Back to GetFilings.com
1
'
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
FOR ANNUAL AND TRANSITION REPORTS
PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
(Mark One)
/X/ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 1997
/ / TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from ______ to __________
Commission File No. 001-13195
INDUSTRIAL DISTRIBUTION GROUP, INC.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
DELAWARE 58-2299339
- ----------------------------------- -------------------------------
(State or other jurisdiction (I.R.S. Employer
of incorporation or organization) Identification No.)
2500 ROYAL PLACE, TUCKER, GEORGIA 30084
---------------------------------------
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (770) 243-9000
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of Each Class Name of each exchange on which registered
------------------- -----------------------------------------
Common Stock, Par Value $0.01 Per Share New York Stock Exchange
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X No .
--- ---
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to
Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein and will not be contained, to
the best of Registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information
statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any
amendment to this Form 10K. [ ]
-1-
2
The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by nonaffiliates
(which for purposes hereof are all holders other than executive officers and
directors) of the Registrant as of March 1, 1998 is $117,888,787.50 (based on
6,287,402 shares held by nonaffiliates at $18.75 per share, the last sales price
on the NYSE on February 28, 1998).
At March 1, 1998, there were issued and outstanding 7,261,551 shares of
Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share, outstanding.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the Registrant's Annual Report to Stockholders for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 1997, filed as an exhibit hereto, are
incorporated by reference into Part I and Part II. Portions of the Registrant's
definitive Proxy Statement for the 1998 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, to be
filed with the Commission, are incorporated by reference into Part III.
-2-
3
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS.
GENERAL
Industrial Distribution Group, Inc. (the "Company" or "IDG") was formed
in February 1997 to create a leading, nationwide supplier of cost-effective,
flexible procurement solutions for manufacturers and other users of maintenance,
repair, operating, and production ("MROP") products. The Company distributes a
full line of industrial MROP products, emphasizing its specialized expertise in
product applications. The Company's principal product categories include
abrasives, cutting tools, hand and power tools, and coolants, lubricants, and
adhesives. Utilizing its proprietary computerized Supply Management System, the
Company's application and product specialists are able to analyze a customer's
acquisition, possession, and application processes for MROP supplies in order to
design programs to streamline the processes and reduce associated costs. Such
programs may include improving a customer's production and procurement
processes, standardizing MROP products, reducing the number of suppliers, or
developing integrated supply arrangements that outsource to the Company some or
all of a customer's MROP procurement and management functions.
In September 1997, IDG completed its initial public offering of Common
Stock and, at the same time, acquired the following nine industrial distribution
companies: Associated Suppliers, Inc., B&J Industrial Supply Company, Cramer
Industrial Supplies, Grinding Supplies Company, J.J. Stangel Co., Shearer
Industrial Supply Company, Slater Industrial Supply Company, The Distribution
Group, Inc. ("TDG") (formerly known as Industrial Distribution Group, Inc.), and
Tri-Star Industrial Supply, Inc., collectively referred to as the "Founding
Companies." In March 1998, the Company completed the acquisition of three
additional companies: Continental Air Tools, Inc., Northern Tool & Supply, Inc.,
and E.C. Blackstone Company.
The Company intends to establish a nationwide presence, with MROP
product and service capability in all or most of the top 50 U. S. industrial
markets. Currently, the Company has 53 operating locations in 48 cities, along
with four small facilities abroad. The Company's more than 24,000 customers
include a diverse group of major national and international corporations,
including AlliedSignal, Black & Decker, Boeing, Chrysler, General Motors,
Hoechst Celanese, PPG Industries, and Shell Oil, as well as small and large
local and regional businesses. On a pro forma combined basis, the Company had
net sales of approximately $284.9 million for the year ended December 31, 1997.
INDUSTRY OVERVIEW
Manufacturers, processors, and other producers of industrial,
commercial, or consumer products have a continual need for a broad range of
industrial MROP products. Many of these products -- such as drill bits,
sandpaper, and saw blades -- are consumed in production processes and are
essential to maintain at the point of production to avoid unnecessary downtime.
Other MROP products -- such as power tools, scales, hoists, and lathes -- have
relatively longer operational lives and are therefore purchased less frequently,
but still must be available "on time" in order to achieve production
efficiencies.
The Company estimates that the size of the market for industrial MROP
products in which it participates primarily is approximately $70 billion
annually. However, the entire U.S. MROP market is
-3-
4
estimated to be in excess of $175 billion annually, and includes electrical,
PVF (pipes, valves, and fittings), power transmission, and other product
categories in which the Company participates to a lesser extent. This larger
market is highly fragmented, with the 50 largest distributors (all of which have
annual sales over $90 million) accounting for less than 15% of the market.
Manufacturers and other users of MROP products are seeking ways to
enhance efficiencies and reduce MROP process and procurement costs in order to
compete more effectively in the global economy. As a result, the industrial
supply industry is experiencing consolidation, as customers focus on the
convenience, cost savings, and economies of scale associated with a reduced
number of suppliers capable of providing superior service and product selection.
Further, as manufacturers focus on their core manufacturing or other production
competencies, they are increasingly outsourcing their MROP procurement,
management, and application processes in search of comprehensive MROP solutions,
such as integrated supply. The Company believes that it will benefit from these
industry trends.
BUSINESS STRATEGIES
The Company believes that it has the size, scale of operations, and
resources necessary to compete effectively in the evolving industrial MROP
supply industry. The Company's size and scale of operations allow it to benefit
from high volume purchasing, attract the highly skilled personnel required to
deliver enhanced levels of service, and realize internal operating efficiencies.
The Company's resources and product knowledge enable it to offer a comprehensive
product line and invest in sophisticated inventory management and control
systems needed to support its enhanced levels of customer service. Moreover,
management believes that the Company's overall position enhances its ability to
implement its acquisition strategy in the consolidating and fragmented MROP
industry.
OPERATING STRATEGY
Superior Product Expertise and Comprehensive Product Line. One of the
Company's core competencies is its extensive product expertise. With its
understanding of the most appropriate product for specific customer
applications, the Company can identify the MROP product best suited for a
customer's specific need. This expertise benefits the customer in two ways, each
of which lowers the customer's total MROP costs. First, the customer increases
the efficiency of its manufacturing processes by minimizing downtime and other
indirect costs. Second, by providing only that level of quality required by the
application, the Company can lower the customer's MROP product costs. The
Company's comprehensive product line supports its commitment to deliver the most
appropriate product to its customers. In addition to maintaining over 100,000
stock keeping units ("SKUs"), as well as special items in stock for regular
customers, the Company can provide virtually any MROP item, including
special-order items.
Flexible Procurement Solutions; Integrated Supply. The Company believes
the key to serving customers in the changing MROP market is the ability to
design and implement customized flexible procurement solutions for acquiring,
possessing, and applying MROP products to satisfy each customer's particular
needs and achieve its cost reduction objectives. The spectrum of services
necessary to deliver such solutions is broad. For customers who are not yet
prepared to outsource their entire MROP procurement and management functions,
the Company provides a range of options from which customers may select the
appropriate types and level of service. For customers who desire total
procurement solutions designed and implemented through a single distributor, the
Company offers its "fully integrated supply" programs, which permit customers to
outsource to the Company the entire MROP procurement and management function,
including ownership by the Company of inventory in the
-4-
5
customer's on-site MROP supply room (or "tool crib"). The Company's services
include, as needed by the customer: assessing a customer's total procurement
costs for its MROP requirements (comprised of product ordering, carrying,
management, administrative, and other overhead costs); re-engineering
procurement and production processes; standardizing products; reducing the
number of distributors, with a corresponding reduction in purchase orders and
invoices processed by customers; reducing the numbers of products used by the
customer; acquiring supplies on an "on-time" basis; managing and supplying MROP
items using the Supply Management System, the Company's proprietary software for
the management of integrated supply sites; managing and staffing customers' tool
cribs; bar coding products in tool cribs to facilitate ordering and to track and
control consumption by employee, product, or cost center; and generating a
variety of customer-designed management reports.
Centralized Corporate Functions and Decentralized Operating Management.
At the corporate level, on the one hand, the Company is consolidating functions
such as financial, accounting, management information systems, employee
benefits, and certain purchasing arrangements to eliminate duplicative
administrative and other costs that otherwise would be incurred at each of its
operating locations. The resulting operating efficiencies, along with the
enhanced leverage from higher volume purchasing, should provide the Company an
advantage over smaller regional and local competitors. At the operating
subsidiary level, on the other hand, the Company is employing a decentralized
management structure that focuses management at each operating subsidiary on
day-to-day operating matters, profitability, and growth, as well as identifying
potential acquisition candidates. The Company believes that its decentralized
management philosophy will result in better customer service by allowing local
management the flexibility to implement policies and make decisions based on
first-hand assessments of the needs and desires of individual customers.
Superior Customer Service. Providing superior quality and a
comprehensive range of MROP services to customers is the IDG hallmark. As part
of its commitment to customer service, the Company emphasizes quality assurance
in all phases of its operations. The Company's sales and service personnel
receive ongoing periodic training in TQM ("total quality management") and other
team management skills to assure such quality performance. IDG also will seek
certification under the International Standards Organization ("ISO") 9002
standards for distribution with respect to its principal locations and expects
to make such certification a Company-wide objective for all future principal
locations.
Commitment to Technology. The Company's proprietary computerized Supply
Management System and its internal management and information systems will be
instrumental in delivering high quality customer service and in reducing the
Company's operating costs. The Supply Management System is designed to allow a
customer to order products directly from the Company, set internal purchase
control limits for its personnel, coordinate the management of MROP items within
its tool cribs, run customized reports, and perform numerous other functions
that facilitate the procurement process or reduce its costs. When fully
implemented, the Company's internal management and information systems will
track all of its products nationwide and will enable a customer and the
Company's sales personnel anywhere to determine the availability of products in
stock on a real time basis and to evaluate alternative products and pricing. The
Company is committed to continually assessing and implementing technological
innovations that will enhance its ability to serve customers and improve its
operating results. The Company will seek to use technology to reduce its order
processing and receiving costs, by means such as product bar coding, electronic
funds transfer ("EFT"), electronic data interchange ("EDI"), and vendor managed
inventory ("VMI") modules to facilitate on-time procurement of products, without
the administrative expense and inconveniences of the traditional exchange of
purchase orders and invoices.
-5-
6
GROWTH STRATEGY
Internal Growth. Management believes that significant opportunities
exist to increase revenues and earnings through internal expansion. Through
focused marketing both inside and outside the United States, the Company will
seek to add revenue by offering additional products and services to new and
existing customers and identifying any unserved facilities of its larger
existing customers. Where necessary to increase its market share, the Company
will open or expand facilities in the vicinity of existing operations. The
Company will also consider the desirability of internal expansion into new
geographic markets.
Acquisitions in Select Geographic Markets. The Company has launched an
acquisitions program to take advantage of consolidation opportunities within the
highly fragmented industrial MROP market. The Company will continue to focus
primarily on industrial MROP markets in the United States, and has initially
focused on expanding its existing markets as well as those major markets where
the Company does not presently operate. The Company will continue to seek to
acquire successful MROP distribution and related businesses that are large
enough to establish a significant initial presence and to provide for future
Company expansion in the particular market. The Company will continue to seek to
retain the management of acquired businesses.
"Hub and Spoke" Expansion Strategy. The Company is utilizing a "hub and
spoke" approach both for acquisitions and internal expansion. In establishing a
"hub" location, the Company generally will assess both the volume of MROP
utilization in the geographic area and the ready availability of transportation
and warehouse facilities to permit the Company to develop and support smaller
operations in surrounding regions through centralization of some functions at
the hub location. Upon establishing a hub, the Company will seek to acquire or
open additional smaller operations, or "spokes", in the surrounding geographic
area to increase market penetration or capitalize on operating efficiencies
available through the hub.
Expansion into International Markets. The Company believes that the
consolidation and outsourcing trends that provide growth opportunities in the
United States offer comparable opportunities in international markets. The
Company plans initially to extend its offering of flexible procurement solutions
to foreign manufacturing facilities of its domestic customers to develop a base
for potentially expanded international operations. The Company has been active
in the People's Republic of China since 1988, establishing sales offices in
Beijing (1994) and Shanghai (1996), and in Mexico since 1997.
FLEXIBLE PROCUREMENT SOLUTIONS; INTEGRATED SUPPLY
The ability to deliver customized flexible procurement solutions that
are specially designed to reduce a particular customer's MROP costs is one of
the fundamental strengths of the Company. The spectrum of services necessary to
design and implement such solutions for customers in the changing industrial
MROP market is broad and must encompass all three phases of a customer's MROP
cycle -- acquisition, possession, and application. The Company offers the entire
spectrum of services in order to assure its ability to design and implement
procurement solutions that meet each particular customer's MROP requirements.
Some customers may require nearly the entire spectrum of services -- a
so-called "fully integrated supply" relationship, where the Company essentially
forms a strategic alliance with the customer to procure, manage, and apply MROP
products at the customer's site and to share the benefits of the cost reductions
achieved. The Company's fully integrated supply relationships, which are not
-6-
7
standardized and vary from customer to customer, usually include licensing IDG's
proprietary Supply Management System to the customer; gaining access to plant
floors to re-engineer procurement and production processes and standardize MROP
products; coordinating the purchase of multiple MROP product lines; providing
consolidated invoices and customized management reports via a direct network
link to customers; and managing and staffing tool cribs. In addition, in a fully
integrated supply relationship, the Company, rather than the customer, generally
owns the inventory in the tool crib. The Company believes that the nature of
integrated supply relationships will continue to evolve, and it will seek to
maintain the capability to provide whatever level of integration its customers
may require over time.
In a fully integrated supply relationship, the Company often guarantees
a minimum annual reduction in the customer's total MROP costs. The Company
believes it can achieve such guaranteed cost reductions through its focused and
ongoing analysis and re-engineering of a customer's production processes to
reduce the variety and number of MROP products used by the customer. In addition
to the contractually guaranteed cost reductions, the Company often achieves
additional costs savings for the customer through the reduction of certain tool
crib staffing expenses; the reduction in shrinkage and obsolete stock due to
better inventory controls; and the elimination of certain inventory holding
costs. Where the Company saves additional costs for a customer through process
improvements, the customer usually shares the additional savings with the
Company. The Company believes that, for appropriate customers, a fully
integrated supply arrangement also has other benefits. For example, through the
use of the Company's proprietary Supply Management System, the customer
experiences a better fill rate for MROP products; reduces production downtime
due to the unavailability of key products; and obtains more useful information
about inventory needs and consumption by cost center than previously collected.
Other customers require less comprehensive solutions, and the Company
has the flexibility to design and implement only those services needed by the
customer. In addition to selections from the services described for fully
integrated supply arrangements, these specialized services may include any one
or more of the following: providing consolidated billing for MROP products and
computerized management reports to customers regarding purchases and inventory
levels; installing computer software and hardware to implement an EDI system to
enable the customer to order products from its own location electronically
without contacting the Company by telephone or facsimile; and bar coding
products in a customer's tool crib to control inventory and track consumption by
product, employee, or cost center. Other services, as needed to respond to a
particular customer's MROP requirements, can be designed and implemented to
achieve the desired solution.
At December 31, 1997, the Company had in place 18 fully integrated
supply arrangements with customers covering 24 sites, and supply contracts for
specialized services with over 250 customers.
PRODUCTS
The Company offers a full line of industrial MROP products, stocks
specific items for regular customers, and can satisfy virtually any requirement
a customer may have for an MROP application or service. The Company's principal
categories of products include abrasives, cutting tools, hand and power tools,
coolants, lubricants, and adhesives, among others. The Company is able to offer
significant depth and breadth in its core product lines to customers throughout
its nationwide operations, which distinguishes it from most of its present
competitors. The Company's products may be ordered electronically, by telephone,
by mail, or by facsimile. The Company seeks at all times to provide its
-7-
8
customers with the most convenient method of selecting and ordering products,
which in the future may include paper and electronic catalogs, Internet
commerce, and other publications.
The Company's offering of specific products from multiple manufacturers
at different prices and quality levels permits the Company to offer the product
that provides the best value for the customer. For example, if a customer
requires a drill bit to drill 100 holes, it would be inefficient and more costly
to purchase the top-of-the line product that is designed for a requirement of
drilling 10,000 holes. The Company's application and product specialists are
trained specifically to assist customers in making such intelligent cost-saving
purchases, with the goal of lowering the customer's total MROP product costs.
The Company believes these factors will significantly enhance its volume of
repeat business, and they are an integral part of the Company's overall customer
costs reduction and total procurement solution.
The following table sets forth the MROP products offered by the
Company, based on the Industrial Distribution Association product categories,
describes typical products in each category, and presents the percentage of the
Company's aggregate revenues from sales of the product category for 1997:
% of
Aggregate
Product Category Typical Products Revenue
- ---------------- ---------------- ---------
Cutting Tools.......................... Drills, Taps, Carbide Tools, End Mills 17.7%
Abrasives.............................. Grinding Wheels, Sanding Belts, Discs, Sheets or 17.6%
Rolls
Hand Tools............................. Wrenches, Socket Sets, Screw Drivers, Hammers 11.2%
Power Tools............................ Air and Electric Drills, Air Compressors, Impact 9.8%
Wrenches, Screwdrivers
Maintenance Equipment & Supplies...... Hydraulic Tools, Paint, Lubrication Equipment 7.3%
Coolants, Lubricants, and Adhesives.... Metal Cutting Coolants, Aerosols, Industrial 6.2%
Adhesives
Material Handling Equipment............ Hoist, Slings, Chain, Shelving, Casters 4.9%
Safety Products........................ Gloves, Signs, Absorbents, Glasses 4.4%
Contractor Supplies.................... Powder-Actuated Tools, Ladders, Shovels 2.2%
Machine Tools & Accessories............ Milling Machines, Work Holding Vises, Tool 1.8%
Holders
Fasteners.............................. Socket Screws, Hex Screws, Anchors 1.6%
Electrical............................. Fuses, Electrical Switches, Controls 1.5%
Saw Blades............................. Band, Hack, Hole, Jig Saw Blades 1.4%
Tapes.................................. Masking, Filament and Duct Tape 1.4%
Fluid Power............................ Hydraulic and Pneumatic Valves, Cylinders 1.3%
Quality Control Products............... Electronic Calipers, Micrometers 1.0%
Tool & Die Supplies.................... Ground Stock, Drill Rod, Die Sets 1.0%
Power Transmission Equipment........... Belts, Drives, Bearings, Gears, Pulleys 0.9%
Brushes................................ Wire Wheel, Floor Brooms 0.7%
Welding Equipment & Supplies........... Welders, Weld Rod 0.5%
Industrial Pipe, Valves & Fittings..... Pipes, Valve, Fittings 0.4%
Industrial Hose........................ Air Hose, Water Hose 0.1%
Metal Goods............................ Angle Iron, Conduit 0.1%
Other Products......................... Special Order Items and Miscellaneous 5.0%
---
Total 100%
-8-
9
In addition to maintaining over 100,000 SKUs in stock, the Company
often maintains supplies of special items for regular customers. Moreover, the
Company is able to supply virtually any special order MROP item. In order to
achieve costs savings for the Company and its customers, the Company
periodically reviews its special order activities to identify items ordered with
sufficient frequency to warrant inclusion in the Company's stock.
The Company obtains its products from approximately 14,800 vendors.
During 1997, only one vendor provided as much as 10% of the products sold by the
Company, and no other vendor provided more than 3%. The Company believes it is
not materially dependent on any one vendor or small group of vendors.
The Company ships products anywhere in the world in the time frame
required by the customer. To facilitate such "on time" delivery of the Company's
products, the Company stores its stock MROP products primarily in warehouses at
various locations across the United States.
CUSTOMERS
The Company's customers, who number over 24,000 include a broad range
of industrial, commercial, and institutional users of MROP products, from
one-person machine shops to national and multinational corporations such as
AlliedSignal, Black & Decker, Boeing, Chrysler, General Motors, Hoechst
Celanese, PPG Industries, and Shell Oil. During 1997, the Company sold products
to over 840 customers who purchased at least $50,000 of products, and no single
customer accounted for as much as 5% of the Company's net sales.
The Company will continue to serve a large number and wide variety of
customers, as part of its planned growth and nationwide expansion strategy.
Management does expect, however, that the Company will place special emphasis on
marketing and sales of core product categories to mid- to large-sized users of
MROP products who require the value-added benefits of the Company's flexible
procurement solutions.
SALES AND MARKETING
The Company has approximately 200 outside sales representatives, 220
inside sales/customer service representatives, and 27 application and product
specialists. Most of the inside sales/customer service representatives support
the outside sales representatives and are responsible for certain types of
customer service contacts and order entry. The application and product
specialists call on designated customers and are responsible for designing and
presenting the Company's flexible procurement solutions to those customers and
providing technical support with respect to certain products. These specialists
are highly trained individuals who build relationships with customers and assist
them in reducing total procurement costs and improving production processes.
Once the Company's internal operating systems are integrated, its entire sales
force will have access to customers' historic product preferences, order values,
and inventory levels for all of the products stocked by the Company. The sales
force will also be able to access billing information and plant and industry
information, and to input product orders. The Company has invested significant
resources in developing these sales force automation systems and databases. The
databases will be a key component of the Company's marketing strategy and can
offer the Company an ongoing competitive advantage in increasing sales to
existing customers and attracting new customers.
-9-
10
The Company has centralized the administration of Company-wide training
programs and provides intensive ongoing TQM training programs for all Company
personnel. In addition, each of the Company's operating subsidiaries provides
regular training programs for its sales personnel and special training programs
for any products distributed only in its market area. Each operating subsidiary
also maintains a technical support group, as part of its overall sales and
marketing function, dedicated to answering specific customer inquiries,
assisting customers with the operation of products, and finding low cost
solutions to manufacturing problems.
MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS
The Company will develop, maintain, and utilize computerized management
and information systems, including its internal management and information
systems and its proprietary PC-based Supply Management System for customer
product procurement and management. Both of these systems are important elements
of the Company's ability to meet customers' requirements for increasing levels
of individualized total MROP procurement solutions and also to achieve the
Company's desired level of operating efficiencies. The Company utilizes its
proprietary Supply Management System in providing flexible procurement solutions
for customers. In addition, certain other of its acquired businesses have
internal information systems that allow centralized management of key functions,
including communication links between warehouse and sales offices, inventory and
accounts receivable management, purchasing, pricing, sales and distribution, and
the preparation of periodic operating control reports that provide concise and
timely information regarding key aspects of its business.
In connection with developing its internal Company-wide systems, the
Company is drawing upon the best features of the existing systems that have been
utilized by its acquired businesses. Once these systems are integrated, certain
of the information systems will operate over a wide area network, and the
real-time information system will allow each warehouse and sales center to share
information and monitor daily progress relating to sales activities, credit
approval, inventory levels, stock balancing, vendor returns, order fulfillment,
and other measures of performance. In addition, the Company's systems will
enable it to automatically purchase inventory from certain vendors based on
projected customer ordering models.
COMPETITION
The industrial MROP products industry is highly competitive and
features numerous distribution channels, including: national, regional, and
local distributors; direct mail suppliers; large warehouse chains; hardware
stores; and manufacturers' own sales forces. Many of the Company's competitors
are small enterprises who sell to such customers in a limited geographic area,
but the Company also competes against several large MROP distributors that have
significantly greater resources than the Company. Certain of the Company's
competitors sell identical products for lower prices than those offered by the
Company. Management believes, however, that the Company's ability to compete
effectively is dependent primarily upon its ability to respond to the needs of
its customers through quality service and product diversity and availability.
Management believes the Company's operating and growth strategies will yield
operating efficiencies that enhance its ability to compete successfully for the
types of customers it desires.
-10-
11
PERSONNEL
The Company had approximately 933 full-time and 26 part-time associates
as of December 31, 1997. Eleven of the Company's associates are employed
pursuant to a collective bargaining agreement with local unions affiliated with
the International Brotherhood of Teamsters. Management believes that the
subsidiary that has been employing these persons pursuant to that contract
enjoys good relations with these associates, and has not experienced work
stoppages. Management believes the Company's relations with all of its
associates is good.
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
Certain information regarding the executive officers of the Company is
set forth in the following table and paragraphs.
NAME AGE POSITION
---- --- --------
Martin S. Pinson 52 Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
Douglass C. Smith 57 President and Chief Operating Officer
Jack P. Healey 38 Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and
Secretary
Mr. Pinson joined the Company in June 1997. Prior to joining the
Company, Mr. Pinson had served as Executive Vice President (from inception) and
Chief Financial Officer (from inception to 1995) of U.S. Office Products
Company, an international office products supplier to corporate, commercial, and
industrial customers, which engaged in a consolidation of office products
suppliers and which he co-founded in 1994. From 1991 to 1995, Mr. Pinson served
as President of Pinson and Associates, a Washington, D.C.-based investment,
legal, and consulting services firm primarily serving development stage
companies. From 1973 to 1990, Mr. Pinson was Senior Vice President and Secretary
of Greater Washington Investors, Inc., a publicly-owned venture capital
investment company, where he specialized in developing investment strategy and
locating new investment opportunities. He received his undergraduate degree from
Union College and his law degree from Georgetown University.
Mr. Smith is a co-founder of the Company and has served as its
President and Chief Operating Officer since its inception. Mr. Smith was a
co-founder in 1981 of TDG and served as its President and Chief Executive
Officer from inception until its acquisition by the Company in September 1997.
Mr. Smith was also a co-founder in 1972, and President, of Boring & Smith
Industries, Inc., a predecessor of TDG. Mr. Smith received his undergraduate
degree from the University of Maryland and his Masters in Business
Administration from Emory University.
Mr. Healey joined the Company in June 1997. Prior to joining the
Company, Mr. Healey was the partner in charge of assurance services (since 1983)
for Miller Ray Healey & Houser, a regional accounting firm and member of the SEC
practice section of AICPA, during which time he served as auditor for TDG. Prior
to joining that firm, Mr. Healey was a senior auditor with the international
accounting firm of Ernst & Young. Mr. Healey is a certified public accountant
and a certified fraud examiner. He received his undergraduate degree in
accounting from Syracuse University.
-11-
12
CERTAIN FACTORS AFFECTING FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS
Many of the matters discussed in this Annual Report on Form 10-K are
forward looking statements, as defined in the Private Securities Litigation
Reform Act of 1995. Any forward looking statements included herein have been
included based upon facts available to management as of the date of the
statements. These statements involve a number of risks and uncertainties that
could cause actual results to differ materially from any such statements. The
following is a nonexclusive list of factors that could cause such results to
differ materially:
Limited Combined Operating History. Although each of the Founding
Companies has operated for over 20 years, IDG's operations of these businesses
as a combined entity only commenced in September 1997 when they were acquired.
There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to integrate
successfully the businesses of the Founding Companies or any subsequently
acquired companies or to operate profitably. There can be no assurance that the
Company's management group, certain of whom, including the Chief Executive
Officer, have not previously worked in the MROP industry, will be able to manage
effectively the combined entity. Failure to integrate successfully its acquired
businesses could have a material adverse effect on the Company's results of
operations and financial condition.
Absence of Integrated Systems. Until the Company implements its
centralized management systems, the Company will utilize and be dependent upon
the information and operating systems of the several companies it acquires for
ordering products, recording and analyzing financial results, controlling
inventory, and other important functions. Although the Company has put in place
certain control mechanisms, it may nonetheless experience delays, disruptions,
and unanticipated expenses in implementing, integrating, and operating its
centralized systems, any of which could have a material adverse effect on the
Company's results of operations and financial condition. The Company will not be
able to fully achieve certain contemplated operating efficiencies and
competitive advantages until it has implemented fully its centralized management
information and operating systems.
Risks Associated with Expansion through Acquisitions. The Company's
growth strategy contemplates the ongoing acquisitions of MROP distribution and
related businesses. As a result, the Company's future success is dependent, in
part, upon its ability to identify, finance, and acquire suitable businesses on
favorable terms and then to integrate and manage the acquired businesses
successfully. Acquisitions involve special risks, including risks associated
with unanticipated liabilities, diversion of management attention, and possible
adverse effects on earnings resulting from increased goodwill amortization,
potential increased interest costs, the issuance of additional securities, the
dependence on retention, hiring, and training of key personnel, and difficulties
relating to the integration of the acquired businesses. Although the Company
believes that it can implement successfully its acquisition program and
establish a nationwide presence, there can be no assurance that the Company will
be able to do so. Further, there can be no assurance that future acquisitions
will not have an adverse effect upon the Company's results of operations,
particularly during periods in which the operations of acquired businesses are
being integrated into the Company's operations.
The Company intends to use a combination of shares of Common Stock and
other types of consideration in making acquisitions. The extent to which the
Company will be able or willing to use Common Stock for this purpose will depend
on the market value of the Common Stock from time to time and the willingness of
potential sellers to accept it as full or partial payment. If the Company is
unable to use its Common Stock for acquisitions, the Company's ability to make
acquisitions may depend upon its ability to raise additional capital, including
through borrowings. Such borrowings could create other risks
-12-
13
for the Company and its stockholders. No assurance can be given that the Company
will be able to obtain the capital it will need to finance its acquisition
program.
Dependence on Supplier Relationships. Each of the Company's acquired
businesses has distribution rights for certain product lines in its respective
geographic market. For the foreseeable future, until it implements procedures
for more centralized procurement arrangements, the Company will depend upon the
maintenance of these distribution rights for a substantial portion of its
business. A significant percentage of these current distribution arrangements
with suppliers are oral, and many of them can be terminated by the supplier
immediately or upon short notice. The termination or limitation by any key
supplier of its relationship with the Company could have a material adverse
effect on the Company's results of operations and financial condition.
Competition. The industrial MROP supplies industry is highly
competitive and features numerous distribution channels, including: national,
regional, and local distributors; direct mail suppliers; large warehouse chains;
hardware stores; and manufacturers' own sales forces. Many of the Company's
competitors are small enterprises who sell to customers in a limited geographic
area, but the Company also competes against several large MROP distributors that
have significantly greater resources than the Company. As customers increasingly
seek low-cost alternatives to traditional methods of purchasing and sources of
supply, they are, among other things, reducing the number of their MROP
suppliers. Also, MROP distributors are consolidating to achieve economies of
scale and increase efficiencies, which consolidation trend could cause the
industry to become more competitive. In addition, new competitors may emerge.
Certain of the Company's competitors sell identical products for prices lower
than those offered by the Company. Moreover, the Company also competes on the
basis of responsiveness to the needs of customers for quality service, product
diversity, and availability. There can be no assurance that the Company will be
able to compete successfully under such conditions.
Dependence on Key Personnel. The Company's operations will depend for
the foreseeable future on the continuing efforts of its executive officers and
the senior management of the businesses it acquires, especially as the Company
enters into new geographic markets. The business and prospects of the Company
could be adversely affected if these persons, in significant numbers, do not
continue their key roles, and the Company is unable to attract and retain
qualified replacements.
Labor Availability. The timely provision of high-quality service by the
Company requires an adequate supply of skilled sales and customer service
personnel, including the application and product specialists whose expertise is
an essential element of the Company's customer-oriented, flexible procurement
solutions approach. Accordingly, the Company's ability to implement its
strategies depends to a degree on its ability to employ the skilled personnel
necessary to meet the Company's marketing and services requirements. From time
to time, the Company has experienced difficulty in attracting or retaining
sufficient numbers of qualified personnel. In addition, the operating costs of
the Company may be adversely affected by turnover in such positions. There can
be no assurance that the Company will be able to maintain an adequately skilled
sales and customer service force or that the Company's labor expenses will not
increase as a result of a shortage in the supply of such skilled personnel.
Industry Cyclicality. Some of the primary markets for the products sold
by the Company are subject to cyclical fluctuations that generally affect demand
for industrial and consumer durable goods produced by the users of MROP
products. Consequently, the demand for MROP products has been and may continue
to be influenced by many of those same national or regional factors. Changes in
economic conditions resulting in a change in the current business cycle could
have a material adverse effect on the Company's results of operations and
financial condition.
-13-
14
Control by Management and Former Owners of Founding Companies.
Directors and officers of the Company, and former stockholders of the Founding
Companies, beneficially own an aggregate of approximately 45% the outstanding
Common Stock. Accordingly, these persons, if they were to act in concert, would
have substantial influence over the affairs of the Company, including the
ability potentially to control the election of directors and other matters
requiring stockholder approval by simple majority vote.
Year 2000 Compliance. The "year 2000 issue" arises from the widespread
use of computer programs that rely on two-digit date codes to perform
computations or decision-making functions. Many of these programs may fail due
to an inability to properly interpret date codes beginning January 1, 2000. For
example, such programs may misinterpret "00" as the year 1900 rather than 2000.
In addition, some equipment, being controlled by microprocessor chips, may not
deal appropriately with the year "00." The Company is evaluating its computer
systems to determine which modifications and expenditures will be necessary to
make its systems compatible with 2000 year requirements. The Company believes
that its systems will be year-2000 compliant upon implementation of such
modifications. The Company currently estimates the total cost of such
modifications to be approximately $250,000. However, there can be no assurance
that all necessary modifications will be identified and corrected or that
unforeseen difficulties or cost will not arise. In addition, there can be no
assurance that the systems of other companies on which the Company's systems
rely will be modified on a timely basis, or that the failure by another company
to properly modify its systems will not negatively impact the systems or
operations of the Company.
ITEM 2. DESCRIPTION OF FACILITIES.
Currently, the Company owns eight properties and leases 45 properties
in 48 cities in the United States for its warehouse, sales, and administrative
offices. The Company also leases four properties in four cities in other
countries. Certain property locations contain multiple operations such as a
warehouse and a sales office. The facilities range in size from 550 square feet
to 68,064 square feet. Leases for the facilities expire at various periods
between 1998 and 2009. The aggregate annual lease payments for real properties
in 1997 were approximately $850,000.
The Company's principal corporate offices are located at 2500 Royal
Place, Tucker, Georgia, where the Company is expanding a portion of TDG's
principal operating location to accommodate its executive offices. The Company
also leases approximately 3,018 square feet of executive office space in Chevy
Chase, Maryland for use by Mr. Pinson as a satellite office.
The Company believes that its facilities are adequate for its needs and
does not anticipate inordinate difficulty in replacing such facilities or
opening additional facilities, if needed.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.
On November 18, 1996, Milliken & Company ("Milliken"), a textile
manufacturer and customer of TDG, filed suit against a manufacturer of an
industrial product and TDG in the Superior Court of Troup County, Georgia, Civil
Action No. 96-CV-964. Milliken claims that a product sold to it by TDG as a
distributor of the defendant-manufacturer was defective and caused a fire,
severely damaging Milliken's textile manufacturing plant in LaGrange, Georgia.
Milliken alleges damages of $500 million against the defendants. TDG has denied
any liability, and its insurance carrier is vigorously defending the lawsuit on
its behalf. While the damages alleged by Milliken are exceptional in amount, the
inclusion of the distributor of a product, along with its manufacturer, as a
defendant in an action for alleged product defectiveness is unexceptional. The
litigation is in the early stages of discovery, and while it
-14-
15
is not possible to predict with accuracy the outcome of any such litigation
matter, the Company believes that its insurance, which provides for $12 million
of coverage, will be adequate to cover any loss to TDG that might result from
the lawsuit.
On August 27, 1997, Robert Hallager filed suit in the Court of Common
Pleas of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Civil Action No. 3222, against his former
employer, Jessop Steel Company, and several manufacturers and distributors of
industrial products, including Shearer Industrial Supply Company, one of the
Company's subsidiaries ("Shearer"). Mr. Hallager claims that he contracted
cobalt poisoning and other pulmonary problems requiring his cessation of work
and lifetime monitoring as a result of his exposure to steel containing cobalt,
chromium, and nickel through a grinding process utilizing abrasive tools
supplied to his employer by the various defendant-manufacturers and
distributors. Mr. Hallager alleges damages "in excess of $50,000". The
litigation is in the very early stages, and no answer is yet due from or has
been filed by Shearer. Shearer intends to deny any liability, and its insurance
carrier is expected to defend the lawsuit on Shearer's behalf. While it is not
possible to predict with accuracy the outcome of any such litigation matter, the
Company believes that its insurance, which provides for $7 million of coverage,
will be adequate to cover any loss to Shearer that might result from the
lawsuit.
On December 22, 1997, TDG brought an action in DeKalb County Superior
Court, Georgia, File No. 97-14388-4, against a former Stockholder, Alvis J.
Waite, under the Georgia dissenters' rights provisions of the Georgia Business
Corporation Code (the "GBCC"). Mr. Waite, as a Stockholder of TDG, had exercised
his rights pursuant to the GBCC to dissent from the merger of TDG with the
Company. In accordance with the GBCC, TDG offered to pay Mr. Waite $4.2 million
for his interest in TDG. Mr. Waite rejected that offer and demanded payment of
$9 million. TDG brought this action to seek a judicial determination of the
value of Mr. Waite's interest in TDG as of the time of the merger. The
proceeding is in the early stages of discovery and it is not possible to predict
the outcome at this time.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.
No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders of the
Registrant during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year covered by this Report.
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.
The Common Stock began trading on the New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE")
under the symbol "IDG" on September 24, 1997. Prior to that time, there was no
trading market for the Common Stock. The following table sets forth for the
periods indicated the high and low sales prices of the Common Stock on the NYSE.
PRICE RANGE
-----------
HIGH LOW
---- ---
1997
----
Third Quarter (from September 24, 1997)................. $21 $20 7/16
Fourth Quarter.......................................... $22 9/16 $14 11/16
1998
----
First Quarter (through March 13, 1998).................. $18 3/4 $15 9/16
--------- ---------
-15-
16
As of February 28, 1998, there were 88 holders of record of the
Common Stock. Investors who beneficially own Common Stock that is held in street
name by brokerage firms or similar holders are not included in this number.
Accordingly, based upon the quantities of periodic reports requested by such
brokerage firms, the Company believes that the actual number of individual
beneficial owners of its Common Stock exceeds 1,778.
The Company has not paid dividends on its Common Stock. The Company
currently intends to retain its future earnings, if any, to finance the growth,
development, and expansion of the Company's business and, accordingly, does not
currently intend to declare or pay any dividends on the Common Stock for the
foreseeable future. The declaration, payment, and amount of future dividends, if
any, will be subject to the discretion of the Company's Board of Directors and
will depend upon the future earnings, results of operations, financial
condition, and capital requirements of the Company, among other factors. Under
Delaware law, the Company is prohibited from paying any dividends unless it has
capital surplus or net profits available for this purpose. In addition, the
Company's loan agreement with the First National Bank of Chicago and other
lenders prohibits the payment of dividends if there exists, or would exist as a
result thereof, a default under the loan agreement.
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA.
The information contained under the heading "Selected Financial Data"
in the Company's Annual Report to Stockholders, filed as an exhibit hereto, is
incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.
The information contained under the heading "Management's Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" in the Company's
Annual Report to Stockholders, filed as an exhibit hereto, is incorporated
herein by reference.
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.
Not applicable.
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA.
The information contained under the headings "Independent Auditors
Report" and "Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes to the Consolidated
Financial Statements" in the Company's Annual Report to Stockholders, filed as
an exhibit hereto, is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.
None.
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT.
The information contained under the heading "Election of Directors" in
the definitive Proxy Statement used in connection with the solicitation of
proxies for the Company's 1998 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, to be filed with
the Commission, is incorporated herein by reference. Pursuant to
-16-
17
instruction 3 to paragraph (b) of Item 401 of Regulation S-K, information
relating to the executive officers of the Company is included in Item 1 of this
Report.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.
The information contained under the heading "Executive Compensation" in
the definitive Proxy Statement used in connection with the solicitation of
proxies for the Company's 1998 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, to be filed with
the Commission, is incorporated herein by reference. In no event shall the
information contained in the Proxy Statement under the heading "Stock
Performance Graph" be deemed incorporated herein by such reference.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT.
The information contained under the heading "Voting Securities and
Principal Stockholders" in the definitive Proxy Statement used in connection
with the solicitation of proxies for the Company's 1998 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders, to be filed with the Commission, is incorporated herein by
reference. For purposes of determining the aggregate market value of the
Company's voting stock held by nonaffiliates, shares held by all directors and
executive officers of the Company have been excluded. The exclusion of such
shares is not intended to, and shall not, constitute a determination as to which
persons or entities may be "affiliates" of the Company as defined by the
Commission.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS.
The information contained under the heading "Certain Transactions" in
the definitive Proxy Statement to be used in connection with the solicitation of
proxies for the Company's 1998 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, to be filed with
the Commission, is incorporated herein by reference.
PART IV
ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES, AND REPORT ON FORM
8-K.
(A) The following financial statements and notes thereto are incorporated by
reference in Item 8 of this Report:
1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Independent Auditors' Report.
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 1997 and 1996.
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31,
1997,1996, and 1995.
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity for the years ended
December 31, 1997, 1996 and 1995.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31,
1997, 1996 and 1995.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements as of December 31, 1997 and
1996 for the years ended December 31, 1997, 1996, and 1995.
2. FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
Schedule II - Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
-17-
18
3. EXHIBITS
The exhibits set forth below are required to be filed with this Report
pursuant to Item 601 of Regulation S-K:
EXHIBIT
NUMBER DESCRIPTION OF EXHIBIT
------ ----------------------
3.1 Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, of
the Company (filed as Exhibit 3.1 of the
Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1
(File No. 333-36233) is hereby incorporated
by reference)
3.2 Bylaws of the Company (filed as Exhibit 3.2
of the Company's Registration Statement on
Form S-1 (File No. 333-36233) is hereby
incorporated by reference)
4.1 Form of Common Stock Certificate of the
Company (filed as Exhibit 3.1 of the
Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1
(File No. 333-36233) is hereby incorporated
by reference) 10.1 Form of Agreement and
Plan of Merger and Reorganization (reverse
merger) (filed as Exhibit 10.1 of the
Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1
(File No. 333-36233) is hereby incorporated
by reference)
10.2 Agreement and Plan of Merger and
Reorganization among the Company, Industrial
Distribution Group, Inc., a Georgia
corporation, IDG Acquisition Company I, Inc.
and the Stockholders named therein (filed as
Exhibit 10.2 of the Company's Registration
Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-36233)
is hereby incorporated by reference)
10.3 Agreement and Plan of Reorganization between
the Company and the Stockholders named
therein (filed as Exhibit 10.3 of the
Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1
(File No. 333-36233) is hereby incorporated
by reference)
10.4 Uniform Provisions for the Acquisition of
Founding Companies (filed as Exhibit 10.4 of
the Company's Registration Statement on Form
S-1 (File No. 333-36233) is hereby
incorporated by reference)
*10.5 Industrial Distribution Group, Inc. Stock
Incentive Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.5 of the
Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1
(File No. 333-36233) is hereby incorporated
by reference)
*10.6 Employment Agreement between the Company and
Martin S. Pinson (filed as Exhibit 10.6 of
the Company's Registration Statement on Form
S-1 (File No. 333-36233) is hereby
incorporated by reference)
*10.7 Employment Agreement between the Company and
Douglass C. Smith (filed as Exhibit 10.7 of
the Company's Registration Statement on Form
S-1 (File No. 333-36233) is hereby
incorporated by reference)
*10.8 Employment Agreement between the Company and
Jack P. Healey (filed as Exhibit 10.8 of the
Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1
(File No. 333-36233) is hereby incorporated
by reference)
*10.9 Form of Indemnification Agreement entered
into between the Company and each of the
executive officers and directors of the
Company (filed as Exhibit 10.9 of the
Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1
(File No. 333-36233) is hereby incorporated
by reference)
-18-
19
10.10 Form of Escrow Agreement among the Company,
American Stock Transfer & Trust Company and
the individuals named therein (filed as
Exhibit 10.10 of the Company's Registration
Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-36233)
is hereby incorporated by reference)
10.11 Letter Agreement dated October 1, 1997 by
and between the Company and the Barth Smith
Company.
13.1 Portions of the 1997 Annual Report to
Stockholders that are incorporated in the
Company's Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 1997.
21.1 Subsidiaries of the Company
23.1 Consent of Arthur Andersen LLP
27.1 Financial Data Schedule (for SEC use only)
99 Proxy Statement for the 1998 Annual Meeting
of Stockholders
---------------------------
*Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement
required to be filed as an exhibit.
-19-
20
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
To Industrial Distribution Group, Inc.:
We have audited in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, the
consolidated financial statements included in Industrial Distribution Group,
Inc.'s annual report to stockholders incorporated by reference in this Form
10-K, and have issued our report thereon dated February 13, 1998. Our audits
were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on those consolidated statements
taken as a whole. The schedule listed in the index is the responsibility of
the Company's management and is presented for purposes of complying with the
Securities and Exchange Commission's rules and is not part of the basic
consolidated financial statements. This schedule has been subjected to the
auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic consolidated financial
statements and, in our opinion, fairly states in all material respects the
financial data required to be set forth therein in relation to the basic
consolidated financial statements taken as a whole.
/s/ Arthur Andersen LLP
Atlanta, Georgia
February 13, 1998
-20-
21
INDUSTRIAL DISTRIBUTION GROUP, INC.
SCHEDULE II-VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997, 1996, AND 1995
Additions
---------------------------
Balance at Charged to Charged to Balance at
Beginning Costs and Other End of
Description of Period Expenses Accounts(2) Deductions(1) Period
- ----------------------------- ---------- ---------- ------------ ------------- ----------
Year ended December 31, 1997:
Allowance for doubtful
accounts $125 $315 $441 $35 $846
Year ended December 31, 1996:
Allowance for doubtful
accounts 115 37 0 27 125
Year ended December 31, 1995:
Allowance for doubtful
accounts 115 27 0 27 115
NOTES:
(1) Deductions represent the write off of uncollectible
receivables, net of recoveries.
(2) Reserves acquired in connection with the acquisition of the
Founding Companies in 1997.
-21-
22
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized in the City of Atlanta,
State of Georgia, on the 24th day of March, 1998.
INDUSTRIAL DISTRIBUTION GROUP, INC.
By: /s/ Martin S. Pinson
--------------------------------------------
Martin S. Pinson
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this
Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Company
in the capacities set forth and on the 24th day of March, 1998.
Signature Position
/s/ Martin S. Pinson
- ---------------------------------------- Chairman of the Board and Chief
Martin S. Pinson Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
/s/ Jack P. Healey Senior Vice President, Chief
- ---------------------------------------- Financial Officer, and
Jack P. Healey Secretary (Principal Financial and
Accounting Officer)
/s/ David K. Barth Director
- ----------------------------------------
David K. Barth
/s/ William J. Burkland Director
- ----------------------------------------
William J. Burkland
/s/ William R. Fenoglio Director
- ----------------------------------------
William R. Fenoglio
/s/ William T. Parr Director
- ----------------------------------------
William T. Parr
/s/ George L. Sachs, Jr. Director
- ----------------------------------------
George L. Sachs, Jr.
/s/ Richard M. Seigel Director
- ----------------------------------------
Richard M. Seigel
/s/ Andrew B. Shearer Director
- ----------------------------------------
Andrew B. Shearer
/s/ Douglas C. Smith Director
- ----------------------------------------
Douglass C. Smith
- 22 -
23
Exhibit Index
-------------
10.11 Letter Agreement dated October 1, 1997 by
and between the Company and the Barth Smith
Company.
13.1 Portions of the 1997 Annual Report to
Stockholders that are incorporated in the
Company's Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 1997.
21.1 Subsidiaries of the Company
23.1 Consent of Arthur Andersen LLP
27.1 Financial Data Schedule (for SEC use only)
99 Proxy Statement for the 1998 Annual Meeting
of Stockholders
-23-