UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-Q

Commission file number 33-82114

Spanish Broadcasting System, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

2601 South Bayshore Drive, PH II

Coconut Grove, Florida 33133

(Address of principal executive offices)(Zip Code)

(305) 441-6901

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year,

if changed since last report)

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.     Yes þ          No o

      Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).     Yes þ          No o

APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS:

      Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date: As of May 6, 2005, 40,277,805 shares of Class A common stock, par value $.0001 per share, 24,503,500 shares of Class B common stock, par value $.0001 per share and 380,000 shares of Series C convertible preferred stock, $.002 par value per share, which are convertible into 7,600,000 shares of Class A common stock, were outstanding.

SPANISH BROADCASTING SYSTEM, INC.

INDEX

PART I. — FINANCIAL INFORMATION

SPANISH BROADCASTING SYSTEM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

See accompanying notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

SPANISH BROADCASTING SYSTEM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations

See accompanying notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

SPANISH BROADCASTING SYSTEM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

See accompanying notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

SPANISH BROADCASTING SYSTEM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

      The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Spanish Broadcasting System, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the “Company”). All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2004 and March 31, 2005, and for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2004 and 2005 do not contain all disclosures required by generally accepted accounting principles. These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements of the Company as of and for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 included in the Company’s fiscal year end 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

      In the opinion of the Company’s management, the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments, which are all of a normal and recurring nature, necessary for a fair presentation of the results of the interim periods. The results of operations for the three-month period ended March 31, 2005 is not necessarily indicative of the results for a full year.

      Certain of the Company’s subsidiaries (collectively, the “Subsidiary Guarantors”) have guaranteed the Company’s 9⁵/8% senior subordinated notes due 2009 on a joint and several basis. The Company has not included separate financial statements of the Subsidiary Guarantors because (i) all of the Subsidiary Guarantors are wholly owned subsidiaries of the Company and (ii) the guarantees issued by the Subsidiary Guarantors are full and unconditional. The Company has not included separate parent-only financial statements since the parent (Spanish Broadcasting System, Inc., a Delaware corporation) is a holding company with no independent assets or operations other than its investments in its subsidiaries. All Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) licenses are held by special purpose subsidiaries formed solely for the purpose of holding each respective FCC license and/or non-guarantor subsidiaries. All of the special purpose subsidiaries are non-guarantors of the 9⁵/8% senior subordinated notes due 2009. Condensed consolidating

SPANISH BROADCASTING SYSTEM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

unaudited financial information for the parent and its guarantor and non-guarantor subsidiaries is as follows (in thousands):

SPANISH BROADCASTING SYSTEM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

SPANISH BROADCASTING SYSTEM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

SPANISH BROADCASTING SYSTEM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

      In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued FASB Statement No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment” (SFAS No. 123R), which is a revision of SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” (SFAS No. 123). SFAS No. 123R requires companies to expense the grant-date fair value of stock options and other equity-based compensation issued to employees. The Company is required to adopt the provisions of SFAS No. 123R on January 1, 2006. The Company is evaluating the requirements of SFAS No. 123R and has not yet determined the method of adoption or the effect of adopting SFAS No. 123R, and has not determined whether the adoption will result in amounts that are similar to the current pro forma disclosures under SFAS No. 123 in Note 5 (d).

      On August 17, 2004, the Company entered into an asset purchase agreement with Styles Media Group, LLC (“Styles Media Group”), to sell the assets of radio stations KZAB-FM and KZBA-FM, serving the Los Angeles, California market, for a cash purchase price of $120.0 million. In connection with this agreement, Styles Media Group made a non-refundable $6.0 million deposit on the purchase price. On February 18, 2005, Styles Media Group exercised its right under the agreement to extend the closing date until March 31, 2005, by releasing the deposit to the Company from escrow.

      On March 30, 2005, the Company entered into an amendment to the asset purchase agreement with Styles Media Group. In connection with this amendment, Styles Media Group made an additional $14.0 million non-refundable deposit on the purchase price and the Company agreed to extend the closing date from March 31, 2005 to the later date of July 31, 2005 or five days following the grant of the FCC Final Order. Although the Company expects the sale of the Los Angeles stations to be completed, there can be no assurance that such sale will be completed.

      On August 17, 2004, Spanish Broadcasting System SouthWest, Inc. entered into a time brokerage agreement with Styles Media Group pursuant to which Styles Media Group was permitted to begin broadcasting its programming on radio stations KZAB-FM and KZBA-FM beginning on September 20, 2004. The time brokerage agreement will terminate upon the closing under, or termination of, the asset purchase agreement.

SPANISH BROADCASTING SYSTEM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

      The Company determined that, since it was not eliminating all significant revenues and expenses generated in this market, the pending sale of these stations did not meet the criteria to classify the stations’ operations as discontinued operations. However, the Company reclassified the stations’ assets as held for sale. On March 31, 2005, the Company had assets held for sale consisting of $63.5 million of intangible assets and $1.1 million of property and equipment for radio stations KZAB-FM and KZBA-FM.

      Pursuant to the credit agreement governing our senior secured credit facilities, the net cash proceeds received from these sales, when and if completed, must be offered to the noteholders to repay our borrowings under the senior secured credit facilities. Therefore, the Company has reclassified the senior secured credit facilities balance from long-term debt to current debt.

      If, prior to the closing of the proposed asset sale, the existing senior secured credit facilities are replaced with the new senior secured credit facilities described in “Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Liquidity and Capital Resources”, the Company intends to use the net cash proceeds received from the asset sale to repay certain amounts under the new senior secured credit facilities. If the proposed asset sale does not close, the Company will be unable to use the anticipated proceeds from such sale to reduce its debt.

      On December 23, 2004, in connection with the closing of the merger agreement, dated October 5, 2004, with Infinity Media Corporation (“Infinity”), Infinity Broadcasting Corporation of San Francisco (“Infinity SF”) and SBS Bay Area, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company (“SBS Bay Area”), the Company issued to Infinity (i) an aggregate of 380,000 shares of Series C convertible preferred stock, $0.002 par value per share (the “Series C preferred stock”), each of which is convertible at the option of the holder into twenty fully paid and non-assessable shares of the Company’s Class A common stock; and (ii) a warrant to purchase an additional 190,000 shares of Series C preferred stock, exercisable at any time from December 23, 2004 until December 23, 2008, at an exercise price of $300.00 per share (the “Warrant”).

      Under the terms of the certificate of designation governing the Series C preferred stock, the holder of Series C preferred stock has the right to convert each share of Series C preferred stock into twenty fully paid and nonassessable shares of the Company’s Class A common stock. The shares of Series C preferred stock issued at the closing of the merger are convertible into 7,600,000 shares of our Class A common stock, subject to adjustment, and the Series C preferred stock issuable upon exercise of the Warrant is convertible into an additional 3,800,000 shares of the Company’s Class A common stock, subject to adjustment.

      In connection with the closing of the merger transaction, we also entered into a registration rights agreement with Infinity, pursuant to which, following a period of one year (or earlier if we take certain actions), Infinity may instruct us to file up to three registration statements, on a best efforts basis, with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) providing for the registration for resale of the Class A common stock issuable upon conversion of the Series C preferred stock.

      The Company is required to pay holders of Series C preferred stock dividends on parity with the Company’s Class A common stock and Class B common stock, and each other class or series of capital stock the Company creates after December 23, 2004.

      The rights of the holders of shares of Class A common stock and Class B common stock are identical except for voting rights and conversion provisions. The Class A common stock is entitled to one vote per share

SPANISH BROADCASTING SYSTEM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

and the Class B common stock is entitled to ten votes per share. Holders of each class of common stock are entitled to receive dividends and, upon liquidation or dissolution, are entitled to receive all assets available for distribution to stockholders. The holders of each class have no preemptive or other subscription rights and there are no redemption or sinking fund provisions with respect to such shares. Each class of common stock is subordinate to the Company’s 10³/4% Series B cumulative exchangeable redeemable preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share and liquidation preference of $1,000 per share (the “Series B preferred stock”) and on parity with the Series C preferred stock with respect to dividend rights and rights on liquidation, winding up and dissolution of the Company.

      In connection with the purchase of KXOL-FM and the merger agreement with Infinity, as discussed in Note 6 (a), the Company has warrants outstanding to ultimately purchase an aggregate of 4,500,000 shares of the Company’s Class A common stock. The following table summarizes information about these warrants which are outstanding as of March 31, 2005:

      In September 1999, the Company adopted an employee incentive stock option plan (the “1999 ISO Plan”) and a non-employee director stock option plan (the “1999 NQ Plan”). Options granted under the 1999 ISO Plan will vest according to terms to be determined by the compensation committee of the Company’s board of directors, and will have a contractual life of up to 10 years from date of grant. Options granted under the 1999 NQ Plan will vest 20% upon grant and 20% each year for the first four years from grant. All options granted under the 1999 ISO Plan and the 1999 NQ Plan vest immediately upon a change in control of the Company, as defined. A total of 3,000,000 shares and 300,000 shares of Class A common stock have been reserved for issuance under the 1999 ISO Plan and the 1999 NQ Plan, respectively. Additionally, on November 2, 1999, the Company granted a stock option to purchase 250,000 shares of Class A common stock to a former director. These options vested immediately, and expire 10 years from the date of grant.

SPANISH BROADCASTING SYSTEM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

      A summary of the status of the Company’s stock options, as of December 31, 2004 and March 31, 2005, and changes during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 and three-months period ended March 31, 2005, is presented below (in thousands, except per share data):

      The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding and exercisable at March 31, 2005 (in thousands, except per share data):

      The Company applies Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25 and related interpretations in accounting for its stock option plans. No stock-based employee compensation cost is reflected in net income (loss), as all options granted under these plans had an exercise price equal to the market value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant. The per share weighted average fair value of stock options granted to employees during the three-month periods ended March 31, 2004 and 2005 was $10.39 and $10.78, respectively, on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions at:

SPANISH BROADCASTING SYSTEM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

      Had compensation expense for the Company’s plans been determined consistent with SFAS No. 123, the Company’s net income (loss) applicable to common stockholders and net income (loss) per common share would have been adjusted to pro forma amounts indicated below (in thousands, except per share data):

      From time to time the Company is involved in litigation incidental to the conduct of its business, such as contractual matters and employee-related matters. In the opinion of management, such litigation is not likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, operating results or financial position.

      As the owner, lessee, or operator of various real properties and facilities, the Company is subject to various federal, state, and local environmental laws and regulations. Historically, compliance with these laws and regulations has not had a material adverse effect on the Company’s business. There can be no assurance, however, that compliance with existing or new environmental laws and regulations will not require the Company to make significant expenditures of funds.

      In connection with the sale of WXLX-AM in 1997, the Company assigned the lease of the transmitter for WXLX in Lyndhurst, New Jersey, to the purchaser of the station. The transmitter is located on a former landfill which ceased operations in the late 1960’s. Although WXLX-AM was sold, the Company retained potential exposure to possible environmental liabilities relating to the transmitter site (the “Transmitter Property”).

      On December 4, 2002, the New Jersey Meadowlands Commission (“NJMC”) filed a Verified Complaint in condemnation in the Superior Court of New Jersey, Bergen County, against Frank F. Viola, Thomas C. Viola Trust and Louis Viola Company (the “Property Owners”) to acquire the Transmitter Property. The Transmitter Property is one of a number of sites that the NJMC is acquiring for a redevelopment project. Many of these sites (owned both publicly and privately) were used for landfill operations including the Transmitter Property. The Company was named as a defendant in the litigation by virtue of its interest of record in the Transmitter Property as a former leaseholder prior to the aforementioned lease assignment.

      The litigation has been settled and concluded by the entry on August 31, 2004 of an Amended Order for Final Judgment (“Final Order”). The Final Order provided for the compensation to be paid to the Property Owners, and for waiver of claims for landfill closure costs against the Property Owners. While the Final Order reserved the NJMC’s claims for environmental remediation against the other parties, including the Company, a Settlement Agreement entered in the Court record further stipulated that the NJMC’s redeveloper would agree to indemnify and insure (under policies expiring on December 31, 2021 and providing coverage in the

SPANISH BROADCASTING SYSTEM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

amount of $50.0 million) such other parties (including the Company) against claims for remediation of environmental contamination. The Company was named as an insured on the aforementioned policy. On September 30, 2004, the Company entered into an Indemnity Agreement with the Property Owners.

      On June 14, 2000, an action was filed in the Eleventh Judicial Circuit (the “Court”) in and for Miami-Dade County, Florida by Jose Antonio Hurtado against the Company, alleging that he was entitled to a commission related to an acquisition made by the Company. The case was tried before a jury during the week of December 1, 2003 and Mr. Hurtado was awarded the sum of $1.8 million, plus interest, which the Company accrued for during the quarter ended December 31, 2003. Mr. Hurtado also filed an application for attorneys’ fees, which the Company opposed on grounds that there was no contractual or statutory basis for such an award. The Company filed a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, which was heard on February 6, 2004. On March 12, 2004, the Court denied the Company’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and, upon its own motion, the Court granted a new trial. On April 7, 2004, Mr. Hurtado filed a notice of appeal with the Third Circuit Court of Appeals, challenging the order granting a new trial, and on April 8, 2004, the Company filed a notice of cross-appeal, challenging the denial of the Company’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. On August 27, 2004, Mr. Hurtado filed his initial brief, and on January 10, 2005, the Company filed a combined response brief and initial brief on the Company’s cross-appeal. On March 7, 2005, Mr. Hurtado filed his reply brief and the Company’s reply brief was due 20 days thereafter. At March 31, 2005, the Company had accrued $1.8 million, plus interest related to this contingency. The Third Circuit Court of Appeals set the matter for oral argument on April 13, 2005. Subsequently, on May 5, 2005, the Third District Court of Appeals ruled that judgment should be entered in favor of the Company. If no motion for rehearing is filed by Mr. Hurtado by May 19, 2005, this case will be closed. However, if a motion for rehearing is filed, the Company will need to await a ruling on that motion.

      On November 28, 2001, a complaint was filed against the Company in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (the “Southern District of New York”) and was amended on April 19, 2002. The amended complaint alleges that the named plaintiff, Mitchell Wolf, purchased shares of the Company’s Class A common stock pursuant to the October 27, 1999 prospectus and registration statement relating to its initial public offering which closed on November 2, 1999. The complaint was brought on behalf of Mr. Wolf and an alleged class of similarly situated purchasers, against the Company, eight underwriters and/or their successors-in-interest who led or otherwise participated in the Company’s initial public offering, two members of the senior management team, one of whom is the Company’s Chairman of the Board, and an additional director, referred to collectively as the individual defendants. To date, the complaint, while served upon the Company, has not been served upon the individual defendants, and no counsel has appeared for them.

      This case is one of more than 300 similar cases brought by similar counsel against more than 300 issuers, 40 underwriter defendants, and 1,000 individuals alleging, in general, violations of federal securities laws in connection with initial public offerings, in particular, failing to disclose that the underwriter defendants allegedly solicited and received additional, excessive and undisclosed commissions from certain investors in exchange for which they allocated to those investors material portions of the restricted shares issued in connection with each offering. All of these cases, including the one involving the Company, have been assigned for consolidated pretrial purposes to one judge of the Southern District of New York. One of the claims against the individual defendants, specifically the Section 10b-5 claim, has been dismissed.

      In June of 2003, after lengthy negotiations, a settlement proposal was embodied in a memorandum of understanding among the investors in the plaintiff class, the issuer defendants and the issuer defendants’ insurance carriers. On July 23, 2003, the Company’s Board of Directors approved both the memorandum of understanding and an agreement between the issuer defendants and the insurers. As of March 1, 2004, the overwhelming majority of non-bankrupt issuer defendants have approved the settlement proposal. The

SPANISH BROADCASTING SYSTEM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

principal components of the settlement include: 1) a release of all claims against the issuer defendants and their directors, officers and certain other related parties arising out of the alleged wrongful conduct in the amended complaint; 2) the assignment to the plaintiffs of certain of the issuer defendants’ potential claims against the underwriter defendants; and 3) a guarantee by the insurers to the plaintiffs of the difference between $1.0 billion and any lesser amount recovered by the plaintiffs against the underwriter defendants. The payments will be charged to each issuer defendant’s insurance policy on a pro rata basis.

      On February 15, 2005, the Southern District of New York granted preliminary approval to the proposed settlement agreement, subject to a narrowing of the proposed bar on underwriter and non-settling defendant claims against the issuer defendants to cover only contribution claims. The Court directed the parties to submit revised settlement documents consistent with its Opinion and scheduled a conference for March 18, 2005 in order to (a) make final determinations as to the form, substance and program of notice, and (b) schedule a Rule 23 fairness hearing. Pursuant to the Court’s request, on May 2, 2005 the parties submitted an Amendment to Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement with Defendant Issuers and Individuals (the “Amendment”). The Board of Directors of the Company approved the Amendment on May 4, 2005. It is anticipated that the Amendment will soon receive approval from all the non-bankrupt issuers. The Company does not have sufficient information to assess its potential exposure to liability, if any, and no amounts have been accrued in the consolidated financial statements.

      On December 5, 2003, Amigo Broadcasting, L.P. (“Amigo”) filed an original petition and application for temporary injunction in the District Court of Travis County, Texas (the “Court”), against the Company, Raul Bernal (“Bernal”) and Joaquin Garza (“Garza”), two former employees of the Company. Amigo filed a first and second amended petition and application for temporary injunction on June 25, 2004 and February 18, 2005, respectively. The second amended petition alleged that the Company (1) misappropriated Amigo’s proprietary interests by broadcasting the characters and concepts portrayed by the Bernal and Garza radio show (the “Property”), (2) wrongfully converted the Property for the Company’s own use and benefit, (3) induced Bernal and Garza to breach their employment agreements with Amigo, (4) used and continued to use Amigo’s confidential information and property with the intention of diverting profits from Amigo and of inducing Amigo’s potential customers to do business with the Company and its syndicators, (5) invaded Amigo’s privacy by misappropriating the name and likeness of Bernal and Garza, and (6) committed violations of the Lanham Act by diluting and infringing on Amigo’s trademarks. Based on these claims, Amigo seeks damages in excess of $3.0 million.

      On December 5, 2003, the Court issued a temporary injunction against all of the defendants and scheduled a hearing before the Court on December 17, 2003. The temporary injunction dissolved by its terms on December 1, 2004. On December 17, 2003, the parties entered into a settlement agreement, whereby the Court entered an Order on Consent of the settling parties, permitting Bernal and Garza’s radio show to be broadcast on the Company’s radio stations. In addition, the Company agreed that it would not broadcast the Bernal and Garza radio show in certain prohibited markets and that the Company would not distribute certain promotional materials that were developed by Amigo. On January 5, 2004, the Company answered the remaining claims asserted by Amigo for damages. The parties have exchanged some written discovery and are in the process of scheduling depositions. The case was scheduled for a jury trial on May 23, 2005. However, on March 18, 2005, the case was removed to the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas. The Company does not have sufficient information to assess its potential exposure to liability, if any, and no amounts have been accrued in the consolidated financial statements.

Overview

      We are the largest Hispanic-controlled radio broadcasting company in the United States. After giving effect to the proposed sale of our radio stations KZAB-FM and KZBA-FM, serving the Los Angeles, California market, we will own and operate 20 radio stations in markets that reach approximately 49% of the U.S. Hispanic population. Our stations are located in six of the top-ten Hispanic markets of Los Angeles, New York, Puerto Rico, Chicago, Miami and San Francisco. Los Angeles and New York have the largest and second largest Hispanic populations, and are the largest and second largest radio markets in the United States in terms of advertising revenue, respectively. Our top three markets, based on net revenues, are New York, Los Angeles and Miami. A significant decline in net revenue or station operating income from our stations in any of these markets could have a material adverse effect on our financial position and results of operations. As part of our operating business, we also operate LaMusica.com, a bilingual Spanish-English Internet website providing content related to Latin music, entertainment, news and culture.

      The success of each of our radio stations depends significantly upon its audience ratings and share of the overall advertising revenue within its market. The radio broadcasting industry is a highly competitive business, but some barriers to entry do exist. Each of our radio stations competes with both Spanish-language and English-language radio stations in its market, as well as with other advertising media such as newspapers, broadcast television, cable television, the Internet, magazines, outdoor advertising, transit advertising and direct mail marketing. Factors which are material to our competitive position include management experience, our radio station’s rank in its market, signal strength and frequency and audience demographics, including the nature of the Spanish-language market targeted by a particular station.

      Our primary source of revenue is the sale of advertising time on our radio stations to local and national advertisers. Our revenue is affected primarily by the advertising rates that our radio stations are able to charge, as well as the overall demand for radio advertising time in each respective market. Seasonal net broadcasting revenue fluctuations are common in the radio broadcasting industry and are due to fluctuations in advertising expenditures by local and national advertisers. Typically for the radio broadcasting industry, the first calendar quarter generally produces the lowest revenue. Our most significant operating expenses are compensation expenses, programming expenses, and advertising and promotional expenses. Our senior management strives to control these expenses, as well as other expenses, by working closely with local station management and others, including vendors.

Comparison Analysis of the Operating Results for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2004 and 2005

      The following summary table presents a comparison of our results of operations for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2004 and 2005. Various fluctuations illustrated in the table are discussed below. This section should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and notes.

      Net Revenue. The increase in net revenue was due to the double-digit growth in our Los Angeles, New York and Miami markets primarily from local and barter revenue.

      Engineering and Programming Expenses. The increase in engineering and programming expenses was mainly caused by (a) the investments made in our Los Angeles programming department, (b) compensation, (c) music license fees, and (d) our new start-up station in San Francisco, KRZZ-FM.

      Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. The increase in selling, general and administrative expenses was mainly caused by the increases in (a) compensation and benefits due to additional personnel in various markets, (b) barter expense due to the increase in barter sales and related marketing costs, (c) professional fees related to our compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, (d) local commissions due to the increase in revenue, and (e) all related expenses of our new start-up station in San Francisco, KRZZ-FM.

      Corporate Expenses. The increase in corporate expenses resulted mainly from an increase in legal and professional fees and other expenses related to new business development projects.

      Operating Income from Continuing Operations. The increase in operating income from continuing operations was primarily attributed to the increase in net revenues, offset by increases in engineering and programming, selling, general and administrative expenses and corporate expenses.

      Income Taxes. The decrease in income tax benefit was due primarily to a decrease in loss from continuing operations before income taxes and discontinued operations, as well as a decrease in the estimated income tax rate. Our effective book tax rate has been impacted by the adoption of SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” (SFAS No. 142). As a result of adopting SFAS No. 142, the reversal of our deferred tax liabilities related to our intangible assets could no longer be assured over our net operating loss carryforward period. Therefore, our effective book tax rate is impacted by a full valuation allowance on our deferred tax assets.

      Discontinued Operations, Net of Taxes. We determined that the sale of our KLEY-FM and KSAH-AM stations serving the San Antonio, Texas market, and the sale of our KPTI-FM station serving the San Francisco, California market, all met the criteria, in accordance with SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed of”, to classify their respective operations as discontinued operations. Consequently, these stations’ results from operations for the fiscal year ended 2004 were classified as discontinued operations. The decrease in discontinued operations, net of taxes, was primarily attributable to the $11.6 million gain recognized on the sale of our San Antonio KLEY-FM and KSAH-AM stations, net of closing costs and taxes, respectively.

      Net Income. The decrease in net income was primarily due to the income from discontinued operations related to the sale of stations in the prior year.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

      Our primary sources of liquidity are cash on hand, cash provided by operations and, to the extent necessary, undrawn commitments that are available under a $10.0 million revolving credit facility. Our ability to raise funds by increasing our indebtedness is limited by the terms of the indentures governing our senior subordinated notes, the certificates of designations governing our preferred stock and the credit agreement governing our senior secured credit facilities. Additionally, the indentures, certificates of designations and credit agreement each place restrictions on us with respect to the sale of assets, liens, investments, dividends, debt repayments, capital expenditures, transactions with affiliates and consolidations and mergers, among other things. We had cash and cash equivalents of $132.0 million and $161.9 million as of December 31, 2004 and March 31, 2005, respectively.

      The following summary table presents a comparison of our capital resources for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2004 and 2005, with respect to certain of our key measures affecting our liquidity. The changes set forth in the table are discussed below. This section should be read in conjunction with the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and notes.

      Net Cash Flows Provided By Operating Activities. Changes in our net cash flows from operating activities were primarily a result of the increase in cash received from customers.

      Net Cash Flows Provided by Investing Activities. Changes in our net cash flows from investing activities were primarily a result of (a) deposits totaling $20.0 million received for the pending sale of our Los Angeles stations KZAB-FM and KZBA-FM, offset by capital expenditures for 2005 and (b) proceeds of $23.7 million we received in 2004 for the sale of radio stations KLEY-FM and KSAH-AM, offset by capital expenditures.

      Net Cash Flows Used In Financing Activities. Changes in our net cash flows from financing activities were primarily a result of the 2004 additional offering costs related to our Series B preferred stock and financing costs.

      Management believes that cash from operating activities, together with cash on hand, should be sufficient to permit us to meet our operating obligations in the foreseeable future, including required interest and quarterly principal payments pursuant to the credit agreement governing our senior secured credit facilities, interest payment requirements under our 9⁵/8% senior subordinated notes due 2009 and capital expenditures, excluding the acquisitions of FCC licenses. Assumptions (none of which can be assured) which underlie management’s beliefs, include the following:

      Our strategy is to primarily utilize cash flows from operations to meet our capital needs and contractual obligations. However, we also have bank borrowings available to meet our capital needs and contractual obligations and, when appropriate and, if available, will obtain financing by issuing debt or stock.

      We are required to maintain financial covenant ratios under the credit agreement governing our senior secured credit facilities as follows: (i) Consolidated EBITDA minimum, (ii) Consolidated Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio, (iii) Consolidated Leverage Ratio, (iv) Consolidated Interest Coverage Ratio and (v) Consolidated Senior Secured Debt Ratio, all as defined in the credit agreement, solely for the purpose of determining compliance with the covenants. The credit agreement governing our senior secured credit facilities requiring compliance with these financial covenants states that the calculations must be based on Generally Accepted Accounting Principles in the United States of America. We are in compliance with all covenants under our senior secured credit facilities and all other debt instruments as of March 31, 2005 and expect to be in compliance in the foreseeable future.

      We intend to enter into new senior secured credit facilities with affiliates of Lehman Brothers Inc., Merrill Lynch and Wachovia Securities. Lehman Brothers Inc. will act as sole lead arranger. The proposed

new proposed credit facilities will provide for an aggregate of $400.0 million in funded term loans (consisting of a $300.0 million first lien credit facility and a $100.0 million second lien credit facility), plus a $25.0 million revolving loan facility.

      Our intentions are that funds available under the new proposed credit facilities will be used to repay amounts outstanding under our existing senior secured credit facilities and to retire all of our outstanding 9⁵/8% senior subordinated notes due 2009. We expect the new senior secured credit facilities to close during the second quarter of 2005 and expect to redeem the 9⁵/8% senior subordinated notes due 2009 within 30 to 45 days after closing the new senior secured credit facilities.

      There can be no assurance that we will be able to complete this refinancing. If we are successful in our refinancing efforts, we will incur a loss on extinguishment of debt totaling approximately $32.9 million related to call premiums, discount write-offs and deferred financing costs write-offs.

      On August 17, 2004, we entered into an asset purchase agreement with Styles Media Group, to sell the assets of radio stations KZAB-FM and KZBA-FM, serving the Los Angeles, California market, for a cash purchase price of $120.0 million. In connection with this agreement, Styles Media Group made a non-refundable $6.0 million deposit on the purchase price, which was held in escrow as of December 31, 2004. On February 18, 2005, Styles Media Group exercised its right under the agreement to extend the closing date until March 31, 2005, by releasing the deposit from escrow to us.

      On March 30, 2005, we entered into an amendment to the asset purchase agreement with Styles Media Group. In connection with this amendment, Styles Media Group made an additional $14.0 million deposit on the purchase price and we agreed to extend the closing date from March 31, 2005 to the later date of July 31, 2005 or within five days following the grant of the FCC Final Order. Although we expect the sale of the Los Angeles stations to be completed, there can be no assurance that such sale will be completed.

      On August 17, 2004, Spanish Broadcasting System SouthWest, Inc. entered into a time brokerage agreement with Styles Media Group pursuant to which Styles Media Group was permitted to begin broadcasting its programming on radio stations KZAB-FM and KZBA-FM beginning on September 20, 2004. The time brokerage agreement will terminate upon the closing under, or termination of, the asset purchase agreement.

      We determined, that since we were not eliminating all significant revenues and expenses generated in this market, the pending sales of these stations did not meet the criteria to classify the stations’ operations as discontinued operations. However, we reclassified the stations’ assets as held for sale. On March 31, 2005, we had assets held for sale consisting of $63.5 million of intangible assets and $1.1 million of property and equipment for radio stations KZAB-FM and KZBA-FM.

      Pursuant to the credit agreement governing our senior secured credit facilities, the net cash proceeds received from these sales, when and if completed, must be offered to the noteholders to repay our borrowings under the senior secured credit facilities. Therefore, we have reclassified the senior secured credit facilities balance from long-term debt to current debt.

      If, prior to the closing of the proposed asset sale, the existing senior secured credit facilities are replaced with the new senior secured credit facilities described above, we intend to use the net cash proceeds received from the asset sale to repay certain amounts under the new senior secured credit facilities. If the proposed asset sale does not close, we will be unable to use the anticipated proceeds from such sale to reduce our debt.

      We continuously evaluate opportunities to make strategic acquisitions, primarily in the largest Hispanic markets in the United States. We engage in discussions regarding potential acquisitions from time to time in the ordinary course of business. Except as discussed above, we currently have no other written understandings, letters of intent or contracts to acquire stations or other companies. We anticipate that any future acquisitions would be financed through funds generated from permitted debt financing, equity financing, operations, asset sales or a combination of these sources. However, there can be no assurance that financing from any of these sources, if necessary and available, can be obtained on favorable terms for future acquisitions.

      During the three months ended March 31, 2005, we entered into various contractual obligations related to employee agreements and other agreements. We expect our unrecorded obligations to increase by approximately $0.7 million, $2.3 million, $0.7 million, and $0.2 million for the fiscal years ended 2005, 2006, 2007 and 2008, respectively, from what was previously disclosed in our 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

New Accounting Pronouncements

      In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued FASB Statement No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment” (SFAS No. 123R), which is a revision of SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” (SFAS No. 123). SFAS No. 123R requires companies to expense the grant-date fair value of stock options and other equity-based compensation issued to employees. We are required to adopt the provisions of SFAS No. 123R on January 1, 2006. We are evaluating the requirements of SFAS No. 123R and we have not yet determined the method of adoption or the effect of adopting SFAS No. 123R, and we have not determined whether the adoption will result in amounts that are similar to the current pro forma disclosures under SFAS No. 123 in Note 5(d).

Disclosure Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

      This quarterly report on Form 10-Q contains both historical and forward-looking statements. All statements other than statements of historical fact are, or may be deemed to be, forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. These forward-looking statements are not based on historical facts, but rather reflect our current expectations concerning future results and events. These forward-looking statements generally can be identified by the use of statements that include phrases such as “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “plan,” “foresee,” “likely,” “will” or other similar words or phrases. Similarly, statements that describe our objectives, plans or goals are, or may be, forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be different from any future results, performance and achievements expressed or implied by these statements. Factors that could cause actual results to differ from those expressed in forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to:

      Consequently, such forward-looking statements should be regarded solely as our current plans, estimates and beliefs. We do not undertake any obligation to update any forward-looking statements to reflect subsequent events or circumstances.

      We believe that inflation has not had a material impact on our results of operations for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2004 and 2005, respectively. However, there can be no assurance that inflation will not have an adverse impact on our future operating results and financial condition.

      Our primary market risk is a change in interest rates. Our primary exposure is variable rates of interest associated with borrowings under our senior secured credit facilities. Advances under the senior secured credit facilities bear base rate or Eurodollar rate interest (in each case subject to applicable margins), as applicable, which vary in accordance with prevailing economic conditions. Our earnings are affected by changes in interest rates due to the impact those changes have on interest expense from variable-rate debt instruments and on interest income generated from our cash and investment balances. At March 31, 2005, all of our debt, other than our $123.4 million senior secured credit facility term loan, had fixed interest rates. If variable interest rates average 10% higher in 2005 than they did during 2004, our variable interest expense would increase by approximately $0.6 million, compared to approximately $6.0 million for the fiscal year ended

December 31, 2004. If interest rates average 10% lower in 2005 than they did during 2004, our interest income from cash and investment balances would decrease by approximately $0.1 million, compared to approximately $0.8 million for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004. These amounts are determined by considering the impact of the hypothetical interest rates on our variable-rate debt, cash equivalents and short-term investment balances at December 31, 2004. There has been no material change in our market risk position since December 31, 2004.

      Evaluation Of Disclosure Controls And Procedures. Our principal executive and financial officers have conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined under Rule 13a-14(c) of the Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) to ensure that information we are required to disclose in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and include controls and procedures designed to ensure that information we are required to disclose in such reports is accumulated and communicated to management, including our principal executive and financial officers, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Based on that evaluation, our principal executive and financial officers concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report.

      Changes In Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting during the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2005 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II — OTHER INFORMATION

      From time to time we are involved in litigation incidental to the conduct of our business, such as contractual matters and employee-related matters. In the opinion of management, such litigation is not likely to have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results or financial position.

      As the owner, lessee, or operator of various real properties and facilities, we are subject to various federal, state, and local environmental laws and regulations. Historically, compliance with these laws and regulations has not had a material adverse effect on our business. There can be no assurance, however, that compliance with existing or new environmental laws and regulations will not require us to make significant expenditures of funds.

      In connection with the sale of WXLX-AM in 1997, we assigned the lease of the transmitter for WXLX in Lyndhurst, New Jersey, to the purchaser of the station. The transmitter is located on a former landfill which ceased operations in the late 1960’s. Although WXLX-AM was sold, we retained potential exposure to possible environmental liabilities relating to the transmitter site (the “Transmitter Property”).

      On December 4, 2002, the New Jersey Meadowlands Commission (“NJMC”) filed a Verified Complaint in condemnation in the Superior Court of New Jersey, Bergen County, against Frank F. Viola, Thomas C. Viola Trust and Louis Viola Company (the “Property Owners”) to acquire the Transmitter Property. The Transmitter Property is one of a number of sites that the NJMC is acquiring for a redevelopment project. Many of these sites (owned both publicly and privately) were used for landfill operations including the Transmitter Property. We were named as a defendant in the litigation by virtue of our interest of record in the Transmitter Property as a former leaseholder prior to the aforementioned lease assignment.

      The litigation has been settled and concluded by the entry on August 31, 2004 of an Amended Order for Final Judgment (“Final Order”). The Final Order provided for the compensation to be paid to the Property Owners, and for waiver of claims for landfill closure costs against the Property Owners. While the Final Order reserved the NJMC’s claims for environmental remediation against the other parties, including us, a

Settlement Agreement entered in the Court record further stipulated that the NJMC’s redeveloper would agree to indemnify and insure (under policies expiring on December 31, 2021 and providing coverage in the amount of $50.0 million) such other parties (including us) against claims for remediation of environmental contamination. We were named as an insured on the aforementioned policy. On September 30, 2004, we entered into an Indemnity Agreement with the Property Owners.

      On June 14, 2000, an action was filed in the Eleventh Judicial Circuit (the “Court”) in and for Miami-Dade County, Florida by Jose Antonio Hurtado against us, alleging that he was entitled to a commission related to an acquisition made by us. The case was tried before a jury during the week of December 1, 2003 and Mr. Hurtado was awarded the sum of $1.8 million, plus interest, which we accrued for during the quarter ended December 31, 2003. Mr. Hurtado also filed an application for attorneys’ fees, which we opposed on grounds that there was no contractual or statutory basis for such an award. We filed a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, which was heard on February 6, 2004. On March 12, 2004, the Court denied our motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and, upon its own motion, the Court granted a new trial. On April 7, 2004, Mr. Hurtado filed a notice of appeal with the Third Circuit Court of Appeals, challenging the order granting a new trial, and on April 8, 2004, we filed a notice of cross-appeal, challenging the denial of our motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. On August 27, 2004, Mr. Hurtado filed his initial brief, and on January 10, 2005, we filed a combined response brief and initial brief on our cross-appeal. On March 7, 2005, Mr. Hurtado filed his reply brief and our reply brief was due 20 days thereafter. At March 31, 2005, we had accrued $1.8 million, plus interst related to this contingency. The Third Circuit Court of Appeals set the matter for oral argument on April 13, 2005. Subsequently, on May 5, 2005, the Third District Court of Appeals ruled that judgment should be entered in our favor. If no motion for rehearing is filed by Mr. Hurtado by May 19, 2005, this case will be closed. However, if a motion for rehearing is filed, we will need to await a ruling on that motion.

      On November 28, 2001, a complaint was filed against us in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (the “Southern District of New York”) and was amended on April 19, 2002. The amended complaint alleges that the named plaintiff, Mitchell Wolf, purchased shares of our Class A common stock pursuant to the October 27, 1999 prospectus and registration statement relating to our initial public offering which closed on November 2, 1999. The complaint was brought on behalf of Mr. Wolf and an alleged class of similarly situated purchasers, against us, eight underwriters and/or their successors-in-interest who led or otherwise participated in our initial public offering, two members of our senior management team, one of whom is our Chairman of the Board, and an additional director, referred to collectively as the individual defendants. To date, the complaint, while served upon us, has not been served upon the individual defendants, and no counsel has appeared for them.

      This case is one of more than 300 similar cases brought by similar counsel against more than 300 issuers, 40 underwriter defendants, and 1,000 individuals alleging, in general, violations of federal securities laws in connection with initial public offerings, in particular, failing to disclose that the underwriter defendants allegedly solicited and received additional, excessive and undisclosed commissions from certain investors in exchange for which they allocated to those investors material portions of the restricted shares issued in connection with each offering. All of these cases, including the one involving us, have been assigned for consolidated pretrial purposes to one judge of the Southern District of New York. One of the claims against the individual defendants, specifically the Section 10b-5 claim, has been dismissed.

      In June of 2003, after lengthy negotiations, a settlement proposal was embodied in a memorandum of understanding among the investors in the plaintiff class, the issuer defendants and the issuer defendants’ insurance carriers. On July 23, 2003, our Board of Directors approved both the memorandum of understanding and an agreement between the issuer defendants and the insurers. As of March 1, 2004, the overwhelming majority of non-bankrupt issuer defendants have approved the settlement proposal. The principal components of the settlement include: 1) a release of all claims against the issuer defendants and their directors, officers and certain other related parties arising out of the alleged wrongful conduct in the amended complaint; 2) the assignment to the plaintiffs of certain of the issuer defendants’ potential claims against the underwriter defendants; and 3) a guarantee by the insurers to the plaintiffs of the difference between $1.0 billion and any lesser amount recovered by the plaintiffs against the underwriter defendants. The payments will be charged to each issuer defendant’s insurance policy on a pro rata basis.

      On February 15, 2005, the Southern District of New York granted preliminary approval to the proposed settlement agreement, subject to a narrowing of the proposed bar on underwriter and non-settling defendant claims against the issuer defendants to cover only contribution claims. The Court directed the parties to submit revised settlement documents consistent with its Opinion and scheduled a conference for March 18, 2005 in order to (a) make final determinations as to the form, substance and program of notice, and (b) schedule a Rule 23 fairness hearing. Pursuant to the Court’s request, on May 2, 2005 the parties submitted an Amendment to Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement with Defendant Issuers and Individuals (the “Amendment”). Our Board of Directors approved the Amendment on May 4, 2005. It is anticipated that the Amendment will soon receive unanimous approval from all the non-bankrupt issuers. We do not have sufficient information to assess our potential exposure to liability, if any, and no amounts have been accrued in the consolidated financial statements.

      On December 5, 2003, Amigo Broadcasting, L.P. (“Amigo”) filed an original petition and application for temporary injunction in the District Court of Travis County, Texas (the “Court”), against us, Raul Bernal (“Bernal”) and Joaquin Garza (“Garza”), two of our former employees. Amigo filed a first and second amended petition and application for temporary injunction on June 25, 2004 and February 18, 2005, respectively. The second amended petition alleged that we (1) misappropriated Amigo’s proprietary interests by broadcasting the characters and concepts portrayed by the Bernal and Garza radio show (the “Property”), (2) wrongfully converted the Property to our own use and benefit, (3) induced Bernal and Garza to breach their employment agreements with Amigo, (4) used and continue to use Amigo’s confidential information and property with the intention of diverting profits from Amigo and of inducing Amigo’s potential customers to do business with us and our syndicators, (5) invaded Amigo’s privacy by misappropriating the name and likeness of Bernal and Garza, and (6) committed violations of the Lanham Act by diluting and infringing on Amigo’s trademarks. Based on these claims, Amigo seeks damages in excess of $3.0 million.

      On December 5, 2003, the Court issued a temporary injunction against all of the defendants and scheduled a hearing before the Court on December 17, 2003. The temporary injunction dissolved by its terms on December 1, 2004. On December 17, 2003, the parties entered into a settlement agreement, whereby the Court entered an Order on Consent of the settling parties, permitting Bernal and Garza’s radio show to be broadcast on our radio stations. In addition, we agreed that we would not broadcast the Bernal and Garza radio show in certain prohibited markets and that we would not distribute certain promotional materials that were developed by Amigo. On January 5, 2004, we answered the remaining claims asserted by Amigo for damages. The parties have exchanged some written discovery and are in the process of scheduling depositions. The case was scheduled for a jury trial on May 23, 2005. However, on March 18, 2005, the case was removed to the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas. We do not have sufficient information to assess our potential exposure to liability, if any, and no amounts have been accrued in the consolidated financial statements.

      We intend to enter into new senior secured credit facilities with affiliates of Lehman Brothers Inc., Merrill Lynch and Wachovia Securities. Lehman Brothers Inc. will act as sole lead arranger. The proposed new proposed credit facilities will provide for an aggregate of $400.0 million in funded term loans (consisting of a $300.0 million first lien credit facility and a $100.0 million second lien credit facility), plus a $25.0 million revolving loan facility.

      Our intentions are that funds available under the new proposed credit facilities will be used to repay amounts outstanding under our existing senior secured credit facilities and to retire all of our outstanding 9⁵/8% senior subordinated notes due 2009. We expect the new senior secured credit facilities to close during the second quarter of 2005 and expect to redeem the 9⁵/8% senior subordinated notes due 2009 within 30 to 45 days after closing the new senior secured credit facilities.

      There can be no assurance that we will be able to complete this refinancing. If we are successful in our refinancing efforts, we will incur a loss on extinguishment of debt totaling approximately $32.9 million related to call premiums, discount write-offs and deferred financing costs write-offs.

      On May 4, 2005, Raúl Alarcón, Jr., our Chairman of the Board of Directors, Chief Executive Officer and President, owning shares of common stock having approximately 80% of the combined voting power of our outstanding shares of common stock, authorized by resolution amendments to our Amended and Restated By-Laws effective as of May 4, 2005, to (i) create the office of Chief Operating Officer and assign certain of the duties formerly exercised by the President to the Chief Operating Officer, (ii) redefine the duties of the President, (iii) formalized the creation of the office of Executive Vice-President, and (iv) make ministerial changes reflecting the amendments noted above.

      On May 4, 2005, our Board of Directors appointed Marko Radlovic to Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer (“COO”). In his capacity as COO, Mr. Radlovic will be responsible for all of our operational divisions, including sales, programming, administration, promotions and marketing. Prior to his appointment as COO, Mr. Radlovic was our Chief Revenue Officer from December 2003 until May 2005, Vice President/ General Manager for our Los Angeles radio cluster from January 2002 until November 2003, and previously served as Vice President of Sales for the Los Angeles cluster. Prior to joining us, Mr. Radlovic was Market Manager for CUMULUS Media in Southern California from January 2001 until August 2001 and was Vice President/ General Manager for AM/ FM Inc. in Los Angeles from October 1998 to October 2000.

      (a) Exhibits —

      (b) Reports on Form 8-K

      The Company filed the following reports on Form 8-K during the three months ended March 31, 2005:

       (i) a current report on Form 8-K filed on March 10, 2005 to report that on March 10, 2005 the Company issued a press release announcing its fourth quarter fiscal year 2004 financial results;

       (ii) a current report on Form 8-K filed on April 5, 2005 to report that on March 30, 2005 the Company entered into an amendment to the asset purchase agreement for the sale of radio stations KZAB-FM and KZBA-FM, dated as of August 17, 2004; and

       (iii) a current report on Form 8-K filed on May 5, 2005 to report that on May 5, 2005 the Company issued a press release announcing its first quarter fiscal year 2005 financial results.

SIGNATURES

      Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

Date: May 10, 2005

      (a) Exhibits —