UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(X) QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended November 3, 2002
OR
( ) TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
From the transition period from to
Commission file number 001-16485
KRISPY KREME DOUGHNUTS, INC.
North Carolina | 56-2169715 | |
|
||
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
(I. R. S. Employer Identification Number) |
370 Knollwood Street, Suite 500, Winston-Salem, North Carolina | 27103 | |
|
||
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
(336) 725-2981
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes
[X] No [ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the
registrant is an accelerated filer
(as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes
[X] No [ ]
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of
common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
Outstanding at December 6, 2002 |
||
|
||
Common stock at no par value | 56,207,012 shares |
Krispy Kreme Doughnuts, Inc.
FORM 10-Q
For the Quarter Ended November 3, 2002
INDEX
Page | |||||||
Part I. Financial Information |
|||||||
Item 1. Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) |
|||||||
a) Balance Sheets
As of February 3, 2002 and November 3, 2002 |
3 | ||||||
b) Statements of Operations
For the Three Months and the Nine Months Ended
October 28, 2001 and November 3, 2002 |
4 | ||||||
c) Statement of Shareholders Equity
For the Nine Months Ended November 3, 2002 |
5 | ||||||
d) Statements of Cash Flows
For the Nine Months Ended October 28, 2001 and November 3,
2002 |
6 | ||||||
e) Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial
Statements |
7 | ||||||
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations |
22 | ||||||
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risks |
37 | ||||||
Item 4. Controls and Procedures |
37 | ||||||
Part II. Other Information |
|||||||
Item 1. Legal Proceedings |
38 | ||||||
Item 2. Changes in Securities and Use of Proceeds |
38 | ||||||
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K |
38 | ||||||
Signatures |
39 | ||||||
Certifications |
40 |
2
Part I. Financial Information
Item I. Financial Statements
Krispy Kreme Doughnuts, Inc.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(in thousands, unaudited)
February 3, | November 3, | ||||||||
2002 | 2002 | ||||||||
ASSETS |
|||||||||
Current Assets: |
|||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 21,904 | $ | 14,830 | |||||
Short-term investments |
15,292 | 17,553 | |||||||
Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts
of $1,182 at February 3, 2002 and $1,377 at November 3, 2002 |
26,894 | 33,869 | |||||||
Accounts receivable, affiliates |
9,017 | 14,878 | |||||||
Other receivables |
2,771 | 1,722 | |||||||
Inventories |
16,159 | 22,728 | |||||||
Prepaid expenses |
2,591 | 4,248 | |||||||
Income taxes refundable |
2,534 | 2,307 | |||||||
Deferred income taxes |
4,607 | 5,315 | |||||||
Total current assets |
101,769 | 117,450 | |||||||
Property and equipment, net |
112,577 | 188,495 | |||||||
Long-term investments |
12,700 | 9,408 | |||||||
Investments in unconsolidated joint ventures |
3,400 | 6,447 | |||||||
Intangible assets |
16,621 | 45,563 | |||||||
Other assets |
8,309 | 8,119 | |||||||
Total assets |
$ | 255,376 | $ | 375,482 | |||||
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|||||||||
Current Liabilities: |
|||||||||
Accounts payable |
$ | 12,095 | $ | 12,874 | |||||
Book overdraft |
9,107 | 10,547 | |||||||
Accrued expenses |
26,729 | 22,228 | |||||||
Revolving lines of credit |
3,871 | | |||||||
Current maturities of long-term debt |
731 | 3,161 | |||||||
Short-term debt related party |
| 1,400 | |||||||
Income taxes payable |
| 381 | |||||||
Total current liabilities |
52,533 | 50,591 | |||||||
Long-term debt, net of current portion |
3,912 | 46,270 | |||||||
Revolving
lines of credit |
| 4,370 | |||||||
Deferred income taxes |
3,930 | 8,652 | |||||||
Accrued restructuring expenses |
1,919 | 1,150 | |||||||
Other long-term obligations |
2,924 | 6,175 | |||||||
Total long-term liabilities |
12,685 | 66,617 | |||||||
Commitments
and contingencies |
|||||||||
Minority interest |
2,491 | 4,392 | |||||||
Shareholders Equity: |
|||||||||
Preferred stock, no par value, 10,000 shares authorized; none
issued and outstanding |
| | |||||||
Common stock, no par value, 100,000 shares authorized at
February 3, 2002 and 300,000 at November 3, 2002; issued
and outstanding 54,271 at February 3, 2002 and 55,584 at
November 3, 2002 |
121,052 | 159,243 | |||||||
Unearned compensation |
(186 | ) | (136 | ) | |||||
Notes receivable, employees |
(2,580 | ) | (723 | ) | |||||
Nonqualified employee benefit plan asset |
(138 | ) | (339 | ) | |||||
Nonqualified employee benefit plan liability |
138 | 339 | |||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
456 | (1,271 | ) | ||||||
Retained earnings |
68,925 | 96,769 | |||||||
Total shareholders equity |
187,667 | 253,882 | |||||||
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
$ | 255,376 | $ | 375,482 | |||||
The accompanying condensed notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
3
Krispy Kreme Doughnuts, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
Three months ended | Nine months ended | |||||||||||||||
October 28, | November 3, | October 28, | November 3, | |||||||||||||
2001 | 2002 | 2001 | 2002 | |||||||||||||
Total revenues |
$ | 99,804 | $ | 129,130 | $ | 277,270 | $ | 354,815 | ||||||||
Operating expenses |
80,177 | 100,295 | 224,055 | 277,144 | ||||||||||||
General and administrative expenses |
7,023 | 7,429 | 19,211 | 21,641 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization expenses |
2,131 | 3,403 | 5,955 | 8,561 | ||||||||||||
Income from operations |
10,473 | 18,003 | 28,049 | 47,469 | ||||||||||||
Interest income |
679 | 511 | 2,519 | 1,702 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense |
(75 | ) | (653 | ) | (242 | ) | (1,161 | ) | ||||||||
Equity loss in joint ventures |
(212 | ) | (819 | ) | (416 | ) | (999 | ) | ||||||||
Minority interest |
(358 | ) | (352 | ) | (599 | ) | (1,476 | ) | ||||||||
Other expenses |
(56 | ) | (218 | ) | (95 | ) | (368 | ) | ||||||||
Income before income taxes |
10,451 | 16,472 | 29,216 | 45,167 | ||||||||||||
Provision for income taxes |
3,971 | 6,347 | 11,102 | 17,323 | ||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 6,480 | $ | 10,125 | $ | 18,114 | $ | 27,844 | ||||||||
Basic earnings per share |
$ | 0.12 | $ | 0.18 | $ | 0.34 | $ | 0.51 | ||||||||
Diluted earnings per share |
$ | 0.11 | $ | 0.17 | $ | 0.31 | $ | 0.47 | ||||||||
The accompanying condensed notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
4
Krispy Kreme Doughnuts, Inc.
Consolidated Statement of Shareholders Equity
(in thousands)
Unaudited
Notes | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Preferred | Preferred | Common | Common | Unearned | Receivable - | ||||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Stock | Shares | Stock | Compensation | Employees | ||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at February 3, 2002 |
| $ | | 54,271 | $ | 121,052 | $ | (186 | ) | $ | (2,580 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net income for the nine months ended
November 3, 2002 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized holding loss, net |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Change in fair value of cash flow hedge |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Exercise of stock options, including |
572 | 10,359 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
tax benefit of $6,672 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of shares in conjunction with
acquisition of franchise market |
741 | 27,682 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Adjustment of nonqualified employee
benefit plan investments |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Collection of notes receivable |
1,857 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of stock options in exchange for services |
150 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of restricted common shares |
50 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at November 3, 2002 |
| $ | | 55,584 | $ | 159,243 | $ | (136 | ) | $ | (723 | ) | |||||||||||||
[Additional columns below]
[Continued from above table, first column(s) repeated]
Nonqualified | Nonqualified | Accumulated Other | |||||||||||||||||||
Employee Benefit | Employee Benefit | Comprehensive | Retained | ||||||||||||||||||
Plan Asset | Plan Liability | Income (Loss) | Earnings | Total | |||||||||||||||||
Balance at February 3, 2002 |
$ | (138 | ) | $ | 138 | $ | 456 | $ | 68,925 | $ | 187,667 | ||||||||||
Net income for the nine months ended
November 3, 2002 |
27,844 | 27,844 | |||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized holding loss, net |
(227 | ) | (227 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
(13 | ) | (13 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Change in fair value of cash flow hedge |
(1,487 | ) | (1,487 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income |
26,117 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Exercise of stock options, including |
10,359 | ||||||||||||||||||||
tax benefit of $6,672 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of shares in conjunction with
acquisition of franchise market |
27,682 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Adjustment of nonqualified employee
benefit plan investments |
(201 | ) | 201 | | |||||||||||||||||
Collection of notes receivable |
1,857 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of stock options in exchange for services |
150 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of restricted common shares |
50 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at November 3, 2002 |
$ | (339 | ) | $ | 339 | $ | (1,271 | ) | $ | 96,769 | $ | 253,882 | |||||||||
The accompanying condensed notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
5
Krispy Kreme Doughnuts, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(in thousands)
(Unaudited)
Nine months ended | ||||||||||
October 28, | November 3, | |||||||||
2001 | 2002 | |||||||||
Cash Flow from Operating Activities: |
||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 18,114 | $ | 27,844 | ||||||
Items not requiring cash: |
||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
5,955 | 8,561 | ||||||||
Loss on disposal of property and equipment, net |
95 | 368 | ||||||||
Compensation expense related to restricted stock awards |
39 | 50 | ||||||||
Deferred income taxes |
771 | 4,809 | ||||||||
Tax benefit from exercise of nonqualified stock options |
6,529 | 6,672 | ||||||||
Equity loss in joint ventures |
416 | 999 | ||||||||
Minority interest |
599 | 1,476 | ||||||||
Change in assets and liabilities: |
||||||||||
Receivables |
(5,411 | ) | (11,656 | ) | ||||||
Inventories |
(2,024 | ) | (6,263 | ) | ||||||
Prepaid expenses |
(1,705 | ) | (1,101 | ) | ||||||
Income taxes, net |
(2,605 | ) | 608 | |||||||
Accounts payable |
142 | (1,214 | ) | |||||||
Accrued expenses |
1,571 | (6,603 | ) | |||||||
Oher long-term obligations |
73 | 669 | ||||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
22,559 | 25,219 | ||||||||
Cash Flow from Investing Activities: |
||||||||||
Purchase of property and equipment |
(28,213 | ) | (64,108 | ) | ||||||
Proceeds from disposal of property and equipment |
217 | | ||||||||
Acquisition of franchise markets, net of cash acquired |
(20,571 | ) | (4,982 | ) | ||||||
Purchases of investments |
(1,043 | ) | (22,122 | ) | ||||||
Proceeds from investments |
14,946 | 23,094 | ||||||||
Increase in investments in unconsolidated joint ventures |
(394 | ) | (6,474 | ) | ||||||
(Increase)
decrease in other assets |
(2,612 | ) | 482 | |||||||
Net cash used for investing activities |
(37,670 | ) | (74,110 | ) | ||||||
Cash Flow from Financing Activities: |
||||||||||
Proceeds from stock offering, net |
17,202 | | ||||||||
Proceeds from exercise of stock options |
3,514 | 3,687 | ||||||||
Book overdraft |
2,988 | 1,440 | ||||||||
Minority interest |
(188 | ) | (422 | ) | ||||||
Issuance of long-term debt |
| 36,187 | ||||||||
Repayment of long-term debt |
| (1,431 | ) | |||||||
Net borrowings from revolving line of credit |
6,800 | 499 | ||||||||
Collection of notes receivable |
503 | 1,857 | ||||||||
Net cash provided by financing activities |
30,819 | 41,817 | ||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
15,708 | (7,074 | ) | |||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
7,026 | 21,904 | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | 22,734 | $ | 14,830 | ||||||
Supplemental schedule of non-cash investing and financing activities: |
||||||||||
Issuance of stock in conjunction with acquisition of franchise market |
$ | 4,183 | $ | 5,434 | ||||||
Issuance of stock in exchange for employee notes receivable |
$ | 879 | $ | | ||||||
Issuance of stock in conjunction with acquisition of additional interest
in area developer franchisee |
$ | | $ | 22,248 |
The accompanying condensed notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
6
Krispy Kreme Doughnuts, Inc.
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 1: Organization and Purpose
Krispy Kreme Doughnuts, Inc. (the Company) was incorporated in North Carolina
on December 2, 1999 as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Krispy Kreme Doughnut
Corporation (KKDC). Pursuant to a plan of merger approved by shareholders on
November 10, 1999, the shareholders of KKDC became shareholders of Krispy Kreme
Doughnuts, Inc. on April 4, 2000. Each shareholder received 80 shares of
Krispy Kreme Doughnuts, Inc. common stock and $15 in cash for each share of
KKDC common stock they held. As a result of the merger, KKDC became a
wholly-owned subsidiary of Krispy Kreme Doughnuts, Inc. Krispy Kreme
Doughnuts, Inc. closed the initial public offering of its common stock on April
10, 2000.
Note 2: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements are presented in accordance
with the requirements of Article 10 of Regulation S-X and, consequently, do not
include all the disclosures normally required by generally accepted accounting
principles and should be read together with the Companys Annual Report for the
year ended February 3, 2002.
The financial information has been prepared in accordance with the Companys customary accounting practices and has not been audited. In the opinion of management, the financial information includes all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of interim results.
Basis of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and
its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts and
transactions are eliminated in consolidation. Generally, investments greater
than 50 percent in affiliates for which the Company maintains control are also
consolidated and the portion not owned by the Company is shown as a minority
interest. As of November 3, 2002, the Company consolidated the accounts of three
joint ventures which the Company controlled: Freedom Rings, LLC (Freedom
Rings), the joint venture with the rights to develop stores in the Philadelphia
market; Glazed Investments, LLC (Glazed Investments), the joint venture with
the rights to develop stores in Colorado, Minnesota and Wisconsin; and Golden
Gate Doughnuts, LLC (Golden Gate), the joint venture with the rights to
develop stores in Northern California. Generally, investments in 20- to
50-percent owned affiliates for which the Company has the ability to exercise
significant influence over operating and financial policies are accounted for
by the equity method of accounting, whereby the investment is carried at the
cost of acquisition, plus the Companys equity in undistributed earnings or
losses since acquisition, less any distributions received by the Company.
Accordingly, the Companys share of the net earnings of these companies is
included in consolidated net income. Investments in less than 20-percent owned
affiliates are accounted for by the cost method of accounting.
Comprehensive Income
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 130, Reporting
Comprehensive Income, requires that certain items such as foreign currency
translation adjustments, unrealized gains and losses on certain investments in
debt and equity securities and minimum pension liability adjustments be
presented as separate components of shareholders equity. Total comprehensive
income for the three and nine months ended November 3, 2002 was $9,561,000 and
$26,117,000, respectively, and for the three and nine months ended October 28,
2001 was $6,464,000 and $18,174,000, respectively.
Investments
Investments consist of United States Treasury notes, mortgage-backed government
securities, corporate debt securities and municipal securities. Investments
are classified as short-term and long-term investments in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheets based upon their stated maturity dates.
7
Management determines the appropriate classification of its investments in marketable securities at the time of purchase and reevaluates such determination at each balance sheet date. As of November 3, 2002 and February 3, 2002, all marketable securities are classified as available-for-sale. Available-for-sale securities are carried at fair value, as determined by the most recently traded price of each security at the balance sheet date. Unrealized gains and losses are reported as a separate component of shareholders equity in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). The cost of investments sold is determined on the specific identification or the first-in, first-out method.
Revenue Recognition
A summary of the revenue recognition policies for each segment of the Company
(see Note 9) is as follows:
| Company Store Operations revenue is derived from the sale of doughnuts and complementary products to on-premises and off-premises customers. Revenue is recognized at the time of sale for on-premises sales. For off-premises sales, revenue is recognized at the time of delivery. | ||
| Franchise Operations revenue is derived from (1) development and franchise fees from the opening of new stores; and (2) royalties charged to franchisees as a percentage of sales. Development and franchise fees are charged for certain new stores and are recognized as revenue when the store is opened. The royalties recognized in each period are based on the sales in that period. | ||
| KKM&D revenue is derived from the sale of doughnut-making equipment, mix and other supplies needed to operate a doughnut store to Company-owned and franchised stores. Revenue is recognized at the time the title and the risk of loss pass to the customer, generally upon delivery of the goods. Revenue from Company-owned stores and consolidated joint venture stores is eliminated in consolidation. |
Foreign Currency Translation
For all non-U.S. joint ventures, the functional currency is the local currency.
Assets and liabilities of those operations are translated into U. S. dollars
using exchange rates at the balance sheet date; revenue and expenses are
translated using the average exchange rates for the reporting period.
Translation adjustments are deferred in accumulated other comprehensive income
(loss), a separate component of shareholders equity.
Intangible Assets
In July 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No.
141, Business Combinations, and SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets. These pronouncements provide guidance on accounting for the
acquisition of businesses and other intangible assets, including goodwill,
which arise from such activities. SFAS No. 141 affirms that only the purchase
method of accounting may be applied to a business combination and provides
guidance on the allocation of purchase price to the assets acquired. SFAS No.
141 applies to all business combinations initiated after
June 30, 2001. Under
SFAS No. 142, goodwill and intangible assets that have indefinite useful lives
are no longer amortized but are reviewed at least annually for impairment.
SFAS No. 142 is effective for the Companys fiscal 2003, although goodwill and
intangible assets acquired after June 30, 2001 were subject immediately to the
non-amortization provisions of SFAS No. 142. The Company evaluated its
intangible assets, which consist of goodwill recorded in connection with a
business acquisition ($201,000) and the value assigned to reacquired franchise
rights in connection with the acquisition of rights to certain markets from
franchisees ($45,362,000), and determined that all such assets have indefinite
lives and, as a result, are not subject to amortization provisions. For the
three and nine months ended October 28, 2001, the Company recorded an expense
of $33,000 and $67,000, respectively, to amortize intangible assets related to
an acquisition completed prior to June 30, 2001. The Company completed its
impairment analysis of its intangible assets and found no instances of
impairment.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In August 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement
Obligations, effective for years beginning after June 15, 2002, or the
Companys fiscal year 2004. SFAS No. 143 addresses financial accounting and
reporting for obligations associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived
assets and the associated asset retirement costs. It applies to legal
obligations associated with the retirement of long-lived assets that result
from the acquisition, construction, development or the normal operation of a
long-lived asset, except
8
for certain obligations of lessees. The adoption of this Statement will not have a significant impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
In October 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, effective for years beginning after December 15, 2001, or the Companys fiscal year 2003. SFAS No. 144 supersedes SFAS No. 121, Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed of and the accounting and reporting provisions of APB Opinion No. 30, Reporting the Effects of Disposal of a Segment of a Business, and Extraordinary, Unusual and Infrequently Occurring Events and Transactions. SFAS No. 144 retains the requirements of SFAS No. 121 to recognize an impairment loss only if the carrying amount of a long-lived asset is not recoverable from its undiscounted cash flows and to measure an impairment loss as the difference between the carrying amount and the fair value of the asset. The adoption of SFAS No. 144 did not have a significant impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
In April 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 145, Rescission of SFAS Nos. 4, 44 and 64, Amendment of SFAS No. 13, and Technical Corrections. Among other provisions, SFAS No. 145 rescinds both SFAS No. 4, Reporting Gains and Losses from Extinguishment of Debt, and the amendment of SFAS No. 4, SFAS No. 64, Extinguishments of Debt Made to Satisfy Sinking-Fund Requirements. This Statement also amends SFAS No. 13, Accounting for Leases, to eliminate an inconsistency between the accounting for sale-leaseback transactions and the accounting for certain lease modifications that have economic effects similar to sale-leaseback transactions. This Statement also amends other existing authoritative pronouncements to make various technical corrections, clarify meanings, or describe their applicability under changed conditions. The provisions of this Statement are applicable for fiscal years beginning after, transactions entered into after and financial statements issued on or subsequent to May 15, 2002. Its adoption will not have a significant impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
In June 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 146, Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities. This Statement addresses financial accounting and reporting for costs associated with exit or disposal activities and nullifies Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue No. 94-3, Liability Recognition for Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity (including Certain Costs Incurred in a Restructuring). The Statement requires that a liability for a cost associated with an exit or disposal activity be recognized when the liability is incurred. Under EITF 94-3, a liability for an exit cost, as defined in EITF 94-3, was recognized at the date of commitment to an exit or disposal plan. This Statement also establishes that fair value is the objective for initial measurement of the liability. The provisions of this Statement are effective for exit or disposal activities initiated after December 31, 2002. The adoption of this Statement will not have a significant impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
In November 2002, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 45, Guarantors Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others. Interpretation No. 45 clarifies the requirements for a guarantors accounting for and disclosures of certain guarantees issued and outstanding. It also specifies that a guarantor is required to recognize, at the inception of the guarantee, a liability for the fair value of the obligation undertaken in issuing the guarantee, although it does not prescribe a specific approach for subsequently measuring the guarantors recognized liability over the term of the guarantee. Interpretation No. 45 also specifies certain disclosures required to be made in interim and annual financial statements related to guarantees. The recognition and measurement provisions of the Interpretation are effective for guarantees issued or modified after December 31, 2002. The accounting for guarantees issued prior to this date is not affected. Disclosure requirements are effective for financial statements of interim or annual periods ending after December 15, 2002. Management is currently evaluating the impact of adoption of this Interpretation.
Reclassifications
Certain reclassifications have been made to the fiscal 2002 balances to conform
to the fiscal 2003 presentation.
Note 3: Investments
The following table provides certain information about investments:
Amortized | Gross Unrealized | Gross Unrealized | Fair | |||||||||||||
(in thousands) | Cost | Holding Gains | Holding Losses | Value | ||||||||||||
February 3, 2002 |
||||||||||||||||
U. S. government notes |
$ | 9,049 | $ | | $ | (17 | ) | $ | 9,032 | |||||||
Federal government agencies |
10,959 | 442 | (166 | ) | 11,235 | |||||||||||
Corporate debt securities |
6,475 | 317 | (88 | ) | 6,704 | |||||||||||
Other bonds |
1,043 | | (22 | ) | 1,021 | |||||||||||
Total |
$ | 27,526 | $ | 759 | $ | (293 | ) | $ | 27,992 | |||||||
9
Amortized | Gross Unrealized | Gross Unrealized | Fair | |||||||||||||
(in thousands) | Cost | Holding Gains | Holding Losses | Value | ||||||||||||
November 3, 2002 |
||||||||||||||||
U. S. government notes |
$ | 8,207 | $ | 102 | $ | (1 | ) | $ | 8,308 | |||||||
Federal government agencies |
15,346 | 405 | (145 | ) | 15,606 | |||||||||||
Corporate debt securities |
2,982 | 184 | (119 | ) | 3,047 | |||||||||||
Total |
$ | 26,535 | $ | 691 | $ | (265 | ) | $ | 26,961 | |||||||
Maturities of investments were as follows at November 3, 2002:
(in thousands) | Amortized Cost | Fair Value | ||||||
Due within one year |
$ | 17,241 | $ | 17,553 | ||||
Due after one year through five years |
9,294 | 9,408 | ||||||
Total |
$ | 26,535 | $ | 26,961 | ||||
Note 4: Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of average cost or market. The components
of inventories are as follows:
(in thousands) | Distribution Center | Equipment Department | Mix Department | Company Stores | Total | ||||||||||||||||
February 3, 2002 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Raw materials |
$ | | $ | 3,060 | $ | 788 | $ | 1,826 | $ | 5,674 | |||||||||||
Work in progress |
| 28 | | | 28 | ||||||||||||||||
Finished goods |
1,318 | 2,867 | 95 | | 4,280 | ||||||||||||||||
Purchased merchandise |
5,503 | | | 613 | 6,116 | ||||||||||||||||
Manufacturing supplies |
| | 61 | | 61 | ||||||||||||||||
Totals |
$ | 6,821 | $ | 5,955 | $ | 944 | $ | 2,439 | $ | 16,159 | |||||||||||
November 3, 2002 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Raw materials |
$ | | $ | 4,028 | $ | 1,389 | $ | 1,901 | $ | 7,318 | |||||||||||
Work in progress |
| 152 | | | 152 | ||||||||||||||||
Finished goods |
1,855 | 3,052 | 5 | | 4,912 | ||||||||||||||||
Purchased merchandise |
9,386 | | | 866 | 10,252 | ||||||||||||||||
Manufacturing supplies |
| | 94 | | 94 | ||||||||||||||||
Totals |
$ | 11,241 | $ | 7,232 | $ | 1,488 | $ | 2,767 | $ | 22,728 | |||||||||||
Note 5: Property and Equipment
Property and equipment consist of the following:
February 3, | November 3, | ||||||||
(in thousands) | 2002 | 2002 | |||||||
Land |
$ | 14,823 | $ | 23,419 | |||||
Buildings |
39,566 | 80,941 | |||||||
Machinery and equipment |
86,683 | 113,849 | |||||||
Leasehold improvements |
13,463 | 17,568 | |||||||
Construction in progress |
1,949 | 3,263 | |||||||
156,484 | 239,040 | ||||||||
Less: accumulated depreciation |
43,907 | 50,545 | |||||||
Property and equipment, net |
$ | 112,577 | $ | 188,495 | |||||
10
Note 6: Accrued Expenses
Accrued expenses are as follows:
February 3, | November 3, | |||||||
(in thousands) | 2002 | 2002 | ||||||
Insurance |
$ | 4,891 | $ | 6,364 | ||||
Salaries, wages, and incentive compensation |
11,686 | 6,270 | ||||||
Taxes, other than income |
1,639 | 2,754 | ||||||
Deferred revenue |
2,082 | 1,768 | ||||||
Restructuring expenses |
1,195 | 1,193 | ||||||
Other |
5,236 | 3,879 | ||||||
$ | 26,729 | $ | 22,228 | |||||
Note 7: Debt
The Companys debt, including debt of consolidated joint
ventures, consists of the following:
February 3, | November 3, | ||||||||
(in thousands) | 2002 | 2002 | |||||||
Krispy Kreme Doughnut Corporation: |
|||||||||
$40 million revolving line of credit |
$ | | $ | | |||||
Golden Gate: |
|||||||||
$6.75 million revolving line of credit |
3,871 | 3,750 | |||||||
Freedom Rings: |
|||||||||
$5 million revolving line of credit |
| 620 | |||||||
Revolving lines of credit |
$ | 3,871 | $ | 4,370 | |||||
Glazed Investments: |
|||||||||
Short-term debt related party |
$ | | $ | 1,400 | |||||
Krispy Kreme Doughnut Corporation: |
|||||||||
$33 million term loan |
$ | | $ | 32,175 | |||||
Golden Gate: |
|||||||||
$4.5 million term loan
|
4,418 | 4,038 | |||||||
$3 million term loan
|
| 3,000 | |||||||
Glazed Investments: |
|||||||||
Real Estate and Equipment loans |
| 10,082 | |||||||
Subordinated
notes |
| 136 | |||||||
Freedom Rings: |
|||||||||
Other debt |
225 | | |||||||
4,643 | 49,431 | ||||||||
Current maturities of long-term debt |
(731 | ) | (3,161 | ) | |||||
Long-term debt, net of current portion |
$ | 3,912 | $ | 46,270 | |||||
$40 Million Revolving Line of Credit
On December 29, 1999, the Company entered into an unsecured loan agreement
(Agreement) with a bank to increase borrowing availability and extend the
maturity of its revolving line of credit. The Agreement provides a $40 million
revolving line of credit and expires on June 30, 2004.
Under the terms of the Agreement, interest on the revolving line of credit is charged, at the Companys option, at either the lenders prime rate less 110 basis points or at the one-month LIBOR plus 100 basis points. There was no interest, fee or other charge for the unadvanced portion of the line of credit until July
11
1, 2002 at which time the Company began paying a fee of 0.10% on the unadvanced portion. No amounts were outstanding on the revolving line of credit at February 3, 2002 or November 3, 2002. The amount available under the revolving line of credit is reduced by letters of credit and certain amounts available or outstanding in connection with credit cards issued by the lender on behalf of the Company and was $31,847,000 at November 3, 2002. Outstanding letters of credit, primarily for insurance purposes, totaled $6,626,000, while amounts available in connection with credit cards issued by the lender totaled $1,527,000 at November 3, 2002.
The Agreement contains provisions that, among other requirements, restrict capital expenditures, require the maintenance of certain financial ratios, place various restrictions on the sale of properties, restrict the Companys ability to enter into collateral repurchase agreements and guarantees, restrict the payment of dividends and require compliance with other customary financial and nonfinancial covenants. At November 3, 2002, the Company was in compliance with each of these covenants.
$33 Million Term Loan
On March 21, 2002, the Company entered into a credit agreement with a bank
(Credit Agreement) to provide funding of up to $35,000,000 for the initial
purchase and completion of the Companys new mix and distribution facility in
Effingham, Illinois (the Facility). Construction of the Facility began in
May 2001 and was originally funded through a synthetic lease agreement with a
bank. The Company terminated the synthetic lease and purchased the Facility
from the bank with the proceeds from the initial borrowing under the Credit
Agreement of $31,710,000.
On May 1, 2002, the outstanding borrowings under the Credit Agreement, totaling $33,000,000, were converted to a term loan (Term Loan). The Term Loan requires monthly payments of principal of $137,500 and interest through September 21, 2007, at which time a final payment of all outstanding principal and accrued interest will be due. The Credit Agreement also permits the Company to prepay the loan in whole at any time, or from time to time in part in amounts aggregating at least $500,000 or any larger multiple of $100,000 without penalty. The Term Loan bears interest at Adjusted LIBOR, as defined within the Credit Agreement, plus an Applicable Margin, as defined within the Credit Agreement. The Applicable Margin ranges from .75% to 1.75% and is determined based upon the Companys performance under certain financial covenants contained in the Credit Agreement. The interest rate applicable on November 3, 2002 was 2.49%. Prior to conversion to a Term Loan, interest on amounts outstanding under the Credit Agreement was payable monthly.
On March 27, 2002, the Company entered into an interest rate swap agreement to convert the variable payments due under the Credit Agreement to fixed amounts, thereby hedging against the impact of interest rate changes on future interest expense (forecasted cash flow). The Company formally documents all hedging instruments and assesses, both at inception of the contract and on an ongoing basis, whether the hedging instruments are effective in offsetting changes in cash flows of the hedged transaction. The swap was effective May 1, 2002 and had an initial notional amount of $33,000,000. The notional amount declines by $137,500 each month, to correspond with the reduction in principal of the Term Loan. The notional amount of the swap at November 3, 2002 was $32,175,000. Under the terms of the swap, the Company will make fixed rate payments to the counterparty, a bank, of 5.09% and in return receive payments at LIBOR. Monthly payments began June 1, 2002 and continue until the swap terminates May 1, 2007. The Company is exposed to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the counterparty to the swap agreement. However, the Company does not anticipate nonperformance. At November 3, 2002, the fair value carrying amount of the swap was a liability of $2,417,000. Accumulated other comprehensive loss for the three and nine months ended November 3, 2002 includes a loss, net of related tax benefits, of $485,000 and $1,487,000, respectively, related to the swap.
The Credit Agreement contains provisions that, among other requirements, restrict the payment of dividends and require the Company to maintain compliance with certain covenants, including the maintenance of certain financial ratios. The Company was in compliance with each of these covenants at November 3, 2002.
12
Consolidated Joint Ventures Golden Gate
On October 12, 2001, Golden Gate Doughnuts, LLC, the Northern California joint
venture, entered into a $6.75 million revolving line of credit agreement with a
bank. The Company has guaranteed 67% of amounts outstanding under the line of
credit and the amount not guaranteed by the Company is collateralized by
buildings and equipment owned by Golden Gate. The line of credit bears
interest at one-month LIBOR plus 1.25% (2.94% at November 3, 2002) and matures
on October 12, 2004. There is no interest, fee or other charge for the
unadvanced portion of the line of credit. The line of credit replaced a
previous $1,500,000 line of credit, established January 25, 2001, with similar
terms.
At November 3, 2002, the amount outstanding under the $6.75 million revolving line of credit was $6,750,000. On November 8, 2002, Golden Gate entered into a loan agreement with the bank to convert $3,000,000 of the amount outstanding to a term loan. Accordingly, this amount is reported as long-term debt at November 3, 2002. The loan bears interest at one-month LIBOR plus 1.25% and is payable in 59 monthly installments of $29,807 of principal and interest, beginning in December 2002, and one final payment of all remaining principal and interest due on November 8, 2007. The Company has guaranteed 67% of the outstanding balance of the term loan and the amount not guaranteed by the Company is collateralized by certain buildings and equipment owned by Golden Gate.
On October 12, 2001, Golden Gate converted its previous revolving line of credit agreement, in the amount of $4,500,000, to a term loan. The Company has guaranteed 67% of the outstanding balance of this term loan. The amount not guaranteed by the Company is collateralized by buildings and equipment owned by Golden Gate. Repayment of the loan began in November 2001 with 59 equal monthly payments of $53,415 of principal and interest and one final payment of all remaining principal and interest due on October 12, 2006. Interest on the term loan is charged at the lenders one-month LIBOR plus 1.25%. At November 3, 2002, the outstanding principal balance was $4,038,000 and the interest rate was 2.94%.
The revolving line of credit and the term loans each contain provisions requiring Golden Gate to maintain compliance with certain financial covenants, including the maintenance of certain financial ratios. The joint venture was in compliance with the applicable covenants at November 3, 2002.
Consolidated Joint Ventures Freedom Rings
On June 13, 2002, Freedom Rings, LLC, the Philadelphia joint venture, entered
into an unsecured loan agreement with a bank to provide initial funding of
$1,500,000 for construction of a retail store. Interest on the
loan was payable at the lenders one-month LIBOR plus 1.25%. At November 3, 2002, the
amount outstanding under the loan was $620,000 and the interest rate was 2.94%.
On November 6, 2002, Freedom Rings entered into a $5,000,000 revolving line
of credit with the bank to provide funding for the construction of additional
retail stores and general working capital purposes. The line of credit
replaced the $1,500,000 loan, which was repaid in full with borrowings under
the line of credit and cancelled. The revolving line of credit bears interest
at the banks one-month LIBOR plus 1.25%, is secured by certain property and
equipment owned by Freedom Rings and matures August 15, 2004. The Company
guaranteed 70% of the outstanding balance of the loan and has guaranteed 70% of
the amounts available under the revolving line of credit.
The revolving line of credit contains provisions requiring the Philadelphia joint venture to maintain compliance with certain financial covenants, including the maintenance of certain financial ratios.
On October 29, 2001, Freedom Rings entered into a non-bank agreement in order to finance the purchase of a parcel of land. Under the terms of the loan agreement, interest on the loan was charged at 8% and repayment began in November 2001 with nine equal monthly payments of principal and interest of $1,930. A final payment of the remaining principal balance of $221,000 plus accrued interest was made in August 2002 and the loan was terminated.
13
Consolidated Joint Ventures Glazed Investments
Glazed Investments, LLC, the joint venture franchisee with rights to Colorado,
Minnesota and Wisconsin, typically enters into arrangements with a non-bank
financing institution to provide funding for the construction of stores and the
purchase of the related equipment. While individual promissory notes exist for
the financing of each store and equipment purchase for which funding was
provided through the issuance of debt, the terms of each are substantially the
same. During the construction period, interest on amounts outstanding is
payable monthly, generally at one-month LIBOR plus a premium. Upon completion of
the store, the amount advanced for construction funding is converted to a real
estate term loan (Real Estate Loan) and amounts advanced for equipment
purchases are converted to equipment term loans (Equipment Loans).
Generally, Real Estate Loans require monthly payments of principal and interest
for a fixed term of fifteen years and Equipment Loans require monthly payments
of principal and interest for a fixed term of seven years. Interest is payable
at rates based on either the one-month LIBOR rate or a commercial paper rate,
plus a premium. The premium charged ranges from 3.05% to 3.6%. At November 3,
2002, interest rates applicable to the debt range from 4.79% to 8.65%. The
loans are secured by the related property and equipment. The Company has also
guaranteed approximately 75% of the amounts outstanding under the loans.
Glazed Investments has entered into promissory notes with Lawrence E. Jaro, chief executive officer of Glazed Investments, who holds an approximate 18% interest in the joint venture, whereby Mr. Jaro will provide funding to the joint venture for general working capital purposes. Borrowings under the promissory notes are also used to fund store development costs prior to establishment of permanent financing. Amounts outstanding are unsecured and bear interest at 10% which is payable at maturity. The notes generally have terms of less than six months and are repaid from operating cash flows of the joint venture or proceeds from permanent financing. Amounts outstanding at November 3, 2002 totaled $1,400,000 and are reported as short-term debt - related party in the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements.
In July 2000, Glazed Investments issued $4,520,000 in senior subordinated notes (Notes) to fund, in part, expenses associated with the start-up of its operations. The Company purchased $1,007,000 of the Notes at the time of the initial offering. In connection with the Companys acquisition of additional interests in Glazed Investments in fiscal 2003 (see Note 10 Joint Ventures and Note 13 Acquisitions), the Company acquired an additional $3,377,000 in Notes. As a result, approximately $4,384,000 of the Notes issued by Glazed Investments were payable to the Company. Prior to the acquisition by the Company of a controlling interest in Glazed Investments in August 2002, the Notes held by the Company were included in investments in unconsolidated joint ventures in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet. Effective with the consolidation of Glazed Investments with the accounts of the Company in August 2002, the Notes held by the Company were eliminated against the amount reflected in Glazed Investments balance sheet as payable to the Company. Accordingly, the Notes outstanding at November 3, 2002 as reflected in the accompanying unaudited consolidated balance sheet totaling $136,000 represent the total amount of the original $4,520,000 issued that remains payable to a third party. The Notes bear interest at 12% payable semi-annually each April 30 and October 31 through April 30, 2010, at which time a final payment of outstanding principal and accrued interest is due.
For franchisees in which we have an ownership interest, the Company will sometimes guarantee an amount of the debt or leases, generally equal to the Companys ownership percentage. The amounts guaranteed by the Company are disclosed in Note 10 Joint Ventures.
Note 8: Earnings per Share
The computation of basic earnings per share is based on the weighted average
number of common shares outstanding during the period. The computation of
diluted earnings per share reflects the potential dilution that would occur if
stock options were exercised and the dilution from the issuance of restricted
shares. The treasury stock method is used to calculate dilutive shares. This
reduces the gross number of dilutive shares by the number of shares purchasable
from the proceeds of the options assumed to be exercised, the proceeds of the
tax benefits recognized by the Company in conjunction with nonqualified stock
plans and from the amounts of unearned compensation associated with the
restricted shares.
The following table sets forth the computation of the number of diluted shares outstanding:
Three months ended | Nine months ended | ||||||||||||||||
October 28, | November 3, | October 28, | November 3, | ||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | 2001 | 2002 | 2001 | 2002 | |||||||||||||
Basic shares outstanding |
53,880 | 55,334 | 53,540 | 54,742 | |||||||||||||
Effect of dilutive securities: |
|||||||||||||||||
Stock options |
4,716 | 4,233 | 4,724 | 4,453 | |||||||||||||
Restricted stock |
5 | 8 | 6 | 8 | |||||||||||||
Diluted shares outstanding |
58,601 | 59,575 | 58,270 | 59,203 | |||||||||||||
Stock options in the amount of 230,800 shares and 444,000 shares for the three and nine months ended October 28, 2001, respectively, and 1,268,500 shares and 149,400 shares for the three and nine months ended
14
November 3, 2002, respectively, have been excluded from the diluted shares calculation as the inclusion of these options would be antidilutive.
Note 9: Business Segment Information
The Company has three reportable segments. The Company Store Operations
segment is comprised of the operating activities of the stores owned by the
Company and those in consolidated joint ventures. These stores sell doughnuts
and complementary products through both on-premises and off-premises channels.
The majority of the ingredients and materials used by Company Store Operations
is purchased from the KKM&D business segment.
The Franchise Operations segment represents the results of the Companys franchise program. Under the terms of the franchise agreements, the licensed operators pay royalties and fees to the Company in return for the use of the Krispy Kreme name. Expenses for this business segment include costs incurred to recruit new franchisees and to open, monitor and aid in the performance of those stores and direct general and administrative expenses.
The KKM&D segment supplies mix, equipment and other items to both Company and franchise owned stores. All intercompany transactions between the KKM&D business segment and Company stores and consolidated joint venture stores are eliminated in consolidation.
Segment information for total assets and capital expenditures is not presented as such information is not used in measuring segment performance or allocating resources among segments.
Segment operating income is income before general corporate expenses and income taxes.
Three months ended | Nine months ended | ||||||||||||||||
October 28, | November 3, | October 28, | November 3, | ||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | 2001 | 2002 | 2001 | 2002 | |||||||||||||
Revenues: |
|||||||||||||||||
Company store operations |
$ | 68,640 | $ | 78,991 | $ | 190,830 | $ | 227,919 | |||||||||
Franchise operations |
3,361 | 4,941 | 9,582 | 13,983 | |||||||||||||
KKM&D |
68,074 | 97,392 | 188,656 | 255,895 | |||||||||||||
Intercompany sales eliminations |
(40,271 | ) | (52,194 | ) | (111,798 | ) | (142,982 | ) | |||||||||
Total revenues |
$ | 99,804 | $ | 129,130 | $ | 277,270 | $ | 354,815 | |||||||||
Operating Income (Loss): |
|||||||||||||||||
Company store operations |
$ | 11,313 | $ | 13,886 | $ | 30,148 | $ | 39,593 | |||||||||
Franchise operations |
2,075 | 3,723 | 6,077 | 10,525 | |||||||||||||
KKM&D |
4,517 | 8,225 | 12,148 | 20,176 | |||||||||||||
Unallocated general and administrative expenses |
(7,432 | ) | (7,831 | ) | (20,324 | ) | (22,825 | ) | |||||||||
Total operating income |
$ | 10,473 | $ | 18,003 | $ | 28,049 | $ | 47,469 | |||||||||
Depreciation and Amortization Expenses: |
|||||||||||||||||
Company store operations |
$ | 1,563 | $ | 2,282 | $ | 4,432 | $ | 6,276 | |||||||||
Franchise operations |
17 | 41 | 53 | 67 | |||||||||||||
KKM&D |
142 | 678 | 358 | 1,034 | |||||||||||||
Corporate administration |
409 | 402 | 1,112 | 1,184 | |||||||||||||
Total depreciation and amortization expenses |
$ | 2,131 | $ | 3,403 | $ | 5,955 | $ | 8,561 | |||||||||
15
Note 10: Joint Ventures
From time to time, the Company enters into joint venture agreements with
partners to develop and operate Krispy Kreme stores. Each partys investment
is determined based on their proportionate share of equity obtained. The
Companys ability to control the management committee of the joint venture is
the primary determining factor as to whether the joint venture results are
consolidated with the Company. See Basis of Consolidation under Note 2 -
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.
In March 2000, upon approval by the Companys board of directors, a pooled investment fund was established, the Krispy Kreme Equity Group, LLC (KKEG), to invest in joint ventures with new area developers in certain markets. The Companys officers were eligible to invest in the fund. Members of the board of directors who were not officers of the Company were not eligible to invest in the fund. The Company did not provide any funds to its officers to invest in the fund nor did it provide guarantees for the investment. The fund invested exclusively in a fixed number of joint ventures with certain new area developers as approved by its manager, obtaining a 5% interest in them. If any member of the fund withdrew, the fund had a right of first refusal with respect to the withdrawing members interest. The remaining members then had the right to purchase any interest the fund did not purchase. Finally, the Company was obligated to purchase any remaining interest. The Company did not own any units of the KKEG at February 3, 2002. The fund had investments in six joint ventures at February 3, 2002. On March 5, 2002, the members of the KKEG voted to dissolve the KKEG and agreed to sell their interests in the KKEG to the Company. The Company paid to each member of the KKEG an amount equal to his or her original investment, totaling an aggregate of $940,100. On March 6, 2002, the KKEG was dissolved.
In February 2000, the Compensation Committee of the Companys board of directors approved investments by Scott Livengood, Chairman, President and CEO, in joint ventures with certain new area developers in exchange for his giving up his right to develop the Northern California market. Krispy Kreme did not provide any funds to Mr. Livengood to invest in the joint ventures nor did it provide guarantees for the investment. Mr. Livengood had 3% investments in joint ventures with six area developers as of February 3, 2002. On March 5, 2002, the Company purchased Mr. Livengoods interests in the joint ventures at his original cost of $558,800.
In February 2000, the Compensation Committee of the Companys board of directors approved an investment by John McAleer, Krispy Kreme Executive Vice President and Vice Chairman of the Board, in a joint venture with a new area developer. Krispy Kreme did not provide any funds to Mr. McAleer to invest in the joint venture nor did it provide guarantees for the investment. Mr. McAleer had a 21.7% investment in the joint venture, KremeWorks, LLC, as of February 3, 2002. On March 5, 2002, the Company acquired Mr. McAleers interest in KremeWorks, LLC at his original cost of $75,800.
As a result of the transactions on March 5, 2002, in which the Company acquired the KKEGs, Mr. Livengoods, and Mr. McAleers investments in the joint ventures described above, the ownership percentages of the Company and other investors (which do not include the KKEG, Mr. Livengood or Mr. McAleer) in each of these joint ventures are as follows:
Ownership Interests | ||||||||||||||||
Prior to March 5, 2002 | As of March 5, 2002 | |||||||||||||||
KKDC | Other Investors | KKDC | Other Investors | |||||||||||||
Golden Gate Doughnuts, LLC |
59.0 | % | 41.0 | % | 67.0 | % | 33.0 | % | ||||||||
New England Dough, LLC |
49.0 | % | 51.0 | % | 57.0 | % | 43.0 | % | ||||||||
Amazing Glazed, LLC |
22.3 | % | 77.7 | % | 30.3 | % | 69.7 | % | ||||||||
A-OK, LLC |
22.3 | % | 77.7 | % | 30.3 | % | 69.7 | % | ||||||||
Glazed Investments, LLC |
22.3 | % | 77.7 | % | 30.3 | % | 69.7 | % | ||||||||
KKNY, LLC |
22.3 | % | 77.7 | % | 30.3 | % | 69.7 | % | ||||||||
KremeWorks, LLC |
3.3 | % | 96.7 | % | 25.0 | % | 75.0 | % |
16
Consolidated Joint Ventures
On March 22, 2000, the Company entered into a joint venture, Golden Gate
Doughnuts, LLC, to develop the Northern California market. The Company
invested $2,060,000 for a 59% interest and holds two of three management
committee seats. At February 3, 2002, the KKEG and Mr. Livengood owned 5% and
3%, respectively, of Golden Gate. The financial statements of this joint
venture are consolidated with those of the Company. The Company has guaranteed
the payments on several leases and 67% of the line of credit and the term loans
of Golden Gate (see Note 7 Debt). The terms of the guarantees range from 5
to 20 years. As noted above, the Company acquired the KKEG and Mr. Livengoods
interest in Golden Gate on March 5, 2002. As a result, the Companys
investment in Golden Gate increased to 67%, and the portion not owned by the
Company, included in minority interest, was reduced to 33% from 41%.
On March 6, 2001, the Company entered into a joint venture, Freedom Rings, LLC, to develop the Philadelphia market. The Company invested $1,167,000 for a 70% interest in Freedom Rings and holds three of four management committee seats. The Company has guaranteed the payments on certain leases and 70% of the bank debt of Freedom Rings (see Note 7 Debt). The terms of the guarantees range from seven to ten years. The financial statements of this joint venture are consolidated with those of the Company and the 30% not owned by Krispy Kreme is included in minority interest.
On February 27, 2000, the Company entered into a joint venture, Glazed Investments, LLC, to develop the Colorado, Minnesota and Wisconsin markets. The Company invested $500,000 for a 22.3% interest and held two of the joint ventures six management committee seats. At February 3, 2002, the KKEG and Mr. Livengood owned 5% and 3%, respectively, of Glazed Investments. As noted above, the Company acquired the KKEG and Mr. Livengoods interest in Glazed Investments on March 5, 2002, increasing the Companys ownership interest in the joint venture to 30.3%. On August 22, 2002, as discussed further in Note 13 Acquisitions, the Company acquired an additional 44.4% interest in Glazed Investments, increasing its total investment in this joint venture to 74.7%. Effective with the acquisition in August, the Company gained the right to designate four of the six management committee seats. As a result, the Company has the ability to control the operations of the joint venture and, therefore, began consolidating the financial statements of Glazed Investments with those of the Company effective August 22, 2002. The Company has guaranteed 74.7% of the amounts outstanding on certain bank and non-bank debt of Glazed Investments (see Note 7 Debt).
Summarized information for the Companys investments in consolidated joint ventures as of November 3, 2002, including outstanding lease guarantees, is as follows:
Number of Stores as | Ownership % | |||||||||||||||||||
of November 3, | ||||||||||||||||||||
General | 2002/Total Stores | |||||||||||||||||||
Geographic | to be | Third | Lease | |||||||||||||||||
Market | Developed (1) | KKDC | Parties | Guarantees (2) | ||||||||||||||||
Freedom Rings, LLC |
Philadelphia, | 2/17 | 70 | % | 30 | % | $ | 1,120,000 | ||||||||||||
Pennsylvania | ||||||||||||||||||||
Manager Allocation | 3 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||
Glazed Investments, |
Colorado, | 10/28 | 74.7 | % | 25.3 | % | $ | | ||||||||||||
LLC |
Minnesota, | |||||||||||||||||||
Wisconsin | ||||||||||||||||||||
Manager Allocation | 4 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||
Golden Gate |
Northern | 11/24 | 67 | % | 33 | % | $ | 5,599,000 | ||||||||||||
Doughnuts, LLC |
California | |||||||||||||||||||
Manager Allocation | 2 | 1 |
17
(1) | The amount shown as Total Stores to be Developed represents the number of stores in the initial development agreement with the joint venture. This number, which excludes commissary locations, will be re-evaluated as the market is developed and the number of stores to be opened may change. | |
(2) | The amounts shown only represent lease guarantees, as the entire amount of bank debt of each of the consolidated joint ventures is included in the Companys consolidated balance sheet as a liability. |
Equity Method Joint Ventures
As of November 3, 2002, the Company had entered into eleven joint ventures as a
minority interest party. Investments in these joint ventures, where required,
have been made in the form of capital contributions and/or notes receivable.
Notes receivable bear interest, payable semi-annually, at rates ranging from
5.5% to 12.0% per annum and have maturity dates ranging from April 30, 2010 to
the dissolution of the joint venture. These investments and notes receivable
are recorded in investments in unconsolidated joint ventures in the
consolidated balance sheets.
Information related to the markets, ownership interests and manager allocations for joint ventures which are accounted for by the equity method is summarized as follows:
Ownership % | ||||||||||||||||
Number of Stores as | ||||||||||||||||
General | of November 3, 2002/ | |||||||||||||||
Geographic | Total Stores to be | Third | Loan | |||||||||||||
Market | Developed (1) | KKDC | Parties | Guarantees | ||||||||||||
KKNY, LLC | New York City, | 6/24 | 30.3 | % | 69.7 | % | $ | | ||||||||
Northern New Jersey | ||||||||||||||||
Manager Allocation | 2 | 4 | ||||||||||||||
New England | Connecticut, | 2/16 | 57 | % | 43 | % | $ | 158,000 | ||||||||
Dough, LLC | Massachusetts, | |||||||||||||||
Rhode Island | ||||||||||||||||
Manager Allocation | 2 | 2 | ||||||||||||||
KremeKo, Inc. | Eastern Canada | 3/34 | 39.3 | %(2) | 60.7 | %(2) | $ | 475,000 | ||||||||
Manager Allocation | 2 | 3 | ||||||||||||||
A-OK, LLC | Arkansas, Oklahoma | 4/10 | 30.3 | % | 69.7 | % | $ | 1,343,000 | ||||||||
Manager Allocation | 2 | 4 | ||||||||||||||
Amazing Glazed, LLC | Pennsylvania | 3/8 | 30.3 | % | 69.7 | % | $ | | ||||||||
(Pittsburgh) | ||||||||||||||||
Manager Allocation | 2 | 4 | ||||||||||||||
KremeWorks, LLC | Alaska, Hawaii, | 3/31 | 25 | % | 75 | % | $ | | ||||||||
Oregon, Washington, | ||||||||||||||||
Western Canada | ||||||||||||||||
Manager Allocation | 1 | 3 | ||||||||||||||
Amazing | Pennsylvania | 0/5 | 33.3 | % | 66.7 | % | $ | | ||||||||
Hot Glazers, LLC | (Erie) | |||||||||||||||
Manager Allocation | 2 | 4 |
18
Ownership % | ||||||||||||||||
Number of Stores as | ||||||||||||||||
General | of November 3, 2002/ | |||||||||||||||
Geographic | Total Stores to be | Third | Loan | |||||||||||||
Market | Developed (1) | KKDC | Parties | Guarantees | ||||||||||||
KK-TX I, L.P. | Texas (Amarillo, Lubbock) | 0/2 | 33.3 | % | 66.7 | % | $ | 336,000 | ||||||||
Manager Allocation | | (3) | | (3) | ||||||||||||
Krispy Kreme of | Southern Florida | 1/8 | 35.3 | % | 64.7 | % | $ | 1,276,000 | ||||||||
South Florida, LLC | ||||||||||||||||
Manager Allocation | 2 | 3 | ||||||||||||||
Krispy Kreme | Australia/New | 0/30 | 35 | % | 65 | % | $ | | ||||||||
Australia Pty | Zealand | |||||||||||||||
Limited | ||||||||||||||||
Manager Allocation | 2 | 3 | ||||||||||||||
Entrepreneurship | Greensboro, North | 1/1 | 49 | % | 51 | % | $ | | ||||||||
and Economic | Carolina | |||||||||||||||
Development | ||||||||||||||||
Investment, LLC | ||||||||||||||||
Manager Allocation | 1 | 1 |
(1) | The amount shown as Total Stores to be Developed represents the number of stores in the initial development agreement with the joint venture. This number, which excludes commissary locations, will be re-evaluated as the market is developed and the number of stores to be opened may change. | |
(2) | On September 5, 2002, KremeKo, Inc. completed an equity offering to raise funds for store development and general working capital purposes. The Company subscribed for its proportionate share of the offering and further agreed to purchase any shares not subscribed for by other existing shareholders. The Company paid approximately $4,000,000 for its subscribed shares as well as the over-allotment it received and, as a result, the Companys ownership interest increased from 34% to 39.3%, effective September 5, 2002. | |
(3) | KK-TX I, L.P. is a Texas limited partnership. The Company holds a 33.3% interest in the joint venture as a limited partner. Under the terms of the partnership agreement, the general partner has full responsibility for managing the business of the partnership. |
On November 13, 2002, the Company entered into a joint venture to develop Krispy Kreme stores in the United Kingdom and Ireland. The Company will own approximately 37% of the joint venture, Krispy Kreme U. K. Limited, which will develop 25 stores in the United Kingdom and Ireland over the next six years. The Company has also announced plans to invest in two additional joint ventures, both of which are with existing franchisees. These new joint ventures include Rigel Corporation, which will develop El Paso, Texas, and L&L Enterprise Holdings, which will develop Montana and Wyoming. At November 3, 2002, the Company had not invested any funds in these joint ventures.
Note 11: Commitments and Contingencies
To assist certain franchise operators in obtaining financing, the Company has
guaranteed certain leases and loans from third-party financial institutions on
behalf of the franchise operators. Generally, financing guarantees are
provided only to joint venture partners in a percentage equivalent to the
Companys ownership interest in the joint venture franchisee. The Companys
contingent liability related to these guarantees was approximately $3,805,000
at February 3, 2002 and $4,955,000 at November 3, 2002.
Because the Company enters into long-term contracts with its suppliers, in the event that any of these relationships terminate unexpectedly, even where it has multiple suppliers for the same ingredient, the Companys ability to obtain adequate quantities of the same high quality ingredient at the same competitive price could be negatively impacted.
19
Note 12: Legal Contingencies
On March 9, 2000, a lawsuit was filed against the Company, Mr. Livengood and
Golden Gate Doughnuts, LLC, a franchisee of the Company in which the Company
has a 67% interest (see Note 10 Joint Ventures), in Superior Court in the
state of California. The plaintiffs allege, among other things, breach of
contract and seek compensation for injury as well as punitive damages. On
September 22, 2000, after the case was transferred to the Sacramento Superior
Court, that court granted our motion to compel arbitration of the action and
stayed the action pending the outcome of arbitration. On November 3, 2000, the
plaintiffs petitioned for a writ of mandate overruling the Superior Court. On
December 21, 2000, the Court of Appeals summarily denied the writ petition.
Plaintiffs failed to petition the California Supreme Court for review of the
lower Courts decision within the time permitted by law. The lawsuit against
Mr. Livengood was dismissed by the California court for lack of personal
jurisdiction. Plaintiffs have not appealed this judgment, and their time for
doing so has expired. On October 1, 2001, plaintiffs filed a demand for
arbitration with the American Arbitration Association against Krispy Kreme
Doughnut Corporation, Golden Gate Doughnuts, LLC and Mr. Livengood. On
November 5, 2001, the Company filed a response to the arbitration demand
generally denying all claims and raising numerous affirmative, dispositive
defenses. The appointed arbitration panel concluded hearings in
Winston-Salem, North Carolina in December 2002. The Company continues to believe
that plaintiffs claims are without merit and that the outcome of the lawsuit
or arbitration will not have a material adverse effect on the Companys
consolidated financial statements. Accordingly, no accrual for loss (if any)
has been provided in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
Note 13: Acquisitions
The Company from time to time acquires market rights from either Associate or Area Developer
franchisees if they are willing to sell to the Company and if there are sound
business reasons for the Company to make the acquisition. These reasons may
include a franchise market being contiguous to a Company store market where an
acquisition would provide operational synergies; upside opportunity in the
market because the franchisee has not fully developed on-premises or
off-premises sales; or if the Company believes an acquisition of the market
would improve the brand image in the market. The purchase price for each
acquisition is based upon an analysis of historical performance as well as
estimates of future revenues and earnings in the respective markets acquired.
Effective June 16, 2002, the Company acquired the rights to the Akron, Ohio market, as well as the related assets, from an Associate franchisee. Effective June 30, 2002, the Company acquired the rights to the Toledo, Ohio market, as well as the related assets, from an Area Developer franchisee. The total purchase price for these acquisitions was $7,672,000, consisting of cash of $2,238,000 and approximately 145,000 shares of common stock, valued at $5,434,000. The purchase price was allocated to accounts receivable $379,000, inventory $39,000, property and equipment $635,000, accounts payable $93,000, accrued expenses $62,000, repayment of a note receivable $177,000 and reacquired franchise rights, an intangible asset not subject to amortization $6,951,000.
Effective August 22, 2002, the Company acquired an additional 44.4% interest in Glazed Investments, LLC, an Area Developer franchisee with the rights to develop Krispy Kreme stores in markets in Colorado, Minnesota and Wisconsin. The total consideration paid was $23,048,000, consisting of cash of $800,000 and approximately 596,000 shares of stock, valued at $22,248,000. In connection with the acquisition, the Company also acquired a note receivable, payable by Glazed Investments, with a principal amount of $3,015,000 plus accrued interest of $111,000. Prior to the acquisition of an additional interest, the Company owned a 30.3% interest in this joint venture and had the right to designate two of the joint ventures six management committee seats. As a result of the acquisition, the Company now owns a 74.7% interest in the joint venture and has the right to designate four of the six management committee seats. As such, the Company has the ability to control the operations of the joint venture and, therefore, began consolidating the financial statements of Glazed Investments with those of the Company effective August 22, 2002.
20
The following unaudited pro forma financial information presents the combined results of Krispy Kreme Doughnuts, Inc. and the acquired markets as if the acquisitions discussed above had occurred as of the beginning of the periods presented. The unaudited pro forma financial information is not intended to represent or be indicative of the consolidated results of operations of the Company that would have been reported had the acquisitions been completed as of the dates presented, and should not be taken as representative of the future consolidated results of operations of the Company.
Three months ended | Nine months ended | |||||||||||||||
(in thousands, except per | October 28, | November 3, | October 28, | November 3, | ||||||||||||
share amounts) | 2001 | 2002 | 2001 | 2002 | ||||||||||||
Total
revenues |
$ | 101,986 | $ | 132,922 | $ | 287,318 | $ | 367,942 | ||||||||
Net income |
$ | 6,769 | $ | 10,377 | $ | 18,898 | $ | 29,183 | ||||||||
Diluted earnings per share |
$ | 0.11 | $ | 0.17 | $ | 0.32 | $ | 0.49 |
The unaudited pro forma financial information presented above includes the revenues and net income of the acquired markets. Adjustments to the combined amounts were made to eliminate franchise fees and royalties previously earned by the Company from these operations for the periods presented, as well as to eliminate KKM&D revenues and corresponding expenses resulting from sales to these operations.
Of the remaining approximately 25% interest in Glazed Investments not owned by the Company, approximately 22% is owned by certain members of Glazed Investments management. As a condition to the acquisition, the Company entered into an option agreement which gives each of these members of management the option to sell to the Company ultimately up to 100% of their respective interest in Glazed Investments during certain defined exercise periods, subject to certain limitations. The purchase price for the individuals respective interest is determined based upon a formula defined in the agreement, which is generally based upon earnings growth and cash flows of Glazed Investments operations. The options become exercisable, in part, beginning in April 2004. If exercised, the Company has the option to pay the purchase price in cash or shares of the Companys common stock. The Company cannot estimate the likelihood of any of the options being exercised.
Effective November 4, 2002, the Company acquired the rights to the Pensacola, Florida and Destin, Florida markets, as well as the related assets, from an Associate franchisee, in exchange for approximately 95,000 shares of the Companys common stock, valued at approximately $3,100,000. The operations and assets acquired, primarily inventory and equipment, will be included with those of the Company effective November 4, 2002.
Note 14: Notes Receivable Employees
During the third quarter of fiscal 2003, approximately 25 members of the
Companys management and Board of Directors repaid in full loans extended to
them in 1998 in connection with the change in terms of an employee benefit
plan. The total amount of principal and interest repaid was approximately
$1,926,000. The remaining employee note receivable in the amount of $723,000
at November 3, 2002 relates to the purchase of Digital Java,
Inc., a
Chicago-based coffee company, which the Company acquired in February 2001.
This note, issued to a single individual as a compensation arrangement, is
secured by Company stock and, under the terms of the acquisition agreement, the
annual amount of principal and interest owed will be forgiven as long as
certain employment and performance criteria are met.
21
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion of our financial condition and results of operations should be read together with the financial statements and the accompanying notes. This discussion contains statements about future events and expectations, including anticipated store and market openings, planned capital expenditures and trends in or expectations regarding the Companys operations and financing abilities, that constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements are based on managements beliefs, assumptions, and expectations of our future economic performance, taking into account the information currently available to management. These statements are not statements of historical fact. Forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties that may cause our actual results, performance or financial condition to differ materially from the expectations of future results, performance or financial condition we express or imply in any forward-looking statements. Factors that could contribute to these differences include, but are not limited to: the Companys ability to continue and manage growth; delays in store openings; the quality of franchise store operations; the price and availability of raw materials needed to produce doughnut mixes and other ingredients; changes in customer preferences and perceptions; risks associated with competition; risks associated with fluctuations in operating and quarterly results; compliance with government regulations; and other factors discussed in Krispy Kremes periodic reports, proxy statement and other information statements filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The words believe, may, will, should, anticipate, estimate, expect, intend, objective, seek, strive, or similar words, or the negative of these words, identify forward-looking statements entirely by these cautionary factors.
Company Overview and Industry Outlook
We expect doughnut sales to continue to grow due to a variety of factors, including the growth in two-income households and corresponding shift to foods consumed away from home, increased snack food consumption and further growth of doughnut purchases from in-store bakeries. We view the fragmented competition in the doughnut industry as an opportunity for our continued growth. We also believe that the premium quality of our products and the strength of our brand will help enhance the growth and expansion of the overall doughnut market.
Our principal business, which began in 1937, is owning and franchising Krispy Kreme doughnut stores where we make and sell over 20 varieties of premium quality doughnuts, including our Hot Original Glazed. Each of our stores is a doughnut factory with the capacity to produce from 4,000 dozen to over 10,000 dozen doughnuts daily. Consequently, each store has significant fixed or semi-fixed costs, and margins and profitability are significantly impacted by doughnut production volume and sales. Our doughnut stores are versatile in that most can support multiple sales channels to more fully utilize production capacity. These sales channels are comprised of:
| On-premises sales. Sales to customers visiting our stores, including the drive-through windows, along with discounted sales to community organizations that in turn sell our products for fundraising purposes. | ||
| Off-premises sales. Daily sales of fresh doughnuts on a branded, unbranded and private label basis to convenience and grocery stores and select co-branding customers. Doughnuts are sold to these customers on trays for display and sale in glass-enclosed cases and in packages for display and sale on both stand-alone display units and on our customers shelves. Branded refers to products sold bearing the Krispy Kreme brand name and is the primary way we are expanding our off-premises sales. Unbranded products are sold unpackaged from the retailers display case. Private label refers to products that carry the retailers brand name or some other non-Krispy Kreme brand. Unbranded and private label products are a declining portion of our business. |
22
In addition to our retail stores, we are vertically integrated. Our Krispy Kreme Manufacturing and Distribution business unit, KKM&D, produces doughnut mixes and manufactures our doughnut-making equipment, which all of our stores are required to purchase. Additionally, this business unit currently operates distribution centers that provide Krispy Kreme stores with essentially all supplies for the critical areas of their business. In the second quarter of fiscal 2003, we opened our second mix manufacturing and distribution facility in Effingham, Illinois. The new mix facility triples our mix manufacturing capacity and also adds our third distribution facility. This business unit is volume-driven, and its economics are enhanced by the opening of new stores and the penetration of on-premises and off-premises sales channels by existing stores. Our vertical integration allows us to:
| Maintain the consistency and quality of our products throughout our system | ||
| Utilize volume buying power which helps lower the cost of supplies to each of our stores | ||
| Enhance our profitability |
In fiscal 2002, through the acquisition of the assets of Digital Java, Inc., we began to expand our vertical integration to sourcing and roasting our own coffee beans. Digital Java, Inc., a Chicago-based coffee company, was a sourcer and micro-roaster of premium quality coffee and offered a broad line of coffee-based and non-coffee based beverages. Subsequent to the acquisition, we relocated the acquired assets and operations to a newly constructed coffee roasting facility at our Ivy Avenue plant in Winston-Salem. This operation will help support the rollout of our new beverage program, which includes drip coffee, espresso and frozen beverages. During the third quarter of fiscal 2003, we completed the rollout of the first component of this program, converting all stores to our new drip coffee offering, replacing the previous product sold which was purchased from an unrelated third party. At the end of the third quarter of fiscal 2003, the operation was supporting the new beverage program in approximately 40 Krispy Kreme locations, most of which are new stores that opened with the full program. We anticipate introducing the remaining components of the new beverage program, primarily espresso and frozen beverages, in all remaining stores over the next twelve to eighteen months.
During fiscal 2002, we introduced a new concept store, the doughnut and coffee shop. This store uses the new Hot Doughnut Machine technology, which completes the final steps of the production process and requires less space than the full production equipment in our traditional factory store. This technology combines time, temperature and humidity elements to re-heat unglazed doughnuts, provided by a traditional factory store, and prepare them for the glazing process. Once glazed, customers can have the same hot doughnut experience in a doughnut and coffee shop as in a factory store. Additionally, the doughnut and coffee shop offers our new full line of coffee and other beverages. During fiscal 2002, we began our initial tests of the concept in three different markets and venues in North Carolina and continue to develop and enhance the technology. At November 3, 2002, five doughnut and coffee shops were open, four of which are owned by the Company. We plan to continue our tests of this concept.
In our recent store development efforts, we have focused on opening both Company and franchise stores in major metropolitan markets, generally markets with greater than 100,000 households. During the third quarter of fiscal 2003, we announced an initiative to enhance our expansion through the opening of factory stores in small markets, with small markets being defined as those markets having less than 100,000 households. Through value engineering, we believe we have reduced the level of investment in property and equipment required to open a Krispy Kreme store, making the opportunity to enter small markets economically viable. We also expect that stores in these small markets will participate in fund-raising programs and develop off-premises business, further enhancing the opportunity in these markets, although we believe that their retail sales alone will generate attractive financial returns. We expect the stores opened in these markets will primarily be franchised stores and will be opened by our existing franchisees.
As stated above, we intend to expand our concept primarily through opening new franchise stores in territories across the continental United States and Canada, as well as select other international markets. We
23
also have entered and intend to enter into joint ventures with some of our franchisees. As of November 3, 2002, there were a total of 249 Krispy Kreme stores nationwide consisting of 90 company-owned stores, 53 Associate franchise stores and 106 Area Developer franchise stores. For fiscal 2003, we anticipate opening approximately 64 new stores under existing agreements, most of which are expected to be franchise stores. As of November 3, 2002, we had opened 35 new stores in fiscal 2003.
In contemplation of our future international expansion, we are beginning to develop our global strategy as well as the capabilities and infrastructure necessary to support our expansion outside the United States. We currently have three stores in Canada, one of which is a commissary, and will open additional stores in the Canadian market in the coming years. In the second quarter of fiscal 2003, we entered into a joint venture to franchise the Australian and New Zealand markets. We expect the joint venture to open its first store in Australia in fiscal 2004. On November 13, 2002, we entered into a joint venture to develop Krispy Kreme stores in the United Kingdom and Ireland. We expect the joint venture to open its first store in the United Kingdom in late fiscal 2004 or early fiscal 2005. We are also focusing on additional markets outside North America, including Japan, South Korea and Spain. Our initial research indicates that these will be viable markets for the Krispy Kreme concept.
As we expand the Krispy Kreme concept, we will incur infrastructure costs in the form of additional personnel to support the expansion, and additional facilities costs to provide mixes, equipment and other items necessary to support and operate the various new stores. In the course of building this infrastructure, we may incur unplanned costs which could negatively impact our operating results.
Results of Operations
In order to facilitate an understanding of the results of operations for each period presented, we have included a general overview along with an analysis of business segment activities.
| Overview. Outlines information on total systemwide sales and systemwide comparable store sales. Systemwide sales includes the sales of both our company and franchised stores and excludes the sales and revenues of our KKM&D and Franchise Operations business segments. Our consolidated financial statements appearing elsewhere in this report include sales of our company stores, including the sales of consolidated joint venture stores, outside sales of our KKM&D business segment and royalties and fees received from our franchisees; these statements exclude the sales of our franchised stores. We believe systemwide sales data is significant because it shows the overall penetration of our brand, consumer demand for our products and the correlation between systemwide sales and our total revenues. A store is added to our comparable store base in its nineteenth month of operation. A summary discussion of our consolidated results is also presented. | |||||
| Segment results. In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 131, Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information, we have three reportable segments. A description of each of the segments follows. | |||||
| Company Store Operations. Represents the results of our company stores and consolidated joint venture stores. Company stores make and sell doughnuts and complementary products through the sales channels discussed above. Expenses for this business unit include store level expenses along with direct general and administrative expenses. | |||||
| Franchise Operations. Represents the results of our franchise programs. We have two franchise programs: (1) the associate program, which is our original franchising program developed in the 1940s, and (2) the area developer program, which was developed in the mid-1990s. Generally, associates pay royalties of 3.0% |
24
of on-premises sales and 1.0% of all other sales, with the exception of private label sales, for which they pay no royalties. Area developers generally pay royalties of 4.5% of all sales and development and franchise fees ranging from $20,000 to $40,000 per store. Most associates and area developers also contribute 1.0% of all sales to our national advertising and brand development fund. Expenses for this business segment include costs incurred to recruit new franchisees; costs to open, monitor and aid in the performance of these stores; and direct general and administrative expenses. | ||||||
| KKM&D. Represents the results of our KKM&D business unit. This business unit buys and processes ingredients used to produce doughnut mixes and manufactures doughnut-making equipment that all of our stores are required to purchase. This business unit also includes our coffee roasting operations, which became operational in the third quarter of fiscal 2003. The operations currently support our drip coffee beverage program, which was rolled out to all our stores in the third quarter of fiscal 2003, replacing the existing drip coffee offering that was purchased from an unrelated third party. Production in this facility will be increased in the remainder of fiscal 2003 and fiscal 2004 as the other components of our expanded beverage program, primarily espresso and frozen beverages, are introduced in our existing and new stores. Currently, the operations support the expanded beverage program in approximately 40 stores, most of which are new stores that opened with the full program. The KKM&D business unit also purchases and sells essentially all supplies necessary to operate a Krispy Kreme store, including all food ingredients, juices, signage, display cases, uniforms and other items. Generally, shipments are made to each of our stores on a weekly basis by common carrier. All intercompany transactions between KKM&D and Company Store Operations have been eliminated in consolidation. Expenses for this business unit include all expenses incurred at the manufacturing and distribution level along with direct general and administrative expenses. | |||||
| Other. Includes a discussion of significant line items not discussed in the overview or segment discussions, including general and administrative expenses, depreciation and amortization expenses, interest income, interest expense, equity loss in joint ventures, minority interest in consolidated joint ventures, other expenses and the provision for income taxes. |
The table below shows our operating results expressed as a percentage of total revenues. Certain operating data are also shown for the same periods.
Three months ended | Nine months ended | ||||||||||||||||
October 28, | November 3, | October 28, | November 3, | ||||||||||||||
2001 | 2002 | 2001 | 2002 | ||||||||||||||
Statement of Operations Data: |
|||||||||||||||||
Total revenues |
100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | |||||||||
Operating expenses |
80.3 | 77.7 | 80.8 | 78.1 | |||||||||||||
General and administrative expenses |
7.0 | 5.8 | 6.9 | 6.1 | |||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization expenses |
2.1 | 2.6 | 2.2 | 2.4 | |||||||||||||
Income from operations |
10.6 | 13.9 | 10.1 | 13.4 | |||||||||||||
Interest income |
0.7 | 0.4 | 0.9 | 0.5 | |||||||||||||
Interest expense |
(0.1 | ) | (0.5 | ) | (0.1 | ) | (0.3 | ) | |||||||||
Equity loss in joint ventures |
(0.2 | ) | (0.6 | ) | (0.2 | ) | (0.3 | ) | |||||||||
Minority interest |
(0.4 | ) | (0.3 | ) | (0.2 | ) | (0.4 | ) | |||||||||
Other expenses |
(0.1 | ) | (0.2 | ) | | (0.1 | ) | ||||||||||
Income before income taxes |
10.5 | 12.7 | 10.5 | 12.8 | |||||||||||||
Provision for income taxes |
4.0 | 4.9 | 4.0 | 4.9 | |||||||||||||
Net income |
6.5 | % | 7.8 | % | 6.5 | % | 7.9 | % | |||||||||
25
Three months ended | Nine months ended | ||||||||||||||||
October 28, | November 3, | October 28, | November 3, | ||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | 2001 | 2002 | 2001 | 2002 | |||||||||||||
Operating Data: |
|||||||||||||||||
Systemwide sales |
$ | 154,414 | $ | 195,314 | $ | 439,077 | $ | 565,310 | |||||||||
Increase in comparable store sales: |
|||||||||||||||||
Company-owned |
13.0 | % | 12.4 | % | |||||||||||||
Systemwide |
10.1 | % | 11.9 | % |
The following table shows business segment revenues expressed as a percentage of total revenues and business segment operating expenses expressed as a percentage of applicable business segment revenues. Operating expenses exclude depreciation and amortization expenses and indirect (unallocated) general and administrative expenses. Direct general and administrative expenses are included in operating expenses.
Three months ended | Nine months ended | ||||||||||||||||
October 28, | November 3, | October 28, | November 3, | ||||||||||||||
2001 | 2002 | 2001 | 2002 | ||||||||||||||
Revenues by Business Segment: |
|||||||||||||||||
Company store operations |
68.8 | % | 61.2 | % | 68.8 | % | 64.2 | % | |||||||||
Franchise operations |
3.4 | 3.8 | 3.5 | 4.0 | |||||||||||||
KKM&D |
27.8 | 35.0 | 27.7 | 31.8 | |||||||||||||
Total revenues |
100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | |||||||||
Operating Expenses by
Business Segment: |
|||||||||||||||||
Company store operations |
81.2 | % | 79.5 | % | 81.9 | % | 79.9 | % | |||||||||
Franchise operations |
37.8 | % | 23.8 | % | 36.0 | % | 24.3 | % | |||||||||
KKM&D |
83.2 | % | 80.3 | % | 83.7 | % | 81.2 | % | |||||||||
Total operating expenses |
80.3 | % | 77.7 | % | 80.8 | % | 78.1 | % |
Three months ended November 3, 2002 compared with three months ended October 28, 2001
Overview
Systemwide sales for the third quarter increased 26.5% to $195.3 million compared to $154.4 million in the third quarter of the prior year. The increase was comprised of an increase of 15.1% in Company store sales, which increased to $79.0 million, and an increase of 35.6% in franchise store sales, which increased to $116.3 million. During the quarter, thirteen new franchise stores and four new Company stores were opened and one Company store was closed for a net increase of sixteen stores. Additionally, nine Area Developer franchise stores became Company stores as a result of the acquisition of a controlling interest in Glazed Investments, LLC, the franchisee with rights to the Colorado, Minnesota and Wisconsin markets. The total number of stores at the end of the quarter was 249. Of those, 53 are Associate franchise stores, 106 (including 23 in which we have a joint venture interest) are Area Developer franchise stores and 90 (including 23 which are consolidated joint venture stores) are Company stores. We believe continued increased brand awareness and increased off-premises sales contributed significantly to the 10.1% increase in our systemwide comparable store sales.
Total Company revenues increased 29.4% to $129.1 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2003 compared with $99.8 million in the third quarter of the prior fiscal year. This increase was comprised of Company Store Operations revenue increases of 15.1% to $79.0 million, Franchise Operations revenue increases of 47.0% to $4.9 million and KKM&D revenue, excluding intercompany sales, increases of 62.6% to $45.2 million. Net
26
income for the quarter was $10.1 million versus $6.5 million a year ago, representing an increase of 56.3%. Diluted earnings per share was $0.17, an increase of 53.2% over the third quarter of the prior year.
Company Store Operations
Company Store Operations Revenues. Company Store Operations revenues increased to $79.0 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2003 from $68.6 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2002, an increase of 15.1%. Comparable store sales increased by 13.0%. The revenue growth was primarily due to growth in sales from both our on-premises and off-premises sales channels. Total on-premises sales increased approximately $2.9 million and total off-premises sales increased approximately $7.5 million. On-premises sales grew principally as a result of more customer visits, the introduction of new products, including featured doughnut varieties, selected price increases and our continued increase in brand awareness due in part to the expansion of our off-premises sales programs. Company store on-premises sales were also positively impacted by the sales of the nine stores operated by Glazed Investments, LLC, the Area Developer franchisee with rights to develop the Colorado, Minnesota and Wisconsin markets. On August 22, 2002, the Company acquired a controlling interest in this franchisee and, as a result, the revenues of this franchisee are consolidated with the Company Store Operations revenues for periods subsequent to the acquisition. Company Store Operations revenues also include the revenues of the Northern California franchisee, in which the Company owns a 67% interest, and the revenues of the franchisee in the Philadelphia market, in which the Company has a 70% interest. Off-premises sales grew primarily as a result of the addition of several new convenience and grocery store customers as well as the expansion of the number of locations served in our existing customer base. We believe excessive summer heat in some of our markets during the first half of the quarter negatively impacted both on- and off-premises sales growth in the quarter.
Company Store Operations Operating Expenses. Company Store Operations operating expenses increased to $62.8 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2003 from $55.8 million in the same quarter of fiscal 2002, an increase of 12.7%. Company Store Operations operating expenses as a percentage of Company Store Operations revenues were 79.5% in third quarter of fiscal 2003 compared with 81.2% in the same quarter of the prior year. The decrease in Company Store Operations operating expenses as a percentage of revenues was primarily due to increased operating efficiencies generated by growth in store sales volumes as demonstrated by the 13.0% increase in comparable store sales discussed above, selected price increases, improved profitability of our off-premises sales and a focus on gross margin improvement, particularly production yields and a reduction in shrink. Partially offsetting the impact of these items was higher labor costs as a percentage of revenues. As previously stated, we believe that excessive summer heat in some of our markets put pressure on sales and margins during the first half of the quarter. As staffing was in place to support higher growth levels, excess labor costs were incurred earlier in the quarter before we adjusted staffing to the slower sales growth. In addition, costs, including training, supplies, and marketing and promotional expenses, associated with the rollout of our new drip coffee beverage program, which was introduced in all stores in the third quarter of fiscal 2003, negatively impacted Company Store Operations operating expenses as a percentage of Company Store Operations revenues.
We constantly evaluate our store base, not only with respect to our stores financial and operational performance, but also with respect to alignment with our brand image and how well each store meets our customers needs. As a result of these reviews, we make necessary adjustments to cover closing or impairment costs for underperforming stores, and for older stores that need to be closed and relocated. No provisions were made during the third quarter of fiscal 2003 or fiscal 2002.
Franchise Operations
Franchise Operations Revenues. Franchise Operations revenues, consisting of franchise fees and royalties, increased to $4.9 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2003 from $3.4 million in the third quarter of the prior year, an increase of 47.0%. The growth in revenue was primarily due to the opening of 49 new franchise stores since the end of the third quarter of fiscal 2002 and comparable store sales increases, all of which resulted in increased royalty receipts from our franchisees. In addition, of the 17 stores opened in the third
27
quarter of fiscal 2003, thirteen were franchise stores, as compared to 8 of the stores opened in the third quarter of fiscal 2002, resulting in greater revenues from franchise fees in fiscal 2003.
Franchise Operations Operating Expenses. Franchise Operations operating expenses decreased to $1.2 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2003 from $1.3 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2002. As a percentage of Franchise Operations revenues, Franchise Operations operating expenses were 23.8% in the third quarter of the current year compared with 37.8% in the third quarter of the prior year. Operating expenses, as a percentage of revenues, have decreased during the third quarter as compared to the same quarter of the prior year as a result of the Company leveraging the infrastructure it has put in place to oversee the expansion of our franchise concept. As a percentage of Franchise Operations revenues, Franchise Operations operating expenses will vary in part depending on the number of store openings in a quarter and the level of opening team support needed to assist with the openings. The amount of support we provide for each Area Developer groups store openings declines with each successive opening. As some of our individual Area Developer groups are now operating multiple stores, our costs associated with their additional store openings have declined.
KKM&D
KKM&D Revenues. KKM&D sales to franchise stores increased to $45.2 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2003 from $27.8 million in the same quarter of fiscal 2002, an increase of 62.6%. The primary reasons for the increase in revenues were the opening, since the end of the third quarter of fiscal 2002, of 49 new franchise stores and comparable store sales increases. Increased doughnut sales through both the on-premises and off-premises sales channels by franchise stores resulted in additional revenues for KKM&D from sales of mixes, sugar, shortening and other supplies. In addition, each of these new stores is required to purchase doughnut-making equipment and other peripheral equipment from KKM&D. Therefore, the timing of new store openings and related equipment purchases may result in fluctuations in KKM&D revenues. The increased number of franchise store openings in the third quarter of fiscal 2003 as compared to the same period of the prior fiscal year, as well as the increased number of stores expected to be opened early in the fourth quarter for which equipment has been shipped, positively impacted KKM&D sales.
KKM&D Operating Expenses. KKM&D operating expenses increased to $36.3 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2003 from $23.1 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2002, an increase of 56.8%. KKM&D operating expenses as a percentage of KKM&D revenues were 80.3% in the third quarter of the current year compared with 83.2% in the third quarter of the prior year. The decrease in KKM&D operating expenses as a percentage of revenues was due to improved efficiencies in our Winston-Salem mix and equipment manufacturing facilities. Because the Effingham facility was in operation for the entire quarter, our Winston-Salem mix manufacturing facility was able to scale back its mix production levels, improving its efficiency as it had been running at excessive levels prior to the Effingham opening. Additionally, the relocation of our equipment manufacturing facility during the third quarter of fiscal 2002 to a facility better designed to facilitate our manufacturing process has resulted in improved manufacturing efficiencies. Start-up costs associated with our new mix and distribution facility in Effingham, Illinois, which became operational during the second quarter of fiscal 2003, and associated with our coffee roasting operation in Winston-Salem, which continues to expand operations as it supports the rollout of our new beverage program, had a negative impact on KKM&D operating expenses as a percentage of KKM&D revenues.
Other
General and Administrative Expenses. General and administrative expenses increased to $7.4 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2003 from $7.0 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2002, an increase of 5.8%. General and administrative expenses as a percentage of total revenues for the third quarter were 5.8% in fiscal 2003 compared with 7.0% in fiscal 2002. The dollar growth in general and administrative expenses is due primarily to increased personnel and related salary and benefit costs needed to support our expansion, as well as other cost increases necessitated by the growth of the Company, offset by lower provisions for employee benefit costs such as insurance and incentive provisions under the terms of the plans. The dollar growth in general and administrative expenses would have been higher, however, during much of the quarter, but particularly in the first half, we implemented strict controls on various general and administrative expenses as we were concerned about a slow-down in the momentum of the business which we believe was caused primarily by the excessive heat and drought in many of our market areas. We imposed controls on salary expenses, travel expenses and professional fees, among others. General and administrative expenses as a percentage of total revenues declined
28
during the third quarter of fiscal 2003 primarily as a result of our 29.4% growth in revenues during the period. In particular, acquisitions of Associate and Area Developer franchisee markets in fiscal 2003, including the acquisition of a controlling interest in Glazed Investments, LLC, a joint venture, resulted in revenue gains with minimal incremental general and administrative expenses as we were able to leverage our existing infrastructure in many functional areas to support these acquired operations. In addition, as a percentage of total revenues, general and administrative expenses will vary in part depending upon the number of new store openings in a quarter. During the third quarter of fiscal 2003, thirteen new franchise stores were opened, as compared to eight new franchise stores opened in the comparable period of the prior year. As each new store is required to purchase doughnut-making equipment and other peripheral equipment from KKM&D, periods with greater equipment shipments due to an increased number of store openings generally result in increased revenues. These increased revenues further leverages the existing general and administrative expense structure as there is minimal incremental general and administrative expenses associated with a store opening.
Depreciation and Amortization Expenses. Depreciation and amortization expenses increased to $3.4 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2003 from $2.1 million in the third quarter of the prior year, an increase of 59.7%. Depreciation and amortization expenses as a percentage of total revenues for the third quarter were 2.6% in fiscal 2003 compared with 2.1% in fiscal 2002. The dollar growth in depreciation and amortization expenses is due to increased capital asset additions, primarily related to our new mix and distribution facility in Effingham, Illinois, as well as for new stores, including new stores opened by consolidated joint ventures.
Interest Income. Interest income decreased in the third quarter of fiscal 2003 as a result of a reduction in rates of interest earned on excess cash invested, as well as a reduction in the average amount invested in the third quarter of fiscal 2003 as compared to the comparable period in fiscal 2002. During the third quarter of fiscal 2003, the average amount invested in cash and marketable securities was approximately $46.5 million, while the average amount invested in cash and marketable securities for the comparable period in fiscal 2002 was approximately $50.6 million.
Interest Expense. Interest expense increased in the third quarter of fiscal 2003 over the same quarter of the prior year. Interest expense in the third quarter of both fiscal 2003 and fiscal 2002 included interest on borrowings by Golden Gate Doughnuts, LLC, our Area Developer developing the Northern California market. As we own 67% of this market, the results are consolidated in the Companys financial statements. In addition, interest expense in the third quarter of fiscal 2003 includes interest on the Term Loan used to finance the Companys new mix and distribution facility in Effingham, Illinois, which was completed in the second quarter of fiscal 2003, as well as interest expense on borrowings of Glazed Investments, LLC, our Area Developer developing the Colorado, Minnesota and Wisconsin markets. As a result of our acquisition of a controlling interest in this franchisee on August 22, 2002, its results are consolidated in the Companys financial statements for periods subsequent to that date.
Equity Loss in Joint Ventures. This item represents the Companys share of operating results associated with the Companys investments in unconsolidated joint ventures, accounted for under the equity method, to develop and operate Krispy Kreme stores. The loss reported for the third quarter of fiscal 2003 is a result of the timing of the joint venture store openings and the preopening expenses incurred by the joint ventures. In addition, the loss for the third quarter of fiscal 2003 includes the Companys share of the initial start-up expenses of the joint venture in the Australian and New Zealand markets. The joint ventures are in various stages of their development of Krispy Kreme stores. For example, some ventures have multiple stores in operation while others, such as the newly formed joint venture in the Australian and New Zealand markets, have none. Each joint venture has varying levels of infrastructure, primarily human resources, in place to open stores. As a result, the joint ventures are leveraging their infrastructure to varying degrees, which greatly impacts the profitability of a joint venture. Note 10 - Joint Ventures in the notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements contains further information about these joint ventures. At November 3, 2002, there were 23 stores open by unconsolidated joint ventures compared to 12 stores at October 28, 2001.
29
Eight of the eleven unconsolidated joint ventures had stores open at November 3, 2002. Of the seven unconsolidated joint ventures in existence at October 28, 2001, five had stores open as of that date.
Minority Interest. This expense represents the net elimination of the minority partners share of income or losses from consolidated joint ventures to develop and operate Krispy Kreme stores. The inclusion of the minority partners share of the results of operations of Glazed Investments, LLC subsequent to the Companys acquisition of a controlling interest in this franchisee during the quarter did not have a significant impact on this expense.
Provision For Income Taxes. The provision for income taxes is based on the effective tax rate applied to the respective periods pre-tax income. The provision for income taxes was $6.3 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2003 representing a 38.5% effective rate compared to $4.0 million, or 38.0%, in the third quarter of the prior year. The increase in the effective rate is primarily the result of increased state income taxes, due to our expansion into higher taxing states as well as increases in statutory rates in several jurisdictions.
Historically, we have experienced seasonal variability in our quarterly operating results, with higher profits per store in the first and third quarters than in the third and fourth quarters. The seasonal nature of our operating results is expected to continue.
Nine months ended November 3, 2002 compared with nine months ended October 28, 2001
Overview
Systemwide sales for the nine months increased 28.7% to $565.3 million compared to $439.1 million in the same period of the prior year. The increase was comprised of an increase of 19.4% in Company store sales, which increased to $227.9 million, and an increase of 35.9% in franchise store sales, which increased to $337.4 million. During the first nine months of the year, 29 new franchise stores and six new Company stores were opened and two franchise stores and two Company stores were closed. Additionally, two Associate Franchise stores and one Area Developer franchise store became Company stores via the acquisition of franchise markets in Akron, Ohio and Toledo, Ohio, and nine Area Developer franchise stores became Company stores via the acquisition during the third quarter of fiscal 2003 of an additional interest in Glazed Investments, LLC, the franchisee with rights to develop markets in Colorado, Minnesota and Wisconsin. The total number of stores at the end of the nine months was 249. Of those, 53 are Associate franchise stores, 106 (including 23 in which we have a joint venture interest) are Area Developer franchise stores and 90 (including 23 which are consolidated joint venture stores) are Company stores. We believe continued increased brand awareness and increased off-premises sales contributed significantly to the 11.9% increase in our systemwide comparable store sales.
Total company revenues increased 28.0% to $354.8 million in the first nine months of fiscal 2003 compared with $277.3 million in the same period of the prior fiscal year. This increase was comprised of Company Store Operations revenue increases of 19.4% to $227.9 million, Franchise Operations revenue increases of 45.9% to $14.0 million and KKM&D revenue, excluding intercompany sales, increases of 46.9% to $112.9 million. Net income for the nine months was $27.8 million versus $18.1 million a year ago, representing an increase of 53.7%. Diluted earnings per share was $0.47, an increase of 51.1% over the same period of the prior year.
Company Store Operations
Company Store Operations Revenues. Company Store Operations revenues increased to $227.9 million in the first nine months of fiscal 2003 from $190.8 million in the same period of fiscal 2002, an increase of 19.4%. Comparable store sales increased by 12.4%. The revenue growth was primarily due to strong growth in sales from both our on-premises and off-premises sales channels. Total on-premises sales
30
increased approximately $13.2 million and total off-premises sales increased approximately $23.9 million. On-premises sales grew principally as a result of more customer visits, the introduction of new products, selected price increases and our continued increase in brand awareness due in part to the expansion of our off-premises sales programs. Company store on-premises sales were also positively impacted by the sales of the nine stores in the Northern California market. The Company has a 67% interest in the Northern California market, and as a result, it is consolidated with the Company Store Operations revenues and results. Our off-premises sales grew primarily through the addition of several new convenience and grocery store customers as well as expansion of the number of locations served in our existing customer base. We believe excessive summer heat in some of our markets put pressure on both on- and off-premises sales growth in both the second quarter and the first half of the third quarter of fiscal 2003.
Company Store Operations Operating Expenses. Company Store Operations operating expenses increased to $182.1 million in the first nine months of fiscal 2003 from $156.3 million in the same period of fiscal 2002, an increase of 16.5%. Company Store Operations operating expenses as a percentage of Company Store Operations revenues were 79.9% in the first nine months of fiscal 2003 compared with 81.9% in the same period of the prior year. The decrease in Company Store Operations operating expenses as a percentage of revenues was due to increased operating efficiencies generated by growth in store sales volumes, selected price increases, improved profitability of our off-premises sales and a focus on gross margin improvement.
The acquisition of the franchise markets in fiscal 2003 and the consolidation of Glazed Investments, LLC subsequent to our acquisition of a controlling interest in that franchisee did not have a material impact on Company Store Operations revenues or operating expenses for the nine-month period.
We constantly evaluate our store base, not only with respect to our stores financial and operational performance, but also with respect to alignment with our brand image and how well each store meets our customers needs. As a result of these reviews, we make necessary adjustments to cover closing or impairment costs for underperforming stores, and for older stores that need to be closed and relocated. No provisions were made during the first nine months of fiscal 2003 or fiscal 2002.
Franchise Operations
Franchise Operations Revenues. Franchise Operations revenues increased to $14.0 million in the first nine months of fiscal 2003 from $9.6 million in the first nine months of the prior year, an increase of 45.9%. The growth in revenue was primarily due to the opening of 49 new franchise stores since the end of the third quarter of fiscal 2002, as well as comparable store sales increases.
Franchise Operations Operating Expenses. Franchise Operations operating expenses were $3.4 million in the first nine months of fiscal 2003 and $3.5 million in the first nine months of fiscal 2002. As a percentage of Franchise Operations revenues, Franchise Operations operating expenses were 24.3% in the first nine months of the current year compared with 36.0% in the first nine months of the prior year. The decrease in Franchise Operations operating expenses as a percentage of revenues is primarily the result of the Company leveraging the infrastructure put in place to oversee the expansion of our franchise concept. In addition, Franchise Operations operating expenses as a percentage of Franchise Operations revenues will vary depending on the number of store openings in a quarter and the level of opening team support needed to assist with the openings. The amount of support that we provide for each Area Developer groups store openings declines with each successive opening. As some of our individual Area Developer groups are now operating multiple stores, our costs associated with their additional store openings have declined.
31
KKM&D
KKM&D Revenues. KKM&D sales to franchise stores increased to $112.9 million in the first nine months of fiscal 2003 from $76.9 million in the same period of fiscal 2002, an increase of 46.9%. The primary reason for the increase in revenues was the opening of 49 new franchise stores since the end of the third quarter of fiscal 2002 and comparable store sales increases. Increased doughnut sales through both the on-premises and off-premises sales channels by franchise stores translated into increased revenues for KKM&D from sales of mixes, sugar, shortening and other supplies. Also, each of these new stores is required to purchase doughnut-making equipment and other peripheral equipment from KKM&D, thereby enhancing KKM&D sales.
KKM&D Operating Expenses. KKM&D operating expenses increased to $91.7 million in first nine months of fiscal 2003 from $64.4 million in the same period of fiscal 2002, an increase of 42.5%. KKM&D operating expenses as a percentage of KKM&D revenues were 81.2% in the first nine months of the current year compared with 83.7% in the same period of the prior year. The decrease in KKM&D operating expenses as a percentage of revenues was due to improved efficiencies in our Winston-Salem mix and equipment manufacturing facilities. Because the Effingham facility was in operation for the entire quarter, our Winston-Salem mix manufacturing facility was able to scale back its mix production levels, improving its efficiency as it had been running at excessive levels prior to the Effingham opening. Additionally, the relocation of our equipment manufacturing facility during the third quarter of fiscal 2002 to a facility better designed to facilitate our manufacturing process has resulted in improved manufacturing efficiencies. Start-up costs associated with our new mix and distribution facility in Effingham, Illinois, which became operational during the second quarter of fiscal 2003, and associated with our coffee roasting operation in Winston-Salem, which continues to expand operations as it supports the rollout of our new beverage program, had a negative impact on KKM&D operating expenses as a percentage of KKM&D revenues.
Other
General and Administrative Expenses. General and administrative expenses increased to $21.6 million in the first nine months of fiscal 2003 from $19.2 million in the first nine months of fiscal 2002, an increase of 12.6%. General and administrative expenses as a percentage of total revenues for the first nine months were 6.1% in fiscal 2003 compared with 6.9% in fiscal 2002. The dollar growth in general and administrative expenses is due primarily to increased personnel and salary and related benefit costs to support our expansion, and other cost increases necessitated by the growth of the Company offset by a net decrease in certain employee benefit costs (consisting of certain insurance and incentive provisions) under the terms of the plans. The dollar growth in general and administrative expenses would have been higher, however, during the second and part of the third quarter, we implemented strict controls on various general and administrative expenses as we were concerned about a slow-down in the momentum of the business which we believe was caused primarily by the excessive heat and drought in many of our market areas. We imposed controls on salary expenses, travel expenses and professional fees, among others. General and administrative expenses as a percentage of total revenues declined during fiscal 2003 primarily as a result of our 28.0% growth in revenues during the period. In particular, acquisitions of Associate and Area Developer franchisee markets in fiscal 2003, including the acquisition of a controlling interest in Glazed Investments, LLC, a joint venture, resulted in revenue gains with minimal incremental general and administrative expenses as we were able to leverage our existing infrastructure in many functional areas to support these acquired operations. In addition, as a percentage of total revenues, general and administrative expenses will vary in part depending upon the number of new store openings in a period. During fiscal 2003, 29 new franchise stores were opened, as compared to 21 new franchise stores opened in the comparable period of the prior year. As each new store is required to purchase doughnut-making equipment and other peripheral equipment from KKM&D, periods with greater equipment shipments due to an increased number of store openings generally result in increased revenues. These increased revenues further leverages the existing general and administrative expense structure as there is minimal incremental general and administrative expenses associated with a store opening.
32
Depreciation and Amortization Expenses. Depreciation and amortization expenses increased to $8.6 million in the first nine months of fiscal 2003 from $6.0 million in the first nine months of the prior year, an increase of 43.8%. Depreciation and amortization expenses as a percentage of total revenues for the first nine months were 2.4% in fiscal 2003 compared with 2.2% in fiscal 2002. The dollar growth in depreciation and amortization expenses is due to increased capital asset additions, including additions related to our new mix and distribution facility, which became operational in the second quarter of fiscal 2003.
Interest Income. Interest income decreased from $2.5 million in the first nine months of fiscal 2002 to $1.7 million in the first nine months of fiscal 2003. This decrease results from a reduction in rates of interest earned on excess cash invested.
Interest Expense. Interest expense increased to $1.2 million in the first nine months of fiscal 2003 from $0.2 million in the first nine months of the prior year. The increase is primarily the result of interest on the Term Loan used to finance the Companys new mix and distribution facility in Effingham, Illinois. Prior to completion of the facility during the second quarter of fiscal 2003, interest on borrowings used to finance the facility was capitalized. Additionally, interest expense in fiscal 2003 includes interest on increased borrowings by our Northern California joint venture, as it continues to finance its expansion through bank debt.
Equity Loss in Joint Ventures. These expenses consist of the Companys share of operating results associated with the Companys investments in unconsolidated joint ventures to develop and operate Krispy Kreme stores. These joint ventures are in various stages of their development of Krispy Kreme stores. For example, some ventures have multiple stores in operation while others have none. Each joint venture has varying levels of infrastructure, primarily human resources, in place to open stores. As a result, the joint ventures are leveraging their infrastructure to varying degrees, which greatly impacts the profitability of a joint venture. Note 10 Joint Ventures in the notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements contains further information about these joint ventures. At November 3, 2002, there were 23 stores open by unconsolidated joint ventures compared to twelve stores at October 28, 2001.
Minority Interest. This expense represents the net elimination of the minority partners share of income or losses from consolidated joint ventures to develop and operate Krispy Kreme stores. The increase in this expense is primarily the result of increased profitability in the Northern California joint venture, which opened three additional stores since the end of the third quarter of fiscal 2002. The inclusion of the minority partners share of the results of operations of Glazed Investments, LLC, subsequent to the Companys acquisition of a controlling interest in this franchisee on August 22, 2002 did not have a significant impact on this expense.
Provision For Income Taxes. The provision for income taxes is based on the effective tax rate applied to the respective periods pre-tax income. The provision for income taxes was $17.3 million in the first nine months of fiscal 2003, representing a 38.4% effective tax rate, compared to $11.1 million, or 38.0%, in the first nine months of the prior year. The increase in the effective rate is primarily the result of increased state income taxes, due to our expansion into higher taxing states as well as increases in statutory rates in several jurisdictions.
Historically, we have experienced seasonal variability in our quarterly operating results, with higher profits per store in the first and third quarters than in the second and fourth quarters. The seasonal nature of our operating results is expected to continue.
33
Liquidity And Capital Resources
Because management generally does not monitor liquidity and capital resources on a segment basis, this discussion is presented on a consolidated basis.
We funded our capital requirements for the first nine months of fiscal 2003 primarily through cash flow generated from operations, with the exception of the purchase of our new mix and distribution facility in Effingham, Illinois. As discussed below, the purchase of the facility was funded from borrowings under a credit agreement with a bank. We believe our cash flow generation ability is becoming a financial strength and will aid in the expansion of our business. Our consolidated joint ventures funded their capital requirements through cash flows from operations and borrowings under various financing arrangements, including revolving lines of credit, term loans and short-term debt.
Cash Flow From Operations
Net cash flow from operations was $25.2 million in the first nine months of
fiscal 2003 and $22.6 million in the first nine months of fiscal 2002.
Operating cash flow has benefited from increased net income, offset by
additional investments in working capital, primarily receivables and
inventories. The increase in receivables is primarily the result of increases
in receivables at KKM&D, driven principally by the growth in stores. Store
openings during the first nine months of fiscal 2003 have increased the number
of stores served by KKM&D. In addition, stores are required to purchase
doughnut-making and related store furnishings and equipment from the Company.
These purchases for new stores generally have payment terms of 54 days. The
volume of such shipments in the latter part of the third quarter of fiscal
2003, for stores opened in the third quarter as well as for those to be opened
early in the fourth quarter, was greater than shipments at the end of fiscal
2002. The increase in inventories is also driven, in part, by the growth in
stores. To support the store openings scheduled for the remainder of the
fiscal year, as well as for unforeseen capacity expansion needs, we are
building inventory levels in our equipment manufacturing facility. In addition,
we have stocked the new mix and distribution operations at our new facility in
Effingham, Illinois, which became operational during the second quarter of
fiscal 2003. Operating cash flow was also impacted by the reduction in accrued
expenses, primarily as a result of the payment of annual incentive bonuses and
the Companys annual contribution to the Krispy Kreme profit sharing stock
ownership plan during the first quarter of fiscal 2003.
Additionally, operating cash flows were favorably impacted by the tax benefit from the exercise of nonqualified stock options of $6.7 million. The Companys operating cash flows may continue to be favorably impacted by similar tax benefits in the future; however, the exercise of stock options is outside of the Companys control.
Cash Flow From Investing Activities
Net cash used for investing activities was $74.1 million in the first nine
months of fiscal 2003 and $37.7 million in the first nine months of the prior
year. Investing activities in fiscal 2003 and fiscal 2002 primarily consist of
capital expenditures for property and equipment, acquisitions of
franchise markets, additional investments in joint ventures with partners to
develop and operate Krispy Kreme stores and the purchase and sale of
investments. Capital expenditures in the first nine months
of fiscal 2003 and fiscal 2002 include expenditures to support our off-premises
sales programs, capital expenditures for existing Company stores and equipment
and development of new Company stores. Capital expenditures in fiscal
2003 also include amounts related to the new
mix and distribution facility in Effingham, Illinois which opened during the
second quarter of fiscal 2003.
Cash Flow From Financing Activities
Net cash provided by financing activities was $41.8 million in the first nine
months of fiscal 2003 and $30.8 million in the first nine months of fiscal
2002. Financing activities in the first nine months of fiscal 2003 consisted
primarily of the borrowing of $33.0 million to finance the Effingham, Illinois
mix and distribution facility, borrowings of long-term debt by consolidated
joint ventures and the exercise of stock options. In addition, cash flows
benefited from the repayment by certain members of the Companys management and
Board of Directors of loans extended to them in 1998 in connection with the
change in terms of an employee
34
benefit plan. These loans were repaid in full in the third quarter of fiscal 2003. Our financing activities in the first nine months of fiscal 2002 consisted primarily of the completion of our follow-on public offering, borrowings by Golden Gate Doughnuts, LLC, our Northern California joint venture, to finance store development and the exercise of stock options.
Capital Resources, Contractual Obligations and Other Commercial Commitments
Operating Leases. The Company conducts some of its operations from leased
facilities and, additionally, leases certain equipment under operating leases.
Under generally accepted accounting principles, operating leases are not
included in liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet. Generally, these
leases have initial terms of five to 18 years and contain provisions for
renewal options of five to ten years. Note 8 Lease Commitments, in our
fiscal 2002 Annual Report contains additional information on our commitments
under noncancelable operating leases as of February 3, 2002. In determining
whether to enter into an operating lease for an asset, we evaluate the nature
of the asset and the associated operating lease terms to determine if operating
leases are an effective financing tool. We anticipate that we will continue to
use operating leases as a financing tool as appropriate.
Debt & Lease Guarantees and Collateral Repurchase Agreements. In order to open stores and expand off-premises sales programs, our franchisees incur debt and enter into operating lease agreements. For those franchisees in which we have an ownership interest, we may guarantee an amount of the debt or leases, generally equal to our ownership percentage. Because these are relatively new entities without a long track record of operations, these guarantees are necessary for our joint venture partners to get financing for the growth of their businesses. In the past, we have also guaranteed debt amounts, or entered into collateral repurchase agreements for Company stock or doughnut-making equipment, for certain franchisees when we did not have an ownership interest in them, though we have suspended this practice unless there are some unusual circumstances which require our financial guarantees. In accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, these guarantees are not recorded as liabilities in our consolidated balance sheets. As of November 3, 2002, we had loan guarantees totaling $4.6 million and lease commitment guarantees totaling $356,000. The total loan guarantee amount does not include debt guarantees of our Northern California joint venture partner, our Philadelphia joint venture partner, or Glazed Investments, LLC, as the entire amount of the debt of these joint ventures is shown as a liability in our consolidated balance sheet. The lease commitment guarantee amount does not include lease guarantees of these consolidated joint venture partners, which total $6.7 million at November 3, 2002. These amounts, which totaled $3.3 million at February 3, 2002, are included in the total amounts shown in Note 8 Lease Commitments, in our fiscal 2002 Annual Report. Of the total amounts guaranteed of $5.0 million, $3.6 million are for franchisees in which we have an ownership interest and $1.4 million are for franchisees in which we have no ownership interest. The amount of debt and lease guarantees related to franchisees in which we have an ownership interest will continue to grow as these joint ventures open more stores while the amount of debt and lease guarantees related to franchisees in which we do not have an interest is expected to decrease. We consider it unlikely that we will have to satisfy any of these guarantees.
Off Balance Sheet Arrangements. The Company does not have any off balance sheet debt nor does it have any transactions, arrangements, or relationships with any special purpose entities.
In the next five years, we plan to use cash primarily for the following activities:
| Adding mix production and distribution capacity to support expansion | ||
| Remodeling and relocation of selected older company stores | ||
| Expanding our equipment manufacturing and operations training facilities | ||
| Investing in all or part of franchisees operations, both domestically and internationally |
35
| Working capital and other corporate purposes |
Our capital requirements for the items outlined above may be significant. These capital requirements will depend on many factors including our overall performance, the pace of store expansion and company store remodels, the requirements for joint venture arrangements and infrastructure needs for both personnel and facilities. Prior to fiscal 2001, we primarily relied on cash flow generated from operations and our line of credit to fund our capital needs. We believe that the proceeds from the initial public offering completed in April 2000, our follow-on public offering completed in early February 2001, cash flow generated from operations, borrowings of long-term debt, and our borrowing capacity under our line of credit will be sufficient to meet our capital needs for at least the next 24 months. If additional capital is needed, we may raise such capital through public or private equity or debt financing or other financing arrangements. Future capital funding transactions may result in dilution to shareholders. However, there can be no assurance that additional capital will be available or be available on satisfactory terms. Our failure to raise additional capital could have one or more of the following effects on our operations and growth plans over the next five years:
| Slowing our plans to remodel and relocate older company-owned stores | ||
| Reducing the number and amount of joint venture investments in area developer stores | ||
| Slowing the building of our infrastructure in both personnel and facilities |
Inflation
We do not believe that inflation has had a material impact on our results of operations in recent years. However, we cannot predict what effect inflation may have on our results of operations in the future.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In August 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement
Obligations, effective for years beginning after June 15, 2002, or the
Companys fiscal year 2004. SFAS No. 143 addresses financial accounting and
reporting for obligations associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived
assets and the associated asset retirement costs. It applies to legal
obligations associated with the retirement of long-lived assets that result
from the acquisition, construction, development or the normal operation of a
long-lived asset, except for certain obligations of lessees. The adoption of
this Statement will not have a significant impact on the Companys consolidated
financial statements.
In October 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, effective for years beginning after December 15, 2001, or the Companys fiscal year 2003. SFAS No. 144 supersedes SFAS No. 121, Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed of and the accounting and reporting provisions of APB Opinion No. 30, Reporting the Effects of Disposal of a Segment of a Business, and Extraordinary, Unusual and Infrequently Occurring Events and Transactions. SFAS No. 144 retains the requirements of SFAS No. 121 to recognize an impairment loss only if the carrying amount of a long-lived asset is not recoverable from its undiscounted cash flows and to measure an impairment loss as the difference between the carrying amount and the fair value of the asset. The adoption of SFAS No. 144 did not have a significant impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
In April 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 145, Rescission of SFAS Nos. 4, 44 and 64, Amendment of SFAS No. 13, and Technical Corrections. Among other provisions, SFAS No. 145 rescinds both SFAS No. 4, Reporting Gains and Losses from Extinguishment of Debt, and the amendment of SFAS No. 4, SFAS No. 64, Extinguishments of Debt Made to Satisfy Sinking-Fund Requirements. This Statement also amends SFAS No. 13, Accounting for Leases, to eliminate an inconsistency between the accounting for sale-leaseback transactions and the accounting for certain lease modifications that have economic effects similar to sale-leaseback transactions. This Statement also amends other existing authoritative pronouncements to make various technical corrections, clarify meanings, or describe their applicability under changed conditions. The provisions of this Statement are applicable for fiscal years beginning after, transactions entered into after
36
and financial statements issued on or subsequent to May 15, 2002. Its adoption will not have a significant impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
In June 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 146, Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities. This Statement addresses financial accounting and reporting for costs associated with exit or disposal activities and nullifies Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue No. 94-3, Liability Recognition for Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity (including Certain Costs Incurred in a Restructuring). The Statement requires that a liability for a cost associated with an exit or disposal activity be recognized when the liability is incurred. Under EITF 94-3, a liability for an exit cost, as defined in EITF 94-3, was recognized at the date of commitment to an exit or disposal plan. This Statement also establishes that fair value is the objective for initial measurement of the liability. The provisions of this Statement are effective for exit or disposal activities initiated after December 31, 2002. The adoption of this Statement will not have a significant impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
In November 2002, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 45, Guarantors Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others. Interpretation No. 45 clarifies the requirements for a guarantors accounting for and disclosures of certain guarantees issued and outstanding. It also specifies that a guarantor is required to recognize, at the inception of the guarantee, a liability for the fair value of the obligation undertaken in issuing the guarantee, although it does not prescribe a specific approach for subsequently measuring the guarantors recognized liability over the term of the guarantee. Interpretation No. 45 also specifies certain disclosures required to be made in interim and annual financial statements related to guarantees. The recognition and measurement provisions of the Interpretation are effective for guarantees issued or modified after December 31, 2002. The accounting for guarantees issued prior to this date is not affected. Disclosure requirements are effective for financial statements of interim or annual periods ending after December 15, 2002. Management is currently evaluating the impact of adoption of this Interpretation.
Item 3. Quantitative And Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risks
We are exposed to market risk from changes in interest rates on our outstanding debt. Our $40 million revolving line of credit bears interest at either our lenders prime rate minus 110 basis points or a rate equal to LIBOR plus 100 points. We elect the rate on a monthly basis. During fiscal 2002, our Northern California Area Developer, a consolidated joint venture, entered into a new credit facility with a bank. Subsequent to the end of the third quarter of fiscal 2003, the Northern California Area Developer converted a portion of the amount outstanding under its revolving line of credit to a term loan. These credit facilities, a revolving line of credit and term loans, bear interest at LIBOR plus 1.25%. We guarantee 67% of the amounts outstanding under these facilities. In June 2002, our Philadelphia Area Developer, a consolidated joint venture, entered into an unsecured loan agreement with a bank to provide initial funding for construction of a retail store. Subsequent to the end of the third quarter of fiscal 2003, the Philadelphia joint venture entered into a revolving line of credit which replaced the unsecured loan and provided additional funding for store construction and general working capital purposes. Amounts outstanding under the revolving line of credit bear interest at LIBOR plus 1.25%. Glazed Investments, LLC, a consolidated joint venture, has outstanding several promissory notes issued to finance store development. These notes bear interest at varying rates, based upon LIBOR or commercial paper rates plus a premium. Amounts outstanding under our Credit Agreement bear interest at adjusted LIBOR plus an applicable margin, which ranges from .75% to 1.75%. We entered into an interest rate swap to convert the variable rate payments due under the Credit Agreement on a notional amount of $33 million to a fixed rate through May 1, 2007. The notional amount declines by $137,500 per month, to correspond with the reduction in principal of the Term Loan. The interest cost of our debt is affected by changes in either prime or LIBOR. Such changes could adversely impact our operating results.
We have no derivative financial interests or derivative commodity instruments in our cash or cash equivalents.
Because the majority of the Companys revenue, expense and capital purchasing activities are transacted in United States dollars currently, the exposure to foreign currency exchange risk is minimal. However, as our international operations grow, our foreign currency exchange risks will increase.
We purchase certain commodities such as flour, sugar and soybean oil. These commodities are usually purchased under long-term purchase agreements, generally one to three years, at a fixed price. We are subject to market risk in that the current market price of any commodity item may be below our contractual price. We do not use financial instruments to hedge commodity prices.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. |
Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have reviewed our disclosure controls and procedures within 90 days prior to the filing of this report. Based upon this review, these |
37
officers believe that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective in ensuring that material information related to us is made known to them by others within the Company. |
(b) Changes in Internal Controls. |
There were no significant changes in our internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect these controls during the quarter covered by this report or from the end of the reporting period to the date of this Form 10-Q. |
Part II. Other Information
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
On March 9, 2000, a lawsuit was filed against the Company, Mr. Livengood and Golden Gate Doughnuts, LLC, a franchise of the Company in which the Company has a 67% interest, in Superior Court in the state of California. The plaintiffs allege, among other things, breach of contract and seek compensation for injury as well as punitive damages. On September 22, 2000, after the case was transferred to the Sacramento Superior Court, that court granted our motion to compel arbitration of the action and stayed the action pending the outcome of arbitration. On November 3, 2000, the plaintiffs petitioned for a writ of mandate overruling the Superior Court. On December 21, 2000, the Court of Appeals summarily denied the writ petition. Plaintiffs failed to petition the California Supreme Court for review of the lower Courts decision within the time permitted by law. The lawsuit against Mr. Livengood was dismissed by the California court for lack of personal jurisdiction. Plaintiffs have not appealed this judgment, and their time for doing so has expired. On October 1, 2001, plaintiffs filed a demand for arbitration with the American Arbitration Association against Krispy Kreme Doughnut Corporation, Golden Gate Doughnuts, LLC and Mr. Livengood. On November 5, 2001, the Company filed a response to the arbitration demand generally denying all claims and raising numerous affirmative, dispositive defenses. The appointed arbitration panel concluded hearings in Winston-Salem, North Carolina in December 2002. The Company continues to believe that plaintiffs claims are without merit and that the outcome of the lawsuit or arbitration will not have a material adverse effect on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
Item 2. Changes in Securities and Use of Proceeds
On August 22, 2002, the Company issued 596,360 shares of its common stock in connection with the acquisition of an additional 44.4% interest in Glazed Investments, LLC, the franchisee with rights to the Colorado, Minnesota and Wisconsin markets. This issuance was a private placement exempt from registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act.
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
a) Exhibits
Exhibit Number | Description | |
99.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer | |
99.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer |
b) Reports on Form 8-K We filed a Current Report on Form 8-K on August 29, 2002 in which we reported the announcement that the Company had increased its ownership in Glazed Investments, LLC, the area developer franchisee that holds the development rights for Colorado, Minnesota and Wisconsin, from approximately 30% to approximately 75%.
38
Signatures
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized. |
KRISPY KREME DOUGHNUTS, INC. (Registrant) | ||
Date: December 18, 2002 |
By: /s/ Scott A. Livengood Scott A. Livengood Chairman of the Board, President, and Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) |
|
Date: December 18, 2002 |
By: /s/ Randy S. Casstevens Randy S. Casstevens Chief Financial Officer (principal financial and accounting officer) |
39
CERTIFICATIONS
I, Scott A. Livengood, President and Chief Executive Officer of Krispy Kreme Doughnuts, Inc., certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Krispy Kreme Doughnuts, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:
a) | designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; | ||
b) | evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of the quarterly report (the Evaluation Date); and | ||
c) | presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date; |
5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
a) | All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and | ||
b) | Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls; and |
6. The registrants other certifying officer and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
Date: December 18, 2002 | ||
/s/ Scott A. Livengood | ||
|
||
Scott A. Livengood President and Chief Executive Officer |
40
I, Randy S. Casstevens, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of Krispy Kreme Doughnuts, Inc., certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Krispy Kreme Doughnuts, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:
a) | designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; | ||
b) | evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of the quarterly report (the Evaluation Date); and | ||
c) | presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date; |
5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
a) | All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and | ||
b) | Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls; and |
6. The registrants other certifying officer and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
Date: December 18, 2002 | ||
/s/ Randy S. Casstevens | ||
|
||
Randy S. Casstevens Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |
41