SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Form 10-K
(Mark One)
|
||
þ
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 | |
For the year ended December 31, 2003 | ||
or | ||
o
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 | |
For the transition period from to |
Commission file number 333-40076
Knowles Electronics Holdings, Inc.
Delaware
|
36-2270096 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number) |
|
1151 Maplewood Drive, Itasca, Illinois (Address of principal executive offices) |
60143 (Zip Code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code:
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of Each Class | Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered | |
None
|
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Title of Each Class
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (Section 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes o No þ
There is no voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant. This Annual Report is being filed by the registrant as a result of undertakings made pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
KNOWLES ELECTRONICS HOLDINGS, INC.
FORM 10-K
CONTENTS
1
PART I
Item 1. | Business |
Overview
We are a leading international manufacturer of technologically advanced products in micro-acoustics. Since our company was founded in 1946 by Hugh and Josephine Knowles, we have leveraged our core competency in acoustic technology to build expertise in hearing aid transducers, electromechanical components, low voltage integrated circuit design, micro-electrical mechanical systems (MEMS) and precision manufacturing. We have operations around the world with the largest facilities in the United States, China and Malaysia. During 2003, we sold our SSPI and Ruwido (Infrared) businesses, and in 2002 we sold Ruf Electronics allowing us to concentrate on our core Micro-acoustics business. Our 2003 results from continuing operations reflect revenue, operating income and EBITDA, of $154.0 million, $37.0 million and $44.4 million, respectively. We manufacture and market micro-acoustic products with strong market share positions in several key markets, including the hearing aid market. In December 2002 we introduced the worlds first silicon microphone, which gained commercial viability in 2003, reflecting its considerable opportunity for growth beyond our traditional markets. We believe that we have achieved these positions in our markets as a result of our strong customer base, technological expertise, international low cost manufacturing capability and capable management team. Our principal executive offices are located at 1151 Maplewood Drive, Itasca, Illinois 60143, and our telephone number is (630) 250-5100.
Products
Knowles develops, manufactures, and supplies audio communications components, primarily miniaturized microphones and receivers used in hearing aids, microphones, headsets, and accessories for the computer and communication industries. The Company is the worlds largest manufacturer of high quality transducers, which are used for hearing aid and other high quality applications. We estimate our market share to be approximately 75% of the worldwide market for these sophisticated products, and have held a major share of the transducer market for over 30 years. The transducer is the name given to both the microphone and the receiver in a hearing aid and other acoustic products that require the accurate and controlled amplification of sound. The microphone converts surrounding sounds to electronic signals. Circuitry then modifies the signal over the audio frequency spectrum. These signals are transferred to the receiver, which then converts the signals to sound. Knowles often customizes transducers to meet the specifications of our customers, and in certain cases develops transducer designs in partnership with our customers. We have consistently and successfully maintained our market share over the years due to our long-standing relationships with a wide range of customers, value-added services and technological leadership.
Knowles also provides a number of additional micro-acoustic devices that benefit from the companys core competency in technology, design and manufacturing of subminiature acoustic products for applications outside the hearing aid industry. The companys capabilities in MEMS (Micro Electro Mechanical Systems), software, and high volume electronic components make Knowles uniquely qualified to provide value added solutions for growth markets such as mobile communications and consumer electronics. We produce and develop a range of microphones, speakers, software, and custom acoustic assemblies primarily for sale to original equipment manufacturers in these markets. Products developed for these markets include the worlds first Silicon Microphones, ECMs (electret condenser microphones), and Custom microphone assemblies.
Knowles also uses its knowledge of the hearing aid market, its engineering strengths and manufacturing expertise in the production of electromechanical components used in hearing aids including switches, trimmers, volume controls and telecoils.
2
Competitive Strengths
Our strong market position is attributable to the following competitive strengths:
Leading International Market Position and Strong Customer Base |
| We have been a market leader in micro-acoustic transducers for the hearing aid industry for more than 30 years, and our worldwide market share of high quality transducers for hearing aid applications is approximately 75%. We protect our leading market share by maintaining strong relationships with all of the key manufacturers that require high quality transducers including hearing aid manufacturers, pro-audio manufacturers, manufacturers of security products and medical device manufacturers. We offer transducers for all categories and often customize models to meet the specifications of manufacturers. |
Technological Expertise |
| We believe that we are a technological leader in each of our products. We offer an advanced transducer product line that covers a variety of technologies, applications and markets including the most comprehensive product offering to the hearing aid industry and our recent introduction of a MEMS-based surface mount silicon microphone. The Company has been setting the standard for both miniaturization and performance as a technology leader in the transducer market for hearing aids for over 30 years. We are also at the forefront of the development of MEMS (micro electro mechanical systems) products as a result of our semiconductor knowledge and our 50 years of experience in acoustics. We believe that we are the first microphone maker to manufacture a MEMS-based surface mount silicon microphone. | |
| To enhance our technological expertise, we emphasize research and development investment. Our 2003 research and development expenditures were $10.2 million, or 6.6% of net sales. We have demonstrated leadership in developing new technologies and have the scale to devote substantial resources toward product development. In addition, we have strategically established patent protection for our products while creating manufacturing processes that competitors cannot readily replicate. |
International Low Cost Manufacturing Capability |
| Since our founding more than 50 years ago, we have developed an international network of well-equipped manufacturing facilities. We operate 5 manufacturing facilities in the United States, Malaysia and China. We have a proven capability of moving manufacturing to lower cost environments. Our manufacturing facilities are not unionized. In March 2000, we announced plans to consolidate our worldwide manufacturing operations. The consolidation plan included outsourcing some activities performed in our U.S. operation and ceasing production in the United Kingdom and Taiwan. Production from those operations was moved to China and Malaysia. In December 2003 we announced that our Elgin, Illinois facility will be closed by the end of 2004. The majority of manufacturing activity will be transferred from Elgin to our locations in China and Malaysia, which will be expanded to accommodate the additional volume. Certain high value operations will be consolidated into our headquarters facility in Itasca, Illinois. Our manufacturing operations operate at high quality levels while maintaining cost effectiveness. | |
| The manufacturing life cycles of some transducers, particularly models for less technologically advanced applications, have been as long as 25 years, reducing our production development costs and allowing us to improve the efficiency of our manufacturing processes. In general, we use automated sub-assembly operations and manual final assembly operations. For low volume products, we employ subcontractors, which provide us with cost structure flexibility and allow us to change capacity quickly based on product demand. |
3
Growth Strategy
We set the standard for engineering excellence in our markets. Our principal objective is to increase revenues, cash flow and profitability by strengthening our leading market positions in our existing products in this core business and applying our technological expertise to new growth opportunities in related products and markets. The primary components of our strategy are to:
Capitalize on Growth Opportunities in the Hearing Aid Market |
Our worldwide share of the hearing aid transducer market is approximately 75% and we have been a market leader in transducer technology for over 30 years. We believe we will increase our sales as the hearing aid industry continues to expand. Hearing aid penetration into the market of potential users has historically been low, ranging from approximately 22% in the United States to less than 1% in some emerging economies. The hearing aid industry is projected to grow based on the following trends:
| Advances in the technology of hearings aids, leading to better customer satisfaction | |
| Improvement in the cosmetic appearance of hearing aids | |
| Growth in the elderly population | |
| Increases in the sale of binaural hearing aids | |
| Increases in the international penetration of hearing aids into developing economies |
Our strategy is designed to capitalize on these trends and develop products designed to expand the hearing aid and hearing aid component market. For example, we have developed transducers for directional hearing aids, which provide better performance than single microphone hearing aids and require three or more, rather than two, transducers per hearing aid. To increase hearing aid market growth, we also collect market data that identifies consumer needs and work with industry participants to improve market penetration.
Develop non-hearing aid Markets for transducers |
In addition to hearing aids, our transducers are used in pro-audio, broadcast and radio communications, and medical devices. We are expanding our product offering and using our application engineering expertise to solve customer needs in all of these growing markets that require high quality micro-acoustic solutions.
Penetrate High Volume Markets with SiSonicTM Silicon Microphone |
We have introduced and begun to sell the worlds first high volume silicon surface mount microphone. This microphones environmental robustness enables it to perform in harsh environments such as automobiles. Since the SiSonicTM Silicon Microphone can withstand high temperatures, it can be mounted to printed circuit boards using pick and place soldering equipment, thereby eliminating costly manual installations currently required for many microphone applications. It is ideal for high volume applications like mobile phones.
Leverage Core Acoustic Expertise to Develop Additional Innovative Products for Markets with High Growth Potential |
We expect to continue combining our core competency in acoustics with other technologies such as MEMS and analog and digital electronics to provide technology solutions for high growth markets, including mobile communications and consumer electronics. We have developed several new technologies and products for these markets including:
IntellisonicTM Far-Field Microphone Software To support emerging markets such as interactive video on demand and voice over internet protocol (VOIP) via portable devices, we have developed a signal processing software to enable clear processing of voice signals in a noisy environment, such as an automobile or within large crowds. This technology will facilitate clear voice communications and differentiate between audio inputs, an important feature in these growing markets.
4
Custom Acoustic Assemblies we continue to introduce new acoustic assemblies, built to customer specification on an OEM basis. Examples of these are headsets produced for call center, cellular phone accessory, and PC markets.
Strengthen Customer Relationships |
We have well-established customer relationships. We plan to continue to strengthen our existing relationships and develop new relationships through the following.
| Customizing the design of transducer models to meet the specifications of individual hearing aid manufacturers. We also conduct joint research and product development with selected customers. | |
| Continuing to expand our geographical presence around the world in order to better serve the increasing demand for micro-acoustical products from OEM electronics manufacturers. |
Maintain Low Cost and High Quality Manufacturing Leadership |
We believe that we are the lowest cost producer of hearing aid quality micro-acoustic transducers due to our significant market share, our relatively large volumes, our effective sourcing processes and our successful transfer of production to lower cost areas. We have more than 25 years of experience operating on a worldwide scale. During this time, we have developed manufacturing and management systems that allow us to operate low cost offshore facilities without compromising either quality or level of service. After the completion of our restructuring efforts in 2004, nearly all of our manufacturing activity will be located in China and Malaysia to benefit from both their lower cost labor markets and proximity to emerging product markets.
Products
Microphones. We have leveraged our microphone technology to create the widest selection of subminiature microphones that we supply to original equipment manufacturers for a diverse set of applications. Our offering of microphones include: Silicon microphone, low cost electrets, worlds smallest microphone, ultra low noise microphones, low vibration microphones, noise canceling microphones, and waterproof microphones. Applications for our products include hearing aids, mobile phones, PDAs, tablets, cellular headsets, monitors, military, radio communications, and sensors.
Receivers/ Speakers. We manufacture the largest offering of balanced armature receivers/speakers used in hearing aids, pro-audio, broadcast and radio communications, and medical devices. We are expanding our offering in high-end consumer electronics applications such as high fidelity MP3 earphones and cellular accessories.
Custom Acoustic Assemblies. We manufacture (on an OEM basis) a variety of wired/noise canceling headsets used in general telephony markets such as mobile accessories and computer telephony applications, including internet based telephony and voice recognition. The company also markets boom-mounted microphones for use in conference rooms, helmets, aerospace and civil/military communications; condenser microphones assemblies for laptop computers, wireless phones and modem accessories; computer monitor microphones and lapel microphones.
Software. We are developing and marketing a broad line of software products to improve the quality of the speech signal prior to transmission. Software under development includes: acoustic echo cancellation, noise suppression, interference canceling, and beam forming. These technologies can be used separately or together with one or more microphones (in an array) to enhance the user experience in applications where the user is not positioned close to the microphone and competing noises degrade voice quality.
Electromechanical Controls. We have developed a broad line of electromechanical controls for hearing aid manufacturers including trimmers, switches, volume controls and connectors. Building on our strong customer relationships in transducers, our engineering capability in hearing aid components and our strength in low cost manufacturing, we expect these products will provide us with significant growth.
5
Research and Development
Our 2003 research and development expenditures were $10.2 million, or 6.6% of net sales. We have a team of 63 scientists, engineers and technicians located primarily in Itasca, Illinois and in Taiwan. Research and development efforts for transducers, micro-electro mechanical systems for the production of silicon microphones, signal processing technology and far field microphone technology are conducted in the United States. Custom acoustic assembly and microphone product development are conducted in Taiwan. In 2003, we focused our research and development activities in two key areas. First, we are intensely focused on providing the best technology in the world in high quality transducers for all applications. Secondly, we are carrying out extensive research and development on producing and expanding our product portfolio in silicon microphones using the micro machining of silicon (also referred to as micro-electro mechanical systems), MEMS packaging and integration of additional electronic functionality.
We believe that our ability to rapidly develop new transducers with superior performance is critical to sustaining our market share and margins. Applied research and advanced modeling lead to new and creative products, which we believe gives us a competitive advantage as manufacturers who use micro-acoustic technology look to us for improvements in their components.
New transducer products and improvements recently introduced include receivers with improved maximum power output and reduced vibration sensitivity using our unique and innovative Pantograph design; significantly reduced vibration with magnetic shield outer housing; and screenless damping using Ferrofluid®. Microphone improvements that have recently been introduced include a analog/digital (A/ D) signal converter, programmable digitally controlled gain amplifier, conjoined ultra-thin microphone pairs, noise reduction, improved electrostatic discharge thresholds and significantly reduced cellular telephone interference.
Our research and development focus on the silicon microphone in 2003 allowed us to move this highly innovative product from design concept to the production quantities required from high volume markets such as cellphones and MP3 players. We believe that we have a leading position in this application of micro-electro mechanical systems. Additional research and development activities will focus on expanding the functionality of the Sisonic product to meet and exceed customer requirements and expand the applications to a wider market place.
Manufacturing
We operate from five manufacturing facilities in the United States, Malaysia and China. We believe that our facilities meet our present needs and that our properties are generally well maintained and suitable for their intended uses. We believe that we generally have sufficient capacity to satisfy the demand for our products in the foreseeable future. We periodically evaluate the composition of our various manufacturing facilities in light of current and expected market conditions and demand. With the closure of our Elgin, Illinois facility at the end of 2004, we will be expanding our operations with additional facilities in our Penang, Malaysia and Suzhou, China locations. These new facilities will be in the place by the end of the second quarter of 2004 and will add approximately 55,000 square feet of assembly capacity and 25,000 square feet of metal fabrication capacity.
In March 2000, we announced plans to consolidate our worldwide manufacturing operations, including the ceasing of production in the United Kingdom and Taiwan and outsourcing some activities performed in the United States. In December 2003 we announced that our Elgin, Illinois facility will be closed by the end of 2004. Certain high value manufacturing operations will be consolidated from Elgin into our headquarters facility in Itasca, Illinois with the balance of manufacturing operations transferred to our locations in China and Malaysia, which will be expanded to accommodate the additional activity. Our manufacturing operations operate at the highest quality levels and we believe our costs are significantly lower than our competitors.
After the completion of our restructuring actions, our production space will be approximately 75% utilized. Our transducer manufacturing facilities are ISO 9001:2000 certified. Our manufacturing processes
6
Sales and Marketing
Sales and marketing efforts are organized to reflect the different markets of our customers. We serve the hearing aid industry through the 24 people in our direct sales group, which operates from offices in Illinois, United Kingdom and Japan. An independent sales representative covers Australia. Pricing of transducer products are based on a volume/price grid in which volume discounts are provided based on actual purchases. From time to time, we reduce prices to meet competition. See Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
The markets for electro-acoustical products from the military, medical, professional audio, and OEM electronics manufacturers are sold through a direct sales force of 25 people and independent sales representatives. This sales force and independent sales representatives are located in the United States, Mexico, United Kingdom, Germany, France, Japan, Taiwan, China, Korea, and Australia.
Customers
We are the principal transducer supplier worldwide to the major hearing aid manufacturers that include GN Resound, Interton, Oticon, Phonak, Rion, Siemens, Sonic Innovations, Starkey Laboratories and Widex; medical device manufactures such as Guidant; and pro-audio manufacturers such as Shure. In addition, we are a major supplier of micro-acoustic devices for electronics manufactures including Plantronics, Phillips and HTC. In 2003, we had four customers that each represented more than ten percent of our consolidated sales and accounts receivable. As a group, these four customers represented 60 percent of our consolidated sales.
Competition
We have held a major share of the transducer market for hearing aids for over 30 years, holding an estimated worldwide market share of approximately 75% in 2003. Our principal competitor is SonionMicrotronic, which we believe had a significant portion of the remaining market share in 2003. SonionMicrotronic generally prices their products below our pricing levels, but the difference in prices has moderated with the increase in the value of the Euro compared to the U.S. Dollar since 2002.
The markets for micro-acoustic products outside the hearing aid industry are highly competitive and in many cases highly fragmented. We compete with many companies using various technologies in these markets, generally on the basis of technological expertise, price, product quality, reliability and on-time delivery. These competitors include large consumer electronics, communications equipment and acoustic component product companies as well as a number of smaller specialized companies.
Patents, Copyrights and Trademarks
Patents play an important role in the strategy for each of our business units. As a matter of practice, we follow an aggressive program of filing patent applications for all new design and development concepts as soon as practical, subject to review for patentability, technical and commercial feasibility and approval by the appropriate business unit. We currently have approximately 170 patents issued in 15 countries around the world. In addition, we have more than 70 patent applications pending, reflecting our high level of focused activity on improving key areas of micro-acoustic technology.
In addition to patents, we have more than 50 trademarks registrations and applications for registration in 20 countries around the world and 8 registered domain names for Internet web sites.
We have five registered copyrights, as well as a number of unregistered copyrights in our original works of authorship. In addition, we have in excess of 100 unregistered trade names used to identify our products and a number of trade secret processes used to design and manufacture our products.
7
Our patents and other intellectual property rights may not protect us from competition. In addition, patents by their nature are of limited duration, and several of our patents will expire during the next few years.
Employees
We had 2,166 employees as of December 31, 2003. Of these, approximately 70% were direct production employees and 30% were staff. Geographically, 302 of our employees are based in North America, 26 in Europe and 1,838 are based in Asia. None of our employees belongs to a labor union. We have good relationships with our employees and turnover is relatively low.
Environmental Matters
Our facilities, like similar manufacturing facilities, are subject to a range of stringent environmental laws and regulations, including those relating to air emissions, wastewater discharges, the handling and disposal of solid and hazardous waste, and the remediation of contamination associated with the current and historic use of hazardous substances or materials. Based on the information available to us, environmental laws currently in force and the advice and assessment of our environmental consultants, we do not consider that we have any material environmental liabilities or failures to comply with applicable environmental laws.
Regulation
Hearing aid manufacturers are subject to a variety of regulatory agency requirements in the United States and in various other countries in which they sell hearing aids. Manufacturers of hearing aids are subject to the United States Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and other federal statutes and regulations governing, among other things, the design, manufacture, testing, safety, labeling, storage, record keeping, reporting, approval, advertising and promotion of medical devices.
Sales of hearing aids outside the United States are also subject to regulatory requirements that vary from country to country. Similar requirements to those in place in the United States are imposed on hearing aid manufacturers by the European Union. All hearing aid manufacturers are required to obtain quality assurance certifications for their components to sell their products in the European Union. Accordingly, we maintain ISO 9001:2000 quality assurance certifications, which subject our operations to periodic surveillance audits.
INDUSTRY
We apply our acoustic technology capabilities in several markets including:
Hearing Aids
Hearing aids have three basic internal components: a microphone, signal processing and amplification circuitry, and a receiver. The microphone is located at the top of the hearing aid and converts surrounding sounds to electronic signals. The circuitry then modifies the signal over the audio frequency spectrum. These signals are transferred to the receiver, which then converts the signals to sounds in the ear. The transducer is the name given to both the microphone and the receiver. Transducers are critical to the performance capabilities of any hearing aid. Without high performance transducers, the processing capabilities of hearing devices are ineffective.
The overall market for hearing aids improved in the second half of 2003 after stagnating in 2001 and 2002 and the first two quarters of 2003. The United States is currently the worlds largest market for hearing aids. Hearing aid sales in the U.S. increased by 12% and 10% in the third and fourth quarters of 2003, respectively, compared to the prior year period, according to the Hearing Industries Association, an industry trade group. For the total year 2003, hearing aid sales in the United States increased 4.9% over the prior year. The increased demand is caused by a combination of factors, including an improved economic outlook, technological advances in hearing aids, and a growing population in the target market.
8
In the longer term, a number of significant factors are expected to increase the demand for hearing aids including:
| Technological advances. Advances in recent years have increased consumer satisfaction by decreasing the size and improving the performance of hearing aids. The development of programmable, digital and multiple microphone devices, greater applicability of computer software, increased use of high technology circuitry, enhanced performance in noisy environments and improved hearing aid casings are expected to further improve product performance and increase consumer satisfaction. | |
| Fitting and after sales care. Improved fitting of hearing aids, both physically and audiologically, is an important factor affecting growth of the hearing aid market. Dispensers are improving after-sales care of patients and their hearing aids, including personal visits to older clients, which promises to improve customer satisfaction with hearing aids. | |
| Improvement in cosmetic appearance. Through technological advances, some higher priced hearing aids have become so small that they are virtually invisible, although occlusion or blockage in connection with their use must be managed. | |
| Growing elderly population. 30% of the population over the age of 65 has historically had a hearing loss problem. The 2000 U.S. Census indicated that 35 million people were age 65 or older. The U.S. Census Bureau also projects that the population age 65 or older will be 39.7 million people in 2010, and five years later in 2015, 46 million. | |
| Greater use of binaural hearing aids. Clinical data has demonstrated that the use of binaural hearing aids (i.e., two hearing aids per user) benefits individuals with a hearing loss in both ears. Increased use of binaural hearing aids would result in more transducer sales (four or more per hearing aid user instead of two). The increased use of binaural hearing aids represents a special opportunity in Europe, where the use of binaural is significantly lower than in the United States. | |
| Undiagnosed hearing loss. Approximately 10% of the U.S. population has some form of hearing loss, and a relatively high proportion of this population is either unaware of their hearing loss since it has occurred gradually over time or has not sought medical advice. There are considerable opportunities to increase sales to this group by educating them on the signs of hearing loss and encouraging them to visit physicians who can diagnose the hearing loss and recommend purchase of a hearing aid. |
The development of a systematic program of routine hearing screening could also lead to significantly more referrals for treatment.
| International penetration. According to industry studies, approximately 10% of the population in developed countries could benefit from hearing aids, but only approximately 2% of the population in developed countries owns them. Since two-thirds of the worldwide population over 65 will be in developing countries by 2025, there are substantial opportunities for increased use of hearing aids in developing economies such as China, India and Eastern Europe, especially as disposable incomes rise. |
Mobile Communications
Mobile communication devices continue to expand in prevalence world wide, with over 520 million mobile phones sold in 2003, with a constant upgrade of features and capabilities driving an increase in demand. Many of the services have new voice-driven communications applications, thus requiring vendors with high volume manufacturing, significant acoustic application support and a broad line of voice input solutions. We are well positioned to capitalize on this market by selling key products to original equipment manufacturers including Silicon microphones, ECMs, custom assemblies and software for elimination of ambient noise.
9
High End Consumer Electronics
We manufacture the largest offering of balance armature receiver/ speakers used in pro-audio, broadcast and radio communications. The market for high fidelity audio continues to expand through new technology (MP3 players, cellular accessories, etc.).
Security Applications
We manufacture a variety of high quality boom-mounted microphones and customer acoustic assemblies for use in helmets, aerospace and civil/military communications that require high quality audio response.
Medical Devices
We manufacture a variety of high quality audio products that are successfully used in manufacturing medical devices that apply high quality micro-acoustic capabilities to several medical applications.
Item 2. | Properties |
PROPERTIES
Owned/ | Lease | Area | ||||||||||||||
Location | Usage | Leased | Expiration | (Square feet) | ||||||||||||
US
|
||||||||||||||||
Elgin, IL(1)
|
Mfg. | Owned | 71,800 | |||||||||||||
Itasca, IL
|
Hdqtrs. | Owned | 60,900 | |||||||||||||
132,700 | ||||||||||||||||
EUROPE
|
||||||||||||||||
Burgess Hill, UK
|
Sales | Leased | 3/31/2016 | 15,000 | ||||||||||||
ASIA
|
||||||||||||||||
Suzhou, China (No. 20)(2)
|
Mfg. | Leased | 3/31/2004 | 21,000 | ||||||||||||
Suzhou, China (Block B)
|
Mfg. | Leased | 1/1/2005 | 12,900 | ||||||||||||
Suzhou, China(3)
|
Mfg. | 83,700 | ||||||||||||||
Tokyo, Japan(5)
|
Sales | Leased | 6/30/2004 | 600 | ||||||||||||
Penang, Malaysia(4)
|
Mfg. | Owned | 57,500 | |||||||||||||
Weifang, China
|
Mfg. | Leased | 9/30/2005 | 32,900 | ||||||||||||
Taipei, Taiwan
|
Sales | Leased | 11/30/2005 | 13,200 | ||||||||||||
221,800 | ||||||||||||||||
GRAND TOTAL
|
369,500 | |||||||||||||||
(1) | This facility is expected to be closed in September 2004. |
(2) | Lease will not be renewed. |
(3) | Occupancy March 2004, lease or purchase terms under negotiation. |
(4) | Land lease expires 09/18/2049 |
(5) | Lease will be renewed. |
Item 3. | Legal Matters |
The Company has no material pending or threatened litigation.
10
Item 4. | Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders |
Not applicable.
PART II
Item 5. | Market for Registrants Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters |
Not applicable.
Item 6. | Selected Consolidated Financial Data |
1999(9) | 2000(9) | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | |||||||||||||||||
Statement of Operations Data(3):
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Net sales
|
$ | 180,595 | $ | 184,573 | $ | 173,116 | $ | 164,119 | $ | 154,042 | |||||||||||
Costs and expenses:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Cost of sales(7)
|
112,749 | 99,975 | 90,705 | 87,970 | 75,594 | ||||||||||||||||
Research and development
|
12,247 | 11,753 | 12,845 | 11,735 | 10,225 | ||||||||||||||||
Selling and administrative expense
|
25,194 | 28,450 | 34,420 | 30,981 | 29,732 | ||||||||||||||||
Recapitalization expense(1)
|
10,674 | | | | | ||||||||||||||||
Loss on sale of business(8)
|
| | | 16,736 | | ||||||||||||||||
Restructuring expenses(2)
|
| 14,858 | (179 | ) | 2,112 | 1,532 | |||||||||||||||
Operating income
|
$ | 19,731 | $ | 29,537 | $ | 35,325 | $ | 14,585 | $ | 36,959 | |||||||||||
Interest income
|
883 | 941 | 139 | 129 | 111 | ||||||||||||||||
Interest expense
|
(23,051 | ) | (43,292 | ) | (37,666 | ) | (33,891 | ) | (35,835 | ) | |||||||||||
Miscellaneous, net
|
(123 | ) | | | | | |||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations
before income taxes
|
(2,560 | ) | (12,814 | ) | (2,202 | ) | (19,177 | ) | 1,235 | ||||||||||||
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
8,786 | (1,580 | ) | 6,313 | 11,744 | 491 | |||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations
after income taxes
|
(11,346 | ) | (11,234 | ) | (8,515 | ) | (30,921 | ) | 744 | ||||||||||||
Income (loss) from discontinued operations
after income taxes:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Loss on sale of Infrared division
|
| | | | (8,576 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Gain on sale of Synchro-Start division
|
| | | | 35,570 | ||||||||||||||||
Income from discontinued operations(3)
|
6,200 | 7,667 | 7,036 | 6,545 | 932 | ||||||||||||||||
Income from discontinued operations after income
taxes
|
6,200 | 7,667 | 7,036 | 6,545 | 27,926 | ||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss)
|
$ | (5,146 | ) | $ | (3,567 | ) | $ | (1,479 | ) | $ | (24,376 | ) | $ | 28,670 | |||||||
C Corporation Pro Forma Data(4)
unaudited:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
C Corporation pro forma income taxes(4)
|
$ | 19,125 | | | | | |||||||||||||||
C corporation pro forma income (loss) from
continuing operations adjusted for income taxes
|
$ | (21,685 | ) | | | | |
11
1999(9) | 2000(9) | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | |||||||||||||||||
Other Financial Data:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization
|
$ | 10,824 | $ | 10,613 | $ | 11,693 | $ | 8,703 | $ | 7,443 | |||||||||||
Capital expenditures
|
14,500 | 16,151 | 21,276 | 8,427 | 14,776 | ||||||||||||||||
Cash flows from operating activities(11)
|
49,274 | 22,835 | 9,816 | 29,679 | 11,111 | ||||||||||||||||
Cash flows from investing activities
|
(14,500 | ) | (15,488 | ) | (17,614 | ) | (4,867 | ) | 30,469 | ||||||||||||
Cash flows from financing activities
|
(19,055 | ) | (12,160 | ) | (6,152 | ) | (3,563 | ) | (54,201 | ) | |||||||||||
EBITDA(5)
|
30,432 | 40,150 | 47,018 | 23,288 | 44,402 | ||||||||||||||||
EBITDA as adjusted(10)
|
44,338 | 54,648 | 46,419 | 42,930 | 45,933 | ||||||||||||||||
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges(6)
|
| | | | 1.0 | x | |||||||||||||||
Balance Sheet Data:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$ | 24,403 | $ | 16,292 | $ | 2,029 | $ | 23,879 | $ | 11,227 | |||||||||||
Total assets
|
188,108 | 193,867 | 179,992 | 150,839 | 112,573 | ||||||||||||||||
Long term debt including current maturities
|
350,134 | 348,807 | 339,773 | 339,622 | 288,180 | ||||||||||||||||
Preferred stock mandatorily redeemable in 2019
|
194,250 | 213,675 | 235,042 | 258,547 | 284,401 | ||||||||||||||||
Total common stockholders equity (deficit)
|
(412,724 | ) | (442,507 | ) | (465,780 | ) | (518,151 | ) | (512,375 | ) |
See accompanying notes.
(1) | The Recapitalization expenses consisted primarily of bonuses, special one-time recognition payments to employees, termination costs of a supplemental executive retirement plan and legal, accounting, public relations and other professional fees. | |
(2) | The Restructuring expenses for the year 2000 thru 2002 are related to the restructuring announced in March 2000. The Company consolidated its worldwide manufacturing operations by ending production at five manufacturing facilities and either outsourcing component production or moving final assembly to lower cost locations in Malaysia, China and Hungary. Through December 2002, these actions reduced our global workforce by about 20%. The restructuring expense in 2003 is primarily related to the closure of our Elgin, Illinois facility announced in November 2003. | |
(3) | Net income from discontinued operations in 1999 thru 2003 represents the activities of the Synchro-Start and Infrared businesses sold during 2003, and in 1999, the Finance Company of Illinois, an equipment financing business that was distributed to our preexisting stockholders on June 29, 1999. Years 1999 thru 2002 have been restated to reflect these discontinued operations. | |
(4) | Effective January 1, 1997, our stockholders elected under the S Corporation rules of the Internal Revenue Code to have Knowles income included in their own income for federal income tax purposes. As a result of the Recapitalization, we terminated our S Corporation status for federal income tax purposes effective June 29, 1999. For informational purposes, the selected historical consolidated financial data includes an unaudited pro forma presentation of income taxes which would have been recorded if we had been a C Corporation. | |
(5) | EBITDA is defined as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. For the years 2000, 2001, 2002 and 2003 EBITDA includes restructuring charges of $14,858, ($179), $2,112 and $1,532 respectively. EBITDA should not be construed as an alternative to operating income, or net income, as determined in accordance with GAAP, as an indicator of our operating performance, or as an alternative to cash flows generated by operating, investing and financing activities. EBITDA is presented solely as a supplemental disclosure because we believe that it is a widely used measure of operating performance and because of debt covenants based on a defined EBITDA. Because EBITDA is not |
12
calculated under GAAP, it may not be comparable to similarly titled measures reported by other companies. |
Reconciliation of operating income to EBITDA:
1999 | 2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | ||||||||||||||||
Operating income
|
$ | 19,731 | $ | 29,537 | $ | 35,325 | $ | 14,585 | $ | 36,959 | ||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization
|
10,824 | 10,613 | 11,693 | 8,703 | 7,443 | |||||||||||||||
Miscellaneous, net
|
(123 | ) | | | | | ||||||||||||||
EBITDA
|
$ | 30,432 | $ | 40,150 | $ | 47,018 | $ | 23,288 | $ | 44,402 | ||||||||||
(6) | The ratio of earnings to fixed charges has been computed by dividing earnings available for fixed charges (income from continuing operations before income taxes and fixed charges) by fixed charges interest expense plus one-third of rental expense (the portion deemed representative of the interest factor). Knowles earnings were inadequate to cover fixed charges for the twelve months ended December 31, 1999, 2000, 2001 and 2002 by approximately $2.6, $14.8, $2.2 and $19.2 million, respectively. | |
(7) | During the fourth quarter of 2001, the Company changed its method of determining the cost of domestic inventories from the LIFO method to the FIFO method. Prior year results have been restated to reflect the retroactive application of this tax accounting change; 2000 and 1999 results were decreased by $1,011 and $1,674, respectively. | |
(8) | In November 2002 the Company sold its Ruf Electronics operations, which were part of the Automotive Components segment, and recorded a loss of $16,736. The loss includes $1,186 transferred from accumulated other comprehensive income. The proceeds from the sale were not material. The Company may receive additional payment amounts in 2004 and 2005 if the Ruf operations meet certain financial targets. | |
(9) | The results for 1999 and 2000 have been restated to correct an error in the pension expense recorded by our U.K. facility, increasing operating income by $267 and $300, respectively, and to reduce restructuring expense in 2000 to reflect the $1.0 million pension curtailment gain that should have been recorded. Appropriate balance sheet accounts have also been restated. See Consolidated Financial Statement Footnote 2. |
(10) | EBITDA as adjusted is defined as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization; and for the year 1999 recapitalization expense; for years 2000 thru 2003 restructuring charges; for years 1999 thru 2002 EBITDA from Ruf Electronics (sold in 2002); and for the year 2002 loss on sale of business. EBITDA as adjusted is a key measurement used by management and presented solely as a supplemental disclosure. |
Reconciliation of EBITDA to EBITDA as adjusted:
1999 | 2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | ||||||||||||||||
EBITDA
|
$ | 30,432 | $ | 40,150 | $ | 47,018 | $ | 23,288 | $ | 44,401 | ||||||||||
Recapitalization expense
|
10,674 | | | | | |||||||||||||||
Restructuring charges
|
| 14,858 | (179 | ) | 2,112 | 1,532 | ||||||||||||||
Ruf EBITDA
|
3,232 | (360 | ) | (420 | ) | 794 | | |||||||||||||
Loss on sale of business
|
| | | 16,736 | | |||||||||||||||
EBITDA as adjusted
|
$ | 44,338 | $ | 54,648 | $ | 46,419 | $ | 42,930 | $ | 45,933 | ||||||||||
(11) | Represents total cash flow from continuing and discontinued operations. |
Item 7. | Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the Selected Consolidated Financial Data and our consolidated financial statements and the related notes included elsewhere in this report on Form 10-K.
13
Overview
We are a leading international manufacturer of technologically advanced microacoustic products. Since we were founded in 1946, we have leveraged our core competence in acoustic technology to build expertise in hearing aid transducer and low voltage integrated circuit design, electronic controls and precision manufacturing in the United States and other countries. We have numerous international operations with our largest facilities in the United States, China and Malaysia. We are strongly focused on reducing costs while simultaneously increasing quality. See Part I Business Description for more details.
The Company divested its non-core businesses during the last two years and is now focused on its core microacoustics business. On July 29, 2003 the Company completed the sale of its Ruwido Austria GmbH subsidiary, whose operations made up the Infrared division, to FM Electronic Holdings. On May 30, 2003 the Company completed the sale of its Synchro-Start division to Woodward Governor Company. In November 2002 the Company sold Ruf Electronics, a manufacturer of automotive sensors and controls. The financial statements for the period ending December 31, 2003 have been prepared with Ruwido and Synchro-Start accounted for as discontinued operations under Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP). Accordingly, the Synchro-Start and Ruwido businesses have been removed from the Companys results of continuing operations for all periods presented. The assets and liabilities of the discontinued operations have been summarized as current and netted together for presentation on the balance sheet. The sale of Ruf is not accounted for as a discontinued operation under GAAP, but is included in the period up to its sale in November 2002 as component of continuing operations. With the sale of these three business units, the Company has focused its product offering in one business segment Microacoustics. For more detail on the divestitures, see Consolidated Financial Statements Footnote 3, Discontinued Operations.
The Company is highly leveraged as a result of its 1999 recapitalization. During 2003, the Company reduced debt by $51.4 million, and refinanced the $31.8 million A portion of its bank debt. As of December 31, 2003, the Company had no short-term debt and Notes payable of $288.2 million. No principal payments are due in the next twelve months. The Company is required to maintain certain leverage and interest coverage ratios in order to be in compliance with its Credit Agreement covenants and to access its revolving credit facility. The Company was in compliance with its leverage and interest coverage ratios and its other covenant requirements as of December 31, 2003 and expects to be in compliance through December 31, 2004. For more detail, see the Liquidity and Capital resources section below.
Our 2003 revenue, operating income and EBITDA, as reported, were $154.0 million, $37.0 million and $44.4 million, respectively. Our 2003 EBITDA as adjusted (defined in Item 6. Selected Consolidated Financial Data, Footnote 10) was $45.9 million.
Sales decreased $10.1 million in the twelve months ending December 31, 2003 because of the sale of Ruf in November 2002. Excluding Ruf sales of $14.2 million from the 2002 results, sales increased by $4.1 million or 2.7% in 2003 with increases in transducers, silicon microphones and electromechanical devices for the hearing aid market. Gross margin rates improved in 2003 due to the sale of Ruf and due to improved product reliability, better inventory controls and on going cost improvement programs. Operating expenses decreased by $2.7 million due to the sale of Ruf, but increased by $2.2 million or 5.8% when Ruf is excluded from the prior year period. The Company reported restructuring expenses of $1.5 million in 2003 (primarily accruals for restructuring related to the scheduled closure of our Elgin, Illinois facility) and restructuring expenses of $2.1 million in 2002 (primarily the loss on the sale of a facility in Taiwan and severance). The Company reported a $16.7 million loss on the sale of Ruf in 2002. Operating income increased by $22.4 million in 2003, primarily because of the 2002 loss on the sale of Ruf and improved operating results in 2003. The Companys key performance indicator is EBITDA as adjusted, which improved by $3.0 million in 2003 due to the improved sales and gross margin rates. The increase in EBITDA was realized in the fourth quarter, primarily due to improved conditions in the market for hearing aids and favorable manufacturing costs. For more detail, see the Consolidated Results from Operations, below.
14
Key Line Items in the Income statement |
Net sales. We recognize sales when title to the products transfers to the customer, which typically is upon the shipment of products to the customers, and when collectability is reasonably assured.
Growth in net sales for transducers is generally driven by growth in the market for hearing aids and to a lesser extent by the market for high quality micro-acoustic products in the security, medical and professional audio markets. There has been growing price competition in the market for hearing aid components over the last several years. Unit volumes increased in the worldwide market for hearing aids in the second half of 2003. We believe that this improvement in the hearing aid markets will continue in 2004 and will more than offset any decline in transducer prices in 2004.
Net sales for microacoustic devises other than transducers have been driven by the emergence of new markets for acoustic technologies and our penetration of those markets. These markets have been growing substantially due to technological advances in and increased penetration of mobile communication devices, high-end consumer electronics, security applications, medical device manufacturers and a variety of specialty applications that require high performance acoustic performance. We realized a major milestone in December, 2002 with what we believe was the first commercial shipment of the worlds first surface mount microphone, based on semiconductor technology. In 2003 we continued to refine this innovative product and developed manufacturing methods that allowed us to ship the Silicon Microphone into markets such as cell phones in commercial quantities.
Cost of sales. Our cost of sales consists mainly of materials, direct and indirect labor costs and other overhead. Other overhead includes depreciation, equipment and tooling maintenance, shipping and manufacturing supplies. Indirect labor payroll expense and production overhead expense make up the largest component of cost of sales. Materials makes up the next largest and direct labor payroll expense is the smallest component of cost of sales. Depreciation is included as an expense in the line item that corresponds to the asset being depreciated (i.e. manufacturing facilities are depreciated in cost of sales, headquarter facilities are depreciated in general and administrative expense). About 57% of our depreciation expense in 2003 and 2002 is reflected in cost of sales.
A semi-skilled workforce performs most of our direct labor. Therefore, we have emphasized moving manufacturing to lower wage locations, including China and Malaysia. In March 2000, we announced plans, which we executed in 2000 and 2001 to consolidate our worldwide manufacturing operations, with a strong focus on Asia. We outsourced manufacturing activities previously performed at our Itasca and Rolling Meadow, Illinois facilities and ceased production at our manufacturing facilities in the United Kingdom and Taiwan. In November 2003 we announced that our Elgin, Illinois facility will be closed by the end of 2004. The majority of manufacturing activity will be transferred from Elgin to our locations in China and Malaysia.
Our material costs primarily relate to unprocessed materials, including steel, copper wire, and magnet bar stock. We purchase certain integrated circuits, magnets and diaphragm assemblies customized specifically for its products from outside suppliers, some of which are single sourced. Our materials costs generally relate to similar unprocessed materials or commodities.
Research and development. Research and development costs consist mainly of personnel cost, facilities and contract costs. The principal purpose of our research and development efforts is to strengthen our product offering, provide technical expertise to our customers and to provide new products for growth markets.
Sales and marketing expense. Our sales and marketing expenses consist of personnel costs, advertising, market research and occupancy expenses. Our selling expenses have not been a significant portion of our period expenses, but are increasing due to our expansion in markets beyond the hearing aid industry, which requires additional sales and product management infrastructure to support future growth. We sell most of our products to original equipment manufacturers and distributors, through internal sales forces and outside sales agents.
General and administrative expense. Our general and administrative expenses consist of personnel costs, legal, accounting and other professional costs, management information systems and rent.
15
We have replaced certain management information systems, requiring expenditures of approximately $11 million from 2000 through 2003. Approximately $8 million was spent in 2001, of which $6.6 million was capitalized. All locations now are integrated into the Companys ERP system.
Other income (expense). Other income (expense) consists of interest income, interest expense and miscellaneous expenses. Due to our recapitalization, interest expense was $35.8 million in 2003, $33.9 million in 2002 and $37.7 million in 2001. The increase in interest expense in 2003 was caused by the refinancing of the A portion of the bank debt with the higher interest C loan.
Income taxes. Effective June 30, 1999, Knowles became a C corporation and subsequently, has been subject to federal income taxes. Income taxes were a small net benefit in 2000 due to our ability to use a net loss carry forward from 1999. The provision for income taxes exceeded pretax income in 2001 due to not being able to offset the profitable foreign operations with the U.S. loss arising from the interest expense. In 2002 the Company provided for $11.7 million of taxes despite a pre-tax loss of $19.2 million primarily due to providing a valuation allowance against the net U.S. deferred income tax assets. The valuation allowance was recorded due to the uncertainty of realizing the benefit of deferred tax assets as a result of continued U.S. losses created by the significant interest expense associated with the Companys debt. Income taxes in 2003 were an expense of $0.5 million, with taxes on profitable foreign operations partially offset by a favorable adjustment to the valuation adjustment against the U.S. deferred tax asset.
Foreign exchange exposure. Our revenues are primarily denominated in the U.S. dollar. To a much lesser degree we also have revenues billed in the Japanese Yen and the British Pound. Our expenses are principally denominated in those currencies, but are also denominated in the local currencies of China, Malaysia, and Taiwan. We do not hedge our foreign exchange exposure, since we generally incur significant costs in the same currencies in which we have sales. China has had a managed floating exchange rate since 1994 and the exchange rate to the U.S. Dollar has been effectively fixed since 1996. Malaysia has practiced a fixed exchange rate regime since 1998 and the exchange rate to the U.S. Dollar has been effectively fixed since then. An increase in the value of the Chinese or Malaysia currency relative to the U.S. Dollar would have an adverse effect on the Companys cost of sales.
16
Consolidated Results of Operations
The table below shows the principal line items from our historical consolidated income statements. For the twelve months ending December 31, 2002 and December 2001, the consolidated results are shown with and without the Ruf business, which was sold in November 2002.
12 Months Ending | 12 Months Ending | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
12 Months | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ending | 12/31/02 | 12/31/01 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
12/31/03 | 12/31/02 | 12/31/02 | Consolidated | 12/31/01 | 12/31/01 | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated | Consolidated | Ruf | Excluding Ruf | Consolidated | Ruf | Excluding Ruf | ||||||||||||||||||||||
$ millions | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net sales
|
$ | 154.0 | $ | 164.1 | $ | 14.2 | $ | 149.9 | $ | 173.1 | $ | 18.0 | $ | 155.1 | ||||||||||||||
Cost of sales
|
75.6 | 88.0 | 10.6 | 77.4 | 90.7 | 13.4 | 77.3 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Gross margin
|
78.4 | 76.1 | 3.6 | 72.5 | 82.4 | 4.6 | 77.8 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Gross margin %
|
50.9 | % | 46.4 | % | 25.4 | % | 48.4 | % | 47.6 | % | 25.6 | % | 50.2 | % | ||||||||||||||
Research and development
|
10.2 | 11.7 | 1.7 | 10.0 | 12.9 | 1.9 | 11.0 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Sales and marketing
|
9.2 | 9.5 | 1.0 | 8.5 | 10.9 | 1.1 | 9.8 | |||||||||||||||||||||
General and administrative
|
20.5 | 21.5 | 2.2 | 19.3 | 23.5 | 2.9 | 20.6 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total operating expenses
|
$ | 39.9 | $ | 42.7 | $ | 4.9 | $ | 37.8 | $ | 47.3 | $ | 5.9 | $ | 41.4 | ||||||||||||||
Loss on sale of business
|
| 16.7 | 16.7 | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Restructuring expenses
|
1.5 | 2.1 | | 2.1 | (0.2 | ) | 0.8 | (1.0 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Operating income from continuing operations
|
$ | 37.0 | $ | 14.6 | $ | (18.0 | ) | $ | 32.6 | $ | 35.3 | $ | (2.1 | ) | $ | 37.4 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense, net
|
35.8 | 33.8 | | 33.8 | 37.5 | | 37.5 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Income from continuing operations, before tax
|
$ | 1.2 | $ | (19.2 | ) | $ | (18.0 | ) | $ | (1.2 | ) | $ | (2.2 | ) | $ | (2.1 | ) | $ | (0.1 | ) | ||||||||
EBITDA from continuing operations
|
$ | 44.4 | $ | 40.8 | $ | 46.6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
EBITDA as adjusted
|
$ | 45.9 | $ | 42.9 | $ | 46.4 |
Key Changes in 2003
Excluding the decrease caused by the November 2002 sale of Ruf, sales increased by $4.1 million in 2003 compared to the year earlier due to increases in sale of transducers for hearing aid and security applications, increased sales of the silicon microphone and sales of electromechanical devices to the hearing aid market.
Gross margins as a percentage of revenue in 2003 increased due to the sale of Ruf and due to improved manufacturing efficiencies, improved inventory controls and reduced costs of warranty.
Operating expenses decreased by $2.8 million in 2003, with a $4.9 million decrease caused by the sale of Ruf only partially offset by a $2.1 million increase in ongoing expenses, primarily general and administrative expenses.
The sale of Ruf in November 2002 resulted in a loss on the sale of the business of $16.7 million in 2002. Restructuring expenses of $1.5 million in 2003 were primarily an accrual for expected severance costs related to the Companys expected closure of its Elgin, Illinois manufacturing facility in 2004. Restructuring expenses in 2002 of $2.1 million included a $1.2 million loss on the sale of a facility in Taiwan and severance expenses.
Operating income increased by $22.4 million in 2003, primarily due to the $16.7 million loss on the sale of Ruf in the prior year and improved sales and margins, only partially offset by increased operating expenses.
Interest expense increased by $2.0 million in 2003, primarily due to the refinancing of the $31.7 million A portion of the bank debt at a higher interest rate partially offset by reduced borrowing levels.
Income from continuing operations before tax increased by $20.4 million, with $16.7 million of the increase due to the loss on the sale of Ruf that was recorded in 2002 and $1.3 million due to the operating loss associated with Ruf in 2002. In addition, income from continuing operations increased by $2.4 million due to improved sales and margins, partly offset by higher operating expenses and higher interest expenses.
17
EBITDA as adjusted increased from $42.9 million in 2002 to $45.9 million in 2003 primarily due to increased sales and improved gross margins.
For more detail on results of operations, see the section below, Year Ended December 31, 2003 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2002.
As a percentage of net sales, results for the last three years were as follows
12 Months Ending | 12 Months Ending | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
12 Months | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ending | 12/31/02 | 12/31/01 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
12/31/03 | 12/31/02 | 12/31/02 | Consolidated | 12/31/01 | 12/31/01 | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated | Consolidated | Ruf | Excluding Ruf | Consolidated | Ruf | Excluding Ruf | ||||||||||||||||||||||
% of net sales | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net sales
|
100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | ||||||||||||||
Cost of sales
|
49.1 | % | 53.6 | % | 74.6 | % | 51.6 | % | 52.4 | % | 74.4 | % | 49.8 | % | ||||||||||||||
Gross margin
|
50.9 | % | 46.4 | % | 25.4 | % | 48.4 | % | 47.6 | % | 25.6 | % | 50.2 | % | ||||||||||||||
Research and development
|
6.6 | % | 7.1 | % | 12.0 | % | 6.7 | % | 7.5 | % | 10.6 | % | 7.1 | % | ||||||||||||||
Sales and marketing
|
6.0 | % | 5.8 | % | 7.0 | % | 5.7 | % | 6.3 | % | 6.1 | % | 6.3 | % | ||||||||||||||
General and administrative
|
13.3 | % | 13.1 | % | 15.5 | % | 12.9 | % | 13.6 | % | 16.1 | % | 13.3 | % | ||||||||||||||
Total operating expenses
|
25.9 | % | 26.0 | % | 34.5 | % | 25.2 | % | 27.3 | % | 32.8 | % | 26.7 | % | ||||||||||||||
Loss on sale of business
|
0.0 | % | 10.2 | % | 117.6 | % | 0.0 | % | 0.0 | % | 0.0 | % | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||
Restructuring expenses
|
1.0 | % | 1.3 | % | 0.0 | % | 1.4 | % | -0.1 | % | 4.4 | % | -0.6 | % | ||||||||||||||
Operating income
|
24.0 | % | 8.9 | % | -126.8 | % | 21.7 | % | 20.4 | % | -11.7 | % | 24.1 | % | ||||||||||||||
Interest expense, net
|
23.2 | % | 20.6 | % | 0.0 | % | 22.5 | % | 21.7 | % | 0.0 | % | 24.2 | % | ||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations, before
tax
|
0.8 | % | -11.7 | % | -126.8 | % | -0.8 | % | -1.3 | % | -11.7 | % | -0.1 | % | ||||||||||||||
EBITDA
|
28.8 | % | 27.2 | % | 30.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
EBITDA as adjusted
|
29.8 | % | 28.6 | % | 29.9 | % |
Operating income excluding Ruf was 24.0% in 2003 compared to 21.7% in 2002 and 24.1% in 2001. EBITDA as adjusted was 29.8% in 2003 compared to 28.6% in 2002 and 29.9% in 2001.
The improved profitability as a percentage of sales in 2003 was due to the increased sales of transducers and electromechanical products; improved gross margin rates created by improved manufacturing efficiencies; improved inventory controls and reduced costs of warranty.
Year Ended December 31, 2003 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2002
12 Months Ending | ||||||||||||||||
$ Change | % Change | |||||||||||||||
12/31/2003 | 12/31/2002 | From Prior Year | From Prior Year | |||||||||||||
$ millions | ||||||||||||||||
Consolidated sales
|
$ | 154.0 | $ | 164.1 | $ | (10.1 | ) | -6.2 | % | |||||||
Sales from Ruf
|
| 14.2 | $ | (14.2 | ) | -100.0 | % | |||||||||
Consolidated sales, excluding Ruf
|
$ | 154.0 | $ | 149.9 | $ | 4.1 | 2.7 | % |
Consolidated net sales decreased by 6.2% in 2003 compared to 2002, due to the November 2002 sale of Ruf Electronics. Excluding the sales of Ruf in 2002, sales increased by 2.7 % in 2003 over 2002. The increase was caused by an increase in sales of transducers to the hearing aid industry and to security and medical applications, increased sales of the Silicon Microphone and increased sales of Deltek brand electromechanical components.
18
The following table sets forth cost of sales and cost of sales as a percent of net sales.
12 Months Ending | ||||||||||||||||
$ Change | % Change | |||||||||||||||
12/31/2003 | 12/31/2002 | From Prior Year | From Prior Year | |||||||||||||
$ millions | ||||||||||||||||
Consolidated cost of sales
|
$ | 75.6 | $ | 88.0 | $ | (12.4 | ) | -14.1 | % | |||||||
Cost of sales from Ruf
|
| 10.6 | $ | (10.6 | ) | -100.0 | % | |||||||||
Consolidated cost of sales, excluding Ruf
|
$ | 75.6 | $ | 77.4 | $ | (1.8 | ) | -2.3 | % | |||||||
% of Net Sales
|
49.1 | % | 51.6 | % |
Consolidated cost of sales as a percentage of net sales decreased by 450 basis points, with 200 basis points of the decrease due to the sale of the low-margin Ruf business. The remaining decrease was primarily due to improved manufacturing efficiencies, including lower production costs, improved inventory controls and reduced costs of warranty.
The following table sets forth operating expenses and operating expenses as a percentage of net sales compared to the prior year:
12 Months Ending | Change Excluding RUF | |||||||||||||||||||||||
12/31/2002 | 12/31/2002 | $ Change | % Change | |||||||||||||||||||||
12/31/2003 | Including | 12/31/2002 | Excluding | From | From | |||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated | RUF | Ruf | RUF | Prior Year | Prior Year | |||||||||||||||||||
$ millions | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Research & development
|
$ | 10.2 | $ | 11.7 | $ | 1.7 | $ | 10.0 | $ | 0.2 | 2.0 | % | ||||||||||||
Sales and marketing
|
9.2 | 9.5 | 1.0 | 8.5 | 0.7 | 8.2 | % | |||||||||||||||||
General and administrative
|
20.5 | 21.5 | 2.2 | 19.3 | 1.2 | 6.2 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Total operating expenses
|
$ | 39.9 | $ | 42.7 | $ | 4.9 | $ | 37.8 | $ | 2.1 | 5.6 | % | ||||||||||||
% of net sales
|
25.9 | % | 26.0 | % | 34.5 | % | 25.2 | % |
Operating expenses decreased by $2.8 million in 2003 compared to the year earlier due to the November 2002 sale of Ruf. Excluding Ruf, total operating expenses increased by $2.1 million or 5.6% in the twelve months ending 2003 compared to the year earlier period. Research and development spending (excluding Ruf) increased by $0.2 million or 2% due to increased spending on product development, including the Ferrofluid receiver, the Pantograph receiver, and the Silicon Microphone. Sales and marketing expenses excluding Ruf increased by $0.7 million or 8.2% primarily due to expanded sales support of the Silicon Microphone worldwide. General and administrative expenses excluding Ruf increased by $1.2 million or 6.2%, primarily due to increased employee and employee benefit costs, including relocation, pension, medical and other benefit expenses. Operating expenses as a percentage of net sales (excluding Ruf) increased from 25.2% to 25.9 % due to the increased sales and marketing and general and administrative expenses.
19
The following table sets forth income from continuing operations for the twelve months ending 2003 compared to the year earlier period:
12 Months Ending | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
12 Months | Change Excluding | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ending | 12/31/02 | RUF | |||||||||||||||||||||||
12/31/03 | 12/31/02 | 12/31/02 | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated | Consolidated | Ruf | Excl Ruf | $s | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
$ millions | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sales
|
$ | 154.0 | $ | 164.1 | $ | 14.2 | $ | 149.9 | 4.1 | 2.7 | % | ||||||||||||||
Gross margin
|
78.4 | 76.1 | 3.6 | 72.5 | 5.9 | 8.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
Gross margin %
|
50.9 | % | 46.4 | % | 25.4 | % | 48.4 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Total operating expenses
|
$ | 39.9 | $ | 42.7 | $ | 4.9 | $ | 37.8 | 2.1 | 5.6 | % | ||||||||||||||
Loss on sale of business
|
| 16.7 | 16.7 | | | | |||||||||||||||||||
Restructuring expenses
|
1.5 | 2.1 | | 2.1 | (0.6 | ) | -28.6 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Operating income
|
$ | 37.0 | $ | 14.6 | $ | (18.0 | ) | $ | 32.6 | $ | 4.4 | $ | 0.3 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense, net
|
35.8 | 33.8 | | 33.8 | 2.0 | 5.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
Income from continuing operations, before tax
|
$ | 1.2 | $ | (19.2 | ) | $ | (18.0 | ) | $ | (1.2 | ) | 2.4 | -200.0 | % | |||||||||||
EBITDA from continuing operations
|
$ | 44.4 | $ | 40.8 | 3.6 | 8.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
EBITDA as adjusted
|
$ | 45.9 | $ | 42.9 | 3.0 | 7.0 | % |
Operating income of $37.0 million in the twelve months ending December, 2003 increased by $22.4 million, with $16.7 million of the increase due to the loss in 2002 on the sale of Ruf and $4.4 million due to improved profitability in ongoing operations due to increased sales and improved gross margin rates. The Company announced the sale of Ruf in November 2002. Although the proceeds from the sale were not significant, the sale allowed the Company to exit from a non-core business, which was not profitable. The net loss from the sale of Ruf in 2002 was $16.7 million.
Restructuring expenses of $1.5 million in 2003 were primarily an accrual for expected severance costs related to the Companys expected closure of its Elgin, Illinois manufacturing facility in 2004. Restructuring expenses in 2002 of $2.1 million included a $1.2 million loss on the sale of a facility in Taiwan and severance expenses.
Interest expenses of $35.8 million in 2003 reflect the debt incurred by the Company in association with its recapitalization in 1999. See Liquidity and Capital Resources below. Compared to 2002, interest expense increased by $2.0 million, primarily due to the refinancing of the $31.7 million of the A portion of the bank debt, which was replaced with $35 million of C debt. The C debt is at a fixed rate of 18.5% compared to a lower rate of LIBOR plus 5% for the A debt.
Income from continuing operations before tax was $1.2 million in 2003, an improvement of $20.4 million compared to the loss of $19.2 million in 2002. The improvement was due to the 2002 loss on the sale of Ruf of $16.7 million, the avoidance of the 2002 operating loss from Ruf of $1.3 million and $4.4 million of improved operating results that were only partially offset by increased interest expense of $2.0 million.
20
The key measurement used by management to gauge the profitability of the business is EBITDA as adjusted, which increased from $42.9 million in 2002 to $45.9 million in 2003. The increase of $3.0 million was caused by increased sales and improved gross margin rates, only partially offset by increased operating expenses.
Key statistics related to income taxes and gains/losses from discontinued operations are as follows:
12 Months Ending | ||||||||||||||||
12 Months | ||||||||||||||||
Ending | 12/31/02 | |||||||||||||||
12/31/03 | 12/31/02 | 12/31/02 | Consolidated | |||||||||||||
Consolidated | Consolidated | Ruf | Excl Ruf | |||||||||||||
$ millions | ||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations,
pre tax
|
$ | 1.2 | $ | (19.2 | ) | $ | (18.0 | ) | $ | (1.2 | ) | |||||
Tax provision
|
0.4 | 11.7 | | 11.7 | ||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations,
after tax
|
$ | 0.8 | $ | (30.9 | ) | $ | (18.0 | ) | $ | (12.9 | ) | |||||
Gain on sale of discontinued businesses, after tax
|
27.0 | | | | ||||||||||||
Income from discontinued operations, after tax
|
0.9 | 6.5 | | 6.5 | ||||||||||||
Net Income (loss)
|
$ | 28.7 | $ | (24.4 | ) | $ | (18.0 | ) | $ | (6.4 | ) | |||||
The tax provision in 2003 reflects taxes of foreign operations partly offset by a reduction in the valuation allowance against the net U.S. deferred tax income tax asset. In 2002, the Company provided for $11.7 million of taxes despite a pre-tax loss primarily due to providing a valuation allowance against the net U.S. deferred income tax assets.
The Company sold Synchro-Start in May 2003 for $49.7 million. The Company retained pension liabilities of $3.5 million associated with the SSPI pension plan covering U.S. employees. The Company recorded a gain of $35.6 million on the sale of Synchro-Start, which is net of $0.7 million of tax expense on the gain. The Company sold the Infrared business for $0.1 million in July 2003 with the buyer assuming $4.0 million of debt. The Company recorded an $8.6 million loss on the sale.
Income from discontinued operations, after tax of $0.9 million in 2003 reflects the after-tax results of the Synchro-Start and the Ruwido businesses in 2003 prior to their sale. The income from discontinued operations was significantly lower than the prior year due to the partial year nature of the results, a decrease in margin rates and an increase in operating expenses.
Year Ended December 31, 2002 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2001
12 Months Ending | ||||||||||||||||
$ Change | % Change | |||||||||||||||
12/31/2002 | 12/31/2001 | From Prior Year | From Prior Year | |||||||||||||
$ millions | ||||||||||||||||
Consolidated sales
|
$ | 164.1 | $ | 173.1 | $ | (9.0 | ) | -5.2 | % | |||||||
Sales from Ruf
|
14.2 | 18.0 | $ | (3.8 | ) | -21.1 | % | |||||||||
Consolidated sales, excluding Ruf
|
$ | 149.9 | $ | 155.1 | $ | (5.2 | ) | -3.4 | % |
Overall, consolidated net sales decreased 5.2% in 2002 compared to 2001. Ruf sales decreased $3.8 million. Consolidated sales excluding Ruf decreased by $5.2 million due to lower average selling prices for transducer products, created by a consolidation in the ownership of the customer base and increased price competition.
Consolidated cost of sales increased by 120 basis points as a percent of net sales in 2002 compared to the prior year, despite the decline in sales from the low margin Ruf business. The increase in cost of sales as a percentage of revenue was due to lower average selling prices for transducers, which were only partially offset by lower warranty costs.
21
The following table sets for operating expenses and operating expenses as a percentage of revenue for the twelve months ending December 31, 2002 compared to the prior year:
$ Change | % Change | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From Prior | From Prior | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
12/31/2002 | 12/31/2002 | 12/31/2001 | 12/31/2001 | Year | Year | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Including | Excluding | Including | Excluding | Excluding | Excluding | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RUF | Ruf | RUF | RUF | Ruf | RUF | RUF | RUF | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
$ millions | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Research & development
|
$ | 11.7 | $ | 1.7 | $ | 10.0 | $ | 12.9 | $ | 1.9 | $ | 11.0 | $ | (1.0 | ) | -9.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Sales and marketing
|
9.5 | 1.0 | 8.5 | 10.9 | 1.1 | 9.8 | (1.3 | ) | -13.3 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
General and administrative
|
21.5 | 2.2 | 19.3 | 23.5 | 2.9 | 20.6 | (1.3 | ) | -6.3 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Total operating expenses
|
$ | 42.7 | 4.9 | $ | 37.8 | $ | 47.3 | $ | 5.9 | $ | 41.4 | $ | (3.6 | ) | -8.7 | % | |||||||||||||||||
% of net sales
|
26.0 | % | 34.5 | % | 25.2 | % | 27.3 | % | 32.8 | % | 26.7 | % |
Operating expenses decreased in all categories in the twelve months ending December 31, 2002 compared to the year earlier period, primarily due to a program to reduce discretionary spending on all non-essential programs.
The following table sets forth key operating statistics for the twelve months ending 2002 compared to the year earlier period:
12 Months Ending | 12 Months Ending | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
12/31/02 | 12/31/01 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
12/31/02 | 12/31/02 | Consolidated | 12/31/01 | 12/31/01 | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated | Ruf | Excl Ruf | Consolidated | Ruf | Excl Ruf | ||||||||||||||||||||
$ millions | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net sales
|
$ | 164.1 | $ | 14.2 | $ | 149.9 | $ | 173.1 | $ | 18.0 | $ | 155.1 | |||||||||||||
Gross margin
|
76.1 | 3.6 | 72.5 | 82.4 | 4.6 | 77.8 | |||||||||||||||||||
Gross margin %
|
46.4 | % | 25.4 | % | 48.4 | % | 47.6 | % | 25.6 | % | 50.2 | % | |||||||||||||
Total operating expenses
|
$ | 42.7 | $ | 4.9 | $ | 37.8 | $ | 47.3 | $ | 5.9 | $ | 41.4 | |||||||||||||
Loss on sale of business
|
16.7 | 16.7 | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||
Restructuring expenses
|
2.1 | 0.0 | 2.1 | (0.2 | ) | 0.8 | (1.0 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Operating income (loss)
|
$ | 14.6 | $ | (18.0 | ) | $ | 32.6 | $ | 35.3 | $ | (2.1 | ) | $ | 37.4 | |||||||||||
Interest expense, net
|
33.8 | 0.0 | 33.8 | 37.5 | 0 | 37.5 | |||||||||||||||||||
Income from continuing operations, before tax
|
$ | (19.2 | ) | $ | (18.0 | ) | $ | (1.2 | ) | $ | (2.2 | ) | $ | (2.1 | ) | $ | (0.1 | ) | |||||||
EBITDA from continuing operations
|
$ | 40.0 | $ | 40.8 | $ | 47.0 | $ | 46.6 | |||||||||||||||||
EBITDA as adjusted
|
$ | 42.9 | $ | 46.4 |
Sales decreased by $9.0 million with microacoustic products declining by $5.2 million due to lower prices and Ruf sales decreasing by $3.8 million. Gross margin decreased by $6.3 million due to the reduction in transducer selling prices and lower sales at Ruf. Partially offsetting these margin declines was a reduction in period expenses of $4.6 million. Restructuring expenses of $2.1 million were recorded in 2002, primarily for the loss on the sale of the Taiwan building and severance. A loss on the sale of Ruf of $16.7 million was recorded in 2002. Operating income decreased by $20.7 million in 2002 due to the loss on the sale of Ruf, the decline in sales and higher restructuring expenses, only partially offset by lower operating expenses.
The key measurement used by management to gauge the profitability of the business is EBITDA as adjusted, which decreased from $46.4 million in 2001 to $42.9 million in 2002. The decrease of $3.5 million in EBITDA as adjusted was caused by the lower sales and margins, which were a result of the decline in average selling prices. The lower sales and margins were only partially offset by the $3.6 million decrease in operating expenses.
22
Key statistics related to income taxes and gains/losses from discontinued operations are as follows
12 Months Ending | 12 Months Ending | |||||||||||||||||||||||
12/31/02 | 12/31/01 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
12/31/02 | 12/31/02 | Consolidated | 12/31/01 | 12/31/01 | Consolidated | |||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated | Ruf | Excl Ruf | Consolidated | Ruf | Excl Ruf | |||||||||||||||||||
$ millions | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loss from continuing operations, pre tax
|
$ | (19.2 | ) | $ | (18.0 | ) | $ | (1.2 | ) | $ | (2.2 | ) | $ | (2.1 | ) | $ | (0.1 | ) | ||||||
Tax provision
|
11.7 | | 11.7 | 6.3 | | 6.3 | ||||||||||||||||||
Loss from continuing operations, after tax
|
$ | (30.9 | ) | $ | (18.0 | ) | (12.9 | ) | $ | (8.5 | ) | $ | (2.1 | ) | $ | (6.4 | ) | |||||||
Income from discontinued operations, after tax
|
6.5 | | 6.5 | 7.0 | | 7.0 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss)
|
$ | (24.4 | ) | $ | (18.0 | ) | $ | (6.4 | ) | $ | (1.5 | ) | $ | (2.1 | ) | $ | 0.6 | |||||||
Income tax expense was $11.7 million in 2002 compared to $6.3 million in 2001. In 2002 the Company provided for $11.7 million of taxes despite a pre-tax loss of $19.2 million primarily due to providing a valuation allowance against the net U.S. deferred income tax assets. The tax provision in 2001 was higher than the statutory rate due to the distribution of earnings between profitable foreign operations, which create taxable expense, and a loss in U.S., which does not create an additional tax benefit.
Income from discontinued operations was $6.5 million in 2002 and $7.0 million in 2001. This represents the net income from the SSPI and the Ruwido businesses in those periods.
The Company reported a net loss of $24.4 million for 2002 due to the loss from continuing operations, the tax provision and the loss on the sale of Ruf, only partially offset by the income from discontinued operations. In 2001, the Company reported a net loss of $1.5 million due to the loss at Ruf and the tax provision, partially offset by income from discontinued operations of $7.0 million.
Seasonality and Quarterly Results of Operations
Our sales have been subject to a small degree of seasonality in the past several years. The second and fourth quarters have been our strongest quarters. This seasonality of our sales resulted primarily from stronger customer demand in the second and fourth quarter. In addition to the normal seasonality trends, the fourth quarter of 2003 was especially strong due to improved conditions in the hearing aid market and an increase in shipments of the Silicon Microphone. The seasonality is slightly distorted in the reported results due to the inclusion of Ruf results up until its sale in November 2002.
23
The following table sets forth selected financial information by fiscal quarter.
SELECTED FINANCIAL INFORMATION BY QUARTER UNAUDITED(4)
March 31, | June 30, | Sept. 30, | Dec. 31, | March 31, | June 30, | Sept. 30, | Dec. 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
2002 | 2002 | 2002 | 2002(3) | 2003 | 2003 | 2003 | 2003 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net sales
|
$ | 39.4 | $ | 44.3 | $ | 39.7 | $ | 40.7 | $ | 37.5 | $ | 38.9 | $ | 34.7 | $ | 42.9 | ||||||||||||||||
Cost of sales
|
21.8 | 23.1 | 21.6 | 21.5 | 18.9 | 18.9 | 17.6 | 20.2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Research and development
|
3.0 | 3.4 | 2.4 | 2.9 | 2.3 | 2.9 | 2.5 | 2.5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Selling and marketing
|
2.6 | 2.6 | 2.1 | 2.2 | 2.1 | 2.3 | 2.3 | 2.5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
General and administrative
|
5.5 | 6.3 | 4.6 | 5.1 | 5.7 | 4.8 | 4.3 | 5.7 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loss on sale of business(1)
|
| 8.7 | 4.2 | 3.8 | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Restructuring expense(2)
|
| 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.5 | | | | 1.5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating income (loss)
|
$ | 6.5 | $ | (0.4 | ) | $ | 3.8 | $ | 4.7 | $ | 8.5 | $ | 10.0 | $ | 8.0 | $ | 10.5 | |||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations
after taxes
|
(1.6 | ) | (9.2 | ) | (2.8 | ) | (17.3 | ) | (1.1 | ) | (0.7 | ) | (1.2 | ) | 3.7 | |||||||||||||||||
Income from discontinued operations(5)
|
1.2 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 2.5 | 1.1 | 25.6 | 1.1 | 0.1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss)(6)
|
$ | (0.4 | ) | $ | (7.8 | ) | $ | (1.4 | ) | $ | (14.8 | ) | $ | 0.0 | $ | 24.9 | $ | (0.1 | ) | $ | 3.8 | |||||||||||
Ruf Sales
|
5.4 | 4.3 | 4.5 | 3.8 | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net sales excluding Ruf
|
$ | 34.0 | $ | 40.0 | $ | 35.2 | $ | 36.9 | $ | 37.5 | $ | 38.9 | $ | 34.7 | $ | 42.9 |
(1) | The Loss on Sale of Business is related to the losses recorded on the sale of Ruf in November 2002. For the quarters ended June 30 and September 30, 2002, the loss represents the impairment of the Ruf assets recorded in those quarters. |
(2) | The Restructuring expenses in 2002 relate to the restructuring announced in March 2000. The Company consolidated its worldwide manufacturing operations by ending production at five manufacturing facilities and either outsourcing component production or moving final assembly to lower cost locations in Malaysia, and China. These actions have reduced our global workforce by about 20%. In 2002 these expenses are related to the loss on the sale of a facility in Taiwan, and severance. The Restructuring expenses in 2003 primarily relate to the closure of the Elgin, Illinois facility announced in November 2003. |
(3) | The quarter ended December 31, 2002 includes a $1.7 million reduction of expenses to adjust depreciation and amortization expense and to adjust the warranty liability related to historical sales and claim experience. |
(4) | Quarterly information for 2002 and 2003 has been restated to reflect the sales of the Synchro-Start and Infrared businesses in May and July 2003 respectively. |
(5) | Income from discontinued operations for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 includes the gain on sale of the Synchro-Start business and loss on the sale of the Infrared business. |
(6) | Net loss for the quarter ended December 31, 2002 includes a tax provision to record a valuation allowance against deferred tax assets of approximately $11.7 million. Net income for the quarter ended December 31, 2003 includes a reduction of contingent tax liabilities of approximately $1.5 million. |
Liquidity and Capital Resources
We have historically used available funds for capital expenditures and working capital management. These funds have been obtained from operating activities and from lines of credit. In the future, we will continue to have these needs. We also will have substantial interest expense of approximately $33 to $38 million each year.
24
We are a holding company. Our subsidiaries conduct substantially all of our consolidated operations and own substantially all of our consolidated assets. Consequently, our cash flow and our ability to meet our debt service obligations depends substantially upon the cash flow of our subsidiaries and the payment of funds by our subsidiaries to us in the form of loans, dividends or otherwise.
In association with its recapitalization on June 30, 1999 the Company borrowed $200 million under a bank credit agreement in two facilities, an A Facility of $50 million and a B Facility of $150 million. On June 30, 1999, the Company also borrowed $153.2 million under a senior subordinated note agreement. The Company borrowed an additional $10 million in Senior Subordinated Debt in August 2002, as required under the Amendment and Waiver to the Credit Agreement dated May 10, 2002. In the first quarter of 2003, the Company repaid $7.7 million of principal on the B facility as required under the Excess Cash provision of the Credit Agreement. On March 25, 2003, the Company entered into the Fifth Amendment of the Credit Agreement, which resulted in the Company repaying the balance of the A facility ($31.7 million), replacing the original A Facility with a $35 million C Facility and revising certain terms and conditions of the Credit Agreement. In May 2003 the Company obtained Amendment Number Six and Waiver that approved the sale of Synchro-Start and Ruwido under certain conditions. The Company completed the sale of the Synchro-Start division May 30, 2003 and prepaid $42 million of Term B facility loans. An additional prepayment of $2.3 million related to the Synchro-Start sale was made in November 2003. The Company completed the sale of Ruwido in July and prepaid $1 million of Tranche B loans in July 2003.
As of December 31, 2003 the Companys outstanding borrowing and repayment dates were as follows:
Less Than | 1 to 3 | 3 to 5 | After 5 | |||||||||||||||||
Contractual obligations | Total | 1 Year | Years | Years | Years | |||||||||||||||
$000s | ||||||||||||||||||||
Credit Agreement dated June 28, 1999 and
most recently amended May 28, 2003
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Tranche B Portion
|
$ | 111,705 | $ | 5,762 | $ | 56,987 | $ | 48,956 | $ | | ||||||||||
Tranche C Portion
|
59,075 | 6,709 | 13,380 | 38,986 | | |||||||||||||||
Total credit agreement
|
170,780 | 12,471 | 70,367 | 87,942 | | |||||||||||||||
13 1/8% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2009
|
273,846 | 20,108 | 40,215 | 40,215 | 173,308 | |||||||||||||||
10% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2009
|
16,000 | 1,000 | 2,000 | 2,000 | 11,000 | |||||||||||||||
Operating leases
|
4,357 | 523 | 801 | 642 | 2,391 | |||||||||||||||
Retention bonus
|
4,000 | | | 4,000 | | |||||||||||||||
Pension contribution(1)
|
$ | 1,360 | $ | 1,360 | $ | | $ | | $ | | ||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 470,343 | $ | 35,462 | $ | 113,383 | $ | 134,799 | $ | 186,699 | ||||||||||
(1) | The pension contribution has not been estimated beyond 2004. |
Under the amended terms of the Credit Agreement, the Company must maintain certain financial ratios. The two primary ratios the Company must maintain are the leverage ratio, which is total net debt divided by EBITDA, and the interest coverage ratio, which is EBITDA divided by net cash interest expense. The Company is required to maintain its leverage ratio below a specified level and its interest coverage ratio above a specified level.
For purposes of calculating the required ratio, under the amended terms of the Credit Agreement, EBIDA excludes up to $7.5 million in cash charges related to the nonrecurring costs of restructuring overhead in the three year period 2003 through 2005. These restructuring costs will be related to the Companys announced closure of its Elgin facility and the increase in capabilities in our Asian manufacturing facilities.
25
The required ratios as amended for future years ends are as follows:
Required | Required Interest | |||||||
Leverage Ratio | Coverage Ratio | |||||||
December 31, 2004
|
6.0 | 1.45 | ||||||
December 31, 2005
|
5.5 | 1.55 | ||||||
December 31, 2006
|
5.0 | 1.65 |
We expect to be able to comply with the required covenants through December 31, 2004. However, our ability to meet these covenants is highly dependent upon market and competitive conditions. If future results are lower than planned, the company may be unable to comply with the debt covenants or make required debt service payments. Such inability could have a material adverse impact on the Companys financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.
The Credit Agreement as amended totals $142 million of credit as of December 31, 2003. Included are undrawn revolving loans of $15 million (Revolving Credit Facility) through June 30, 2006, a Term B facility of $91.6 million which matures on June 29, 2007 and a Term C facility of $35.7 million which matures on June 29, 2007. The Revolving Credit facility bears interest, at the Companys option, at either (1) one-, two-, three-, or six month LIBOR plus 4.0% or (2) the greater of the prime rate, a base certificate of deposit rate plus 1.00% or the federal funds effective rate plus ..50 (the Alternate Base Rate) in each case plus an initial margin of 3%. The Term B facility bears interest, at the Companys option, at either (1) one-, two-, three-, or six month LIBOR plus 5.00% or (2) Alternate Base Rate plus an initial margin of 4.00%. The Term C Facility bears interest at a fixed rate of 18.5% of which 13% is payable in cash, and the remainder, at the Companys option, payable in cash or increased principal. The percentage rate that is payable in cash increases 1.0 percentage point on March 31 of each year. At December 31, 2003, the weighted average interest rate was 6.2% for the B facility and 18.5% for the C facility.
The Credit Agreement as amended reduced the Revolving Credit Facility to $15 million. Amendment Number Six and Waiver and the subsequent sale of Synchro-Start and Ruwido substantially revised the terms of the amortization of the Credit Agreement. The principal is due and payable in four quarterly principal payments from September 30, 2006 to June 29, 2007. Under the amended Credit Agreement, in the event the B Facility is fully prepaid prior to June 30, 2006 the Revolving Credit Facility will cease to be available to the Company and any amounts outstanding thereunder shall thereupon become due and payable. The C Facility is payable in full on June 29, 2007.
The Fifth and Sixth Amendments modified the Credit Agreement that was substantially amended on May 10, 2002. On that date, the Company received agreement from the lenders to revise the terms and conditions of the Credit Agreement. At the end of the first quarter of 2002, the Company was not in compliance with the terms of the Credit Agreement, particularly the required leverage and interest coverage ratios. As a result, the Company did not make the interest payment on its senior subordinated notes scheduled for April 15, 2002. After the Company obtained the Fourth Amendment and Waiver to the Credit Agreement on May 10, 2002 (the Fourth Amendment), on May 14, 2002 the Company made the interest payment on our senior subordinated notes. The Fourth Amendment waived our non-compliance with the required interest coverage ratio for the period ended March 31, 2002 and the leverage ratio for the period January 1, 2002 through March 31, 2002, and amended these required ratios for subsequent periods through the first quarter of 2003. In addition the Amendment required the Company to receive additional funding of at least $10 million by September 3, 2002, which was required to pay down the outstanding balance on the revolving credit facility to $8.25 million. As a result of this agreement, the Company entered into a Senior Subordinated Debt agreement with an affiliate of Doughty Hanson on August 28, 2002 for $10 million in financing, under terms pari passu to the Senior Subordinated Debt Agreement of 1999. The proceeds were used to provide funding for working capital and reduced the balance under the revolving credit agreement to zero.
26
Cash Flows 2003 vs 2002 |
Cash balances decreased by $12.7 million in 2003, as the Company used the $11.1 million of cash provided by operations and the $45.2 million in proceeds from the sale of SSPI and Ruwido to pay down debt and to fund capital expenditures.
Net cash provided by operating activities was $11.1 million in 2003 compared to $29.7 million in 2002. The net provided by operating activities in 2003 is primarily the result of the net income from continuing operations of $0.7 million, the net cash provided by discontinued operating activities of $4.0 million and the depreciation and amortization of $7.4 million. Net cash provided by operating activities in 2002 was higher than in 2003 despite lower income from continuing operations. The 2002 loss included two significant non-cash write-offs the $16.7 million non-cash loss on the sale of Ruf and the $6.7 million non-cash loss from adjustments in deferred tax valuations. The 2002 cash flow reflects cash generated by reductions in working capital that were not repeated in 2003 a reduction in accounts receivable of $6.9 million and a reduction of inventory of $9.4 million.
Net cash provided by investing activities in 2003 of $30.5 million represents the $45.2 million in cash generated by the sales of Synchro-Start and Ruwido offset by $14.8 million in capital equipment purchases. The primary capital expenditures in 2003 were for new product tooling and production equipment, particularly the equipment required for the new Silicon Microphone. Net cash used in investing activities of $4.9 million in 2002 was primarily the purchases of new tooling and production equipment, partially offset by the proceeds from sale of the Taiwan building for $3.6 million.
Net cash used in financing activities in 2003 was $54.2 million which primarily represents the $9.5 million payment of principal on the bank debt related to the Excess Cash provision of the Credit Agreement; the $31.7 million payment of the A portion of the bank debt; and $45.3 million in payments on the bank debt related to the sale of SSPI and Ruwido partially offset by the additional borrowing of $35 million of C debt. Debt payments on the long-term portion of the Companys Credit Agreement totaled $10.5 million in 2002, with an additional $2.0 million in payments used to reduce the Companys short-term debt. The Company issued $10 million of 10% Senior Subordinated Notes dated August 28, 2002.
Cash Flow 2002 versus 2001 |
Cash balances increased by $21.8 million in 2002 due to $29.7 million in cash provided by operating activities from continuing operations that was only partly offset by $4.9 million used in investing and $3.6 million in financing activities. In 2001, cash balances decreased by $14.3 million as cash provided by operating activities of $9.8 million was offset by net cash used in investing activities of $17.6 million and net cash used in financing activities of $6.2 million.
Net cash provided by operating activities was $29.7 million in 2002 compared to $9.8 million in 2001. The favorable cash provided by operating activities was despite an increase in the net loss from continuing operations, which increased to a $30.9 million loss in 2002 compared to a net loss of $8.5 million in 2001. The increase in the net loss in 2002 was largely comprised of the $16.6 million non-cash loss on the sale of Ruf and $6.7 million non-cash write-off of deferred income taxes. Most of the improvement in cash flow from operations in 2002 compared to 2001 came from improvements in working capital during 2002, especially the $9.4 million reduction in inventory and $6.9 million reduction in receivables, only partly offset by $3.6 million reduction in accrued restructuring expenses. Accrued interest payable increased $2.2 million in 2002, reflecting the timing of interest payments under the Credit Agreement. In 2001 several working capital items were a major use of cash including a reduction in accrued restructuring expenses of $8.7 million and an increase in inventory of $5.2 million.
Net cash used in investing activities was $4.9 million in 2002 compared to $17.6 million in 2001. Investing activities for both years are primarily purchases and sales of property, plant and equipment. In 2002, gross purchases of property, plant and equipment were $8.4 million, partially offset by the sale of the Taiwan building for $3.6 million. In 2001, gross purchases of fixed assets were $21.3 million, partially offset by the sale of the United Kingdom plant for $3.7 million. The primary capital expenditures in 2002 were for new product
27
Net cash used in financing activities was $3.6 million in 2002 compared to $6.2 million in 2001. Debt payments on the long-term portion of the Companys Credit Agreement totaled $10.5 million in 2002, with an additional $2.0 million in payments used to reduce the Companys short-term debt. The Company issued $10 million of 10% Senior Subordinated Notes dated August 28, 2002. In addition, the Company paid $0.7 million in costs associated with the May 10, 2002 Amendment to the Credit Agreement and $0.4 million related to common stock transactions. Net debt payments of $9.4 million were the primary financing activities for 2001.
The Recapitalization
On June 30, 1999, Key Acquisition, L.L.C. (Key Acquisition), all of whose membership interests are held by limited partnerships for which Doughty Hanson & Co. Limited or its affiliates (collectively, Doughty Hanson) act as general partner, acquired control of Knowles Electronics, Inc. in a recapitalization transaction (Recapitalization). On June 29, 1999, Knowles equipment financing business, which included certain parcels of real estate, were distributed to our preexisting stockholders, in redemption of 10% of the stock owned by those stockholders. As part of the June 30, 1999 recapitalization, we repurchased from our preexisting stockholders for $505.5 million 90% of our common stock remaining outstanding after the previous days redemption, and our preexisting stockholders exchanged their remaining common stock for shares of the newly authorized common stock and preferred stock. In addition, upon closing of the Recapitalization, certain of our senior officers purchased shares of newly authorized common stock issued by Knowles. Upon the closing of the recapitalization, Key Acquisition owned approximately 82.3% of our newly authorized common stock and approximately 88.9% of our newly authorized preferred stock, certain of our preexisting stockholders owned approximately 10.3% of our common stock and approximately 11.1% of our preferred stock, and certain of our senior officers owned approximately 7.4% of our common stock.
The amount payable to our preexisting stockholders for the repurchase of their common stock in our recapitalization was subject to a post-closing adjustment payable by Knowles to our preexisting stockholders or by our preexisting stockholders to Key Acquisition. In June 2000, the independent accountants appointed pursuant to the recapitalization agreement determined that Knowles owed the preexisting stockholders approximately $8.3 million of the $13.3 million purchase price adjustment originally proposed by the preexisting stockholders, plus approximately $0.7 million in interest. The purchase price adjustment was recorded as a reduction to stockholders equity in the second quarter of 2000. In addition, Knowles agreed to indemnify our preexisting stockholders for any damages they suffer as a result of any breach of the various representations, warranties and agreements made by Key Acquisition in connection with our recapitalization.
In connection with the Recapitalization, a syndicate of lenders led by The Chase Manhattan Bank and Morgan Stanley Senior Funding, Inc. provided us with a $250 million senior credit facility consisting of a $50 million revolving credit facility, subject to certain conditions, and $200 million in term loans. We also sold $150 million of subordinated bridge notes to Morgan Stanley Senior Funding, Inc. and The Chase Manhattan Bank, all of which were repaid with proceeds from the senior subordinated offering of October 15, 1999 and available cash. The Recapitalization was financed with the term loans under the senior credit facility and subordinated bridge notes as well as a $214.2 million equity investment by Key Acquisition, certain senior officers of Knowles and the Knowles family.
Ownership of Knowles. Interests in Key Acquisition, which owns approximately 83.6% of our common stock and 88.9% of our preferred stock are held by the limited partnerships, which together form Doughty Hanson & Co. III. The general partner of these limited partnerships is Doughty Hanson & Co. Limited.
Holding Company Reorganization. Subsequent to the Recapitalization, we reorganized Knowles Electronics, Inc. as a holding company. Pursuant to a contribution agreement on August 30, 1999 Knowles Electronics, Inc. contributed substantially all of its assets and liabilities (other than the capital stock of
28
The Credit Agreement
We entered into the Credit Agreement, dated as of June 28, 1999 and amended and restated as of July 21, 1999, December 23, 1999, April 10, 2000, December 12, 2001, May 10, 2002, March 25, 2003 and May 28, 2003 with the Lenders named therein, JP Morgan Chase Bank (as successor to The Chase Manhattan Bank), as Administrative Agent and Swingline Lender, Morgan Stanley Senior Funding, Inc., as Syndication Agent, and Chase Securities Inc., as Lead Arranger and Book Manager. The Credit Agreement, as amended, consists of (i) a $91.6 million term loan facility (B Facility) due in scheduled principal payments that begin September 30, 2006 and are completed as of June 29, 2007, (ii) a $35.7 million term loan facility (C Facility) due June 29, 2007 and (iii) a $15 revolving credit facility due June 30, 2006 (the Revolving Facility). Under the terms of the Credit Agreement, and in order to provide financing for the Recapitalization, the A Facility (which was subsequently replaced with C Facility in March, 2003) and B Facility were fully drawn on June 30, 1999, the closing date of the Recapitalization. The Revolving Facility is available for working capital and general corporate purposes. No borrowing was outstanding under The Revolving Facility as of December 31, 2003.
In March 2003 we repaid $9.5 million of aggregate principal of the A and B Facilities in accordance with the excess cash provision of the amended Credit Agreement. In June 2003 we repaid $42 million in principal of the B facility in accordance with Amendment No. 6 and the sale of Syncho-Start. An additional prepayment of $2.3 million related to the Synchro-Start sale was made in November 2003. A payment of $1 million related to the sale of Ruwido was made in July 2003.
Repayment Dates
According to the revised terms of the Amended Credit Agreement, and taking into account the effect of the three prepayments in 2003, the B Facility will amortize in four equal quarterly amounts commencing on September 30, 2006. The C Facility is due and payable upon maturity on June 29, 2007.
Amount in $000s | |||||
B tranche of Credit Agreement to be
paid -
|
|||||
September 30, 2006
|
$ | 22,440 | |||
December 31, 2006
|
23,054 | ||||
March 30, 2007
|
23,054 | ||||
June 29, 2007
|
23,052 | ||||
C tranche of Credit Agreement to be
paid on June 29, 2007
|
35,668 | ||||
Total Credit Agreement Outstanding as of
December 31, 2003
|
$ | 127,268 | |||
The Revolving Facility is available as revolving credit advances or letters of credit. Pursuant to the Revised Credit Agreement, this facility has no scheduled reduction in availability, unless the B Facility is fully repaid prior to June 30, 2006, in which case the Revolving Facility will cease to be available to the Company and any amounts outstanding thereunder shall thereupon become due and payable. If such earlier maturity does not occur, final repayment is due on all amounts outstanding under this facility on June 30, 2006. The Credit Agreement provides for certain limitations governing advances under the Revolving Facility, in particular limits on the amount of letters of credit and swingline loans outstanding at any one time. In the Fourth Amendment dated as of May 10, 2002, the Company was required to receive additional funding of at least $10 million by September 3, 2002. As a result, the Company entered into a $10 million Note Purchase Agreement on August 28, 2002 with an affiliate of Doughty Hanson.
29
Prepayment
In addition to the scheduled repayment dates described above, in certain circumstances the Credit Agreement requires us to make mandatory prepayments of outstanding amounts under B Facility and thereafter, beginning on April 1, 2004, under C Facility, when we or our subsidiaries receive proceeds of certain material dispositions and insurance claims or issue certain indebtedness or when we have a positive adjusted cash flow in the prior year. Pursuant to these provisions, a prepayment in the amount of $9.5 million was made on March 28, 2003 from excess cash flow. This prepayment was applied to prepay the A Facility $1.8 million and the B Facility $7.7 million. We may voluntarily prepay the B facility in whole or in part without premium or penalty. We may voluntarily prepay indebtedness under the C Facility on or after April 1, 2004. Any voluntary and certain mandatory prepayments of the C Facility are subject to a prepayment penalty of 3%, 2.5% and 2% for the yearly periods ending March 2005, March 2006 and March 2007, respectively.
Interest Rate and Fees
Amounts outstanding under the Revolving Facility will bear interest, at our option, at either (1) one-, two-, three- or six-month LIBOR plus an initial interest margin of 4.0% (as amended April 10, 2000, December 12, 2001, May 10, 2002, March 25, 2003 and May 28.2003) or (2) the greatest of the prime rate, a base certificate of deposit rate plus 1.0% or the federal funds effective rate plus 0.50% (Alternate Base Rate), in each case plus an initial margin of 3%. Amounts outstanding under B Facility will bear interest, at our option, at either (1) one-, two-, three-or six-month LIBOR plus an initial interest margin of 5.0% (as amended April 10, 2000, December 12, 2001, May 10, 2002, March 25, 2003 and May 28,2003) or (2) the Alternate Base Rate plus an initial margin of 4%. The interest margin may be reduced for advances under the Revolving Facility if we, on a consolidated basis, meet certain specified leverage ratio targets during a period consisting of the prior four consecutive fiscal quarters. Amounts outstanding under C Facility will bear interest at 18.5%, a portion of which is payable in cash on a monthly basis and a portion of which may, at the Companys option, be payable upon maturity of the loan, scheduled for June 29, 2007. The portion of interest on the C Facility paid in cash monthly is 13% for the year ending March 2004. The portion of interest on the C Facility mandatorily payable in cash increases to 14% for the year ending March 2005 and increases by 1% for each year thereafter. The remainder of the C Facility interest shall, at the option of the Company, be paid in cash or accrue and be added to the outstanding principal balance of the C Facility each month and paid at maturity, scheduled for June 29, 2007. At December 31, 2003, the weighted average interest rate was 6.2% for the B facility and 18.5% for the C facility.
We will pay a commitment fee on the undrawn portion of the Revolving Facility at a rate of 0.375% to 0.50% per annum, depending upon our leverage ratio. In addition, the Amended Credit Agreement provides for additional interest to accrue to the B facility at the rate of approximately $420,000 per year (subject to a reduction in the event of a prepayment of the B facility), to be paid at the maturity of the facility (or in certain instances, at an earlier date). The requirement for the additional interest terminated with the prepayment of $42 million resulting from the sale of the Synchro-Start division. In addition, we will pay certain agency and other fees.
Guarantee and Security
Our obligations under the Credit Agreement are guaranteed by our U.S. subsidiaries. As security for our obligations under the Credit Agreement, we have pledged all of the shares of our U.S. subsidiaries and 65% of the shares of our non-U.S. subsidiaries and have granted the lenders a security interest in substantially all of our assets and the assets of our U.S. subsidiaries.
Covenants
The Amended Credit Agreement contains a number of covenants requiring us to achieve or maintain specified consolidated financial ratios, including certain interest expense coverage ratios and certain leverage ratios, which have been described above. The Amended Credit Agreement also contains general covenants which restrict the incurrence of debt and liens, the payment of dividends, the incurrence of substantially all
30
Senior Subordinated Debt
13 1/8% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2009 |
We issued Notes under an Indenture, dated October 1, 1999, among us, the Subsidiary Guarantors and the Bank of New York, as Trustee (the Trustee). The Notes are general unsecured obligations of the Company, rank subordinate to all Senior Indebtedness of the Company and pari passu or senior to all other Indebtedness of the Company, and are unconditionally guaranteed on a general unsecured senior subordinated basis by all of the Companys existing and future domestic Restricted Subsidiaries and any other Restricted Subsidiaries of the Company that guarantee the Companys indebtedness under the Credit Agreement.
Principal, Maturity and Interest |
The Company issued $153,200,000 aggregate principal amount of Notes on October 1, 1999 in denominations of $1,000 and integral multiples of $1,000. The Notes will mature on October 15, 2009. The Notes will not be entitled to the benefit of any mandatory sinking fund.
Subject to the covenants described below under Covenants and applicable law, the Company may issue additional Notes under the Indenture. The Notes offered hereby and any additional Notes subsequently issued will be treated as a single class for all purposes under the Indenture.
The Companys registration became effective September 13, 2000 and all the notes were exchanged for registered notes on October 13, 2000. The penalty interest accrued through that day and all but 13 days was paid with the October 15, 2000 interest payment. The remaining interest penalty was paid on the next interest payment date, April 16, 2001.
Interest on the Notes will accrue at the rate of 13 1/8% per annum and will be payable semi-annually in arrears on each April 15 and October 15 (each, an Interest Payment Date), commencing on April 15, 2000. Payments will be made to the persons who are registered Holders at the close of business on April 1 and October 1, respectively (each, a Regular Record Date), immediately preceding the applicable interest payment date. The Company did not make the interest payment on our senior subordinated notes scheduled for April 15, 2002. We subsequently obtained an Amendment and Waiver dated as of May 10, 2002 to our Credit Agreement and made the interest payment on our senior subordinated notes that was scheduled for April 15, 2002 on May 14, 2002.
Guarantees |
Payment of the principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the Notes will be guaranteed, jointly and severally, on an unsecured senior subordinated basis by certain Subsidiaries of the Company (the Subsidiary Guarantors), each of which has guaranteed Indebtedness of the Company incurred under the Credit Agreement. All current and future Restricted Subsidiaries of the Company other than Foreign Subsidiaries will be Subsidiary Guarantors. In addition, if any Restricted Subsidiary which is a Foreign Subsidiary becomes a guarantor of Indebtedness of the Company incurred under the Credit Agreement, the Company will cause such Restricted Subsidiary to guarantee the Companys obligations under the Notes. Foreign Subsidiaries of the Company, which have substantial assets, liabilities, net sales and income, will not initially guarantee the Notes, and the Company does not anticipate that any Foreign Subsidiary will at any time become a Subsidiary Guarantor.
The Note Guarantee of any Subsidiary Guarantor may be released in certain circumstances.
31
Covenants |
The Senior Subordinated Note Agreement also contains general covenants, which restrict Limitation on Indebtedness, Limitation on Senior Subordinated Indebtedness, Limitation on Restricted Payments, Limitation on Dividend and Other Payment Restrictions Affecting Restricted Subsidiaries, and Limitation on Liens. The Senior Subordinate Note Agreement also contains the following covered in detail below.
Limitation on Asset Sales |
The Company will not, and will not permit any Restricted Subsidiary to, consummate any Asset Sale, unless: (i) the consideration received by the Company or such Restricted Subsidiary is at least equal to the fair market value of the assets sold or disposed of; and (ii) at least 75% of the consideration received consists of: (A) Replacement Assets; or (B) cash or Temporary Cash Investments, provided that the amount of: (a) any liabilities of the Company or any such Restricted Subsidiary that are assumed by the transferee of any such assets, provided that the Company or such Restricted Subsidiary is irrevocably and unconditionally released in writing from all such liabilities, or (b) any notes or other obligations received by the Company or any such Restricted Subsidiary from such transferee that are converted within 120 days by the Company or such Restricted Subsidiary into, shall be deemed to be cash for the purposes of determining the percentage of cash or Temporary Cash Investments received by the Company or such Restricted Subsidiary.
Repurchase of Notes upon a Change of Control |
The Company must commence, within 30 days of the occurrence of a Change of Control, and consummate an Offer to Purchase for all Notes then outstanding, at a purchase price equal to 101% of the principal amount thereof, plus accrued interest (if any) to the Payment Date.
There can be no assurance that the Company will have sufficient funds available at the time of any Change of Control to make any debt payment (including repurchases of Notes) required by the foregoing covenant (as well as any covenant that may be contained in other securities of the Company which might be outstanding at the time). The above covenant requiring the Company to repurchase the Notes will, unless consents are obtained, require the Company to repay all indebtedness then outstanding which by its terms would prohibit such Note repurchase, either prior to or concurrently with such Note repurchase.
10% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2009 |
We issued a Note under a Note Purchase Agreement dated August 28, 2002, among us, the Subsidiary Guarantors and Key Acquisition LLC. The Note is a general unsecured obligation of the Company, ranks subordinate to all Senior Indebtedness of the Company and pari passu to the 13 1/8% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2009.
Principal, Maturity and Interest |
The Company issued a $10,000,000 Note on August 28, 2002. The Notes will mature on October 15, 2009. The Notes will not be entitled to the benefit of any mandatory sinking fund.
Interest on the Note will accrue at the rate of 10% per annum and will be payable semi-annually in arrears on each April 15 and October 15 (each, an Interest Payment Date), commencing on April 15, 2003. Payments will be made to the persons who are registered Holders of such Note either in cash or at the option of the Company, by issuance of an additional Note registered in the name of such Holders, bearing interest from the relevant Interest Payment Date at a rate of 10%, and having a face value equal to the amount of the Interest Payment applicable to such Note.
Guarantees |
Payment of the principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the Notes will be guaranteed, jointly and severally, on an unsecured senior subordinated basis by certain Subsidiaries of the Company (the Subsidiary Guarantors), each of which has guaranteed Indebtedness of the Company incurred under the Credit
32
The Note Guarantee of any Subsidiary Guarantor may be released in certain circumstances.
Covenants |
The Senior Subordinated Note Agreement also contains general covenants, which restrict Limitation on Indebtedness, Limitation on Restricted Payments, Limitation on Dividend and Other Payment Restrictions Affecting Restricted Subsidiaries, Limitation on the Issuance of Capital Stock of Restricted Subsidiaries, Limitation on Issuances of Guarantees by Restricted Subsidiaries, Limitation on Transactions with Stockholders and Affiliates, Limitation on Senior Subordinated Indebtedness and Limitation on Liens. The Senior Subordinate Note Agreement also contains the following covered in detail below.
Limitation on Asset Sales |
The Company will not, and will not permit any Restricted Subsidiary to, consummate any Asset Sale, unless: (i) the consideration received by the Company or such Restricted Subsidiary is at least equal to the fair market value of the assets sold or disposed of; and (ii) at least 75% of the consideration received consists of: (A) Replacement Assets; or (B) cash or Temporary Cash Investments, provided that the amount of: (a) any liabilities of the Company or any such Restricted Subsidiary that are assumed by the transferee of any such assets, provided that the Company or such Restricted Subsidiary is irrevocably and unconditionally released in writing from all such liabilities, or (b) any notes or other obligations received by the Company or any such Restricted Subsidiary from such transferee that are converted within 120 days by the Company or such Restricted Subsidiary into, shall be deemed to be cash for the purposes of determining the percentage of cash or Temporary Cash Investments received by the Company or such Restricted Subsidiary.
Repurchase of Notes upon a Change of Control |
The Company must commence, within 30 days of the occurrence of a Change of Control, and consummate an Offer to Purchase for all Notes then outstanding, at a purchase price equal to 101% of the principal amount thereof, plus accrued interest (if any) to the Payment Date.
There can be no assurance that the Company will have sufficient funds available at the time of any Change of Control to make any debt payment (including repurchases of Notes) required by the foregoing covenant (as well as any covenant that may be contained in other securities of the Company which might be outstanding at the time). The above covenant requiring the Company to repurchase the Notes will, unless consents are obtained, require the Company to repay all indebtedness then outstanding which by its terms would prohibit such Note repurchase, either prior to or concurrently with such Note repurchase.
Critical Accounting Policies
The consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, which require management to make estimates and assumptions. We believe that of our significant accounting policies (see Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements), the following may involve a higher degree of judgment and complexity.
33
Bad Debt |
We maintain allowances for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability of our customers to make required payments. If the financial condition of our customers were to deteriorate, resulting in an impairment of their ability to make payments, additional allowances may be required.
Excess and Obsolete Inventory |
Significant management judgment is required to determine the reserve for obsolete or excess inventory. Inventory on hand may exceed future demand either because the product is outdated, or obsolete, or because the amount on hand is more than can be used to meet future need. We currently make a 50% provision for all inventory that has had no activity for 18 months and a 100% provision for all inventory that had no activity for more than 36 months as well as any additional specifically identified inventory to be excess. We also provide for the total value of inventories that we determine to be obsolete based on criteria such as customer demand and changing technologies. At December 31, 2003, our inventory reserves were $4.1 million, or 19% of our $21.5 million gross inventories.
We value our inventories at lower of cost or market. Cost is determined by the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method.
Warranties |
Products sold are generally covered by a warranty for periods ranging from one to three years. We accrue a warranty reserve for estimated costs to provide warranty services. Our estimate of costs to service warranty obligations is based on historical claims experience and expectation of future conditions. To the extent we experience increased (or decreased) warranty claim activity or increased (or decreased) costs associated with servicing those claims, our warranty accrual will increase (or decrease) resulting in decreased (or increased) gross profit.
Pension Benefits |
The Companys pension benefit costs and obligations are dependent on the various actuarial assumptions used in calculating such amounts. These assumptions relate to discount rates, salary growth, long-term return on plan assets and other factors. The Company bases the discount rate assumptions on current investment yields on AA-rated long-term corporate bonds. The salary growth assumptions reflect the Companys actual experience and near-term outlook. Long-term return on plan assets is determined based on historical portfolio results and managements expectation of the future economic environment. The Companys key assumptions are described in further detail in Note 8.
Deferred Tax Assets |
We account for deferred income taxes based upon differences between the financial reporting and income tax bases of our assets and liabilities. The measurement of deferred tax assets is adjusted by a valuation allowance, if necessary, to recognize the extent to which, more likely than not, the future tax benefits will be recognized.
At December 31, 2003, we recorded net deferred tax liabilities of approximately $1 million, which includes a $25.1 million valuation allowance. The Company has provided a valuation allowance against the net U.S. deferred tax assets due to the uncertainty of realization of those assets. See footnote 5, Income Taxes.
New Accounting Pronouncements |
In June 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations, which is effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2002. The Statement requires legal obligations associated with the retirement of long-lived assets to be recognized at their fair value at the time that the obligations are incurred. Upon initial recognition of a liability, that cost should be capitalized as part of the related long-lived asset and
34
In June 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued SFAS No. 146, Accounting for Cost Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities, which changes the timing of the recognition of restructuring charges. Liabilities for restructuring costs will be required to be recognized when the liability is incurred rather than when we commit to the plan. SFAS No. 146 is effective for restructuring activity initiated after December 31, 2002. The adoption of this statement did not have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In November 2002, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation (FIN) No. 45, Guarantors Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others. FIN No. 45 clarifies that a guarantor is required to recognize, at the inception of a guarantee, a liability for the fair value of the obligation undertaken in issuing the guarantee. We adopted the provisions of FIN No. 45 on January 1, 2003 for all new or amended guarantees subsequent to that date. The adoption of this statement did not have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In May 2003, the FASB issued EITF No. 03-4, Determining the Classification and Benefit Attribution Method for a Cash Balance Pension Plan. EITF 03-4 defines a cash balance pension plan as a plan that contains a defined principal-crediting rate as a percentage of salary and a defined, non-contingent interest-crediting rate that entitles participants to future interest credits at a stated, fixed rate until retirement. EITF No. 03-4 requires that cash balance pension plans be considered defined benefit pension plans for the purpose of applying SFAS No. 87, Employers Account for Pension. EITF No. 03-4 also declares the traditional unit credit method to be the appropriate cost attribution approach for cash balance pension plans. Although the Companys U.S. pension plan is a cash balance pension for certain employees, the plan does not have the characteristics of the cash balance pension plans covered by EITF 03-4. The U.S. pension plan contains an interest-crediting rate that entitles participants to future interest credits at a variable rate until retirement. The adoption of EITF No. 03-4 has not had a material impact on the Companys Consolidated Financial Statements.
In May 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 150, Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity. SFAS 150 requires certain obligations including mandatorily redeemable preferred stock to be reflected as liabilities in the balance sheet. Additionally, dividends paid or accrued on mandatorily redeemable preferred stock will be presented as interest expense in the income statement. The Company will adopt the provisions of SFAS 150 on January 1, 2004. The Company has reviewed the provisions of this standard, and its adoption is not expected to have a material effect on the Companys Consolidated Financial Statements.
Management does not anticipate the adoption of any other new accounting pronouncement will have a material effect on our results of operations or on the financial position of the company.
Restatement of Financial Statements |
The Company is restating its prior year financial statements because an error was discovered that affects the pension expense (income), related balance sheet accounts and certain disclosures previously reported in our financial statements. We have discovered that our United Kingdom subsidiarys prepaid pension expense balance was misstated as of December 31, 2000 by $2.1 million primarily due to a curtailment gain associated with the restructuring of our U.K. facility in 2000 that was not reflected. The net effect of the correction of this non-cash error was to increase prepaid pension expense and retained earnings as of December 31, 2000 by $2.1 million. Additionally, the U.K. subsidiary did not properly reflect their required minimum pension liability as of December 31, 2002. The net effect of this balance sheet only error was to increase pension liability by $4.5 million and reduce other comprehensive income accordingly.
35
Discontinued Operations |
The Companys consolidated financial statements and related footnote disclosures reflect the Synchro-Start and Infrared (Ruwido) businesses as discontinued operations, net of applicable income taxes, for all periods presented in accordance with SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets. As such, discontinued operations includes the January thru May operating results of the Synchro-Start business, the sale of which was completed May 30, 2003, and the gain on the Synchro-Start sale. Discontinued operations also includes the January thru July operating results of the Infrared business, the sale of which was completed July 29, 2003, and the loss on the sale. The assets and liabilities of these businesses have been summarized as current on a gross basis and reclassified for presentation on the December 31, 2002 balance sheet.
The Synchro-Start division was part of the Companys Automotive Components reporting segment. The Infrared business was part of the Companys Acoustic and Infrared Technology reporting segment. The Company has subsequently modified its segment reporting, see footnote 3 Segments and Geographical Information.
Summarized selected financial information for the discontinued operations is as follows:
For the year ended December 31: | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | |||||||||
Net sales
|
$ | 26,513 | $ | 51,986 | $ | 50,605 | ||||||
Income from discontinued operations
|
$ | 1,102 | $ | 6,591 | $ | 7,255 | ||||||
Income tax expense
|
170 | 46 | 219 | |||||||||
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
$ | 932 | $ | 6,545 | $ | 7,036 | ||||||
The major classes of assets and liabilities for the discontinued operations at December 31, 2002 were as follows:
December 31, | ||||
2002 | ||||
Current assets
|
$ | 23,942 | ||
Net property, plant and equipment
|
8,309 | |||
Miscellaneous other assets
|
1,239 | |||
Assets of discontinued operations
|
$ | 33,490 | ||
Accounts payable and other current liabilities
|
$ | 11,871 | ||
Notes payable
|
1,282 | |||
Liabilities of discontinued operations
|
$ | 13,153 | ||
The Company sold Synchro-Start for $49.7 million. The Company retained pension liabilities of $3.5 million associated with the pension plan covering U.S. employees. The Company recorded a pre-tax gain on the sale of Synchro-Start of $36.3 million. The tax on the gain was $0.7 million which reflects an alternative minimum tax created by the transaction. The benefit of the carryforward of the alternative minimum tax credit has not been recognized due to the uncertainty of the realization of this benefit. The tax on the gain was limited to the alternative minimum tax due to the utilization of net operating loss carryforwards that had previously not been benefited.
The Company sold the Infrared business for $0.1 million on July 29, 2003 and the buyer retained debt of $4.0 million. The Company recorded a pre-tax loss on the sale of $8.6 million. No tax benefit from the loss was recorded because the loss is netted against the gain on the Synchro-Start sale and the tax on that net gain is offset by the utilization of net operating loss carryforwards that had previously not been benefited.
In November 2002, the Company sold its Ruf division, which was part of the Companys Automotive Components reporting segment. In accordance with APB No. 30 Reporting the Results of Operations
36
Forward Looking Statements
This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements are based on the Companys current plans and expectations as of the date of this document and involve risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements. Generally, the words believe, expect, estimate, anticipate, will and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements.
Important factors that could cause such differences include, among others: general economic conditions in the U.S. and worldwide; fluctuations in currency exchange rates and interest rates; implementation of new software systems; dependence on our largest customers and key suppliers; the competitive environment applicable to the Companys operations; political, economic and regulatory changes effecting our foreign operations; greater than expected expenses associated with the Companys activities or personnel needs; changes in accounting assumptions; changes in customers business environments; regulatory, legislative and judicial developments, including environmental regulations; ability to generate sufficient liquidity to service debt obligations; and ability to maintain compliance with debt covenants.
The risks included here are not exhaustive. New risk factors emerge from time to time and it is not possible for management to predict all such risk factors or to assess the impact of such risk factors on the Companys business. Accordingly, the Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
Item 7a. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk |
We do not hedge our foreign currency exchange rate exposure. Therefore, we are exposed to foreign currency exchange rate risks. Our revenues are primarily denominated in the U.S. dollar. During 2003, approximately 93% of our revenue was denominated in U.S. dollars, approximately 4% of our revenue was denominated in Japanese Yen, and the balance were denominated in other foreign currencies. Some of our expenses are denominated in the local currencies of the United Kingdom, China, Japan, Malaysia and Taiwan, a number of which are closely tied to the U.S. dollar. China has had a managed floating exchange rate since 1994 and the exchange rate to the U.S. Dollar has been effectively fixed since 1996. Malaysia has practiced a fixed exchange rate regime since 1998 and the exchange rate to the U.S. Dollar has been effectively fixed since then.
We do not invest in speculative or derivative financial instruments. We have significant amounts of debt that are subject to interest rate fluctuation risk. The amounts outstanding under the B portion of the Credit Agreement have variable interest rates, and therefore, adjust to market conditions. An increase of 1 percentage point in the interest rate of the loans under the Credit Agreement would increase annual interest expense by approximately $0.9 million. The amounts outstanding under the C portion of the Credit agreement have fixed interest rate of 18.5%. We have estimated the fair value of the Tranche C loans under the Credit Agreement to be $45 million. The amount outstanding under the 13 1/8% senior subordinated notes accrues interest at a fixed rate of 13.125%. We have estimated the fair value of the notes as of December 31, 2003 to be 106% of their face value or $162 million based on current market prices. We also have $10 million outstanding under 10% senior subordinated notes.
37
Item 8
KNOWLES ELECTRONICS HOLDINGS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONTENTS
Page | |||||
Report of Independent Auditors
|
39 | ||||
Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|||||
Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
40 | ||||
Consolidated Statements of Operations
|
41 | ||||
Consolidated Statements of Changes in
Stockholders Equity (Deficit)
|
42 | ||||
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
|
43 | ||||
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
44 |
38
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Knowles Electronics Holdings, Inc., as of December 31, 2003, and 2002, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders equity (deficit), and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2003. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule listed in the index at Item 15. These financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedule based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Knowles Electronics Holdings, Inc., at December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2003, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.
As discussed in Note 2 to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, the Company has restated its financial statements to correct an error in their accounting for pensions.
/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP |
Chicago, Illinois
39
KNOWLES ELECTRONICS HOLDINGS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
Restated | ||||||||||
December 31 | December 31 | |||||||||
2003 | 2002 | |||||||||
(In thousands except | ||||||||||
share data) | ||||||||||
ASSETS | ||||||||||
Cash & cash equivalents
|
$ | 11,227 | $ | 23,879 | ||||||
Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful
accounts of $527 and $350
|
23,128 | 21,084 | ||||||||
Inventories, net
|
17,373 | 19,620 | ||||||||
Prepaid expenses and other
|
5,023 | 4,757 | ||||||||
Assets of discontinued operations
|
| 33,490 | ||||||||
Total current assets
|
56,751 | 102,830 | ||||||||
Property, plant and equipment, at cost:
|
||||||||||
Land
|
2,787 | 2,787 | ||||||||
Building and improvements
|
19,273 | 18,215 | ||||||||
Machinery and equipment
|
48,750 | 44,740 | ||||||||
Furniture and fixtures
|
24,104 | 23,421 | ||||||||
Construction in progress
|
11,743 | 4,674 | ||||||||
Subtotal
|
106,657 | 93,837 | ||||||||
Accumulated depreciation
|
(61,152 | ) | (55,073 | ) | ||||||
Net
|
45,505 | 38,764 | ||||||||
Other assets, net
|
3,149 | 1,187 | ||||||||
Deferred finance costs, net
|
7,168 | 8,058 | ||||||||
Total assets
|
$ | 112,573 | $ | 150,839 | ||||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY (DEFICIT) | ||||||||||
Accounts payable
|
$ | 11,272 | $ | 10,861 | ||||||
Accrued compensation and employee benefits
|
8,681 | 4,602 | ||||||||
Accrued interest payable
|
4,868 | 7,253 | ||||||||
Accrued warranty and rebates
|
5,902 | 8,344 | ||||||||
Accrued restructuring costs
|
1,490 | 1,197 | ||||||||
Other liabilities
|
2,645 | 3,388 | ||||||||
Income taxes
|
3,784 | 6,833 | ||||||||
Deferred income taxes
|
968 | 541 | ||||||||
Current portion of notes payable
|
| 11,996 | ||||||||
Liabilities of discontinued operations
|
| 13,153 | ||||||||
Total current liabilities
|
39,610 | 68,168 | ||||||||
Accrued pension liability
|
12,350 | 14,649 | ||||||||
Other noncurrent liabilities
|
407 | | ||||||||
Notes payable
|
288,180 | 327,626 | ||||||||
Preferred stock mandatorily redeemable in 2019
including accumulating dividends of: $99,401 December 2003;
$73,547 December 2002
|
284,401 | 258,547 | ||||||||
Stockholders equity (deficit):
|
||||||||||
Common stock, Class A, $0.001 par value,
1,052,632 shares authorized, outstanding: 957,500 December 2003;
969,167 December 2002
|
| | ||||||||
Common stock, Class B, $0.001 par value,
52,632 shares authorized: none ever issued
|
| | ||||||||
Capital in excess of par value
|
16,488 | 16,838 | ||||||||
Accumulated deficit
|
(520,826 | ) | (523,642 | ) | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
(8,037 | ) | (11,347 | ) | ||||||
Total stockholders equity (deficit)
|
(512,375 | ) | (518,151 | ) | ||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
(deficit)
|
$ | 112,573 | $ | 150,839 | ||||||
See accompanying notes.
40
KNOWLES ELECTRONICS HOLDINGS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | |||||||||||
(In thousands) | |||||||||||||
Net sales
|
$ | 154,042 | $ | 164,119 | $ | 173,116 | |||||||
Cost of sales
|
75,594 | 87,970 | 90,705 | ||||||||||
Gross margin
|
78,448 | 76,149 | 82,411 | ||||||||||
Research and development expenses
|
10,225 | 11,735 | 12,845 | ||||||||||
Selling and marketing expenses
|
9,185 | 9,503 | 10,917 | ||||||||||
General and administrative expenses
|
20,547 | 21,478 | 23,503 | ||||||||||
Loss on sale of business
|
| 16,736 | | ||||||||||
Restructuring expenses
|
1,532 | 2,112 | (179 | ) | |||||||||
Operating income
|
36,959 | 14,585 | 35,325 | ||||||||||
Other income (expense):
|
|||||||||||||
Interest income
|
111 | 129 | 139 | ||||||||||
Interest expense
|
(35,835 | ) | (33,891 | ) | (37,666 | ) | |||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations
before
income taxes |
1,235 | (19,177 | ) | (2,202 | ) | ||||||||
Income tax
|
491 | 11,744 | 6,313 | ||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations
after
income taxes |
744 | (30,921 | ) | (8,515 | ) | ||||||||
Income (loss) from discontinued operations
after
income taxes: |
|||||||||||||
Loss on sale of Infrared division
|
(8,576 | ) | | | |||||||||
Gain on sale of Synchro-Start division
|
35,570 | | | ||||||||||
Income from discontinued operations
|
932 | 6,545 | 7,036 | ||||||||||
Income from discontinued operations after income
taxes
|
27,926 | 6,545 | 7,036 | ||||||||||
Net income (loss)
|
$ | 28,670 | $ | (24,376 | ) | $ | (1,479 | ) | |||||
See accompanying notes.
41
KNOWLES ELECTRONICS HOLDINGS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY (DEFICIT)
Capital in | Cost of | Accumulated | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Excess of | Common | Other | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Common | Par | Accumulated | Treasury | Comprehensive | |||||||||||||||||||||
Stock | Value | Deficit | Shares | Loss | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2000 as previously
reported
|
$ | | $ | 17,263 | $ | (455,077 | ) | $ | | $ | (6,803 | ) | $ | (444,617 | ) | ||||||||||
Prior period adjustments
(see footnote 2)
|
| | 2,110 | | | 2,110 | |||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2000,
as restated
|
$ | | $ | 17,263 | $ | (452,967 | ) | $ | | $ | (6,803 | ) | $ | (442,507 | ) | ||||||||||
Net loss
|
| | (1,479 | ) | | | (1,479 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income foreign
currency translation adjustment
|
| | | | (363 | ) | (363 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive loss
|
| | | | | (1,842 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of common stock
|
| 250 | | | | 250 | |||||||||||||||||||
Repurchase stock
|
| (300 | ) | | | | (300 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Preferred stock dividends
|
| | (21,367 | ) | | | (21,367 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Other
|
| | (14 | ) | | | (14 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2001, as restated
|
$ | | $ | 17,213 | $ | (475,827 | ) | $ | | $ | (7,166 | ) | $ | (465,780 | ) | ||||||||||
Net loss
|
| | (24,376 | ) | | | (24,376 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustment
|
| | | | 4,068 | 4,068 | |||||||||||||||||||
Minimum pension liability
pension adjustment net of tax(1) |
| | | | (8,249 | ) | (8,249 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive loss
|
| | | | | (28,557 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Issue common stock
|
| 150 | | | | 150 | |||||||||||||||||||
Repurchase stock
|
| (525 | ) | | | | (525 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Preferred stock dividends
|
| | (23,505 | ) | | | (23,505 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Other
|
| | 66 | | | 66 | |||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2002, as restated
|
$ | | $ | 16,838 | $ | (523,642 | ) | $ | | $ | (11,347 | ) | $ | (518,151 | ) | ||||||||||
Net income
|
| | 28,670 | | | 28,670 | |||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustment
|
| | | | 1,543 | 1,543 | |||||||||||||||||||
Minimum pension liability
pension adjustment net of tax |
| | | | 1,767 | 1,767 | |||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income
|
| | | | | 31,980 | |||||||||||||||||||
Repurchase stock
|
| (350 | ) | | | | (350 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Preferred stock dividends
|
| | (25,854 | ) | | | (25,854 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2003
|
$ | | $ | 16,488 | $ | (520,826 | ) | $ | | $ | (8,037 | ) | $ | (512,375 | ) | ||||||||||
(1) | As restated see footnote 2 |
See accompanying notes.
42
KNOWLES ELECTRONICS HOLDINGS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Year Ended December 31 | ||||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | ||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||
Operating Activities
|
||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations
|
$ | 744 | $ | (30,921 | ) | $ | (8,515 | ) | ||||||
Adjustments to reconcile income (loss) from
continuing operations to net cash provided by operating
activities:
|
||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization
|
7,443 | 8,703 | 11,693 | |||||||||||
Restructuring costs
|
1,532 | 942 | 1,132 | |||||||||||
Loss on sale of business
|
| 16,626 | | |||||||||||
Amortization of deferred financing fees and debt
discount
|
2,388 | 1,434 | 2,133 | |||||||||||
Inventory obsolescence provision
|
1,416 | 2,391 | 2,663 | |||||||||||
Deferred income taxes
|
427 | 6,733 | (121 | ) | ||||||||||
Stock compensation expense
|
| 504 | | |||||||||||
(Gain) loss on disposal of fixed assets
|
160 | 1,170 | (2,745 | ) | ||||||||||
Change in assets and liabilities:
|
||||||||||||||
Accounts receivable
|
(2,044 | ) | 6,882 | 2,278 | ||||||||||
Inventories
|
831 | 9,362 | (5,246 | ) | ||||||||||
Other assets
|
272 | 1,200 | (2,200 | ) | ||||||||||
Accounts payable
|
411 | (2,380 | ) | 4,928 | ||||||||||
Accrued restructuring costs
|
(1,239 | ) | (3,574 | ) | (8,733 | ) | ||||||||
Accrued interest payable
|
(1,717 | ) | 2,157 | 198 | ||||||||||
Accrued compensation and benefits
|
2,719 | 132 | (1,813 | ) | ||||||||||
Other current liabilities
|
(3,273 | ) | (196 | ) | (2,139 | ) | ||||||||
Other noncurrent liabilities
|
833 | 1,426 | 211 | |||||||||||
Income taxes payable
|
(3,763 | ) | 141 | 2,790 | ||||||||||
Net cash provided by discontinued operating
activities
|
3,971 | 6,947 | 13,302 | |||||||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
11,111 | 29,679 | 9,816 | |||||||||||
Investing Activities
|
||||||||||||||
Proceeds from sales of businesses and equipment
|
45,245 | 3,560 | 3,662 | |||||||||||
Purchases of property, plant, and equipment, net
|
(14,776 | ) | (8,427 | ) | (21,276 | ) | ||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) investing
activities
|
30,469 | (4,867 | ) | (17,614 | ) | |||||||||
Financing Activities
|
||||||||||||||
Debt payments long term
|
(87,102 | ) | (10,541 | ) | (9,375 | ) | ||||||||
Debt proceeds long term
|
35,000 | 10,055 | | |||||||||||
Debt proceeds (payments) short term,
net
|
| (1,996 | ) | 4,034 | ||||||||||
Issuance of preferred stock and common stock
|
| | 125 | |||||||||||
Costs associated with debt
|
(1,749 | ) | (681 | ) | (636 | ) | ||||||||
Repurchase of common stock, net
|
(350 | ) | (400 | ) | (300 | ) | ||||||||
Net cash used in financing activities
|
(54,201 | ) | (3,563 | ) | (6,152 | ) | ||||||||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash
|
(31 | ) | 600 | (312 | ) | |||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash
equivalents
|
(12,652 | ) | 21,849 | (14,262 | ) | |||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
|
23,879 | 2,030 | 16,292 | |||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
|
$ | 11,227 | $ | 23,879 | $ | 2,030 | ||||||||
Cash paid for interest
|
$ | 36,276 | $ | 30,525 | $ | 35,335 | ||||||||
Cash paid for taxes
|
$ | 3,592 | $ | 5,131 | $ | 4,297 | ||||||||
See accompanying notes.
43
KNOWLES ELECTRONICS HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. Accounting Policies
Basis of Recapitalization and Presentation |
The consolidated financial statements of Knowles Electronics Holdings, Inc. (the Company) include all of its subsidiaries, including British, French, German, Chinese, Japanese, Malaysian, Singaporean and Taiwanese subsidiaries. Significant intercompany and affiliate accounts and transactions have been eliminated.
In connection with a reorganization as a holding company, the Company changed its name from Knowles Electronics, Inc. to Knowles Electronics Holdings, Inc. on September 23, 1999.
On June 23, 1999, the Company entered into a recapitalization agreement with Key Acquisition L.L.C., (the Investor) and the preexisting common stockholders of the Company (the Recapitalization). The recapitalization transaction closed on June 30, 1999. The Recapitalization was treated as a leveraged recapitalization in which the issuance of the debt has been accounted for as a financing transaction, the sales and purchases of the Companys stock have been accounted for as capital transactions at amounts paid or received, and no changes were made to the carrying values of the Companys assets and liabilities.
In conjunction with the Recapitalization, the Company authorized and issued, on June 30, 1999, new shares of mandatorily redeemable preferred stock (Series A-1 and Series A-2), each with par value $0.001 per share (the Preferred Stock), and common stock (Class A and Class B), par value $0.001 per share (Common Stock). The Investor purchased 800,000 shares of Common Stock for $24,000 and 164,444 shares of Series A-1 Preferred Stock for $164,444. In addition, certain members of management purchased 71,667 shares of Common Stock for $2,150. After the transactions related to the Recapitalization, which are described below, the preexisting stockholders held 100,000 shares of Common Stock and 20,556 shares of Series A-2 Preferred Stock which was recorded at $20,556. As of December 31, 2003, the liquidation value of the outstanding Series A-1 Preferred Stock is $252,800 and the liquidation value of the outstanding Series A-2 Preferred stock is $31,601.
The Preferred Stock ranks senior to all other equity securities of the Company with respect to dividend and distribution preference. The liquidation value of each share of Preferred Stock is $1,000. Dividends on each share of Preferred Stock accrue at a rate of 10% per annum of the liquidated value plus any accumulated dividends. Such dividends for the year ended December 31, 2003, amounted to $25,854. The Preferred Stock is mandatorily redeemable on July 2, 2019, at a redemption price per share equal to the liquidation value plus all previously accumulated dividends and all accrued dividends not yet paid or accumulated. The Company may, at any time, and the holders may, upon the earlier of June 30, 2010, or an initial public offering of the Companys Common Stock which is a primary registered offering or the sale of all or substantially all of the Companys Common Stock or assets, require the Company to redeem all or any portion of the Series A-1 Preferred Stock then outstanding at a price per share equal to the liquidation value plus all accumulated and all accrued and unpaid or unaccumulated dividends. The Series A-2 Preferred Stock is not redeemable at the Companys option at any time. In the event of such an initial public offering, holders of Series A-1 and A-2 Preferred Stock may elect to convert the shares into Common Stock. In addition, on each June 30, the Company has an option to exchange the then outstanding shares of Series A-1 Preferred Stock in whole, but not part of, for 10% Junior Subordinated Notes due 2010 of the Company, in an aggregate principal amount equal to the sum of the liquidation value of the Series A-1 Preferred Stock plus an amount equal to all accumulated and all accrued and unpaid, but not yet accumulated, dividends.
Series A Preferred Stock have no voting rights; with respect to any issue required to be voted on and approved by holders of Series A-1 Preferred Stock, the holders of the Series A-1 Preferred Stock and the holders of Series A-2 Preferred Stock will each vote as a single class.
44
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
After completion of the Recapitalization transactions, the Investors, preexisting stockholders, and managements ownership percentage of the Company was approximately 82.3%, 10.3%, and 7.4%, respectively.
Description of Business |
The Company develops, manufactures, and supplies audio communications components, primarily miniaturized microphones and receivers used in hearing aids, microphones, headsets, and accessories for the computer and communication industries.
Foreign Operations |
Assets and liabilities are translated using the exchange data at the balance sheet date and revenues and expenses are translated using weighted-average exchange data. Translation adjustments for those entities which have the U.S. dollar as their functional currency are recorded to the income statement and adjustments for all other entities are recorded as a separate component of common stockholders equity.
Use of Estimates |
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Reclassifications |
Certain prior years amounts have been reclassified to conform to the 2003 financial statement presentation.
Cash Equivalents |
Cash equivalents consist of highly liquid investments, having maturities of three months or less from date of purchase, which are readily convertible into cash.
Accounts Receivable and Allowances for Doubtful Accounts |
The Company carries its accounts receivable at face value amount net of an allowance for doubtful accounts. The allowance for doubtful accounts is calculated by applying standard reserve percentages to the aging categories. An additional reserve is also recorded for uncollectible accounts that have been specifically identified. A receivable is considered past due if payments have not been received within agreed upon invoice terms. Uncollectible receivables are charged against the allowance for doubtful accounts when approved by management after all collection efforts have been exhausted.
Inventories |
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (first in, first out) or market. Costs include direct material, direct labor and applicable production overhead costs.
Deferred Finance Costs |
Deferred finance costs associated with the issuance of long-term debt are capitalized and amortized over the life of the related debt using the effective interest method.
45
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Property, Plant, and Equipment |
Property, plant and equipment are valued at cost. Interest expense capitalized as part of the cost of property, plant and equipment was $442, $225 and $0 in 2003, 2002 and 2001 respectively.
Depreciation of property, plant, and equipment is computed principally on a declining-balance method based on the following estimated useful lives: Buildings and Improvements 10 to 40 years; Leasehold Improvements lesser of useful life of assets or lease terms including option periods; Machinery and Equipment 4 to 12 years; Furniture and Fixtures 3 to 18 years; and Computer Equipment 3 to 5 years.
Property, plant, and equipment are reviewed for impairment whenever changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the assets may not be recoverable.
Product Warranties |
The Company provides an accrual for estimated future warranty costs at the time products are sold and periodically adjusts the accrual to reflect actual experience. The warranty on products sold generally extends from one to three years.
Pension Benefits |
The Companys pension benefit costs and obligations are dependent on the various actuarial assumptions used in calculating such amounts. These assumptions relate to discount rates, salary growth, long-term return on plan assets and other factors. The Company bases the discount rate assumptions on current investment yields on AA-rated long-term corporate bonds. The salary growth assumptions reflect the Companys actual experience and near-term outlook. Long-term return on plan assets is determined based on historical portfolio results and managements expectation of the future economic environment. The Companys key assumptions are described in further detail in Note 8.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments |
The carrying amounts reported in the Companys balance sheets for cash and cash equivalents, trade accounts receivable, accounts payable, and short-term debt approximate fair value because of the short-term nature of these instruments.
The carrying amounts reported in the Companys balance sheets for variable-rate long-term debt approximate fair value.
The Company estimates the fair value of fixed rate long-term debt obligations using current market prices available for these or similar obligations. The fair value of the 13 1/8% Senior Subordinated Notes was approximately $162 million at December 31, 2003. The fair value of the Term C loan and 10% Senior Subordinated Notes were $45 million and $10 million respectively at December 31, 2003.
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss |
The balance of accumulated other comprehensive loss is $1,555 of translation adjustment plus $6,482 of minimum pension liability in 2003, and in 2002, $3,098 of translation adjustment plus $8,249 of minimum pension liability.
46
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Revenue Recognition |
Revenues from the Companys products are recognized when title to the products transfers to the customer, which typically is upon the shipment of products to the customers. Such revenue is based on fixed or determinable sales prices and is recognized when collectibility is reasonably assured.
Shipping Costs |
Amounts invoiced to customers to cover shipping costs are included in sales. The cost of shipping product to customers is included in cost of sales.
Research and Development |
Research and development expenditures are charged to expense as incurred.
Interest Expense |
The Company presents interest expense net of capitalized interest cost and includes amortized deferred finance costs and bond discount.
Income Taxes |
Income taxes are provided currently on financial statement earnings of non-U.S. subsidiaries expected to be repatriated. The Company accounts for income taxes using the asset and liability method. This approach requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the carrying amounts and the tax bases of assets and liabilities.
Stock Options |
The Company accounts for its stock-based compensation plan using the intrinsic value method in accordance with Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and related interpretations. Under the intrinsic value method, compensation expense for stock options is based on the excess, if any, of the fair value of the stock at the date of the grant over the exercise price.
New Accounting Standards |
In June 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations, which is effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2002. The Statement requires legal obligations associated with the retirement of long-lived assets to be recognized at their fair value at the time that the obligations are incurred. Upon initial recognition of a liability, that cost should be capitalized as part of the related long-lived asset and allocated to expense over the useful life of the asset. We adopted SFAS No. 143 as of January 1, 2003, and there was no material impact on our financial position or results of operations.
In June 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued SFAS No. 146, Accounting for Cost Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities, which changes the timing of the recognition of restructuring charges. Liabilities for restructuring costs will be required to be recognized when the liability is incurred rather than when we commit to the plan. SFAS No. 146 is effective for restructuring activity initiated after December 31, 2002. The adoption of this statement did not have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In November 2002, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation (FIN) No. 45, Guarantors Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others.
47
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
FIN No. 45 clarifies that a guarantor is required to recognize, at the inception of a guarantee, a liability for the fair value of the obligation undertaken in issuing the guarantee. We adopted the provisions of FIN No. 45 on January 1, 2003 for all new or amended guarantees subsequent to that date. The adoption of this statement did not have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In May 2003, the FASB issued EITF No. 03-4, Determining the Classification and Benefit Attribution Method for a Cash Balance Pension Plan. EITF 03-4 defines a cash balance pension plan as a plan that contains a defined principal-crediting rate as a percentage of salary and a defined, non-contingent interest-crediting rate that entitles participants to future interest credits at a stated, fixed rate until retirement. EITF No. 03-4 requires that cash balance pension plans be considered defined benefit pension plans for the purpose of applying SFAS No. 87, Employers Account for Pension. EITF No. 03-4 also declares the traditional unit credit method to be the appropriate cost determination approach for cash balance pension plans. Although the Companys U.S. pension plan is a cash balance pension for certain employees, the plan does not have the characteristics of the cash balance pension plans covered by EITF 03-4. The U.S. pension plan contains an interest-crediting rate that entitles participants to future interest credits at a variable rate until retirement. The Company uses a projected unit credit method for cost determination for the cash balance pension. The adoption of EITF No. 03-4 has not had a material impact on the Companys Consolidated Financial Statements.
In May 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 150 Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity. SFAS 150 requires certain obligations including mandatorily redeemable preferred stock to be reflected as liabilities in the balance sheet. Additionally, dividends paid or accrued on mandatorily redeemable preferred stock will be presented as interest expense in the income statement. The Company will adopt the provisions of SFAS 150 on January 1, 2004. The Company has reviewed the provisions of this standard, and its adoption is not expected to have a material effect on the Companys Consolidated Financial Statements.
2. Restatement of Financial Statements
The Company is restating its prior years financial statements because an error was discovered that affects the pension expense (income), related balance sheet accounts and certain disclosures previously reported in our financial statements. We have discovered that our United Kingdom subsidiarys prepaid pension expense balance was misstated as of December 31, 2000 by $2.1 million primarily due to a curtailment gain associated with the restructuring of our U.K. facility in 2000 that was not reflected. The net effect of the correction of this non-cash error was to increase prepaid benefit cost and retained earnings as of December 31, 2000 by $2.1 million. Additionally, the U.K. subsidiary did not properly reflect their required minimum pension liability as of December 31, 2002. The net effect of this balance sheet only error was to increase pension liability by $4.5 million and reduce other comprehensive income accordingly.
3. Discontinued Operations
The Companys consolidated financial statements and related footnote disclosures reflect the Synchro-Start and Infrared (Ruwido) businesses as discontinued operations, net of applicable income taxes, for all periods presented in accordance with SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets. As such, discontinued operations includes the January thru May operating results of the Synchro-Start business, the sale of which was completed May 30, 2003, and the gain on the Synchro-Start sale. Discontinued operations also includes the January thru July operating results of the Infrared business, the sale of which was completed July 29, 2003, and the loss on the sale. The assets and liabilities of these businesses have been summarized as current on a gross basis and reclassified for presentation on the December 31, 2002 balance sheet.
48
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The Synchro-Start division was part of the Companys Automotive Components reporting segment. The Infrared business was part of the Companys Acoustic and Infrared Technology reporting segment. The Company has subsequently modified its segment reporting, see footnote 10. Segments and Geographical Information.
Summarized selected financial information for the discontinued operations is as follows:
For the year ended December 31: | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | |||||||||
Net sales
|
$ | 26,513 | $ | 51,986 | $ | 50,605 | ||||||
Income (loss) from discontinued operations
|
$ | 1,102 | $ | 6,591 | $ | 7,255 | ||||||
Income tax expense
|
170 | 46 | 219 | |||||||||
Income (loss) from discontinued operations,
net of tax
|
$ | 932 | $ | 6,545 | $ | 7,036 | ||||||
The major classes of assets and liabilities for the discontinued operations at December 31, 2002 were as follows:
December 31, | ||||
2002 | ||||
Current assets
|
$ | 23,942 | ||
Net property, plant and equipment
|
8,309 | |||
Miscellaneous other assets
|
1,239 | |||
Assets of discontinued operations
|
$ | 33,490 | ||
Accounts payable and other current liabilities
|
$ | 11,871 | ||
Notes payable
|
1,282 | |||
Liabilities of discontinued operations
|
$ | 13,153 | ||
The Company sold Synchro-Start for $49.7 million. The Company retained pension liabilities of $3.5 million associated with the pension plan covering U.S. employees. The Company recorded a pre-tax gain on the sale of Synchro-Start of $36.3 million. The tax on the gain was $0.7 million which reflects an alternative minimum tax created by the transaction. The benefit of the carryforward of the alternative minimum tax credit has not been recognized due to the uncertainty of the realization of this benefit. The tax on the gain was limited to the alternative minimum tax due to the utilization of net operating loss carryforwards that had previously not been benefited.
The Company sold the Infrared business for $100 on July 29, 2003 and the buyer retained debt of $4.0 million. The Company recorded a pre-tax loss on the sale of $8.6 million. No tax benefit from the loss was recorded because the loss is netted against the gain on the Synchro-Start sale and the tax on that net gain is offset by the utilization of net operating loss carryforwards that had previously not been benefited.
In November 2002, the Company sold its Ruf division, which was part of the Companys Automotive Components reporting segment. In accordance with APB No. 30 Reporting the Results of Operations Reporting the Effects of Disposal of a Segment of a Business and Extraordinary, Unusual and Infrequently Occurring Events and Transactions, the Ruf business did not qualify as a discontinued operation and therefore, its results of operations and cash flows are included in the Companys results of continuing operations and cash flows for all 2002 and 2001 periods presented.
49
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
4. Inventory
Inventories are as follows:
2003 | 2002 | ||||||||
Raw materials
|
$ | 9,211 | $ | 10,230 | |||||
Work in process
|
1,341 | 1,074 | |||||||
Finished goods
|
10,969 | 13,430 | |||||||
21,521 | 24,734 | ||||||||
Less allowances for:
|
|||||||||
Obsolescence and net realizable value
|
(4,148 | ) | (5,114 | ) | |||||
$ | 17,373 | $ | 19,620 | ||||||
5. Income Taxes
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes consists of the following:
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | ||||||||||
Domestic (U.S.)
|
$ | (17,396 | ) | $ | (30,946 | ) | $ | (9,679 | ) | |||
Foreign
|
18,631 | 11,769 | 7,477 | |||||||||
$ | 1,235 | $ | (19,177 | ) | $ | (2,202 | ) | |||||
A reconciliation of income tax expense to the statutory federal rate of 35% is as follows:
Year Ended December 31 | |||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | |||||||||||
Statutory federal income tax expense (benefit)
|
$ | 432 | $ | (6,712 | ) | $ | (771 | ) | |||||
Effects of:
|
|||||||||||||
Foreign rate differential
|
(4,283 | ) | (10,633 | ) | (8,036 | ) | |||||||
Taxes on unremitted foreign earnings
|
3,800 | (1,179 | ) | 5,441 | |||||||||
Valuation allowance
|
2,286 | 29,574 | 9,345 | ||||||||||
Reduction of prior year taxes
|
(1,596 | ) | | | |||||||||
Other, net
|
(148 | ) | 694 | 334 | |||||||||
$ | 491 | $ | 11,744 | $ | 6,313 | ||||||||
50
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The income tax provision (benefit) for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002, and 2001 consists of the following:
Year Ended December 31 | |||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | |||||||||||
Current:
|
|||||||||||||
Federal
|
$ | (1,641 | ) | $ | | $ | 1,464 | ||||||
State
|
| | | ||||||||||
Foreign
|
1,006 | 5,432 | 4,961 | ||||||||||
Total Current
|
(635 | ) | 5,432 | 6,425 | |||||||||
Deferred
|
|||||||||||||
Federal
|
| 6,797 | (976 | ) | |||||||||
State
|
| | 0 | ||||||||||
Foreign
|
1,126 | (485 | ) | 864 | |||||||||
Total Deferred
|
1,126 | 6,312 | (112 | ) | |||||||||
Total tax provision (benefit)
|
$ | 491 | $ | 11,744 | $ | 6,313 | |||||||
Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effect of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes.
Significant components of deferred tax assets and liabilities as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, are as follows:
December 31 | |||||||||
2003 | 2002 | ||||||||
Deferred tax assets:
|
|||||||||
Non-U.S. net operating loss carryforward
|
$ | 910 | $ | 20,110 | |||||
U.S. net operating loss carryforward
|
6,018 | 15,206 | |||||||
Foreign tax credits carryforward
|
17,632 | 17,131 | |||||||
Pension
|
2,429 | 2,345 | |||||||
Inventory
|
1,484 | 2,401 | |||||||
Accrued expenses
|
3,893 | 7,290 | |||||||
Other, net
|
715 | 160 | |||||||
Total deferred tax assets
|
33,081 | 64,643 | |||||||
Deferred tax liabilities:
|
|||||||||
Taxes on unremitted foreign earnings
|
(10,259 | ) | (12,619 | ) | |||||
Other deferred tax liabilities
|
(2,466 | ) | (282 | ) | |||||
Total deferred tax liabilities
|
(12,725 | ) | (12,901 | ) | |||||
Valuation allowance
|
(21,322 | ) | (52,283 | ) | |||||
Net deferred tax (liabilities)
|
$ | (968 | ) | $ | (541 | ) | |||
The Company had foreign net operating loss carryforwards of $3,466 and $47,559 at December 31, 2003 and 2002 that have an indefinite carryforward period. In addition, the Company had state net operating loss carry forwards of $48,378 at December 31, 2003, that begin to expire in 2019. The Companys foreign tax
51
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
credit carryforward of $17,632 begins to expire in 2004. The Company has provided a valuation allowance against the net deferred tax assets due to the uncertainty of realization of those assets.
During 2003, the Company wrote off $20,019 of foreign net operating losses concurrent with the discontinuation of certain foreign operations in recognition that the possibility of receiving future tax benefits from those net operating losses is highly unlikely. At December 31, 2002 the entire balance of $20,019 was offset by a valuation allowance. As such, the net impact of the write off on the Companys deferred tax assets and liabilities was zero.
The Companys future operating plan is to repatriate all foreign earnings not needed for near term investment in each country. As a result, a substantial portion of the unremitted earnings of the affected foreign subsidiaries is not considered permanently reinvested. The Company has recorded a deferred tax liability for the anticipated tax liability on the unremitted foreign earnings, which are not considered permanently reinvested.
6. Notes Payable
As part of the Recapitalization transaction, the Company entered into a Senior Credit Agreement dated June 28, 1999 and amended and restated as of July 21, 1999, and further amended as of December 23, 1999, April 10, 2000, December 12, 2001, May 10, 2002, March 25, 2003 and May 28, 2003 with certain lenders (Senior Credit Agreement). The Company obtained a Limited Waiver and Amendment dated as of March 25, 2003 under which the remaining balance of the Term A Facility was repaid and replaced by a $35,000 Term C Facility due June 29, 2007 with a fixed interest rate of 18.50%. The Limited Waiver and Amendment waives the required interest coverage ratio and leverage ratio from the effective date of the Amendment through June 29, 2003 and amends these ratios for the remainder of the Credit Agreement. The Limited Waiver and Amendment also increased the Term B Facility interest rate and the Revolving Credit Facility interest rate by 0.5 percentage points, modified the Term B Facility installment payments, and reduced the Revolving Credit Facility to $15,000.
The $15.0 million Revolving Credit facility bears interest, at the Companys option, at either: (1) one-, two-, three-, or six-month LIBOR plus 4.0%, or (2) the greater of the prime rate, a base certificate of deposit rate plus 1.00%, or the federal funds effective rate plus 0.50% (the Alternate Base Rate), in each case plus an initial margin of 3%.
The Revolving Credit Facility expires on June 30, 2006, unless the B Facility is fully repaid prior to June 30, 2006, in which case the Revolving Facility will cease to be available to the Company and any amounts outstanding thereunder shall thereupon become due and payable. There were no borrowings under this facility at December 31, 2003 and 2002.
The Term B Facility bears interest, at the Companys option, at either: (1) one-, two-, three-, or six-month LIBOR plus 5.00%, or (2) Alternate Base Rate plus an initial margin of 4.00%. In addition, as of March 31, 2003, the B Facility will accrue additional interest at the rate of approximately $420 per year (subject to reduction in the event of a prepayment of the B Facility), to be paid at the maturity of the facility (or, in certain cases, at an earlier date). The requirement for the additional interest terminated with the prepayment of $42 million resulting from the sale of the Synchro-Start division.
The initial margin may be reduced if the Company meets certain specified leverage ratios during a period consisting of the prior four consecutive fiscal quarters. Any reduced interest margin may be increased to the original margin if such leverage ratios do not continue to be met by the Company.
The Term C Facility bears interest at a fixed rate of 18.5% of which 13% is payable in cash, and the remainder, at the Companys option, payable in cash or increased principal. The percentage rate that is
52
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
payable in cash increases 1.0 percentage point on March 31 of each year. At December 31, 2003, the interest rate was 6.1875% for the Term B Facility and 18.5% for the Term C Facility.
The Company prepaid $9,533 of principal under the Senior Credit Agreement on March 28, 2003 as required by the excess cash flow calculation.
The Company obtained Amendment Number Six and Waiver, dated as of May 28, 2003, which approved the sale of the Synchro-Start division and Ruwido (infrared) division under certain conditions. The Synchro-Start division sale required minimum net proceeds from the sale of $42 million to be used to prepay Term B Facility loans, provided that $10 million of the principal repayment out of the net proceeds from the transaction would be applied to the subsequent scheduled repayments, and any payments in respect of excess cash flow, and the remaining net proceeds would reduce the remaining scheduled Term B repayments ratably. The sale of the Ruwido division would require a prepayment of not less than $1 million made up of the sum of the net proceeds received on the date of consummation plus the amount of any optional prepayments. The Amendment Number Six and Waiver also amended the definition of consolidated EBITDA to exclude up to $7.5 million of cash restructuring charges taken in 2003, 2004 and 2005 in connection with restructuring of overhead costs. The Company completed the sale of the Synchro-Start division May 30, 2003 and prepaid $42 million of Term B facility loans. An additional prepayment of $2.3 million was made in November 2003 based on the final purchase price adjustment related to the Synchro-Start sale. The Company completed the sale of the Ruwido division July 29, 2003 and made the required $1 million principal prepayment.
The Term B Facility is due on June 29, 2007, and is payable in quarterly installments during the following periods, as amended, subject to the effect of prepayments:
September 30, 2006
|
22,440 | |||
December 31, 2006 to June 29, 2007
|
23,054 |
The balance under the Term A Facility, Term B Facility, Term C Facility, the 13 1/8% Senior Subordinated Notes (13 1/8% Notes), and the 10% Senior Subordinated Notes (10% Notes) is as follows:
December 31, | ||||||||
2003 | 2002 | |||||||
Term A facility
|
$ | | $ | 33,461 | ||||
Term B facility
|
91,600 | 144,998 | ||||||
Term C facility
|
35,668 | | ||||||
13 1/8% Senior Subordinated Notes, net
|
150,912 | 151,163 | ||||||
10% Senior Subordinated Notes
|
10,000 | 10,000 | ||||||
288,180 | 339,622 | |||||||
Less: Current portion
|
| 11,996 | ||||||
Total long-term notes payable
|
$ | 288,180 | $ | 327,626 | ||||
53
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Included in the liabilities of discontinued operations is the long-term debt of Ruwido, our Austrian subsidiary as follows:
December 31, | December 31, | |||||||
2003 | 2002 | |||||||
Austrian subsidiary long-term debt due September
2006
|
$ | | $ | 1,145 | ||||
Austrian subsidiary long-term debt due June 2006
|
| 593 | ||||||
| 1,738 | |||||||
Less: Current portion
|
| 456 | ||||||
Total long-term notes payable
|
$ | | $ | 1,282 | ||||
Maturities of Notes Payable follows (including Term B Facility and Term C Facility under the Credit Agreement as amended March 25, 2003):
2004
|
$ | | ||
2005
|
| |||
2006
|
45,494 | |||
2007
|
81,774 | |||
2008
|
| |||
2009
|
163,200 | |||
$ | 290,468 | |||
The 13 1/8% Notes were issued in a private placement on October 1, 1999, and are due October 15, 2009, with interest payable semiannually at 13 1/8% commencing April 15, 2000. The Company subsequently exchanged all of the privately placed Notes for a like amount of identical Notes registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The 13 1/8% Notes rank equally with all other unsecured senior subordinated indebtedness of the Company. The Notes are junior to all of the Companys current and future indebtedness, except indebtedness which is expressly not senior to the 13 1/8% Notes.
The 10% Senior Subordinated Notes were issued in a private placement to an affiliate of Doughty Hanson on August 29, 2002 and are due October 15, 2009, with interest payable semiannually at 10% commencing April 15, 2003. The 10% Notes rank subordinate to all Senior Indebtedness of the Company and pari passu to the 13 1/8% Notes.
The Companys Senior Credit Agreement requires that the Company comply with certain covenants and restrictions, including specific financial ratios that must be maintained. As of December 31, 2003, the Company is in compliance with these covenants. If future actual results are lower than planned the Company may be unable to comply with the debt covenants or make required debt service payments. Such inability could have a material adverse impact on the Companys financial condition, results of operations or liquidity. There are no assurances that the Company could favorably resolve such a situation.
As security for our obligations under the Credit Agreement, we have pledged all of the shares of our U.S. subsidiaries and 65% of the shares of our non-U.S. subsidiaries and have granted the lenders a security interest in substantially all the assets of our U.S. subsidiaries.
The 13 1/8% Notes and 10% Notes are unconditionally guaranteed, on a joint and several basis, by the following wholly owned U.S. subsidiaries of the Company: Knowles Electronics LLC, Knowles Intermediate Holding, Inc., Emkay Innovative Products, Inc. and Knowles Manufacturing Ltd. The following tables present summarized balance sheet information of the Company as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and summarized
54
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
income statement and cash flow information for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002, and 2001. The column labeled Parent Company represents the holding company for each of the Companys direct subsidiaries which are guarantors of the Notes, all of which are wholly owned by the parent company; and the column labeled Nonguarantors represents wholly owned subsidiaries of the Guarantors which are not guarantors of the Notes. The Company believes that separate financial statements and other disclosures regarding the Guarantors, except as otherwise required under Regulation S-X, are not material to investors.
Summarized information as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and for the three years ended December 31, 2003, is as follows:
December 31, 2003 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Parent | Guarantors | Non-Guarantors | Eliminations | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||
Cash
|
$ | 866 | $ | 5,627 | $ | 4,734 | $ | | $ | 11,227 | ||||||||||
Accounts receivable
|
| 29,333 | 60,541 | (66,746 | ) | 23,128 | ||||||||||||||
Inventories
|
| 6,047 | 11,326 | | 17,373 | |||||||||||||||
Assets of discontinued operations
|
| | | | | |||||||||||||||
Other current assets
|
| 1,169 | 3,854 | | 5,023 | |||||||||||||||
Net property, plant and equipment
|
| 25,609 | 19,896 | | 45,505 | |||||||||||||||
Assets held for sale, net of impairment
|
| | | | | |||||||||||||||
Investment in and advances to subsidiaries
|
101,347 | 358,574 | 2,443 | (462,364 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Deferred finance costs, net
|
7,168 | | | | 7,168 | |||||||||||||||
Deferred income taxes
|
| | | | | |||||||||||||||
Other non-current assets
|
| 2,969 | 180 | | 3,149 | |||||||||||||||
Total assets
|
$ | 109,381 | $ | 429,328 | $ | 102,974 | $ | (529,110 | ) | $ | 112,573 | |||||||||
Accounts payable
|
$ | | $ | 32,642 | $ | 45,376 | $ | (66,746 | ) | $ | 11,272 | |||||||||
Accrued restructuring costs
|
| 1,490 | | | 1,490 | |||||||||||||||
Advances from parent
|
217,164 | 90,385 | 350 | (307,899 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Liabilities of discontinued operations
|
| | | | | |||||||||||||||
Other current liabilities
|
4,875 | 15,761 | 5,244 | | 25,880 | |||||||||||||||
Short-term debt
|
| | | | | |||||||||||||||
Deferred income taxes
|
| | 968 | | 968 | |||||||||||||||
Noncurrent liabilities
|
| 9,043 | 3,714 | | 12,757 | |||||||||||||||
Notes payable
|
288,180 | | | | 288,180 | |||||||||||||||
Preferred stock
|
284,401 | | | | 284,401 | |||||||||||||||
Stockholders equity (deficit)
|
(685,239 | ) | 280,007 | 47,322 | (154,465 | ) | (512,375 | ) | ||||||||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
(deficit)
|
$ | 109,381 | $ | 429,328 | $ | 102,974 | $ | (529,110 | ) | $ | 112,573 | |||||||||
55
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2002 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Parent | Guarantors | Non-Guarantors | Eliminations | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||
Cash
|
$ | 9,614 | $ | 7,578 | $ | 6,687 | $ | | $ | 23,879 | ||||||||||
Accounts receivable
|
| 28,512 | 45,217 | (52,645 | ) | 21,084 | ||||||||||||||
Inventories
|
| 8,072 | 11,389 | 159 | 19,620 | |||||||||||||||
Other current assets
|
| 2,204 | 2,553 | | 4,757 | |||||||||||||||
Assets of discontinued operations
|
| 40,635 | 36,296 | (43,441 | ) | 33,490 | ||||||||||||||
Net property, plant and equipment
|
| 19,421 | 19,386 | (43 | ) | 38,764 | ||||||||||||||
Assets held for sale, net of impairment
|
| | | | | |||||||||||||||
Investment in and advances to subsidiaries
|
101,347 | 217,071 | 425 | (318,843 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Deferred finance costs, net
|
8,058 | | | | 8,058 | |||||||||||||||
Deferred income taxes
|
| | | | | |||||||||||||||
Other non-current assets
|
| 996 | 191 | | 1,187 | |||||||||||||||
Total assets
|
$ | 119,019 | $ | 324,489 | $ | 122,144 | $ | (414,813 | ) | $ | 150,839 | |||||||||
Accounts payable
|
$ | | $ | 33,187 | $ | 29,465 | $ | (51,791 | ) | $ | 10,861 | |||||||||
Accrued restructuring costs
|
| 1,045 | 152 | | 1,197 | |||||||||||||||
Advances from parent
|
137,293 | 45,373 | 2,650 | (185,316 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Other current liabilities
|
6,361 | 18,505 | 6,401 | (847 | ) | 30,420 | ||||||||||||||
Short-term debt
|
11,996 | | | | 11,996 | |||||||||||||||
Deferred income taxes
|
| | 541 | | 541 | |||||||||||||||
Liabilities of discontinued operations
|
| 10,186 | 19,758 | (16,791 | ) | 13,153 | ||||||||||||||
Noncurrent liabilities
|
| 10,101 | 4,548 | | 14,649 | |||||||||||||||
Notes payable
|
327,626 | | | | 327,626 | |||||||||||||||
Preferred stock
|
258,547 | | | | 258,547 | |||||||||||||||
Stockholders equity (deficit)
|
(622,804 | ) | 206,092 | 58,629 | (160,068 | ) | (518,151 | ) | ||||||||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
(deficit)
|
$ | 119,019 | $ | 324,489 | $ | 122,144 | $ | (414,813 | ) | $ | 150,839 | |||||||||
56
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2003 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Parent | Guarantors | Non-Guarantors | Eliminations | Consolidated | |||||||||||||||||
Net Sales
|
$ | | $ | 140,399 | $ | 165,808 | $ | (152,165 | ) | $ | 154,042 | ||||||||||
Cost of sales
|
| 84,311 | 142,411 | (151,128 | ) | 75,594 | |||||||||||||||
Gross margin
|
| 56,088 | 23,397 | (1,037 | ) | 78,448 | |||||||||||||||
Selling, research and administrative expenses
|
| 33,607 | 6,905 | (555 | ) | 39,957 | |||||||||||||||
Restructuring activity
|
| 1,617 | (85 | ) | | 1,532 | |||||||||||||||
Operating income
|
| 20,864 | 16,577 | (482 | ) | 36,959 | |||||||||||||||
Other income (expense):
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Interest income
|
| 134 | 46 | (69 | ) | 111 | |||||||||||||||
Interest expense
|
(36,231 | ) | (56 | ) | (117 | ) | 569 | (35,835 | ) | ||||||||||||
Dividend income
|
| 46,290 | | (46,290 | ) | | |||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations before
income taxes
|
(36,231 | ) | 67,232 | 16,506 | (46,272 | ) | 1,235 | ||||||||||||||
Income taxes
|
| 1,500 | (1,991 | ) | | (491 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations after
income taxes
|
(36,231 | ) | 68,732 | 14,515 | (46,272 | ) | 744 | ||||||||||||||
Income from discontinued operations after income
taxes
|
| 27,743 | 559 | (376 | ) | 27,926 | |||||||||||||||
Net income (loss)
|
$ | (36,231 | ) | $ | 96,475 | $ | 15,074 | $ | (46,648 | ) | $ | 28,670 | |||||||||
57
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Year Ended December 31, 2002 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Parent | Guarantors | Non-Guarantors | Eliminations | Consolidated | |||||||||||||||||
Net Sales
|
$ | | $ | 120,352 | $ | 161,911 | $ | (118,144 | ) | $ | 164,119 | ||||||||||
Cost of sales
|
| 75,847 | 129,723 | (117,600 | ) | 87,970 | |||||||||||||||
Gross margin
|
| 44,505 | 32,188 | (544 | ) | 76,149 | |||||||||||||||
Selling, research and administrative expenses
|
| 31,739 | 11,704 | (727 | ) | 42,716 | |||||||||||||||
Loss on sale of business
|
| | 16,736 | | 16,736 | ||||||||||||||||
Restructuring activity
|
| 1,139 | 925 | 48 | 2,112 | ||||||||||||||||
Operating income
|
| 11,627 | 2,823 | 135 | 14,585 | ||||||||||||||||
Other income (expense):
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Interest income
|
| 2,305 | 431 | (2,607 | ) | 129 | |||||||||||||||
Interest expense
|
(34,106 | ) | (1,382 | ) | (1,009 | ) | 2,606 | (33,891 | ) | ||||||||||||
Dividend income
|
3,380 | 12,280 | | (15,660 | ) | | |||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations before
taxes
|
(30,726 | ) | 24,830 | 2,245 | (15,526 | ) | (19,177 | ) | |||||||||||||
Income taxes
|
| (6,858 | ) | (4,886 | ) | | (11,744 | ) | |||||||||||||
Loss from continuing operations after income tax
|
(30,726 | ) | 17,972 | (2,641 | ) | (15,526 | ) | (30,921 | ) | ||||||||||||
Income from discontinued operations
|
| 4,205 | 2,413 | (73 | ) | 6,545 | |||||||||||||||
Net income (loss)
|
$ | (30,726 | ) | $ | 22,177 | $ | (228 | ) | $ | (15,599 | ) | $ | (24,376 | ) | |||||||
58
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Year Ended December 31, 2001 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Parent | Guarantors | Non-Guarantors | Eliminations | Consolidated | |||||||||||||||||
Net Sales
|
$ | | $ | 136,809 | $ | 144,718 | $ | (108,411 | ) | $ | 173,116 | ||||||||||
Cost of sales
|
| 85,470 | 112,437 | (107,202 | ) | 90,705 | |||||||||||||||
Gross margin
|
| 51,339 | 32,281 | (1,209 | ) | 82,411 | |||||||||||||||
Selling, research and administrative expenses
|
| 32,626 | 15,311 | (672 | ) | 47,265 | |||||||||||||||
Restructuring activity
|
| 2,220 | (2,399 | ) | | (179 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Operating income
|
| 16,493 | 19,369 | (537 | ) | 35,325 | |||||||||||||||
Other income (expense):
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Interest income
|
79 | 1,634 | 443 | (2,017 | ) | 139 | |||||||||||||||
Interest expense
|
(37,653 | ) | (922 | ) | (1,003 | ) | 1,912 | (37,666 | ) | ||||||||||||
Miscellaneous, net
|
| | | | | ||||||||||||||||
Dividend income
|
| 29,804 | | (29,804 | ) | | |||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations before
taxes
|
(37,574 | ) | 47,009 | 18,809 | (30,446 | ) | (2,202 | ) | |||||||||||||
Income taxes
|
| (796 | ) | (5,517 | ) | | (6,313 | ) | |||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations
after income tax
|
(37,574 | ) | 46,213 | 13,292 | (30,446 | ) | (8,515 | ) | |||||||||||||
Income from discontinued operations
|
| 5,241 | 1,227 | 568 | 7,036 | ||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss)
|
$ | (37,574 | ) | $ | 51,454 | $ | 14,519 | $ | (29,878 | ) | $ | (1,479 | ) | ||||||||
59
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2003 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Parent | Guarantors | Non-Guarantors | Eliminations | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) continuing
operating activities
|
$ | (34,418 | ) | $ | 45,705 | $ | 20,933 | $ | (25,080 | ) | $ | 7,140 | ||||||||
Net cash provided by discontinued activities
|
| 1,625 | 2,346 | | 3,971 | |||||||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) operating
activities
|
(34,418 | ) | 47,330 | 23,279 | (25,080 | ) | 11,111 | |||||||||||||
Proceeds from sales of businesses and equipment
|
| 45,245 | | | 45,245 | |||||||||||||||
Equity contributions into subsidiaries
|
| (6,450 | ) | | 6,450 | | ||||||||||||||
Purchases of property, plant and equipment, net
|
| (12,521 | ) | (2,255 | ) | | (14,776 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) investing
activities
|
| 26,274 | (2,255 | ) | 6,450 | 30,469 | ||||||||||||||
Debt payments long term
|
(87,102 | ) | | | | (87,102 | ) | |||||||||||||
Debt proceeds long term
|
35,000 | | | | 35,000 | |||||||||||||||
Debt proceeds (payments) short term,
net
|
| | | | | |||||||||||||||
Common stock transactions
|
(350 | ) | | | | (350 | ) | |||||||||||||
Intercompany loans
|
79,871 | (75,555 | ) | (4,316 | ) | | | |||||||||||||
Costs associated with debt
|
(1,749 | ) | | | | (1,749 | ) | |||||||||||||
Intercompany dividends
|
| | (25,080 | ) | 25,080 | | ||||||||||||||
Equity contributions into subsidiaries
|
| | 6,450 | (6,450 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing
activities
|
25,670 | (75,555 | ) | (22,946 | ) | 18,630 | (54,201 | ) | ||||||||||||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash
|
| | (31 | ) | | (31 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net change in cash and cash equivalents
|
(8,748 | ) | (1,951 | ) | (1,953 | ) | | (12,652 | ) | |||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
9,614 | 7,578 | 6,687 | | 23,879 | |||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$ | 866 | $ | 5,627 | $ | 4,734 | $ | | $ | 11,227 | ||||||||||
60
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Year Ended December 31, 2002 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Parent | Guarantors | Non-Guarantors | Eliminations | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||
Net cash provided by continuing operating
activities
|
$ | (30,495 | ) | $ | 56,719 | $ | 8,788 | $ | (12,280 | ) | $ | 22,732 | ||||||||
Net cash provided by discontinued operating
activities
|
| 8,026 | (1,079 | ) | | 6,947 | ||||||||||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
(30,495 | ) | 64,745 | 7,709 | (12,280 | ) | 29,679 | |||||||||||||
Proceeds from sales of property
|
| | 3,560 | | 3,560 | |||||||||||||||
Equity contributions into subsidiaries
|
| (2,690 | ) | | 2,690 | | ||||||||||||||
Purchases of property, plant and equipment, net
|
| (4,345 | ) | (4,082 | ) | | (8,427 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net cash used in investing activities
|
| (7,035 | ) | (522 | ) | 2,690 | (4,867 | ) | ||||||||||||
Debt payments long term
|
(10,541 | ) | | | | (10,541 | ) | |||||||||||||
Debt proceeds long term
|
10,000 | | 55 | | 10,055 | |||||||||||||||
Debt proceeds (payments) short term,
net
|
(2,000 | ) | | 4 | | (1,996 | ) | |||||||||||||
Common stock transactions
|
(400 | ) | | | | (400 | ) | |||||||||||||
Intercompany loans
|
43,726 | (44,721 | ) | 995 | | | ||||||||||||||
Costs associated with debt
|
(681 | ) | | | | (681 | ) | |||||||||||||
Intercompany dividends
|
| (5,651 | ) | (6,629 | ) | 12,280 | | |||||||||||||
Equity contributions into subsidiaries
|
| | 2,690 | (2,690 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing
activities
|
40,104 | (50,372 | ) | (2,885 | ) | 9,590 | (3,563 | ) | ||||||||||||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash
|
| | 600 | | 600 | |||||||||||||||
Net change in cash and cash equivalents
|
9,609 | 7,338 | 4,902 | | 21,849 | |||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
5 | 240 | 1,785 | | 2,030 | |||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$ | 9,614 | $ | 7,578 | $ | 6,687 | $ | | $ | 23,879 | ||||||||||
61
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Year Ended December 31, 2001 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Parent | Guarantors | Non-Guarantors | Eliminations | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||
Net cash provided by continuing operating
activities
|
$ | (35,113 | ) | $ | 60,117 | $ | 1,366 | $ | (29,856 | ) | $ | (3,486 | ) | |||||||
Net cash provided by discontinued operating
activities
|
| 8,739 | 4,563 | | 13,302 | |||||||||||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
(35,113 | ) | 68,856 | 5,929 | (29,856 | ) | 9,816 | |||||||||||||
Proceeds from sales of property
|
| 182 | 3,480 | | 3,662 | |||||||||||||||
Equity contributions into subsidiaries
|
| (8,002 | ) | | 8,002 | | ||||||||||||||
Purchases of property, plant and equipment, net
|
| (13,674 | ) | (7,602 | ) | | (21,276 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net cash used in investing activities
|
| (21,494 | ) | (4,122 | ) | 8,002 | (17,614 | ) | ||||||||||||
Debt payments long term
|
(9,375 | ) | | | | (9,375 | ) | |||||||||||||
Debt proceeds long term
|
2,000 | | 2,034 | | 4,034 | |||||||||||||||
Common stock transactions
|
(175 | ) | | | | (175 | ) | |||||||||||||
Intercompany loans
|
36,228 | (35,588 | ) | (640 | ) | | | |||||||||||||
Costs associated with debt
|
(636 | ) | | | | (636 | ) | |||||||||||||
Intercompany dividends
|
| (14,928 | ) | (14,928 | ) | 29,856 | | |||||||||||||
Equity contributions into subsidiaries
|
| | 8,002 | (8,002 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing
activities
|
28,042 | (50,516 | ) | (5,532 | ) | 21,854 | (6,152 | ) | ||||||||||||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash
|
| | (312 | ) | | (312 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net change in cash and cash equivalents
|
(7,071 | ) | (3,154 | ) | (4,037 | ) | | (14,262 | ) | |||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
7,076 | 3,394 | 5,822 | | 16,292 | |||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$ | 5 | $ | 240 | $ | 1,785 | $ | | $ | 2,030 | ||||||||||
62
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
7. Operating Leases
The Company leases various manufacturing facilities and office space. Future minimum payments under operating leases with initial terms of one year or more are as follows:
2004
|
$ | 523 | ||
2005
|
501 | |||
2006
|
300 | |||
2007
|
322 | |||
2008
|
320 | |||
Thereafter
|
2,391 | |||
$ | 4,357 | |||
Rent expense was $866, $1,179 and $1,823 for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002, and 2001, respectively.
8. Retirement Plans
The Company has defined-benefit plans covering approximately substantially all of its U.S., U.K. and Taiwanese employees. The U.S. Plan was amended effective January 1, 2002 to change the calculation of benefits for employees hired after May 1, 2002 to a cash balance benefit where the employees account is credited each year with a percentage of their salary based on their age and years of service. Additionally, any prior year accumulated benefit balance is credited with interest based on the ten year U.S. Treasury Notes rate. The pension benefit for employees age forty or older continues to be calculated under the previous method generally based on salary and years of service. Employees under age forty have their benefit under the previous method frozen as of December 31, 2001 and start accruing a benefit under the cash balance formula starting January 1, 2002. Annual contributions to retirement plans equal or exceed the minimum funding requirements of applicable local regulations.
63
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table provides a reconciliation of the changes in the plans benefit obligations and fair value of assets for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002 as well as a statement of the funded status and balance sheet reporting for these plans as of December 31, 2003 and 2002:
U.S. Plan | Foreign Plans | ||||||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2003 | 2002 | ||||||||||||||
Change in benefit obligation:
|
|||||||||||||||||
Benefit obligation at beginning of year
|
$ | 65,223 | $ | 56,935 | $ | 11,870 | $ | 10,069 | |||||||||
Service cost
|
1,618 | 1,738 | 197 | 188 | |||||||||||||
Interest cost
|
3,830 | 4,052 | 615 | 579 | |||||||||||||
Plan participants contributions
|
| | 42 | 36 | |||||||||||||
Plan amendment
|
| (103 | ) | | | ||||||||||||
Curtailment(1)
|
(3,641 | ) | | | | ||||||||||||
Actuarial loss (gain)
|
1,398 | 5,225 | 825 | 1,534 | |||||||||||||
Foreign currency exchange rate change
|
| | 30 | 20 | |||||||||||||
Benefits paid
|
(3,118 | ) | (2,624 | ) | (437 | ) | (556 | ) | |||||||||
Benefit obligation at end of year
|
$ | 65,310 | $ | 65,223 | $ | 13,142 | $ | 11,870 | |||||||||
Change in plan assets:
|
|||||||||||||||||
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year
|
$ | 44,160 | $ | 53,176 | $ | 7,774 | $ | 9,473 | |||||||||
Adjustment to fair asset value disclosed
|
| (4 | ) | 10 | | ||||||||||||
Actual return on plan assets
|
8,715 | (6,388 | ) | 1,427 | (1,461 | ) | |||||||||||
Employer contributions
|
| | 351 | 272 | |||||||||||||
Plan participants contributions
|
| | 42 | 36 | |||||||||||||
Foreign currency exchange rate change
|
| | 16 | 10 | |||||||||||||
Benefits paid
|
(3,118 | ) | (2,624 | ) | (437 | ) | (556 | ) | |||||||||
Fair value of plan assets at end of year
|
$ | 49,757 | $ | 44,160 | $ | 9,184 | $ | 7,774 | |||||||||
Funded status
|
|||||||||||||||||
Funded status
|
$ | (15,553 | ) | $ | (21,063 | ) | $ | (3,958 | ) | $ | (4,096 | ) | |||||
Unrecognized actuarial (gain) loss
|
6,542 | 13,069 | 5,958 | 6,310 | |||||||||||||
Unrecognized transition asset
|
| | 92 | 100 | |||||||||||||
Unrecognized prior service cost
|
275 | 505 | | | |||||||||||||
Accrued pension cost before additional minimum
liability
|
(8,736 | ) | (7,489 | ) | 2,092 | 2,315 | |||||||||||
Additional minimum liability
|
(950 | ) | (2,387 | ) | (5,806 | ) | (6,366 | ) | |||||||||
Accrued pension cost after additional minimum
liability
|
$ | (9,686 | ) | $ | (9,876 | ) | $ | (3,714 | ) | $ | (4,051 | ) | |||||
Amounts recognized in the balance sheets:
|
|||||||||||||||||
Prepaid benefit cost
|
$ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | |||||||||
Accrued benefit cost
|
(9,686 | ) | (9,876 | ) | (3,714 | ) | (4,051 | ) | |||||||||
Intangible assets
|
275 | 505 | | | |||||||||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
675 | 1,883 | 5,806 | 6,366 | |||||||||||||
Net amount recognized
|
$ | (8,736 | ) | $ | (7,488 | ) | $ | 2,092 | $ | 2,315 | |||||||
(1) | Curtailment relates to the sale of the Synchro-Start business in 2003. |
64
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The funded status of the Companys defined benefit pension plans at December 31, 2003, reflects the effects of negative returns experienced in the global capital markets over the past several years and a decline in the discount rate used to estimate the pension liability. As a result, the accumulated benefit obligation of certain U.S. and foreign plans exceeded the fair value of plan assets. As a result, the Company recorded a minimum pension liability of approximately $6.5 million in the Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 2003. The projected benefit obligation, accumulated benefit obligation and fair value of plan assets for pension plans with an accumulated benefit obligation in excess of plan assets as of December 31, 2003 and 2002 was:
U.S. Plan | Foreign Plans | |||||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2003 | 2002 | |||||||||||||
Projected benefit obligation
|
$ | 65,310 | $ | 65,223 | $ | 13,142 | $ | 11,870 | ||||||||
Accumulated benefit obligation
|
59,443 | 54,036 | 12,899 | 11,825 | ||||||||||||
Fair value of plan assets
|
49,757 | 44,160 | 9,184 | 7,774 |
The following table provides the components of net periodic benefit costs for the plans for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001:
U.S. Plan | Foreign Plans | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Components of net periodic benefit cost:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Service cost
|
$ | 1,618 | $ | 1,738 | $ | 1,774 | $ | 239 | $ | 224 | $ | 255 | |||||||||||||
Interest cost
|
3,830 | 4,052 | 3,828 | 615 | 579 | 608 | |||||||||||||||||||
Expected return on plan assets
|
(4,431 | ) | (4,729 | ) | (4,668 | ) | (582 | ) | (726 | ) | (853 | ) | |||||||||||||
Amortization of prior service cost
|
92 | 111 | 229 | | | | |||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of transitional asset
|
| | | 10 | 3 | (21 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Recognized actuarial (gain) or loss
|
| (312 | ) | (491 | ) | 326 | 121 | 21 | |||||||||||||||||
Expected contributions from employees
|
| | | (42 | ) | (36 | ) | (45 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Net periodic benefit cost
|
$ | 1,109 | $ | 860 | $ | 672 | $ | 566 | $ | 165 | $ | (35 | ) | ||||||||||||
FAS 88 curtailment cost
|
138 | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||
Total expense
|
$ | 1,247 | $ | 860 | $ | 672 | $ | 566 | $ | 165 | $ | (35 | ) | ||||||||||||
The following table presents the assumptions used in determining benefit obligations as of December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 and the net periodic costs amounts for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001:
U.S. Plan | Foreign Plans | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted-average assumption for benefit
obligations at year end:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Discount rate
|
6.00% | 6.60% | 7.25% | 5.27% | 5.32% | 5.89% | |||||||||||||||||||
Rate of compensation increase
|
4.90% | 4.90% | 5.20% | 4.17% | 3.72% | 4.00% | |||||||||||||||||||
Weighted-average assumption for net periodic cost
for the year:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Discount rate
|
6.60% | 7.25% | 7.50% | 5.32% | 5.89% | 6.00% | |||||||||||||||||||
Expected return on plan assets
|
8.00% | 8.00% | 8.00% | 7.51% | 7.55% | 7.79% | |||||||||||||||||||
Rate of compensation increase
|
4.90% | 5.20% | 6.00% | 3.72% | 4.00% | 4.45% |
65
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table reflects the U.S. pension plans actual asset allocation as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and target allocation as of December 31, 2003:
Actual | Actual | |||||||||||
Asset category | Target | 2003 | 2002 | |||||||||
Equity securities
|
70 | % | 72 | % | 66 | % | ||||||
Debt securities
|
30 | % | 28 | % | 34 | % | ||||||
Real estate
|
0 | % | 0 | % | 0 | % | ||||||
Other
|
0 | % | 0 | % | 0 | % | ||||||
Total
|
100 | % | 100 | % | 100 | % | ||||||
To the extent that the actual allocation of plan assets differs from the targeted allocation by more that 5% for any category, plan assets are re-balanced. The Company establishes its estimated long-term return on plan assets considering various factors, which include the targeted asset allocation percentages, historic returns, and expected future returns. Specifically, the factors are considered in the fourth quarter of the year preceding the year for which those assumptions are applied.
The Company has a defined-contribution plan covering substantially all of its U.S. employees. The plan has funding provisions which, in certain situations, require Company contributions based upon a formula relating to employee gross wages, participant contributions, or hours worked. The plan also allows for additional discretionary Company contributions based upon profitability. The contributions made by the Company to the plan for 2003, 2002 and 2001 were $470, $482 and $568, respectively.
9. Stock Options
The Company implemented the 2001 Stock Option Plan (Option Plan) during 2001, and authorized 375,000 options. Eligibility for the Option Plan is recommended by the Chief Executive Officer and approved by the Board of Directors. Options are for shares of Class A Common Stock and are exercisable only from and after an initial public offering (IPO) at a price per share equal to eighty percent of the price per share which the underwriters pay for the stock in connection with an initial public offering. Options are exercisable for fifty percent (50%) of the shares on the second anniversary of the grant, and for one hundred percent (100%) of the shares after the third anniversary of the grant. Options expire ten years from the date of the grant. The options that had been granted and were outstanding were 263,058 and 337,689 as of December 31, 2003 and 2002 respectively. During 2003, 87,631 options were cancelled and 13,000 options were granted. The Company will record a charge for the difference between the exercise price and the IPO price of these options upon the completion of the IPO.
10. Segments and Geographical Information
The Companys continuing business consists of one operating segment known as Microacoustics. In the third quarter of 2003 after the sale of the Synchro-Start and Infrared operations, the Company reviewed its segment reporting under SFAS No. 131, Disclosure about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information, and concluded that the operating results of the Company should be reported as a single operating segment. Previously, the Company reported three operating segments: hearing aid components, acoustic and infrared technology, and automotive components. The Synchro-Start division was sold May 30, 2003, and was part of the Companys Automotive Components reporting segment. The two businesses that once made up this reporting segment have now been sold. The 2002 amounts for Automotive Components represent the Ruf business. The Infrared business was part of the Companys Acoustic and Infrared Technology reporting segment. (see footnote 3. Discontinued Operations.) As a result of this change, segment information for the prior year has been restated to reflect the Microacoustic segment.
66
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The Microacoustic operating segment utilizes the Companys acoustic technologies to design, manufacture, and market transducers and other components for hearing aids, mobile communications and computer telephony integration telematics (voice controlled wireless services delivered to an automobile environment).
The Company uses the following financial information presented below to assess performance and make resource allocation decisions:
Ruf | |||||||||||||
Microacoustics | Electronics | Total | |||||||||||
2003
|
|||||||||||||
Revenues from external customers
|
$ | 154,042 | $ | | $ | 154,042 | |||||||
Operating income (loss)
|
36,959 | | 36,959 | (1) | |||||||||
2002
|
|||||||||||||
Revenues from external customers
|
$ | 149,936 | $ | 14,183 | $ | 164,119 | |||||||
Operating income (loss)
|
32,631 | (1,310 | ) | 31,321 | |||||||||
2001
|
|||||||||||||
Revenues from external customers
|
$ | 155,117 | $ | 17,999 | $ | 173,116 | |||||||
Operating income (loss)
|
37,450 | (2,125 | ) | 35,325 |
(1) | A reconciliation of segment operating income (loss) and assets to the Companys consolidated totals follows below. |
The total assets of the microacoustics operating segment as of December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 were $112,573, $117,349 and $128,827, respectively. Depreciation expense associated with these assets was $7,443, $8,236 and $9,938 for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002, and 2001, respectively. Total capital expenditures for the microacoustic operating segment were $14,776, $6,734 and $18,563 for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002, and 2001, respectively.
The total assets of the Ruf Electronics business unit were $0, $0 and $18,303 as of December 31, 2003, 2002, and 2001, respectively. Depreciation expense associated with these assets was $0, $467 and $1,755 for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002, and 2001, respectively. The assets of the Ruf Electronics were sold in November 2002. The total capital expenditures for the Ruf Electronics business unit were $0, $1,693 and $2,713 for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002, and 2001.
In 2003, the Company announced the closure of its Elgin, Illinois facility and recorded restructuring expense of $1,479, which affected the microacoustic segment. The Company also recorded a final adjustment related to the restructuring of its worldwide manufacturing operations announced in 2000 of $53 which affected the microacoustic segment.
In 2002, the Company essentially finalized the restructuring of its worldwide manufacturing operations and recorded restructuring expenses of $2,112, which affected the operating segments as follows: microacoustics $2,064 and Ruf Electronics $48. The charge for microacoustics includes a loss on the sale of the Taiwan facility of $1,170. The Company also recorded a $16,736 loss on the sale of its Ruf operations.
In 2001, the Company continued with restructuring of its worldwide manufacturing operations announced in 2000 and recorded restructuring expenses of ($179), which affected the operating segments as follows: microacoustics ($968) and Ruf Electronics $789. The charge for microacoustics includes a gain on the sale of UK facility of $3,046.
67
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following is a reconciliation of segment operating income and assets to the Companys consolidated totals:
Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | |||||||||||
Profit or Loss
|
|||||||||||||
Total operating income for reportable segments
|
$ | 36,959 | $ | 31,321 | $ | 35,325 | |||||||
Loss on sale of business
|
| (16,736 | ) | | |||||||||
Total consolidated operating income
|
36,959 | 14,585 | 35,325 | ||||||||||
Other expense
|
(35,724 | ) | (33,762 | ) | (37,527 | ) | |||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations before
income taxes
|
$ | 1,235 | $ | (19,177 | ) | $ | (2,202 | ) | |||||
Assets
|
|||||||||||||
Microacoustic
|
$ | 112,573 | $ | 117,349 | |||||||||
Discontinued
|
| 33,490 | |||||||||||
Total consolidated assets
|
$ | 112,573 | $ | 150,839 | |||||||||
Geographic Information
|
|||||||||||||
Revenues (based invoicing location):
|
|||||||||||||
United States
|
$ | 88,022 | $ | 81,551 | $ | 107,160 | |||||||
Germany
|
| 14,183 | 17,999 | ||||||||||
United Kingdom
|
50,293 | 52,661 | 36,679 | ||||||||||
Other geographic areas
|
15,727 | 15,724 | 11,278 | ||||||||||
$ | 154,042 | $ | 164,119 | $ | 173,116 | ||||||||
Long Lived Assets
|
|||||||||||||
United States
|
$ | 28,578 | $ | 20,334 | |||||||||
Malaysia
|
11,489 | 10,650 | |||||||||||
China
|
6,591 | 6,732 | |||||||||||
Taiwan
|
1,528 | 1,650 | |||||||||||
Other geographic areas
|
468 | 585 | |||||||||||
$ | 48,654 | $ | 39,951 | ||||||||||
Major Customers |
The Company is dependent on sales of products to a small number of large customers. The Companys top ten customers accounted for approximately 80%, 81% and 81%, of consolidated sales in 2003, 2002, and 2001 respectively. Revenues from one customer accounted for approximately 24%, 20% and 18% of consolidated revenues in those same years and 19% and 21% of consolidated accounts receivable at December 31, 2003 and 2002 respectively.
68
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
11. Restructuring Expenses
November 2003 Elgin, Illinois Restructure |
The Company announced the closure of its Elgin, Illinois facility in November of 2003, which it expects to complete in September of 2004. Operations will be shifted to facilities in China, Malaysia and Itasca, Illinois, with 74 positions at the Elgin facility being eliminated. The Company recorded employee severance and outplacement expenses of $1,479 in accordance with SFAS No. 112 Employers Accounting for Post Retirement Benefits.
March 2000 Worldwide Restructure |
The Company announced a major restructuring in March 2000 under which the Company consolidated its worldwide manufacturing operations by ending production at five manufacturing facilities and either outsourced component production or moved final assembly to lower cost locations in Malaysia, China and Hungary. The following table presents the restructure costs and payments related to the March 2000 Restructure for 2003, 2002, 2001 and 2000.
Accrued | |||||||||
Restructure | Restructure | ||||||||
Expense | Liability | ||||||||
2000 Activity
|
|||||||||
Employee severance and outplacement
|
$ | 18,079 | $ | 18,079 | |||||
Pension curtailment
|
(3,221 | ) | | ||||||
Employee severance and outplacement payments
|
| (6,805 | ) | ||||||
Balance December 31, 2000
|
$ | 14,858 | 11,274 | ||||||
2001 Activity
|
|||||||||
Employee severance and outplacement
|
1,363 | 1,363 | |||||||
Employee outplacement costs
|
645 | | |||||||
Gain on sale of United Kingdom facility
|
(3,046 | ) | | ||||||
Facility closure costs and loss an disposal of
assets
|
199 | | |||||||
Inventory write-off
|
660 | | |||||||
Employee severance and outplacement payments
|
| (8,544 | ) | ||||||
Foreign currency translation
|
| (349 | ) | ||||||
Balance December 31, 2001
|
$ | (179 | ) | 3,744 | |||||
2002 Activity
|
|||||||||
Employee severance and outplacement
|
567 | 567 | |||||||
Inventory write-off
|
375 | | |||||||
Loss on sale of Taiwan facility
|
1,170 | | |||||||
Employee severance and outplacement payments
|
| (3,109 | ) | ||||||
Foreign currency translation
|
| (5 | ) | ||||||
Balance December 31, 2002
|
$ | 2,112 | 1,197 | ||||||
69
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Accrued | |||||||||
Restructure | Restructure | ||||||||
Expense | Liability | ||||||||
2003 Activity
|
|||||||||
Employee severance and outplacement
|
53 | 53 | |||||||
Employee severance and outplacement payments
|
(1,239 | ) | |||||||
$ | 53 | $ | 11 | ||||||
Of the total positions that were planned to be eliminated in the March 2000 restructuring, 678, 976, 1,072 and 1,072 had cumulatively been eliminated as of December 31, 2000, 2001, 2002 and 2003 respectively. The remaining liability balance was paid out in January 2004.
12. Commitments and Contingencies
Synchro-Start Divestiture Indemnifications. In connection with sale of the Synchro-Start business, the Company has agreed to indemnify certain tax obligations arising out of tax audits or administrative or court proceedings relating to tax returns for any periods ending on or prior to the closing date of the sale. The Company has also agreed to indemnify certain liabilities, losses or claims arising from presale operations, limited such that the Company is not liable for total claims under $250, is fully liable for claims totaling between $250 and $7.5 million, is 50% liable for total claims between $7.5 million and $12.5 million and is not liable for total claims exceeding $12.5 million. Proceeds from the Synchro-Start sale include $2.5 million in escrow for potential indemnification obligations. The Company considers it unlikely that a claim would be made of such magnitude that it would have a material impact on the Companys financial position.
The foregoing summary of the indemnities made by the Company in connection with the sale of the Synchro-Start business is qualified in its entirety by reference to the Stock Purchase Agreement Between and among Woodward Governor Company and Knowles Intermediate Holding, Inc. and Knowles Electronics Holdings, Inc. dated May 20, 2003 incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.25 to Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission June 16, 2003.
Ruwido (Infrared) Divestiture Indemnifications. In connection with the sale of the Ruwido business, the Company has agreed to indemnify certain liabilities, losses or claims up to a total of $100. The Company believes that any claim would not have a material impact on the Companys financial position.
The foregoing summary of the indemnities made by the Company in connection with the sale of the Ruwido business is qualified in its entirety by reference to the Share Deal agreed by and between Knowles Intermediate Holding, Inc. and FM Electronics-Holding GmbH and WEHA Holding GmbH dated July 29, 2003 incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.27, a copy of which was attached as an exhibit to the Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003.
Retention Incentive Plan. In 2003 the Company established the Retention Incentive Plan to provide key management employees with an incentive to remain in the employ of the Company. The Plan provides for a Retention Bonus Pool of $4.0 million to be paid on the earlier of an initial public offering, sale of the Company or August 31, 2008.
Other Commitments and Contingencies. The Company is involved in various lawsuits, claims, investigations and proceedings including patent and commercial matters that are in the ordinary course of business. The Company cannot at this time estimate with any certainty the impact of such matters on its financial position.
70
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Product Warranties. The Company provides an accrual for estimated future warranty costs at the time products are sold and periodically adjusts the accrual to reflect actual experience. The warranty on products sold generally extends from one to three years.
Changes in the Companys accrual for warranty during the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002 are as follows:
2003 | 2002 | |||||||
Beginning balance
|
$ | 4,438 | $ | 5,375 | ||||
Settlements made during the period
|
(1,321 | ) | (2,210 | ) | ||||
Provision for warranty liability on sales
|
1,601 | 2,301 | ||||||
Adjustments in estimates for pre-existing
warranties
|
(2,436 | ) | (1,028 | ) | ||||
Ending balance
|
$ | 2,282 | $ | 4,438 | ||||
Adjustments in pre-existing warranties in 2003 and 2002 were due to substantial improvements in the warranty experience of the Company after 2001.
13. Disposal of Long Lived Assets
In November 2002 the Company sold its Ruf Electronics operations, and recorded a loss of $16,736. The loss includes $1,186 of accumulated other comprehensive income relating to foreign currency translation. The proceeds from the sale were not material. The Company may receive additional payment amounts in 2004 and 2005 if the Ruf operations meet certain financial targets.
In December 2002, the Company sold its Taiwan facility as part of the restructuring plan announced in March 2000 and recorded a loss of $1,170 which is included in Restructuring Expenses in the Statement of Operations. Proceeds from the sale were $3,560.
71
Item 9. | Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure |
None.
Item 9A. | Controls and Procedures |
Under the supervision and with the participation of the Companys management, including the Companys Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, the Company evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2003. Based upon that evaluation, the Companys Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the Companys disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports it files is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms. There have been no changes in the Companys internal controls over financial reporting during the quarterly period ended December 31, 2003, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
PART III
Item 10. | Directors and Executive Officers |
Pursuant to Knowles by-laws, each of its directors is designated as a Class A director or a Class B director. Each Class A director is entitled to four votes and each Class B director is entitled to one vote. Knowles currently has five directors, three of whom are with Doughty Hanson (Kenneth Terry, Christopher Wallis and David Chalom). Set forth below is certain information with respect to our directors and officers.
Name | Age | Position | ||||
Kenneth John Terry
|
39 | Class A Director, Chairman of the Board | ||||
Christopher Wallis
|
45 | Class A Director | ||||
David Chalom
|
28 | Class A Director | ||||
James E. Knowles
|
73 | Class B Director | ||||
John J. Zei
|
59 | President and Chief Executive Officer, Class B Director | ||||
James H. Moyle
|
51 | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer | ||||
Louis T. Morabito
|
59 | Vice President of Operations | ||||
Jeffrey S. Niew
|
37 | Vice President and General Manager of Knowles Acoustics | ||||
Dennis R. Kirchhoefer
|
54 | Vice President Research & Development | ||||
Stephen D. Petersen
|
45 | Vice President Finance and Secretary |
Kenneth John Terry is a principal with Doughty Hanson & Co. Limited. Mr. Terry currently serves on the Board of Directors of Dunlop Standard Aerospace Group Limited, Ilford Imaging Limited, Impress Group B.V., RHM Limited, LM Group Holdings A/ S. He is a graduate of University of Leeds.
Christopher Wallis joined Doughty Hanson & Co Limited at its inception in 1990 and is a director, co-founder and has served as Senior Principal for 13 years. Mr. Wallis previously worked with the other co-founders of Doughty Hanson at Standard Chartered Bank since 1985, having previously been a corporate banking officer at Standard Chartered Bank in Hong Kong and the Middle East. He is a member of the Investment Committee of Doughty Hanson & Co. He is also a director of North American Membership Group, Inc., a Doughty Hanson & Co fund portfolio company. He holds a degree in Economics (M.A.) from Cambridge University.
David Chalom joined Doughty Hanson in September 1999, focusing on private equity transactions in North America. Prior to joining Doughty Hanson, Mr. Chalom worked for two years in the Investment
72
James E. Knowles is president of The Financial Corporation of Illinois. Prior to his current position, Mr. Knowles served as a Director of Knowles from 1987 to 1996. He served as Chairman of the Compensation Committee and the Audit Committee of Knowles from 1990 to 1996. Mr. Knowles also served as President of Synergistic International Ltd. from 1969 to 1996. Mr. Knowles holds a bachelor of science and a Master of Business Administration degree from Stanford University.
John J. Zei joined Knowles in January, 2000 as President and Chief Operating Officer. He was elected a Class B Director in March, 2000 and President and Chief Executive Officer as of April, 2000. Mr. Zei was with Siemens Hearing Instrument Corporation from 1987 to 1999 and served as President and Chief Executive Officer from 1990 through 1999. Prior to Siemens, John was with Beltone Electronics from 1976 to 1987. Mr. Zei is a graduate of Loyola University, Loyola University School of Law and the University of Chicago.
James H. Moyle joined Knowles in July of 2002 as Vice President & Chief Financial Officer. Prior to joining Knowles, he was Senior Vice President & Chief Financial Officer of Contech Construction Products, the nations leading supplier of civil engineering site solutions. He is a graduate of Bethany College and the University of Pennsylvania.
Louis T. Morabito Vice President of Operations joined Knowles in 1996. Prior to joining Knowles he was Director of Operations for US Robotics, and Director Operations for a subsidiary of United Technologies Corporation. He is a graduate of the University of Bridgeport, and has an Executive MBA from the University of New Haven in Connecticut.
Jeffrey S. Niew joined Knowles in May 2000 as Director of Advanced Products for Knowles Acoustics. He was promoted to Vice President and General Manager of Knowles Acoustics in November of 2002. Prior to Knowles, Mr. Niew has held various management positions in product development, operations, sales, and product management. He spent 1995 to 2000 with Littelfuse, Inc. Prior to Littelfuse, he was with Hewlett Packards (now Agilent) from 1988 to 1995. Mr. Niew is a graduate of University of Illinois at Chicago, College of Mechanical Engineering.
Dennis R. Kirchhoefer joined Knowles in December of 1992 as Engineering Manage, was promoted to Director of Research & Development in March of 2000 and Vice President of Research & Development in May of 2003. He was with Electro-Voice (EV) Inc. from 1984 to 1992 and served as Chief Acoustic Engineer. Prior to Electro-Voice he was with Shure Brothers Inc., now known as Shure. Mr. Kirchhoefer is a graduate of DeVry and Southwestern Illinois University.
Stephen D. Petersen joined Knowles in 1980 and served in various accounting positions including Assistant Treasurer and Vice President Controller of KE. He was promoted to Vice President Finance in 1999. Mr. Petersen is a graduate of Augustana College, holds a Master of Management degree from Northwestern University, and is a certified public accountant.
Audit Committee |
The Company is not a listed company under SEC rules and is therefore not required to have an audit committee comprised of independent directors. The Company does not currently have an audit committee and does not have an audit committee financial expert. The Board of Directors has determined that each of its members is able to read and understand fundamental financial statements and has substantial business experience that results in that members financial sophistication. Accordingly, the Board of Directors believes that each of its members have the sufficient knowledge and experience necessary to fulfill the duties and obligations that an audit committee would have.
73
Code of Ethics |
The Company has adopted a code of ethics that applies to officers (including its chief executive officer, chief financial officer, chief accounting officer, senior executive officers and persons performing similar functions) and employees. The Company has filed a copy of the code of ethics as Exhibit 14.1 to this Form 10-K and copies are available upon request.
Item 11. | Executive Compensation |
Summary Compensation Table |
The following table provides information concerning the compensation we paid to our senior officers for 2003, 2002 and 2001:
Long-Term | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Annual Compensation | Compensation | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Securities | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Annual | Underlying | All Other | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Name and Principal Position | Year | Salary | Bonus | Compensation | Options/SARs | Compensation(1) | |||||||||||||||||||
John J. Zei
|
2003 | $ | 440,884 | $ | 686,973 | $ | | $ | | $ | 8,325 | ||||||||||||||
President and Chief Executive Officer
|
2002 | 430,533 | 300,000 | | | 282,480 | |||||||||||||||||||
2001 | 417,194 | 125,000 | | | 6,058 | ||||||||||||||||||||
James H. Moyle
|
2003 | 275,522 | 468,516 | | | 366,480 | |||||||||||||||||||
Executive Vice President &
|
2002 | 127,413 | | | | 23,598 | |||||||||||||||||||
Chief Financial Officer
|
2001 | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||
Louis T. Morabito
|
2003 | 171,840 | 199,959 | 11,073 | (2) | | 7,477 | ||||||||||||||||||
Vice President of Operations
|
2002 | 161,720 | | | | 6,904 | |||||||||||||||||||
2001 | 158,850 | 50,000 | | | 5,830 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Jeffrey S. Niew
|
2003 | 178,391 | 171,128 | | | 3,886 | |||||||||||||||||||
Vice President & General Manager
|
2002 | 146,247 | | | | 3,912 | |||||||||||||||||||
Knowles Acoustics
|
2001 | 125,941 | 10,233 | | | 4,024 | |||||||||||||||||||
Dennis R. Kirchhoefer
|
2003 | 161,357 | 103,373 | | | 5,577 | |||||||||||||||||||
Vice President R&D
|
2002 | 143,603 | 50,000 | | | 4,159 | |||||||||||||||||||
2001 | 139,264 | 20,000 | | | 4,644 |
(1) | The following chart is a breakdown of the payments made to the executive officers under the heading All Other Compensation. The Company also made contributions to the Knowles Electronics, LLC. Employee Retirement Savings 401(k) Plan on behalf of the executive officers and paid life insurance premiums on behalf of the executive officers in the amounts set fourth in the chart. |
(2) | Short-term disability compensation. |
74
Knowles | Life | Relocation/ | |||||||||||||||||||
Special | 401(k) Plan | Insurance | Moving | ||||||||||||||||||
Executive | Year | Bonus | Contributions | Premiums | Expenses | ||||||||||||||||
John J. Zei
|
2003 | $ | | $ | 6,000 | $ | 2,325 | $ | | ||||||||||||
President and Chief Executive Officer
|
2002 | 275,000 | 5,500 | 1,980 | | ||||||||||||||||
2001 | | 5,250 | 808 | | |||||||||||||||||
James H. Moyle
|
2003 | | 4,705 | 1,242 | 360,533 | (1) | |||||||||||||||
Executive Vice President &
|
2002 | | 612 | 518 | 22,468 | ||||||||||||||||
Chief Financial Officer
|
2001 | | | | | ||||||||||||||||
Louis T. Morabito
|
2003 | | 5,155 | 2,322 | | ||||||||||||||||
Vice President of Operations
|
2002 | | 4,582 | 2,322 | | ||||||||||||||||
2001 | | 5,250 | 580 | | |||||||||||||||||
Jeffrey S. Niew
|
2003 | | 3,601 | 285 | | ||||||||||||||||
Vice President & General Manager
|
2002 | | 3,912 | | | ||||||||||||||||
Knowles Acoustics
|
2001 | | 4,024 | | | ||||||||||||||||
Dennis R. Kirchhoefer
|
2003 | | 5,177 | 400 | | ||||||||||||||||
Vice President R&D
|
2002 | | 4,159 | | | ||||||||||||||||
2001 | 550 | 3,968 | 126 | |
(1) | Relocation expenses and gross-up for taxes. |
Retention Incentive Plan |
In 2003 the Company established the Retention Incentive Plan to provide key management employees with an incentive to remain in the employ of the Company. The Plan provides for a Retention Bonus Pool of $4.0 million to be allocated to participants based on their Retention Bonus Percentage with the resulting amount being each participants Retention Bonus. The Plan is unfunded, with any payments coming from the general assets of the Company. Participation and the Retention Bonus Percentage for each participant are determined by the compensation committee of the board of directors subject to the participant signing the Participation Agreement and Confidentiality/ Non-Competition/ Non-Solicitation Agreement. The Retention Bonus vests in 20% increments on the yearly anniversary over a five year period starting September 1, 2003. Full 100% vesting will occur at the earlier of a initial public offering, sale of the Company or August 31, 2008. Voluntary termination of employment by the participant for reason other than retirement causes the forfeiture of all vested and non-vested benefits under the Plan.
Retention bonuses awarded in 2003, with vesting and payment subject to the provisions of the Retention Incentive Plan, include:
John J. Zei
|
$ | 600,000 | ||
James H. Moyle
|
400,000 | |||
Louis T. Morabito
|
300,000 | |||
Jeffrey S. Niew
|
300,000 | |||
Dennis R. Kirchhoefer
|
300,000 |
75
Long-Term Incentive Plans Awards In Last Fiscal Year |
The following table presents the Value Enhancement Bonus Percentages awarded in 2003 under the Value Enhancement Bonus Plan which is described below:
Number of | Performance or | Estimated future payouts under non-stock | ||||||||||||||||||
shares, units or | other period until | price-based plans (in thousands)(1) | ||||||||||||||||||
other rights | maturation or | |||||||||||||||||||
Name | (%) | payout | Threshold ($) | Target ($) | Maximum ($) | |||||||||||||||
John J. Zei
|
20 | % | | $ | 2,000 | | | |||||||||||||
James H. Moyle
|
16 | % | | 1,600 | | | ||||||||||||||
Louis T. Morabito
|
10 | % | | 1,000 | | | ||||||||||||||
Jeffrey S. Niew
|
10 | % | | 1,000 | | | ||||||||||||||
Dennis R. Kirchhoefer
|
10 | % | | 1,000 | | |
(1) | The threshold payout assumes the minimum payment level is achieved, there is no target payout and maximum payout cannot be determined until the liquidity event proceeds, if any, are known. |
Value Enhancement Incentive Plan |
In 2003 the Company established the Value Enhancement Incentive Plan to motivate and reward key management employees for increasing the enterprise value of the Company. The Plan provides for a Value Enhancement Bonus Pool to be determined on the occurrence of an initial public offering or sale of the Company as follows:
Value Enhancement | ||
Liquidity Event Proceeds | Bonus Pool | |
Less than $212 million
|
None | |
Exceed $212 million but less than
$275 million
|
$10.0 million | |
Equal $275 million
|
$12.65 million | |
Exceed $275 million
|
$12.65 million plus 5% of the proceeds in excess of $275 million up to the sum of $275 million plus the redemption value of the Companys preferred stock and its accrued but unpaid dividends. |
A partial Liquidity Event will result in a prorated calculation of the Bonus Pool. The Bonus Pool will be allocated to participants based on their Value Enhancement Bonus Percentage with the resulting amount being each participants Value Enhancement Bonus. The Plan is unfunded, with any payments coming from the general assets of the Company. Participation and the Retention Bonus Percentage for each participant are determined by the compensation committee of the board of directors subject to the participant signing the Participation Agreement and Confidentiality/ Non-Competition/ Non-Solicitation Agreement.
76
Pension Plan |
The following table provides information concerning the estimated annual pension benefit we pay to U.S. employees of the Company on their retirement, based upon their years of service and their average monthly earnings prior to their retirement (as described below).
Years of Service | ||||||||||||||||||||
Renumeration | 15 | 20 | 25 | 30 | 35 | |||||||||||||||
$125,000
|
$ | 34,000 | $ | 45,000 | $ | 56,000 | $ | 56,000 | $ | 56,000 | ||||||||||
150,000
|
41,000 | 55,000 | 69,000 | 69,000 | 69,000 | |||||||||||||||
175,000
|
48,000 | 64,000 | 80,000 | 80,000 | 80,000 | |||||||||||||||
200,000
|
48,000 | 64,000 | 80,000 | 80,000 | 80,000 | |||||||||||||||
225,000
|
48,000 | 64,000 | 80,000 | 80,000 | 80,000 | |||||||||||||||
250,000
|
48,000 | 64,000 | 80,000 | 80,000 | 80,000 | |||||||||||||||
275,000
|
48,000 | 64,000 | 80,000 | 80,000 | 80,000 | |||||||||||||||
300,000
|
48,000 | 64,000 | 80,000 | 80,000 | 80,000 | |||||||||||||||
325,000
|
48,000 | 64,000 | 80,000 | 80,000 | 80,000 | |||||||||||||||
350,000
|
48,000 | 64,000 | 80,000 | 80,000 | 80,000 | |||||||||||||||
400,000
|
48,000 | 64,000 | 80,000 | 80,000 | 80,000 | |||||||||||||||
450,000
|
48,000 | 64,000 | 80,000 | 80,000 | 80,000 | |||||||||||||||
500,000
|
48,000 | 64,000 | 80,000 | 80,000 | 80,000 |
The U.S. pension plan, which became effective on July 1, 1963, is a non-contributory defined benefit plan covering U.S. employees. As of December 31, 2003, John Zei, James Moyle, Louis Morabito, Jeffery Niew, and Dennis Kirchhoefer. have 3, 1, 7, 3 and 11 credited years of service, respectively. Under the plan, a participant who terminates employment with a vested benefit, and either immediately or at a later date attains his or her early or normal retirement age is entitled to receive a monthly pension benefit commencing on his or her normal or deferred retirement date., which may be an early retirement date. Normal retirement is at age 65. However, early retirement may commence any first of the month following attainment of age 55, but benefits are actuarially reduced for early retirement. The Plan was amended effective January 1, 2002 to change the calculation of benefits for employees hired after May 1, 2002 to a cash balance benefit where the employees account is credited each year with a percentage of their salary based on their age and years of service. Additionally, any prior year accumulated benefit balance is credited with interest based on the ten year U.S. Treasury Notes. The pension benefit for employees age forty or older would continue to be calculated under the previous method generally based on salary and years of service. Employees under age forty would have their benefit under the previous method frozen as of December 31, 2001 and start accruing a benefit under the cash balance formula starting January 1, 2002. The retirement benefit for the executives listed would be calculated using the previous calculation, with the exception of Mr. Niew whose benefit under the previous calculation was frozen and is accruing a benefit under the cash balance formula. The previous retirement benefit payable under the plan is equal to 2% of a participants average monthly covered compensation during the five consecutive years during which such participant received his or her highest earnings within the ten year period ending on the date of termination, multiplied by credited service up to a maximum of twenty-five years, reduced by the participants Social Security offset allowance. Under the plan, the Social Security offset allowance is equal to the product of 0.65% multiplied by (i) the participants years of credited service up to a maximum of twenty-five years and (ii) the lessor of: (A) the participants average monthly earnings over the three years prior to termination or (B) 1/12th of the average of the Social Security taxable wage base for the 35 year period ending with the last day of the calendar year in which the participant attains Social Security retirement age.
Employment Agreements |
Effective January 3, 2000, John Zei became the President and Chief Operating Officer of Knowles, with an annual salary of $325,000, a signing bonus of $25,000 payable on the date Mr. Zei commenced his
77
In connection with the commencement of his employment, Knowles has agreed to loan Mr. Zei $300,000 to purchase Knowles common stock at fair market value, and Mr. Zei has purchased an additional $200,000 worth of common stock at fair market value with his own funds. The stock is subject to Stockholders and Registration Rights Agreements described under the heading Related Party Transactions. As of December 31, 2002, the Company deemed the note satisfied in its entirety. Mr. Zei received a special bonus related to interest on the note and income taxes of $275,000.
In July of 2002, James H. Moyle joined the Company as Vice President and Chief Financial Officer with an annual salary of $265,000 and eligibility to participate in certain bonus plans generally available for senior management employees. The Company agreed to reimburse Mr. Moyle for certain relocation expenses and in connection with his relocation provided a bridge loan of $900,000 which was repaid within one week. Mr. Moyle is also eligible to receive common stock of the Company of $200,000 and $150,000 as part of his incentive for 2002 and 2003, respectively.
Executive Stock Purchase Agreement |
In connection with the purchase of Class A Common Stock by members of management, each executive purchasing stock entered into an Executive Stock Purchase Agreement with Knowles and Key Acquisition, LLC. Among other things, the Executive Stock Purchase Agreements (i.) define Vested Stock, the Executives Put Option, and the Companys Call Option, (ii.) provides for restrictions on the executive from competing with Knowles or soliciting its employees and (iii.) provides for severance benefits to the executive under certain circumstances.
Compensation of Directors |
Following the Recapitalization, our directors no longer receive any fees or other compensation for services rendered in their capacity as directors.
Item 12. | Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management |
Set forth below is certain information, as of February 28, 2004, concerning (a) the beneficial ownership of our voting securities by entities and persons who beneficially own more than 5% of our voting securities and (b) the ownership of our securities by our executive officers and directors. The determinations of beneficial ownership of voting securities are based upon Rule 13d-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act). This rule provides that securities will be deemed to be beneficially owned where a person has, either solely or in conjunction with others, (1) the power to vote or to direct the voting of securities and/or the power to dispose or to direct the disposition of, the securities or (2) the right to acquire any such power within 60 days after the date such beneficial ownership is determined.
Amount | |||||||||
Beneficially | Percent | ||||||||
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner(1) | Owned(2) | of Class | |||||||
Key Acquisition, L.L.C.
|
800,000 | 83.6 | % | ||||||
c/o Doughty Hanson & Co. Limited
|
|||||||||
Times Place, 45 Pall Mall,
|
|||||||||
London SW1Y 5JG, England
|
|||||||||
Doughty Hanson & Co. Limited(3)
|
800,000 | 83.6 | % | ||||||
Times Place, 45 Pall Mall,
|
|||||||||
London SW1Y 5JG, England
|
(1) | After the Recapitalization, various members of the Knowles family and trusts for the benefit of members of the Knowles family hold in the aggregate 100,000 shares of common stock, or 10.4% of currently |
78
outstanding shares of common stock. Such stockholders have the right to elect one of our directors pursuant to a stockholders agreement with Key Acquisition, L.L.C. We have no reason to believe that various members of the Knowles family and trusts for the benefit of members of the Knowles family constitute a group, as that term is in Section 13(d)(3) of the Exchange Act. |
(2) | Class A Common Stock. |
(3) | Consists only of shares of Knowles owned by Key Acquisition, L.L.C., the majority of whose membership interests are held by limited partnerships for which Doughty Hanson acts as general partner. |
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF DIRECTORS AND MANAGEMENT
Amount | ||||||||||||
Beneficially | Percent | |||||||||||
Name of Beneficial Owner | Title of Class | Owned | of Class | |||||||||
James E. Knowles
|
Class A Common | 9,947 | 1.0 | |||||||||
Series A Preferred | 2,045 | 0.2 | ||||||||||
Kenneth John Terry
|
| | | |||||||||
Christopher Wallis
|
| | | |||||||||
David Chalom
|
| | | |||||||||
John J. Zei
|
Class A Common | 16,667 | 1.7 | |||||||||
James H. Moyle
|
| | | |||||||||
Louis T. Morabito
|
Class A Common | 5,000 | 0.5 | |||||||||
Jeffery S. Niew
|
Class A Common | 833 | 0.0 | |||||||||
Dennis R. Kirchhoefer
|
Class A Common | 1,667 | 0.2 | |||||||||
Stephen D. Petersen
|
Class A Common | 3,333 | 0.3 | |||||||||
Combined holdings of directors and executive
officers as a group
|
Class A Common | 67,447 | 7.0 | |||||||||
Series A Preferred | 2,045 | 0.2 |
Equity Compensation Plan Information
The Company implemented the 2001 Stock Option Plan (Option Plan) during 2001, and authorized 375,000 options. Eligibility for the Option Plan is recommended by the Chief Executive Officer and approved by the Board of Directors. Options are for shares of Class A Common Stock and are exercisable only from and after an initial public offering (IPO) at a price per share equal to eighty percent of the price per share which the underwriters pay for the stock in connection with an initial public offering. Options are exercisable for fifty percent (50%) of the shares on the second anniversary of the grant, and for one hundred percent (100%) of the shares after the third anniversary of the grant. Options expire ten years from the date of the grant.
Number of securities | Number of | |||||||||||
to be issued upon | securities remaining | |||||||||||
exercise of | Weighted average | available for future | ||||||||||
outstanding options | exercise price | issuance | ||||||||||
Equity compensation plans not approved by
securities holders
|
263,058 | (a | ) | 111,942 | ||||||||
(a) | The weighted average exercise price is based on an IPO transaction and is not determinable. |
79
Item 13. | Certain Relationships and Related Transactions |
Distribution of the Equipment Financing Business |
On June 29, 1999, Knowles equipment financing business (The Financial Corporation of Illinois), including certain parcels of real estate, were distributed to our preexisting stockholders, in redemption of 10% of the stock owned by those stockholders. James E. Knowles, one of our directors, is a stockholder of, and currently serves as the president of, The Financial Corporation of Illinois.
Service and Commission Agreements |
In connection with the Recapitalization, we entered into a Service Agreement dated June 23, 1999 (the Service Agreement) with Doughty Hanson & Co. Managers Limited (DHCM), a subsidiary of Doughty Hanson & Co. Limited, pursuant to which DHCM received a fee of $3,000,000 upon the successful completion of the Recapitalization for financial advisory services related to the Recapitalization. The Service Agreement made available the resources of DHCM concerning a variety of financial and operational matters including advice and assistance in negotiating the purchase of shares owned by the Knowles family.
Also in connection with the Recapitalization, we entered into a Commission Agreement dated June 23, 1999 (the Commission Agreement) with DHCM pursuant to which DHCM received a total aggregate commission of $2,000,000 upon the successful completion of the Recapitalization for its services in arranging the equity financing for the Recapitalization.
Stockholders and Registration Rights Agreements |
In connection with the Recapitalization, Knowles and the holders of its common stock, including Key Acquisition and certain members of management, entered into a stockholders agreement dated as of June 30, 1999 (the Stockholders Agreement) and a registration rights agreement dated as of June 30, 1999 (the Registration Rights Agreement). Among other things, the Stockholders Agreement and Registration Rights Agreement (i) impose certain restrictions on the transfer of shares of common stock by such holders and (ii) give such holders registration rights under certain circumstances. We will bear the costs of preparing and filing any such registration statement and will indemnify and hold harmless, to the extent customary and reasonable, holders selling shares covered by such a registration statement. Directors and executives of the company to date have purchased 69,167 shares of common stock which are subject to the Stockholders Agreement and Registration Rights Agreement.
Loan to John J. Zei |
In connection with the commencement of his employment, Knowles agreed to loan Mr. Zei $300,000 to purchase Knowles common stock at fair market value. As of December 31, 2002, the Company awarded Mr. Zei a bonus to retire the note and to pay interest and taxes totaling $275,000. (see the description of these items under Employment Arrangements).
Loan From Key Acquisition LLC |
The Company issued a $10 million Note to an affiliate of Doughty Hanson under a Note Purchase Agreement dated August 28, 2002. The Note is a general unsecured obligation of the Company, ranks subordinate to all Senior Indebtedness of the Company and pari passu to the 13 1/8% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2009.
Loan to James H. Moyle |
In connection with his relocation, the Company provided a bridge loan to Mr. Moyle of $900,000 in January 2003 which was repaid in one week.
80
Item 14. | Principal Accounting Fees and Services |
Independent Auditor Fee Information |
Fees for professional services provided by our independent auditors in each of the last two fiscal years, in each of the following categories (in thousands) are:
2003 | 2002 | |||||||
Audit fees
|
$ | 437 | $ | 601 | ||||
Audit-related fees
|
$ | 307 | $ | 198 | ||||
Tax fees
|
$ | 361 | $ | 299 | ||||
All other fees
|
$ | | $ | | ||||
$ | 1,105 | $ | 1,098 | |||||
Fees for audit services include fees associated with the annual audit, the review of the Companys quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, and statutory audits required internationally. Audit-related fees principally included accounting consultation related to divestitures. Tax fees included tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning, including expatriate tax services.
PART IV
Item 15. | Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K |
Page | ||||||||
a)
|
1. | Financial Statements | ||||||
Consolidated balance sheets December 31, 2003 and 2002 | 40 | |||||||
Consolidated statements of operations for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2003 | 41 | |||||||
Consolidated statements of changes in stockholders equity for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2003 | 42 | |||||||
Consolidated statements of cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2003 | 43 | |||||||
Notes to consolidated financial statements | 44 | |||||||
2. | Schedules | |||||||
The following consolidated financial schedule of Knowles Electronics Holdings, Inc. is included in response to Item 15(a.) II Valuation and Qualifying Accounts | 82 | |||||||
All other schedules under Regulation S-X for Knowles Electronics Holdings, Inc. have been omitted because they are either non-applicable, not required or because the information required is included in the financial statements or notes thereto. | ||||||||
Signatures | 83 | |||||||
3. | Index to Exhibits | 84 | ||||||
b)
|
Reports on Form 8-K |
There were no reports on Form 8-K filed during the three months ended December 31, 2003
81
SCHEDULE II VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
KNOWLES ELECTRONICS HOLDINGS, INC.
Additions | |||||||||||||||||||||
Charge to | Charge to | ||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at | Costs | Other | Balance at | ||||||||||||||||||
Beginning | and | Accounts | Deductions | End of | |||||||||||||||||
of Period | Expenses | Describe | Describe | Period | |||||||||||||||||
Year ended December 31, 2003
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Reserves and allowances deducted from asset
accounts:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
$ | 350 | $ | 247 | $ | (6 | )(1) | $ | 64 | (2) | $ | 527 | |||||||||
Allowance for obsolete inventory
|
5,114 | 1,416 | (9 | )(1) | 2,373 | (3) | 4,148 | ||||||||||||||
Year ended December 31, 2002
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Reserves and allowances deducted from asset
accounts:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
647 | (180 | ) | (1 | )(4) | 116 | (6) | 350 | |||||||||||||
Allowance for obsolete inventory
|
7,817 | 2,391 | 133 | (5) | 5,227 | (7) | 5,114 | ||||||||||||||
Year ended December 31, 2001
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Reserves and allowances deducted from asset
accounts:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
1,110 | 26 | 489 | (8) | 647 | ||||||||||||||||
Allowance for obsolete inventory
|
7,099 | 2,663 | 1,945 | (9) | 7,817 |
(1) | Foreign currency translation gain. |
(2) | Uncollectible accounts written off. |
(3) | Disposal of obsolete inventory. |
(4) | Foreign currency translation gain. |
(5) | Foreign currency translation loss. |
(6) | Uncollectible accounts written off. |
(7) | Disposal of obsolete inventory. |
(8) | Uncollectible accounts written off. |
(9) | Disposal of obsolete inventory. |
82
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized:
KNOWLES ELECTRONICS HOLDINGS, INC. | |
(Registrant) |
By: | /s/ JOHN J. ZEI |
|
|
John J. Zei | |
President and Chief Executive Officer |
Dated: March 25, 2004
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated:
Signature | Title | Date | ||||
/s/ JOHN J. ZEI John J. Zei |
President and Chief Executive Officer Class B Director |
March 25, 2004 | ||||
/s/ JAMES H. MOYLE James H. Moyle |
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
March 25, 2004 | ||||
/s/ KENNETH JOHN TERRY Kenneth John Terry |
Class A Director | March 25, 2004 | ||||
/s/ CHRISTOPHER WALLIS Christopher Wallis |
Class A Director | March 25, 2004 | ||||
/s/ STEPHEN D. PETERSEN Stephen D. Petersen |
Vice President Finance and Secretary |
March 25, 2004 |
83
EXHIBIT INDEX
2.1
|
| Recapitalization Agreement dated as of June 23, 1999, among Key Acquisition, L.L.C., Knowles Electronics Holdings, Inc. and the Stockholders (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to Registration Statement No. 333-40076) | ||
2.2
|
| Contribution Agreement dated August 30, 1999, between Knowles Electronics Holdings, Inc. and Knowles Electronics, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.2 to Registration Statement No. 393-40076) | ||
3.1
|
| Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Knowles Electronics, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Registration Statement No. 333-40076) | ||
3.2
|
| Certificate of Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Knowles Electronics, Inc. changing its name to Knowles Electronics Holdings, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to Registration Statement No. 333-40076) | ||
3.3
|
| Certificate of Incorporation of Knowles Intermediate Holding, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 to Registration Statement No. 333-40076) | ||
3.4
|
| Certificate of Incorporation of Emkay Associates, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.4 to Registration Statement No. 333-40076) | ||
3.5
|
| Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation of Emkay Associates, Inc. changing its name to Emkay Innovative Products, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.5 to Registration Statement No. 333-40076) | ||
3.6
|
| Certificate of Incorporation of Knowles Manufacturing Ltd. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.6 to Registration Statement No. 333-40076) | ||
3.7
|
| Certificate of Incorporation of Synchro-Start Products, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.7 to Registration Statement No. 333-40076) | ||
3.8
|
| Certificate of Formation of Knowles Electronics, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.8 to Registration Statement No. 333-40076) | ||
3.9
|
| Amended and Restated By-laws of Knowles Electronics Holdings, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.9 to Registration Statement No. 333-40076) | ||
3.10
|
| By-laws of Knowles Intermediate Holding, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.10 to Registration Statement No. 333-40076) | ||
3.11
|
| By-laws of Emkay Innovative Products, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.11 to Registration Statement No. 333-40076) | ||
3.12
|
| By-laws of Knowles Manufacturing Ltd. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.12 to Registration Statement No. 333-40076) | ||
3.13
|
| By-laws of Synchro-Start Products, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.13 to Registration Statement No. 333-40076) | ||
3.14
|
| Limited Liability Company Agreement of Knowles Electronics, LLC, and an amendment dated as of March 14, 2000 thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.14 to Registration Statement No. 333-40076) | ||
4.1
|
| Indenture, dated as of October 1, 1999, among Knowles Electronics Holdings, Inc., the Subsidiary Guarantors and The Bank of New York, as trustee, relating to the 13 1/8% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Registration Statement No. 333-40076) | ||
4.2
|
| Form of 13 1/8% Senior Subordinated Note due 2009 of Knowles Electronics Holdings, Inc. (the Initial Note) (included as Exhibit A to the Indenture filed as Exhibit 4.1) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Registration Statement No. 333-40076) | ||
4.3
|
| Form of 13 1/8% Senior Subordinated Note due 2009 of Knowles Electronics Holdings, Inc. (the Exchange Note) (included as Exhibit A to the Indenture filed as Exhibit 4.1) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Registration Statement No. 333-40076) | ||
4.4
|
| Registration Rights Agreement, dated October 1, 1999, between Knowles Electronics Holdings, Inc., Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated and Chase Securities, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to Registration Statement No. 333-40076) |
84
4.5
|
| Note Purchase Agreement dated August 28, 2002 between Knowles Electronic Holdings, Inc., the Subsidiary Guarantors and Key Acquisition LLC, (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2002) | ||
10.1
|
| Credit Agreement, dated as of June 28, 1999, as amended and restated as of July 21, 1999, among Knowles Electronics Holdings, Inc., The Chase Manhattan Bank, as Administrative Agent, Morgan Stanley Senior Funding, Inc., as Syndication Agent and Chase Securities Inc., as Lead Arranger and Book Manager, and an amendment dated December 23, 1999 and an amendment dated April 10, 2000 thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Registration Statement No. 333-40076) | ||
10.2
|
| Parent Guarantee Agreement, dated as of June 30, 1999, between Knowles Electronics Holdings, Inc. and The Chase Manhattan Bank, as administrative agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Registration Statement No. 333-40076) | ||
10.3
|
| Subsidiary Guarantee Agreement, dated as of June 30, 1999 among Knowles Intermediate Holding, Inc., Emkay Innovative Products, Inc., Knowles Manufacturing Ltd., Synchro-Start Products, Inc., Knowles Electronics, LLC, the subsidiary guarantors of Knowles Electronics Holdings, Inc. that are signatories thereto, and The Chase Manhattan Bank, as administrative agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Registration Statement No. 333-40076) | ||
10.4
|
| Security Agreement, dated as of June 30, 1999, among Knowles Intermediate Holding, Inc., Emkay Innovative Products, Inc., Knowles Manufacturing Ltd., Synchro-Start Products, Inc., Knowles Electronics, LLC, the subsidiary guarantors of Knowles Electronics Holdings, Inc. that are signatories thereto, and The Chase Manhattan Bank, as administrative agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to Registration Statement No. 333-400076) | ||
10.5
|
| Pledge Agreement, dated as of June 30, 1999 among Knowles Electronics, Inc., the Subsidiary Pledgors and The Chase Manhattan Bank, as administrative agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to Registration Statement No. 333-40076) | ||
10.6
|
| Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated as of June 21, 1993, between Knowles Electronics Holdings, Inc. and Reg G. Garratt (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to Registration Statement No. 333-40076) | ||
10.7
|
| Employment Agreement between Knowles Electronics Holdings, Inc. and John J. Zei (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to Registration Statement No. 333-40076) | ||
10.8
|
| Employment Agreement, dated December 29, 1999, between Knowles Electronics Holdings, Inc. and James F. Brace (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to Registration Statement No. 333-40076) | ||
10.9
|
| Executive Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of April 28, 2000, by and among Knowles Electronic Holdings, Inc., John J. Zei and Key Acquisition, L.L.C. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to Registration Statement No. 333-40076) | ||
10.10
|
| Executive Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of April 28, 2000, by and among Knowles Electronics Holdings, Inc., James F. Brace and Key Acquisition, L.L.C. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to Registration Statement No. 333-40076) | ||
10.11
|
| Executive Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of June 30, 1999, by and among Knowles Electronics Holdings, Inc., Stephen D. Peterson and Key Acquisition, L.L.C. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to Registration Statement No. 333-40076) | ||
10.12
|
| Special Severance Commitment, dated as of September 9, 1998, between Knowles Electronics Holdings, Inc. and Bernard J. Smith (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to Registration Statement No. 333-40076) | ||
10.13
|
| Change-in-Control Severance Pay Plan, dated as of September 21, 1998, established by Knowles Electronics Holdings, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to Registration Statement No. 333-40076) | ||
10.14
|
| Management Incentive Plan of Knowles Electronics Holdings, Inc. for Calendar Year 1999 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to Registration Statement No. 333-40076) | ||
10.15
|
| Long Term Incentive Plan of Knowles Electronics Holdings, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to Registration Statement No. 333-40076) |
85
10.16
|
| Service Agreement, dated June 28, 1999, between Doughty Hanson & Co. Managers Limited and Knowles Electronics Holdings, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to Registration Statement No. 333-40076) | ||
10.17
|
| Commission Agreement, dated June 28, 1999, between Doughty Hanson & Co. Managers Limited and Knowles Electronics Holdings, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17 to Registration Statement No. 333-40076) | ||
10.18
|
| Stockholders Agreement dated as of June 30, 1999, among Knowles Electronics Holdings, Inc., Key Acquisition, L.L.C., Management, the Vendor Group, Morgan Stanley Senior Funding, Inc., Chase Securities, Inc. and The Chase Manhattan Bank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to Registration Statement No. 333-40076) | ||
10.19
|
| Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of June 20, 1999, among Knowles Electronics Holdings, Inc., Key Acquisition, L.L.C., Management, the Existing Holder Group, Morgan Stanley Senior Funding Inc., Chase Securities Inc. and The Chase Manhattan Bank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19 to Registration Statement No. 333-40076) | ||
10.20
|
| Amendment No. 3 dated as of December 12, 2001 to the Credit Agreement, dated as of June 28, 1999, as amended and restated as of July 21, 1999, and further amended as of December 23, 1999 and April 10, 2000, among Knowles Electronics Holdings, Inc., The Chase Manhattan Bank, as Administrative Agent, Morgan Stanley Senior Funding, Inc., as Syndication Agent and Chase Securities Inc., as Lead Arranger and Book Manager. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20 to Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001) | ||
10.21
|
| Amendment No. 4 and Waiver dated as of May 10, 2002 to the Credit Agreement, dated as of June 28, 1999, as amended and restated as of July 21, 1999, and further amended as of December 23, 1999, April 10, 2000 and December 12, 2001, among Knowles Electronics Holdings, Inc., The Chase Manhattan Bank, as Administrative Agent, Morgan Stanley Senior Funding, Inc., as Syndication Agent and Chase Securities Inc., as Lead Arranger and Book Manager. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21 to Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001) | ||
10.22
|
| Investor Funding Agreement dated as of May 10, 2002 among Key Acquisition, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Knowles Electronics Holdings, Inc., a Delaware limited liability company, and JP Morgan Chase Bank, in its capacity as Administrative Agent for the lenders under the Credit Agreement, dated as of June 28, 1999, as amended and restated as of July 21, 1999, among Knowles Electronics Holdings, Inc., The Chase Manhattan Bank, as Administrative Agent, Morgan Stanley Senior Funding, Inc., as Syndication Agent and Chase Securities Inc., as Lead Arranger and Book Manager. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22 to Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001) | ||
10.23
|
| Employment Agreement between Knowles Electronics Holdings, Inc. and James H. Moyle. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2002) | ||
10.24
|
| Limited Waiver and Fifth Amendment dated March 25, 2003 and entered into by and among Knowles Electronics Holdings, Inc. (f/k/a Knowles Electronics, Inc.), the financial institutions listed on the signature pages hereof, JPMorgan Chase Bank as agent for the lenders, and, for the purposes of Section 3.9 and Section 6 thereof, the subsidiaries of the Company party thereto. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.24 on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003) | ||
10.25
|
| Stock Purchase Agreement between and among Woodward Governor Company and Knowles Intermediate Holding, Inc. and Knowles Electronics Holdings, Inc dated May 20, 2003. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.25 to Form 8-K filed June 16, 2003) | ||
10.26
|
| Share Deal agreed by and between Knowles Intermediate Holding, Inc. and FM Electronics-Holding GmbH and WEHA Holding GmbH dated July 29, 2003. (incorporated by reference to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003) | ||
10.27
|
| Knowles Electronics Holdings, Inc. Retention Incentive Plan dated December 12, 2003 | ||
10.28
|
| Knowles Electronics Holdings, Inc. Value Enhancement Incentive Plan dated December 12, 2003 | ||
12.1
|
| Calculation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges | ||
14.1
|
| Code of Ethics |
86
21.1
|
| List of Subsidiaries | ||
31.1
|
| Rule 13a-14 and 15d-14 Certification of the Chief Executive Officer | ||
31.2
|
| Rule 13a-14 and 15d-14 Certification of the Chief Financial Officer |
87