UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

FORM 10-K

þ	ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For The Year Ended December 31, 2004

Commission File Number 001-14784

Income Opportunity Realty Investors, Inc.

(214) 750-5800
(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

NONE

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for at least the past 90 days.       Yes þ No o

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.       þ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes o No þ

The aggregate market value of the shares of voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the Registrant, computed by reference to the closing sales price of the Common Stock on the American Stock Exchange as of June 30, 2004 (the last business day of the Registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter) was $4,034,394 based upon a total of 298,844 shares held as of June 30, 2004 by persons believed to be non-affiliates of the Registrant. The basis of the calculation does not constitute a determination by the Registrant as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, such calculation, if made as of a date within sixty days of this filing would yield a different value. As of March 18, 2005, there were 1,389,345 shares of common stock outstanding.

Documents Incorporated by Reference:
NONE

INDEX TO
ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K

2

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Certain Statements in this Form 10-K are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The words “estimate,” “plan,” “intend,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “believe,” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements are found at various places throughout this Report and in the documents incorporated herein by reference. The Company disclaims any intention or obligations to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. Although we believe that our expectations are based upon reasonable assumptions, we can give no assurance that our goals will be achieved. Important factors that could cause our actual results to differ from estimates or projections contained in any forward-looking statements are described under “Risks Related to the Company” beginning on page 7.

PART I

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

Income Opportunity Realty Investors, Inc. (“IORI” or the “Company” or “we” or “us”), a Nevada corporation, is the successor to a California business trust organized on December 14, 1984, which commenced operations on April 15, 1985. Prior to January 1, 2003, IORI elected to be treated as a Real Estate Investment Trust (“REIT”) under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). Due to the completion of a tender offer by American Realty Investors, Inc. (“ARI”), an affiliate, on March 19, 2003, and the resulting concentration of ownership, IORI no longer met the requirement as of January 1, 2003 for tax treatment as a REIT. Currently, Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc. (“TCI”), an affiliate, owns approximately 24.9% of IORI’s outstanding shares of Common Stock. IORI cannot re-qualify for REIT tax status for at least five years after January 1, 2003.

At December 31, 2004, IORI’s real estate consisted of 10 properties held for investment. In addition, IORI owns an interest in one partnership, which owns real property and a second partnership which holds a wraparound mortgage note receivable. IORI’s real estate portfolio is more fully discussed in ITEM 2. “PROPERTIES.”

Acquisition by Syntek West, Inc. – Change of Control

On June 2, 2003, Syntek West, Inc. (“SWI”) purchased 106,802 shares and 674,971 shares of IORI Common Stock (a total of 781,773 shares, or approximately 54.3% of the outstanding shares) as a “block” from Basic Capital Management, Inc. (“BCM”) at a price of $18.45 per share for a total price of $14,423,711. SWI is also the contractual advisor to IORI.

3

Business Plan

IORI’s business is investing in equity interests in real estate through direct equity investments and partnerships, and financing real estate and real estate related activities through investments in mortgage loans. IORI’s real estate is located in the Southwest region of the continental United States. Information regarding IORI’s real estate portfolio is set forth in ITEM 2. “PROPERTIES,” and in Schedule III to the Consolidated Financial Statements included at ITEM 8. “FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA.” IORI has three operating segments, Apartments, Commercial Properties and land ownership. See Note 14 to the Financial Statements.

IORI’s business is not seasonal. Management has determined to pursue a balanced investment strategy, seeking both current income and capital appreciation. With respect to new investments, management’s plan of operation is to acquire higher class apartment and commercial properties in keeping with the current class of properties in IORI’s real estate portfolio. In 2005, management intends to focus on income producing property acquisitions to maintain a balance between income producing and non-income producing properties. Management does not expect that IORI will seek to fund or acquire additional mortgage loans. IORI may, however, originate mortgage loans in conjunction with providing purchase money financing of a property sale. Management also intends to continue its strategy of maximizing each property’s operating income by aggressive property management through closely monitoring expenses while at the same time making property renovations and/or improvements where appropriate. While renovation and/or improvement expenditures increase the amount of revenue required to cover operating expenses, management believes that such expenditures are necessary to maintain or enhance the value of IORI’s properties.

The Board of Directors currently intends to continue its policy of prohibiting IORI from incurring aggregate secured and unsecured indebtedness in excess of 300% of IORI’s net asset value (defined as the book value of all assets of IORI minus all of its liabilities); however, the Board may alter such policy at any time.

Management of the Company

Although the Board of Directors is directly responsible for managing the affairs of IORI and for setting the policies which guide it, the day-to-day operations of IORI are performed by Syntek West, Inc. (“SWI”), the contractual advisor under the supervision of the Board. SWI’s duties include, among other things, locating, investigating, evaluating and recommending real estate and mortgage note investment, acquisitions, and sales opportunities, as well as financing and refinancing sources. SWI also serves as a consultant in connection with IORI’s business plan and investment decisions made by the Board.

All of the issued and outstanding common stock of SWI is owned by Gene

4

E. Phillips. Mr. Phillips is Chairman, President, Chief Executive Officer, and a Director of SWI, and he is involved in daily consultation with the officers of SWI and has significant influence over the conduct of SWI’s business, including the rendering of advisory services and the making of investment decisions for itself and for IORI. See ITEM 10. “DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND ADVISOR OF THE REGISTRANT—The Advisor.”

Effective June 30, 2003 IORI terminated its Advisory Agreement with BCM. BCM had served as IORI’s advisor from 1989 to June 30, 2003. On July 1, 2003 IORI entered into an Advisory Agreement with SWI, the beneficial owner and holder of approximately 54.3% of IORI’s common stock at the time. The new advisory agreement with SWI contains the same terms as the old one with BCM.

Since February 1, 1990, affiliates of BCM have provided property management services to IORI. Currently Triad Realty Services, Ltd. (“Triad”) provides such property management services. Triad subcontracts with other entities for the provision of property-level management services to IORI. The general partner of Triad is BCM. The limited partner of Triad is Highland Realty Services, Inc. (“Highland”). Triad subcontracted the property-level management and leasing of IORI’s five office buildings and the commercial property owned by a real estate partnership in which IORI and TCI are partners to Regis Realty, Inc. (“Regis”), which is a company owned by Highland, until December 2002. Regis was entitled to receive property and construction management fees and leasing commissions in accordance with the terms of its property-level management agreement with Triad, until December 2002. Regis also was entitled to receive real estate brokerage commissions in accordance with the terms of a non-exclusive brokerage agreement. Since January 1, 2003, Regis Realty I, LLC (“Regis I”) has provided these services. Regis I is also owned by Highland. See ITEM 10. “DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND ADVISOR OF THE REGISTRANT-The Advisor.”

IORI has no employees. Employees of SWI render services to IORI.

Competition

The real estate business is highly competitive and IORI competes with numerous entities engaged in real estate activities (including certain entities described in ITEM 13. “CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS—Related Party Transactions”), some of which have greater financial resources than those of IORI. Management believes that success against such competition is dependent upon the geographic location of the property, the performance of the property-level managers in areas such as marketing, collection and control of operating expenses, the amount of new construction in the area and the maintenance and appearance of the property. Additional competitive factors with respect to commercial properties are the ease of access to the property, the adequacy of related facilities, such as parking, and sensitivity to market conditions in setting rent levels. With respect to apartments, competition is also based upon the design and mix of units and IORI’s

5

ability to provide a community atmosphere for the tenants. Management believes that beyond general economic circumstances and trends, the rate at which properties are renovated or the rate new properties are developed in the vicinity of each of IORI’s properties also are competitive factors.

To the extent that IORI seeks to sell any of its properties, the sales prices for such properties may be affected by competition from other
real estate entities and financial institutions also attempting to sell their properties located in the same areas as well as aggressive buyers attempting to penetrate or dominate a particular market.

As described above (and in ITEM 13. “CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS—Related Party Transactions”) two of the officers of IORI also serve as officers or directors of certain other entities, such as BCM, Prime Income Asset Management, Inc. (“PIAMI”), ARI and TCI, some of which have business objectives similar to those of IORI. One Director of IORI also serves as an officer and director of SWI. IORI’s Directors, officers and advisor owe fiduciary duties to such other entities as well as to IORI under applicable law. In determining to which entity a particular investment opportunity will be allocated, the officers, Directors and contractual advisors consider the respective investment objectives of each entity and the appropriateness of a particular investment in light of each entity’s existing real estate and mortgage notes receivable portfolios. To the extent that any particular investment opportunity is appropriate to more than one of the entities, the investment opportunity will be allocated to the entity which has these funds available for investment for the longest period of time, or, if appropriate, the investment may be shared among all or some of such entities.

In addition, as described in ITEM 13. “CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS—Certain Business Relationships,” IORI also competes with other entities which are affiliates of SWI, which may have investment objectives similar to IORI’s and that may compete with it in the acquisition, sale, leasing and financing of real estate. In resolving any potential conflicts of interest which may arise, SWI has informed management that it intends to continue to exercise its best judgment as to what is fair and reasonable under the circumstances in accordance with applicable law.

Certain Factors Associated with Real Estate and Related Investments

IORI is subject to all the risks incident to ownership and financing of real estate and interests therein, many of which relate to the general illiquidity of real estate investments. These risks include, but are not limited to, changes in general or local economic conditions, changes in interest rates and the availability of permanent mortgage financing which may render the acquisition, sale or refinancing of a property difficult or unattractive and which may make debt service burdensome, changes in real estate and zoning laws, increases in real estate taxes,

6

federal or local economic or rent controls, floods, earthquakes, hurricanes and other acts of God and other factors beyond the control of management or SWI. The illiquidity of real estate investments also may impair the ability of management to respond promptly to changing circumstances. Management believes that such risks can be partially mitigated by the diversification by geographic region and property type of IORI’s real estate portfolio. However, to the extent property acquisitions are concentrated in any particular geographic region or property type, the advantages of diversification may be mitigated.

Available Information

IORI’s Common Stock is traded on the American Exchange, Inc. (“AMEX”) under the symbol “IOT.” Our principal executive offices are located at 1755 Wittington Place, Suite 340, Dallas, Texas 75234, and our telephone number is 214-750-5800.

We maintain an internet website at http://www.incomeopp-realty.com. We make available through our website, free of charge, our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, reports filed pursuant to Section 16 and amendments to those reports as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file or furnish such materials to the Securities and Exchange Commission. In addition, we have posted the Charters of our Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, and our Governance and Nominating Committee, as well as our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, Corporate Governance Guidelines on Director Independence, and other information on our website. These charters and principles are not incorporated in this Report by reference. We will also provide a copy of these documents free of charge to stock holders upon written request. The Company issues Annual Reports containing audited financial statements to its common stockholders.

Risks Related to the Company

Adverse events concerning existing tenants, or negative market conditions that may affect existing tenants could have an adverse impact on our ability to attract new tenants, relet space, collect rent or renew leases, and thus could adversely affect our cash flow from operations and inhibit growth.

Our cash flow from operations depends on the ability to lease space to tenants on economically favorable terms. Therefore, we could be adversely affected by various facts and events over which we have limited control, such as:

•

lack of demand for space in areas where our properties are located

7

	•	inability to retain existing tenants and attract new tenants
	•	oversupply of or reduced demand for space and changes in market rental rates
	•	defaults by our tenants or their failure to pay rent on a timely basis
	•	the need to periodically renovate and repair our space
	•	physical damage to our properties
	•	economic or physical decline of the areas where our properties are located
	•	potential risk of functional obsolescence of our properties over time

At any time, any of our tenants may experience a downturn in its business that may weaken its financial condition. As a result, a tenant may delay lease commencement, fail to make rental payments when due, decline to extend a lease upon its expiration, become insolvent or declare bankruptcy. Any tenant bankruptcy or insolvency, leasing delay or failure to make rental payments when due could result in the termination of the tenant’s lease and material losses to our Company.

If tenants do not renew their leases as they expire, we may not be able to rent the space. Furthermore, leases that are renewed, and some new leases for space that is relet, may have terms that are less economically favorable to us than current lease terms, or may require us to incur significant costs, such as for renovations, tenant improvements or lease transaction costs.

Any of these events could adversely affect our cash flow from operations and our ability to make expected distributions to shareholders and service our indebtedness.

A significant portion of our costs, such as real estate taxes, insurance costs, and debt service payments, generally are not reduced when circumstances cause a decrease in cash flow from our properties.

We may not be able to compete successfully with other entities that operate in our industry.

We experience a great deal of competition in attracting tenants for our properties and in locating land to develop and properties to acquire.

In our effort to lease our properties, we compete for tenants with a broad spectrum of other landlords in each of our markets. These competitors include, among others, publicly-held REITs, privately-held

8

entities, individual property owners and tenant who wish to sublease their space. Some of these competitors may be able to offer prospective tenants more attractive financial terms than we are able to offer.

If the availability of land or high quality properties in our markets diminishes, our operating results could be adversely affected.

We may experience increased operating costs, which could adversely affect our operations.

Our properties are subject to increases in operating expenses such as insurance, cleaning, electricity, heating, ventilation and air conditioning, administrative costs and other costs associated with security, landscaping, repairs and maintenance of our properties. While our current tenants generally are obligated to pay a significant portion of these costs, there is no assurance that these tenants will make such payments or agree to pay these costs upon renewal or that new tenants will agree to pay these costs. If operating expenses increase in our markets, we may not be able to increase rents or reimbursements in all of these markets so as to meet increased expenses without at the same time decreasing occupancy rates. If this occurs, our ability to make distributions to shareholders and service our indebtedness could be adversely affected.

We face risks associated with property acquisitions.

We acquire individual properties and portfolios of properties, and intend to continue to do so. Our acquisition activities and their successes are subject to the following risks:

	•	when we are able to locate a desired property, competition from other real estate investors may significantly increase the purchase price
	•	acquired properties may fail to perform as expected
	•	the actual costs of repositioning or redeveloping acquired properties may be higher than our estimates
	•	acquired properties may be located in new markets where we face risks associated with an incomplete knowledge or understanding of the local market, a limited number of established business relationships in the area and a relative unfamiliarity with local governmental and permitting procedures
	•	we may be unable to quickly and efficiently integrate new acquisitions, particularly acquisitions of portfolios of properties, into our existing operations, and as a result, our results of operations and financial condition could be adversely affected

9

We may acquire properties subject to liabilities and without any recourse, or with only limited recourse, with respect to unknown liabilities. As a result, if a liability were asserted against us based upon ownership of those properties, we might have to pay substantial sums to settle it, which could adversely affect our cash flow.

Many of our properties are concentrated in our primary markets, and we therefore may suffer economic harm as a result of adverse conditions in those markets.

Our properties are located principally in specific geographic areas in the Southwestern United States. Due to the concentration of our properties in these areas, performance is dependent on economic conditions in these areas. These areas have experienced periods of economic decline.

We may not be able to access financial markets to obtain capital on a timely basis, or on acceptable terms.

We rely on proceeds from property dispositions and third party capital
sources for a portion of our capital needs, including capital for acquisitions and development. The public debt and equity markets are among the sources we rely on. There is no guarantee that we will be able to access these markets, or any other source of capital. The ability to access the public debt and equity markets depends on a variety of factors, including:

	•	general economic conditions affecting these markets
	•	our own financial structure and performance
	•	the market’s opinion of REITs and real estate companies in general
	•	the market’s opinion of REITs and real estate companies that own properties like ours

We may suffer adverse effects as a result of the terms of and covenants relating to our indebtedness.

Required payments on our indebtedness generally are not reduced if the economic performance of the portfolios declines. If the economic performance declines, net income, cash flow from operations and cash available for distribution to stockholders will be reduced. If payments on debt cannot be made, we could sustain a loss, or in the case of mortgages, suffer foreclosures by mortgagees or suffer judgments. Further, some obligations contain cross-default and/or cross-acceleration provisions, which means that a default on one obligation may constitute a default on other obligations.

We anticipate that only a small portion of the principal of our debt will be repaid prior to maturity. Therefore, we are likely to need to refinance at least a portion of our outstanding debts as it matures. There is a risk that we may not be able to refinance existing debt or

10

that the terms of any refinancing will not be as favorable as the terms of our existing debt. If principal payments due at maturity cannot be refinanced, extended or repaid with proceeds from other sources, such as the proceeds of sales of assets or new equity securities, our cash flow will not be sufficient to repay all maturing debt in years when significant “balloon” payments come due.

Our credit facilities and unsecured debt securities contain customary restrictions, requirements and other limitations on our ability to incur indebtedness, including total debt to asset ratios, secured debt to total asset ratios, debt service coverage ratios and minimum ratios of unencumbered assets to unsecured debt which we must maintain. Our continued ability to borrow is subject to compliance with our financial and other covenants. In addition, our failure to comply with such covenants could cause a default under credit facilities, and we may then be required to repay such debt with capital from other sources. Under those circumstances, other sources of capital may not be available to us, or be available only on unattractive terms.

Our degree of leverage could limit our ability to obtain additional financing or affect the market price of our common stock.

Our degree of leverage could affect our ability to obtain additional financing for working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions, development or other general corporate purposes. Our degree of leverage could also make us more vulnerable to a downturn in business or the economy generally.

An increase in interest rates would increase our interest costs on variable rate debt and could adversely impact our ability to refinance existing debt.

We currently have, and may incur more, indebtedness that bears interest at variable rates. Accordingly, if interest rates increase, so will our interest costs, which would adversely affect our cash flow and our ability to pay principal and interest on our debt and our ability to make distributions to our shareholders. Further, rising interest rates could limit our ability to refinance existing debt when it matures.

We may need to sell properties from time to time for cash flow purposes.

Because of the lack of liquidity of real estate investments generally, our ability to respond to changing circumstances may be impaired. Real estate investments generally cannot be sold quickly. In the event that we must sell assets to generate cash flow, we cannot predict whether there will be a market for those assets in the time period we desire or need to sell them, or whether we will be able to sell them at a price that will allow us to fully recoup our investment. We may not be able to realize the full potential value of our assets, and we may incur costs related to the early pay-off of the debt secured by such assets.

11

Our business overall is subject to all of the risks associated with the real estate industry.

We are subject to all the risks incident to investment in real estate, many of which relate to the general lack of liquidity of real estate investments, including, but not limited to:

	•	changes in general or local economic conditions – because our real estate assets are concentrated in the Southwest, any deterioration in the general economic conditions in any of those states could have an adverse effect our business and assets in that state;
	•	changes in interest rates that may make our ability to satisfy our debt service requirements materially more burdensome;
	•	lack of availability of financing that may render the purchase, sale or refinancing of a property more difficult or unattractive;
	•	changes in real estate and zoning laws;
	•	increases in real estate taxes and insurance costs;
	•	federal or local economic or rent control; and
	•	floods, earthquakes and other similar natural disasters.

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

IORI’s principal executive offices have been located since January 1, 2005 at 1755 Wittington Place, Suite 340, Dallas, Texas 75234 and are, in the opinion of management, suitable and adequate for IORI’s present operations at such location and are fully utilized.

IORI’s real estate portfolio at December 31, 2004, is set forth in Schedule III to the Consolidated Financial Statements included at ITEM 8. “FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA.” The following provides certain summary information concerning IORI’s real estate portfolio.

At March 18, 2005, IORI’s real estate portfolio consists of 10 owned properties and an investment in a partnership which owns commercial property. Of the 10 owned properties, in 2002 six apartments were sold to partnerships controlled by Metra Capital, LLC (“Metra”). See NOTE 5. “NOTES AND INTEREST PAYABLE.” Since that transaction was accounted for as a financing transaction, IORI continues to account for those properties as owned properties. IORI is a partner in a partnership in which it is a 40% general partner that holds a wraparound mortgage note. At December 31, 2004, IORI held equity investments in apartments and office buildings in the Southwest region of the continental United States, and more specifically in Texas.

At December 31, 2004, 35% of IORI’s assets consisted of investment in owned real properties on a leveraged basis, in the Southwest region of

12

the continental United States, and 60% consisted of notes receivable. Less than 1% of IORI’s assets consisted of investments in partnerships. The remaining 4% of IORI’s assets were cash, cash equivalents and other assets. The percentage of IORI’s assets invested in any one category is subject to change and no assurance can be given that the composition of IORI’s assets in the future will approximate the percentages listed above. See ITEM 1. “BUSINESS—Business Plan.”

Geographic Regions

All properties of IORI are located in Texas.

Real Estate

Types of Real Estate Investments. IORI’s real estate consists of apartments and commercial properties (office buildings) with established income-producing capabilities. In selecting real estate for investment, the location, age and type of property; gross rents; lease terms; financial and business standing of tenants; operating expenses; fixed charges; land values and physical condition are considered. IORI may acquire properties subject to, or assume, existing debt and may mortgage, pledge or otherwise obtain financing. The IORI Board may alter the types of and criteria for selecting new real estate investments and for obtaining financing. IORI has typically invested in developed real estate, although it also may invest in new construction or development either directly or in partnership with nonaffiliated parties or affiliates (subject to approval by the Board). To the extent that IORI invests in construction and development projects, it will be subject to business risks, such as cost overruns and construction delays, associated with such higher risk projects.

In the opinion of management, IORI’s properties are adequately covered by insurance.

During 2004, the activity in IORI’s owned real estate portfolio was:

13

Properties Held for Investment. Set forth below are IORI’s owned properties at December 31, 2004, all of which were held for investment and the monthly rental rate for apartments and the average annual rental rate for office buildings and occupancy thereof at December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002:

Partnership Properties. Set forth below is the commercial property owned by the partnership in which IORI is an equity investor and the average annual rental rate and occupancy thereof at December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002:

IORI owns a 10% limited partner interest and TCI owns a 90% general partner interest in TCI Eton Square, L.P., which owns the Eton Square Building in Tulsa, Oklahoma.

Mortgage Loans

Prior to 1991, a substantial portion of IORI’s assets had been invested in mortgage notes secured by income-producing real estate. IORI’s mortgage notes had included first, wraparound and junior mortgage loans. Prior to the third quarter of 2000, management had not sought to fund or acquire new mortgage loans, other than those which may have originated in conjunction with purchase money financing of a property sale provided by IORI. See ITEM 1. “BUSINESS.”

IORI funded no new mortgage notes in 2004.

14

Junior Mortgage Loans. Junior mortgage loans are loans secured by mortgages that are subordinate to one or more prior liens either on the fee or a leasehold interest in real estate. Recourse on the loans ordinarily includes the real estate which secures the loan, other collateral and personal guarantees of the borrower.

On September 30, 2004, a Secured Promissory Note in the amount of $1,222,500 given by Unified Housing Foundation, Inc. (“UHF”) for Unified Housing of Parkside Crossing, LLC to Regis I and the accrued interest receivable of $112,878 were assigned from Regis I to IORI as a paydown of certain intercompany receivables.

On September 30, 2004, a Secured Promissory Note in the amount of $1,053,616 given by UHF for Unified Housing of Temple, LLC to Regis I and the accrued interest receivable of $98,338 were assigned from Regis I to IORI as a paydown of certain intercompany receivables.

On September 30, 2004, a Secured Promissory Note in the amount of $835,658 given by UHF for Unified Housing of Terrell, LLC to Regis I and the accrued interest receivable of $80,223 were assigned from Regis I to IORI as a paydown of certain intercompany receivables.

On September 30, 2004, a Secured Promissory Note in the amount of $1,770,000 given by UHF for Housing for Seniors of Lewisville, LLC (“Lewisville”) to Regis I and the accrued interest receivable of $174,640 were assigned from Regis I to IORI as a paydown of certain intercompany receivables.

On May 24, 2004, a Secured Promissory Note in the amount of $2,990,000 given by UHF for Unified Housing of McKinney, LLC (“UHM”) to Transcontinental Eldorado, Inc. was assigned from TCI to IORI as a partial payment for TCI’s repurchase of 100% of the outstanding common shares of Transcontinental Treehouse Corporation (“Treehouse-IR”) from IORI.

On December 30, 2003, a Secured Promissory Note in the amount of $6,363,360 given by Housing for Seniors of Humble, LLC (“Humble”) to NLP Lakeshore Villas, LLC (“NLP”) was assigned from ARI to IORI as a paydown of certain intercompany receivables.

On December 30, 2003, a Secured Promissory Note in the amount of $2,000,000 given by Humble to NLP was assigned from ARI to IORI as additional paydown of certain intercompany receivables.

On October 14, 2003, IORI purchased, sold, and conveyed an office building known as One Hickory Centre, and sold 202 acres of unimproved real property known as the Travelers Land in Dallas County, Texas to Encino Executive Plaza, Ltd. The sale price for One Hickory Centre was $12,200,000 and Encino Executive Plaza, Ltd. executed a wrap-around promissory note in the amount of $11,973,025 payable to the order of IORI secured by a Deed of Trust encumbering One Hickory Centre. The remaining difference of which was as a result of prorations and various

15

expenses paid by IORI in connection with the closing of the transaction. The note bears interest at 5.5% per annum. The sale price for the Travelers Land was $25,000,000. At closing, Encino Executive Plaza, Ltd. executed an all inclusive wrap-around promissory note payable to the order of IORI in the principal amount of $22,801,987 secured by a Deed of Trust covering the Travelers Land sold and delivered cash to IORI in the amount of $1,946,715. As with the prior transaction, the difference between the purchase price and the promissory note represented adjustments for various prorations. The note bears interest at 5.5% per annum. Subsequently, IORI made a loan to Encino Executive Plaza, Ltd. in the amount of $1,567,232 payable upon demand or if no demand is made prior thereto on June 30, 2006 with a market rate of interest. Encino Executive Plaza, Ltd. executed and delivered a promissory note payable to the order of IORI in the stated principal amount of $1,567,232. The note bears interest at 5.5% per annum.

Partnership mortgage loans. IORI owns a 40% general partner interest and TCI owns a 60% general partner interest in Nakash Income Associates (“NIA”), which holds a wraparound mortgage note receivable secured by a building occupied by a Wal-Mart in Maulden, Missouri.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Innovo Realty, Inc. On August 10, 2004, American Realty Investors, Inc., Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc., and Income Opportunity Realty Investors, Inc. instituted an action in Texas State District Court as Cause No. 2004-60231-393 styled American Realty Investors, Inc., Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc. and Income Opportunity Realty Investors, Inc., Plaintiffs v. Innovo Realty, Inc. and Innovo Group, Inc., Involuntary Plaintiffs v. Innovo Realty, Inc., Metra Capital LLC, Innovo Group, Inc., Joseph Mizrachi, Simon Mizrachi, Hubert Guez, Third Millennium Partners LLC, Third Millennium Partners, Inc., Third Millennium Group LLC and Sunridge Management Group, Inc., Defendants. Plaintiffs’ Complaint alleges that Joseph Mizrachi, a former director of ARI and others, offered a plan to the Plaintiffs to create one or more joint venture arrangements with one or more of the Plaintiffs to pursue alternative forms of financing or refinancing portions of Plaintiffs’ real estate portfolios, which entailed the creation of 22 separate limited partnerships to acquire 28 separate apartment complexes in three states (Texas, Florida and Louisiana), the general partners of which are affiliates of, or controlled by, Joseph Mizrachi. Plaintiffs’ Complaint alleges that the overall transaction required the establishment of a sinking fund by the Defendants and the 22 limited partnerships as a trust for the benefit of certain preferred shareholders of Innovo Group, Inc. and the payment of certain proceeds to the Plaintiffs. Plaintiffs assert that payments have not been made pursuant to the agreement of the parties. Plaintiffs allege that Defendants’ conduct constituted a common business enterprise, alleges breach of contract and derivative claims on behalf of Innovo Group, Inc. against Joseph Mizrachi and others, and requests declaratory relief

16

involving the Plaintiffs’ rights in the partnerships, an accounting of proceeds, and the creation of a constructive trust. Plaintiffs’ Complaint also alleges that Joseph Mizrachi engaged in fraud, negligent misrepresentation and/or breach of fiduciary duty and seeks unspecified damages, attorneys’ fees, the establishment of a constructive trust and other relief.

Sunset Management, LLC. On October 5, 2004, Sunset Management LLC (“Sunset”) filed a Complaint as a purported stockholder’s derivative action on behalf of Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc. in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division, against American Realty Investors, Inc., Basic Capital Management, Inc., Prime Income Asset Management, Inc., Prime Income Asset Management, LLC, Income Opportunity Realty Investors, Inc., United Housing Foundation, Inc. (“United”), Regis Realty, Inc., Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc., and Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc.’s current directors and officers and others. Sunset’s Complaint was instituted as Case No. 304CV02162-B styled Sunset Management LLC, Derivatively on Behalf of Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc. v. American Realty Investors, Inc., et al. Sunset’s Complaint alleges (i) Sunset is the owner of 10 shares of Common Stock of TCI and Sunset is the pledgee and beneficial owner of 3,673,115 shares of Common Stock of TCI, (ii) Sunset is a single-member limited liability company, (iii) all of the Defendants* have in their various capacities breached fiduciary duties to TCI, and (iv) unjust enrichment of the various Defendants. Sunset’s Complaint seeks an injunction prohibiting TCI from entering into any related-party transactions that are not fair to TCI and approved by disinterested directors and/or the stockholders of TCI with full knowledge of the common interest of the directors and/or officers, unspecified damages, attorneys’ fees and costs. All Defendants believe the action is not properly brought as a derivative action on behalf of TCI, as Sunset’s interests are adverse to the interests of TCI. The current action brought by Sunset contains many of the same allegations raised by Sunset in four other cases which, as rulings have occurred, have resulted in a denial of Sunset’s requested relief. The Defendants intend to vigorously defend the action, and on November 8, 2004, filed a Motion to Dismiss the case pursuant to Rules 12 and 23.1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure on the basis that Sunset’s allegations are insufficient to evade the stringent demand requirement under the futility exception for stockholder derivative actions, and that Sunset cannot fairly and adequately represent the interests of other stockholders. Separately, one of the individual Defendants has also filed on January 4, 2005 a motion to disqualify Sunset’s counsel.

17

The Company and its subsidiaries, from time to time, have been involved in various items of litigation incidental to and in the ordinary course of its business and, in the opinion of management, the outcome of such litigation will not have a material adverse impact upon the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

Not applicable. During the fourth quarter of the fiscal year covered by this report, no matter was submitted to a vote of security holders of the Company.

PART II

ITEM 5.	MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT’S SHARES OF COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED SHAREHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

IORI’s Common Stock is traded on the American Stock Exchange (“AMEX”) under the symbol “IOT”. The following table sets forth the high and low prices for IOT’s Common Stock as reported on the AMEX.

As of March 18, 2005, the closing price of IORI’s Common Stock on the AMEX was $16.30 per share.

As of March 18, 2005, IORI’s Common Stock was held by 826 holders of record.

No dividends on the IORI Common Stock were declared or paid in 2004 or 2003. Although no express intention with respect to the future declaration or payment of dividends has been adopted by the Board of Directors, it is unlikely that any cash dividends on the IORI Common Stock will be declared or paid in 2005. See also ITEM 7. “MANAGEMENT DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS — Liquidity and Capital Resources.”

18

On December 5, 1989, the Board of Directors approved a share repurchase program authorizing the repurchase of up to a total of 200,000 shares of the predecessor. In June 2000, the Board of IORI’s predecessor increased the authorization to up to 300,000. In September 2001, the Board of Directors approved separately a private block purchase of 75,100 shares of IORI Common Stock at a total cost of $1.3 million. During 2004, a total of 49,600 shares of IORI Common Stock were repurchased at a total cost of $791,327. Through December 31, 2004, a total of 268,404 shares (out of the authorization of up to 300,000 shares) had been repurchased at a cost of $2.7 million. The following table represents shares repurchased during the three months ended December 31, 2004:

19

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

Earnings data reflects the retroactive changes in the discontinued operations from 2000 to 2004.

IORI purchased four properties for a total of $21.0 million in 2003, and nine properties for a total of $46.5 million in 2000. IORI sold five properties for a total of $ 24.5 million in 2004, four properties for a total of $55.7 million in 2003, two properties for a total of $19.2 million in 2002, and seven properties for a total of $66.6 million in 2000. See ITEM 2. “PROPERTIES – Real Estate” and ITEM 8. “FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA.”

20

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND

Introduction

IORI invests in equity interests in real estate through acquisitions, leases, partnerships and in mortgage loans. IORI is the successor to a California business trust organized on December 14, 1984, which commenced operations on April 10, 1985.

Critical Accounting Policies

Critical accounting policies are those that are both important to the presentation of IORI’s financial condition and results of operations and require management’s most difficult, complex or subjective judgments. IORI’s critical accounting policies relate to the evaluation of impairment of long-lived assets and the evaluation of the collectibility of accounts and notes receivable.

If events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of a rental property to be held and used or land held for development may be impaired, management performs a recoverability analysis based on estimated undiscounted cash flows to be generated from the property in the future. If the analysis indicates that the carrying value is not recoverable from future cash flows, the property is written down to estimated fair value and an impairment loss is recognized. If management decides to sell rental properties or land held for development, management evaluates the recoverability of the carrying amounts of the assets. If the evaluation indicates that the carrying value is not recoverable from estimated net sales proceeds, the property is written down to estimated fair value less costs to sell and an impairment loss is recognized within income from continuing operations. IORI’s estimates of cash flow and fair values of the properties are based on current market conditions and considers matters such as rental rates and occupancies for comparable properties, recent sales data for comparable properties and, where applicable, contracts or the results of negotiations with purchasers or prospective purchasers. IORI’s estimates are subject to revision as market conditions and IORI’s assessments of them change.

IORI’s allowance for doubtful accounts receivable and notes receivable is established based on analysis of the risk of loss on specific accounts. The analysis places particular emphasis on past due accounts. Management considers such information as the nature and age of the receivable, the payment history of the tenant or other debtor, the financial condition of the tenant or other debtor and IORI’s assessment of its ability to meet its lease or interest obligations. IORI’s estimate of the required allowance, which is reviewed on a quarterly basis, is subject to revision as these factors change and is sensitive to the effects of economic and market conditions.

21

Obligations and Commitments

IORI has contractual obligations and commitments primarily with regards to the payment of mortgages.

The following table aggregates IORI‘s expected contractual obligations and commitments subsequent to December 31, 2004. (Dollars in thousands) See ITEM 7A. “QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK-Liabilities” and NOTE 5. “NOTES AND INTEREST PAYABLE”.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Cash and cash equivalents totaled $399,000, $58,000, and $10,000 at December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002. IORI’s principal sources of cash have been and will continue to be property operations, proceeds from property sales and refinancings and partnership distributions. Management anticipates that IORI will generate excess cash from operations in 2005 due to increased interest income and increased rental rates and occupancy at its properties, however, if such excess does not prove to be sufficient to satisfy all IORI’s obligations as they mature, when necessary, management also may selectively sell income producing assets, refinance real estate and incur additional borrowings secured by real estate to meet cash requirements.

Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities was ($124,000) in 2004, $92,000 in 2003, and ($2.5) million in 2002. The primary factors affecting cash flow from operating activities are discussed in the following paragraphs.

Cash flow from property operations (rents collected less payments for property operating expenses) was $3.0 million in 2004, $4.8 million in 2003, and $3.4 million in 2002. The decrease of $1.8 million in 2004 from 2003 was primarily due to a decrease in rental income caused by sale of five properties during the year. The increase of $1.4 million

22

in 2003 from 2002 was primarily due to a decrease in property operating expenses.

Interest collected was $2.4 million in 2004, $262,000 in 2003, and $291,000 in 2002. The significant increase in 2004 was due to the increase in notes receivable from sale of properties throughout 2004. The decrease in 2003 was due to the reduction of two notes from 2002, offset by funding of a new note in 2003.

Interest paid on notes payable was $3.9 million in 2004, $3.7 million in 2003, and $4.3 million in 2002. Of the decrease in 2003 from 2002, $300,000 was due to the sale of three commercial properties in 2003 and the sale of two commercial properties in 2002, and $300,000 was the effect of Metra refinancing in 2002 and the payments to Metra for its return on capital.

Advisory and net income fee paid to affiliate was $1.1 million in 2004, $451,000 in 2003, and $868,000 in 2002. The increase in 2004 from 2003 was due to $323,000 increase in net income fee and $269,000 increase in advisory fee incurred. The decrease in 2003 from 2002 was due to a decrease in advisory fees caused by the increase in the operating expenses over the specified limit. See NOTE 8. “ADVISORY AGREEMENT.”

General and administrative expenses paid was $562,000 in 2004, $785,000 in 2003, and $1.0 million in 2002. The decrease in 2004 from 2003 was primarily due to a decrease in legal expense and advisor cost reimbursement paid. The decrease in 2003 from 2002 was primarily due to a decrease in director insurance expense.

Net cash provided by investing activities was $1.8 million in 2004, $60,000 in 2003, and $6.8 million in 2002. Cash from investing activities increased in 2004 from 2003 due to less payments were made to the advisor and the affiliates. The cash increases were partially offset by less proceeds received from sale of real estate in 2004 than in 2003.

Net cash used in financing activities was $1.3 million in 2004, $104,000 in 2003, and $4.3 million in 2002. The increase of cash spending on financing activities in 2004 from 2003 was primarily due to repurchase of IORI common stock and more payments were made on notes payable in 2004.

Scheduled principal payments on notes payable of $6.5 million are due in 2005. For those mortgages that come due in 2005, it is management’s intent to either seek an extension of the due dates by one or more years, or refinance the debt on a long-term basis, or pay off the debt at maturity, or selectively sell income producing assets. Management believes it will continue to be successful in obtaining loan extensions and/or refinancings.

23

Management expects that funds from existing cash resources, selective sales of income producing assets, refinancing of real estate, and additional borrowings against real estate will be sufficient to meet IORI’s cash requirements associated with its current and anticipated level of operations, maturing debt obligations and existing commitments. To the extent that IORI’s liquidity permits or financing sources are available, management intends to make new real estate investments.

IORI owned a 36.3% general partner interest in the Tri-City partnership until it was sold in 2002. IORI received a distribution of $25,000 in 2002 from Tri-City’s operating cash flow. In 2002, IORI received $752,000 as a distribution from the sales proceeds. IORI owns a 40% general partner interest in the NIA partnership. IORI received no distributions and made no contributions to the partnership in from 2002 to 2004. IORI owns a 10% limited partnership interest in the TCI Eton Square partnership. IORI received no distributions and made no contributions to the partnership from 2002 to 2004. See NOTE 4. “INVESTMENT IN EQUITY METHOD PARTNERSHIPS.”

IORI paid no dividends in 2004 and 2003. In December 2000, the Board of Directors determined not to pay a fourth quarter dividend to holders of IORI’s Common Stock. The non-payment decision was based on the Board determining that IORI needed to retain cash for acquisitions that were anticipated in 2001 and that IORI had no REIT taxable income that required a distribution. It is unlikely that IORI will pay any cash dividends for 2005.

In 2001, IORI repurchased 75,100 shares of Common Stock in a private block purchase for a total of $1.3 million. In 2004, IORI repurchased 49,600 shares of IORI Common Stock for a total cost of $791,327. Through December 31, 2004, a total of 268,404 shares had been repurchased at a cost of $2.7 million.

Management reviews the carrying values of IORI’s properties at least annually and whenever events or a change in circumstances indicate that impairment may exist. Impairment is considered to exist if the future cash flow from a property (undiscounted and without interest) is less than the carrying amount of the property. If impairment is found to exist, a provision for loss is recorded by a charge against earnings. The property review generally includes selective property inspections, discussions with the manager of the property and visits to selected properties in the area and a review of (1) the property’s current rents compared to market rents, (2) the property’s expenses, (3) the property’s maintenance requirements and (4) the property’s cash flows.

Results of Operations

IORI reported a net income of $5.5 million in 2004, net income of $1.8 million in 2003, and net income of $2.1 million in 2002. Fluctuations in these and the other components of revenue and expense are discussed in the following paragraphs.

24

Rents were $5.9 million in 2004, $5.2 million in 2003 and $5.3 million in 2002. Rents in 2005 are expected to increase if IORI selectively buys properties.

Property operations expense was $3.1 million in 2004, $3.3 million in 2003, and $2.8 million in 2002. The slight decrease in 2004 from 2003 was due to a decrease in property taxes. The increase in 2003 from 2002 was due to an overall increase in various operating expenses including property taxes. Property operations expense is expected to increase in 2005 if IORI purchases more properties.

Interest income was $3.3 million in 2004, $626,000 in 2003, and $270,000 in 2002. The significant increase in 2004 from 2003 was due to additional interest earned from the additional notes receivable obtained from affiliates of IORI. The increase in 2003 from 2002 was due to interest income earned from the payment of the notes receivable on Rosedale Towers. Interest income is expected to increase in 2005 due to the increase in notes receivable during 2004.

Interest expense was $3.5 million in 2004, $1.4 million in 2003, and $1.5 million in 2002. The increase in 2004 from 2003 was due to increase in Metra net income, purchase of Parkway Centre and One Hickory Center in late 2003. Interest expense in 2005 is expected to decrease due to the retirement of four notes payable from sale of properties during 2004, however, it may possibly increase if IORI purchases additional properties in 2005.

Depreciation expense was $740,000 in 2004, $816,000 in 2003, and $748,000 in 2002. The decrease in 2004 from 2003 was due to sale of properties and fully depreciated tenant improvements in 2004. Depreciation expense in 2005 is expected to approximate 2004 and/or increase if IORI adds more properties.

Advisory fees to affiliates were $743,000 in 2004, $425,000 in 2003, and $714,000 in 2002. The increase in 2004 was due to decrease in the operating expenses which resulted in no refund from SWI for the cost reimbursement payment IORI had made to SWI during the year. See NOTE 8. “ADVISORY AGREEMENT.”

IORI paid net income fees to its contractual advisors of $453,000 in 2004, $130,000 in 2003, and $169,000 in 2002. The net income fee is based on 7.5% of IORI’s net income.

General and administrative expense was $563,000 in 2004, $779,000 in 2003, and $1.0 million in 2002. The decrease in 2004 from 2003 was primarily due to decrease in legal fees and advisor cost reimbursement. The decrease in 2003 from 2002 resulted from reduced director and officers insurance premiums.

Equity losses in partnerships were $3,000 in 2004 and $7,000 in 2003, and equity gains were $862,000 in 2002. The Tri-City partnership was dissolved in 2002, which resulted in equity gain in that year.

25

IORI realized gains on the sale of real estate of $5.5 million in 2004, $3.8 million in 2003, and $6.8 million in 2002. In 2004, the gains on sale of real estate derived from the sale of Akard and Yeager, Treehouse (San Antonio), and Frankel Land. In 2003, the gains on sale of real estate represent the gain on the sale of Mowry and La Mesa, commercial properties. In 2002, the gain on sale of real estate represents the gain from the sale of Daley Corporate Center.

IORI realized a loss on operations from discontinued operations of $89,000, $1.8 million, and $3.1 million in 2004, 2003 and 2002. The loss relates to the operating losses on two commercial properties, two residential properties, and a land property that IORI sold during 2004. The following table summarizes revenue and expense information for the properties sold.

Environmental Matters

Under various federal, state and local environmental laws, ordinances and regulations, IORI may be potentially liable for removal or remediation costs, as well as certain other potential costs, relating to hazardous or toxic substances (including governmental fines and injuries to persons and property) where property-level managers have arranged for the removal, disposal or treatment of hazardous or toxic substances. In addition, certain environmental laws impose liability for release of asbestos-containing materials into the air, and third parties may seek recovery for personal injury associated with such materials.

Management is not aware of any environmental liability that would have a material adverse effect on IORI’s business, assets or results of operations.

Inflation

26

The effects of inflation on IORI’s operations are not quantifiable. Revenues from property operations tend to fluctuate proportionately with inflationary increases and decreases in housing costs. Fluctuations in the rate of inflation also affect the sales values of properties and the ultimate gain to be realized from property sales. To the extent that inflation affects interest rates, earnings from short-term investments and the cost of new financings as well as the cost of variable interest rate debt will be affected.

Taxes

For the years 2002 and 2001, IORI elected and in the opinion of management qualified to be taxed as a REIT as defined under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. To continue to qualify for federal taxation as a REIT, IORI was required to hold at least 75% of the value of its total assets in real estate assets, government securities, cash and cash equivalents at the close of each quarter of each taxable year. As a REIT, IORI was also required to distribute at least 90% (95% in 2000) of its REIT taxable income plus 90% (95% in 2000) of its net income from foreclosure property on an annual basis to stockholders.

Due to the completion of the tender offer by ARI on March 19, 2003, and the resulting concentration of ownership, IORI no longer met the requirement for tax treatment as a REIT as of January 1, 2003. IORI cannot re-qualify for tax treatment as a REIT for at least five years from that time.

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

IORI’s future operations, cash flow and fair values of financial instruments are partially dependent upon the then existing market interest rates and market equity prices. Market risk is the change in the market rates and prices and the affect of the changes on future operations. Market risk is managed by matching the property’s anticipated net operating income to an appropriate financing.

IORI is exposed to interest rate risk associated with variable rate notes payable and maturing debt that has to be refinanced. IORI’s interest rate sensitivity position is managed by IORI’s finance department. Interest rate sensitivity is the relationship between changes in market interest rates and the fair value of market rate sensitive assets and liabilities. IORI’s earnings are affected as changes in short-term interest rates impact its cost of variable rate debt and maturing fixed rate debt. A large portion of IORI’s market risk is exposure to short-term interest rates from variable rate borrowings. The impact on IORI’s financial statements of refinancing fixed debt that matured during 2004 was not material. If market interest rates for variable rate debt average 100 basis points more in 2005 than they did during 2004, IORI’s interest expense would increase and income would decrease by $101,000. This amount is determined by considering the impact of hypothetical interest rates on IORI’s

27

borrowing cost. This analysis did not consider the effects of the reduced level of overall economic activity that could exist in such an environment. Further, in the event of a change of such magnitude, management would likely take actions to further mitigate its exposure to the change. However, due to the uncertainty of the specific actions that would be taken and their possible effects, the sensitivity analysis assumes no change in IORI’s financial structure.

The following table contains only those exposures that existed at December 31, 2004. Anticipation of exposures or risk on positions that could possibly arise was not considered. IORI’s ultimate interest rate risk and its affect on operations will depend on future capital market exposures, which cannot be anticipated with a probable assurance level. (Dollars in thousands) See ITEM 7. “MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS-Obligations and Commitments” and NOTE 5. “NOTES AND INTEREST PAYABLE”.

Liabilities

28

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

All other schedules are omitted because they are not required, are not applicable or the information required is included in the Financial Statements or the notes thereto.

29

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Board of Directors of
Income Opportunity Realty Investors, Inc.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Income Opportunity Realty Investors, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2004, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for year ended December 31, 2004. We have also audited the schedules listed in the accompanying index. These financial statements and the schedules are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedules based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and schedules are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements and schedules. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements and schedules. We believe our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Income Opportunity Realty Investors, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2004 and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for year ended December 31, 2004, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Also, in our opinion, the schedules referred to above presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

Swalm & Associates, P.C.
March 2, 2005

30

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Board of Directors of
Income Opportunity Realty Investors, Inc.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Income Opportunity Realty Investors, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2003, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for year ended December 31, 2003. We have also audited the schedules listed in the accompanying index. These financial statements and the schedules are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedules based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and schedules are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements and schedules. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements and schedules. We believe our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Income Opportunity Realty Investors, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2003 and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for year ended December 31, 2003, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Also, in our opinion, the schedules referred to above presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

Farmer, Fuqua, & Huff, P.C.
March 12, 2004

31

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Board of Directors of
Income Opportunity Realty Investors, Inc.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and cash flow of Income Opportunity Realty Investors, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2002. We have also audited the schedules listed in the accompanying index. These financial statements and the schedules are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

As described in Note 17, Income Opportunity Realty Investors, Inc.’s management has indicated its intent to both sell income producing properties and refinance or extend debt secured by real estate to meet its liquidity needs.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows of Income Opportunity Realty Investors, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2002, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Also, in our opinion, the schedules presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

BDO SEIDMAN, LLP

Dallas, Texas
March 21, 2003

32

INCOME OPPORTUNITY REALTY INVESTORS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

33

INCOME OPPORTUNITY REALTY INVESTORS, INC.

34

INCOME OPPORTUNITY REALTY INVESTORS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (cont.)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

35

INCOME OPPORTUNITY REALTY INVESTORS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

36

INCOME OPPORTUNITY REALTY INVESTORS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

37

INCOME OPPORTUNITY REALTY INVESTORS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Continued)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

38

INCOME OPPORTUNITY REALTY INVESTORS, INC.

The accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements of Income Opportunity Realty Investors, Inc. and consolidated entities were prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, the most significant of which are described in NOTE 1. “SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES.” The Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements. The data presented in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are as of December 31 of each year and for the year then ended, unless otherwise indicated. Dollar amounts in tables are in thousands, except per share amounts.

Certain balances for 2003 and 2002 have been reclassified to conform to the 2004 presentation.

NOTE 1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Organization and business. Income Opportunity Realty Investors, Inc. (“IORI”) is the successor to a California business trust organized on December 14, 1984, which commenced operations on April 10, 1985. IORI invests in real estate through direct ownership, leases and partnerships and it also may invest in mortgage loans on real estate.

Basis of consolidation. The Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of IORI and controlled subsidiaries and partnerships. All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated.

Accounting estimates. In the preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, it is necessary for management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the Consolidated Financial Statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses for the year then ended. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Recent accounting Pronouncements. SFAS No. 151 – In November 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 151, “Inventory Costs, an Amendment of ARB No. 43, Chapter 4” (“SFAS No. 151”). SFAS No. 151 amends ARB 43, Chapter 4, to clarify that abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs and wasted materials (spoilage) be recognized as current period charges. It also requires that allocation of fixed production overheads to the costs of conversion be based on the normal capacity of the production facilities. SFAS No. 151 is effective for inventory costs incurred during fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. The adoption of SFAS No. 151 is not expected to have a material impact on the consolidated financial position or results of operations of IORI.

39

INCOME OPPORTUNITY REALTY INVESTORS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – Continued

NOTE 1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

SFAS No. 152 – In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 152, “Accounting for Real Estate Time-Sharing Transactions” (“SFAS No. 152”). SFAS No. 152 amends FASB Statement No. 66, Accounting for Sales of Real Estate, to reference the financial accounting and reporting guidance for real estate time-sharing transactions that is provided in AICPA Statement of Position 04-2, Accounting for Real Estate Time-Sharing Transactions (“SOP 04-2”). This Statement also amends FASB Statement No. 67, Accounting for Costs and Initial Rental Operations of Real Estate Projects, to state that the guidance for (a) incidental operations and (b) costs incurred to sell real estate projects does not apply to real estate time-sharing transactions. The accounting for those operations and costs is subject to the guidance in SOP 04-2.

SFAS No. 152 is effective for financial statements for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005, and is to be reported as a cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle. The adoption of SFAS No. 145 is not expected to have a material impact on the consolidated financial position or results of operations of IORI.

SFAS No. 123 – In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, Share-Based Payment, revised (“SFAS No. 123R”). SFAS No. 123R addresses the accounting for share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options. Under the new standard, companies will no longer be able to account for share-based compensation transactions using the intrinsic method in accordance with APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees. Instead, companies will be required to account for such transactions using a fair-value method and recognize the expense in the consolidated statement of income. SFAS No. 123R will be effective for periods beginning after June 15, 2005 and allows, but does not require, companies to restate the full fiscal year of 2005 to reflect the impact of expensing share-based payments under SFAS No. 123R. The Company has not yet determined which fair-value method and transitional provision it will follow. The adoption of SFAS No. 123R is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.

SFAS No. 153 – In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 153, Exchanges of Non-monetary Assets, An Amendment of APB Opinion No. 29 (“SFAS No. 153”). The guidance in APB Opinion No. 29, Accounting for Non-monetary Transactions, is based on the principle that exchanges of non-monetary assets should be measured based on the fair value of the assets exchanged. The guidance in APB Opinion No. 29, however, included certain exceptions to that principle. SFAS No. 153 amends APB Opinion No. 29 to eliminate the exception for non-monetary exchanges of similar productive assets and replaces it with a general exception for exchanges

40

INCOME OPPORTUNITY REALTY INVESTORS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – Continued

NOTE 1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

of non-monetary assets that do not have commercial substance. A non-monetary exchange has commercial substance if the future cash flows of the entity are expected to change significantly as a result of the exchange. SFAS No. 153 is effective for non-monetary asset exchanges in fiscal periods beginning after June 15, 2005. The adoption of SFAS No. 153 is not expected to have a material impact on the consolidated financial position or results of operations of IORI.

Real estate held for investment and depreciation. Real estate held for investment is carried at cost. Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144 (“SFAS No. 144”) requires that a property be considered impaired, if the sum of the expected future cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges) is less than the carrying amount of the property. If impairment exists, an impairment loss is recognized by a charge against earnings equal to the amount by which the carrying amount of the property exceeds the fair value of the property. If impairment of a property is recognized, the carrying amount of the property is reduced by the amount of the impairment and a new cost for the property is established. Such new cost is depreciated over the property’s remaining useful life. Depreciation is provided by the straight-line method over estimated useful lives, which range from 2 to 40 years.

Revenue recognition on the sale of real estate. Sales of real estate are recognized when and to the extent permitted by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 66, “Accounting for Sales of Real Estate” (“SFAS No. 66”). Until the requirements of SFAS No. 66 for full profit recognition have been met, transactions are accounted for using either the deposit, the installment sale, the cost recovery or the financing method, whichever is appropriate. See NOTE 2. “REAL ESTATE.”

Investment in noncontrolled partnerships. The equity method is used to account for investments in partnerships which IORI does not control. Under the equity method, an initial investment, recorded at cost, is increased by a proportionate share of the partnership’s operating income and any additional advances and decreased by a proportionate share of the partnership’s operating losses and distributions received.

Operating segments. Management has determined reportable operating segments to be those that are used for internal reporting purposes which disaggregates operations by type of real estate.

Fair value of financial instruments. The following assumptions were used in estimating the fair value of notes receivable and payable. For notes receivable the fair value was estimated by discounting future cash flows using current interest rates for similar loans. For notes payable

41

INCOME OPPORTUNITY REALTY INVESTORS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued

NOTE 1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

the fair value was estimated using year end interest rates for mortgages with similar terms and maturities.

Cash equivalents. For purposes of the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, all highly liquid investments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less are considered cash equivalents.

Earnings per share. Income (loss) per share is presented in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 128 “Earnings Per Share.” Income (loss) per share is computed based upon the weighted average number of shares of Common Stock outstanding during each year.

NOTE 2. REAL ESTATE

In 2004, IORI sold the following properties:

Concentration of investment risk. IORI has a high concentration of investment risk on properties in the Southwest region of the United States. This risk includes, but is not limited to changes in local economic conditions, changes in real estate and zoning laws, increases in real estate taxes, floods, tornados and other acts of God and other factors beyond the control of management. In the opinion of management, this investment risk is partially mitigated by the diversification of property types in other geographical regions of the United States, management’s review of additional investments, acquisitions in other areas and by insurance.

42

NOTE 3. NOTES AND INTEREST RECEIVABLE

Junior Mortgage Loans. Junior mortgage loans are loans secured by mortgages that are subordinate to one or more prior liens either on the fee or a leasehold interest in real estate. Recourse on the loans ordinarily includes the real estate which secures the loan, other collateral and personal guarantees of the borrower.

On September 30, 2004, a Secured Promissory Note in the amount of $1,222,500 given by UHF for Unified Housing of Parkside Crossing, LLC to Regis I and the accrued interest receivable of $112,878 were assigned from Regis I to IORI as a paydown of certain intercompany receivables.

On September 30, 2004, a Secured Promissory Note in the amount of $1,053,616 given by UHF for Unified Housing of Temple, LLC to Regis I and the accrued interest receivable of $98,338 were assigned from Regis I to IORI as a paydown of certain intercompany receivables.

On September 30, 2004, a Secured Promissory Note in the amount of $835,658 given by UHF for Unified Housing of Terrell, LLC to Regis I and the accrued interest receivable of $80,223 were assigned from Regis I to IORI as a paydown of certain intercompany receivables.

On September 30, 2004, a Secured Promissory Note in the amount of $1,770,000 given by UHF for Housing for Seniors of Lewisville, LLC to Regis I and the accrued interest receivable of $174,640 were assigned from Regis I to IORI as a paydown of certain intercompany receivables.

On May 24, 2004, a Secured Promissory Note in the amount of $2,990,000 given by UHF for UHM to Transcontinental Eldorado, Inc. was assigned from TCI to IORI as a partial payment for TCI’s repurchase of 100% of the outstanding common shares of Treehouse-IR from IORI.

On December 30, 2003, a Secured Promissory Note in the amount of $6,363,360 given by Humble to NLP was assigned from ARI to IORI as a paydown of certain intercompany receivables.

On December 30, 2003, a Secured Promissory Note in the amount of $2,000,000 given by Humble to NLP was assigned from ARI to IORI as additional paydown of certain intercompany receivables.

On October 14, 2003, IORI purchased, sold, and conveyed an office building known as One Hickory Centre, and sold 202 acres of unimproved real property known as the Travelers Land in Dallas County, Texas to Encino Executive Plaza, Ltd. The sale price for One Hickory Centre was $12,200,000 and Encino Executive Plaza, Ltd. executed a wrap-around promissory note in the amount of $11,973,025 payable to the order of IORI secured by a Deed of Trust encumbering One Hickory Centre. The remaining difference of which was as a result of prorations and various expenses paid by IORI in connection with the closing of the transaction. The note bears interest at 5.5% per annum. The sale price for the Travelers Land was $25,000,000. At closing, Encino Executive Plaza, Ltd. executed an all inclusive wrap-around promissory note payable to the

43

order of IORI in the principal amount of $22,801,987 secured by a Deed of Trust covering the Travelers Land sold and delivered cash to IORI in the amount of $1,946,715. As with the prior transaction, the difference between the purchase price and the promissory note represented adjustments for various prorations. The note bears interest at 5.5% per annum. Subsequently, IORI made a loan to Encino Executive Plaza, Ltd. in the amount of $1,567,232 payable upon demand or if no demand is made prior thereto on June 30, 2006 with a market rate of interest. Encino Executive Plaza, Ltd. executed and delivered a promissory note payable to the order of IORI in the stated principal amount of $1,567,232. The note bears interest at 5.5% per annum.

NOTE 4. INVESTMENT IN EQUITY METHOD PARTNERSHIPS

Investments in equity method partnerships consisted of the following: