Back to GetFilings.com

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Quarter ended February 26, 2005

Commission File Number 1-8504

UNIFIRST CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

68 Jonspin Road
Wilmington, Massachusetts 01887
(Address of principal executive offices)(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number: (978) 658-8888

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes     No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2).

Yes     No

The number of outstanding shares of UniFirst Corporation Common Stock and Class B Common Stock at March 31, 2005 were 9,464,138 and 9,758,560, respectively.

UniFirst Corporation
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
For the Quarter ended February 26, 2005

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

UniFirst Corporation and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Unaudited)

(a)     Derived from audited financial statements

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

UniFirst Corporation and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income
(Unaudited)

(1) - Exclusive of depreciation and amortization

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

UniFirst Corporation and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

UniFirst Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Amounts in thousands, except per share and common stock options data)

1. Summary of Critical and Significant Accounting Policies

Business Description

UniFirst Corporation (the “Company”) is one of the largest providers of workplace uniforms and protective clothing in the United States. The Company designs, manufactures, personalizes, rents, cleans, delivers, and sells a wide range of uniforms and protective clothing, including shirts, pants, jackets, coveralls, jumpsuits, lab coats, smocks and aprons, and also rents industrial wiping products, floor mats, facility service products, other non-garment items, and provides first aid cabinet services and other safety supplies, to a variety of manufacturers, retailers and service companies. The Company serves businesses of all sizes in numerous industry categories. Typical customers include automobile service centers and dealers, delivery services, food and general merchandise retailers, food processors and service operations, light manufacturers, maintenance facilities, restaurants, service companies, soft and durable goods wholesalers, transportation companies, and others who require employee clothing for image, identification, protection or utility purposes. At certain specialized facilities, the Company also decontaminates and cleans work clothes that may have been exposed to radioactive materials and services special cleanroom protective wear. Typical customers for these specialized services include government agencies, research and development laboratories, high technology companies and utilities operating nuclear reactors.

Interim Financial Information

These condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared by the Company without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations; however, the Company believes that the information furnished reflects all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair statement of results for the interim period. It is suggested that these condensed consolidated financial statements be read in conjunction with the financial statements and the notes, thereto, included in the Company’s latest annual report on Form 10-K. Results for an interim period are not indicative of any future interim periods or for an entire fiscal year.

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiaries, all of which are wholly-owned. Intercompany balances and transactions are eliminated in consolidation. All assets and liabilities of foreign subsidiaries are translated into U.S. dollars using the exchange rate prevailing at the balance sheet date, while income and expense accounts are translated at average exchange rates during the year.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates. There have been no changes in judgments or the method of determining estimates that had a material effect on our condensed consolidated financial statements for the periods presented.

Fiscal Year

The Company’s fiscal year ends on the last Saturday in August. For financial reporting purposes, fiscal 2005 will have 52 weeks, as did fiscal 2004.

Revenue Recognition and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

The Company recognizes revenue from rental operations in the period in which the services are provided. Direct sale revenue is recognized in the period in which the product is shipped. Judgments and estimates are used in determining the collectability of accounts receivable. The Company analyzes specific accounts receivable and historical bad debt experience, customer credit worthiness, current economic trends and the age of outstanding balances when evaluating the adequacy of the allowance for doubtful accounts. Management judgments and estimates are used in connection with establishing the allowance in any accounting period. Changes in estimates are reflected in the period they become known. If the financial condition of the Company’s customers were to deteriorate, resulting in an impairment of their ability to make payments, additional allowances may be required. Material differences may result in the amount and timing of bad debt expense recognition for any given period if management makes different judgments or utilizes different estimates.

Inventories and Rental Merchandise in Service

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market value, net of any reserve for excess and obsolete inventory. Judgments and estimates are used in determining the likelihood that new goods on hand can be sold to customers or used in rental operations. Historical inventory usage and current revenue trends are considered in estimating both excess and obsolete inventories. If actual product demand and market conditions are less favorable than those projected by management, additional inventory write-downs may be required. The Company uses the last-in, first-out (LIFO) method to value a significant portion of its inventories. Had the Company used the first-in, first-out (FIFO) accounting method, inventories would have been approximately $1.5 million higher at February 26, 2005 and August 28, 2004. Substantially all inventories represent finished goods.

Rental merchandise in service is being amortized on a straight-line basis over the estimated service lives of the merchandise, which range from 6 to 36 months. In establishing estimated lives for merchandise in service, management considers historical experience and the intended use of the merchandise. Material differences may result in the amount and timing of operating profit for any period if management makes different judgments or utilizes different estimates.

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment are recorded at cost. The Company provides for depreciation on the straight-line method based on the following estimated useful lives:

Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred. Expenditures for renewals and betterments are capitalized.

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

The Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards “SFAS” No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”, effective August 26, 2001. Under SFAS No. 142, goodwill is no longer amortized. SFAS No. 142 also requires that companies test goodwill for impairment on an annual basis and when events occur or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of the reporting unit to which goodwill is assigned below its carrying amount. Our evaluation considers changes in the operating environment, competitive information, market trends, operating performance and cash flow modeling. Management completes its annual impairment test in the fourth quarter of each fiscal year and there have been no impairments of goodwill or definite-lived intangible assets since the adoption of SFAS No. 142. Future events could cause management to conclude that impairment indicators exist and that goodwill and other intangibles associated with acquired businesses are impaired. Any resulting impairment loss could have a material impact on our financial condition and results of operations.

Property, plant and equipment and definite-lived intangible assets are depreciated or amortized over their useful lives. Useful lives are based on management estimates of the period that the assets will generate revenue. Long-lived assets are evaluated for impairment whenever events and circumstances indicate an asset may be impaired.

Customer contracts are amortized over their estimated useful lives which have a weighted average useful life of approximately 14.7 years as of February 26, 2005. Restrictive covenants are amortized over the terms of the respective non-competition agreements, which have a weighted average useful life of approximately 9.4 years as of February 26, 2005. Other intangible assets, net, includes primarily deferred financing costs, which have a weighted average useful life of approximately 4.8 years as of February 26, 2005.

Income Taxes

The Company’s policy of accounting for income taxes is in accordance with SFAS No. 109 — “Accounting for Income Taxes”. Deferred income taxes are provided for temporary differences between amounts recognized for income tax and financial reporting purposes at currently enacted tax rates. The Company computes income tax expense by jurisdiction based on its operations in each jurisdiction.

The Company is periodically reviewed by domestic and foreign tax authorities regarding the amount of taxes due. These reviews include questions regarding the timing and amount of deductions and the allocation of income among various tax jurisdictions. In evaluating the exposure associated with various filing positions, the Company records estimated reserves for probable exposures. Based on the Company’s evaluation of current tax positions, the Company believes they have appropriately accrued for probable exposures.

Net Income per Share

The Common Stock of the Company has a 25% dividend preference to the Class B Common Stock. The Class B Common Stock, which has ten votes per share as opposed to one vote per share for the Common Stock, is not freely transferable but may be converted at any time on a one-for-one basis into Common Stock at the option of the holder of the Class B Common Stock. The company uses the dual class method in accordance with SFAS No. 128, “Earnings per Share”, and Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) Issue No. 03-6, “Participating Securities and the Two-Class Method under FASB Statement No. 128", to calculate basic earnings per share for each class of common stock. This method assumes that 100% of the Company’s earnings are distributed as dividends to each class of common stock based on their respective dividend rights. The result is that the basic earnings per share for the Common Stock are 25% greater than the basic earnings per share of the Class B Common Stock.

Basic earnings per share for the Company’s Common Stock and Class B Common Stock is calculated by dividing net income allocated to Common Stock and Class B Common Stock by the weighted average number of shares of Common Stock and Class B Common Stock outstanding, respectively. Diluted earnings per share for the Company’s Common Stock is calculated assuming the Class B Common Stock has been converted to Common Stock and includes the dilutive effect of the assumed exercise of stock options issuable under the Company’s stock-based employee compensation plan using the treasury stock method.

The following table shows how net income has been allocated using this method:

The following table illustrates the weighted average number of Common and Class B Common shares outstanding during the year and utilized in the calculation of earnings per share:

Stock Based Compensation

The Company has a stock-based employee compensation plan (the “Plan”)which is described in Note 10 to the consolidated financial statements on the Company’s most recently filed Form 10-K. The Company uses the intrinsic value method to account for the plans under Accounting Principles Board No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” under which no compensation cost has been recognized related to stock option grants. The Company has adopted the disclosure provisions of SFAS No. 148 “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation — Transition and Disclosure”. Had compensation cost for the Plan been determined consistent with SFAS No. 123, the Company’s net income and earnings per share would have been reduced to the following pro forma amounts for the following periods:

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents include cash in banks and bank short-term investments with maturities of less than ninety days.

Financial Instruments

The Company’s financial instruments, which may expose the Company to concentrations of credit risk, include cash and cash equivalents, receivables, accounts payable, notes payable and long-term obligations. Each of these financial instruments is recorded at cost, which approximates its fair value.

Insurance

The Company self-insures for certain obligations related to health, workers’ compensation, vehicles and general liability programs. The Company also purchases stop-loss insurance policies to protect it from catastrophic losses. Judgments and estimates are used in determining the potential value associated with reported claims and for losses that have occurred, but have not been reported. The Company’s estimates consider historical claims experience and other factors. The Company’s liabilities are based on estimates, and, while the Company believes that the accrual for loss is adequate, the ultimate liability may be in excess of or less than the amounts recorded. Changes in claim experience, the Company’s ability to settle claims or other estimates and judgments used by management could have a material impact on the amount and timing of expense for any period.

Environmental and Other Contingencies

The Company is subject to legal proceedings and claims arising from the conduct of its business operations, including environmental matters, personal injury, customer contract matters and employment claims. Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States require that a liability for contingencies be recorded when it is probable that a liability has occurred and the amount of the liability can be reasonably estimated. Significant judgment is required to determine the existence of a liability, as well as the amount to be recorded. The Company regularly consults with attorneys and outside consultants to ensure that all of the relevant facts and circumstances are considered, before a contingent liability is recorded. The Company records accruals for environmental and other contingencies based on enacted laws, regulatory orders or decrees, the Company’s estimates of costs, insurance proceeds, participation by other parties and the timing of payments, and the input of outside consultants and attorneys.

The estimated liability for environmental contingencies has been discounted using risk-free rates of interest ranging from 4% to 5% over periods ranging from ten to thirty years. The estimated current costs, net of legal settlements with insurance carriers, have been adjusted for the estimated impact of inflation at 3% per year. Changes in enacted laws, regulatory orders or decrees, management’s estimates of costs, insurance proceeds, participation by other parties, the timing of payments and the input of outside consultants and attorneys based on changing legal or factual circumstances could have a material impact on the amounts recorded for environmental and other contingent liabilities. Refer to Note 6 of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for additional discussion and analysis.

Reclassifications

Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform with current year presentation. These reclassifications did not impact current or historical net income or shareholders’ equity.

2. Comprehensive Income

The components of comprehensive income are as follows:

3. Acquisitions

On September 2, 2003 (“Closing Date”), the Company completed its acquisition of 100% of Textilease Corporation (“Textilease”). The purchase price of approximately $175.6 million in cash was financed as part of a new $285.0 million unsecured revolving credit agreement (“Credit Agreement”), with a syndicate of banks. Textilease, headquartered in Beltsville, Maryland, had fiscal year 2002 revenues of approximately $95.0 million. It serviced over 25,000 uniform and textile products customers from 12 locations in six southeastern states, and also serviced a wide range of large and small first-aid service customers from additional specialized facilities. Textilease’s operating results have been included in the Company’s consolidated operating results since September 2, 2003.

At the time of acquisition, management initiated a plan to integrate certain Textilease facilities into existing operations. Included in the purchase price allocation was an accrual for exit costs and employee termination benefits. As of February 26, 2005 and August 28, 2004, the accrual balances of $1.6 million and $2.0 million, respectively, are included in accrued liabilities in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. The Company expects to incur substantially all of the remaining costs by December 2006. The changes in the accrual balance for the twenty-six weeks ended February 26, 2005 are as follows:

4. Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities

The Company had entered into an interest rate swap agreement, which expired on October 13, 2004, to manage its exposure to movements in interest rates on its variable rate debt. The Company reflected all changes in the fair value of the swap agreement in earnings in the period of change. The swap agreement, notional amount $40.0 million (the “$40.0 million SWAP”), matured October 13, 2004. The Company paid a fixed rate of 6.38% and received a variable rate tied to the three month LIBOR rate. As of August 28, 2004, the applicable variable rate was 1.59%. The Company has recorded, in the interest rate swap income line item of its consolidated statements of income, income of $0 and $420 for the thirteen weeks ended February 26, 2005 and February 28, 2004, respectively, and income of $223 and $900 for the twenty-six weeks ended February 26, 2005 and February 28, 2004, respectively, for the changes in the fair value of the $40.0 million SWAP. As of February 26, 2005, there were no interest rate swap agreements outstanding.

5. Asset Retirement Obligations

The Company accounts for asset retirement obligations in accordance with SFAS No. 143, “Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations.” SFAS No. 143 generally applies to legal obligations associated with the retirement of long-lived assets that result from the acquisition, construction, development and/or the normal operation of a long-lived asset. Under this accounting method, the Company recognizes asset retirement obligations in the period in which they are incurred if a reasonable estimate of fair value can be made. The associated asset retirement costs are capitalized and set up as a liability as part of the carrying amount of the long-lived assets.

The estimated liability has been based on historical experience in decommissioning nuclear laundry facilities, estimated useful lives of the underlying assets, external vendor estimates as to the cost to decommission these assets in the future and federal and state regulatory requirements. The estimated current costs have been adjusted for the estimated impact of inflation at 3% per year. The liability has been discounted using credit-adjusted risk-free rates that range from approximately 3.00% to 7.25% over one to thirty years. Revisions to the liability could occur due to changes in the Company’s estimated useful lives of the underlying assets, estimated dates of decommissioning, changes in decommissioning costs, changes in federal or state regulatory guidance on the decommissioning of such facilities, or other changes in estimates. Changes due to revised estimates will be recognized by increasing or decreasing the carrying amount of the liability and the carrying amount of the related long-lived asset if the assets are still in service or charged to expense in the period if the assets are no longer in service.

In fiscal 2003, the Company began decommissioning one of the nuclear laundry facilities for which it had recognized an asset retirement obligation. Costs incurred in connection with the decommissioning for the twenty-six weeks ended February 26, 2005 were approximately $317. As of February 26, 2005, the Company believes this current decommissioning project will be completed by the end of fiscal 2005.

A reconciliation of the Company’s liability is as follows:

As of February 26, 2005, the $7.3 million asset retirement obligation is included in accrued liabilities in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet.

6. Commitments and Contingencies

The Company and its operations are subject to various federal, state and local laws and regulations governing, among other things, the generation, handling, storage, transportation, treatment and disposal of hazardous wastes and other substances. In particular, industrial laundries use and must dispose of detergent waste water and other residues. The Company is attentive to the environmental concerns surrounding the disposal of these materials and has, through the years, taken measures to avoid their improper disposal. In the past, the Company has settled, or contributed to the settlement of, actions or claims brought against the Company relating to the disposal of hazardous materials and there can be no assurance that the Company will not have to expend material amounts to remediate the consequences of any such disposal in the future.

Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States require that a liability for contingencies be recorded when it is probable that a liability has occurred and the amount of the liability can be reasonably estimated. Significant judgment is required to determine the existence of a liability, as well as the amount to be recorded. The Company regularly consults with attorneys and outside consultants to ensure that all of the relevant facts and circumstances are considered, before a contingent liability is recorded. Changes in enacted laws, regulatory orders or decrees, management’s estimates of costs, insurance proceeds, participation by other parties, the timing of payments and the input of outside consultants and attorneys based on changing legal or factual circumstances could have a material impact on the amounts recorded for environmental and other contingent liabilities.

Further, under environmental laws, an owner or lessee of real estate may be liable for the costs of removal or remediation of certain hazardous or toxic substances located on or in or emanating from such property, as well as related costs of investigation and property damage. Such laws often impose liability without regard to whether the owner or lessee knew of or was responsible for the presence of such hazardous or toxic substances. There can be no assurances that acquired or leased locations have been operated in compliance with environmental laws and regulations or that future uses or conditions will not result in the imposition of liability upon the Company under such laws or expose the Company to third-party actions such as tort suits. The Company continues to address environmental conditions under terms of consent orders negotiated with the applicable environmental authorities or otherwise with respect to sites located in or related to Woburn, Massachusetts, Uvalde, Texas, Springfield, Massachusetts, Stockton, California, and three sites related to former operations in Williamstown, Vermont.

In addition, the Company is investigating the extent of environmental contamination and potential exposure at sites it recently acquired in connection with its acquisition of Textilease, and it is defending against claims concerning alleged environmental conditions with respect to a site once owned by a former subsidiary in Somerville, Massachusetts.

The Company has accrued certain costs related to the sites described above as it has been determined that the costs are probable and can be reasonably estimated. The Company also has potential exposure related to an additional parcel of land (the Central Area) related to the Woburn, Massachusetts site discussed above. Currently, the consent order for the Woburn, Massachusetts site discussed above does not define or require any remediation work in the Central Area. The Company has not accrued for this contingency as the Company believes, at this time, the liability is not probable and the amount of such contingent liability can not be reasonably estimated.

We routinely review and evaluate sites that may require remediation and monitoring and determine our estimated costs based on various estimates and assumptions. These estimates are developed using our internal sources or by third party environmental engineers or other service providers. Internally developed estimates are based on:

There is usually a range of reasonable estimates of the costs associated with each site. We generally use the amount within the range that constitutes our best estimate. Where we believe that both the amount of a particular liability and the timing of the payments are reliably determinable, we adjust the cost in current dollars using a rate of 3% for inflation until the time of expected payment and discount the cost to present value using risk-free rates of interest ranging from 4% to 5%.

For environmental liabilities that have been discounted, we include interest accretion, based on the effective interest method, in operating costs on the consolidated statement of income. The changes to our environmental liabilities for the year ended August 28, 2004 and the twenty-six week period ended February 26, 2005 are as follows (in thousands):

Anticipated payments and insurance proceeds of currently identified environmental remediation liabilities as of August 28, 2004 for the next five years and thereafter as measured in current dollars are reflected below.

Estimated insurance proceeds are primarily received from an annuity received as part of a legal settlement with an insurance company. Annual proceeds of approximately $330 are deposited into an escrow account which funds remediation and monitoring costs for three sites related to former operations in Williamstown, Vermont. Annual proceeds received but not expended in the current year accumulate in this account and may be used in future years for costs related to this site through the year 2027. As of August 28, 2004 the balance in this escrow account, which is held in a trust and is not recorded on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet, was approximately $1.6 million. Also included in estimated insurance proceeds are amounts the Company is entitled to receive pursuant to legal settlements as reimbursements from three insurance companies for estimated costs at the site in Uvalde, Texas.

The Company’s nuclear garment decontamination facilities are licensed by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (“NRC”), or, in certain cases, by the applicable state agency, and are subject to regulation by federal, state and local authorities. There can be no assurance that such regulation will not lead to material disruptions in the Company’s garment decontamination business.

From time to time, the Company is also subject to legal proceedings and claims arising from the conduct of its business operations, including litigation related to charges for certain ancillary services on invoices, personal injury claims, customer contract matters, employment claims and environmental matters as described above.

While it is impossible to ascertain the ultimate legal and financial liability with respect to contingent liabilities, including lawsuits and environmental contingencies, the Company believes that the aggregate amount of such liabilities, if any, in excess of amounts accrued or covered by insurance, will not have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial position or results of operation of the Company. It is possible, however, that future financial position or results of operations for any particular future period could be materially affected by changes in the Company’s assumptions or strategies related to these contingencies or changes out of the Company’s control.

7. Recent Accounting Pronouncements

On October 13, 2004, the FASB concluded that SFAS No. 123R, “Share Based Payments” which would require companies to measure compensation cost for all share-based payments, including employee stock options, would be effective for public companies for interim or annual periods beginning after June 15, 2005. Retroactive application of the requirements of SFAS No. 123 and SFAS No. 123R to the beginning of the fiscal year that includes the effective date would be permitted, but not required. Early adoption of SFAS No. 123R is encouraged. The FASB issued SFAS No. 123R on December 16, 2004. The Company believes the impact of adopting SFAS No. 123R will not have a material impact on the results of operations of the Company. See Note 1 to these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion regarding stock based compensation.

In November 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151, “Inventory Costs — an amendment of ARB No. 43, Chapter 4” (SFAS No. 151). SFAS No. 151 requires that abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs and wasted materials be recognized as current period charges. Further, SFAS No. 151 requires the allocation of fixed production overheads to the cost of conversion be based on the normal capacity of the production facilities. Unallocated overheads must be recognized as an expense in the period in which they are incurred. SFAS No. 151 is effective for inventory costs incurred during fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. Earlier application of the provisions of SFAS No. 151 is permitted for costs incurred after this statement was issued, but not required. The Company believes the impact of adopting SFAS No. 151 will not have a material impact on the results of operations of the Company.

8. Segment Reporting

The Company has a single reportable segment which manufactures and purchases, rents, cleans, delivers and sells uniforms and protective clothing, specialty garments and non-garment items which represents more than 95% of consolidated revenues. The remaining revenues are generated in connection with the sale of first aid cabinet services and other safety supplies.

The Company’s long-lived assets as of February 26, 2005 and August 28, 2004 and revenues for the periods ended February 26, 2005 and February 28, 2004 were attributed to the following countries (in thousands):

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

(Amounts in thousands, except per share and common stock options data)

Overview

UniFirst is one of the largest providers of workplace uniforms and protective clothing in the United States. The Company designs, manufactures, personalizes, rents, cleans, delivers, and sells a wide range of uniforms and protective clothing, including shirts, pants, jackets, coveralls, jumpsuits, lab coats, smocks and aprons, and also rents industrial wiping products, floor mats and other non-garment items, to a variety of manufacturers, retailers and service companies. The Company serves businesses of all sizes in numerous industry categories. Typical customers include automobile service centers and dealers, delivery services, food and general merchandise retailers, food processors and service operations, light manufacturers, maintenance facilities, restaurants, service companies, soft and durable goods wholesalers, transportation companies, and others who require employee clothing for image, identification, protection or utility purposes. At certain specialized facilities, the Company also decontaminates and cleans work clothes that may have been exposed to radioactive materials and services special cleanroom protective wear. Typical customers for these specialized services include government agencies, research and development laboratories, high technology companies and utilities operating nuclear reactors. See Note 3 of Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for information related to the Company’s acquisition of Textilease Corporation on September 2, 2003.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The Company believes the following critical accounting policies reflect our more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates. There have been no changes in judgments or estimates that had a material effect on our consolidated financial statements for the periods presented.

Revenue Recognition and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

The Company recognizes revenue from rental operations in the period in which the services are provided. Direct sale revenue is recognized in the period in which the product is shipped. Judgments and estimates are used in determining the collectability of accounts receivable. The Company analyzes specific accounts receivable and historical bad debt experience, customer credit worthiness, current economic trends and the age of outstanding balances when evaluating the adequacy of the allowance for doubtful accounts. Management judgments and estimates are used in connection with establishing the allowance in any accounting period. Changes in estimates are reflected in the period they become known. If the financial condition of the Company’s customers were to deteriorate, resulting in an impairment of their ability to make payments, additional allowances may be required. Material differences may result in the amount and timing of bad debt expense recognition for any given period if management makes different judgments or utilizes different estimates.

Inventories and Rental Merchandise in Service

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market value, net of any reserve for excess and obsolete inventory. Judgments and estimates are used in determining the likelihood that new goods on hand can be sold to customers or used in rental operations. Historical inventory usage and current revenue trends are considered in estimating both excess and obsolete inventories. If actual product demand and market conditions are less favorable than those projected by management, additional inventory write-downs may be required. The Company uses the last-in, first-out (LIFO) method to value a significant portion of its inventories. Substantially all inventories represent finished goods.

Rental merchandise in service is being amortized on a straight-line basis over the estimated service lives of the merchandise, which range from 6 to 36 months. In establishing estimated lives for merchandise in service, management considers historical experience and the intended use of the merchandise. Material differences may result in the amount and timing of operating profit for any period if management makes different judgments or utilizes different estimates.

Goodwill, Intangibles and Other Long-Lived Assets

The Company adopted SFAS No. 142 effective August 26, 2001. Under SFAS No. 142, goodwill is no longer amortized. SFAS 142 also requires that companies test goodwill for impairment on an annual basis and when events occur or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of the reporting unit to which goodwill is assigned below its carrying amount. Our evaluation considers changes in the operating environment, competitive information, market trends, operating performance and cash flow modeling. Management completes its annual impairment test in the fourth quarter of each fiscal year and there have been no impairments of goodwill or definite-lived intangible assets since the adoption of SFAS No. 142. Future events could cause management to conclude that impairment indicators exist and that goodwill and other intangibles associated with acquired businesses are impaired. Any resulting impairment loss could have a material impact on our financial condition and results of operations.

Property, plant and equipment and definite-lived intangible assets are depreciated or amortized over their useful lives. Useful lives are based on management estimates of the period that the assets will generate revenue. Long-lived assets are evaluated for impairment whenever events and circumstances indicate an asset may be impaired.

Insurance

The Company self-insures for certain obligations related to health, workers’ compensation, vehicles and general liability programs. The Company also purchases stop-loss insurance policies to protect it from catastrophic losses. Judgments and estimates are used in determining the potential value associated with reported claims and for losses that have occurred, but have not been reported. The Company’s estimates consider historical claim experience and other factors. The Company’s liabilities are based on estimates, and, while the Company believes that the accrual for loss is adequate, the ultimate liability may be in excess of or less than the amounts recorded. Changes in claim experience, the Company’s ability to settle claims or other estimates and judgments used by management could have a material impact on the amount and timing of expense for any period.

Environmental and Other Contingencies

The Company is subject to legal proceedings and claims arising from the conduct of its business operations, including environmental matters, personal injury, customer contract matters and employment claims. Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States require that a liability for contingencies be recorded when it is probable that a liability has occurred and the amount of the liability can be reasonably estimated. Significant judgment is required to determine the existence of a liability, as well as the amount to be recorded. The Company regularly consults with attorneys and outside consultants to ensure that all of the relevant facts and circumstances are considered, before a contingent liability is recorded. The Company records accruals for environmental and other contingencies based on enacted laws, regulatory orders or decrees, the Company’s estimates of costs, insurance proceeds, participation by other parties and the timing of payments, and the input of outside consultants and attorneys.

The estimated liability for environmental contingencies has been discounted using risk-free rates of interest ranging from 4% to 5% over periods ranging from ten to thirty years. The estimated current costs, net of legal settlements with insurance carriers, have been adjusted for the estimated impact of inflation at 3% per year. Changes in enacted laws, regulatory orders or decrees, management’s estimates of costs, insurance proceeds, participation by other parties, the timing of payments and the input of outside consultants and attorneys based on changing legal or factual circumstances could have a material impact on the amounts recorded for environmental and other contingent liabilities. Refer to Note 6 of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for additional discussion and analysis.

Income Taxes

The Company’s policy of accounting for income taxes is in accordance with SFAS No. 109 — “Accounting for Income Taxes”. Deferred income taxes are provided for temporary differences between amounts recognized for income tax and financial reporting purposes at currently enacted tax rates. The Company computes income tax expense by jurisdiction based on its operations in each jurisdiction.

The Company is periodically reviewed by domestic and foreign tax authorities regarding the amount of taxes due. These reviews include questions regarding the timing and amount of deductions and the allocation of income among various tax jurisdictions. In evaluating the exposure associated with various filing positions, the Company records estimated reserves for probable exposures, in accordance with SFAS No. 5 — “Accounting for Contingencies”. Based on the Company’s evaluation of current tax positions, the Company believes it has appropriately accrued for probable exposures.

Asset Retirement Obligations

Effective September 1, 2002, the Company adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 143, “Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations.” SFAS No. 143 generally applies to legal obligations associated with the retirement of long-lived assets that result from the acquisition, construction, development and/or the normal operation of a long-lived asset. Under the new accounting method, the Company now recognizes asset retirement obligations in the period in which they are incurred if a reasonable estimate of fair value can be made. The associated asset retirement costs are capitalized as part of the carrying amount of the long-lived asset. The Company will depreciate, on a straight-line basis, the amount added to property and equipment and recognize accretion expense in connection with the discounted liability over the various remaining lives which range from approximately one to thirty years.

The estimated liability has been based on historical experience in decommissioning nuclear laundry facilities, estimated useful lives of the underlying assets, external vendor estimates as to the cost to decommission these assets in the future and federal and state regulatory requirements. The estimated current costs have been adjusted for the estimated impact of inflation at 3% per year. The liability has been discounted using credit-adjusted risk-free rates that range from approximately 3.00% — 7.25% over one to thirty years. Revisions to the liability could occur due to changes in the Company’s estimated useful lives of the underlying assets, estimated dates of decommissioning, changes in decommissioning costs, changes in federal or state regulatory guidance on the decommissioning of such facilities, or other changes in estimates. Changes due to revised estimates will be recognized by increasing or decreasing the carrying amount of the liability and the carrying amount of the related long-lived asset if the assets are still in service or charged to expense in the period if the assets are no longer in service.

Results of Operations

The amounts of revenues and certain expense items for the twenty-six week periods and the thirteen week periods ended February 26, 2005 and February 28, 2004, respectively, and the percentage changes in revenues and certain expense items as a percentage of total revenues between these periods are presented in the following table:

Twenty-Six Weeks Ended February 26, 2005 Compared with Twenty-Six Weeks Ended February 28, 2004

Revenues. Revenues for the twenty-six weeks ended February 26, 2005 increased 5.8% to $379.1 million as compared with $358.3 million for the twenty-six weeks ended February 28, 2004. The increase is primarily due to revenue growth in the laundry operations as a result of internal growth, increased charges for damaged garments, and price increases. Revenues from the nuclear and first aid divisions accounted for 0.8% of the increase. These increases were offset somewhat by the sale of a certain linen business in fiscal 2004 which reduced revenues by approximately 0.7%.

Operating costs. Operating costs increased to $238.0 million for the twenty-six weeks ended February 26, 2005 as compared with $230.8 million for the twenty-six weeks ended February 28, 2004. However, as a percentage of revenues, operating costs decreased to 62.8% from 64.4%. The primary reason for this decrease was lower merchandise costs. This decrease is also partially due to lower merchandise amortization for the locations acquired as part of the Textilease acquisition. The Company also benefited from cost savings realized from the Company’s manufacturing operations in Mexico and lower industrial laundry production payroll costs as a percentage of revenues. These benefits were somewhat offset by higher energy costs associated with operating industrial laundries as well as in utilizing our fleet of delivery vehicles.

Selling and administrative expenses. The Company’s selling and administrative expenses increased to $78.6 million, or 20.7% of revenues, for the twenty-six weeks ended February 26, 2005 as compared with $73.9 million, or 20.6% of revenues, for the twenty-six weeks ended February 28, 2004. The increase in overall selling and administrative expenses is consistent with the Company’s revenue growth.

Depreciation and amortization. The Company’s depreciation and amortization expense decreased to $21.7 million, or 5.7% of revenues, for the twenty-six weeks ended February 26, 2005, as compared with $22.7 million, or 6.3% of revenues, for the twenty-six weeks ended February 28, 2004. The decrease in depreciation and amortization expense was primarily related to certain fixed assets owned by the Company becoming fully depreciated in fiscal 2004, as well as certain intangible assets becoming fully amortized in fiscal 2004.

Interest. The Company’s interest expense, net was $3.1 million, or 0.8% of revenues, for the twenty-six weeks ended February 26, 2005, as compared with $4.7 million, or 1.3% of revenues, for the twenty-six weeks ended February 28, 2004. The decrease in interest expense was due to the significant reduction in the level of debt outstanding during the twenty-six week period ended February 26, 2005 as compared to the twenty-six week period ended February 28, 2004. The average debt outstanding in the twenty-six week period ended February 26, 2005 was $179.7 million as compared to $239.7 million during the twenty-six week period ended February 28, 2004.

Provision for income taxes. The Company’s effective income tax rate was 38.0% for the twenty-six weeks ended February 26, 2005 and 38.5% for the twenty-six weeks ended February 28, 2004. This decrease is primarily due to changes in the provision required for foreign taxes.

Thirteen Weeks Ended February 26, 2005 Compared with Thirteen Weeks Ended February 28, 2004

Revenues. Revenues for the thirteen weeks ended February 26, 2005 increased 7.5% to $190.7 million as compared with $177.4 million for the thirteen weeks ended February 28, 2004. The increase is primarily due to revenue growth in the laundry operations as a result of internal growth, increased charges for damaged garments, and price increases. Revenues from the nuclear and first aid divisions accounted for 1.1% of the increase. These increases were offset somewhat by the sale of certain linen business in fiscal 2004 which reduced revenues by approximately 0.6%.

Operating costs. Operating costs increased to $121.9 million for the thirteen weeks ended February 26, 2005 as compared with $115.7 million for the thirteen weeks ended February 28, 2004. However, as a percentage of revenues, operating costs decreased to 63.9% from 65.2%. The primary reason for this decrease was lower merchandise costs. This decrease is also partially due to lower merchandise amortization for the locations acquired as part of the Textilease acquisition. The Company also benefited from cost savings realized from the Company’s manufacturing operations in Mexico and lower industrial laundry production payroll costs as a percent of revenues. These benefits were somewhat offset by higher energy costs associated with operating industrial laundries as well as in utilizing our fleet of delivery vehicles.

Selling and administrative expenses. The Company’s selling and administrative expenses increased to $40.0 million, or 21.0% of revenues, for the thirteen weeks ended February 26, 2005 as compared with $37.0 million, or 20.9% of revenues, for the thirteen weeks ended February 28, 2004. The increase in overall selling and administrative expenses is consistent with the Company’s revenue growth.

Depreciation and amortization. The Company’s depreciation and amortization expense decreased to $11.1 million, or 5.8% of revenues, for the thirteen weeks ended February 26, 2005, as compared with $11.7 million, or 6.6% of revenues, for the thirteen weeks ended February 28, 2004. The decrease in depreciation and amortization expense was primarily related to certain fixed assets purchased by the Company becoming fully depreciated in fiscal 2004, as well as certain intangible assets becoming fully amortized in fiscal 2004.

Interest. The Company’s interest expense, net was $1.5 million, or 0.8% of revenues, for the thirteen weeks ended February 26, 2005, as compared with $2.2 million, or 1.3% of revenues, for the thirteen weeks ended February 28, 2004. The decrease in interest expense was due to the significant reduction in the level of debt outstanding during the thirteen week period ended February 26, 2005 as compared to the thirteen week period ended February 28, 2004. The average debt outstanding in the thirteen week period ended February 26, 2005 was $176.6 million as compared to $236.7 million during the thirteen week period ended February 28, 2004.

Provision for income taxes. The Company’s effective income tax rate was 38.0% for the thirteen weeks ended February 26, 2005 and 38.5% for the thirteen weeks ended February 28, 2004. This decrease is primarily due to changes in the provision required for foreign taxes.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

General. For the twenty-six weeks ended February 26, 2005, the Company had a net increase in cash and cash equivalents of $1.2 million. The Company completed the twenty-six weeks ended February 26, 2005 with cash and cash equivalents of $5.6 million and working capital of $66.7 million. The Company believes that current cash and cash equivalent balances, cash generated from operations and amounts available under the Company’s Amended Credit Agreement (defined below) will be sufficient to meet the Company’s anticipated working capital and capital expenditure requirements for at least the next 12 months.

Sources and uses of cash. During the twenty-six weeks ended February 26, 2005, the Company generated cash primarily from operating activities. The Company’s operating activities provided net cash of $37.8 million, resulting primarily from net income of $23.4 million, amounts charged for depreciation and amortization of $21.7 million, a net decrease in inventories of $4.5 million, an increase in accounts payable and accrued liabilities of $3.8 million, offset by an increase in accounts receivable of $9.3 million, an increase in rental merchandise in service of $4.6 million, an increase in prepaid expenses of $1.7 million and a decrease in accrued income taxes of $0.4 million. The Company used its cash to, among other things, fund $29.1 million in capital expenditures and fund the acquisitions of businesses of approximately $10.4 million. The Company’s long-term debt increased by approximately $1.8 million as a result of $9.0 million of borrowings offset by $7.2 million of payments during the twenty-six week period ended February 26, 2005.

Additional cash resources.   In connection with the purchase of Textilease, the Company entered into a $285 million unsecured revolving credit agreement (the “Credit Agreement”), with a syndicate of banks. The Credit Agreement replaced the Company’s previous $125 million unsecured revolving credit agreement and, prior to its amendment, was due on the third anniversary of the Closing Date (September 2, 2006).

On June 14, 2004, the Company issued $165 million of fixed and floating rate notes pursuant to a Note Purchase Agreement (“Note Agreement”). Under the Note Agreement, the Company issued $75 million of notes with a seven year term bearing interest at 5.27% (“Fixed Rate Notes”). The Company also issued $90 million of floating rate notes due in ten years (“Floating Rate Notes”). Of the Floating Rate Notes, $75 million bear interest at LIBOR plus 70 basis points and may be repaid at face value two years from the date they were issued. The remaining $15 million of Floating Rate Notes bear interest at LIBOR plus 75 basis points and can be repaid at face value after one year.

The Company also amended its Credit Agreement (“Amended Credit Agreement”) to, among other things, reduce the amount available for borrowing thereunder to $125 million and to reduce interest rates payable on such borrowings. As amended, loans under the Amended Credit Agreement, which matures September 2, 2007, bear interest at floating rates which vary based on the Company’s funded debt ratio. The proceeds from the Fixed Rate Notes and the Floating Rate Notes were used to repay borrowings under the Amended Credit Agreement. At February 26, 2005, the interest rate applicable to the Company’s borrowings under the Amended Credit Agreement was LIBOR plus 100 basis points, which approximated 3.1%. As of February 26, 2005, the Company had outstanding borrowings of $12.4 million, letters of credit of $24.4 million and $88.2 million available for borrowing . Availability of credit requires compliance with financial and other covenants. Under the most restrictive of these provisions, the Company was required to maintain minimum consolidated tangible net worth as of February 26, 2005 of $128.4 million. As of February 26, 2005, the Company’s consolidated tangible net worth was $148.0 million and the Company was in compliance with all covenants under the Note Agreement and the Amended Credit Agreement.

Commitments and Contingencies

The Company and its operations are subject to various federal, state and local laws and regulations governing, among other things, the generation, handling, storage, transportation, treatment and disposal of hazardous wastes and other substances. In particular, industrial laundries use and must dispose of detergent waste water and other residues. The Company is attentive to the environmental concerns surrounding the disposal of these materials and has, through the years, taken measures to avoid their improper disposal. In the past, the Company has settled, or contributed to the settlement of, actions or claims brought against the Company relating to the disposal of hazardous materials and there can be no assurance that the Company will not have to expend material amounts to remediate the consequences of any such disposal in the future.

Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States require that a liability for contingencies be recorded when it is probable that a liability has occurred and the amount of the liability can be reasonably estimated. Significant judgment is required to determine the existence of a liability, as well as the amount to be recorded. The Company regularly consults with attorneys and outside consultants to ensure that all of the relevant facts and circumstances are considered, before a contingent liability is recorded. Changes in enacted laws, regulatory orders or decrees, management’s estimates of costs, insurance proceeds, participation by other parties, the timing of payments and the input of outside consultants and attorneys based on changing legal or factual circumstances could have a material impact on the amounts recorded for environmental and other contingent liabilities.

Further, under environmental laws, an owner or lessee of real estate may be liable for the costs of removal or remediation of certain hazardous or toxic substances located on or in or emanating from such property, as well as related costs of investigation and property damage. Such laws often impose liability without regard to whether the owner or lessee knew of or was responsible for the presence of such hazardous or toxic substances. There can be no assurances that acquired or leased locations have been operated in compliance with environmental laws and regulations or that future uses or conditions will not result in the imposition of liability upon the Company under such laws or expose the Company to third-party actions such as tort suits. The Company continues to address environmental conditions under terms of consent orders negotiated with the applicable environmental authorities or otherwise with respect to sites located in or related to Woburn, Massachusetts, Uvalde, Texas, Springfield, Massachusetts, Stockton, California, and three sites related to former operations in Williamstown, Vermont.

In addition, the Company is investigating the extent of environmental contamination and potential exposure at sites it recently acquired in connection with its acquisition of Textilease, and it is defending against claims concerning alleged environmental conditions with respect to a site once owned by a former subsidiary in Somerville, Massachusetts.

The Company has accrued certain costs related to the sites described above as it has been determined that the costs are probable and can be reasonably estimated. The Company also has potential exposure related to an additional parcel of land (the Central Area) related to the Woburn, Massachusetts site discussed above. Currently, the consent order for the Woburn, Massachusetts site discussed above does not define or require any remediation work in the Central Area. The Company has not accrued for this contingency as the Company believes, at this time, the liability is not probable and the amount of such contingent liability can not be reasonably estimated.

We routinely review and evaluate sites that may require remediation and monitoring and determine our estimated costs based on various estimates and assumptions. These estimates are developed using our internal sources or by third party environmental engineers or other service providers. Internally developed estimates are based on:

There is usually a range of reasonable estimates of the costs associated with each site. We generally use the amount within the range that constitutes our best estimate. Where we believe that both the amount of a particular liability and the timing of the payments are reliably determinable, we adjust the cost in current dollars using a rate of 3% for inflation until the time of expected payment and discount the cost to present value using risk-free rates of interest ranging from 4% to 5%.

For environmental liabilities that have been discounted, we include interest accretion, based on the effective interest method, in operating costs on the consolidated statement of income. The changes to our environmental liabilities for the year ended August 28, 2004 and the twenty-six week period ended February 26, 2005 are as follows (in thousands):

Anticipated payments and insurance proceeds of currently identified environmental remediation liabilities as of August 28, 2004 for the next five years and thereafter as measured in current dollars are reflected below.

Estimated insurance proceeds are primarily received from an annuity received as part of a legal settlement with an insurance company. Annual proceeds of approximately $330 are deposited into an escrow account which funds remediation and monitoring costs for three sites related to former operations in Williamstown, Vermont. Annual proceeds received but not expended in the current year accumulate in this account and may be used in future years for costs related to this site through the year 2027. As of August 28, 2004 the balance in this escrow account, which is held in a trust and is not recorded on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet, was approximately $1.6 million. Also included in estimated insurance proceeds are amounts the Company is entitled to receive pursuant to legal settlements as reimbursements from three insurance companies for estimated costs at the site in Uvalde, Texas.

The Company’s nuclear garment decontamination facilities are licensed by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (“NRC”), or, in certain cases, by the applicable state agency, and are subject to regulation by federal, state and local authorities. There can be no assurance that such regulation will not lead to material disruptions in the Company’s garment decontamination business.

From time to time, the Company is also subject to legal proceedings and claims arising from the conduct of its business operations, including litigation related to charges for certain ancillary services on invoices, personal injury claims, customer contract matters, employment claims and environmental matters as described above.

While it is impossible to ascertain the ultimate legal and financial liability with respect to contingent liabilities, including lawsuits and environmental contingencies, the Company believes that the aggregate amount of such liabilities, if any, in excess of amounts accrued or covered by insurance, will not have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial position or results of operation of the Company. It is possible, however, that future financial position or results of operations for any particular future period could be materially affected by changes in the Company’s assumptions or strategies related to these contingencies or changes out of the Company’s control.

Other

On September 2, 2003 (“Closing Date”), the Company completed its acquisition of 100% of Textilease Corporation (“Textilease”). The purchase price of approximately $175.6 million in cash was financed as part of a new $285 million unsecured revolving credit agreement (“Credit Agreement”), with a syndicate of banks. Textilease, headquartered in Beltsville, Maryland, had fiscal year 2002 revenues of approximately $95.0 million. It serviced over 25,000 uniform and textile products customers from 12 locations in six southeastern states, and also serviced a wide range of large and small first-aid service customers from additional specialized facilities. Textilease’s operating results have been included in the Company’s consolidated operating results since September 2, 2003.

At the time of acquisition, management initiated a plan to integrate certain Textilease facilities into existing operations. Included in the purchase price allocation was an accrual for exit costs and employee termination benefits. As of February 26, 2005 and August 28, 2004, the accrual balances of $1.6 million and $2.0 million, respectively are included in accrued liabilities in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet. The Company expects to incur substantially all of the remaining costs by December 2006. The changes in the accrual balance for the twenty-six weeks ended February 26, 2005 are as follows (in thousands):

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

On October 13, 2004, the FASB concluded that SFAS No. 123R, “Share Based Payments” which would require companies to measure compensation cost for all share-based payments, including employee stock options, would be effective for public companies for interim or annual periods beginning after June 15, 2005. Retroactive application of the requirements of SFAS No. 123 and SFAS No. 123R to the beginning of the fiscal year that includes the effective date would be permitted, but not required. Early adoption of SFAS No. 123R is encouraged. The FASB issued SFAS No. 123R on December 16, 2004. The Company believes the impact of adopting SFAS No. 123R will not have a material impact on the results of operations of the Company. See Note 1 to these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion regarding stock based compensation.

In November 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151, “Inventory Costs — an amendment of ARB No. 43, Chapter 4” (SFAS No. 151). SFAS No. 151 requires that abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs and wasted materials be recognized as current period charges. Further, SFAS No. 151 requires the allocation of fixed production overheads to the cost of conversion be based on the normal capacity of the production facilities. Unallocated overheads must be recognized as an expense in the period in which they are incurred. SFAS No. 151 is effective for inventory costs incurred during fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. Earlier application of the provisions of SFAS No. 151 is permitted for costs incurred after this statement was issued, but not required. The Company believes the impact of adopting SFAS No. 151 will not have a material impact on the results of operations of the Company.

Seasonality

Historically, the Company’s revenues and operating results have varied from quarter to quarter and are expected to continue to fluctuate in the future. These fluctuations have been due to a number of factors, including: general economic conditions in the Company’s markets; the timing of acquisitions and of commencing start-up operations and related costs; the effectiveness of integrating acquired businesses and start-up operations; the timing of nuclear plant outages; capital expenditures; seasonal rental and purchasing patterns of the Company’s customers; and price changes in response to competitive factors. In addition, the Company’s operating results historically have been lower during the second and fourth fiscal quarters than during the other quarters of the fiscal year. The operating results for any historical quarter are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for an entire fiscal year or any other interim periods.

Effects of Inflation

In general, management believes that our results of operations are not dependent on moderate changes in the inflation rate. Historically, we have been able to manage the impacts of more significant changes in inflation rates through our customer relationships, customer agreements that generally provide for price increases consistent with the rate of inflation, and continued focus on improvements of operational productivity.

Significant increases in energy costs, specifically natural gas and gasoline, can materially affect our results of operations and financial condition. Currently, energy costs represent approximately 3% of our total revenue.

SAFE HARBOR FOR FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

Forward looking statements contained in this report are subject to the safe harbor created by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and are highly dependent upon a variety of important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those reflected in such forward looking statements. Such factors include uncertainties regarding the Company’s ability to consummate and successfully integrate acquired businesses, uncertainties regarding any existing or newly-discovered expenses and liabilities related to environmental compliance and remediation, the Company’s ability to compete successfully without any significant degradation in its margin rates, seasonal fluctuations in business levels, uncertainties regarding the price levels of natural gas, electricity, fuel, and labor, the impact of negative economic conditions on the Company’s customers and such customer’s workforce, the continuing increase in domestic healthcare costs, demand and prices for the Company’s products and services, the impact of interest rate variability upon the Company’s interest rate swap arrangements, additional professional and internal costs necessary for compliance with recent and proposed future changes in Securities and Exchange Commission (including the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), New York Stock Exchange, and accounting rules, strikes and unemployment levels, the Company’s efforts to evaluate and potentially reduce internal costs, economic and other developments associated with the war on terrorism and its impact on the economy and general economic conditions. When used in this report, the words “intend”, “anticipate”, “believe”, “estimate”, and “expect” and similar expressions as they relate to the Company are included to identify such forward looking statements.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Foreign Currency Exchange Risk

Management has determined that all of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries operate primarily in local currencies that represent the functional currencies of the subsidiaries. All assets and liabilities of foreign subsidiaries are translated into U.S. dollars using the exchange rate prevailing at the balance sheet date. The effect of exchange rate fluctuations on translation of assets and liabilities are recorded as a component of stockholders’ equity. Income and expense accounts are translated at average exchange rates during the year. As such, the Company’s financial condition and operating results are affected by fluctuations in the value of the U.S. dollar as compared to currencies in foreign countries. Revenue denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar represented approximately 7% of total consolidated revenues for the twenty-six weeks ended February 26, 2005 and total assets denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar represented approximately 6% of total consolidated assets at February 26, 2005. If exchange rates had changed by 10% from the actual rates in effect during the twenty-six weeks ended and as of February 26, 2005, the Company’s revenues and assets for the twenty-six week period ended and as of February 26, 2005 would have changed by approximately $2.6 million and $3.0 million, respectively.

The Company does not operate a hedging program to mitigate the effect of a significant rapid change in the value of the Canadian Dollar, Euro, British Pound, or Mexican Peso as compared to the U.S. dollar. Any gains or losses resulting from foreign currency transactions, including exchange rate fluctuations on intercompany accounts are reported as transaction gains (losses) in selling and administrative expenses. The intercompany payables and receivables are denominated in Canadian Dollars, Euros, British Pounds and Mexican Pesos. During the twenty-six weeks ended February 26, 2005 transaction gains (losses) included in selling and administrative expenses were not material. If the exchange rates had changed by 10% during the twenty-six weeks ended February 26, 2005, the Company would have recognized an exchange gain or loss in other income (expense) of approximately $145,000.

Interest Rate Sensitivity

The Company is exposed to market risk from changes in interest rates which may adversely affect its financial position, results of operations and cash flows. In seeking to minimize the risks from interest rate fluctuations, the Company manages exposures through its regular operating and financing activities. The Company is exposed to interest rate risk primarily through its borrowings under its $125 million Amended Credit Agreement with a syndicate of banks and its $90 million of Floating Rate Notes with a group of insurance companies. Under both agreements, the Company borrows funds at variable interest rates based on the Eurodollar rate or LIBOR rates. If the LIBOR and Eurodollar rates fluctuated by 10% from the actual rates in effect during the twenty-six weeks ended February 26, 2005, interest expense would have fluctuated by approximately $146,000 from the interest expense recognized for the twenty-six weeks ended February 26, 2005.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Disclosure Controls and Procedures. As required by Rule 13a-15 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), the Company carried out an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon their evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that material information relating to the Company required to be disclosed by us in reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, the Company’s management recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurances of achieving the desired control objectives, and management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in designing and evaluating the controls and procedures. The Company currently is in the process of further reviewing and documenting its disclosure controls and procedures, and its internal control over financial reporting, and may from time to time make changes aimed at enhancing their effectiveness and to ensure that our systems evolve with our business.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting. There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the second quarter of fiscal year 2005 that have materially affected, or that are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders:

The Company’s Annual Meeting of Shareholders was held on January 11, 2005. Ronald C. Croatti, Donald J. Evans and Lawrence R. Pugh were reelected to the Board of Directors. With respect to Mr. Croatti, 8,244,241 shares of Common Stock and 7,120,612 shares of Class B Common Stock were voted for his election and 188,882 shares of Common Stock and no shares of Class B Common Stock were withheld from voting for his election. With respect to Mr. Evans, 8,242,196 shares of Common Stock and 7,120,612 shares of Class B Common Stock were voted for his election and 190,927 of Common Stock and no shares of Class B Common Stock were withheld from voting for his election. With respect to Mr. Pugh, 8,366,471 shares of Common Stock and 7,120,612 shares of Class B Common Stock were voted for his election, and 66,652 shares of Common Stock and no shares of Class B Common Stock were withheld from voting for his election. The terms to office of Mr. Albert Cohen, Mr. Anthony DiFillippo, Mr. Phillip L. Cohen and Ms. Cynthia Croatti continued after the Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

EXHIBIT INDEX

DESCRIPTION