SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13
OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
(Mark One) |
ý QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
For the quarter ended September 30, 2003 |
|
OR |
|
o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
For the transition period from to |
|
Commission File Number 1-7516 |
KEANE, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
MASSACHUSETTS |
|
04-2437166 |
(State or other
jurisdiction of |
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification |
|
|
|
100 City Square, Boston, Massachusetts |
|
02129 |
(Address of principal executive offices) |
|
(Zip Code) |
|
|
|
Registrants telephone number, including area code (617) 241-9200 |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ý No o
As of September 30, 2003, the number of issued and outstanding shares of Common Stock (excluding 11,772,879 shares held in treasury) and Class B Common Stock are 63,772,512 and 284,599 shares, respectively.
Keane, Inc.
Table of Contents
2
Keane, Inc.
Part I. Financial Information
Item 1. Financial Statements
Keane, Inc.
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income
|
|
Three
Months Ended |
|
Nine
Months Ended |
|
||||||||
|
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
||||
|
|
(In Thousands Except Per Share Amounts) |
|
||||||||||
Total revenues |
|
$ |
200,421 |
|
$ |
213,383 |
|
$ |
608,594 |
|
$ |
660,704 |
|
Salaries, wages and other direct costs |
|
137,976 |
|
154,714 |
|
418,284 |
|
474,452 |
|
||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
48,481 |
|
48,129 |
|
146,702 |
|
151,442 |
|
||||
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
3,904 |
|
4,342 |
|
11,981 |
|
11,898 |
|
||||
Operating income |
|
10,060 |
|
6,198 |
|
31,627 |
|
22,912 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Interest and dividend income |
|
959 |
|
487 |
|
2,205 |
|
2,021 |
|
||||
Interest expense |
|
1,454 |
|
37 |
|
2,553 |
|
176 |
|
||||
Other expense (income), net |
|
333 |
|
131 |
|
(6,585 |
) |
(214 |
) |
||||
Income before income taxes |
|
9,232 |
|
6,517 |
|
37,864 |
|
24,971 |
|
||||
Provision for income taxes |
|
3,692 |
|
2,607 |
|
15,143 |
|
9,987 |
|
||||
Net income |
|
$ |
5,540 |
|
$ |
3,910 |
|
$ |
22,721 |
|
$ |
14,984 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Earnings per share (basic) |
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
$ |
0.34 |
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Earnings per share (diluted) |
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
$ |
0.34 |
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding (basic) |
|
64,080 |
|
73,841 |
|
66,488 |
|
75,091 |
|
||||
Weighted average common shares and common share equivalents outstanding (diluted) |
|
65,115 |
|
73,847 |
|
66,922 |
|
75,549 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
3
Keane, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
|
September
30, |
|
December
31, |
|
||
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
(See Note A) |
|
||
|
|
(In Thousands) |
|
||||
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Current: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
91,410 |
|
$ |
46,383 |
|
Marketable securities |
|
116,054 |
|
21,872 |
|
||
Accounts receivable, net: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Trade |
|
118,730 |
|
129,432 |
|
||
Other |
|
650 |
|
1,004 |
|
||
Prepaid expenses and deferred taxes |
|
33,978 |
|
37,430 |
|
||
Total current assets |
|
360,822 |
|
236,121 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Property and equipment, net |
|
27,451 |
|
24,729 |
|
||
Building, net |
|
40,190 |
|
40,888 |
|
||
Goodwill |
|
277,752 |
|
277,435 |
|
||
Customer lists, net |
|
60,730 |
|
69,193 |
|
||
Other intangible assets, net |
|
14,161 |
|
17,613 |
|
||
Deferred taxes and other assets, net |
|
25,936 |
|
19,695 |
|
||
Total assets |
|
$ |
807,042 |
|
$ |
685,674 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Current: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Accounts payable |
|
11,894 |
|
11,986 |
|
||
Accrued expenses and other liabilities |
|
34,401 |
|
34,917 |
|
||
Accrued building costs |
|
449 |
|
234 |
|
||
Accrued restructuring |
|
9,611 |
|
13,694 |
|
||
Accrued compensation |
|
46,240 |
|
36,346 |
|
||
Note payable |
|
2,456 |
|
3,100 |
|
||
Accrued income taxes |
|
8,717 |
|
81 |
|
||
Unearned income |
|
8,425 |
|
11,535 |
|
||
Current capital lease obligations |
|
628 |
|
887 |
|
||
Total current liabilities |
|
122,821 |
|
112,780 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Convertible debentures |
|
150,000 |
|
|
|
||
Accrued long-term building costs |
|
40,160 |
|
40,654 |
|
||
Accrued long-term restructuring |
|
7,740 |
|
12,541 |
|
||
Deferred income taxes |
|
28,223 |
|
28,343 |
|
||
Long-term capital lease obligations |
|
395 |
|
772 |
|
||
Total liabilities |
|
349,339 |
|
195,090 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Stockholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Common stock |
|
7,555 |
|
7,555 |
|
||
Class B common stock |
|
28 |
|
28 |
|
||
Additional paid-in capital |
|
166,558 |
|
166,598 |
|
||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
(471 |
) |
(1,411 |
) |
||
Retained earnings |
|
392,263 |
|
369,542 |
|
||
Unearned compensation |
|
(246 |
) |
|
|
||
Less treasury stock, at cost |
|
(107,984 |
) |
(51,728 |
) |
||
Total stockholders equity |
|
457,703 |
|
490,584 |
|
||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
807,042 |
|
$ |
685,674 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
4
Keane, Inc.
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
||||
|
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
||
|
|
(In Thousands) |
|
||||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net income |
|
$ |
22,721 |
|
$ |
14,984 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used for) operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
20,252 |
|
20,118 |
|
||
Deferred income taxes |
|
2,351 |
|
(1,377 |
) |
||
Provision for doubtful accounts, net |
|
(1,929 |
) |
(1,048 |
) |
||
(Gain) loss on sale of property and equipment |
|
(195 |
) |
73 |
|
||
Other charges, net |
|
(1,636 |
) |
|
|
||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Decrease in accounts receivable |
|
12,985 |
|
19,741 |
|
||
Increase in prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
(2,787 |
) |
(10,090 |
) |
||
Decrease in other liabilities |
|
(1,070 |
) |
(12,097 |
) |
||
Increase in income taxes payable |
|
8,246 |
|
2,916 |
|
||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
58,938 |
|
33,220 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Purchase of investments |
|
(102,933 |
) |
(18,699 |
) |
||
Sale and maturities of investments |
|
8,215 |
|
59,677 |
|
||
Purchase of property and equipment |
|
(8,154 |
) |
(6,148 |
) |
||
Proceeds from the sale of property and equipment |
|
1,066 |
|
342 |
|
||
Payments for current year acquisitions, net of cash acquired |
|
|
|
(61,229 |
) |
||
Payments for prior years acquisitions |
|
(903 |
) |
|
|
||
Net cash used for investing activities |
|
(102,709 |
) |
(26,057 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Proceeds from issuance of convertible debentures |
|
150,000 |
|
|
|
||
Debt issuance costs |
|
(4,233 |
) |
|
|
||
Repayment of debt |
|
(100 |
) |
|
|
||
Principal payments under capital lease obligations |
|
(635 |
) |
(1,067 |
) |
||
Proceeds from issuance of common stock |
|
4,321 |
|
6,171 |
|
||
Repurchase of common stock |
|
(60,894 |
) |
(35,888 |
) |
||
Net cash provided by (used for) financing activities |
|
88,459 |
|
(30,784 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash |
|
339 |
|
1,484 |
|
||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
45,027 |
|
(22,137 |
) |
||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
46,383 |
|
65,556 |
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
91,410 |
|
$ |
43,419 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Supplemental information: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Income taxes paid |
|
$ |
3,179 |
|
$ |
11,367 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
5
Keane, Inc.
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(In Thousands Except Per Share Amounts)
Note A. Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and, accordingly, do not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Keane, Inc. and our subsidiaries. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, considered necessary for a fair presentation of the results of operations for the interim periods reported and of our financial condition as of the date of the interim balance sheet have been included. Operating results for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2003 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2003 or for any other period.
The balance sheet at December 31, 2002 has been derived from the audited financial statements at that date, but does not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements.
Certain reclassifications have been made to the 2002 financial statements to conform to the 2003 presentation. Such reclassifications have no effect on previously reported net income or stockholders equity.
For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 26, 2003.
Note B. Earnings Per Share Data
Computation of earnings per share for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2003 and 2002 is as follows:
|
|
Three
Months Ended |
|
Nine
Months Ended |
|
||||||||
|
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
||||
Net income |
|
$ |
5,540 |
|
$ |
3,910 |
|
$ |
22,721 |
|
$ |
14,984 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding used in calculation of basic earnings per share |
|
64,080 |
|
73,841 |
|
66,488 |
|
75,091 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Incremental shares from the assumed exercise of dilutive stock options |
|
1,035 |
|
6 |
|
434 |
|
458 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding used in calculation of diluted earnings per share |
|
65,115 |
|
73,847 |
|
66,922 |
|
75,549 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Earnings per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Basic |
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
$ |
0.34 |
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
$ |
0.34 |
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
6
Our 2% Convertible Subordinated Debentures (Debentures) are convertible at the option of the holder into shares of our common stock at an initial conversion rate of 54.4989 shares of common stock per $1,000 principal amount of Debentures, which is equivalent to an initial conversion price of approximately $18.349 per share. The Debentures become convertible during any fiscal quarter commencing after September 30, 2003 when, among other circumstances, the closing price of our common stock is more than 120% of the conversion price (approximately $22.019 per share) for at least 20 trading days in the 30 consecutive trading days ending on the last trading day of the preceding fiscal quarter. The total amount of shares issuable upon the conversion of the Debentures is approximately 8.2 million.
For the quarter ended September 30, 2003, the 8.2 million shares issuable upon the conversion of the Debentures were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because, in accordance with their terms, the Debentures had not yet become convertible.
Note C. Stock-Based Compensation
Our stock-based compensation plans provide for grants of stock options to employees, officers and directors of, and consultants and advisors to, Keane at a purchase price per share of not less than 100% of the fair market value per share of the shares of our common stock on the date of grant. This stock-based compensation is accounted for utilizing the intrinsic value method in accordance with the provisions of Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25 (APB 25), Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and related Interpretations. We have adopted the disclosure-only provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation Transition and Disclosure, an amendment of SFAS No. 123 Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation. Accordingly, no compensation expense has been recognized for our stock-based compensation plans other than for restricted stock.
Had we accounted for stock-based compensation utilizing the fair value method and provisions prescribed in SFAS No. 123, our net income and earnings per share would have been reduced to the pro forma amounts indicated below:
|
|
Three
Months Ended |
|
Nine
Months Ended |
|
||||||||
|
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Net income - as reported |
|
$ |
5,540 |
|
$ |
3,910 |
|
$ |
22,721 |
|
$ |
14,984 |
|
Less: Total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under the fair value method for all awards, net of tax effects |
|
909 |
|
2,517 |
|
3,230 |
|
7,581 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Net income - pro forma |
|
$ |
4,631 |
|
$ |
1,393 |
|
$ |
19,491 |
|
$ |
7,403 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Earnings per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Basic - as reported |
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
$ |
0.34 |
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
Basic - pro forma |
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Diluted - as reported |
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
$ |
0.34 |
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
Diluted - pro forma |
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
We also grant restricted stock for a fixed number of shares to employees for nominal consideration. Compensation expense related to restricted stock awards is recorded ratably over the restriction period.
7
Note D. Comprehensive Income
Total comprehensive income (i.e. net income plus available-for-sale securities valuation adjustments, currency translation adjustments and adjustments related to a foreign defined benefit plan, net of tax) was $5.1 million for the three-month period ended September 30, 2003 and $23.7 million for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2003, and was $4.4 million and $15.9 million, for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2002, respectively.
Note E. Business Acquisitions
On March 15, 2002, we acquired SignalTree Solutions Holding, Inc. (SignalTree Solutions), a privately held, United States-based corporation with two software development facilities in India and additional operations in the United States. Under the terms of the merger agreement, we paid $68.2 million in cash for SignalTree Solutions.
We accounted for the acquisition as a purchase, pursuant to which the assets and liabilities of SignalTree Solutions, including intangible assets, were recorded at their respective fair values. All identifiable intangible assets are being amortized over their estimated useful lives with the exception of goodwill. The financial position, results of operations and cash flows of SignalTree Solutions were included in our financial statements effective as of the acquisition date.
The total cost of the acquisition was $78.9 million. Portions of the purchase price, including intangible assets, were identified by independent appraisers utilizing proven valuation procedures and techniques. Goodwill was recorded at $41.3 million and other identified intangible assets were valued at $21.5 million. At the date of acquisition, we entered into a plan to exit certain activities and consolidate facilities. As a result, we recorded a restructuring liability of $1.6 million related to the lease obligations and certain other costs for the consolidated facilities. In accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue No.95-3, Recognition of Liabilities in Connection with a Purchase Business Combination, these costs have been reflected in the purchase price of the acquisition.
The components of the purchase price allocation are as follows:
|
|
December
31, |
|
Total |
|
September
30, |
|
|||
Consideration and merger costs: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Consideration paid |
|
$ |
66,927 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
66,927 |
|
Transaction costs |
|
1,303 |
|
5 |
|
1,308 |
|
|||
Restructuring |
|
1,553 |
|
|
|
1,553 |
|
|||
Deferred tax liability |
|
9,120 |
|
|
|
9,120 |
|
|||
Total |
|
$ |
78,903 |
|
$ |
5 |
|
$ |
78,908 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Allocation of purchase price: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Net asset value acquired |
|
$ |
16,133 |
|
$ |
245 |
|
$ |
16,378 |
|
Customer lists (seven-year life) |
|
18,800 |
|
|
|
18,800 |
|
|||
Non-compete agreements (three-year life) |
|
2,700 |
|
|
|
2,700 |
|
|||
Goodwill |
|
41,270 |
|
(240 |
) |
41,030 |
|
|||
Total |
|
$ |
78,903 |
|
$ |
5 |
|
$ |
78,908 |
|
The following table presents the condensed balance sheet disclosing the amounts assigned to each of the major assets acquired and liabilities assumed of SignalTree Solutions at the acquisition date and 2003 adjustments recorded to finalize the purchased balance sheet:
8
|
|
December
31, |
|
Total |
|
September
30, |
|
|||
Condensed balance sheet: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Cash |
|
$ |
2,650 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
2,650 |
|
Accounts receivable |
|
7,304 |
|
|
|
7,304 |
|
|||
Other current assets |
|
3,562 |
|
(2 |
) |
3,560 |
|
|||
Property, plant, and equipment, net |
|
8,011 |
|
(75 |
) |
7,936 |
|
|||
Total assets |
|
21,527 |
|
(77 |
) |
21,450 |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Accounts payable |
|
569 |
|
(16 |
) |
553 |
|
|||
Accrued compensation |
|
1,569 |
|
|
|
1,569 |
|
|||
Other liabilities |
|
3,256 |
|
(306 |
) |
2,950 |
|
|||
Net assets |
|
$ |
16,133 |
|
$ |
245 |
|
$ |
16,378 |
|
The unaudited pro forma combined condensed statements of income below present our historical statements and our acquisition of SignalTree Solutions on March 15, 2002 as if the acquisition had occurred at January 1, 2002. Unaudited pro forma combined condensed financial information is presented for comparative purposes only and is not necessarily indicative of the results of operations that would have actually been reported had the acquisition occurred at the beginning of the periods presented, nor is it necessarily indicative of future financial position or results of operations.
|
|
Three
Months |
|
Nine
Months |
|
||||||||
|
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
||||
Total revenues |
|
$ |
200,421 |
|
$ |
213,383 |
|
$ |
608,594 |
|
$ |
670,913 |
|
Net income |
|
5,540 |
|
3,910 |
|
22,721 |
|
15,713 |
|
||||
Net income per share (basic) |
|
.09 |
|
.05 |
|
.34 |
|
.21 |
|
||||
Net income per share (diluted) |
|
.09 |
|
.05 |
|
.34 |
|
.21 |
|
||||
In addition to the SignalTree Solutions acquisition, we completed an acquisition of a business complementary to our business strategy during the Third Quarter of 2002. The merger and consideration costs of this acquisition, which were accounted for using the purchase method of accounting, totaled $13.4 million in 2002. The purchase price included contingent consideration based upon operating performance of the acquired business. During the First Quarter of 2003, we paid an additional $895,000 related to earn-outs for this acquisition and have recorded this amount as additional purchase price. Future earn-outs are based on specific net revenue targets. Payments in the next twelve months for achieving these goals may range from $1.0 million to $2.0 million. We also recorded $3.0 million as deferred revenue related to contingent service credits and issued a $3.0 million non-interest bearing note payable as partial consideration. As of September 30, 2003, the deferred revenue and non-interest bearing note had a balance of $2.5 million, respectively. The note has a one-year term with a one-year extension expiring on September 25, 2004. As of September 30, 2003, we had not recorded additional contingent liabilities in relation to the earn-outs.
The results of operations of these acquired companies have been included in our condensed consolidated statements of income from the date of acquisition. The excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the net assets has been allocated to identifiable intangible assets and goodwill. Identifiable intangible assets are being amortized on a straight-line basis over periods ranging from three to seven years. Pro forma results of operations for these acquisitions have not been provided, as they were not material on either an individual or an aggregate basis.
9
Note F. Restructurings
During the Third Quarter of 2003, we had an additional workforce reduction of twenty-one employees related to our business consulting arm and, as a result of this reduction and the reduction in the Second Quarter, we recorded a total charge of $899,000, consisting of retention and severance costs. We recorded $563,000 of the charge in salaries, wages, and other direct costs and $336,000 of the charge in selling, general and administrative costs in the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated statements of income. Due to immateriality, these costs were not separately reported in the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated statements of income. In accordance with SFAS No. 146, Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities, we are accruing for these costs beginning at the time of an employees notification through his or her termination date. We anticipate completing these reorganization plans by the Fourth Quarter of 2003.
During the Second Quarter of 2003, we reevaluated the estimates recorded for the restructuring charge taken in 2002 for a workforce reduction and, as a result, reduced our accruals by $882,000. We recorded $704,000 of the expense reduction in salaries, wages, and other directs costs and $178,000 of the expense reduction in selling, general and administrative costs in the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated statements of income. Due to immateriality, these costs were not separately reported in the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated statements of income. In addition, we had a workforce reduction of fifty-four employees and, as a result, recorded a charge of $321,000 related to retention and severance costs, included in salaries, wages, and other direct costs. In accordance with SFAS No. 146, we are accruing for these costs beginning at the time of the employees notification through his or her termination date. The net impact during the Second Quarter of 2003 was a reduction to expense in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of income of $561,000.
As of September 30, 2003, we had completed six and thirteen terminations related to the reductions in force recorded in the Second and Third Quarters, respectively. Cash expenditures related to the severance and retention costs recorded in the Second and Third Quarters of 2003 were $401,000.
In the Fourth Quarters of 2002, 2001, 2000, and 1999, we recorded restructuring charges of $17.6 million, $10.4 million, $8.6 million, and $13.7 million, respectively. Of these charges, $3.2 million, $4.4 million, $1.7 million and $3.8 million related to a workforce reduction of approximately 229, 900, 200 and 600 employees for the years 2002, 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively. In 2002, we also had a change in estimate of $251,000 in connection with workforce reduction, which resulted in a net workforce restructuring charge of $2.9 million. Cash expenditures for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 related to prior year workforce reductions were $1.7 million.
We also performed a review of our business strategy and concluded that consolidating some of our branch offices was key to our success. As a result of this review, our restructuring charges included $12.1 million in 2002, $4.0 million in 2001, $3.5 million in 2000, and $5.1 million in 1999 for branch office closings and certain other expenditures. In conjunction with the review during the Fourth Quarter of 2002, we also performed a review of accrual balances for properties restructured in prior years. As a result, we determined that the cost to consolidate and/or close certain non-profitable offices would be higher than the original estimate. The change in estimates resulted in a net charge to our restructuring liability of $756,000 and $1.2 million in 2002 and 2001, respectively. The resulting net charge in 2002 and 2001 was $12.9 million and $5.1 million, respectively. Cash expenditures for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 related to branch office closures and other expenditures were $7.1 million.
On November 30, 2001, we completed the acquisition of Metro Information Services, Inc. (Metro). At the date of acquisition, we entered into a plan to exit certain activities and consolidate facilities. As a result, we recorded a restructuring liability of $11.0 million in 2001 related to the lease obligations and certain other costs for the consolidated facilities. During 2002, the valuation of the liability assumed for the restructured facilities and for other matters unresolved at the time of the acquisition was adjusted, resulting in an increase of $3.1 million. On March 15, 2002, we acquired SignalTree Solutions. At the date of acquisition, we entered into a plan to exit certain activities and consolidate facilities. As a result, we recorded a restructuring liability of $1.6 million related to the lease obligations and certain other costs for the consolidated facilities. In accordance with EITF Issue No. 95-3, Recognition of Liabilities in Connection with a Purchase Business Combination, these costs have been reflected in the purchase price of the acquisition.
10
The activity for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 associated with restructuring charges is as follows:
|
|
January 1, |
|
Cash |
|
Change in |
|
Charges in |
|
September 30, |
|
|||||
Branch office closures and other expenditures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
1999 |
|
$ |
623 |
|
$ |
(373 |
) |
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
250 |
|
2000 |
|
760 |
|
(417 |
) |
|
|
|
|
343 |
|
|||||
2001 |
|
6,615 |
|
(2,991 |
) |
|
|
|
|
3,624 |
|
|||||
2002 |
|
14,952 |
|
(3,355 |
) |
|
|
|
|
11,597 |
|
|||||
|
|
22,950 |
|
(7,136 |
) |
|
|
|
|
15,814 |
|
|||||
2002 Workforce reduction |
|
3,285 |
|
(1,685 |
) |
(882 |
) |
|
|
718 |
|
|||||
2003 Workforce reduction |
|
|
|
(401 |
) |
|
|
1,220 |
|
819 |
|
|||||
Total Restructuring Balance |
|
$ |
26,235 |
|
$ |
(9,222 |
) |
$ |
(882 |
) |
$ |
1,220 |
|
$ |
17,351 |
|
The restructuring balance is included in current and long-term accrued restructuring costs in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets.
Note G. Segment Information
Based on qualitative and quantitative criteria established by SFAS No. 131, Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information, we operate within one reportable segment: Professional Services. In this segment, we offer an integrated mix of end-to-end business solutions, such as Business Consulting (Plan), Application Development and Integration (Build), and Application Development and Management Outsourcing (Manage).
In accordance with the enterprise wide disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 131, our geographic information is as follows:
|
|
Three
Months |
|
Nine
Months |
|
||||||||
|
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
||||
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Domestic |
|
$ |
195,307 |
|
$ |
205,446 |
|
$ |
593,056 |
|
$ |
638,024 |
|
International |
|
5,114 |
|
7,937 |
|
15,538 |
|
22,680 |
|
||||
Total Revenues |
|
$ |
200,421 |
|
$ |
213,383 |
|
$ |
608,594 |
|
$ |
660,704 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
||||
Long-lived Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Domestic |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
403,400 |
|
$ |
409,513 |
|
||
International |
|
|
|
|
|
26,423 |
|
26,601 |
|
||||
Deferred Tax Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
16,397 |
|
13,439 |
|
||||
Total Long-lived Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
446,220 |
|
$ |
449,553 |
|
No single customer provides revenues that equal or exceed 10 percent of our consolidated revenues.
Note H. Convertible Subordinated Debentures
In June 2003, we issued in a private placement $150.0 million principal amount of 2.0% Convertible Subordinated Debentures due 2013 (Debentures). The Debentures are unsecured and subordinated in right of payment to all of our senior indebtedness. The Debentures accrue regular interest at a rate of 2.0% per year. Interest is payable semi-annually in arrears on June 15 and December 15 of each year, beginning December 15, 2003. Beginning with the six-month interest period commencing June 15, 2008, we will pay additional contingent interest during any six-month interest period if the trading price of the Debentures for each of the five trading days immediately preceding the first day of the interest period equals or exceeds 120% of the principal amount of the Debentures. During any interest period when
11
contingent interest is payable, the contingent interest payable per $1,000 principal amount of Debentures will equal 0.35% calculated on the average trading price of $1,000 principal amount of Debentures during the five trading days immediately preceding the first day of the applicable six-month interest period and will be payable in arrears.
On or after June 15, 2008, we may, by providing at least 30-day notice to the holders, redeem any of the Debentures at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the Debentures, plus accrued interest and unpaid interest, if any, and liquidated damages, if any, to, but excluding, the redemption date.
The Debentures are convertible at the option of the holder into shares of our common stock at an initial conversion rate of 54.4989 share per $1,000 principal amount of Debentures, which is equivalent to an initial conversion price of approximately $18.349 per share, subject to adjustments, prior to the close of business on the final maturity date only under the following circumstances: (a) during any fiscal quarter commencing after September 30, 2003, and only during such fiscal quarter, if the closing sale price of our common stock exceeds 120% of the conversion price (approximately $22.019) for at least 20 trading days in the 30 consecutive trading day period ending on the last trading day of the preceding fiscal quarter; (b) during the five business days after any five consecutive trading day period in which the trading price per $1,000 principal amount of Debentures for each day of that period was less that 98% of the product of the closing sale price of our common stock and the number of shares issuable upon conversion of $1,000 principal amount of the Debentures; (c) if the Debentures have been called for redemption; or (d) upon the occurrence of specified corporate transactions.
Debt issuance costs were approximately $4.5 million and are included in other assets in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. These costs are being amortized over five years to interest expense on a straight-line basis. The unamortized debt issuance costs were $4.2 million as of September 30, 2003.
Note I. Related Parties, Commitments, and Contingencies
Related Party Transactions
Our principal executive office is located at 100 City Square in Boston, Massachusetts (the New Facility). We lease the New Facility from Gateway Developers LLC (Gateway LLC) as described below. We lease additional office space and apartments in more than seventy locations in North America, the United Kingdom, and India under operating leases and capital leases, some of which may be renewed for periods up to five years, subject to increased rental fees.
In October 2001, we entered into a lease with Gateway LLC for a term of twelve years, pursuant to which we agreed to lease approximately 95,000 square feet of office and development space. We lease approximately 57% of the New Facility and the remaining 43% is, or will be, occupied by other tenants. John Keane Family LLC is a member of Gateway LLC. The members of John Keane Family LLC are trusts for the benefit of John F. Keane, Chairman of our Board of Directors, and his immediate family members.
On October 31, 2001, Gateway LLC entered into a $39.4 million construction loan with Citizens Bank of Massachusetts (the Gateway Loan) in connection with the New Facility and an adjacent building located at 20 City Square, Boston, Massachusetts. John Keane Family LLC and John F. Keane are each liable for certain obligations under the Gateway Loan if and to the extent Gateway LLC requires funds to comply with its obligations under the Gateway Loan. Stephen D. Steinour, a director of the Company, is Chief Executive Officer of Citizens Bank of Pennsylvania. Citizens Bank of Massachusetts and Citizens Bank of Pennsylvania are subsidiaries of Citizens Financial Group, Inc. Mr. Steinour was not involved in the approval process for the Gateway Loan.
We began occupying the New Facility and making lease payments in March 2003. Based upon our knowledge of lease payments for comparable facilities in the Boston area, we believe that the lease payments under the lease for the New Facility, which will be approximately $3.2 million per year ($33.00 per square foot for the first 75,000 square feet and $35.00 per square foot for the remainder of the premises) for the first six years of the lease term and approximately $3.5 million per year ($36.00 per square foot for the first 75,000 square feet and $40.00 per square foot for the remainder of the premises) for the remainder of the lease term, plus specified percentages of any annual increases in real estate taxes
12
and operating expenses, were, at the time we entered into the lease, as favorable to us as those which could have been obtained from an independent third party.
In view of these related party transactions, we concluded that, during the construction phase of the New Facility, the estimated construction in progress costs for the New Facility would be capitalized in accordance with EITF Issue No. 97-10, The Effect of Lessee Involvement in Asset Construction. A credit in the same amount was included in the caption Accrued construction-in-progress costs. For purposes of the consolidated statement of cash flows, we characterized this treatment as a non-cash financing activity.
As a result of the completion of the construction phase and our current occupancy, the related capitalized costs are now classified as Building in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. A credit for the same amount appears as accrued building costs into both our short and long-term components. The costs of the building are being amortized on a straight-line basis over a 39-year useful life. Additionally, the obligation will be reduced over the life of the lease at an interest rate of 8.67%. The net effect of the amortization that is included in the operating results approximates the rent expense resulting from the contractual payments we are required to make under the lease.
In February 1985, we entered into a lease, which subsequently was extended to a term of 20 years, with City Square Limited Partnership (City Square), pursuant to which we leased approximately 34,000 square feet of office and development space in a building located at Ten City Square, in Boston, Massachusetts. We now lease approximately 88% of this building and the remaining 12% is leased by other tenants. John F. Keane, Chairman of the Board of the Company, and Philip J. Harkins, a director of the Company, are limited partners of City Square. Based upon our knowledge of lease payments for comparable facilities in the Boston area, we believe that the lease payments under this lease, which will be approximately $1.0 million per year ($30.00 per square foot) for the remainder of the lease term (until February 2006), plus specified percentages of any annual increases in real estate taxes and operating expenses, which will be approximately $0.2 million per year were, at the time we entered into the lease, as favorable to us as those which could have been obtained from an independent third party. As a result of its occupancy of the New Facility (as described above), we vacated and are in the process of seeking a third party to sublease the space we formerly occupied at Ten City Square.
As a result of the vacancy at Ten City Square in December 2002, we reserved the remaining lease payments due to City Square for the remainder of the lease term, resulting in a charge of approximately $3.9 million in the Fourth Quarter of 2002.
In January 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Financial Interpretation No. 46 (FIN 46), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, which requires the consolidation of a variable interest entity, as defined, by its primary beneficiary. Primary beneficiaries are those companies that are subject to a majority of the risk of loss or entitled to receive a majority of the entitys residual returns, or both. In determining whether it is the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity, an entity with a variable interest shall treat variable interests in that same entity held by its related parties as its own interests.
We have evaluated the applicability of FIN 46 to our relationship with each of City Square and Gateway LLC and determined that we are not required to consolidate these entities within our consolidated financial statements. We have determined that Gateway LLC is not a variable interest entity as the equity investment is sufficient to absorb the expected losses and the holders of the equity investment do not lack any of the characteristics of a controlling interest. We have concluded that as we no longer occupy the space at Ten City Square and no longer derive any benefit from leasing the space, we would not be determined to be the related party most closely associated with City Square. As a result, we will continue to account for our leases with City Square and Gateway LLC consistent with our historical practices in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. We continue to evaluate the applicability of FIN 46 to other relationships and, based on the information to date, we have not identified any entities that would require consolidation.
In March 2003, our Audit Committee approved a related party transaction involving a director of Keane. We have subcontracted with Guardent, Inc. (Guardent) for a customer project. Maria Cirino, a director of Keane, is an executive officer, director, and shareholder of Guardent. The payments to Guardent are
13
not expected to exceed approximately $25,000. In addition, the Audit Committee permitted us to engage Guardent as a sub-contractor for the purposes of providing future services to Keanes customers. No payment to Guardent for a single engagement may exceed $75,000 and no payment to Guardent for all engagements in any calendar year may exceed $250,000. As of September 30, 2003, we made payments of approximately $143,000 to Guardent.
In April 2003, our Audit Committee approved an additional related party transaction involving a director of Keane. We sub-contracted with ArcStream, Inc (ArcStream) for two customer projects. John F. Keane, Jr., a director of Keane, is Chief Executive Officer, director, and founder of ArcStream, Inc. John F. Keane, Jr. is the son of John F. Keane, Sr., our Chairman of the Board of Directors, and the brother of Brian T. Keane, our President, Chief Executive Officer and a director. The payments to ArcStream related to these projects were not expected to exceed $50,000 at that time. In addition, the Audit Committee permitted us to engage ArcStream as a sub-contractor for the purposes of providing future services to our customers. No payments to ArcStream for a single engagement may exceed $75,000 and no payments to ArcStream for all engagements in any calendar year may exceed $250,000. On July 23, 2003, our Audit Committee amended its previous approvals relating to ArcStream. The payments to ArcStream related to the two customer projects previously approved, not to exceed $50,000, have now been approved not to exceed $250,000. In addition, the Board of Directors gave us approval to engage ArcStream for future engagements such that no payments to ArcStream for a single engagement may exceed $100,000 and no payments to ArcStream for all engagements in any calendar year may exceed $500,000. As of September 30, 2003, we made payments of approximately $34,000 to ArcStream.
Commitments and Contingencies
We are a guarantor with respect to a line of credit for Innovate EC, an entity in which we acquired a minority equity position as a result of a previous acquisition. The total line of credit is for $600,000. We guarantee $300,000 of this obligation. The line is subject to review by the lending institution. We would be required to meet our guarantor obligation in the event the lending institution refuses to extend the credit facility and Innovate EC is unable to satisfy its obligation.
During the First Quarter of 2003, we paid $895,000 related to certain earn-out considerations in connection with an acquisition made during the Third Quarter of 2002. Future earn-outs are based on specific net revenue targets. Payments in the next twelve months for achieving these goals may range from $1.0 million to $2.0 million. We also recorded, in the Third Quarter of 2002, $3.0 million as deferred revenue related to contingent service credits and issued a $3.0 million non-interest bearing note payable as partial consideration. During the nine months ended September 30, 2003, we recognized revenue of approximately $1.1 million in relation to the contingent service credits and reduced each of the related deferred revenue and note by approximately $544,000. The note has a one-year term with a one-year extension expiring on September 25, 2004.
In April 1998, First Command (formerly United Services Planning Association, Inc.) and Independent Research Agency for Life Insurance, Inc. filed a complaint in the District Court for Tarrant County, Texas (Civil Action No. 96-173235-98), against us and two of our employees alleging that we misrepresented our ability to complete a project contracted for by the plaintiffs and concealed from the plaintiffs material facts related to the status of the project. During the Third Quarter of 2003, in order to avoid further costs, we settled the claim in full with payment to the plaintiffs of $3.5 million, of which $1.6 million was previously accrued. We continue to believe the project was performed professionally and in accordance with the contract terms.
During the First Quarter of 2003, we received a $7.3 million award in connection with an arbitration proceeding initiated by us in 2000 against Signal Corporation for a breach of an agreement between Signal Corporation and our Federal Systems subsidiary.
We are involved in other litigation and various legal matters, which have arisen in the ordinary course of business. We do not believe that the ultimate resolution of these matters will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows. We believe that legal claims against us are without merit and intend to defend these matters vigorously.
14
Note J. Subsequent Event
On October 21, 2003, we announced our acquisition of a controlling interest in Worldzen, Inc., a privately held Business Process Outsourcing (BPO) firm. In connection with the acquisition, we contributed a majority of the assets of the Keane Consulting Group (KCG), our business consulting arm, along with the Series A Preferred Shares of Worldzen Holdings Limited, which we purchased from Carlyle Asia Venture Partners II, L.P. and CAVP II Co-Investment, L.P., to Worldzen, Inc. Our initial investment resulted in an equity position of approximately 62% of the issued and outstanding capital stock of Worldzen, Inc., with the right to increase our ownership position over time. This transaction will be accounted for as a purchase in accordance with SFAS No. 141 Business Combinations and SFAS No. 142 Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. As a result of this transaction, we will consolidate Worldzen, Inc.s financial results starting in the Fourth Quarter of 2003.
15
Keane, Inc.
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
This Report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. For purposes of these Acts, any statement that is not a statement of historical fact may be deemed a forward-looking statement. For example, statements containing the words believes, anticipates, plans, expects, and similar expressions may be forward-looking statements. We caution investors not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements in this Report. We undertake no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. There are a number of factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those indicated by these forward-looking statements, including without limitation the factors set forth below under the caption Certain Factors That May Affect Future Results. These factors and the other cautionary statements made in this quarterly report should be read as being applicable to all related forward-looking statements wherever they appear in this quarterly report. If one or more of these factors materialize, or if any underlying assumptions prove incorrect, our actual results, performance, or achievements may vary materially from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements.
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes included in this Report.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
2003 COMPARED TO 2002
REVENUES (in thousands, except percentages)
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
2003 |
|
% |
|
2002 |
|
% |
|
2003 |
|
% |
|
2002 |
|
% |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Plan |
|
$ |
12,005 |
|
6 |
|
$ |
16,310 |
|
8 |
|
$ |
38,597 |
|
6 |
|
50,134 |
|
8 |
|
|
Build |
|
50,397 |
|
25 |
|
53,569 |
|
25 |
|
150,711 |
|
25 |
|
165,193 |
|
25 |
|
||||
Manage |
|
138,019 |
|
69 |
|
143,504 |
|
67 |
|
419,286 |
|
69 |
|
445,377 |
|
67 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Total |
|
$ |
200,421 |
|
100 |
% |
$ |
213,383 |
|
100 |
% |
$ |
608,594 |
|
100 |
% |
$ |
660,704 |
|
100 |
% |
Total revenues for the Third Quarter ended September 30, 2003 were $200.4 million compared to revenues of $203.5 million from the quarter ended June 30, 2003. Revenues were relatively flat compared to the quarter ended June 30, 2003, reflecting a more stable demand for IT services in North America, offset in part by the impact of lower productivity in the Third Quarter. Total revenues for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 decreased $13.0 million, or 6.1%, compared to the Third Quarter of 2002. Total revenues for the first nine months of 2003 were $608.6 million, a decrease of $52.1 million, or 7.9%, over the same period in 2002. The decrease in total revenues year over year was primarily the result of clients continuing to defer discretionary technology-related expenditures as a result of economic uncertainty. We have seen a more stable demand for our services and we believe that we are beginning to see some indications of increases in discretionary IT spending.
Plan. Plan service revenues for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 were $12.0 million, a decrease of $1.1 million, or 8.1%, compared to the quarter ended June 30, 2003. Plan service revenues for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 decreased $4.3 million, or 26.4%, and for the first nine months of 2003 decreased $11.5 million, or 23.0%, over the same periods in 2002. Plan service revenues are comprised primarily of business consulting services, which includes our Applications Rationalization Service that is delivered by Keane Consulting Group, our business-consulting arm. Additional IT-focused consulting services within Plan are sold and delivered out of our network of branch offices. The decreases in Plan service revenues were primarily the result of the deferral of consulting projects and a decrease in billing rates caused by general economic conditions.
16
Build. Build service revenues for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 were $50.4 million, an increase of $206,000 compared to the quarter ended June 30, 2003, which reflects our belief that the marketplace for AD&I services, although still challenging, is becoming more stable. Build service revenues for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 decreased $3.2 million, or 5.9%, and for the first nine months of 2003 decreased $14.5 million, or 8.8% over the same periods in 2002. Build revenues, which consist primarily of the AD&I business, were adversely affected during the first nine months of 2003 by customers deferral of software development projects due to the reduction in capital spending related to technology. The products and services sold within the less cyclical healthcare industry have remained consistent year over year and have helped to stabilize Build service revenues.
Manage. Manage service revenues for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 were $138.0 million, a decrease of $2.2 million, or 1.6% compared to the quarter ended June 30, 2003. Manage service revenues for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 decreased $5.5 million, or 3.8%, and for the first nine months of 2003 decreased $26.1 million, or 5.9%, over the same periods in 2002. The decrease in Manage service revenues was due to lower revenues associated with staff augmentation and other services, offset in part by an increase in Applications Outsourcing revenues.
Manage services consist primarily of Applications Outsourcing services, together with Staff Augmentation and other Maintenance and Migration services. Generally, under Applications Outsourcing agreements, we receive a fixed monthly fee in return for meeting or exceeding a contractually agreed upon service level. Applications Outsourcing agreements generally do not require any capital outlay from us. Applications Outsourcing revenue and expenses are recognized on a monthly basis consistent with the service provided by us to our customers. We do not employ percentage-of-completion accounting on our Applications Outsourcing agreements.
Within our Applications Outsourcing business, we carefully monitor and manage designated large, long-term strategic Applications Outsourcing engagements. These deals represent Applications Outsourcing contracts that have been signed since January of 2000, with a minimum contract value of $5.0 million in revenue. We believe that these engagements are representative of the type of Applications Outsourcing business that forms the core element of our growth strategy. During the Third Quarter of 2003, these long-term strategic Applications Outsourcing engagements generated $58.3 million in revenue, a 20.7% increase from $48.3 million in revenue from these engagements in the Third Quarter of 2002.
Salaries, wages, and other direct costs
Salaries, wages, and other direct costs for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 decreased $16.7 million, or 10.8%, and for the first nine months of 2003 decreased $56.2 million, or 11.8%, over the same periods in 2002. The decreases were primarily attributable to ongoing efforts to bring our costs in alignment with anticipated revenues through workforce reductions and increased offshore staffing, primarily at our India facilities. During the Third Quarter of 2003, we recorded a charge of $563,000 related to retention and severance costs. For the first nine months of 2003, we recorded retention and severance costs of $884,000 and recorded a reduction of expense of $704,000 as the result of a re-evaluation of our 2002 workforce reduction charge. Salaries, wages, and other direct costs were $138.0 million, or 68.8%, of total revenues, for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 and $418.3 million, or 68.7%, of total revenues for the first nine months of 2003 compared to $154.7 million, or 72.5%, of total revenues and $474.5 million, or 71.8%, of total revenues, respectively, for the same periods in 2002. Salaries, wages, and other direct costs for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 were $99,000 higher compared to $137.9 million in the quarter ended June 30, 2003.
Total billable employees for all operations were 5,949 as of September 30, 2003, compared to 5,819 total billable employees as of June 30, 2003 and 6,216 as of September 30, 2002. In addition to these employees, we occasionally use sub-contract personnel to augment our billable staff. The base of billable employees within our India operation was 794 as of September 30, 2003, an increase of 171 employees, or 27.4%, over the quarter ended June 30, 2003 and an increase of 442 employees, or 125.6%, over the quarter ended September 30, 2002. We added our India operation in March 2002 with our acquisition of SignalTree Solutions.
17
Gross margin
Management believes gross margin (revenue less salaries, wages, and other direct costs) provides an important measure of our profitability. Gross margin for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 increased $3.8 million, or 6.4%, and for the first nine months of 2003 increased $4.1 million, or 2.2%, over the same periods in 2002. Gross margin as a percentage of revenue for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 was 31.2%, and for the first nine months of 2003 was 31.3% compared to 27.5% and 28.2%, respectively, for the same periods in 2002. The increase in gross margin as a percentage of revenue was largely the result of a more stable environment for IT services and improved utilization related to our base of billable personnel in North America. Also contributing to the improvement in the gross margin percentage was our lower labor cost due to increased use of offshore resources at our India facilities. Gross margin as a percentage of revenue on a sequential basis decreased from 32.3% in the quarter ended June 30, 2003, as a result of lower seasonal utilization rates due to the higher number of vacation days during the summer months. We closely monitor utilization rates and other direct costs in an effort to avoid adverse impacts to our gross margin.
Selling, General & Administrative
Selling, General & Administrative (SG&A) expenses for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 increased $352,000, or 0.7%, and for the first nine months of 2003 decreased $4.7 million, or 3.1%, over the same periods in 2002. SG&A expenses for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 were $48.5 million, or 24.2%, of total revenue, and for the first nine months of 2003 were $146.7 million, or 24.1%, of total revenue as compared to $48.1 million, or 22.6%, of total revenue and $151.4 million, or 22.9%, of total revenue, respectively, for the same periods in 2002. During the Third Quarter of 2003, in order to avoid further costs, we settled and paid a legal claim related to First Command and Independent Research Agency of Life Insurance, Inc. (formerly United Services Planning Association, Inc.) for $3.5 million, of which $1.6 million was previously accrued. We continue to believe the project was performed professionally and in accordance with the contract terms. We also settled a number of other legal claims in our favor. As a result, the net impact of the settlement and the reversal of accruals related to the resolution of other legal claims did not have an effect on SG&A expenses for the quarter ended September 30, 2003. In addition, during the Third Quarter of 2003, we recorded a severance charge of $336,000 compared to a reduction of expense of $178,000 in the Second Quarter of 2003 as a result of a re-evaluation of the 2002 workforce reduction charge taken in the Fourth Quarter of 2002. The decrease in SG&A expenses for the first nine months of 2003 was attributable to cost synergies obtained from the acquisition of Metro as well as our continued focus on tightly controlling discretionary expenses.
Amortization of intangible assets
Amortization of intangible assets for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 was $3.9 million, a decrease of 10.1%, and for the first nine months of 2003 was $12.0 million, an increase of 0.7%, over the same periods in 2002. The increase in amortization of intangible assets for the first nine months of 2003 was primarily due to additional intangible assets resulting from the acquisitions of SignalTree Solutions in March 2002 and one other acquisition complementary to our business strategy made during the Third Quarter of 2002.
Interest and dividend income
Interest and dividend income for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 was $959,000 and for the first nine months of 2003 was $2.2 million, compared to $487,000 and $2.0 million, respectively, for the same periods in 2002. The increase in interest and dividend income was the result of higher average cash balances and marketable securities offset in part by overall lower interest rates compared to the same periods in 2002. The higher average cash balances and marketable securities was due to the investment of the net proceeds from the issuance of our convertible debt issue in June 2003, and strong cash flow, offset in part by the impact of our share repurchases in the first six months of 2003.
Interest expense
Interest expense for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 was $1.5 million and for the first nine months of 2003 was $2.6 million, compared to $37,000 and $176,000, respectively, for the same periods in 2002. The interest expense increase is primarily related to the issuance of our $150 million convertible debt issue in June 2003 and the accounting for our new corporate facility. The accounting for the facility as noted in Note I, requires us to incur interest expense, with a corresponding reduction to SG&A.
Other expenses (income), net
Other expenses were $333,000 for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 compared to $131,000 for the same period in 2002. For the first nine months of 2003, other income was $6.6 million compared to $214,000 for the same
18
period in 2002. Other income during the first nine months of 2003 included a $7.3 million favorable judgment in an arbitration award proceeding related to damages for breach of an agreement between Signal Corporation and our Federal Systems subsidiary.
Income Taxes
We generated income before taxes of $9.2 million for the Third Quarter ended September 30, 2003 and $37.9 million for the first nine months of 2003, compared to $6.5 million and $25.0 million, respectively, for the same periods in 2002. The provision for income taxes represents the amounts owed for federal, state, and foreign taxes. Our effective tax rate was 40.0% for the quarters ended September 30, 2003 and 2002 and for the first nine months in 2003 and 2002.
Net Income
Net income increased to $5.5 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 and $22.7 million for the first nine months of 2003, compared to $3.9 million and $15.0 million, respectively, for the same periods in 2002. As compared to the quarter ended June 30, 2003, net income decreased by 16.3% as a result of lower operating income and higher interest expense.
19
RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In January 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Financial Interpretation No. 46 (FIN 46), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, which requires the consolidation of a variable interest entity, as defined, by its primary beneficiary. Primary beneficiaries are those companies that are subject to a majority of the risk of loss or entitled to receive a majority of the entitys residual returns, or both. In determining whether it is the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity, an entity with a variable interest shall treat variable interests in that same entity held by its related parties as its own interests. FIN 46 is effective prospectively for all variable interests obtained subsequent to December 31, 2002. For variable interests existing prior to December 31, 2002, consolidation will be required beginning July 1, 2003. In October 2003, the FASB agreed to a broad-based deferral of the effective date of FIN 46 for public companies until the end of periods ending after December 15, 2003. We have evaluated the applicability of FIN 46 to our relationship with each of City Square and Gateway LLC and determined that these entities are not required to be consolidated within our consolidated financial statements. We have determined that Gateway LLC is not a variable interest entity as the equity investment is sufficient to absorb the expected losses and the holders of the equity investment do not lack any of the characteristics of a controlling interest. We have concluded that as we no longer occupy the space at Ten City Square and no longer derive any benefit from leasing the space, we would not be determined to be the related party most closely associated with City Square. As a result, we will continue to account for our leases with City Square and Gateway LLC consistent with our historical practices in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. We continue to evaluate the applicability of FIN 46 to other relationships and, based on the information to date, we have not identified any entities that would require consolidation.
In April 2003, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 149, Amendment of Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. SFAS No. 149 amends and clarifies financial accounting and reporting for derivative instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts (collectively referred to as derivatives) and for hedging activities under SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. This statement is effective for contracts entered into or modified after June 30, 2003. Adoption of this statement did not have a significant effect on our consolidated financial position or results of operations.
In November 2002 and May 2003, the Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) reached a consensus on Issue No. 00-21, Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables. EITF Issue No. 00-21 provides guidance and criteria for determining when a multiple deliverable arrangement contains more than one unit of accounting. The guidance also addresses methods of measuring and allocating arrangement consideration to separate units of accounting. The guidance is effective for revenue arrangements entered into after June 15, 2003. Adoption of this statement did not have a significant effect on our consolidated financial position or results of operations.
In May 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 150, Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity. SFAS No. 150 establishes standards for how an issuer classifies and measures certain financial instruments with characteristics of both liabilities and equity. This statement is effective for financial instruments entered into or modified after May 31, 2003. Adoption of this statement did not have a significant effect on our consolidated financial position or results of operations.
In May 2003, the EITF reached a consensus on Issue No. 01-08, Determining Whether an Arrangement Contains a Lease. EITF Issue No. 01-08 provides guidance on how to determine whether an arrangement contains a lease that is within the scope of FASB Statement No. 13, Accounting for Leases. The guidance in Issue No. 01-08 is based on whether the arrangement conveys to the purchaser (lessee) the right to use a specific asset. The Issue No. 01-08 will be effective for arrangements entered into or modified in the second quarter of fiscal 2004. Presently, we intend to adopt this statement prospectively and do not anticipate adoption of this statement to have a significant effect on our consolidated financial position or results of operations.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
We are focused on continuing to generate strong cash flow in order to fund potential mergers and acquisitions, stock repurchases, and to build long-term shareholder value. Our cash and investments at September 30, 2003, increased to $207.5 million from $68.3 million at December 31, 2002. The increase was primarily due to the issuance of $150.0 million in convertible subordinated debentures in June 2003. We simultaneously invested approximately $37.3 million of the proceeds from the sale in the repurchase of 3 million shares of our common stock from authorizations approved by our Board of Directors in October of 2002 and May of 2003. Net proceeds after the repurchase of shares and debt issuance costs were approximately $108.8 million.
20
Net cash provided by operating activities totaled $58.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2003, as compared to $33.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2002. The increase in net cash provided by operating activities was driven in part by an improvement in working capital and a $7.3 million award that we received in the quarter ended March 31, 2003 in connection with an arbitration proceeding initiated by us in 2000 against Signal Corporation for a breach of an agreement between Signal Corporation and our Federal Systems subsidiary. Partially offsetting this increase is approximately $9.2 million that we paid associated with prior and current restructuring charges and a $3.5 million payment made in connection with the settlement of a legal claim. Day Sales Outstanding (DSO) was 55 days as of September 30, 2003 as compared to 57 days as of June 30, 2003. We calculate DSO using the trailing three months total revenue divided by the number of days in the quarter to equal daily revenue. The average accounts receivable balance for the three-month period is then divided by daily revenue.
Net cash used in investing activities was $102.7 million and $26.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Net cash used in investing activities in each of these periods was primarily the result of investments, acquisitions, and capital expenditures. During the nine months ended September 30, 2003, we purchased investments of $102.9 million and sold $8.2 million in marketable securities. In addition, we spent $8.2 million on property and equipment along with $903,000 for payments related to prior years acquisitions. In connection with an acquisition made during the Third Quarter of 2002, we may incur additional payments related to earn-out considerations that are based on achieving specific net revenue targets. Payments in the next twelve months for achieving these goals may range from $1.0 million to $2.0 million. We also recorded, in the Third Quarter of 2002, $3.0 million as deferred revenue related to contingent service credits and issued a $3.0 million non-interest bearing note payable as partial consideration. As of September 30, 2003, the deferred revenue and non-interest bearing note each had a balance of $2.5 million. The note has a one-year term with a one-year extension expiring on September 25, 2004.
Net cash provided by financing activities totaled $88.5 million for the first nine months of 2003 compared to $30.8 million used for financing activities during the first nine months of 2002. The increase reflects $150.0 million in proceeds from our issuance of convertible subordinated debentures, which was offset in part by our repurchase of 6,052,100 shares of our common stock for approximately $60.9 million and approximately $4.2 million in debt issue costs.
In June 2003, we issued, in a private placement, $150.0 million principal amount of 2.0% convertible subordinated debentures due June 15, 2013 (Debentures). The Debentures are unsecured and subordinated in right of payment to all of our senior indebtedness. The Debentures accrue regular interest at a rate of 2.0% per year. Interest is payable semi-annually in arrears on June 15 and December 15 of each year beginning December 15, 2003. Beginning with the six-month interest period commencing June 15, 2008, we will pay additional contingent interest during any six-month interest period if the trading price of the Debentures for each of the five trading days immediately preceding the first day of the interest period equals or exceeds 120% of the principal amount of the Debentures. During any interest period when contingent interest is payable, the contingent interest payable per $1,000 principal amount of Debentures will equal 0.35% calculated on the average trading price of $1,000 principal amount of Debentures during the five trading days immediately proceeding the first day of the applicable six-month interest period and will be payable in arrears.
On or after June 15, 2008, we may, by providing at least 30 day notice to the holders, redeem any of the Debentures at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the Debentures, plus accrued interest and unpaid interest, if any, and liquidated damages, if any, to, but excluding, the redemption date.
The Debentures are convertible at the option of the holder into shares of our common stock at an initial conversion rate of 54.4989 share per $1,000 principal amount of Debentures, which is equivalent to an initial conversion price of approximately $18.349 per share, subject to adjustments, prior to the close of business on the final maturity date only under the following circumstances: (a) during any fiscal quarter commencing after September 30, 2003, and only during such fiscal quarter, if the closing sale price of our common stock exceeds 120% of the conversion price (approximately $22.019) for at least 20 trading days in the 30 consecutive trading day period ending on the last trading day of the preceding fiscal quarter; (b) during the five business days after any five consecutive trading day period in which the trading price per $1,000 principal amount of Debentures for each day of that period was less than 98% of the product of the closing sale price of our common stock and the number of shares issuable upon conversion of $1,000 principal amount of the Debentures; (c) if the Debentures have been called for redemption; or (d) upon the occurrence of specified corporate transactions.
21
On June 12, 2003, our Board of Directors authorized us to repurchase 3 million shares of our common stock. The authorization is in addition to the 3 million share repurchase authorization that the Board of Directors authorized on May 30, 2003 and in addition to the 5 million share repurchase authorization we announced on October 25, 2002, which expired in October 2003. The repurchases may be made on the open market or in negotiated transactions, and the timing and amount of shares purchased will be determined by our management based on its evaluation of market and economic conditions and other factors. During the first nine months of 2003, we purchased (i) the remaining 3,676,400 shares of our common stock under the October 2002 authorization for a total investment of $31.3 million at an average share price of $8.52 and (ii) 2,375,700 shares under the May 2003 authorization for a total investment of $29.6 million at an average share price of $12.44. As of September 30, 2003, there are 3,624,300 shares remaining to be repurchased, of which 624,300 shares remain from the May authorization and 3 million shares remain from the June 2003 authorization. The authorizations expire in May 2004 and June 2004, respectively. Between May 1999 and September 30, 2003, we have invested $223.9 million to repurchase 18.0 million shares of our common stock under nine separate authorizations.
In February 2003, we entered into a new $50.0 million credit facility with two banks. The credit facility replaces a previous $10.0 million demand line of credit, which expired in July 2002. The terms of the credit facility require us to maintain a maximum total funded debt and other financial ratios. On June 11, 2003, we and two of our banks amended certain provisions of the credit facility relating to financial covenants. These covenants, which include total indebtedness and leverage ratios, are no more restrictive than those initially contained in the credit facility. As of September 30, 2003, we have no debt outstanding under the credit facility. Based on our current operating plan, we believe that our cash and cash equivalents on hand, marketable securities, cash flows from operations, and our new line of credit will be sufficient to meet our current capital requirements for at least the next twelve months.
22
IMPACT OF INFLATION AND CHANGING PRICES
Inflationary increases in costs have not been material in recent years and, to the extent permitted by competitive pressures, are passed on to clients through increased billing rates. Rates charged by us are based on the cost of labor and market conditions within the industry.
CERTAIN FACTORS THAT MAY AFFECT FUTURE RESULTS
The following important factors, among others, could cause actual results to differ materially from those indicated by forward-looking statements made in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and presented elsewhere by management from time to time.
Our quarterly operating results have varied, and are likely to continue to vary significantly. This may result in volatility in the market price of our common stock. We have experienced and expect to continue to experience fluctuations in our quarterly results. Our gross margins vary based on a variety of factors including employee utilization rates and the number and type of services performed during a particular period. A variety of factors influence our revenue in a particular quarter, including:
general economic conditions which may influence investment decisions or cause downsizing;
the number and requirements of client engagements;
employee utilization rates;
changes in the rates we can charge clients for services;
acquisitions; and
other factors, many of which are beyond our control.
A significant portion of our expenses do not vary relative to revenue. As a result, if revenue in a particular quarter does not meet expectations, our operating results could be materially adversely affected, which in turn may have a material adverse impact on the market price of our common stock. In addition, many of our engagements are terminable without client penalty. An unanticipated termination of a major project could result in an increase in underutilized employees and a decrease in revenue and profits.
We have pursued, and intend to continue to pursue, strategic acquisitions. Failure to successfully integrate acquired businesses or assets may adversely affect our financial performance. In recent years, we have grown significantly through acquisitions. From January 1, 1999 through September 30, 2003, we have completed eleven acquisitions. The aggregate merger and consideration costs of these acquisitions totaled approximately $359.8 million. Our future growth may be based in part on selected acquisitions. At any given time, we may be in various stages of considering acquisition opportunities. We can provide no assurances that we will be able to find and identify desirable acquisition targets or that we will be successful in entering into a definitive agreement with any one target. In addition, even if we reach a definitive agreement with a target, there is no assurance that we will complete any future acquisition.
We typically anticipate that each acquisition will bring benefits, such as an increase in revenue. Prior to completing an acquisition, however, it is difficult to determine if we can realize these benefits. Accordingly, there is a risk that an acquired company may not achieve an increase in revenue or other benefits for us. In addition, an acquisition may result in unexpected costs, expenses, and liabilities. Any of these events could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
The process of integrating acquired companies into our existing business might also result in unforeseen difficulties. Unforeseen operating difficulties may absorb significant management attention, which we may otherwise devote to our existing business. In addition, the process may require significant financial resources that we might otherwise allocate to other activities, including the ongoing development or expansion of our existing operations.
Finally, future acquisitions could result in our having to incur additional debt and/or contingent liabilities. We may also issue equity securities in connection with acquisitions, which could have a dilutive effect on our earnings per share. Any of these possibilities could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and result of operations.
We face significant competition for our services, and our failure to remain competitive could limit our ability to maintain existing clients or attract new clients. The market for our services is highly competitive. The technology for custom software services can change rapidly. The market is fragmented, and no company holds a dominant position. Consequently, our competition for client assignments and experienced personnel varies
23
significantly from city to city and by the type of service provided. Some of our competitors are larger and have greater technical, financial, and marketing resources and greater name recognition in the markets they serve than we do. In addition, clients may elect to increase their internal information systems resources to satisfy their custom software development and integration needs.
In the healthcare software systems market, we compete with some companies that are larger in the healthcare market and have greater financial resources than we do. We believe that significant competitive factors in the healthcare software systems market include size and demonstrated ability to provide service to targeted healthcare markets.
We may not be able to compete successfully against current or future competitors. In addition, competitive pressures may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
We conduct business in the United Kingdom, Canada, and India, which exposes us to a number of difficulties inherent in international activities. As a result of our acquisition of SignalTree Solutions in March 2002, we now have two software development facilities in India. Moreover, we have added approximately 794 technical professionals to our professional services organization in the region. India is currently experiencing conflicts with Pakistan over the disputed territory of Kashmir as well as clashes between different religious groups within the country. These conflicts, in addition to other unpredictable developments in the political, economic, and social conditions in India, could eliminate or reduce the availability of these development and professional services. If access to these services were to be unexpectedly eliminated or significantly reduced, our ability to meet development objectives important to our strategy to add offshore delivery capabilities to the services we provide would be hindered, and our business could be harmed.
If we fail to manage our geographically dispersed organization, we may fail to meet or exceed our financial objectives and our revenues may decline. We perform development activities in the United States, Canada, and in India, and have offices throughout the United States, and in the United Kingdom, Canada, and India. This geographic dispersion requires us to devote substantial management resources that locally based competitors do not need to devote to their operations.
Our operations in the United Kingdom, Canada, and India are subject to currency exchange rate fluctuations, foreign exchange restrictions, changes in taxation, and other difficulties in managing operations overseas. We may not be successful in managing our international operations.
We may be unable to re-deploy our professionals effectively if engagements are terminated unexpectedly, which would adversely affect our results of operations. Our clients can cancel or reduce the scope of their engagements with us on short notice. If they do so, we may be unable to reassign our professionals to new engagements without delay. The cancellation or reduction in scope of an engagement could, therefore, reduce the utilization rate of our professionals, which would have a negative impact on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
As a result of these and other factors, our past financial performance should not be relied on as an indication of future performance. We believe that period-to-period comparisons of our financial results are not necessarily meaningful and we expect that our results of operations may fluctuate from period to period in the future.
Our growth could be limited if we are unable to attract and retain personnel in the information technology and business consulting industries. We believe that our future success will depend in large part on our ability to continue to attract and retain highly skilled technical and management personnel. The competition for such personnel is intense. We may not succeed in attracting and retaining the personnel necessary to develop our business. If we do not, our business, financial condition, and results of operations could be materially adversely affected.
24
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
We do not engage in trading market risk sensitive instruments or purchasing hedging instruments or other than trading instruments that are likely to expose us to market risk, whether interest rate, foreign currency exchange, and commodity price or equity price risk. We have not purchased options or entered into swaps or forward or futures contracts. Our primary market risk exposure is that of interest rate risk on our investments, which would affect the carrying value of those investments. Since January 1, 2001, the United States Federal Reserve Board has significantly decreased certain benchmark interest rates, which has led to a general decline in market interest rates. The decline in market interest rates has had an impact on our rate of return on our cash and investments. Additionally, we transact business in the United Kingdom, Canada, and India and as such have exposure associated with movement in foreign currency exchange rates.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Our management, with the participation of our president and chief executive officer and senior vice president of finance and chief financial officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of September 30, 2003. Based on this evaluation, our president and chief executive officer and senior vice president of finance and chief financial officer concluded that, as of September 30, 2003, our disclosure controls and procedures were (1) designed to ensure that material information relating to us, including our consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to our president and chief executive officer and senior vice president of finance and chief financial officer by others within these entities, particularly during the period in which this report was being prepared and (2) effective, in that they provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SECs rules and forms.
No change to our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) occurred during the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2003 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
25
Keane, Inc.
Part II. Other Information
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
In April 1998, First Command (formerly United Services Planning Association, Inc.) and Independent Research Agency for Life Insurance, Inc. filed a complaint in the District Court for Tarrant County, Texas (Civil Action No. 96-173235-98), against us and two of our employees alleging that we misrepresented our ability to complete a project contracted for by the plaintiffs and concealed from the plaintiffs material facts related to the status of the project. During the Third Quarter of 2003, in order to avoid further costs, we settled the claim in full with payment to the plaintiffs in the amount of $3.5 million, of which $1.6 million was previously accrued. We continue to believe the project was performed professionally and in accordance with the contract terms.
We are involved in other litigation and various legal matters, which have arisen in the ordinary course of business. We do not believe that the ultimate resolution of these matters will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows. We believe that legal claims against us are without merit and intend to defend these matters vigorously.
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
(a) Exhibits.
Exhibit 31.1 - Certification by the Registrants President and Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Exhibit 31.2 - Certification by the Registrants Senior Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Exhibit 32.1 - Certification by the Registrants President and Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Exhibit 32.2 - Certification by the Registrants Senior Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
(b) Reports on Form 8-K.
1. On July 23, 2003, we furnished a Current Report on Form 8-K under Item 9, containing a copy of our earnings release for the period ended June 30, 2003 (including financial statements) pursuant to Item 12 (Disclosure of Results of Operations and Financial Condition).
26
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
KEANE, INC. |
|||||
|
(Registrant) |
|||||
|
||||||
|
||||||
Date |
|
November 12, 2003 |
|
/s/ Brian T. Keane |
|
|
|
Brian T. Keane |
|||||
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
|||||
|
||||||
|
||||||
Date |
|
November 12, 2003 |
|
/s/ John J. Leahy |
|
|
|
John J. Leahy |
|||||
|
Senior Vice President of Finance and |
|||||
27
Exhibit No. |
|
Description |
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
Certification by the Registrants President and Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
Certification by the Registrants Senior Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.1 |
|
Certification by the Registrants President and Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.2 |
|
Certification by the Registrants Senior Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
28