classified as a component of service
fee income for mortgage servicing assets, and as a component of
gain or (loss) on mortgage-backed securities, net, for our
AAA-rated interest-only and principal-only securities.
IndyMac recognizes ineffective changes in hedge values resulting
from designated SFAS 133 hedges discussed above in the same
income statement captions as effective changes when such
ineffectiveness occurs. IndyMac recognized gains totaling
$0.9 million and $0.2 million, and losses totaling
$5.8 million of ineffectiveness in earnings, respectively,
for the periods ended December 31, 2004, 2003, and 2002.
F-37
INDYMAC BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
We had the following derivative financial instruments as of
December 31, 2004 and 2003:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Notional | |
|
|
|
Expiration | |
|
|
Amounts | |
|
Fair Value | |
|
Dates | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Loans held for sale hedges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate lock commitments
|
|
$ |
3,547,883 |
|
|
$ |
1,354 |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
Forward agency and loan sales
|
|
|
1,933,000 |
|
|
|
(4,736 |
) |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
Euro Dollar futures contracts
|
|
|
7,424,000 |
|
|
|
1,282 |
|
|
|
2005-2009 |
|
AAA-rated interest-only securities and mortgage servicing hedges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate caps (LIBOR/ Swaps)
|
|
|
600,824 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-2006 |
|
|
Interest rate floors (LIBOR/ Swaps)
|
|
|
250,000 |
|
|
|
4,524 |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Euro Dollar futures contracts
|
|
|
4,810,000 |
|
|
|
3,446 |
|
|
|
2005-2006 |
|
|
Interest rate swaps (LIBOR)
|
|
|
3,050,000 |
|
|
|
(2,109 |
) |
|
|
2005-2024 |
|
|
Interest rate swaptions (LIBOR)
|
|
|
1,435,000 |
|
|
|
31,238 |
|
|
|
2005-2009 |
|
Borrowings and advances hedges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate caps (LIBOR/ Swaps)
|
|
|
24,524 |
|
|
|
249 |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Interest rate swaps (LIBOR)
|
|
|
4,091,460 |
|
|
|
28,511 |
|
|
|
2005-2009 |
|
|
Interest rate swaptions (LIBOR)
|
|
|
2,745,000 |
|
|
|
17,072 |
|
|
|
2005-2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
29,911,691 |
|
|
$ |
80,831 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Notional | |
|
|
|
Expiration | |
|
|
Amounts | |
|
Fair Value | |
|
Dates | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Loans held for sale hedges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate lock commitments
|
|
$ |
2,148,391 |
|
|
$ |
24,994 |
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
Forward agency and loan sales
|
|
|
1,934,194 |
|
|
|
(11,943 |
) |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
FNMA put options
|
|
|
115,000 |
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
2004 |
|
AAA-rated interest-only securities and mortgage servicing hedges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate caps (LIBOR/ Swaps)
|
|
|
1,944,190 |
|
|
|
1,190 |
|
|
|
2004-2006 |
|
|
Interest rate flooridors (LIBOR/ Swaps)
|
|
|
5,188,000 |
|
|
|
28,853 |
|
|
|
2006-2008 |
|
|
Interest rate swaps (LIBOR)
|
|
|
845,000 |
|
|
|
(2,568 |
) |
|
|
2004-2013 |
|
|
Interest rate swaptions (LIBOR)
|
|
|
865,000 |
|
|
|
53,855 |
|
|
|
2004-2008 |
|
Borrowings and advances hedges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps (LIBOR)
|
|
|
2,007,000 |
|
|
|
(19,385 |
) |
|
|
2005-2009 |
|
|
Interest rate swaptions (LIBOR)
|
|
|
2,950,000 |
|
|
|
39,778 |
|
|
|
2004-2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
17,996,775 |
|
|
$ |
114,853 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
While we do not anticipate nonperformance by the counterparties,
we manage credit risk with respect to such financial instruments
by entering into agreements with entities (including their
subsidiaries) approved by a committee of the Board of Directors
and with a long term credit rating of A or better.
Unless otherwise
F-38
INDYMAC BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
noted, we do not require collateral or other security to support
financial instruments with approved counterparties.
|
|
NOTE 16 |
FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS |
The following table presents the estimated fair values of the
various classes of financial instruments we held as of
December 31, 2004 and 2003. Fair value estimates were
determined for existing balance sheet and off-balance sheet
financial instruments, including derivative instruments, without
attempting to estimate the value of certain assets and
liabilities that are not considered financial instruments.
Significant assets that are not considered financial instruments
under SFAS No. 107, Disclosures about Fair
Value of Financial Instruments, include MSRs,
foreclosed assets, fixed assets, goodwill and intangible assets.
The estimated fair value amounts of our financial instruments
have been determined using available market information and
valuation methods that we believe are appropriate under the
circumstances. These estimates are inherently subjective in
nature and involve matters of significant uncertainty and
judgment to interpret relevant market and other data. The use of
different market assumptions and/or estimation methods may have
a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts.
Financial instruments consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
December 31, 2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Carrying | |
|
Estimated | |
|
Carrying | |
|
Estimated | |
|
|
Amount | |
|
Fair Value | |
|
Amount | |
|
Fair Value | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Financial Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
356,157 |
|
|
$ |
356,157 |
|
|
$ |
115,485 |
|
|
$ |
115,485 |
|
|
Securities classified as trading
|
|
|
235,036 |
|
|
|
235,036 |
|
|
|
223,632 |
|
|
|
223,632 |
|
|
Securities classified as available for sale
|
|
|
3,454,435 |
|
|
|
3,454,435 |
|
|
|
1,613,974 |
|
|
|
1,613,974 |
|
|
Loans held for sale
|
|
|
4,445,572 |
|
|
|
4,474,459 |
|
|
|
2,573,248 |
|
|
|
2,573,248 |
|
|
Loans held for investment
|
|
|
6,696,862 |
|
|
|
6,732,885 |
|
|
|
7,396,540 |
|
|
|
7,402,298 |
|
|
Investment in FHLB stock
|
|
|
390,716 |
|
|
|
390,716 |
|
|
|
313,284 |
|
|
|
313,284 |
|
Financial Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
5,743,479 |
|
|
|
5,584,017 |
|
|
|
4,350,773 |
|
|
|
4,260,193 |
|
|
Advances from the FHLB
|
|
|
6,162,000 |
|
|
|
6,160,151 |
|
|
|
4,934,911 |
|
|
|
4,949,477 |
|
|
Other borrowings
|
|
|
3,162,241 |
|
|
|
3,141,585 |
|
|
|
2,622,094 |
|
|
|
2,634,252 |
|
Derivative Financial Instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments to purchase and originate loans
|
|
|
1,354 |
|
|
|
1,354 |
|
|
|
24,994 |
|
|
|
24,994 |
|
|
Commitments to sell loans and securities
|
|
|
(4,736 |
) |
|
|
(4,736 |
) |
|
|
(11,943 |
) |
|
|
(11,943 |
) |
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
|
26,402 |
|
|
|
26,402 |
|
|
|
(21,953 |
) |
|
|
(21,953 |
) |
|
Interest rate swaptions
|
|
|
48,310 |
|
|
|
48,310 |
|
|
|
93,633 |
|
|
|
93,633 |
|
|
Interest rate caps, floors, flooridors and futures
|
|
|
9,501 |
|
|
|
9,501 |
|
|
|
30,043 |
|
|
|
30,043 |
|
|
Put options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
79 |
|
F-39
INDYMAC BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following describes the methods and assumptions we use in
estimating fair values:
Cash and Cash Equivalents. Carrying amount represents
fair value.
Mortgage-Backed Securities Classified as Trading or Available
for Sale. Carrying amount represents fair value. Fair value
is estimated using quoted market prices or by discounting future
cash flows using assumptions for prepayment rates, market yield
requirements and credit losses.
Loans Held for Sale. The fair value of loans held for
sale is estimated primarily based on quoted market prices for
securities backed by loans with similar coupons, maturities and
credit quality.
Loans Held for Investment. Fair value is estimated using
quoted market prices or by discounting future cash flows using
assumptions for prepayment rates, market yield requirements and
credit losses.
Investment in FHLB Stock. The carrying amount represents
the fair value. FHLB stock does not have a readily determinable
fair value, but can be sold back to the FHLB at its par value
with stated notice.
Deposits. The fair value of time deposits and transaction
accounts is determined using a cash flow analysis. The discount
rate for time deposits is derived from the rate currently
offered on alternate funding sources with similar maturities.
The discount rate for transaction accounts is derived from a
forward LIBOR curve plus a spread. Core deposit intangibles are
included in the valuation.
Advances from FHLB. The fair value of advances from FHLB
is valued using a cash flow analysis. The discount rate is
derived from the rate currently offered on similar borrowings.
Other Borrowings. Fair values are determined by
estimating future cash flows and discounting them using interest
rates currently available to us on similar borrowings.
Commitments to Purchase and Originate Loans. Fair value
is estimated based upon the difference between the current value
of similar loans and the price at which we have committed to
purchase or originate the loans, subject to the anticipated loan
funding probability, or fallout factor. With the adoption of
SAB No. 105 in 2004, the fair value as of
December 31, 2004 does not include the initial value
inherent in the rate lock commitments at origination and
represents the amount of change in value since the inception of
the commitments. The fair value of the commitments as of
December 31, 2003 included the initial inherent value of
the rate lock commitments.
Commitments to Sell Loans and Securities. We utilize
forward commitments to hedge interest rate risk associated with
loans held for sale and commitments to purchase loans. Fair
value of these commitments is determined based upon the
difference between the settlement values of the commitments and
the quoted market values of the securities.
Interest Rate Swaps, Swaptions, Caps, Floors, Flooridors,
Futures, and Put Options. Fair value for the caps, floors,
flooridors, and put options is estimated based upon specific
characteristics of the option being valued, such as the
underlying index, strike rate, and time to expiration, along
with quoted market levels of implied volatility for similar
instruments. Interest rate and Euro dollar futures are traded on
the Chicago Board of Trade and market pricing is readily
available and continuously quoted on systems such as Bloomberg.
Fair value for swap and swaption agreements is estimated using
discounted cash flow analyses based on expectations of rates
over the life of the swap or swaption as implied by the forward
swap curve.
F-40
INDYMAC BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
NOTE 17 |
OPERATING EXPENSES |
A summary of operating expenses is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Salaries and related
|
|
$ |
286,121 |
|
|
$ |
228,931 |
|
|
$ |
202,030 |
|
Premises and equipment
|
|
|
43,621 |
|
|
|
35,899 |
|
|
|
30,946 |
|
Loan purchase costs
|
|
|
34,790 |
|
|
|
29,916 |
|
|
|
23,349 |
|
Professional services
|
|
|
25,836 |
|
|
|
20,706 |
|
|
|
22,997 |
|
Data processing
|
|
|
36,181 |
|
|
|
36,236 |
|
|
|
20,500 |
|
Office
|
|
|
21,870 |
|
|
|
22,925 |
|
|
|
18,151 |
|
Advertising and promotion
|
|
|
43,488 |
|
|
|
26,803 |
|
|
|
13,705 |
|
Operations and sale of foreclosed assets
|
|
|
6,693 |
|
|
|
4,572 |
|
|
|
1,216 |
|
Other
|
|
|
22,777 |
|
|
|
18,617 |
|
|
|
11,164 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
$ |
521,377 |
|
|
$ |
424,605 |
|
|
$ |
344,058 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The income tax provision for the years ended December 31,
2004, 2003 and 2002 consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Current tax expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$ |
57,275 |
|
|
$ |
38,800 |
|
|
$ |
65,121 |
|
|
State
|
|
|
14,221 |
|
|
|
9,981 |
|
|
|
9,902 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current tax expense
|
|
|
71,496 |
|
|
|
48,781 |
|
|
|
75,023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
|
34,472 |
|
|
|
53,222 |
|
|
|
12,256 |
|
|
State
|
|
|
5,539 |
|
|
|
9,376 |
|
|
|
(512 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax expense
|
|
|
40,011 |
|
|
|
62,598 |
|
|
|
11,744 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income tax expense
|
|
$ |
111,507 |
|
|
$ |
111,379 |
|
|
$ |
86,767 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-41
INDYMAC BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The tax effect of temporary differences that gave rise to
significant portions of deferred tax assets and liabilities is
presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Deferred tax assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
$ |
20,397 |
|
|
$ |
19,111 |
|
State taxes
|
|
|
10,760 |
|
|
|
11,341 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax assets
|
|
|
31,157 |
|
|
|
30,452 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MSRs and mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
(199,242 |
) |
|
|
(161,113 |
) |
Other
|
|
|
(12,088 |
) |
|
|
(5,487 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
(211,330 |
) |
|
|
(166,600 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liability, net
|
|
$ |
(180,173 |
) |
|
$ |
(136,148 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The effective income tax rate differed from the federal
statutory rate for 2004 and 2003 as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Federal statutory rate
|
|
|
35.0 |
% |
|
|
35.0 |
% |
State income taxes, net of federal tax effect
|
|
|
4.6 |
% |
|
|
4.5 |
% |
Other items, net
|
|
|
(0.1 |
)% |
|
|
(0.1 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective income tax rate
|
|
|
39.5 |
% |
|
|
39.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 19 EARNINGS PER SHARE
The following is a reconciliation of the numerator and
denominator of the basic and diluted earnings per share
calculation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings | |
|
Average Shares | |
|
Per Share | |
|
|
(Numerator) | |
|
(Denominator) | |
|
Amount | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars and shares in thousands, except per | |
|
|
share data) | |
December 31, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings
|
|
$ |
170,522 |
|
|
|
59,513 |
|
|
$ |
2.87 |
|
Effect of options and restricted stock and warrants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,639 |
|
|
|
(0.13 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings
|
|
$ |
170,522 |
|
|
|
62,152 |
|
|
$ |
2.74 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings
|
|
$ |
171,303 |
|
|
|
55,247 |
|
|
$ |
3.10 |
|
Effect of options and restricted stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,679 |
|
|
|
(0.09 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings
|
|
$ |
171,303 |
|
|
|
56,926 |
|
|
$ |
3.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings
|
|
$ |
143,393 |
|
|
|
58,028 |
|
|
$ |
2.47 |
|
Effect of options and restricted stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,564 |
|
|
|
(0.06 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings
|
|
$ |
143,393 |
|
|
|
59,592 |
|
|
$ |
2.41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-42
INDYMAC BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Options to purchase 721,000 shares of common stock at
an average exercise price of $35.35 were outstanding at
December 31, 2004, but were not included in the computation
of diluted earnings per share because the options exercise
prices were greater than the average market price of the common
shares and, therefore, the effect would be antidilutive.
Additionally, 3,500,000 warrants issued in November of 2001, as
part of the WIRES offering, each convertible into
1.5972 shares of our common stock at an effective exercise
price of $31.50 per share, were outstanding, and were
included in the computation of diluted earnings per share for
2004. These warrants were not included in the computation of
diluted earnings per share for 2003 and 2002 because the effects
were antidilutive. The WIRES are described in more detail in
Note 12.
NOTE 20 ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE
LOSS
The following table presents the ending balance in accumulated
other comprehensive loss for each component:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Net (loss) gain on mortgage-backed securities available for
sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AAA-rated agency securities
|
|
$ |
(84 |
) |
|
$ |
(191 |
) |
|
$ |
(548 |
) |
|
AAA-rated agency notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,537 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
AAA-rated non-agency securities
|
|
|
(11,754 |
) |
|
|
(4,393 |
) |
|
|
(770 |
) |
|
Other investment and non-investment grade securities
|
|
|
4,191 |
|
|
|
717 |
|
|
|
1,328 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) gain on mortgage-backed securities available for sale
|
|
|
(7,647 |
) |
|
|
(5,404 |
) |
|
|
10 |
|
Net unrealized loss on derivatives used in cash flow hedges
|
|
|
(12,657 |
) |
|
|
(21,050 |
) |
|
|
(17,757 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
(20,304 |
) |
|
$ |
(26,454 |
) |
|
$ |
(17,747 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table presents the changes to other comprehensive
income (loss) and the related tax effect for each component:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Net (loss) gain on mortgage-backed securities available for sale
|
|
$ |
(3,708 |
) |
|
$ |
(8,949 |
) |
|
$ |
6,287 |
|
|
Related tax benefit (expense)
|
|
|
1,465 |
|
|
|
3,535 |
|
|
|
(2,798 |
) |
Mortgage securities transferred to trading
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,156 |
) |
|
Related tax benefit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,143 |
|
Net gain (loss) on interest rate swaps used in cash flow hedges
|
|
|
13,873 |
|
|
|
(5,443 |
) |
|
|
(32,126 |
) |
|
Related tax (expense) benefit
|
|
|
(5,480 |
) |
|
|
2,150 |
|
|
|
13,333 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change to accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
$ |
6,150 |
|
|
$ |
(8,707 |
) |
|
$ |
(18,317 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 21 |
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES |
Legal Matters
In the ordinary course of business, the Company and its
subsidiaries are defendants in or parties to a number of legal
actions. Certain of such actions involve alleged violations of
employment laws, unfair trade practices, consumer protection
laws, including claims relating to the Companys loan
origination and collection
F-43
INDYMAC BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
efforts, and other federal and state banking laws. Certain of
such actions include claims for breach of contract, restitution,
compensatory damages, punitive damages and other forms of
relief. The Company reviews these actions on an on-going basis
and follows the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 5, Accounting for
Contingencies when making accrual and disclosure
decisions. When assessing reasonably possible and probable
outcomes, the Company bases its decisions on the evidence
discovered and in its possession, the strength of probable
witness testimony, the viability of its defenses and the
likelihood of prevailing at trial or resolving the matter
through alternative dispute resolution. Due to the difficulty of
predicting the outcome of such actions, the Company can give no
assurance that it will prevail on all claims made against it;
however, management believes, based on current knowledge and
after consultation with counsel, that these legal actions,
individually and in the aggregate, and the losses, if any,
resulting from the final outcome thereof, will not have a
material adverse effect on the Company and its
subsidiaries financial position, but may have a material
impact on the results of operations of particular periods.
Commitments
We enter into a number of commitments in the normal course of
business. These commitments expose us to varying degrees of
credit and market risk and are subject to the same credit and
risk limitation reviews as those recorded on the consolidated
balance sheets. The following types of non-derivative
commitments were outstanding at year end:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Investment portfolio commitments to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase loans pursuant to clean-up calls
|
|
$ |
58,858 |
|
|
$ |
203,529 |
|
Undisbursed loan commitments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Builder construction
|
|
|
598,841 |
|
|
|
474,028 |
|
|
Consumer construction
|
|
|
1,142,409 |
|
|
|
897,554 |
|
|
HELOC
|
|
|
434,192 |
|
|
|
477,719 |
|
Letters of credit
|
|
|
10,577 |
|
|
|
16,507 |
|
IndyMac Bank has notified the trustees of certain securitization
trusts that we intend to exercise our clean-up call rights. A
clean-up call right is an option we retain when we securitize
our loans and retain the related servicing rights. This option
allows us to purchase the remaining loans from the
securitization trusts if the amount of outstanding loans falls
to a specified level, generally 10% of the original securitized
loan pool balance. At this level, the costs of servicing these
loans exceeds the economic benefit of servicing the loans. At
December 31, 2004, the loan purchase commitment under our
clean-up call rights approximated $58.9 million. IndyMac
Bank exercises its clean-up call rights based on
managements assessment of the economic benefits and costs
associated with such transactions.
Additionally, during 2002, the Company entered into agreements
with two mortgage insurance companies to reimburse those
companies for any losses incurred on certain portfolios of
single-family mortgage loans. The total single-family mortgage
loans covered by these agreements was $51.5 million and
$83.1 million as of December 31, 2004 and
December 31, 2003, respectively. The Companys
obligations under these agreements are accounted for in the
secondary marketing reserve, which is included in other
liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets. Total
reimbursements related to these agreements of $2.9 million
and $11.1 million were paid in 2004 and 2003, respectively.
Our Homebuilder Division issues standby letters of credit to
municipalities to guaranty the performance of improvements
related to tract construction projects. The risk of loss on the
standby letters of credit is mitigated by the fact that the
funds to complete the improvements are included in the
construction loan
F-44
INDYMAC BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
balance and supported by the underlying collateral value. We
have not incurred any loss on these standby letters of credit
since the inception of this practice.
Leases
We lease office facilities and equipment under lease agreements
extending through 2010. Future minimum annual rental commitments
under these non-cancelable operating leases, with initial or
remaining terms of one year or more, are as follows for the
years ended December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
2005
|
|
$ |
18,571 |
|
2006
|
|
|
19,431 |
|
2007
|
|
|
17,911 |
|
2008
|
|
|
16,175 |
|
2009
|
|
|
14,031 |
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
31,184 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
117,303 |
|
|
|
|
|
Included in the above table is an average annual payment of
$4.6 million, for a total of $24.1 million through
March 2010, payable to Countrywide Financial Corp., Inc.
(CFC) for our corporate headquarters in Pasadena,
California. At the time the lease was entered into, CFC was
considered a related party to the Company.
Rental expense, net of sublease income, for all operating leases
was $15.3 million, $17.0 million, and
$15.0 million, in 2004, 2003, and 2002, respectively.
NOTE 22 RELATED PARTY LOANS
At December 31, 2004 and 2003, we had $1.3 million in
notes receivable from our employees. There were no such loans
outstanding with directors at those dates. These loans have
varying interest rates and terms and were secured by IndyMac
stock or real estate.
NOTE 23 REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS
Federal Reserve Board regulations require depository
institutions to maintain certain deposit reserve balances. One
of our subsidiaries, IndyMac Bank, is a depository institution
required to maintain deposit reserves under the Federal Reserve
Board regulations. At December 31, 2004, IndyMac
Banks deposit reserve balance of $5.0 million,
included in cash and cash equivalents on the consolidated
balance sheets, met the required level.
IndyMac Banks primary federal regulatory agency, the OTS,
requires savings associations to satisfy three minimum capital
ratio requirements: tangible capital, Tier 1 core
(leverage) capital and risk-based capital. To meet general
minimum adequately capitalized requirements, a savings
association must maintain a tangible capital ratio of 1.5%, a
Tier 1 core capital ratio of 3% for the most highly rated
associations and 4% for others, and a risk-based capital ratio
of 8%. Most associations are expected to maintain capital levels
in excess of the above-mentioned capital levels. The OTS
regulations also specify minimum requirements to be considered a
well-capitalized institution. A
well-capitalized savings association must have a
total risk-based capital ratio of 10% or greater and a leverage
ratio of 5% or greater. Additionally, to qualify as a
well-capitalized institution, a savings
associations Tier 1 risk-based capital must be equal
to at least 6% of risk-weighted assets. In order not to be
deemed critically undercapitalized and therefore
subject to immediate remedial
F-45
INDYMAC BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
action, a savings association must maintain a tangible equity to
tangible assets ratio of 2%. As a result of the SGV Bancorp,
Inc. acquisition in July 2000, the OTS required that IndyMac
Bank hold Tier 1 (core) capital of at least 8% of
adjusted assets for three years following the consummation of
the transaction and maintain a total risk-based capital position
of at least 10% of risk-weighted assets. This particular
condition expired on July 1, 2003, and IndyMac Bank has
committed to the OTS to maintain the
well-capitalized minimums. IndyMac Bank is currently
well-capitalized. However, the characterization of
IndyMac Bank as well-capitalized by the OTS is for
prompt corrective action purposes only and does not
necessarily characterize IndyMac Banks financial condition.
During 2001, the OTS issued guidance for subprime lending
programs, which requires a lender to quantify the additional
risks in its subprime lending activities and determine the
appropriate amounts of allowances for loan losses and capital it
needs to offset those risks. The Company generally classifies
all loans in a first lien position with a FICO score less than
620 and all loans in a second lien position with a FICO score
less than 660 as subprime. As of December 31, 2004, loans
meeting this definition were supported by capital equal to two
times that of similar prime assets. We report our subprime loan
calculation in an addendum to the Thrift Financial Report that
we file with the OTS. As of December 31, 2004, subprime
loans totaled $695.8 million as calculated for regulatory
reporting purposes, of which $612.5 million were loans held
for sale.
The following table presents the IndyMac Banks actual and
required capital ratios and the minimum required capital ratios
to be categorized as well-capitalized at
December 31, 2004. Because not all institutions have
uniformly implemented the new subprime guidance, it is possible
that IndyMacs risk-based capital ratios will not be
comparable to other institutions. The impact of the additional
risk-weighting criteria had the effect of reducing
IndyMacs risk-based capital by 64 basis points as
noted in the table that follows.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted for | |
|
|
|
|
As Reported | |
|
Additional | |
|
Well- | |
|
|
Pre-Subprime | |
|
Subprime | |
|
Capitalized | |
|
|
Risk-Weighting | |
|
Risk-Weighting | |
|
Minimum | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Capital Ratios:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tangible
|
|
|
7.66% |
|
|
|
7.66% |
|
|
|
2.00% |
|
|
Tier 1 core
|
|
|
7.66% |
|
|
|
7.66% |
|
|
|
5.00% |
|
|
Tier 1 risk-based
|
|
|
12.14% |
|
|
|
11.53% |
|
|
|
6.00% |
|
|
Total risk-based
|
|
|
12.66% |
|
|
|
12.02% |
|
|
|
10.00% |
|
The ratios above do not include $102.7 million of
unencumbered cash at IndyMac Bancorp that is available for
contribution to IndyMac Banks regulatory capital. Under
the capital distribution regulations, a savings association that
is a subsidiary of a savings and loan holding company must
notify the OTS of an association capital distribution at least
30 days prior to the declaration of a dividend or the
approval by the Board of Directors of the proposed capital
distribution. The 30-day period provides the OTS an opportunity
to object to the proposed distribution if it believes that the
distribution would not be advisable.
An application to the OTS for specific approval to pay a
dividend, rather than the notice procedure described above, is
required if: (a) the total of all capital distributions
made during a calendar year (including the proposed
distribution) exceeds the sum of the institutions
year-to-date net income and its retained income for the
preceding two years; (b) the institution is not entitled
under OTS regulations to expedited treatment (which
is generally available to institutions the OTS regards as well
run and adequately capitalized); (c) the institution would
not be at least adequately capitalized following the
proposed capital distribution; or, (d) the distribution
would violate an applicable statute, regulation, agreement, or
condition imposed on the institution by the OTS.
F-46
INDYMAC BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
In addition to applicable OTS regulatory requirements, IndyMac
Bank is required to maintain compliance with various servicing
covenants such as a minimum net worth requirement. Management
believes IndyMac Bank was in compliance with all material
financial covenants as of December 31, 2004 and 2003.
NOTE 24 BENEFIT PLANS
Stock Incentive Plans
We have two stock incentive plans, the 2002 Incentive Plan, as
Amended and Restated, and the 2000 Stock Incentive Plan, as
amended (collectively, the Plans), which provide for
the granting of non-qualified stock options, incentive stock
options, restricted stock awards, performance stock awards,
stock bonuses and other awards to our employees (including
officers and directors). Options and awards are granted at the
average market price of our common stock on the date of grant,
vest over varying periods. Options expire ten years from the
date of grant. Unearned compensation on stock awards is being
amortized to compensation expense over the service period, not
exceeding five years, and is recorded as a reduction in
shareholders equity. In addition to the preceding activity
pursuant to the Plans, approximately 160,000 shares of
restricted stock awards were granted during 2004, primarily in
lieu of commission cash bonuses, for a fair value of
$5.5 million and a weighted-average share price of $34.29.
As of December 31, 2004, 339,974 nonvested restricted stock
awards were outstanding and 33,882 restricted stock awards were
forfeited during 2004. Compensation expense during 2004 related
to these restricted stock awards totaled $2.8 million.
As of December 31, 2004, options to
purchase 5.0 million shares were exercisable. There
were 3.2 million shares reserved for options and future
award grants outstanding under the Plans as of December 31,
2004. Stock option transactions for the years ended
December 31, 2004, 2003, and 2002, respectively, are
summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Options outstanding, beginning of year
|
|
|
9,776,396 |
|
|
|
11,159,592 |
|
|
|
8,983,388 |
|
|
Options granted
|
|
|
896,327 |
|
|
|
1,235,888 |
|
|
|
3,631,214 |
|
|
Options exercised
|
|
|
(1,788,918 |
) |
|
|
(1,770,428 |
) |
|
|
(710,325 |
) |
|
Options forfeited
|
|
|
(210,985 |
) |
|
|
(848,656 |
) |
|
|
(744,685 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options outstanding, end of year
|
|
|
8,672,820 |
|
|
|
9,776,396 |
|
|
|
11,159,592 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercisable, end of year
|
|
|
4,995,022 |
|
|
|
4,689,334 |
|
|
|
4,251,302 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average Exercise Price | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Options outstanding, beginning of year
|
|
$ |
19.50 |
|
|
$ |
18.95 |
|
|
$ |
16.92 |
|
|
Options granted
|
|
|
34.89 |
|
|
|
19.97 |
|
|
|
23.85 |
|
|
Options exercised
|
|
|
15.69 |
|
|
|
14.22 |
|
|
|
12.68 |
|
|
Options forfeited
|
|
|
23.42 |
|
|
|
24.00 |
|
|
|
24.23 |
|
Options outstanding, end of year
|
|
|
21.78 |
|
|
|
19.50 |
|
|
|
18.95 |
|
Options exercisable, end of year
|
|
|
19.78 |
|
|
|
17.62 |
|
|
|
14.63 |
|
F-47
INDYMAC BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following summarizes information about stock options
outstanding at December 31, 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding | |
|
Options Exercisable | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Weighted | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average | |
|
Weighted | |
|
|
|
Weighted | |
|
|
Number | |
|
Remaining | |
|
Average | |
|
Number | |
|
Average | |
|
|
Outstanding | |
|
Contractual | |
|
Exercise | |
|
Exercisable | |
|
Exercise | |
Range of Exercise Prices |
|
at Period End | |
|
Life (Years) | |
|
Price | |
|
at Period End | |
|
Price | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
$ 7.08 $10.61
|
|
|
255,356 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
$ |
10.25 |
|
|
|
255,356 |
|
|
$ |
10.25 |
|
$10.62 $14.15
|
|
|
1,583,381 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
11.54 |
|
|
|
1,283,381 |
|
|
|
11.62 |
|
$14.16 $17.69
|
|
|
98,800 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
|
15.97 |
|
|
|
98,800 |
|
|
|
15.97 |
|
$17.70 $21.22
|
|
|
1,437,878 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
|
18.92 |
|
|
|
541,704 |
|
|
|
18.97 |
|
$21.23 $24.76
|
|
|
2,485,390 |
|
|
|
6.3 |
|
|
|
24.26 |
|
|
|
1,602,791 |
|
|
|
24.30 |
|
$24.77 $28.30
|
|
|
1,960,582 |
|
|
|
7.3 |
|
|
|
25.11 |
|
|
|
1,212,990 |
|
|
|
25.13 |
|
$31.85 $35.38
|
|
|
851,433 |
|
|
|
9.2 |
|
|
|
34.89 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 7.08 $35.38
|
|
|
8,672,820 |
|
|
|
6.8 |
|
|
|
21.78 |
|
|
|
4,995,022 |
|
|
|
19.78 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Plan
Through December 31, 2002, we provided a defined benefit
pension plan (the DBP Plan) to substantially all of
our employees. Employees hired prior to January 1, 2003,
with one or more years of service are entitled to annual pension
benefits beginning at normal retirement age (65 years of
age) equal to a formula approximating 0.9% of final average
compensation multiplied by credited service (not in excess of
35 years), subject to a vesting requirement of five years
of service. Our policy is to contribute the amount actuarially
determined to be necessary to pay the benefits under the DBP
Plan, and in no event to pay less than the amount necessary to
meet the minimum funding standards of Employee Retirement Income
Security Act of 1974 (ERISA). Employees hired after
December 31, 2002 are not eligible for the DBP Plan.
The following tables set forth the change in the benefit
obligation and the change in plan assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Benefit obligation, beginning of year
|
|
$ |
21,515 |
|
|
$ |
12,167 |
|
Service cost
|
|
|
5,921 |
|
|
|
3,729 |
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
1,433 |
|
|
|
886 |
|
Benefits paid including expense
|
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
(27 |
) |
Actuarial loss
|
|
|
4,955 |
|
|
|
4,760 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation, end of year
|
|
$ |
33,794 |
|
|
$ |
21,515 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-48
INDYMAC BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Fair value of plan assets, beginning of year
|
|
$ |
12,708 |
|
|
$ |
6,333 |
|
Actual return on plan assets
|
|
|
1,450 |
|
|
|
1,538 |
|
Employer contributions
|
|
|
6,021 |
|
|
|
4,864 |
|
Benefits paid including expense
|
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets, end of year
|
|
$ |
20,149 |
|
|
$ |
12,708 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accrued pension costs recognized in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheets are computed as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Funded status
|
|
$ |
(13,646 |
) |
|
$ |
(8,807 |
) |
Unamortized prior service cost
|
|
|
658 |
|
|
|
714 |
|
Unrecognized net actuarial loss
|
|
|
11,707 |
|
|
|
7,435 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued pension cost
|
|
$ |
(1,281 |
) |
|
$ |
(658 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts recognized in the accompanying balance sheets consist of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in | |
|
|
thousands) | |
Prepaid benefit cost
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Accrued pension cost
|
|
|
1,281 |
|
|
|
658 |
|
Intangible assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net amount recognized
|
|
$ |
1,281 |
|
|
$ |
658 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The components of net periodic expense for the DBP Plan are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in | |
|
|
thousands) | |
Service cost
|
|
$ |
5,921 |
|
|
$ |
3,729 |
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
1,433 |
|
|
|
886 |
|
Expected return on assets
|
|
|
(1,178 |
) |
|
|
(658 |
) |
Recognized actuarial loss
|
|
|
412 |
|
|
|
189 |
|
Amortization of prior service cost
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic expense
|
|
$ |
6,644 |
|
|
$ |
4,202 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-49
INDYMAC BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The weighted-average assumptions used in computing the preceding
information as of December 31, 2004 and 2003 were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Benefit obligations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
6.00 |
% |
|
|
6.00 |
% |
|
Rate of compensation increase
|
|
|
4.00 |
% |
|
|
4.00 |
% |
Net periodic costs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
6.00 |
% |
|
|
6.75 |
% |
|
Rate of compensation increase
|
|
|
4.00 |
% |
|
|
4.00 |
% |
|
Expected return on assets
|
|
|
7.50 |
% |
|
|
7.50 |
% |
The DBP Plans weighted-average asset allocation as of the
measurement date, by asset category, is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Money market
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bond and mortgage
|
|
|
34 |
% |
|
|
35 |
% |
Large cap stock index
|
|
|
66 |
% |
|
|
65 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The investment goals and the allocation of the plan assets are
determined jointly by the Employee Benefits Fiduciary Committee
and Principal Life Insurance Company, the investment manager of
the Plan. The assets of the DBP Plan are invested to provide
safety through diversification in a portfolio of equity
investments, common stocks, bonds and other investments which
may reflect varying rates of return. Only classes or categories
of investments allowed by the Employee Retirement Income
Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) as acceptable
investment choices are considered. The overall return objective
for the portfolio is a reasonable rate on a long-term basis that
would balance the benefit obligations with the appropriate asset
allocation mix consistent with the risk levels established by
our Employee Benefits Fiduciary Committee.
During 2004 the Company contributed $6.0 million to the DBP
Plan for the 2003 plan year. We expect to make contributions of
$8.0 million in 2005 for the 2004 plan year.
The Companys 2004 and 2003 pension expense was calculated
based upon a number of actuarial assumptions, including an
expected long-term rate of return on plan assets of 7.5% for
both years. In developing the long-term rate of return
assumption, historical asset class returns as well as expected
returns were evaluated based upon broad equity and bond indices.
The expected long-term rate of return on plan assets assumes an
asset allocation of approximately 66% in equity and 34% in fixed
income financial instruments. The Employee Benefits Fiduciary
Committee regularly reviews the asset allocation with its plan
investment manager and periodically rebalances the investment
mix to achieve certain investment goals when considered
appropriate. Actuarial assumptions, including the expected rate
of return, are reviewed at least annually, and are adjusted as
necessary.
The discount rate that was utilized for determining our pension
obligation and net periodic cost was based on a review of
long-term bonds that received one of the two highest ratings
given by a recognized rating agency. The discount rate for our
pension obligation remained the same at 6.00% in 2004 due to
small movements in the long-term interest rates.
F-50
INDYMAC BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table indicates the benefits expected to be paid
in each of the next five fiscal years, and in the aggregate for
the five fiscal years thereafter:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in | |
|
|
thousands) | |
2005
|
|
$ |
19 |
|
2006
|
|
|
61 |
|
2007
|
|
|
99 |
|
2008
|
|
|
229 |
|
2009
|
|
|
274 |
|
2010-2014
|
|
|
4,185 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
4,867 |
|
|
|
|
|
Defined Contribution Plan
We also offer a defined contribution plan (the
401(k) Plan) covering substantially all of our
employees. Employees with 90 days or more of service may
contribute up to 40% of annual compensation to a maximum of
$13,000 of pre-tax annual compensation in 2004. We may
determine, at our discretion, the amount of employer matching
contributions to be made. We contributed a total of
$4.6 million, $3.7 million, and $2.7 million
during the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002,
respectively. During each of the years, we matched 75% of the
first 3% of the annual compensation contributed by the employee
and 25% of the second 3% of the annual compensation contributed
by the employee to the 401(k) Plan. The employer matching
contribution was made in cash.
NOTE 25 SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS PLAN
Our Board of Directors adopted a Shareholder Rights Plan (the
Rights Plan) on October 17, 2001. The
Boards purpose in adopting the Rights Plan is to protect
shareholder value in the event of an unsolicited offer to
acquire us, particularly one that does not provide equitable
treatment to all shareholders. In connection with the adoption
of the Rights Plan, we declared a distribution of one right to
purchase one one-hundredth of a share of Series A Junior
Participating Preferred Shares (Preferred Shares)
for each outstanding share of common stock, payable to the
shareholders of record on November 1, 2001. These rights
automatically become associated with outstanding shares of
common stock on our books, and individual shareholders need take
no action with respect thereto. The rights will not become
exercisable unless an investor acquires 15 percent or more
of our common shares, or announces a tender offer that would
result in the investor owning 15 percent or more of our
common shares or makes certain regulatory filings seeking
authority to acquire 15 percent or more of our common
shares. If someone does acquire 15 percent or more of our
common shares, or acquires us in a merger or other transaction,
each right would entitle the holder, other than the investor
triggering the rights and related persons, to purchase common
shares, or shares of an entity that acquires us, at half of the
then current market price. The Board of Directors authorized and
directed the issuance of one right with respect to each common
share issued thereafter until the redemption date (as defined in
the Rights Agreement). The terms of the rights are set forth in
the Rights Agreement between us and the Bank of New York, as
Rights Agent, dated as of October 17, 2001. The rights will
expire at the close of business on October 17, 2011,
unless we redeem them earlier. The Preferred Shares have a par
value of $0.01 per share, are junior to all other series of
our preferred shares, and are entitled to quarterly dividends at
a rate equal to the dividends paid, if any, on 100 common
shares. Each one one-hundredth of a Preferred Share entitles the
holder to one vote on matters submitted to a vote of our
shareholders. The Rights Plan can be terminated or amended by
the Board at any time.
F-51
INDYMAC BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
NOTE 26 QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA
UNAUDITED
Selected quarterly financial data follows for the years ended
December 31, 2004 and 2003:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31 | |
|
June 30 | |
|
September 30 | |
|
December 31 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data) | |
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
$ |
166,559 |
|
|
$ |
190,308 |
|
|
$ |
195,003 |
|
|
$ |
215,738 |
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
72,626 |
|
|
|
83,330 |
|
|
|
94,413 |
|
|
|
112,177 |
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
93,933 |
|
|
|
106,978 |
|
|
|
100,590 |
|
|
|
103,561 |
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
|
3,200 |
|
|
|
1,498 |
|
|
|
1,972 |
|
|
Gain on sale of loans and securities, net
|
|
|
78,681 |
|
|
|
62,670 |
|
|
|
88,614 |
|
|
|
110,044 |
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
|
41,930 |
|
|
|
22,955 |
|
|
|
49,726 |
|
|
|
55,911 |
|
|
Earnings per share(1):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$ |
0.74 |
|
|
$ |
0.39 |
|
|
$ |
0.81 |
|
|
$ |
0.91 |
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
0.70 |
|
|
|
0.38 |
|
|
|
0.78 |
|
|
|
0.87 |
|
2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
$ |
128,196 |
|
|
$ |
132,477 |
|
|
$ |
147,339 |
|
|
$ |
167,829 |
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
65,172 |
|
|
|
64,962 |
|
|
|
64,886 |
|
|
|
69,884 |
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
63,024 |
|
|
|
67,515 |
|
|
|
82,453 |
|
|
|
97,945 |
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
3,100 |
|
|
|
6,900 |
|
|
|
6,200 |
|
|
|
3,500 |
|
|
Gain on sale of loans and securities, net
|
|
|
76,873 |
|
|
|
92,888 |
|
|
|
112,851 |
|
|
|
73,846 |
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
|
36,917 |
|
|
|
41,369 |
|
|
|
49,704 |
|
|
|
43,313 |
|
|
Earnings per share(1):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$ |
0.67 |
|
|
$ |
0.75 |
|
|
$ |
0.90 |
|
|
$ |
0.78 |
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
0.66 |
|
|
|
0.73 |
|
|
|
0.87 |
|
|
|
0.75 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Earnings per share are computed independently for each of the
quarters presented. Therefore, the sum of the quarterly earnings
per share may not equal the total for the year. |
F-52
Directors
IndyMac Bancorp & IndyMac Bank
Michael W. Perry
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
James R.
Ukropina, Esq.1,
3, 4, 7, 8
Presiding Director
Chief Executive Officer
Directions, LLC
Louis E.
Caldera3,
4, 7
President
University of New Mexico
Lyle E.
Gramley2,
5, 7
Senior Economic Adviser
Stanford Washington Research Group
Hugh M.
Grant1, 5,
7, 8
Retired Vice Chairman
Ernst & Young, LLP
Patrick C.
Haden5, 6,
7
General Partner
Riordan, Lewis & Haden
Equity Investments
Terrance G.
Hodel2, 5,
7
Former President and Chief Operations Officer
North American Mortgage Company
Robert L.
Hunt II1,
2, 7, 8
Former President and Chief Operations Officer
Coast Savings Financial, Inc.
Senator John Seymour
(ret.)3,
4, 7
Former Chief Executive Officer,
Southern California Housing Development Corporation
IndyMac Bank
Stuart A.
Gabriel2,
6, 7
Director and Lusk Chair in Real Estate at the University of
Southern California Lusk Center for Real Estate
Lydia H.
Kennard6,
7
Chairman
KDG Development Construction Consulting
Directors Emeritus
Thomas J. Kearns
Frederick J. Napolitano
Board Committees & Designations
|
|
1. |
Audit Committee |
2. |
Asset and Liability Committee |
3. |
Management, Development and Compensation Committee |
4. |
Corporate Nominating and Governance Committee |
5. |
Strategic & Financial Planning Committee |
6. |
Community Lending, Compliance and Technology Committee |
7. |
Independent Director |
8. |
Audit Committee Financial Expert |
Executive Committee
Michael W. Perry
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Scott Keys
Executive Vice President
Chief Financial Officer
S. Blair Abernathy
Executive Vice President
Investment Portfolio, Whole Loans and MBS
Ashwin Adarkar
Executive Vice President
Chief Executive Officer
Consumer Bank Corporate Development & Global
Resources
Gary D. Clark
Executive Vice President
Chief Information Officer, MBPAT
John D. DelPonti, Jr.
Executive Vice President
Chief Risk Officer
Sherry M. DuPont
Executive Vice President
General Counsel
Anthony L. Ebers
Executive Vice President
Consumer Direct and Indirect Lending and Servicing
James A. Fraser
Executive Vice President
Chief Executive Officer, Consumer Construction Lending
Gulshan Garg
Executive Vice President
Chief Technology Officer, MBPAT
Patrick A. Hymel
Executive Vice President
Retained Assets
R. Patterson Jackson III
Executive Vice President
Chief Executive Officer, Home Equity Division and Government
Lending
James R. Mahoney
Executive Vice President
Chief Executive Officer, Financial Freedom
Raymond D. Matsumoto
Executive Vice President
Enterprise Process and Technology
Michelle Minier
Executive Vice President
SFR Lending Operations and Risk Management
Grosvenor G. Nichols
Executive Vice President
Chief Administrative Officer
John D. Olinski
Executive Vice President
Secondary Marketing and Retained Assets
Thomas H. Potts
Executive Vice President
Corporate Finance
Frank M. Sillman
Executive Vice President
Chief Executive Officer, Mortgage Professionals
Scott W. Van Dellen
Executive Vice President
Chief Executive Officer, Homebuilder Division
Charles A. Williams
Executive Vice President
Chief Audit Executive
Richard H. Wohl
Chief Executive Officer
IndyMac Mortgage Bank
Francisco Nebot
Senior Vice President
Whole Loan Portfolio
Executive Vice Presidents
James M. Banks
Jill I. Barnes
Drew R. Buccino
Kevin D. Cochrane
Edward L. Goddin
Charles T. Holroyd, Jr
Kenneth R. Horner
James R. Jerwers
Richard C. Lieber
Pamela K. Marsh
Mark A. Mozilo
Mark C. Nelson
James D. Nichols, Jr.
Joel M. Packer
Tim D. Ray
Jules R. Vogel
Senior Vice Presidents
Anwar Akram
Brent Anderson
David M. Balsam
William B. Barber
James L. Barbour
Alpino Benedetti
Jeffrey M. Birdsell
Wendy L. Cariello
Brian N. Carter
Mohan Chhabra
Christina Ching
Marianne Churney
Craig Corn
Scott B. Cousins
Brigitte Dewez
Edward J. Doyle III
Joanne Droge
Bruce C. Duclos
Kathy L. Edwards
Todd A. Elling
Terrin U. Enssle
Brent H. Frost
Melissa K. Gerard
Molly J. Graham
Samir Grover
Etta M. Helm
David Hickey
Lawrence V. Holguin
Janice Kay Huey
Leonard Israel II
Barton Johnson
Kurt G. Johnson
J. Mark Kempton
Richard S. Koon II
Robert Kos
John R. Krantz
Jeffrey W. Lankey
John M. Lawrence
Don E. Linde
Steven M. Majerus
Karen M. Mastro
Rayman K. Mathoda
Susan E. McGovney
Ellen F. Mochizuki
Sharad Nishith
Barbara Perez
John J. Reed
Maria A. Roa
Joel A. Schiffman
Steven Schwimmer
Andrew J. Sciandra
Ramanupam Sen
Kenneth Shellem
Walter Tharp
Aaron D. Wade
Thomas Wagner
Raedelle A. Walker
Marie-Therese Wynne