UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004
OR
¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to .
COMMISSION FILE NUMBER: 0-32453
Inergy, L.P.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware | 43-1918951 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
(IRS Employer Identification No.) | |
Two Brush Creek Blvd., Suite 200 Kansas City, Missouri |
64112 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip code) |
(816) 842-8181
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year,
if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the last 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes x No ¨
The following units were outstanding at August 2, 2004:
Common Units |
14,669,822 | |
Senior Subordinated Units |
7,135,252 | |
Junior Subordinated Units |
1,145,084 |
INDEX TO FORM 10-Q
2
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
June 30, 2004 (Unaudited) |
September 30, 2003 |
|||||||
(In Thousands) | ||||||||
Assets |
||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||
Cash |
$ | 8,009 | $ | 3,528 | ||||
Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $1,700,000 and $997,000 at June 30, 2004 and September 30, 2003, respectively |
35,724 | 21,841 | ||||||
Inventories |
25,358 | 35,722 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
5,761 | 3,957 | ||||||
Assets from price risk management activities |
12,105 | 8,905 | ||||||
Total current assets |
86,957 | 73,953 | ||||||
Property, plant and equipment, at cost: |
||||||||
Land and buildings |
19,324 | 14,265 | ||||||
Office furniture and equipment |
9,913 | 8,614 | ||||||
Vehicles |
30,126 | 21,986 | ||||||
Tanks and plant equipment |
171,286 | 135,040 | ||||||
230,649 | 179,905 | |||||||
Less accumulated depreciation |
(33,204 | ) | (22,704 | ) | ||||
Property, plant and equipment, net |
197,445 | 157,201 | ||||||
Intangible assets: |
||||||||
Covenants not to compete |
11,009 | 8,752 | ||||||
Deferred financing costs |
5,282 | 8,843 | ||||||
Customer accounts |
69,454 | 59,951 | ||||||
Goodwill |
72,079 | 64,546 | ||||||
157,824 | 142,092 | |||||||
Less accumulated amortization |
(15,486 | ) | (12,383 | ) | ||||
Intangible assets, net |
142,338 | 129,709 | ||||||
Other |
222 | 1,530 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 426,962 | $ | 362,393 | ||||
3
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (continued)
June 30, 2004 (Unaudited) |
September 30, 2003 |
|||||||
(In Thousands) | ||||||||
Liabilities and partners capital |
||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||
Accounts payable |
$ | 43,136 | $ | 22,733 | ||||
Accrued expenses |
14,985 | 11,919 | ||||||
Customer deposits |
4,642 | 11,830 | ||||||
Liabilities from price risk management activities |
9,425 | 5,801 | ||||||
Current portion of long-term debt |
1,379 | 12,449 | ||||||
Total current liabilities |
73,567 | 64,732 | ||||||
Long-term debt, less current portion |
111,629 | 118,678 | ||||||
Partners capital: |
||||||||
Common unitholders (14,669,822 and 11,044,822 units issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2004 and September 2003, respectively) |
199,431 | 129,168 | ||||||
Senior subordinated unitholders (7,135,252 units issued and outstanding) |
39,979 | 46,842 | ||||||
Junior subordinated unitholders (1,145,084 units issued and outstanding) |
(1,242 | ) | (141 | ) | ||||
Non-managing general partner (2% interest) |
3,598 | 3,114 | ||||||
Total partners capital |
241,766 | 178,983 | ||||||
Total liabilities and partners capital |
$ | 426,962 | $ | 362,393 | ||||
See accompanying notes.
4
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In Thousands, Except Per Unit Data)
(unaudited)
Three Months Ended June 30, |
Nine Months Ended June 30, |
|||||||||||||||
2004 |
2003 |
2004 |
2003 |
|||||||||||||
Revenue: |
||||||||||||||||
Propane |
$ | 57,540 | $ | 35,331 | $ | 345,787 | $ | 292,823 | ||||||||
Other |
12,175 | 4,150 | 34,578 | 14,998 | ||||||||||||
69,715 | 39,481 | 380,365 | 307,821 | |||||||||||||
Cost of product sold |
52,728 | 28,414 | 275,941 | 228,078 | ||||||||||||
Gross profit |
16,987 | 11,067 | 104,424 | 79,743 | ||||||||||||
Expenses: |
||||||||||||||||
Operating and administrative |
20,027 | 12,057 | 60,514 | 43,441 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
5,591 | 3,362 | 15,267 | 10,097 | ||||||||||||
Operating income (loss) |
(8,631 | ) | (4,352 | ) | 28,643 | 26,205 | ||||||||||
Other income (expense): |
||||||||||||||||
Interest expense, net |
(1,443 | ) | (2,263 | ) | (5,810 | ) | (7,399 | ) | ||||||||
Write-off of deferred financing costs (Note 3) |
| | (1,216 | ) | | |||||||||||
Make whole premium charge (Note 3) |
| | (17,949 | ) | | |||||||||||
Swap value received (Note 3) |
| | 949 | | ||||||||||||
Gain (loss) on sale of property, plant and equipment |
143 | (96 | ) | (136 | ) | (86 | ) | |||||||||
Finance charges |
238 | 147 | 591 | 236 | ||||||||||||
Other |
6 | 48 | 84 | 99 | ||||||||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes |
(9,687 | ) | (6,516 | ) | 5,156 | 19,055 | ||||||||||
Provision for income taxes |
113 | 32 | 164 | 102 | ||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | (9,800 | ) | $ | (6,548 | ) | $ | 4,992 | $ | 18,953 | ||||||
Partners interest information for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003: |
||||||||||||||||
Non-managing general partners interest in net income (loss) |
$ | (196 | ) | $ | (131 | ) | $ | 100 | $ | 379 | ||||||
Limited partners interest in net income (loss): |
||||||||||||||||
Common unit interest |
$ | (5,728 | ) | $ | (3,489 | ) | $ | 3,012 | $ | 9,576 | ||||||
Senior subordinated unit interest |
(3,340 | ) | (2,497 | ) | 1,620 | 7,672 | ||||||||||
Junior subordinated unit interest |
(536 | ) | (431 | ) | 260 | 1,326 | ||||||||||
Total limited partners interest in net income (loss) |
$ | (9,604 | ) | $ | (6,417 | ) | $ | 4,892 | $ | 18,574 | ||||||
Net income (loss) per limited partner unit: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | (0.42 | ) | $ | (0.38 | ) | $ | 0.23 | $ | 1.16 | ||||||
Diluted |
$ | (0.42 | ) | $ | (0.38 | ) | $ | 0.22 | $ | 1.14 | ||||||
Weighted average limited partners units outstanding: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
22,950 | 17,032 | 21,551 | 16,044 | ||||||||||||
Diluted |
22,950 | 17,032 | 22,011 | 16,276 | ||||||||||||
See accompanying notes.
5
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF PARTNERS CAPITAL
(In Thousands)
(unaudited)
Common Unit Capital |
Senior Capital |
Junior Capital |
Non-Managing General Partner and Affiliate |
Total Partners Capital |
||||||||||||||||
Balance at September 30, 2003 |
$ | 129,168 | $ | 46,842 | $ | (141 | ) | $ | 3,114 | $ | 178,983 | |||||||||
Net proceeds from issuance of common units |
83,290 | | | | 83,290 | |||||||||||||||
Contribution from non-managing general partner |
| | | 1,790 | 1,790 | |||||||||||||||
Distributions |
(15,988 | ) | (8,456 | ) | (1,357 | ) | (1,404 | ) | (27,205 | ) | ||||||||||
Comprehensive income: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
3,012 | 1,620 | 260 | 100 | 4,992 | |||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation |
(51 | ) | (27 | ) | (4 | ) | (2 | ) | (84 | ) | ||||||||||
Comprehensive income |
4,908 | |||||||||||||||||||
Balance at June 30, 2004 |
$ | 199,431 | $ | 39,979 | $ | (1,242 | ) | $ | 3,598 | $ | 241,766 | |||||||||
See accompanying notes.
6
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In Thousands)
(unaudited)
Nine Months Ended June 30, |
||||||||
2004 |
2003 |
|||||||
Operating activities |
||||||||
Net income |
$ | 4,992 | $ | 18,953 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
||||||||
Depreciation |
10,925 | 7,116 | ||||||
Amortization |
4,342 | 2,981 | ||||||
Amortization of deferred financing costs |
1,197 | 1,045 | ||||||
Provision for doubtful accounts |
484 | 619 | ||||||
Write-off of deferred financing costs |
1,216 | | ||||||
Make whole premium charge |
17,949 | | ||||||
(Gain) loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment |
136 | 86 | ||||||
Net asset (liabilities) from price risk management activities |
424 | (4,476 | ) | |||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects from acquisitions: |
||||||||
Accounts receivable |
(10,543 | ) | (5,651 | ) | ||||
Inventories |
11,524 | 22,391 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
(1,792 | ) | 1,594 | |||||
Other assets |
43 | (4 | ) | |||||
Accounts payable |
15,195 | (2,340 | ) | |||||
Accrued expenses |
768 | 984 | ||||||
Customer deposits |
(7,238 | ) | (5,349 | ) | ||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
49,622 | 37,949 | ||||||
Investing activities |
||||||||
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired |
(56,698 | ) | (19,804 | ) | ||||
Purchases of property, plant and equipment |
(10,005 | ) | (3,902 | ) | ||||
Deferred financing and acquisition costs incurred |
(901 | ) | (577 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment |
1,572 | 490 | ||||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(66,032 | ) | (23,793 | ) |
7
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (continued)
(In Thousands)
(unaudited)
Nine Months Ended June 30, |
||||||||
2004 |
2003 |
|||||||
Financing activities |
||||||||
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt |
$ | 268,138 | $ | 102,995 | ||||
Principal payments on long-term debt |
(287,089 | ) | (123,355 | ) | ||||
Payment of make whole premium charge |
(17,949 | ) | | |||||
Contribution from non-managing general partner |
1,790 | 511 | ||||||
Net proceeds from issuance of common units |
83,290 | 23,350 | ||||||
Distributions |
(27,205 | ) | (17,685 | ) | ||||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
20,975 | (14,184 | ) | |||||
Effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash |
(84 | ) | 6 | |||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash |
4,481 | (22 | ) | |||||
Cash at beginning of period |
3,528 | 2,088 | ||||||
Cash at end of period |
$ | 8,009 | $ | 2,066 | ||||
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information |
||||||||
Cash paid during the period for interest |
$ | 4,773 | $ | 6,531 | ||||
Supplemental schedule of noncash investing and financing activities |
||||||||
Acquisition of NGL business through the issuance of obligations |
$ | 1,970 | $ | | ||||
Acquisition of retail propane company through the issuance of common units |
$ | | $ | 100 | ||||
Additions to covenants not to compete through the issuance of noncompete obligations |
$ | 2,096 | $ | 1,243 | ||||
Increase (decrease) in the fair value of senior secured notes and the related interest rate swap |
$ | (316 | ) | $ | 1,373 | |||
See accompanying notes.
8
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Note 1 Organization and Basis of Presentation
Organization
The consolidated financial statements of Inergy, L.P. (the Company) include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiary Inergy Propane, LLC which, collectively, are referred to as Inergy. Inergy Partners, LLC (the Non-Managing General Partner), a subsidiary of Inergy Holdings, LLC (Holdings), owns the Non-Managing General Partner interest representing a 2% unsubordinated general partners interest in the Company. Inergy GP, LLC, (the Managing General Partner), a wholly owned subsidiary of Holdings, has sole responsibility for conducting our business and managing our operations. Holdings is a holding company whose principal business, through its subsidiaries, is its management of and ownership in Inergy, L.P. Holdings also directly owns the incentive distribution rights with respect to Inergy, L.P.
Basis of Presentation
The financial information as of June 30, 2004 and for the three-month and nine-month periods ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 contained herein is unaudited. The Company believes this information has been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for interim financial information and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. The Company also believes this information includes all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) necessary to present fairly the financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the periods then ended. The retail distribution business is largely seasonal due to propanes primary use as a heating source in residential and commercial buildings. Accordingly, the results of operations for the three-month and nine-month periods ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 are not indicative of the results of operations that may be expected for the entire year.
The accompanying financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements of Inergy, L.P. and subsidiary and the notes thereto included in Form 10-K/A as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission for the year ended September 30, 2003.
9
INERGY, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Note 2 Accounting Policies
Financial Instruments and Price Risk Management
Inergy, through its wholesale operations, sells propane to various propane users, retailers, and resellers and offers price risk management services to these customers as part of its marketing and distribution operations. Inergys wholesale operations also sell propane to energy marketers and dealers. Derivative financial instruments utilized in connection with these activities are accounted for using the mark-to-market method in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, and Emerging Issues Task Force Issue (EITF) No. 02-3, Issues Involved in Accounting for Contracts Held for Trading Purposes and Contracts Involved in Energy Trading and Risk Management Activities, as discussed below and, prior to its October 2002 rescission effective for periods beginning after December 15, 2002, EITF No. 98-10, Accounting for Contracts Involved in Energy Trading and Risk Management Activities. Inergys overall objective for entering into such derivative financial instruments, including those designated as fair value hedges of Inergys inventory positions, is to manage its exposure to fluctuations in commodity prices and changes in the fair market value of its inventories.
SFAS No. 133 requires recognition of all derivative instruments in the balance sheets and measures them at fair value. If a derivative does not qualify for hedge accounting, it must be adjusted to fair value through earnings. Beginning in December 2002, certain of Inergys commodity derivative financial instruments have been designated as hedges of selected inventory positions, and qualify as fair value hedges, as defined in SFAS No. 133. For derivative instruments designated as hedges, Inergy uses regression analysis to formally assess, both at the hedge contracts inception and on an ongoing basis, whether the hedge contract is highly effective in offsetting changes in fair value of hedged items. Changes in the fair value of derivative instruments designated as fair value hedges are reported in the balance sheet as price risk management assets or liabilities. The ineffective portions of hedging derivatives are recognized immediately in cost of product sold. At June 30, 2004, the fair value of approximately 21.5 million gallons of propane inventory was being hedged by various commodity derivatives with a fair value of $1.3 million recorded as a liability from price risk management activities in accordance with Inergys hedging strategies. Changes in the fair value of derivative instruments that are not designated as hedges are recorded in current period earnings in accordance with SFAS No. 133. The fair value of derivatives not designated as hedges are determined based on quoted market prices, current transactions or similar commodities with similar counterparties, or other calculations based on observable market inputs.
During the three months and nine months ended June 30, 2004, Inergy recognized a net loss of $0.1 million and a net gain of $0.0 million, respectively, related to the ineffective portion of its hedging instruments and net losses of $0.2 million related to the portion of the hedging instruments Inergy excluded from its assessment of hedge effectiveness.
The cash flow impact of financial instruments is reflected as cash flows from operating activities in the consolidated statements of cash flows.
10
INERGY, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Note 2 Accounting Policies (continued)
In October 2002, the EITF reached a consensus in EITF No. 02-3 to rescind EITF No. 98-10, the basis for mark-to-market accounting used for recording energy trading activities. The October 2002 EITF consensus requires that all new energy-related contracts entered into subsequent to October 25, 2002 should not be accounted for pursuant to EITF No. 98-10. Instead, those contracts should be accounted for under accrual accounting and would not qualify for mark-to-market accounting unless the contracts meet the requirements stated under SFAS No. 133. The October 2002 EITF consensus also provides that inventory will no longer be accounted for using mark-to-market accounting and must be accounted for at the lower of cost or market. As noted above, Inergy has elected to use the special hedge accounting rules in SFAS No. 133 and hedge the fair value of certain of its inventory positions, whereby the hedged inventory and the related derivative instruments are both marked to market. Inventories purchased under energy contracts subsequent to October 25, 2002, and not otherwise designated as being hedged, as discussed above, are carried at the lower-of-cost or market effective January 1, 2003.
The effective date for the full rescission of EITF No. 98-10 was for quarterly periods beginning after December 15, 2002. The effect of the rescission of EITF No. 98-10 did not have a material impact on Inergys financial position or results of operations.
Revenue Recognition
Sales of propane and other liquids are recognized at the time product is shipped or delivered to the customer. Gas processing and fractionation fees are recognized upon delivery of the product. Revenue from the sale of propane appliances and equipment is recognized at the time of sale or installation. Revenue from repairs and maintenance is recognized upon completion of the service.
Expense Classification
Cost of products sold includes the actual cost of propane and other fuels, merchandise, production costs associated with our gas processing plant, and compensation and fuel costs associated with our transportation business. Operating and administrative expenses include all corporate and wholesale operating expenses, and all costs incurred to deliver products to our retail customers, including all retail branch operating expenses.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the year. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
11
INERGY, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Note 2 Accounting Policies (continued)
Inventories
Inventories for retail operations, which mainly consist of liquid propane, are stated at the lower of cost, determined using the average-cost method, or market. Wholesale propane inventories are stated at the lower of cost, determined using the average-cost method, or market unless designated as being hedged by forward sales contracts, as discussed above, in which case the inventories are marked to market. Wholesale propane inventories being hedged and carried at market were $14.8 million and $28.9 million at June 30, 2004 and September 30, 2003, respectively.
Inventories consist of (in thousands):
June 30, 2004 |
September 30, 2003 | |||||
Propane gas and other liquids |
$ | 21,528 | $ | 32,247 | ||
Appliances, parts and supplies |
3,830 | 3,475 | ||||
$ | 25,358 | $ | 35,722 | |||
12
INERGY, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Note 2 Accounting Policies (continued)
Income Per Unit
Basic net income (loss) per limited partner unit is computed by dividing net income (loss), after considering the Non-Managing General Partners interest, by the weighted average number of Common and Subordinated Units outstanding. Diluted net income (loss) per limited partner unit is computed by dividing net income (loss), after considering the Non-Managing General Partners interest, by the weighted average number of Common and Subordinated Units outstanding and the dilutive effect of unit options granted under the long-term incentive plan. All limited partnership units and per limited partner unit amounts have been restated to reflect the two-for-one split which was effective January 12, 2004. See Note 4, Two-For-One Unit Split. The following table presents the calculation of basic and dilutive net income (loss) per limited partner unit (in thousands, except per unit data):
Three Months Ended June 30, |
Nine Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||
2004 |
2003 |
2004 |
2003 | |||||||||||
Numerator: |
||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | (9,800 | ) | $ | (6,548 | ) | $ | 4,992 | $ | 18,953 | ||||
Less: Non-Managing General Partners interest in net income (loss) |
(196 | ) | (131 | ) | 100 | 379 | ||||||||
Limited partners interest in net income (loss) basic and diluted |
$ | (9,604 | ) | $ | (6,417 | ) | $ | 4,892 | $ | 18,574 | ||||
Denominator: |
||||||||||||||
Weighted average limited partners units outstanding basic |
22,950 | 17,032 | 21,551 | 16,044 | ||||||||||
Effect of dilutive unit options outstanding |
| | 460 | 232 | ||||||||||
Weighted average limited partners units outstanding dilutive |
22,950 | 17,032 | 22,011 | 16,276 | ||||||||||
Net income (loss) per limited partner unit: |
||||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | (0.42 | ) | $ | (0.38 | ) | $ | 0.23 | $ | 1.16 | ||||
Diluted |
$ | (0.42 | ) | $ | (0.38 | ) | $ | 0.22 | $ | 1.14 | ||||
As the effects of including the incremental units associated with options are antidilutive for the quarters ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, both basic earnings per unit and diluted earnings per unit reflect the same calculation. Weighted average antidilutive unit options outstanding totaled 453,472 and 286,932 for the quarters ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
13
INERGY, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Note 2 Accounting Policies (continued)
Accounting for Unit-Based Compensation
Inergy has a unit-based employee compensation plan, which is accounted for under the recognition and measurement principles of APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees for all periods presented and presents the fair value method pro forma disclosures required under the provisions of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, as amended by SFAS No. 148 Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation Transition and Disclosure. No unit-based employee compensation cost is reflected in net income (loss), as all options granted under the plan had an exercise price equal to the market value of the underlying Common Units on the date of grant. The following table illustrates the effect on net income (loss) and net income (loss) per limited partner unit as if Inergy had applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123, to unit-based employee compensation. For purposes of pro forma disclosures, the estimated fair value of an option is amortized to expense over the options vesting period. Inergys pro forma information for each of the three and nine month periods ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 is as follows (in thousands, except per unit data):
Three Month Ended June 30, |
Nine Months ended June 30, | |||||||||||||
2004 |
2003 |
2004 |
2003 | |||||||||||
Net income (loss) as reported |
$ | (9,800 | ) | $ | (6,548 | ) | $ | 4,992 | $ | 18,953 | ||||
Deduct: Total unit-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value method for all awards |
55 | 45 | 166 | 111 | ||||||||||
Pro forma net income (loss) |
$ | (9,855 | ) | $ | (6,593 | ) | $ | 4,826 | $ | 18,842 | ||||
Pro forma limited partners interest in net income (loss) for the three and nine month periods ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 |
$ | (9,659 | ) | $ | (6,462 | ) | $ | 4,726 | $ | 18,463 | ||||
Net income (loss) per limited partner unit: |
||||||||||||||
Basic as reported |
$ | (0.42 | ) | $ | (0.38 | ) | $ | 0.23 | $ | 1.16 | ||||
Basic pro forma |
$ | (0.42 | ) | $ | (0.38 | ) | $ | 0.22 | $ | 1.15 | ||||
Pro forma net income (loss) per limited partner unit: |
||||||||||||||
Diluted as reported |
$ | (0.42 | ) | $ | (0.38 | ) | $ | 0.22 | $ | 1.14 | ||||
Diluted pro forma |
$ | (0.42 | ) | $ | (0.38 | ) | $ | 0.22 | $ | 1.13 |
14
INERGY, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Note 2 Accounting Policies (continued)
Reclassifications
Certain reclassifications have been made to the consolidated financial statements for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2003 to conform to the three and nine months ended June 30, 2004.
Note 3 Long-Term Debt
Long-term debt consisted of the following (in thousands):
June 30, 2004 |
September 30, 2003 | |||||
Credit agreement: |
||||||
Working Capital Facility |
$ | 129 | $ | 15,500 | ||
Acquisition Facility |
107,604 | 25,524 | ||||
Senior secured notes (including interest rate swap liability) |
| 86,265 | ||||
Obligations under noncompetition agreements and notes to former owners of businesses acquired |
5,272 | 3,833 | ||||
Other |
3 | 5 | ||||
113,008 | 131,127 | |||||
Less current portion |
1,379 | 12,449 | ||||
$ | 111,629 | $ | 118,678 | |||
Effective in May 2004, Inergy Propane, LLC executed an Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (the Amended Facility) with its existing lenders in addition to others. The Amended Facility consists of a $75 million revolving working capital facility and a $225 million revolving acquisition facility. The Amended Facility expires in July 2006 and carries terms, conditions and covenants substantially similar to the previous credit agreement. The Amended Facility is also guaranteed by Inergy, L.P.
Inergy is required to reduce the principal outstanding on the revolving working capital line of credit to $4 million or less for a minimum of 30 consecutive days during the period commencing March 1 and ending September 30. As such, $4 million of the outstanding balance at September 30, 2003 and the $0.1 million balance at June 30, 2004, have been classified as long-term liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. At June 30, 2004 and September 30, 2003, the total balance outstanding under this Amended Facility was $107.7 million and $41.0 million, respectively, including $0.1 million and $15.5 million, respectively, under the working capital facility. The prime rate and LIBOR plus the applicable spreads were between 3.15% and 4.00% at June 30, 2004, and between 3.11% and 4.00% at September 30, 2003, for all outstanding debt under the credit agreement.
15
INERGY, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Note 3 Long-Term Debt (continued)
In June 2002, Inergy entered into a note purchase agreement with a group of institutional lenders pursuant to which it issued $85.0 million aggregate principal amount of senior secured notes with a weighted average interest rate of 9.07% and a weighted average maturity of 5.9 years. The senior secured notes consisted of the following: $35 million principal amount of 8.85% senior secured notes with a 5-year maturity, $25.0 million principal amount of 9.10% senior secured notes with a 6-year maturity, and $25.0 million principal amount of 9.34% senior secured notes with a 7-year maturity. The net proceeds from these senior secured notes were used to repay a portion of the amount outstanding under the credit facility. The funds from a public unit offering, together with net new borrowings under the revolving credit facility were used to repay in full $85.0 million aggregate principal amount of senior secured notes, plus a make whole premium charge of approximately $17.9 million in January 2004. All interest rate swap agreements were cancelled in conjunction with the repayment of $85 million of senior secured notes. The make whole premium charge of $17.9 million was recorded as a charge to earnings in the quarter ended March 31, 2004 together with the write-off of the $1.2 million deferred financing costs associated with the senior secured notes, partially offset by a $0.9 million gain from the cancellation of the interest rate swaps.
The Amended Facility contains several covenants which, among other things, require the maintenance of various financial performance ratios, restrict the payment of distributions to unitholders, and require financial reports to be submitted periodically to the financial institutions. Unused borrowings under the Amended Facility amounted to $188.2 million and $154.9 million at June 30, 2004 and September 30, 2003, respectively.
The aggregate amounts of principal to be paid on the outstanding long-term debt during the next five years ending June 30 and thereafter, are as follows, in thousands of dollars:
2005 |
$ | 1,379 | |
2006 |
743 | ||
2007 |
108,349 | ||
2008 |
1,176 | ||
2009 |
609 | ||
Thereafter |
752 | ||
$ | 113,008 | ||
16
INERGY, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Note 3 Long-Term Debt (continued)
In August 2002, Inergy Propane, LLC (the Operating Company) entered into two interest rate swap agreements scheduled to mature in June 2008 and June 2009, respectively, each designed to hedge $10 million in underlying fixed rate senior secured notes, in order to manage interest rate risk exposure and reduce overall interest expense. In October 2002, the Operating Company entered into three additional interest rate swap agreements scheduled to mature in June 2007, June 2008, and June 2009, each designed to hedge $5 million in underlying fixed rate senior secured notes. These swap agreements, which were scheduled to expire on the same dates as the maturity dates of the related senior secured notes, required the counterparty to pay us an amount based on the stated fixed interest rate on the notes due every three months. In exchange, the Operating Company was required to make quarterly floating interest rate payments on the same dates to the counterparty based on an annual interest rate equal to the 3 month LIBOR interest rate plus spreads between 4.83% and 5.02% applied to the same notional amount of $35 million. The swap agreements have been recognized as fair value hedges. Amounts to be received or paid under the agreements were accrued and recognized over the life of the agreements as an adjustment to interest expense. Inergy, L.P. recognized the approximate $1.3 million increase in the fair market value of the related senior secured notes at September 30, 2003, with a corresponding increase in the fair value of its interest rate swaps, which was recorded in other non-current assets. In January 2004, all interest rate swap agreements were cancelled in conjunction with the repayment of $85 million of senior secured notes.
Note 4 Two-for-One Unit Split
On December 10, 2003, the Board of Directors of the Managing General Partner declared a two-for-one split of the outstanding common and subordinated units. The split entitled unitholders of record at the close of business on January 2, 2004 to receive one additional unit for each unit held as of such date. The distribution was made on January 12, 2004. The effect of the split was to double the number of all outstanding units and to reduce by half the minimum quarterly per unit distribution and the targeted distribution levels. All common and subordinated unit amounts and per unit amounts have been restated to reflect the two-for-one split.
17
INERGY, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Note 5 Quarterly Distributions of Available Cash
On May 14, 2004, a quarterly distribution of $0.405 per limited partner unit was paid to its unitholders of record on May 7, 2004 with respect to the second fiscal quarter of 2004, which totaled $9.9 million. Inergy distributed $0.415 per limited partner unit on August 13, 2004 to unitholders of record on August 6, 2004, for a total distribution of $10.2 million with respect to its third fiscal quarter of 2004.
Inergy distributed $0.365 per limited partner unit on May 15, 2003 to unitholders of record on May 8, 2003, for a total distribution of $6.4 million with respect to its second fiscal quarter of 2003. On August 14, 2003, Inergy distributed $0.375 per limited partner unit to its unitholders of record on August 7, 2003, for a total distribution of $7.5 million with respect to its third fiscal quarter of 2003.
Note 6 Commitments and Contingencies
Inergy periodically enters into agreements to purchase fixed quantities of propane at fixed prices with suppliers. At June 30, 2004, the total of these firm purchase commitments was approximately $78.2 million.
At June 30, 2004, Inergy was contingently liable for letters of credit outstanding totaling $4.1 million, which guarantee various transactions.
Inergy is periodically involved in litigation. The results of litigation cannot be predicted with certainty; however, management believes that Inergy does not have material potential liability in connection with these proceedings that would have a significant financial impact on its consolidated financial condition and results of operations.
18
INERGY, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Note 7 Segments
Inergys financial statements reflect two reportable segments: retail sales operations and wholesale sales operations. Retail sales operations include all retail operations and transportation services. Wholesale sales operations include wholesale supply, marketing and distribution, and the recently acquired natural gas processing and NGL fractionation operations. Revenues, gross profit and identifiable assets for each of our reportable segments are presented below.
The identifiable assets associated with each reportable segment include accounts receivable and inventories. The net asset/liability from price risk management, as reported in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, is related to the wholesale segment.
The following segment information is presented in thousands of dollars:
Three Months Ended June 30, 2004 | |||||||||||||
Retail Sales Operations |
Wholesale Sales Operations |
Intersegment Eliminations |
Total | ||||||||||
Revenues |
$ | 30,873 | $ | 49,205 | $ | (10,363 | ) | $ | 69,715 | ||||
Gross profit |
14,673 | 2,314 | | 16,987 | |||||||||
Identifiable assets |
19,103 | 41,979 | | 61,082 |
Three Months Ended June 30, 2003 | |||||||||||||
Retail Sales Operations |
Wholesale Sales Operations |
Intersegment Eliminations |
Total | ||||||||||
Revenues |
$ | 21,687 | $ | 25,756 | $ | (7,962 | ) | $ | 39,481 | ||||
Gross profit |
10,694 | 373 | | 11,067 | |||||||||
Identifiable assets |
14,698 | 23,355 | | 38,053 |
19
INERGY, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Note 7 Segments (continued)
Nine Months Ended June 30, 2004 | |||||||||||||
Retail Sales Operations |
Wholesale Sales Operations |
Intersegment Eliminations |
Total | ||||||||||
Revenues |
$ | 187,591 | $ | 278,994 | $ | (86,220 | ) | $ | 380,365 | ||||
Gross profit |
90,613 | 14,421 | (610 | ) | 104,424 | ||||||||
Identifiable assets |
19,103 | 41,979 | | 61,082 |
Nine Months Ended June 30, 2003 | |||||||||||||
Retail Sales Operations |
Wholesale Sales Operations |
Intersegment Eliminations |
Total | ||||||||||
Revenues |
$ | 150,778 | $ | 220,354 | $ | (63,311 | ) | $ | 307,821 | ||||
Gross profit |
73,099 | 7,638 | (994 | ) | 79,743 | ||||||||
Identifiable assets |
14,698 | 23,355 | | 38,053 |
20
INERGY, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Note 8 Subsequent Events
Effective in July 2004, Inergy acquired the assets of Highland Propane Company, an operating subsidiary of RGC Resources, Inc. Highland Propane, with headquarters in Roanoke, Virginia represents less than 10% of consolidated total assets and partners capital.
On August 13, 2004, 1,656,684 senior subordinated units converted on a one-for-one basis to common units. The conversion of senior subordinated units does not impact the amount of cash distributions paid or the total number of limited partnership units outstanding.
21
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation
Our Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of Inergy should be read in conjunction with the accompanying consolidated financial statements and Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003 of Inergy, L.P.
The statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that are not historical facts, including most importantly, those statements preceded by, or that include the words may, believes, expects, anticipates or the negation thereof, or similar expressions, constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the Reform Act). Such forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements that: (i) we believe entering the mid-stream gas processing and natural gas liquids (NGL) business complements our existing operations and (ii) we believe the sufficiency of cash received from operations and borrowings will meet our foreseeable liquidity needs. Such forward-looking statements involve risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such factors include, but are not limited to, the following: weather in our area of operations; market price of propane; availability of financing; changes in, or failure to comply with, government regulations; the costs, uncertainties and other effects of legal and administrative proceedings and other risks and uncertainties detailed in our Securities and Exchange Commission filings. For those statements, we claim the protection of the safe harbor for forward-looking statements contained in the Reform Act. We will not undertake and specifically decline any obligation to publicly release the result of any revisions to any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of such statements or to reflect events or circumstances after anticipated or unanticipated events.
Overview
We are a rapidly growing retail and wholesale propane marketing and distribution business. We have grown primarily through acquisitions of retail propane companies. In October 2003, we acquired from Link Energy, LLC (formerly known as EOTT Energy, L.P.) its west coast NGL business (Inergy Services), which includes gas processing, fractionation, above-ground NGL storage, truck and rail distribution facilities, and a NGL transportation fleet all located in south central California. In October 2003, we also acquired the assets of two retail propane companies; Smith Propane, with headquarters in La Crosse, Virginia and Peoples Gas and Appliance, with headquarters in Beaufont, South Carolina. In November 2003, we acquired the assets of another retail propane company, Pembroke Propane, with headquarters in Pembroke, Georgia. In December 2003, we acquired certain assets of two retail propane companies in the southeast. These six companies generated revenue during the 12 months ended September 30, 2003, of less than 10% of our consolidated revenue during fiscal 2003, and represent less than 10% of consolidated assets and partners capital.
In January 2004, we acquired the assets of a retail propane company, Dorsey Propane Gas Company, with headquarters in Nashville, Georgia. In February 2004, we acquired the assets of a retail propane company, Direct Propane Inc., with headquarters in Norristown, Pennsylvania. In March 2004, we acquired the assets of two more retail propane companies; Premier Propane, LLC, with headquarters in
22
Richmond, Virginia and Hancock Gas Company, Inc., with headquarters in Scotland Neck, North Carolina. These four retail propane companies acquired in the three-months ended March 31, 2004 represent less than 10% of our consolidated revenues, consolidated assets and partners capital.
In April 2004, Inergy acquired the assets of two retail propane companies, Hometown Propane Gas located in central Arkansas and Gaylord Gas, Inc. located in Michigan. In May of 2004, Inergy acquired the assets of Burnwell Gas Corporation, and affiliates Sullivan County Gas Service, Inc. and Sarpol Gas Corporation located in the Hudson Valley area of New York. In June of 2004, we acquired the assets of Midland Gas Company, Inc., with headquarters in Sumter, South Carolina and the assets of Petersen Propane Company located in the greater Chicago, Illinois market. The retail companies acquired in the three-months ended June 20, 3004 represent less than 10% of our consolidated revenues, consolidated assets and partners capital.
The retail distribution business is largely seasonal due to propanes primary use as a heating source in residential and commercial buildings. As a result, operating income is highest when customers purchase propane during the six-month peak heating season of October through March. The operating expenses incurred in the normal course of business with the acquisitions in the nine-months ended June 30, 2004, combined with the off season, as described above, have contributed to the increased net losses for the three-months ended June 30, 2004 as compared to the same period in 2003. We generally experience net losses in the six-month, off season of April through September. During the three-months and nine-months ended June 30, 2004 the weather was approximately 18% and 11% warmer in our retail areas of operations as compared to the same periods in 2003, respectively.
The retail propane business is a margin-based business where the level of profitability is largely dependent on the difference between sales prices and product cost. The unit cost of propane is subject to volatile changes as a result of product supply or other market conditions. Propane unit cost changes can occur rapidly over a short period of time and can impact margins as sales prices may not change as rapidly. There is no assurance that we will be able to fully pass on product cost increases, particularly when product costs increase rapidly. We have generally been successful in passing on higher propane costs to our customers and have historically maintained or increased our gross margin per gallon over the long term in periods of rising costs.
We believe our wholesale supply, marketing and distribution business complements our retail distribution business. Through our wholesale operations, we distribute propane and also offer price risk management services. We engage in hedging transactions to reduce the effect of price volatility on our product costs and to help ensure the availability of propane during periods of short supply. In October 2003, we expanded our wholesale and supply operations by acquiring from Link Energy, LLC (formerly known as EOTT Energy, L.P.) its west coast NGL business (Inergy Services), which includes natural gas processing, NGL fractionation, NGL rail and truck terminals, bulk storage, trucking and marketing operations. We believe Inergy Services complements our existing U.S. and Canadian wholesale and supply operations. Our wholesale profit margin during the three-months and nine-months ended June 30, 2004 was $2.3 million and $13.8 million, respectively, an increase from $0.4 million and $6.6 million in the same periods of 2003. This increase was primarily attributable to our Inergy Services acquisition.
23
Three Months Ended June 30, 2004 Compared to Three Months Ended June 30, 2003
Volume. During the three months ended June 30, 2004, we sold 18.2 million retail gallons of propane, an increase of 37% over the 13.4 million retail gallons sold during the same three-month period in 2003. The increase in retail sales volume was principally due to acquisitions, partially offset by lower retail gallon sales at existing locations as a result of deferral of purchases by our customers due to the higher wholesale cost of propane.
Wholesale gallons delivered during the three months ended June 30, 2004 was 53.7 million gallons, as compared to 32.6 million gallons during the same three-month period in 2003. This increase was primarily attributable to increased volume sales to existing customers in our wholesale operations, and to a lesser extent, wholesale sales volumes through Inergy Services.
Revenues. Revenues in the three months ended June 30, 2004 were $69.7 million, an increase from $39.5 million during the same period in 2003.
Revenues from retail sales were $29.7 million (after elimination of sales to our wholesale operations) in the three months ended June 30, 2004, an increase of 42% from $20.9 million during the same three-month period in 2003. This increase was primarily attributable to acquisition-related volume and higher selling prices of propane, as a result of the higher cost of propane. Revenues from retail sales consist of retail propane sales, transportation revenues, tank rentals, heating oil sales, and appliance sales and service.
Revenues from wholesale sales were $40.0 million (after elimination of sales to our retail operations) in the three months ended June 30, 2004, compared to $18.6 million during the same three-month period in 2003. This increase was primarily attributable to our Inergy Services acquisition, the higher cost of propane and the volume increase generated in our wholesale propane operations.
Cost of Product Sold. Cost of product sold in the three months ended June 30, 2004 was $52.7 million, compared to $28.4 million in the same period in 2003. This increase was primarily attributable to an increase in retail acquisition-related volume, higher wholesale cost of propane, production costs associated with our Inergy Services acquisition, and wholesale volume.
Gross Profit. Retail gross profit was $14.7 million in the three months ended June 30, 2004 compared to $10.7 million during the same three-month period in 2003. This increase was primarily attributable to an increase in acquisition-related volume and an increase in margin per gallon. Wholesale gross profit was $2.3 million in the three months ended June 30, 2004 compared to $0.4 million in fiscal 2003. This increase was primarily attributable to the Inergy Services acquisition and increased wholesale volumes partially offset by a decrease in margin per gallon.
Operating and Administrative Expenses. Operating and administrative expenses increased to $20.0 million in the three months ended June 30, 2004 as compared to $12.1 million in the same three-month period in 2003. This increase was primarily attributable to increased personnel and operating expenses as a result of acquisitions.
Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization increased to $5.6 million in the three months ended June 30, 2004 from $3.4 million in the same three-month period in 2003, primarily as a result of acquisition activity.
24
Interest Expense. Interest expense decreased to $1.4 million in the three-month period ended June 30, 2004 as compared to $2.3 million in the same period of 2003. Interest expense decreased primarily due to a decrease in debt outstanding including the January 2004 early retirement of the $85.0 million senior secured notes, and lower average interest rates.
Net Income (loss). Net loss increased to $9.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2004 from a loss of $6.5 million in the same three-month period in 2003. This increase in net loss is primarily due to the increased operating costs associated with the acquisitions during the current period and warmer weather incurred as well as the deferral of gallon purchases by customers in the three months ended June 30, 2004 as compared to the same period in 2003.
EBITDA. For the three months ended June 30, 2004, income (loss) before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization was $(2.7) million compared to $(0.9) million in the same period in 2003. EBITDA is defined as income before taxes, plus net interest expense (inclusive of write-off of deferred financing costs, make whole premium charge, less gain from termination of interest rate swap agreement) and depreciation and amortization expense. EBITDA should not be considered an alternative to net income, income before income taxes, cash flows from operating activities, or any other measure of financial performance calculated in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles as those items are used to measure operating performance, liquidity or ability to service debt obligations. EBITDA is presented because such information is relevant and is used by management, industry analysts, investors, lenders and rating agencies to assess the financial performance and operating results of our fundamental business activities. We believe that the presentation of EBITDA is useful to lenders and investors because of its use in the propane industry and for master limited partnerships as an indicator of the strength and performance of the ongoing business operations, including the ability to fund capital expenditures, service debt and pay distributions. Additionally, we believe that EBITDA provides useful information to our investors for trending, analyzing and benchmarking our operating results as compared to other companies that may have different financing and capital structures. The presentation of EBITDA allows investors to view our performance in a manner similar to the methods used by management and provides additional insight to our operating results.
Three Months Ended June 30, |
||||||||
2004 |
2003 |
|||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||
EBITDA: |
||||||||
Net loss |
$ | (9,800 | ) | $ | (6,548 | ) | ||
Interest expense, net |
1,443 | 2,263 | ||||||
Provision for income taxes |
113 | 32 | ||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
5,591 | 3,362 | ||||||
EBITDA |
$ | (2,653 | ) | $ | (891 | ) | ||
25
Nine Months Ended June 30, 2004 Compared to Nine Months Ended June 30, 2003
Volume. During the nine months ended June 30, 2004, we sold 117.4 million retail gallons of propane, an increase of 18% over the 99.8 million retail gallons sold during the same nine-month period in 2003. The increase in retail sales volume was principally due to acquisitions, partially offset by lower retail gallon sales at existing locations as a result of weather in the nine-month period ended June 30, 2004 that was approximately 11% warmer than the same period in 2003.
Wholesale gallons delivered during the nine months ended June 30, 2004 was 290.1 million gallons, as compared to 239.0 million gallons during the same nine-month period in 2003. This increase was primarily attributable to increased volume sales to existing customers in our wholesale operations, and to a lesser extent, wholesale sales volumes through Inergy Services.
Revenues. Revenues in the nine months ended June 30, 2004 were $380.4 million, an increase from $307.8 million during the same period in 2003.
Revenues from retail sales were $181.7 million (after elimination of sales to our wholesale operations) in the nine months ended June 30, 2004, an increase from $145.2 million during the same nine-month period in 2003. This increase was primarily attributable to acquisition-related volume and higher selling prices of propane, as the result of higher cost of propane. Revenues from retail sales consist of retail propane sales, transportation revenues, tank rentals, heating oil sales, and appliance sales and service.
Revenues from wholesale sales were $198.7 million (after elimination of sales to our retail operations) in the nine months ended June 30, 2004, compared to $162.6 million during the same nine-month period in 2003. This increase was primarily attributable to our Inergy Services acquisition and the volume increase generated by our wholesale operations.
Cost of Product Sold. Cost of product sold in the nine months ended June 30, 2004 was $275.9 million, compared to $228.1 million in the same period in 2003. This increase was primarily attributable to an increase in retail acquisition-related volume, production costs associated with our Inergy Services acquisition, and increased gallon sales volume.
Gross Profit. Retail gross profit was $90.6 million (after elimination of gross profit attributable to our wholesale operations) in the nine months ended June 30, 2004 compared to $73.1 million during the same nine-month period in 2003. This increase was primarily attributable to an increase in acquisition-related volume and an increase in margin per gallon. Wholesale gross profit was $13.8 million (after elimination of gross profit attributable to our retail operations) in the nine months ended June 30, 2004 compared to $6.6 million in fiscal 2003. This increase was attributable to the Inergy Services acquisition and increased wholesale volumes partially offset by a decrease in margin per gallon.
Operating and Administrative Expenses. Operating and administrative expenses increased to $60.5 million in the nine months ended June 30, 2004 as compared to $43.4 million in the same nine-month period in 2003. This increase was primarily attributable to increased personnel and operating expenses as a result of acquisitions.
26
Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization increased to $15.3 million in the nine months ended June 30, 2004 from $10.1 million in the same nine-month period in 2003, primarily as a result of acquisition activity.
Interest Expense. Interest expense decreased to $5.8 million in the nine-month period ended June 30, 2004 as compared to $7.4 million in the same period of 2003. Interest expense decreased primarily due to a decrease in debt outstanding including the January 2004 early retirement of the $85.0 million senior secured notes, and lower average interest rates.
Make Whole Premium Charge, Write-off of Deferred Financing Costs, and Swap Value Received. In January 2004, we repaid in full our $85.0 million senior secured notes before their scheduled maturity dates. As such, we were required to pay an additional amount of approximately $17.9 million as a make-whole payment which was recorded as a charge to earnings in the quarter ended March 31, 2004. We used proceeds from our January 2004 common unit offering and borrowings from our bank credit facility for this repayment. In addition, we also recorded a charge to earnings of approximately $1.2 million to write-off deferred financing costs associated with the senior secured notes. Partially offsetting these charges was a $0.9 million gain from the cancellation of interest rate swap agreements also associated with the senior secured notes.
Net Income. Net income decreased to $5.0 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2004 from $19.0 million in the same nine-month period in 2003. Net income decreased primarily as a result of the charges associated with the early repayment of the senior secured notes through an equity offering, offset partially by the accretive earnings associated with our retail acquisitions and our Inergy Services acquisition.
EBITDA. For the nine months ended June 30, 2004, income before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization was $44.4 million compared to $36.6 million in the same period in 2003. EBITDA is defined as income before taxes, plus net interest expense (inclusive of write-off of deferred financing costs, make whole premium charge, less gain from termination of interest rate swap agreement) and depreciation and amortization expense. EBITDA should not be considered an alternative to net income, income before income taxes, cash flows from operating activities, or any other measure of financial performance calculated in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles as those items are used to measure operating performance, liquidity or ability to service debt obligations. EBITDA is presented because such information is relevant and is used by management, industry analysts, investors, lenders and rating agencies to assess the financial performance and operating results of our fundamental business activities. We believe that the presentation of EBITDA is useful to lenders and investors because of its use in the propane industry and for master limited partnerships as an indicator of the strength and performance of the ongoing business operations, including the ability to fund capital expenditures, service debt and pay distributions. Additionally, we believe that EBITDA provides useful information to our investors for trending, analyzing and benchmarking our operating results as compared to other companies that may have different financing and capital structures. The presentation of EBITDA allows investors to view our performance in a manner similar to the methods used by management and provides additional insight to our operating results.
27
Nine Months Ended June 30, | |||||||
2004 |
2003 | ||||||
(in thousands) | |||||||
EBITDA: |
|||||||
Net income |
$ | 4,992 | $ | 18,953 | |||
Interest expense, net |
5,810 | 7,399 | |||||
Write off of deferred financing costs |
1,216 | | |||||
Make whole premium charge |
17,949 | | |||||
Swap value received |
(949 | ) | | ||||
Provision for income taxes |
164 | 102 | |||||
Depreciation and amortization |
15,267 | 10,097 | |||||
EBITDA |
$ | 44,449 | $ | 36,551 | |||
Liquidity and Sources of Capital
Cash flows provided by operating activities of $49.6 million in the nine months ended June 30, 2004 consisted primarily of: net income of $5.0 million, net non-cash charges of $18.2 million (principally related to depreciation and amortization of $15.3 million), a make whole premium charge of $17.9 million associated with the early repayment of the senior secured notes and an increase in cash flows of $8.4 million associated with the changes in operating assets and liabilities, including assets and liabilities from price risk management activities. The source of cash associated with the changes in operating assets and liabilities is primarily due to the $15.2 million increase in accounts payable and an $11.5 million reduction in inventory, partially offset by an increase of $12.3 million in accounts receivable and prepaid expenses and other current assets, and a $7.2 million decrease in customer deposits. These changes are attributable to the seasonal nature of our business and our retail and wholesale growth. Cash flows provided by operations of $37.9 million in the same nine-month period of 2003 consisted primarily of net income of $19.0 million, net non-cash charges of $11.8 million (principally related to depreciation and amortization of $10.1 million) and $7.2 million associated with the changes in operating assets and liabilities, including net liabilities from price risk management activities. The source of cash associated with the changes in operating assets and liabilities in the 2003 period was due primarily to a $22.4 million decrease in propane inventory, partially offset by decreases in accounts payable and customer deposits and an increase in accounts receivable.
Cash used in investing activities was $66.0 million in the nine months ended June 30, 2004 as compared to $23.8 million in the same period of 2003. Investing activities during the nine months ended June 30, 2004 included a use of cash of $56.7 million for the acquisitions of EOTT Energy, L.P.s west coast NGL business and fourteen retail propane companies, and $10.0 million of purchases of property plant and equipment. Investing activities in the 2003 period included a use of cash of $19.8 million for the acquisitions of seven retail companies and five locations from a regional marketer and $3.9 million of purchases of property, plant and equipment.
Cash provided by financing activities was $21.0 million in the nine months ended June 30, 2004, compared to a use of cash of $14.2 million in the same period of 2003. Cash used in financing activities in 2004 included net payments of $19.0 million compared to net payments of $20.4 million in 2003,
28
under long-term debt agreements, including borrowings and repayments of our revolving working capital and acquisition credit facility and the early repayment in full of our senior secured notes during the nine-months ended June 30, 2004. The early repayment of our senior secured notes resulted in a make whole premium payment to the lenders in the amount of $17.9 million. Cash paid as distributions to unitholders was $27.2 million and $17.7 million in the nine months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
The following table summarizes our companys long-term debt and operating lease obligations as of June 30, 2004 in thousands of dollars:
Total |
Less than 1 year |
1-3 years |
4-5 years |
After 5 years | |||||||||||
Aggregate amount of principal to be paid on the outstanding long-term debt |
$ | 113,008 | $ | 1,379 | $ | 109,092 | $ | 1,785 | $ | 752 | |||||
Future minimum lease payments under noncancelable operating leases |
14,931 | 3,524 | 5,381 | 3,741 | 2,285 | ||||||||||
Standby letters of credit |
4,101 | 4,101 |
In January and February 2004, Inergy issued 3,625,000 common units in a public offering, resulting in proceeds of approximately $83.3 million, net of underwriters discounts, commissions, and offering expenses. Additionally, Inergy Partners, LLC contributed $1.8 million in cash to Inergy, L.P. in conjunction with the issuance in order to maintain its 2% non-managing general partner interest. These funds were used to repay indebtedness under our revolving credit facility, which was incurred for acquisitions and funding of growth capital expenditures and, together with net new borrowings under the revolving credit facility, to repay in full $85.0 million aggregate principal amount of senior secured notes, plus a prepayment premium of approximately $17.9 million. All interest rate swap agreements were cancelled in conjunction with the repayment of $85 million of senior secured notes.
29
The following table summarizes the change in the unrealized fair value of our energy contracts related to our risk management activities for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2004 where settlement has not yet occurred (in thousands of dollars):
Three Months Ended June 30, 2004 |
Nine Months Ended June 30, 2004 |
|||||||
Net unrealized gains and (losses) in fair value of contracts outstanding at beginning of period |
$ | 3,565 | $ | 3,104 | ||||
Initial recorded value of new contracts entered into during the period |
| 2,723 | ||||||
Change in fair value of contracts attributable to market movement during the year |
(569 | ) | (4,054 | ) | ||||
Realized (gains)/losses recognized |
(316 | ) | 907 | |||||
Net unrealized gains in fair value of contracts outstanding at June 30, 2004 |
$ | 2,680 | $ | 2,680 | ||||
Of the outstanding unrealized gain as of June 30, 2004, all contracts had a maturity of less than one year.
We believe that anticipated cash from operations and borrowings under our amended and restated credit facility described below will be sufficient to meet our liquidity needs for the foreseeable future. If our plans or assumptions change or are inaccurate, or we make any acquisitions, we may need to raise additional capital. We may not be able to raise additional funds or may not be able to raise such funds on favorable terms.
Seasonality
The retail market for propane is seasonal because it is used primarily for heating in residential and commercial buildings. Approximately three-quarters of our retail propane volume is sold during the peak heating season from October through March. Consequently, sales and operating profits are generated mostly in the first and fourth calendar quarters of each year.
Description of Credit Facility
Effective May 2004, Inergy executed an Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (the Amended Facility) with its existing lenders in addition to others. The Amended Facility consists of a $75 million revolving working capital facility and a $225 million revolving acquisition facility. The Amended Facility expires in July 2006 and carries terms, conditions and covenants substantially similar to the previous credit agreement. The Amended Facility is guaranteed by Inergy, L.P. and its subsidiary.
This credit agreement accrues interest at either prime rate or LIBOR plus applicable spreads, resulting in interest rates of 3.15% to 4.00% at June 30, 2004. At June 30, 2004, borrowings outstanding under the credit facility were $107.7 million, including $0.1 million under the revolving working capital facility of the entire outstanding credit facility balance of $107.7 million, $107.6 is classified as long term in the accompanying 2004 consolidated balance sheet. At August 2, 2004, the borrowings outstanding under the credit facility were $158.9 million, with $23.9 million due under the revolving working capital facility.
30
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Interest Rate Risk
We have long-term debt and a revolving line of credit subject to the risk of loss associated with movements in interest rates. At June 30, 2004, we had floating rate obligations totaling approximately $107.7 million for amounts borrowed under our credit agreement.
If the floating rate were to increase by 100 basis points from June 2004 levels, our interest expense would increase by a total of approximately $1.1 million per year.
Commodity Price, Market and Credit Risk
Inherent in our contractual portfolio are certain business risks, including market risk and credit risk. Market risk is the risk that the value of the portfolio will change, either favorably or unfavorably, in response to changing market conditions. Credit risk is the risk of loss from nonperformance by suppliers, customers or financial counterparties to a contract. We take an active role in managing and controlling market and credit risk and have established control procedures, which are reviewed on an ongoing basis. We monitor market risk through a variety of techniques, including daily reporting of the portfolios position to senior management. We attempt to minimize credit risk exposure through credit policies and periodic monitoring procedures. The counterparties associated with assets from price risk management activities are propane retailers, resellers and consumers and energy marketers and dealers.
The propane industry is a margin-based business in which gross profits depend on the excess of sales prices over supply costs. As a result, our profitability will be sensitive to changes in wholesale prices of propane caused by changes in supply or other market conditions. When there are sudden and sharp increases in the wholesale cost of propane, we may not be able to pass on these increases to our customers through retail or wholesale prices. Propane is a commodity and the price we pay for it can fluctuate significantly in response to supply or other market conditions. We have no control over supply or market conditions. In addition, the timing of cost pass-throughs can significantly affect margins. Sudden and extended wholesale price increases could reduce our gross profits and could, if continued over an extended period of time, reduce demand by encouraging our retail customers to conserve or convert to alternative energy sources.
We engage in hedging transactions, including various types of forward contracts, options, swaps and future contracts, to reduce the effect of price volatility on our product costs, protect the value of our inventory positions, and to help ensure the availability of propane during periods of short supply. We attempt to balance our contractual portfolio by purchasing volumes only when we have a matching purchase commitment from our wholesale customers. However, we may experience net unbalanced positions from time to time which we believe to be immaterial in amount. In addition to our ongoing policy to maintain a balanced position, for accounting purposes we are required, on an ongoing basis, to track and report the market value of our purchase obligations and our sales commitments.
31
Notional Amounts and Terms
The notional amounts and terms of these financial instruments as of June 30, 2004 and September 30, 2003 include fixed price payor for 3.6 million and 3.0 million barrels of propane, respectively, and fixed price receiver for 3.8 million and 4.8 million barrels of propane, respectively. Notional amounts reflect the volume of transactions, but do not represent the amounts exchanged by the parties to the financial instruments. Accordingly, notional amounts do not accurately measure our exposure to market or credit risks.
Fair Value
The fair value of the derivative financial instruments related to price risk management activities as of June 30, 2004, and September 30, 2003 was assets of $12.1 million and $8.9 million, respectively, and liabilities of $9.4 million and $5.8 million, respectively. All intercompany transactions have been appropriately eliminated. The market prices used to value these transactions reflect managements best estimate considering various factors including closing exchange and over-the-counter quotations, recent transactions, time value and volatility factors underlying the commitments.
Sensitivity Analysis
A theoretical change of 10% in the underlying commodity value would result in an approximate $0.1 million change in the market value of the contracts as there were approximately (0.9) million gallons of net unbalanced positions at June 30, 2004.
32
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
The Company maintains controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that the Company files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the rules and forms of the SEC, and that information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. An evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of the Companys management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures (as such terms are defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act). Based upon that evaluation, management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, concluded that the Companys disclosure controls and procedures were adequate and effective as of June 30, 2004. There have been no change in the Companys internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13(e)-15 or Rule 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act) or in other factors during the Companys fiscal quarter covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal controls over financial reporting, and there have been no corrective actions with respect to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in our internal controls.
33
None.
Item 2. Changes in Securities and Use of Proceeds
None
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
None.
None.
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
(a) Exhibits
10.1 | Sixth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement by and among Inergy Propane, LLC and the lenders named therein, dated as of May 27, 2004 | |
31.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Inergy, L.P. pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
31.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Inergy, L.P. pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
32.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Inergy, L.P. pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
32.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Inergy, L.P. pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
(b) Inergy filed one report on Form 8-K pertaining to the three months ended June 30, 2004:
Form 8-K dated May 10, 2004, was filed regarding the issuance of a press release reporting its second quarter 2004 financial results.
34
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
INERGY, L.P. | ||||
By: |
INERGY GP, LLC | |||
(its managing general partner) | ||||
Date: August 13, 2004 |
By: |
/s/ R. Brooks Sherman, Jr. | ||
R. Brooks Sherman, Jr. | ||||
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) |
35